Slashdot Mirror


Kids Who Skip School Get Tracked By GPS

suraj.sun writes with this excerpt from the Orange County Register: "Frustrated by students habitually skipping class, police and the Anaheim Union High School District are turning to GPS tracking to ensure they come to class. The six-week pilot program is the first in California to test GPS. Seventh- and eighth-graders with four unexcused absences or more this school year are assigned to carry a handheld GPS device, about the size of a cell phone. Five times a day, they are required to enter a code that tracks their locations – as they leave for school, when they arrive at school, at lunchtime, when they leave school and at 8 p.m."

515 comments

  1. Great plan there by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because kids who regularly skip school can be relied upon to willingly cooperate in keeping and activating their own personal tracking device.

    1. Re:Great plan there by veganboyjosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was my first thought as well.

      1. make friends with truants.
      2. collect their GPS devices.
      3. enter codes when called to do so.
      4. profit.

    2. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do they have to do it at 8:00pm? That seems like a really dumb time; its none of the school's business where the student is at 8:00pm.

      Four unexcused abscences seems a bit of a low bar; I know my daughter has they many just due to custody hearings this past fall when her mom tried to get her back.

    3. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      4 UNexcused are quite different than your daughter's excused absences.

    4. Re:Great plan there by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Excuse me sir, but all the GPS hoodlums are reporting from the same location, every day!"

      "Dear god, they've formed a GANG!"

    5. Re:Great plan there by sonnejw0 · · Score: 1

      I missed 40 days of school in 8th grade (a personal high point), and I didn't get much better about it during highschool. Now I'm working on a Ph.D. in Neurobiology at a translation research and teaching hospital. I credit my not-being-at-my-public-school for the level of success I've achieved.

      As a parent, it's my business where my kid is. I'll smash that damn device and hand it back to the truant officer on my kid's behalf. Schools have become the Juvenile Executive branch of the government, and it's not their responsibility. "We'll educate you with the information we want you to know, whether you like it or not!"

    6. Re:Great plan there by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Why do they have to do it at 8:00pm?

      To make sure they are at home, awake, and studying at that time; instead of at a friends house drinking, OR sleeping when the school has dictated they should be finishing their homework?

    7. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 2

      I generally find the low unexcused absence threshold in the U.S. to be overboard, by an order of magnitude at least, or maybe two. When I was in 11th grade of high school in Poland, I had 51% attendance rate. You'd get to repeat the grade if it dropped to 50% or less. That was fair, IMHO. I don't think I turned out all that bad, nor do I think I missed out on much. U.S. schools seem to be designed like prisons with "voluntary" attendance.

      Never mind that the U.S. school system on one hand tries to promote attendance, on another -- in spite of itself -- also promotes expulsion and suspension as disciplinary aids. Every time I hear that, it's a WTF?! moment to me. If a student messes up, make them work more, not less!

      What's especially puzzling is that if, say, your parents decide not to let you go to school, they may lose custody of you. OTOH, when the school district decides they don't want you anymore, it's fine and dandy. Our former school district's superintendent saw no problem with that, citing that state law forces their hand, too. Then I asked her: what did she personally do to influence a change in state law, to get rid of expulsion/suspension as disciplinary measures, and to promote/reinforce attendance instead? She seemed puzzled that I'd expect her to do something about changing a law that she pretended to disagree with (the radio show she participated in was about promoting attendance). It was like Hypocrisy 101.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    8. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I recall from high school, what was excused and what should be excused were two completely different things. There was a very short list of things that would qualify you as excused. Various things I saw count as unexcused included vomiting at school and being sent out by the school nurse and genuine medical emergency of a parent. Your own illness is always unexcused unless it is severe enough to go to a doctor, and I heard it gets tough to get excuses for a parent's medical emergency.

      Overall, the high school I recall was more burdened with bureaucracy than any corporation I've worked at since.

    9. Re:Great plan there by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's stupid. 8pm is when high schoolers should be at a friend's house getting a blow job, lest they wind up like sexually defunct college kids that had their entire sexual maturation period suppressed until it was over, fixating them into a cycle of sexual discomfort.

      You all know that guy. You knew him in college. You felt sorry for him 'cause he never got laid. Then you got him a girl and he damn near had a heart attack. Today he's an astrophysicist making $$$bazillions, but he still can't get comfortable in bed.

      You all know the girls too. They're the "all sex is rape" femenists and the complete dorm sluts that finally lost their virginity their first day freshman year and fucked damn near everyone. They fall one way or the other eh?

    10. Re:Great plan there by dmacleod808 · · Score: 1

      Seems like Anonymous Coward should have paid more attention in spelling class.

      --
      There Can Be Only One...
    11. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a parent, it's my business where my kid is. I'll smash that damn device and hand it back to the truant officer on my kid's behalf. Schools have become the Juvenile Executive branch of the government, and it's not their responsibility. "We'll educate you with the information we want you to know, whether you like it or not!"

      I'm sure you'll be delighted when you get a citation for destruction of government property and a visit from Children and Family Services.

      Look, when you have a kid, you have basically four options. One, public school, and all the gov't-mandated rigamarole that that involves. Two, private school, and all the expense that involves. Three, homeschooling, and all the time that involves. Four, giving up your kids for adoption, and all the hassle that involves.

      TL;DR; don't have a kid.

    12. Re:Great plan there by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about learning, it's about training kids to be profitable worker bees. High attendance rates in school train them to come to work on time every day. When company's can count on 100% attendance they can hire less employees because they don't have to worry about covering shifts.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    13. Re:Great plan there by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Informative

      I missed 40 days of school in 8th grade (a personal high point), and I didn't get much better about it during highschool. Now I'm working on a Ph.D. in Neurobiology at a translation research and teaching hospital. I credit my not-being-at-my-public-school for the level of success I've achieved.

          As a parent, it's my business where my kid is. I'll smash that damn device and hand it back to the truant officer on my kid's behalf. Schools have become the Juvenile Executive branch of the government, and it's not their responsibility. "We'll educate you with the information we want you to know, whether you like it or not!"

      Send your kids to private school, or home school them; there is no law that says you have to send them to public school (at least in my state). There are options besides teaching them that its OK to completely disregard authority...

    14. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot. What do you know about girls?

    15. Re:Great plan there by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      I really don't get the point of this system - they already (hopefully) know whether the kid is in school or not. They could (and should) pass this information on to the parents. Call them, send them a letter and ask for a reply. What's the GPS adding to that? Now you have a record that they are hanging out in the mall, or on the basketball court or whatever. Did you really need to know that? They are not in school, that's what matters.

      You can't even go and get them from wherever they are, if they just leave the device somewhere. Now what?

    16. Re:Great plan there by corbettw · · Score: 2

      As Mark Twain famously observed, one should not let one's schooling interfere with their education.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    17. Re:Great plan there by stms · · Score: 0

      Indeed when I was a student if a school tried to pull this shit with me the device would have been promptly smashed.

    18. Re:Great plan there by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      "there is no law that says you have to send them to public school (at least in my state)"

      its actually legal in ALL 50 states to even go to the point of homeschooling your kids. http://www.hslda.org/laws/default.asp

      a law maker trying to make it otherwise will be visited by Mr Smith so he can explain reality in the US. http://www.hslda.org/about/staff/attorneys/Smith.asp

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    19. Re:Great plan there by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds autobiographical.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    20. Re:Great plan there by glazener · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This may well be related to a funding issue. In my state, schools receive money based on the average daily attendance, not the actual enrollment. In any case, it seems that having a draconian excused absence policy only serves to teach both parents and kids to lie effectively. My son's high school had a fairly strict excused absence policy. When one of his friends was killed in an automobile accident the school told us that if he missed school to attend the funeral, the absence would have been unexcused. I had no problem at all telling the school that he was absent due to a scheduled doctors appointment. Had the school asked for proof that he had actually seen the doctor I would have had no problem mocking of the letter on official looking stationary stating that he had been seen on that day and scrawling a doctors name at the bottom. Even if the school were inclined to verify the excuse with the doctor, medical privacy laws in general prohibit medical practitioners from disclosing information about the patient so the risk of detection would be minimal. Even if we were found out, there were essentially no negative consequences to lying to the school. There were a couple of other instances when I felt it was reasonable and proper to keep my child out of school but the school would have defined the reason as an unexcused absence. I felt no obligation to be honest with the school under the circumstances. In some ways I guess that the schools are teaching a valuable lesson. Sometimes it's just best to tell the convenient lie rather than the truth. Honesty is not always the best policy.

    21. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I missed 40 days of school in 8th grade (a personal high point), and I didn't get much better about it during highschool. Now I'm working on a Ph.D. in Neurobiology at a translation research and teaching hospital. I credit my not-being-at-my-public-school for the level of success I've achieved.

      I learned in public school that correlation does not always equal causation. . .

    22. Re:Great plan there by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Because kids who regularly skip school can be relied upon to willingly cooperate in keeping and activating their own personal tracking device.

      That's the point; once they drop / lose / destroy them, administrators can respond that it requires an under-the-skin implant.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    23. Re:Great plan there by khallow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Overall, the high school I recall was more burdened with bureaucracy than any corporation I've worked at since.

      They have to be in order to evade any shred of responsibility for their actions. If they didn't have rigid rules on what counted as an excused absence or not, then they might have to make a decision and that could be inconvenient or even cause them trouble.

    24. Re:Great plan there by Push+Latency · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which means they're likely skipping class to play Dungeons & Dragons!

    25. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because these kids will learn the most important lesson of all. To listen to and obey authority, unquestioningly and not to ever deviate from the norm.

      You know, I skipped school a lot when I was a kid, too. Got in lots of fights. Shoplifted. Disobeyed authority every chance I got. Missed so much school in junior high that I got less than a zero-point-two GPA one year. I even went so far as to drop out of my first year of highschool and get a GED.

      And what came of me? Five years after dropping out, when most of my peers would have been in the middle of college at best, I had a career as a software developer making nearly $100k. Five years after that, making nearly $150k. And I've held that job and excelled in that career for almost twenty years, now.

      Kids who skip school aren't necessarily bad. They shouldn't be written off. The act of skipping school isn't an ultimate act of stupidity. In many cases, sure it is. In others, it's a desperate gasp for air and freedom and independence away from the guiding hand of institutional stupidity and stagnation that would other suffocate them. Dropping out of school isn't going to hamper truly ambitious people and staying in school isn't going to promise a rewarding life or career for total losers.

    26. Re:Great plan there by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Very similar story here. I missed 20-40 days each year, yet I kept good grades. My teachers and the administration were frustrated and angry with me because I ignored their rules, but at the end of the day I knew the material. Once I had a teacher that just couldn't stand things not being done their way and threatened to fail me for poor attendance. I walked out of the classroom, went straight to the principal and demanded to take the final right then. It was November, so we weren't even half way through the school year. After much arguing I was allowed to take the final and the Regents exam in December, which I aced. I didn't have to go to that class anymore for the rest of the year.

      I've done very well, I've started several Internet companies and sold some of them. I own my own business now. I credit my success to all the free time I had to really learn while my peers were filling out dittos in class.

      I feel very sorry for this next generation who are growing up prisoners in their schools and in their homes. Nobody is allowed to go out unattended anymore. Kids are taught to blindly follow stupid "zero tolerance" rules for the sake of following authority.We are training sheep. Where will our next generation of thinkers and leaders come from?

      Just the idea that the school and police would have made me carry a GPS tracker like a criminal is infuriating me even now. I would have made it my mission in life to hack that thing to report me located in the Principal's bedroom whenever he's not at home.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    27. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or they could be sued by those very same parents when their grades suck. Sometimes, when you're covering your ass, there's a reason.

      Schools can't take responsibility for the students any more, what with parents suing over everything.

      It's a two way street. There are irresponsible, stupid, and just plain lazy school personnel who want to avoid responsibility. There are those who hide behind bureaucratic bullshit so they don't have to put any effort in. And there are those who fall victim to a parent who sues because their kid's grades were affected by the detention they got because little Joey self-actualized and beat the shit out of the class geek for fun, and the detention interfered with Joey's development because he's at a stage where he's not ready to deal with the difficult reality that actions have consequences. Plus, of course, you'll get sued by the victim's parents because you didn't prevent the ass-kicking, and the parents of several students to witnessed it because their kids were traumatized by the sirens of the ambulance you called to make sure the class geek's scraped knee didn't get infected lest you face a permanent disfigurement lawsuit.

      Clear policies and procedures don't prevent this sort of thing, but they make job of your defense lawyers easier, and save taxpayer dollars in the long run by preventing long discovery phases in the eventual lawsuits.

    28. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An anecdote is hardly a sample size sufficient to find a correlation. If you're trying to apply statistics to a sample of 1, you're missing the point and you should have had a better teacher.

    29. Re:Great plan there by Sectoid_Dev · · Score: 1

      That's stupid. 8pm is when high schoolers should be at a friend's house getting a blow job, lest they wind up like sexually defunct college kids that had their entire sexual maturation period suppressed until it was over, fixating them into a cycle of sexual discomfort.

      You all know that guy. You knew him in college. You felt sorry for him 'cause he never got laid. Then you got him a girl and he damn near had a heart attack. Today he's an astrophysicist making $$$bazillions, but he still can't get comfortable in bed.

      You all know the girls too. They're the "all sex is rape" femenists and the complete dorm sluts that finally lost their virginity their first day freshman year and fucked damn near everyone. They fall one way or the other eh?

      Those are some serious issues you have there.
      Since we're in the mood for generalizations; you'll either mellow in time and perspective or become more bitter and fixed on how you were screwed over in life.

      Deposit your nickel in the can please.

    30. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schools are obligated to keep students in a seat a certain number of days per year to receive funding from the state for that student. Otherwise, it would be irrelevant. If you can make the test on 20% attendance rather than 100% attendance, then what difference does it make? Hell, I remember skipping class for days or weeks and only showing up for the tests, which I aced having never studied the material (or even known what the material might be prior to turning over the paper and putting pencil to it come testing time).

      Too much emphasis is placed on "sit and obey" rather than "think, achieve, and excel".

    31. Re:Great plan there by khallow · · Score: 1

      What's especially puzzling is that if, say, your parents decide not to let you go to school, they may lose custody of you. OTOH, when the school district decides they don't want you anymore, it's fine and dandy. Our former school district's superintendent saw no problem with that, citing that state law forces their hand, too. Then I asked her: what did she personally do to influence a change in state law, to get rid of expulsion/suspension as disciplinary measures, and to promote/reinforce attendance instead? She seemed puzzled that I'd expect her to do something about changing a law that she pretended to disagree with (the radio show she participated in was about promoting attendance). It was like Hypocrisy 101.

      Pardon me, but it doesn't seem "puzzling" at all. She gets the rules she wants, the lack of responsibility she wants, and she gets to pretend that "her hands are tied". In all, I'd say your experience sums up the fundamental reason why we have rigid rules (particularly, the "zero tolerance" kind). It allows bureaucrats to collect paychecks without taking risks.

    32. Re:Great plan there by Sectoid_Dev · · Score: 1

      It's not about learning, it's about training kids to be profitable worker bees. High attendance rates in school train them to come to work on time every day. When company's can count on 100% attendance they can hire less employees because they don't have to worry about covering shifts.

      Exactly. A large amount of effort is made to get the kid into the classroom. A much smaller effort goes into actually educating them.

    33. Re:Great plan there by Sectoid_Dev · · Score: 1

      Very similar story here. I missed 20-40 days each year, yet I kept good grades. My teachers and the administration were frustrated and angry with me because I ignored their rules, but at the end of the day I knew the material. Once I had a teacher that just couldn't stand things not being done their way and threatened to fail me for poor attendance. I walked out of the classroom, went straight to the principal and demanded to take the final right then. It was November, so we weren't even half way through the school year. After much arguing I was allowed to take the final and the Regents exam in December, which I aced. I didn't have to go to that class anymore for the rest of the year.

      I've done very well, I've started several Internet companies and sold some of them. I own my own business now. I credit my success to all the free time I had to really learn while my peers were filling out dittos in class.

      I feel very sorry for this next generation who are growing up prisoners in their schools and in their homes. Nobody is allowed to go out unattended anymore. Kids are taught to blindly follow stupid "zero tolerance" rules for the sake of following authority.We are training sheep. Where will our next generation of thinkers and leaders come from?

      Just the idea that the school and police would have made me carry a GPS tracker like a criminal is infuriating me even now. I would have made it my mission in life to hack that thing to report me located in the Principal's bedroom whenever he's not at home.

      Also a similar story, although I wish I could had taken finals early. I missed 28 days, 4 separate weeks, of excused absences in 6th grade. My teacher grumbled at me a lot about as if I were cheating the system and threatened to fail me if I missed anymore. I was far ahead in the class and blew through the work he assigned. As petty as it sounds I think he resented me. Each excused week of absence he assigned me a ton of work that no one else had to do and he never bothered to check it when I returned. The unintended lessons that taught me were numerous.

    34. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I dropped out of high school and worked minimum wage for 2 years. I've made at least $70,000 *after taxes* every year since. I'm 23 now already with my own home, two cars, girlfriend of 4 years who eventually will be my wife.

      I'm sick of people acting like you're a failure without some institution.

      I think it's incredibly unintelligent of someone to believe you can only learn something one way.

      I skipped your school, I skipped class, your rules were bullshit, I didn't show my work because my way is *better* and I'm already more successful than you ever were!

    35. Re:Great plan there by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0

      I just don't think today's taboo society is natural or healthy, at all. If we could do it, we would make sure that people never saw anyone naked or knew what sex was until they turned 18. Think about it. If we could administratively put up a system where we prevented anyone under 18 from hearing about sex and prevented them from ever experimenting or getting into talks that wander toward such topics with their peers (and thus, discovering sex on their own), do you think we'd do it?

      I don't think the struggle between parent and child on this is unhealthy. The parents need to parent. They need to set down ground rules. I think they need to explain sexuality and moral and ethical and health issues to their kids, too. The child then becomes a teenager, and wants to have sex; the parent has armed the child with enough knowledge to not screw up too bad (pregnancy, STDs, etc) in this endeavor, but also does not want the now-teenager to have sex, and takes steps to prevent it.

      This needs to remain balanced as it is. Sorry but your teenage daughter needs to be able to get away with it, as hard as it might be to get that one by you, when she's 16. She doesn't need to be put under constant watch, with a cell phone with a baby monitor app running on it, with a GPS, phone calls every 20 minutes, and a chaperon. That's just sociopathic and likely to cause a huge amount of psychological damage.

      When I was a kid, parents were concerned about their kids not going out and playing. I mean not like that, but they really wanted you to go outside and disappear with friends from time to time, instead of spending 24 hours a day locked in your room alone. They knew the risks, and when you did something stupid and got caught they beat you with a leather belt. That's called "parenting." What happened?

    36. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Brother is already here...

    37. Re:Great plan there by hawguy · · Score: 1

      This tracking system also gives predators a bigger toy to play with as GPS signals can be traced relatively easily and if you don't know how you can Google it like anything else and get your answer.

      What are you talking about? GPS signals are not traceable - they are one-way communications from the satellites to the ground. Well, they are traceable, but they'll just lead you to a satellite 12,000 miles above us... I don't think that's what you meant.

      The article doesn't say what technology is used to report back to the home office, but it's a pretty safe bet that it's cell based. Do you also worry that cell phones are a tool for predators?

      Or do you have some proof that whatever web site or tool that the school uses to track the students is available to the world?

    38. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like teaching them to peacably assemble, burn a flag, and yell 'Fuck the poooolllliiiiccccceeee.' :)

    39. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.... Way to teach your kid ethics. As far as honesty not being the best policy, in your opinion, I doubt you know what honesty is with your willingness to lie.

    40. Re:Great plan there by mlts · · Score: 2

      Disclaimer: Not all school districts are like this. However, a lot are.

      It is more like a vicious circle. Parents with justified issues are completely ignored by the school board muckety-mucks until they start having to get "loud" enough to be heard by having to threaten litigation, or actually start hauling school officials into court.

      Schools retaliate by adding more and more paperwork to cover their derrieres, and start adding more levels of bureaucratic crap, to try to make themselves more deaf to parents and students.

      So, it ends up that having to retain counsel becomes second nature with the thick-headed school districts as opposed to actually being able to voice concerns and have some action taken in the first place.

      Of course, there are the idiot parents as mentioned above who have their kids beat people up, and then said parents get mad because their little darling is in the in school suspension room. However, school districts don't address either type of parent (the bad ones, nor the ones that have legitimate issues), and try to bury themselves in paperwork.

      The best thing for the US education system? Well, funding comes to mind first of all [1]. It might be nice for something other than football stadiums to receive grants [2]. It is absolutely laughable how pathetic the school system here is compared to almost any other developed country. It can be debated, but probably one of three options is needed:

      1: Go with a system similar to Germany, let each state have its own schooling ability, overseen by the Federal government.

      2: Go with a voucher based system similar to France, and let schools compete for students, assuming the schools are accredited.

      3: Try to fix the existing school district system here in the US without throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and not doing brain-dead things like No Child Left Behind either.

      [1]: Funding to college level. An American has to get $50,000+ in debt to finance four years of college unless they are lucky to have savings, or a fat trust fund. Their competitor coming from Chile, Venezuela, China, or India? Their entire education was financed by their government, so they have no worries about finances once they get their diploma.

      [2]: Where I live, high school football stadiums are starting to have skyboxes. Districts which barely can keep their vital services running ask for bond money so they can rebuild their 5 year old stadium with a bigger Jumbotron so they can be on par with the small town down the road.

    41. Re:Great plan there by digsbo · · Score: 2

      As petty as it sounds I think he resented me.

      Of course he resented you. While I have friends who are public school teachers, and though they're great people, for many of them it's inconceivable that children can learn without them, and they find it threatening, as though the secret might get out that there are alternatives to public schooling which work well for some people. Why do you think states with stronger teacher unions have laws which make it harder to home-school?

    42. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I missed 40 days of school in 8th grade (a personal high point), and I didn't get much better about it during highschool. Now I'm working on a Ph.D. in Neurobiology at a translation research and teaching hospital. I credit my not-being-at-my-public-school for the level of success I've achieved.

          As a parent, it's my business where my kid is. I'll smash that damn device and hand it back to the truant officer on my kid's behalf. Schools have become the Juvenile Executive branch of the government, and it's not their responsibility. "We'll educate you with the information we want you to know, whether you like it or not!"

      You sound angry.

      And you're the one-in-a-million exception. Please think of the dumber children.

    43. Re:Great plan there by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I could go on a rant about what happened. I'll just say that America doesn't have any respect for individualists any more. Instead, it's the collectivists who get recognition and respect. Everyone at the capital agrees that it's somehow evil and wrong to discipline a child, and all the nice little collectivist sheeps fall in line. The odd man (or woman) who doesn't agree, and acts differently, is soon found out, and convicted of some trumped up charge of child abuse and/or neglect. It takes a village to raise an idiot. I heard that on television years ago, and the bullshit still makes the circuits in print. Some bimbo left a leaflet from some stupid program or another in the shopping cart a few months ago, with that village idiot thing printed on it. The village didn't raise me, nor did it raise my sons.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    44. Re:Great plan there by edumacator · · Score: 1

      Private school would certainly better overall and is pretty much the best way in America for an education

      This is one of the most pervasive misconceptions about American public education. Some of our public schools aren't doing well, but many are.

      A lot of a school's success is predicated on its socio-economic setting and mobility rate. I will agree with you that private schools are better when you can show me a private school that has the same requirements that a public school does. We have to take everyone and kicking a student out is virtually impossible. Private schools often have very strict admittance processes and are certainly willing to kick a student out who isn't performing well. In addition, parents almost always pay for private schools, or at the very least apply for scholarships or grants for access. Therefore the kids at private school invariably have a quality that almost always results in better grades, involved parents. Their parents care about their child's education and are willing to pay for it. That's not true with a large portion of the public school population.

      If you were to put my AP students in a suburban school with a relatively stable student population, I can guarantee you they are just as successful as those students at a private school. I'd go even further and say that if you took all of my students in all grades whose parents came to Open House, it would be a safe bet to say they would parallel any of our local private schools.

    45. Re:Great plan there by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      You'd be one of the few to learn that fact. It seems like most of the people in my municipality don't understand the concept. I'm assuming most of them got a public education.

    46. Re:Great plan there by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 1

      In Japan there was a big controversy about GPS in cell-phones and pedophiles a few years ago which is why I brought it up. After searching Google for a few minutes it seems that there are a lot of websites that are willing to attest that such a system is plausible while others think it's not. I'm not saying that it is, I'm just saying what I've heard and briefly seen. As for your last question, I don't worry about GPS tracking anyone or myself. I'm as much as part of the cloud in my daily life as anything else. Lastly, I don't get why I was rated as a troll for my post, it has nothing to do with trolling.

    47. Re:Great plan there by ZmeiGorynych · · Score: 1

      You're saying it's not OK to compeltely disregard authority if its demands make no sense to you and you think you can get away with it?

    48. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And we all know that playing fantasy games in school makes you a felonious terrorist...

    49. Re:Great plan there by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Everyone at the capital agrees that it's somehow evil and wrong to discipline a child, and all the nice little collectivist sheeps fall in line.

      Yes and that's the problem. It's your job to raise and discipline your children. It's not in the interest of the public good for our public services to nanny your kids 24/7. They will get away with shit. They will get caught doing shit, and then you will punish them. Both of these are important, good, and proper.

    50. Re:Great plan there by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I skipped a fair amount in high school as well. And I too wound up with above average grades despite it all. That anger is one of the odder things I remember about it as well. Most of the teachers didn't give a shit. However, there were a couple that just seemed infuriated that I could cover the material on my own by reading the text book myself instead of sitting and having them read it for me.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    51. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really him who would be teaching his children to disregard authority or the authority that is passing on frivolous and useless policy? I've found that the best way to teach people to disregard authority is to show them how irresponsible and ignorant the authority is.

    52. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All "authority" should be disregarded. There is no such thing really, it is just something made up so that the people with power can justify their use of force against people without power.

    53. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Principal : Where were you really?

      James : I was in Miss Doe's class.
      John : I was in Miss Doe's class.
      Jason : I was in Miss Doe's class.

      Principal : Then why were all of you within 30 feet of each other.

    54. Re:Great plan there by Adam+Appel · · Score: 1

      Yup. My son (3rd grade) was late 3 or 4 time in one month (he walks less then 500 yards to school) and his teacher sent home a note about how he would not be able to keep a job if those habits continue. I was a little blown away but the bizarreness of that line of reasoning.

      --
      They come in the dark, only in the darkest.
    55. Re:Great plan there by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I generally find the low unexcused absence threshold in the U.S. to be overboard, by an order of magnitude at least, or maybe two. When I was in 11th grade of high school in Poland, I had 51% attendance rate. You'd get to repeat the grade if it dropped to 50% or less. That was fair, IMHO. I don't think I turned out all that bad, nor do I think I missed out on much.

      Counterpoint - you're posting on Slashdot as opposed to doing something with your life.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    56. Re:Great plan there by mfh · · Score: 1

      Because kids who regularly skip school can be relied upon to willingly cooperate in keeping and activating their own personal tracking device.

      "Sir, it says they are in the library but all I see here is an empty bag of Doritos." (trackers crammed into ceiling tiles.)

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    57. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      So if one participates in a discussion, that's "doing nothing with one's life" according to you? And you see no problem in that line of reasoning? You win 5 failed internets.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    58. Re:Great plan there by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I'm blown away that you think it's ok for your son to disrupt the class by being late regularly.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    59. Re:Great plan there by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show you, you don't have to be a good thinker to work on a PhD.

      seriously, if you can see or understand what's going on, STFU.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    60. Re:Great plan there by mrjb · · Score: 1

      I'll smash that damn device

      No need. As a parent, it's probably much more fun to bring the GPS with you to work.

      Your child will be thankful for being on their side (even if you do reprimand them) and might even take responsibility from that point on. School will need to spend some time figuring out what on earth their student is doing at Acme corp all day. Once they find out, you've passed a clear message that you don't accept school bullying your children.

      Now it's no longer school vs. child; suddenly it's school vs parents. That's such a pity for the school, because students are so much easier to intimidate! But let's say the worst case is true- school is prepared to sue for your childs behaviour (not likely- just imagine the red tape that goes with that for them!). I'd be seriously surprised if you'd lose if you state you don't consent to the school snooping on your children. In all seriousness, not being under invasive government surveillance is freedom worth fighting for.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    61. Re:Great plan there by fishthegeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah... because kids being able to work with an ethic and have what they need to get a job is such a horrible thing?

      --
      load "$",8,1
    62. Re:Great plan there by Hatta · · Score: 1

      It is OK to disregard authority, and that's the best lesson you can teach a person. Second best lesson is how not to get caught.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    63. Re:Great plan there by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. School is such a waste of time. I didn't really learn anything after I finished my multiplication tables and basic vocabulary courses. History is useless since I heard it's basically rewritten for its audience. Higher math is something geeks use. And my reading and grammar is good enough, better in fact, than most people I've met.

      Or I would totally agree, except everytime I talk to someone who hasn't completed high school about science or history, or god help me have to read a cover letter, I can't wait to get away from the ignorance that makes my brain hurt. High school is regimented because aside from a few golden apples, teenagers can't even make their bed in the morning. If you want them to learn something, or teach them how to be rigorous *about* learning something, you need to train your mind to discipline. You need to learn how to learn. Not everything can be answered with a Google search.

      Not saying Poland's 50% mandatory attendance rate is more or less effective than the U.S.'s 90% rate. But it'll depend on the person. Anyone who says "it was good enough for me" is saying that from a 100% subjective viewpoint. Take a scientific poll (if you've bothered learning the scientific method) and determine what is actually best. Not "Who has the highest paying job" but perhaps "Who has the most life experience" or something more esoteric.

    64. Re:Great plan there by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Never taught have you. I have. I was "volunteered" to be on the team that was responsible for tracking down the slacker that had more than six unexcused absences. I had to have them sign a form acknowledging that I had told them that their sorry tails needed to be in class instead of out smoking pot somewhere. I then had to call their parents and tell them this, even though the computer automatically called them every day their kid skipped. This is, of course, on top of the form the kids and parents sign at the beginning of the year that acknowledges they have read the attendance rules and consequences. Why did we have to do all this crap? Because even when we do, there are a large number of parents who, when confronted with little Jimmy's 15 absences in a semester, will threaten lawsuits, call board of ed members and threaten to get everyone fired because their little sunshine isn't going to graduate. And if parents have enough political pull in the community, they may get you fired. It's a little more than "inconvenient." And before someone brings up the almighty "teacher's unions," remember that in most states (especially the South) there are laws that prevent teacher's unions from being anything more than professional organizations with no bargaining power.

    65. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you send your kids to private school you still have to pay to subsidize the public schools. This is not right. Maybe the OP doesn't make enough to pay for private school, whichi would make sense since he's paying for a Ph.D program right now. Mandatory GPS tracking devices are a violation of one's natural rights, specifically those outlined in the Fourth Amendment. I must say this doesn't surprise me, coming from California.

    66. Re:Great plan there by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Please! When I was in the classroom, I wasted tons of time on skippers. I didn't waste time, I had too much material to cover. They would miss the material and then expect me to catch them up when I really wanted to spend time with the majority that were actually in class. I won't say that every teacher uses their time wisely, but most of us do. Dealing with the perpetually tardy and absent who get suddenly serious around report card time wastes a lot of teacher time.

    67. Re:Great plan there by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      If you haven't realized it yet, you aren't average. I'll go along with allowing your kid to skip whenever he wants if you agree that his teachers don't have to spend their time creating makeup assignments, tests and copies of notes from the days he missed. Let's see how that works out.

    68. Re:Great plan there by Americium · · Score: 1

      This is why you need charter schools, because when you send your kid to private school, it's not like they reimburse you for all the taxes you are paying towards public school.

    69. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they must not learn to completely disregard authority, that leads to unsanctioned behavior. Seriously though, if more people had a lot less regard for authority our collective liberty wouldn't be as wilted as it is now. The state was never supposed to be our master, it was designed to be our servant to carry out the collective will of the people. There is an upstream bug that causes bureaucracy replication until it uses all of the systems resources and the devs are more interested in flogging their status to stroke their ego and enrich themselves than in dealing with bug reports. That's the beauty of open source though, we can disregard the mess and fork, as long as we are not mesmerized by their "authority".

    70. Re:Great plan there by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2

      It was my first thought as well. TFA addresses it though:

      "The idea is for this not to feel like a punishment, but an intervention to help them develop better habits and get to school," said Miller Sylvan, regional director for AIM Truancy Solutions.

      Clearly, it won't help a student that doesn't want help. But for students who have trouble remembering where they are supposed to be, it may be just what they need.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    71. Re:Great plan there by jdoverholt · · Score: 1

      In my school we had "employability points" that made up some 10-20% of our grade in each class. This was a discretionary grade from which points were subtracted for things like tardiness, failing to do homework, etc. It's a fairly transparent step toward the goal of making profitable worker bees. It's not really a bad thing, though. I don't like working with people who can't be bothered to show up on time, I can't imagine why anyone would.

      <criticism type='constructive'>It's "fewer" employees, not "less". Fewer is for discrete objects.</criticism>

    72. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that is an 'excused' absence. They are not trying to control the behavior of children when their parents excuse their absence.
      Unexcused absences, those absences without the permission of the parents, are the problem being targeted.

    73. Re:Great plan there by maxume · · Score: 1

      To be fair, there are plenty of things outside of the school bureaucracy that attempt to wack anyone trying to take responsibility for their choices upside the head.

      (The incipient authoritarianism is at least encouraged by requiring attendance in a one-size-fits-all system, especially when you wind it together with social promotion and the conflation of teaching hours and education)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    74. Re:Great plan there by khallow · · Score: 0

      Never taught have you.

      Nor will I teach in public schools. I'm not stupid and I wasn't such a great teacher in the first place when I taught in college.

      And why am I supposed to be impressed by your complaint? Have the parents sign a waiver against that sort of thing in the first place or the kid doesn't go to school. That's how private schools deal with the problem. Children and their parents don't have a right to frivolous lawsuits.

    75. Re:Great plan there by artfulshrapnel · · Score: 1

      A custody hearing where she is required to be in court would (or at least SHOULD) be an excused absence. They're referring to the kind where the kid doesn't show up and the parents are like "What? He wasn't? Well shit, where did he go?"

    76. Re:Great plan there by vux984 · · Score: 1

      This was my first thought as well.

      1. make friends with truants.
      2. collect their GPS devices.
      3. enter codes when called to do so.
      4. profit.

      Meh, too much hassle.

      In high school, we'd have tossed them in the goldfish tank, or drilled holes in them in shop class, put them in hydrochrolic acid from the chem lab, or something else equally "creative"...

      Either that or just put them into the recyling bins...on our way out to the mall.

    77. Re:Great plan there by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      disregarding irresponsible and/or hypocritical authority is what defends liberty. yes, blind ignorance of wise leadership leads to chaos, but blind submission to any sort of leadership leads to a reductionist society where no one is allowed to do much of anything. I find it interesting that youth mostly finds a reason to disregard authority and most older people (like yourself judging by your low id number) find excuses to defend it, no matter what the actual situation is and what the solution to it might be. IMO both sides' wish to mislead and/or manipulate the rules to stick it to the other places both on an equal moral plane and thus equally responsible for any conflicts. You've got no room to preach. Many school systems are corrupt and full of insecure opportunistic bullies that try to pass themselves off as teachers/administrators. The 'handbooks' at most schools read like the rules for a prison cell block. I grew up going to such a school system and it was quite unpleasant, despite being in a wealthy area as a well-behaved student. This is one situation where the faculty has overstepped their bounds because the students aren't their responsibility once school lets out and they are sending the wrong message to them (all of them, not just those who are tracked). Yes, this is school and the students aren't adults, but we don't want them growing up with the idea that such invasive and ubiquitous tracking is morally acceptable for ANY reason, nor do we want parents thinking that the school system will do their parenting for them.

      Send your kids to private school, or home school them;

      Both options cost money that most cannot afford.

    78. Re:Great plan there by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It's not in the interest of the public good for our public services to nanny your kids 24/7.

      But it's in the interests of the public nanny state.

      Produce kids who are not self-sufficient, and you can guarantee they will depend on the nanny state and entitlement programs for the rest of their lives; which further cements the political position of the powers that be.

    79. Re:Great plan there by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Actually I think I'd build and Arduino project on a helium min-blimp that would drift across the continental U.S, after telling everyone me dream in life was to make a flight in one of those weather balloon plus lawn chair devices.

    80. Re:Great plan there by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      You are correct.

      The lawsuit is the school's 'Terrorist'. Public schools do not have ridiculous attendance requirements because of lawsuits. They have it because they get paid by attendence. This means that if a student skips the day, they get x dollars less that day. If the students parent decides that a week long trip to view the great museums in Europe, the school doesn't get paid for those days. If a student gets a cold, and the parent decides that infecting a bunch of other kids is a bad idea even if it isn't bad enough to go to the doctor, the school does get paid. So, the school counts them as "unexcused absences". That way they can school can use the threat of failing the student to force the kids to show up, even if it is not in the student's best interest. When a parent keeps the student out of class for legitimate reasons, and the school tries to fail them for it, responsible parents WOULD sue the school when that is what is neccessary to get action. You then get posts like the posts above claiming that the schools have these rules to prevent lawsuits.

      Schools do NOT have to fail students for missing class.
      Schools do NOT have to take responsibility for students that are not in school.

    81. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because remembering you are supposed to be at school is so hard...

    82. Re:Great plan there by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      It's not about learning, it's about training kids to be profitable worker bees. High attendance rates in school train them to come to work on time every day. When company's can count on 100% attendance they can hire less employees because they don't have to worry about covering shifts.

      Yes, that's the last thing we want, people who are *duped* into thinking that it's a good thing to show up for work reliably!

    83. Re:Great plan there by crakbone · · Score: 1

      In life you need to be able to have the ability to lie based on the situation. Such as when your wife asks if her ass looks fat in those jeans, or if the girl she caught you looking at was cuter than her. You still lover her more than the other girl, you have committed your life to her. Why harm her with an observation that will only cause her harm? This man's actions did no harm to the school, no harm to the child and actually improved the child's life by allowing him to greave for a friend and find closure without penalty. What is the harm in that? I doubt that child is now going to cheat on his future wife and file bad tax reports. More likely the child will learn that sometimes you have to lie to help another and that bureaucracy has no compassion.

    84. Re:Great plan there by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I don't know who modded you as a troll, but perhaps it's because you're spouting off inaccurate information as if it pertains to this particular device?

      And you're contradicting yourself. First you say:

      GPS signals can be traced relatively easily

      Then you say:

      a lot of websites that are willing to attest that such a system is plausible ... I'm not saying that it is

      Even though you just said that it is?

      Then you say:

      I'm just saying what I've heard and briefly seen

      So you've briefly seen this tracking system, even though you're not claiming that it exists?

      Those are the kind of inconsistent statements that get you modded as a troll.

    85. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So right you are. If it were my kids, I'd teach them how to hack the GPS and have some fun with the wannabe overlords.

    86. Re:Great plan there by Korin43 · · Score: 2

      If you need to remind the kids to leave for school, get them free watches with alarms. The whole point of this is so they can watch them at all times (because kids don't deserve any privacy -- especially the kids who dare to ignore the school's authority).

    87. Re:Great plan there by DinDaddy · · Score: 2

      Sorry, have to slice you with Occam's razor.

      Public schools lose money for every day a child does not attend.

      Now we might extend your reasoning to the motivation BEHIND that policy.

    88. Re:Great plan there by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 1

      Because even when we do, there are a large number of parents who, when confronted with little Jimmy's 15 absences in a semester, will threaten lawsuits, call board of ed members and threaten to get everyone fired because their little sunshine isn't going to graduate.

      ...

      Children and their parents don't have a right to frivolous lawsuits.

      I agree with both statements but, having said that, it still doesn't prevent me from suing you and prove in a trial that my lawsuit is not frivolous. In the mean time: you're being sued, your job is at stake, your school MIGHT suspend you pending investigation and I'm sure that while you might think this a frivolous lawsuit, it will still affect you emotionally.

      Frivolous lawsuits are a huge problem especially for any public institution like schools but even a private school can suffer at the hands of an idiot parent trying to sue their way through.

      Unfortunately, the US (dunno about other countries specifically) has become a world of liability and everyone is trying to cover their ass from Joe Schmoe's lawsuit.

      --
      A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
    89. Re:Great plan there by The+O+Rly+Factor · · Score: 1

      U.S. schools seem to be designed like prisons with "voluntary" attendance.

      Ironic that state prisons and state public schools are usually designed by the same architecture firm...sometimes with the exact same blueprints.

    90. Re:Great plan there by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      It only disrupts class because teachers insist on making a big deal of it. "Oh hey John, couldn't get to school on time!? I'm now going to rant about you being late for the next 10 minutes." In my college classes people show up late all the time, they sit down quietly in the back, and the teachers completely ignore them. Same thing with cell phones: Phone goes off, its owner quickly turns it off, people giggle for about 5 seconds, class continues.

      If teachers don't want students distracted by stupid things, they should stop allowing themselves to be distracted by those things.

    91. Re:Great plan there by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      There is a simple solution for this for most people. Open a private school. Enroll your child in that school, and declare wherever they are to be the classroom at that time. I know it sounds like that wouldn't work, but it is done all the time, and it's popularity is increasing. You frequently will hear it being referred to as "Home Schooling".
      Here in California, there is actually no such thing as "Home Schooling". We have mandatory education laws, and kids are required to go to school. So, when you hear someone is "Home Schooling" that is just a euphemism for "They are not sitting in a public, or large private school". Starting a private school in CA is free, and takes about 20 minutes to fill out a form on line with the state. So, my child for example is enrolled in a private school with a student body of 1, and a 2:1 teacher to student ratio.

      Many schools see home "Home Schooling" as siphoning money away from them, and for a while we saw pretty aggressive behavior from public schools. As the popularity of home schooling has increased, many school districts have started to give up fighting it, and work it to steer more money into their coffers. Many districts have started what they call "Umbrella Programs". This means that the students are technically enrolled in the school, and are assigned to their homes as their classroom. Usually this involves a weekly meeting at the school to track the students work. In exchange for signing their kids up, the parent usually will get some supplies from the school. Those of us that open private schools pay 100% of the cost for schooling. By having the student technically enrolled in the school, the school get their paycheck from the state. I recently found out that some schools are even going so far as redefining a student that is out sick for more than 3 days as being "Home Schooled", and thus they report them as being in attendance. While I consider that to be highly unethical, from a pragmatic stand point, it is better than the school failing the student for getting sick.

    92. Re:Great plan there by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      I would like to preface this with an apology, since it will seem barbed and pointed, but I consider these to be important questions.

      However, When I was in public school, it seemed to me that each successive year that I attended the teachers riggorously went over THE SAME EXACT material that had been administered the year before for quite possibly the first 2/3 of the school year, followed by some very tiny token gesture of new content.

      Exactly how many times does the public school system feel it needs to "teach" its students what a noun is, for example?
      Also, given the observation above, why does the school system think it is justified to bore students to the point that they become jaded and impatient with their educators and ultimately end up "Hating" the entire prospect of being "educated"- A condition that from my own observations of my peers in the adult work environment, persists LONG into their adult life?

      If you look at early children, say ages 5 to 6, you will find genuine and honest curiosity, and a willingness (if not eagerness) to learn in most of them. Coincidentally, you'll find that this is about the age of your average kindergarten student. Somehow, through some freak process that remains elusive, these same kids have an alarming propensity to become bull-headed, truant, and to start resisting being educated by the age of 10 to 12... I would wager it is because of several things:

      1) Children learn through play. The education system teaches through repitition, regimented assesment, and mandates. (I know it does this for standardization and metrics purposes; these useful things for lawmakers, staticians, and schoolboards are not so useful nor healthy for children, especially young ones that have only a nebulous view of cause and effect.)

      2) The educational system bars children from learning "Cool" things, even if the student in question shows a brilliant aptitude for it, if such subject matter is in any way able to be conflated as "dangerous", or worse "Disruptive." Instead it focuses on regimented, pre-proscribed, and totally "safe" curriculum which ultimately destroys any motivation to TRY to learn something new, and engaging later. If other students are like I was, it is because the system that operates in US public schools seems to actively prohibit such subject matter, or to denegrate that subject matter into something draconian, and boring.

      Some major victims of this process are science, math, and computer technology, though literature and art also suffer.

      Science can be, and should be FUN. Putting a 2 liter bottle of soda into an ultrasonic denture cleaning machine is fun, and cool. Learning why it causes a volcanic eruption of sweet fizz due to phonons and neucleation is empowering, which can become fun as well. (Where do you think the diet cola and mentos trick came from?) Learning about boolean logic and programming should also be fun; It should not be boiled down into a denaturated and lifeless exercise.

      The reasons for shelving the more successful "Fun" approach to education are many-fold, but the big ones are these:

      a) The teacher is not competent to teach the subject in question, and has only rudimentary knowledge of the subject him/herself, and actively crafts a curriculum that would avoid exposing this fact. (Teaching the test)

      b) The school's legal counsel has 'suggested' to the school that teaching kids such things might cast the school in a negative, 'non-conformist' light, which would reflect badly on it when it comes time to renew government finance...

      c) The school administrators erroniously believe that the students "are not ready" for such stimulating educational experiences. (You would never know when a student is 'ready' for such an experience until you expose them to one. See D)

      d) The faculty staff do not want to deal with an empowered and 'eager to demonstrate what they learned' student body. (EG, they don't want to deal with mentos fountains on the school steps, or with genuine hacker talent cutti

    93. Re:Great plan there by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      I don't like working with people who can't be bothered to show up on time, I can't imagine why anyone would.

      Would you wake up early every morning to go to a job that doesn't pay you, where all day you sit in meetings about things you're not interested in, and will likely never work on again, and then they send you home with a bunch of work to do to "prove that you paid attention in the meetings", but you know that they're not actually going to use your results for anything except picking the employee of the month? Also, the only questions you'll be asked in the meetings are to make sure that you were paying attention.

      And remember, you can't quit. For your own good, you're forced to work at this job for at least 12 years.

      You don't see why people wouldn't see much reason to show up on time? Maybe it annoys the teachers, but it's their own fault for assuming they have the right to demand attendance. They need to realize that they're the employees and the students are the customers. If your customers don't want what you're selling, then maybe you're doing it wrong.

      Maybe it's helpful for training the McDonald's employees of the future, but some of us want real jobs, where we do something interesting, and your ability to memorize things doesn't matter at all (in the real world, there are cheat-sheets everywhere).

    94. Re:Great plan there by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      If you haven't realized it yet, you aren't average.

      I'll go along with allowing your kid to skip whenever he wants if you agree that his teachers don't have to spend their time creating makeup assignments, tests and copies of notes from the days he missed. Let's see how that works out.

      How about this:

      • Don't grade homework. Now you can give out the same assignment to students who missed a day (keep extra copies on your desk). You don't have to worry about them cheating, because you're not grading it. Post the solutions online and in the classroom so students can check their answers whenever they want. The students who don't do it will either do badly on the tests, or won't have needed it anyway.
      • Make your notes in a printable format in the first place and post it online and in the classroom. Let the students read the notes any time they want, and maybe pass them out for anyone who wants one. Now it's no extra work if a student misses a day (keep extra copies on your desk if you do pass them out), AND students won't be distracted by trying to copy down your notes while you talk.

      That just leaves tests. I'm inclined to say "who cares if people cheat on tests", but I guess primary schools still think people's grades mean something (yeah right). Requiring kids to show up on test days seems reasonable. That's significantly less of a hassle than requiring attendance every day.

      And if you think any of that is "too much work", you should keep in mind that what I just described is how colleges work (of course, colleges don't have a choice -- since they have to keep their students somewhat happy).

    95. Re:Great plan there by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      GPS tracking is definitely a very bad thing, but the cost of homeschooling just isn't that great. Here in California, it costs $0 to establish a private school. It only takes 10-20 minutes to fill out the paperwork, which can be done on paper, or can be filled out and submitted online. It just isn't a burden to do.

      As a parent that has established a private school, and has a student body of 1 enrolled in that school, I don't have a problem with funding public schools. The reason is that as much as I believe home schooling will give many kids (particularly mine) a better education than a public school, I am not so delusional as to think that every parent is as concerned about their child as I am. Public school may not give a child what I would consider a "Good" education, but it will give them enough that most of them will be able to function in society. They will be able to read, write, and do basic math. Even if they don't do them well. We are almost at a good point right now, where those parents that care to give their child a better education can either home school or send their kids to a regular private school. Those parents that don't care (or believe public school is the best) will simple go with the default which is public school.

      Having this minimal education supplied to every kid is a benefit to us all. Just as having roads in my city that I don't use is a benefit to us all. If you only made those with kids in the public schools pay for the schools, you would end up with almost identical funding as private schools. If you have the same funding as private schools, you remove the single benefit that public schools have over private schools, so you might as well shut down the public schools and only have private ones. I don't think this would be a good thing.

      All that being said, I repeat, GPS tracking is a VERY BAD THING, and I would still like to see a major overhaul of the school system, as it is severely broken.

    96. Re:Great plan there by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The bug you refer to is in the definition of who is "authority".

    97. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. You can be late and still be civilized about it. Teachers can, too. If they don't -- WTF blame it on the student?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    98. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      You missed my point. I claim you can complete a year of high school while being 49% absent, without missing out on anything of importance. I claim I have learned no less than I'd have learned were I there for every class of every school day.

      I can't see how some arbitrary number can be effective in and of itself. It's the effort that's effective, not a checkmark in the student register. You don't put the effort, and you become a stereotypical dropout. If you misdirect your effort (not having learned how to learn), you become a teacher's pet who has 99.9% attendance and can't get into college. Had both kinds for classmates throughout the grade school.

      U.S. has a rather weird way of recording attendance. The school district we live in measures attendance in half-day increments. A half-day doesn't count if you are absent for more than 30 minutes. I kid you not. In Poland, in grades 4 and up, attendance was taken in the student register once per lesson. Perhaps it's a huge collective waste of time, but how else can one do it while staying fair?

      One bit I left out: IIRC in Poland the attendance was counted per subject. Say if there was one history lesson (hour) per week in a 35 week school year, you had to attend at least 13 lessons. Otherwise you'd fail that single subject and that was enough to have to repeat the school year. I'm not sure if this lack of subject attendance implied that you got a compulsory failing grade in spite of positive test/homework grades, or if it merely caused you not to be promoted to the next grade in spite of having all passing individual grades. I believe the latter was the case.

      Not having the pleasure of going through this ordeal, I'm not exactly sure how, when repeating a school year, did they count repeat grades for subjects you already got a passing grade for. I'm also unsure whether you had to retake all the other subjects you already passed in given grade. Maybe they expected you to audit them only. It was almost 2 decades ago...

      I agree with you that not having basic knowledge in science makes it hard to even reasonably fulfill your civic duties: how can you vote if you can't filter out the substance (or lack thereof) of politics of the candidates you vote for? Heck, it's very hard to be a competent citizen or politician if you have no clue about the basic workings of modern communications and computer systems.

      Alas, I disagree that there is a lot to be gained from the teachings of history. I find the most widely circulated arguments there be vacuous and unimpressive. You don't need to know there were a 100 dead tyrants before you to figure out you're seeing one. Experience in past events can only carry you so far.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    99. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I missed 40 days of school in 8th grade (a personal high point), and I didn't get much better about it during highschool. Now I'm working on a Ph.D. in Neurobiology at a translation research and teaching hospital. I credit my not-being-at-my-public-school for the level of success I've achieved.

          As a parent, it's my business where my kid is. I'll smash that damn device and hand it back to the truant officer on my kid's behalf. Schools have become the Juvenile Executive branch of the government, and it's not their responsibility. "We'll educate you with the information we want you to know, whether you like it or not!"

      Send your kids to private school, or home school them; there is no law that says you have to send them to public school (at least in my state). There are options besides teaching them that its OK to completely disregard authority...

      I disagree, I don't think they are teaching them to completely disregard authority, I think they are teaching them to disregard, and disrespect, authority that is overstepping it's bounds. And I think that is a trait more people need to be taught.

      How anyone thinks it is acceptable to GPS track CHILDREN 5 times a day (or at all) is beyond me. A parent? Sure, ok, I get that, it's your kid, knowing where they are is important, but who the hell is the school to track children?

      Since you like alternatives, expell the kid. But nobody would expell a kid for as little as four unexcused absences, because that would be stupid. Almost as stupid as GPS tagging them, including two times daily when they are not at school and have no responsibility to answer to the school.

    100. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      Are you in charge or not? Whatever the skippers expect you to do, is their problem, not yours. You don't have to "deal" with tardy or absent. Ignore the dimwits, grade appropriately, have them repeat the year if they so deserve.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    101. Re:Great plan there by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on what you call "tracking" : the GPS is able to track someone , in the sense that it can find out it's current location, and if you happen to be near it , you also know where you are ( that's the point of a GPS :-) )

      However , if you want someone else to see your location , you need something to transmit that location , which can be done with a cell phone.

      If the data is transmitted over the air , it may be possible to intercept it.

    102. Re:Great plan there by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If it comes down to it, the school does not need to sue. They will just place a call to the CPS, and let an entire other part of the government handle harassing you.

      In the end, the issue will come down to how badly the school wants this power, and if they think they can get away with it. I am always amazed at how many people do not understand the difference between something being "illegal", and something being "against the school rules". Because of this confusion, one risks CPS agents using the force of their government position to try to stop you from breaking school rules that they believe to be laws. If it ever makes it to a courtroom, you also risk having a judge or jury believing that school rules and law are synonymous. We have already seen this slippery slope make progress with things like strip searches of students, and the common belief that a school has authority over the student when they have left the school property.

    103. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      I can't agree more. Before turning 6, my daughter has done quote a few "disruptive" experiments (OMG WON'T THEY HURT THEMSELVES OR BURN DOWN THE SCHOOL THE LITTLE TERRORISTS):

      - melting and boiling kitchen salt (800C and 1400C respectively),
      - burning wood with sunlight focused with a Fresnel lens (no, we didn't burn the freakin' bugs, she values life ya know),
      - melting concrete driveway with sunlight focused from a tad larger Fresnel lens,
      - testing a diode made out of a lightbulb immersed in heated up kitchen salt,
      - deforming cheap aluminum pans placed on a coil pulsed from a capacitor storage bank holding about 1kJ of energy,
      - learning about effects of unilateral restriction to the brain perfusion while monitoring daddy with a custom pletysmograph,
      - learning about effects of electrical nerve and muscle stimulation (using a battery powered stimulator/EMG recorder that would play back the slowed-down recorded EMG via a speaker after every stimulation pulse (or group in case averaging was used): you could "hear" the conduction speed by moving the stimulating electrode farther up and hearing the response "burp" getting more and more delayed),
      - blowing up soap bubbles filled with H2, O2, and the mixture of the two.

      Those were perhaps the most "hair rising" ones. With each experiment we'd do some measurements to underscore physical reality (cooling law, existence of thermal mass, existence of polarized electric charge carriers, some hydraulic laws, finite speed of neural conduction, etc.). I'm not claiming she could recite all that in the middle of the night, but little-by-little she is getting the fundamentals needed not to take every piece of made up crap from talking heads at face value.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    104. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's a really fucked up system of funding that bases money allocation on measured attendance. It should be based on legally necessary enrollment, since school is compulsory after all. If a kid lives in given school district and is enrolled in given school, the school gets the money. If the kid fails to show up: so much the better for others, right? That's how it was IIRC in Poland. How is it now -- I don't know.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    105. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's where the real problem is in the U.S.A. States should stop accepting federal money, for any purpose. Local school districts should stop accepting state money, for any purpose. What's wrong with that? It seems to me that money coming from higher levels is there merely as a bait-and-switch to spread federal influence on the states, and state influence on local communities. The freed up money should be returned (as tax cuts) to the source, then the school districts can increase taxes to compensate to some extent.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    106. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      Very, very interesting! Thank you!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    107. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      Regarding privacy intrusions / delusional internet use policies, etc: so far it has worked for me to simply cross out and/or amend/modify the terms I disagree with on various forms that the school wants parents to sign. They are bureaucrats: they don't read it. They just look for the signature and file it (at least here). I also refused to sign a couple of "not applicable yet" blanket forms that really apply to middle- and high-schoolers. I count on them forgetting to check later, ha.

      I also flatly refuse participation in some things that they make-believe to be compulsory. The school has a mobile dentist office come in to do dental exams every year. I simply never signed the release form in spite of nagging to do so: our kids have a dentist, so thank you and b'uh-bye.

      The issue of having parents sign various privacy-limiting agreements is quite iffy, it seems that at least here they can do nothing to force you to sign anything. The kid has to go to school (law says so), the kid goes to school, your end of the deal is done. This may vary state-to-state, of course.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    108. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an urban legend. Give at least two verifiable examples, please.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    109. Re:Great plan there by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

      For kids who "have trouble remembering where they're supposed to be" I would recommend a giant 6x3 foot poster with the word "SCHOOL" written on it in giant block letters. It's probably cheaper than a GPS tracker, too!

    110. Re:Great plan there by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      There are definitely people who can learn and not attend all the classes. But I don't want to discount the information you're being given -- by book or by lecture. Even history -- perhaps especially history -- is important. It gives you perspective. For example, we've all read that the Repulican and/or Democratic party has done things like posted the wrong polling place or date on their opposition party voters' doors. You've heard newspapers, supposedly unbiased, endorse candidates, slander others.

      For awhile I thought this was the fault of the New Republicans vs the Old Democrats. Such a chasm between the two parties that our country HAD to be so divided. As it turns out, after reading a little history on the matter, this is lightweight. People have been killed over their votes, establishments burned, extortion, etc. If anything, things have gotten better. It puts things in perspective so one might realize that the world isn't quite so ready to fall apart as the newspapers would have you believe.

    111. Re:Great plan there by syousef · · Score: 1

      Because kids who regularly skip school can be relied upon to willingly cooperate in keeping and activating their own personal tracking device.

      I wonder what happens when the GPS device is accidentally dropped in the toilet, accidentally run over, accidentally set on fire, accidentally dropped from a great height? What about when the kid pays or bullies someone else into entering the codes for them? Vandalism and thuggery: You're teaching these kids the skills they need to become criminals.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    112. Re:Great plan there by silentphate · · Score: 2

      If a student is passing there classes, who gives a damn if they show up all the time.

    113. Re:Great plan there by tibit · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this bit of perspective is important. I'm more worried, though, about complacency. The sensationalist bias in media may just be what's needed to combat complacency. Or maybe it just desensitizes us due to information overload to such an extent that we turn back to complacency. There's always an unintended consequence somewhere there ;)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    114. Re:Great plan there by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      wire a timer, to enter password (used walkman? cheap mp3 player)
      leave where u should be in a few hours
      repeat
      wait till people offer you money to do the same for thiers
      ????
      profit

      --
      warning pointless sig
    115. Re:Great plan there by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2

      Agreed. Removing kids' privacy is obviously the goal -- hence the requirement to check in at 8pm. Schools should not know or care where kids are after school.

    116. Re:Great plan there by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a Beowulf cluster solution to this problem?

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
    117. Re:Great plan there by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      I quit skewl in the 2nd grade adn never looked back. I would have got As anyways and can read and cipher like a mofo. I make over $150k/year and have sex with several different women a day.Rulez aRE for lozers whom can't get their own acts together. Everyone is smarts enough to miss 50% of scool and still be smarter than average.

    118. Re:Great plan there by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Instead it focuses on regimented, pre-proscribed, and totally "safe" curriculum which ultimately destroys any motivation to TRY to learn something new, and engaging later.

      This was precisely my problem. After elementary school, I quickly became bored with the curriculum in middle school, and with only one or two exceptions, it got even worse in high school. I probably averaged a B- through high school (and even then, only because my parents were not pleased when I got Cs). But I wasn't dumb, by any means; my SAT/ACT scores were high enough to get me a full tuition scholarship for college despite my poor GPA.

      In other words, my problem was apathy, and apathy is not solved by removing fun from the classroom. The few classes I actually enjoyed were classes where I was *encouraged* to have fun; I particularly enjoyed the jewelry-making and basic electronics classes. I loved the yearly statewide high school programming competition put on by a local university my first two years of high school, but what teacher really cares enough to put in the time to help prepare four kids for a one-time competition? It didn't help that the teacher put in charge of that was really the golf coach and remedial math teacher. Suffice it to say, despite my pleas, we did not attend the competition my senior year.

      People like to say that high school is supposed to prepare kids for college. In my case, that wasn't even close to true. By the time I got to college, apathy had become a habit, and I'm sure I don't have to point out that apathy doesn't produce good grades in college.

    119. Re:Great plan there by Adam+Appel · · Score: 1

      We have an emergency placement foster child and it is my sons responsibility to make sure she gets to her classroom. Sometimes she takes a little extra time to get to school just to be difficult. Besides that, we are talking 6 times in the last 3 months and not so late as to go into class time.

      --
      They come in the dark, only in the darkest.
    120. Re:Great plan there by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Obligatory 8-bit Dungeons and Dragons video link. Are there any girls there?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    121. Re:Great plan there by ThunderThor53 · · Score: 1

      In public schools, it's not even about training attendance, it's about the money. Simply put, students attending class get the school money. Students on suspension (in-school or otherwise) ALSO get the school money! The schools are incentivized to either get kids in class OR suspend them. Absences are expensive, as are expulsions! This is why kids get full-year suspensions (at home under their parent's care) rather than expulsion from the district.

      This al

    122. Re:Great plan there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait until they add up the cost of all these GPS units that get 'lost' being pitched off the nearest train bridge.
      You'll see this program's funds dry right up as parents refuse to pay for replacements.

    123. Re:Great plan there by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      "I just described is how colleges work".

      Times seem to be changing. This was true a few years ago, but colleges now collect/grade homework, and the tests are quickly becoming a smaller portion of your grade. Yeah, I dislike it. I always did well on tests (did not do the homework). My tests indicate that I learned more than my classmates, and had the time to involve myself in other school and community activities while my peers studied and did homework. Now, returning to college, I struggle. Classes are heavily graded based upon homework and jumping through hoops. Years ago, I am not sure I went an entire day without sleeping through at least one class, but still Aced the courses. Now your grade would be docked for sleeping in class. Times are changing. Colleges are now run like high schools. Highschools are run like middle schools, and elementary schools are just sad. Disclaimer: There are still great teachers, but I see less of them than I used to. I mostly see teachers doing the same thing as everyone else.....and it doesn't work.

      Also, teachers (at all levels) are forced to pass kids. They are told that they MUST pass their kids. No child left behind! So, the result is that teachers grade the homework and attendance as a higher percentage of their grade, and the tests become less important. This seems to be spreading. This does help the struggling kids pass, but it also turns the creative and insightful students into dull worker-bees.

      Specifically, I would like to see science education revert back to what it was when I was in school. We were given critical thinking challenges and exercises; now I see mostly worksheets and temporary memorization of terms. Very disappointing. Maybe I was just lucky....but somebody needs to step up and demonstrate to the education system that there is a better way. The crappy pay of teachers doesn't help.... and we act surprised when our kids teacher isn't the cream of the crop.

    124. Re:Great plan there by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    125. Re:Great plan there by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Also, teachers (at all levels) are forced to pass kids. They are told that they MUST pass their kids. No child left behind! So, the result is that teachers grade the homework and attendance as a higher percentage of their grade, and the tests become less important. This seems to be spreading. This does help the struggling kids pass, but it also turns the creative and insightful students into dull worker-bees.

      It does sort of make sense because some kids have trouble spewing memorized things in a test environment. The problem is that these people don't seem to realize you can have it both ways. I'd rather see some sort of system where people who don't do well on tests could do something else to demonstrate their knowledge of the subject, but the way it ends up now is that everyone has to do both, so everyone suffers. It would take more work, but it seems like it would be worth it.

      Specifically, I would like to see science education revert back to what it was when I was in school. We were given critical thinking challenges and exercises; now I see mostly worksheets and temporary memorization of terms.

      What's worse is how math is taught: "Here's some stuff that would be obvious if it was written in English. Now memorize this new notation so you can read it."

      The crappy pay of teachers doesn't help.... and we act surprised when our kids teacher isn't the cream of the crop.

      I don't think teacher's pay is really that bad. The problem is more the huge amount of effort required to become a teacher, and then merely average pay for doing it. And that huge amount of effort is mostly taking classes on how to teach people using the current, terrible system. That, and teachers are given way too much work, since they generally do everything (write lesson plans, teach lessons, write homework, grade homework, write tests, grade tests). Pretty much all of those things could be done by a different person, and some of them (writing homework, tests, and general frameworks for lesson plans) could be done by one person for an entire district (or multiple if their schedules were similar enough).

    126. Re:Great plan there by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      For once, I agree with someone on slashdot entirely. Wow.

      "I don't think teacher's pay is really that bad. "

      I agree. It isn't that bad. The teachers that got in 15+ years ago actually make a really good wage now. Also, living in a larger city helps. In rural areas, it is still pretty low though. The average teacher in Wisconsin is making something like 45K per year, plus another $5k contributed to their retirement/pension for them. So, $50k average. Not bad at all. The problem is, the big cities are pulling that average up. The teachers with 5 years of experience or less, in the rural areas, are making under $30k. Why go through all the trouble of teaching when you can go get a job fresh out of high-school and make just as much?

      Yeah, you can make a decent wage teaching if you stick with it for 20 years...........but is it really worth it?

      You may have heard about the political turmoil here in Wisconsin lately. The teachers are going to lose half of that pension contribution......we already have trouble attracting talent to the public sector. The tax payers are stuck on the idea that private sector workers don't have a pension and this apparently means that public sector workers shouldn't either (even though most private employers offer a retirement plan, with the majority not contributing to it). Anyway, it is just a political smoke screen. The bill is about other issues, but uses the pension issue to con the voters who won't even read the bill themselves.

    127. Re:Great plan there by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      That's bad? I'd rather we have more thugs - to help against government.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    128. Re:Great plan there by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      That's bad? I'd rather we have more thugs - to help against government.

      I'd rather have fewer thugs who help themselves against the citizenry.

  2. 8PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you fucking kidding me? Where these kids are after school hours is no business of the school, whatsoever. How about taking all the money they pissed away on this failure-to-be, and invest it in the teachers? Pay a little extra and hire people who don't suck at their jobs and maybe, just maybe, attendance won't be such an issue.

    God damn I can't wait until California falls into the ocean.

    1. Re:8PM? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      The sort of kids who are skipping school regularly enough that they need to be part of this kind of tracking program are the same sort of kids who are likely to stay out until all hours of the night cruising with their mates (or their gang) and potentially causing trouble.

      By requiring an 8pm check-in it ensures the kids are actually at home and not out causing problems.

    2. Re:8PM? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      California is also known for having a budget excess to pay for this.

    3. Re:8PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer they send those little shits to a camp where they can work, study, maybe eat, sleep, shit, and back doing it again the next morning.

      Let'em know what prison is like because that's where they're headed.

    4. Re:8PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That still doesn't make it the school's business.

      Besides which, if you're out to cause trouble, just starting after your 8pm check-in doesn't seem like much of an impediment.

    5. Re:8PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think thats the school's responsibility though. Thats the parent's responsibility to make sure the kid isn't out past 8pm, or where they are. I feel like that 8pm status check should be a voluntary one, based on the parent's request. Otherwise, its indeed out of bounds for the schools to require this.

    6. Re:8PM? by strack · · Score: 1, Funny

      headed?

    7. Re:8PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is California...

      Funny thing is that CA used to have a public education system that was an envy of the whole US.

      Now they have no interest in the basics of keeping decent teachers, but want to tell kids that they are essentially prisoners.

      No wonder the kids want to skip school. It is no wonder why kids stick in school until 16, then drop their ass out and go for a GED or high school equivalence. The only thing taught in CA schools is how to be a good little consumer.

    8. Re:8PM? by merlock18 · · Score: 1

      "Taxes arent paying for this, the school is," cries someone somewhere.
      On a lighter note, Im pretty sure this is an invasion of privacy. Even though an individual is not a full citizen responsible for their actions until they are 18, I doubt there could be any repurcussions from a publicly funded institution for not checking in at 8 p.m. Im no lawyer though.

    9. Re:8PM? by AVee · · Score: 2

      By requiring an 8pm check-in it ensures the kids are actually at home and not out causing problems.

      Wouldn't that be the parents responsibility?
      A better system would probably be to call their parents every evening and ask where their kids are.

    10. Re:8PM? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      I live next to a prison school in Baltimore. No joke. Bars on the doors, I never see any kids come in or out... I think it's a middle school, maybe an elementary school. It's across the street from me. I didn't realize it was a school until one year i saw school busses at the beginning of the school year, and then NO MORE. There's never any kids around, nobody comes in or out, but in the morning you can hear prison-yard-style bullhorns blaring the morning announcements out around the whole school.

    11. Re:8PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because kids who ditch school MUST be gangbanging and cruising around all night causing trouble...

      Back when I was in high school (93-94), I used to ditch all of the time because I wasn't learning anything and it was a waste of my time. Where was I? Sitting in front of my PC writing software and operating a BBS. After I was expelled from the high school, I was excepted into another school the following year on an accelerated curriculum, skipping one entire grade and graduating within a matter of months. My father, who was initially furious with me following my expulsion, later admitted that he had been wrong about my actions and was proud that I had finished school so early and had already gotten a real job (as a software developer) at the age of 16. One of my good friends did the exact same thing and had a similar reaction from his family when he ended up with a job making more money than his mother before he was 18.

      Our cases might not be common, but it is a definite possibility for any kids choosing to "play hooky". It's wrong to automatically label those kids as no good miscreants before you even know the reasons why they aren't going to school.

    12. Re:8PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it shows some discretion that they aren't recording a constant data stream, which would be a flagrant invasion of privacy.

      Mandatory checking at 8PM will get shot down by the courts eventually, as it is an invasion of privacy by the schools. There is no *necessary* link between gang-like behavior and truancy. That said, optional checking at 8PM could work with the approval of the parents. I'm not sure whether that helps or not; are there parents that allow their kids to be AWOL at 8PM that will somehow have a change of heart if they now know where their kids are at 8PM? My feeling is that if you don't know where your kids are at 8, you sure as hell don't have enough parental control to prevent them from gang activity, if you did know.

    13. Re:8PM? by somersault · · Score: 2

      Are you enquiring of the dictionary definition, or making a joke about fellatio in prison?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    14. Re:8PM? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I was excepted

      I was accepted. What kind of English teacher did you.. oh wait.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:8PM? by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      He probably learned that at his first high school. Seriously, having only one grammatical error in a post of that length puts him in the top 95% around here...

    16. Re:8PM? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... and if they're not home at 8PM, and (somehow, I mean what else could they be doing*) happen to not be causing problems?

      While I was hardly a chronic skipper (fairly rare), I had plenty of friends who did so far more often (because of boredom, retarded curriculum etc) - and we were a far cry from the stupid troublemakers they associate with skipping.

      * - that was sarcasm by the way.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    17. Re:8PM? by ezratrumpet · · Score: 1

      Story about a social worker who was having trouble getting a kid to get home by curfew. She talked to the drug dealer who worked the corner near the kid's home. Kid was never late for curfew after that.

    18. Re:8PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google search of define: headed

      having a heading or course in a certain direction; "westward headed wagons"

      Basically their actions lead the GP to believe that these youths will be going to jail.
      Even if English isn't your first language you should really google something if you don't know what it means. Its what I do with a foreign word I don't understand.

    19. Re:8PM? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      That would assume they have parents and not just crotchfruit farmers. Big assumption.

    20. Re:8PM? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I am always surprised by how ignorant school administrators are of the law.

    21. Re:8PM? by moortak · · Score: 1

      4 unexcused absences doesn't imply that they are in any other way problematic.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    22. Re:8PM? by mtempsch · · Score: 1

      h puts him in the top 95% around here...

      Faint praise if I ever saw it...I suspect that you mean "in the top 5%" or "above 95% of"

    23. Re:8PM? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I found it difficult to tell if it was a joke or a serious question.. too used to speaking to people who don't have a good grasp of English idioms I suppose.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    24. Re:8PM? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      By requiring an 8pm check-in it ensures the kids are actually at home and not out causing problems.

      Speaking as a parent, it's not of the school systems's business where my children are at 8pm. If they're out causing problems at 8pm, that's a law enforcement issue, not a school one.

      Schools, sadly, do a horrible job of respecting the boundaries of their own authority, preferring instead to involve themselves in countless other things which are not their core mission -- educating children.

    25. Re:8PM? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A better system would probably be to call their parents every evening and ask where their kids are.

      No, it wouldn't. This parent would respond "It's 8pm in the evening, not during school hours, and it's none of your business where my children are."

    26. Re:8PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the political left for you, as that is the political element that controls California.

      Educate a kid so he actually knows something? Nah. Teach him political correctness and that capitalism is evil. What they are doing to the school system is exactly what they will do to the entire country if they ever come to control this country. You don't want any individual freedom? Vote far left every time.

    27. Re:8PM? by zoefff · · Score: 1

      Don't need to call. We can have an app for that....

    28. Re:8PM? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That is touching on the problem. Who is really the parent. As it stands now, a large portion of the minor population spends more waking hours under the care of the state than they do their biological "parents". By a wide margin they spend more time under the care of the state than they do an individual "parent". It is now common for students to be supplied breakfast and lunch by the state. Many places are pushing to have dinners supplied by the state as well. There is a constant push to expand these programs. Even when the child is under the care of the biological "parent", the "parent" is being pressured to follow the directions of the school.

      So, good or bad, who is really the child's parent? I believe we now live in an orphanage nation where most biological parents only get visitation rights.

    29. Re:8PM? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Then after getting involved, they complain about being involved, and how that involvement means they do not get enough money.

  3. Conditioning by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All this will do is to condition these children to accept invasive tracking and surveillance. This is not a question of children's rights, it is a question of what those children will think is normal or acceptable in a decade, when they are adults.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Conditioning by tophermeyer · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...so it's not a bug, it's a feature?

    2. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's face reality. This kid is either going to be in jail or forced by the courts to wear a tracking device for most of his life. He might as well get used to it. At least this one won't be bolted to his ankle unlike the ones he will wear in his 20s. Start early and easy on him. Educate him that this is his future.

    3. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or teach them from an early age the need and the how to evade Big Brother.

    4. Re:Conditioning by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're joking right? Those students who do this are already truants. They have little interest in actually responding properly to authority and I'd be absolutely and utterly shocked if, in a decade when they're adults, if they have any more respect for the laws of society.

      I am not saying it's not an invasion of privacy, it is, but those outfitted with these tracking devices aren't exactly the types you're making them out to be.

    5. Re:Conditioning by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Kids are supposed to be tracked, some times invasively. It's called parenting. Freedom and privacy should be earned through good behavior.

      I don't support using devices like this, but if the parents can't keep the kids in check it makes sense to work something out.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    6. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Authority. Whose authority? In the United States, we the people are the ultimate authority. The government works for us and does our bidding. A lot of people (police, judges, and citizenry) seem to forget that.

    7. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Double plus good.

    8. Re:Conditioning by linuxwolf69 · · Score: 1

      And it's stereotypical attitudes like this that cause kids to believe that's their fate in life and live up to it. I believe the mantra "whether you say you can, or you say you can't, you are right." That's why I require of my kids to do their best in everything they do. I expect perfection out of myself. That being said, as another poster mentioned, it's VERY easy to get 4 UNexcused absences. My daughter had 8 in the first half of the year, and she's a straight A student. An absence is only considered "excused" if there is a doctor's note, and only for the time of the appointment, or otherwise specified by the doctor's note. Which means my daughter has only had 3 excused absences out of 12 so far this year. We don't go to the doctor anytime we have a cold. We try not to go to the doctor at all. That means anytime my kids throw up or have a fever, they stay home and in bed. These are UNexcused absences because they didn't go to a doctor. Maybe it's a bit more lenient in CA, but I would suspect that they would be "asking" my daughter to carry one of these. I might be inclined to "borrow" it from her and activate it at 8PM at the school, or at a bar, or somewhere nefarious while my daughter is at home.

    9. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you know, Slashdot's favorite tale -- the child who was beat up on by school bullies -- is a typical truant, often to the complete unawareness of his parent. So is the less common, but still frequent, tale: the child who received no parenting whatsoever and was left to his own vices for the entire school year (with a trainwreck at home, in many cases).

      Careless attitude towards authority in teenagers is usually just misperceived depression. Get a clue -- they are in a prison 8 hours of every day. Lack of [imaginary] control is the worst suffering you can inflict on a person.

    10. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon already offers a program for this in which you can put boundaries on your kids cell phone for specific times (i.e. school) and Verizon will send you a text message alerting you that they have left those prescribed boundaries, you can then log onto Verizons website to see where they are. California has no right to implement this sort of program themselves and it should be left entirely to the parents to raise their children the way they see fit.

    11. Re:Conditioning by lowtekk · · Score: 2

      This fits well with the boiling a frog metaphor. Indoctrination not only has to occur at an early age, but it has to be implemented incrementally across generations. By the way, where are all the hippie protesters fighting the 'man'? Now they are the 'man' and they don't like kids doing things they did when they were that age. I guess civil liberties aren't as important as they once though.

    12. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So after four unexcused absences they're already hardened anarchistic state smashers to be abandoned into the wilds of Numerica?

    13. Re:Conditioning by BigT · · Score: 2

      Yeah, how's that working out for ya?

      --
      Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
    14. Re:Conditioning by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      An absence is only considered "excused" if there is a doctor's note, and only for the time of the appointment, or otherwise specified by the doctor's note.

      That's ridiculous. Around here a kid just needs a note from their parent/guardian, unless they're continually out sick.

      Given the lack of access to health care, that's just what we need, parents without health insurance taking their kids to the ER for sick-but-not-serious illness just to get a doctors note. "Yes, doctor, he's vomiting but not life threatening or anything, and has a mild fever but not enough to require medication or anything. I was just going to give him some fluids and have him rest, but I need you to sign this note..."

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    15. Re:Conditioning by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      Authority. Whose authority? In the United States, we the people are the ultimate authority. The government works for us and does our bidding. A lot of people (police, judges, and citizenry) seem to forget that.

      And clearly that means that kids can cut schools and no one can tell them otherwise! After all, they are the ultimate authority! While we are at it, what's with the government telling me to pay taxes or drive 55mph anyway? Don't they know that citizens and drivers are the ultimate authority, not the government?

      Sorry Virginia, but there are all sorts of requirements that The People, exercising their authority collectively, impose on themselves; e.g. compulsory education, driving the speed limit and paying taxes. Popular sovereignty is not the same as anarchism and compliance with democratically-ratified laws (within some bounds, naturally) is not the same as tyranny.

    16. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one question:

      Why does skipping school equals disrespect for authority?

      I've skipped school all the time. Lack of interest. It didn't stop me from getting A grades, nor was it about authority. Those days I just didn't want to go. Does that make me a truant? Perhaps.

      Anti-social? Unlawful? Criminal? That's pushing it.

    17. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not about the truants... As their peers see that this is an accepted standard as they grow up, when more draconian step take it a bit further down the timeline, it is merely hand-waived as "we had that when I was younger and I turned out alright".

      This whole scenario takes failing in education to a new low!

    18. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I skipped over 40 days in eleventh grade and over 30 days in twelfth grade. Graduated in the top ten with honors, received a scholarship from the high school due to extensive volunteer work, finished a semester of college courses before high school graduation. I pissed off most of the other students in the gifted class because I didn't need to show up to get an A. Administration hated me for showing them how I taught myself better than any of the teachers there. Truant != Evil. (For that matter, Criminal != Evil) Has anyone told you that generalization is a logical fallacy?

    19. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 "unexcused absences" from public school is a Lack of Respect for the Laws Of Society? really?

      really?

    20. Re:Conditioning by doubleplusungodly · · Score: 1

      Authority. Whose authority? In the United States, we the people are the ultimate authority. The government works for us and does our bidding. A lot of people (police, judges, and citizenry) seem to forget that.

      We the people? Don't you mean they the big corporations?

      --
      ---
    21. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're joking right? Those students who do this are already truants. They have little interest in actually responding properly to authority and I'd be absolutely and utterly shocked if, in a decade when they're adults, if they have any more respect for the laws of society.

      I am not saying it's not an invasion of privacy, it is, but those outfitted with these tracking devices aren't exactly the types you're making them out to be.

      So you know that much about these kids based on four unexcused absences? Maybe you never skipped a class in your life, but I personally did quite well in junior/senior high, despite missing a fair few more than four classes a year.

    22. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry Virginia, but there are all sorts of requirements that The People, exercising their authority collectively, impose on themselves; e.g. compulsory education, driving the speed limit and paying taxes.

      True enough, but there are even more requirements that a minority of capitalists and "representatives" impose upon the citizenry without even consulting them. That's what I'm talking about. Was the Patriot Act passed by a common vote? How about hauling people accused of "terrorism" before secret courts? How about torture? Did "we the people" give consent to any of that? I sure as hell didn't. I wasn't even asked. So don't hand me this "compliance with democratically-ratified laws" because a lot of it isn't so.

      I'll be happy to obey the laws, as long as I have a hand in saying what the laws are (through voting or whatever). Otherwise, I don't feel compelled to obey them. (See seatbelt laws, drug prohibition, infinite copyright extension, etc.)

    23. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man, Slashdot's user base is getting old.

    24. Re:Conditioning by faedle · · Score: 2

      I actually grew up in Anaheim. And I often ditched class. If I was a kid today in Anaheim, I'd probably have one of these devices.

      Funny. I'm a fully functional member of society, making a good wage and don't have so much as a traffic ticket on my record.

      This has more to do with revenue, I'd gather. I understand that in California school districts get so much money for each student that's in class each day. Kid doesn't come to school, school doesn't get paid.

    25. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the interest of full disclosure, I was found guilty of 3 counts of truancy for missing 96 days of school in Pennsylvania at the age of 16 (I eventually was successful in emancipating myself and joining the Army, but that's another story.)

      As something that hits close to home for me personally, I'd say that I understand what they're trying to do here, but it's not going to work. Too many times when people are attempting to resolve the problems of truancy they look at the kid missing school as the problem without bothering to figure out the why.

      For me, I had chronic insomnia and some other issues at home, which makes me think that if this had happened to me I would either disregard the "check-in" completely or rebel against that, too - because that's what knucklehead kids do.

    26. Re:Conditioning by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      They have little interest in actually responding properly to authority and I'd be absolutely and utterly shocked if, in a decade when they're adults, if they have any more respect for the laws of society.

      Whoa, dude! What are you, a crystal ball reader? If you're not, then you have ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE what the future holds for these students.. You seem to think they have a 'bad attitude'. What if they're just bored? What if their teachers are clueless assholes who have no competence either at teaching in general or in the subject they're teaching? What if they're getting bullied and no-one is intervening? What if these kids are getting a more comprehensive and useful education outside of school?

      This GPS thing is the beginning of a slippery slope. If the practice remains unchallenged, it may not be long before our children are wearing ankle monitors, as some criminals are required to wear. If you think this isn't the logical outome here, have a look at history, and read '1984' again while you're at it. Orwell's timeline was a few decades off, but his predictions were pretty much on target.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    27. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids do dumb things. They rebel, disrespect authority, and hopefully learn from their experiences. Heck, when I was a kid I skipped class. Nowadays I work at a tech job that allows me to read slashdot while at work. I consider myself to have respect for the laws of society.

      This is why the court system tries kids as minors and sends them to JV instead of prison. Skipping class in junior high hardly guarantees a life of criminal activity and dismissing them as such only increases the chances they do end up in the overcrowded prison system.

    28. Re:Conditioning by stephathome · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous. I'm in California, and parents saying their kids are sick are an excused absence at every school I've dealt with so far. Sorry to hear you're dealing with a school with such an insane policy.

      That said, at our current school she'd be in trouble anyhow. The school we're at right now, you get up to 10 excused absences, then they say they will require a meeting between the parents of the student, school officials and the sheriff's office. Yes, on excused absences, and they start this in kindergarten. They start warning of it at 4 excused absences. That part strikes me as really ridiculous, as kindergarten isn't even legally required in California. It's quite easy for a kindergartener to rack up more than 10 sick days, with all the bugs they pass around that young. We're supposed to keep a child home for 24 hours after the end of any fever, which means sick kids often need to be out two or more days.

      I really cheered up a kindergarten mom who was starting to get harassed by them as her son had been out more than 4 days. Knowing that he didn't legally have to attend helped her realize that she might not have to put up with it. I don't know if the rules change once you put your kid in kindergarten, though.

      That said, when my 2nd grader hit 10 absences last year they let us off with a note saying they could have done that to us, didn't actually do that. So I hope they're sane about it and only use it for when they think there's a problem.

      I've been talking to my now 3rd grader (homeschooled now) about this discussion, as she's going back to public school next year, reluctantly. They're starting a new charter school and we're giving it a one year shot. I told her that if things ever get so bad with school that she needs to start skipping, let me know so we can go over her options and get her out of that situation. It's a bit tough - I'm enjoying homeschooling, my husband disapproves but agreed to let us try one year, but if it's homeschool or burn one of my kids out on school, I know what I'm doing.

    29. Re:Conditioning by geekoid · · Score: 1

      IT's a fit punishment for kids that don't have a reason for skipping school.

      If you don't mind if your kid skips school, just write a fucking note so the absence is excused. That's what my mom did so I could go surfing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    30. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom and privacy should be earned through good behavior.

      I hope you don't have kids, for your sake and possibly theirs. Freedom and privacy are basic human rights.

      Treating kids like animals just makes them behave as animals, as witnessed by any amount of "well-behaved" brats I've had to suffer in my (thankfully short) teaching career.

      Interestingly enough, when I began treating them as persons, they stopped behaving like vicious and depressed trained monkeys in a cage.

    31. Re:Conditioning by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      True enough, but there are even more requirements that a minority of capitalists and "representatives" impose upon the citizenry without even consulting them. That's what I'm talking about. Was the Patriot Act passed by a common vote?

      It was passed by an overwhelming majority. Granted, my Rep and 1 of my Senators both voted against the Patriot Act. Nevertheless, I accept that a majority of Representatives and Senators did vote in favor and I respect the contrary judgment of the rest of the populace (they are wrong, but they have the right to be wrong).

      My question to you is this: if you are unwilling to accept such contrary judgment when things go against you, what right could you claim to bind others when things go your way? I mean, can't everyone just exempt themselves from any law by this claim, or does it only apply to laws that you don't like?

      I'll be happy to obey the laws, as long as I have a hand in saying what the laws are (through voting or whatever). Otherwise, I don't feel compelled to obey them. (See seatbelt laws, drug prohibition, infinite copyright extension, etc.)

      First, I'm not aware that any of these laws were passed without my Rep/Sen being qualified to vote. I don't approve of drug prohibition but I also don't claim that I have any right to unilaterally veto laws that I don't like any more than my boss has the right not to pay me minimum wage because he disagrees. If I want others to abide laws that they don't like, it would be hypocritical for me not to abide laws that I don't like.

      Second, the nice thing about law is that even if you don't feel internally compelled, you will be externally compelled. It would be rather foolish to pass a law saying "don't rape people unless you don't feel compelled to obey this law" or "pay minimum wage unless you don't want to".

    32. Re:Conditioning by spleendamage · · Score: 1

      All this will do is to condition these children to accept invasive tracking and surveillance. This is not a question of children's rights, it is a question of what those children will think is normal or acceptable in a decade, when they are adults.

      So then, it seems to me like it's the students who attend school every day that should have the GPS devices. I mean, they're the ones we're all concerned about being fully indoctrinated in government mandated group think anyway. They'll go along with it if it means a better chance to get into college, be accepted by their peers, win approval from their parents. Why waste the time on the ditchers who just aren't buying in anyway?

    33. Re:Conditioning by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      All this will do is to condition these children to accept invasive tracking and surveillance. This is not a question of children's rights, it is a question of what those children will think is normal or acceptable in a decade, when they are adults.

      Let me get this straight... children who regularly flout authority and decide to do what they want to do instead being given a device that is supposed to make them accountable for their whereabouts (in the same way that some prisons track day leave and parole) are going to start accepting invasive tracking and surveillance??? It sure works for ex-cons, doesn't it?

      When I read the title of this article, I thought: "Great idea! The schools have got permission to track student's cell phones during school hours!" To me, this would have been within the remit of the schools, and as a kid these days isn't going to skip without their phone, the schools (and parents, as the data would automatically be shared with parents) would know exactly what the kids were up to. They could even go so far as to get all SMS and phone records for activities during a school day.

      Instead, they issue a device that makes the kids feel like they're on parole, and are already part of the prison system -- except that they can "lose" the device, or break it, or give it to a friend, or....

      This is definitely a solution chasing after the wrong problem.

    34. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, some of the most prolific skippers in highschool were the smartest students. They were just bored out of their minds and sick of following asinine rules -- it was simply better for them to be in the classroom less.

      I should note that many of these students have gone on to excel in university, get advanced degrees, and be productive members of society. Many of their peers who "stuck it out" every school day have been less impressive.

      You're right about them not having had interest in authority, but that was the false authority of, quite often, unreasonable parties. Are you suggesting that everyone should just accept who's in charge and adhere to their demands solely because they are in an authority position? Have you taken a look at the imbeciles that comprise most governments? If there's any hope for humanity, it lies in those who recognise their leader's weaknesses, not in the ones who blindly obey.

    35. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but that is a truly ignorant perspective. When I was a kid I got into fights, skipped school, did drugs, got arrested and dropped out by the time I was a sophomore.

      When I turned 20 it became painfully clear that I had done nothing but hurt myself and that an education was important. I utilized public service programs and got myself back in school. I graduated with a high school diploma and went on through community college. That was 12 years ago. I now own a successful web development and graphic design studio. If anything, I learned how to survive and become more self sufficient though my truant youth than anything.

      Now, I count myself as pretty lucky cause I figured it out early. But many of my deviant friends from the day took a while and are just now starting to realize they should have listened as kids. The fact of the matter is that all of us were treated like dirt by authority. The more authority demanded we conform, the harder we resisted - nobody ever tried to listen to us or treat us like kids who were caught up in a system that truly didn't work for us.

      The point is, kids are KIDS. This kind of big brother attitude is what will drive them to be deviant - not the other way around. We're supposed to be TEACHING them how to survive and become successful members of society. A large number of us learn through mistakes, adversity makes us smarter and stronger people, but treating kids like criminals for being kids is way over the line. From my own personal experience I can say without doubt that an iron fist does nothing to truant children but push them even farther into truancy.

      I wasn't given taught reasonable consequences for my actions as a youth, I was treated like dirt, like an idiot by authority figures and made to feel like I wasn't worth it by my teachers. Kids who are fighting the system need real help in keeping them on the right track - my teachers weren't teachers so much as wardens. This kind of program will do one of two things, it will teach them this kind of surveillance is acceptable and train them to be the next stick-up-their-ass adults who treat kids like dirt, or it will force them farther down the wrong track and many of them won't be as capable in reversing it as I was. Keeping track of attendance records and providing other, more reasonable consequences for their actions is appropriate, but this big brother attitude and branding is absolutely not alright. Teachers need to remember that we all have individual struggles which require individual guidance. Fact: a one-punishment-fits-all approach doesn't exist.

      If this was 16 years ago and I was one of these kids, I'd be smashing their little toy on the pavement while holding my middle finger up high for all administrators to see. If I had teacher's who were actually interested in helping me, rather than punishing me and treating me like a fuck-up, perhaps I would have gone on to get a much higher level education (although, curiously enough, I've done pretty well for myself considering so I'm not sure I regret my particular path), many of my childhood friends would certainly be better off.

      Not that the parent of this thread does or does not fall into this category, but those of you who didn't grow up with broken homes might want to think about the fact that you have absolutely no idea what these kids are going through or how to help them before you make judgments about what the right punishment is for poor scholastic performance, attendance, attitude, whatever. They are real hard case kids, requiring caring and understanding of their problems. They need people to try harder to reach them because obviously the system is failing them (not the other way around).

    36. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not perfect, but that is to be expected. At least we know it is still the best system implemented so far.

      So, what are you doing to improve it? Oh, excuse me - I see you are playing armchair quarterback whilst complaining about it online, like all the other sheep.

      How's that working out for you?

    37. Re:Conditioning by Ghengis+Khak · · Score: 1

      This GPS thing is the beginning of a slippery slope. If the practice remains unchallenged, it may not be long before our children are wearing ankle monitors, as some criminals are required to wear. If you think this isn't the logical outome here, have a look at history, and read '1984' again while you're at it. Orwell's timeline was a few decades off, but his predictions were pretty much on target.

      I agree with the rest of your comment, except that it isn't the beginning of the slope.

    38. Re:Conditioning by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Okay, I can go with that. So long as you change the rules to allow schools to summarily fail students who miss too much work and can't demonstrate on homework, test and projects that they have learned what they are supposed to from the classes. You'll also need to convince politicians to start ignoring dropout rates and test scores. The real problem is that teens aren't adults. Their brains aren't done cooking yet and they can't make decisions on what is good for them in the long-term. For many of them, skipping geometry and going out under the bridge to smoke pot instead makes perfect sense. In two years when they really want to be an engineer but can't figure out how to keep a popsickle stick bridge from falling down, they will probably regret their decision. Until then, schools sometimes have the unenviable task of forcing kids to go to class for their own good. And since most of society recognizes this, they hold schools responsible for doing it.

    39. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, I'm not aware that any of these laws were passed without my Rep/Sen being qualified to vote. I don't approve of drug prohibition but I also don't claim that I have any right to unilaterally veto laws that I don't like any more than my boss has the right not to pay me minimum wage because he disagrees. If I want others to abide laws that they don't like, it would be hypocritical for me not to abide laws that I don't like.

      Yeah, right. I suppose that slavery was okay as long as it was legal. Same goes for the Inquisition. Same goes for the King allowing his men to rape peasant women. Point being, any government is illegitimate without the consent of the governed. Just because "some process" is formally being followed, doesn't mean it is legitimate. I'm not talking about disobeying laws I don't like. I'm talking about a minority of individuals passing laws willy-nilly without consulting the people who are supposed to obey them. The basic function of the government should be to protect the border, and maintain the status quo, not to continually invent laws without the imprimatur of the people.

      Second, the nice thing about law is that even if you don't feel internally compelled, you will be externally compelled.

      Hardly. There are several ways to avoid compulsion. In this particular case (to get back on topic) I pulled my children from public schools and educate them at home. No truancy.

    40. Re:Conditioning by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Freedom and privacy should be earned through good behavior.

      I hope you don't have kids, for your sake and possibly theirs. Freedom and privacy are basic human rights.

      Treating kids like animals just makes them behave as animals, as witnessed by any amount of "well-behaved" brats I've had to suffer in my (thankfully short) teaching career.

      Interestingly enough, when I began treating them as persons, they stopped behaving like vicious and depressed trained monkeys in a cage.

      You can't help but marvel at the wonders of the Internet when people think they can judge your character by a single misinterpreted sentence.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    41. Re:Conditioning by sjames · · Score: 1

      They have 4 whole unexcused absences. Plenty of students get that many even with the full knowledge and approval of their parents for such nefarious purposes as not canceling the family vacation scheduled a year in advance because the school decided to make up a snow day. I got one of those because I chose to spend the day in the park observing a solar eclipse through a telescope with my science teacher and classmates (god forbid I should miss the third review of diagramming sentences!)

      We're not necessarily talking about what would be considered juvenile delinquents here.

    42. Re:Conditioning by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You're joking right? Those students who do this are already truants. They have little interest in actually responding properly to authority and I'd be absolutely and utterly shocked if, in a decade when they're adults, if they have any more respect for the laws of society.

      Yes, because kids who are bored at school will naturally become thiefs, rapiststs, and murderers. Truancy is a gateway drug!

      Please. I think my grade 9 year was the last time I bothered going to classes on anything approaching a regular basis. In my final year I had just under 300 unexcused absences. For my computer class that year, I missed every single lesson; I only showed up to hand in projects, and write the tests and the exam, and still managed to get a 97% (A+) average for the course. By your reasoning, I should be a serial killer by now.

    43. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're joking right? Those students who do this are already truants. They have little interest in actually responding properly to authority and I'd be absolutely and utterly shocked if, in a decade when they're adults, if they have any more respect for the laws of society.

      I am not saying it's not an invasion of privacy, it is, but those outfitted with these tracking devices aren't exactly the types you're making them out to be.

      I missed a ton of school when I was younger. I almost got held back due to missing school. My reasons for not going are my own but that has nothing to do with the way I act now as an adult. During my childhood I learned and grew as a person, as most people do. To say that a truant child will not respect laws of society as an adult is very wrong if you ask me. Not only was I truant, I was also labeled as a "problem child". So this means you must believe I have a criminal record. I do not and I abide most laws set forth by the government. So sorry I have a few speeding tickets. Other than that I pay my taxes, work full time, as well as donate my time and money to helping others and animals. Did you see that in my future when you heard I was a truant problem child? I think it is extremely unfair to judge a child. Children make mistakes they grow and learn. You cannot slap a label on a child’s future purely based on their current actions. They learn as they grow.

    44. Re:Conditioning by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about a minority of individuals passing laws willy-nilly without consulting the people who are supposed to obey them. The basic function of the government should be to protect the border, and maintain the status quo, not to continually invent laws without the imprimatur of the people.

      Last I checked, the guy with the most vote wins (with one exception per 100 years). So the imprimatur of the people seems to be functioning perfectly well, except for the point that you don't like what they approved.

      The basic function of the government should be to protect the border, and maintain the status quo, not to continually invent laws without the imprimatur of the people.

      And if The People were to vote for representatives that overwhelmingly approve particular laws, what gives you the right to veto their judgment on this topic (not that you have to accept it as correct, only as their judgment)?

      Last I checked, the topic suitable for government functions is itself a matter commended to The People and their representatives (or, in case of a drastic change requiring amendment, to some more stringent procedure that still ultimately rests with The People).

      Hardly. There are several ways to avoid compulsion. In this particular case (to get back on topic) I pulled my children from public schools and educate them at home. No truancy.

      YMMV, but home schoolers in many States still have to attend the same number of hours of instruction that the public schools. See, e.g. http://www.hslda.org/laws/analysis/New_York.pdf requiring "the substantial equivalent of 900 hours yearly" plus standardized tests. Obviously laws vary by State.

      PS. Good on you (seriously) for educating your children though.

    45. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have to be joking with me ...

      kids that skip classes don't have respect for society laws!?!?!?!? you gotta be joking with me .... I've skipped classes like 10 . 000 times, and i do respect laws of society, and i'm a very good professional...

      Now if i skipped school and someone gave me a GPS to track me down ... ahahaha, yes.... i would never do it, i could go like "damn... i broke it :( i'm sry"

    46. Re:Conditioning by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      I understand that in California school districts get so much money for each student that's in class each day. Kid doesn't come to school, school doesn't get paid.

      Bingo.

    47. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh fuck you. I'm a PhD student now and in highschool, I cut class at least twice a week.

      I don't want to pull the sheeple card, but people are truants for a variety of reasons. Otherwise respectful kids who are just bored out of their fucking skulls in slow-moving classes that serve mostly as holding pens for teenage mayhem, who are white and middle-class like me, get out of having negative consequences hit them through sheer privilege alone. Kids who are disadvantaged in some way, often, get punished in ways that make it more difficult for them to get ahead, and which make them feel like school is the enemy. And *that* is the tragedy in this. Learning should be a choice we all gladly make; it should NOT be something we need to slog through, and then stop.

      Cutting class or not is not indicative of whether you are a model citizen. You're naive for thinking so, frankly.

    48. Re:Conditioning by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Bingo! That is what the CA schools are all about. Public school is big business.

    49. Re:Conditioning by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      This kid is either going to be in jail or forced by the courts to wear a tracking device for most of his life.

      I see that you can peer into the future. Impressive! Shall we imprison every individual who looks like they might be a future murderer? If he does, then that is his choice. No need for a nanny state.

      He might as well get used to it.

      Because getting people used to their rights being violated is a good thing, right?

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    50. Re:Conditioning by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      It's not working out at all. The people aren't controlling the government. Corporations and power hungry politicians are. Rarely do people get a real say.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    51. Re:Conditioning by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      They have little interest in actually responding properly to authority

      How do you 'properly' respond to an authority figure? With absolute obedience? I'm not saying you should be unreasonable, but their situations are unknown.

      in a decade when they're adults, if they have any more respect for the laws of society.

      Well, we don't know that yet. So, there's really no need to attempt to predict future events and punish people based on said predictions. That's a bad idea.

      but those outfitted with these tracking devices aren't exactly the types you're making them out to be.

      I don't care what 'types' they are. An invasion of privacy is an invasion of privacy.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    52. Re:Conditioning by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      they are wrong, but they have the right to be wrong

      But they don't have the right for their wrong, unconstitutional ideas to be put into action. It's amazing what rights can be stripped away by taking advantage of fear.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    53. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're joking right? Those students who do this are already truants. They have little interest in actually responding properly to authority and I'd be absolutely and utterly shocked if, in a decade when they're adults, if they have any more respect for the laws of society.

      I am not saying it's not an invasion of privacy, it is, but those outfitted with these tracking devices aren't exactly the types you're making them out to be.

      And what about the other children who observe their peers being subjected to such tracking? What will they think is normal?

    54. Re:Conditioning by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

      I would say that the scarier part of this, is that adults think that this is something normal and acceptable now.

    55. Re:Conditioning by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you didn't completely submit to authority. Shame on you, terrorist!

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    56. Re:Conditioning by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      What's next? Send them to boot camp, and make them to labour for free. Free labour = profit. We can expand the program to criminals as well, they might as well be a benefit to society. Those anti-war folks make the government look bad, send them there too. The opposition party are always spreading lies about our party, those libelous bastards, send them to the labour camps too.

    57. Re:Conditioning by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      It's called parenting.

      Indoctrination and shutting them in bubbles isn't parenting. Especially worrying over nothing.

      Freedom and privacy should be earned through good behavior.

      Sorry, but no. I'd rather not have some person revoking my freedom and privacy just because they believe that their subjective idea about "good behavior" isn't being followed. You weren't absolutely obedient to authority in every single way? You didn't listen to every nonsensical law in existence? You questioned an authority figure? You skipped school a few times to get away from the terrible 'educational' system? No freedom or privacy for you, criminal!

      but if the parents can't keep the kids in check it makes sense to work something out.

      Not a nanny state. That's for sure. Also, treating children as potential criminals merely because they skipped classes to get away from the terrible 'educational' system is absolutely illogical.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    58. Re:Conditioning by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      A lot of people have the thinking that the "trouble makers" are different types of people. Those criminals are different types of people. We have to protect themselves from them! But the only difference between us and them is poor upbringing and parenting. We could have easily been them, if we were born under different circumstances. It would be much better to treat the root cause rather than the symptom. It would probably be better to try to help them deal with their issues first, before sending them to jail as a last resort.

    59. Re:Conditioning by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Their brains aren't done cooking yet and they can't make decisions on what is good for them in the long-term.

      What a stereotypical statement. Their brains may not be fully developed yet, but that doesn't make all of them (or even most) incapable of making intelligent decisions that have long term benefits. Assess the individual, not the group they are in.

      For many of them, skipping geometry and going out under the bridge to smoke pot instead makes perfect sense.

      The lack of choice in the 'educational' system probably has something to do with this. Sorry, but what? You desire to work in a profession that doesn't require knowledge about chemistry, biology, geometry, or most of the other pointless subjects that we force upon you? Too bad! You'll take them all anyway, even though forcing you to take it will increase the rate of failures, give you less time to learn about important subjects, and make the 'educational' system even less appealing! I mean, sure, you'll forget everything that you didn't use so quickly that if you wish to change your profession later on, you'll end up relearning it, anyway (making the original education a complete waste of time). However, you will still be forced to take all of these subjects. Why? Because we said so!

      Until then, schools sometimes have the unenviable task of forcing kids to go to class for their own good.

      Not when it violates their freedoms. Also, skipping classes a few times does not mean that you're an idiot, will end up a criminal, or any other such nonsense. They are dealing with a non-problem and escalating the situation to unbelievable levels.

      This just sends the message that it is okay for your rights to be violated if you break some pointless, arbitrary rule, even when there is no basis for it. You questioned an authority figure? You skipped classes a few times to get away from the terrible 'educational' system? No more privacy for you!

      And since most of society recognizes this

      Even if "most of society" believed that, that wouldn't make it true.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    60. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have never had to endure the American education system. It's more of a prison than an institution of learning. A place where intelligent students are mocked, harassed, and generally made to feel like non-conformist social outcast. I can't fault the students for not wanting to attend. Odds are that a student would learn more spending all day sitting a library reading books than going to school.

    61. Re:Conditioning by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      I had about 50% absence in 5th grade.... Why?

      Because being at the school was a living hell due to the harassment issues....

      Fuck, I'm still in therapy and I'm twenty-fecking-seven....

      Judging someone solely on not showing up to school is asinine. I'd rather the school actually pay attention to what goes on before gps-tracking is thought to fix anything... Personally I do not think any amount of technology will fix the issue of some kids skipping school...

      Meh to it all

      (Oh, and I have a job building control systems for the oil biz these days. Cant say I'm damaged all that much by being away from school that much... :p)

    62. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if The People were to vote for representatives that overwhelmingly approve particular laws, what gives you the right to veto their judgment on this topic (not that you have to accept it as correct, only as their judgment)?

      The same thing that gave the founding fathers of the U.S. the right to veto the judgment of of the British Crown. They just did it. They felt they were being wronged and that their voice didn't matter. In other words, they felt like they were not being represented. A lot like I feel, actually.

      I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. But, thanks for civil. Much appreciated.

    63. Re:Conditioning by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you didn't completely submit to authority. Shame on you, terrorist!

      I have no problem with authority - I was in the cadet program starting in my early teens and I joined the army reserves before I finished highschool - but authority needs to have a purpose and a reason, and they need to be ones that make sense to the individual. Authority for the sake of authority is just a dictatorship. Blind obedience to unreasonable authority is one of the greatest failings of our species.

    64. Re:Conditioning by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Freedom and privacy should be earned through good behavior.

      From the parents' perspective, yes; but schools have no place deciding how much freedom or privacy students have, least of all after school hours, away from school property. This GPS tracking crosses the line rather blatantly, but requiring an 8pm check-in is even more ridiculously invasive. My wife and I are the only two people who have a reason to know where our daughter is at 8pm.

      if the parents can't keep the kids in check it makes sense to work something out.

      There be dragons! It is an extremely bad, dangerous idea to allow schools to take over any aspect of parenting; schools should teach the curriculum, nothing else. It is not the school's place to decide a parent isn't "keeping the kids in check" well enough for the school's taste.

      When my daughter goes to school, I intend to see to it that the school does not overstep its bounds. I don't care whether the school thinks I'm too lax; it's not their business how I raise my child. I certainly don't intend to simply let her run amok with no discipline, but it will be my discipline, not that of some uncaring school official. If circumstances dictate that she must be tracked, I will do the tracking as I see fit, not the school.

    65. Re:Conditioning by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      The problem is, it isn't the school's responsibility to get kids to school, it's the parents' responsibility. Think of this from the kid's perspective. If your teachers don't trust you, you have no reason to trust them, right? And if you don't trust them, why would you want to listen to what they try to teach, or do as they say?

      Schools should not be forcing kids to do anything at all. If the school is concerned that a student's absences are impeding his learning, or provide any other concern, they should go through the kid's parents. If a student is behaving disruptively, then nothing the school can do will improve the situation; that must be resolved by the kid's parents. No good can come of allowing schools to do more than simply teach the students.

      Kids may not be fully developed, but they're far more intelligent and perceptive than you give them credit for. They are, in fact, capable of making good long-term decisions, if their parents teach them how to do it. They are, in fact, capable of understanding why they should attend school and put some effort into it, if their parents teach them why. They are, in fact, capable of understanding why they should behave respectfully to their fellow students and to teachers, if their parents teach them why. These are not problems resolvable by GPS tracking devices or detention, they must be resolved by good parenting.

      Parents who want schools to do their parenting for them are causing far more trouble than anything else. Parents who do not accept responsibility for their child's behavior -- by attempting to force schools to take on that responsibility -- are giving that child a very poor message: "we don't love you enough to take care of you." I'm sure I don't have to explain why that would tend to worsen a child's behavior, rather than improve it -- and as I already pointed out, good parenting is the solution, not draconian school-instituted punishments.

    66. Re:Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That complaint works against most examples of federal law, but not state-governed schools. If anything, our public schools are terrible precisely because the people have far too much influence over them.

    67. Re:Conditioning by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      It was meant to be a complaint against the government in general.

      If anything, our public schools are terrible precisely because the people have far too much influence over them.

      I guess I'll have to agree here. Giving too much power to either the government or the people would only result in the situation getting worse. There are some things that the people shouldn't really control, and given their ignorant attitudes on what qualifies as a good education (purely rote memorization, mandatory classes that are useless to most people, and belittlement of people who so much as question the school's authority), they probably shouldn't be in control of it. Of course, I'm not so sure the government would do any better...

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    68. Re:Conditioning by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      You learn a lot about yourself when smoking pot in the school toilet, let me tell you. OTOH, not all of us science types like geometry. There is more to science than math, you idiots!
      Anyway, my math teacher didn't give a fuck about attendance, or what exactly you are doing in the classroom (short of fucking your classmates or lighting up a joint), as long as, when you do work, you do work. And get graded accordingly. My only year that I liked math classes, though I didn't attend them all.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  4. Training for the future by ATMAvatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This, like so many other school programs, is an egregious violation of the students' rights. Yet, we allow it under the all to used "think of the children" guise. What it really results in is a bunch of people who are trained from childhood that violating their rights is OK if the right circumstances present themselves.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:Training for the future by theY4Kman · · Score: 2

      You say this as if it wasn't their intention.

    2. Re:Training for the future by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 0

      Blame stupidity -- I doubt that the people who devised this program would object to having their own movements tracked by GPS, and so they never considered how this program would impact the students' future perception of their rights.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."
      -- Justice Abe Fortas, in Tinker v. Des Moines, 1969.92

      But, apparently, they do shed their right to privacy.

    4. Re:Training for the future by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      This, like so many other school programs, is an egregious violation of the students' rights.

      Not so. Most parents would happily sign a release if it meant not having to go through truancy charges.

    5. Re:Training for the future by __aaxtnf2500 · · Score: 1

      What right to privacy?
      That which is not in the constitution can be removed without amendment.

    6. Re:Training for the future by Eevee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From the fine article

      Students and their parents volunteer for the monitoring as a way to avoid continuation school or prosecution with a potential stay in juvenile hall.

      So this is to keep children from getting in legal problems. It's not all kids, just those at risk of getting dragged into the court system.

      Police Investigator Armando Pardo reminded parents that letting kids skip school without a valid reason is, in fact, a crime.

      The entering of the codes isn't just to verify the child has the unit, but also to assist them in planning to get to school. (8PM code entry? Reminder to get stuff ready for the next school day.) In addition, it involves coaching the children to work on their attendance habits.

      So it's voluntary, has less impact on the students than the alternatives, and is designed to work with the students to improve their performance. Yep, that sounds like a violation of their rights.

    7. Re:Training for the future by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

      No, i am pretty sure the guise here is "think of the fuckups" who will be carrying the trackers; maybe after they spend their freshman year of high school doing so and feeling what its like to be treated like a criminal they will decide they need to start earning trust (by not skipping school). Sure there are other ways to punish, this is just a slightly more convoluted way to do it that has the side effect of maintaining discipline whilst the punishment is being carried out (as opposed to suspension/expulsion which often leads to more delinquency). This is nothing more than a virtual (and MUCH MUCH cheaper) form of juvenile detention. The rest of the population will have no problem since they wont be required to carry the trackers at all.

      Perfect? Not at all, but in a perfect world parents would be keeping their kids in line so the schools didnt have to.

    8. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right against unreasonable search. Pinpointing a person's exact location on a whim could be interpreted as unreasonable search.

    9. Re:Training for the future by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Blame stupidity -- I doubt that the people who devised this program would object to having their own movements tracked by GPS, and so they never considered how this program would impact the students' future perception of their rights.

      Their perception of their rights should be thus: If you violate the law (in this case, the law is *go to class*) you will be punished accordingly by having some of your rights (the right to have control over where you go and when) taken away, because you have demonstrated a lack of aptitude for properly exercising that right. It's quite simple. If the alternative is suspension/expulsion, I say strap a tracker on them and watch them 24/7 with updates every 15 seconds. Kids who are on the slippery slope toward delinquency need to be shown what its like to be punished, instead of being given what they want (a way out of school).

    10. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checking in at 8pm is a bit much but during the school day they need to be at school. If a parent excuses the absence it won't count. If a kid ditches class 4 times in grade school something should be done. They should make the parent pay for the use of the device so it doesn't cause the taxpayer to fund it. If they keep ditching school punish the parent, restrict their drivers licsense to only allow them to drive to work. Saying this violates their rights is howash. They have a right to an education not the right to run around doing what they want.

    11. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument against "think of the children" is as over-used and trite as the "think of the children" argument itself.

      And what "rights" are being violated here? We're talking about 6th - 8th grade students here - students whose parents are apparently not doing their job very well and so the school district is taking proactive steps to try and "parent" these students. If these truant students are negatively affecting your quality of life would you still care about these imaginary rights?

      Lesson: if you're a minor; if you don't go to school; if you don't have parents that are able (or willing) to make you go to school, then the school system will explore innovative solutions to mitigate the impact. Shameful - shameful I say.

    12. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell us, what's your life like without a spine ?

    13. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The only problem with your argument is the reality of education in California.

      School districts receive money for each kid that attends school. In the 80s when I attended, it was $50 per kid per day. Kid doesn't attend, school district doesn't get the money.

      My school district had employees who's sole job was to call the parents at home and work and ask them why their kid wasn't in school, within hours of the first bell. Not after 2,3, or 4 days. After 2 hours....

      The school district, the district attorney, and the police may be giving high-minded explanations for the program, but the reality is they just want the money. Kids are just the means to the ends...

    14. Re:Training for the future by operagost · · Score: 1

      The Constitution is a list of enumerated rights. The federal government only has those rights which it is given, explicitly. That being said, when we're talking about local governments that's a matter of debate as to whether the federal or state constitutions have more force. In any case, the ninth amendment explicitly protects the natural rights of the individual from arguments such as yours, and the 10th explicitly reserves those rights to the states and/or the people. I'd say it's pretty well covered.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    15. Re:Training for the future by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      So much for due process. What this comes down to is a bullying tactic to deny these people due process. Its threat. Accept punishment or we are going to drag you into a supposedly fair process which will all know is stacked heavily in our favor and the result no matter what you say is that you will be assigned a harsher punishment. That is the threat anyway, as to if the truancy hearing in California would be fair or not I can't say.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    16. Re:Training for the future by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Freedom's just another word for "nothing left to lose"... If having a spine means being a colossal fuckup, then i will forgo the spine in favor of the lucrative career and freedoms that most people (especially those who arent US citizens or convicts) cant even imagine.

    17. Re:Training for the future by value_added · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Students rights? Seventh and eighth graders don't have or need rights.[1]

      Instead of asserting that students of that age should be making their own judgments (the consequences of which only an adult could appreciate), I'd suggest we ask why it is that a child isn't doing what they were TOLD TO DO (by either or both their parents and the school).[2]

      The problem, as I see it, is a lack of parenting. The excuse (parents are routinely too busy, overworked, and stressed) may have widespread appeal, but it's a lousy excuse. We've all heard that the best indicator of a child's success is a talented and qualified teacher, right? What's missing from that statement is the qualifier "outside the home".

      Combine lousy parenting with a convenient excuse, and you've got the present day situation in which the responsibility of parenting has shifted to the school. The school, of course, deserves its own excuse (we're too overworked, too underfunded, etc.), so it should come as no surprise that some schools would seek out a technological solution.

      So, yeah, it is (and is supposed to be) about thinking of the children. The problem in this case, however, is that a technological solution cannot possibly solve what's really a social problem. To the extent it can help, I'm all for the idea of electronic monitoring for problem cases, as absurd as it is. A better approach, the best approach, would be for the parents to start being parents and get involved.

      ------------------
      1. At least not the sort you're thinking of.

      2. I'll remind any school-aged Slashdot snowflakes reading this that parents do indeed have such rights.

    18. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it really results in is a bunch of people who are trained from childhood that violating their rights is OK if the right circumstances present themselves.

      No, what it really results "from the current method" is a bunch of people who are trained from childhood that violating their DUTIES is OK. Full stop.

    19. Re:Training for the future by __aaxtnf2500 · · Score: 1

      The right to privacy is not explicitly granted in the constitution, it has been produced by American jurisprudence as implicit under various amendments.
      If you had a right to privacy, then why can the police read your email when it is 182 days old?

    20. Re:Training for the future by Xphile101361 · · Score: 1

      Student's rights? What are those? Schools are basically the parents of the students now a days. Parents gladly hand over power to the schools so that they don't have to raise their children. If a parent did this to their child, would you be all up in arms about children's rights?

    21. Re:Training for the future by unwastaken · · Score: 1

      This, like so many other school programs, is an egregious violation of the students' rights.

      Not so. Most parents would happily sign a release if it meant not having to go through truancy charges.

      You seem to be ignoring the fact that truancy charges themselves are a violation of an individual's right to raise his own children. Guess they already got to you!

    22. Re:Training for the future by nomadic · · Score: 1

      There's no debate at all over whether federal or state constitutions have more force; the U.S. Constitution always trumps the state constitution. And I'm not really following your 9th and 10th amendment arguments here, they're pretty much a truism. The 9th amendment doesn't create rights, and the 10th amendment doesn't talk about rights, it talks about powers: if the federal government doesn't have the power to infringe on someone's privacy, it's expressly something the states may do (which is the actor in this case).

    23. Re:Training for the future by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


      Rights? What rights do minor students have that would be violated by this?

    24. Re:Training for the future by ZmeiGorynych · · Score: 1

      You're being sarcastic, right? Right?

    25. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The statement that the responsibility of parenting has shifted to the school is not entirely true. In many cases this responsibility is stolen from the parents by the school and so parents eventually give in. In my case I refuse to let the school take away my child and my responsibilities as a parent, and most times it is a difficult fight to not make it a punishment for my son in the process. My son is required to take part in a sex education program introduced by the school, yes we have the option to let him opt out, but the opt out assignment is to write a report on what essentially would have been covered in the sex education program. In this case what the hell is the point of opting out?

    26. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Limited rights =/= no rights

    27. Re:Training for the future by Magada · · Score: 1

      What risk? Are you talking about pre-crime, maybe? Are you seriously suggesting that having school, police and courts tag some children as "at risk of becoming institutionalized" is a good thing?

      In any sane society, it should be clear-cut: guilty or innocent.

      None of this "risk" thing that somehow is justification for treating innocent (yes, I am using the legal meaning of the term and so should you) children (ditto) in exactly the same way as felons and criminals on parole are treated?

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    28. Re:Training for the future by briansct · · Score: 1


      Are you being sarcastic? It is a violation of their rights. Authority uses heavy hand to get them to volunteer to "help" the student!

      --
      What's the point of Mod points over a long weekend?
    29. Re:Training for the future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's a punishment for not having a reason to skip school. All punishments remove rights to some degree.

      While 'think of the children' isn't an end all, and is often an erroneousness excuse, sometimes it's a valid point.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    30. Re:Training for the future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "So much for due process"

      Are you really the clueless? How is a voluntary program to help teach kids to be more organized and prepared a violation of due process?

      These are kids who are most likely to end up in the court system and go to jail.

      This is a good thing. Having an additional avenue to help kids move to better habits is far better then throwing them in prison. It's cost effective, it helps keep the community safer, and it gives these kids an addition chance to become productive.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    31. Re:Training for the future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " Are you talking about pre-crime, maybe"
      Nice strawman.

      "In any sane society, it should be clear-cut: guilty or innocent."

      it almost never is.. welcome to the real world, Jackass.

      SIne you are eaither to lazy to read what's going on or stupid..or both I will try to make it simple for you.

      There are kids who are high risk.
      They are offered a program to help them good habit basic habits.

      Now a kid and parents can look at the risk and choose to improve their habits before it gets them in jail.
      Not necessarily in stead of jail.

      Yes the are innocent of a crime, but an avenue to develop basic good life habits isn't a punishment.

      There isn't a damn thing wrong with this program, and tis a great use of money. Far cheaper then kids going through the judicial system.

      What is wrong with you people? Do you not understand risk/rewards? Are you caught up in some circle jerk of thinking that you can't actually think about what's happening?

      I know if I had bad habits and someone brought it to my attention I would want to change. Hell, I WISH they ahd this program when I was in school. I would have actually had good study and preparation habits when I got out of high school.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    32. Re:Training for the future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      WRONG.

      JD doesn't teach good habits. This is focused on developing good habits. Reminder to prepare for school and that sort of thing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Training for the future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Except it's a lot harder then that.

      First off, society frowns on calling out bad parenting unless is incredibly immediate and harsh. Sometime not even then.

      Almost no one actually knows how to parent. Some reason they think whatever pops into their heads after having a child is 'right' and they think following their gut instincts is correct. It almost never is.

      In this situation, the child is being taught good habits like responsibility and preparation.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    34. Re:Training for the future by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      You raise a good point; this device shouldn't be given to the student; it should be given to the parent(s). Give the kids an RSA token on a bracelet, and the parent has to enter the code at "check in" times -- which would be agreed upon case-by-case as times when the parent should actually be with their child.

      After all, parents are legally responsible for their children, and should be held to this.

    35. Re:Training for the future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      BS.

      Both my children go to public school. They also come home to a parent who is their for to help them. This is not unusual.

      We send are kids to school for education, and social development. We do that because educators are better at that then we are. Don't buy into that home schooling crap. Most parents don't know jack shit about education. Yes, home schoolers are almost entirely focused on SATs and do nothing they don't need to to get high marks on the specific test.

      We looked into home schooling. I spent two years looking into to it, and by and large it's BS. Mostly it's used to keep the kids from coming into thoughts the parents don't approve of.

      As for you final question: I pretty sure almost all these jackasses whose opinion is based on exactly no facts would also be outraged if a parent dared use technology to help improve the habits of their kids.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    36. Re:Training for the future by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      There's no debate at all over whether federal or state constitutions have more force; the U.S. Constitution always trumps the state constitution..

      State and local governments are not bound to respect Bill of Rights protections unless the protection has been specifically "incorporated" by the Supreme Court. At the time of ratification, the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government. Massachusetts had an established state religion until 1833.

      It was not until the 1890s that the due process clause of the 14th amendment was used by the Supreme Court to selectively apply Bill of Rights to the states. Incorporation was certainly not the intent of the 14th amendment but it is better than nothing. A far better solution would be one sweeping decision that incorporates all constitutional protections or a constitutional amendment that addresses the issue directly.

    37. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I'd suggest we ask why it is that a child isn't doing what they were TOLD TO DO...

      Kids are KIDS, not robots. We're supposed to teach them; and true education comes in individual forms for individual people. Some kids simply need to learn the hard way. Treating them like its natural for teenagers to simply conform to authority is about as un-insightful as one can get - we're talking about TEENAGERS here, its in their nature to not listen!

      Children of that age ARE supposed to be learning how to assert their own judgments. That's what learning how to grow up is. Growing up is not conforming to authority and doing what you're told to do - that's called the military (or prison).

      That said, I agree with everything else you said. It is a social problem which starts at home with poor parenting. Unfortunately, many of the "excuses" are valid. When someone has to choose between what we consider "proper parenting" and working multiple jobs so their kids can eat, its pretty difficult to claim their just lazy. The issue, as I read it, is FAR more complicated than "parents just need to suck it up and parent" - its a result of the entire society not doing its job to help those who need it most. Admittedly there are a lot of lazy parents, but we can't point the finger at this one thing and say that's the problem.

      Whatever the vast complexities of the issue are, I don't see this as a positive way to teach kids. How about we, as a society, step up to the plate and use our tax dollars to properly fund our educational programs, rather than the plethora of overseas excursions our government self-righteously engages in, so that we can properly educate our children?

    38. Re:Training for the future by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      That is not what this is at all. I am not going to deny that for a certain number of individuals this might "work out for the best". All I am saying is this is anything but voluntary. Its not as if they are saying to every student and parent on the first day of classes, you can have one of these GPS devices to help develop better habits. They are telling kids and parents who have in the schools view a problems and there certainly is an implied "or else."

      It sort of like how the courts have ruled that the standard for wrongful arrest is if you felt you were not free to leave. It comes down to if these people really think they have choice, and my guess is they don't. They are almost certainly being made to feel they can comply or that things will go hard for them, ah but because there compliance is "voluntary" there need be no procedure, after all its just a suggestion.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    39. Re:Training for the future by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

      "volunteer for the monitoring as a way to avoid continuation school or prosecution"

      This is no different than depriving people of their rights because they might be terrorists (they have a turban on their head). "I volunteer to be flogged because I don't want to be shot." Is that voluntary? The slippery slope is the use of the threat of continuation school or prosecution for progressively less serious reasons. That's were volition quietly dies.

      If this program were truly for the benefit of the child in time management and development of other skills, then it should be a product or service offered entirely independent of the penal system. Oh, wait. A parent can do this already with many readily available cell phone apps that allow you to track friends and family.

      I think there is still something here as far as, "something that leads to a bad place".

    40. Re:Training for the future by sjames · · Score: 1

      So if I pull a gun at the bank and say give me all your money or die it constitutes a charitable contribution to my cause because they technically could have chosen not to give me the money?

    41. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Students rights? Seventh and eighth graders don't have or need rights.[1]"

      And the constitution has age limits for adulthood, right? Just because we won't acknowledge it doesn't mean their rights don't exist, they just need to use a big enough stick/bludgeon to get noticed. And they definitely need those rights to protect them from overly pushy peers, parents, and other superiors?. It's amazing at a time when peoples minds are opening up in various directions we are determined to lock them down into whatever mind choking system we determined as best for them which is actually best for us. Sort of does away with the idea of being free doesn't it.

      Kids have enough trouble figuring out life themselves without everyone ramming their own viewpoints down their throats.

    42. Re:Training for the future by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2

      > not having to go through truancy charges.

      Ah, governmental blackmail. "You can go ahead and not do this, but you'll be subject to this shit we just whipped up to punish you."

      Even governments are subject to this sort of shit.Consider federally mandated speed limits. Consider WIPO and ACTA.

    43. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying that U.S. citizens and convicts are somehow superior to everyone else in the world? This is the exact attitude that makes me hate this country with every ounce of my soul. Take a look around, and you'll see that the U.S. is no longer the shining beacon of education, innovation, and success, no matter how much you would like it to be so.

    44. Re:Training for the future by darkshadow88 · · Score: 1

      Where in the Constitution does it say that you only get your rights once you've graduated high school?

    45. Re:Training for the future by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Attention slashdotters; Listen very carefully because this bears repeating:

      Children are not adults.

      Children are not adults.

      Children are not adults.

      Children are not adults.

      Children are not adults.

      From TFA:

      Students who routinely skip school are prime candidates to join gangs, police say.

      This is the real world, folks. It's full of shady people and negative influences that can change the course of a young person's life for the worst if they're not steered away from them.

      This isn't some Hollywood flick where the child starts miraculously talking like an adult and knows all the right things to do and all the right things to say. This isn't some TV drama where the kid always says no to drugs, always hangs with the right people, doesn't get involved in substance abuse or petty crime as part of some 'dare' or gang initiation rite. Kids are unpredictable, vulnerable, immature, and need structure, rules, discipline, and enforcement of the rules. People who think of the children as just regular "consumers" or citizens with the same "rights" as grown-ups are the ones who end up having to call Nanny 911 for help in sorting their little shits out because they're out of control.

      If any kids of mine had more than four unexcused absences and were ducking out of school behind my back I can assure you there would be hell to pay. I for one think this is a natural evolution of the old truant officer who used to get paid to go around and catch kids in the act of bunking off lessons. Hell I remember what it was like in my day. The school role call system was so full of loopholes that the lower achieving "students" could game the system and skip lessons secure in the knowledge that they had a slim to zero chance of getting caught. They wouldn't get away with it now. My sister's a principal at a comprehensive school in England and they have an intranet system that lets them do role call in every class at the start of every period. If anyone's missing in one lesson who was present earlier, they're reported as missing to their parents, and if the parents can't track them down then the police are called. Proper order.

      Think of it this way. You send your kid to school and you trust that the school is going to "hand them back" to you at the end of the day. How would you like it if your kid went missing from school, you called the school up and complained about it and their attitude was "well I don't know, we assumed he was with you"? Fuck that shit! If schools are using new technology to keep tabs on children then I'm all for it.

      "Violating rights of children" my ass! Children have a right to be protected from the dangers in society, and that is exactly what this system ensures.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    46. Re:Training for the future by tm-dai · · Score: 1

      The entering of the codes isn't just to verify the child has the unit, but also to assist them in planning to get to school. (8PM code entry? Reminder to get stuff ready for the next school day.)

      I don't think children skip school because they forget they have school the next day...

    47. Re:Training for the future by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


      That's not an answer. What rights are being violated by this?

    48. Re:Training for the future by darkshadow88 · · Score: 1

      The 4th Amendment--unreasonable search and seizure (on the grounds of monitoring the kid at 8 PM).

    49. Re:Training for the future by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Kids who are on the slippery slope toward delinquency need to be shown what its like to be punished

      Yeah! The same goes for potential criminals and everyone else. Honestly, I think people need mandatory security cameras installed inside of their homes. That way, crime will surely be reduced!

      (a way out of school)

      It's called homeschooling.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    50. Re:Training for the future by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The Constitution itself describes itself as the "Supreme Law of the Land." Where there is a conflict, the US Constitution controls (though state Constitutions can institute stronger protections than the US Constitution); in the case of an amendment that isn't incorporated, then there's no conflict so there's no need for the US Constitution to assert its supremacy.

    51. Re:Training for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody has any business knowing where a specific child is at 8pm except their parents or guardians. Nobody -- not the teachers, not the administrators, not the government, and not the IT staff gluing this all together. I hope parents LOUDLY reject this idea.

    52. Re:Training for the future by theY4Kman · · Score: 1

      For the same reason bank robbers can rob banks.

    53. Re:Training for the future by Magada · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily in stead of jail.

      If it can be mis-used, it will be mis-used. You admit as much with that one word, "necessarily".

      I shudder to think what would happen to a problem child if word got out among his/her colleagues - more abuse and ostracism, of the kind you yourself have no doubt experienced, as evidenced by the emotionally-charged language you are using. Jackass? Seriously?

      I was a problem child myself, in many ways. I often wish I had found more people interested in educating me properly. I never wish I had been lojacked "for my own good".

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    54. Re:Training for the future by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      What exactly do you achieve while keeping them in class? I started doing drugs because I had no way of blowing off steam with all those motherfucking classes. How would have this system helped me?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    55. Re:Training for the future by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      What exactly do you achieve while keeping them in class?

      Oh. My. God.

      Most people in the civilised world have gotten it into their heads that children belong in school. Not in chimneys, factories, gangs, etc.

      I started doing drugs because I had no way of blowing off steam with all those motherfucking classes.

      Sounds like you haven't stopped taking them. It explains a great deal.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  5. Big Brother by acalltoreason · · Score: 0

    Wow, talk about an invasion of privacy. I realize they are kids, but they have rights too. Plus, and I realize I have to solid arguments to back this up, but this is just wrong...while being truant is not an ideal course of action for the kids future...its not going to work, if for no other reason that it relies on a KID remembering to imput a code 5 times a day. If I were any of the kids in this pilot program, I'd tell them to shove it.

    --
    Where has reason in the world gone? Have we abandoned it in favor of power and politics?
    1. Re:Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Students and their parents volunteer for the monitoring as a way to avoid continuation school or prosecution with a potential stay in juvenile hall."

      They volunteered. Don't volunteer if you think they should shove it.

    2. Re:Big Brother by Iceykitsune · · Score: 1

      The parents "volunteered" their kids.

      --
      GENERATION 24: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    3. Re:Big Brother by SargentDU · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe the part that they have to press a key sequence is wrong, but they don't know that - to see if they will follow rules. It probably tracks locations every minute so it can be reviewed later when bracelet is downloaded. In fact, maybe the key sequence is actually to download their data to the school for their data retention.

    4. Re:Big Brother by Wolvenhaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Threatening someone with jail time or fines if they don't volunteer is like saying there is a mandatory donation required to attend a free event.

      --
      Orwell was an optimist.
    5. Re:Big Brother by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      Threatening someone with jail time or fines if they don't volunteer is like saying there is a mandatory donation required to attend a free event.

      So should they also scrap community service and probation options and stick everyone with pure jail-time instead? If you've done something you can be jailed for but they think you'll reform with some minimal oversight I don't see the issue with offering it as an option.

    6. Re:Big Brother by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Threatening someone with jail time or fines if they don't volunteer is like saying there is a mandatory donation required to attend a free event.

      They're not picking random kids off the street for this. These kids are already facing juvenile hall. They a had a choice: go to school or get in trouble. Now they have another choice: go to school and be tracked or go to juvenile hall. These kids already made the first choice so now they (and their parents) are forced to make the second choice.

      I'm not thrilled with the program - I think they should just lock the kids up in reform school/juvenile hall/whatever. They have free will and they made their choice so let them live with the consequences. Maybe they'll learn from their mistakes, or maybe not.

    7. Re:Big Brother by Arccot · · Score: 2

      Threatening someone with jail time or fines if they don't volunteer is like saying there is a mandatory donation required to attend a free event.

      So should they also scrap community service and probation options and stick everyone with pure jail-time instead? If you've done something you can be jailed for but they think you'll reform with some minimal oversight I don't see the issue with offering it as an option.

      He didn't say that. He's just pointing out, correctly, that "volunteering" means there is little to no incentive to do something, but you do it anyways. Convicted criminals don't "volunteer" to accept community service or probation, they choose it as an alternative to options they consider worse. Just like I don't "volunteer" to go to work every day.

      These kids are the same. To call it voluntary is a joke.

    8. Re:Big Brother by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      My uni had that schizo policy: you had to pay "voluntary" contribution tickets. When, on the students' system, you read "This year, you are required to pay 8 voluntary contribution tickets", hilarity ensued. To be honest, if you didn't have that money, you could pay less, or nothing at all, but they could have chosen a better name. One that didn't blatantly lied would have been cool.

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
    9. Re:Big Brother by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      I guess the laws didn't permit to charge a fee, so they masked it as a donation.

    10. Re:Big Brother by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The right thing to do is to just let them go. Nobody learns anything without wanting to. Forcing kids who don't want to learn to be in school hurts everyone who is there to learn. Forcing kids who do want to learn to be in school just holds them back. School should be 100% voluntary.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  6. After reading the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think its fine for just a temporary program. Was a bit reluctant about it, but since the kids and parents are volunteering for six weeks, seems like a pretty good idea. Just wish they would explain what schools that they have been implemented in. I'm gonna guess that this probably doesn't work well in the hoods of Baltimore.

    1. Re:After reading the article by phek · · Score: 1

      i doubt that any of the kids were the ones to volunteer. also anaheim is a pretty ghetto so a comparison to the "hoods of baltimore" wouldn't be that far off.

  7. this really is the nanny state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what business is it of the school, what the kid does at 8pm?
    if tfs is correct (there's a first for everything), that is after
    they leave school.

    oh, and how could a kid possibly cheat. anyone with opposable
    thumbs could potentially operate the device.

  8. What a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a bad joke. I can see one of these kids leaving the unit with a buddy that is in school and they enter the code while the other kid is out enjoying themselves.
    Maybe if the state spent the money to keep school interesting they wouldn't have so many kids skipping out on them.

  9. And this will stop what? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

    I skipped quite often in high school, consequences be damned. I would have just left this in my locker and ignored it, not bothering to enter the code or keep it on me -- even on the days I was actually at school. I don't know why they expect this to stop anyone.

    1. Re:And this will stop what? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Because these are people who chose this rather than a fine and/or jail time.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:And this will stop what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O.- Are you off your rocker? These are for school KIDS who skipped. Not doing the stupid requirements results in a fine or jail time? Jail time is rediculous as it's there not even a law for that for obvious reasons. As for a fine, I'd be outraged as a parent since this punished the parents who work and not the actual students.

      That said, the consequences at most would be the normal punishments like detention, suspension or expulsion (pretty ironic since those take away time from education) so I fail to see how this would stopped kids.

    3. Re:And this will stop what? by vgerclover · · Score: 1

      Students get fine and/or jail time for skipping class in the USA!?

    4. Re:And this will stop what? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I would have just left this in my locker and ignored it, not bothering to enter the code or keep it on me -- even on the days I was actually at school. I don't know why they expect this to stop anyone.

      I think you missed the part where this is an voluntary alternative to the already-in-place harsher bits like holding you back, or prosecution, etc?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:And this will stop what? by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      From TFA:
      Seventh- and eighth-graders with four unexcused absences or more this school year are assigned to carry a handheld GPS device, about the size of a cell phone.
      and
      Because schools lose about $35 per day for each absent student, the program can pay for itself and more if students return to class consistently, Miller said.
      Four absences? Hell, I coulda blown through that many "unexcused" absences in a week, let alone a year and I didn't turn out to be a violent criminal. This really seems like it's more about the money than anything else. It looks like they're criminalizing absences because they don't want to lose funding. The "criminal activity" is denying the school a hundred dollars or so in government funding.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    6. Re:And this will stop what? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      If a student skips beyond a certain number of classes/days, they or their parents are subject to fines and/or jail time (laws vary by state). School attendance is mandatory in every state in the U.S., isn't it in your country?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    7. Re:And this will stop what? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Four absences? Hell, I coulda blown through that many "unexcused" absences in a week,...

      Out of a five day school week, you frequently missed four? How did you graduate?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    8. Re:And this will stop what? by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Out of a five day school week, you frequently missed four? How did you graduate?

      Luckily I went to one of those schools where there was more than one week in a school year.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    9. Re:And this will stop what? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      That is amazing! I was about to question if that (the reacking device) makes school officialy a form of prision, it seems at the US is already was. What, on my country kids have the RIGHT to go to school. Can you also be locked for not saying everything you want?

    10. Re:And this will stop what? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      If you, with any frequnecy, missed four out of five days, I still don't see how you graduated.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    11. Re:And this will stop what? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      So in your country you don't have to go to school? In the U.S., there are a lot of children who would not go to school if they did not have to. I find it hard to believe that there are not a significant number in your country as well.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    12. Re:And this will stop what? by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Neither do I. Oddly, I don't see where I said it was with any frequency, I just said I could have had *a* week with that many. That's a detail that you seem to have come up with all by yourself.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    13. Re:And this will stop what? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Since this is a volunteer program, I am assuming the student want to use this tool to help them develop better habits.

      Clearly, if you were leading a destructive path you would choose to help yourself and end up in jail. That makes YOU a moron. That doesn't make this a bad program.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:And this will stop what? by MPolo · · Score: 1

      Around here we've had the German police threaten to bodily carry American HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES to a German high school because they had had the temerity to get a high school degree before the legal age of being able to stop going to school in Germany. (They were 16, IIRC.)

      On the other hand, I'm pretty O.K. with this. It is in society's interest that the kids go to school (whether they learn anything or not), and if they refuse to do this (breaking the laws for mandatory education), they can be sent to alternative education or carry the device. If they choose alternative education and fail to attend, they go to juvenile hall. Nowhere are the kid's rights being infringed that I can see.

    15. Re:And this will stop what? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      A parent can impose that his children go to school (as he can inpose lots of other things). A school must be available for him, and nobody can stop him from going to school. But if both the child and the parents don't care, sure, nobody will do anything with them.

      Well, I also didn't want to go to school lots of times when I was a kid; those times, my parents forced me. That is what happens with nearly all of the kids.

    16. Re:And this will stop what? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Well, that explains why your schools rate better than ours, the kids who don't want to be there whose parents don't care, aren't there to be tested. Personally, I think that if the states in the U.S. took that approach it would measurably improve the education that most public school students get, even if you continued to factor in those students who didn't go to school.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    17. Re:And this will stop what? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Hum, no. On average our schools aren't better than yours (we are sligtly worse). We (Brazil) are a poor country after all. But jail time for kids that don't go to shcool is simply wrong, and there are (several) countries where it doesn't exists and the population is still better educated than yours.

  10. Why 8pm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can understand the other check-times as they're related to attendance and the school day. 8pm is way outside anything a school should be interested in. Its just a police "anti-gang" initiative hiding under the subterfuge of preventing truancy.

  11. Wrong approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again with the technical solution to a social problem. Why not talk to the students and ask them why they are skipping school.

    1. Re:Wrong approach by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we should also ask re-captured prisoners why they tried to escape.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:Wrong approach by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Being sent to a prision should be a bit different from being sent to a school.

  12. Where are the parents? by MellowTigger · · Score: 1

    Why not track the parents instead? Why not require that the adults check in 5 times a day, insisting that they know what their spawn are up to.

    1. Re:Where are the parents? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      In a perfect world, I agree with your sentiment. In the real world, with parents (or single parents) working multiple jobs just to make ends meet it's not that easy. Yes, there are shitty worthless parents, plenty of them, but there are also a lot of parents struggle to keep everything together, so something like this would be seen as a blessing to them.

  13. What happens when you put it in a faraday cage? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    A plastic bag and then aluminum foil. Or one of those mylar lined freezer bags?

    1. Re:What happens when you put it in a faraday cage? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      It doesn't report that you are where you are supposed to be at the appropriate times and the police come around and you get to serve whatever the alternate sentence (fine and/or jail time) was that you accepted this in lieu of.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:What happens when you put it in a faraday cage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They put kids in jail for skipping school?

    3. Re:What happens when you put it in a faraday cage? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Yes. And fine the parents a couple grand.

      Though very rarely, and this is far broader and hence not a case of "do this or we'll prosecute".

    4. Re:What happens when you put it in a faraday cage? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Just for fun, stash it in the bag and make sure to be marked present for all your classes.

  14. Treat students like livestock! by pm_rat_poison · · Score: 1

    How very educational.

    1. Re:Treat students like livestock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      market forces

    2. Re:Treat students like livestock! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      A little shit who doesn't go to class on a regular basis and is off getting up to god-knows-what without adult supervision does not deserve the title "student".

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  15. Spare the rod, spoil the child. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's to stop these kids from paying someone else to punch in the code for them at the school/home? This just seems like a huge waste of tax dollars!

  16. Little Siblings and Friends by Crippere · · Score: 1

    What's going to keep these kids from handing the tracker to a younger sibling or to a friend who does actually go to class? "At eight o'clock, enter this code, or I'll tell Mom you screwed up!" Oh yeah, the truant student's own sense of "doing the right thing"...

  17. Parents by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see the reaction of the parents. If my child were going truant a lot, I'd approve. Education is important, and it's hard to get that education if you avoid spending any time in the presence of your assigned educators. However, if I don't believe my child is being truant, then I'd be outraged. I can't see how the school can enforce this without parental cooperation. Especially the 8PM entry. That's essentially tracking what the parents do with their child, and when they send them to bed. Is the child going to be in trouble because he fell asleep on the couch at 7 and Dad carried him to bed without entering the ping at 8? What about when the parents decide to treat them to a movie that gets out at 8:15 at a theatre half an hour from home?

    --
    Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a parent. I agree that education is important, but if your kid can't stand to actually attend school, it might be time to look for some alternative education. Forcing him to attend isn't going to make him learn, and if he's disruptive, it's ruining the experience for the other kids. Anecdotes like this article make me want to homeschool my kid.

    2. Re:Parents by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Why is the school district pushing it? If the parents don't care, throw the bums out of school, and protect the kids that want to study. Truancy is not the school district's responsibility.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:Parents by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Anecdotes like this article make me want to homeschool my kid.

      Home schooling is perfectly fine for those parents that can do it (not everyone can - it's just another skill set). Home schooling has its good and bad points, but it will certainly address the truancy issue. Will it fix the reasons why the student doesn't want to learn or go to school? Maybe, maybe not. If you have the choice between home school or reform school, I'm thinking home school is the better solution almost every time.

    4. Re:Parents by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

      I'd guess the district cares because, while many parents appear not to care they also don't want to be responsible for their kid during school hours. It's the "Schools as public baby-sitter" mentality. They may not care if the kid learns, but they don't want the hassle of keeping track of the child either.

      Also, in many places (everyone I lived in) truancy is the school districts problem, because it is one of the metrics by which they are evaluated. Schools with high truancy rates can see funding cuts, lower test scores (again with further funding cuts as "under performing" schools), and find themselves being used as examples of "What's wrong with American Education" despite having little control over the root causes of the truancy.

      I imagine that the parent I described above would be in favor of is, as long as it didn't inconvenience them too much. Not saying I agree with those parents rationale, but it just might help some students avoid dropping out entirely. Whether the cost is worth the dubious gain is a different question that probably can't be answered until the program get's off of the ground and a couple of years under its belt.

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    5. Re:Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the school district receives state and federal money for every kid that attends, counted daily. If there is a kid within their school district boundaries, then they want that kid in school so they can receive the money.

      Hi-falutin' reasons aside, it's all about the money. No kid in school, no money for the district.

    6. Re:Parents by linuxwolf69 · · Score: 1

      But in California, you have to have a teachers certificate to homeschool your kids. We homeschooled in TX for a year and I think it was great, but kids wanted to go back into public school. Something like this, they wouldn't have that option.

    7. Re:Parents by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? This is for people who have FOUR unexcused absences. That's hardly at the level of not wanting to learn or go to school - that's having something better to do every few months.

    8. Re:Parents by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      The reasons are in the article:

      The program is paid for by a state grant.

      schools lose about $35 per day for each absent student

      Where the GPS technology has been implemented, average attendance among the chronically truant jumped from 77 percent up to 95 percent during the six-week program.

      That state grant part makes it all worthwhile, otherwise you'd be spending $240 (or $336 depending on whether the cost per student per day of the system is school day or calendar day) to save $189 - and no they don't give a shit about the kids themselves...

    9. Re:Parents by Synn · · Score: 1

      > If my child were going truant a lot, I'd approve.

      If my child were going truant without my approval, I'd take away his xbox/playstation/tv/computer and ground him in his room until he started going to class again. I don't need a GPS tracker.

      On the flip side, if my kid wanted to take a "personal day" off from school now and again, they could ask me and I'd write the sick note myself.

    10. Re:Parents by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      This tracker is an entirely reasonable way of dealing with repeated extreme truancy.

      However, when four absences are 'repeated extreme truancy', something is seriously wrong.

      Especially as I know, from my time in school, that a good portion of the reasonable excuses do not count as 'excused'. Like just being sick without visiting the doctor. Someone gets a bad cold with a sinus headache so bad they can't function, they're not going to the doctor, no one can afford that. They'll just be out for two days.

      In fact, when you think about, requiring a doctor's excuse is a little bit classist in the first place. Rich kids can afford to go to the doctor for almost anything, and get a nice excuse. Even pretending that all those excuses are entirely legitimate, that the rich kid really couldn't go to school, that doesn't change the fact that rich people will go to the doctor, and hence have excused absences instead of unexcused ones for their twisted ankle or stomach flu.

      Likewise, kids only get excused absences for specific funerals, which is insane when you think about it. Sure, thanks to public outrage, if an immediate family member dies, you get a day out and a funeral day, or whatever...but what if your family is flying to Great Uncle Charlie's funeral across the country?

      Four days is less than the personal leave days that companies have, and on top of that they end up getting used for sick days because a doctor didn't sign off on them, and on top of that children often have to deal with other stuff, like their parents being unable to get them to school or pay a babysitter to keep them at home when they go on trips.

      I know that I repeatedly banged up against the eight days or so I got when a kid, and I NEVER, literally never, skipped school. I couldn't, my mother was a teacher in the same school system, and they'd call her.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    11. Re:Parents by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If your write a note for your kids, then they would have an excused absence.

      If you child habitual broke minor violations, and there was an option to help improve your child's habits, Why wouldn't the parent approve?

      The *pm entry is there to remind kids to get prepared. If you don't enter it, someone calls you and reminds you.

      A child in this situation is having problems outside of school, and those areas need to be addressed as well.

      SO missing the 8PM entry occasionally and for good reason will be fine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Parents by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? This is for people who have FOUR unexcused absences. That's hardly at the level of not wanting to learn or go to school - that's having something better to do every few months.

      Yes I RTA. I posted about home schooling in response the AC. I didn't say I liked this tracking system ... and you're absolutely right about "only four?" absences. AC didn't like this program and voiced his thoughts about home schooling. Home schooling will fix the problem with truancy but not the problem that may be causing the truancy or unwillingness to learn.

    13. Re:Parents by stephathome · · Score: 1

      I'm in California and no, you don't. They tried to require that, but a big fight was put up. Homeschoolers won.

    14. Re:Parents by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't expect it to ever be an issue. I was raised in the "More scared of parents than the teacher's" school of child rearing. I have no problem taking away everything fun and if necessary removing bedroom doors (no slamming MY doors because you are mad). I'm not even opposed to a little corporal punishment from time to time. However, if despite my best efforts one child was willful enough to decide truancy is worth the punishment, then I wouldn't have a problem fitting them with a lo-Jack, whether from the school or one I bought myself.

      The ultimate flaw I see in this approach is that the parents most likely to approve are those least likely to need it.

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    15. Re:Parents by tm-dai · · Score: 1

      I can't see how the school can enforce this without parental cooperation.

      Well, it's not. The system is opt-in by the parents of the truant students.

      If my child were going truant a lot, I'd approve.

      Personally, I still wouldn't. These problems are better solved by the parent than by the school administration.

    16. Re:Parents by InsaneMosquito · · Score: 1

      Sadly, your last statement is true. :(

    17. Re:Parents by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      And you would even think of asking why the hell is your kid going through all that trouble of not going to school, I suppose?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    18. Re:Parents by makomk · · Score: 1

      If your write a note for your kids, then they would have an excused absence.

      Only if the reason you give on the note is one of the narrow range of permitted reasons for them not to be in school - which basically boils down to the kid in question being ill, and that's it. Any other reason and it's an unauthorized absence, note or no note.

    19. Re:Parents by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

      I may know why, but not be able to do anything to prevent the original problem. I'd try to find out the "Why" of it, but at the end of the day their attendance is not optional, and if the school is willing to help me ensure they attend, I'd be more than willing to take it. I have anecdotal experience with a sibling that tried cutting school for a while. He did it to be Cool, not for any other discernible reason. My mother took to randomly stopping by the school or home to check on him, and the uncertainty proved too much for him and he stopped cutting class. She had a job where she spent a lot of time driving through our home town, so brief stops were easy to fit into her schedule, I do not have that luxury. I don't expect to NEED this service, but would have no problem accepting the help should it prove necessary.

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    20. Re:Parents by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I don't see attendance as a need - as many posters mentioned - it's not key to academic success - not to mention that it can be detrimental, in my experience, but that's another story. For me, learning is not optional, and as a great man once said (I forgot who), you shouldn't let school interfere with your education. OTOH, that's your kids, you get to raise them your way, and I'm pretty sure that you're gonna do better than most parents in the US. My only worry is you being to harsh on them - that can ruin lives in very subtle, but painful ways - I've seen it first hand.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  18. Optional? by yakovlev · · Score: 1
    I love how they claim it's "optional" but,

    If the District Attorney chooses to prosecute, truant students could be sentenced to juvenile hall and parents could face up to a $2,000 fine, Pardo said.

    In other words, if you miss school, we track you or you go to jail.

    1. Re:Optional? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Yes, but before this program, it was, if you miss school, you go to jail.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:Optional? by Takichi · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the penalty for truancy to begin with? They're already going to be fined and detained, so this is offering them a less severe punishment if they can accept the terms responsibility.

    3. Re:Optional? by yakovlev · · Score: 1

      No, it wasn't. Reality is that truancy is seldom actually prosecuted.

      Attendance requirements are about school funding, not actually caring whether or not the kids are in school. If the kid is there 50% of the time, that's still more money for the school than if they get sent to juvenile detention and are there 0% of the time. The school will still prosecute the most egregious offenders to "set an example" but won't go after the small fry who miss 10-20 days of school in a year.

      My point above is that with this program the school found a way to effectively bully the parents into agreeing to a horribly over-the-top program by threatening to send the kids to jail, even if they would seldom actually go that far.

      NOTE: I actually think having a mentor call the kids every school day (another part of this program) is a good idea, and probably has more to do with the success of the program than the GPS tracking devices. The GPS tracking is just dumb. Having them sign in and out at the office would accomplish the same thing.

    4. Re:Optional? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      People are getting way to caught up on the GPS device.
      It only tells your location when the code is entered. IT's actually a great reminder and a tool to stay on track.

      It's not over the top.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Optional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hold on -- California students go to juvenile hall for missing school? That's called going overboard. Why should anybody care if they don't go to school? No harm, no foul. Things like this serve to engender distrust among our nation's youth. They can't count on anyone for help -- except maybe their friendly neighborhood drug dealer.

    6. Re:Optional? by yakovlev · · Score: 1
      If it only tells your location when the code is entered, then it does nothing except invade your privacy at 8:00pm, and is primarily a waste of taxpayer money. It's easy to determine whether or not you're at school by looking at attendance records or having you sign in.

      However, in the article they imply that they can find your location at other times:

      Parents will be responsible for paying for lost devices. But Miller said that rarely happens. They are tracking devices and typically can be found immediately.

      If they can find it when it's lost, then they can find it whenever they want.

  19. extracurricular by strack · · Score: 2

    8pm? what goddamn business is it of the government where your child is at 8pm? not that the rest of it isnt bad enough.

    1. Re:extracurricular by mistralol · · Score: 1

      Actually the system does't work without it. Loo at the following. Its a gps device and a code is required. Ok so I would give it to the school nerd to carry for the day and for that agree not to beat him up. However I may have not had a chance to get the device off the person at the end of the day. So unfortunately the person skipping school gets cough out later @ 8pm because the device is still in the home of the other person carrying the device. Now you have two people in trouble!

    2. Re:extracurricular by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      But the school nerd is a huge dork and thinks he's Bruce Lee, so has been studying Kung Fu since he was like 10; and you're a fat schoolyard bully with big fists. True story.

    3. Re:extracurricular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the teacher takes roll call, or the truant officer decides to stop by the classroom?

    4. Re:extracurricular by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, 8PM is none of the school's damn business. Knowing where they are at 8pm is the PARENTS job!

    5. Re:extracurricular by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Part of the program is teaching kids to be prepared for school the next day. This is a pretty good way to do that.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. Such negative backlash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of you guys are actually teachers? As an educator, I actually this is a great idea. Students under 16 are required to be in school, so if they are truant we have to spend resources to sends truancy officer after them, then the kids have to show up in court, etc. This seems it would reduce those costs, both financial and educational.

    1. Re:Such negative backlash... by Arccot · · Score: 2

      How many of you guys are actually teachers? As an educator, I actually this is a great idea. Students under 16 are required to be in school, so if they are truant we have to spend resources to sends truancy officer after them, then the kids have to show up in court, etc. This seems it would reduce those costs, both financial and educational.

      It would only reduce costs if the child complies with the terms of the tracking or it causes the child to attend school instead of skipping. I honestly can't see why it would. If the threat of going to juvie didn't stop the kid from cutting in the first place, why would it stop them from not using their tracker?

    2. Re:Such negative backlash... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Students under 16 are required to be in school

      And there's the core problem.

    3. Re:Such negative backlash... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      As an educator, you are even below the lawyers because you pretend to do something useful while serving a barely-functional system that students escape from with exactly two things:

      • Knowledge of arithmetic (not enough to hand out cashier change without a pocket calculator, though)
      • Ability to read and write
    4. Re:Such negative backlash... by tibit · · Score: 1

      As an educator, it's your right and responsibility to lobby to change fucked up laws. And truancy laws are truly overboard in the U.S. Change the laws and you won't have to bleed tax money on court proceedings, sending truancy officers, etc. It's really simple -- don't complain of it if you do nothing to change it.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    5. Re:Such negative backlash... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the kids would exceed your assessment of them if they went to school and learned something. Putting all the responsibility on teachers is a cop out. Parents need to teach their kids too ... and students need to learn. In the end the kids are responsible for how much or how little they've actually learned. A student with a book can learn many things without a teacher or parent. Without the student's cooperation a parent, teacher or book can't do a damn thing.

    6. Re:Such negative backlash... by Eevee · · Score: 1

      If you read the fine article, you'll see it raised the attendance rate from 77% up to 95% in other locations.

    7. Re:Such negative backlash... by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Lol you had truancy officers? Shit, good thing my county didn't have those when I grew up. I thought that shit only worked in towns of like 200. I mean how is the truancy officer gonna find some 12 year olds out playing in the woods? Truancy Officers = Waste of money IMHO. Taking a kid to court for skipping school = Even bigger waste of money.

      If the kid doesn't want to go, and you call the parent and they don't fix it.. then who gives a damn? Not me.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    8. Re:Such negative backlash... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the kids would exceed your assessment of them if they went to school and learned something.

      Yes, exactly. If they actually went to school and learned something they would exceed my assessment.

    9. Re:Such negative backlash... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Because the stats so far say it does. Or does your honest thoughts trump the measured results?

    10. Re:Such negative backlash... by phek · · Score: 1

      "Students under 16 are required to be in school, so if they are truant we have to spend resources to sends truancy officer after them, then the kids have to show up in court, etc."

      That's a state by state thing. I went to school 5 miles from anaheim and was truent enough to get kicked out of 4 schools between 7th and 10th grade. There were no truancy officers sent to come after me or even call my parents. There was no court I had to attend. All that happened was that there would be a meeting between me, my parents and the principle where it would be decided that the best thing for me was to start going to a continuation or alternative school (which I would end up getting kicked out of as well).

      What exactly do you think these things are going to do? If my school gave me one of these things, i may have used it but not to check in.

    11. Re:Such negative backlash... by Arccot · · Score: 1

      Because the stats so far say it does. Or does your honest thoughts trump the measured results?

      Incorrect. The stats say that the tracking devices, combined with...

      The students are also assigned an adult coach who calls them at least three times a week to see how they are doing and help them find effective ways to make sure they get to class on time.

      get them to class more often. Mentors by themselves have been shown to dramatically decrease truancy. These tracking devices have not.

      And why do you feel the need to be sarcastic? It seems to be an epidemic around here I just don't understand.

    12. Re:Such negative backlash... by Arccot · · Score: 1

      Also, in case anyone's interested in what happens when Baltimore, one of the cities cited as a success story in this article, simply tries to enforce its truancy laws, you can see an article about it here. The short answer is a 27% increase in attendance, although they don't give many specifics about the increase.

  21. ok, i'll say it. by furrymitn · · Score: 1

    Where the fuck are the parents? TFA makes no mention of the parents involvement in this program, only school officials, police, etc. WTF? On top of that they get an AUTOMATED call reminding them to get to school. Where I come from, that's called an ALARM CLOCK. Really? Talk about teaching irresponsibility by taking the responsibility from them...forcefully. Here you go, now you don't have to worry about setting your alarm... it's all done for you now. Oh, and your parent doesn't have to do anything...

    1. Re:ok, i'll say it. by piripiri · · Score: 1

      Well said, mate.

    2. Re:ok, i'll say it. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the part where it said the *parents* could *volunteer* for this, instead of juvie or fines and things.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  22. 8 PM? by dragonsomnolent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WTF? If this is about them skipping school, what does their location at 8PM have anything to do with whether or not they are at school?

    --
    I got nuthin
    1. Re:8 PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? If this is about them skipping school, what does their location at 8PM have anything to do with whether or not they are at school?

      It's to help combat the huge problem we have with truant children breaking into the school at 8pm to stud... er wait

  23. GPS isn't a solution by sheehaje · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe instead of treating students like cattle, schools should become more interesting and figure out why kids are actually skipping school.

    I did all the time, until I was old enough to drop out, get a GED and head to college. I never missed classes in College because I was able to determine for myself what interested me and what goals I wanted to achieve.

    This was because I had moved into a new school district that didn't really evaluate my needs, and instead stuck be in classes that were beneath the level of work I was doing in my previous school. I went from doing algebra and trigonometry to doing long division.

    I'm sure that's not why all students skip school. I sure some are getting bullied, some are on drugs, and others are overwhelmed with their homework. Whatever the case, GPS won't solve the problems.

    1. Re:GPS isn't a solution by mrthoughtful · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Meeting the needs of your client (in this case, the child) is something that seems to be missed out here.
      But then, the US seems to be caught in a web of antiquated behavioural psychology ideas.
      The idea of actually caring about how your client feels is missed. Not just schools, but prisons and other institutions also.
      It seems to be driven by "conform with authority, or be penalized" - a weird message from the Land of the Free.

      --
      This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
    2. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe instead of treating students like cattle, schools should become more interesting and figure out why kids are actually skipping school.

      I did all the time, until I was old enough to drop out, get a GED and head to college. I never missed classes in College because I was able to determine for myself what interested me and what goals I wanted to achieve.

      This was because I had moved into a new school district that didn't really evaluate my needs, and instead stuck be in classes that were beneath the level of work I was doing in my previous school. I went from doing algebra and trigonometry to doing long division.

      I'm sure that's not why all students skip school. I sure some are getting bullied, some are on drugs, and others are overwhelmed with their homework. Whatever the case, GPS won't solve the problems.

      Nothing will change until thier double helix can be fixed!

    3. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was up to the teachers sure, but the people who decide what is going on in the classroom sit on their fat ass in a government building, and in many cases it is 90 year old retired teachers who taught back in Al Capone's time which was different.

      our Super here just announced that they should only teach Reading and Math to kids K-5 no more Science or Social Studies, now talk about BORING

    4. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you missed an opportunity...

      FREE college.

      Straight A student from underprivileged school system...

      Some people get golden opportunities handed to them on a silver platter and ignore them.

    5. Re:GPS isn't a solution by rwv · · Score: 1

      I [am] sure some are getting bullied, some are on drugs, and others are overwhelmed with their homework.

      I recall that bullies were the ones who were more likely to be skipping. They were also more likely to be the ones on drugs, so maybe you bundled in that consideration with your second option.

      As for being overwhelmed by homework... the only reason for this is that you didn't care to either (a) spend the time after school doing what you needed to do, or (b) spend 10 minutes copying answers from your peers who DID do the work the day before. In an ideal high school with lots of over-achievers, everybody would do a little of (a) and a little of (b) so that everybody learns how to put forth the effort when needed as well as relying on social partnerships to share the pain so you don't have to deal with it all by yourself.

    6. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The current system was designed for a different age ..."

      According to Sir Ken Robinson, "Education is modeled on the interests of industrialism, and the image of it".
      Like cattle.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U

    7. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Confusador · · Score: 2

      Sorry, no. Just like I'm not one of Google's clients, I'm their product. The client is always the one who pays the bills. For a public school the client is the taxpayers, for a private school it's the parents. Children are their raw material, and their product is (supposed to be) educated citizens.

      I won't claim to agree with the message, but in that light "conform with authority, or be penalized" makes a lot more sense.

    8. Re:GPS isn't a solution by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Its been that way largely since WW2 (notice the hippies rebelling socially against the authoritarian 50s/60s norms).

      And not Just USA. The factory like educational system is failing in the "industrial" world as a whole. Perhaps because one have moved from hand industry to thought industry, as well as having a marketing system that more and more rely on the message of "self actualization". Hell, i find it of endless amusement that a media world that have been selling the message of the rebel for decades still can not grasp why people are, well, rebelling against them.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    9. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schools are designed for the narrow majority of students that won't act out even when bored out of their skulls because school is a baby sitting device to allow our modern system where both parents work to function.

      The simple fact is that a minority of students are not suited to this AND NEVER HAVE BEEN. In the old days these kids would have left school at 14-15 and entered the workforce. Here in Australia the government has gone even more insane and is trying to force compulsary year 12 schooling* when this minority struggle to even make it through year 10.

      * By eliminating programs that allow these kids to enter work related training. Yeah brillant idea 'cause they won't just become dole bludgers if that happens.

    10. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meeting the needs of the kids is not the purpose of (most) public education. Meeting the needs of large corporations (fast food, big retailers, etc.) to have a steady supply of low-cost, compliant employees is.

      The only other thing you need to understand about public education is that money, as in school funding, has, at best, a a passing correlation with the quality of education. The environment and the local society and, of course, particularly parents has a huge effect. Politician only control money and so are frustrated in their efforts to have any positive effect on education. Their attempts to relieve their impotence result in things like standardized testing, which is so obviously useless as to not need explanation.

    11. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My situation was the same back in H.S. Moved towns right before my senior year. Got thrown into "comparable" classes that were a couple levels beneath what I'd already done the previous year. After complaining and being told "Suck it up for the year. The classes you wanted are full, here." I just told them to fuck themselves. Dropped out, and was in college 6 months early with a head start and I don't regret a minute of it.

      H.S. diploma is worthless in this country.

    12. Re:GPS isn't a solution by the_raptor · · Score: 1

      If you look back a bit you will see many industrialists didn't want an over educated working force (as they would become disillusioned with their lot in life).

      Considering the US education system is one of the worst performing in the industrial world I think those running the system know who butters their bread.

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    13. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't claim to agree with the message, but in that light "conform with authority, or be penalized" makes a lot more sense.

      One would think. However, the taxpayers/parents don't get to choose the curriculum, or how many hours their child must be at school, or pretty much anything else related to the educational process. Instead, government bodies and boards consisting of a handful of individuals determines these things. The students don't like the process/outcome, and neither do many teachers nor parents, nor industry. The only winners here are government officials and manufacturers of standardized tests.

    14. Re:GPS isn't a solution by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Maybe instead of treating students like cattle"
      what is that, a straw man? appeal to emotion? I'm not sure which logical fallacy it is.

      "chools should become more interesting and figure out why kids are actually skipping school."
      They are. And you know what? they have found that bad preparation habits, and bad social habits are the most common reason.
      This is a tool to help the students develop good habits. It's a technique that is far better then putting kids in JD.It's teaching the kids how to rpepare and to change destructive habits.

      oh, and they 'school was so easy', so I quit' BS is getting really fucking old. I can't think of any school that wouldn't change the class of a student who showed they can do it.

      Yeah, I booght into the school is too easy and it sucks crap in high school for the first semester of my freshman year. Then I eventually thought about how to solve the problem and it downed on me that I can not claim that unless I am taking the hardest classes getting A and bored. **
      So I went o the teachers of the classes I want to take talk to them and without exception They found a way to gt me into their class. Since I went to 5 different high schools* I had to to it again each time.

      This system is a good one to accomplish what it's tasked to accomplish.

      *My mother was crazy, and we moved all the time. We lived in over 50 different address by the time I was 18.

      ** When entering HS is missed the placement, so they stuck me in basic math i.e. arithmetic.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:GPS isn't a solution by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And yet, most private schools are WORSE then public schools.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe instead of treating students like cattle, schools should become more interesting and figure out why kids are actually skipping school."
      "... rest of comment"

      Here! Here! Author! Author!

      I know my brother dropped out for many of those reasons as well. Ten years on, he's doing pretty well.

    17. Re:GPS isn't a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say they should find out why kids are skipping. It seems to me they are trying to find out. The GPS system doesn't make kids go to school, it tells where they are. So, if they do skip school then someone knows where and thats part of why.

      I see very little rights violation here. The kids are going to face court if they opt out, that seems to be the law. An option is granted, not forced. If it is not forced then how is it a rights violation. There are many things one can do but does not have to do and they are not all rights violations.

    18. Re:GPS isn't a solution by mrthoughtful · · Score: 1

      [...] The client is always the one who pays the bills.

      Well, picking up on the term 'client' misses my point. However, with respect, I ask you to choose a dictionary of your choice and look up the word 'client'. The term 'client' is used by government agencies to indicate those people who are receiving the benefits, services, etc. of the agency, or in general, it is the person or group who use the services of an agency, not necessarily those who pay for it. Contextually, it can be seen that the term 'client' clearly refers to the children/prisoners/patients.

      --
      This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
  24. bad parents, bad kids by metalgamer84 · · Score: 1

    Juan Cruz's mom, Cristina, said she supports the program and hopes it helps her son get to school â" and stay there. "I understand that he's been missing class. He's one of six children, and we can't always keep an eye on him," she said in Spanish. "I think this is a good idea that will help him."

    Ahh yes, crappy parents with too many kids want the state to raise their delinquent children... *sigh*

  25. I don't get it by ProbablyJoe · · Score: 1
    How does this help? Obviously if they're not at school, then their location is not...in the school. The staff in the school know if they are at school. And then if they're not at school, they're obviously not going to willingly tell the police or their school where they are.

    So basically, if they're at school it's redundant, and if they're not at school they're not going to use it. How is this supposed to be useful?

    "Hey Billy, let's skip class and go to the mall!" "Ok, but I need to tell the police once we're there"

    1. Re:I don't get it by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The police show up at home and Billy gets to spend some time in juvy hall.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  26. Students and inmates now have a lot in common by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 1

    Schools are one step closer to becoming prisons. I do not condone truancy, but I cringe when I hear of solutions such as tracking students by GPS. Not only does it treat students like prisoners, but it conditions the students to accept such tracking as acceptable and they will grow up not seeing an issue with the government wanting to track them and control them. I don't know what is the best way to combat truancy, but there has to be a less invasive way. Fine the parents for unexcused truancy, since the sole reason schools want better attendance is to get more state monies since it is often tied to daily attendance. Sure the parents may not pay, but I'd rather the solution be something to encourage parents to make sure their kids go to school rather than have big brother stepping in to do it for the parents.

    1. Re:Students and inmates now have a lot in common by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Three groups in society always have fewer rights than the rest of us: soldiers, prisoners, and children. Soldiers, because they nobly relinquish their rights to protect the rest of us. Prisoners, because they forfeit their rights due to breaking our laws. Children, because forcing them to do things is good for them.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Students and inmates now have a lot in common by nilloc · · Score: 1

      Placing fines on the parents is not a solution also. If parent drags the child to school in the morning and place that child in the classroom, what is stopping that child from leaving the school grounds? Some kids don't care about authority and their parents. If you fine the parent and they cannot paid it goes on their credit report. What good is that? Children that deems their parents to be unfit can petition court for emancipation. What parents should do that have children that won't listen should petition the court to have the child declared emancipated. After all isn't that what the child wants? To be declared an adult and do as he please?

    3. Re:Students and inmates now have a lot in common by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      "Soldiers, because they nobly relinquish their rights to protect the rest of us."

      No, because it's necessary to run an effective army. And they don't do it nobly, but usually simply because it's a way to earn money and get health insurance. The US army is several times the size needed to protect the US - the rest of it is subsidies for defense contractors and empire-related activities.

    4. Re:Students and inmates now have a lot in common by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      wat? You forget that these kids will grow up into adults who will see no problem with taking the rights away from the rest of us too.

    5. Re:Students and inmates now have a lot in common by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      fine the parents because the school system loses money based on the rules the government setup in the first place?? talk about twisted justice.

    6. Re:Students and inmates now have a lot in common by makomk · · Score: 1

      Soldiers, because they nobly relinquish their rights to protect the rest of us.

      Often whether they actually chose to or not, particularly from a historical perspective. When the draft was in effect in the US, as soon as you were selected you became, legally speaking, a soldier and lost many of your rights - including the right to petition the civilian courts in the hope of actually doing something about this.

      Prisoners, because they forfeit their rights due to breaking our laws.

      That, and because we basically dehumanise criminals (at least the male ones) to the point where we, as a society, are happy to treat them as less than animals.

      Children, because forcing them to do things is good for them.

      More precisely, it'll make them more like us, and by definition that has to be a good thing right?

      Also, there's a running theme through all these, in which the groups in question are treated less like people and more like objects to be manipulated for some goal that's "obviously" good for society. Forget thinking about whether it's actually in soldiers' interests to die en masse in the latest war dreamt up by the upper classes, or whether criminals are more than just pure evil, or why children might not want to do what we're forcing them to - they're not human, so it doesn't matter.

  27. What about a friend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure these students have friends. So why not pay a friend to be in school for you? Problem solved

  28. Is this really a surprise? by Revotron · · Score: 1

    This is California, the state built on the foundation of "Save the Trees, Kill the Children."

    Is there any mystery why the fuck they're in massive amounts of debt and suffering the biggest budget crisis of the state's history? Their answer to EVERY problem is to throw money at it. Kids not learning as well? Let's give them all iPads. Kids not eating well? Instead of teaching them healthy choices, let's remove all the vending machines. Kids not showing up at school? Instead of making school more appealing to them, let's tag them like cattle.

    California is a state where passing the buck (literally and figuratively) has become not only a regular occurrence, but a fucking pastime.

    1. Re:Is this really a surprise? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Kids not eating well? Instead of teaching them healthy choices, let's remove all the vending machines.

      School lunch could stand a rework, if nothing else.

      Every morning, I get up and immediately put rice (Kukuho Rose california sushi rice) I've been soaking into a stoneware pot, then fire it up to simmer. While that's going, I cook and eat breakfast; 15, maybe 20 minutes later the fire's off and I let it sit for about 5 minutes, during which time I prep the sashimi and avocado and whatever else. After the first 5 minutes I pull the rice, dump it in a bowl or small cypress Hangiri, fluff it to let some steam out for a minute, then add sushi seasoning and continue to mix. At this point I have nori (DARK nori, $18 for 50 sheets, extremely high quality) cut and ready, on a makisu (rolling mat). From one sheet I make 8 pieces of makizushi and two pieces of gunkanmaki. Total prep time is about 20 minutes of my day, give or take, since I have the rice cook while I make and eat breakfast.

      The actual cost here for 10 pieces of sushi, given that I get 5 days out of $5 of sashimi and several months out of a $15 20lb bag of rice, is $1 sashimi + (we'll overestimate) 10 cent rice + 36 cent nori = $1.46. You can make rice in bulk; rolling and cutting sushi is rather quick (a minute or two). This would not be a huge undertaking for a school.

      Other decent Japanese dishes include Onigiri, yaki-tori (to serve with the sushi, actually; it's chicken), some "Japanese Hot Pots," anything served in an Izakaya especially is quick and easy to make. Likewise, a lot of Chinese can be made pretty well (there's a lot of crap Chinese food out there though) with minimal effort and expense, since a lot is a pile of stewed or steamed meat covered with a sauce and mixed with a large amount of rice, or steamed buns/vegetables. Australian food is often... unhealthy... but who cares? You won't die of a meat pie and a small Pavlova once a month, and the "healthy choices" thing that dictates to NEVER EVER TOUCH THESE THINGS is retarded. Seafood is healthy, and Belgian dishes like mussels steamed in white wine sauce come to mind, as well as dishes like seafood soup. Mexican dishes, too, can be made pretty cheaply.

      It's easy to select a few healthy/unhealthy main courses through the week, and pair them with unhealthy/healthy deserts. For example, a Japanese bento box with sushi, some yaki-tori, daifuku (sugary desert including anko paste, mochi (rice paste + sugar), and a whole strawberry), some steamed vegetables, and some sliced fruit is easy to assemble in a few seconds from prepared dishes (the sushi, yaki-tori, vegetables, and daifuku would just be around; the fruit would need to be continuously sliced, of course, for fresheness, if not preserved in a light syrup or salt water). Nobody can argue that a daifuku or yaki-tori (FRIED chicken) is extremely healthy, but it won't kill you. This is called "balance."

      The same goes for, say, a taco salad. Sure, the sour cream, fried taco bowl, cheese, and refried beans are not "really good for you;" but it's filled with lettuce and tomatoes and well... beans have fiber and lots of protein... and a proper (not Taco Bell style) corn tortilla shell is tasty and filled with vitamins... cheese is 'unhealthy' but it's protein filled. Serve with apples in a light syrup with cinnamon; and perhaps add some beef or chicken to the taco salad for a meat balance. It's mostly vegetables.

      School is mainly lunchroom pizza, milk, and a tray of unidentifiable fruit in a light syrup nobody is going to eat-- except the halved pears, because they're actually good. Sometimes they give you manacotti or stuffed shells that equate to manacotti in a shell shaped pasta instead of a tube shaped pasta. Sometimes there is spaghetti. here is a menu in a typical MD school. We can do far better.

      I t

    2. Re:Is this really a surprise? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      More accurately "Cut the taxes, Kill the children"
      Fucking prop 13 destroyed that state.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Is this really a surprise? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I think the key to running a better lunch room is to examine the entire lunch serving process as a business process. "
      no. That's how they got here.

      They need to view it as it is, a social program. Government has a socially responsibility business do not have.

      TO a busing it's :Get the cheapest food into the mouths ans cheaply as possible.

      Once you recognize the food isn't the big expense, the process is. The process becomes have some one deliver cheap crap food.

      This would happen even if the food was free to get because as I said, the process is the biggest expense.

      If ti's a social program to meet certain social goals the its about meeting those good nutritional goals as cheaply as possible.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Is this really a surprise? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Raw fish and 3rd graders? are you kidding? most kids' palettes are sensitive and the fish smell is a big turn off to a lot of them... this goes for just about all seafood. sure they might like it when they get a bit older but you've got to be kidding me about suggesting sushi. many ADULTS have trouble with the smell. I think an attempt to make the status quo healthier would be a better way to go, like a subway like menu with quality cuts of meat and fresh vegetables.

    5. Re:Is this really a surprise? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You can find cooked ethnic foods, Japanese and otherwise. Seafood is healthy and upper middle school and high school kids will appreciate sashimi. Salmon is better than tuna in respect to palate though. That wasn't my point; it costs me $1.46 and a few minutes' time to make 10 pieces of sushi, what's it cost you for 6 pieces of basic salmon roll? $5.95? $7.95 if it includes avocado?

      How much Japanese Izakaya- and hotpot-style food do you think you can make cheap without a quality sacrifice? Cheap Chinese food (beef, chicken, pork!)? German, Mexican, Belgian, ... Russian and Indian are kind of tough. Still, we can do better than having Pizza day and Hotdog day, with some kind of spaghetti-like food on Fridays.

    6. Re:Is this really a surprise? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      "I think the key to running a better lunch room is to examine the entire lunch serving process as a business process. " no. That's how they got here.

      They got there on the wrong goals.

      TO a busing it's :Get the cheapest food into the mouths ans cheaply as possible.

      Once you recognize the food isn't the big expense, the process is. The process becomes have some one deliver cheap crap food.

      It's still a business process. Study business process management. Not all processes are strictly goal oriented towards "reduce expenses." Polo Ralph Lauren clothes have a big margin and are overpriced; but did you know they're also more expensive to produce? Not proportionally to their price, but they are indeed more costly to make than Chinese sweat-shop clothes you buy at Wal-Mart. They have a quality standard they want to live up to, and that is part of their business specification.

      Look at Paul Reed Smith guitars vs Gibson for the same. Gibson guitars are pretty crappy. They have a big name, they have some materials requirements (solid tone wood), but they don't have the best craftsmanship. Tone wood is solid, but it's not selective; and sometimes it's frail, the grain can be wrong and the neck can snap or split (Gibson headstocks are known to break quite a lot, hence the volute during the 70s... which didn't help, so they discontinued it). Yet PRS guitars are cheaper, even though they're manufactured to a higher quality requirement, with better electronics, thicker wires, and carefully selected cuts of tone wood. Even the PRS SE line, made in Korea, has quality requirements; if they don't meet standards, PRS finds another Korean factory that will.

      We can do much, much better than we are now; and we can do it cheaply and efficiently, and at quality. I would find $2 lunches acceptable (currently they are $1.50 on average here) with the same free and reduced lunch plans for low-income families here if we only used high-quality ingredients. Asian food is easier because rice is so cheap; but baked rotisserie chicken is cheap as hell too (American ethnic food), relatively healthy, and can be seasoned with expensive high-quality spices without breaking the bank. Yeah, a $6 bottle of i.e. Thyme vs a $3 bottle, but the bottle is good for about two dozen chickens so it's like 25 cents vs 12 cents a dozen, or 1-2 pennies per whole chicken; your students should not be eating a whole chicken by themselves, and the 8 spices that go into this make a whole 5 cents price increase in their meal.

      Think on it. Quality chicken costs what $5? (I spend under $9 on packs of 2 cornish hens; a bigger chicken is bigger, but I don't expect a third grader to eat half a hen) Cut it up into 6 pieces and everyone gets a leg and a wing or just a breast; unused parts get chopped up for something like chicken and rice the next day. So the $5 / 4 == $1.25, plus you go with fresh fruits and steamed vegetables as sides (these are cheap as hell, even at high quality levels) for no more than 75 cents and you're at $2 lunch on very rich tastes. Whatever pays the teacher pays the cafeteria server (i.e. taxes, tuition fees...).

      Food prep takes forever... at home. If I had to make sushi for 10 people, though, it would take me about 3 times as long as it does to make sushi for me... see it? Never mind anything stew (Japanese hot pots, Russian/German stews, British mutton stew) or soup (Chinese, Indian, Scandinavian, Belgian... lots to pick from). Tacos and makizushi are "some assembly required," meaning you make all the components in bulk and then grab tortillas or nori and wrap everything together in a few seconds; makizushi is somewhat easier since you can just do stock/flow economics and keep so much on hand, and start rapidly making/rolling/cutting the stuff when you run low. Still not a burden. Even better pizza is doable with some modification in process; you already have a giant oven, though meeting capacit

  29. Are the schools worth attending? by accessbob · · Score: 1

    Considering how badly funded many US schools are, with under-qualified teaching staff, does it make much difference whether the kids are actually there or not?

    1. Re:Are the schools worth attending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned everything I was going to from school by sophomore year of high school. College was great, but those last years of high school were pathetic. It was about the people who didn't learn what they were supposed to years ago getting another final try.

      I dropped out senior year because I couldn't take it anymore. There was crap happening at home and school. It was lame. I easily passed the GED test, had previously passed the Michigan proficiency test, and earned my BS in CS.

      At the time, Mt. Morris had the highest number of dropouts going to college in the state.

      I'm not trying to encourage others to drop out of school; I want schools to get better. I had a terrible teacher named McBride who spent class time harassing me instead of teaching. One bad egg can put one over the top.

  30. Waste by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

    What a great waste of money. Great idea, take away from kids that actually want to learn.

    --
    Anything is possible given time and money.
  31. Sledgehammer to crack a walnut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may be a cultural thing, but don't you have registers in the USA? Where at the start of the day, each lesson, after lunch etc... a teacher goes down a list of names and checks said named student is actually present in class? So missing ones are instantly noticed? Admittedly it is rather low-tech compared to GPS-enabled bracelets but... seriously?

  32. Behold - A Magic Trick! by AtomicDevice · · Score: 1

    Behold as I ... give it to my friend and tell him the code!!!! UNBELIEVABLE

    Also what if I just throw the tracking device in a lake and continue skipping school? This just seems like a waste of resources - buying expensive GPS (they must be at least a GPS module and probably a cell phone radio?) units and giving them to kids who, as they are often skippers, don't really care about school or keeping in good condition the expensive thing you gave them.

    This seems like the kind of tactic that would encourage a (potenital) miscreant who skips sometimes to just stop coming all together.

    --
    Ze Atomic Device! It iz Ztolen!
    1. Re:Behold - A Magic Trick! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      ...except that the alternative to keeping this in good condition and entering the codes is going to juvenile detention and/or a hefty fine. This won't stop option 1 from happening though.

  33. Seems like a stillborn idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is rather broken
    1) GPS is not reliable due to requiring line of site, A-GPS requires triangulation from mobile phone towers, and is only accurage to about 100 meters.
    2) The little twits that skip school are either really stupid, or really smart, this is only going to work on the stupid ones.
    a. The stupid ones will just get their smart friends to hack it or teach them how to work around it.
    b. The smart ones will just hack it or work around it.
    3.) Having to enter a code is the weakness in combined with the GPS. Throw the tracker in shielded box and enter the code without the GPS locking on, and voila, broken.

    This is the kind of thing I'd hack because it's a challenge.

  34. so not thought out by mrthoughtful · · Score: 1

    What stops a truant from giving it to the class geek for a dollar?

    --
    This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
    1. Re:so not thought out by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Now I get it - the program provides funding for gifted kids. They can use the money to upgrade their computers.

    2. Re:so not thought out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, alright, at least the nerd scores cheap free hardware

    3. Re:so not thought out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CA geeks are more expensive than that.

  35. Why this won't work by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    "Hey Dexter, I got this GPS thing I have to keep inputting to. Put the codes in for me while I skip school again and I won't beat you up for the next week."

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Why this won't work by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Dexter just has to throw the GPS on the next freight train out of town, and he'll never have to worry about that bully again.
      If caught, he can blame it on the next bully...

    2. Re:Why this won't work by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

      *wooooooooosh* The point was that they could get someone else to input codes for them. Doesn't have to necessary be someone they pick on, a friend would work too.

      --
      What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  36. incomplete summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I RTFA, and the headline/summary is rather sensationalistic--Oh right, I'm on Slashdot.

    The one hugely important detail left out:

    This is NOT a punishment, it's a VOLUNTARY program to help students get back on track.

  37. Can't handle the pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I now have to reliably remember to check in on five different devices with five different codes or risk a 5x atomic wedgie from hell.

  38. Re:Cell Phone Solution! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

    Do you live in PA?

  39. Re:Cell Phone Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cannot assume that EVERY kid has a cell phone. Not all families are wealthy, you know...

  40. Be VERY careful talking shit about these kids by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Informative
    I see a lot of borderline or open racism in this thread about the Anaheim school district. Let's review the demographics before we start spouting off ignorant bullshit about the students.

    Asian 12.09%
    Filipino 3.94%
    Hispanic 62.02%
    Black 3.33%
    White 17.17%

    Free & Reduced Lunch 52.0%

    Limited English Proficiency 27.6%
    Fluent English Proficiency 36.1%
    Native English speakers 36.3%

    Now, who wants to take back their bigoted statements? Click reply to make apologies for unspoken assumptions about the low achievement levels of the student body.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Be VERY careful talking shit about these kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see a lot of borderline or open racism in this thread about the Anaheim school district. Let's review the demographics before we start spouting off ignorant bullshit about the students.

      Asian 12.09%

      Filipino 3.94%

      Hispanic 62.02%

      Black 3.33%

      White 17.17%

      Free & Reduced Lunch 52.0%

      Limited English Proficiency 27.6%
      Fluent English Proficiency 36.1%
      Native English speakers 36.3%

      Now, who wants to take back their bigoted statements? Click reply to make apologies for unspoken assumptions about the low achievement levels of the student body.

      Why would any of these statistics change anything about low achievement?

    2. Re:Be VERY careful talking shit about these kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is the point you're trying to make?

    3. Re:Be VERY careful talking shit about these kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying I should expect less of these kids because they're poor and Hispanic? Sounds kind of racist right there.

    4. Re:Be VERY careful talking shit about these kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm...what? I think you're finding "bigoted statements" where there really are none...

    5. Re:Be VERY careful talking shit about these kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying I should expect less of these kids because they're poor and Hispanic? Sounds kind of racist right there.

      It really is. We should expect more out of the school district because these kids are poor and Hispanic. GPS tracking for truant students is not the answer.

  41. I'm not sure I see the point by mark-t · · Score: 1

    What happens if a kid doesn't report in reliably? Why not just make whatever that is the penalty for truancy in the first place instead of trying to fix a social problem with technology?

  42. Yep! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Simply reinforcing my notion that modern schooling is less about education and more about simply "jailing" children so mommy and daddy can go to work.

    Is it any wonder why prison is such a growth industry in this country when we're institutionalizing them from age 6 onward?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  43. Enter a code? by kieran · · Score: 1

    What's to stop them giving the codes and devices to someone who is going to class?

    This system nicely straddles the horribly invasive and the pointlessly insecure, doesn't it?

  44. it's all about the money $$$ ding ding ding by rjejr · · Score: 1

    For the 98% of you who didn't read the article - the schools pay $8 per day for GPS to make the kids come to school and the schools are then paid $35 per day (presented as school loses $35 per each kid per each absence). It's not about education or truancy or delinquency or anything else, it's about the almighty dollar. End. Of. Story.

    1. Re:it's all about the money $$$ ding ding ding by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Nail --> Head. HIT!

  45. 7th Grade - Big Steps Now by Sulfate · · Score: 1

    7th grade, ah, the year we learned about smoking, and shortly after drinking, and thc. We also become more aware of the real situation of the nation, militarized thug coppery and your future slavery to the bankstrocity. The fragile times of deciding right from wrong, understanding law vs violent tyrannic power, of loving your neighbor and putting a cap in his or her ass, of course they want to train us to be slaves and accept the fascist patriot act while tossing out the us constitution, George Washington, and our souls so we can work for the TSA. Ah 7th grade, our parents finally have to leave us alone, there is no choice, they can't baby us forever.

    It seems to me it's better to shut down the school. If they would just teach something worth while in the real world like electronics+math or science+physics, perhaps the school wouldn't have to keep students. It's not that I don't think black history is important, but I think the original founding of the nation, the us constitution and bill of rights and where they have strayed down the path by foreign and corporate oath breakers are today of a bit more importance.

    Math class could discuss things like Debt to GDP or why establishment supplied unemployment statistics are always wrong or what happens to the dollar when the printing press runs.

    why the banksters are not in jail, could be social science / law

    But no, in four years we'll have another generation of meth users who work at burger king and can't count the fucking change when you give them an extra 11 cents to make a dollar change. Then four more years and we'll have them on slashdot saying you have no right to privacy, or a domain, or webhosting, or free speech, and on and fucking on. Of course none of them will ever have owned an M1 Carbine and 30 round clip, a shotgun, or gone deer, or duck hunting, which is why we have all these forest fires, idiots never been in cub scouts, boy or girl scouts don't know how to build a fucking safe fire. How many kids can use a soldering gun/pencil/flame and repair something? Not only is everything surface mount, nobody cares about ham radio. Can't they teach kids to make an emergency doublet antenna with low swr? Or first aid, or how to wire a 48 channel mixer?

    Soon they will have all these mobile devices, and ipads, net pads whatever, and facebook and google can document all their shit for the government. They'll never know bbs software, fidonet, pgp at the command line, telnet, or an mfm drive. There is no Fravia to teach them to love coffee, v0dsky, or life, to be analytic, careful, or how to search those retarded errors in /var/log/message. Nope, they'll show up in all the blogs, asking the same old droning shit. Why doesn't my X work. What's a path, now whats file not found mean? Which is why we will have to keep writing the how-to's.

    Back to the school issue.
    I think tossing the constitutional ramifications aside, I'd like to know who funds the GPS thingy here. There has to be money involved, GPS don't grow on trees. Who pays? Who profits? Who analyzes the data? There's where you should be filling out the pink slips, and drawing lines in the sand.

    If I was going to skip school that GPS tracker would be at the bottom of a river sooner rather than later.

  46. It's not forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair here, the article states "Students and their parents volunteer for the monitoring as a way to avoid continuation school or prosecution with a potential stay in juvenile hall."

    1. Re:It's not forced by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      That's like saying that the school nerd volunteers to hand over his lunch money to avoid being punched in the face by the school bully.

      Many of the most important people in the history of the world never went to school or left well before eighteen; today they'd be considered juvenile criminals.

  47. I think I like my hometowns method better by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    Where I live if your child has excessive unexcused absences then both the child and the parent have to report to court. The parent can face fines and/or community service relating to contempt of court if the child continues to be truant or the parent doesn't show up for court.

    It makes the parent responsible, and we don't condition our children to believe that "big brother" is normal. That's Google's job :P.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  48. Stupidest fucking thing I ever heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is incredible that the people who started this program have so little self awareness that they didn't realize they were being outrageously fucking stupid.

  49. Kids will work around even this by Killer+Eye · · Score: 1

    Kids won't be stopped by that. Maybe each day they'll nominate one friend to carry all the stupid devices to school and log in while the others goof off. Or worse, they'll probably threaten some small kid to do it for them.

    --
    "Microsoft killed my company, I hold a personal grudge. I don't use Microsoft products and neither should you."-JWZ
  50. First and Foremost by Ribbons+Almark · · Score: 1

    INVASION OF PRIVACY! This is ridiculous. First off the school which I am assuming is a public school has not authority force a child to do anything without the consent of the guardian of the child. Second, if this is put into effect how long before your employeer is like well Mike is five minutes late for work in the morning, I'm gonna strap a GPS on him to see where he is and when he leaves his house and where he hangs out after work. Nope simply will not fly. Second can the school ensure that the GPS data is completely protected from hackers or people looking to track the student. I think not yet. If the GPS data were to fall into the wrong hands say a person looking to do harm to children he would be able to pin point where this kid and when he would appear to be alone. This is a dangerous concept and school be removed from the school place. If the school really wants to stop cutter do the GOD DAMN OLD FASHION WAY AND YELL AT THE PARENTS.

    1. Re:First and Foremost by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Legally you don't have to be at work. You can just not turn up and you haven't broken any laws (well assuming you aren't in the Army or some other job with such special circumstances).

      Legally a student under the age of 16 has to be at school. If they just don't turn up they have broken the law and can be sent to juvie and their parents fined.

      Hence the two situations are completely unrelated.

  51. You dolt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Addressing the root cause is embarrassing to many powerful people. It is also expensive and difficult.

    Why in God's name would anyone pick such an option over showy, easy, relatively cheap options that don't make anyone look incompetent?

  52. Absurd by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Completely absurd. When I was in high school, my friends and I regularly skipped 9 days per semester (as the limit was 10). I proceeded to go to college, get a degree and have a successful (so far) career. High school was a dreadful place to be, and forcing things in this way is just going to make the kids resent it even more. This is major overkill, people in that district need to get a grip on reality. ...in other news, Anaheim Union High School District votes Monday to place snipers on rooftops to guard against jaywalkers near campus.

  53. Re:Cell Phone Solution! by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

    You'll know that the cell phone is moving when you see a picture of the inside of the kid's pocket.

  54. Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would suck if the GPS trackers cause cancer when the kids grow older. The kids have no choice, but beleive the devices are safe.

  55. Parenthood by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    You know, Mrs. Buckman, you need a license to buy a dog, to drive a car - hell, you even need a license to catch a fish. But they'll let any butt-reaming asshole be a father.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Parenthood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yanno you can't make babies in that hole, right?

  56. Not the way I'd go about things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering all the things I got into/around during school, I have no issues with my kids being tracked. As long as I'm doing it, and it's actually useful, rather than "Here, honey, enter the code and keep Mommy posted please!"
    How is this supposed to be useful for anything besides a paperweight, CA?
    -.-

  57. My first reaction exactly by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

    You saved me the hassle of torturing english to say the same thing, albeit with lot of spelling and grammar atrocities intermixed.

  58. Re:Cell Phone Solution! by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

    Nowadays every kid has a cell phone. Why not allow the schools to install an app. that automatically relays their location back to the school every five minutes?

    The kids may decide to just leave the cell phone somewhere. Luckily cell phones have cameras too. If you automatically relay a picture back every hour, you can ensure that the cell phone is moving and that the kid is near it. Or require the kid to take a picture of his face next to a clock every hour.

    Surely that's not overly intrusive.

    Verizon wireless already has the feature that (naturally) costs like ten bucks a month to relay cell phone GPS data to a website so parents can track location. It's simple: the school will require the student to CALL the truancy office during the times of day for a verbal authenticator and the phone can be checked against location. No stupid codes that someone else can punch in on the delinquent child's behalf.

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  59. Re:Cell Phone Solution! by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

    You cannot assume that EVERY kid has a cell phone. Not all families are wealthy, you know...

    Issuing a cell phone for the purposes of checking in with the school would probably be far cheaper than the units that they'll end up using. It will be used only to call the school during the proscribed times for the purposes of voice verification while matched against the GPS location.

    Simple and effective.

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  60. Give a device to the parent too by aarongadberry · · Score: 1

    ...and watch how often they are in the same place.

  61. An alternative approach? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not simply physically punish children who keep playing truant?

    Perhaps then they'll start turning up before stronger measures are required?

    1. Re:An alternative approach? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      pff.. physical abuse is just another weapon, like this gps. a weapon that'll get misused. that's why corporal punishment was banned in the first place: misuse.

  62. Low tech solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Students cut class because they're frustrated. With bad teachers who take interesting subjects and make them boring, with not being able to understand what is being taught, with not seeing any possible purpose for what is being taught, etc.

    Why not do something radical like taking the tens of thousands of dollars the system is going to cost and.. Hire better teachers?

  63. It's about learning . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    If a child/teenager doesn't want to learn, there is no point about forcing him/her into school. That's a sad fact to say, but where I went to school, a mother tried to sue the town school system for flunking her son. Well, duh, when he came to school in the morning, he had already smoked some stuff. He had no interest in learning anything.

    So, back on topic: If some dumb-ass does not want to learn, there is no point in forcing him/her to go to school.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  64. $18,000!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It costs $18,000 for SIX WEEKS to track dropouts!?

    And I still have to pay for college? What is wrong with this picture?

  65. There's even a better way by dmomo · · Score: 1

    Instead of the GPS, why not.. check to see if they are at school? If those blasted kids are not going to trick you into thinking that they are at school by making it appear as if they are in school... why do they even care about tricking the GPS let alone honoring it?

  66. Truancy Laws by perlith · · Score: 1
    I RTFA and was very confused. Then I googled "truancy laws" and things made a bit more sense:

    http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0112617.html
    http://www.ecs.org/ecs/ecscat.nsf/WebTopicView?OpenView&count=-1&RestrictToCategory=Attendance--Truancy

    Apparently the pilot is supposed to evaluate whether this is more cost-effective than serving warrants and the like. What's interesting to me, there isn't much available in terms of national data for effects of truancy: http://gradworks.umi.com/32/58/3258431.html

    "An important implication of this study is that researchers are not able to examine the true extent of truancy in this country because each state has a different way of defining truancy. This also makes it impossible to interpret the statistical data on truancy rates because there is no system or statewide information. The lack of consistency in defining truancy makes it difficult to make comparisons. "

    How many times has Slashdot said "IT should not be the solution to the business/societal/cultural issue"? Prime example right here, the GPS device should not be doing the job of the parent(s) and the community.

  67. Why worry about the children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they can't even get the teachers to show up for their job in WI.

  68. Unintended Science Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great unintended science project! Just one truant student has to learn how to automate the GPS device sign-in. Then, this "answer key" can be passed around.

  69. common sense fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Title is wrong. Kids don't get tracked by gps. Kids send their gps location data to school. Very stupid and cumbersome process. If the kids skipped school the teacher's note is as strong as the kid sending in his gps data. Technology fail, common sense fail. If the kid was skipping school, do you think he would care enough to send in gps data?

  70. Maybe it's the funding by subanark · · Score: 1

    When I was in high school I was permitted to substitute 1 of my high school classes for a college class. The reason being that I couldn't substitute anymore was that the school last funding on my attendance for subbing out more than 1. I'm wondering if there is a similar issue going on here. Could lack of attendance reduce funding that a school gets for a student?

  71. Think harder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Conditioning and indoctrination are tactics used by governments against the common man for thousands of years. I'll give you one guess as to why you don't realize it.

    Here's one obvious example. Ask the average person (in 2011) whether he thinks that drug users are criminals and should be treated as such, locked in cages like animals among rapists, murderers -- people who pose an actual threat to others in terms of theft, fraud, or physical force. He will almost certainly say YES without even thinking twice. But if you look a little deeper, he doesn't say yes because he's carefully considered it. He says yes because that's all he knows. And this is by design.

    Now go back to the year 1911 and ask the average person the same question. The answer here will almost certainly be NO, and in addition you would likely find yourself being accused of preaching tyranny, oppression, runaway consolidation of power, and destruction of civil rights. Indeed, prohibition is a modern business (and one worth billions per year to the people who run it).

    So what exactly is the difference that 100 years made? Indoctrination. Let's call a spade a spade here: the common man wasn't the one who came up with the idea to lock non-violent people in cages for made-up crimes against nobody but "the state". And when the idea was first implemented, he certainly didn't cheer it on like he does today. At best, he ignored it, telling himself "it doesn't affect me" (to the delight of the elite who actually define the law).

    The federal income tax has a similar history. When it was first proposed, the majority of people were dead set against it. As a compromise, the elite at the top promised that it would only be "temporary" until the "state of emergency" was "over" (bet that sounds familiar). A hundred years later, the common man can't imagine a world without it -- exactly as planned. Not only that, but he considers it normal, just, and necessary -- despite the constant wave of corruption, death, and destruction caused directly by the federal government, not only at home but abroad. But here's the kicker: the income tax had been absolutely key in allowing the US federal government to swell into the most expensive, most powerful governing body AND world empire (with military bases in some 150 countries around the world) in world history.

    Of course, the common man has no clue about that, either.

  72. Missing the point by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

    You're missing the point. It is not the truants themselves that will be conditioned, but their fellow students. They'll grow up thinking its normal for "bad" kids/people to be tracked like cattle. That will become acceptable.

    It is not acceptable. Its a violation of our fundamental rights, and, at least in the US, our society needs to be made to realize that and fight against this sort of thing. It's against the basic principals that our country was founded for

  73. Destroy the device by jprupp · · Score: 1

    If I were one of those kids I'd destroy the device disregarding the possible consequences as an act of disobedience to this 1984 attempt.

  74. School + 1984 by Kc_spot · · Score: 1

    Administrator Big Brother is watching!

    --
    This needs more cowbell!!!
  75. It always amusese me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... When i read stuff where total privacy invasion is ok for kids. Of course the parents doing it would scream bloody murder if it happened to them.

    imo some parents should go to jail for the way they raise their children. The way it should be since any crime committed by a kid is the parent's responsibility.

    "Maam, even if you tell me your kid is good and "can't do this!", he did. That is 120$ for the glass, 200$ for the fine and YOU will go to jail if you don't pay."

    You don't have to agree with me. As a counter point, the law does agree but judges don't. Look at the result.

  76. My thoughts exactly. One problem though... by crovira · · Score: 2, Funny

    I doubt that kids have enough folding dough to make this truly profitable, unless you count pre-tit poontang from the girly-truants. (If inept sex is all you can manage; go for it. :-)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:My thoughts exactly. One problem though... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Are you shitting me?

      I see kids in 3rd, 4th grade with iPhones and Blackberrys. They've got 20s in their pockets because their parents just hand them wads of cash and don't make them work for it.

      School is practically like prison (especially junior high/middle school and high school/secondary school). EVERYBODY hustles.

      In my example, I used to get bus tickets because I lived 2 1/2 miles from school; enough to get me most of the way there and back. Instead I'd sell them for a buck (about $0.30 less than the bus), trade them for favors, homework, etc. One enterprising group of people managed to steal a stack of the whole things. Bus tickets were the high school equivalent of cigarettes in prison.

      Trust me, even if they didn't have money they'd figure things out. They'd intimidate some other kids into doing it or bribe them with favors, booze, drugs, sex, whatever.

    2. Re:My thoughts exactly. One problem though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You presume that the person punching the codes will be doing so willingly or calling the shots. "Take this and punch in the codes when you're suppose to or I rearrange your face the next time I see you."

      I expect there to be more bullying than profit to be made here.

    3. Re:My thoughts exactly. One problem though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to me, no, but to the 12yr old nerd that can figure out how to redirect the signal? goldmine!

    4. Re:My thoughts exactly. One problem though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless you count pre-tit poontang from the girly-truants.

      Post-tit poontang from the girly-truants; when was the last time you saw a flat-chest skip school?

  77. updates 5 times a day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    God's been doing this to muslims for centuries.

  78. IMHO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I got > 4.0 in high school. I viewed the marginal cost of driving 50 minutes each way to school for one more day of class vs. the marginal benefit (maybe one or two key points which I could make up by reading others' notes the next day and .043 on my GPA), and decided that I only needed to go to class about 4 days a week. So I did. The spring of my senior year I only had about 2 full weeks of class, and still got over a 4.0. I missed around 28 days and then 14 half days (either left early or came late) due to dental / ortho appointments.

    I an in my final semester of college and so far I have only missed about one week of classes total. Three days of those were due to recovery from a pretty serious surgery, one day recently due to illness, and the rest were random excused absences.

    I think that if people want students to come to class they need to make it worth their time.

  79. hell no by luther349 · · Score: 1

    when i was a kid i skipped all the time. like most geeks of my era did. are school system is ran like a jail and nobody wanted to be there.my school had a 94% dropout rate.i still managed a high grade point being i aruldy knew what was tought attendance didn't mean shit. of course when they started threatening me with bs i dropped entirely. got my ged and whent to tec school and am now a server admin. others drop due to bullys or drugs. if they ever said take this gps or else to me i would have smashed it right in front of them. but if you notice the grade levels they are targeting its kids who do not have the option to tell them to go to hell without there parents help. the issue has always been how public school suck and seem to get worse and adding more jail like bs to it only makes it worse. but as everyone said hear its all abought forcing kids to become dedicated worker bees unwilling to stand up and say no to stupid shit. hell thats are problem now theres to few like me willing to sand up and say fuck off.

  80. And by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    they are never a monsterous distraction in an already over-crowed classroom.

    1. Re:And by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      in an already over-crowed classroom.

      Oh, spiffy.
      "Caw-Caw!"

  81. So what by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Who cares, if they don't want to be in class that badly, they're probably not contributing anyway.

    Just inform their parent[s] or guardian on every absence and give them the grade they earn.

    If they fail, they fail.

    If you coerce them into following the rules like that, they will probably end up the last place we want them to be, law enforcement.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  82. Absolutely crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the schools responsibility to "track" children, it's the parents. I hope the parents raise hell over this dumb idea.

    I thought it was crazy to ticket parents for their truant children... this is wayyy over the top.

  83. Re:Cell Phone Solution! by SuppositoryPlacebo · · Score: 1

    It probably would be cheaper, but then the superintendent's brother in-law will have wasted millions of dollars to create these devices which was the whole point of this idea in the first place: making money at the taxpayers expense. Because California isn't corrupt and bankrupt enough already.

  84. another win for Tech! by cifey · · Score: 1

    Practically this might be useful in regards to crime control etc. But really irritating for kids that are just bored going to day care/er public school, however statistically those would be a minority.

    --
    Hello Cruel World
  85. Did you ditch school the day they discussed by unassimilatible · · Score: 0

    the scientific method, Mr. Neurobio? You ditched school and turned out oh-so-smart, so truancy is good. I drank beer in high school and now have a law degree. Therefore, it is good that children drink beer. I guess you skipped the day in high school when they discussed inductive reasoning?

    And will you reimburse your childless neighbors for their property taxes, squandered so your little cherub can ditch the classes they are paying for? Are you a real libertarian who believes childless people shouldn't have to pay for your kids, or a fake Slashdot "libertarian," who only believes in freedom for himself? I wonder how far this rebel act of yours actually goes. Must have got you a lot of chicks the days you did show up to school, with your red James Dean windbreaker with the collar turned up.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  86. Submitting to threats does not equal volunteering. by Zigbigadoorlue · · Score: 1

    They are being threatened with "prosecution with a potential stay in juvenile hall." and "letting kids skip school without a valid reason is, in fact, a crime." How could you possibly call that volunteering?

    Additionally, yes, for now, it is just the bad, bad truants. People that citizens would be reluctant to defend or start an outcry over. But this is a pilot program. Once pilots are successful (or I suspect in a case like this, even if it's not) they are expanded to larger groups. I wonder if in the future they will get the ability to track students via their cell phones. Maybe a mandatory smart phone app that periodically calls home with GPS data.

  87. Time to spend some quailty time with your SO by jeko · · Score: 1

    Hi Geekoid,

    I grew up on base with an actual drill instructor for a father. I have heard bullets fired in anger fly past my head. I have a decade and a half teaching experience. My kids shoot, climb, cave and scuba-dive, all activities which cheerfully kill the undisciplined. My hair is short and gray, which judging from your user ID, yours probably is as well.

    Even I think you're wound a little tight on this. :-)

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  88. Obligatory Gatto on schooling's purpose... by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://www.newciv.org/whole/schoolteacher.txt
    "Look again at the seven lessons of schoolteaching: confusion, class assignment, dulled responses, emotional and intellectual dependency, conditional self-esteem, surveillance -- all of these things are good training for permanent underclasses, people derived forever of finding the center of their own special genius. And in later years it became the training shaken loose from even its own original logic -- to regulate the poor; since the 1920s the growth of the school bureaucracy and the less visible growth of a horde of industries that profit from schooling just exactly as it is, has enlarged this institution's original grasp to where it began to seize the sons and daughters of the middle classes."

    http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/16a.htm
    "I'll bring this down to earth. Try to see that an intricately subordinated industrial/commercial system has only limited use for hundreds of millions of self-reliant, resourceful readers and critical thinkers. In an egalitarian, entrepreneurially based economy of confederated families like the one the Amish have or the Mondragon folk in the Basque region of Spain, any number of self-reliant people can be accommodated usefully, but not in a concentrated command-type economy like our own. Where on earth would they fit? ... Before you can reach a point of effectiveness in defending your own children or your principles against the assault of blind social machinery, you have to stop conspiring against yourself by attempting to negotiate with a set of abstract principles and rules which, by its nature, cannot respond. Under all its disguises, that is what institutional schooling is, an abstraction which has escaped its handlers. Nobody can reform it. First you have to realize that human values are the stuff of madness to a system; in systems-logic the schools we have are already the schools the system needs; the only way they could be much improved is to have kids eat, sleep, live, and die there."

    So, yes, give schools more money and they will do this even better:
        http://www.thewaronkids.com/

    I suggest just give the money as a basic income to the parents instead...
    http://www.pdfernhout.net/towards-a-post-scarcity-new-york-state-of-mind.html
    "New York State current spends roughly 20,000 US dollars per schooled child per year to support the public school system. This essay suggests that the same amount of money be given directly to the family of each homeschooled child. Further, it suggests that eventually all parents would get this amount, as more and more families decide to homeschool because it is suddenly easier financially. It suggests why ultimately this will be a win/win situation for everyone involved (including parents, children, teachers, school staff, other people in the community, and even school administrators :-) because ultimately local schools will grow into larger vibrant community learning centers open to anyone in the community and looking more like college campuses. New York State could try this plan incrementally in a few different school districts across the state as pilot programs to see how it works out."

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  89. Why are students skipping school? by rleibman · · Score: 1

    My kids go to a small private coop school. They are bummed when there is NO school. Why is nobody asking why schools are so boring that kids are making an effort to get out of them? And as a parent I've in the past supported my kids effort to play hookie if I considered the activity they were planning a better educational experience.

  90. better use for the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the money spent on the GPS devices could be spent on those who GO to school... if they skip school then the parents should be dealing with THEIR kids... not the school... the ones who skip could get an application for mcdonalds or something to help them prepare for their life for when they drop out..

  91. I can think of so many fun things I would do by Cant+use+a+slash+wtf · · Score: 1

    Damn, kids nowadays are so lucky. Can you imagine how many pranks you could play with this one? Put it in a watertight bag and throw it in the river. Mail it to another country. Leave it outside a strip club. The list goes on... These people really trust misbehaving kids an awful lot.

  92. Where the sun doesn't shine..... by joerog · · Score: 1

    The tracking device, if given to me, would end up in the closest storm sewer!

  93. This was my thought almost precisely. by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    When I first moved from New York to Florida as a 16 year old. I made the move from a highly competitive school W.T. Clarke which year after year competes (successfully) in the " Intel Science Talent Search" formerly the "Westinghouse Science Talent Search" to a school called Dunedin High School where the focus was clearly on keeping kids from being a nuisance to the voters (elderly people who like to walk in the air conditioned shopping malls during the day).

    I was in utter shock that there would be two full time armed police officers on the premises of the school. I had been used to walking to 7-Eleven for lunch in my New York high school but was required to stay on the campus at all times during the school day in this state run penitentiary. I was absolutely amazed at how little responsibility the students showed as they had become dependent on the police and the administration to keep them in line instead of simply being given positive reasons to do so. In short, this was a nightmare for a person who had been raised to think intelligently and responsibly for themselves. I left high school shortly after and chose to start college prematurely instead. I needed an environment where students were educated as opposed to policed.

    Your point is true though. Kids these days walk around with gobs of cash and gadgets. As a father raising a 7 and 8 year old in a neighborhood of "entitled people", I can safely say that it doesn't take much for a kid near us to milk mom and dad for $100. All they have to do is say 'we're going on a field trip and I want to buy a toy in the gift shop after' and boom, there you go.

    Since I hate school administrators that simply don't use their brains, let me help a little.

    1) Kids can't be trusted to be responsible enough to activate this stuff 5 times a day. It's stupid to do it anyway. Instead, the tracking system can choose to log the device's results during each class period where the student should be present and toss the other results to avoid privacy concerns.

    2) The GPS units are going to get lost. You can't depend on the students actually remembering where they put them. Teachers are going to be sick of "can I be excused, my house arrest collar is in my locker and I don't want to get in trouble". It's the new "I need to go to the bathroom ploy"

    3) As mentioned in the poster, kids are going to help other kids out by carrying their bracelets for them. In fact, a popular kid can skip all day and get counted as present just by taking advantage of one kid in each class who wants to earn his favor and the those guys will organize handing it off between classes when needed... no problem. The gps units should warn when there are 3 of them within a small radius. Two is a problem since boyfriends and girlfriends tend to intertwine themselves in hallways.

    The best solution for this is to issue house arrest bracelets on the way in and on the way out of school each day. Or better yet, a house arrest bracelet which stays locked from the time they're put on until after a certain hour of the day has been reached and the bracelet is back in the presence of the charging unit at the student's house. If the bracelet isn't in locked and in contact with human PH levels (meaning skin) by 8:30am, then the school will call the student's mother for a reason why the criminal... I mean student isn't wearing their house arrest brace... I mean GPS sensor. If the mother/father clears it, then the bracelet will be deactivated remotely for the day. If not, then a high pitched nasty nasty hissing noise will be emitted from the bracelet until it's placed on the student. When the student comes home and scans their fingerprint on the base station, then the criminal tracker will release itself and the student will be free to behave like miscreants.

    Bonus features :

    1) Electric shocker
    If a student is doing something wrong or not quickly enough, the a high voltage shock can be administered to get them moving. Let's say they're walking to school and aren't moving f

  94. This is not a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pedophiles rejoice :(

  95. Why not just take attendance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How in God's name is this better than taking attendance? Does it really matter where they are? Isn't the important thing that they aren't in school?