I think you did not understand the point of the mcmonkey. The question is not whether the software is stable, the question is whether it will works: Many of the current applications will not work in the future because they can not communicate with authorization servers that will no longer exist, to stay in one example.
Uhh... Okay, now I've seen everything. But I really doubt that he is Russian considering that he repeats the exact same arguments of the extreme right "economists" and even with the exact really dumb mistakes committed by those who can not understand the real world.
This discovery expands the possibilities of planetary configurations. This suggests for example that the number of rocky planets can be even greater than what is currently envisioned and the greater the number of possibly habitable planets then most likely to find life in some of them.
You continue following the programming and not understanding the point. Communism, Capitalism, in fact all we really had all these years were modern variations of Feudalism.
Guy, americans are hardwired to start insulting anything which may have the least relation to the forbidden word "communism". That's why I do not even try to explain such matters to a american.
I was thinking of drivers from the same manufacturer to the same hardware unless you are thinking of putting in that signature the manufacturer and the driver version. And I noticed that Microsoft's idea would also work in the situation where you're replacing a manufacturer's driver with a newer version of the same manufacturer without having to depend on the manufacturer having informed the versions correctly. So with the same code you can satisfy both cases (manufacturer-manufacturer and manufacturer-microsoft)
The problem arises when both drivers looks the best ones to use, assume equal signatures, certifications, etc. Compilation date is not a bad option to decide priority when you have many copys from the same driver from the same vendor for the same hardware and this vendor forgets to report correctly the version.
It would not work very well. It would have the same original problem if two drivers had the same source and you would still have to define a criterion to decide which source would have priority (not always the manufacturer's drivers will automatically be better than Microsoft's, or both drivers are from different third parties and Windows does not know which one to give priority to).
Okay, you win. That's what I get for trying to argue with stupid people. You can happily come back to your basement now because I will not waste any more time trying to explain what I'm talking about.
You. From you I should expect ignorance all the time. If you record a sound using digital recording and storage, is pointless to make a LP using this digital source, you should use a CD to storing digital sound. Is the only thing I will say to you.
As I had to remind everyone else, if you put any digital processing in the process then it will not make sense to record an LP. To make sense all the recording process from the sound capture to the printing of the LP needs to be analog.
Did you stop to think about the bullshit you wrote? By chance did I mention anything about obvious things like media wear? Read again what I wrote, I am not comparing media durability here.
As I already said for an AC, recording an LP only makes sense if your entire mix chain is analog. I assume manufacturers are taking this into consideration of course.
Millennials can not accept this. I have seen that they believe that what they consider to be good for themselves must be good for all mankind and anyone who disagrees can only be an idiot, even when this "idiot" has four times the age and experience of the millennial.
True, but you do not get it? I'm going to make it really clear: I'm NOT, I repeat, I not claiming that the LP's sound is "perfect". What I'm saying (and that seems to have caused nerve reactions by the answers I've read) is that the best way to store an analog sound still is an analog recording medium. The digital medium is good but it is still a coding of an analog signal where you have no way to avoid loss of information. The LP recording may even distort the original sound a bit (if it distorts too much then your recording equipment is really bad and should be discarded), but it does not lose information doing that.
If you put any digital conversion between recording the sound and printing the LP then it will not make sense to create the LP. I suppose the manufacturer of the LPs took that into account, obviously.
Closer to a good idea provided it doesn't interfere with their intended use. A better idea would be for the agent to ask how the person knows you and what the money is for, but then the last time I sent a WU transfer (friend I met while travelling in Europe, met through someone I met who works at the Red Cross needed emergency money) The agent at the local store was just a cashier who had access to the WU terminal and had no training whatsoever.
Uh... You still have the basic problem of WU: How you will find the recipient if the transaction was a fraud? Anyone can get the money if he or she has the transaction identifier and the WU does not even require an identification (driver licence, social security number, etc) of who appears to receive the money. I described the bank as a better idea here because usually a person to be able to have a bank account needs to be found, he or she needs an address.
I think you did not get the idea... Nigeria is usually where scammers are in person, if there are no WU agencies in Nigeria they would have to go to other countries to collect the money and so the scam would be more expensive or even impossible. To legitimate money transfers one should use common banks (I know, it's a pain in the ass to use them but it's a lot more secure than using the WU).
All said, you also should not take my suggestion to the letter because I wrote it with a touch of humor in the middle. If you would prefer a literal suggestion then my suggestion would be that no one should be allowed to send money to Nigeria (or any other country perhaps) without having a sender and a recipient duly identified that can be held liable for fraud if they happen.
Slashdot Mirror
I think you did not understand the point of the mcmonkey. The question is not whether the software is stable, the question is whether it will works: Many of the current applications will not work in the future because they can not communicate with authorization servers that will no longer exist, to stay in one example.
The trouble is where they give you chicken-flavoured "meat" but charges the price of real chicken meat.
Your results on the graph are very, very funny :-D
Uhh... Okay, now I've seen everything. But I really doubt that he is Russian considering that he repeats the exact same arguments of the extreme right "economists" and even with the exact really dumb mistakes committed by those who can not understand the real world.
This discovery expands the possibilities of planetary configurations. This suggests for example that the number of rocky planets can be even greater than what is currently envisioned and the greater the number of possibly habitable planets then most likely to find life in some of them.
You continue following the programming and not understanding the point. Communism, Capitalism, in fact all we really had all these years were modern variations of Feudalism.
Guy, americans are hardwired to start insulting anything which may have the least relation to the forbidden word "communism". That's why I do not even try to explain such matters to a american.
The Libertarians are doing it again right now in Brazil.
We still have contact with the laboratory in the Antartic?
US CEOs will nuke Sweden to stop this dangerous idea from spreading around the world!
I was thinking of drivers from the same manufacturer to the same hardware unless you are thinking of putting in that signature the manufacturer and the driver version. And I noticed that Microsoft's idea would also work in the situation where you're replacing a manufacturer's driver with a newer version of the same manufacturer without having to depend on the manufacturer having informed the versions correctly. So with the same code you can satisfy both cases (manufacturer-manufacturer and manufacturer-microsoft)
The problem arises when both drivers looks the best ones to use, assume equal signatures, certifications, etc. Compilation date is not a bad option to decide priority when you have many copys from the same driver from the same vendor for the same hardware and this vendor forgets to report correctly the version.
It would not work very well. It would have the same original problem if two drivers had the same source and you would still have to define a criterion to decide which source would have priority (not always the manufacturer's drivers will automatically be better than Microsoft's, or both drivers are from different third parties and Windows does not know which one to give priority to).
Okay, you win. That's what I get for trying to argue with stupid people. You can happily come back to your basement now because I will not waste any more time trying to explain what I'm talking about.
Great, now the ignorant have mod points to "argument" when he is unable to understand what I said. Way to go Slashdot...
You. From you I should expect ignorance all the time. If you record a sound using digital recording and storage, is pointless to make a LP using this digital source, you should use a CD to storing digital sound. Is the only thing I will say to you.
As I had to remind everyone else, if you put any digital processing in the process then it will not make sense to record an LP. To make sense all the recording process from the sound capture to the printing of the LP needs to be analog.
Did you stop to think about the bullshit you wrote? By chance did I mention anything about obvious things like media wear? Read again what I wrote, I am not comparing media durability here.
As I already said for an AC, recording an LP only makes sense if your entire mix chain is analog. I assume manufacturers are taking this into consideration of course.
Millennials can not accept this. I have seen that they believe that what they consider to be good for themselves must be good for all mankind and anyone who disagrees can only be an idiot, even when this "idiot" has four times the age and experience of the millennial.
True, but you do not get it? I'm going to make it really clear: I'm NOT, I repeat, I not claiming that the LP's sound is "perfect". What I'm saying (and that seems to have caused nerve reactions by the answers I've read) is that the best way to store an analog sound still is an analog recording medium. The digital medium is good but it is still a coding of an analog signal where you have no way to avoid loss of information. The LP recording may even distort the original sound a bit (if it distorts too much then your recording equipment is really bad and should be discarded), but it does not lose information doing that.
If you put any digital conversion between recording the sound and printing the LP then it will not make sense to create the LP. I suppose the manufacturer of the LPs took that into account, obviously.
Well, even the best DAC available only can create a approximation from the original analog sound signal, while vinyl is an analog recording by nature.
Closer to a good idea provided it doesn't interfere with their intended use. A better idea would be for the agent to ask how the person knows you and what the money is for, but then the last time I sent a WU transfer (friend I met while travelling in Europe, met through someone I met who works at the Red Cross needed emergency money) The agent at the local store was just a cashier who had access to the WU terminal and had no training whatsoever.
Uh... You still have the basic problem of WU: How you will find the recipient if the transaction was a fraud? Anyone can get the money if he or she has the transaction identifier and the WU does not even require an identification (driver licence, social security number, etc) of who appears to receive the money. I described the bank as a better idea here because usually a person to be able to have a bank account needs to be found, he or she needs an address.
I think you did not get the idea... Nigeria is usually where scammers are in person, if there are no WU agencies in Nigeria they would have to go to other countries to collect the money and so the scam would be more expensive or even impossible. To legitimate money transfers one should use common banks (I know, it's a pain in the ass to use them but it's a lot more secure than using the WU).
All said, you also should not take my suggestion to the letter because I wrote it with a touch of humor in the middle. If you would prefer a literal suggestion then my suggestion would be that no one should be allowed to send money to Nigeria (or any other country perhaps) without having a sender and a recipient duly identified that can be held liable for fraud if they happen.