So very true. Other cancers of todays medicine are the "let it all out"-philosophy in gastroenterology and the "don't be so hard on yourself" school of urology.
and before you say that it can be eaten or steeped like tea, carcinogens can still cause cancer even if not smoked.
Thats true. Luckily there aren't any carcinogens in the cannabis oil itself, which is just like any other plant oil you might use in your household. It just has an additional psychotropic component.
You don't really have to process marijuana at all. If you want to smoke it, you probably want to dry it first. If you want to cook with it, you can just throw it into your dough.
Who cares about what we can get out of *this* planet? The human race has whole a universe to exploit. I say, let's start with our sun.
Re:No good ideas come to mind....
on
Daemon
·
· Score: 1
If we're talking hacker movies, I just have to mention Sneakers. I know, some parts of the movie aren't technically accurate, and others not unrealistic.
But it is one of the few hacker films I really enjoy, even as a computer-literate person, or maybe even because of it.
I strongly disagree. On many search terms, I hit the Wikipedia result first, and use the rank button to push it higher, because Wikipedia provides pretty accurate information in a presentation form that I am used to.
Try the search term "Flipflop" (the ones used in electronics). Ignoring the shoes for now, you will find some university sites with crazy color schemes, about some specific flip flops, many hobbyist sites and other crap. "Ajax" brings up tutorials, frameworks, but nothing that tells you what Ajax is. Worse even for search terms like "Homeopathy", where all kinds of crap pops up.
When people bitch about Wikipedia, they always forget that the rest of the Internet is even worse.
Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia; vandalism cannot and will not be tolerated. The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, the insertion of nonsense into articles or otherwise replacing legitimate content with vandalism.
That leads me to the conclusion that, while Wikipedia isn't perfect, it is better than everything else we have, including "serious" encyclopedias like Encyclopedia Britannica.
Slashdot Mirror
So very true. Other cancers of todays medicine are the "let it all out"-philosophy in gastroenterology and the "don't be so hard on yourself" school of urology.
Make that 228 years.
Life expectancy 2 Million Hours Mean Time Before Failure (MTBF)
Hint: learn about "wear leveling"
Bittorrent?
Apperently they are the same. I was a little bit surprised, too.
and before you say that it can be eaten or steeped like tea, carcinogens can still cause cancer even if not smoked.
Thats true. Luckily there aren't any carcinogens in the cannabis oil itself, which is just like any other plant oil you might use in your household. It just has an additional psychotropic component.
So no, you do not have a point.
Because the burden of proof is on those that believe that it's harmless rather than those that don't believe it to be safe.
This one doesn't go to you specifically, but to everybody who wants to tell me what I am allowed or not allowed to do with my body:
Fuck you.
Please explain how the lung is damaged by eating hash brownies.
You need a lot less weed to get high than you need tobacco. A good joint can last for hours, a cigarette might not even last for 10 minutes.
I'd rather eat it anyways if it was legal here.
You don't really have to process marijuana at all. If you want to smoke it, you probably want to dry it first. If you want to cook with it, you can just throw it into your dough.
Free speech does not mean you can say anything you want, anywhere you want.
What does it mean?
Who cares about what we can get out of *this* planet? The human race has whole a universe to exploit. I say, let's start with our sun.
If we're talking hacker movies, I just have to mention Sneakers. I know, some parts of the movie aren't technically accurate, and others not unrealistic.
But it is one of the few hacker films I really enjoy, even as a computer-literate person, or maybe even because of it.
For vi(m) definitely, if you're a coder. For the rest not so much.
1. Pops up faster
2. Being able to use it over a tty console
3. Hotkeys
4. If you want to compare it to a KDE app, at least pick Krusader
5. Profit
Then what about Notepad? And MS Paint?
I doubt it's even on. You never see the screen, the user interface is rendered.
[citation needed]
Seriously, I am astonished about the amount of butthurt over Wikipedia.
I strongly disagree. On many search terms, I hit the Wikipedia result first, and use the rank button to push it higher, because Wikipedia provides pretty accurate information in a presentation form that I am used to.
Try the search term "Flipflop" (the ones used in electronics). Ignoring the shoes for now, you will find some university sites with crazy color schemes, about some specific flip flops, many hobbyist sites and other crap. "Ajax" brings up tutorials, frameworks, but nothing that tells you what Ajax is. Worse even for search terms like "Homeopathy", where all kinds of crap pops up.
When people bitch about Wikipedia, they always forget that the rest of the Internet is even worse.
Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia; vandalism cannot and will not be tolerated. The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, the insertion of nonsense into articles or otherwise replacing legitimate content with vandalism.
This seems like a good start.
Knol is Google's child and it sucks badly.
That leads me to the conclusion that, while Wikipedia isn't perfect, it is better than everything else we have, including "serious" encyclopedias like Encyclopedia Britannica.
I like good change. I switched from Win95 to Win98 because Win98 was better.
All these precautions don't protect you from the dancing bunnies problem.
Do you pick out movies without reading reviews too? Just click the random button in Imdb?
Let me tell you, it's all fine and dandy until you stumble upon Battlefield Earth.
Or Microsoft Bob.
Here is the print version.
It's a little bit frustrating to read because you can't tell the interviewers questions and the answers apart.
I don't believe you.