Slashdot Mirror


Athletes' Brains Reveal Concussion Damage

jamie found a story on research about what concussions do to athletes, with the insights coming mostly from the study of the donated brains of dead athletes. The NFL has the biggest profile in the piece, but other sports make an appearance too. Turns out that repeated concussions can result in depression, insomnia, and the beginnings of something that looks a lot like Alzheimer's. "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone," said [retired wrestler] Nowinski. "We know we can't do that anymore. This causes long-term damage."

328 comments

  1. Referencing to other article by Herr_Skymarshall · · Score: 5, Funny

    They just need to smoke more pot!

    1. Re:Referencing to other article by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      They can't. Pot is classified as a performance enhancing substance...which just shows how backwards the world of sport is.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Referencing to other article by Feanturi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not sure how that's "backwards". Depending on the activity, pot is in fact performance enhancing. I just can't remember how offhand.

    3. Re:Referencing to other article by computerman413 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Citation please. AFAIK, it isn't considered a PED, but is is a banned substance. Banned != Performance-Enhancing for all banned drugs.

    4. Re:Referencing to other article by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      It certainly enhances my pizza eating ability.

    5. Re:Referencing to other article by wizbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oblig Eddie Izzard:

      "But the Dutch speak four languages and smoke marijuana!"

      "Yes, but they're cheating! Everyone knows marijuana is a drug enhancement, that can help you on track in field, to come... last, in a team of... eight million other runners who are all dead."

    6. Re:Referencing to other article by number17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently not performance enhancing, but will win you a gold medal!
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Rebagliati

    7. Re:Referencing to other article by leromarinvit · · Score: 1

      I just can't remember how offhand.

      I guess you should smoke some more, then!

      --
      Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
    8. Re:Referencing to other article by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I'm told that it makes certain really bad music concerts seem palatable, so I suppose in that regard, it enhances performances... for some definition of "enhance"... and "performance"....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:Referencing to other article by shermo · · Score: 1

      To be a banned substance, something must satisfy two out of: Performance Enhancing; Illegal; Bad for you.

      Doesn't work for everything but apparently that's one of the guidelines used.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    10. Re:Referencing to other article by justinlee37 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, it must be two of these three things: illegal, good for you, and bad for you?

      Considering that most things are either good or bad for you, and that nothing can be both really, they should have just said "we ban illegal drugs."

    11. Re:Referencing to other article by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      Towelie, is that you?

    12. Re:Referencing to other article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, pot is not considered a performance enhancing substance by any sport. It is considered either 'illegal drug' or an 'illegal activity'. Most major sports give first time pot offenders treatment, since the drug is illegal. In fact the last time I looked, only baseball has a specific class of drugs label performance enhancing in the CBA, which offer different penalties.

    13. Re:Referencing to other article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All CBAs ban illegal drug usage. They will also ban the illegal use of legal drugs, which is much of the HGH and steroids issue and where much of the gray area is.

    14. Re:Referencing to other article by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They can't. Pot is classified as a performance enhancing substance...which just shows how backwards the world of sport is.

      Pot IS a performance enhancing substance. It is a vasodilator, and it increases blood flow. That you don't know this shows how ignorant you are.

      Maybe you were just trying to be funny, in which case, you failed.

      Incidentally, it is NOT classified as a performance enhancing substance, probably due to political pressure. They took away that snowboarder's medal because he was on weed and then gave it back because it was decided not to be a performance enhancing substance, right? So you double-extra have no fucking clue.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Referencing to other article by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Maybe you were just trying to be funny, in which case, you failed.

      Spot on, so there's no need to be an arsehole.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    16. Re:Referencing to other article by shermo · · Score: 1

      Performance enhancing and "bad for you" aren't antonyms. But I guess I should have clarified the last point a bit more. By "bad for you" I mean "has a proven long term negative effect on health".

      That's why caffeine is permitted. It's performance enchaning, but it's not illegal nor "bad for you".

      It's also why steroids aren't permitted even though they're not illegal. They're performance enchancing and have long term negative side effects.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    17. Re:Referencing to other article by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I knew I was stretching to imply that they were antonyms, I just leapt at the opportunity to be a smart ass.

  2. Simple... give 'em ganja by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/27/1354225
    If it works for Alzheimers... maybe it'll work for Football

    1. Re:Simple... give 'em ganja by dedazo · · Score: 2, Funny

      That has the insidious side effect of causing the patient to start speaking lolcat though.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  3. How about Rockys brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Rockys brain?

    1. Re:How about Rockys brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering that he decided to face someone who is 60 pounds heavier and has a 2150 psi punch, you tell me.

    2. Re:How about Rockys brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering that he decided to face someone who is 60 pounds heavier and has a 2150 psi punch, you tell me.

      2,150 PSI is just nuts. That's a serious, crippling blow. It's amazing that the body can withstand such things at all.

  4. duh by djupedal · · Score: 1

    drain bamage - when only the best will do.

    1. Re:duh by joocemann · · Score: 1

      No joke. Whomever still believes that... "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone,"... obviously has never met or seen a head trauma patient or, more easily/popularly, Mohammed Ali.

      Can we mod this whole article 'ridiculously obvious'?

    2. Re:duh by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 2

      "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone,"... obviously has never met or seen a head trauma patient or, more easily/popularly, Mohammed Ali.

      Very poor example, Muhammad Ali has Parkinson's. If you ever saw him box you'd know better. He was too quick back in his day, that most of his opponents were lucky if they could land a decent punch. AFAIK, he was never KO'ed and only ever lost by decision.

    3. Re:duh by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Yes but as grew older and slower, he adopted a new style which basically consisted of Ali's being beaten to a pulp. He received brutal punishment, and no doubt that's where his brain & nerve damage came from.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:duh by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that he got Parkinson's from being hit too much?

    5. Re:duh by joocemann · · Score: 1

      I would definitely agree that all those beatings had a lot to do with the conditions he is in today. Isn't parkinsons mostly a physically encumbering disease? How do you account for the obvious mental capacity/function losses?

  5. Really? by bFusion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone," said [retired wrestler] Nowinski.

    This was a legitimate idea that people actually believed?

    1. Re:Really? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      We're told that we will corrupt a HDD of we don't shut down properly, but who here hasn't done it anyways when necessary?

    2. Re:Really? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The "Just suck it up and be a man" theory of sports medicine is surprisingly persistent. As are its close relatives the "Stay strong and positive" theory of oncology and the "Pull yourself together" theory of psychotherapy.

    3. Re:Really? by jockeys · · Score: 4, Funny

      actually, I'm pretty sure the only people who believed it were people who had been whacked on the head hundreds of times.

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    4. Re:Really? by bFusion · · Score: 1

      And the "It Builds Character" of parenting?

    5. Re:Really? by bFusion · · Score: 1

      I haven't found many occasions when it is necessary to get whacked in the head repeatedly.

    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      evolutionarily, though it was probably pretty common. Humans, particularly men, have a *lot* of "reserve" brain capacity. It may be part of the reason we're so "smart" is just so that the progressive endumbening of our combat-filled ancestral environment doesn't cripple us beyond the point of survival.

    7. Re:Really? by ChienAndalu · · Score: 5, Funny

      So very true. Other cancers of todays medicine are the "let it all out"-philosophy in gastroenterology and the "don't be so hard on yourself" school of urology.

    8. Re:Really? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      You don't have a lifestyle that requires a multi-million dollar salary to maintain, or a salary that's derived from getting whacked in the head repeatedly.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    9. Re:Really? by FiloEleven · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "stay strong and positive" theory of oncology does hold. In most cases it won't save your life in the absence of other treatment, but it's been repeatedly shown that patients with positive attitudes often have more positive prospects than those who succumb to gloom and doom.

      This is the same idea as having faith in your ability to jump over a large gap. If you question your ability, you become less steady on your feet, less able to time your leap, and increase the chance of your failure.

    10. Re:Really? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      if I had to choose between the two extremes, I would choose this over the "lets remove all risk from a child's environment" philosophy. Fortunately, this is a false dichotomy.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    11. Re:Really? by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, not really. I mean a quick look at ex-boxers, like Muhammad Ali, would tell you otherwise. The phrase "punch drunk" has been in the English language for some time now.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    12. Re:Really? by drodal · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, me too, I never worry about... now why does it keep saying frag error link 238 of 4096.....

    13. Re:Really? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously you're not my little brother.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:Really? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Hey when I was in pre-school I fell on my head plenty of times while learning to ice skate and I'm none the worse for wear now who are you and how did you get in my tv?

    15. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not true. Survival is equivalent between positive attitude and negative attitude patients. Just as you would expect it to be, since nothing in cancer is amenable to conscious control.

    16. Re:Really? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Informative
    17. Re:Really? by GNT · · Score: 5, Informative

      Cancer survival not linked to a positive attitude, study finds
      Print version: page 14

      Some cancer patients seek out support groups and psychotherapy with the notion that improving their emotional states will extend their lives, says University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine psychologist James C. Coyne, PhD.

      However, in a study in the journal Cancer, (Vol. 110, No. 11) Coyne and colleagues reported that emotional well-being in no way predicted survival among patients with head and neck cancer.

      "If people want to go to a support group there are lots of advantages to it, such as a sense of belonging, but survival isn't one of them," says Coyne.

      In the large-scale study conducted over nine years, Coyne and colleagues used baseline quality-of-life questionnaires to assess the well-being of 1,093 cancer patients. All participants were involved in clinical trials, which ensured uniformity of treatment and ruled out substantial health disparities in the sample. During the study, 646 patients died, and the research team found no relationship between their emotional well-being and cancer progression and death.

      Though his findings strongly contradict the notion that a positive attitude is related to survival, the idea of "fighting" cancer is deeply rooted in our culture, says Coyne.

      "It's the American way, that you can do it, you can fight it," he adds.

      Based on the study results, Coyne believes it's important to not blame cancer patients who don't adopt an aggressively positive spirit.

      "We want to recognize thatthere are lots of individual differences in coping with cancer," he says. "People have to do what's comfortable with them, but they have to do it without the burden of thinking they've got to have the right attitudeto survive."

    18. Re:Really? by Hordeking · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone," said [retired wrestler] Nowinski.

      This was a legitimate idea that people actually believed?

      No. He just whacked his head a few hundred times, and finally came to the correct conclusion.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    19. Re:Really? by causality · · Score: 1

      "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone," said [retired wrestler] Nowinski.

      This was a legitimate idea that people actually believed?

      No, but "I'm a real tough guy, watch me prove it" is an idea that lots of people actually believe. You just used a more accurate phrasing. That's what I mean when I say that when you call things what they are, everything becomes so simple.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    20. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      storey iz not tru, i ben boxer fo loung times n i Ma FINE!

    21. Re:Really? by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if I had to choose between the two extremes, I would choose this over the "lets remove all risk from a child's environment" philosophy. Fortunately, this is a false dichotomy.

      If our public schools were worthy institutions, they would teach critical thinking so that people could learn the concept of a "false dichotomy" or "excluded middle" once and for all. I'd much prefer that to having to debunk myriad instances of the idea each time they are found.

      If you'll permit a fanciful image, it's like the hydra with a thousand heads. Debunking the myriad instances is like trying to cut off each head, one at a time. Learning the concept involved and moving on is like going straight for the heart of the beast and taking it down in one stroke. I know which one suits me.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    22. Re:Really? by yaphadam097 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Muhammad Ali has Parkinson's which is rather a different thing from being "punch drunk" and is not related to boxing. His tremors make it difficult for him to speak in public. This is no reflection of his intelligence, his memory, or anything else related to higher mental function.

    23. Re:Really? by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To "stay positive in oncology" (that is, if cancer patients have an optimistic/positive posture) has been confirmed multiple times to be effective. And it's not purely psychosomatic, either: patients with a positive attitude are much more likely to take an active role in their therapy.

      I have quite recently read about a study that confirmed this very thing, again.

      And this from a guy who is totally against stuff like chakra, "meridians", "energy flows" and other such horseshit.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    24. Re:Really? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      The classic "Rub some dirt on it" treatment followed by the classic "Shake it off" advice.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    25. Re:Really? by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1

      This was a legitimate idea that people actually believed?

      They musta been dropped on their head as a child.

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    26. Re:Really? by jd · · Score: 1

      See: "Erik The Viking" for details.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    27. Re:Really? by overcaffein8d · · Score: 1

      i was dropped on my head as a child, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Those of us who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.
    28. Re:Really? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Might as well not have children.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    29. Re:Really? by g0at · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, my understanding is that he suffers from Parkinson's syndrome, which is not the same as the disease proper.

      -b

    30. Re:Really? by matantisi · · Score: 1

      True, but there is some reason to believe that his head injuries may have contributed to the Parkinson's.

    31. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think the point of life is to live it. Not to try to stay alive as long as possible. I know there quite a few on here who would happily accept a one way ticket to Mars.

    32. Re:Really? by FiloEleven · · Score: 3, Funny

      Okay, okay! I admit I was wrong. Will you call off your friends from posting even more damning replies!?

    33. Re:Really? by sjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least unlike the suck it up and be a man approach to concussion, a positive outlook is unlikely to cause harm. It may even improve quality of life for the remaining time.

    34. Re:Really? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To "stay positive in oncology" (that is, if cancer patients have an optimistic/positive posture) has been confirmed multiple times to be effective.

      Er, no, its been repeatedly shown to be completely bunk, as was discussed (with citations) in response to the previous response to GP claiming the same thing even before the parent was posted.

    35. Re:Really? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      This was a legitimate idea that people actually believed?

      Well, yeah, but to be fair, the people that believe it and promote it have consisted largely of people who are either or both of (a) young, ignorant, and impressionable, and (b) people who have themselves whacked their heads hundreds of times and knocked themselves out.

    36. Re:Really? by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've read something similar to what you are quoting and while I don't particularly disbelieve it I do wonder how the "positive thinking doesn't help" idea fits in with the observed lowered life expectancy for people with depression. In fact just getting health insurance after being diagnosed with depression can be very difficult.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    37. Re:Really? by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. This is Slashdot where:
          1. No one has any friends.
          2. No one reads the article or even comments
          3. ???
          4. Only 2 people have replied to you anyways
          5. Profit!

    38. Re:Really? by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, it is true that Muhammad Ali is not "punch drunk," and that his condition is classified as a movement disorder, as opposed a form of dementia (though parkinsonism may include neurological deficits as secondary symptoms). Whether or not Muhammad Ali's parkinsonism is related to his boxing career is an open, but probably unanswerable question, however. I keep using the term "parkinsonism" rather than "Parkinson's" because "Parkinson's Disease" is preferred for cases of unknown origin (with a presumable genetic cause), while "parkinsonism" or "Parkinson's Syndrome" more generally refers to the suite of symptoms that are associated with the disorder.

      It's a subtle distinction, but the issue is that there are known environmental causes of the disorder. Parkinsonism simply refers to the collection of symptoms that result from damage to dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra. Similarly to the way that Alzheimer's damage is connected to buildup of beta-amyloid and tau proteins, Parkinson's Disease can manifest from an improper buildup of alpha-synuclein, a gradual process that can become more likely if genes related to alpha-synuclein synthesis, or to protein transport and disposal are mutant.

      However, if you were to directly damage the dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra, you would manifest the same symptoms as a Parkinson's Disease patient. Exposure to the paraquat family of herbicides damages those neurons, as can the chemical MPTP, for example. There is evidence that damage from reactive oxygen species like hydroxyl radicals, superoxides, and peroxides can also kill these neurons; reactive oxygen species are released in traumatic brain injury, and persons who have suffered a traumatic brain injury are known to be several times more like to eventually develop parkinsonism. Tracing back to Ali, it may well have been a genetic factor he has carried his whole life that has led to his symptoms, but the effect of his long boxing career cannot be definitively ruled out.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    39. Re:Really? by mctk · · Score: 1

      Dan, is that you?

      --
      Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    40. Re:Really? by Mex · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, it still stands today! Some awesome, physically and genetically superior warriors like Fedor Emelianenko might be able to do it, and they inspire everyone else to do the same.

      Most martial arts teachers do this, most sports coaches, every boxing and muay thai instructor...

    41. Re:Really? by martinX · · Score: 1

      It does go against "common sense", but a positive attitude won't improve your prospects but it stops you being an annoying shit while you're dying. Which in itself may actually lengthen your survival, after all no-one is going to hold the pillow over the head of happy gramps, but they'll be lining up to do it to curmudgeonly gramps.

      Studies have shown prayer doesn't help either. It helps to know you are being prayed for, but blinded prayer doen't help.

      As for the 'having faith you can jump over a large gap', I humbly submit this: http://despair.com/limitations.html

      And I mean this post in the nicest way possible.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    42. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Immune system health (in conjunction with other therapies like chemo and surgical removal) can be fairly important in recovering from/fighting some types cancer. Being negative can lead to the production of stress hormones, which can depress the immune system. Stress relief may be part of what underlies placebo effects, for example. So being positive may not be a factor in recoveries from all cancers and it certainly isn't a sufficient treatment, but I would be extremely sceptical of a report that indicated it wasn't a factor in recovery from any cancers.

    43. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every concussion doubles a person's chances of developing Parkinsonism. I have looked into it intensively, as I have had several concussions in the last few years.

    44. Re:Really? by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      I think the parent is trying to say that the injury from his boxing may have caused his symptoms.I have heard similar stories about soccer players who head the ball a lot.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    45. Re:Really? by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, my understanding is that he suffers from Parkinson's syndrome, which is not the same as the disease proper.

      -b

      Head trauma *is* correlated with the onset of Parkinson's.

      Past episodes of head trauma are reported more frequently by individuals with Parkinson's disease than by others in the population. A recent methodologically strong retrospective study found that those who have experienced a head injury are four times more likely to develop Parkinsonâ(TM)s disease than those who have never suffered a head injury. The risk of developing Parkinsonâ(TM)s increases eightfold for patients who have had head trauma requiring hospitalization, and it increases 11-fold for patients who had experienced severe head injury.

    46. Re:Really? by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      Hercules got a helper to seal each neck as he sliced off the hydra heads, instead of just going for the heart. So in your analogy you'd want to give the person a concussion each time you have to correct them so you kill the brain cells that spawned the bad assumption. Going by this article, it would work since eventually they'd just stop being able to think of anything if they keep it up long enough.

    47. Re:Really? by NinthAgendaDotCom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      patients with a positive attitude are much more likely to take an active role in their therapy

      So what's to say that it's not the actively taking a role in therapy is what's doing the trick?

      --
      -- http://ninthagenda.com/
    48. Re:Really? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      It very well may be. My aunt has given up her fight with cancer, and so has the father of my ex-GF. They both have a chance, but have basically decided that their own lives aren't worth the effort. Staying positive also means being active in fighting for yourself.

      Anyhow, all I am saying that you are probably right, and I never disputed your point.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    49. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, even in minor league hockey coaches/parents push their kids through injuries. When I was younger playing rep hockey I was rode into the end of the bench where the glass starts. At full speed even with a helmet one of my eyes almost came out of the socket (it was scary because the eye was partially out, and had massive pressure on it, so the first instinct you have is that you broke/crushed your eye socket). The doctor told me no ice time for 3 weeks, and no physical play for another 1 week. My coach threatened to cut me from the team if I did not return after 2 weeks, and against my parents wishes I went back early.

      Competitive sport has a lot of pressure in it. Coaches, friends, sometimes even parents push you so hard that at the time you dont think about consequences of injuries. I was lucky in that I only suffered 2 concussions through the years. Had I gotten more, I know I would have kept playing. At least now a days concussions are treated much more seriously, and more thought is put into the long term health of the player.

    50. Re:Really? by pinkstuff · · Score: 1

      Isn't the placebo effect a result of positive thinking? Doesn't that prove positive thinking works?

    51. Re:Really? by mystran · · Score: 1

      I'd guess (and this is a pure guess) if you look at the life expectancy vs. attitude and quantize the attitude on a binary scale (positive thinking vs. depression) you'll see a corralation between life expectancy and positive thinking. But what happens if we compare positive attitude vs. realistic (or "average") attitude? It could be that negative attitude correlates with shortened life-expectancy, but once your attitude improves back to what can be considered "normal" there is no further advantage in being more positive. Kinda like some sort of "dimishing returns" situation?

      --
      Software should be free as in speech, but if we also get some free beer, all the better.
    52. Re:Really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In fact just getting health insurance after being diagnosed with depression can be very difficult.

      Health insurance companies are pure evil. You have just made yourself their toady on slashdot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    53. Re:Really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you'll permit a fanciful image, it's like the hydra with a thousand heads. Debunking the myriad instances is like trying to cut off each head, one at a time.

      You learned the wrong lesson from the Hydra story. When you cut someone down for expressing a logical fallacy, next time cleanse them with fire. It'll keep them from coming back.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    54. Re:Really? by CensorshipDonkey · · Score: 1

      Depression is not just the lack of positive thinking, and it is not just psychological. Depression is physiological and has very many low level, chemical impacts and observable symptoms beyond "thinking negatively". Do not confuse a pessimist with someone suffering from depression.

    55. Re:Really? by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      Of course depression has physiological etc. impacts - it's an illness of the brain. I don't confuse it with pessimism although they are not unconnected. And AFAIK while depression can result from a purely physiological event the vast majority of cases result from psychological events which lead to physiological (is there another kind?) changes to the brain, i.e. psychological state affects physiological state. Which was my point. Well, one of them.

      However the misconceptions about depression are so widespread it is always worth emphasizing the points in your post.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    56. Re:Really? by CensorshipDonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      And AFAIK while depression can result from a purely physiological event the vast majority of cases result from psychological events.

      Untrue, and this is a major misconception. Depression often arises, without contributing factors, from fundamentally physiological and chemical problems in the brain. It then generates problems in the sufferer's life as they make bad decisions, certainly giving reasons for more psychological distress. But do not mistake the underlying problem in the majority of true depression cases: a physiological cause, independent of top-level psychological problems or events in a person's life.

    57. Re:Really? by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      It may very well be as you describe - I certainly think it would be worth knowing if that's the case. Which is perhaps part of what troubled me about the study being reported - it's asking too limited a question. I also kind of wonder if, when someone with cancer gets so depressed that they kill themself, is the death attributed to cancer or depression? If simply the latter then is anyone even questioning whether "think positively" programs for cancer patients would have saved those lives? What if they simply feel there is no point in fighting it any more and cease treatment? Would they have done that if there had been a "think positively" program in place? Not because the program actually affects the bodily response to the cancer but because the belief that it will do that helps people carry on?

      I was once diagnosed with a systemic and chronic disease and the doctor played the opposite game - he overemphasized the negatives and how careful I had to be just to retard the onset. But being educated after the initial diagnosis I had gone and read the research so I new some of what he was saying was BS and that there was actually some reason to believe it was not what he was concluding. In the end he said "you know too much for your own good" and ordered a different test which gave different results. But it may now turn out that the first diagnosis was right, that in this case he was right about my "knowing too much" for my own good and that I would have been much better off being scared by his original comments - a case of creating an overly negative attitude, not supported by the facts, being life preserving/extending.

      This seems like a very important question reaching well beyond cancer. We know psychological state affects physiological state, e.g. reaction to stress, immune system response etc. so it seems like it would be worthwhile to investigate just what is the optimum state of mind to deal with disease, what can mental attitude accomplish etc. Or the flip side, is shortened lifespan for those suffering from depression only a result of suicide? Does it also include mental impairment causing one to neglect health routines (seems likely), or does the mental state itself impair other aspects of the the body's functioning, e.g. immune system response?

      Just what affect our mind can have on our body seems like it would be one of the most fascinating research problems out there.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    58. Re:Really? by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      OK, I would like to see some support for that statement because I have been told the opposite by practitioners.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    59. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another example for this topic is ex Houston Oilers running back Earl Campbell.

    60. Re:Really? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      >>> that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine
      > This was a legitimate idea that people actually believed?

      Well, there are athletes who believe it, but bear in mind these are some of the same people who believe that wearing the same underwear they had on last time they won will help them win again, especially if they don't wash it in between times.

      There are probably also sports fans who believe it, but if there's a class of people less intelligent than the athletes, it's probably the fans.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  6. If this is true... by scubamage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this is true, then why do schools insist on giving money to sports programs while starving arts and sciences budgets? Not only do they not do their job, they're effectively making kids dumber by causing brain damage.

    1. Re:If this is true... by Vectronic · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a conspiracy.

    2. Re:If this is true... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not only do they not do their job, they're effectively making kids dumber by causing brain damage.

      Unless making kids dummer is their job.

    3. Re:If this is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      NCAA Division 1 football programs are profitable. If schools gave up their football programs, they would *lose* money.

    4. Re:If this is true... by Duradin · · Score: 1

      I think it's a federal law you have to sustained at least one lifelong injury while in highschool to meet their No Child Left Unmaimed standards.

      It's pure coincidence the bill was backed by the sports medicine lobby.

    5. Re:If this is true... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If this is true, then why do schools insist on giving money to sports programs while starving arts and sciences budgets?

      That's what the parents want. They must all have head injuries.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:If this is true... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      The majority like sports more than art and science, it's as simple as that.
      If enough parents asked for the reverse, it would happen.

      ... making kids dumber by causing brain damage.

      Well, there's only so many football linemen in a given school.
      The population is large enough to allow for a few sacrificial lambs :-)

    7. Re:If this is true... by Artraze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It honestly depends. At my old college, the sports stuff fell under an entity completely distinct from the school. It was initially set up this so that what you were describing couldn't happen. The school was one thing, and the sports were another, so that the school _couldn't_ give money to sports. And it turned out, the sports teams (well, specifically football) actually ended up turning _huge_ profits. Since they can transfer this to the school, the extra money ends up getting spent on new buildings and equipment.

      The point I'm making here, in an admittedly roundabout way, is that sports actually tend to pull in a decent amount of money, so that the funding usually isn't that major.

      Beyond that, 'starving' art and science budgets isn't exactly common, and the schools that do it are generally lacking enough money to even manage the basics (e.g. requiring HS students to share books) and usually have minimal sports programs. The rest of the time, it's usually only for lack of interest that arts and sciences don't get much funding; if kinds started a robotics club (or the like), they wouldn't have a hard time getting funds. But they rarely do, and for that, we should blame the parents.

    8. Re:If this is true... by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The answer is marketing. A highly visible sports program does seem to increase the visibility of the school and in response, the school gets a bigger pool of student applications and can choose better students out of that pool. But I agree that the idea that we have these "athlete scholars" is usually a farce, their is a double-standard for athletes and universities do whatever they can to ignore huge problems with athletes cheating, etc. The universities really need to stop spending so much money on their athletic programs and worry about their core missions, which are education and research, which does NOT include entertainment.

      As for TFA, for us sedentary desk-jockeys, we think of "exercise" as healthy, but anyone who has played a sport in some sort of serious way has probably noticed that athletics at this level is not healthy, it's damaging to the body, it doesn't surprise me that the brain is no exception. I played competitive ultimate frisbee on a regular basis for several years and I was beginning to get knee trouble. Looking at the health problems some of the older players had was enough to make me quit. I'd much rather still be able to walk when I'm 50 thank you.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    9. Re:If this is true... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind this is for professional players. Not necessary for the High School Jerk/err um Jock, who thinks he has a chance to get in the big league.
      I would like to see data on kids brains on sports.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:If this is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority like sports more than art and science, it's as simple as that..

      ... making kids dumber by causing brain damage.

      Well, there's only so many football linemen in a given school.
      The population is large enough to allow for a few sacrificial lambs :-)

      They wanna play football? How smart could they be in the first place? Not much brain to damage if you ask me.

    11. Re:If this is true... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      yeah.. else they would play real football instead of "american football"

      --
      bickerdyke
    12. Re:If this is true... by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      Got a link or reference. I'm intrigued...

    13. Re:If this is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not only do they not do their job, they're effectively making kids dumber by causing brain damage.

      Unless making kids dummer is their job.

      Who's getting dummer?

    14. Re:If this is true... by causality · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not only do they not do their job, they're effectively making kids dumber by causing brain damage.

      Unless making kids dummer is their job.

      This is the first time I've seen anyone other than me reference this excellent man and the wisdom he is willing to share. You referenced the book The Underground History of American Education. That's an amazing thing to read, for it explains not just the problem but how it came to be this way and the sort of politics that made it override the wishes of parents.

      If you ever need (depending on your audience) a shorter introduction to John Taylor Gatto and his message, you may also like his essay, The Six-Lesson Schoolteacher.

      I know that you referenced truth because doing so was its own reward. It does not make you want to horde it like gold and silver, but rather to share it with whomever will listen. Knowing this, I say BLESS YOU for bringing such excellence into this discussion. To lots of us, even those of us already familiar with these things, it is a welcome sight.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    15. Re:If this is true... by frosty_tsm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      but anyone who has played a sport in some sort of serious way has probably noticed that athletics at this level is not healthy, it's damaging to the body

      This has actually been a big thing for me. I do martial arts and have experienced a wide range of styles and schools. When I go to a school and see a master in his 30s with knee problems, I move on.

      I've developed a theory that there is a balance that one decide when picking a marital art. One one side, there are brutal styles with lots of sparing that will make you incredibly strong / effective. But the strain on the body will result in you only being strong for a limited number of years. Since I'm not a soldier and am not fighting for my life, there's no benefit in me studying one of these styles for an extended period of time. These would include Krav Maga, Jujitsu, and many Tae Kwon Do styles (depends on the round-house kicking technique).

      There are gentler styles that still are effective martial arts but without stressing one's body to the point of failure after a few years. This includes Aikido (even though you fall, you fall gently), Iaido (just don't cut yourself), and possibly Kendo.

      I can't say my observations are perfect, but I've seen a lot more old yet effective practitioners of these styles than of the first styles.

    16. Re:If this is true... by KovaaK · · Score: 1

      I don't know that I believe the stuff that JTG is preaching. I just read something of his yesterday going into it with a fully open mind, and I left it doubting many of his conclusions.

      Many of the lessons that he describes can simply be explained by "It's the most efficient form of education that works." Aside from that, there have in fact been many improvements to society under our formal education system in the recent years, so despite all he does to bitch about it, we seem to be doing pretty well.

    17. Re:If this is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      laido ?
      Getting laid is a martial art ? Darn.

    18. Re:If this is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Getting laid is a martial art ?

      It's a marital art.

    19. Re:If this is true... by jd · · Score: 1

      ^ti^it

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    20. Re:If this is true... by FluffyWithTeeth · · Score: 1

      yup, nothing like a nice game of gaelic football.

    21. Re:If this is true... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      why not hand out clubs to the player and have hurling? :-)

      P.S. Helmets are optional

      --
      bickerdyke
    22. Re:If this is true... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Many martial art styles have been transmitted for hundreds of years. If the style itself caused any kind of injury to the teacher, there wouldn't have been any students.

      What it comes down to is doing too much too quickly. Whether it is the fault of the teacher or the student is irrelevent. For the sake of retaining students, teachers speed up the cirriculum by cutting out the boring parts. It's not that they'll force students to do something beyond their capabilities, but that they'll gloss over or outright cut the things that build up a foundation.

      And on the flip side, students will try to advance to the next level by pushing their bodies sometimes well beyond their limits (while it's fine to do so in an emergency, repeatedly doing this just results in damage over time). Even toeing the line is dangerous, because that line isn't at all discrete. Different things break down at different stress levels, and different stress gets applied to different things.

      Even a system as benign as tai chi can injure the knees of a practitioner if that person immediately tries to do low stances without having first built up to it.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    23. Re:If this is true... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Tai-chi and Bagua are also good martial arts options that won't wreck your body...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    24. Re:If this is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is essentially most teachers jobs, sadly. (and some don't even realize)
      Most of the courses could be taught at younger ages quite easily and still be absorbed and retained by the kids.
      There have been tests done all over that proved such.
      Algebra, it is one of the most logical things in existence, kids WILL learn it easily if you use nice pretty pictures of fruit, or animals... (mind you, division plus animals isn't exactly a good idea)
      So, why no change?

      Generally, 70+% of people will end up being simple cogs of society, making your food, preparing your food, doing your office work, cleaning up after you, etc.
      Most higher-ups in the education system know this, but won't admit it.
      It is the hidden source of the worlds "slave labour".
      Those who want to change their lives, those who actually WANT to learn, will actually have to pay for it.
      It is, as always, another business to be run.

    25. Re:If this is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you can't play at the most extreme, demanding level, you quit?

      I suppose you took up something less rigorous, like raquetball?

      Well on my way to 50 and sure, I got creaky legs, a few dings here and there, but I wouldn't trade in my cleats for the world. Nor would I miss out on the look on the face of a vanquished competitor who realizes they were beaten by someone twice their age. Or the company of like-minded spirits who love to leave it all on the field!

      To each his own...

    26. Re:If this is true... by causality · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many of the lessons that he describes can simply be explained by "It's the most efficient form of education that works."

      Then you missed his point. The point is that things like efficiency or this image of a great competition among nations are our goals, not healthy development of strong, mature minds that can think critically and are not easily deceived. I recommend that you read his book, The Underground History of American Education (the entire book is available for on the Web site, for free) in order to really understand the difference. Yeah it's a full book and no you won't be able to instantly read it, but believe me when I tell you that the subject is worthy.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    27. Re:If this is true... by causality · · Score: 1

      I think it's a federal law you have to sustained at least one lifelong injury while in highschool to meet their No Child Left Unmaimed standards.

      Yeah but usually that's taken care of by the way institutionalized schooling suffocates the spirit and retards personal development (ever seirously wonder why most adults in the USA are nothing more than overgrown children?). Oh you meant physical injury ... nevermind.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    28. Re:If this is true... by istewart · · Score: 1

      Please elaborate on your metrics of efficiency. I would also like to hear about specific social improvements that are a direct result of the school system.

    29. Re:If this is true... by brkello · · Score: 1

      Do you really have to ask such a dumb question? It isn't even really true since P.E. and sports are being cut in a lot of areas as well. Our children are becoming obese. We need them to get exercise for them to be healthy. They aren't playing in the NFL. Is their risk? Yes! But there is risk stepping outside of your house. Obviously, we should have funding for arts and sciences as well, but cutting out major forms of exercise is not the answer.

      And if you are referring to college, because their sports teams actually make money and draw more students to their campus. I don't know about you, but I don't see the results of Chemistry 101 in the Rose Bowl.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    30. Re:If this is true... by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      Haha... stupid font. It's supposed to be an "i", not an "L"

      Wikipedia

    31. Re:If this is true... by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      It's not just contact sports either. Scuba diving creates very tiny lesions on the brain. The more time diving and the deeper you dive the more lesions. And it happens in as little as 30' of water.

      Every once in a while I think about the things we did as kids and frankly I'm surprised we didn't die. Aside from the errr, more explosive, things we did I remember one of my favorite things in a fight was to just bash the other guy's skull with my forehead. Then in my 20's I got to handle an actual skull - kids should be shown just how fragile a human skull is and how easy it is to break or fracture.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    32. Re:If this is true... by mdarksbane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, because there's a much higher earning potential for artists than football players... they're both disciplines where a few people make it big, and the rest scrounge or go into something else while talking about their lost dreams.

      In high school, I resented the attention that the jocks and the athletic department got at our school. But then I got to college and went into engineering... and saw dozens of young men who couldn't run a mile, who were obese and unattractive and unable to be self-sufficient when it came to anything physical. Moreover, I saw the inability to work as a team, to work within a command structure or to lead others, to communicate, to deal with stress and confrontation.

      Deifying athletics is ridiculous - but so is ridiculing it. Music, art, athletics, hell, even math and science for the vast majority of high schoolers, are not things we teach our children because we want them to spend the rest of their lives painting or playing guitar. They are ways to grow the whole human body and mind into a stronger, faster, smarter, more social, more responsible, and just pure *better* adult.

      We should support better safety in sports - but as others have pointed out, concussions are something that are only recently well understood. There was a general idea of a correlation between too many head injuries and brain damage, but no one knew how often, or how bad, or anything it would take to do serious damage. Sports medicine isn't the only area where there have been bad knowledge or just plain lack of knowledge, especially at the high school level.

      We should fund art, and music, and science, and everything else in schools better, and many schools do have more priority than they probably should on athletics. But then, how often do you see the whole community energized and supportive in physical presence and monetary donations to watch a science class. Maybe we should be hitting that angle before we complain about schools spending on athletics.

    33. Re:If this is true... by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Well duh! Why do you think we're all being Educated Stupid? :)

    34. Re:If this is true... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Dumbies?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    35. Re:If this is true... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Tai-chi isn't a martial art. It is a meditative exercise, by design.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    36. Re:If this is true... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      I practice Gracie-style Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, and although I pretty much suck at it, I've discovered that it's a very flowing art. Not "brutal styles with lots of sparing that will make you incredibly strong / effective", of course, MMV. I think it's a very safe and fun style with lots of rolling that will make you incredibly effective and a little stronger.

      The whole idea is not to use force, but simple mechanical advantage thru technique. You don't do the move you want, you do the move your adversary gives you. "Flow with the go" as Rickson Gracie puts it. This isn't to say that BJJ/GJJ is never intense, but it lacks the jarring impacts and joint damage of other martial arts. Here's Helio rolling at 94 years old.

      Your overall thesis is exactly right, however.

    37. Re:If this is true... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      ...or be of any use in a fight.

    38. Re:If this is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't go into politics unless your IQ falls short of vegetable!

    39. Re:If this is true... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Informative

      The point I'm making here, in an admittedly roundabout way, is that sports actually tend to pull in a decent amount of money, so that the funding usually isn't that major.

      Actually, I've read that this isn't actually the case; that while a small number of schools have very successful (and well known) sports programs that do pull in a profit, the majority of colleges do in fact lose money on their sports programs, at least for Division 1-A schools.

      The amount of money require to field a top tier competitive team - scholarships, coaching salaries, stadiums and facitilies - can reach into the tens of millions (especially for football). Only a few schools have the draw to recoup enough to make up for it.

    40. Re:If this is true... by NinthAgendaDotCom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Marketing. It has everything to do with what's visible in the community. Parents and alumnis see sports scores in the local paper. You don't generally see as much about the arts and sciences as much in the media.

      --
      -- http://ninthagenda.com/
    41. Re:If this is true... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      My college allocates $1560 of each student's tuition per year toward intercollegiate athletics. This doesn't include athletic funding derived from other sources.

      More alarmingly, our athletics programs are not terribly large, nor do they perform particularly well.

      If anything, athletics are sucking us dry.

      (To save you a Wikipedia search, we're a Div-1 public liberal arts college with 5,850 undergraduates.)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    42. Re:If this is true... by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      There is a martial form of tai-chi, but it's not nearly as common as the old-people-in-the-park form.

    43. Re:If this is true... by keean · · Score: 1

      Actually both are the same. AFAIK the "Martial" Chen style is the oldest, and from this the "Martial" Yang style was derived. The "Medicinal" Wu Style Tai-Chi did not arrive until later. If you watch two people practicing the Yang and Wu long forms in sync you can see the movements are the same, just the extent of the movement is greatly limited in the Wu Style. For example a rotation and lift of the heel in the Wu style becomes a turn with knee to the floor in the Yang style.

    44. Re:If this is true... by Anzya · · Score: 1

      It's interesting how that depends on the environment. In the town I live in culture and especially music seems to be more popular than sports.
      It could of course be that I run in those circles but it seems like we have more concerts and theatres than our size should warrant.

      --
      "This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (or STFU, for you un-hip people)."
    45. Re:If this is true... by squizzar · · Score: 1

      It's not the low stances of tai chi, it's having your knee alignment wrong. Knees are perfectly capable of flexing in the correct direction an awful lot of times. If the alignment of your body is wrong, this will put pressure on the ligaments on the side of your knees, which will damage them. This applies to almost any sport. The main thing is to keep your toes pointing in the same direction as your knee. If you do a tai chi session and your knees hurt it's not over exertion or lack of strength (that should come across as muscular, not joint pain), it's that the technique you are doing (or worse being taught) is poor.

    46. Re:If this is true... by droptone · · Score: 1

      Well, there's only so many football linemen in a given school.

      While it's not exactly a great reference, this story reports the average Wonderlic scores by position. Surprisingly, linemen fair pretty well, with all being in the upper half of the listed scores.

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    47. Re:If this is true... by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Ever consider that jocks are some dumb motherfuckers to start with?
      Unlike the 1337 Crew kids that eventually become guys like us?

      (Just kidding - I was a high school athlete too - swimming and water polo. Less head trauma, unless you are not paying attention doing the backstroke and swim right into the wall.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    48. Re:If this is true... by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      As for TFA, for us sedentary desk-jockeys, we think of "exercise" as healthy, but anyone who has played a sport in some sort of serious way has probably noticed that athletics at this level is not healthy, it's damaging to the body, it doesn't surprise me that the brain is no exception. I played competitive ultimate frisbee on a regular basis for several years and I was beginning to get knee trouble. Looking at the health problems some of the older players had was enough to make me quit. I'd much rather still be able to walk when I'm 50 thank you.

      Since we're going on anecdotal evidence here, let's take my experience. I am currently 34 years of age. I've played soccer competitively (the league below what is now MLS), played ultimate competitively, played basketball in high school and basically been involved in competitive sports for about two-thirds of my life. I've broken my wrist once, and all of my fingers. Other than that, clean bill of health. Only a few of my friends have suffered any sort of really debilitating sorts of injuries. Proper preparation helps to reduce injury, stretching and warming up is vital.
      The other vital component to staying healthy is to know when to rest your body. As for being a sedentary desk jockey, Linux will be ready for the desktop before I become an office drone....

    49. Re:If this is true... by KovaaK · · Score: 1

      Well, I'll give it some more consideration then (provided I can find the time to read it). Thanks for the non flaming post.

    50. Re:If this is true... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much of this tendency is simply the convenience of being able to be lazy? If you don't HAVE to work for the money, will you? Perhaps if every sports program were started with this restriction (by law, I hope; you can teach your kids to run their little asses off for free at home but you can't necessarily teach them math and physics - oops, the school won't do that either) then we'd have less problems funding them, and less problems funding schools in general.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    51. Re:If this is true... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I would like to see data on kids brains on sports.

      Is there something about kids' brains that would make them less prone to concussion? Answer is no. I had a couple concussions when I was a kid. One sent me to the CT scan, but no hospital stay... Reading up above in this thread, my parkinson's risk is substantially increased. But one's brain seems to be very much "use it or lose it". Your brain is making new connections throughout your life (so we have discovered) but only if you are actually learning new things. What's important is stimulation. And now, let me return to hacking up my tablet PC.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    52. Re:If this is true... by KillaBeave · · Score: 1

      My High School's sports budget was almost 100% funded by ticket sales from the Friday night football games. We could put on average about 2-3k people in the stands at $5 a pop, 8 times a year. Works out to over $100k and paid for girls volleyball, baseball, swimming, wrestling, cheerleading etc. Basketball also contributed a significant but smaller ammount, simply because the gym couldn't hold more than about 2000.

      I was a 160lb running back & strong saftey, and went on to get a Master's and now excell at a job in software architecture for a very large company (who's having some hard times right now). I would say that my 8 years of football taught me more about myself, others and the world and life in general than any other expereince in my life. The grit, determination and self-confidence football instilled in me, has enabled me to achieve what I have thus far in my life. Without that expereince, I'm not sure where I'd be. (Actually I'd probably be dead or in jail ... lots of drugs in my old hometown and lots of dead friends before our 10yr reunion. Extra curriculars are a "good thing" (tm). )

      It's not all dumb jocks out there ... and in my opinion, the benefits I've recieved through my participation in sports has far out weighed any future cost I may incur. We all have to die sometime, even if you never really lived.

    53. Re:If this is true... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Our children are becoming obese. We need them to get exercise for them to be healthy.

      Unfortunately, the problem is that PE is often not about teaching personal health and exercise, but almost entirely focused on team sports.

    54. Re:If this is true... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      In high school, I resented the attention that the jocks and the athletic department got at our school. But then I got to college and went into engineering... and saw dozens of young men who couldn't run a mile, who were obese and unattractive and unable to be self-sufficient when it came to anything physical.

      I'd argue that these are part of the same problem. Because PE often doesn't teach you personal fitness, and instead focuses on team sports and having a ball kicked at your head. People who lack the coordination typically do badly, and typically will dislike the whole thing (especially do to the team nature, where being bad at it may make you unpopular). I'd say current PE teaching probably does more to put such people off of any kind of personal fitness.

      And as for unattractive - I'm curious what school you went to where they taught beauty tips. Certainly, running around a field in mud is not my idea of it.

      As for safety - we ban all sorts of "unpopular" things for children (or in some mad cases, even for adults), based on unproven claims that they might be harmful, "just in case". Yet forcing children to bash their heads with a ball is considered perfectly acceptable. I just think there's a slight double-standard here.

    55. Re:If this is true... by mdarksbane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Define personal fitness. I'd say it includes running and jumping around. PE teaches team sports because they're a lot more interesting (to most people), and keep a lot more people involved, than running on a treadmill. I guess it's a bit of a philosophy thing - if you're uncoordinated, do you give up or push harder. Some people were never taught (or never had - we could argue that all day) that kind of physical competitiveness.

      Team sports may seem like they teach worthless things... but throwing, catching, dodging, all build agility and coordination better than most pure drills you could do, especially when you add that you're trying to do it over the head of someone else.

      Unattractiveness is 90-95% body weight and muscle mass. A guy can have one of the ugliest mugs you've ever seen but he will still beat out every over or underweight nerd you know if he has a six pack. Are football players generally naturally attractive? Not their faces, but ask most women and they'd love it if their husband had their bodies. How much depression and disorders are directly linked to poor fitness? How many nerds do you know with major psychological issues due to their inability (or perceived inability ) to attract women (or men, although that is generally less of an issue in our discipline).

      And finally... no one is forced to hit their head with a ball. You're encouraged to play, but if you don't go for that header, they aren't going to fail you for the class.

      I get tired of this false dichotomy in our society between physical and mental pursuits. There is no reason to ignore any aspect of your personal development. Being smart does not give you and excuse to be weak, nor being athletic an excuse to ignore your math studies. You may not start on the football team or win the nobel price, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't play the game.

    56. Re:If this is true... by CardiganKiller · · Score: 1

      Brutality to one's opponent and damage to their own body are not mutually bound. I think the psychology of aggression is what causes the damage to the practitioner, but being brutal does not require aggression. A true professional who immerses him or herself into violent situations in order to make a living should reach a point where they do only what's necessary to get the job done and go home. Joint, nerve, and brain damage arise from improper practices. Why hit the skull with one's knuckles, damaging them, when the neck is only a few inches away? Why become overexcited and adrenally charged when the situation requires calm and decisive action? Why spar with a person who wants to kill you? Martial arts that enforce mandatory aggression (Krav Maga for example) in order to be effective are just as terrible as the ineffective arts that make non-aggression mandatory. One damages your body and psyche through training, while the other leaves your body and psyche unprepared for high-stress encounters.

    57. Re:If this is true... by Stormie · · Score: 1

      This is the first time I've seen anyone other than me reference this excellent man and the wisdom he is willing to share.

      Are you serious? I don't think I've ever seen a story about education on Slashdot which didn't feature some disciple linking to his book.

    58. Re:If this is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless making kids dummer is their job.

      So apropos...

    59. Re:If this is true... by causality · · Score: 1

      This is the first time I've seen anyone other than me reference this excellent man and the wisdom he is willing to share.

      Are you serious? I don't think I've ever seen a story about education on Slashdot which didn't feature some disciple linking to his book.

      While I appreciate the subtle hint that there is mindless following going on, reading what the man says and realizing to your own satisfaction that he has a good point and that it's a particularly important point that's worth mentioning doesn't make one his disciple. It's alright, I see that dismissive sort of response aimed at most people who were either ahead of their time or willing to call things what they are when most others weren't. I wouldn't really expect Gatto to be any different.

      I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I consider our public education system to be fundamentally broken because it's very good at what it does yet that is different from what it claims to do. Gatto happens to be one of the best at explaining this, probably because he was a teacher himself and so he has the perspective of an insider. This isn't a religious thing; he provides a myriad of facts and references and reasoning (see the book, The Underground History of American Education, which is available for free on his Web site johntaylorgatto.com). You're either willing to evaluate the man's work and subject it to whatever tests of truth you think are appropriate and come to your own conclusions, or you're not, and I wouldn't expect anything I say or do to change that. What I am doing here is letting you know that the way you're categorizing people who mention him doesn't hold water.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    60. Re:If this is true... by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      See, my *high school* did and does this through volunteers and boosters. I was amazed to learn this after I graduated, and very proud of them. The extra money that the athletic association brings in goes to the school.

      This is why I always get thoroughly annoyed when the local school districts start crying that they need more tax money from us or they'll have to start doing pay-to-play. They don't if they just get a handful of volunteers to ask for money from people who want to support them, or to sell concessions, or to just be there and help so that the school doesn't need to pay assistant coaches or whatever. There are a million ways to support these things without forcing it on people.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  7. Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We have to stop that before someone is so gone that he shoots himself in the leg.

    1. Re:Dangerous by Spatial · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ceiling voyeur faggot is watching you masturbate.

  8. It's not that surprising by Anonymous+Cowbell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember an ESPN interview of a retired NFL linebacker. He'd had multiple concussions in his playing days. He was quite mentally damaged, at the ripe old age of 45.

    One day he went out for a drive, and when he got to his block, he couldn't recognize his own house. So he decided to just keep driving around the block, over and over. More than an hour elapsed before one of his family members spotted the car out the front window and went outside and flagged him down.

    It wasn't the first time seemingly simple things/memories just completely escaped him

    1. Re:It's not that surprising by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...enough of a meathead that he would've done that anyways

      Yeah but Meatwad make the money see, Meatwad get the honeys G.
      With all of that, what would you want with a functioning brain?

    2. Re:It's not that surprising by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Besides, without a brain you can float further with glass embedded in you to pop a static-electricity filled balloon that's threatening the city.

    3. Re:It's not that surprising by ChienAndalu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just out of curiosity, I just googeled for Muhammad Ali to find about his Parkinson condition.

      It looks like his career choice was at least partly responsible for his brain damage: Article.

      This isn't mentioned in the Wikipedia, by the way.

      Makes you wonder if it is smart to glorify professional boxing.

    4. Re:It's not that surprising by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not surprising, but it's also a bit of a slight to the way concussions are being handled today. These artciles give the impression that concussions are treated today the same way they were 30 years ago.

      Ten years ago was the point where things really started to "click" when it came to concussions. Jim Everett's case in particular. He was an NFL quarterback who spent several years as a veritable punching bag for some god-awful teams, including the St. Louis Rams. Everett had actually taken to keeping his phone number in his wallet, since he frequently got lost on the way home (a 15 minute drive) from the stadium, and couldn't remember his address or phone number. At that point, a lot of NFL teams began taking notice. The tissue samples we're seeing are from guys who, for the most part, played in the 70's and 80's, back when "shut up and play you pussy, you just 'got your bell rung'" was a way of life. Now, concussions are handled with considerably more care. Is it enough? I don't know that anyone is sure yet. But at least they're being treated like the legitimate, serious injury they are.

      But what's really waking up pro sports teams? Money. With teams investing over 100 million dollars over ten years in some players, the risk is losing not only what you've invested in development, but what you stand to earn in terms of marketing and merchandise revenues. What do you think a Peyton Manning-level players is worth to his franchise over his career? a quarter of a billion dollars? Half a billion? Do you think it's any different in the NHL? Or EPL?

      It's interesting that Chris Nowinski is mentioned in the article. As a former pro-wrestler, hearing him talk about concussions is like hearing about gang violence from someone who lives in Compton. The WWE has an absolutely abysmal record of handling athlete injuries, especially concussions.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    5. Re:It's not that surprising by KTheorem · · Score: 1

      Do what now?

    6. Re:It's not that surprising by butalearner · · Score: 4, Informative

      The tissue samples we're seeing are from guys who, for the most part, played in the 70's and 80's, back when "shut up and play you pussy, you just 'got your bell rung'" was a way of life. Now, concussions are handled with considerably more care. Is it enough? I don't know that anyone is sure yet. But at least they're being treated like the legitimate, serious injury they are.

      My father was a linebacker for 8 years in the '80s, and he says something very similar. He had several concussions himself, and only when he suffered the one or two major ones did he come out of the game. He's coached for a high school and a smaller college team recently and says that even at that level everyone is so much more aware of injuries, and other dangers like dehydration and heat exhaustion, than they were when he played professionally. And before that it was worse...when he was in high school they used to take salt pills instead of water breaks.

      Anyway, he's 50 now, his knees and back are shot so he walks like a 75 year old. Maybe it's because he just turned 50, but the NFLPA has recently gotten serious about former player health, so they've begun periodically checking his heart and other health problems. But thankfully the only mental problem I've noticed is that he votes Republican.

    7. Re:It's not that surprising by michael+path · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The NHL has taken special attention to 'head shots' this year and the injuries that go with. There's a handful of guys - Eric Lindros being the most prominent - who lost a great deal of playing time from getting their bell rung.

      Rough story about Everett. I just read about some of the stuff he's done since, including completing his MBA. He actually never played with St. Louis, though - the Rams didn't move there until 1995.

      As far as franchise players and their value, I imagine a guy like Peyton Manning or Tom Brady, or starting MLB pitchers are probably worth close to $800M-1B now given the TV, merchandise, ticket, etc. revenue generated. It's reflected in the contracts they're getting; $25M isn't unprecedented for a season in the MLB, and over 15 years would get you up to $375M in their career. So, yeah - there's a huge benefit in further research.

      -m.

    8. Re:It's not that surprising by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      lolwut?

    9. Re:It's not that surprising by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some of Lindros' problems were his own doing. He rose through the junior ranks so quickly that he never developed any on-ice vision. Be it either due to his meteoric rise or a simple lack of skill, he never had a decent sense of what was going on around him. Igor Larionov was generously listed as 5'8" 185 lbs, yet never once took the hits that I saw Lindros take.

      And of course, Lindros had a habit of taking the puck up through center ice with his head down. That may have worked back in the OHL when he was 50lbs heavier than everyone and could muscle his way through just about any check, but that same move is just like ringing the dinner bell when you had guys like Scott Stevens patrolling the blue line.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    10. Re:It's not that surprising by barzok · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about Bill Romanowski, he had issues beyond what his various concussions may have caused. He did steroids & other substances which screwed him up bad.

      The concussions definitely didn't help his mental condition, but they are not solely to blame for where he ended up.

    11. Re:It's not that surprising by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      But thankfully the only mental problem I've noticed is that he votes Republican.

      Lol. Poor bastard.

    12. Re:It's not that surprising by droptone · · Score: 1

      Troy Polamalu has reportedly had 7-8 concussions during his football career. If you see a pool on who will develop serious problems down the road, bet on him.

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    13. Re:It's not that surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But thankfully the only mental problem I've noticed is that he votes Republican.

      It wouldn't hurt to have some sense knocked in to you, too.

    14. Re:It's not that surprising by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0821171/

      Jeez... watch the show. It's awesome ;)

    15. Re:It's not that surprising by KTheorem · · Score: 1

      "Do what now?" was Meatwad's response to the rest of the team when, after having his brain removed and himself rolled in glass, they told him to pop the balloon. YOU watch the show :p

    16. Re:It's not that surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, without a brain you can float further with glass embedded in you to pop a static-electricity filled balloon that's threatening the city.

      Do what now?

    17. Re:It's not that surprising by yaphadam097 · · Score: 1

      Nuts.

      Here is the about page from the site you linked to. Essentially they publish anything from anyone.

      The cause of Parkinson's is unknown. Furthermore, several of the details about Mr. Ali's brain anatomy described in the article could only be determined by dissection. AFAIK, an autopsy has never been performed on the *still living* former boxer.

      Wikipedia has a list of famous Parkinson's sufferers here. You'll note that Mohammed Ail is not only the only boxer on the list but one of the few athletes. Most of the famous sufferers are artists, scientists, or politicians.

  9. Athletes? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone," said [retired wrestler] Nowinski. "We know we can't do that anymore. This causes long-term damage."

    And they needed to study athletes for this? They could have asked anyone who's ever done more than a week of front-line tech support.

    Briefly, the degree of mental impairment is roughly proportional to the depth of the worn-out concavity in the desk. The rates at which both measurements increase over time show a logarithmic flattening-out as one progresses from front-line support to management.

    1. Re:Athletes? by Lord+Faust · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know you're being funny, but seriously, there's a huge difference between mild trauma and huge, 300+ pound men smashing into each other. (Mass * Velocity)^2 = your brain is mush. There has not been nearly enough research into this subject; the actual effects of the trauma, both over long and short-term periods of time. This information will help everyone, not just athletes. It just so happens athletes experience massive numbers of concussions; hopefully their sacrifices will help benefit anyone experiencing head-trauma issues.

    2. Re:Athletes? by ciaohound · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not surprisingly, regression testing reveals a high correlation between desk concavity and temporal follicular density (in layman's terms, "pointy-hairedness").

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  10. nobrainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whoever tagged this "nobrainer" deserves a cookie. :)

  11. Think about it.. by qoncept · · Score: 2, Funny

    The thing that is probably going to be lost on 99% of the people reading this article and thinking the "dumb jocks" deserve it is the affects of sitting in a chair for many hours staring at monitors and making the same repetative movements day after day.

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:Think about it.. by MrEricSir · · Score: 2, Funny

      At first your comment made me want to bang my head against the desk, but I know better than to do that now.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Think about it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh the horror of your Language! It's so hard to read! Grammar!?! Spelling?!?! Punctuation?!? O'Lord, where art thou?

    3. Re:Think about it.. by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      Yes but that's all that these 'athletes' do is bang their heads together repeatedly day in day out, so it's a worse kind of crazy because you don't get the time to develop proper psychotic tendencies some one in a cube farm might*.

      *I don't know I've never worked in one, but I think I might go crazy in one.

    4. Re:Think about it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, I only make those movements for 2 minutes...

  12. whodathunkit? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone," said [retired wrestler] Nowinski. "We know we can't do that anymore. This causes long-term damage."

    Wow! This is absolutely shocking news! I never would've guessed that repeated damage to a single organ/body part would have lasting effects....

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:whodathunkit? by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 4, Funny

      whodathunkit?

      +1 unintentional onomatopoeia

    2. Re:whodathunkit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of what?
      an articulated puppet falling on the ground?

    3. Re:whodathunkit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whodathunkit

  13. Thankfully I'm a nerd. by danking · · Score: 1

    For once I am thanking the fact that I have no atheletic skill and turned to a life of technology and computers.

    1. Re:Thankfully I'm a nerd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should be thanking that fact that you don't have any *football* (the American kind) skills--you'll still regret having no athletic skills at some point. I don't see how, say, badminton would give you routine concussions.

    2. Re:Thankfully I'm a nerd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, and don't regret not getting the hotties, because masturbation is good for you too!

      http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3942-masturbating-may-protect-against-prostate-cancer.html

    3. Re:Thankfully I'm a nerd. by causality · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For once I am thanking the fact that I have no atheletic skill and turned to a life of technology and computers.

      Personally I balance that by enjoying the outdoors. It does not take very much effort to be able to easily handle a five-mile hike in relatively rough (i.e. difficult, but no special equipment needed) terrain and it's quite enjoyable. There is something magic about the forest that puts your mind at ease and gives you a sense of peace, especially when you find a harmony there that is often missing in the "rat race" life. Depending on where you like to go, it also can involve a lot of different movements like jumping and climbing which is why I consider it superior to simply walking around the block.

      Now, I am not a doctor so this is just my personal opinion, but I also think this is a healthy sort of exercise that, assuming you are not careless or clumsy, does not carry anything like the risks of injury that most sports like American football include. That's not to say that no one ever gets hurt in the wilderness, because that certainly does happen to some people and it's not for everybody, but I've yet to hear such a story that was not the direct result of negligence on the part of the person involved. I also think that a lean, agile body is healthier than a "beefcake" body like those that American football players are often encouraged to have, for the latter is often built on what I would call a burnout lifestyle.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:Thankfully I'm a nerd. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how bad for your health it is sitting at a desk for hours every day, repeated for years and years?

    5. Re:Thankfully I'm a nerd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could get eaten by a bear in the wilderness.

    6. Re:Thankfully I'm a nerd. by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      You should probably be concerned about your general health if you participate in NO athletic endeavors...

  14. Here is the cure by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    Fixed it for them. Take some of these

  15. Poorly Titled by CallFinalClass · · Score: 1

    This is about FOOTBALL (American) players, not all athletes.

    Only a small subset of athletes get their bells rung on a regular basis.

    Crikey already.

    1. Re:Poorly Titled by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain rugby and even "soccer" (I know, it's "football" to everyone but Americans) also involve head knocking at times. Rugby especially.

    2. Re:Poorly Titled by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      I would assume since you're pointing out that it's american football, you've seen some rest o' the world football. I'd suspect that a study of the guys who slam their heads against a leather sphere probably suffer from similar results...

      Sports are dangerous, always have been. I'd be interested in some of the curling statistics! (I mean mixing ice and alcohol can't be good, and that sport makes zero sense sober)

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    3. Re:Poorly Titled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put a rugby player in his usual attire on the field with a team of American football players and he'd probably sustain a serious injury in the first play.

    4. Re:Poorly Titled by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Oh, Lord...

      Hockey

      Aussie Rules Football (a fabulous bame, BTW)

      Rugby

      Several other games lead to repeated head injuries, if only for the very elite players.

      I doubt heading the ball in Soccer qualifies, but I've been kicked in the head a few times in the goal crease. Of course, wanting to play the keeper pretty much disqualifies me as a control subject. Playing it for 15+ years should write that in stone, eh...

      What? WHAT??

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    5. Re:Poorly Titled by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in real football players knock their heads together by accident (usually in a corner kick), they don't do it on purpose on every single play like in American football

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    6. Re:Poorly Titled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly certain rugby and even "soccer" (I know, it's "football" to everyone but Americans) also involve head knocking at times. Rugby especially.

      You can use the word soccer without the scary "quotes". Different countries tend to have different languages and a given sequence of letters in one language may not mean the same thing in every language ("a" in English and "a" in Spanish, e.g.). This should not be a surprise to a grown man. Also, many non-Americans use the term soccer to reference what is also football or futbal or ??? in their native tongue.

      I'm a member of a (big city omitted) Soccer League. Nearly everyone is Spanish-speaking yet they use the word "Soccer" in the title of their organization. They do this because it conveys meaning in a non-ambiguous way. That is what language attempts to do, in theory. Don't let it throw you and don't fall into the PC trap of assuming everything American is wrong. There are literally billions of people hellbent on making sure their arbitrary choices are enforced by law. Don't walk down the path of political correctess of your own volition.

    7. Re:Poorly Titled by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I'd suspect that a study of the guys who slam their heads against a leather sphere probably suffer from similar results...

      It was known back in the day. When the ball was actually made of leather, with laces, on a rainy day on a muddy pitch it would be heavy. Footballers who frequently headed the ball would sometimes come down with cumulative brain damage similar to that suffered by boxers. There's a reason 'heid-the-baw' is a Scots term for 'lunatic' to this day.

      Nowadays the ball is much lighter, so heading it is a far smaller impact and not likely to be a health risk - at least compared to the far greater hazards associated with giving a man in his teens or early twenties tens of thousands of pounds every week. The human wreckage going by the name of Paul Gascoigne or Diego Maradona has nothing to do with blows to the head.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:Poorly Titled by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I am definitely not politically correct (I'm a white male, for one thing). But in dealing with the international audience on slashdot, I figured I would use the "scary" "quotes," hehe.

    9. Re:Poorly Titled by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      The human wreckage going by the name of Paul Gascoigne or Diego Maradona has nothing to do with blows to the head.

      But everything to do with blow in the head.

  16. The sports will always stay, the game must change by JamJam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Physical sports where concussion's occur are not going to go away. People will always sacrifice their body for potential fame and fortune. The fallacy of "a concussion will never happen to me or have lasting effects" is strong amongst young people, those typically playing these types of sports. Plus, using football as an example, is so ingrained in North American society: from high school through to college/university to a Professional paying job that the game will not go away. What needs to change is the way these sports are played.

    Where there just as many concussions when people wore the thin leather helmets vs today's super helmets? Players dressed up in all that protective gear feel invincible literally throw themselves around and taking more hits and risks. You don't see near as many concussion injuries in a sport like rugby. While similar in nature those players aren't spearing others with their head to make a tackle.

  17. Perhaps I'm just too old by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Turns out that repeated concussions can result in depression, insomnia, and the beginnings of something that looks a lot like Alzheimer's. "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone,"

    But this has been fairly obvious since Mohammed Ali...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Perhaps I'm just too old by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in spirit, but the plural of anecdote is not data.

      Also, please read up on Ali. What he so visible suffers from is Parkinson's... he's not a good study example for Alzheimers-like syndromes, since some Alzheimers-like complications could be masked by the Parkinson's. And we don't know if his boxing had any impact on the Parkinson's, either. All of these are issues supporting my first statement about making generalizations from a single sample.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Perhaps I'm just too old by ChienAndalu · · Score: 1

      This article may be interesting for you.

    3. Re:Perhaps I'm just too old by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in spirit, but the plural of anecdote is not data.

      Also, please read up on Ali. What he so visible suffers from is Parkinson's

      I agree, Ali suffers from Parkinson's Syndrome. Now you only have to ask "Why does Ali suffer from Parkinson's Syndrome". I've read a few papers over the years which have found a pretty good corolation between head trauma and incrased odds of devolping Parkinson's.

  18. fencing coaches beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I remember discussing this with fellow fencers and coaches. The consensus was that after receiving literally thousands of blows to the head every day during practice and lessons, coaches would eventually show signs of brain damage in their (not so) old age. Basically, the younger coaches looked at the old ones and figured that perhaps it was better to hold a mask in the unarmed hand as a target instead of using their own mask/head to prevent micro-choc from debilitating them.

    1. Re:fencing coaches beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fencing? Really? I mean I could see Kendo or something but fencing? With those little lightweight fishing poles? That's a pretty fucking dorky thing to be afraid of.

    2. Re:fencing coaches beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sabres and epees are about the same weight as a shinai, and are obviously considerably denser. You also wear far less robust protective gear.

    3. Re:fencing coaches beware! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I remember discussing this with fellow fencers and coaches.

      Obviously, you have taken up the practice of holding an off-hand target?

      The consensus was that after receiving literally thousands of blows to the head every day during practice and lessons, coaches would eventually show signs of brain damage in their (not so) old age. Basically, the younger coaches looked at the old ones and figured that perhaps it was better to hold a mask in the unarmed hand as a target instead of using their own mask/head to prevent micro-choc from debilitating them.

      That's a horseshit consensus. Are you really serious that a group of coaches came to the consensus that it was a good idea to ingrain into muscle memory a false target? Glad I never took lessons from anyone in that group.

      Try wearing a compression bandage under your mask instead, and instruct your pupils not to be so ham-handed. And have them do repetitive practice against eachother, or against a dummy.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  19. Doing research by acohen1 · · Score: 0

    Shortly my company is going to be working on a way to detect and hopefully stage concussions using a portable non-invasive test. Looks like sports medicine will be our target (previously looked at military). It already works for neurodegenerative disorders, so it should be able to find traumatic neropathy as well.

  20. Sports + Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sports programs are important part of a good all round education. Being in shape is conducive to good mental ability, well for the majority of us at least.

    However I do agree that the amount of money spent on sports compared to arts and science is disproportionate. I wonder if there is a correlation between decades of such spending policies and our current economic problems. We do need to cut down Educational Administration costs, increase the budgets for arts and sciences, and bring sports budgets into line with the rest. (Most sports costs are due to liability coverage; so people stop suing everything under the sun when little Johnny or Erica gets a bump on the head). Oh and most importantly get educators to start teaching and allowing critical thinking in the classroom again.

  21. Not only football. by Tavor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of my local tack shops is staffed by a lady who had her bell rung enough times being thrown from her horse (sans helmet in those days) that she can't ride for risk of getting her last concussion. And she makes sure that everyone starting has a good *properly* fitting helmet. (Even someone with as big a head as me - finding proper fitting hats is a lifelong challenge!) So no. Concussions are not limited to only American Football.

    --
    Windows has detected an undetectable error.
    1. Re:Not only football. by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even someone with as big a head as me - finding proper fitting hats is a lifelong challenge!

      http://bigheadcaps.com/

      I also have a big head, and that is the only place I can buy headgear that fits well. (Except even there if they have a size selection to choose from, I have to get the biggest one.)

      I do wildland firefighting, and it was an issue to get a helmet that fit me at all. The helmet I currently have doesn't provide very much protection in the back because it was only made for up to about a 7 3/4 size hat, and I am beyond that.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:Not only football. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do wildland firefighting, and it was an issue to get a helmet that fit me at all.

      I admire people who are willing to do something like that. If you are even paid for that, it isn't enough. Any man who can voluntarily face a monster like a wildfire has balls of steel. Sir, I salute you.

  22. Fear Mongering by Mephistophocles · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Not to create massive waves of controversy or anything, but this is a non-story. Of course it causes problems. Everyone knew this already - including the athletes. All you're doing by spreading this kind of panicky attitude is asking for silly legislation which outlaws a perceived danger. Eventually we must understand that we can't protect people from everything, and we can't escape from danger. Sometimes it really is ok to live dangerously. It's funny, but once upon a time mankind understood this, and while he may not have lived as long, his life was far more interesting, and I would argue that he was a better human being for it.

    --
    Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
    1. Re:Fear Mongering by mangu · · Score: 1

      All you're doing by spreading this kind of panicky attitude is asking for silly legislation which outlaws a perceived danger

      The sanest reaction would be not to outlaw, but make the athletes pay the full cost of their activities. Instead of giving scholarships to athletes, schools should start charging them for the future cost of treating their problems, even if that cost only arises years after they left school.

      If football players were told "you are likely to need intensive medical care from your forties until your premature death, so start saving now" perhaps they would think twice and choose some less destructive recreational activities.

    2. Re:Fear Mongering by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The sad part is all the people who get crippled by playing high school and college sports, motivated by the very unlikely prospect of a professional career. They are cannon fodder for a system that makes big profits for the schools and TV networks, and does little for the athlete.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Fear Mongering by Mephistophocles · · Score: 1

      If football players were told "you are likely to need intensive medical care from your forties until your premature death, so start saving now" perhaps they would think twice and choose some less destructive recreational activities.

      Possibly, but not necessarily, and here again, I think that's not necessary. Most of them know exactly what they're doing and what the costs will be. Most of them play because they enjoy the game (or for any number of other reasons which are just as legitimate and acceptable). And it my humble opinion, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. Think about a soldier, for example. When you volunteer for service, unless you're a complete idiot, you know what the risks are. Will it deter people from volunteering for the military if we force the armed forces to spend massive amounts of money telling recruits that they might get shot? Would that be a good thing? I know serving one's country and playing football are two very different things, but the analogy can still be made.

      --
      Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
    4. Re:Fear Mongering by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      All you're doing by spreading this kind of panicky attitude is asking for silly legislation which outlaws a perceived danger.

      I would oppose any kind of silly legislation intended to "protect" people for their own good.

      But I'd say it's unlikely to happen - sports is one of those things that's protected, no matter how harmful. Yet many other things in society are banned, even for adults, based on claims that they might be harmful. So I think next time someone proposes silly legislation for something else, it's worth waving this story at them, and asking if they plan to ban all sports too.

  23. Since the times of the ancient Romans . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1, Interesting

    . . . crowds of plebes have gleefully enjoyed watching folks, bash the shit, out off other folks. It keeps the populace's minds of other social problems.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the next government economic stimulus act funds "Ben Hur" style Roman warship battles in the Washington Monument Reflecting pool. With free bread for the spectators.

    If this is true, then why do schools insist on giving money to sports programs while starving arts and sciences budgets?

    Such programs don't bring out the crowds on the weekends to the stadiums.

    Hmmm . . . maybe Stem Cell experiments, with cheerleaders would work.

    Enraged wacko-physicists hurling cold fusion experiments at each other, maybe.

    You just need to have plenty of vendors with cheap booze and fast food on hand.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Since the times of the ancient Romans . . . by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if the next government economic stimulus act funds "Ben Hur" style Roman warship battles in the Washington Monument Reflecting pool. With free bread for the spectators.

      "Welcome back to Extreme Gladiators of America, sponsored by Burger King!"

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  24. I could read this article or... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    I could look at any video of Muhammad Ali made in the last 20 years.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:I could read this article or... by burning-toast · · Score: 1

      Not as a counter to your point, but rather to make sure you are aware, he has Parkinson's Disease. His apparent mental difficulties cannot be entirely attributed to his fighting career.

      - Toast

  25. 5th Estate Documentary by LevonB · · Score: 1

    The Fifth Estate did a fantastic news piece on this. http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2008-2009/head_games/video.html/

    --
    Levon Barker
    1. Re:5th Estate Documentary by sonsonifty · · Score: 1

      Yes, a friend told me about that and it sounded really interesting. Now go back to your igloo! Har har!

  26. How is this different from being 'punch drunk'? by rts008 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is nothing new, and has been described and studied for decades as 'Dementia pugilistica', and ..."first described in 1928 by Harrison Stanford Martland in a Journal of the American Medical Association article..."[from the above linked wiki article]

    Having watched the changes in both George Foreman and Cassius Clay(AKA Mohammed Ali) over the years in interviews, this was pretty obvious even to a medical layman.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    1. Re:How is this different from being 'punch drunk'? by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      "Having watched the changes in both George Foreman[...]"

      With God as my witness, I thought George Foreman only sold grills.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:How is this different from being 'punch drunk'? by Swampash · · Score: 1

      Having watched the changes in both George Foreman and Cassius Clay(AKA Mohammed Ali) over the years in interviews, this was pretty obvious even to a medical layman.

      I totally agree with your point, but I'm not sure Foreman is a good example. In his 1970s interviews he was a sullen monosyllabic grunter. Now he's an outgoing energetic speaker. Although I guess it could be that he was an intelligent sullen monosyllabic grunter in the 70s and now he's a stupid outgoing energetic speaker...

    3. Re:How is this different from being 'punch drunk'? by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      No, he rose to fame when he was a spokesman for Mineke-brand mufflers.

      In seriousness though, Foreman has said that not only has he made way more money selling his grills, but he's far more famous for that than he ever was for boxing.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    4. Re:How is this different from being 'punch drunk'? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Ali is affected by Parkinson's as well, as other commenters have stated. Though, the combination of the two can't be good.
      Yeah, it's sad to see these great stars past their prime...

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  27. Sports are worthless by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To be honest even considering the money they make I don't think it'd worth it to have a body and mind that will be worthless well before it should be.

    These are grown men playing children's games. It's quite sad how worked up people can get over something so insignificant as sports while at the same time they're typically not into keeping themselves fit.

    1. Re:Sports are worthless by Skyshadow · · Score: 2, Insightful
      'Professional'-level sporting events have been a constant for the entire span of human civilization, from the guys getting paid big bucks in the NFL now to the chariot races of Rome to the well-moviated players of the mesoamerican ballgame.

      Going out on a limb here I'm going to guess that, your feelings on the subject aside, sports do fill a certain basic requirement in human society.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:Sports are worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I think it's sad how worked up grown men can get over big trucks that are basically just children's toys, but I don't expect everyone to share my entire value system.

      Most people spend a ton of time pursuing "optional" things whose selection is understood only by people like them. Religions, hobbies, even many careers would qualify. And what is with all those people who climb mountains? Why do they do that? I sure don't know!

    3. Re:Sports are worthless by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I don't play or watch any sport, but I really have to question anyone who says "sports are worthless". What made you take such an extreme attitude?

    4. Re:Sports are worthless by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a vacation I took to the Grand Canyon area back in April 2006.

      I recall how one of our tour destinations was an Indian ruin (relatively well-preserved thanks to the desert climate), and one of the biggest features of that town was a *sports stadium*. [It is believed to be for some sort of ball game, though maybe not as brutal as the Aztec one].

      You look forward 800 years, and the sports stadiums are major components of a city's architecture.

      Very interesting to see that it isn't an isolated case of Ancient Rome's gladiators and such.

      I think it may have something to do with a spirit for aggressive competition outside of war, as well as the tribal/team dynamics of the team sports.

      "When Karl Marx called religion the opiate of the masses, he must not have been thinking of commercialized sports." (Granted, the rise of *that* was past Marx's time)

      Think about it as a 'painkiller' taken in response to real issues that treats the symptoms and not the underlying problem.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    5. Re:Sports are worthless by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I'd say older sports in past centuries can't really be compared to the bunch of over-paid spoiled brats we have today.

  28. Nowinski? by loshwomp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never bet on the guy named "Nowinski". He's never won anything.

    1. Re:Nowinski? by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that was his stage name? He could have been one of the original guys who were brought on to intentionally lose to make some other guy look good? ;)

  29. Marijuana by Cantus · · Score: 0

    Just tell them to smoke marijuana.

  30. No pain, no brain. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    If you feel pain that means that the body is telling you are damaging something. Athletes that think you must work through the pain and the attempt to believe in their mind that the pain is not there.
    A good example is Muhammad Ali which now has Parkinson's Syndrome.
    If you don't feel pain, you may not have a brain.

  31. This makes my plans for vengeance problematical by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    Damn.

    There's this football player from my High School who once smeared crap all over the bathroom of the fast food restaurant at which I was working . . . several minutes after he saw me sweeping the floors and repeatedly asked if I worked there.

    Now, after twenty years of designing, building, and testing a Piranha-infested Lap Pool of Doom to torture the bastard in, I learn that he's probably already a Depends-clad imbecile. What's the sport in luring to his doom through a fiendish social engineering scheme a shaky feeb who probably earns a living waving around a Mattress Barn sign by the side of the road?

    1. Re:This makes my plans for vengeance problematical by couchslug · · Score: 1

      " I learn that he's probably already a Depends-clad imbecile. What's the sport in luring to his doom through a fiendish social engineering scheme a shaky feeb who probably earns a living waving around a Mattress Barn sign by the side of the road?"

      I'M a mentally challenged, tremulous, incontinent discount bedding promoter, you insensitive clod!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  32. Non-Symptomatic Athletes by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 1

    Given the large number of althletes who do not have any of these symptoms, but are injured in the same way; it is great that there is a body of knowledge out there to encourage those to be tested as well so there can be a sort of "control" group. I would think it would help deturmine "what kind" or "what extent" of damage the brain can handle and what health factors make others less susceptible to the symptoms (genetics, cell density, injury location, protien/biochemical differences, etc.)

    I'm not a doctor but it seems if there is causal evidence for "Alzheimer's like" damage, and non-symptomatic athletes have the same damage(s), it would help researchers isolate causes and contributing (or preventative) factors of the disease for the general population, specifically lessor athletes (amatuer or pre-professional) to make sports safer.

    --
    Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
  33. Brain injuries bad? by Livius · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it's a good idea to study the effecs scientifically, but, seriously, no-one actually believed that you could "whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine."

  34. Concussions.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ORLY!!

  35. There's no hope for the Hardy boys by man_who_was_thursday · · Score: 1

    Ever notice how many times they were knocked on the head in every book?

  36. Common F. Sense is absent again... by geekmux · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone....We know we can't do that anymore."

    Just curious in what medical journal was this ever listed outside of the No-Shit-Sherlock section?

    Unreal what a Common Sense deficiency can do to a person.

    1. Re:Common F. Sense is absent again... by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually fairly recently there were some news articles where studies supposedly showed that as long as you didn't get a second concussion before the current one healed you would probably have NO permanent damage. http://familydoctor.org/online/famdocen/home/common/brain/head/458.html#ArticleParsysMiddleColumn0011 It isn't too hard to find articles like this one, but I think the thoughts about this are changing, as there is (was) evidence on both sides. Perhaps the problem is sometimes there really is no permanent damage, and sometimes there is. Therefore one or two in your life probably won't cause any permanent damage, but over time, eventually there will be (just like getting shot doesn't automatically mean you'll die, but get shot enough and the odds are one of them will be fatal.) This is different than many of the previous articles indicated.

  37. Confused causality by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    I can tell you from my time in high school that the brain damage in football players actually occurs far before their professional careers.

  38. Captain Obvious by tsstahl · · Score: 1

    Captain Obvious strikes again. Although, quantifying the effects is certainly a useful undertaking.

    The problem is that this will surely encourage proponents of the continued woosification of America.

    Are we supposed to live our lives in plastic bubbles eating only bean curd?

    1. Re:Captain Obvious by sandmaninator · · Score: 1

      I think the word you're looking for is "wussification". Stay off the field, mate.

    2. Re:Captain Obvious by mangu · · Score: 1

      The problem is that this will surely encourage proponents of the continued woosification of America.

      I think the word you're looking for is "wussification". Stay off the field, mate.

      What? You don't know what's "woosification"? It means "becoming like Bertie Wooster

    3. Re:Captain Obvious by Icegryphon · · Score: 0

      AMEN brother. Where have all the real men gone?

    4. Re:Captain Obvious by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      Didn't realize slang had a grammar nazi following. Oh wait, that would be Nazi.

  39. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Athletes have brains?

  40. What by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Who EVER had "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine" ?!

    1. Re:What by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who EVER had "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine" ?!
      Obviously somebody that whacked their head thousands of times in their life!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  41. Re:The sports will always stay, the game must chan by composer777 · · Score: 1

    I doubt it, our society in it's current form, with it's selfish economy, violent sports, and warlike nature is way too volatile, corrupt, and short-sighted to last. I'd give it another 100 years, 200 max. Egypt lasted 5000 years, but that's not us. When I think of America, I tend to think of Rome.

  42. tehFunny++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  43. It's NFL grammar and spelling by mangu · · Score: 1

    Oh the horror of your Language! It's so hard to read!

    What do you expect? He has probably been playing football for too long.

  44. What about Monty Python Style? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    There are gentler styles that still are effective martial arts but without stressing one's body to the point of failure after a few years. This includes Aikido (even though you fall, you fall gently), Iaido (just don't cut yourself), and possibly Kendo.

    Their "Run Away! Run Away!" technique seems to avoid most martial arts injuries.

    Provided that you are a better runner than your opponent.

    On the serious side, I read about a "Beimo" champ a few years ago. "Beimo" were roof-top informal bare-knuckles fights in Hong Kong in the 60's. He was very successful, but he stated that the purpose was to whack your opponent out of commission, before he did the same to you.

    With devastating results on the health of both opponents. I can't find the original link, but I think this is from the same guy: http://home.vtmuseum.org/articles/peterson/wongbeimo.php

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:What about Monty Python Style? by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      There are gentler styles that still are effective martial arts but without stressing one's body to the point of failure after a few years. This includes Aikido (even though you fall, you fall gently), Iaido (just don't cut yourself), and possibly Kendo.

      Their "Run Away! Run Away!" technique seems to avoid most martial arts injuries.

      Oh dear. Even on Slashdot the "aikido doesn't work" trolls appear?
      On the other hand, I knew a black belt who actually was asked by his students what was the best technique to use against an attacker with a knifeâ" he literally ran out of the room. (Actually, he even drove off and came back with a soda 20 minutes later). Just like in a koan: the students were enlightened.

      Grandparent's point stands, though. I've practiced aikido with people in their 60s and 70s. This October I narrowly avoided an collision while riding my bike and I rather gracefully rolled out of it rather than doing a faceplant. Taekwondo wasn't going to help me in that situation.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    2. Re:What about Monty Python Style? by bh_doc · · Score: 1

      Against assailants, I prefer to just shoot them. And then eat their banana.

    3. Re:What about Monty Python Style? by Anzya · · Score: 1

      One of my senseis on the same subject said:
      1. Run away
      2. Do not try to do any aikido techniques
      3. Focus to do an aikido technique

      The reasoning was that knifes are reaaaaly dangerous so your best bet is to just run. If you can't run it's better to just trust your training and the instincts you have built rather than plan ahead what the opponent will do. And in the last case it's better to do something than to be paralysed when you are attacked.

      That said I believe the grandparent was talking about the "Monty Python Style" and no Aikido in regards to "Run Away".

      Though I'm a bit biased due to being an Aikidoka I prefer the reflex to get out of the way than to try and block what ever is coming. Blocking is a bad reflex when the attack is a bus ;)

      --
      "This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (or STFU, for you un-hip people)."
  45. Me loose brain? by SupremoMan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uh oh!

    Why me laugh?

  46. Poor fellas and all, but it's for a great cause! by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    They're better than the gladiators that entertained thousands by killing or getting killed. These guys actually get to see something out of the sacrifice they make.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  47. Boxing is like cigarettes by mangu · · Score: 1

    I read that article, and it seems that the main proponent of the idea that not all of his problems may be caused by boxing is -- surprise -- his "long-time ringside physician".

    This is like the tobacco industry claiming that smoking does not cause cancer.

    1. Re:Boxing is like cigarettes by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      (Playing the Devil's advocate for the tobacco industry in a rather tongue in cheek fashion)

      But smoking doesn't cause cancer. Most of our smokers die from heart disease long before they can get cancer...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  48. Ummm.... by htnprm · · Score: 1

    ...Duh?

  49. Elect these guys! by macraig · · Score: 1

    This is precisely why it's so great that so many of us live where these guys get elected as mayors or governors or Congressmen. Isn't at least a little brain damage a job requirement for elected offices? They're good to go after a stint in pro sports.

  50. Blame the gloves? by old_dragoon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have read several places that for a fighter to be "punch drunk" was not known during the bareknuckle days. It makes sense that the heavy gloves allow a man to hit his opponent harder in the head than he could otherwise. One proponent of this opinion was Louis L'Amour. Better known for being a great western writer, he also had a long and successful career as a heavy-weight fighter.

    1. Re:Blame the gloves? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      But then again, if it was "not known" that just means it was never reported.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Blame the gloves? by NinthAgendaDotCom · · Score: 1

      Naw, it's the fact that gloves allow you to hit people more often *without showing damage*. In bare knuckle boxing, your opponent's face is going to look like a train wreck and the fight will be stopped earlier. Boxing gloves allow pretty faces, but more internal damage over time.

      --
      -- http://ninthagenda.com/
  51. Living dangerously by wytcld · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Risks can be good. But the risks from playing high school football? Unacceptable. There's absolutely no reason to raise a generation of brain-damaged kids with no decent work alternative other than going into the army - were further concussions are currently the most prevalent combat injury. Okay, might as well get them partly brain-dead before sending them into combat ... except, this being /., we need to consider that we're not too many years short of having an all-robot army. Anticipating that, we should shut football down, now.

    As Richard Florida's research shows, public investment in sports arenas negatively correlates with economic growth. So it's time to go for zero tolerance for activities which demonstrably produce brain-damaged kids, and in their professional forms are bad for our civic economies. Let's make football illegal by 2010!

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    1. Re:Living dangerously by Mephistophocles · · Score: 1

      As Richard Florida's research shows, public investment in sports arenas negatively correlates with economic growth.

      What about other studies that show (definitively) that investment in sports tends to keep kids off the streets and away from crime? I don't think your study holds water, so to speak. And regarding your comment about shutting down football, that's rather draconian. Stopping public money for football is one thing, but outlawing it is quite another.

      --
      Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
    2. Re:Living dangerously by Mephistophocles · · Score: 1

      Um, scratch above - I meant to say that I don't think your point of view holds water. I'm sure the study is perfectly legitimate.

      --
      Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
  52. OJ Simpson by ChefInnocent · · Score: 0, Troll

    So then OJ should be able to ask for a retrial and plead mental insanity. Clearly he is brain damaged.

    1. Re:OJ Simpson by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I don't know why the moderators are so harsh on you. It's a valid question (even if sprinkled a little with silly sauce). I've read some expert opinion that suggested sports injuries may indeed have affected OJ's behavior. Why would he be more crime-prone later in life than in his earlier years? Usually people mellow with age. It is a bit suspicious.

  53. Sports rules adapting by sjames · · Score: 1

    Recently, medical rules in several sports have changed to avoid the second concussion syndrome (mandatory bench time after a concussion). SCS is a sudden death that can occur when a person receives even a mild concussion too soon after receiving a concussion.

    I wonder if those same rules might limit the long term damage TFA talks about. Unfortunately it will be several years before we really know.

  54. Re:The sports will always stay, the game must chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There were fewer concussions in the 1910s.

    Instead players died.

    The NCAA was created because of the horrifying number of permanent injuries and fatalities being incurred on an annual basis by intramural football players. More people died of football injuries on a yearly basis in the 1910s than died on a yearly basis in the 2000s, despite an almost hundred-fold increase in the amount of competitive players today as compared to then.

    Concussions were pretty common with the old leather and suspension helmets of the 1920s through the 1960s. They were good enough to prevent skull fracture, basically. The new wave of helmets, starting in the 1970s, largely prevented devastating head injury and most concussions, and moved the big injuries into the neck, as injuries became inertial instead of focal.

    One reason you don't see as many rugby injuries is that rugby has a very small penetration in the American market, and their injuries just aren't noted. Cheerleading and soccer are also surprising dangerous sports that don't get as much coverage, because they are less viewed here and aren't perceive as as violent of sports.

  55. Another bright light burns dim by hyades1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow! I can barely imagine how brilliant I'd be if I hadn't played all that hockey. Move over Hephen Stawking!

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  56. Did anyone else read it as... by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else skim over the headline and see "Atheists' Brains Reveal Concussion Damage"?

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

    1. Re:Did anyone else read it as... by Bill+Dog · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's what I saw at first glance. And then instantaneously the next thought that popped into my head was: Finally, an explanation!

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
  57. Coach says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's alright to bleed from the ears!

  58. Bike Helmets good idea for kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    All I will say is make sure your kid wears a bike helmet. Wouldn't be a bad idea for adults to wear one too. If you've suffered any type of brain injury, you'd know how much they can affect you.

    I'm posting as AC, but I can tell you that I have a type of epilepsy likely due to a brain injury as a child. The condition became active an adult. Its not fun. Prevention is the best medicine. There's debate of the effectiveness of helmets. I'd say if its 10% better prevention than no helmet, choose helmet.

  59. Now I know why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it is called football. Apparently, the idiot decided to play the game before giving it a name. Which also resulted in a game being called soccer, as opposed to anywhere else on the planet.

  60. target sports like archery and shooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    require calm nerves

  61. C.T.E. mistakenly called Parkinson's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While he very well may have suffered from Parkinson's syndrome, this may have been just what was claimed (or known at the time) while he actually suffered from the histopathology of chronic traumatic encephalopathy from a career in boxing. It in fact is a more likely explanation of his early onset of symptoms than Parkinson's, given that this is so common among NFL players who have had post-mortem exams and that boxers intentionally sustain repeated concussions.

  62. WWE "wrestler" != athlete by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    The guy in the article was a "wrassler," not real wrestler, and before that, apparently played football for those gridiron legends at Harvard. Concussions in real contact sports such as pro football and hockey are a definite problem, but please, CNN, don't make a WWE washout who's trying to sell his book into the poster child for this important issue.

    1. Re:WWE "wrestler" != athlete by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      Why not? The key figure right now for the effects of concussions is a WWE wrestler who killed his wife and child, then strangled himself. Nowinski's Sports Legacy Institute was the one that examined the brain, and their findings were similar to those of the various football players examined.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    2. Re:WWE "wrestler" != athlete by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      Because with the WWE -- and potentially some real sports e.g. MLB -- it's much more likely that steroid abuse screwed up those guys and killed them. I wouldn't be surprised if the WWE is sanctioning the whole "OMG concussionz" issue to distract from any potential investigations into whether or not their "athletes" are using steroids. The WWE guys are nothing more than glorified bodybuilders jumping up and down on a trampoline -- it'd be quite a stretch to compare them to someone like Muhammed Ali or even Troy Polamalu.

      My point is the WWE is viewed by most people as a joke, and you shouldn't have one of their ilk as a spokesperson for such an important issue affecting real athletes. I mean, their whole "sport" is completely fake -- how could you expect anyone coming from their world to be taken seriously at all?

  63. You sound . . . by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    . . . like the prototypical geek who got beat up by the jocks in high school and never got laid. Get over yourself already.

    Apparently, you've never been to a Friday night football game to see hundreds of people cheering on a team, or lived in a city with a franchise contending for a championship to see how it can bring people together. Pro athletes donate a lot of time and money to charities, too -- probably a lot more than you ever will. You may not like sports, but most people do and aren't as negative and anti-social as you apparently are.

    1. Re:You sound . . . by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I've played some football (which I think is gay) and a lot of baseball as a kid. After all they are kid's games.

      I have my own home gym and jog or lift weights most days. Sure I choose to sit in the computer lab at school rather than play football with the mongs but not because they were mean but I aspired to do more than chase a ball around like a cat or dog.

  64. the hell it doesn't by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    At one point there were NINE wrestlers in the WWE that had BROKEN THEIR NECKS, had their neck vertebra FUSED, and then then RESUMED WRESTLING.

    Pro-wrestling is not a sport as the results are scripted, but you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about if you think pro wrestling doesn't require a hell of a lot of athleticism. Aside from the vastly more grueling schedule (name a sport where you're on the road for 270+ days out of the year), you're expected to work through injuries that would sideline you in a second in the NBA or the NFL. Pulled hamstring? Work through it. Herniated disk in your back? Go out there and drop the title in a match before taking time off.

    Kurt Angle - who headlined Wrestlemania knowing he was going in for neck surgery immediately afterword - pulled his groin, tore his abdominal muscle and blew his hamstring in his last night for the company. And he still finished the match.

    If you don't like pro-wrestling, it's a free country. I haven't watched it in years. But if you don't think pro-wrestlers are athletes, go tell that to a wrestlers face and see what the result is.

    1. Re:the hell it doesn't by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      Easy there, fella. As you mentioned, it's WWEntertainment, not a sport -- don't take it too seriously. ;-)

      I think pro wrasslin' is white trash soap opera meets body building. It's like the circus fused with a monster truck rally. I wouldn't put it past those honest folks at WWE headquarters to perhaps sensationalize some of those "injuries," either. I reckon the injuries you mention, if real, were mostly caused when dumb guys take steroids and train for sheer bulk instead of strength, because that's the most important thing in the WWE (besides their costume, anyway -- how big a wrassler looks on TV), and then try to do something dumb like jump twenty feet onto their neck and those huge overdeveloped muscles peel right away from their weak bones and tendons. And most people are willing to put themselves through a lot of abuse for a shot at "making it" -- that's true in anything on TV. But that doesn't make them great athletes, and to suggest that it equates them with, for example, someone like Muhammed Ali, is just silly.

  65. and the "its the users fault" school of software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which is found all over open source

  66. Hard Sports by Kensai7 · · Score: 1

    The article's attention applies mainly to concussion-prone sports such as hockey, rugby, boxing, and the like.

    I don't think running the track does any kind of damage. The post's title is somehow generic.

    --
    "Sum Ergo Cogito"
  67. True by LKM · · Score: 1

    Deifying athletics is ridiculous - but so is ridiculing it. Music, art, athletics, hell, even math and science for the vast majority of high schoolers, are not things we teach our children because we want them to spend the rest of their lives painting or playing guitar. They are ways to grow the whole human body and mind into a stronger, faster, smarter, more social, more responsible, and just pure *better* adult.

    Or at least they should be.

    The goal of school should be to produce well-rounded people. That includes being able to read, math skills, logical thinking and similar things, but it also includes being healthy, and having at least some basic knowledge of arts, and being able to draw, and to make music, at least on some basic level.

    Too often, people assume that the goal of school is to produce a workforce for corporations. This is the wrong way of looking at it. The goal of school should be to produce people who have the abilities they need to live a happy life. This includes, of course, being able to work, but it isn't the only aspect by far.

  68. Bullshit. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    My brother's liver was invaded by cancer, no amount of positive thinking would have changed the final outcome.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  69. No, it hasn't. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Backtrack on this thread to find scientific proof of this.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  70. Most sports don't require banging your head. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Football (you have to use your head very occasionaly to hit the ball), tennis, athletics, gymnastics just to name a few.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  71. Wrestlers are athletes. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    But they are performers also.

    If you think anybody can do what they do and that they don't injure themselves while jumping, spinning and being thrown all around the place, then your sense of logic may need some checking.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  72. who gives a fuck... by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    .. when your making millions of dollars and banging super models???

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  73. Breaking news! by Syberz · · Score: 1

    Research shows that multiple, repeated blows to the head cause brain damage.

    In other breaking news, jabbing a railroad spike through your left testicle hurts. More at 11.

    --
    ~Syberz
  74. Only in America by khchung · · Score: 1

    One should also take note that both this "Just suck it up" mentality and the pervasive idea that "sports" means powerful concussion is only pervasive in America.

    Just take a look at the Olympics, how many of the sports there are done wearing full body armor?

    To most of the rest of the world, "sports" consists of athletic activities to often have little body contact. Even those that have body contact, one is not expected to crash head-on with the opponent.

    --
    Oliver.
    1. Re:Only in America by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that, while American football is played in armor, unamerican football(soccer, if you will) frequently involves hitting the (fast moving and sometimes waterlogged) ball with your unarmored head. At the Olympics, fencing is done in armor, and a fair few events are conducted in helmets.

      America's sports oriented stupidity is certainly of high quality and intensity; but it is hardly a monopoly.

    2. Re:Only in America by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      One should also take note that both this "Just suck it up" mentality and the pervasive idea that "sports" means powerful concussion is only pervasive in America.
      Just take a look at the Olympics, how many of the sports there are done wearing full body armor?
      To most of the rest of the world, "sports" consists of athletic activities to often have little body contact. Even those that have body contact, one is not expected to crash head-on with the opponent.

      Hockey is pretty popular in Europe and Asia. Then there are:

      Rugby
      Aussie rules football
      Boxing

      to name a few sports practiced by rather a lot of people in non-USA companies.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  75. Rocky by nickruiz · · Score: 1

    I don't need some scientists to tell me that. I watched all of the Rocky movies.

  76. So that explains interviews with hockey players... by dskoll · · Score: 1

    So, Bobby, how do you think the game has gone in the first period?

    Well, Jim, uhh, we're playing good. But, uhh, the other team, uhh, they're like a bit better, eh? Uhh... so they're leading us... uhh... two to one.

    Bobby, what's your strategy for the rest of the game?

    Well, uhh... we've got to play better, like... uhh... score more, maybe and uhh... improve the defence. Our players are good, Jim, but... uhh... we have to push to be better than the other team or... uhh... we'll lose, Jim.

  77. Personal experience by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    I played youth soccer in the late 70's/early 80's. I was a goalkeeper mostly and got a rep for bravery/idiocy due to the fact that, if someone broke away and was going to take a shot, I'd run out and jump on the ball. This inevitably led to being kicked in the head - hard - about 3x. At the time, I was viewed as having great big balls and just sat out until the throbbing stopped, then got right back in there. I wasn't seriously concussed - not dizzy, etc. - but I'd definitely had my bell rung.

    Fast forward, and after decades of trouble in school and at work with focus and motivation, I was diagnosed with dysthymia, a form of chronic depression. I don't know that I can pin it on soccer - I seem to remember having depressive episodes before I started playing - but it is intriguing nonetheless. And I'm going to keep a closer eye on the wrestlers I coach, including my son.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  78. Ouch by nilbog · · Score: 1

    This is bad news for football players. If my high school experience is at all indicative of these guys mental powers, they're not exactly bangin' on all cylinders to begin with. I can't imagine some of these guys any dumber then they already were.

    --
    or else!
  79. Just look at Mike Tyson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did we really need any other proof that hits to the head cause brain damage?

  80. The "Tournament" by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    "Yes, because there's a much higher earning potential for artists than football players... they're both disciplines where a few people make it big, and the rest scrounge or go into something else while talking about their lost dreams."

    Reminds me of a big theme in Levitt's _Freakonomics_. He called it the "tournament", what you describe there where you have an attractive or seemingly attractive top position that few people reach...thanks to seeing this "top position", people put what should logically be considered an unrealistic amount of effort into reaching it.

    His at-length examples involve business (well, at least the drug business) and the sports world (his case study being elite Japanese sumo)

    HG Bissinger's _Friday Night Lights_ is another book that explores the effects of this phenomenon (Warning: the movie sucked; not sure about the TV show)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  81. Non contact sports by wfstanle · · Score: 1

    There are many non contact sports out there. We should replace football in schools with one of them. Certainly you would want to eliminate any academic boxing programs (if there are any). As for soccer, I am OK with that if they also outlaw any use of the head as well as the arms. This is one of the modifications in sports rules that can be done. Now for the people that cry that these rule changes would change the nature of the game. Yes, they will but would that be a bad thing? Also, you could allow the full contact stuff for when the child is over 18 years old. I'm just opposed with school sports program actually doing harm when they should be doing good.

  82. Sports programs paying for themselves? by wfstanle · · Score: 1

    It's rare for a sports program to pay for itself. If this was true, why do many school districts have a "pay for play" policy? Football has very high equipment costs and these costs are only partially offset by ticket receipts. If you did a careful analysis of all the costs, you would probably find that it cost the school district. The real shame is that this analysis is often not done.

    1. Re:Sports programs paying for themselves? by KillaBeave · · Score: 1

      It's pretty rare in big cities, but in small towns there's no bigger draw than the Friday night football game. So I appreciate that all schools might not be in the same position.

      High school sports were so big where I grew up that the news chopper would actually fly to the big games that week and land on the practice fields. All to interview players and coaches for the 10pm news. No joke.

    2. Re:Sports programs paying for themselves? by wfstanle · · Score: 1

      Football might be more profitable is small towns but do the overall profits outweigh all the costs? If you include such intangible costs to society as caring for brain injured players (sometimes for life), the reduced productivity later in life for these players to the profits still outweigh the costs. The costs of a brain injury can be quiet high.

      On the other hand, how do you determine brain injury? It sometimes seems that some jocks are brain injured at birth so no additional injury is possible.

  83. Football players by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    "Football players are really in the same business as prostitutes...abusing their bodies for the benefit of others' enetertainment"

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  84. Re:So that explains interviews with hockey players by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    A lot of sports players (and the announcers for that matter) drop obviously tactical points like it's divinely inspired strategery; it's not just hockey.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  85. scary by vzerbee · · Score: 1

    this is not good.. and it happens in a lot of sports.. more consideration needs given to the personal future of the athletes and their quality of life. I know sports are competitive but we are given only one head and certain injuries can not be repaired.

    --
    Vicki Zerbee http://AntiAgingByDesign.com Central PA, USA vicki@antiagingbydesign.com