The photos were rather dull. Where are the shots of the server rooms? I think that would be more interesting to the average/. viewer than somebody's rather boring cubicle.
TiVo IPO'ed back in 1999 for 5.5 million shares at $16/share or $88 million. I don't think the cash they have now is all from the IPO. It looks like they took on some debt and issued some more shares. Dig around in their SEC filing if you're interested.
TiVo doesn't carry a huge amount of debt. It carries just $7.3 million in debt. It has $88.3 million in cash, so the debt is minimal. Unfortunately, TiVo's cash flow is seriously negative, so that $88.3 million might not last them very long.
If you read the Symantec security advisory, you will see that it's a buffer overflow problem with a carefully crafted UPX-compressed file. It's not an "execute-to-test" issue.
The point of the article is that there are different prices for the same part, not that Dell memory prices are too high. You're looking at the tree and not seeing the forest.
It will end when either the defense or the offense runs out of money.
Well, IBM made $3.04 billion last quarter so I can't see the defense running out of money anytime soon. SCO loss $6.5 million last quarter and apparently has less than $30 million in cash left. Of course, if you believe the conspiracy theory, then Microsoft made $4.75 billion last quarter. We could be here for awhile...
They're at the mercy of the bottlers, too. The bottlers have to put the new caps into production. During the last promotion, I finally saw the iTunes caps at my local store after the last day you could redeem the code.
Are you sure the A9 discount is still on? I thought it was a limited time, introductory thing to get Amazon customers to try it out. I used it once, but it's disappeared since then.
Dashboard is almost a direct rip off of a third party app, but I forget what it's called.
You're thinking of Konfabulator. Dashboard is not a rip off of Konfabulator. I suggest you go read this essay/blog/whatever on Dashboard vs. Konfabulator.
Nice, but it doesn't show the inclination changes since it's a top down view of Saturn. NASA's plots of the Saturn tour show the inclinations. It's not animated, but it's got more info. Check the Subphase Boundaries pages, too.
Then prevent all installations unless a determination can be made.
But you can't easily do that. People are unknowingly putting malware on their computers. They want whatever feature the software offers, but don't realize that it installs malware, too.
Identifying non-malware via, say, always getting software updates from a trusted source, verifying a sha1 / md5sum signature where apropo, et. al.
The issue isn't software updates. It's full applications. Users trusted it because they see no reason not to. Checking md5/sha1 (average Joe User isn't going to know what that is anyways) isn't going to help. So the malware company publishes an md5/sha1 hash, so what? Great, it's verified, but it's still got malware. People downloaded some application and got more than what they bargained for.
If 90% of malware infections come from bad users ( where's that statistic from, anyway? ) then don't let the users be bad ( i.e. revoke all admin rights from them ).
This hardly seems a revolutionary idea... isn't this what most organizations do?
Controlling a corporate environment is much different than a home computer. You can't just take away admin rights from a home computer because then they wouldn't be able to install anything, evenly "legitimate" stuff (see what I said above).
You can't easily determine what is good or bad. You can't ask any questions of the user nor can you use some verification technique to check to see if what was downloaded was the right file: "Did you intend to install this software from XYZ company that I verified was from XYZ?" -- "Well, yes, I did, install it."
It seems that the only people who "win" in class action lawsuits are the lawyers when they collect their huge fees. The consumers of the class usually get stuck with something they don't want or is of such small value that it's not worth it.
Slashdot Mirror
The parent poster was referring to PDFs with form fields, I believe.
The photos were rather dull. Where are the shots of the server rooms? I think that would be more interesting to the average /. viewer than somebody's rather boring cubicle.
Maybe it was in the videos? I don't do WMV.
TiVo IPO'ed back in 1999 for 5.5 million shares at $16/share or $88 million. I don't think the cash they have now is all from the IPO. It looks like they took on some debt and issued some more shares. Dig around in their SEC filing if you're interested.
TiVo doesn't carry a huge amount of debt. It carries just $7.3 million in debt. It has $88.3 million in cash, so the debt is minimal. Unfortunately, TiVo's cash flow is seriously negative, so that $88.3 million might not last them very long.
Kind of hard to sim something that doesn't exist yet. Unless you're Boeing.
Try using MirrorDot.
AMD's Alchemy processors are not x86 compatible so you can't directly compare it to your C3/Eden setup.
For those curious, here's a group photo of all the winners.
IE on Mac OS X is very different from IE on Windows. I don't think they share all that much code.
It's just like how Office on Mac OS X is different (and some would say better) than Office on Windows.
If you read the Symantec security advisory, you will see that it's a buffer overflow problem with a carefully crafted UPX-compressed file. It's not an "execute-to-test" issue.
The point of the article is that there are different prices for the same part, not that Dell memory prices are too high. You're looking at the tree and not seeing the forest.
Well, IBM made $3.04 billion last quarter so I can't see the defense running out of money anytime soon. SCO loss $6.5 million last quarter and apparently has less than $30 million in cash left. Of course, if you believe the conspiracy theory, then Microsoft made $4.75 billion last quarter. We could be here for awhile...
There's better coverage on Anandtech.
You obviously don't watch Monster Garage.
They're at the mercy of the bottlers, too. The bottlers have to put the new caps into production. During the last promotion, I finally saw the iTunes caps at my local store after the last day you could redeem the code.
Are you sure the A9 discount is still on? I thought it was a limited time, introductory thing to get Amazon customers to try it out. I used it once, but it's disappeared since then.
Yes, I know it's comparing Windows vs. Mac.
You're thinking of Konfabulator. Dashboard is not a rip off of Konfabulator. I suggest you go read this essay/blog/whatever on Dashboard vs. Konfabulator.
Nice, but it doesn't show the inclination changes since it's a top down view of Saturn. NASA's plots of the Saturn tour show the inclinations. It's not animated, but it's got more info. Check the Subphase Boundaries pages, too.
Italy is a member of ESA.
The only thing I could find on the NASA and ESA websites was that NASA built Cassini, ESA built Huygens, and the Italy provided the high-gain antenna.
MacWorld Expo is really run by IDG, which also runs the LinuxWorld Expo. The LinuxWorld Expo website also runs Windows Server 2003.
IBM Pledges 500 U.S. Patents To Open Source In Support Of Innovation And Open Standards
But you can't easily do that. People are unknowingly putting malware on their computers. They want whatever feature the software offers, but don't realize that it installs malware, too.
Identifying non-malware via, say, always getting software updates from a trusted source, verifying a sha1 / md5sum signature where apropo, et. al.
The issue isn't software updates. It's full applications. Users trusted it because they see no reason not to. Checking md5/sha1 (average Joe User isn't going to know what that is anyways) isn't going to help. So the malware company publishes an md5/sha1 hash, so what? Great, it's verified, but it's still got malware. People downloaded some application and got more than what they bargained for.
If 90% of malware infections come from bad users ( where's that statistic from, anyway? ) then don't let the users be bad ( i.e. revoke all admin rights from them ).
This hardly seems a revolutionary idea... isn't this what most organizations do?
Controlling a corporate environment is much different than a home computer. You can't just take away admin rights from a home computer because then they wouldn't be able to install anything, evenly "legitimate" stuff (see what I said above).
You can't easily determine what is good or bad. You can't ask any questions of the user nor can you use some verification technique to check to see if what was downloaded was the right file: "Did you intend to install this software from XYZ company that I verified was from XYZ?" -- "Well, yes, I did, install it."
It seems that the only people who "win" in class action lawsuits are the lawyers when they collect their huge fees. The consumers of the class usually get stuck with something they don't want or is of such small value that it's not worth it.