Slashdot Mirror


Adobe Acrobat Toolbar Worse than Malware?

Phr3n3tik writes "Adobe Acrobat has long included a toolbar plugin to automate PDF Making from Office Products. Those who found the toolbar an eyesore, or just used it infrequently could always hide it from view. Not so in their new versions, (6, and 7 apparently.) Their new take on the PDFMaker toolbar is getting some users riled up, since it is harder to Move/Hide/Delete/Uninstall this new toolbar than many forms of malware!"

504 comments

  1. If it looks like malware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    smells like it..

    IT IS!

    And to think you paid $600 for a piece of malware.

    1. Re:If it looks like malware... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it weighs as much as a duck, and made of wood, it's a witch.

    2. Re:If it looks like malware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you dress her this way?

      Noo no no...!!!
      [whispered]well yes.
      Yes yes!!! just a lil' bit.

    3. Re:If it looks like malware... by Cymoro · · Score: 1

      She turned me into a newt!


      ...


      ...I got better.

    4. Re:If it looks like malware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually: if it weighs as much as a duck, it's made of wood so it's a witch.

  2. Simple answer: by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't install it if you don't want it? I don't think you need to add the toolbar.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Simple answer: by bl4nk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What about people that installed it when they needed it, but later found out that they did not need it? What if they installed it when they knew it was easy to hide, and then updated their version of Acrobat?

      No so simple, my friend.

    2. Re:Simple answer: by devphaeton · · Score: 1, Funny

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.


      OT i know, and not to nitpick, but that was actually Yoda. ;)

      Now the real question is, do you ALSO get more responses related to your sig than your comments (like me?) :-D

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    3. Re:Simple answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The point of this whole story was that the toolbar is hard to uninstall, hence the comparison to malware. How are people supposed to know they don't need it if they haven't used it yet.

    4. Re:Simple answer: by fronthead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think that the sig's supposed to be funny. It's credited to Dr. Spock, who is actually the famous pediatrician and author, and the stardate format doesn't appear to be correct (though I could be wrong about that). I'm afraid the joke's probably on you.

    5. Re:Simple answer: by devphaeton · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm afraid the joke's probably on you.

      I'm not a StarWars geek, so i'll have to consult my gf for a second opinion....

      But if i just made an ayse out of myself, i can't say it's the first time ;)

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    6. Re:Simple answer: by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Don't install it if you don't want it? I don't think you need to add the toolbar.

      Actually, I'm one of those cretins who installs it, then goes hunting for the actual bit of offending code and and rename/delete it. I've just done that to something recently, which now launches notepad instead of some exremely annoying thing.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Simple answer: by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 0, Troll

      Uh, then just uninstall Acrobat and re-install it without the toolbar. 1 minute later, you're all set.

    8. Re:Simple answer: by dnaSpyDir · · Score: 1

      actually, i believe it was yoda who said that...

    9. Re:Simple answer: by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it's funny that everybody picks on him for saying it's supposed to be Yoda, while nobody points out that Spock is not a "Dr." :)

      Unless he's talking about a different Dr. Spock, for whom "Do or do not, there is no try" might be referring to raising children. :)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    10. Re:Simple answer: by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Don't install it if you don't want it? I don't think you need to add the toolbar.

      What if you want it only for a week?
      And why are defending them? They make software that installs itself and refuses to go away, that's evil! EVIL!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    11. Re:Simple answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahhaa... girlfriend.

    12. Re:Simple answer: by rayde · · Score: 3, Insightful

      having to remove and reinstall is not a "Simple answer." you should be able to hide it as an option.

    13. Re:Simple answer: by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've always wondered what a pointy-eared alien who has sex once every 7 years knows about raising children, and now you tell me he isn't even a "Dr."?!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    14. Re:Simple answer: by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree that it's not a decent software distribution practice, but it still sounds simple enough for me. The fact that Adobe is trying to "force" people to use their toolbar is pretty obvious. Then again, there are other ways of producing PDF files than using Acrobat. I'm not sure that toolbar issue justified a whole Slashdot article comparing it to malware and worse.

    15. Re:Simple answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      don't like star wars and have a girlfriend....

      we don't take kindly to ur kind 'round here.

    16. Re:Simple answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its still not a solution, just wait til the next version, when you try that and you get "We're sorry, this copy of Acrobat has already been installed. Please call our Licensing Help Desk at 1-800-888-8888, and have the name of the product and a major credit card # available. Thank you."

    17. Re:Simple answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've had problems w/ the PDFMaker (in v. 4 & 5)toolbar causing MS Excel to crash. After a few painful, registry-scrubbing MS office uninstalls, we started doing the "custom" Acrobat install and unchecking PDFMaker.

      Seems to be working much better in the last several months. *knocks on wood* (or is it a witch duck)

    18. Re:Simple answer: by fireman+sam · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sex once every seven years eh? Maybe that is why so many geeks want to play Spock at Sci Fi conventions.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    19. Re:Simple answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The optimistic geeks you mean.

    20. Re:Simple answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Ted, that was the joke.

    21. Re:Simple answer: by ralphcringely · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered how allegedly celibate priests could know enough about the rest of us to give us moral advice.

      --
      Tell me again, who knew Mary was a virgin, and how did they know?
    22. Re:Simple answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, for a minute there I thought you were referring to Docktor Laura, but then she is a woman....or IS she ever since Bill Ballance got through with her.

    23. Re:Simple answer: by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I've always wondered what a pointy-eared alien who has sex once every 7 years"

      Dammit! If I were a vulcan than I'd be able to have sex in a few more months! Curse my round ears and red blood!

    24. Re:Simple answer: by callqcmd · · Score: 1

      Without the toolbar its difficult to create the links and bookmarks embedded in the word doc.

  3. Where is the line... by Kimos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... Between legit software and malware? You don't want the toolbar, it's hard to get rid of the toolbar, it's an eyesore that you never use and don't remember asking for. Sounds like 'XXX Teen Search Buddy' to me!

    1. Re:Where is the line... by m50d · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it can't be uninstalled through the standard add/remove programs thing then it's malware. Plain and simple. The only reason not to let your users remove you is if you're deliberately doing something they don't want.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Where is the line... by dicepackage · · Score: 4, Funny

      But people use XXX Teen Search Buddy whereas they don't use the Acrobat toolbar.

    3. Re:Where is the line... by mOoZik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree. The only thing it's doing is making it difficult for the user to remove the toolbar, which is contrary to malware, whose sole purpose is to do some sort of *actual* harm, not simply perceived harm from one's inability to get rid of it. Maybe it's annoyware? ;)

    4. Re:Where is the line... by justforaday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Keep in mind that this isn't a "toolbar" along the lines of the Yahoo! toolbar or Google toolbar. This is one of the toolbars that only appears in Office apps. It provides three "Convert to PDF" buttons. It doesn't log anything. It doesn't track anything. It simply converts documents to PDF when you click it.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    5. Re:Where is the line... by robyannetta · · Score: 1
      If it can't be uninstalled through the standard add/remove programs thing then it's malware.

      Wait... You're still using Windows?

      --
      - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    6. Re:Where is the line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "XXX Teen Search Buddy" you are talking about?

      Sounds like something I could use. Can it restrict to 18 and 19 only? I know it doesn't fall into the formula (My Age)/2 + 7

      But honestly, who wouldn't want someone 18-19?

    7. Re:Where is the line... by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      See! Proof that windows is in fact malware!

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    8. Re:Where is the line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " But honestly, who wouldn't want someone 18-19?"

      Pedophiles.

    9. Re:Where is the line... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      So my entire OS qualifies as malware?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    10. Re:Where is the line... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      My mozilla suite(and most of the software I "install" for that matter) can't be removed that way beccause it's never really installed. I just copy the folder to my hard drive, just like the mac. If I don't like it, the delete key works wonders, and cleans all of it. All programs should work this way. "Install" is a hideous mess and should be banned. That would stop malware in its tracks.

      --
      What?
    11. Re:Where is the line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! I KNEW Internet Explorer was malware! But Notepad?!?

    12. Re:Where is the line... by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Well, I consider malware anything that I don't want and have trouble getting rid of (come to think of it IE almost falls in this category). If malware were alive then it'd be probably called a parasite. Spyware makers could very well argue that they aren't trying to harm anything. It may slow down your computer (just as any running program will) and show ads, but obviously some people find the ads helpful because they buy stuff from them. And if the spyware is properly written then it won't break anything, so it technically isn't doing any harm.

    13. Re:Where is the line... by Phr3n3tik · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It's also crashing Visio on startup.

      If I delete the file that causes the crash,
      Visio tries to reinstall it next time it starts.
      and EVERY time it starts. If I reinstall it, it crashes as soon as the install completes.

      --
      -------------------- Hmmm... what does this button d
    14. Re:Where is the line... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be running on hardware that supports the NX bit, would you? Try disabling that protection for Visio. I've heard that some plugins to Office products crash/behave badly with NX enabled.

    15. Re:Where is the line... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Windows lets you uninstall it through standardish methods, at least 98 which is all I have used.

      --
      I am trolling
    16. Re:Where is the line... by m50d · · Score: 1

      I've never used a version of windows that couldn't be removed through standard OS removal methods. In fact windows proved easier to remove without losing any data on the same partition than linux

      --
      I am trolling
    17. Re:Where is the line... by m50d · · Score: 1

      If you can't remove it through the normal ways of removing operating systems (which yes are different from add/remove programs, but I'd have thought it was obvious I meant "the normal way to remove it"), then yes your OS is malware.

      --
      I am trolling
    18. Re:Where is the line... by m50d · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. Despite all the problems they cause, dynamic libraries and perhaps even the registry are basically good ideas. Install gives a better laid out system, I've felt that especially since moving to linux, where the packages that stuff themselves in a folder in /opt just seem...wrong, and those who do the same in /usr doubly so. There are ways to stop users deleting files too, I don't think it would solve the malware problem. The biggest problem to me is non-standard installers. Having everything in a standard package where an external program installs it, like rpms or proper msi packages (msi adds zero overhead if used correctly because all the actual installer bit is already on the system) would be a great step forward. IIRC programs which make proper MSIs charge for them though, which results in a plethora of almost-compatible installation systems

      --
      I am trolling
    19. Re:Where is the line... by m50d · · Score: 1

      If you go to add/remove programs, I think you'll find notepad is one of those optional components you can add or remove on one of the other tabs.

      --
      I am trolling
    20. Re:Where is the line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're obviously a moron. If you knew how to read you would have read this on the great grandparent: "If it can't be uninstalled through the standard add/remove programs thing then it's malware."

      Also, if you weren't an idiot you would know how to delete stuff off of your hard drive without "losing any data."

      Please, do everyone a favour and stop posting and/or breathing, whichever shuts you up more.

    21. Re:Where is the line... by Skrybe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Frankly I think anything that doesn't provide an easy means of uninstalling should be considered malware. And even if you don't consider it malware for the fact it won't uninstall, it's a pain in the neck when you try to hide the toolbar and it reappears each time you start word, or it positions itself wherever the hell it likes.

      And another gripe with Acrobat is that it wants to leave a service running all the time. I might create a PDF once every three months. Why should I need a service running in the background the rest of the time? And if you terminate the service some of the PDF functionality just stops working - no explanation, no attempt to restart the service. It just fails. It's ok for a technically savvy user who can recognise what's going and knows to start/stop it when they want. But for Joe Average he won't realise.

      I continually get asked to "fix" friends PCs and they're running umpteen little background services/apps that get used maybe once a month, or less. Yet they all want to stay resident all the time as though the users want to use them every hours of every day.

      I wish application vendors would provide options to (un)load these things on demand. Let me choose whether I use Acrobat so much that I want to have that service running all the time. And if I don't then when I want to make a PDF it takes me a few extra seconds while the service loads.

      Rant over sorry :)

    22. Re:Where is the line... by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      they have to try hard to disallow removing it. It also inserts menus, and for some reason wants the document changeing system toolbar up as well. It shifted my bars over and it just keeps popping back in. So its making my whole toolbar setup out of alignment.

      Its annoying as all the damn icons piled on my desktop everytime i install an app.

    23. Re:Where is the line... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      For one thing, I'm speaking from a user's point of view. I'm uncertain by what you maen by "better laid out". The early macs had the best lay out that I've seen, to this day. Pagemaker notwithstanding. If you're merely talking about saving space, I can agree. The reason I like self contained programs is that they're less likely to screw up the system or other programs. If it gets hosed, then it's delete and re-copy, and back to work. We're always going to have to put up with non standard installers, and that's only one reason I don't like installers at all. I like everything to be in its own little space, programs here, system there. Never should the two ever meet. And of course your data should be on another volume altogether.

      --
      What?
    24. Re:Where is the line... by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      Well, I consider malware to be any software written by someone with a z in their slashdot name. Therefore, if you've ever written a single line of code in your life, you're an unethical purveyor of malware and should be shunned by the community.

      Hey, if you can blatantly redefine terms, so can I.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    25. Re:Where is the line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you trying unconventional ways of removing the visio toolbar like deleting files? This is triggering the self-heal capability of the installation which asks you to reinstall.

      Control Panel->Add/Remove programs and turn off any specific PDFMakers. The self-heal message will never appear, and the PDFMaker you choose to remove will be gone forever.

      So if a feature can be uninstalled using the OS's regular uninstall route it's malware?

      On the crash itself, why not contact Adobe Support? It's certainly not a general problem (I use the Visio toolbar in Acrobat 7 all the time), Crashes in Windows apps because of configuration/dll issues are not unheard of, and it may well be a problem with your Visio installation.

      Apparently, you prefer to write unsubstantiated rants about malware, and Slashdot's editorial quality is now so low, and their need for sensationalism so high, that they fall for it:

      Well known application? - check
      A biggish company making lots of money? - check
      An article which says it's all a conspiracy - check
      Does the article have an element of truth? - who cares?

    26. Re:Where is the line... by m50d · · Score: 1

      I *am* the great grandparent, and I would have thought it was obvious that I meant the standard method in general for removing that type of thing, which isn't always the add/remove programs dialog. And yes, I can remove linux installs, but because of configurations being stored in home folders and other things it is tricky to remove it completely enough to install another distro on top of it. Wheras I had no trouble removing win98 and installing freedos and keeping all my data files.

      --
      I am trolling
    27. Re:Where is the line... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Having the different types of thing in different places. Binaries in /usr/bin, libraries in /usr/lib, config files in /etc, shared data folder in /usr/share, all seems much neater to me than the "folder for each program" layout. I can understand the desire for a distinction between system and applications, but to me it seems a false duality, because the more useful an application gets quite often the more integrated it becomes, and the more a part of the system. Maybe this is true of linux much more than other OSes, which are normally made as a coherent whole, rather than aggregating together.

      --
      I am trolling
  4. Re:yeah so? by U1timateZer0 · · Score: 0

    Because, at least in my mind, Adobe is a respectable software company. One that should not stoop so low as to be compared to common malware.

    --
    Unplug all controller for great reset!!
  5. Not just 6 and 7 by SdnSeraphim · · Score: 5, Informative

    I haven't used Acrobat 4 for quite a long time. However I cannot find a way to remove the PDF toolbar even after I have removed the software completely from my machine.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right on a subject on which the established authorities are wrong. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Not just 6 and 7 by justforaday · · Score: 5, Informative

      IIRC, it's the PDFMaker.dot file in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Startup.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Not just 6 and 7 by Listen+Up · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is wrong for Adobe Acrobat 7.0 and Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Pro. The toolbar is now found in a DLL file which is a bitch to remove.

    3. Re:Not just 6 and 7 by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that deleting files to remove something has become a "hack," and is usually the last method a Windows user (myself included) thinks of anymore.

    4. Re:Not just 6 and 7 by Buran · · Score: 1

      Or, in the case of the OS X version, it's INSIDE the flippin' app package. I have no problem going inside my apps (do this all the time to migrate firefox searchplugins without redownloading them all) but running a search for it (I tried a few weeks ago) won't find it, as it's not in the normal place for Office toolbars. Now, after reading the Mac version of the tip, the goddamn thing is GONE. Deleted it from the Acrobat app package. Beat THAT, you piece of (not overpriced as I got it for the EDU price) crap!

    5. Re:Not just 6 and 7 by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      It's the same for just about any other modern OS. It's perilous to jump in and start deleting library files and other binaries in Linux, BSD, and MacOS just the same.

      That's what modern package handling tools are supposed to do for us.

      Except for those special "./configure; make; make install" goodies you can only find a source tarball for.

    6. Re:Not just 6 and 7 by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      "./configure; make; make install; make uninstall" ? If you keep the source around (like lots of people do), then problem solved. If its small enough you could probably just redownload the previous version and run "./configure; make uninstall" (idk if it would require a make, I've never tried).

  6. Versions by AzBats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm trying to stick with 5 since it works and the other versions are getting too feature rich.

    --
    A Brit in Tallahassee.
    1. Re:Versions by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      7 is much faster then 6, and at least I didnt notice any toolsbars/ect after installing, but otoh, i dont click on every "l337 xtras here" checkboxs in setup programs.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Versions by nes11 · · Score: 2, Informative

      version 5 doesn't work with MS Office 2003 at all. My office installed 2003 last week & now, every time I open Word, I get an error message that says Acrobat 5 is incompatible & i have the choice to either go buy an upgrade or disable Acrobat while using Word. So sticking with 5 is fine, as long as you don't upgrade anything else either.

    3. Re:Versions by Gates82 · · Score: 1
      I work IT at a large campus, the high and mighty overlords decided to push Office 2003 on all the users. Using a minimal install (of course) and most users have been running Acrobat 5.0. This cost us tons of time installing the newer version on all those effected.

      My experience has been that Adobe products are general very controllable and easy to interface with other software. But to have a new version of office require an upgrade can only be M$'s fault.

      --
      So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's sister?

    4. Re:Versions by barzok · · Score: 2

      6 was/is garbage.

      5 was causing IE to crash every time I closed an IE window that had a PDF in it.

      I removed 5 at work and 6 at home, installed 7 in both locations, and have been much happier. It's far more responsive and seems to work better overall.

      Just make sure you do the Custom install so you don't get the junk you don't want.

    5. Re:Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but if you have javascript disabled, 7 bugs you about enabling it every time you exit the app. I think it's safe for adobe to assume that someone who disabled it did so for a reason. The distracting bright advert to the upper right really pisses me off, is that the toolbar?

      I install GSView these days so my users have the choice.

    6. Re:Versions by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

      I upgraded to 7.0 for the new virtual reality PDFs that our CAD guys can make. version 7.0 wouldn't open up when a link to a PDF in excel was clicked. It had lost functionality as far as I could tell. I rolled back as quick as I could to 6

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    7. Re:Versions by de+Siem · · Score: 1

      fixed in 7.01 apparently

      --
      Beating up people in little rooms, if you do it for a good reason you do it for a bad one.
    8. Re:Versions by fief · · Score: 1

      It's not that difficult to make your program to seem more responsive; simply load the program on system startup (look in the StartUp folder on a system with Reader 7).

      Another fun fact is that Reader 7 breaks many fill-in forms created with older versions of Adobe Acrobat (the creation software).

  7. Who cares? by bogie · · Score: 3, Informative

    I mean geez I try not to bitch about the dupes and crappy stories that get posted here, but man is this a non-story.

    btw a good free pdf creatore for windows.
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreat or/

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Who cares? by boarder8925 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's a better one:

      OpenOffice.org

      Just use the export-to-PDF button.

    2. Re:Who cares? by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny
      That stupid thing has been adding an extra row to my Word toolbars, eating up...lessee...0.3 inches of vertical real estate. The monitor is 15.5 inches high, the lowest price on Froogle is $520 -- so learning how to delete it saves me $9.85!

      Admittedly, that's not a fortune but it's a bigger bottom-line benefit than I've ever gotten from a "Bill Gates Says Lunix Isn't As Good As Windows" or "Open Letter From Darl McBride Responding To Open Letter From Groklaw To Darl McBride" story.

    3. Re:Who cares? by cmd · · Score: 1

      Yes, bogie, there are slow news days. Would you prefer to post nothing?

      A blog site that must publish 20 stories a day is a voracious beast. Sometimes it's caviar, sometimes it's yesterday's trash.

    4. Re:Who cares? by urlgrey · · Score: 1

      to say nothing about OpenOffice. It has excellent pdf creation, too, via the 'export' function.

      --
      Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. It's "a more elegant weapon for a more civilized time."
    5. Re:Who cares? by radarsat1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i love the irony of people who think that the stories on slashdot are totally pointless and stupid, and yet take the time to submit a comment about it. why don't you just ignore it if it's not interesting to you?

    6. Re:Who cares? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    7. Re:Who cares? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Even better, use PostScript instead of PDF.

      Don't use Proprietary Document Format.

      Adobe had a hand in Sklyarov getting arrested in Las Vegas.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    8. Re:Who cares? by -O.ster_66 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      i love people that just suggest changing your entire workflow. switch from ms office to OOo? no sweat, sure, ok, let me just grab a coffee first.

      it ain't always that easy.

      --
      "You get all the fun of sitting still, being quiet, writing down numbers, paying attention...science has it all."
    9. Re:Who cares? by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      PDF is an open standard, as for your suggestion of exporting to PS (which by the way, is also an Adobe proposed standard), I suggest you give it a try and then post your findings back.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    10. Re:Who cares? by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 1

      I Get $10.06 but thats not the point (I was using M$ calculator and we know M$ always inflates the price).

      But seriously if it takes up 1.9% of the screen and one uses the screen 100% of their time/year (yea I know it's sick but stay with me) then if I make say 100K/year (humor me you dick-head) then this "thing" cost $1900 dollars/year to my employer.

      So in a Co. such as my own with 5K employees this "thing" would cost around 9.5M/year.

      "eye take it for granite that my speling is rong and m-eye gramer sucs"

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    11. Re:Who cares? by taxevader · · Score: 1

      Dude that was some funny shit! You got talent buddy! If only I had some modpoints..

      --
      -Copyright law #69:Whenever Mickey Mouse is about to enter the public domain,copyrights get extended by 25 years.
  8. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, I'll take one. Can you mail him to me at work?

  9. Subject misleading... by mOoZik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    By asking whether or not it is worse than malware, you are implying it is harmful. However, in the very end, you suggest that it is only worse in the sense that you can't get rid of it. That is very misleading.

    1. Re:Subject misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By asking whether or not it is worse than malware, you are implying it is harmful.

      No. By asking you are implying that you don't know. By dropping the question mark you would be implying that it is harmful.

    2. Re:Subject misleading... by breadboy21 · · Score: 1

      By asking whether or not it is worse than malware, you are implying it is harmful. However, in the very end, you suggest that it is only worse in the sense that you can't get rid of it. That is very misleading.

      Not necessarily, and it was clarified in the article that harm was not the issue.

      Is Star Wars worse than Star Trek?
      Harm is not implied.

  10. Is this news? by flynt · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can remove the toolbar (Acobat Pro 6) from all the office products I just tried (only word and excel). The first link in this story is something about Visio, which is an add-on to office i think. I don't have that product, so I can't say. The other post is for office for mac osX, so I can't say there either. But the problem doesn't seem to be as big as the write-up suggests, surprised?

    1. Re:Is this news? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      You can hid it in 7 as well (right-click on the toolbar, uncheck 'PDFMaker 7'). No problems. This is a non-story.

    2. Re:Is this news? by justforaday · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahhh, but does it stay off when you quit and restart the program? My experience has been that it will always revert itself to on with a restart. This is with versions 4 and 6 (the two that I've used on my machine), so maybe it's been fixed in 7.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    3. Re:Is this news? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, it does stay off. Close Word. Relaunch Word... still gone. Reboot machine, lanuch Word... still gone. No problems. I didn't have a problem with 6 either. Are you sure some doc or spyware didn't change the default config of Word on your machine?

    4. Re:Is this news? by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Is this news? Well, I don't know about the other site, but it seems breakingwindows.com has at least a little bit of something against adobe.

    5. Re:Is this news? by PoorImpulseControl · · Score: 1

      He is not the only one experiencing this. I turn that sucker off everytime, and it keeps comning back.

    6. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just checked and it went away and stayed away for me.

      Windows 2000
      Office 2000 Pro
      Acrobat 6 Pro

    7. Re:Is this news? by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      Which version of Word are you running? I'm on 2000 and it comes back each time. Then again, as others report it stays away from them, it may well be that it's sorted in some versions and not others.

      If that is the case, the whole fuss is about, shock horror, there maybe being a bug in a Microsoft product?

      If it bothers you that much, right click on the menu, choose customize|toolbars select PDF Maker 6.0 or whatever. Click Delete.

  11. How to remove... by Golgafrinchan · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's a page that provides instructions for how to remove the Acrobat Toolbar from Word.

    Instructions

    Worked for me!

    --
    My userid is prime!
  12. What's the use for the toolbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just add a printer selection option like PDFCreator or any other pdf writer. It's pathetic to have toolbar, the only reason is for advertisement.

  13. OS X by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the nicest features of OS X is the ability to turn just about any darn thing into a PDF. Rather than spend the money on this just go out and buy a Mac. Of course you can't turn this feature off in OS X, so maybe my OS is malware too.

    1. Re:OS X by bonch · · Score: 1

      It isn't a feature you can turn off as a user. Quartz itself is based on the PDF imaging model, so spitting out PDF documents from views is naturally inherent.

    2. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there's no nice GUI to make a pdf out of, say, 6 different word.doc files. Sure, it can be done in the terminal, but i suspect this is one of the reasons many OSX users still buy/snatch the full blown Acrobat.

    3. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Save money on Adobe Acrobat by purchasing a mac? I think a Mac costs more than Acrobat...

    4. Re:OS X by Delilah+Jones · · Score: 0

      It's funny.

      I'm, like, one of 5 people in my company with a PDF writer. Some people just send out raw .xls files for their reports!

      Then I go home to my Macs, and it's just a regular ol' button on the print window!

      Gotta love it.

      --
      http://augustwestproducts.i8.com
    5. Re:OS X by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      Didn't Apple license the PDF format from Adobe for integration into Mac OSX? If so, it's likely you paid an "Adobe tax" with your purchase price. Of course, that's still much cheaper than a real Acrobat license.

      Almost any Linux distro will give you PDF printing functionality as well thanks to the 'ps2pdf' tool that comes with Ghostscript.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    6. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For Windows just install the free Ghostscript plus CuteWriter.

    7. Re:OS X by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Didn't Apple license the PDF format from Adobe for integration into Mac OSX?

      Nope. PDF is an open standard. There are several open and closed source readers and writers. Apple implemented their own version (well I heard they acquired an existing solution and reworked it).

    8. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      OSX's PDF printing ability doesn't let you recompress the graphics to fit the target. So if you have a word document with a tremendous tiff image in it, you get a tremendous PDF with the full-resolution tiff.

      With Acrobat, you can say "all images 150 dpi" (or whatever), and it will appropriately recompress them in the final pdf. The OSX pdf is great, but it's the tweaking that's the reason I stick with Acrobat.

    9. Re:OS X by nunchux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Acrobat does have features that the "print" funtion doesn't. Lots of them, actually. One that I use frequently is the ability to merge many small documents in a binder to create a larger PDF. It's a clunky program, far from intuitive and a bit of a pain in the ass to use but Acrobat is essential for creating professional PDFs.

      Also, OSX PDFs aren't print quality... They're low resolution and the colors get wacky. If you're dealing with graphics that are going to be printed you need to export the PDF from Photoshop, Illustrator, Quark etc., not simply hit the "print" button.

      Not that OSX PDF creation isn't a Godsend... I use it all the time, for example it's a great way to save a web page. But it doesn't replace the higher-end document creation programs.

    10. Re:OS X by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      have you ever seen the price for adobe acrobat?

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    11. Re:OS X by linguae · · Score: 1

      In *nix, you don't even need a Mac to make PDFs if you have GhostScript installed. All you have to do is tell the application to print to a file, and then use ps2pdf foo.ps bar.pdf to convert the file to a PDF. Alright, they don't look as nice as those Quartz PDF files produced on the Mac, but it does the job.

    12. Re:OS X by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Also, its shit becuase if you've got Acrobat 7 installed, any pdf's you view in Safari have to open Acrobat first, no matter how many times you tell it to 'always open with preview'. Bugger.

      I prefer all of my non HTML and image stuff to be downloaded to my download directory, managed by my download manager, and launched whenever I want without having to go back to the website, waiting for the movie to buffer and pause, etc.

      So, I have Safari just download extra junk and I have no plugins loaded in Safari. Well, my taxes require Acrobat proper because preview does not seem to do PDFs with forms. Got Acrobat, and now Safari loads a blank page with nothing when I follow a PDF link.

      I noticed in Acrobat's preferences, if I uncheck all of the internet options I have my browser back. Been fine ever since.

      However, I cannot unload the "Print to PDF" option in all of my applications. It just comes with OS X, and I consider it more of a feature than not.

    13. Re:OS X by micromoog · · Score: 3, Informative
      Rather than spend the money on this just go out and buy a Mac.

      Puh-leaze. Instead of spending money on Apple's overpriced wares, just use one of the many free alternatives, available on all of your favorite platforms.

    14. Re:OS X by eomnimedia · · Score: 2, Informative
      To remove the PDFMaker for Mac Office 2004 simply trash the files located at:
      /Applications/Microsoft Office 2004/Office/Startup/Excel/PDFMaker.xla
      /Applicati ons/Microsoft Office 2004/Office/Startup/PowerPoint/PDFMaker.ppa
      /Appl ications/Microsoft Office 2004/Office/Startup/Word/PDFMaker.dot
      As far as the stupid PDF viewer in Safari, trash the Adobe-related files (you'll know them when you seen them) located at:
      /Library/Internet Plug-Ins
      If you want to view PDFs within Safari go and download the "PDF Browser Plugin" (free for personal use):
      http://www.schubert-it.com/pluginpdf/
    15. Re:OS X by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      One of the problems using the quartz context in making pdf files is that they tend to be quite larger than the ones acrobat makes.

      Also - pdf maker on windows converts links, styles, and bookmarks into the pdf file as well. So its not just "ease of use" - its a useful tool.

    16. Re:OS X by mobilebuddha · · Score: 1

      except you can't save the formatting, such as 2-up, or page margin, or portrait vs. landscape in the "convert to PDF" thing.

      you need adobe pdf printer to do this.

      imagine setting these features for each one of your 500 "prints" that you gotta do.

    17. Re:OS X by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No. PDF was released by Adobe as a public spec, or nobody would be using it.

      The PDF model was chosen to replace the Display Postscript model used by NeXT, which would definitely have required an Adobe license.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    18. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you just pull things out of your ass as it fits your point of view?

    19. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most excellent. thanks.

    20. Re:OS X by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      May I introduce you to Combine PDFs?

      I think you'll find that there are little scriptable apps for OS X that do just about everything you'd want done to a PDF except for the Adobe-style encryption/protection.

    21. Re:OS X by ManxStef · · Score: 1

      Or just install the fantastic PDFCreator, which creates a Windows printer that generates PDFs. It's awesome, and free. Based on Ghostscript, too, I believe.

    22. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to put "This spamvertisement brought to you by a local astroturfing shill" in your message. I realize you like your os but your comment shows to me you didn't read the article at all. "Rather than spend the money on this just go out and buy a Mac." Do you really believe what you're typing or are you getting paid well to write this? I believe the former but its just my opinion. Good luck on the advertisement campaign.

    23. Re:OS X by Buran · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, if you need to be able to edit PDFs (I do; I just did a pile of edits just a little while ago) you need to buy Acrobat. Fortunately, the educational price for Pro is quite reasonable -- far from the typical Adobe ripoff.

    24. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you or your cow-orkers are stupider. But you are all morons.

      There are PDF "Print To" plugins free for every OS.

      If just ONE PERSON stood up and took responsibility for inter-office file exchange solutions it could not be simpler or freeer.

      YOU are apparently not even close to being helpful to the situation either with your insanely annoying and compeletly mis-placed Mac smugness either. Shame on you.

    25. Re:OS X by Buran · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You pay more at the outset when you buy the machine, but you save quite a bit of money and time when you don't have to deal with Windows' dime-a-dozen swiss-cheese security holes and the incessant viruses/worms/other malware you have to deal with. You also have to buy a lot more software as Apple provides a lot of stuff for free, pre-installed (and gives you real OS install disks in addition to system restore disks, not restore-only like a lot of system makers do lately) and you can buy a productivity suite (iWork) for a lot less than the insane amount of money MS wants for Office. (Sadly, no Aqua-native version of OpenOffice exists yet, though you can get decently-priced/free word processor/text editor apps if you look around a bit).

      It is not as inexpensive as a Linux box, but then, you still can't run Photoshop (and there are those of us like me who actually need Photoshop, not the GIMP; fortunately, we university research types are eligible for educational prices, so the cost is reasonable) on Linux.

      Macs really are the best choice for a lot of people, but a lot of those same people are too stupid to think of the long-term cost of ownership and only look at up-front numbers, which can be incredibly misleading.

      I love my Macs. I support not just the lab I work in (every machine is a Mac except where we got stuck with Windows-only apps, like the controller for the Bio-Rad confocal microscope) but also support the department at large, and encourage people to get Macs. I spend far less time helping those who do have them than I do cleaning malware and spyware off Windows machines.

    26. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like a photo album I made with iPhoto: 400mb

    27. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quartz itself is based on the PDF imaging model, so spitting out PDF documents from views is naturally inherent.

      "Based on the PDF imaging model" != "uses PDF internally".

      Quartz is based on the PDF imaging model in that it handles stuff in the same way as PDF files do (for example, using floating point units for positions as opposed to integer pixel offsets like Windows and X). It is not "Display Postscript".

    28. Re:OS X by myov · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that OS X pdf's are huge. The acrobat PDF driver always makes the file smaller.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    29. Re:OS X by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      You can run Photoshop in Linux using Wine or CrossOver Office. Thats what I believe Pixar does (I think several of the other major studios use Linux as well for all the work). Apparently they concluded that the Windows version ran faster on Linux (via Wine) than it did on either OS X or Windows (I can't remember off the top of my head, it was a year or so ago I read the article on Newsforge).

    30. Re:OS X by Buran · · Score: 1

      Weird. Usually emulation is slower. If you or anyone else has a link, toss it my way -- I'm curious. We all love our Macs, but it'll be good to know about that in case I'm ever asked about it.

    31. Re:OS X by Trillan · · Score: 1

      This is true, but there's PDFCompress for $27. Not free, but cheaper than Adobe Acrobat.

  14. Worse than malware? by s4m7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How can you tell in the MS office suite? The whole thing's got so many sliding panels, animated dogs saying "it looks like you're trying to get some work done." and other crap too numerous to list... I can't imagine one more toolbar being noticable.

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    1. Re:Worse than malware? by l810c · · Score: 4, Informative
      The built in toolbars can be turned on/off, moved around and organized just how you like. Restart the program and your settings are remembered.

      I actually would not mind this toolbar being there. I even used it occasionally. But this thing does not behave like all the other tool bars. Turn it off or move it, restart program and Bam, there it is right back on the top row of toolbars pushing all the others down one line and reducing my view of the document.

      It is a very annoying POS, so I just uninstalled it.

    2. Re:Worse than malware? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Something must be different about the configuration of Office on your machine. I turn it off on any one of the machines here, restart the program, even reboot and restart Word... the buttons are still gone. It sounds like a Word configuration issue rather than an Acrobat issue.

    3. Re:Worse than malware? by l810c · · Score: 1

      It's not just my machine, that's the whole point of this article. Many people are having this problem.

    4. Re:Worse than malware? by Novous · · Score: 1

      Of course, let's not take into account that all those buttons (that you can remove) actually do something useful, like edit your text. Bloated, definitely! Unless you want any real control whatsoever...

    5. Re:Worse than malware? by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

      and other crap too numerous to list... I can't imagine one more toolbar being noticable.
      One time back in 1997 or so, I was messing with Word 97. I enabled every single toolbar available. It ended up I had room for one line of text. I took a screen-shot and saved it as the wallpaper to confuse other users of the computer. Crap to numerous to list? I don't understand what you mean.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    6. Re:Worse than malware? by nojomofo · · Score: 2, Informative

      OT, but I have to say this. Excel has problems. I hate the reviewing toolbar. I just don't use it. It takes up valuable real estate. Whenever I open up a .xls that was saved by somebody who had the reviewing toolbar turned on (which is 98% of the rest of the world), the toolbar appears again, completely overriding my settings until I turn the toolbar off again. Fricking POS.

    7. Re:Worse than malware? by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't still happen to have that image around, would you? I'd very much like to see that. I'd make one myself, but I don't have Word around.

      /* Begining of shameless pimping */

      By the way, any other *nix users out there that are tired of document editors like Word, Abiword, or OpenOffice but still need formating ( vim's not cutting it ) have you seen lyx?

      /* End of shamless pimping */

      --

      What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    8. Re:Worse than malware? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Have you even used Office? It takes a total of 30 seconds to disable the introductory features, and another 5 minutes to customize the toolbars the way you like them.

      You sound exactly like a Word user would when sitting down at vi for the first time.

  15. Obligatory Mac elitist response by bonch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Adobe toolbar, what's that? I just hit "Save to PDF" on any print dialogs...

  16. Version 5 by Flave · · Score: 3, Informative

    I refuse to use anything newer than version 5 of Acrobat. They completely and totally fucked up the product after this release.

    1. Re:Version 5 by Yankel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's because Adobe is trying to make PDF the be-all-and-end-all of document formats -- when it's only useful as a common format for printing.

      Do we really need a PDF document to display flash, sound, full motion video, and act like a webpage?

      --
      --- Dan
    2. Re:Version 5 by BarryNorton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That link mostly assumes, as do you, that you're either printing or web surfing. Lots of people usefully use PDF for on-screen-read document exchange (nothing to do with the Web), lots of people have real jobs...

  17. If you chose to install it... by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I guess youre stuck with it.

    On the other hand, it really shouldn't be this difficult to remove valid programs - MS should really step in here and mandate a total-removal tool. Something that wipes ALL THE BLOODY FILES and icons from the HDD.

    Of course, unless its IE, MS has never really believed in standards for the good of the end user - just for the good of the bottom line (WMA anyone???)

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    1. Re:If you chose to install it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On the other hand, it really shouldn't be this difficult to remove valid programs - MS should really step in here and mandate a total-removal tool. Something that wipes ALL THE BLOODY FILES and icons from the HDD.

      Yup, like the FF uninstall procedure that wipes a users HDD completely.

    2. Re:If you chose to install it... by ivansanchez · · Score: 2, Funny

      MS should really step in here and mandate a total-removal tool. Something that wipes ALL THE BLOODY FILES and icons from the HDD.

      You mean, like "format c:"?

    3. Re:If you chose to install it... by Gates82 · · Score: 1
      I would think more along the lines of fdisk, blow the whole partition out of the way.

      --
      So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's sister?

    4. Re:If you chose to install it... by Albio · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering why you're mentioning .wma
      I'm not particularily fond of it and as such have not used it extensively, but to me it looks like any old closed filetype.

    5. Re:If you chose to install it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something that wipes ALL THE BLOODY FILES and icons from the HDD.

      If your computer is bleeding, I think toolbars are the least of your worries...

    6. Re:If you chose to install it... by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft really started requiring Third party Programs to fully clean themselves up, including the registry, or lose that little Windows compatable mark on the box art, they would lose over half the companies claiming to be compatable. That means Windows stops claiming to run just about everything. Not at all good for the bottom line.
      Microsoft cut third party companies a lot of slack during the growth years, to be able to brag about how much more software runs on Windows than the competition. Now they have saturated the market, there's no direction left for compatability percentages to move, except down, and the policy is starting to come back to haunt them. Any threat to deny a company that little Windows symbol is a hollow threat, as more and more companies realize MS will take a hit from it too.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    7. Re:If you chose to install it... by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
      If Microsoft really started requiring Third party Programs to fully clean themselves up, including the registry, or lose that little Windows compatable mark on the box art, they would lose over half the companies claiming to be compatable.

      The "Designed for Windows 2000" and the XP variation are pretty strict. The program has to use the Windows installer, which usually ensures a clean removal. The program also has to run properly under limited privileges. Most programs are not certified by Microsoft in that way. They just say "compatible," which has no restrictions. Check your facts.

  18. Maybe it's just me but... by xero9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't it as simple as right-clicking the toolbar area and unchecking PDFmaker? I did this in about 2 seconds and it's gone.

    1. Re:Maybe it's just me but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the problem, you'd think that would work but the next time you open Word, its back.

    2. Re:Maybe it's just me but... by Golgafrinchan · · Score: 1
      No, you're right. The problem is that it's only gone for as long as Word is open. Once you open Word again, the Acrobat Toolbar is back.

      --
      My userid is prime!
    3. Re:Maybe it's just me but... by Gates82 · · Score: 1
      This is only a temp fix, the real way to take care of it is to go into where you have office installed and under start up there is pdf.dot file for word and then in the xlstart there is like a pdf.xot or something like that. You need to delete those.

      --
      So who is hotter? Ali or Ali's sister?

    4. Re:Maybe it's just me but... by xero9 · · Score: 1

      That's strange. Before my original post I even closed out of Word and opened it again to see if it would come back and it didn't. Same with Excel.

  19. So... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Adobe has taken the Real approach to software.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:So... by carpe_noctem · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, it's a shame that...

      BUFFERING: 8%, 86%, 98%

      thatttttt Adobe really had to stoop to thes...

      BUFFERING: 12%, 36%, 76%, 95%

      eeee kind of business practices. They should really know bett...

      BUFFERING: 36%, 45%, 45%, 45%... Connection to host lost. Would you like to upgrade to RealPlayer Gold(TM)?

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    2. Re:So... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Damn, I hate when the follow-up is funnier than my original!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  20. Slow news by mattmentecky · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've seen slow news days before on Slashdot but....wow.

  21. Hooray for OpenOffice.org by jestered1 · · Score: 1
    File -> Export as PDF.

    Native to the application, simple, and intuitive. That's what happens when users and geeks design the application instead of the marketing wonks.

    1. Re:Hooray for OpenOffice.org by Malc · · Score: 1

      PDFCreator is even better. Any Windows application that prints can output to PDF for free.

    2. Re:Hooray for OpenOffice.org by masklinn · · Score: 1

      No, because you don't have access to any configuration (like images quality settings) while OOo gives you such features in the Export to PDF dialog thingie

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:Hooray for OpenOffice.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You've discovered OpenOffice's single good feature. Congratulations! I am impressed that you were willing to wait the several minutes it takes to open.

      No fully conscious user would ever design that piece of crap as it has been. There is "self-important nerd" written ALL OVER that particular 'application'.

    4. Re:Hooray for OpenOffice.org by Malc · · Score: 1

      So if I set graphic quality to 4000dpi, you're telling me PDFCreator will ignore it?

      To be honest though, I've never needed to change the settings. They're more than good enough for everything I've ever had to use it for. It's free, and it works with everything in Windows that uses standard printing mechanisms. The OOo export is only available to OOo, right?

    5. Re:Hooray for OpenOffice.org by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Yes it is

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  22. Mine doesn't show up!!! by erykjj · · Score: 1

    It must be hiding in the registry, I guess.

  23. The Worst Yet by devphaeton · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    .... is Norton Internet Security.

    That is THE worst malware to date.

    - It preys on people's ignorant paranoia

    - It succeeds in taking money from people (most malware fails at this)

    - It blocks websites, services, and causes the computer to slow WAY down

    - It is poorly written and buggy as hell. (how many times have you seen "please reinstall NIS"?

    - When you turn it off it says it's off but stays on, when you disable it says it's disabled but it's still enabled, and worst yet it requires registry hacking to remove it without b0rking your networking capabilities.

    - Customers calling Symantec with any support issues are directed towards their ISP for help.

    fux0r Symantec.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
    1. Re:The Worst Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm ... off topic anyone?

  24. Had the problem here as well... by GoNINzo · · Score: 1
    What's worse is that basically 'infects' word and excel using the plugin system, and will 'reinstall' itself if it disappears, but if it's in there but broken, it will just spam errors to the users.

    We have licenses for 7.0 standard, but I've uninstalled and gone back to just reader. But I had to do a complete reinstall to get rid of entirely. (didn't hurt that I have a new laptop so... heh)

    Good news though: Reader does not do the plugin stuff, nor does it do it on my Solaris workstation.

    --
    Gonzo Granzeau
    "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
  25. Re:yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our world today is based upon a Capitalistic Imerialistic aided in with militaristic type mind set where profits rule above basic human needs. if the usa gov can do it why not adobe?

  26. Easy fix by BlizzyMadden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess the best way to avoid this is to not install MS Office and use OpenOffice instead :-)

    1. Re:Easy fix by danheskett · · Score: 1

      It's all fun and games until mal-ware plugins for OpenOffice are designed and implemented. You don't think the malware writers are going to ignore you forever, do you?

    2. Re:Easy fix by harrkev · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, they are. Note that I am NOT in any way, shape, or form, an office expert.

      But, AFAIK, to get new toolbars to pop up, you have to copy files to the hard drive. If somebody else already has the ability to copy stuff to the hard drive, then you have worse things to worry about than Office toolbars.

      It is sort of like Fort Knox worrying that somebody might break in and steal office supplies ;)

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  27. OS X by nottsp1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its annoying in Word 2004 for Mac.. always there in the toolbar. Also, its shit becuase if you've got Acrobat 7 installed, any pdf's you view in Safari have to open Acrobat first, no matter how many times you tell it to 'always open with preview'. Bugger.

  28. Re:yeah so? by Nimrangul · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes, it is so respectable to take postscript and fuck it up and rename it and close it off so you're in charge.

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
  29. Adobe or Microsoft? by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why should Adobe be held to any different standard than Microsoft? If we've decided that Microsoft can't (at least in the U.S.) be forced to remove IE from Windows (even after they have been proven to posess market "monopoly" power) then why should we now demand that an "integral part of Adobe's product" be removable, hidable or whatever.

    Or maybe it was a mistake to allow Microsoft to get away with that?

    --

    The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    1. Re:Adobe or Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good point, while we're at it, I demand that Microsoft remove all file systems from Windows.

      I am sick of them keeping the third party file system market down with their evil, evil, evil horrible mean monopoly.

      And damn them for including a web browser!

      Also, while we're at it, I demand they stop forcing you to buy the OS with every computer they sell. I want to buy my OS and hardware separately. Oh, wait, that's Apple, sorry, my bad, I forgot, it's not a monopoly unless you are Microsoft.

    2. Re:Adobe or Microsoft? by almostmanda · · Score: 1

      One difference is, you can hide Internet Explorer.

      Also, it doesn't mesh well with me that Adobe assumes they can go about inserting toolbars into other products wherever they please. At least Internet Explorer and Windows are both made by Microsoft. Pretty soon, we'll see the Adobe Bittorrent Toolbar installed whenever you install Acrobat. "Click here to see if the e-book you downloaded was pirated illegally!" "Loading of PhotoshopCScrack.torrent blocked by Adobe BT Toolbar!"

    3. Re:Adobe or Microsoft? by harrkev · · Score: 1
      One difference is, you can hide Internet Explorer.
      Riiiiight...

      I switched over to FireFox a long time ago. I still encounter software that launches IE whenever you click on "help." Very annoying. I know which browser I want to use, I just wish that ALL software would respect that choice.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    4. Re:Adobe or Microsoft? by TrentC · · Score: 1

      Why should Adobe be held to any different standard than Microsoft? If we've decided that Microsoft can't (at least in the U.S.) be forced to remove IE from Windows (even after they have been proven to posess market "monopoly" power) then why should we now demand that an "integral part of Adobe's product" be removable, hidable or whatever.

      You're assuming that "we" agree with the opinion that MS shouldn't be forced to unbundle IE...

      Jay (=

    5. Re:Adobe or Microsoft? by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 1
      You're assuming that "we" agree with the opinion that MS shouldn't be forced to unbundle IE...

      By we I meant the U.S. government DOJ, and by extension, the people who elected (directly or indirectly) these representatives. I can't say wether that applies to you, but I, unfortunately, have to live with the decisions the other people in the US made.

      But more to the point, I think it is a correct decision to leave software developers (including the ones who work for Microsoft) the freedom to choose what software they supply, without government interference. Otherwise we (meaning FOSS developers) might find ourselves having to include or exclude certain functions we'd rather not, such as DRM in our ogg players, respect for the BroadcastBit in our Bittorrent clients, etc.

      But if I had my druthers, I'd've granted them the right to include or exclude whatever functionality they choose, provided they disclose what was being included. Wouldn't've made a difference to the FOSS crowd (we do that anyway) but would probably have been impossible for proprietary software vendors to implement. At least, I would've hoped so... ;-)

      It's a moot popint, however. People are beginning to understand that allowing Microsoft to bundle IE is a liability they wish they could choose to avoid.

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    6. Re:Adobe or Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox is crippled and doesn't support HTML help.

  30. Adobe-Yahoo customer apathy connection by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Informative

    Adobe seems to have partnered with Yahoo! to get Adobe Reader users to install the Yahoo! toolbar. When you go to adobe.com to download Adobe Reader, they try to bundle a lot of other junk with it as well (Yahoo! toolbar, Adobe Download Manager, etc.) It's getting really annoying.

    I hate the way Acrobat loads in my browser window when I click a link to a PDF file, instead of simply opening Acrobat outside of my browser window. I end up with half the screen taken up by toolbars. It's ridiculous.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Adobe-Yahoo customer apathy connection by superstick58 · · Score: 1
      You can open PDF files out of the browser pretty easily. Open the Acrobat application and go to Edit -> Preferences. Under Internet in the preferences menu there is a check box for "Display PDF in Browser". Simply uncheck this box.

      For firefox users, go to Tools -> Options in the browser and in the Downloads menu change the action for PDF files to "open with acrobat.exe". That should do it.

    2. Re:Adobe-Yahoo customer apathy connection by NormAtHome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep, saw that... if you're not paying attention after the Adobe downloader finishes getting the three different install files (Adobe Photo Album, Yahoo Toolbar and of course the Acrobat Reader) and you answer Yes suddenly you've got stuff you never wanted or needed on your system and it's hard to get rid of.

      Someone else mentioned that Acrobat products after 5 have sucked bad and from what I've seen I'd have to agree.

      This is really getting out of hand, next thing you know there'll be sneakwrap / EULA crap saying as a condition of using "our" software you must install our adware / spyware / malware so that you can be bombarded by advertising while we monitor what you do with our software on your computer.. oh and by the way by installing our software you're computer now belongs to us..

    3. Re:Adobe-Yahoo customer apathy connection by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Tried that, it still displays in firefox window. Not sure why it doesn't work like you say.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  31. why deal with bloat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.oldversion.com

    seriously, there is no reason to use any version past acrobat 4.

  32. It's quite simple. by jd · · Score: 4, Funny
    For the longest time, the Malware market has been massively underexploited. Users have had to put up with low-grade, destroyable, self-sharing malware. In today's fast-paced marketplace, this is clearly unacceptable. Consumers need robust Malware with a quality brand-name behind it and technical support that speaks Ancient Egyptian only.


    Adobe is clearly filling a market need with their product. As pioneers they can, of course, charge premium rates for their commercial-grade Malware. They have to recoup the costs of conducting psychological studies on the most brain-corroding toolbar scheme imaginable. These things cost money, you know. It is wholly unreasonable to ask Adobe to develop such brain-mangling software and shoulder the research costs involved.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  33. I'm confused by plj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does this mean that even uninstalling Acrobat itself won't remove the said toolbar?

    If does, then I understand whining about it. Not otherwise.

    --
    “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    1. Re:I'm confused by m50d · · Score: 1

      Yep. The uninstaller seems to forget about the file that causes the toolbar. I have two(!) copies of that toolbar still stuck into Office, next time I boot into windows (timescale idea: it's going to tell me I need to put my clock back because daylight savings time has finished) they will still be there staring at me whenever I try to use word or whatever. Not only that but they won't remember where I've moved them to, and won't remember that they're disabled, so they're there making my toolbar take up 50% more space until I move them, then back again when I restart the app. This is from acrobat 4 which I uninstalled a while ago.

      --
      I am trolling
  34. Adobe = Malware? Pshaw! by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    This article is ridiculous. I've been a user of (BUY ADOBE ACROBAT!!!!) Adobe's toolbar and I have never seen any (BUY ADOBE ACROBAT!!!!) evidence of being infected with any sort of adware (BUY ADOBE ACROBAT!!!!) or malware.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  35. It's About the User Interface by Delilah+Jones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    True, not being able to get rid of a simple toolbar is not exactly malware-worthy.

    But let's face it, not being able to customize your own personal environment can be pretty frustrating.

    Imagine having a stack of papers on your desk that could never be removed, no matter what you did. Dang man. That'd drive me nuts!

    BTW, this discussion of permanent toolbars kind of reminds me of the invasive qualities of AOL. Ever try to get that junk off your PC? It's worse than a virus!

    --
    http://augustwestproducts.i8.com
  36. Ok, so I'm irritated by rueger · · Score: 1

    Geez, the first link from the article is to a visio problem that really is only obliquely related to Acrobat. The second does make reference to problems in disabling the Toolbar.

    But to call this malware is really rather much. Can't posters and editors make a little more effort to do more than whine?

    1. Re:Ok, so I'm irritated by Phr3n3tik · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, except that the Adobe software CAUSES the visio problem.

      -G

      --
      -------------------- Hmmm... what does this button d
  37. not so simple by infinite+jester · · Score: 4, Informative

    On OS-X, at least, it installs itself automatically when doing an Acrobat Reader installation. I had to manually uninstall it from the Internet Plug-ins folder in order to use the significantly faster Schubert PDF Browser Plugin .

    --
    i thought, therefore i was...
    1. Re:not so simple by justforaday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're referring to the web browser plugin. This is the PDFMaker toolbar that appears in Word, Excel, Outlook, etc.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:not so simple by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why would you want to install Acrobat Reader at all? Is there something wrong with Preview and the PDF stuff that's already built into the OS?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:not so simple by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to install Acrobat Reader at all? Is there something wrong with Preview and the PDF stuff that's already built into the OS?

      I install it for compatibility testing. There is nothing wrong with Preview.app though.

    4. Re:not so simple by CanSpice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Preview doesn't let you edit edit-able PDFs, does it? I had some PDFs downloaded from the IRS that, when downloaded on my Windows box with Reader installed, allowed me to fill in some of the boxes. I don't think I could do that using Preview.app.

    5. Re:not so simple by sbump · · Score: 1

      On a simple latex document (converted with ps2pdf) Preview misrendered some plain text subheadings into garbage, and also where it was working, the font just looked worse (It was computer modern, I think.) Acrobat looked fine. I may have had something set up wrong in Preview perhaps.

    6. Re:not so simple by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      Preview doesn't let you edit edit-able PDFs, does it?

      That's a huge nuisance on Mac OS X. Every application lets one save as a PDF (through Print to PDF) but there is no application that is part of the OS that lets one actually edit a PDF. I'm really shocked you can't do it with TextEdit.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    7. Re:not so simple by nacturation · · Score: 1

      That's a huge nuisance on Mac OS X. Every application lets one save as a PDF (through Print to PDF) but there is no application that is part of the OS that lets one actually edit a PDF. I'm really shocked you can't do it with TextEdit.

      Sure you can edit it with vi if you wanted to. I just hope you're handy with its postscript-like tags.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    8. Re:not so simple by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      If you get into e book stuff, preview is too weak too.

      Its name is "preview" btw, previewing something before opening with "real app". Apple's pdf rendening is amazing, the speed is amazing but they won't make it acrobat of course.

      I speak about viewing stuff.

    9. Re:not so simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you can edit it with vi if you wanted to.

      vi, is there anything it _can't_ do ?

    10. Re:not so simple by prog-guru · · Score: 1

      Did you run latex 2x like some of the docs say? :/

      pdflatex might save you a step too.

      --

      chris@xanadu:~$ whatis /.
      /.: nothing appropriate.

    11. Re:not so simple by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Can't right click. Wait, that's Macs.

      --
      I love my sig.
    12. Re:not so simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "vi, is there anything it _can't_ do ?"

      um.... oral sex?

    13. Re:not so simple by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I just hope you're handy with postscript.

      Fixed it for you.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    14. Re:not so simple by nacturation · · Score: 1

      (me: I just hope you're handy with postscript.)

      Fixed it for you.


      You sure about that? Why does one then need a PS to PDF converter if it's just postscript?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    15. Re:not so simple by myov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Preview doesn't always work with some PDF features. I've added a background image then compressed the PDF in Acrobat. Preview stopped displaying all images. PDF's with embedded links also fail to work in Preview.

      However, since Acrobat 6 runs like a bloated pig I only use it when preview won't work.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    16. Re:not so simple by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

      The parent poster was referring to PDFs with form fields, I believe.

    17. Re:not so simple by pizero · · Score: 1

      You're right. It is obnoxious in Office programs; however, it is easy to get rid of in OS X. Just delete it from the /Applications/Microsoft Office (version)/Office/Startup/(application name) folder.

      Acrobat will put it back if you let it, so in order to keep that from happening use Get Info on the /Applications/Microsoft Office (version)/Office/Startup/ folder and change the permissions to read only and extend them to all sub folders.

    18. Re:not so simple by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I have yet to install Acrobat reader on OS X. I've found the Preview reader to be just fine for everything I do and it doesn't try to advertise other products.

    19. Re:not so simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tiger is coming out in April. Wink Wink nudge nudge.

    20. Re:not so simple by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      Why does one then need a PS to PDF converter if it's just postscript?

      Because PDF is a subset of PS, therefore, it *IS* PS syntax, just not every PS operation works in PDF.

      look it up - I would but I'm drunk and don't want to... also since I'm drunk you should probably take the above with a grain of salt, and look it up. Posted without the karma bonus for that reason.

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    21. Re:not so simple by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Because PDF is a subset of PS, therefore, it *IS* PS syntax, just not every PS operation works in PDF.

      Thanks for the info. And re: posting while drunk, consider a large grain of salt taken. :)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    22. Re:not so simple by sbump · · Score: 1

      I'm not so worried about my old pdf. I'm worried about the viewer. This is a pdf that looked fine in acrobat 4 when I made it, so why would I have done it differently? I assume I'll come across other pdf's on the web that will break in Preview if mine did.

  38. just upgraded office 2002 to 2003... by Mechamse · · Score: 1

    We hae Adobe Element 6 installed on our stanard build, and so when we upgraded tot he new office 2003, there were a lot of issues surrouning the PdfMaker plugin... Not a fun week... seems that the people that had Acrobat pro 6 though, didn't have any trouble with it... very strange..

  39. Openoffice too by CdBee · · Score: 2, Informative

    lol. OpenOffice also can export to PDF without Acrobat present.. I'm sure most people don't know that, else why do they buy Acrobat?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  40. I don't even see this toolbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Perhaps that's because, for obvious security reasons, I deactivated macros in MS word?

  41. Re:yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coherency learn it, and some people might pause to read your opinion.

  42. how about don't install it by michaelbuddy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wouldn't mess with it anyway. You can use Ghostscript. And you can used the modified primo pdf from active pdf. it's a free PDF creator.

    http://www.primopdf.com

    works great. one time it will ask you for personal info after you make like 25 pdfs, but you can just push the cancel button if you don't want to give them any statistical information. It appears as a printer on your computer. I use it, it's great.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

    1. Re:how about don't install it by Plug · · Score: 1

      Or a completely open source alternative, PDF Creator.

    2. Re:how about don't install it by Barrakketh · · Score: 1

      How about PDFCreator?

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator

      It's open source. Been using it for a couple of years with no problems. The files aren't as small as using Distiller, but that's something that seems to be universal when you're using Ghostscript.

    3. Re:how about don't install it by Kevitt · · Score: 1

      Aye... or CutePDF!

    4. Re:how about don't install it by capoccia · · Score: 1

      ghostscript works for simple things, but it's font substitution method is junk, and it doesn't have all the fancy options for controlling compression of graphics. there is also no fancy ghostscript interface for editing pdfs.

  43. Not necessarily $2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Rather than pay $100 for acrobat on your $900 computer spend $2000 on a mac and do it for free. That is a good idea.

    To be fair, the Mac Mini doesn't even come close to $2000. Still more expensive than Acrobat though. ;)

    1. Re:Not necessarily $2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who on earth is going to use the Mini to actually do work? More to the point, who's going to actually be creating PDFs on it for professional use?

      Close to nobody.

  44. Solution by MagPulse · · Score: 4, Informative

    Search your hard drive for "PDFMaker.dot" or probably anything else withe PDFMaker in the name. On my machine it installs it here:

    C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\OFFICE11\STARTUP

    That will get rid of it in all your Office apps including Outlook.

    1. Re:Solution by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Even better in windows - go to add/remove > click change > uncheck the office components > pdfmaker is gone - and it really works.

      Hardly what I call malware.

    2. Re:Solution by mattmatt · · Score: 1

      Better yet: after searching for said files, delete them.

    3. Re:Solution by SrLnclt · · Score: 1

      I agree with Skuld-Chan - hardly malware. Can simply be removed with the installer/uninstaller.

      Add/Remove Programs, Adobe Acrobat 7, change/remove, modify, have it remove the AdobePDFMaker group. All the toolbars go away.

      And yes you can still 'print' to a pdf like usual.

  45. PDF Creation Tools by linguae · · Score: 1

    Well, what's the difference between using a tool like Adobe Acrobat and printing to a PostScript file and converting that *.ps file into a PDF document? Unless you need features such as links between the documents, for many uses, the PostScript -> PDF route is a much easier route. Besides, there are plenty of alternatives to converting Office files directly to PDFs, too, and I bet you that some of them have some of those extra capabilities that PDFs provide, too.

    Well, it doesn't really solve the toolbar problem, but if the toolbar is that annoying, there are plenty of alternatives to Acrobat.

  46. Thank God for OS X by Skraut · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Print > save as PDF. Saves $800 in the process.

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    1. Re:Thank God for OS X by enosys · · Score: 1

      You can get a Mac Mini for less than that.

    2. Re:Thank God for OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, the ignorance is killing me!

      Exporting or "printing" a file to PDF is not the same thing as being able to EDIT a PDF. Not 1/100th of the ability to produce a real PDF document.

      As far as money goes, you are saving nothing, becuase you are getting nothing!

  47. Obligatory Mac elitist response response by Scorchio · · Score: 3, Funny

    You need to select print to save? That's intuitive... err, I think.

    1. Re:Obligatory Mac elitist response response by harrkev · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It works for me! You have to think of .PDF as being a form of "electronic paper".

      A complete noob trying to save his spreadsheet might be a bit annoyed if he tried the new "acrobat" spreadsheet format, just to find all of his formulas blown away ;)

      So having it as a "print" option makes more sense than a "save" option.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:Obligatory Mac elitist response response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats also how the acrobat distiller works. It installs a virtual printer that you would use to save a pdf from outside of Acrobat.

    3. Re:Obligatory Mac elitist response response by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      I thought thats what 'Export' was for?

    4. Re:Obligatory Mac elitist response response by pretentiousPPC · · Score: 1

      Works for me, with the expense, cost and pain of ink and printers it's not worth it to me to have a printer at home. So if I feel I need a hard copy of something or have something just a bit more tangible than what just a save would give me (like web receipts), I just act like I'm printing and receive to what amounts to a digital "hard" copy.
      It'll be exactly the same at any time and I can open it on practically any computer and if need be, able to print it out at later time, with no hassles.

      --
      Artist will always make art.
  48. only Adobe needs 50mb of dedicated install code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    just to read a 100kb pdf

  49. Re:yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    goddammit, does slashdot code not know what a hard return is? one more time, for the stupid code.


    coherency
    learn it, and some people might pause to read your opinion.

  50. Here's how to turn it off: by khrtt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uncheck this:

    Edit>Preferences>Startup>Show Messages and automatically update

    The banner goes away, and, as a bonus, if you have auto-update disabled, the stupid app stops tickling the network too.

    C'mon gentlemen, this is not worth a slashdot article. Next time start your engines before flooring the pedal.

    1. Re:Here's how to turn it off: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I know RTFA is not a habit of \. readers, but this is talking about a toolbar within MS Office, not within Adobe Reader.

    2. Re:Here's how to turn it off: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the time they try to start their engines twice! (dupes)

    3. Re:Here's how to turn it off: by khrtt · · Score: 1

      My bad. The reason - either my office doesn't get the toolbar, or I turned it off somehow a long time ago and forgot all about it..

  51. can I be the first to say it? by kajoob · · Score: 1, Troll
    That is very misleading.

    ... "you must be new here"



    [Thanks guys, I always wanted to do that.]

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  52. That is a kind of malware by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sorry, IMHO software that installs itself and refuses to let you remove it without herculean effort is a kind of malware.

    What is wrong with complying to "uninstall" standards? Or better yet have a checkbox when it runs that tells it to scram or to never pop-up or run again?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:That is a kind of malware by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      I agree. It should have a removal option. BUT, it doesn't do any harm, which is the actual definition of malware. Again, I think Adobe should be more responsible, but let's not bundle this with other, harmful toolbars or software. Instead of being upset, why not we email pressure Adobe to incorporate such a feature?

    2. Re:That is a kind of malware by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "I agree. It should have a removal option. BUT, it doesn't do any harm, which is the actual definition of malware"

      Thousands of computer viruses don't do harm, either. Many of the Bonzi Buddy-etc malware toolbar and "helper" apps were not designed with malice in mind, and many like them. I guess none of these are malware either?

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:That is a kind of malware by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it malware unless it does something malicious to your machine. I would just call it lousy software with poor removal tools.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    4. Re:That is a kind of malware by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      From WikiPedia: "Malware (a contraction of "malicious software") refers to software developed for the purpose of doing harm." If its not purpose is not to do harm, then no, it is not malware. Malware are viruses, trojans, etc.

      This is why we need something along the lines of "annoyware" so that we can separate the two.

    5. Re:That is a kind of malware by fupeg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So like Internet Explorer for example?

    6. Re:That is a kind of malware by lewp · · Score: 4, Funny

      It does harm to my eyeballs. Also, PDF killed my father.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    7. Re:That is a kind of malware by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "So like Internet Explorer for example?"

      Give the man a cigar. Or at least a free AOL CD. I was going to add "like Windows" to the original post, but I figured that this sort of thing went without saying around here!

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    8. Re:That is a kind of malware by marnerd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obi Wan lied to you. PDF IS your father.

      --
      Not so much a sig as a lack of one.
    9. Re:That is a kind of malware by sconeu · · Score: 1

      So Adobe PDF has six fingers on its right hand?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    10. Re:That is a kind of malware by numbski · · Score: 1

      Who's your daddy? Who's your Dah Dae....

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    11. Re:That is a kind of malware by numbski · · Score: 1

      I feel I owe an explanation for that post.

      Here you go.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    12. Re:That is a kind of malware by Razzberry28 · · Score: 1

      "My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die." *tries to uninstall PDF Toolbar* "Hmmm...My name is..."

    13. Re:That is a kind of malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true! That's impossible!

    14. Re:That is a kind of malware by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      What is wrong with complying to "uninstall" standards?
      There's an operating system that has uninstall standards?
      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    15. Re:That is a kind of malware by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 3, Funny

      So what does that make me? PostScript Kenobi? Adobe eBook Skywalker? Darth Preview.app?

    16. Re:That is a kind of malware by Donkey5555 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? It raped my mother and laid eggs in my brain.

    17. Re:That is a kind of malware by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      If Adobe actual customers (huge corps, universities, medical, law) actually got sick of that feature and couldn't uninstall, a point release would be out in 1 week or so :)

      I wouldn't be surprised if Adobe gets compliments instead of complaints.

      Slashdot you know... If you paste entire submission of a guy nicked "Phr3n3tik", thats what you get ;)

    18. Re:That is a kind of malware by Traa · · Score: 1

      oh, man....that would have been just that bit funnier if you had thought of "Adobi Wan"

    19. Re:That is a kind of malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I have this vision of Luke Skywalker saying to Darth Vader, "My name is Luke Skywalker. You killed my father. Prepare to die."

    20. Re:That is a kind of malware by de+Siem · · Score: 1

      hmm last time i checked add/remove software chosing to modify Acrobat, let's me get rid of the pdfmaker rather easily in version 6 and 7. Alas no such thing on the mac.

      --
      Beating up people in little rooms, if you do it for a good reason you do it for a bad one.
  53. where could I find this XXX Teen Search Buddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of which you speak???

    20721

  54. /. goes down yet another notch by Concrete+Nomad · · Score: 1

    Quit posting stupid tech questions claiming they are newsworthy. Just remove the pdfmaker.dot template to get rid of the Office toolbar. Sheesh.

    1. Re:/. goes down yet another notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. Agreed. How are software nuisances news? Office 2003 changes default keys, OH NO!!! What to do? Let's post on Slashdot and get some help from the most openminded techies on the planet. (Mod me troll if you like, but its the truth!)

    2. Re:/. goes down yet another notch by Phr3n3tik · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are wrong though. There are no .dot files with acrobat7.

      How can you delete the file, when it isn't there?

      --
      -------------------- Hmmm... what does this button d
  55. Re:yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Irony.

    Read it, learn it, live it.

  56. It's a fair cop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    After all, they've been telling us for years that

    "There's more to Acrobat than Reader!"

  57. Don't Install It...Or Modify The Original Install by Omicron · · Score: 1

    If you don't want it, don't install the things. It's not that hard of a choice. And it's an MSI based install so you can easily jump in and remove the features you don't want.

    I'm working on getting v7 ready for deployment in my company so I'm looking into it right now, but honestly...it's not that hard of a thing to do!

  58. Why stop there? Thank god for OO.org by meheler · · Score: 1

    File->Export as PDF... :)

  59. Version 3 here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have Acrobat 3 (all 5.6 megs of it) on my Windows partition. It could probably be traced back all the way to my first Win95 machine; I simply copied it over every hardware upgrade.

  60. Try again by DnemoniX · · Score: 1

    The default installation adds the Acrobat Toolbar to Word. REconfiguring it's position, or unselecting it in the toolbar settins is only good for the current session. If you close Word and open it back up, BAM! There is is, right back where it started. It's just plain annoying.

  61. Whats the Problem? by Kookus · · Score: 0

    You right click on the toolbar and click on PDF Maker 7.0 and it's hidden. What you should be more upset with is that Adobe Acrobat PDF stuff doesn't work with Office 2003 in many instances, you have to buy Acrobat 7 just to get the functionality they should release a patch for. The point of this article is making a mountain out of a mole hill though.

  62. Re:yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not saying what adobe is doing is right thing to do all I am pointing out too is a direct link between USA Gov. and mindset in with our corporate wolrd operates under.

  63. Frustration with the PDF system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What has happened to the PDF concept? Back in 1997-98, I used Acrobat on Windows, Mac, Solaris and HP-UX without any problems. I embraced it as an almost universal format with good layout retention and presentation. Since then it's all gone down hill. Back then, Acrobat reader was 3 or 5 MB? And now its a >20MB download (bigger?). Just to read a PDF file?

    And so much for interoperability, I receive countless warnings saying I have some feauture that is incompatible or I cannot view some part of the file, etc. etc. ... I used Acrobat 5 but forced to also install Acrobat 6 reader, and that combo still gives some nuisances. Forget about Linux for the moment.

    PDF really sucks. I understand most organizations use it for FORMs but I truly think a better open format needs to come into play.

  64. Obligatory.... by temojen · · Score: 3, Informative
    link to PDF Creator

    For those that don't know... it's a windows printer driver that makes PDFs of your document when you print to it... very handy.

    1. Re:Obligatory.... by rpozz · · Score: 2, Informative

      ..and for those of you using Linux it's a similar deal - print to a file and use ps2pdf, or 2pdf.

    2. Re:Obligatory.... by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      PDFCreator is great. I've been using it for over two years and it's definitely one of my standard tools to install after reformatting a machine.

    3. Re:Obligatory.... by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      been wondering something.. i do this all the time, print to a .ps and then convert with ps2pdf. but is there a way to get programs to print directly to pdf? perhaps something to do with CUPS or Foomatic? I'm pretty good with most things on linux, but printing has always been a bit evasive for me.

      (For example, i still can't always get programs to print directly to my network's windows-networked printer, even though I can smbclient and upload to it just fine... bah!)

    4. Re:Obligatory.... by masklinn · · Score: 1

      or there is OpenOffice and the native PDF export feature (also avaible with Windows, why bother with MS Word?)

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    5. Re:Obligatory.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The KDE print system supports transparent printing to both PDF and PS. You can use it outside of KDE -- say, in Firefox -- by printing to the command kprinter. There're probably other options, too.

    6. Re:Obligatory.... by abigor · · Score: 1

      KDE has this capability. Example: I am writing code in Kate right now, a rather nifty text editor. If I click File->Print..., I can select "Print to PDF" in the dialogue box. This is pervasive throughout KDE.

      Actually, printing in general in KDE is very good.

    7. Re:Obligatory.... by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      Er, but i was thinking along the lines of a PDF printer driver, like the way PDF Writer works in Windows. Something not specific to a particular application. Is there any way of doing that?

    8. Re:Obligatory.... by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, openoffice can export directly to PDF.

    9. Re:Obligatory.... by teidou · · Score: 1

      it's definitely one of my standard tools to install after reformatting a machine.

      So, uh, what OS are you using?

    10. Re:Obligatory.... by nolife · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are many ways. This link is a little dated but still worth a read. You can create different printers on a Samba machine and print to them from any computer on the network, the resulting file is dropped into a Samba share.

      At work, I have a Samba server setup with a PDF, jpeg, tiff, gp4 fax, and several other "printers" that I can print documents to from any Win machine and have them converted.

      Basically building on the above link, create multiple printers and use gs and switches to your desire. For jpeg I use gs -sDEVICE=jpeg -r300x300, for g4 fax I use gs -sDEVICE=tiffg4 -r100x100 and so on (man gs or google for other options). Works great.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    11. Re:Obligatory.... by abigor · · Score: 1

      Sort of - you can use kprinter from the command line, or use it from other applications if they allow you to enter a custom printing command (most do; just type "kprinter"). Then you'll get the KDE dialogue, regardless of what app you're in. This way, any app can print to PDF.

      Note that it's only in KDE, though ;) That's why every KDE app can do this by default.

    12. Re:Obligatory.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be funny if it hadn't already been mentioned that PDFCreator is a Windows printer driver.

    13. Re:Obligatory.... by the_womble · · Score: 1

      So can all KDE apps and Lyx.

    14. Re:Obligatory.... by MikeFM · · Score: 1
      Cute PDF Writer


      Here's the one I use. Very easy to use.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    15. Re:Obligatory.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that the results from pdftex are better than those from using latex and then dvipdf on the resulting dvi file. You're mileage may vary.

  65. Next up by justforaday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next on Slashdot, how to remove the MSNMessenger icon from your system tray!

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:Next up by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      MSNMessenger?
      WTF!
      I'm still trying to remove that bloody IE malware!

    2. Re:Next up by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Hint: MSconfig

      Worst example of bloatware I've seen in some time. By default, MSN instant messenger's process is running all the time, wasting RAM, even if you don't have an account. This is not when you install MSN Instant Messenger. This is when you install Windows.

      Using monopoly in one area to gain monopoly in another, anyone?

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    3. Re:Next up by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

      Next on Slashdot, how to remove the MSNMessenger icon from your system tray!

      Make a batch file and paste this into it, run, and enjoy:

      @echo off
      echo Removing Microsoft Messenger...
      rundll32 advpack.dll,LaunchINFSection %WinDir%\inf\msmsgs.inf,BLC.Remove
      echo Disabling it from running in the future...
      echo REGEDIT4>%temp%\nomsngr.reg
      echo [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Me ssenger\Client]>>%temp%\nomsngr.reg
      echo "PreventRun"=dword:00000001>>%temp%\nomsngr.reg
      echo "PreventAutoRun"=dword:00000001>>%temp%\nomsngr.re g
      echo "PreventAutoUpdate"=dword:00000001>>%temp%\nomsngr .reg
      echo "PreventBackgroundDownload"=dword:00000001>>%temp% \nomsngr.reg echo "Disabled"=dword:00000001>>%temp%\nomsngr.reg
      regedit /s %temp%\nomsngr.reg

    4. Re:Next up by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      Tools|Options, General Tab... uncheck "Automatically run messenger when I log on to Windows"

      How hard is that?

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    5. Re:Next up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently a hell of a lot harder than whining :)

  66. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting?!?

    I've never seen anything more over-rated - it was trolling to start with...

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by s4m7 · · Score: 1

      an AC bitching about trolling? HA!

      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
  67. jumping the gun ? by technoviper · · Score: 1

    i have versions 6 and 7 on different computers in my office and have no trouble hiding the toolbars.

    simple directions follow:
    1) right click anywhere on the button bar
    2) click on "Add remove buttons"
    3) Clear the check mark next to PDFMaker x.0 (where x is your version of Acrobat Pro)
    Thats it... it doesnt reappear unless you reverse the process.
    Just because its not userfriendly doesnt mean its malware...

  68. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Adobe toolbar is uninstalled, the terrorists will have won.

  69. Adobe hasn't played nice with Windows for years by PingXao · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Adobe is a company that just doesn't care that its products fail to adhere to common WIndows GUI guidelines *. I doubt they care about this. One example is their brain-dead "Save A Copy" function. That's just not "Windows", and what it does could have been handled with "Save As". Maybe it's Mac-like and they're trying to retain cross-platform look-and-feel but it just doesn't "feel" like WIndows and that goes for Acrobat, Photoshop, Premiere, etc. When it comes to the user interface they don't care so I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for them to "fix" something they don't feel is broken.

    * other offenders: Macromedia, Autodesk products. You realy notice when a program requires your UI neural pathways to shift gears.

    1. Re:Adobe hasn't played nice with Windows for years by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I always got the feeling that "Save a copy" was supposed to help you think of documents in terms of whether you had the right to make yourself a copy or just view the one online.

      The fact that your computer *has* a copy if you're reading it being left out of the picture of course.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:Adobe hasn't played nice with Windows for years by m50d · · Score: 1

      Actually Save A Copy is very useful and I'm pretty sure it's made its way into newer versions of Office. Certainly it should do.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:Adobe hasn't played nice with Windows for years by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Save A Copy is different from Save As, in that it retains the context of current document as active document. Save As implies that the active document needs to become the newly saved document, instead.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    4. Re:Adobe hasn't played nice with Windows for years by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

      IBM commits the same crimes all over Lotus Notes. The program was nearly useless for general users who wanted an email program, and could not navigate through menu choices that were nothing like all the other windows programs they used.

      I was grateful when I moved jobs to somewhere that uses outlook

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    5. Re:Adobe hasn't played nice with Windows for years by sp5 · · Score: 1
      Does this also apply to normal users not being able to save to disk the file that they are viewing?

      In my lab environment, normal users cannot save acrobat documents that they are viewing. They can click on a link and view the document but can't save it?!? I, on the other hand, as administrator, can save the documents so Adobe must be doing something wrong.

      I suppose another solution would be to save the document by right-clicking it while using a browser, but the web site (a WebCT implementation) uses convoluted javascript links...

      That's my gripe with Acrobat... that and the fact that it loads a zillion plug-ins that I don't need!

    6. Re:Adobe hasn't played nice with Windows for years by Porter+Doran · · Score: 1

      No they don't play any nicer with Mac. Adobe apps look Fisher-Price, run slowly and crash -- basically since OS X Adobe has said, Screw you, to the Macintosh. The worst thing was Adobe flat-out refusing to support OS X's best new graphics stuff in Photoshop. Rumor has it too that an important VP at Adobe keeps saying the Mac is dead, and it's a fact that he's written forewards for Adobe books saying, Windows is a better platform than Mac. That's not cool since the Macintosh basically put them on the map ...

  70. Jumping through Hoops? by levitater · · Score: 1

    So would you say that Acrobat makes you jump through hoops or bend over backwards to uninstall their toolbar? Ahem.. yes, its a very bad joke.

  71. PDF Creator by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

    No problem with PDF creator (search sourceforge for it). It's not as seamless as OSX, but gives print-to-PDF functionality to anything that can print in Windows (not just MS Office).

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
  72. Adobe Online PDF Converter by FriedTurkey · · Score: 1

    I need to make a PDF so infrequently I can just use the online conversion tool. You get 5 free conversions. I only need it once in a blue moon so I have 2 free conversions left. Works great.

  73. open-source acrobat reader alternative on Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps OT, but does anyone know of a decent open-source Adobe Acrobat Reader alternative on Windows? The current version is bloated beyond hell, and I simply cannot believe reading PDFs should require that much bloat. Thanks!

  74. A story based on. . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that noone bothers to read software manuals anymore .
    It clearly states in the manuel that you can stop it starting with word by removing its entry from the word startup files folder.
    Its only hard if you dont RTFM

  75. Install Minimum, not Full by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple fix:

    Just install the minimum version of Reader, and not the Full version.

    Go here:

    http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.ht ml

    Choose your OS and connection speed, and then DESELECT the checkbox next to "Download the full version of Adobe Reader..."

    The "Minimum" install allows you to read PDF files just fine.

    You probably also want to deselect the other two checkboxes, unless you want more crap to get installed...

  76. Open Office.org by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    I forgot to mention the OpenOffice.org has been creating PDFs for a few years now. The new 2.0 beta has a lot more options for image compression and a bit better MSWord import too, so your table formatting is more likely to look good upon import.

    exports right to PDF. Of course you always have to worry that one day OpenOffice.org just might not be there anymore. Cause you know that "open source" software isn't reliable, stable, or in the end secure. right.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  77. Adobe's PDF reader sure sucks by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "PDF really sucks. I understand most organizations use it for FORMs but I truly think a better open format needs to come into play"

    Adobe's PDF reader sure sucks, that is for sure. By default, it brings up PFD pages on the Web with the fonts in a microscopic size smaller than "font size = 1" on regular HTML. So, the first thing I have to do is bang on the "+" enlarge icon a bunch of times, while waiting for the slow screens to update in a watery- washy fashion. Then I can read the PDF. HTML is so much faster, so much friendler, and so much easier to read. It is rare that I find an HTML page that can't be read just as it appears. You don't need a 20 meg bag on the browser with annoying "there is a new version!" nag messages just to read HTML.

    PDF on the Internet is an annoyance to be worked around. The "read as HTML" feature of Google sure is great.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Adobe's PDF reader sure sucks by Fluk3 · · Score: 1

      Try sending an HTML file to a printing press.

      --
      I've been upgraded to "bad"!
    2. Re:Adobe's PDF reader sure sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't read much mathematical notation, do you? HTML is only usable for this purpose if it's basically wrapping several inline .png or .gif files which themselves are converted LaTeX output.

  78. yeah lets go crazy behead adobe CEO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we should all boycot adobe now? think this trough a little. the problem lies with in the corporate elite
    drive for profit which is clearly inpowered by the USA Govt's drive for profit. If USA can do what ever the profits call for why not adobe. if you ask me we should not be beheading adobe but the sys in witch this kind of business practice can sustain.

  79. OpenOffice and Firefox -- no worries, mate! by mmell · · Score: 1

    I didn't even know there was a toolbar (well, yes I did -- I saw it mentioned in the license when I installed Acro7).

  80. That definition is out of date. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    That definition is out of date, for sure. It excludes a large percentage of the malware that spybot, Adaware, etc are designed to filter.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:That definition is out of date. by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's out of date. Simply, most people who use it don't know what it means, thus, it has an "extra" meaning, which is not very accurate at all. Even if we do count those programs in the same malware pool, I don't think the Adobe toolbar falls anywhere near them.

    2. Re:That definition is out of date. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      " don't think the Adobe toolbar falls anywhere near them."

      I agree. No way it it worse than (other?) malware, as the news item title says. I don't think it is as bad as Bonzi either.

      "Even if we do count those programs in the same malware pool"

      I don't think I want to go swimming there, that is for sure.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  81. Re:your sig by thrashbluegrass · · Score: 1

    Actually, according to netcraft, the military runs IIS 5 on Linux:

    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.af. mi l

    smee

  82. Hijack This by digidave · · Score: 1

    Hijack This will let you remove this and any other toolbar quite easily, though it is a bit cryptic to use.

    http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/downloads.htm l

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  83. Apple not so saintly given QuickTime task by Salk · · Score: 1

    Any body know why I need the qttask.exe
    running all the time? Ive turned off the taskbar
    function and sadly every time I view a QT video
    it puts its RunOnce entry back in the registery.

    1. Re:Apple not so saintly given QuickTime task by ewhac · · Score: 2, Informative
      Any body know why I need the qttask.exe running all the time?

      You don't. Go install QuickTime Alternative instead.

      Schwab

    2. Re:Apple not so saintly given QuickTime task by MC68000 · · Score: 1

      You don't need it, it just checks for updates. Quicktime videos can still be played. To kill this pest and save yourself 2 MB RAM, go to Control Panel, select QuickTime, select browser plug-in from the drop-down list, and deselect the Quicktime in system tray option.

      This works on my machine with QT 6

      --
      E = m c^3 Don't drink and derive E = m c^3
  84. Hi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haji! Seeing you long time for not was I!!!

  85. Adobe on how to completely uninstall toolbar: by TheGuano · · Score: 5, Informative
    For Windows:
    http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/328399.html

    For Mac:
    http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/329307.html

    Annoying, but at least they show you how to get around the reappear/reinstall/undeletable garbage the toolbar usually subjects you to.

    1. Re:Adobe on how to completely uninstall toolbar: by Phr3n3tik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Great, but your link goes to:
      Removing and Reinstalling Acrobat PDFMaker (6.0 for Office 2000 or XP)

      is there one for version 7? Since that's the version that sucks the hardest here...

      -G

      --
      -------------------- Hmmm... what does this button d
    2. Re:Adobe on how to completely uninstall toolbar: by TheGuano · · Score: 1
      Sorry, don't have 7.0 so I can't say for sure. But with every version of Acrobat since 5.0, I've had luck by 1) removing all instances of pdfmaker.dot and .xla from all acrobat and Office/template directories, and deleting the pdfmaker directory from within the Acrobat install directory.

      Did Adobe "fix" that in 7.0? They're incredible bastids. I woudln't mind if the PDFMaker stuff stuck around in an an existing toolbar...but making an undeletable toolbar with only 2 icons on it is just ridiculous.

  86. If I have to reinstall my OS... by solios · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... then it's malware. Period.

    Also why I don't use symantec products- one too many command line hunt-and-kills for my liking.

  87. Or better yet.. by Lysol · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple-P -> Save as PDF :)

    1. Re:Or better yet.. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+P in almost any Windows app and select PDFCreator. Works pretty well too ;)

    2. Re:Or better yet.. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      There are freeware apps (PPF995 and PDFCreator) as well as Adobe's own app (Distiller, which is included with Acrobat) that allow the same thing on Windows.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  88. Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    It's amazing how many Joe Average Users don't seem to grok a statement like "my OS can turn anything into a PDF".

    At my old college, I used to use the school's writing lab to print any papers I needed for class, since I don't do enough printing to be worth keeping my old inkjet fed with ink. However, I'm also using a G4 tower with no CD burner, and I've not had any real need for removable media since I can always transfer anything I want over the internet; put it on my webspace and download from wherever.

    However, in the lab at school, there was a "no printing off the internet" policy. Nothing technical to enforce it, just a rule for the staff; the print queue from the lab computers is monitored by some staff person and each job is has to be approved before it will print. So often times I'd be standing there at the printing waiting for my job to come out and the Print Queue Nazi and I would have a conversation like this:

    "Are you waiting for your job to print?"
    "Yeah."
    "What's the file called?"
    "Philosophy Final."
    "Did you get this off the internet?"
    "Technically, but I put it there. Why?"
    "There's no printing off the internet allowed."
    "I didn't download this from some website. That's my homework. That's my final due in 15 minutes. I made that, uploaded it to my space, and downloaded it here to print."
    "Why didn't you just upload a Word file?"
    "Cause I didn't use Word."
    "Then how did you write that?"

    I then have to proceed to explain that there are other word processors besides Word, which they don't have and thus couldn't read my file, but that my OS can turn anything I want into a PDF that can be read just about anywhere, and that yes, in fact, some of us mere mortals DO have their own presence on the internet and I can put damn well whatever I please up there and grab it from anywhere I need! If it's so hard for him to grok I could go nextdoor to the CS lab, download it there, burn a CD, bring THAT back in here to print off of and he'll still bitch at me cause it's a PDF and not a .DOC.

    Thankfully at this point there's usually a line of people waiting for their print jobs and the trained staff monkey will just print my paper for me anyway.

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    1. Re:Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      Of course, when he asks "did you get this off the internet", instead of trying to explain to the unwashed, you could just answer "no." Problem solved.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    2. Re:Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I'm a modern day George Washington; I cannot tell a lie. I mean that practically; it makes me so uncomfortable to directly and "honestly" state something that I know to be false that it's very clear to an observer that I must be lying. My brain is very intolerant of blatant contradictions in itself.

      Now, circumlocution and saying something that is technically true but sounds, to someone who's not listening carefully, like I'm saying something else entirely... that I can do. And I have in some cases when I'm really in a hurry. But when I've got time to spare I'd rather educate the ignorant masses so that maybe next time they won't bother me or someone trying to do what I'm doing.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    3. Re:Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, circumlocution and saying something that is technically true but sounds, to someone who's not listening carefully, like I'm saying something else entirely

      Try "Did I print it from the web? No." Technically true, but most people that equate the internet as being the web won't see that other services also can run over it, like FTP or iDisk or whatever you're using.

      But I think your real problem is:

      I'd rather educate the ignorant masses so that maybe next time they won't bother me or someone trying to do what I'm doing

      beware: a lot of folks don't like being educated. Particularly when they are in the nominal position of authority. So you might be wise to chose your battles.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    4. Re:Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Try "Did I print it from the web? No." Technically true, but most people that equate the internet as being the web won't see that other services also can run over it, like FTP or iDisk or whatever you're using.

      But technically I *am* using the web. I've got a small amount of FTP space with http access from my local ISP. I FTP in to upload the files there, but I just point any web browser to my (HTML-less) public_html directory, which returns a directory listing with the files I put in there. iDisk and FTP and such rely too much on the assumption that the client will have usable software; this method lets me grab my files from any web browser regardless of other aspects of the system (unless it's got boneheaded security measures like Kinkos).

      beware: a lot of folks don't like being educated. Particularly when they are in the nominal position of authority. So you might be wise to chose your battles.

      Yeah, but I (A) Don't care if I offend people by politely informing them of things, cause if they're gonna be that way then deserve worse anyway, and (B) Make sure that I'm never 'under' any 'authority figures' who would treat me that way.

      Trained staff monkeys in the writing lab ultimately answer to the dean of the Media Arts department, who's a friend of mine; my bosses pay me to know more than them in my field, so I'm just doing my job there and they appreciate it; etc. If I'm ever in a situation where (politely!) offering true information is going to get me in some sort of trouble, I make sure that that situation changes very shortly.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    5. Re:Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by Buran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not a lie to answer no to this question; you 'got it' from your own head, didn't you? Where you get something and where you store something aren't really the same. I store my car in my garage. Did I get my car from my garage? No; I got it from a Volkswagen dealer. If asked where I got my car from, I state the dealership's name. If I answered 'My garage', people would look at me funny and ask if I built it myself like in the Johnny Cash song 'One Piece At A Time' ... which I didn't. (I'm not THAT good!)

    6. Re:Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by ddent · · Score: 1

      Even simpler: "I did not print it from a web page".

    7. Re:Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But when I've got time to spare I'd rather educate the ignorant masses so that maybe next time they won't bother me or someone trying to do what I'm doing.

      Because people just love being lectured by a rude little know-it-all!

    8. Re:Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      If I'm ever in a situation where (politely!) offering true information is going to get me in some sort of trouble, I make sure that that situation changes very shortly.

      You probably shouldn't go to work anywhere that has Union employees, then. They can file a grievance against you and your supervisor if you piss them off. The worst part is that you can't do anything about this other than leave the company.

      My friend had a new chair delivered to the his mailbox near the secretary's office. After it was delevered, he tried to move the chair from the mailboxes to his office (which was 50 feet away). Unfortunately, there happened to be a Millwright walking by who saw him move the chair. The Union guy immediately came over and told my friend that he had to put in a work order to have the chair moved.

      My friend tried to reason with the guy and politely pointed out how his office was only fifty feet away, putting in a work order would take a long time to get through the system, he was sitting in a broken chair, and the new chair was blocking the hallway which is a fire hazard. The Union guy was furious. He immediately filed a grievance against my friend. Subsequently, my friend and the department head had to go talk to the Union representatives in a formal hearing. My friend had disciplinary action taked against him. The chair eventually got moved, but it took weeks.

      If my friend had simply apologized and left the chair where it was, he could have waited until the Union guys left at 5 and moved the chair to his office.

      The moral of the story is that you have to pick your battles, and trying to educate the masses just isn't a good idea.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    9. Re:Print-to-PDF is an unexpected feature by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      You probably shouldn't go to work anywhere that has Union employees, then. They can file a grievance against you and your supervisor if you piss them off. The worst part is that you can't do anything about this other than leave the company.

      Yeah, well I dislike unions as much as I dislike corporations and governments. Big monolithic anything just rubs me wrong and I avoid them as much as possible.

      If my friend had simply apologized and left the chair where it was, he could have waited until the Union guys left at 5 and moved the chair to his office.

      Well, aside from the union guy being an asshat and immediately filing a complaint for daring to question him, I'd probably have done about the same if I were stuck in that situation. If he was gonna be an obstinant ass about it, I'd say OK, I'll put in a work order, then wait for him to leave, and then move the chair anyway.

      The moral of the story is that you have to pick your battles, and trying to educate the masses just isn't a good idea.

      For the most part I don't bother. If someone wants to be ignorant of their own accord, let them, their funeral. But if it's causing me grief then I've got every right in the world to argue my position until they either prove me wrong (which I'll accept if they've got a good coutnerargument) or concede themselves.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  89. Semi Offtopic by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

    What the frack is the MS "Journal Reader" and how do I murder it? I can't read PDF files any more after an autoinstall that has more lives than the god-damned mummy

    --
    Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    1. Re:Semi Offtopic by TheGuano · · Score: 1

      I believe this is a plugin/applet that lets you read MS Journal files (duh) - which are the data files created by handwritten/tabletPC-editions of XP. No idea how it breaks pdf though.

    2. Re:Semi Offtopic by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

      Thanks. The auto-install kicks on everytime I click a pdf file. The file associations don't seem to be affected

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    3. Re:Semi Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/329118.html

  90. No, by 2names · · Score: 3, Funny
    Yoda said,

    "By Grapthar's Hammer, avenged you shall be!"

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:No, by VultureMN · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought Yoda said "Game Over, man. GAME OVER!"

    2. Re:No, by dnaSpyDir · · Score: 1

      naw, that was private pyle(s) in full metal jacket

    3. Re:No, by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "Game over man, Game Over!!"

      No that was Bill Paxton as Pvt. Hudson in Aliens.

  91. Re:your sig by xutopia · · Score: 1

    the air force is only part of the military. Not the whole military. Go to http://www.army.mil to see what I mean.

  92. CuteWriter free by michaelbuddy · · Score: 2, Informative

    This software is similar to my previous post:

    another free replacement for your toolbar.

    http://www.cutepdf.com/products/cutepdf/Writer.a sp

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  93. It's tastefully hidden. :P by solios · · Score: 1

    I've heard about "OMFG OS X PEE DEE EFF!!!!!11111" for years. YEARS I SAY.

    I print tiffs from photoshop. I'm not really a document kind of guy. I've run off some ebay invoices from textedit a couple of times, but that's been it. I've never dicked with pdfs in OS X.

    So just for the heck of it, I hit Apple-P (PRINT) in Safari on this article. Got a list of shared printers three floors above my head, and options to [ PREVIEW ] [ SAVE AS PDF ] and [ FAX ]*. Saved off the article as an 11 page pdf and opened it up in Preview for a skim. Smooth.

    PDFing in OS X is a completely transparent process- it's an option in the print menu, which is in turn present in damned near every application under the "File" menu. None of this obnoxious "Office Toolbar" crap.

    * I imagine FAX capability would be damned handy for some people.

  94. Obligatory PC elitist reponse to Mac elitist by TiggertheMad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Adobe toolbar, what's that? I just hit "Save to PDF" on any print dialogs...

    Would that be with the right or left mouse button?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Obligatory PC elitist reponse to Mac elitist by 0x000000 · · Score: 1

      Right or Left? What an outrage. I shall call up logitech later today and ask them to stop making 7 button mouses!

      --
      cat /dev/null > .signature
    2. Re:Obligatory PC elitist reponse to Mac elitist by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 1
      Do Windows users complain that they have the choice to use 2, 3, 4, or higher button mice with their system?

      Similarly Mac users have the choice to use 1, 2, 3, 4, or higher button mice with their systems. So if anything Mac gives you more options (unless somebody has successfully used a one-button mouse with Windows???)

      Of course your comment is a joke, but regarding the fundamental issue I never really understood why non-Mac users are so horrified by the one-button mouse. If you don't want to use it, then use whatever other mouse you want! It's like having the choice to use a one-button mouse, along with the other options available for Windows systems, is considered a Bad Thing.

    3. Re:Obligatory PC elitist reponse to Mac elitist by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      What does one do with 7 buttons?????

  95. Typical Adobe Crap by nwf · · Score: 1

    Actually, have you seen the latest Acrobat Pro? For $450 (US) you get a buggy application with a horrible interface. The application barely lets you edit PDF files. I created a form earlier, when loaded into v7, it forced me to use their new Designer application that completely changed the format, screwed up all the fonts and doubled the size of the PDF (neither were compressed.) Now document conversion fails with a crypic and uninformative error message about the printer getting an error (i.e. their PDF driver). Fun from Adobe! They need competition.

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
  96. Former Adobe Technical Support rep here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    (posting anonymously to save my ass)

    This article is 100% bullshit.

    If you actually search the support documents, you can find instructions for removing PDFMaker. Or, if you're doing a first-time installation, you can just do a custom installation and *gasp* tell it not to install PDFMaker to begin with!

    What made version 6.0 and 7.0 annoying is the "self-heal" feature that would put the PDFMaker files back after you deleted them. However, if you use the custom install approach, the self-heal will not put PDFmaker back.

    Trivia: I personally have spoken with people who either want PDFMaker gone or want it back. The latter grossly outnumber the former.

    1. Re:Former Adobe Technical Support rep here. by dvdweyer · · Score: 1

      It's not 100% bullshit and your link only covered Acrobat 6 for Windows.

      It a real pain to disable the Acrobat 6/7 PDFMaker toolbar on Mac OS X completely (i.e. kill the self-healing functionality), I've heard that Acrobat 7 on Windows is also a major PITA (I switched to Mac a year ago so I can't tell from experience)

      Adobe should get a clue and not annoy their customers. The toolbar is annoying, does take valuable screen space and cannot be enabled/disabled like any other toolbar.

      Bah!

    2. Re:Former Adobe Technical Support rep here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's annoying is the toolbar placement, and you still haven't given us an option to fix it other than to remove it entirely, gee thanks, I just spent 90 bucks on a program and you tell me the only way to fix an annoyance is to not use it

      why is it so fucking hard for adobe to make a toolbar that isn't bullocks?

  97. Adobe Reader v7.0 for Linux/UNIX by antdude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you guys didn't know, Adobe released its Reader v7.0 for Linux/Unix recently:

    ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/7x/7.0 /e nu/

    I don't think this port has the toolbar though. I don't remember and cannot check from work.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Adobe Reader v7.0 for Linux/UNIX by IdJit · · Score: 1

      Nice app for Linux. Pops open PDFs PDQ!

  98. Try installing it in an enterprise environment! by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    First you need to distribute the 20MB+ Adobe Reader...

    Then you find out that Adobe uses a custom installer that doesn't accept command line arguements to modify various installation parameters.

    So instead, you need to download a 150MB Installshield tweak tool to disable ad banners, the Yahoo search bar, etc. That generates a .MST file that you apply to the Adobe MSI...

    Its an absolutely horrible program... but management types get suckered in by the new "advanced" features.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Try installing it in an enterprise environment! by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Ummm, or you could just use Orca and edit the MSI yourself. If you're (re)packaging software for enterprise deployment, do yourself a favor and learn the MSI table schema. You won't regret it.

      As a side note, I think Installshield's perversion of the MSI format is far worse than most malware installs: custom action DLLs for EVERYTHING, and affected software won't even be able to uninstall if they get hosed.

    2. Re:Try installing it in an enterprise environment! by de+Siem · · Score: 1

      Well for those that can't be bothered learnig msi tables, there's the adobe install shield tuner to create mst files: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp? ftpID=2709 (14Mb)

      --
      Beating up people in little rooms, if you do it for a good reason you do it for a bad one.
  99. OT: Kinkos Internet Policy by Pfhorrest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bad taste to follow up to one's own post, and getting off the topic of PDFs, but it might be interesting to note for anyone who likes to send files to themselves over the net as I do:

    Apparently Kinkos computer policy is to universally ban any directory listings (like "http://www.localisp.com/~someuser/transferfiles/" , with no index.html in there) or direct links to PDFs (possibly other files) not referred from an HTML page (like typing "http://www.localisp.com/~someuser/transferfiles/m ypaper.pdf" directly into the address bar). So my usual strategy of sending things to myself through my own webspace doesn't work if I want to print something from a Kinkos.

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    1. Re:OT: Kinkos Internet Policy by vistic · · Score: 1

      so just make like a really small index.html with one link in it to the PDF file if you know you will have to go to kinko's.

  100. web browser toolbars the new systray icons? by British · · Score: 4, Funny

    Old & busted: programs that had Windows systray icons you couldn't turn off, nor did you need

    New hotness: programs that have a web browser toolbar you can't uninstall.

    1. Re:web browser toolbars the new systray icons? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Except that this isn't a web toolbar but one in office, but don't let not having rtfa or even the summary interfere with reusing an old joke.

      --
      I am trolling
  101. Roxio Drag To Disk has similar issues by MetalOne · · Score: 1

    I just bought a new DVD burner and installed the Roxio DVD burning software that came with it. Roxio installs a program called Drag To Disk to allow treating a CD/RW or DVD/RW as a regular drive. This is kind of cool, but it runs at startup. I wanted to disable it from running at startup. It is not in the Startup folder. It is not in the registry in any of the following locations: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\Run HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\Run HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\RunOnce HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion\RunOnce HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\ RunServices HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\ RunServicesOnce HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\ RunOnce\Setup It is not in the Services. I have no idea what is starting it up. So I decided to rename the executable. When I used File Explorer to add a new folder, Roxio's installation program runs, and copies Drag To Disk back onto my drive. wtf. Drag To Disk cannot be uninstalled either. I would need to uninstall the entire Roxio product. I also cannot terminate the process from Task Manager as it states that I don't have the proper permission. Even though I am the admistrator. F**ing windows. Fortunately there is a task bar icon that lets me terminate the program.

  102. Yes it is malware by emarkp · · Score: 2, Informative
    It was causing Word to crash on me on exit. I couldn't get rid of it. Finally I uninstalled Acrobat. And I won't go back.

    Of course I don't need it so much now that I've switched to OpenOffice anyway.

  103. Pointless Anyway by cyberformer · · Score: 1

    There are several free (as in beer) or very cheap add-ons to Windows that will install a virtual printer driver to make PDFS. These work with any Windows app, not just MS OFfice. OO.org also has excellent PDF-creation functions, and understands the Office formats very well.

    The thing you need Acrobat (or a similar program) for is editing existing PDFs. That's a much harder capability to implement, but it doesn't involve Office at all (unless you don't have Acrobat and need to use a workaround, like turning the PDF into a giant GIF and pasting text boxes over it).

    1. Re:Pointless Anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The thing you need Acrobat (or a similar program)
      > for is *editing* existing PDFs.

      Spot on.

      So what else is out there for *editing* PDFs? More specifically, for commenting in PDFs in a fashion that's compatible with Acrobat 6 and 7?

      <rant>

      Take my situation. I ditched Windows in favour of Linux. Then I started writing a new book. Guess what? My publisher requires the use of a Word template that won't convert into an OO.org template, and in the copyedit/corrections stage they use PDFs made with Acrobat 6.0 that are incompatible with previous (and much less invasive and bloatmongering) versions as well. Hell, the damn things won't even *print*, even with the latest Acrobat Reader for Linux, much less xPDF or KPDF). I had to move my printer over to the Windows machine to print my contracts to sign, because the PDF file would print correctly ONLY using the Windows drivers, I couldn't even print them over the network. (They did provide me with a licensed copy of Acrobat 6, I'll say that much for them.)

      So my book on Open Source Web development is has to be written on a Windows box. Ugh.

      </rant>

  104. Phew !!!! by Beebos · · Score: 1

    I just installed Acrobat 2 minutes ago, and deselected the checkbox for installing the toolbar.

    May last XP install was brought down by software bloat. You won't get me this time you evil minons of software bloat!

  105. Re:yeah so? by justforaday · · Score: 2

    Ummm, Adobe invented postscript. I think that gives them the right to do whatever the fuck they want with it.

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  106. Acrobat uses by Vandil+X · · Score: 2, Informative

    Acrobat is used extensively in commercial prepress print publishing workflows that use PostScript.

    That's essentially every newspaper and magazine with a circulation of 40,000 and up.

    And most of those publications use Macs for the final pagination & printing, yet still purchase Acrobat for the fine-tuning features of Distiller.

    Also, Acrobat allows you to set document security attributes that OpenOffice.org's "Export to PDF" and Mac OS X's native "Save as PDF" don't support.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
  107. Re:open-source acrobat reader alternative on Windo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not open source, but you can get old Adobe Acrobats here.

  108. Zapping the toolbar in OS.X by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nice as the Print to PDF feature in OS.X is there are a few things it can't do that Adobe can. Another problem that I have heard people gripe about who use Adobe Acrobat alot is that the OS.X PDF functionality lags a little behind the Acrobat suite in terms of features. That means you sometimes have trouble with files you get sent from people running the latest Acrobat suite. I dont use PDF's often enough to be irritated by this but I know some people who use Adobe products because of it.

    If you have any trouble with this bar the thing to do (Worked for me on Adobe Acrob at 6.0 for Mac) is:
    YourMac$ cd /Applications/Microsoft Office 2004/Office/Startup
    or where ever else you installe Office there are three subfolderst there.
    $ ls
    Excel PowerPoint Word
    each directory contains a file name
    PDFMaker.[xla|ppa|dot]
    Delete those files and you are rid of the damn toolbar. The only problem is that the next time you start Adobe Acrobat you get a nag screen stating that Acrobat needs to make repairs. No matter how I try to opt out of the damn repair Acrobat still re-creates those files. Just for kicks I tried to refuse Acrobat write permission to those three directories but it just refused to start which I thought was rather funny. After that I deleted the damn thing (aka Adobe Acrobat Professional) and have yet to regret it.
    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Zapping the toolbar in OS.X by dvdweyer · · Score: 1

      To disable the automatic repair follow these instructions; worked very well for me in Mac OS X with both Acrobat 6 and 7.

  109. Yeah, but by multiOSfreak · · Score: 2, Informative

    OS X's built-in PDF maker sucks. It doesn't do any optimization at all, so anything with graphics turns out huge.

    For full control of *all* PDF settings, it's best to make a postscript file and then use Distiller to crank out a PDF. It's not a free solution, but it's the best thing out there.

    1. Re:Yeah, but by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      OS X's built-in PDF maker sucks. It doesn't do any optimization at all, so anything with graphics turns out huge.

      It sucks because it puts out the best quality? So I should pay $450 just to get a slightly smaller file size? Talk about not a free solution. Yes, it would be nice if Apple gave the option of optimising graphics when you print to PDF but I'd rather have slightly large files and still keep my $450 (per Adobe's website).

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    2. Re:Yeah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you can make ColorSync filters that do everything from alter colors by forcing particular color profiles to be embedded in the document to desaturating to recompressing all of the images to JPEGs at varying levels of quality.

      When you go to print something, bring up the picker that, by default, says "Copies & Pages" and go down to "ColorSync". Bring up the "Quartz Filter:" picker and choose "Add Filters..."

      Admittedly, still not as versatile as Distiller, but it comes with the OS and it's far more powerful than most people need and/or know.

      As an example, I just made a filter to apply medium-high quality JPEG compression to all images in a printed file. This turned a 972 kB screenshot into a 128 kB PDF with very little loss of quality.

  110. However I cannot find a way to remove... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    I would either,
    a: consider it a gift, copyright and license has just gone out the window.
    b: Phone them up and say you'll be charging them rental of the HDD, memory and CPU space/time it is taking up at $100 a day until they send an engineer round to remove it from you system.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  111. Too integrated by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Informative

    Recent versions of Acrobat reader and writer which have come with other Adobe products and which I use for testing are really annoying. They hook into Word. They hook into Safari. They integrate with numerous apps by adding buttons and toolbars. It is really bothersome. On OS X, why do I need an extra button in Word That tries to sell me Acrobat Writer. It's not like Word on OS X can't already make PDFs. Also, Acrobat reader is much slower than Preview and grinds the browser to a halt while trying to open PDFs inline. That is half the reason PDFs suck so badly on Windows. Worse yet, recent version of reader on OS X silently fail to open some PDFs. Adobe needs to get their act together.

  112. Re:yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PostScript was invented by Adobe. They were in charge before. PDF is a superset of PostScript.

  113. Re:yeah so? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about PDF? You do realize its an open spec format right?

    Its also what OSX uses for rendering the desktop.

  114. Stupid formatting (space) by antdude · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  115. Free PDF printer driver, forget Adobe malware by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet.
    pdf995
    Been using it for years.
    Only "cost" is a popup ad when you print to PDF.

    1. Re:Free PDF printer driver, forget Adobe malware by imrec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm surprise nobody mentioned THIS yet
      pdfcreator
      Been using it for years
      Only "cost" is that it doesn't give me a DRMed pdf file when I print a DRMed pdf!! Whoops!

      --
      Note: This sig contains nine S's, nine I's and five O's which... means absolutely nothing.
  116. OT: A convenient way to save PDF Forms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is OT, but does anyone know a good (free) way to edit and save PDF forms (in Windows)? For instance, many tax forms can be filled out through Acroread, but Acroread provides no way to save the data you entered, which is really annoying. I searched for free solutions, and came up with nothing. The best I found is 'CutePDF Form Filler' which does what I want, but I need this functionality so infrequently, I'm not keen on paying for it (there is an evaluation edition, which I have used successfully, but it adds a blurb to the bottom of the page)

  117. Adobe Acrobat = Poor Quality Software by jcdenhartog · · Score: 1

    Ever try to run a lower version of the full copy of Acrobat alongside a newer version of the reader? In your web browser, the older version of the plugin will always be loaded, no matter how many times you reinstall the newer version of the reader. That and the whole problems with the button(s) on the MS Word toolbar have dramatically lowered my opinion of Adobe Acrobat.

    --
    "The majority is always wrong; the minority is rarely right." - Henrik Ibsen
  118. Adobe Reader? Never install it... use Foxit by liveevil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a symptom of the overall personality of the Adobe software. You install it on your machine and it throws it's weight around like an 800 lb gorilla. It's disgusting the number of files folders and registry keys it creates. You'd think the the sole purpose in life of your computer was to be the home of this software. At least Adobe seems to think so. Well, being that pdf is an open standard format, there are many many free implementations of readers, editors, converters etc. out there. For plain old viewing of pdfs I use and recommend Foxit pdfReader: http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php It's very handy, fast, and not bloated. I for one will never let adobe get its meat hooks into my computer again.

  119. use Wordperfect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    problem solved.

  120. bad, but not fatal by drteknikal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Prior to Acrobat 6, if you said not to install PDFMaker, it didn't. Starting with 6, it does it anyway. However, we've found that simply deleting the templates placed in the Office startup folders is enough to remove the integration and toolbars.

    The program installs things you specifically exclude. That is bad. The effect on end users is somewhere between confusing and aggravating. But at a support level, we've had very good luck removing the templates before creating workstation images, and we've been able to mostly avoid the problems as a result.

    --
    http://drteknikal.blogspot.com/
  121. It is harmful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acrobat's toolbar will reset the toolbar settings for some of the Office Apps, like Visio.

    So, it does harm the computing environment I have set up and it deletes it irreparably. It resets the toolbar each and every time it is run. So, re-customizing the toolbar is useless.

    I can not just delete the Visio/Acrobat template file as Visio will give me an error message that the plug-in is not found. The solution, uninstall Visio and reinstall.

    Furthermore, each of the Office Apps interact with the toolbar in its own special way. In Outlook it is a registry edit. In Word a template that can be deleted (IIRC). And, in Visio, a template that cannot be deleted.

  122. Simpler answer... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    Use OpenOffice's 'save to PDF' function.

    I do.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  123. Why use Adobe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find PDFcreator (open source) works just as good. The only downside is that is that you cant combine exsisting PDF's

  124. It's worse than you know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. geeks are of course running the latest linux, OSX, or windoze on a massively powerful box.

    By contrast, Ma and Pa Kettle are running windows 98 on a Pentium 133 with 64 MB of RAM.

    When Ma and Pa trustingly click on the "install Adobe" button, for any version greater than 5 (and five will do it too, if they only have 16 MB) they get FUCKED UP THE ASSHOLE WITH A BARBED WIRE CONDOM.

    Reinstall the OS or spend many hours chopping out bloat by hand. Reinstall is easier.

    Been there, done it, at least FIVE TIMES NOW supporting elderly retired folks (who typically just want to visit a fly-tying site, but who have grandkids who try to install Adobe).

    Complained to Adobe. They don't care.

  125. Re:Adobe Reader? Never install it... use Foxit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cost
    Fox it - $100
    PDFcreator (open source)- Free
    No brainer

  126. Re:No, (OT) by Inzkeeper · · Score: 1

    Gah! Where's my mod points now???
    This must have been during the lecture to young master Luke about the dangers of wearing a red uniform when landing on strange planets.

  127. open source pdf creator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    PDFCreator easily creates PDFs from any Windows program. Use it like a printer in Word, StarCalc or any other Windows application.

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/

    Works like a charm.

  128. Re:your sig by thrashbluegrass · · Score: 1

    And the army is only a part of the military. Not the whole military.

    pentagon.mil is running Sun's webserver on Linux.
    navy.mil is running IIS on Linux.
    usmc.mil is running lotus-domino on an unknown os.

    Not to mention the individual units within the military, each with their own IT groups, each running their own servers.

    Not to mention the fact that you missed the entire point:

    netcraft reports IIS running on LINUX. How much do you trust netcraft now?

  129. Toolbars are very easy to remove by megalomaniacs4u · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes the visio version of the bar is right PITA.

    The toolbars are dead easy to remove.

    1. Control Panel, Add/Remove Programs
    2. Find Acrobat Professional
    3. Click "Change", wait a little while
    4. Click "Next"
    5. Make sure the modify radio button is selected and click "Next"
    6. Expand "Create Adobe PDF"
    7. Expand "Acrobat PDF Maker"
    8. For each toolbar you want to remove click the drop-down icon and select "This feature will not be available"
    9. Hit "Next"
    10. Hit "Update" & wait a while...
  130. How to disable in OS X without hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How to permanently disable in Mac OS X without hackin' around (tested with Office 2004, Acrobat Professional 6.0.1):

    Similar to the situation on Microsoft Windows the toolbars tend to want to reinstall themselves each and every time you open Acrobat professional. I've found the following workaround on OS X:
    In the Finder navigate to the folder Applications/Microsoft Office 2004/Office/Startup
    Replace the PDFmaker.xla, .ppa and .dot files from the subfolders with similarly named empty folders by using File->New Folder (use the Finders get info pane to actually add the respective file-extensions to the three items)

    The next time you start an MSOffice application the toolbar is gone; the next time you start Acrobat professional it still thinks the installation is complete and it won't attempt to re-install.

  131. Adobe Acrobat Toolbar Worse than Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, in every miserable way

  132. Obligatory Mac elitist reponse to PC elitist re... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    Why the left one; and the scroll wheel lets me select which options I want (print to PDF, Email PDF, etc.).

  133. Try this by zenray · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This works for us to get rid of the PDF icons in Office 2003. Configure Outlook to use Word as the editor of your e-mail. Start Outlook - this pre-loads word for e-mail editing. Start Word -- the PDF icons are gone!!

    --
    zenray
    1. Re:Try this by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      Magic 8-ball says, "Outlook not so good"...

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  134. Multiple monitors? by tepples · · Score: 1

    To be fair, the Mac Mini doesn't even come close to $2000.

    Some people need to use multiple monitors in order to work efficiently. Can the Mac mini run Quartz on a display other than the one controlled by its onboard video?

    1. Re:Multiple monitors? by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 1

      If you're quibbling about running multiple monitors, then you shouldn't be looking at the low-cost Mac option anyway. I don't know if it's possible to run multiple monitors on the mini though.

    2. Re:Multiple monitors? by tepples · · Score: 1

      If you're quibbling about running multiple monitors

      ...then introducing the Mac mini is a red herring. The comparison was between a $900 PC running Windows XP and a $2000 Mac running Panther. As far as I know, those price points are about right for a dual-head-capable system.

  135. Re:yeah so? by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

    Seemed coherent to me. A bit misplaced, but coherent.

  136. Obligatory Unix Guru reponse to PC Elitist by theridersofrohan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Adobe toolbar, what's that? I just hit "Save to PDF" on any print dialogs...

    Would that be with the right or left mouse button?


    What's a mouse?
  137. Acrobat has always been mildly annoying by SComps · · Score: 1

    Has anyone ever timed Acrobat (or Acrobat reader) on it's startup? It's reaaaally slow. Has anyone ever had IE freeze only to kill the process and find Acrobat Reader's "Do you want to check for updates?" box hidden under the browser?

    I have several times, including once today. Checking the don't ever do this again checkbox only seems to work until the next upgrade and then it just turns itself back on again. (or so it seems)

    Acrobat does have a lot going for it, but the ways of doing many things are irritating. Some things we just learn to live with. That doesn't mean it's right, but it also doesn't mean it's a reason to throw away the tool.

    1. Re:Acrobat has always been mildly annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acrobat reader is the piece of software that convinced me that i have no room on my HDD for adobe products. I have since found alternatives to all of their products, and will never again install any program with an adobe logo.

      Adobe is at the top of my list of software vendors that should be drug out into the street & shot.

  138. $449 vs $499 by dmoen · · Score: 1

    Acrobat 7.0 Professional costs $449.

    A Mac Mini costs $499.

    Doug Moen.

    --
    I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.
  139. DId you hear that? by 2names · · Score: 1
    That was the sound of the joke going right over your head.

    You should probably get used to that sound...

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:DId you hear that? by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      I got the yoda joke, I was correcting my parent... thx for being condescending tho...

    2. Re:DId you hear that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, either you're being uber-meta-ironic, or you're still missing the point. The joke that whooshed over your head was in the post you were correcting.

  140. Acrobat = slow and evil by teknokracy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is why I use Acrobat 5. No bloated features, but still lots of functionality. Does anyone else love the fact that Mac OS X can produce PDFs without having to install ANY Adobe products?

  141. FOR GODS SAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Print to PDF != Acrobat in any way shape or form!

    Is all of /. a giant moron magnet or what?!?!?!?

  142. How to remove from Outlook 2003 by Beatlebum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right click on toobar, and uncheck "PDFMaker 7.0".

    What's the big deal?

  143. Err. What's so hard about removing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just went to:

    View->Toolbars and unchecked PDFMarker 7.0.

    No problems here. :shrug:

  144. Obligatory reality check... by curunir · · Score: 1

    So do I.
    (ok, so I actually just select the PDF printer, but it's still the same number of clicks)

    --
    "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
  145. Why does Acrobat Reader install a BHO? by Crazen · · Score: 1

    I never figured out why reader installs a BHO. I always disable it, and notice no detrimental effects. Of course I also disable OLE integration for PDFs, since I'd rather download them usually, and more importantly have it respond quicker and cause less stability issues. What does the Browser Helper Object in acrobat reader do?

  146. How about pdftk? by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    One that I use frequently is the ability to merge many small documents in a binder to create a larger PDF.

    In the same vein as Em_Adespoton's suggestion of Combine PDF, I suggest you check out the Command Line Utility I like using to combine pdf files which is pdftk.

    A very clean and efficient tool.

    --
    blog
    1. Re:How about pdftk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pdftk has an updated site located at accesspdf.com. There you will find an OS X installer, too.

      From the site:

      If PDF is electronic paper, then pdftk is an electronic staple-remover, hole-punch, binder, secret-decoder-ring, and X-Ray-glasses. Pdftk is a command-line tool for doing everyday things with PDF documents. Keep one in the top drawer of your desktop and use it to:

      • Merge PDF Documents
      • Split PDF Pages into a New Document
      • Decrypt Input as Necessary (Password Required)
      • Encrypt Output as Desired
      • Fill PDF Forms with FDF Data and/or Flatten Forms
      • Apply a Background Watermark
      • Report on PDF Metrics such as Metadata, Bookmarks, and Page Labels
      • Update PDF Metadata
      • Attach Files to PDF Pages or the PDF Document
      • Unpack PDF Attachments
      • Burst a PDF Document into Single Pages
      • Uncompress and Re-Compress Page Streams
      • Repair Corrupted PDF (Where Possible)

      Pdftk allows you to manipulate PDF easily and freely. It does not require Acrobat, and it runs on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, FreeBSD and Solaris.

  147. Hey! by game+kid · · Score: 1

    I love hieroglyphics and mangled brains, you insensitive clod!

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  148. Couldn't be easier to get rid of by geekwithsoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Go to Tools>Templates and Add-ins Under Templates, uncheck PDFMaker.dot. It will not load it anymore. Or you could simply leave, and choose to not view that Toolbar. Not sure what the big freaking deal is.

  149. Checked the bug report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking into a Bug Report on this (move or remove toolbar, quit outlook, relaunch, toolbar is back in original position) I see the developer comment "Because of an Outlook limitation, the toolbar position is saved every time one creates a new email." So, the workaround is after removing the toolbar, create an email. Sounds less like malware and more like a bug due to a lack in the Office toolbar API.

  150. Quick Question by incognitopoet · · Score: 1

    Please excuse my lack of sophistication, but is there some special reason that Office and Acrobat are required for making pdf's? I've been very happy with OpenOffice.org. It creates nice pdf's without any hassle.

  151. WILL you say that I am mad? by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 5, Funny
    It simply converts documents to PDF when you click it.

    Oh no no no... it does plenty of things.

    Now this is the point. You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing. But you should have seen me. You should have seen how wisely I proceeded -- with what caution -- with what foresight, with what dissimulation, I went to work! I was never kinder to the registry during the whole week before I killed it. And every night about midnight I turned on the back door and opened it oh, so gently! And then, when I had made an opening sufficient for my edits, I put in a dark comment, commented so that no bits came out, and then I thrust in my command. Oh, you would have laughed to see how cunningly I thrust it in! I moved it slowly, very, very slowly, so that I might not disturb the backups. It took me an hour to place my whole script within the opening so far that I could see the library as it lay within its folder. Ha! Would a madman have been so wise as this? And then when my script was well in the folder I executed it cautiously -- oh, so cautiously -- cautiously (for the hard drive creaked), I launched it just so much that a single thin electron fell upon the vulture toolbar. And this I did for seven long nights, every night just at midnight, but I found the toolbar always closed, and so it was impossible to do the work, for it was not the toolbar that vexed me but this Evil Icon. And every morning, when the day broke, I went boldly into my applications and spoke courageously to them, calling them by name in a hearty tone, and inquiring how they had passed the night. So you see it would have been a very profound program, indeed, to suspect that every night, just at twelve, I looked in upon the toolbar while it slept.

    I had my head in, and was about to open the folder, when my pinky slipped upon the enter key, and the program sprang up in the toolbar, crying out, "MAKE PDF?" And now have I not told you that what you mistake for madness is but over-acuteness of the senses? With a loud yell, I threw open the script and leaped into the registry. It err'd once -- once only. In an instant I dragged it to the trash, and emptied it quickly. I then smiled gaily, to find the deed so far done.

    Yet, upon the next reopening, first and formost it mocks me. It was open, wide, wide open, and I grew furious as I gazed upon it. I saw it with perfect distinctness -- all a dull grey with a hideous veil over it that chilled the very marrow in my bones, but I could see nothing else of document's font or margin, for I had directed my sight as if by instinct precisely upon the damned spot.

    I paced the floor to and fro with heavy strides, as if excited to fury, but the toolbar remained. O God! what COULD I do? I foamed -- I raved -- I swore! I swung the chair upon which I had been sitting, and bounced upon my cube, but the toolbar arose over all applications and continually increased. It spawned over -- over -- over! And still the office chatted pleasantly , and smiled. Was it possible they saw not? Almighty God! -- no, no? Adobe saw! -- Adobe suspected! -- Adobe KNEW! -- they were making a mockery of my horror! -- this I thought, and this I think. But anything was better than this agony! Anything was more tolerable than this derision! I could bear those hypocritical responses no longer! I felt that I must scream or die! -- and now -- again -- hark! louder! louder! louder! LOUDER! --

    "Villains!" I shrieked, "dissemble no more! I admit the deed! -- tear up the registry! -- here, here! -- it is the beating of his hideous icon!"

    With profound apolgies to Poe, this is the truth of that toolbar.

    1. Re:WILL you say that I am mad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny?? in lack of a +1 Creatively Inspired Masterpiece modding, this is one of the most insightful posts I've seen on slashdot!

  152. Making the Zapping Permanent by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    The only problem is that the next time you start Adobe Acrobat you get a nag screen stating that Acrobat needs to make repairs.

    Here is a Mac OS X-ey hack/kludge to get around this problem.

    1. Delete the PDFMaker.dot file from the directory in question.
    2. Make a new directory within the directory from which you deleted the PDFMaker.dot file.
    3. Make a ZIP archive of the new directory (this step may not be necessary, but this prevents the program from complaining that a directory cannot be replaced by a file which some programs do).
    4. Rename the ZIP archive to PDFMaker.dot

    Acrobat will no longer try to install the missing PDFMaker.dot files and your office programs will be Adobe PDF Toolbar-free even upon relaunch.

    --
    blog
  153. I blame MS (of course) by Dutchmang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I blame Microsoft for setting the standard for "I now own your computer sucker." You can't load a product these days without it assuming that you are bent over and ready to accept everything the vendor feels like doing. Adobe is only following in the footsteps of Real and AOL and others who install download managers and e-wallets and toolbar enhancements. It all started with MS, which makes you suffer through all their programs instantiating when you start Windows, so they are all "snappier" to load than the otherwise superior products from just about anyone else... this is a social problem not a technological one.

    --
    I'm looking over the wall, and they're looking at me!
  154. Just FYI: Visio isn't an add-on. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    Visio is a really cool program for doing all sorts of diagrams. It's great for network diagrams and flow charts, application diagrams, among hundreds of other uses. Some people even use it for crime scene diagrams.

    It was made by Visio corporation. It was purchased by Microsoft in 2000, where they simply re-labeled it "Microsoft Visio 2000" and did nothing else to the product.

    In 2003, they upgraded Visio with more detailed shapes and other visual enhancements, along with add-on tools you can use to auto-discover and map out your network into Visio diagrams for you. You can also export a Visio to a web page, with clickable objects and everything.

    If you run Windows, it's definately worth a look-see, especially if you have to document any sort of network or process.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  155. Whoops! by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    Spoke too quickly. The problem is robust, as they say. There are a couple of other things I needed to do. FYI, I'm running Adobe Acrobat Professional 6.0.2.

    After following the above instructions, I also had to do the following.

    1. cd to the directory with the modified ZIP file.
    2. Change the ZIP file named PDFMaker.dot so that its permissions are 444
    chmod 444 *.dot
    3. Change the owner to root
    sudo chown root *.dot
    4. There is no step 4.
    --
    blog
    1. Re:Whoops! by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      In a whispery voice: The next time you fire up Acrobat, it will tell you that it needs to repair certain files. Check the box which says "Do not show this notice again" and click "No" or whatever the dismiss-without-execution button is.

      --
      blog
    2. Re:Whoops! by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Actually you have to uncheck the 'PDF maker' component, check the 'Do not show this notice again' and then click 'Continue' which (IIRC) is contrary to what the instructions say, which is to click 'Cancel' to opt out of the repair. Now curses and pestilence upon you for irritaning me into re-installing Adobe Acrobat just to try this out.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    3. Re:Whoops! by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      Now curses and pestilence upon you for irritaning me into re-installing Adobe Acrobat just to try this out.

      And blessings to you Savage-Rabbit for correcting my suggestion. Thanks.

      --
      blog
  156. It's called get a different pdf viewer by abandonment · · Score: 0

    How about using a different pdf viewer?

    Foxit PDF is a great little pdf viewer for windows - you couldn't pay me enough to install acrobat...

    1. Re:It's called get a different pdf viewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's ridiculous to suggest you RTFA, but you could at least read the fucking title. It says Acrobat, not Acrobat Reader.

    2. Re:It's called get a different pdf viewer by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Acrobat is not a viewer (Acrobat Reader is), it's a creator. A viewer would not need a toolbar in Office to create PDFs, would it? :)

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  157. Re:Just FYI: Visio isn't an add-on. by wiredlogic · · Score: 1
    It was purchased by Microsoft in 2000, where they simply re-labeled it "Microsoft Visio 2000" and did nothing else to the product

    The Visio team has has actually made quite a few improvements to Visio since the last pre-MS version 5. They have tried to integrate it more into the rest of the Office suite by changing to standard Office Command Bars, adding VBA support, Antialiased rendering, Transparent fills, Scroll wheel zooming, better connector routing, Dynamic guides, Automated shape gluing, and many other new features.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  158. use the free Foxy PDF reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem solved. You can get it from http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php.
    Re ad more about it at http://www.searchlores.org/pdffing.htm

  159. WIndows Guidlines by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they dont conform to the 'Microsoft guidelines' because the guidelines dont conform to what the 3rd parties are trying to accomplish?

    There are many cases where you really *need* something different in a UI to be productive.

    Not everything is a word processor or spreadsheet and works well with what Microsoft thinks is right. When was the last time Microsoft produced a good CAD application.. Oh wait, that isnt their market is it.. See my point?.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  160. this is about acrobat not acrobat reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ffs

  161. Someone hasn't done his homework by sankarson · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PDF toolbar V6 can be hidden by right clicking on a toolbar and unselecting PDFMAker from the list of toolbars. The same way as every other toolbar in Office. What's the fuss about?

    I suspect the problem is more with people...

    --
    An incredibly intellingent person, not to mention handsome and very very rich
  162. How dare they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In their efforts to occupy everyone's desktop, how dare companies assume that they own our desktop?

    Fuck 'em, just fuck 'em! Boycott them and their efforts every chance that you get!

  163. Re:Just FYI: Visio isn't an add-on. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    Yes, and I mentioned they made several improvements in Visio 2003, but when they purchased Visio in 2000, Microsoft made no changes to the product at that time. They took Visio 2000, which was a great product, and stuck a Microsoft sticker on it.

    It was just a statement, no more then that.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  164. Yeah, and the turd installs on OS X as well... by CatOne · · Score: 1

    Which is pretty farking dumb, as the OS has PDF generation BUILT IN. There is maybe one time out of 1 thousand that I'd want Adobe's PDF generator over the built-in one in OS X. And for that, they have a stupid toolbar that automatically comes up in Excel, Word, PowerPoint, and maybe Entourage (I never use Entourage).

    And the BEST thing... it has a bug in it, so every time you quit Excel, you get an ERROR dialog. Sweet.

    Can't say I give Adobe higher than a 4 on the software quality scale :-/

  165. Re:yeah so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I did back to 5.0.5 because ...

    6.1 & 7.0 versions are too worse and bigger than the quicker and tiniest 5.0.5 version.

    I'm printing this /. in .pdf, hohoho.

  166. My solution: by syrion · · Score: 1

    emacs, plus LaTeX, plus pdflatex.

  167. MOD PARENT UP by bradleyland · · Score: 1

    Don't go complaining about Save A Copy. If you'd spent any time as a graphic designer, you'd understand how useful it is. If it disappears from Adobe products, you'll find me knocking at your door.

  168. Not to mention..... by yodhe · · Score: 1

    the complete kerfuffle you get when you try to help people get rid of it.

    --
    Life is a continual education in the triumph of application over ability.
  169. Acrobat in my software hall of shame by saha · · Score: 1
    As a sys admin I install all sorts of software on our computers and Adobe's Acobat team marches to a totally different drum and is one of the most messy and poorly installed software on Mac OS X. See University of Utah computer lab notes on their list of crappy applications

    1. Requires write permission for all users (non-admin) permissions in
    /Library/Application Support/Adobe/Adobe Registration Database
    If you installed Acrobat after installing Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign and GoLive which don't need write permissions in the Registration Database, then the original default read only permissions correctly set by the other Adobe applications causes problems for the Acrobat application

    2. Acrobat writes folders everywhere on the system. Even if you haven't bought any eBooks. Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign and GoLive don't need to generate legal documents in the users Document folder or place file in the /Users/Shared/ folder
    ~Documents/Acrobat/Legal _______ (Unnecessary)
    ~Documents/Acrobat Reader/Legal _______ (Unnecessary)
    ~Documents/eBooks _______ (Unnecessary)
    ~Library/Acobat User Data/ _______ (Unnecessary. Wrong place)
    /Users/Shared/Adobe PDF 6.0/ _______ (Unnecessary. Wrong Place)
    /Library/Application Support/Adobe/
    ~Library/Application Support/Adobe/
    ~Library/Preferences/Adobe/

    3. Acrobat tool bar plugin "pushes" Microsoft Office tool bar around and takes up an entire row by itself. This is another pet peeve of mine

    4. Acobat 6.0.2 and prior versions had issues with Microsoft Office 2004 SP1. The known issue about Excel 2004 SP1 quitting with the "Compile error in hidden module: AutoExec" was mentioned. That's actually related to the Acrobat "PDFMaker.xla" startup item. Adobe has finally fixed this in version 6.0.3. Another administrator indicated he had a user with a PowerPoint file that refuses to open in PowerPoint SP1, but will open fine otherwise in older versions Office vX and Office 2004 11.0 (and other Windows versions...)

    My message to the Acrobat team is to stop writing poorly written applications for Mac OS X and to talk to your coworkers writing other well written Adobe applications. They better fix most of this in Acrobat 7.0 otherwise I'm not upgrading if there is no improvement.

  170. Turning it off by samhain_tm · · Score: 0

    Version 6... right click the toolbar, uncheck PDF Toolbar. How freakin hard is that?

    --
    I'm the root of all that's evil, yeah, but you can call me cookie.
  171. What about Yahoo! messenger by alphakappa · · Score: 1

    While installing messenger, it asks you if you want to install Yahoo! mail. Even if you do not check that option, you get Yahoo! integrated into the shell so that when you right-click on a file you get the option 'Emai with Yahoo!'. Why you get that option even when you say that you don't want Yahoo! mail beats me. And oh, there is no straightforward way to remove it short of uninstalling Yahoo! messenger itself. Isn't that some kind of malware?

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  172. not shure what you are complaining about by cg0def · · Score: 1

    last I checked every toolbar that adobe installs can be removed very easily and you can also setup the installer so that there are no toolbars if that's the way you like it. Also a tool bar has nothing to do with spyware. Stuff like Encarta and pretty much most other MS software installs things withot telling you all the time so you should be used to stuff like that by no if you are using windows.

  173. How to remove the toolbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Windows anyway, the installer is an MSI. So, you can do this:

    msiexec /i adobe.msi REMOVE=PDFMaker -qb!

    Replace adobe.msi with the install file's actual name.

    Adobe puts the PDFmaker stuff into a seperate MSI feature, so you can remove it easily.

  174. how to remove pdfmaker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/328399.html

    learn how to search the knowlege base.
    period

  175. Breaks hyperlinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But like most PDF tools, it doesn't preserve hyperlinks from the original document (Adobe's tools do).

    Even OpenOffice fails that test and the control the whole application and PDF writing code... it still breaks its hyperlinks when wiring a PDF.

    A free tool to convert Word docs to PDF with hyperlinks intact would be a godsend.

    1. Re:Breaks hyperlinks by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1
      A free tool to convert Word docs to PDF with hyperlinks intact would be a godsend.


      Ghostword does hyperlinks in Word and Powerpoint
      http://ghostword.sourceforge.net/
  176. How do I make the Acrobat Toolbar Leave Outlook? by sirshannon · · Score: 1

    I've tried everything I could find, in Outlook, in Word, and in Acrobat (6, full version) but the annoying and darn-near-useless Acrobat toolbar (which is about 1 button) will only go away until I reboot or restart Outlook. It isn't that bad, but it's quite annoying when I ask for something to happen and it doesn't. And why would I want to attach an email to my email as a pdf? My Outlook Acrobat toolbar stinks because it smells like desperation. Anyone know how to get rid of it?

  177. by the way by Kanasta · · Score: 1

    anyone know how to remove Acrobat 'integration' with mozilla? all it does is crash.
    while a save as + open takes all of 5s

  178. PDF: unfit for human consumption by Yankel · · Score: 1

    I never said that people *didn't* read PDF on screen, I said they should *avoid it at all costs*.

    My comment reflected Adobe's wanting to replace PDF as the standard format for any type of document. Instead of reading from a webpage, they'd rather have you read from a PDF. It just doesn't make any sense at all.

    A great example of this is an online auto brochure that I saw once (either for Jaguar or Nissan.. I forgot): it was in PDF embedded with flash and some other nonsense that could just as easily been built as a webpage. The joke is, the page size was so odd, and all of the content was buried in the flash -- so it couldn't even be printed out!

    Adobe has been pushing for PDF as a de-facto standard for any document (print or on screen) for quite a while now. I've been to one of their brainwashing sessions -- it's quite impressive, until you realize that they're trying to push PDF beyond its useful means.

    --
    --- Dan
    1. Re:PDF: unfit for human consumption by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      Did you read my comment at all? I was criticising that your - and even moreso the article you quoted's - objections seem to be mostly based around PDF on the Web. As much as I agree about it being unatural there, and as much as Adobe tried to push for such usage, this isn't actually its primary use. You're simply over-generalising... Take a typical example (an almost daily example in my wife's business) - email: "can you review this contract and suggest changes or print and sign off". It's then read on screen and then, usually after some iterations, printed off and faxed back. Perfectly effective but according to you she should *avoid this at all costs* - why?

    2. Re:PDF: unfit for human consumption by Yankel · · Score: 1

      Why?

      In your particular example, a PDF of a text document is sent. The recipient is asked to:
      - review
      - make changes if necessary*
      - print

      * In the Windows world, the only way to do this is to own a copy of Adobe Acrobat. Not exactly a common item on the desktop.

      If you were downloading a contract or manual specifically to print without modifying, okay.

      If you were reviewing creative art from an odd-format like Quark Xpress, okay.

      If you were filling out a web-based e-form that spits out a printable document when you were done, okay (the Ontario government has a fantastic system incorporating PDF and web forms).

      However, in the "daily example" (your words, not mine) using a text document, where the recipient might need to make changes, it's just too darn awkward. There are other options:

      Ideally: OASIS -- the open document format that several word-processing platforms have adopted. The popularity of this format is increasing over time. Editing, reviewing and printing is much easier.

      Realistically: MS Word or Rich Text Format -- as above. Most word-processors (including OpenOffice.org) can read and write the .doc format fairly well as long as you're not using macros (which, if you were saving to PDF, you wouldn't be doing anyway).

      --
      --- Dan
    3. Re:PDF: unfit for human consumption by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
      Nope, a client does not edit a contract.

      Besides, MS Word, apart from not presenting a consistent document (page breaks and tables different on different machine), is not standard for everybody - most legal types still use Word Perfect.

      And don't make me laugh - OASIS, OpenOffice... what world do you live in?

    4. Re:PDF: unfit for human consumption by Yankel · · Score: 1

      Okay, then your scenario applies to one of the "PDF is acceptable" cases I mentioned -- no editing required. So we agree.

      > Besides, MS Word, apart from not presenting a
      > consistent document (page breaks and tables
      > different on different machine)

      And since when did a contract need to be so formatting specific? It's a plain text document, not a fancy dog-and-pony-show report being delivered to an executive.

      About OASIS: like I said, that's the ideal. I know where it stands right now. -- nowhere near reality at this point.

      About OpenOffice: it is gaining populairity. It can read and write MS Word. If I'm correct, 2.0 can also manage WordPerfect quite well. It's already being used in government, schools and other places that can't afford Microsoft's fees.

      Truth be told, I ran WordPerfect (Academic edition) when I was a student and I'd never pay the ludicrous prices Microsoft is asking for Office (even if my computer was still running Windows).

      --
      --- Dan
    5. Re:PDF: unfit for human consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And since when did a contract need to be so formatting specific?

      Always has - you can't sign off on a different document than filed. MS Word can honestly change the page count on a document - this is unacceptable.

      About OpenOffice: it is gaining populairity.

      It's gaining popularity among the computer literate, sure (I even used it myself last week for a multi-author document), but hardly elsewhere. My wife, for instance, used it for a couple of weeks (until I showed her a simpler process to make PDFs from MS Word than manual GhostScript invocation); she simply could not use it for documents she shared-edits with clients and colleagues.

      It can read and write MS Word. If I'm correct, 2.0 can also manage WordPerfect quite well.

      Yeah, it's not just Microsoft who are full of hype/lies...
  179. I want PDFMaker -- just not the toolbar by Rommel · · Score: 1

    I want to get rid of the toolbar, not PDFMaker. PDFMaker installs a menu, too. I would prefer to use the menu and save my screen space for other things instead of another toolbar.

    1. Re:I want PDFMaker -- just not the toolbar by de+Siem · · Score: 1

      right-click empty spot on the toolbar, deselect pdfmaker. The menu and functionality is still there, the icon isn't. If it comes back after relaunching word, I suggest to make sure you go the latest Office service packs installed.

      --
      Beating up people in little rooms, if you do it for a good reason you do it for a bad one.
    2. Re:I want PDFMaker -- just not the toolbar by Rommel · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I've tried that to no avail.

      Everytime I choose to send a new message in Outlook, there's that pesky toolbar. Open Word, there's that pesky toolbar. At least in Word, for example, I've been able to move the toolbar so it's not on its own row. I've been able to get rid of it in Excel and PowerPoint, so I think it has something to do with use Word as my email editor. Still annoying that I can't get rid of it, though.

      Yes, I'm current on service packs and patches for Windows and Office.

  180. openoffice by kel-tor · · Score: 1

    open office has been real handy to have with its native ability to export to pdf or flash, however, one of the tasks i usually have when working with pdf's is to build a single pdf out of a variety of sources. are there any alternatives to acrobat for doing merging? and more importantly, why does acrobat whine and refuse to merge a couple of files created with open office with an error to the effect of "both documents contain the same font, so cannot be merged?"

    --

    ---

  181. Meta-mod slip-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the moderator who rightly marked this as off-topic ever checks back, I was the dork who gave him a meta-mod of "unfair".

    For this, I apologize. I had originally marked you as "fair", but then slipped when reaching for the submit button.

    sorry.

  182. Is there anything to edit PDFs that doesn't suck? by arete · · Score: 1

    PDFs are not a major area of my expertise. I know that they're only supposed to be a "distribution" format. However, I've ended up doing some informal support on the following problem:

    Alice writes a document in format X. Bob (in legal) edits text all over the document. Then Bob saves it in format Y and distributes it to 900 employees. Now, in my opinion PDF is the only good option for format Y - distribution with a good printable layout.

    Right now format X is .doc, which I think is pretty poor choice. Format X ought to be the same as Format Y. But Acrobat doesn't seem to let you edit paragraphs... it seems to save every line of text separately.

    So what I really want is for somebody to have made a better PDF editor, or to tell me how to have working paragraphs in Acrobat. Failing that, I want there to be a universally accessible format that has similar capabilities. (HTML/CSS seems best; .doc LaTeX, Quark and Pagemaker have all been mentioned. RTF doesn't have enough formatting)

    thanks!

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  183. New, WinME HDD Wiper! Just install, and Bork! by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1
    MS should really step in here and mandate a total-removal tool. Something that wipes ALL THE BLOODY FILES and icons from the HDD.

    Isn't that what Windows is, in the first place? :)

    I understand WinXP is a lot better, but there are still times when the best you can do in terms of time savings are to wipe the HDD and start over with a fresh install. So, BAM -- looks like Windows itself is exactly what you were looking for!

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."