Simply not having the patience to argue with an idiot doesn't mean I don't know the subject matter. I said good day sir.
Re:"soon-to-be Leader of the Free World"
on
Obama's "ZuneGate"
·
· Score: 1
Corrections:
Abortions - Legal, providing the religious right hasn't burned down the hospital. Even if so, you're going to get shit for it.
Hooker - We have one state in 50, he still gets the point for this one (if hookers are a point, but still)
Divorce - Over half of marriges end in divorce (ironically, more religious homes have a higher rate, whats up with that?)... we're damn good at divorce in america
Alcohol - You can't purchase alcohol in much of the country on a sunday. Blue laws. You skipped the point of his post to argue the wording, not a good way to argue.
Visa - his point is that he can go to different countrys without needing to put a tag in his ear.
I own a Zune, it's a damn fine MP3 player... and I don't have to jump through itunes hoops. I find a lot of mac's stuff pretentious, and just prefer it.
Hell forbid we find out he's using shower gel instead of good american bar soap.
Damn you're desperate to have everyone be wrong, and really come off as an asshole.
Representation, by your own bloody definition, means that you get a say in government. They are representing us... 'taking care of shit' the way we would if we were there.
If the govt decides it wants to spend the budget on dog chew toys, they're not acting as a representative of the people... likewise if they're not building infastructure, keeping america stable, and-
You know what, screw this. It's obvious from your post you're a bigoted asshole, and I don't have the patience to explain how stupid you are to someone who is just going to reply with a childish "no you!"
I'm saying that the more we cut science, the farther ahead other countrys will get. Our ability to bomb brown people isn't going to keep us ahead in the world... our ability to produce products and technology is.
If I had my way I'd cut the military funding by 3/4, and the military manpower by 7/8... then spend more money on less people to better equip them. A small effective group with just enough nukes in storage to keep M.A.D active. And the money saved would go toward research, production, and improving our own country.
Oh yes, would be a much better country without roads, police, and all those other little things government wastes our money on. Why I'm sure some loving company would step in and be happy to take care of that. Or would you prefer each community deals with that individually? Say with a system where we each have a day we work those jobs?
Guess it would be simpler to appoint people to do those jobs... and appoint people to deal with it. And we'll need a way to pay them, probably just each pay a share of it, that'd be the most fair way to do it. We could send the money to a group who then sends it to the approprate people, and tells them what's needed to be done where.
Oh, shit... we've made a government again. How about that?
This is one of those areas where I don't CARE if his motives (or JFK's) are impure for doing it. I could care less if he thought putting a man on the moon would suddenly get him laid (more)... the fact is that it was a good choice which pushed us forward technologically and as a people.
If Obama justifys space by saying it's to prevent terrorism I'd sign up for it. Whatever keeps the great minds there expanding our knowledge as a whole.
We've oursourced the space program along with every other job we have. I hear the Chinese are doing some cool shit with their space program, lets watch them.
Spoken like someone who has no idea why it will always be possible for a single crazy fuck to damage large areas.
You could put a platoon on every block in this country, and I could tell you how to blow up a building. Defence against a small one shot attack is impossible in the long run. And while money is poured into the problem endlessly, it's simply a no-fix situation.
Even when we sort out the fact that half the world thinks we're satans bastard children, even when the world is singing and dancing together, there's still going to be sick fuckers out there who want to blow shit up, and defence is never 100% for that in a country with any semblence of freedom.
So torn on this issue... but I'm going with the 'bomb them to hell' crowd.
Park an aircraft carrier out there, give the ships the radio for it, and whenever someone yells help send a plane to blow them out of the water.
I know it doesn't address the source, but we're not able to fix that source. This is effectivly a 'bad neighborhood' and we frankly don't have to take this shit from them. We tried to help them, the country doesn't want helped. If that's how it's going to be, fine... but there's no reason countrys around them should suffer from issues in shipping lanes.
I DO think that a warning should be given... big explosion in the water type thing, make damn sure they know we're not joking... but if they continue, regretably their lives are less then the merchants to me.
Slashdot Mirror
A fundimentalist muslim will scream, shout, and threaten violence. The more extreamists will kill people.
Oh, btw, a fundimentalist christian will scream, shout, and threaten violence... or bomb abortion clinics.
Protip: Religion is a drug, overdosing can cause a person to behave erraticly
Anything can be made funny also by adding "In my pants" to the end of it.
ffs, we're just now finally getting the first headway on the religious mind control... now the govenments getting good at it.
Simply not having the patience to argue with an idiot doesn't mean I don't know the subject matter. I said good day sir.
Corrections:
Abortions - Legal, providing the religious right hasn't burned down the hospital. Even if so, you're going to get shit for it.
Hooker - We have one state in 50, he still gets the point for this one (if hookers are a point, but still)
Divorce - Over half of marriges end in divorce (ironically, more religious homes have a higher rate, whats up with that?)... we're damn good at divorce in america
Alcohol - You can't purchase alcohol in much of the country on a sunday. Blue laws. You skipped the point of his post to argue the wording, not a good way to argue.
Visa - his point is that he can go to different countrys without needing to put a tag in his ear.
This is news? Even crap news?
I own a Zune, it's a damn fine MP3 player... and I don't have to jump through itunes hoops. I find a lot of mac's stuff pretentious, and just prefer it.
Hell forbid we find out he's using shower gel instead of good american bar soap.
Damn you're desperate to have everyone be wrong, and really come off as an asshole.
Representation, by your own bloody definition, means that you get a say in government. They are representing us... 'taking care of shit' the way we would if we were there.
If the govt decides it wants to spend the budget on dog chew toys, they're not acting as a representative of the people... likewise if they're not building infastructure, keeping america stable, and-
You know what, screw this. It's obvious from your post you're a bigoted asshole, and I don't have the patience to explain how stupid you are to someone who is just going to reply with a childish "no you!"
Good day sir.
I'm refering to the Predator aircraft. Remote manned.
Why do we need jets when we have the capability for that or better?
Who said invasion?
I'm saying that the more we cut science, the farther ahead other countrys will get. Our ability to bomb brown people isn't going to keep us ahead in the world... our ability to produce products and technology is.
If I had my way I'd cut the military funding by 3/4, and the military manpower by 7/8... then spend more money on less people to better equip them. A small effective group with just enough nukes in storage to keep M.A.D active. And the money saved would go toward research, production, and improving our own country.
Oh yes, would be a much better country without roads, police, and all those other little things government wastes our money on. Why I'm sure some loving company would step in and be happy to take care of that. Or would you prefer each community deals with that individually? Say with a system where we each have a day we work those jobs?
Guess it would be simpler to appoint people to do those jobs... and appoint people to deal with it. And we'll need a way to pay them, probably just each pay a share of it, that'd be the most fair way to do it. We could send the money to a group who then sends it to the approprate people, and tells them what's needed to be done where.
Oh, shit... we've made a government again. How about that?
Grow up.
Well you know what they say. A cut here, a cut there, pretty soon we're all speaking chinese.
This is one of those areas where I don't CARE if his motives (or JFK's) are impure for doing it. I could care less if he thought putting a man on the moon would suddenly get him laid (more)... the fact is that it was a good choice which pushed us forward technologically and as a people.
If Obama justifys space by saying it's to prevent terrorism I'd sign up for it. Whatever keeps the great minds there expanding our knowledge as a whole.
We can't afford to go to canada.
That's not how america works now.
We've oursourced the space program along with every other job we have. I hear the Chinese are doing some cool shit with their space program, lets watch them.
Why exactly do we need jets in the first place?
Unmanned is safer and better... both for recon and weapons.
Anyone care to take a swing at this? I'm honestly curious
Yeah, it's just their duty to tax, not represent.
Why do I suddenly want to throw tea off a boat?
Spoken like someone who has no idea why it will always be possible for a single crazy fuck to damage large areas.
You could put a platoon on every block in this country, and I could tell you how to blow up a building. Defence against a small one shot attack is impossible in the long run. And while money is poured into the problem endlessly, it's simply a no-fix situation.
Even when we sort out the fact that half the world thinks we're satans bastard children, even when the world is singing and dancing together, there's still going to be sick fuckers out there who want to blow shit up, and defence is never 100% for that in a country with any semblence of freedom.
You never hear the full quote, but it is so much better then the shortened version:
Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't.
As if we don't have enough problems with people misunderstanding and quote mining about evolution without bringing rock evolution into it...
Brace for more creationist idiots.
so do the priests and televangalists who feed off of them
So because it's not 100% lets stick with 50%? I really can't understand modern black and white thinking.
Lets agree on this at least... if laws are broken with this system, there would be a damn record to prove it instead of their word against ours.
I really wish I had mod points. Bravo
Protip: Humans are animals, I fail to see how having a living link is any different then knowing the link is there.
your tinfoil hat is a bit tight, seems to be speeding the insanity
So torn on this issue... but I'm going with the 'bomb them to hell' crowd.
Park an aircraft carrier out there, give the ships the radio for it, and whenever someone yells help send a plane to blow them out of the water.
I know it doesn't address the source, but we're not able to fix that source. This is effectivly a 'bad neighborhood' and we frankly don't have to take this shit from them. We tried to help them, the country doesn't want helped. If that's how it's going to be, fine... but there's no reason countrys around them should suffer from issues in shipping lanes.
I DO think that a warning should be given... big explosion in the water type thing, make damn sure they know we're not joking... but if they continue, regretably their lives are less then the merchants to me.