Slashdot Mirror


Google Map To Real Piracy

An anonymous reader noted that you can now see a Google Map of piracy. Not the pretend kind, the real kind with boats and stuff. Considering how much time we spend talking about the other kind, I think it's worth paying attention to the real problems out there.

262 comments

  1. Time for Qs to come back by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From what I've been hearing, it sounds like the biggest problem in defending against the Solmalian surge in piracy is that the pirates know where the US ships are and avoid them. They've taken to attacking farther and farther out from the coast, often impacting new shipping lanes when displaced by US warships.

    Maybe I've been reading too much fiction, but am I the only one thinking: Q Ship?

    1. Lure pirate in with tasty looking merchie.

    2. Wait until pirate is within range and intentions are clear.

    3. Throw the covers off the guns and blast them into next year.

    4. ???

    5. Profit!!!

    (Well, the merchies do anyway.)

    1. Re:Time for Qs to come back by mmkkbb · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not just that. Trying to coordinate the numerous navies involved can't be easy. I have been reading the occasional bit of Informattion Dissemination's coverage of the events out there. It's way too much for me to swallow on a regular basis, but it has commentary from professionals, not just journalists or cheerleaders.

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:Time for Qs to come back by thrillseeker · · Score: 5, Funny

      The pirates are on the run now - the UN has approved sanctions against them - God help them when they read that.

    3. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Kabuthunk · · Score: 2

      That sounds more prone to problems (and should the pirates actually still capture it, then you're screwed) than my idea. Much like a Q-ship, you have a ship that looks like it's got good stuff on it. However, it's loaded to the hilt with explosives. Have it radio-controlled, so no actual people are on-board. A few lifelike dummies behind the wheel perhaps. Sail it around where things get hijacked, wait for it to have just that done to it, and push the big red button that says "make pirates go away now". Hell, even just full-speed that ship into Eyl pirate bay and pushing the button when it gets to land. That option probably would be avoided though, since likely people might be concerned that some non-criminals are there, and you can't try them in court with this method, etc, etc.

      But a few decoy explody ships here and there to take out the ones actually in the act of pirating the ship, and I'm sure the amount of piracy would decrease significantly.

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    4. Re:Time for Qs to come back by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Throw the covers off the guns and blast them into next year.

      Your punishment may be a bit extreme but maybe it's just because I'm the kind of guy that likes fair justice & is concerned that the rest of the world sees my country as one that blindly kills people.

      You are forgetting that these pirates are (aside from being human beings) winning people over by giving them things in a very Robin-Hood-esque type scenario--even if it's only offering the people a paying job as a pirate in an otherwise devastated and unstable economy. You would very quickly fall into disfavor with the locals ... these pirates have even alegedly defended fishing areas for locals. They claim they are more like the coast guard trying to protect the food of hungry people. I think entire cities have bought into their propaganda and are willing to harbor/help them.

      True or not, it's brazen disregard for how other people see things that causes really really bad things for America. Going in there, shooting up criminals & leaving is not going to improve anyone's image. Yes, these people are kidnappers & thieves but I don't think insta-death is a good way to deal with them.

      Not a whole lot in this world is purely black and white.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    5. Re:Time for Qs to come back by nbert · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One thing I'd like to add: There are not enough military ships in the world to really control the affected area. More ships result in higher safety, but as long as cargo and tourist ships pass the area unguarded the pirates still have a chance.

      In my opinion any real solution has to change something within Somali territory. It's not like the pirates can switch to safer jobs on land when the international efforts become unpleasant.

    6. Re:Time for Qs to come back by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I seriously doubt that a Q-Ship armed to the hilt and crewed by experienced naval personnel would fall into pirate hands. These guys are attacking with fishing boats for crying out loud! The problem isn't that our ships can't hold their own against the pirates. That much is stupidly simple. It's finding the pirates that's the problem. And these guys are even less sophisticated than other piracy organizations equipped with speedboats and cutters.

      I mean, take a look at these guys. If someone would arm our merchies with a few mortars and sniper rifles, these pirates wouldn't be able to get their assault rifles within weapons range. But for some reason, today's governments think that armed merchies are a bad idea. So... Q-Ships. They'd kick ass. :-)

    7. Re:Time for Qs to come back by mo · · Score: 1

      I heard a report on the Diane Rehm show that that's exactly what they're planning to do. The other approach that is forthcoming is convoys where multiple shipping vessels get together with one armed gunboat to protect them. Blackwater has come forth as a potential candidate for the security contract of future convoys.

    8. Re:Time for Qs to come back by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Why not? How do the police deal with an uncooperative bank robber? They convince him to let the hostages go and/or lure him out and open a can of lead whoop-ass on him.

    9. Re:Time for Qs to come back by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Please don't tell me that you are suggesting that all Somalians are pirates?

    10. Re:Time for Qs to come back by polar+red · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      but the question is : who is the robber here ? Answer : the west. we are going over there and rob their seas and soil, and then we expect them to roll over docile ?

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    11. Re:Time for Qs to come back by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Launch Marine Assault to capture positively identified pirates" works just as well. It merely lacks that nice ring "blast them into next year" has. :-)

      Your point is well taken. However, I still think Q-Ships are an answer. Q-Ships are the kind of bait that would cause pirates to identify themselves so that you can take action. Whether that be a matter of sinking them or capturing them, there's a good chance of it working. As a bonus, you'll start to give the pirates pause as they attempt to ascertain whether the ship they're about to attack is a real merchie or a Q-Ship.

      For bonus points, borrow real merchant ships but crew them with naval officers and marines. That way NATO forces can move from ship to ship, leaving the pirates to further second-guess themselves. Is this merchie a trap? No way to know short of attempting attack.

    12. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...any real solution has to change something within Somali territory

      Pave the entire country and turn it into permit required parking.
      Then deny parking permits to all of the pirates.

    13. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Sniper511 · · Score: 1

      Oh, good. That's fixed then. NEXT!!!

    14. Re:Time for Qs to come back by eldavojohn · · Score: 0
      Your point is also well taken. I agree some military action must be taken here. I would rather see justice than death in this case though. Have the pirates been killing anyone? Not to my knowledge ....

      As a bonus, you'll start to give the pirates pause ...

      It was my understanding that these pirates are people in desperate times ... which--to some at least--calls for desperate measures. I fear that locally they are viewed as starving people stealing things to buy food or shelter with ... because the state of Somalia is not a healthy one. Warring politicians have left the populace in disrepair with no hope of stability or law enforcement.

      I'm merely saddened your plan doesn't involve fixing any of Somalia's real problems. Just killing offenders.

      It's funny, the shit has been hitting the fan for innocent civilians in Somalia but it only gets real attention (and demand for NATO intervention) when it starts to affect our trade ships ... heaven forbid our trade be interrupted!

      --
      My work here is dung.
    15. Re:Time for Qs to come back by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not just allow ships to arm themselves? Q-ships will just lead to "scout" pirate ships that test the waters to see if the ship is armed then still go after the regular ships.

      If that oil tanker had a few RPGs and people that knew how to use them, there wouldn't be a problem. As other people have said these are fishing boats.

    16. Re:Time for Qs to come back by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I would rather see justice than death in this case though.

      Justice from where? What court do you try them in? Somalia has no functioning government.

      It's funny, the shit has been hitting the fan for innocent civilians in Somalia but it only gets real attention (and demand for NATO intervention) when it starts to affect our trade ships

      Going into Somalia with assistance was tried not so long ago. Didn't work out too well. It's not surprising that there is no real desire to try it again.

    17. Re:Time for Qs to come back by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      While the parent should be modded flamebait, I'll bite. You do realize that there has been virtually zero western influence in Somalia for years? Because Somalia's government has completely collapsed, no foreign company has the foolhardiness to operate there. There is no rule of law and no infrastructure. Any respectable foreign agent in Somalia would have little to nothing to gain and would likely get ripped to shreds. The only foreigners in Somalia are criminals and pirates from other countries.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    18. Re:Time for Qs to come back by mangu · · Score: 1

      There are not enough military ships in the world to really control the affected area.

      Kill enough of them and the others will be scared away.

      any real solution has to change something within Somali territory

      Something like this has been tried before. Controlling cities is much harder than controlling the sea. What else would you suggest? Pay them to stop piracy? This is called "extortion", and usually only leads to more payoffs.

    19. Re:Time for Qs to come back by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have the pirates been killing anyone? Not to my knowledge ....

      Sadly, this is incorrect:

      http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21842522-1702,00.html
      http://article.wn.com/view/2008/10/23/Pirates_to_kill_crew_on_arms_ship_if_NATO_ships_attack/
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1572236/Somali-pirates-threaten-to-kill-tanker-crew.html

      They can and do kill people. And if this is allowed to continue, more and more people are going to die. On both sides.

      I'm merely saddened your plan doesn't involve fixing any of Somalia's real problems. Just killing offenders.

      My plan only addresses the short term issue: The piracy. That has to be dealt with immediately. Unchecked piracy will only result in the loss of more lives and cause economic problems on a world-wide scale.

      Dealing with the political issues in Somalia is a more complex issue that lacks an immediate solution. I wish I could venture a good plan, but I do not understand the dynamics of the situation well enough to produce one. It's not like Somalia hasn't been receiving foreign aid:

      By some
      reckonings, no other country save Israel has
      received such high levels of military and
      economic aid per capita; certainly no country
      has less to show for it. Even before its collapse
      into protracted civil war and anarchy in 1990,
      Somalia had earned a reputation as a graveyard
      of foreign aid, a land where aid projects were
      notoriously unsuccessful, and where high levels
      of foreign assistance helped to create an
      entirely unsustainable, corrupt and repressive
      state.

      What do they do with our foreign aid workers? Why, they kidnap and kill them:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/world/africa/06briefs-6FOREIGNAIDW_BRF.html
      http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20081105/wl_afp/somaliaunrestreliefkidnap_081105183945
      http://www.patronusanalytical.com/files/Somali%20Aid%20Worker%20Murdered.php
      http://www.pr-inside.com/somali-aid-worker-killed-witnesses-say-r904499.htm

      What would you have us do? I'm all for finding a peaceful solution if one can be arrived at. But as of this moment, there is an immediate problem people are dying or being threatened with death.

      Food for thought: Isn't it interesting how the pirates can't afford food, but can always afford assault rifles? Perhaps there is more to their Robin Hood image than meets the eye.

    20. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone would arm our merchies with a few mortars and sniper rifles, these pirates wouldn't be able to get their assault rifles within weapons range.

      It looks like someone has played a bit too much Halo.

    21. Re:Time for Qs to come back by willrj.marshall · · Score: 1

      There's a fair argument to make that the poor Somali are simply trying to make ends meet. We're rich. They're not. This dichotomy is at least partly our fault. Is it surprising that they're resentful and willing to *take* what they don't have.

    22. Re:Time for Qs to come back by denis-The-menace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The irony is that things only get moving when oil is involved.

      Now that they have a tanker full of it, the US will be called to "liberate" it.

      Once that ship is gone, we'll go back to Status Quo.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    23. Re:Time for Qs to come back by MacColossus · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a great idea. Just sneak up on them and push the "F" key on your keyboard.

    24. Re:Time for Qs to come back by polar+red · · Score: 1

      a few years doesn't repair the influence of 300 years of colonialism.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    25. Re:Time for Qs to come back by kaynaan · · Score: 1

      While the parent should be modded flamebait, I'll bite. You do realize that there has been virtually zero western influence in Somalia for years?

      you do realize that Ethiopia who is currently occupying Somalia and has been for the last 2 years was given the go ahead by the states department and directly financed by the EU. far stretch from virtually zero influence don't you think ?

    26. Re:Time for Qs to come back by IronChef · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't find the reference right now, but when I was reading about piracy last week arming the merchant ships was said to be difficult politically.

      I think it was something like this: the merchant ships have to pass through many nations' waters, and in some of those nations the arms needed to fight off pirates are illegal. So... if you have private armed guards on board, you're breaking the law at some of your ports. Therefore, being a well behaved company, you don't have guards at all.

      This is lame, even as it makes sense. How would a US port feel about a foreign ship pulling in when a dozen civilians with grenade launchers are strolling around on deck? The Coast Guard would go ape.

      Anyway, I would like to find a proper explanation for the current state of affairs.

    27. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Duradin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you want the US, fresh on its "success" in Iraq and Afghanistan to "liberate" yet another country we don't really understand (and one that we've previously failed in)?

      We go in, "liberate" a country and get called the great satan and western pig-dog imperialists.

      We don't go in and everyone whines that we're not doing anything.

      Somali isn't even a cause of regime change. There is no effective regime. Somali would be like Afghanistan on hell difficulty in hardcore mode. Humanitarian aid doesn't work because you basically need to launch an invasion to get it to where and who it needs to go to. Then you have to make sure it stays where it should be. You've got warlords and factions to deal with, not a government. Each one will try to play you against the others.

      Letting the pirates rake in millions of dollars in ransoms isn't helping anyone. They aren't going out in their little boats throwing sunshine and rainbows at their target.

      In the long run probably the best thing that could happen would be that they end up sinking a ship. Then the fun and games would be over and the kid gloves would come off.

    28. Re:Time for Qs to come back by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm merely saddened your plan doesn't involve fixing any of Somalia's real problems. Just killing offenders.

      It's funny, the shit has been hitting the fan for innocent civilians in Somalia but it only gets real attention (and demand for NATO intervention) when it starts to affect our trade ships ... heaven forbid our trade be interrupted!

      In principle I agree with what your sentiments, but it isn't as if helping Somalia hasn't been tried. Unfortunately, the experience has been that going to Somalia and trying to help has often meant that one will be killed. Merely sending food, technology or money results in one or more of the ruling juntas stealing it.

      It's a extremely unfortunate situation in which many innocents suffer and die, and many people and governments would happily give of their time and money to help the situation. But, sadly, it's kind of like giving money to your drug-addicted brother-in-law--helping him doesn't help him.

    29. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Snocone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If that oil tanker had a few RPGs and people that knew how to use them, there wouldn't be a problem.

      No, RPGs aren't an appropriate defense weapon. 500m is the propulsion limit and the limit of hand held accuracy is more like 50m.

      All you need is a handful of hunting rifles of polar bear hunting capability, I suggest my preferred caliber the .300 Win Mag aka 7.62 × 67 mm. Half a dozen of those on deck and you are effectively safe from anything short of an actual warship.
       

    30. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      That is what they did during the WWII. They had merchie converted to carry 5-inch guns and torpedo tubes. When the U-boat came close, remember back then they didn't have good sonar so most of the kills where visual kills so they had to come in visual range, they would open the canvas covers and open fire on the U-boats. I think a RAM launcher and 25-mm cannon would put these craft and ships out of order quickly.
      http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/ram.htm
      http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/systems/mk-38.htm
      However the better method is to put an blockade on the Somalia coast. Any boat or ship going in and out of the blockade will stopped and checked. Hey, we (the USA) did this to a nuclear armed country why not a much simpler armed pirates?

    31. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Snocone · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's funny, the shit has been hitting the fan for innocent civilians in Somalia but it only gets real attention (and demand for NATO intervention) when it starts to affect our trade ships

      Uh, dude...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hawk_Down_(book)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hawk_Down_(film)

      For crying out loud, there's VIDEO GAMES about it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Force:_Black_Hawk_Down

      Just exactly what does it take to meet your threshold for "real attention", since apparently a multiple Academy Award winning Ridley Scott motion picture doesn't do it?

    32. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > How would a US port feel about a foreign ship pulling in when a dozen civilians
      > with grenade launchers are strolling around on deck? The Coast Guard would go ape.

      As an NRA member I'm not afraid of arms or people wielding them, so long as they are the right people bearing them for the right reasons and shooting them at the right (or would that be wrong?) people. So no, I would have no problem with a $150M tanker laden with $100M in crude being armed. Seems rather sane to me. If we are trusting the crew not to use the far more dangerous tanker itself as a weapon I see no reason to begrudge them a couple of rocket launchers to defend themselves from pirates. No, they can't carry them off the ship and they should be expected to have the decency to stow them away once they are safely in US waters. If I can't have a rocket launcher why should they get to have all the fun. :)

      This story just goes to show ya what pansies we have allowed ourselves to become. Can you imagine pirate infested waters under Ronald Reagan's six hundred ship navy? People might accuse America of trying to police the world, but dang it back when we really did it the world was a safer place... as it was when the British Navy ruled the seas. Pirates had short life expectancies.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    33. Re:Time for Qs to come back by pluther · · Score: 1

      What we really need is for the United States to have a War on Piracy!

      Remember how we had the War on Terror, and there hasn't been any terrorism since?

      And how the War on Drugs got rid of all drug problems in the US?

      And if you don't explain to them what you mean, maybe you can get the RIAA and MPAA behind it!

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    34. Re:Time for Qs to come back by winkydink · · Score: 3, Informative
      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    35. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Reapman · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is, right now although the Pirates are armed with RPG's and such they're not generally using them (not saying deaths haven't occured) Doing so would result in an arms race. Look at the roadside bombs on Afganistan.. we supply heavier armor to protect the troops, they build bigger bombs. Although I won't say your idea doesn't have merit, I've thought it myself, it must be looked at carefully before going down such a path.

    36. Re:Time for Qs to come back by el+americano · · Score: 4, Funny

      A strongly worded letter can't be far behind.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    37. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a whole lot in this world is purely black and white.

      Minstrels?

    38. Re:Time for Qs to come back by severoon · · Score: 1

      All you have to do is pull the ol' switcheroo when the pirates start to offload your booty. Switch your booty with remote-detonating incendiary explosives and, once they reach a safe distance, press down dramatically on your red plunger switch.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    39. Re:Time for Qs to come back by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The UN. What a laugh. A real power the pirates might have had to contend with, NATO, declined to do anything, which I don't quite understand. Then again I don't know much about their post-cold ware mandate. But if they were to take on the pirates, then you might be justified in your appeal to your deity.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    40. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mebbe cuz the pirates stay away from the North Atlantic?

    41. Re:Time for Qs to come back by swarsron · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      funny how everybody seems to see no problem in just killing those people without any trial etc.

      i don't talk about those cases where you have to kill them to defend your life. but in the current debate noone ever questions if hijacking a boat and kidnapping the crew is a crime which deserves instant death.

    42. Re:Time for Qs to come back by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      This sort of solution needs to be applied to areas other than just Somalia. Many (but not all) of our enemies are poor.

    43. Re:Time for Qs to come back by toriver · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can go further back also, to Lyndon B. Johnson's War on Poverty which eradicated poverty in the U.S.

    44. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Theres been a war on piracy since 1801. And a war on slavery off the coast of Africa that the US was involved in. Theres a power vacuum now with the fall of the Soviet Union and the shrinking of navies and naval basing.

      Back before, the Soviets had naval basing in the region, out of Somalia and at times, Yemen. That dried up, Somalia got disastrous and the UN pulled out. the boil festered and now we are seeing some fallout for giving up on Somalia in the mid 90s.

    45. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Kill enough of them and the others will be scared away.

      Has that ever worked? I don't really care if we execute them as punishment, but it seems a bit naive to think that will stop it from occuring in the future. It's a punishment, not a deterrent.

    46. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Don't need to screw around with Q ships. An LHD/LHA with Marine Harriers, some Cobra gunships and a SEAL/SAS or Delta teams with Chinooks and CH-53s sitting in the middle of the action area with some maritime surveillance would do the job. Like the Global Hawks and maritime predators they keep trying to sell the Navy and Australia.

    47. Re:Time for Qs to come back by RogerWilco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is, that if the ships start shooting at the pirates, the pirates start shooting at the merchant ships.

      Given that those ships might carry a cargo worth hundreds of millions, are very slow, almost impossible to miss, and can be sunk with a well placed RPG, it's not a risk most of the merchant companies want to take.

      That is the essence of the issue why these ships are not protecting themselves. The pirates would blow them up.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    48. Re:Time for Qs to come back by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

      One thing I'd like to add: There are not enough military ships in the world to really control the affected area.

      Huh? The US alone could do it if really wanted to. Probably the UK or France could too, though they might need a bit of aid from the other.

    49. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Throw the covers off the guns and blast them into next year.

      Your punishment may be a bit extreme but maybe it's just because I'm the kind of guy that likes fair justice & is concerned that the rest of the world sees my country as one that blindly kills people.

      You are forgetting that these pirates are (aside from being human beings) winning people over by giving them things in a very Robin-Hood-esque type scenario--even if it's only offering the people a paying job as a pirate in an otherwise devastated and unstable economy. You would very quickly fall into disfavor with the locals ... these pirates have even alegedly defended fishing areas for locals. They claim they are more like the coast guard trying to protect the food of hungry people. I think entire cities have bought into their propaganda and are willing to harbor/help them.

      True or not, it's brazen disregard for how other people see things that causes really really bad things for America. Going in there, shooting up criminals & leaving is not going to improve anyone's image. Yes, these people are kidnappers & thieves but I don't think insta-death is a good way to deal with them.

      Not a whole lot in this world is purely black and white.

      They are pirates, and an ancient law of the sea is that pirates can be hunted and destroyed wherever they roam.

      They chose a life of piracy, and should not be surprised when others hunt them down mercilessly; which is what needs to be done to make sea lanes safe for commerce.

      One need not worry about image when dealing with pirates on the high seas; other than the one in the pirates mind where they see themselves hanging from a yardarm.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    50. Re:Time for Qs to come back by eggnet · · Score: 1

      That's a really touching story but the pirates are armed and attempting to take over a ship with a crew and hundreds of millions of dollars of cargo.

      The only thing treating them nicely will buy you is more pirates.

    51. Re:Time for Qs to come back by DJ+Manning · · Score: 1

      Have you ever fired a rifle or mortar on land and hit a moving target that is beyond assault rifle range? For a skilled person that is hard. Add to that rocking and rolling of the boat on the sea and it's next to imposible for a sailor with no training in weapons and combat to do it.

      I say help the pirates to become more modern. Help install radars and radios on their boats. Install GPS systems and big cannons. Then you can track their positions based on the radio/radar signals and catch up with them due to their slow speed from the heavy cannons and radio gear.

      PS, I'm longing to sail the high seas with a Jolly Roger above my head, so while the above would work, I'd prefer if you all left the pirates to do their own thing.

    52. Re:Time for Qs to come back by eggnet · · Score: 1

      Most people are talking about killing the pirates before the boat is hijacked. You might be able to argue that that doesn't deserve instant death if there is a way to capture the crew without risking yourself doing it. Reasonable people could argue that.

      But, if you are talking about people that have already hijacked the boat and kidnapped the crew, I don't see how you could argue that instant death isn't warranted. If the pirates surrender that is one thing, but I don't think we're talking about that are we.

    53. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      After 9/11, we don't think of hijacking as a crime where the victims are likely to survive anymore? So the seriousness of the crime approaches the level of murder?

    54. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the way the US reacts to other 'issues', they'll probably just decide to write a law to make it illegal then declare the problem solved.

    55. Re:Time for Qs to come back by IronChef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I agree. I wasn't trying to say that fear was the RIGHT reaction. If foreign merchant ships want to have mercenaries on board I think we should find a way to make that work--and their home ports should extend us the same courtesy.

      Pirates... Sheesh. History, like Hollywood, has run out of ideas and is relaunching old ideas.

    56. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A botched military operation that made people hate us even more is "real attention?"

    57. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > As in, full of Middle-Easterners. Do you really want those people armed?

      Ok, you are trying to make a funny and all that but I'm gonna play along. Dude, they are already armed with a fully loaded oil tanker. Just how much more damage are they going to do with a couple of AKs and perhaps a rocket launcher or three? A hundred million dollars worth of crude oil is enough to do a heck of a lot of damage to a port. Plus they could opt to just sink the damned thing in an inconvienient spot.

      So unless we are going to forbid ships with 'ragheads' in the crew we just have to hope that the people who own that quarter billion worth of tanker and cargo have enough on the line to avoid hiring a crew of terrorists. The worry would be a gang of these pirates being terrorists and instead of holding a tanker hostage quietly throwing the origional crew overboard and then continuing it's voyage and blowing it up/sinking it at an oil terminal here or in the middle east.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    58. Re:Time for Qs to come back by swb · · Score: 1

      .300 Win Mag is a great sniper round from a scoped rifle, but that's a terrible platform for a maritime engagement. Aimed fire at ranges very likely to be 300m+ on moving targets from a moving platform on open water with a scoped weapon is a substantial challenge for the most gifted marksman, and that's just hitting the enemy vessel! .300 Win Mag would require a magic shot for that round to do any meaningful damage, and the magic is limited to killing a pirate or damaging the boat's propulsion. It's just not enough bullet for the distances involved.

      The ideal option is a couple of twin .50 cal machine guns, but a compromise might be a half-dozen guys with Barrett 82s with low-power scopes (4x?) and tracer rounds and a fallback guy with a Javelin missile.

      The .50 cal Barretts are semi-auto and with low-power optics and tracers, shooters could get on target and put enough rounds down to possible score hits under the maritime circumstances. And .50 cal hits would matter much more. If you assume a higher hit ratio, it could be expected that even larger fishing vessels might see cumulative damage to superstructures or other structural elements, not to mention engines and personnel.

      The Javelin would be a nice option if the Barretts proved ineffective (bigger ship, suicide mission, whatever), since it would effectively stop anything the pirates have, including the larger mother ships the small speedboats depart from.

    59. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      funny how everybody seems to see no problem in just killing those people without any trial etc.

      Hmmm... pirates armed with REAL WEAPONS approach your ship, and you want to talk them to death? If they got anywhere near my ship and I had even a remote chance of winning a firefight, you bet I'd be shooting to kill.

    60. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post sign reads: "don't feed the trolls".

    61. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Digital+End · · Score: 1

      So torn on this issue... but I'm going with the 'bomb them to hell' crowd.

      Park an aircraft carrier out there, give the ships the radio for it, and whenever someone yells help send a plane to blow them out of the water.

      I know it doesn't address the source, but we're not able to fix that source. This is effectivly a 'bad neighborhood' and we frankly don't have to take this shit from them. We tried to help them, the country doesn't want helped. If that's how it's going to be, fine... but there's no reason countrys around them should suffer from issues in shipping lanes.

      I DO think that a warning should be given... big explosion in the water type thing, make damn sure they know we're not joking... but if they continue, regretably their lives are less then the merchants to me.

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    62. Re:Time for Qs to come back by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative

      Huh? The USN (and other nation's navies) have been working on anti-piracy measures in that area for years. Just because you've never heard of it doesn't mean it isn't happening.

    63. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would have modded you up just for the neat phrase you invented: got disastrous ;)

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    64. Re:Time for Qs to come back by willrj.marshall · · Score: 1

      Why? What right do we have to kill people who are trying to survive by taking a tiny segment of our vast wealth?

    65. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Piracy has been punishable by death going back almost as long as there have been pirates. Nobody questions it because it's practically written into International Law that summary execution of pirates is okay.

    66. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Solution: Don't send sailors with no combat or weapons training out on the boats that are intended to be attacked.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    67. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget that this stuff happens in INTERNATIONAL WATERS. People like me (mariners) who have to protect not only the ship and cargo it holds but ourselves in these waters have a right to shoot back. You act like these pirates simply board the ships when the reality is that they come at you firing ak-47's (the real ones not the semi-auto ones the media calls "assault weapons") and RPGs. I don't know about you but if someone is shooting at me I will shoot back.

    68. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ships are governed by the laws of the country who's flag they fly. If you are on a US flagged ship you are on US soil. Believe me, many merchant ships keep armed watch while in port.

    69. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      you have a lot fewer enemies than you think, a lot of whom you call enemies are just operating to their own self interests. They are not your natural enemies.

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    70. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      So, you support guns but only if people will only shoot the people you disagree with? Nice.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    71. Re:Time for Qs to come back by syousef · · Score: 1

      They can and do kill people. And if this is allowed to continue, more and more people are going to die. On both sides.

      Yes, but by minimizing the killing they're maintaining their support base. Instead of the indiscriminate kill, rape, pillage, plunder of the traditional pirate that's bad news for all involved, they're making the case that they may be beneficial to have around for some groups. Now, the truth is they're after money and indifferent to life, but they're not stupid about it. They're creating a fluffy feel good image for their piracy.

      My plan only addresses the short term issue: The piracy. That has to be dealt with immediately. Unchecked piracy will only result in the loss of more lives and cause economic problems on a world-wide scale.

      I agree.

      Dealing with the political issues in Somalia is a more complex issue that lacks an immediate solution.

      Nuke them from space. It's the only way to be sure.

      I kid! I kid!

      I'm all for finding a peaceful solution if one can be arrived at.

      It may be possible to incapacitate rather than kill them. An unpowered boat sitting in the middle of the ocean isn't a good bargaining platform and they may surrender willingly. Then there's non-lethal force. Gas them. Taser them. Tranqulize them.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    72. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US Navy has been engaging pirates in this area since at least 2006

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ships_attacked_by_Somali_pirates

    73. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trial under whose jurisdiction? 12 miles off the coast is international waters. As such there is no police force which is precisely why pirates are given so little leeway.

    74. Re:Time for Qs to come back by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      This story just goes to show ya what pansies we have allowed ourselves to become. Can you imagine pirate infested waters under Ronald Reagan's six hundred ship navy?

      I don't have to imagine it - because it was reality. Pirates off of Somalia, pirates in Indonesia, pirates along the coast of South America... (John McPhee's Looking for a Ship (1991) describes encounters with the latter.)
       
      Not that the [US] Navy ever reached six hundred ships anyhow.
       

    75. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Fnord666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Food for thought: Isn't it interesting how the pirates can't afford food, but can always afford assault rifles?

      That's because assault rifles are a lot more plentiful than food in Somalia.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    76. Re:Time for Qs to come back by dspratomo · · Score: 1

      yes, and in return Somalia becomes US' 51st state. US could do it, however it's really really outside their jurisdiction. At the moment all foreign countries (to somalia) only there to protect their interests.

      --
      Work like you don't need the money, love like you've never been hurt, and dance like you do when nobody's watching
    77. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, in Republic of Somalia you steal from pirates?

    78. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's anything like NZ, you declare the weapons and hand them over to Customs for safe-keeping until you depart for international waters again. I saw this in a docco on NZ Customs, they frequently have super yachts and the like, arriving with large calibre rifles on board for defensive purposes.

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    79. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because they're kidnapping and murdering the crew.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    80. Re:Time for Qs to come back by tukang · · Score: 1

      RPGs on a super oil tanker ... what could possibly go wrong?

    81. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it interesting how the pirates can't afford food, but can always afford assault rifles?

      I guess they find it easier to get food with a rifle than without one.

    82. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      All you need is a handful of hunting rifles of polar bear hunting capability,

      That would work, I suppose, but I'd prefer to let the pirates see Reason.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    83. Re:Time for Qs to come back by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not outside their jurisdiction - under the law of the sea, on the high sea a pirate may be engaged or apprehended by any nation. Historically, to protect their own interest is the only reason any state engages pirates.

    84. Re:Time for Qs to come back by eh2o · · Score: 1

      > Unchecked piracy will only result in the loss
      > more lives and cause economic problems on
      > world-wide scale.

      Loss of life, yes, some. World wide economic problems, no, not even close... in fact its been mostly ignored for several years because the actual cost in terms of pirate ransoms is trivial compared to the basic operations revenue and profit margins of a major global shipping company. In fact the only thing that is really expensive is the payout to families when people get killed--and the pirates know this--their goal is to get money without making a big scene.

      Its a basic fact that impoverished regions of the world breed terrorists, drugs, piracy, human rights abuse and other crimes. Somalia and areas of Afganistan/Pakistan being a couple of the worst, ... the sooner the G8 (and especially the US) come to senses and realize this, the better.

      If you want to talk piracy with real economic impact, lets take a look at the corrupt investment bankers on wall street.

    85. Re:Time for Qs to come back by smellotron · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

    86. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, of course not. Some of them are just ordinary lying thieves.

    87. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone comment on why NATO refuses to act when an Indian warship thousands of miles away from its base can patrol and pick a fight with the pirates?

    88. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, instead of tryin to actually grow food or manufacture something. When did demanding 20 million ransom become "trying to survive"? I call bullshit. They're trying to gain more power by buying more weapons. And you just want to let them do that? The somali, while being murderous thieves, are not idiots. Which cannot be said for you.

    89. Re:Time for Qs to come back by srussia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would have modded you up just for the neat phrase you invented: got disastrous ;)

      That would be a euphemism for "was destabilized by a US-backed coup"--in this case in 2006.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    90. Re:Time for Qs to come back by chain_from_hell · · Score: 1

      I was thinking a bit more "this ship will self-destruct in 60 minutes". If there's nothing to get but debris there's no reason to attack the ships.

    91. Re:Time for Qs to come back by polar+red · · Score: 1
      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    92. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the US don't kill innocent civilians, but I guess you'd just have to ask the father/mother of children killed when a US smartbomb takes out his neighbours house.

      Then who is the bad guy?

    93. Re:Time for Qs to come back by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why should NATO act ? How many of those hijacked vessels are registered in NATO countries ? I'm betting it's not many so why would we care if they're hijacked or not.

      It's down to countries like Saudia Arabia who are making vast sums of money transporting oil through that area to spend some of that money on their own protection, if they want to protect their ships. At the moment it looks like they prefer to pay out ransoms ( which seems to me to be a highly stupid strategy and is simply providing the pirates with better weapons to capture bigger ships ) but if that's what they want to do it's up to them.

      If our own ships are affected we should take a leaf out the Frenchies book and send in aquatic special forces to eliminate the pirates but whilst it's not our ships we don't have to do anything.

    94. Re:Time for Qs to come back by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Not with warships though, I doubt huge frigates, destroyers or battle ships are going to do that much to prevent small speedboats dashing about on their piratical business. Obviously if the pirates are stupid enough to run slap bang into the path of any of the above then they're in trouble but I can't imagine they're that hard to avoid.

      I guess what you need are many more boats and helicopters to keep large areas under surveillance and with enough strike power to check out suspect craft almost immediately but I think this would be an extremely expensive and logistically complicated operation during which most sensible pirates would sit at home enjoying their lives of luxury until the clampdown let up again and they could get back to business.

      So long as Somalia is lawless and people there are being given huge sums of money to spend on arms and technology you're always going to have problems with pirates.

    95. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Bokononist · · Score: 1

      If that oil tanker had a few RPGs and people that knew how to use them, there wouldn't be a problem. As other people have said these are fishing boats.

      Sure, that would work really well...

      "We're being boarded!"

      "Hold them off a little longer, I only need 471 experience points before my magic-user will be able to cast Fireball!"

    96. Re:Time for Qs to come back by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      I'm glad it was UN and not the USA. Now we have a chance that the problem will go away and not be multiplied by 100.

      Or maybe Bush will want to fight the Somalian pirates and declare war on Kenya. It's not like he hasn't done stupid things like that before.

    97. Re:Time for Qs to come back by zoefff · · Score: 1

      The irony is that things only get moving when oil is involved.

      Damn right it does. Up until the emergence of the hydrogen economy, that is.

    98. Re:Time for Qs to come back by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      As an NRA member I'm not afraid of arms or people wielding them, so long as they are the right people bearing them for the right reasons and shooting them at the right (or would that be wrong?) people.

      But who decides who's right?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    99. Re:Time for Qs to come back by janrinok · · Score: 1

      Others have pointed out that the US has been fighting piracy here for several years, as have the UK and other NATO nations. But they have been doing so as national assets - not as NATO assets. So, NATO declining to be involved is not the same as NATO members refusing to play a role, they are just not doing it under the NATO umbrella because it is not NATO's responsibility.

      --
      Have a look at soylentnews.org for a different view
    100. Re:Time for Qs to come back by ZmeiGorynych · · Score: 1

      And it's also not surprising that we try to do what we can to stop them. Being a poor Somali doesn't justify armed robbery on the high seas, at least in my book. If their country sucks, the ethical ways of dealing with it are either trying to improve it or emigrating, not robbing other people. And by the way, just putting half a dozen decently armed mercenaries on each potential target should resolve the issue, no?

    101. Re:Time for Qs to come back by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Theres a power vacuum now with the fall of the Soviet Union

      That's actually a very interesting point. If you look at the map, nearly all incidents happened off shore of former Soviet client states, allies, or friends.

    102. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Snocone · · Score: 1

      that's a terrible platform for a maritime engagement. Aimed fire at ranges very likely to be 300m+

      You miss that pirates actually board these vessels. By the time they're within docking range, a .300 Win Mag round is going to go straight through whatever makeshift plating they might have bolted on their little speedboats with no trouble whatsoever. And if they're not deterred by that, trying to storm the metal superstructure off the unprotected deck with even a couple of snipers picking at you from its protection is going to be ... well, a tactical situation *I* sure wouldn't get into voluntarily.

      from a moving platform on open water

      These things are bigger than cruise ships, and boarding actions will only take place in calmish conditions. You can consider them a stable platform for engagement purposes.

      The ideal option is a couple of twin .50 cal machine guns ... The Javelin would be a nice option

      But serious weaponry is just plain not in the cards for cargo ships. There is an outside chance that you can get the ports of the world to agree that personal weaponry of the moose/bear hunting type which can be bonded/confiscated whilst docked is something they can tolerate, as that kind of rifle is legal without undue complication in pretty much every nation. And I think that would be sufficient to deter virtually all piracy.

      Keep in mind, we're not trying to actually win an engagement here, as these are pirates not zealots. We're just trying to convince the pirates to go look for a different target. That means we don't need to sink them, we don't need to kill them -- or even come particularly close -- we only need to convince them that either

      a) They'll have to damage the ship so badly to subdue us that they won't be able to salvage enough cargo to make it profitable, or

      b) There's enough of a chance of getting killed trying to board that our ship/cargo isn't worth their personal risk.

      Even a handful of large caliber hunting rifles in even semi-competent hands is quite enough to make that case convincingly enough that virtually all pirates won't even think about closing to boarding distance, I confidently predict.

    103. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on now... we're winning that war... just like Iraq...

    104. Re:Time for Qs to come back by instarx · · Score: 1

      I think the most benefit from hanging the pirates would come from getting rid of the pirates, not so much from deterrence. These guys are repeat offenders.

      The problenm is that the pirates hold hostages. It would be best if the pirates simply did not come back from their raids.

      Some hope comes from yesterdays announcement by the US government that the pirates have connections to al Queda. The problem the Navy has had in the past is that it couldn't perform law-enforcemet activities as long as the pirates were just criminals. However, if the ransoms are going to terrorists it becomes a genuine military objective to stop it. So expect more soon.

      And yes, Q-ships ARE a great answer to the problem. I suggest an attack helicopter in the hold to sink the mother-ship. Wolves in sheep's clothing.

      Still, these pirates are incredibly cocky. They threatened to sink the Indian guided missle frigate! I bet that got some laughs on the bridge.

    105. Re:Time for Qs to come back by instarx · · Score: 1

      If I were a pirate and the ships began carrying snipers and mortars I'd just tie women and children on the decks of my boat and put a camera boat in the area to film the SS [insert corporate name here] mortaring women and children. The problem is more difficult than simple "more guns".

    106. Re:Time for Qs to come back by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 1

      Now THIS is a job for the Blackwater types.

    107. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Xest · · Score: 1

      One thing I've not understood so far is why aircraft aren't involved more. Wouldn't a carrier with jets be enough to respond to distress calls before the pirates can get too close? According to BBC articles, ships passing through the area know the pirates are coming as they keep constant lookout it's just that the world's navies can't sail to them fast enough by the time pirates are in sight but again, surely jets could? I would think Harriers would be perfect for this task.

      Is it the cost of flying constant air sorties that's the problem? I'd have thought even some helicopter carriers with gunships on board would be a better bet than trying to do it all with boats.

      Alternatively perhaps a nuclear submarine or two off the major ports sinking the odd one or two out the blue would act as a nice deterrent :)

    108. Re:Time for Qs to come back by kalirion · · Score: 1

      2. Wait until pirate is within range and intentions are clear.

      3. Throw the covers off the guns and blast them into next year.

      This is the problem right there. If the Blackwater behavior is any indication, pretty soon any fishing boat within 5 miles of such a "Q-Ship" will be dead meat.

    109. Re:Time for Qs to come back by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      I agree in principal with your argument. Perhaps if the Saudis agree to pay protection money? But then, for that matter, why don't the Russians offer the same service. They're running around the sea truckin' it down to Venezuela to play war games with Chavez, they could make a few extra bucks playing the protection racket too.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    110. Re:Time for Qs to come back by mmkkbb · · Score: 1
      --
      -mkb
    111. Re:Time for Qs to come back by swb · · Score: 1

      You miss that pirates actually board these vessels. By the time they're within docking range, a .300 Win Mag round is going to go straight through whatever makeshift plating they might have bolted on their little speedboats with no trouble whatsoever.

      By the time they are within docking range, the pirates are capable of accurate RPG hits and their AKs are pretty deadly, even by African militia standards of marksmanship. Tactically you do not want them to be able to get within 500 yards of your vessel as it renders the usual small arms (AKs, RPGs, handguns) combat ineffective.

      Even if you restrict yourself to docking range engagements, bolt action .300 win mag is still a loser from a cyclic rate (you're going up against a boat full of guys with full-auto AKs) and a dependency on precision aimed fire. At those ranges you would be much better off with semi-auto 7.62x54mm weapons with 4x red dots. Easier to operate, a higher cyclic rate and larger magazine capacities for what you're actually encouraging, a close quarters engagement.

      The fact is that nobody fields bolt action rifles for anything other than parades and very specific sniping missions. They require too much precision aimed fire, have inadequate magazine capacity and cyclic rates that are just too low. This isn't to say that getting whacked with a 3000 ft/sec 180gr slug isn't going to do damage inside of 300 yards, but you'll get your hat handed to you even by Somali thugs with AKs.

      As for what customs thinks, my guess is they'll either freak over *any* weapons or they're willing to give it a pass. But you may not be able to flag your ship with a Liberian flag or whatever the preferred flag of convenience is or necessarily staff your ship with whatever ethnic flotsam you can find.

      The best plan is probably flagging the ship from a real country with actual diplomatic clout and hiring Blackwater or some other mercenary organization as trigger men on board to assuage local customs that you're acting above board and not gun running or whatever their paranoia is.

    112. Re:Time for Qs to come back by instarx · · Score: 1

      The people behind this are warlords, and very rich. I do not buy the "just trying to survive" argument. If it were a valid argument there would be nothing to keep anyone less well off than me to point a gun at my head and just take what I have.

    113. Re:Time for Qs to come back by instarx · · Score: 1

      Plus I seem to remember pirates operating in the Carribean during Reagan's term, preying on private pleasure craft.

    114. Re:Time for Qs to come back by instarx · · Score: 1

      Except they take the whole ship into port, with you on board. They then ransome you, the ship and the cargo. There is no off-loading. There is no safe distance. Thanks for your valuable input anyway. Feel free to comment on any topic you know absolutely nothing about.

    115. Re:Time for Qs to come back by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Plus I seem to remember pirates operating in the Carribean during Reagan's term, preying on private pleasure craft.

      Where do you think Disney got the idea for the ride? (grin) OK, the ride predates Reagan but so do pirates. A lot of people think piracy ended with the end of the golden age of buccaneers - but they've pretty much always been around. They just haven't made the mainstream news much.

    116. Re:Time for Qs to come back by severoon · · Score: 1

      Easy fix! When they take over your ship, just grab the remote detonator and dive overboard with you and your loved ones. Then detonate your incendiary explosives from the water, taking them and their ship lashed to yours. (You can use the debris to float home.)

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    117. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Snocone · · Score: 1

      This isn't to say that getting whacked with a 3000 ft/sec 180gr slug isn't going to do damage inside of 300 yards, but you'll get your hat handed to you even by Somali thugs with AKs.

      I guess we'll just have to disagree, then. I think that having bullets flying anywhere near the assault vessel is going to keep the vast majority of pirates from daring to come anywhere near RPG/AK-47 range in the first place, and if they do close to that range, from a cargo ship platform even half a dozen crewmen with hunting rifles, never mind the 15-20 that would actually be available on the larger ships, are going to have enough of a cover and accuracy advantage to turn into fish bait any of these typical pirate gangs long before their weaponry is anything approaching a serious worry. And you're not worried about the whole gang in any case, because I'll pretty much guarantee you that once two or three are hit the rest are going to be turning their guns on their own captain if he's not already heading out of range as lickety-spit as his little dinghy can go.

      If you have any real life action reports to contradict this, I'll cheerfully concede that I am actually not able to put myself properly into the mindset of a Somali pirate crew. But absent any facts to the contrary, I'll maintain that I understand their psychology, and you don't, so you're pretty much completely missing the point here. It's like saying that a .22 pistol fired out your window is not going to win an engagement against the burglar attempting to jimmy that window armed with a Mac-10. No, it won't, but 99.999999% of the time it'll make him hotfoot it to a gunless house a couple blocks away where there's no resistance, so comparing householder vs. burglar armament as if they were having a tac match is stupid when the measure of success is not winning the fight, it's deterring the fight.. Same principle here.

    118. Re:Time for Qs to come back by willrj.marshall · · Score: 1

      And we're starving them through economic means. They're guilty. So are we. They're killing a few of us, and we're killing a lot of them.

      Who is more evil?

    119. Re:Time for Qs to come back by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Pave the entire country and turn it into permit required parking

      It worked in East St. Louis. It had the added benefit of running all the redncecks out of Cahokia, where the people from East St. Louis moved to when their city was paved over. Now instead of being plagued by redneck trailer trash, Cahokia is now home to black thugs and gangsters.

      Who says government can't do its part?

    120. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      Take your bleeding heart someplace else, go ever there and help them directly. See how long you survive, how much they appreciate it.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    121. Re:Time for Qs to come back by willrj.marshall · · Score: 1

      Individual action is a bit pointless. What is needed is an end to foreign economic intervention, so the Somali government can stabilise.

      The problem, fundamentally, is that the Western world sees the application of free-market/neo-liberal principles to the world economy as a legitimate activity, which inevitably leads to resource-rape and economic exclusion.

    122. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      Individual action is a bit pointless.

      What a cop-out.

      What is needed is an end to foreign economic intervention, so the Somali government can stabilise.

      That's going well thus far, after all, it's not as if they're now committing crimes in international water. Oh, wait... That may also be somewhat difficult since they have no permanent, national government.

      The problem, fundamentally, is that the Western world sees the application of free-market/neo-liberal principles to the world economy as a legitimate activity, which inevitably leads to resource-rape and economic exclusion.

      Perhaps the problem isn't everyone else, but the inability of the Somali people to control and govern themselves. So if you blame the free-market for this pathetic failure, what's the solution? A benevolent dictator that takes over forcing everyone to share everything equally, taking nothing for themselves. I hate to be the one to have to clue you in, but that's never, ever, going to happen, and believing otherwise is, at the very least, naive.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    123. Re:Time for Qs to come back by willrj.marshall · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the problem isn't everyone else, but the inability of the Somali people to control and govern themselves. So if you blame the free-market for this pathetic failure, what's the solution? A benevolent dictator that takes over forcing everyone to share everything equally, taking nothing for themselves. I hate to be the one to have to clue you in, but that's never, ever, going to happen, and believing otherwise is, at the very least, naive.

      Do you really think that their inability is their fault? Do you think there's some kind of taint in the air in Somalia that makes people incapable of rational decision-making?

      The Somali people are subject to greater economic and social pressures, just like everyone else. Their political instability is a product of these forces, not of some kind of 'moral' failure on their part.

      Don't blame the victim. Don't blame people who are acting as best they can within the social framework that has been imposed on them.

      What needs to happen? In general terms, the Western world provides free education to Somalia, and the World Bank and International Monetary Fund provide low-interest loans *without* the usual strings attached.

      In detail? I don't know. Somalia is a ridiculously complicated situation, and there are no easy answers.

      If we want to stop Somalian piracy, however, shooting the pirates we can catch will achieve nothing. There will always be more. Unless we can change the economic pressures within Somalia that drive these people to piracy in the first place, nothing can be done.

    124. Re:Time for Qs to come back by danwesnor · · Score: 1

      Maybe I've been reading too much fiction, but am I the only one thinking: Q Ship? 1. Lure pirate in with tasty looking merchie. 2. Wait until pirate is within range and intentions are clear. 3. Throw the covers off the guns and blast them into next year. 4. ??? 5. Profit!!!

      Yeah, I think the "step 1, ???, profit" joke has been banned from use by people who live in the year 2006 or later.

    125. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that their inability is their fault?

      YES, it certainly isn't the fault of anyone else.

      What needs to happen? In general terms, the Western world provides free education to Somalia, and the World Bank and International Monetary Fund provide low-interest loans *without* the usual strings attached.

      It is NOT our responsibility to take care of the Somali people. The problem with people like you is that you want it both ways. Before we go in it's help us, save us, protect us from ourselves, keep the peace. After we go in we're heartless imperialists. If the Somali people want help, they should get after helping themselves. I suppose if someone broke into your house, murdered your family, and held you and your belongings for a ransom, you'd advocating paying them off as well.

      If we want to stop Somalian piracy, however, shooting the pirates we can catch will achieve nothing. There will always be more. Unless we can change the economic pressures within Somalia that drive these people to piracy in the first place, nothing can be done.

      Shoot enough pirates, and everyone that could potentially become a pirate will realize that it's fruitless, and will perhaps start fixing their own problems.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    126. Re:Time for Qs to come back by willrj.marshall · · Score: 1

      YES, it certainly isn't the fault of anyone else.

      So it's their fault that they were invaded by Ethiopia? Their fault that their traditional government was destroyed by the British and Italians in the late 1800s?

      Somalia is as it is because of greater forces, and their role in the generation of those greater forces is minimal. The blame is collective, and no individual has ever had the power to change the country.

      It is NOT our responsibility to take care of the Somali people. The problem with people like you is that you want it both ways. Before we go in it's help us, save us, protect us from ourselves, keep the peace. After we go in we're heartless imperialists. If the Somali people want help, they should get after helping themselves. I suppose if someone broke into your house, murdered your family, and held you and your belongings for a ransom, you'd advocating paying them off as well.

      Why is not our responsibility? Is it acceptable for use to take our stolen wealth and deny reparations to those we stole it from?

      You're wrong about 'people like me'. I've never advocated direct intervention in internal politics. It inevitably makes the situation worse. I advocate fair and equitable economic policy; the protection of emerging economies and regulation preventing economic arm-twisting. Yes - the Somali have to help themselves. We can make it a whole lot easier for them with minimal effort.

      War is caused by poverty, in one form or another. The only way to prevent it is to prevent poverty.

      Someone breaking into my house is a false analogy and not relevant to this conversation.

      Shoot enough pirates, and everyone that could potentially become a pirate will realize that it's fruitless, and will perhaps start fixing their own problems.

      No. They'll still become pirates, because they need to eat. They'll just become better-armed, more violent pirates with chips on their shoulders.

    127. Re:Time for Qs to come back by swb · · Score: 1

      No, I reject your analysis of Somali pirate psychology, just as I reject your obsolete choice in small arms.

      These are people who have grown up in a totally lawless and stateless culture and many are likely experienced militiamen. They will not blanch or run when facing small arms fire. Many of them have been drawn on, shot at, and possibly even wounded throughout the course of their entire lives. These are Somalis, not risk-averse Europeans or Americans who make the "safe" choice when faced with danger. These people have chosen boarding large commercial shipping vessels by force of arms on the open seas as a way of life; a few stray rounds from a rifle is not going to alter their motivation one iota.

      As for your specific analogy of the .22 pistol and the burglar armed with the Mac-10 -- most law-abiding people expect once you pull a gun on a bad guy, he's going to run. It's true *some* of the time, but many "bad guys" have lived their entire lives in dangerous situations and have had guns pointed at them if not fired at them countless times. Whitey thinking that brandishing his Glock impresses some thug needs to think again.

      As for the mechanics of your Elmer Fudd meets Cutty Sark scenerio, who do you think is going to be shooting these rifles? Your typical merchant marine crew? Some peasant out of the Philippines who has done nothing but cook his entire life? A Greek diesel mechanic? They don't hire trigger men to run these ships.

    128. Re:Time for Qs to come back by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      You would very quickly fall into disfavor with the locals

      What are they going to do about it exactly? We could tell them to pound sand. It is high time that we stopped occupying countries and attempting to convert the natives to our ways of thinking. However, that does not mean that we should not punish those who threaten our interests on the high seas. Who will hear the complaints of Somali locals living off the pirate economy? The world ignored Darfur, they will ignore complaining Somalis too.

      True or not, it's brazen disregard for how other people see things that causes really really bad things for America.

      Piracy is not acceptable I don't care how they see things. If they continue then we should mine their coasts and warn all foreign vessels with legitimate business to avoid Somali waters and stick to the corridors or convoys established by the navies of the world protecting our vital economic interests.

      Not a whole lot in this world is purely black and white.

      I don't want to argue with them and I sure as heck don't want to understand them. They can keep their hell-hole of a country (no need for us to go there and occupy) but if they continue to pirate shipping then we should blow them out of the water. We could easily beat these pirates if the Europeans and Americans would stop pussy footing around and just use some good old WWII convoy protection tactics, shoot em in the head, and stopping wringing our collective hands about it. Somalia is a brutal, violent, and nasty place that requires a violent solution. Why pretend otherwise?

    129. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Under international law I'm fairly sure the US navy are quite free to attack, sink and otherwise interfere with pirates.

      This isn't even law enforcement, it's self defense (and defense of those unable to defend themselves).

      Ironically law enforcement is only relevant if the pirates are just criminals. Oh well.

    130. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Cederic · · Score: 1

      They have automatic weapons and RPGs. I'm not sure a tazer will really cut it.

    131. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, they're releasing the crews unharmed.

      Murdering them would be bad for business - why seek peaceful return of a vessel and its crew if the crew will be dead anyway? You may as well drop a squad of well trained professional troops onto it and prevent the next capture.

      Ransoms are being paid because the crews are alive, not murdered.

    132. Re:Time for Qs to come back by Snocone · · Score: 1

      Do you have any actual evidence to back up your beliefs? Everything I've read about piracy both in the South China Sea and Somalia indicates that pirates flee like little bunny rabbits the instant they hear the report of a firearm without even getting close enough to size up how serious the opposition actually is. If you have some counterevidence from actual engagements, I'd be most interested to pursue it.

      As for the mechanics of your Elmer Fudd meets Cutty Sark scenerio, who do you think is going to be shooting these rifles? Your typical merchant marine crew? Some peasant out of the Philippines who has done nothing but cook his entire life? A Greek diesel mechanic? They don't hire trigger men to run these ships.

      That I can speak to with some confidence, from my time training novice hunters to go after grizzlies here in B.C., which although grizzlies don't have firearms is still an activity with non-negligible risk. Give me four days with this "peasant out of the Philippines" you speak of and I'll have him or her in fine form to defend their ship, I'm quite certain.

    133. Re:Time for Qs to come back by smellotron · · Score: 1

      I see nothing in that article that indicates that the US is orchestrating, condoning, or even involved in that illegal fishing. Citation fail.

    134. Re:Time for Qs to come back by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Repair the influence indeed. If not for 300 years of colonialism, Africa would be even more disease-ridden, illiterate, and likely to suffer seasonal resource shortfalls than it is already, and that's saying a lot. Reminds me a lot of...

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    135. Re:Time for Qs to come back by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      If the EU was really financing an Ethiopian occupation, and European commerce is increasingly forced to go all the way around Africa rather than risk the Gulf of Aden on the way to the Suez, then I would say they would at the very least appear not to be getting their money's worth are they?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    136. Re:Time for Qs to come back by instarx · · Score: 1

      This wasn't simply my opinion, it has been the official position of the U.S. Navy. I am sure if a commercial vessel is being attacked the Navy has the authority to intervene, but taking pro-active steps to catch or stop the pirates has been deemed a law-enforcement activity and is therefore not within the jurisdiction of the Navy. The Coast Guard would be an entirely different story.

      As I said, this will probably change if there is an al Queda link to the pirates. In fact I would not be surprised if the claim of an al Queda link is merely an excuse to allow the Navy to take pre-emptive action.

    137. Re:Time for Qs to come back by jam244 · · Score: 1

      That's a great idea. Just sneak up on them and push the "F" key on your keyboard.

      I prefer B plus Right Trigger, makes a better statement.

    138. Re:Time for Qs to come back by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Why should NATO act ? How many of those hijacked vessels are registered in NATO countries ?

      Quite a few, actually. In 2008 alone, the list of affected NATO countries include France, Spain, Netherlands, Germany, Greece, Turkey, Denmark - 11 ships in all. In addition to that, there were a few Japan and South Korean ships, which I guess should count as "NATO friendly".

    139. Re:Time for Qs to come back by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that Somalia didn't have a full-scale civil war in the lack of any definite stable government going on before 2006?

    140. Re:Time for Qs to come back by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      True or not, it's brazen disregard for how other people see things that causes really really bad things for America. Going in there, shooting up criminals & leaving is not going to improve anyone's image. Yes, these people are kidnappers & thieves but I don't think insta-death is a good way to deal with them.

      Well, it's not just the US that's annoyed. We've got a UN resolution on that matter, and not a single country so far has voiced its opposition to use of force, to the best of my knowledge. Piracy has long been universally considered unacceptable by all states, and death penalty a fitting punishment for pirates caught on the high seas. If US (or NATO as a whole, or someone else) starts actively enforcing this, I really don't see anyone seriously objecting.

    141. Re:Time for Qs to come back by srussia · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the late reply, but here you go: Somali Pirates Thrive After U.S. Helped Oust Their Islamic Foes

      Posted by Bloomberg on Dec 4. Guess /. scooped 'em this time. ;)

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
  2. Not Pirates by youngerpants · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish people would stop using the word Pirate; they're merely redistributing content.

    1. Re:Not Pirates by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      Yes, they redistribute valuables from a big ship to a small port. What's wrong with redistributing the contents of a big ship?

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:Not Pirates by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      I know, we'll let the majority vote on whether or not we should take the contents from the bigger ships and distribute to the smaller ships... Just the ones catching less than 250,000 fish per year.

    3. Re:Not Pirates by Mantrid · · Score: 3, Funny

      We should really be going after the shipyards...without them, we wouldn't have this problem!!

    4. Re:Not Pirates by megamerican · · Score: 2, Informative

      Historically, there were very few real pirates.

      Most were privateers, meaning they were sponsored by a nation. It wouldn't surprise me if this is the case here as well. These so-called pirates don't have a lot to gain in the long term. It'll be interesting to see what the response will be by governments in order to "fix" this problem and who really benefits.

      These stories about pirates have been very frequent in the past few weeks, magically when oil and gas are well below what most could have ever predicted.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    5. Re:Not Pirates by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you heard anything about Somolia in the past, oh I don't know 20 years? There is no government in control of the people, not in the sense you seem to imply. There's also no organized economy or workers rights. Most likely, these pirates are average people with starving family back home, doing anything they can to put food on the table.

      Like a lot of problems around the world, the only way you are going to 'fix' the problem is to raise the standard of living so that the risks of brazenly illegal behavior outweigh the benifits. Sending aid is, of course, a very tricky situation. For many people, it feels like rewarding people who have broken the law. Not to mention there will always be the select few who have become attached to the power they have gained.

    6. Re:Not Pirates by PPalmgren · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work for a large shipping company. Piracy has been in the news lately because they are going after larger and larger ships in deeper waters. The most recent headliner was a supertanker carrying $100 million in crude oil getting hijacked, the largest vessel in history to ever be hijacked. One of our company's vessels fended off an attempted hijacking a few weeks ago as well. Regardless of cargo, vessels of this size often cost nearly 6 figures a day just to own, let alone operating costs. The costs of these hijackings are astronomical, that is why they are in the news. It is not OPEC propaganda.

    7. Re:Not Pirates by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      These stories about pirates have been very frequent in the past few weeks

      Mostly because the pirates have gotten very, very, bold of late. And without the election or the Emmys, well there isn't much news.

    8. Re:Not Pirates by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Care to tell us how they fended off the hijacking attempt? Just curious - thanks!

    9. Re:Not Pirates by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      I can't find the press release so I can't be sure, but I recall it involving evasive maneuvers and use of the emegency fire equipment over the side of the vessel.

    10. Re:Not Pirates by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Interesting - thanks!

  3. Where's Wall Street? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How come Wall Street doesn't have the biggest cluster? It's talking about robbing $7.4 TRILLION in booty from Americans now, with no end in sight.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Where's Wall Street? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Wall street is on the receiving end of that largess, but they're not doing the robbing. Congress is.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Where's Wall Street? by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      Don't worry. Crimson Permanent Assurance Co. will get them.

    3. Re:Where's Wall Street? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Oh, right, it's just a coincidence that Wall Street is getting bailed out, and Wall Street spend huge money on bribes and inserting cronies into government.

      Congress is stuffing the loot into sacks. But of course it's Wall Street's piracy operation.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Where's Wall Street? by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Technically, Wall Street is the Capo di tutti Capi directing their Uomini D'onore, Congress, on who to shake down. Leave it to a troll who's name is deliberately reminiscent of 'hairy vagina' to defend Wall Street.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  4. Woah if you zoom in, you can see the ships! by FredFredrickson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Google identified the pirate locations based on the ships themselves! If you zoom in on one, such as Attack ID: 2008/187 You can actually see the pirate ship, and somebody walking the plank! (Just above puerto la cruz)

    --
    Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    1. Re:Woah if you zoom in, you can see the ships! by Briareos · · Score: 1

      And if you follow this link you can even see the pirates and ships up close!

      np: Rhythm & Sound with Paul St. Hilaire - Free For All (See Mi Yah)

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  5. Shippers urge copyright blockade of Somali coast by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    By EILEEN NG - 42 minutes ago
    KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) -- Shipping officials from around the world called Monday for a military blockade along Somalia's coast to intercept copyright infringer vessels heading out to sea. Yemen's government said Somali copyright infringers have seized another ship.

    Peter Swift, managing director of the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners, said stronger naval action -- including aerial and aviation support -- is necessary to battle rampant piracy in the Gulf of Aden near Somalia.

    But NATO, which has four warships off the coast of Somalia, rejected a blockade.

    Some 20 tankers sail through the sea lane daily. But many tanker owners are considering a massive detour around southern Africa to avoid copyright infringers, which will delay delivery and push costs up by 30 percent, Swift said.
    The association, whose members own 2,900 tankers or 75 percent of the world's fleet, opposes attempts to arm merchant ships because it could escalate the violence and put crew members at even greater risk, he said.
    "The other option is perhaps putting a blockade around Somalia and introducing the idea of intercepting vessels leaving Somalia rather than to try to protect the whole of the Gulf of Aden," Swift said.

    Somali copyright infringers have become increasingly brazen, seizing eight vessels in the past two weeks, including a huge Saudi supertanker loaded with $100 million worth of crude oil.

    On Monday, Yemen's Interior Ministry says Somali copyright infringers have hijacked a Yemeni cargo ship in the Arabian Sea. It said communication with the vessel was lost last Tuesday after it had been out to sea for a week.

    The ship is called Adina and it was not immediately clear what cargo it was carrying. The U.S. 5th Fleet based in Bahrain could not confirm the hijacking.
    The Arabian Sea is part of the Indian Ocean and stretches between Yemen and Somalia. The Gulf of Aden links it with the Red Sea.

    A blockade along Somalia's 2,400 mile coastline would not be easy.
    "But some intervention there may be effective," Swift told reporters on the sidelines of a shipping conference in Malaysia.

    U.S. Gen. John Craddock, NATO's supreme allied commander, said Monday the alliance's mandate is solely to escort World Food Program ships to Somalia and to conduct anti-piracy patrols.

    Asked what he thought of a Russian proposal to jointly attack the copyright infringer strongholds, Craddock answered: "That's far beyond what I've been tasked to do."

    According to Lt. Nathan Christensen, 5th Fleet spokesman, more than 14 warships from Denmark, France, India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Russia, the U.S. and NATO are currently patrolling a vast international maritime corridor. They escort some merchant ships and respond to distress calls in the area.
    Christensen declined to comment on the idea of a blockade.
    But the navies say it is virtually impossible to patrol the vast sea around the gulf.
    NATO has ruled out a blockade.

    "Blocking ports is not contemplated by NATO," said NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer in Brussels. U.N. Security Council resolutions "do not include these kind of actions and as far as NATO is concerned, this is at the moment not on the cards," he said.

    Secretary-General of the Arab League Amr Moussa said Monday Arabs should deploy their own naval forces to fight piracy in the Horn of Africa and also cooperate with foreign fleets in the area.

    Diplomats of the Arab countries on the Red Sea met in Cairo last week to coordinate efforts to combat piracy, but some of these nations have been reluctant to get involved.

    Somalia, an impoverished nation caught up in an Islamic insurgency, has had no functioning government since 1991. Before the Yemeni report of another hijacked ship, there had been 95 copyright infringer attacks so far this year in Somali waters, with 39 ships hijacked.

    There were 15 ships with nearly 300 crew still in the hands of Somali copyright infringers, who dock the

  6. /.ed by WiiVault · · Score: 1

    5 Comments in and its already Slashdotted. Time to upgrade the 'ol 486!

    1. Re:/.ed by smallshot · · Score: 0, Informative

      not the first time i've seen a joomla site /.ed. pretty sure its not the server.

  7. They've kidnapped the maps! by davidwr · · Score: 5, Funny

    NEWS FLASH

    This just in...

    Somali pirates have seized control of Slashdot and are using it as their new gunship to take down web sites such as http://www.icc-ccs.org/ .

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  8. Re:Shippers urge copyright blockade of Somali coas by canderley · · Score: 1

    omg I so wish I had mod points right now.

  9. Site slashdotted, mirror here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Site is slashdotted, here's a mirror of the current pirate activity:

    Pirate Hotbed

    1. Re:Site slashdotted, mirror here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going for the coveted 50% Funny, 50% Troll are we?

    2. Re:Site slashdotted, mirror here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Site is slashdotted, here's a mirror of the current pirate activity:

      Pirate Hotbed

      NYSE. Very NYSE.

    3. Re:Site slashdotted, mirror here: by Falkkin · · Score: 1

      Really, the funniest thing about this is one of the "reviews":

      Rated 2.0 out of 5.0
      Service was OK - bob - Aug 1, 2008
      Atmosphere could use some help, and gets a bit noisy at times (I could barely hear my lunchpal throughout the meal). The service was mediocre, because while they do exactly (most of the time) as you tell them, it takes a holler and sometimes a fervent hand wave to get their attention. Plus, you have to shout out your orders too. Food was decent but for the price, not really worth it.

  10. Convoys by zentinal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Does anyone know why, given the huge area and the number of ships to protect, merchant ships in the area aren't being organized into convoys with military escort through those waters?

    Wouldn't that strategy work at least as well as it did in WWII?

    I don't think the pirates have submarines or aircraft... yet.

    1. Re:Convoys by 18_Rabbit · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering this myself. Not only did it work well in WWII, it has worked since the age of sail.

    2. Re:Convoys by kwiqsilver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because that would be expensive. There are too many ships going through the Red Sea or other hot spots to organize small enough convoys that don't end up leaving ships waiting for days for an escort. And imagine the traffic jams you'd see at the Suez and Panama Canals when that convoy showed up.

      If you want a military solution, a better option would be to park a carrier or two in each hot spot, and give each merchant ship contact information for the carrier(s) in an area, so they can call in a strafing run on any small, well armed boats that get too close (like pirate 911).

      A better solution still would be to remove the international legal restrictions against carrying small arms (e.g. battle rifles) and fixed armaments (e.g. fixed machine guns and light artillery) on a merchant ship. A few years ago, a Cruise Ship used a sonic weapon to fend off a pirate attack off Somalia. Imagine if instead of a non-lethal sonic cannon, they had unleashed a few rounds from a 30mm Cannon modified to fire at sea-based attackers. It would have stopped that attack and prevented those pirates (and that boat) from mounting any future attacks.

    3. Re:Convoys by Pheersome · · Score: 2, Informative

      The EU navies have begun convoy operations in the Gulf of Aden:

      http://www.lloydslist.com/ll/news/eu-launches-naval-escorts-in-gulf-of-aden/20017577798.htm

      --
      Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
    4. Re:Convoys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why don't they form convoys?
      Because these are commercial ships, each with its own schedule, route, and agenda.

      Why don't they arm themselves?
      Because these are small crews on huge boats, their goal is to stay alive, if they start a gun fight, those odds drop.

      Why do these companies pay the ransoms? Doesn't that just encourage more piracy?
      Because these companies and their investors want their really expensive stuff back, and paying a small percentage of face value is therefore a good deal. Why would they care what long term consequences it has on other ships.

    5. Re:Convoys by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Informative

      give each merchant ship contact information for the carrier(s) in an area, so they can call in a strafing run on any small, well armed boats that get too close (like pirate 911).

      By the time the 'small, well armed boat' is identifiably too close...it is too close for an aircraft to get there in time. Plus which, the military pilot can't just take the word of some random guy about whether to shoot some other random boat in the water.

    6. Re:Convoys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's not enough ships to guard every convoy and the shipping lanes aren't a war zone. In WW2 if a destroyer saw a boat they could sink him; that's not possible right now because Somali "fishing" boats are allowed to operate in Somali waters.

    7. Re:Convoys by rpmayhem · · Score: 1

      I don't think the pirates have submarines or aircraft... yet.

      Even if they did, I'm pretty sure the convoy escort could handle those.

      And even if the pirates did use their ransom money to buy things like subs or aircraft, the navies would just more countermeasures. We already have anti-sub measures. Also, planes have to land somewhere. A little bit of satellite photography and a squad of jet fighters would end this.

    8. Re:Convoys by snakeplissken · · Score: 1

      Imagine if instead of a non-lethal sonic cannon, they had unleashed a few rounds from a 30mm Cannon modified to fire at sea-based attackers.

      I'd prefer a Destructomatic T-47;
      or a voodoo cannon ball!

    9. Re:Convoys by SixAndFiftyThree · · Score: 1

      If the alternative is going round the Cape, waiting a few days will not seem like such a bad idea.

    10. Re:Convoys by fbjon · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, nobody who actually works on the ships want any weapons, because they don't want to go to war and get killed.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  11. Re:start "paying attention to the real problems"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True, however it doesn't cause any physical harm as piracy tends to.. I'd say while it's not entirely harmless, it is definatly much 'less real'

  12. the REAL piracy is on wall street by swschrad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    remember the "bailout?" more like a handout to old buddies from the club for King Henry. a yo-ho-ho and a tip of the hat when they put a cluster of about 10 circles in New York.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  13. speaking of piracy by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like the jacked up idle template pirated my user page. What do we have to do to get rid of it?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:speaking of piracy by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I was wondering about that. I go to my user page now and I've got a bunch of spam about features of slashdot I don't care a damn about instead of the list of my recent comments I was looking for.

    2. Re:speaking of piracy by treeves · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was annoyed. I was at 999 comments and this makes 1000, but my comments page no longer says how many comment I made...How can I ever prove I wasted all that time?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:speaking of piracy by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      You only get spam? Lucky you. It won't even render properly in Firefox and barely renders legibly (with formatting fuckups) in IE. And my top firehose story is about necrotic dog penis, I shit you not. Could it be a comment about the quality of the CSS?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  14. The Real Deal. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    "Considering how much time we spend talking about the other kind, I think it's worth paying attention to the real problems out there."

    You don't consider people who share content they're not suppose to a "real problem"? Why am I not surprised?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  15. The solution is simple by xs650 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Send the RIAA and their lawyers after the pirates. It won't stop the piracy, but it will get rid of the RIAA and a bunch of lawyers.

  16. RIAA by javilon · · Score: 1

    If I were the RIAA I would be donating money to the effort the united nations are making to stop Somali pirates. That way they could try to keep the word "piracy" for their own corporate use.
    Right now, with the news of the pirates real kidnapping and killing, people has to be wondering why the same word is used for someone that makes a copy of a file.

    --


    When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
  17. The World's Biggest Pirate Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U.S. Pledge for Bailout: U.S. $ 7.4 trillion

    This Criminal who
    continues steal from the U.S. Treasury: Priceless

  18. Piet Hein by tsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in NL we have a song about Piet Hein. He brought us the Spanish silver fleet when Holland ruled the waves and was at war with the Spaniards in the 17th century. He was a national hero back then, but in fact he was just a pirate. He stole all the silver the Spaniards had stolen from the natives in South America.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Piet Hein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fellow dutchman here :)

      His capture of the spanish silver fleet would have been privatering, not piracy, since it occured in wartime with permission of the dutch government, which is somewhat different from looting ships not part of the war...

      Granted he may have been a pirate as well, but the silverfleet caper wasnt piracy.

      as for the somalian situation, i say defend those ships, put defense guns on there (that outrange any weapons the pirates may have, best blow that dingy out of the water before they RPG you in the flank), guided misseles if need be. Hell, for all i care they can start equipping large merchant ships with a temporary detachment of apache gunships, that'll scare the living daylights out of any pirate.

  19. Excellent work Google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can find where to download the new Photoshop more easily!

  20. No, they might laugh themselves to death . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . which can only be the real intention of the announcement of sanctions against the pirates.

    This is actually a big deal for the UN, because they banned Joke Warfare (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke_warfare) years ago.

    Maybe someone should threaten the pirates with "going to bed without any supper?"

    OK, no Nintendo for a week?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:No, they might laugh themselves to death . . . by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      I read your post, laughed so hard I fell off my chair, hit my head on the corner of the filing cabinet and am now dead. My co-worker came into my cubicle to see what the noise was read your post, began to guffaw slipped in my blood and put a pencil through his temple - dying instantly. I hope you're happy now.!!!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    2. Re:No, they might laugh themselves to death . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, no Nintendo for a Wiik?

      FTFY

  21. Proof for Pastafarienism by Nick+Ives · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Great Flying Spaghetti Monster has revealed to us that there is a link between pirates and global warming, as piracy goes down, global warming increases. Surely this is evidence (not that any is needed) for this basic truth? As pirates steal oil tankers the price of oil will increase thereby limiting its consumption and decreasing the amount of global warming.

    It's plain simple logic, just like the plain, simple, wholesome taste of pasta with a tomato sauce.

    --
    Nick
    1. Re:Proof for Pastafarienism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of what you say sounds valid, but Sir, your words offend me. The mer implication that tomato sauce is "wholesome".

      Member of the church of White-Sauce Pastafarian

    2. Re:Proof for Pastafarienism by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 1

      The Great Flying Spaghetti Monster has revealed to us that there is a link between pirates and global warming, as piracy goes down, global warming increases.

      Hear hear! And the fact that there hasn't been any global warming for ten years now (i.e., since 1998) is proof!

      Oh, praise His Noodly Appendage.

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
  22. Take off the tinfoil hat by spun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, most pirates were not privateers. But most privateers were also pirates. The reason being, privateers could only get Letters of Marque and Reprisal when their country was at war, and the letters only covered attacking enemy shipping. What did privateers do during the times their country was not at war? They turned to outright piracy.

    The idea of modern countries handing out letters of Marque is ridiculous. Implying the pirates are after oil is just dumb. Saying the pirates don't have a lot to gain in the long run is also stupid, and shows how uneducated you are on the matter. Just look at the ransoms they receive. You only have to do it once. This is not some kind of Pirates of the Caribbean secret order of pirates. This is groups of starving desperate men trying for the Big Score. They take what they can get, and hope the shipping company will pay a ransom rather than see their ship sunk. They aren't selling oil and goods on the black market.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  23. Real problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I think it's worth paying attention to the real problems out there."

    Problem? I find it refreshing that pirates are able to preserve their autonomy in spite of the land cartel.

  24. "Real" Piracy? by Beyond+Opinion · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I believe that re-distributing digital content is the new piracy. The merchants seem to be scared enough of it, and like "real" piracy, they can do things to put a damper on it, but it's going to keep happening until they find a different way to distribute it. In this round, the merchants use DRM and lawsuits instead of cannon and guns-for-hire, and in place of the Seven Seas we have the World Wide Web. We even have "letters of mark" from people like Radiohead and Trent Reznor. And if digital piracy doesn't seem adventurous enough for ye romantics out there, take a look at some of the exploits of the world's largest BitTorrent tracker: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pirate_Bay/ http://thepiratebay.org/legal/ I'm not saying that "boat" piracy doesn't exist, of course, but that digital piracy is just as legitimate.

  25. Re:Shippers urge copyright blockade of Somali coas by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    stronger naval action -- including aerial and aviation support -- is necessary to battle rampant piracy in the Gulf of Aden near Somalia.

    Nice try, grasshopper.. You got the concrete nouns, but you missed the abstract.

  26. Historical Precident by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm normally pro-US hegemony and quick to defend our actions. But, I'm about to give a silver bullet to my opposition.

    I can't help but notice the parallels between America's situation and Rome during its final centuries. Rome eventually degraded as barbaric pressures from the outside world overwhelmed their ability to control them.

    Modern America seems to be collapsing under a similar weight. Terrorism and piracy are equivalent modern forms of barbarism. The fact that the US cannot control it anymore validates the position that the US military is way overstretched and that our empire is on the decline.

    Ug.

    1. Re:Historical Precident by willrj.marshall · · Score: 1

      Terrorism is not actually any more of a problem than it has always been, except insofar as it has been recently used as an excuse for all sorts of bad internal and foreign policy on the part of the US, UK and Australian governments.

    2. Re:Historical Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, and of course Modern America and Anciend Rome ruled under very intellicent people.

      So all that was fault of damn barbarians...

    3. Re:Historical Precident by Panseh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many of these ships taken hostage have been American owned? None that I know of. Even if they were all American ships, the pirates only received an estimated $30 million in ransoms this year. Not exactly a huge chunk of US GDP. Consider focusing your concerns on issues within the country, rather than get distracted by FUD like terrorism and piracy.

    4. Re:Historical Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not going to dismiss the notion of any parallels between America's present situation and that of the fall of Rome. But I'm not sure that the ones you've stated stand up to scrutiny.

      If there's one thing we should take from the last 8 years, is that international terrorism is not a problem to be solved through military means.

      As for these pirates. Purely because the US hasn't sent its military to deal with them, doesn't mean that it couldn't. The US Navy is quite capable of indiscriminately denying Somalian ships passage to the sea. Not to mention sending in the marines, or airstrikes. Now this would be like swatting some flies with the 5th fleet. And undoubtebly the wrong move, given the situation. But its a mistake to confuse not having the capability, and not choosing you use that capability.

    5. Re:Historical Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh

      this is so totally not the point.

      these pirates are screwing with everyone who isn't them. If the go-ahead was given to stop these SOB's, it would take days to curtail piracy, but the world does not have the political will to do so, given the ~300 hostages they have. Give it time. It has nothing to do with capability.

    6. Re:Historical Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of history, the U.S. had a couple of wars over piracy (in the Mediterranean) back in the day: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_Wars

    7. Re:Historical Precident by khallow · · Score: 1

      The thing is, piracy and terrorism get worse, if you don't deal with it. My take is that the current level of piracy has gotten worse over the past couple of years (though no doubt it is somewhat exaggerated by the media). If the world were to consistently fail to deal with the problem for twenty years, for example, Somali pirates would probably be raiding all over the Indian Ocean. The piracy business would be so profitable that massive numbers of eye-patch wannabes from elsewhere would be immigrating to Somalia for the money. Other coastal areas (eg, Yemen, Ethiopia, etc) would get into the business as well.

      There are two things stopping Somalis and other places from conducting Viking-style raids on Australia, for example. 1) They don't currently have the capability to conduct such a raid, and 2) they wouldn't survive the return trip. Aggressive antipiracy both keeps would-be pirates from developing the infrastructure and experience to conduct more economically harmful activities and it also encourages would-be pirates to pursue a more benigh vocation.

      So in summary, harmful activities like piracy or terrorism should be countered with more effort than you'd expect for the damage they cause. That's so that these problems do not get worse and require greater effort to correct down the road.

    8. Re:Historical Precident by khallow · · Score: 1

      Also, looking at the Google Map information, I see two things that make the Somali piracy stand out. First, it has unusually high occurance. I wager it is most of the reported worldwide piracy for 2008. Second, these pirates range far from base. If one looks at the rest of the world, most of the piracy is in a port rather than out in open ocean (Indonesia being a notable exception). However, most Somali piracy is well out to sea either hitting the Red Sea route or ships sailing off of Southeastern Africa.

    9. Re:Historical Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Ancient Rome degraded from barbaric pressures because it wasn't willing/able to bring its full military strength against them. In comparison, the U.S. could've turned Somalia into a giant parking lot anytime since the early 1990's. Its just that the U.S. military has been effectively tied up, gagged and locked in the closet only to be let out when the U.N. needed a real military force. It was only after 9/11 did they really start flexing their muscles around.

    10. Re:Historical Precident by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I can't help but notice the parallels between America's situation and Rome during its final centuries. Rome eventually degraded as barbaric pressures from the outside world overwhelmed their ability to control them.

      Rome's problem was that it reduced its money supply by 90% towards the end and debased its existing currency until it was nearly worthless. As a result, commoners lost their land and homes and refused to support the government which was then able to be easily toppled from without.

      We'd never do something so foolish, right?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:Historical Precident by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      What are you, f'in nuts? The US Navy rules the waves. The only thing stopping them from blasting the pirates out of the water is the ruthless international media, which would change the focus from the good guys destroying criminals, to the poor oppressed Africans always getting screwed by the imperialist aggressors. Rome never had to deal with that, did they? I'd say that's more of a societal breakdown than a few rag-tag out-of-work sailors next to Arabia. "The fact that the US can not control it anymore"? Seriously, what planet do you live on.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:Historical Precident by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The difference between terrorism and sea piracy is that the latter is an actual problem, and most (all?) countries in the world agree that it can only be dealt with by the use of force.

      As for paying the pirates because it's just pocket money - well, it exacebrates the problem in the long term. You know, "no deals with terrorists".

  27. So... by yyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...when will there be a Google map showing the locations of ninjas?

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you noticed?! It's the default map.

    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will become a map of people killed by ninjas

    4. Re:So... by oPless · · Score: 1

      They're behind you!




      ---
      I look forward to killing you with a map soon!

    5. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 14 ninjas on that map. Oh, you don't see them?

  28. Atlas Shrugged by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, the economy is collapsing because of the sin of "greed". People are screaming for the government to bail them out because of their "need". Huge industries are being nationalized in the name of protecting the People. And now, Ragnar Danneskjold, is terrorizing the seas.

    Where have I seen this before?

  29. Citizen of the Galaxy as applied to this problem: by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Robert Heinlein wrote a book where merchant ships scooting through space were armed with nuclear rockets to blow the pirates straight to hell because the government cruisers, while effective, were few and far between.

    Obviously, we don't need to go nuclear on the pirates, but some small arms would go a long way to curbing the problem. Bigger ships can get bigger guns.

    Arm each ship with some guns and grenade launchers. Scale up as appropriate for larger ships. Problem solved.

    --
    ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
  30. massive weaponry has been suggested by peter303 · · Score: 1

    But its a question of manpower. These large argo ships have may one, two dozen people to keep costs down. The pirates have a semi-infinite supply.

    1. Re:massive weaponry has been suggested by Philzli · · Score: 0

      http://www.rheinmetall-detec.de/index.php?fid=2919&lang=3&pdb=1
      Something like this could the trick, I think. Can be remote controlled, what about a company that installs and maintains those guns and also takes care of the firing? :)

    2. Re:massive weaponry has been suggested by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hire adventurers? Put an exclamation point in front of the hiring place and gun toting wow players will naturally gravitate towards the quest giver. Set up cameras and sell footage to TV shows. Adventurers get salvage rights on the pirates taken out, everyone wins.

      Call it the Naval Interdiction Nullification Joint Assault program. Or for short, the NINJA program.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
  31. I guess that's why it's so cold right now by KDR_11k · · Score: 1
    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  32. Why take away Nintendo? We have Xbox and PC. by tepples · · Score: 1

    OK, no Nintendo for a week?

    So what? Real pirates pirate PC and Xbox 360 games.

  33. Send in the Air Force by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    With Daisy Cutters and turn the ports into rubble. Then use the Navy to sink everything floating larger than an egg carton.

    http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/blu-82.htm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_upy14pesi4

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  34. A little background by kaynaan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This Issue is not black and white as most people think. This piracy has been going on for more than a 15 years off the coast of Somalia. In the past the targets were usually Japanese boats illegally tuna fishing a few miles off the north-eastern coast. back home these men are not looked upon as pirates they were a de facto navy for so long. believe it or not they have certain code they follow which is largely based on our nomadic culture .. they have not hurt a single hostage nor are they interested in doing so ... their hostages are treated with respect and food and water are shared equally among capture and captured... they are not locked up or anything like that. I admit the last few months what they are doing is beyond the pale .. but I cannot help admiring the the courage to take on a vessels of that size with dingy motor boats. contrary to what many articles report they are nowhere near as organized as they would have you believe .. the whole hi-tech thieves things is BS ... granted the last 'pirate' boat i've seen was about 13 years ago .. but the only thing these guys have got going for them is the 2 steel spheres in their shorts

    1. Re:A little background by ghostunit · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, taking advantage of the lack of a Somali government, Korean and Taiwanese trawlers depleted their coasts of fish, thus depriving them of a fishing industry and perhaps forcing some Somali into piracy (in addition to the ones who do it willingly, of course).

    2. Re:A little background by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      believe it or not they have certain code they follow which is largely based on our nomadic culture ... I cannot help admiring the the courage to take on a vessels of that size with dingy motor boats.

      That's alright, we have a certain code we follow, too. I'm sure the Marines (either US or Royal) will not refuse those oh-so-honorable pirates their final smoke when they're up against the wall. And a blindfold, of course. As it should be.

  35. Lets see how that would play out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Merchant ships start arming themselves with small weapons.
    Pirates notice this and begin increasing their armament to compensate.
    Merchant ships begin loading bigger and bigger guns in an accelerating arms race in an effort to scare off the pirates.
    Pirates become used to buying weapons from the black market and scavenging from captured merchant ships.
    Naval artillery becomes as easily available as AK's as weapons manufacturers begin to step up production to meet the increased demand.
    Pirate fleets begin to organize themselves with small lightly armed scout ships and heavily armed destroyers cruising through the seas. They experiment with a few old Russian subs acquired cheaply.
    Turf wars begin to erupt between the pirates as the small guys are not able to keep up with the arms race and the big players begin to defend their 'feeding grounds'.
    Some of the more desperate merchants begin to hire pirate groups to protect their cargo from the other pirates.
    International navies realise that the situation is getting out of hand and try to intervene only to actually be outgunned.
    The cost of shipping goods increases exponentially as protection money costs are passed on to the consumer.
    Boosted by the influx of cash from "protecting" merchant ships, huge pirate flotillas, the rival of any countries' navy, begin raiding sea ports worldwide stealing cargo even from dry land, blockading ports and demanding ransoms, etc.
    The world's oceans become a lawless zone where people fear to tread. People begin to move away from the coasts for fear of pirates. Cities like Singapore become pirate-run towns.
    Governments try to use their full military force to stamp out the problem only to realize that the pirates just keep growing in number and CANNOT BE STOPPED. For every one that falls a new one is born.

    AND THIS IS HOW THE PIRATE NATION WAS BORN!!!!

    1. Re:Lets see how that would play out by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      And this is how the neo ninja-pirate wars begin.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
  36. The register by JCWDenton · · Score: 1

    The register published an informative article on this not too long ago. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/13/retro_piracy_brouhaha_discussed/ Basically, why would the UK suddenly care about ships being captured it failed to care about the high numbers of ships with foreign crews sinking?

  37. Mk-38 (M-242) by DnemoniX · · Score: 1

    The solution is rather simple, the Mk-38 25MM Autocannon. In international waters these vessels have every right to defend themselves against pirates. This unit is widely used by the military and is very easily attached to all sorts of ships would provide a nice deterrent. The rate of fire and range are more that sufficient to keep many craft at a distance. And not only are they easy to maintain, simple to use, but fun as heck to use.

    http://www.zombiesurvivalwiki.com/page/M-242+Bushmaster+25MM+Autocannon?t=anon

    Link goes to details

    1. Re:Mk-38 (M-242) by Cederic · · Score: 1

      And also easy for pirates to acquire and use against the larger, slower, easier to hit and rather more valuable merchant vessel.

      You're suggesting an arms race. You'll need to race a little higher than that to beat the pirates..

  38. This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to find out where all the pirates have been hiding in order to decrease global war.. I mean... "climate change" (that's it)... So sayeth Our Noodly Saviour....

  39. Reasons Piracy Continues by linuxbert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Piracy exists in Somalia because the government lacks sufficient ability and influence to stop it.
    It continues largely because the international community that has the ability to stop it, doesnt have the reason to. Modern warships can sink targets they cant visually see. The Gulf of Aden is large, but its not that large.

    Most ships, even if owned by a western company, are flagged in a Convenient state - Panama, Liberia etc. these countries love the revenue form being a flag state but have no means of protecting their flagged ships. Most ships are crewed by non western crews.. many from the Philippines, Bangladesh, etc. again countries with limited abilities to protect their nationals internationally.

    The west has many ships in the area, however they are reluctant to act for political reasons, if no nationals are involved, or its not a home flagged ship, its really not the concern of the country. The pirates get their million dollar ransom, which to a pirate is a wind fall, but to a shipping company, used to paying $60000/day fuel bills, really isnt that big a deal. Furthermore the risks to the pirates are relatively small - the French raided a la Poinete, a yacht that was taken by pirates and was crewed by french nationals, and the Indians sunk a Pirate mother ship last week. So for the pirates 2 out of over 100 incidents ended badly. To stop the pirates, the western world needs to actively seek them out, hunt them down and stop them from taking ships, as well as recapturing ships by force. When pirates begin to face the consequences - to this point there have been almost none, then they will cease their actions, because taking a ship no longer results in a quick profit for the prirates, and the risk of death goes up significantly for the actual takers of the ship.

    Incidentally, the IMO is now recommending ships hire private security to protect them in troubled waters. Blackwater international has also purchased ships. The 18th century tales of piracy make a difference between a Privateer and a pirate a privateer was a mercenary ship working for a nation, to harass enemy shipping - they could take prizes, but paid a percentage to the crown, and wouldn't attack friendly shipping. a pirate had no Letter of Marque, paid no commissions, and attacked who he wanted when he wanted...

    everything old is new again.

    One final aside, those whom complain about copyright infringement by referring to it as piracy do a great disservice to the victims of piracy, imagine having your office attacked by men armed with machine guns and RPG's and your only defense is to run, and spray the attackers with a fire hose. from the floor above..

  40. Didn't we do this once already. . ? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Didn't we already have an age of piracy? Wasn't it the main reason the U.S. Navy was invented?

    This looks like another trumped up excuse to scare people and spend money on guns.

    --We've had a fairly large up-tick in media awareness about pirates over the last few years. (Thank-you, Disney and Mr. Depp.) --Heck, a few weeks back when I was buying some coffee, the lady at the cash informed me that I could win a prize because it was international 'Pirate Day'. WTF??

    Before Iraq, there was a media build up with huge popular mind-shaping software like, "Command & Conquer". Something is going on. Despite conventional wisdom, convergences of this nature never happen for no reason.

    -FL

    1. Re:Didn't we do this once already. . ? by Digital+End · · Score: 1

      your tinfoil hat is a bit tight, seems to be speeding the insanity

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
  41. Speed Limits by Therefore+I+am · · Score: 1

    If all small boats were warned that if they travelled at more than 10 knots they were liable to be sunk without notice the whole thing would fizzle out after a dozen sinkings or so.

  42. What a bunch of crap by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to some of the hostages just released:

    Five Indian sailors who were among the crew of a Japanese-owned cargo ship hijacked by pirates and held for two months before a ransom was paid said Monday their captivity was "total desperation."

    The sailors were generally in good health when they were released, but according to the five who spoke publicly Monday conditions aboard the Stolt Valor were severe and they lived for two months in continual fear of being killed by the pirates.

    "We were always ... all 24 hours we were on gunpoint," said Fernandes. "We were all staying on the bridge (in the) navigation area. All 22 crew members were sleeping there, eating there. Only for shower and all, only two people were allowed -- two people will go, then they come up, two (more) people will go."

      Another crew member, Naved Burandkar, said the hijacking occurred when pirates came behind the Stolt Valor on a boat and fired rocket-propelled grenades.

    "They were continuously firing (at) our ship," he said. "They boarded our ship. They were firing ... nobody was going to understand what's happening so you can imagine what the situation was there."

    http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/11/24/india.pirates/index.html

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  43. Not to read anything into it by warp_kez · · Score: 1

    But is it me, or are the highest piracy rates located in areas where a certain religion is practised?

    1. Re:Not to read anything into it by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Too late, you already did...

  44. calming program initiate. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    your tinfoil hat is a bit tight, seems to be speeding the insanity

    Think now: You took the time to fling a pre-packaged insult at me in an attempt to. . ? What? Embarrass me into only speaking the 'right' things? Have you ever stopped to wonder why your knee jerks like that? What purpose does it serve? --Of course, it's pack mentality; this is understood. But why? Do you really think it's YOU making that decision. It's not. It's auto-reaction, and it was baked in place long ago. And not by you.

    Most people simply auto-react their way through every minute of every day, thinking that it's them at the helm, when really it's not. It's actually very easy to control populations and events in a way which is quite invisible to the population. Heck, there's a good chance you don't even realize you're mostly robot. The very idea right now is most likely making you scramble to access some basic calming program to make the creepy feeling go away as fast as possible.

    With these mechanisms being so ubiquitous, if somebody wanted to make a group of people become pirates and have them think it was their idea all along, it would be very easy to do.

    -FL

  45. Real problem? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    Considering how much time we spend talking about the other kind, I think it's worth paying attention to the real problems out there.

    Maybe I'm just old-fashiond and boring, but it's not because you couldn't care less about piracy that it isn't someone lese's real problem...

  46. Most of these are covert robberies by tukang · · Score: 1

    When I opened the site I thought that the map points are incidents of piracy where violence was threatened so I was surprised to see that most of the reports are about covert robberies of anchored ships ... I guess they're still technically incidents of piracy since a ship was robbed but it's probably not what people have in mind when they think about pirates

  47. Platoon on board ? by CalcuttaWala · · Score: 1

    Is it so difficult to position a platoon of troops armed with the latest infantry weapons on every merchant ship that is sailing through this area ? If we can have security guards in banks, factories and other land based installations, why is it so difficult to have guards on a ship carrying USD 100m worth of merchandise ?

    --
    Insight into much, Influence over nothing !
  48. Re:Leaflets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A strongly worded letter can't be far behind.

    RIMMER: Well, that's certainly an option, David, yes. Erm, but here's my proposal: Let's get tough. The time for talking is over. Call it
    extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard and hit it fast with a major -- and I mean _major_ -- leaflet campaign, and while it's
    reeling from that, we'd follow up with a {whist} drive, a car boot sale, some street theatre and possibly even some benefit concerts. OK?
    Now, if that's not enough, I'm sorry, it's time for the T-shirts: "Mutants Out" ... "Chameleonic Life Forms, No Thanks" ... and if that's
    not enough, well, I don't know what will be.

  49. The equator...and Italy? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    If you actually RTFM(ap), you'll see its actually *not* Somali problem, its a world-wide problem.

    The really interesting thing is that almost every single attack (all but one or two) happened in the tropics. Why would that be? There are plenty of failed states outside of the tropics. Does the international pirate union require the perpetrators to go shirtless or someting?

    Also, they were all offshore of "third world counties" ... with one exception: Italy. It looks like one incident happened right near Rome. WTH is up with that?

  50. SUG by redGiraffe · · Score: 1

    I'm off to brush up on my Somali for Talk-Like-a-Pirate-Day :)

  51. Howto with two helicopters and 40 soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Protecting a route in international waters:

    At the beginning of the route, a small team of 4 soldiers is put onto a voluntary ship by an helicopter.

    At the end of the route, another helicopter takes back the team and a bit later puts it onto another voluntary ship cruising in the other direction.

    Needs:
    - Two small helicopter carriers, one at each end of the route
    - Ten or so teams of 4 soldiers.

    Thus, ships are not armed when they re-enter national waters, which is the main concern against arming ships.

  52. Who are the pirates here? by kholburn · · Score: 1
    Fishing fleets are pirates, too:
    http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/fishing-fleets-are-pirates-too/2008/11/23/1227375062168.html

    WHILE their warships patrol the Gulf of Aden to protect merchant shipping from Somali pirates, a number of those nations are directly linked to foreign fishing fleets that are plundering Somalia's fish stocks, says a new paper on reasons behind the growth of piracy off the Horn of Africa.

    There are warships from India, Malaysia, Britain, the US, France, Russia, Spain and South Korea in the region shepherding merchant shipping and pursuing pirates but largely ignoring the illegal foreign fishers.

  53. How does stuff like this get modded so high? by Linux987 · · Score: 1

    No offense, but the example you used to prove your point is absolutely terrible. You wrote:

    The fact that the US cannot control it anymore validates the position that the US military is way overstretched and that our empire is on the decline.

    These are very small fishing boats for god sake. You write like we used to somehow control all small forms of piracy but now we can't. Think about your point, it doesn't make sense.

    Really, you're just writing to get modded up by all the Anti-American trolls on the site. Newsflash: The American Navy is not in danger of falling any time soon.. I'm too lazy to look them up, but simulations have been run where the U.S. navy can simultaneously engage all other navies of the world and come out victorious.

    If you're going to predict the downfall of America, try using a different example.