Slashdot Mirror


Oil Exploration Leads To Video of a Mysterious Elbowed Squid

eldavojohn writes "A rare glimpse from Shell Oil of a giant squid brings to light the strange relationships some deep sea marine biologists have with drilling companies. The video of the squid (Magnapinna) is very rare as this creature remains largely a mystery to science. While some are concerned of a conflict of interest, biologists and big oil sure make for strange bedfellows. The video is from 200 miles off the coast of Houston, TX and about 4,000 feet down." Looking at this creature gives me the willies, frankly.

256 comments

  1. Nice animal by KasperMeerts · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Damn, mother nature is really infinitely more inventive than every sci-fi movie director or write in the world. I mean, this is something I would expect to find on some alien planet or something.

    --
    As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
    1. Re:Nice animal by powerslave12r · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mother nature also invented(sic) the sci-fi movie directors.

      --
      Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
    2. Re:Nice animal by neuromanc3r · · Score: 1

      Amen. I'm not a biology geek, but that is one of the coolest things I have seen in a while.

    3. Re:Nice animal by flacco · · Score: 4, Funny

      A rare glimpse of the Aquatic Chupacabra.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    4. Re:Nice animal by lysergic.acid · · Score: 5, Informative

      yea, that video gave me the chills. at first it looked sorta like the alien from Independence Day, but about 100 times creepier. but once i actually understood what i was seeing, i was just in awe at the beauty of such a bizarre living creature. these kinds of discoveries just emphasize the reason we need to support ecological conservation all the more. imagine all of the millions of other bizarre and beautiful creatures out there still unknown to science.

      for those who are interested in other video clips of Magnapinnidae, here's a page with several short clips and screen captures. most of them are poor quality, as they seem to be VHS-rips, but the 6th and 8th clips are pretty amazing.

    5. Re:Nice animal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Probably would think the same thing about us...

    6. Re:Nice animal by azav · · Score: 1

      The plague of the aquatic goats.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    7. Re:Nice animal by kumanopuusan · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Japanese have a word for the sensation you get looking at this sort of otherworldly monstrosity. They say oishisou, which literally means, "that looks delicious."

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    8. Re:Nice animal by Odin+The+Ravager · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Take a look at Giant Isopods. Definitely the most alien thing I've ever seen.

    9. Re:Nice animal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STRIDER!!!!

    10. Re:Nice animal by NoPantsJim · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whats the Japanese word for "That would make good tentacle porn"?

    11. Re:Nice animal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That would be something like "sugoi shokushu-hentai ni narisou".

    12. Re:Nice animal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely that would imply the existence of some sort of aquatic mutant goat?

    13. Re:Nice animal by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In fact that reminds me of the movie Abyss.
      And if you want inventivity, you will have to look toward SF writers, not movie directors.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    14. Re:Nice animal by meyekul · · Score: 2, Funny

      "oishisou"

    15. Re:Nice animal by dubski · · Score: 1

      Looks like a Zerg Overlord from Starcraft http://homepage.mac.com/cheethorne/Starcraft/images/overlord.jpg

    16. Re:Nice animal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new Squid overlords.

    17. Re:Nice animal by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1
    18. Re:Nice animal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shio or tare?

    19. Re:Nice animal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Echi, I think.

  2. Really? by Entropy98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    biologists and big oil sure make for strange bedfellows
     
    Really? I would think that they (deep sea drillers and deep sea biologists) have learned quite a bit from each other over the years.
    --
      IP address Finding

    1. Re:Really? by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously. Environmentalists need to set the jihad switch to off and try rational discussion with the deep sea outfits for a change.

      I'm fairly sure they'd be quite happy to load all of their deep sea platforms up with tethered, submersible, camera-wielding drones and drastically increase the amount of deep water footage and readings scientists are able to gather.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    2. Re:Really? by DeathElk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not while there's the risk of discovering an endangered species, thus threatening their drilling rights.

    3. Re:Really? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Why would it threaten drilling rights? Unless the fish are living in the rock what's the problem?

    4. Re:Really? by RockDoctor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why would it threaten drilling rights? Unless the fish are living in the rock what's the problem?

      Three things occur to me : (in decreasing order, probably) drilling mud coating the surface of rock cuttings discharged over the side ; unstable and/ or soluble minerals as part of the rock cuttings themselves ; heat from the cuttings. If you're using oil-based mud (technically, invert emulsion drilling fluid with a low-dielectric continuous phase and a high-dielectric discontinuous phase ; the chemical nature of the continuous phase is varied but it is universally some degree of bad news for any skin it encounters ; I've got the chemical burns to prove it.) then it's unsurprising that dumping tons of it onto the seabed can cause problems in the surrounding areas. Less obviously, throwing tons of rock salt or anhydrite or unstable clay minerals has potential to do various degrees of nasty to water chemistry. There's also the other additives in the mud to consider - barytes is often associated with lead mineralisation, for example, raising the possibility of other forms of pollution. Finally, the rocks that come up from drilling are generally hot to some degree, and while the sea does have significant cooling power, when many tons are dumped into the sea in short order, it's within the bounds of credibility to change temperatures for a while, particularly within the seabed.

      All of which is why discharge of cuttings coated with "oil" (natural or synthetic) is now forbidden in a number of areas. Which simply prompted the development of a range of "skip'n'ship" solutions which are loathed by drillers, but allow drilling to continue to use oil-based muds.

      Well, you did ask!

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    5. Re:Really? by tomtomtom777 · · Score: 1

      Why would it threaten drilling rights? Unless the fish are living in the rock what's the problem?

      Sound, for one. Scientists have shown that underwater sounds cause major trouble for whales, and might as well cause big trouble for many other species

    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no whales 1.5 miles down on the ocean bed.

    7. Re:Really? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      and drastically increase the amount of deep water footage and readings

      Google sea?

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    8. Re:Really? by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      Most whales end up on the ocean bed. No one knows how deep they can go whilst alive ; ).
      Submarine sonar readings have documented sperm whales at 2500 meters (8200 feet or 27.3 football fields or 1.6 miles below the surface).

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    9. Re:Really? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Seriously. Environmentalists need to set the jihad switch to off and try rational discussion with the deep sea outfits for a change.

      You guys should see The Secret Life of Words with Tim Robbins. Not only it's a wonderful movie, with some of the best acting I've ever seen, but it takes place on an oil rig and it has a slight environmentalist bent (thought it doesn't have a huge stupid oversimplified one like in many Steven Seagal movies).

    10. Re:Really? by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause NOTHING lives in ROCKS!

    11. Re:Really? by Shao+Ke · · Score: 1

      I don't see too much of a problem with offshore platforms from an environmental standpoint, as long as the operation is well run.
      It's not like they're scraping the bottom with nets (evil) and they're like artificial reefs too.

    12. Re:Really? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      At a depth of 1.5 miles? Please, enlighten me or stop with your dumb shit.

  3. Conflicts, always conflicts. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While some are concerned of a conflict of interest, biologists and big oil sure make for strange bedfellows. The video is from 200 miles off the coast of Houston, TX and about 4,000 feet down."

    Research is research. The data doesn't 'care' who paid for the camera. Besides it is in Shell (or whomever's) interest to understand as much as possible about the location they plan on dumping large amounts of money on.

    What happens if there is an alien colony down there? Wouldn't you like to know? Don't go expecting Shell to fund a study of these things, but why wouldn't they show it to people. Looks pretty cool actually.

    And didn't the camera say about 7500 feet (not 4000 as in TFS)?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by jd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The data doesn't care, but oil drillers are unlikely to give information that harms their potential to drill, and can afford to be "selective" on what they provide. They also have more than enough technical equipment and expertise to "improve" the data, if it is in their interests to do so. That is why it is generally bad science to get information from those who have a vested interest in your conclusions being what they want them to be. It has nothing to do with the camera and everything to do with the eyes far behind it.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The data doesn't care, but oil drillers are unlikely to give information that harms their potential to drill, and can afford to be "selective" on what they provide.

      The conflict is potentially deeper than that. The oil drillers, by providing the hardware, may be able dictate the direction science takes.

      Its no different really than the cigarette companies providing the labs for cancer research. Any scientist working in the lab who finds that 'cigarettes cause cancer' is out of work... any scientist who finds that cigarettes and cancer is unrelated gets increased funding and access to better equipment.

      THAT is the real potential conflict of interest here.

    3. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by aevans · · Score: 1, Troll

      The oil drillers actually believe in science, they have to, to find the oil, to build the rigs, and to convert it to gasoline to run in vehicles that use combustion. Completely unlike the environmentalists with their superstition and ignorance-based mythologies and hysteria induction strategies for manipulating people's emotions and fears into giving them money.

    4. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Informative

      While I am as cynical as the next slashdotter about corporations, Shell have donated submersible time for researchers to gather their own information at this (and other) sites. Without that generous donation the researchers concerned would have squat.

      This video was just something the oilmen spotted and thought was interesting enough to film.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, if they take submersible time from the oil companies they're at risk of spuriously deciding that giant squid cause cancer? Or that they cause global warming? :)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    6. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      So you believe that atmospheric pollution, oil spills and groundwater contamination are myths and hysteria? Perhaps incidents like the Bhopal disaster and the Exxon Valdez spill could demonstrate that the risk to human and animal survival is very real, and based in observed fact.

      Dude really, you're on the wrong forum. Perhaps www.RavingPsychoticIndustryDrones.com would be more to your liking.

      --
      I hate printers.
    7. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      So, if they take submersible time from the oil companies they're at risk of spuriously deciding that giant squid cause cancer? Or that they cause global warming? :)

      At risk of concluding that the oil companies presence is destroying an ecosystem, or otherwise negatively impacting it. And then deciding not to pursue that area of research, for fear of losing access to submersible time and other resources.

    8. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The oil drillers actually believe in science

      The oil drillers believe in science as long as it supports their worldview. That is, drilling for more oil. As soon as a scientific finding conflicts with what they want, however, you can bet said belief wavers considerably.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    9. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speaking as someone in that industry, you have no fucking idea, so much so that it's amusing.

    10. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Informative

      "The oil drillers actually believe in science...unlike the environmentalists with their superstition

      Warning, this could cause your politically biased head to explode.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The oil drillers believe in science as long as it supports their worldview.
      The wonderful thing about this truth is that you can replace oil drillers with environmentalists, politicians, religious leaders, nazis, whatever, and it is still true.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    12. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      The environmentalists believe in science as long as it supports their worldview. That is, not drilling for more oil. As soon as a scientific finding conflicts with what they want, however, you can bet said belief wavers considerably.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    13. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      No argument there. I wasn't picking on oil drillers specifically, just anyone with an agenda that can either be proved or disproved by science.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    14. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      speaking as someone in that industry, you have no fucking idea, so much so that it's amusing.

      I never said this was happening. I simply outlined where the argument for a conflict of interest arises.
      There =is= indisputably a conflict of interest here, however, that doesn't mean there is any actual corruption or abuse, or even that anyone is trying to abuse it.

    15. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by tomhath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What you say is true, but same can be said for any other organization that funds research. Everything from global warming to offshore drilling to nuclear energy has scientists on both sides proving their case.

    16. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by tfiedler · · Score: 1

      Not to defend the oil companies, but there are certainly examples of scientists publishing data that supports their positions and leaving out data that does not... I know the standard liberal/conservative reality doesn't allow for shades of gray, but the real world isn't black and white.

      --
      Democrats and Republicans are like AIDS and Cancer, I want neither!
    17. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Arthur C. Clarke:

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert."

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    18. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Exxon spill may not be the best example. The cleanup efforts were probably more harmful than the spill itself, and the environment has completely recovered since then. My authority on the subject comes from having lived in Valdez, AK for nearly my entire life; I can provide further sources if need be.

      This criticism should not be taken as arguing against your point in general.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    19. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by FooGoo · · Score: 1
      This is a possibility no matter who owns the gear or provides the funding. The point is we know something exists that we didn't know before and there is value in that no matter what. Whether it's Shell Oil or Greenpeace both will try to get the best possible spin on whatever they create/discover. No matter where it comes from there is value in knowing...

      If you think that organizations who oppose the oil companies don't direct their research towards specific ends you are mistaken. Money is rarely provided for pure independent research....most people no matter what their ideology expects a return on their investment.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    20. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      This is a possibility no matter who owns the gear or provides the funding.

      To be sure, but that's not to say that all cases are remotely equal.

      Money is rarely provided for pure independent research....most people no matter what their ideology expects a return on their investment.

      If I invest in your company to develop a cure for X, because I want to profit from selling the cure for X, that's not really a conflict of interest. Just because money is involved doesn't mean there is an automatic conflict of interest.

    21. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is /. you don't need authority on a subject to make a comment. I was under the impression that it was almost against the rules to post when you have some facts!

    22. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Same thing happens with all these charities for breast cancer. It's caused less research to be done on other types of cancer which means you're more likely to die of a non-breast tumour.

    23. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      The environmentalists believe in science as long as it supports their worldview. That is, being anti capitalist. As soon as a scientific finding conflicts with what they want, however, you can bet said belief wavers considerably.

    24. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I fish commercially in Alaska during the summers. (Caught 112 000 lbs of fish last summer with three other guys.) Valdez's salmon run is still completely destroyed in some places. I don't know how things are on land, but out on the water fishermen have lost their trade from that oil spill.

    25. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by RockDoctor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They also have more than enough technical equipment and expertise to "improve" the data, if it is in their interests to do so.

      Ah, that would account for the 30-odd (sometimes very odd) video editors, graphics artists and CGI programmers I see occupying the 4 spare bedspace on a normal drilling rig.

      Sure, the oil industry can hire all the graphics expertise that it needs, when it needs it. And when they're no longer needed ... well that's the difference between "contractor" and "core crew". (I say this with one long-standing friend who's been kept off the breadline doing cartoons and animations for safety training materials while another friend regularly does video editing for induction courses, training courses and all sorts of other tediously repetitive bullshit. Hi Snoddy, Peet!)

      Plus, of course, the rig is a great place for passing around video clips that are either weird (RTFA), shoot-yourself-in-the-foot-funny (I should have a link for the dropping of the Oseberg casing string somewhere at home, and there's always the wreckage of the LE's jetting assembly for raising a laugh), variously perverse ("She does WHAT to an Alsatian with a bog brush??"). Or just plain old kill porn, from the smoking wreckage of 167 men in the Piper to laughing one's arses off at YABLR (Yet Another Burning Land Rig) as everyone stands around looking sheepish and counting the crew.

      In their traditional role as Porn-Merchants Designate to the industry, the ROV shack know fine well their obligations to copy and disseminate anything in the slightest bit out of the ordinary. for decades they were the only people on board with a video recording system, let alone a video COPYING system, and they've always known what to do with the spread.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    26. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like how when global warming grants come in the guy who finds that burning oil doesn't do crap to our environment is out of work too.. hmm..

      The difference is one is being payed for by taxpayers.

    27. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by jd · · Score: 1

      You're right. The Rolling Stones painted it all black.

      Seriously, yes, many scientists leave out data that doesn't suit their theories. It's still bad science and they're still bad scientists. The number of good scientists is extremely small. I don't see the scientific world in shades of grey, simply because either it's a valid, falsifiable, theory or it isn't; either the data was collected and presented or it wasn't. There isn't any room for shades of grey in science. Data selection is why Copernicus failed to see what Kepler observed - orbits aren't circles. This put science back centuries because of religious and metaphysical bigotry. Sorry, that ain't science, that's stupidity and as close to evil as science gets. I have no respect for such corruption. It's claimed Pythagoras had people murdered in order to keep mathematical proofs that contradicted his cult teachings from leaking out.

      If you add up all the bigotry and corruption over the millennia, you start talking serious timeframes. I doubt medieval Europe could have put a man on the moon (see: The Tomorrow People, Rift in Time) but I could easily see astronomy, some areas of physics, mathematics and possibly chemistry being many hundreds of years further advanced than they are today, had people chosen to put scientific integrity over and above all else. Beyond Star Trek, but achieved yesterday, in those fields that are less sensitive to things that were probably not going to happen much sooner, like microtechnology and nanotechnology. To me, the incalculable damage done to humanity through such actions is unacceptable and beyond any classification of "greyness". There is no moral relativism in whether or not the square root of two is a fraction or an irrational, there is only a fact of whether it is or it isn't. It's extremely quantized.

      (Relativism is valid in essentially every aspect of culture, philosophy, politics, and so on, but 0 != 1 no matter what. It's not dependent on the observer.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    28. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Burnhard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unlike say, Climate Scientists, the scientists who are involved in commercial geological exploration are held to a much higher standard as their "results" can potentially swing share prices one way or another. The Securities Commission require full disclosure.

      I may also say that those concerned about our destroying the giant squid eco-system should think very carefully. We have killed so many Sperm Whales in the past (their main predator) it wouldn't surprise me if their population were much higher today than it has been historically.

    29. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually gets much worse than this, and discovering a cure for cancer would be all in the interest of cigarette companies at this point (how many people honestly don't think they cause cancer).

      It plays out as follows:
      Cancer researcher A finds a cure for cancer, which now belongs to the cigarette companies. They now sell you cigarettes and sure they cause cancer but who gives a $%&# because they can now also sell you the cure for a nice big double whammy.

    30. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If somebody wants to explain what all this is about, I'll be happy to abuse it. Might liven the discussion a bit, eh.

    31. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Hi Snoddy, Peet!)

      Peet from Aberdeen? That I might know?

    32. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mixing things up. The kind of conflicts you are thinking about are moral conflicts, not scientific conflicts.

      A moral conflict - "you can't drill here, because of the pretty squid" would probably be ignored.

      A scientific conflict - "you can't drill here, the rock is too hard" will NOT be ignored. Quite the contrary, more money will be poured into the research, to find a better drill or other solution.

    33. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      The last thing shell want is some endangered species around their site.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    34. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      discovering a cure for cancer would be all in the interest of cigarette companies at this point

      Absolutely... as an ex-customer of theirs, they'd be on their way to getting my business back...

      If there were a cure to every known serious illness caused by smoking (cancer being just one of the many), I would happily start smoking again.

      Quitting has:

      1. Hurt my social life more than helped it (especially at work as now I spend all my time sitting in my office instead of socialising at the smoking area)
      2. Cost me more money (I now have less patience, so spend money on "doing stuff" rather than just relaxing with a long time consuming task and a few cigarettes)
      3. Improved my sense of smell (which is a bad thing - not a good thing... walking in to a public men's room when I needed to go never used to bother me as a smoker... now I usually hold it in, because the smell make me retch)

      I'll put up with these negatives because I know that they're far less serious than the health issues associated with smoking, but remove the health issues (such as having cures available at prices I can afford), and I'd go back to it in a flash.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    35. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by bipbop · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing with you, but I'm interested to read more about this. Can you provide those sources?

    36. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Now why would environmentalists, as a whole, want to stop oil drilling if it isn't to help the environment? Maybe they're all secretly aliens!

    37. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by hachete · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Read the last paragraphs of that article. One can only assume that Shell are trying to clean-up their image after fucking up over a period of time.

      In short, I need more than just the bleatings of a CEO in trouble to convince me that an oil company is fighting global warming.

      Maybe you shouldn't be so naive.

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    38. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, three cheers for Lord Oxburgh and his fine PR team. Note that his Lordship himself is quoted as saying:

      "I think that in corporate organisations like Shell... you develop a corporate mentality and you can develop an insensitivity to some of the factors that weigh very heavily with people outside."

      Which lays it out very clearly for anyone who can understand the euphemisms of bureaucratic speech. Mind you, I will give the man credit for even saying this. There's a straight talker worthy of universal admiration. Heck, he may yet make us forget the 20 precious years his industry made us waste with their stalling, lies and "debunking" of global warming.

    39. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.sf.adfg.state.ak.us/FedAidPDFs/sp08-13.pdf

      This appears to be a current summary of the Prince William Sound fisheries. Since the oil spill, PWS has been quite well studied.

      http://www.lib.noaa.gov/japan/aquaculture/proceedings/report22/kron.html

      The above report gives a summary of the historical data, which seems damn hard to come by online. The short form is that salmon stocks fluctuate wildly for reasons that are little understood.

      The cleanup effort was a media circus. Nobody had any idea what to do about it, there were no preparations*, no science, and very little thought involved. The primary method of oil removal was to spray boiling water on the beaches. I think the idea was that if the oil didn't kill everything, the cleanup would fix that. I was reading a NOAA paper earlier on the effectiveness of that technique, which was negative, but I seem to have lost the link.

      Beyond that, I can try to dig up more local sources tomorrow, if you'd like. Certainly I could provide a wealth of anecdote, but I'm sure that more concrete data is available within the community.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    40. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by arse+maker · · Score: 0, Troll

      How nice of them... so... if I give you a new pair of shoes you wont mind me contining to raping your daughter?

      I also get you defending me for it!

      Who cares about some obscure creature being found by an industry that is destroying the earth - of course its us who are doing it, but we dont tend to give drug dealers a free pass when people ruin themselves with addiction... oddly enough.

    41. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      "The oil drillers believe in science as long as it supports their worldview. That is, drilling for more oil. As soon as a scientific finding conflicts with what they want, however, you can bet said belief wavers considerably."

      - well, I wouldn't paint it as black as all that. I believe that the best way for oil companies is to share the time when they aren't using it, both it will help us all to understand the ocean better, it'll help them to make better designs for ecological symmetry, and further their image as a green company, and I believe they know this.

      Let's say they uncover a oil-rich spot which is also science-rich, it's in their best interest to work closely with scientists to do as little damage as possible, or be seen to do as little damage as possible while getting at the oil. They might not have cared a decade ago, but today things are different.

      They wouldn't agree to not drill for oil, but they probably would agree to as little disruption as possible if it won't cost them too much.

    42. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by xigxag · · Score: 1

      What's with the negative vibes? The point of the link wasn't to show that oil companies are fighting global warming. The point was to show that they're acknowledging it. In other words, it's moved far past the point where it can be written off as the mere rantings of "superstitious environmentalists."

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    43. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I'll give drug dealers a pass if they refrain from violence, stay away from schools and playgrounds, and focus on adults who have the life experiences to make informed decisions (we've decided as a society that that's what adults can do, right?)

      Then again, I'm pretty easygoing about drugs, right up until someone's addiction inflicts pain and suffering on me and mine.

    44. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      After she stopped laughing at your jelly-bean my daughter would rip it off just to see if she could make your balls drop. Scum sucking soft-cocks like yourself are the reason so many slashdotters despise environmentalist.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    45. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, a BBC article. Now THAT will be unbiased.

      Or not.

      Who cares about science? After all, its just what you want it to be...

    46. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You know this to be true? Dealt with a lot of "oil drillers" during the course of your many deep sea scientific pursuits?

      GOD SHUT UP. How can 6 people reply to each other with the same retarded, uninformed statement?

    47. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Oh for God's sake, I have been trying to convince slashdotters about the reality of AGW for 8yrs now and have been following the science since the early eighties. I was ridiculed and modded to hell until the tide of public opinion started to change about two years ago and now that you have jumped on the bandwagon you start attacking me as naive?

      "I need more than just the bleatings of a CEO in trouble to convince me that an oil company is fighting global warming"

      Did you read the rest of the link? - The previous CEO was the one "in trouble". Oxburgh put the wind up Shell in the short time he was there, so much so that on more than one occasion his corporate minders tried to cut interviews short when he started talking about global warming. He was also the first CEO from ANY industry to propose a limit on CO2 concentration, the limit he proposed was 450ppm and it is now accepted by everyone except the US as the ideal target in the UN negotiations. He also played a part in setting up the Stern review which was the first serious report by hard-nosed economists to advocate early and concerted action to reduce CO2 emmission to a sustainable level. I could go on, but in short he has done far more for the cause than you or I could ever hope to achive.

      And just for the record I was not trying to convince anyone that Shell are "fighting global warming", I was trying to make a psuedo-skeptics head explode by pointing out a highly respected scientist that advocates emmision controls AND was chairman of an oil company. However since we are on the subject, most oil companies can now see the writing on the wall and are desprately trying to diverify their energy portfolio so as to adapt to the new reality. Even Exonn seems to have ceased it's disinformation campaign, with a bit of luck the lack of funds will finally consign Fred Singer to the dustbin of crooked scientist. I can only hope that the coal industry will catch on soon but until recently they have been very successfull at shifting the blame to oil.

      "One can only assume that Shell are trying to clean-up their image after fucking up over a period of time."

      That's exactly what they were doing and you don't have to assume anything because is says as much in the link. However the reason the previous CEO and board of directors were "in trouble" had nothing to do with global warming.

      "Maybe you shouldn't be so naive."

      Maybe you should practice your comprehension skills, try reading what I was replying to, and do some research before shooting your mouth off. As for naivity, I can tell you from experience you won't change the world by shouting at it, it may make you feel better but all you are doing is encouraging people to ignore your very real concerns.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    48. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Kayden · · Score: 1

      Sure we do, you just need a more liberal state. Here in good old Minnesota, employees can not be fired for drug addiction unless the refuse FREE treatment. I can't remember who pays for the treatment, but I know it's either the state or the company. I used to work with a guy that shot heroin 3 times a day and everyone knew it. However, no one wanted to fire him or pay for his treatment, so they just let it slide. They finally just started riding his ass over every mistake until he got fed up and quit.

    49. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by whopub · · Score: 1

      Without that generous donation the researchers concerned would have squat.

      Instead of squid...

    50. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, but there could be bias in interpretation.

      That just means that the data and methods needs to be published, perhaps to be reviewed by colleagues..or some such~

      Squids ARE alien. As is most marine life. They evolved in a completly different enviroment.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    51. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's disingenuous.

      You make it appear as if the sides are equal, when in many cases they are not.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    52. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      He is wrong.

      There may be experts, but it's seldom a 1 for 1 ratio, no matter how the media portrays it.

      That's why there is consensus.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    53. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Hmmm doubtfull.

      I never smoked, yet I can go into public restrooms.
      I also enjoy the delicate smell of certain flowers, the light scent of my daughters hair, and other thing. So the smell of a rest room is a small 'penalty'.

      Why do you need to spend money to do stuff? there are lots of free things to do.

      15% of people smoke, if not smoking has hurt your social life, then you need to find some new way to socialize.
      As a non smoker, I socialize just fine with the smokers in my organization.

      You seem to have let the idea of being a smoker define you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    54. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I believe he thinks that they are overrated to the general public.
      Many of them are. While Valdez was bad, it's risk/cost ratio was low.
      Look at how many gallons of oil have been spilled by tankers, now compare that to how many gallons tankers move without any harm.
      The spill ration is a tiny drop.

      This doesn't mean we should be cavalier in our transportation, or that a spill isn't bad, or that we should stop looking for better ways to ship it, and a way to replace oil based transportation. Just means that we need to be rational when discussing these things.
      Valdez is pretty much back to normal.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    55. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you have head of them but there are free services on the internet called search engines. Instead of simply spitting out what I spoonfed you perhaps you could try one and come up with an intelligent comment.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    56. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, freaky coincidence: When I linked to RC the top story was "mind the gap", I go there today and find Fred Singer is the top story.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    57. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      Why would drug addiction be fireable? If a person does the job they were hired to do who gives a shit what they are on while they do it? I admit, I don't want someone who is drunk to drive the bus I am on, but at the same time if he wants to take steroids to have bigger muscles who I to complain? Your post tells me that he got nitpicked to quit, not that he was doing his job poorly. Worse, your post tells me that no one wanted to help a heroin addict ("or pay for his treatment"). That is just wrong. I would imagine that you are thinking of some version of the 'bootstrap' philosophy right now - 'Dun pull myself up, why don't you?' Which of course is woefully ignorant of the way the world actually works. Kayden, I live in Minnesota as well, it is an 'at will' state. He could have been canned at any time for any reason. There is no 'keep an addict' law. I don't know who started the rumor at your job, but it just ain't true. Seraphim

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    58. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Hi Snoddy, Peet!)

      Peet from Aberdeen? That I might know?

      GordonJCP from Aberdeen that I might know? 'Peet' as in bad feet, bad eyes, extremely old and dodgy cat, and a living room between 4 and 8 feet deep in computer bits? That Peet. "Pint of cider and off to perforate" Peet. If you know James The Weird Person, or Bushy Bob, AndyG or Handy Andy, then we're in the same group of "people".

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    59. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The yellow number in the upper right is the depth from the original ROV depth reading, flickering between 7828 and 7829 feet. (The two yellow numbers under it are altitude and seabed depth, but are only accurate if the ROV is close to the seabed, usually within 30 feet, but varies depending on the altimeter in use.) The second overlay (white) agrees with this (and probably came from that.)

      - CN

    60. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      Without that generous donation the researchers concerned would have squat.

      Whereas now they have squid?

    61. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Kayden · · Score: 1

      I have talked to many people in management positions and they've said the same thing. As for why didn't any one help him, he didn't want help. He was happy using and wouldn't stop if anyone tried to make him. Infact, he'd been to treatment twice before and was still on the horse. He was late everyday, but only like 1-2 minutes, and that's highly subjective to the clock you were looking at. So yea, he was nitpicked out, but it happened after I quit.

    62. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I never smoked, yet I can go into public restrooms.

      I'm sure that once I get used to it, I'll be able to as well, but it's still distinctly unpleasant when it never used to bother me at all...

      I also enjoy the delicate smell of certain flowers, the light scent of my daughters hair, and other thing. So the smell of a rest room is a small 'penalty'.

      Lucky you... I've experienced more new negative smells than positive ones since quitting smoking. I'm not saying that's the case for everyone, but for me it has been.

      15% of people smoke, if not smoking has hurt your social life, then you need to find some new way to socialize.

      In the country I live in (Germany), the percentage of people that smoke is much higher than 15%... actually it's a bit over 30% for men and a bit under 30% for women. Then you take in to account age groups, and mine is also the most likely to smoke... So, the percentage of people I am likely to want to socialise with that smoke is actually only slightly under 50% smokers.

      At work, who is and is not a smoker doesn't really affect me (addressed by your next point, which I've quoted below) - what does affect me there is that I'm not smoking.

      Work isn't the only place that it affects me. I'm 29 years old and most of my friends in the age range from early 20s to mid 30s. Most are unmarried with no children (including myself) and our social lives tend to include various forms of weekend hedonism ("sex, drugs, rock 'n' roll" kind of thing) generally getting "very trashed" once every couple of months or so. Being a non-smoker in this environment is extremely difficult of course, meaning that until I can become more comfortable with not smoking around large groups of smokers, I have to spend less time with this group of friends.

      As a non smoker, I socialize just fine with the smokers in my organization.

      I socialise well with both the smokers are non smokers at my workplace - since quitting smoking however, I just don't get to see them! I used to get a 5 minute break every hour or two where I'd go stand at the smoking area and talk with people, make new friends and have good times. Now, I get to work, sit in my office until lunch, take 30 minutes to eat, and then sit in my office again until I leave. There's just no possibility to see these people without getting up and going to the smoking area (which I'll freely admit to being too "afraid" to do because I don't think I have sufficient willpower to not have a cigarette if I were to do that - someone would definitely offer one)

      You seem to have let the idea of being a smoker define you.

      I don't think so... It's more a cultural thing (not just the culture of the place I live, but of all aspects of my life) - at my age, in this country, with my job, and my spare-time activities/hobbies/social-groups, I'm definitely in the minority now as an ex-smoker and it really is a lot less fun than being a smoker was. I'm not saying that's true for everyone - you mentioned you have a daughter, which I'm sure is a wonderful thing, but it also probably means that your lifestyle is worlds apart from mine, to the point that I wouldn't really expect you to understand (nothing wrong with that of course, and I would also like to point out that I am a long time fan of yours here on Slashdot - just to say that I'm not trying to incite any flames by that statement)

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    63. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, I shared a flat with AndyG (brought my own shovel), and briefly with Peet. I've been in a car with Handy Andy and not crashed, and I know James The Weird Person slightly (been round to his place with Peet once). I can't place you though...

    64. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      When AndyG disappeared down to Alva, you disappeared to Glasgow ? And you'd borrowed a Psion of mine because you felt the need to dial into some servers you were administrating and wanted a pocket terminal that could hook up to an IR-enabled telephone. I think I had a beard then, and the evil act took place in the KGB.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    65. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all have a drug, I've smoked joints for 35yrs and live a productive life, I make it a habit every now an then to go on holiday and stop for a week to a month. OTOH about 10yrs ago I tried everything I could to help get my nephew off a $1000/week heroin habit including having him living with me for 3 months, and paying for two lots of rehab. Out of desperation we cut off all access to any source of money and took turns watching him full time for three days, on the third night he ran off and a few days later ended up in jail for six months after trying his hand at bag snatching. Jail seemed to do him good, he came out looking like superman, the parole officer had organised a job and accomodation in a large country town about 4hrs drive away, I had him stay with me the weekend before leaving.

      He went out for a walk on the Saturday night, when he came home he was shit-faced. I looked at him and said "that's the saddest thing I've seen in decades" and turned back to the TV, I haven't seen him since but I am told he is still on it. His sister went completely bonkers and at one stage was on the cops top 10 list for burning down a boarding house. At 16 she was an attractive A grade student full of life - at 20 she was a toothless speed addict with two kids in foster care. The other two sibling grew up into hard working individuals, go figure?

      My opinion is someone wants to take drugs fine but they get nothing from me while they are on them. An untrained person is ill equiped to deal with a drug addict in any other way and thus drug addicts tend to be treated as modern day 'niggers', not the least by some in the medical proffession. After all the shitty things he did, my nephew never stole from me nor lied to me about what he had done. The biggest problem with drugs is getting the money to pay black market prices for them, the biggest problem with paying the black market is it promotes corruption and drug wars. IMHO nobody should be denied medical assistance or humane treatment, all drugs should be cheap, legal, and kept out of the reach of children - how you balance the freedom to do as you please with your own body, and your need for a pay cheque to do it again is up to you alone.

  4. Hmm yeah... by cjfs · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why I don't eat creatures from the ocean.

    Hopefully they'll return the courtesy.

    1. Re:Hmm yeah... by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anything that lives that far down must be tough, it'd be like eating prawn flavoured tyres.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Hmm yeah... by M0b1u5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I love fish.

      They're delicious.

      --
      How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
    3. Re:Hmm yeah... by TheRequiem13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stay tuned for footage of another poorly understood creature: Deep Sea Elbow Macaroni

      No less elbowed and worm-like, but probably a little more appetizing.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Hmm yeah... by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      Boil it in oil.

      Seriously. With very tough flesh, use enough oil to cover the flesh and heat the oil just to below it's smoke point.

      And yes, as soon as I saw the video I thought "calamari".

    5. Re:Hmm yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that lives that far down must be tough, it'd be like eating prawn flavoured tyres.

      Except of course that things from that far down do tend to disintegrate when you bring them up. So it's really just another kind of strange soup.

    6. Re:Hmm yeah... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Be happy you don't taste like prawns/shrimp then!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    7. Re:Hmm yeah... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      just use more shirachi

    8. Re:Hmm yeah... by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It needs to withstand the pressure, but as it is filled with liquids itself, that is pretty much a no-brainer (pun intended). There are other things to take into consideration like the reduced amount of oxygen, no light, etc. But for a creature which does not need actual air bubbles, they problem becomes a lot less complicated than it is for us.

    9. Re:Hmm yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ammonia flavoured tyres, in fact. Giant squid would make very unpleasant, and probably poisonous, eating.

    10. Re:Hmm yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah - it'd probably taste like squid flavored tires...

    11. Re:Hmm yeah... by armando_wall · · Score: 1

      Maybe the creature was filming the ROV and it will post it to SquidTube.

  5. I can hear the conversation from the video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oil...oil...oil... wtf? Holy shit! Wait Bill, go back, go back, you missed it. Wait. Cut it out! Your screwing up the joystick!

  6. I, for one... by Darundal · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...welcome our new 10-tentacled elbowed cephalopod overlords.

    1. Re:I, for one... by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is clearly a new branch of Homeland Security for Cthulhu. Tired of people carrying around copies of the Necronomicon to dispell him, he has invested in an army of multi-jointed drifters to act as a lynch mob should any deep sea fish try to exchange knowledge of his whereabouts for a reduction in EU tuna quota.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  7. Cthulhu by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    "That is not dead which can eternal lie,
    And with strange aeons even death may die."


    And while we're on the subject.

    1. Re:Cthulhu by cjfs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not Cthulhu, but possibly a distant cousin of something else:

      He speculates that Magnapinna passively waits for prey to bump into the sticky appendages

      Could these sticky appendages also be... noodly?

    2. Re:Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tekeli-li! Tekeli-li!

    3. Re:Cthulhu by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      "That is not dead which can eternal lie,
      and--HOLY SHIT, I think that squid just looked me in the eye."

    4. Re:Cthulhu by Jesus_666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, now we have Pastafarianism: Terror From The Deep, the same as regular Pastafarianism but underwater and with a lot of bugs.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, it looks ready to go old testament on your ass, but I wouldn't worry too much. Salty water makes good pasta.

    6. Re:Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cthulhu Fhta..

      Wait, what did you say? He's awake? Oh s***!

  8. Killed milions of them myself by imbaczek · · Score: 4, Funny

    using nothing but my keyboard and mouse!

  9. Of course it gives you the willies! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    It has a bunch of willies hangin' there! Who loves tentacle porn?!

    1. Re:Of course it gives you the willies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the japanese stereotype!

  10. Essentially this shows.. by powerslave12r · · Score: 1

    ..that humans are working nicely towards disturbing yet another 'ecosystem'. Who'd have thought, these creatures, existing for god knows how many million years, were actually waiting to drink some leaked oil.

    --
    Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
    1. Re:Essentially this shows.. by MrMista_B · · Score: 1, Informative

      Um, I dunno if you noticed, but... squid float, and swim in the water. Unless they stay suidicially still while one of the drilling beams is slowly lowered onto them, there's nothing to worry about.

    2. Re:Essentially this shows.. by powerslave12r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? You thought of squids getting hit by the drill bit as the disturbance to their ecosystem? Of course, you were joking.

      --
      Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
    3. Re:Essentially this shows.. by Lershac · · Score: 1, Informative

      Get a grip. Ever been to an actual oil rig?

      They provide an artificial reef and are little islands of life. Fishing around them is a full time industry in the Gulf of Mexico.

      Most of them are very very clean and scrupulous about keeping the sea uncontaminated... as in everything a few bad apples have given the whole barrel a bad image.

      --
      Chuck
    4. Re:Essentially this shows.. by powerslave12r · · Score: 1

      It's as easy as claiming how nuclear power provides so much energy cheaply and efficiently while ignoring the risks.

      --
      Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
    5. Re:Essentially this shows.. by Lershac · · Score: 1

      Yeah thats why France is such a horrible place to live, seeing as how they get about 80%+ of their energy from Nuclear power.

      --
      Chuck
  11. Who knows what else is down there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Squid with elbows? What's next, jellyfish with knees and octopi with nipples?

    In all seriousness, we should be a little concerned about the effects that our deep drilling is having on biodiversity. If we're just now discovering new species at the bottom, them maybe we shouldn't be drilling down there until we've explored more fully, if not just for the sake of protecting our ecosystems from us, then for the sake of protecting our oil rigs from the unknowns in our ecosystems?

    1. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...elbows? What's next, jellyfish with knees and octopi with nipples?

      Oil Shmoil, I smell a new revenue stream for porn.
         

    2. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      fortunately your fear mongering has no effect on people with brains.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by Repton · · Score: 5, Funny

      But how would the giant squid be able to pay?

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    4. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Providing fishermen with smaller squid for sushi?

    5. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with how much he can ink? The squid is a star!

    6. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by mjaworsk · · Score: 1

      I understand they know a lot of suckers.

    7. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Why, you sell support services, of course! There's your money.

    8. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They pay in OIL!

    9. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how would the giant squid be able to pay?

      The question is not how the squid would pay us, but rather how we would pay the squid.

    10. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

      Stolen CC details. They'll have access to all the deep sea cables, they're probably running all the botnets from down there.

      --
      Nick
    11. Re:Who knows what else is down there? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      But how would the giant squid be able to pay?

      Another problem is the squid's rather large pantyhose and high-heels bills.
                   

  12. Size? by freedumb2000 · · Score: 1, Informative

    I missed any mention of the approximate size of the squid. Does anyone have an idea about how large this creature might have been?

    1. Re:Size? by Takichi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Based on analysis of videos not unlike the one captured at the Perdido site, scientists know that the adult Magnapinna observed to date range from 5 to 23 feet (1.5 to 7 meters) long

      From the second page of the article.

    2. Re:Size? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but that is for all of this type of squid. I think they are asking if anyone has speculated how big this particular specimen was. I mean they should have an approximate range and based on that plus the magnification they should be able to calculate the approximate size. I would think that would be incredibly useful information that surely someone has tried to figure out.

  13. Mother of all viruses? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks like a giant virus:

    http://50milesmore.blogspot.com/2008/03/prepare-to-be-assimalated.html

    Squiddy will give you a flu like no other.
         

    1. Re:Mother of all viruses? by BorgHunter · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is a bacteriophage, which is neither a cold nor a flu virus.

      --
      "Excuse me, did you say 'Trekker'? The word is 'Trekkie.' I should know; I created them." -- Gene Roddenberry
    2. Re:Mother of all viruses? by Kenoli · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the right is the cold virus which looks like its from another planet.

      Now I know what life on other planets looks like!

    3. Re:Mother of all viruses? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That is a bacteriophage, which is neither a cold nor a flu virus.

      Shhh, you're ruining my joke.
           

  14. Giant Alien Squid? by TrickFred · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone tell Zack Snyder, maybe he can get some budget footage for the Watchmen movie, give it a proper ending.

  15. Cthulhu?? by dissy · · Score: 1

    And I for one welcome our new underwater cthulhu overlords...

  16. Truth/Fiction by Digital+End · · Score: 4, Informative

    You never hear the full quote, but it is so much better then the shortened version:

    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't.

    --
    Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
    1. Re:Truth/Fiction by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      There's another quote that sheds some light on your quote. I don't remember who by:

      The existence of something is irrefutable proof of its possibility.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Truth/Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't.

      Imagine doing science with fictional data... "well this data is still plausible... it could easily happen... it probably happened somewhere..."

      That's basically why I don't read any fiction. I haven't since I was forced to in college, and even then I raised objections with teachers (who didn't appreciate my view because it apparently threatens their profession).

    3. Re:Truth/Fiction by Terrasque · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've heard it a bit more elegantly said :

      Truth is stranger than fiction, because fiction have to make sense.

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    4. Re:Truth/Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we do that already, we just call it "statistics".

    5. Re:Truth/Fiction by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I never liked that.

      I prefer:
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to expectations; Truth isn't.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. Nature by d12v10 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn nature, you scary!

  18. Oh my god! by tommten · · Score: 1

    It's full of tentacles!

    --
    - I choked on the red pill and now I'm stuck in limbo
  19. Oh Shit by CraigoFL · · Score: 4, Funny

    Still not as scary as Dolphins with Opposable Thumbs

  20. Terror from the deep! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 3, Funny

    It actually made me want to fire up XCom 2 and go destroy some underwater aliens! FWOOSH-BLEAH!

    1. Re:Terror from the deep! by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      "Terror From The Deep" was a lame name, but dang if that game wasn't fun! It was missing giant tentacle monsters, though...

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    2. Re:Terror from the deep! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I actually liked it better than UFO: Enemy Unknown" but the ship terror missions made me swear. A lot. Plus your guys literally started the game with pyjamas and blowguns.

      I do seem to remember some tentacled critters, it's been a long time though.

    3. Re:Terror from the deep! by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      INFORMATIVE? Funny maybe, but informative?
      In that case, this post actually made me wanna eat some calamari!!

      Mod me informative, baby!

    4. Re:Terror from the deep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh memories ... hours of searching on one ship for the last hiding alien .. performing the team cover routines a billion times and then getting shot in the back the second I run past the tiniest nook without cover to save some time

    5. Re:Terror from the deep! by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      It informs those too young hat XCom 2 is a fucking BLAST! I would say both informative and insightful. Sadly, you don't get games like those anymore. Good times for sure

      --
      -- dnl
    6. Re:Terror from the deep! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      You don't get games like that anymore

      Actually, you can.

      Steam does an awesome job of making old games work with Dosbox. Just download and start fraggin' those lobstermen, man. Men.

    7. Re:Terror from the deep! by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      I meant NEW games like that. I actually play quite a lot on dosbox... ;-)

      --
      -- dnl
    8. Re:Terror from the deep! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      OK, what about the UFO series from Altar? I never played them but lots of people like them.

      There's also the open-source Project Xenocide which looks cool (haven't tried it though.)

    9. Re:Terror from the deep! by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      I will give it a try!

      --
      -- dnl
    10. Re:Terror from the deep! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      Send me a pm and tell me what you think...

  21. Shell Oil by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

    Video and crazy squid mutation
    courtesy Shell Oil Corporation.

  22. Bimimetics anyone? by Plazmid · · Score: 1, Funny

    So this squid drifts just above the bottom of the seabed dragging its tentacles along the bottom to pickup yummy tidbits. Why not put a similar system on that Titan balloon probe for sampling the ground/lakes.

  23. Re:Conflicts, always conflicts. But hope also by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    True, although increasingly many large international organisations are paying more than just lip service to sustainability etc. Yes, beacuse they see this is key to making a buck, or just survival, still, it's progress.

    Sometimes serendipity intervenes too. On the 'swords into ploughshares' front, look at what they're using SOSUS for these days - whale watching!

  24. It was filmed at around 1.5 miles in depth... by Fierlo · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not to be picky about the summary, but that video wasn't shot at 4000 feet. It was shot at 1.5 miles, which is about 7900 ft. It's the first sentence of the article.

    A mile and a half (two and a half kilometers) underwater, a remote control submersible's camera has captured an eerie surprise

    Anyhow, very creepy.

  25. Alien? by ThierryD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, is it me or does it kind of look like the queen mother from the Aliens movie? Argh.

    1. Re:Alien? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Actually, is it me or does it kind of look like the queen mother from the Aliens movie? Argh.

      Well, to me it looked more like the final phase of Metroid Prime. Except, um, longer tentacles and floating in water, not air.

  26. Nearly the perfect article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn, a giant squid, a robot submarine AND big oil!
    Now if only;
    * The robot ran BSD, but formerly ran Vista
    * The MAFIAA was claiming copyright on the film
    * On close inspection, the squid had a google logo but was in fact an alien species
    * Some jerk had just been granted a lame patent for 'swimming at great depths with tentacles'

    We'd never need another!

    1. Re:Nearly the perfect article! by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, well, in Soviet waters, squid exploration leads to oil discoveries!

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    2. Re:Nearly the perfect article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not quite the last article needed.

      We'd also need a dupe.

    3. Re:Nearly the perfect article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now imagine a beowulf cluster of similar articles!

  27. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone please shoot the asshole controlling the camera
     
    Chill out - the camera's servo only has one speed as should be obvious from the panning when the view zooms out versus when it zooms in. You would not have done any better.

  28. Worse, probably. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Giant squids use ammonia salts to provide buoyancy. I can't imagine just how awful that must taste.

    At least, Architeuthis species do. I know nothing about whether this kind of squid does, but it wouldn't surprise me since several other, smaller, deep sea squids use ammonia for buoyancy as well.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Worse, probably. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that means much as far as what food would be made from the squid? I mean, sharks have urea running through them but people manage to get palatable meat from them.

    2. Re:Worse, probably. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      No idea. I tried looking around, but I don't know if cleaning and draining the meat would do as much to clear it out as it does for shark flesh.

      On the other hand, there are apparently Finnish "candies" made from ammonium salt, sugar, and licorice, but they are also "an acquired taste."

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  29. Discovery Channel has had a few shows on this by CFD339 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've seen at least three different shows on Discovery Channel about these squid that until a few years ago were considered by most biologists to be nothing by a myth.

    One was about the first ever captured specimen of a Giant Squid -- it was almost microscopic and they couldn't keep any alive.

    Later, one was about actually getting fleeting video of one in the wild.

    Most recent was one about another kind of giant squid that's even bigger and was caught in a net accidentally. The fishing trawler was smart enough to quickly freeze it. In the show, they were able to thaw it carefully and do a dissection. Apparently one of the problems with scientists working with these is that thy decompose extremely rapidly.

    Oil exploration is pushing serious camera time deeper than ever. At the same time, an awareness of the value to science of creatures that we don't know about is making inroads into fishing crews in even the most remote places where in the past such a find might simply have been discarded as waste.

    There is a LOT of volume in the oceans, and we're far from understanding it in the kind of depth we one day will.
     

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:Discovery Channel has had a few shows on this by Opyros · · Score: 1

      Most recent was one about another kind of giant squid that's even bigger and was caught in a net accidentally. The fishing trawler was smart enough to quickly freeze it. In the show, they were able to thaw it carefully and do a dissection. Apparently one of the problems with scientists working with these is that thy decompose extremely rapidly.

      You mean the Colossal Squid. The team that dissected it has a blog about it here.

    2. Re:Discovery Channel has had a few shows on this by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Since when are giant squid mythical? Haven't the bodies been washing up on shores pretty much forever?

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    3. Re:Discovery Channel has had a few shows on this by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      It's actually quite rare for deep sea animals such as giant squid to get washed up on shores, so many scientists really did believe that they only existed in tall tales from mariners until the 19th century, when a French gunboat brought back part of a specimen.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  30. Willies ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    doesnt it give you johnsons ?

    dont discriminate against johnsons.

  31. Spooky! by therpham · · Score: 1

    I expected it to flip out and start destroying shit.

  32. Parent is truth by unity100 · · Score: 1

    we have NO idea what kind of role do these squits play in ecosystem of the world.

    i said world. if you noticed, these squids are in every ocean of the world. apparently they are a common species.

    that makes their situation more integral to world ecosystem.

  33. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    With a camera?

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  34. It's the goddam robot aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, it was all I could think of. :P

  35. glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the matrix.

  36. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn by DrYak · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, Cthulhu ask us if we could go drilling for Oil at another place rather than at Rlyeh, because He would rather like to be left alone slumbering in peace, thank you very much.
    All this noise gives Him maddening head aches....

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  37. Its just a squid... by kwantar · · Score: 2, Funny

    to me it looks like a squid which just ate a rather large king crab. either that or it really is an alien searching for oil. Thats my story and I'm sticking to it.

    --
    If it were anything else...
  38. Ecological conservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if we keep polluting, these fantastic creatures will die and their corpses will float to the surface! Surely this is a much more efficient method than poking a camera into the ocean and hoping it sees something!

    On a more serious note, if we weren't drilling for oil under the sea we'd never know about this squid in the first place...

    1. Re:Ecological conservation by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Informative

      actually, Bigfin squids were first discovered in 1907, and the species in this particular video isn't new either. if you're talking about this particular specimen that's captured the video, then you may be right. but otherwise, deep sea drilling hasn't contributed much to our scientific understanding of this species.

  39. Oil and Squid by tknd · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was thinking about frying it in oil to make a new type of Calamari.

    1. Re:Oil and Squid by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about frying it in oil to make a new type of Calamari.

      I think you'll find that the crude oil Shell is dealing with imparts a bitterness and some sulphurous notes that are too strong for the delicate flavor of the calamari.

      You want to go with a more neutral oil, say, something like a 5W50 synthetic should do nicely. It's got a nice high smoke point, so should be good for frying.

      Maybe a diesel/kerosene blend as a dipping sauce to give it a nice tang. A little cracked white pepper would be a nice addition here. ;-)

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  40. Just you wait! by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Next time it'll be a squid Sean Penn, and he'll kick your deep sea paparazzi ass, then you'll be sorry!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  41. Amazing, and Ordinary by gordguide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Truly awesome video and a truly awesome creature visible for the first time. Awesome might even be a bit understated.

    But, the manner in which it was discovered? As ordinary as dirt. Face it ... imperial expansion, military exercises and exploration of the furthest corners of the earth, and beyond, and below, are all pretty much the province of the miner, the soldier, the geologist, the imperialist paying those salaries. There is nothing new about how this was found ... it's how EVERYTHING is found. The hunter finds the range and extent of the animals in the local area. The mapping of America was done by fur traders and those seeking treasure. You could go on and on.

    There are those who oppose commercial enterprise, who oppose war and the exercises that preparation for war entail, who find man is essentially unkind to both man and the world he lives in. But, they learn from the adventures and the wallets of the "Bad Man".

    That Shell released this video is hardly a surprise. Our entire knowledge of the world around us is essentially paid for by those like Shell Oil and those who came before them. Shell Oil is as interested in advancing our knowledge as anyone; perhaps more so because they intend to live in this world where this particular creature was found.

    To imply evil intent is really off base ... they have plenty of opportunity to be evil the markets, on Capital Hill, at the UN, or the WTO. Note that few endangered species are likely to be found in those places, that is the environment of man, and is also the place where you are most likely to encounter the environmentalist, PETA, and the like.

    They don't go a mile or more under the ocean's surface ... Shell Oil does, though.

    I have never met anyone who works in the field for companies like Shell who is not far more aware of the world around them than those who occupy the cities and rail against the destruction of our environment. They have tremendous respect for the environment and the absolute wonder of the world we live in. Those who sit at their computers or write letters about banning plastic bags have no concept of the outdoors, usually. In fact, they rarely go about exploring the very city they live in.

    1. Re:Amazing, and Ordinary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting post and I don't entirely disagree with what you say but it sounded a little too pro-Shell and a little too enthusiastic about them.

      You don't work for Shell per chance do you?

    2. Re:Amazing, and Ordinary by Coopa · · Score: 1

      Truly awesome video and a truly awesome creature visible for the first time. Awesome might even be a bit understated.
      This isn't the first time it has been seen.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnapinnidae

    3. Re:Amazing, and Ordinary by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The mapping of America was done by fur traders and those seeking treasure. You could go on and on."

      No it wasn't. The mapping of the United States was done by a long and detected surveying project. Or maybe you mean things like Lewis and Clark and the Powell expedition. Sorry, those weren't fur traders or treasure seekers, those were flat out scientific and exploration expeditions. Like the Apollo missions of their day.

    4. Re:Amazing, and Ordinary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to say commerce and war do not have their place in science, that would clearly be insane - but from what I can tell this particular squid was discovered back in the 80's be submarine called Nautile. Nautile is run by a french research institute, IFREMER. And the first mapping of America may have been by fur traders, but government funded explorers also made important contributions. So just chill out a little, everyone can play their part in advancing knowledge.

    5. Re:Amazing, and Ordinary by gordguide · · Score: 1

      Firstly, try not to confuse "America" with the United States of America. The Americas extend from the southern tip of South America to the Arctic, and includes a large number of Islands along the way. Canada is in America. Brazil in in America. Costa Rica is in America. And, the United States of America is in America.

      Secondly, I said nothing about Lewis and Clark and I would put that down to the fact that I was not thinking of them.

      They used information that was gleaned from those who came before ... in no particular order and with no attempt to be comprehensive, the likes of The Hudsons Bay Company, The Spanish arm of the Catholic Church, the armies and navies of the Spanish, British, French, Portuguese, Dutch and Russians, later the same military branches of the modern Nations that eventually formed, the adventurers of the Gold Rush(es), the nomadic native tribes, Indian scouts, the cattle ranchers, botanists, the pirates and privateers, the slave traders, horse traders, gun runners, whisky traders, and, of course, the hunter.

      More knowledge of any area is known, and more is lost with the passing of each generation of locals, than ever is put to paper by cartographers and surveyors. Lewis and Clark, for their part, used the primitive maps that came before them as the basis for planning their expedition in the first place. Accuracy is, in itself, not a measure of whether a map exists or not. It must be so; the degree of accuracy is always limited. The most current maps of today can be wrong in a very short time; the earth changes daily.

      Regardless of the purpose of their situation, Europeans mapped their travels regardless of the business that put them there in the first place. The Americas, like everywhere else on Earth, were mapped by the work of untold thousands, not an identifiable few.

    6. Re:Amazing, and Ordinary by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Well, if you read my post, I limited the scope to the United States. I'm well aware of the geographical limits of the Americas.

      Lewis and Clark did not used primitive maps that came before. They used guides who had been in the areas, local Indians for translation and information, but once they moved into what now is NW Iowa/SE South Dakota, they were beyond any known maps.

      Furthermore, the actual formal surveying of the United States was done by small groups as they plotted out the baselines as part of the Public Land Survey System.

  42. Geography? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Houston isn't on the coast. It's 50 miles from the coast at Galveston, which leaves two questions:

    1) Was the squid found 150 miles off the coast at Galveston, or 200 miles?

    2) Are there no longer any geographers working at National Geographic?

    Score: 1 (pedantic+)

  43. one of the lessons of evolution by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is that the same anatomies keep getting reinvented for various reasons: environment, food source, etc.

    so you have dolphins mimicking the body plans of fish

    you have bats mimicking the body plans of birds

    you have the herds of grazers during the dinosaur age and the predators who track them, and you have the herds of grazers in our age and the predators who track them

    the same bodyplans and anatomical features and feeding strategies keep getting reinvented

    and here, you have a squid, who has evolved to live like a jellyfish

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:one of the lessons of evolution by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      ...and what about the platypus? Leftovers?

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    2. Re:one of the lessons of evolution by S3D · · Score: 1

      ...and what about the platypus? Leftovers?

      Evolutionary niche of Donald Duck ?

  44. Deep Sea Creatures by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    Eight-armed appendages.
    Two titanium-hard beaks with paralyzing neuropoisons.
    Crushes any and all protection you have.
    Partially digests your flesh while it's still on you, then sucks it in!

    Coming next Summer to the screen near you.

  45. Geography lesson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Off the coast of _Houston_? Hurricane Ike didn't take out everything between Houston and Galveston!

  46. As usual .. by HW_Hack · · Score: 1

    where is a Sperm Whale when you need one ?

    --
    Its not the years, its the mileage .....
  47. the platypus is proof by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    that god/ evolution/ the fsm has a sense of humor

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  48. Ew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disgusting creature. Seriously, why does sea critters have to be so gross? Didn't their mother teach them that it's impolite?

    Flat out disgusting. I hope it died from contamination.

  49. And scientists! by littleghoti · · Score: 1

    There are many scientists that are not too keen to change their world view in the face of evidence. It's healthy scepticism.

  50. Not just research by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    There are always people who find themselves randomly on one side or another of an issue that isn't clear. A rare few will actually find the truth, whatever side it's on.

  51. an elbowed squat at that by Chems_R_Us · · Score: 1

    So the researchers would have had squat and in this case, it would have been elbowed squat. Or not.

  52. Didn't you know? by CSLarsen · · Score: 1

    It's not the oil companies that are evil. These creatures are the ones that really control the world's oil market.

    --
    Claiming to be pedantic on Slashdot is asking for trouble
  53. I don't see why this should be a shock to anyone by Greg_D · · Score: 1

    Maybe in the California suburbs, oil rigs are giant monstrosities that destroy all life as we know it, but down in communities near the Louisiana and Texas coasts, oil rigs are artificial reefs that put to shame every other attempt by man to create such a structure. When offshore fishing guides discuss where they're going to find their fish, they use the oil platforms to describe the location because that's where the fish are.

    Not only that, but many old rigs can be knocked over after they've finished their life cycle to have permanent aquatic reefs. Good for the environment, good for the oil companies. This doesn't always have to be a religious issue.

  54. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by Dan541 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I would have been zoomed out while panning so yes, I would have done considerably better.

    --
    An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  55. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it blend?

  56. how.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And to think, there was a 'big-bang' and then a whole lot of time and then this! Somewhat that theory is too incredible to be believable.

  57. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, of course you would have. Naturally. Without question.

    I bet you'd disagree if I called you an arrogant twit too?

  58. Oil exploration: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See interesting creatures - and kill them.

  59. Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, that is creepy.

  60. Anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else have the desire to play some Metal Slug after watching that video?

  61. Aliens... by pythonhacker · · Score: 1

    This gives credence to the theory that aliens are right on Earth, living under water, disguised as giant elbowed squids. SETI is wasting time scanning the skies. Now, we only need to find the MIBs...

    --
    If you don't succeed at first, try again. If you still don't succeed, try harder. If nothing works, try reality shows.
  62. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by sa1lnr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought the camera's movement spoke volumes.

    To me it said "Whoa WTF was that (doubletake)"

  63. SSM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the swimming spaghetti monster, with his extra-soaked noodly appendages...

  64. Abyss by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the movie The Abyss. Cool!

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
  65. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would have been zoomed out while panning so yes, I would have done considerably better.

    Yes, because I'm sure that the oil companies are only using barely trained idiots to operate their multi million dollar ROVs for their exploration of oil worth billions.

    Seriously, WTF? Do you think they spend all that money on oil exploration only to have some tool operating the ROV who doesn't know how it works?

    If you knew the squid was going to be there and rehearsed it, you might have gotten a better shot. If you were operating the ROV in real time and saw this thing, your odds of doing better are pretty slim.

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  66. Re:Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fht by danieltdp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank god it was taped by a robot. Nobody got insane this time.

    --
    -- dnl
  67. In R'yleth doth Cthulhu lay by danieltdp · · Score: 1

    That is not dead which eternal lie, and with strange aeons, even death may die.

    --
    -- dnl
  68. 2007? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did anybody else notice that the video is from November 2007?

  69. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

    I suggest you spend some time learning about the limitations of designing, building, and operating equipment with the enormous pressure of water at those depths. As an example, the physical properties of the metal shackles holding the rig to the ocean floor changed because of the pressure. How well do you think fragile electronic equipment holds up under those conditions?

    Look in the mirror to find the @$$.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  70. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by GaryOlson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, you would not. This is a Remotely Operated Vehicle. The endpoint of the control is not less than 4000 feet away -- straight down. The camera is not anything like a camera you hold in your hand. The camera is specifically designed for deep water use; and not for taking live action sweeps. The water at that depth is close to freezing, there are currents, and there is immense pressure.

    Videography is not limited to just the narrow uses to which you are acquainted.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  71. this is true, however by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you aren't supposed to like it

    i believe everything you wrote above, i believe just as you believe

    but the difference between you and i is that i accept these observations of truth with shame and grief, i don't trumpet it as wonderful

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  72. STFU. by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

    "but otherwise, deep sea drilling hasn't contributed much to our scientific understanding of this species."

    Really?

    And just exactly how the fuck would you know that? Are you some secret marine biologist squid expert that has intimate working knowledge of EVERY facet of oil exploration/squid research?

    No, you're not.

    You're some fucking kid running his mouth about something he's only able to speculate on, pandering to the bias of the audience.

    But you have NO FUCKING IDEA how much oil exploration has contributed to squid research, so stop lying with pathetic statements like "otherwise, deep sea drilling hasn't contributed much to our scientific understanding of this species" that you can't possibly know to be true.

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
    1. Re:STFU. by DougWombat · · Score: 1

      Got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning, did we?

      You're quite good in the bile and bias line, but with a bit of practice you could master the subtleties of the english language without resorting to guttersniping.

      I vote your post Rant of the Week, and as a bonus, your sig gets the Bad Taste Sig of the Month Award.

      --
      To understand recursion, you first have to understand recursion
  73. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad Shell doesn't employ junior college dropouts(at least for the important jobs...)- otherwise you'd be able to show them a thing or two about "zooming out while panning."

    ^_^

  74. FSM by Rohobian · · Score: 1

    Can we get an FSM tag on this? :)

  75. In soviet russia, squid eats YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...

  76. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by kimvette · · Score: 1

    You're presuming that their controller/software allows for controlling multiple servos in the camera assembly. Not all camera controllers support sending more than one control code concurrently.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  77. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    No, these cameras do not have 'fine' control. They aren't designed for following something.
    No, you would have been lucky to do as well.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  78. Re:Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fht by euxneks · · Score: 1

    Actually, R'Lyeh is supposed to be somewhere in the Pacific ocean: Source. Also, according to the article summary at least, they were checking for potential sources somewhere off the coast of Houston, TX, which would mean the Gulf of Mexico, attached to the Atlantic. This was likely nothing more than a star-spawn.

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  79. In other news... by BottleCup · · Score: 1

    Astronauts discover squid-like aliens with elbows..

  80. Re:I for one... by llamafirst · · Score: 1
  81. damn nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn nature, you scary!

  82. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by Bertie · · Score: 1

    I dunno, I think the camerawork actually adds to it. The person operating it clearly, genuinely couldn't quite believe what they were seeing.

  83. Re:Shoot the cameraman. by Dan541 · · Score: 1

    Why should I care what the camera is made of?

    If you get a unique opportunity to film something, don't fuck it keep the dam thing in frame.

    It's no different that the amateurs who shake cameras while walking with them.

    --
    An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  84. Eat me by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

    "Got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning, did we?"

    NO, I just hate the menagerie of stupid fucks that make declarations like that idiot did, while the audience KNOWS he's talking out of his ass but approves anyway because he's pandering to their biases.

    "I vote your post Rant of the Week, and as a bonus, your sig gets the Bad Taste Sig of the Month Award. "

    Who cares? I certainly don't give a fuck about your opinion, so why did you share it with someone you know would only enjoy how much it pisses your loser ass off?

    Fuck off now, thanks.

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...