For human evaluation, they compared their "meme list" to a set of phrases selected at uniform random from papers with enough citations. This is worthless; any half-way intelligent method will outperform that. If you had physicists come up with a list of 20 important phrases de novo, it would probably not have a huge amount of overlap with their "memes."
You absolutely do not need real/complex analysis to read 95%+ of Knuth's TAoCP. Even a math illiterate can read easily 50% of TAoCP with just a little patience, and that 50% is still way beyond what any other book will cover. Of course, whether it's worth spending this time is, as you pointed out, not obvious.
There are many more current topics; particularly, I'd plug statistics and data mining. A solid understanding of advanced statistics combined with strong algorithmic skills (coding, analysis, design, whatever) is probably the most lucrative cross-specialization there is, at least for the next 10-15 years.
uh, sure, except these aren't independent trials. to clarify, the event of being in a storm now, and the event of being in a storm one minute from now are almost perfectly correlated. this means you can't use the product rule.
by contrast, the event of a storm happening this year vs. a storm happening next year are closer to independent exactly because the blocks are bigger (a storm on Dec. 31 will make a storm on Jan. 1 more likely, but apart from that...).
your 'improvement' rests on assumptions which are not only unwarranted, but obviously untrue.
I'm sure MIT would be thrilled to hear your opinions; they're really floundering and could use all the help they can get. Email them, they've hired people of your caliber before.
Martin and Erik Demaine are professors, not students.
Erik Demaine, in particular, is widely considered to be a genius, so perhaps it's fortunate that you have no administrative power over your alma mater.
Ah, yeah, fair enough, though the standby consumption of an xbox is also much, much higher than an appletv. The arithmetic is trivial, but I won't bother with it since I have neither.
The "embodied energy" of a laptop is about 1500MJ, so let's call the Apple TV+HDMI a generous total of 2000MJ. Shipping energy is relatively low and fits easily in the 2000MJ upper bound.
The Xbox360 uses ~120W to watch a movie, while according to ArcadeMan the Apple TV uses 6W. Thus you make up the embodied energy in about 2000000000/114 seconds, or about 200 days.
The Xbox One is a bit more efficient, using ~75W, for a makeup time of about 335 days.
Either one is less than a year, so if you want to minimize energy consumption, it seems like a good plan to buy an Apple TV.
Of course it isn't clear that this is the right thing to be doing, but if it is, the benefit seems obvious.
Pace the implication of the article, medieval musicians and other low-tech entertainers would likely be in high demand.
If electronic technology magically stops working (somehow), then judging by the amount of purchased and pirated music today, one of the most secure professions would probably be musician. And if technology is low, medieval music (or some synthesis of it and modern forms like jazz) would be the go-to.
Yeah, if things are so dire that computers magically disappear for decades, the concomitant disappearance of advanced agriculture, etc., will mean the lingering miserable death of probably 90% of the developed world.
Like most doomsday scenarios, this is a masturbatory exercise. Things will end up either 1) like now, but worse in many ways or 2) utter decimation. In neither of these cases will your soldering hobby become the salvation of your village and earn you the respect and admiration long-denied you by our anti-intellectual society, granting you, finally, a day in the sun where the jocks pull you along on a rickshaw while Julie the prom queen gives you deep throat.
Obviously, he doesn't understand Picard's story. He's just being comforted by a newly-won ally, enjoying the bitter victory and what it might mean for the future of his people. What Picard is saying is basically irrelevant. It's simply a way for the character to celebrate and it emphasizes the themes of the episode, for one, that words have meanings beyond the literal or even evocative.
They may not have meant it that way, but it works.
Of course, it is completely impossible that a culture could develop space-faring technology, or even a fucking automobile, through such a simple language; the language would just be so information-poor, that it would be basically impossible to collaborate on anything beyond a wheeled cart. But most Star Trek episodes are total bullshit on a scientific level; it's just part of what you accept. They're simple fables and morality tales in spaaaaaace, nothing more, no matter how much obsessive neurotics fetishize it.
What mostly irritates me is the (few?) furries with the idea that their furry identity is legitimate, sort of like with transgendered folks. The thing is, we mostly understand what differentiates the human sexes and the technology, though primitive, is capable of making significant changes from one to the other. Transgendered folks use these technologies to various extents. Once the technology is mature, the label of transgendered will mostly evaporate, apart from the few who intentionally adopt an ambiguous sex. The thing that freaks people out, is that trans people today are kind of in an uncanny valley. Nonetheless, for whatever reason, this is an acceptable price for many people.
Now, the thing is, we also understand some of what differentiates humans from animals and while most of the technology does not exist yet, I haven't heard of any furry yet who has stabbed out their frontal lobes or at least cauterized their Broca's area. These would seem like reasonable steps to take, if you were "really" a leopard or whatever.
Did you read the article? He wants a degree as easily as possible, just so that he can make more money. If an accredited institution offered Bachelor's degrees in CS for sucking dick in the parking lot, I'm sure our erstwhile submitter wouldn't have bothered asking for anything else.
No it isn't, you fucking moron. The product of probability and cost is the expected cost; risk is almost exactly the opposite. Risk is a measure of uncertainty; it's vague because there are many ways to define risk. For instance, one may define risk as the probability that seeking medical care will completely ruin you financially. It's easy to reduce this risk, even if it increases the average cost of medical care. There are many other definitions which I won't bother going over. The point is that you're an idiot. Don't use probabilistic lingo if you don't know what it means.
There are about 500 active trademarks matching the string "multimeter". I could go through them myself in a few hours manually, or about ten minutes if I could grep the records first for relevancy.
My conclusion is that Sparkfun are just incompetent. I'm sure they would have no problem paying their lawyers to enforce their trademark, but they plead for special treatment as a poor widdle small business when they're on the receiving end. Fuck 'em.
Heh. Yeah, but whose common sense and human decency? Why, yours, of course, and no one else's! It's amazing how many disputes can be settled by individual whim.
If you can't think of a case where your own permissive standards wouldn't work against what you consider good and decent if the shoe were on the other foot, then you aren't very imaginative.
Uh, yeah, that is no reason. A lawyer could make everyone happy (at least for the short term), but it would still dilute the mark (correctly, imho, but that's not important).
Slashdot Mirror
For human evaluation, they compared their "meme list" to a set of phrases selected at uniform random from papers with enough citations. This is worthless; any half-way intelligent method will outperform that. If you had physicists come up with a list of 20 important phrases de novo, it would probably not have a huge amount of overlap with their "memes."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...
You absolutely do not need real/complex analysis to read 95%+ of Knuth's TAoCP. Even a math illiterate can read easily 50% of TAoCP with just a little patience, and that 50% is still way beyond what any other book will cover. Of course, whether it's worth spending this time is, as you pointed out, not obvious.
There are many more current topics; particularly, I'd plug statistics and data mining. A solid understanding of advanced statistics combined with strong algorithmic skills (coding, analysis, design, whatever) is probably the most lucrative cross-specialization there is, at least for the next 10-15 years.
uh, sure, except these aren't independent trials. to clarify, the event of being in a storm now, and the event of being in a storm one minute from now are almost perfectly correlated. this means you can't use the product rule.
by contrast, the event of a storm happening this year vs. a storm happening next year are closer to independent exactly because the blocks are bigger (a storm on Dec. 31 will make a storm on Jan. 1 more likely, but apart from that...).
your 'improvement' rests on assumptions which are not only unwarranted, but obviously untrue.
what? where the hell did you pull that from? why 1/e?
if a storm hit every two years, your method would give a probability of 0.393. what sense does that make?
I'm sure MIT would be thrilled to hear your opinions; they're really floundering and could use all the help they can get. Email them, they've hired people of your caliber before.
Idiot.
Martin and Erik Demaine are professors, not students.
Erik Demaine, in particular, is widely considered to be a genius, so perhaps it's fortunate that you have no administrative power over your alma mater.
i said skilled, not necessarily young or lovely. and i'd can my own goddam food if it meant better blowies.
Ah, yeah, fair enough, though the standby consumption of an xbox is also much, much higher than an appletv. The arithmetic is trivial, but I won't bother with it since I have neither.
The "embodied energy" of a laptop is about 1500MJ, so let's call the Apple TV+HDMI a generous total of 2000MJ. Shipping energy is relatively low and fits easily in the 2000MJ upper bound.
The Xbox360 uses ~120W to watch a movie, while according to ArcadeMan the Apple TV uses 6W. Thus you make up the embodied energy in about 2000000000/114 seconds, or about 200 days.
The Xbox One is a bit more efficient, using ~75W, for a makeup time of about 335 days.
Either one is less than a year, so if you want to minimize energy consumption, it seems like a good plan to buy an Apple TV.
Of course it isn't clear that this is the right thing to be doing, but if it is, the benefit seems obvious.
Pace the implication of the article, medieval musicians and other low-tech entertainers would likely be in high demand.
If electronic technology magically stops working (somehow), then judging by the amount of purchased and pirated music today, one of the most secure professions would probably be musician. And if technology is low, medieval music (or some synthesis of it and modern forms like jazz) would be the go-to.
no skill involved
uh, haven't gotten around much, have you?
here's one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
Yeah, if things are so dire that computers magically disappear for decades, the concomitant disappearance of advanced agriculture, etc., will mean the lingering miserable death of probably 90% of the developed world.
Like most doomsday scenarios, this is a masturbatory exercise. Things will end up either 1) like now, but worse in many ways or 2) utter decimation. In neither of these cases will your soldering hobby become the salvation of your village and earn you the respect and admiration long-denied you by our anti-intellectual society, granting you, finally, a day in the sun where the jocks pull you along on a rickshaw while Julie the prom queen gives you deep throat.
Obviously, he doesn't understand Picard's story. He's just being comforted by a newly-won ally, enjoying the bitter victory and what it might mean for the future of his people. What Picard is saying is basically irrelevant. It's simply a way for the character to celebrate and it emphasizes the themes of the episode, for one, that words have meanings beyond the literal or even evocative.
They may not have meant it that way, but it works.
Of course, it is completely impossible that a culture could develop space-faring technology, or even a fucking automobile, through such a simple language; the language would just be so information-poor, that it would be basically impossible to collaborate on anything beyond a wheeled cart. But most Star Trek episodes are total bullshit on a scientific level; it's just part of what you accept. They're simple fables and morality tales in spaaaaaace, nothing more, no matter how much obsessive neurotics fetishize it.
What mostly irritates me is the (few?) furries with the idea that their furry identity is legitimate, sort of like with transgendered folks. The thing is, we mostly understand what differentiates the human sexes and the technology, though primitive, is capable of making significant changes from one to the other. Transgendered folks use these technologies to various extents. Once the technology is mature, the label of transgendered will mostly evaporate, apart from the few who intentionally adopt an ambiguous sex. The thing that freaks people out, is that trans people today are kind of in an uncanny valley. Nonetheless, for whatever reason, this is an acceptable price for many people.
Now, the thing is, we also understand some of what differentiates humans from animals and while most of the technology does not exist yet, I haven't heard of any furry yet who has stabbed out their frontal lobes or at least cauterized their Broca's area. These would seem like reasonable steps to take, if you were "really" a leopard or whatever.
Typical partisan hack commie; your ticket would bring only serfdom.
I, and any true American lover of liberty, demand a Libertarian president and Green Party vice president! ;-)
Nice false dichotomy, you fucking imbecile.
Did you read the article? He wants a degree as easily as possible, just so that he can make more money. If an accredited institution offered Bachelor's degrees in CS for sucking dick in the parking lot, I'm sure our erstwhile submitter wouldn't have bothered asking for anything else.
Risk is the product of probability and cost
No it isn't, you fucking moron. The product of probability and cost is the expected cost; risk is almost exactly the opposite. Risk is a measure of uncertainty; it's vague because there are many ways to define risk. For instance, one may define risk as the probability that seeking medical care will completely ruin you financially. It's easy to reduce this risk, even if it increases the average cost of medical care. There are many other definitions which I won't bother going over. The point is that you're an idiot. Don't use probabilistic lingo if you don't know what it means.
Wow. Maybe you should try reading a few of these books yourself.
yeah, and Dara Ó Briain did it before Tim Minchin.
who cares?
They could sell them, and then use that money to pay for a new non-infringing shipment of (inferior) multimeters.
Of course since it's important for them to appear altruistic, they'll probably just give away a smaller number of (superior) multimeters.
There are about 500 active trademarks matching the string "multimeter". I could go through them myself in a few hours manually, or about ten minutes if I could grep the records first for relevancy.
My conclusion is that Sparkfun are just incompetent. I'm sure they would have no problem paying their lawyers to enforce their trademark, but they plead for special treatment as a poor widdle small business when they're on the receiving end. Fuck 'em.
I meant "would work against." Sorry about that.
Heh. Yeah, but whose common sense and human decency? Why, yours, of course, and no one else's! It's amazing how many disputes can be settled by individual whim.
If you can't think of a case where your own permissive standards wouldn't work against what you consider good and decent if the shoe were on the other foot, then you aren't very imaginative.
Uh, yeah, that is no reason. A lawyer could make everyone happy (at least for the short term), but it would still dilute the mark (correctly, imho, but that's not important).