That's actually strange, minesweeper is about the only piece of software on Linux that isn't broken after an update - well, most of the 350 versions of minesweeper on Linux that is.
before 2008 they made a movie for every Welsh-speaking community per year, after that they went into Welsh porn and the whole thing kinda got commercial.
If you have access to a network or external drive... than why not use your single BR drive on that network or as external drive ? You're just looking for excuses to allow cracking of copyrighted material. Let's try this approach: I don't want to spend x$ for y -> then don't buy it.
It's about the hardware. You all want that shiny spotless minimalistic big screen to put linux on. Regarding open source: you allready have android, you just want to port some stable new Gui/FX into these linux desktop failures
"In Native Client we disallow such [self-modifying code] practices through
a set of alignment and structural rules that, when observed,
insure that the native code module can be disassembled
reliably, such that all reachable instructions are identified
during disassembly."
Ok, when I read the post I had to chuckle when I read the asm joke. I've been programming in asm for 16 years now and there are a few rules of thumb:
- if assembly is allowed then the only real security is executed by hardware.
- malware writers love a challenge like this.
Videos here illustrate the effects of the comet's (abnormal) very close trajectory to the sun. Collected dust is pretty much sandblasted away on a regular base. But since it doesn't contain assembly language I don't really know what I'm talking about.
Here's a challenge for you: find me one post in the history of slashdot truly in favour of MS or in disrespect of LNX which has a score 4 or above - and I'm not talking about (funny) and the likes.
I don't believe they were fooled by the company in any way. I don't believe that Groundwork takes advantage of backdoors or fools the developers. What I do believe is that this whole story is BS: the "poor little open source company" is portrayed as a victim of a mad greedy multinational. It's the kind of stereotypical reaction you get whenever a/. post has the words "microsoft" or "open source" in it. It's been going on for a couple of months, BTW. As what appears to be the rule here lately,/. is bringing stuff like this as a breaking news story when it is in fact old and cold. The crowd spits out some clichees and moves on to the next "article". There's no depth, novelty, insight or interpretation in this post. Have a look around the internets and you'll see that the story is "somewhat different" than how it is presented here. HP isn't the aggressor.
It's corporate BS like this that makes life suck for everyone else. Competitive pricing is one thing businesses try to hide as much as possible so that they can backstab others. I'm glad it's being publicized, and I hope it gets HP to lower their list price so they won't be able to fuck over so many consumers and will have to start actually competing fairly. How could you stand up for fuck-you-over corporate tactics when this information should be free and they shouldn't be able to do that?
Which is off course much worse than selling software other people wrote for free and competing with companies that pay their programmers.
/. is the unbeatable major-league BS champ when it comes to open-source marketing.
That's a chicken & egg philosophy. It's long known that genes code for different proteins - please scroll through the comments in that post and count the 'old news' remarks. You need protein expression profiling to uncover how those basepairs relate - among other things - but this does not shift part of the amount of heredity in sequences to protein level. In your reasoning, a transplanted liver introduces heredity information from the donor to the recipient. It doesn't. You just need DNA.
Slashdot Mirror
That's actually strange, minesweeper is about the only piece of software on Linux that isn't broken after an update - well, most of the 350 versions of minesweeper on Linux that is.
Thank God they didn't choose an OS with less than 1% desktop market penetration, which has been designed for networking.
Is that a typical ratio on slashdot?
No, normally it's worse, but this time the title includes Windows - so brace yourself for a flood of cliches.
Well said. Where are those mod-points when you need them.
Scotland, where men are men and sheep are nervous.
Let me correct that for you:
Google is becoming the first open source evil empire
streaming video != network drive
the car can be started from outside but it's impossible to get in or drive it.
before 2008 they made a movie for every Welsh-speaking community per year, after that they went into Welsh porn and the whole thing kinda got commercial.
If you have access to a network or external drive ... than why not use your single BR drive on that network or as external drive ?
You're just looking for excuses to allow cracking of copyrighted material.
Let's try this approach:
I don't want to spend x$ for y -> then don't buy it.
instead of making decent movies to begin with
Learn a second language, you'll see there's no shortage of quality movies.
Replace OpenOffice with utter crap, dillhole.
Wrote my thesis on it. OpenOffice is truly the king of all that sucks.
It's about the hardware.
You all want that shiny spotless minimalistic big screen to put linux on.
Regarding open source: you allready have android, you just want to port some stable new Gui/FX into these linux desktop failures
yes, i did get past page 3. We'll see.
BTW, I wonder if this environment is the reason for the stripped user agents described here
from page 3 in the paper:
"In Native Client we disallow such [self-modifying code] practices through a set of alignment and structural rules that, when observed, insure that the native code module can be disassembled reliably, such that all reachable instructions are identified during disassembly."
Ok, when I read the post I had to chuckle when I read the asm joke. I've been programming in asm for 16 years now and there are a few rules of thumb:
- if assembly is allowed then the only real security is executed by hardware.
- malware writers love a challenge like this.
They mapped their milestones with photographs & videos:
Clink
Indeed, was quite surprised myself to see all that crap wizzing and blimping through the video.
overconfident
Videos here illustrate the effects of the comet's (abnormal) very close trajectory to the sun. Collected dust is pretty much sandblasted away on a regular base.
But since it doesn't contain assembly language I don't really know what I'm talking about.
or better, read the contract before signing it.
Here's a challenge for you: find me one post in the history of slashdot truly in favour of MS or in disrespect of LNX which has a score 4 or above - and I'm not talking about (funny) and the likes.
I don't believe they were fooled by the company in any way. I don't believe that Groundwork takes advantage of backdoors or fools the developers. What I do believe is that this whole story is BS: the "poor little open source company" is portrayed as a victim of a mad greedy multinational. It's the kind of stereotypical reaction you get whenever a /. post has the words "microsoft" or "open source" in it. It's been going on for a couple of months, BTW. As what appears to be the rule here lately, /. is bringing stuff like this as a breaking news story when it is in fact old and cold. The crowd spits out some clichees and moves on to the next "article". There's no depth, novelty, insight or interpretation in this post. Have a look around the internets and you'll see that the story is "somewhat different" than how it is presented here. HP isn't the aggressor.
Flashbacks to the days that rumours were rampant about McAfee installing viral software in printers for Russia ... Does anyone remember those stories?
It's corporate BS like this that makes life suck for everyone else. Competitive pricing is one thing businesses try to hide as much as possible so that they can backstab others. I'm glad it's being publicized, and I hope it gets HP to lower their list price so they won't be able to fuck over so many consumers and will have to start actually competing fairly. How could you stand up for fuck-you-over corporate tactics when this information should be free and they shouldn't be able to do that?
Which is off course much worse than selling software other people wrote for free and competing with companies that pay their programmers.
/. is the unbeatable major-league BS champ when it comes to open-source marketing.
That's a chicken & egg philosophy. It's long known that genes code for different proteins - please scroll through the comments in that post and count the 'old news' remarks. You need protein expression profiling to uncover how those basepairs relate - among other things - but this does not shift part of the amount of heredity in sequences to protein level. In your reasoning, a transplanted liver introduces heredity information from the donor to the recipient. It doesn't. You just need DNA.
Step 0: send women in space