Well jeez, you don't suppose the boxes in question might also have been, y'know, locked, like the other species of utilities boxes that reside in the vicinity of intersections?
I strongly suspect everyone here will feel much the same way, but TFA and I agree that there are a lot of people out there who are just technically challenged enough to use their web-capable TVs on sites where credit cards might be involved, or perhaps not find it surprising when attempting to purchase PPV content responds with a mysterious credit card prompt they've never seen before. The TFA also mentions scenarios where the TV's functionality could be extended, limited, or denied to the user, in addition to things like stealing browser history.
It's sheerly a question of the availability of diverse development tools. GP was speaking about chipmakers providing good platforms for OEMs to build customer-attracting products on. If these Atom processors were available 8 years ago, the iPhone might very well have been x86.
The Old English genitive is -es; an "e" is what the apostrophe in the possessive form represents. The possessive pronouns "his", "hers", and "its" lost this "e" before the contraction became common-place.
Nice backtracking. In your original post you said that to reach the multitudes, you would need to have enough money to buy off the media corporations—not to buy the supplies necessary to run a poster campaign, which is far cheaper. You're changing your position and it's sleazy as hell. Go troll somewhere else.
Well, the strategy of multiplicity works pretty darn well. And laws are already bouncing off the Wikileaks people pretty hard—they're going to be far harder to apply to hundreds of similar leak sites than just one! It's standard guerilla warfare.
Wikipedia to the rescue! Answer: it does! Or at least appears to! Adenosine triarsenide! Arsenylation of proteins! Arsenolipid bilayers! You name it, this thing is currently believed to do it!
The definition of terrorism is a lot more consistent than that, methinks: it's not terrorism in the eyes of the people doing it, no matter who those people are.
Slashdot Mirror
Well jeez, you don't suppose the boxes in question might also have been, y'know, locked, like the other species of utilities boxes that reside in the vicinity of intersections?
I strongly suspect everyone here will feel much the same way, but TFA and I agree that there are a lot of people out there who are just technically challenged enough to use their web-capable TVs on sites where credit cards might be involved, or perhaps not find it surprising when attempting to purchase PPV content responds with a mysterious credit card prompt they've never seen before. The TFA also mentions scenarios where the TV's functionality could be extended, limited, or denied to the user, in addition to things like stealing browser history.
Wouldn't that violate your sig's Microsoft-free lifestyle?
"iPhone makes sniping easier", "Bullet Flight 1.0.0 – the US$15 iPhone app for snipers"... You'd be surprised just at how many ballistics calculators there are! There are, in fact, tons of places in combat where iPhones already have a foothold. And I'm pretty sure that a good bumper that covers the ports would make it sand-proof, too.
It's sheerly a question of the availability of diverse development tools. GP was speaking about chipmakers providing good platforms for OEMs to build customer-attracting products on. If these Atom processors were available 8 years ago, the iPhone might very well have been x86.
Speak (CHEEP C1AL1$ CALL NOW) for yourself!
Not a thing. Despite the implications of replying, my post didn't attempt to defend such a strange idea.
The Old English genitive is -es; an "e" is what the apostrophe in the possessive form represents. The possessive pronouns "his", "hers", and "its" lost this "e" before the contraction became common-place.
You're right! A proper journalist would be more subtle than that. Let's fix it.
Alleged rapist and terrorist Julian Assange has been brought in for questioning. Extradition by the end of the week? #rape #terrorism #news
Sieg heitl!
Nice backtracking. In your original post you said that to reach the multitudes, you would need to have enough money to buy off the media corporations—not to buy the supplies necessary to run a poster campaign, which is far cheaper. You're changing your position and it's sleazy as hell. Go troll somewhere else.
Well, the strategy of multiplicity works pretty darn well. And laws are already bouncing off the Wikileaks people pretty hard—they're going to be far harder to apply to hundreds of similar leak sites than just one! It's standard guerilla warfare.
Well, as Arancaytar said, screwdrivers already exist. We're half way there!
As a molecular biologist, I'm aware :)
Richard Dawkins?
Regardless, this method was reckless.
It isn't. Obviously.
We're talking about Assange making a bad thing worse, not about whether that thing was bad to begin with. No one is suggesting that.
Civilians who had assisted the US military in Afghanistan. See lgw's post just below this one.
Wikipedia to the rescue! Answer: it does! Or at least appears to! Adenosine triarsenide! Arsenylation of proteins! Arsenolipid bilayers! You name it, this thing is currently believed to do it!
Respectfully disagree. The prototype's purpose is to show the feasibility of the usage paradigm, not satisfy your arbitrary aesthetic passions.
The definition of terrorism is a lot more consistent than that, methinks: it's not terrorism in the eyes of the people doing it, no matter who those people are.
I believe you. Wholly.
This was to be a Haiku,
but I couldn't think of anything finish up with.
Refrigerator.
Sometimes there's no choice
but to accept simple means
to express alarm.
Japanese formats
don't even work for poems
in English, anyway.
To be real Haiku,
we would have to use moras.
(Wikipedia.)
You're either crazy
or trying to scam someone.
Maybe it is both?
Your analogy
Isn't actually clever.
No one hears our screams.