Slashdot Mirror


User: aozilla

aozilla's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,256
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,256

  1. This is great. on Google to Offer API · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Text ads... Open standards for content distribution... If only certain other sites would follow...

  2. Re:A brief history of HDTV on FCC Pushes Digital TV and Digital Restrictions · · Score: 2

    That is the coolest thing I've ever read. Not only was it funny as hell, it's a nearly perfect paraphrase of exactly what happened.

  3. Intentionally crashes? on Sony Intentionally Crashes Customers' Computers · · Score: 2

    Where in the article does it say that, exactly?

  4. Re:My god mod the troll down on Browser Becomes Billboard · · Score: 2

    If you don't like cookies to be stored on your comptuer, turn them off.

    Then I can't use most of the features of the site.

    Would you rather /. logged your IP address?

    I guarantee you they already do.

  5. cookies on Browser Becomes Billboard · · Score: 1, Troll

    Friends don't let friends use browsers susceptible to this.


    This from a site which requires the user to allow tracking information to be stored on the user's hard drive in order to use most of the features.

  6. Re:Why is it on Feds Cracking the Whip on Spammers · · Score: 1

    It is when those 1s and 0s affect real money, property or life & limb.

    I disagree. If my 1s and 0s control a "real world" device which causes a "real wold" crime, I agree. If my 1s and 0s communicate with someone to conspire to commit a real world crime, I agree. But 1s and 0s, in absense of any real world crime, should not be illegal. Contractual agreements consisting entirely of 1s and 0s should be void in the absense of a real world agreement that future and/or past 1s and 0s are binding.

  7. Re:We are still flipping the bill on Feds Cracking the Whip on Spammers · · Score: 1

    Damn... You win... I lose...

  8. Re:Why is it on Feds Cracking the Whip on Spammers · · Score: 2

    If you use the internet to scam an old woman out of her life savings and she had to eat dog food for the rest of her life, she has been hurt just as bad as if someone committed a "real" crime and stole all the money she hides under her mattress.

    You can't use pain to judge whether or not something is a crime.

    People need to get out of the mindset that white collar crime isn't a "real" crime.

    I'm not saying white collar crime isn't "real" crime, I'm saying 1s and 0s aren't "real" crime.

  9. What good guys? on AOL Wins One Over The Spammers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Notch one up for the good guys.

    Would that be AOL, the spammers, or the lawyers?

  10. Re:We are still flipping the bill on Feds Cracking the Whip on Spammers · · Score: 2

    I would pay an extra $50 a year to receive less Spam

    For $50 a year I will personally go through all your email and delete the spam. Deal?

  11. Re:Libertarian response? on Feds Cracking the Whip on Spammers · · Score: 2

    So, what do libertarians think about this? Isn't the market supposed to regulate itself?

    If it goes over the internet, it shouldn't be illegal. It can however be used as evidence of real world illegal activies.

  12. Re:In other words, what took so long? on Feds Cracking the Whip on Spammers · · Score: 2

    Even if that's true, what's wrong with the feds finally enforcing laws that have been skirted for years?

    It's a waste of taxpayer dollars. Frankly, the people who fall for stupid pyramid schemes deserve to lose their money, as far as I'm concerned.

  13. Re:Why is it on Feds Cracking the Whip on Spammers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That it took so long for the Feds to finally realize that crimes on the Internet are no different than those off of it?

    Because all the "real" crimes take place in the "real" world.

  14. Repeal the law on Suing Sony for Everquest Related Suicide? · · Score: 2

    Wow, you mean people use laws other than the DMCA to bring baseless lawsuits against others? I guess we should repeal these laws, because they are obviously restricting free speech.

  15. Re:That's not all! on Updated Slashdot Advertising Policy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mozilla 1.0 is released, two years after work on it began.

  16. Re:Enough with the April Fools already on Updated Slashdot Advertising Policy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Subscribe. Subscribers aren't forced to see the April Fools' jokes.

  17. Re:The moral of the story on AOL Buying Up Blogs · · Score: 2

    Sorry, anonymous posting has been turned off. Please register and log in.

    So, it's definately not a bug... And logging off and on again doesn't work...

  18. wow on Google's Pageranking Explained · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow, that's really stupid and not funny. Stick to search engines, guys.

  19. The moral of the story on AOL Buying Up Blogs · · Score: 2

    If you have something to admit, admit it on April Fools' day.

  20. Re:Neat post... on Crystal Technology and 3D TV · · Score: 2

    touché

  21. Wow that's neat... on Crystal Technology and 3D TV · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wonder how it compares to this.

  22. Should we really be answering this? on Encryption by Hand? · · Score: -1, Troll

    Sounds like the perfect information to be used by terrorists.

  23. Re:Undermine Unix? on Microsoft To Start Running Anti-Unix Ads · · Score: 2

    no, GNU's Not Unix.
    no, PalmOS isn't unix.

  24. Undermine Unix? on Microsoft To Start Running Anti-Unix Ads · · Score: 2

    Unix is dead. Linux, on the other hand, isn't unix.

  25. Is it just a coincidence on Web Surfing Losing Its Luster · · Score: 2

    Or did slashdot intentionally pick this article to change the ad server from m.doubleclick.net to m2.doubleclick.net?

    Does anyone know if *.doubleclick.net works for mozilla image blocking?