The problem is if you have an account lockout based on too many failed attempts too fast, then I can lock Bill out of his account by simply making that many failed attempts that fast. I'm not trying to get into Bill's account, I'm trying to stop Bil from getting into it.
Yes he can. That should be obvious by the simple fact that he does.
Usually people get in trouble because they are revealing classified information, but that doesn't apply the President since they are at the top of the chain and can declassify at will anyway.
Can is not the same as should, but the claim is explicitly about "can".
Except that they did try to get the records without asking the defendant, it would be difficult for Amazon to drop its fight against subpeona if there was no subpoena after all.
It's the normal bog standard case of the prosecution/police asking for someone's private data held by a third party by serving a search warrant on that third party. With the little less typical case of the third party pushing back and challenging the warrant. And the very uncommon case of the person just saying "go ahead" - one can only hope he had a good lawyer before doing that and they know something...
Because gmail.com isn't a widely used domain for email or anything, so no spammer would ever think of changing x+y@gmail.com to x@gmail.com in their lists of addresses...
Often is a rather large exaggeration. Yes, people die from concussions - however, there are four million concussions annually just in sports (and training/practice) in the US. There'd be a lot fewer high school students if it was "often".
> With a blood alcohol level of.21 you're not "drunk".
At 0.21 you are in the BAC range where the physiological effects are typically: confusion, dizziness, exaggerated emotions (anger, fear, grief) impaired visual perception, decreased pain sensation, impaired balance, staggering gait, slurred speech, moderate muscular incoordination. Which I think most people would classify as "drunk".
Said scientist is not allowed to reveal the pass code to anyone. Scientist did reveal the pass code to someone. Thus scientist has shown themselves as incapable of handling sensitive documents.
He caved after being to US border control and handed over the information because they threatened to detain him for a while if he didn't. Do you think he might cave if some other country made much more serious threats while he was outside of the US?
Australia has the ever so slight advantage of being an island in the middle of nowhere. Sure running cigarettes between the US and Canda/Mexico is easy. Running cigarettes between european countries is easy.
You need something other than a truck and someone willing to take the risk to do that into Australia though. They take their customs checks pretty seriously too since that island part means they have avoided quite a few pests and diseases that they'd prefer to keep out.
Just because you can't read doesn't mean the FDA isn't telling.
They released their numbers, they aren't very useful since they varied widely within the same bottle and hence tell you next to nothing about any individual tablet.
H-1B visas are supposed to be for positions for which there aren't enough US workers to go around and thus foreign workers need to be brought over. They are clearly being abused to some extent, since I've personally met some people on H-1B visas who certainly aren't doing work that there are no US workers able to do - they mightn't be being abused en-masse I only have an anecdote or two obviously but people claim they are. People also claim that "bad guys" would immigrate within a week even though the immigration process takes months or years, so take that with as much salt as you please.
However, if that is truly what H-1B visas are for then the American market driven capitalist solution to allocating the limited number of them would be based on price. The current system is a literal lottery - they take the applications and pick at random which ones are granted - there is still the usual vetting of "are you a terrorist" and so on. Instead they could sort them by salary and grant the the 65,000 (or whatever the limit is changed to) ones with the highest salaries.
That would be using market forces to select which skills truly are in most need of foreign workers to fill gaps in the US worker pool. And makes perfect sense from a Republican free market point of view.
Billionaires/millionaires (well being a millionaire is not as high a hurdle these days) already have other far more beneficial visa options open to them - such as EB-5 (https://www.uscis.gov/eb-5).
So you restore from the day before that instead of the most recent one.
The whole idea of backups is you can restore to some point in the past - with the size of that window and the granularity within it depending on how much you want to spend...
If you just have one copy then you don't have a backup, you have a really slow RAID.
That's a nice sounding little statement from an emotional perspective, but is unlikely to be true. Someone who is paying for their education is likely to work harder, so as not to waste their money, which will lead to them becoming better educated. And someone who has no desire for more learning after high school is unlikely to spend their money on college. On the other hand, make it "free" and then all those same people who may not be interested in learning will start going, because who doesn't want a four year party free from parents and working a real job? Just because more people show up, doesn't mean "society is better educated" (and given the insanity going on right now at places like Mizzou and Yale, where students are calling for repealing the first ammendment, having safe spaces, etc, I'd argue society is becoming less educated at college, but that's a topic for another day).
You seem to have a strange assumption that "free" means everyone gets to go. But that isn't the case, instead of allocating places based on ability to pay they are allocated based upon results in previous education (high school usually) - that doesn't change the number. And yes all things else the same the student with straight As in high school is more likely to do well at college than the student with straight Cs whose parents are richer.
You don't want more people showing up. You just want to pick the people that do attend based upon performance and not wealth.
SJW idiocy is irrelevant.
Unless you are a communist like Marx or Lenin, that is not the role of government. Government's role is to keep us free and preserve our rights, including our core rights of life, liberty and property. Taking people's property away by force to redistribute it and spend it how the government deems "best" is most assuredly not a valid role of government, especially under the US constitution.
I clearly prefixed who would consider those the role of the government. And that you are free to disagree. But you jump to the extreme instantly and dismiss alternative views with "communist" rather than considering for a moment that maybe the made up by people concept of government might be thought of differently when made up by different people?
Numerous governments that exist in the world today and are not communist consider the pooling and allocation of resources to be a role of the government. The US constitution is irrelevant, given that other countries is specifically ("like is it in..." comparing other places with the US) what is being discussed and it means as much to them as theirs do to the US.
The US clearly considers the pooling and allocation of resources to be a role of the government, since that is what the military is. The pooling of resources in order to allocate communal defense rather than having each individual do whatever they think is needed for the military defense of the nation.
The US is famously more individualist than most other countries. But that shouldn't stop you from at least being able to comprehend how and why other people might see things differently without instantly labeling them with bogyman (well in the US) terms like communist. You don't have to agree with people to understand them.
Slashdot Mirror
I make one attempt every 1.5 seconds.
That doesn't thwart the problem.
The problem is if you have an account lockout based on too many failed attempts too fast, then I can lock Bill out of his account by simply making that many failed attempts that fast. I'm not trying to get into Bill's account, I'm trying to stop Bil from getting into it.
Yes he can. That should be obvious by the simple fact that he does.
Usually people get in trouble because they are revealing classified information, but that doesn't apply the President since they are at the top of the chain and can declassify at will anyway.
Can is not the same as should, but the claim is explicitly about "can".
Yes he does have something to lose. And no it doesn't score points with a jury.
Hopfully he has a good lawyer with a plan and he's not just trying to be nice.
So exactly what the article says that echo does then. If you believe Apple you believe Amazon, surely.
Except that they did try to get the records without asking the defendant, it would be difficult for Amazon to drop its fight against subpeona if there was no subpoena after all.
It's the normal bog standard case of the prosecution/police asking for someone's private data held by a third party by serving a search warrant on that third party. With the little less typical case of the third party pushing back and challenging the warrant. And the very uncommon case of the person just saying "go ahead" - one can only hope he had a good lawyer before doing that and they know something...
Because gmail.com isn't a widely used domain for email or anything, so no spammer would ever think of changing x+y@gmail.com to x@gmail.com in their lists of addresses...
It's common misspelling that you would have to be borderline retarded to not be able to work out yourself.
Often is a rather large exaggeration. Yes, people die from concussions - however, there are four million concussions annually just in sports (and training/practice) in the US. There'd be a lot fewer high school students if it was "often".
Should we be expecting one everytime dell/lenovo/etc comes out with a new laptop model too?
What base is the number being referenced written in? There's your answer.
Of course computer science idiots will like to use base 2 in areas that it doesn't make sense, but they can safely be ignored.
Spicer is awesome. His most commonly said sentence in the back must be "You want me to say what?... ok".
The only way he lasts 4 years is if he picks up a tremendous drinking problem.
Since he didn't buy it. And he wasn't the one who was drunk. And he wasn't driving. How exactly is this entirely his fault?
> With a blood alcohol level of .21 you're not "drunk".
At 0.21 you are in the BAC range where the physiological effects are typically: confusion, dizziness, exaggerated emotions (anger, fear, grief) impaired visual perception, decreased pain sensation, impaired balance, staggering gait, slurred speech, moderate muscular incoordination. Which I think most people would classify as "drunk".
You are only off by an order of magnitude, congrats!
At 0.5 you are more likely to be in a coma than driving anyway.
Said scientist is not allowed to reveal the pass code to anyone. Scientist did reveal the pass code to someone. Thus scientist has shown themselves as incapable of handling sensitive documents.
He caved after being to US border control and handed over the information because they threatened to detain him for a while if he didn't. Do you think he might cave if some other country made much more serious threats while he was outside of the US?
A temper tantrum has nothing to do with anything.
Australia has the ever so slight advantage of being an island in the middle of nowhere. Sure running cigarettes between the US and Canda/Mexico is easy. Running cigarettes between european countries is easy.
You need something other than a truck and someone willing to take the risk to do that into Australia though. They take their customs checks pretty seriously too since that island part means they have avoided quite a few pests and diseases that they'd prefer to keep out.
Since that suggestion isn't prohibition that doesn't seem relevant.
"manufacture, sale, or transportation" is just obviously broader than "sale".
It's nice that you exist to tell everyone else what is and isn't right and wrong.
Whatever would we do without you?
If there are "No Americans" how are "more Americans riffed" every six months or so?
Just because you can't read doesn't mean the FDA isn't telling.
They released their numbers, they aren't very useful since they varied widely within the same bottle and hence tell you next to nothing about any individual tablet.
H-1B visas are supposed to be for positions for which there aren't enough US workers to go around and thus foreign workers need to be brought over. They are clearly being abused to some extent, since I've personally met some people on H-1B visas who certainly aren't doing work that there are no US workers able to do - they mightn't be being abused en-masse I only have an anecdote or two obviously but people claim they are. People also claim that "bad guys" would immigrate within a week even though the immigration process takes months or years, so take that with as much salt as you please.
However, if that is truly what H-1B visas are for then the American market driven capitalist solution to allocating the limited number of them would be based on price. The current system is a literal lottery - they take the applications and pick at random which ones are granted - there is still the usual vetting of "are you a terrorist" and so on. Instead they could sort them by salary and grant the the 65,000 (or whatever the limit is changed to) ones with the highest salaries.
That would be using market forces to select which skills truly are in most need of foreign workers to fill gaps in the US worker pool. And makes perfect sense from a Republican free market point of view.
Billionaires/millionaires (well being a millionaire is not as high a hurdle these days) already have other far more beneficial visa options open to them - such as EB-5 (https://www.uscis.gov/eb-5).
So you restore from the day before that instead of the most recent one.
The whole idea of backups is you can restore to some point in the past - with the size of that window and the granularity within it depending on how much you want to spend...
If you just have one copy then you don't have a backup, you have a really slow RAID.
tablet interfaces work on the PC but are slow and annoying.
PC interfaces simply don't work on a tablet.
You have the money to develop one interface for your project that has to work on both tablet and PC, which interface do you pick?
You seem to have a strange assumption that "free" means everyone gets to go. But that isn't the case, instead of allocating places based on ability to pay they are allocated based upon results in previous education (high school usually) - that doesn't change the number. And yes all things else the same the student with straight As in high school is more likely to do well at college than the student with straight Cs whose parents are richer.
You don't want more people showing up. You just want to pick the people that do attend based upon performance and not wealth.
SJW idiocy is irrelevant.
I clearly prefixed who would consider those the role of the government. And that you are free to disagree. But you jump to the extreme instantly and dismiss alternative views with "communist" rather than considering for a moment that maybe the made up by people concept of government might be thought of differently when made up by different people?
Numerous governments that exist in the world today and are not communist consider the pooling and allocation of resources to be a role of the government. The US constitution is irrelevant, given that other countries is specifically ("like is it in ..." comparing other places with the US) what is being discussed and it means as much to them as theirs do to the US.
The US clearly considers the pooling and allocation of resources to be a role of the government, since that is what the military is. The pooling of resources in order to allocate communal defense rather than having each individual do whatever they think is needed for the military defense of the nation.
The US is famously more individualist than most other countries. But that shouldn't stop you from at least being able to comprehend how and why other people might see things differently without instantly labeling them with bogyman (well in the US) terms like communist. You don't have to agree with people to understand them.