Slashdot Mirror


Indian IT Sector Warns Against US Visa Bill (reuters.com)

India's IT lobby warned on Tuesday that a bill before the U.S. Congress aimed at imposing tougher visa rules unfairly targets some of its members and will not solve a U.S. labor shortage in technology and engineering. From a report on Reuters: Industry lobby group Nasscom was responding to a bill introduced by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat from California, that would double the minimum salary required for holders of H-1B visas to $130,000 and determine how many of the visas were allocated, based on factors such as overall wages. India's $150 billion information technology sector, led by Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys and Wipro, uses the H-1B visas to fly engineers and developers to service clients in the U.S., their biggest market, but opponents say they are using the visas to replace U.S. workers. Concerns about President Donald Trump's immigration policies were heightened by his ban on refugees on Friday. "The Lofgren Bill contains provisions that may prove challenging for the Indian IT sector and will also leave loopholes that will nullify the objective of saving American jobs," Nasscom said.

477 comments

  1. Take a hike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could careless about the Indian IT job sector. Piss off.

    1. Re:Take a hike by The-Ixian · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you *do* care. Awww.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Take a hike by Sam36 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      THIS^^^^ We don't care.

    3. Re:Take a hike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but just a little. I'll admit I should have clarified this in the original post, but.. I care as little about this as is possible without going to absolute zero caring.

    4. Re:Take a hike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't like it they can pay for the wall.

    5. Re:Take a hike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep wogs of all casts care ... when you fuck 'em in the azzwhole no Vaseline applied.

    6. Re:Take a hike by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Aw, H1B Zombies not feeling the burn?

    7. Re: Take a hike by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      No more papadum or tamarind chutney for you!!!

    8. Re: Take a hike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      India can pound sand. That includes all the Indian contractors here that took away jobs from Americans who were trying to feed their families. That includes all the Indian nationals who took job opportunities from Americans who wanted to work for agencies like NASA, DOD, or NIH. Indians who showed no remorse for the Americans they betrayed, Americans who brought wealth to so many in their country.

    9. Re:Take a hike by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      I thought Trump was going to piss all over this shit with another executive order

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    10. Re:Take a hike by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      hahahaha that was good

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  2. Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    How about salary shortage? There is no shortage in engineering. Engineering in the West is a dead-end profession and you can only lie so much to young people before they study in some other field.

    https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/electrical-and-electronics-engineers.htm

    "Job Outlook, 2014-24 0% (Little or no change)"

    Engineering is for the naive.

    1. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      That's one field. The reason EE is dying is because software engineering is booming. Back 30, even 20 years ago you had a ton of people making custom ASICs for every piece of electronics. Now, processors are so cheap that there's little need for anything but a SOC solution for all but the most complex products. You still need people to build out those SOCs and embed them, but it takes a fraction of the people. All the work that was done on those ASICs is now done in software- which is still adding a ton of people.

      You can't just cherry pick one point and call it a dead end. Many of the other fields of engineering on that same website have high 20% growth.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What other fields can I make six figures in?

      Sure, business and medical can make more, but they are very competitive and very stressful.

      As an engineer, while I realize there is outsourcing, I can still find a job relatively easily. People here seem to forget that the grass isn't always greener in other careers.

    3. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by unixisc · · Score: 0

      Only problem w/ that: when your pool is empty - at any price, and your company can't bring in H1Bs or any of the other work visas, there is no one left to do the job. The companies in question would then have to move their basic operations offshore. The government could then try passing a law that if a company offshores any operation, they'd be penalized, but then, the company would have to weigh in whether it's better off moving wholly to India and servicing that market.

      Which could be a good thing

    4. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone with an engineering degree who is not currently working as an engineer, I have found that the knowledge I gained obtaining that degree is broadly applicable to all kinds of things, both in the world of employment as well as hobbies and home life. I don't regret it for a second. Most people respect the amount of work and intelligence it takes to get an engineering degree and I've never had a problem getting interesting jobs, even if they aren't necessarily making me rich. I would do it again without hesitation.

    5. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just move to another state within the US...

    6. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      So let's say you need core Java programmers in Charlotte, and can't find them. Now, under this law, you can't bring in people from Bangalore either. So are you likely to find them in SC or WV or AL?

    7. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Considering the tens of thousands of software developers and engineers who are laid off each year by companies such as Microsoft, Google, Cisco and so on, and all the people coming into the market after graduation, I don't think that pool will ever be empty.

      What might be empty are people with the exact qualifications a company may want, but all that needs to be done is a little retraining.

      If companies insist on wanting someone with the exact, no-other-options, candidate for a position and are unwilling to offer training, they deserve to go under.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    8. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      Actually, yes. Especially if the work is steady there. I worked as an Engineer in West Virginia, a decade ago. No cut in salary from DC, but my salary went a whole lot further. A real house, rather than an apartment or a townhouse. A more relaxed lifestyle.

      On the other hand, the dance club scene sucked, had to go an hour up the interstate to Morgantown and WVU, unless I wanted to do a country/western place. And you learned to rely on Amazon for anything not generally found in a Wally World or generic mall. . . (yes, we still went shopping at malls, 10 years ago. . .)

    9. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you pay enough, the workers will come. The problem isn't a labor shortage, it's companies who've been spoiled on cheap labor for so long that they offer workers peanut salaries, refuse to pay relocation costs, offer no training and shit benefits--then run to Congress begging for more H1B's when they can't find American workers.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's say you need core Java programmers in Charlotte, and can't find them. Now, under this law, you can't bring in people from Bangalore either. So are you likely to find them in SC or WV or AL?

      Forbid we go back to the old way of actually paying Americans to relocate to near your office.

    11. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by ems2004 · · Score: 1
      --
      ..... best things in life are not so free..........
    12. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's say you need core Java programmers in Charlotte, and can't find them. Now, under this law, you can't bring in people from Bangalore either. So are you likely to find them in SC or WV or AL?

      Well duh.... if you pay them enough, they'll move from any state to where you want them.

    13. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. There is a very good reason why companies can ask for unpaid "internships" to do low-level software work (on-the-job training). Because they can. That indicates more than enough capable supply.

    14. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Financing. If I could do it over again, I'd go into financing instead of wasting my time with programming.

    15. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Management. Bring your magic 8 ball for all the important decisions and you're set.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      If EE is dying, then maybe I should tell my nephew and all his EE friends who have been scooped up right after graduation from U of Washington. My nephew is in British Columbia doing a Masters (all paid for), several of his friends have $100K+ jobs in the Pacific NW. Yes, they were at the top of the class in a relatively good department, but there are jobs out there. Perhaps not for everyone with a pulse but that has pretty much always been the case.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    17. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or paying the ones you have to get the skills you need. Business have been outsourcing the training of employees for a long time now. Don't have the people with the skills you need? Find people who paid for their own training or were trained at another job. Education is expensive and time off is a luxury.

    18. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      So let's say you need core Java programmers in Charlotte, and can't find them. Now, under this law, you can't bring in people from Bangalore either. So are you likely to find them in SC or WV or AL?

      Well, the research triangle in NC is bound to have some people that you can attract. You're close enough to ATL which has a pretty good tech industry (not to mention GA Tech for recent grads). A little bit further west and you have Huntsville which has a ridiculous amount of PhDs (many with smart kids who probably went into tech) and Nashville which has a reputable school in Vandy. Any major college like Duke, UNC, SC, UT, Vandy, UGA, Ga Tech, Auburn, Bama, Clemson, etc will have CS programs, and many of your smaller schools in the region might have them as well. Why don't you actually try looking?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    19. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I've rarely seen people older than 30 in dance clubs. I went to Coachella when I was 32 and think I was the oldest person there besides the performers. Enjoy it while you can.

    20. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no labor shortage in engineering. It is fake, look at the universities, pushing out 10's of thousands of engineers every year. The problem is people like getting paid in the US and companies don't like paying. So they make this crap up about it, hire someone from outside the US willing to do an engineering job for pennies of what a US engineer would do it for.

      Again: there is no shortage, just cheap companies that don't want to pay its employees. e.g. the average starting salary for a mech. eng. in NYC is $35K. The average starting salary for a banker is $100K, something doesn't seem right here.

    21. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      So let's say you need core Java programmers in Charlotte, and can't find them. Now, under this law, you can't bring in people from Bangalore either. So are you likely to find them in SC or WV or AL?

      They are not doing away with H1-B visas. The changes are designed to prevent situations like we've seen over and over lately where a company fires their entire IT department to outsource them to Wipro or the like who fill the positions with H1-Bs. That isn't what the program was supposed to be used for and it's being abused right now.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    22. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      I was 45 at the time, and frequenting Goth clubs.

      Never said I was vanilla. Mind you, the local Country Swing-dance places, would have people in their 60s and 70s.

    23. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      "Job Outlook, 2014-24 0% (Little or no change)"

      If 1 million engineers are set for retirement and 1 million and you need 1 million to replace them what is net growth?

    24. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      It is not just that.

      I am not looking for work, but I am interested in any interesting possibilities that may be out there. I have seen several for which I am an almost perfect match for their qualifications. I have those qualifications because I have grown into them in my current job. Yet, these other companies are only willing to pay me what I am currently making.
      Why would anyone leave their current job, unless it is a complete hell-hole, for what they are currently making?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    25. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      What if those laid off don't have relevant job skills anymore?

      If companies laid off engineers that refused to learn CAD would they be laying off people that were 'highly skilled' or people that refused to adapt with the times?

      Fire up any job search engine, there are jobs out there. But you have to have relevant job skills.

    26. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      If the degree has unpaid internships have you ever considered that maybe the job prospects aren't much better?

      I didn't take a single unpaid internship in Engineering.

    27. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if 800000 jobs are outsourced, and the 200000 jobs that are left are basically technician-level jobs that pay 1975 wages?

      And how many students are universities fleecing, err, recruiting? Two million?

      What is the net growth then if you're part of the superfluous EE cohort??

      Hmm?

    28. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      +1 Score: 6

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    29. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by chipschap · · Score: 1

      University education should be less about learning specific application of facts (although there needs to be some of that) and more about learning how to learn and teach yourself.

      I found upon graduation from MIT that I and other MIT engineering grads were, in terms of ability to immediately perform specific job tasks, behind grads of numerous other schools. But after about six months in a given job that leveled out and after about a year we were way out in front. We had a solid background in the fundamentals and the ability to apply that background in new and varied situations.

    30. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by chipschap · · Score: 2

      As I understand the proposed law, you CAN bring them in from Bangalore IF you can show you can't hire them in the US ... AND you pay them a high enough wage.

      So what's it worth to you? If you want cheap labor, too bad. On the other hand if you have a critical need and you're willing to pay for it, you're good to go.

    31. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I can remember when Java didn't exist. Where did all these Java programmers come from?

      Oh, wait. They learned to program. Or they took existing programming skills and learned how to use them with the Java language.

      Companies even helped. They gave people time and training.

      So if I need Java programmers in Charlotte and I can't find them, I'll fucking create them. It's not that hard.

    32. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Shit, it's finding dance clubs with people under 40 that's the issue here. Even in my mid 40s I'm too frequently the youngest person in the room.

      Sure, some of the ladies can really seriously properly dance. Better than me. Doesn't quite compare with a sexy 30yo wriggling against you though.

    33. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      Umm, remote??? Good enough for off shoring, why not do that locally? That has always been a peeve of mine, they will readily off shore to the other side of the world, but not the next city or state? WTF??

    34. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Wait, you lived somewhere in WV where you saw Morganhole as the big city? Eeeeesh.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    35. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sample size of two is truly a case study.

    36. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      If EE is dying, then maybe I should tell my nephew and all his EE friends who have been scooped up right after graduation from U of Washington. My nephew is in British Columbia doing a Masters (all paid for), several of his friends have $100K+ jobs in the Pacific NW. Yes, they were at the top of the class in a relatively good department, but there are jobs out there. Perhaps not for everyone with a pulse but that has pretty much always been the case.

      The thing about EE is, that you *do* often start out a t a high salary.....and then you almost immediately stagnate.

      But there's always the contract circuit after you pay your dues in the W2 world...you can then make some really good $$.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    37. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or your company could train people, which is what used to happen.

    38. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck, you might actually have to TRAIN SOMEONE to do the job!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    39. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have enough money to pay enough, then that won't be a problem. And for the rest of the companies? The ones that can't afford to pay top $. The ones where entitled US graduates refuse to work because they think they deserve 6 figures out of college? Well I guess they don't deserve to have IT. Idiot.

    40. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      As an EE making custom silicon, I can say that the job market is very ... mixed.

      The biggest problem with the industry, as I see it, is that the jobs are geographically limited. I currently have a job in a state that I love. However, should something happen to this job, I have very limited prospects for a new job in this town. In general, chip design jobs are largely in places that I don't want to live (and generally near huge cities). California, Illinois, and New York? Nope. I wold rather panhandle. Washington/Oregon? Maybe, depends on the area, traffic, cost of living, etc. Texas? Yeah, maybe, but it is pretty hot and humid there. Florida? Yeah, I left there because of the heat, humidity, and hurricanes.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    41. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you're being paid above market wage, the company will expect they can find someone else cheaper - but may still make you a lowball (for you) offer above market, since they've already invested effort in you.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    42. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that you, Rajesh?

    43. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A real labor shortage would create salary be increases well above inflation... 5% to 10% per year. If companies aren't paying more than US citizens for H1Bs then there is no shortage

    44. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Wisp · · Score: 1

      +1 Score: 9

    45. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      As I understand the proposed law, you CAN bring them in from Bangalore IF you can show you can't hire them in the US ... AND you pay them a high enough wage.

      That was the old law, it just wasn't enforced. Ever.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    46. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Florida? Yeah, I left there because of the heat, humidity, and hurricanes.

      Don't forget alligators and FloridaMan.

    47. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think I'd go into medicine.

    48. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true, but it's only part of the problem. If US workers were better unionized (and I mean better also in the sense of better unions, less corrupt and spineless etc.) - then the H1B's would not help employers all that much since unions would make them hire local first, and would struggle and hopefully ensure that wages and benefits were high enough for the positions to be attractive to US workers - and then even though immigrant workers would get the same conditions, there would be much less motivation to try and get them.

    49. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by Type44Q · · Score: 1
      Q) What has two hundred legs and twelve teeth?

      A) The front row at a Willie Nelson concert.

    50. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, BUT, it's a bit like saying: you could date Paris Hilton if you earn enough (i.e. billions).
      Fully correct in theory, and even in sentiment, but also fully idiotic in some cases (e.g. startups or struggling companies, or in fact anyone not Microsoft/Apple/Google).
      You are just making a bigger push for offshoring.

    51. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Hire C++ programmers and lobotomize them. Done.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    52. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      The only labor shortage in engineering is CHEAP labor. There are plenty of domestic engineers out there. They just:

      Cost more than you're willing to pay.
      or
      Don't want to live in your super high cost of living areas.

      Mix both of those together and the only folks you will find willing to do it at all is from offshore labor farms.

      Which is why they import it from India.

    53. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's say you need core Java programmers in Charlotte, and can't find them. Now, under this law, you can't bring in people from Bangalore either. So are you likely to find them in SC or WV or AL?

      Why would you not look elsewhere in North Carolina? Did UNC and Duke stop teaching computer science?

    54. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, People need to get in the mindset that they may need to *gasp* move to another state for the job they want.

      It turns out that if you leave one of the 5 big cities you can not only get paid more, but enjoy a lower cost of living and a better commute!

    55. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stack overflow to the rescue!

    56. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if those laid off don't have relevant job skills anymore? I think this is rarely the case. Maybe 10-15 years ago they were getting rid of ancient skillsets, but if you've made it this long, your skills are probably still relevant. At the company from which I was laid off last year, they brought in H1-B contractors, had the locals train them, then laid off the locals. The people laid off were not old OS/390 guys or COBOL coders: they were developing OpenStack software and drivers; a couple of the guys were core OpenStack contributors. The "plan" was to transfer the skillset to the H1's, who would then train the other H1's back home. This same company hires a huge number of H1's, yet also lays off thousands each quarter. Only the most hard-core H1-B apologist can't see or won't admit what is happening.

    57. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of shit, Karthik. Move outside a big city and you'll see they lowball you because it's not a big city. Oh, and...poo in loo

    58. Re: Labor shortage in engineering? by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      You forget to mention that an engineer can start working right after finishing school, but to get even an entry level real banking job (and word real here means that 99% of tellers, bond peddlers, retail account managers do not qualify,) you need years of prior experience learning arts of the big finance world: doin blowjobs, political prostitution, ass and shoe licking, incentivised sales, creative accounting and such

    59. Re:Labor shortage in engineering? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      THere's definitely some. It will never go down to zero- even with SOC you need a little bit of knowledge to set it up. But its not the industry it used to be- its not experiencing growth, and it was flat to decreasing for most of a decade. But other industries in engineering are increasing.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  3. This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see no downsides at all. This should have been done long ago.

    I suspect this will be the only good thing to come out of the Trump presidency.

    I doubt much good will come out of the Pence presidency either. Bets on how many months before that begins?

    1. Re:This is a good thing by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      According to Alec Baldwin on Saturday Night Live, Pence will be president in two months. So far... right on schedule.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_Gf0mGJfP8

    2. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no downsides at all.

      Only that it is clearly racist, as it disproportionately affects non-whites from working in the US. Oh, wait, this wasn't introduced by DT. Nevermind, its a good thing.

    3. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll raise a toast to both Trump and Pence having very short presidencies. One month each is too long.

    4. Re:This is a good thing by skids · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as they don't screw it up, either accidentally or on-purpose. I'd wonder what "loopholes" are being referred to.

    5. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, how clearly you miss the point. Read the entire thing again. Maybe you'll react with a bit wiser response.

    6. Re:This is a good thing by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Okay, so you appreciate Trump for getting this moving, then wanna remove him and his VP. What guarantee do you have that anyone else you have in mind - probably from the Dem side - is gonna continue this? And Trump, as a Republican, has a better chance of standing b/w lobbyists like NASSCOM and GOP congressmen: why would any of the latter go against their lobbyist to oblige, say, a Bernie or a Pocahontas?

    7. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you lack reasoning skills.. A lack of equal outcome does not prove racist intent.

    8. Re:This is a good thing by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I guess sarcasm is lost on people. I clearly read the GP as pointing out that had DJT or a GOP congressman introduced something like this, he'd have been tagged 'racist', and that Lofgren ain't being treated that way b'cos she's a Liberal

    9. Re:This is a good thing by Salgak1 · · Score: 0

      American isn't a race. You could argue it is nativist, but not racist. Especially as the people of the Subcontinent are ethnically Caucasians. . .

    10. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean non-white workers who 1) don't already live in the US, 2) do not have citizenship, and 3) do not yet have a work permit/legal residence.

    11. Re:This is a good thing by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      . . .and then, if you get your way, you get President Ryan.

      I suspect you wouldn't like him either...

    12. Re:This is a good thing by Adambomb · · Score: 2

      Unless I misunderstand how it works in the US, if both Trump and Pence were removed from office this very moment the presidency would fall to the president pro tempore of the senate, who is currently Senator Orrin Hatch (A Republican).

      I know nothing of his politics or whether he'd be for or against h1b reform though.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    13. Re:This is a good thing by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Orrin Hatch is an old-school corporate-whore Republican who has made his position on H1B's quite clear.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:This is a good thing by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      Its good enough for the mass media and their politically active teenagers and young adults, which is a huge target now that their last voting block is all but dead.

    15. Re:This is a good thing by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      You assume to much. He likes complaining, the conditions are always right for complaining.

    16. Re:This is a good thing by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless I misunderstand how it works in the US, if both Trump and Pence were removed from office this very moment the presidency would fall to the president pro tempore of the senate, who is currently Senator Orrin Hatch (A Republican).

      I know nothing of his politics or whether he'd be for or against h1b reform though.

      Actually, it would go to Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan. President Pro-Tempre (not sure about spelling) of the Senate is #4.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    17. Re:This is a good thing by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

      Succession goes: VP, House Speaker (Ryan), President pro tempore of the Senate (Hatch), Sec. State (Shannon, a career diplomat and now just a place holder), Treasury, Defense, AG...Secretary of Homeland Security. The order of cabinet succession is based on date of the department's creation. They also have to meet the standard presidential requirements such as native born resident for 14 years and 35 years old.

    18. Re:This is a good thing by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      This is nothing about race. This is only about nationality.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    19. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only the ones that belong to the right cast, thank you drive through

    20. Re:This is a good thing by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Senator Orrin Hatch (A Republican)... I know nothing of his politics or whether he'd be for or against h1b reform though.

      He was the authoritarian asshat most supportive of Jack Thompson's crusade against video games, among other things.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    21. Re: This is a good thing by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      They really don't have much to work with here; perhaps we could cut 'em a little slack and let 'em conflate the issues... just a bit?? :)

  4. "opponents say they are using the visas..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to replace U.S. workers". Let's not be naive - that is exactly what is happening, and nothing else.

    1. Re:"opponents say they are using the visas..." by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, ask the poor fucks at Disney what they think about the idea that H1B's don't replace American workers.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  5. No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I worked a few months for a company that was stocked mostly with H1-Bs and owned and ran by Indian immigrants. The way that they abused the heck out of their own countrymen like they had imported the caste system to their little office just filled me with disgust.

    Yeah plenty of American employers abusing American employees but at least the American employees don't risk deportation if they quit, or get fired because the employer suspected them of trying to find a better job.

    1. Re:No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's part of the culture I think. A woman I volunteer with works in an office with a lot of H1-Bs. She's probably about to get laid off and she looks forward to it, as the Indians tend to treat her like garbage. As far as they're concerned women are second class citizens. With the layoff she'll be able to collect a severance and have some time to look for something better hopefully not having to deal with that bullshit.

    2. Re:No Sympathy by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I worked for a contract house that imported Indians hand over fist. (I guess they saw my resume online and snapped it up to keep up appearances of hiring Americans first. Works for me.)

      Anyway, the brought us into a room one day and explained they paid overtime (which the gigantic customer paid for) but only in excess of the 45th hour. However, they would charge for hours 41-45 anyway.

      This did not sit well with the Indian people. I have no idea what their base salaries were.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:No Sympathy by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      I worked a few months for a company that was stocked mostly with H1-Bs and owned and ran by Indian immigrants. The way that they abused the heck out of their own countrymen like they had imported the caste system to their little office just filled me with disgust.

      I have seen this first-hand and it needs to stop.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    4. Re:No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We see the same things here in Denmark as well. Some companies refused to have their IT outsourced to India so companies like Tech Mahindra had to bring in some people to work there. (they had outsourced it to a company hosting it within country borders) Their work culture is something from the 60's.

      You are doing as told, even if you know it is wrong or won't work because the guy above you said so.

      Sometimes they need to bring in skilled local people to do some of the jobs that require some independent thinking. The work climate are so poor that they have a hard time finding any, even freelancers and consultants are hard to find that will accept to work there.

      Even though they are said to be paid minimum wage, I keep hearing rumors that in reality they are paying much of it back when the money goes back to India.

      They have been doing a bit of sabotage when their bosses are having meetings with local people to fill positions to cover for their incompetence. Oops, this system broke down, now we need all hands on deck and the boss have to cancel the meeting that he just started.

      The toilets there are a mess, they have no concept of how to use them, so for the few local Danish workers that were left there, they had to open up new facilities so you had a place to use that wasn't covered en feces everywhere.

      Some of them have pages after pages of certifications from Microsoft and others, but no basic concept of how things work in a computer. It looks impressive, it is worthless.

    5. Re:No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are doing as told, even if you know it is wrong or won't work because the guy above you said so

      I had a manager who was from India and this describes him perfectly. There was one incident where I argued for three days that something was not going to work and in the end he said he didn't care, that "we'll agree to disagree" and to do it his way. So I did and month later it failed exactly the way I said it would fail and later that week publicly berated me in a meeting when his boss asked why it was designed like it was. I quit on the spot and found out through some of my friends who still worked there that he had been fired for doing the same thing with at least two other people.

      He was a nice guy and really smart, but his background was in mechanical engineering and had no experience in software.

    6. Re:No Sympathy by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      >>The toilets there are a mess, they have no concept of how to use them,

      This! A thousand times this! , why can't you? And I'm not talking about just not flushing, I think they purposely shit on the seat or even on the back(!?!) of the toilet because they've never seen one before. I have no idea how you can be paid $100,000+ a year and still have no idea how to use a toilet! A three year old can do it Then again what do you expect from a country where over 60% of the people don't have access to indoor plumbing. I feel sorry for our cleaning staff, they must see things that would make your hair curl.

    7. Re:No Sympathy by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      >>A three year old can do it, why can't you?

      I have no idea what happened there, but my rant got cut in half. :)

    8. Re:No Sympathy by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      It's highly likely that they did import the caste system.

    9. Re:No Sympathy by rfengr · · Score: 1

      Hell, mine only applies "overtime" (not real overtime, but straight time) for hours 46 through 59, and that's only for certain projects. Once you hit 60 there is nothing.

    10. Re: No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about this. White people are the racists.

      I laugh at what we'll think of white racism when indians or Chinese take over.

    11. Re:No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude! i live in the country and you are smoking some powerful stuff. most indian (and american/european/korean/japanese) companies in india have a near 50:50 ratio of women to men and I've never seen any kind of discrimination at the workplace. I am often amazed at how few women are part of any technology leadership in the US. so I'd say go easy on the stereotypes. And the OC says its because of fucking caste system! Does the bozo even know what he's talking about? yes, there are serious caste issues including riots in rural areas but in urban, cosmopolitan neighborhoods you barely hear of this. The only ones who bring this up are the indian version of SJWs. But stick to your stupid stereotypes and let the indian idiots stick to theirs (they have their own about you btw; lazy asses who barely do any work. disappear by 3.00 pm on friday and pretend that you are smarter because you speak english without an accent). but go on, it's fascinating stuff you bring up...

    12. Re:No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cleaning staff refused at one point to clean the toilets. They had to bring in like a special hazmat team who ended up being the only ones wanting to clean the damn thing.

    13. Re: No Sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What bothered me most in that nightmare of a place where I had the misfortune of working once that they put the toilet paper on the FLOOR, right next to a drippy, dirty mop and overflowing garbage can. Luckily there was a Starbucks in the building which I started frequenting...

    14. Re:No Sympathy by NewYork · · Score: 1

      Caste was born when the first con-man met the first fool; http://www.petition2congress.c...

  6. MAGA by MichaelRudner · · Score: 1

    about time, even though using me to prove American skilled worker stat is not fulfilled was not helping the cause when they tech interviewed me

    1. Re:MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a business really can't find US-based labor for *missing skills* (I guess they don't support training their employees anymore), why not add this to any proposed bill?

      When a company pleads for foreign labor to fill a position require them to - submit the job position requirements along with all the resumes and interview data they collected whom were *missing skills* to a gov agency (like the GAO, as an example). When said company fills the position with a foreign labor individual, that foreign labor individual be interviewed (with the premise of losing future temporary and permanent citizenship if found to have lied) at the 30-day (or 60, 90 day) mark of employment to determine what skills were actually required to complete the job? Should a discrepancy be found between what the company originally stated versus what is actually utilized then the company would be fined a generous sum of money - something like 25% of their yearly gross revenue per violation?

      That should reduce the gargantuan "dream" job requirements of most postings and "the sky is falling" pleads for cheap labor (regardless of where it is from outside the borders of the country. Notice I did not say "US". Why not use this logic on a broad scale and think like a globalist?

    2. Re:MAGA by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "If a business really can't find US-based labor for *missing skills* (I guess they don't support training their employees anymore), why not add this to any proposed bill?"

      How do you propose those companies recoup the training expense? What's to keep someone who just got training from demanding much more money or going elsewhere? There needs to be an ROI. Sure, it's not an unsolvable problem, and many companies, my own included, require some period of continued employment, or you're expected to reimburse them. That said, I've seen several people get away w/o paying them back, and the company doesn't want the legal headache of trying to push it in court.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    3. Re:MAGA by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

      What they should do a charge an H1B fee which goes to the government so that hiring an H1B would be a 25% premium.

    4. Re: MAGA by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      The ROI is having a greater pool of skilled labour to choose from, rather than trying to constantly outbid other companies for the same employees.

  7. The Stopped Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donald Trump is an idiotic stopped clock, but on this issue he is right with the times. H-1B and L1 visas have to go. Entire divisions at companies like Microsoft are virtually monolithic blocks of Indian or Chinese immigrants, and foreign staffing firms dominate their placement. 9 out of 10 recruiting emails I get are from foreign recruiters, all trying desperately to eek out another dollar or two on the rate.

    Screw 'em. This is the only thing Trump has done (or will do) that I find appealing.

    1. Re:The Stopped Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used to work for Verisigm at their headquarters in Reston, VA. It is an eight story building. Over 4.5 floors of the building is jammed cheek to jowl with curry eaters. No Americans. Every six months or so more Americans are riffed and more curry boys are imported. It's been a couple of years, but now I bet the whole damn building smells like a street market in Bombay.

    2. Re:The Stopped Clock by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      If there are "No Americans" how are "more Americans riffed" every six months or so?

    3. Re: The Stopped Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long has he been in office?

      How long did Obama take to make good on any of his campaign promises?

      Btw, Gtmo is still open.
      We don't seem to care much about those detainees.

    4. Re:The Stopped Clock by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      This is the only thing Trump has done (or will do) that I find appealing.

      Hey now, stopped clocks are right twice a day. He might do something else you find appealing, eventually... maybe.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:The Stopped Clock by thomn8r · · Score: 1

      In the group I worked with @ HP, they had to hire Americans just so they could lay them off. Seriously: in my group they hired a bunch of developers that had been out of school anywhere from 0 - 5 years, and then 6 months later, replaced them with H1's. You read it right: Meg had to hire people in order to make her layoff quota.

  8. "Labor Shortage" by binkless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a myth

    1. Re:"Labor Shortage" by naughtynaughty · · Score: 0, Troll

      Low Cost Labor Shortage

      Not sure if this will affect Trump's resorts flying in seasonal workers from Romania because not enough American's apply to their 3-day ads in small local papers.

    2. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no shortage. People are getting laid off by bringiin in H1B workers who are then trained by people who they replace. This is bugger scan than treason.

    3. Re:"Labor Shortage" by tempmpi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a myth

      There is no shortage of people with an CS degree. But there is certainly a shortage of people that can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks. Proper CS is hard, you need to know tons of things about very different topics from algorithms and maths, to hardware details and interfaces. In addition problem solving and abstract thinking skills are required. Only a small fraction of people is able to do that and even if people have the talent, but are only into CS for the money, they will likely never learn enough.

      The issue with H1B is that they are justified with the real shortage of really good people, but are used to keep wages down for people doing routine, trivial tasks that can be done even by people with only so-so education and skills.

      --
      Jan
    4. Re: "Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree this is a very big scam. The emphasis should be on finding local citizens and traning them with the needed skills.

    5. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Desler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then you do this thing called "on-the-job training." Oh silly me, that would require companies invest in their employees for the long-term versus paying barebones wages to maximize executive bonuses.

    6. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

      You're not talking about a people shortage, you're talking about a training shortage. When every company hires only the top few percent and expects people on the job market to train themselves whilst unemployed that's what happens. It's just an extension of the low wage problem. If you don't pay enough for people (whether by refusing to train them, offering a low salary, cutting back benefits, or whatever else) you don't get good people. Of all the people on the CS job market a fraction has the drive and income to train themselves while not employed. If you want that top 10% of the labor market you should expect to pay through the nose for it.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    7. Re:"Labor Shortage" by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no shortage of people with an CS degree. But there is certainly a shortage of people that can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks.

      That's why companies *USED* to actually invest in worker training. That was back when a worker was treated like a long-term asset, who would stay with the company for the long haul and be professionally developed and trained in-house. The CS or Engineering degree was just a start that got them in the door in an entry position.

      But these days, companies treat workers like disposable pens and expect them to pay for all their own training and professional development on their own time (with their shit salary and long work hours, no less). Then they wonder why they have so much turnover and can't find/keep decent workers.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      There is no shortage of people with an CS degree. But there is certainly a shortage of people that can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks. Proper CS is hard, you need to know tons of things about very different topics from algorithms and maths, to hardware details and interfaces. In addition problem solving and abstract thinking skills are required. Only a small fraction of people is able to do that and even if people have the talent, but are only into CS for the money, they will likely never learn enough.

      And you believe that H1B IT workers brought in from India will satisfy this requirement? If so your experiences must have been vastly different from mine.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    9. Re:"Labor Shortage" by The-Ixian · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, I am sure any new legislation will have enough loopholes for politician's interests to be served. Of course, the same loopholes will make the new legislation toothless and easily circumvented. All the while all the politicians will pat themselves on the back and congratulate themselves on enacting the will of the people...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    10. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry, but when a candidate cannot write a simple game of Battleship, or takes an hour to figure out all the bugs in their FizzBuzz implementation, no amount of "worker training" will make up for their lack of intellectual horsepower. Believe it or not, people like that make up 80% of the candidates I have interviewed in the course of my 15+ year career. There might be enough people out there who have the skills to reboot Windows servers, but I know for a fact that there aren't enough people who can write or who could be taught to write complex software.

      As a matter of fact, we are so desperate for candidates we do worker training all the time. When I interview, I do not require knowledge of specific languages, frameworks or APIs. Show me that you can code in any language, and that you understand OO design principles, and you're hired. Whatever you need to know that you don't already know, we'll teach you.

      In my own career I have jumped from one domain to the next without any experience. I just know how to write software. I started with C/C++, got a job that required me to learn Java, and so on. In my current position I write Android apps. I had never done that before. I just learned on the job, with the help of my coworkers and some internal documentation.

      Software companies ALREADY train their workers. But they can't be expected to train the untrainable.

    11. Re:"Labor Shortage" by tempmpi · · Score: 1

      And you believe that H1B IT workers brought in from India will satisfy this requirement? If so your experiences must have been vastly different from mine.

      A very small number of them will, but most won't. H1Bs are abused, this needs to stop. H1Bs are not needed to bring in people with bad to mediocre skills. There is no shortage of those people. But not every usage of H1Bs is abusive and training can only help people that have the required talent.

      --
      Jan
    12. Re:"Labor Shortage" by tempmpi · · Score: 2

      You're not talking about a people shortage, you're talking about a training shortage.

      Nope. Training can help people to learn about a new language, a new operating system, etc. But if people lack the talent for abstract thought, can't write something as simple as FizzBuzz in any language of their choice, then no amount of training is going to enable them to write complex software. The issue is that Universities do not want to tell people early that they lack talent and should switch to a different profession. Then they somehow finish their CS degree and cannot find a job.

      --
      Jan
    13. Re:"Labor Shortage" by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Just like 'food shortage' is a myth.

      It's a job distribution problem. Do you do to force people to move to where the jobs are like they did during the great depression?

    14. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm lucky that I've never met any CS holder who couldn't fizzbuzz (I hear about him all the time) but I can tell you about dealing with obviously mediocre indian workers at other firms in great numbers, many of them with jobs I would kill for.

      I can tell you about american citizens who were once h1bs who tell me stories of getting 60k salaries for working 80+ hours a week

      I can tell you about a steady stream of people constantly contacting me to pretend interest in hiring me me. Their ads all look the same, different indian staffing firms, different indian names.

      Never past the phone screen with any of those particular companies.

      Always in capital letters MUST BE US CITIZEN OR GC HOLDER. Often so inexperienced dealing with american workers that they ask for things like date of birth in the posting.

      Trust me if this will be the disaster it's played up to be... mark zuckerburg will have no problem getting the program to go back to normal.

    15. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      There is no shortage of people with an CS degree. But there is certainly a shortage of people that can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks.

      Wrong again. A shortage means that those people cannot be hired on the open market at any price. The real problem is that employers don't value those people enough to pay the market clearing rate.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    16. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be surprised how many CS people without talent for abstract thought somehow do end up finding a job.

      A loss of innocence - that moment when you first realize that your new teammate is incompetent.

    17. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a shortage of people who can fill the jenga requirements at the low prices that most want.

      Oh you know C++, Java, Python, C#, SQL, a couple you have forgotten about, and 6+ different libraries. Dont know GO and the new library we just found on the internet, and you do not live 1 mile away from here? Hit the fucking bricks you jackass.

      I have told people I am willing to move to their location. No cost to them usually 10k less than what they are asking on the website. Positions still open 8 months later or filled by an h1b which had none of the qualifications. Which tells me the real qualification was money and ability to fire.

    18. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Cederic · · Score: 1

      On the flipside I wouldn't expect a chartered accountant to be able to knock out a optimised no modulus fizzbuzz solution in any language at interview.

      I could easily train them to do that.

    19. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you talking about accountants? I am talking about people with CS or related degrees who can't even code a simple non-optimized bug-free solution to fizzbuzz. They're alarmingly common. Actually they make up the VAST MAJORITY of candidates I've interviewed in the past 15 years. Most of them already had jobs, sometimes working for well known companies.

      If you've ever done any serious recruiting you know that for every guy you want to hire, you will have met 9 that you didn't. And let me repeat that this is not a case of being picky. Don't bring up the old canard of requesting 5 years of experience with a 3 year old language. I've never done that. My criteria is, show me that you understand OO concepts and can solve a problem in the language of your choice, and you're hired.

      I could write a book with interview stories. Most people would probably believe I made them up but unfortunately I don't need to.

    20. Re:"Labor Shortage" by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It is not a myth. I'm looking for someone with a PhD in CS and 20 years experience in Windows 2016. Oh, and the job pays $20k a year.

      That I can't fill that position proves there's a labor shortage.

    21. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. You don't need "the best of the best" to write standard run of the mill business software for the 50-500 man shops that are so common everywhere. Really scalable solutions do require rare talent, but you're not going to fix that by importing millions of low skill workers under prevailing wages. Every H1-B I've met has been hilariously inept, which tends to make the real motivation behind the program obvious to anyone with their head screwed on straight, and I see there are many here around /. that have had similar experiences.

      As long as I personally know people that are unemployed and unable to find a new job despite looking for months, H1-B isn't justified at all and there are objectively numerous examples of companies getting caught illegally abusing it, then getting away with it. (I suspect money is changing hands with a judge somewhere)

    22. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      The problem is that a program with limited intended use, for specific high-skill high-demand positions that can't otherwise be filled, and restrictions in place to prevent it from being used to replace American jobs, is being abused by companies (particularly the ones listed as complaining) to do exactly that.

      The way they get around this is that they are not the one "replacing" an American job. They hire people from India as employees, and then compete for and fill contract services with other corporations. It is those corporations who get rid of their American work force and replace them with the Infosys/Tata/Wipro contract workforce, that just 'happens' to be H-1B staff. See Disney, SoCal Edison, etc.

    23. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. With a labor for of ~ 180-million there are 19.8-million workers ( IQ --> 80 Bantu excluded ) able to perform complex mental tasks ( formal operations as Piaget would call it ). Are twenty-million IT-creatives needed in any possible world? The current numbers are: 650,000 IT folks and 1.1-million otherwise engineers. Now, if fuckwitd employers ( tek term = biz-nazi ) will not produce work environments suitable for these problem solvers ( that's a corporate task ) then naturally you have an issue. Shoot a few dozen CEOs and see how able the native USA worker population becomes.

    24. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried this with mixed results. Bottom line is that some people shouldn't get hired in the first place for developer jobs.

    25. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not what he said

    26. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Software · · Score: 1

      People have been moving for better employment opportunities for thousands of years. Jobs which can be done remotely are the minority by a wide margin.

    27. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Talent for abstract thought" is not a binary trait. It's on a spectrum. Also, it's not static and can be developed, encouraged, honed. Training can do that as well.

    28. Re:"Labor Shortage" by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      They have, but people don't. Especially these days. I can't count how many times I've seen complaints on Engineering subreddits about not being able to find a job and then when pressed they're only looking within 25 miles of Seattle or Chicago (Not known to be Engineering hot beds).

      They whine and gnash when told they may have to move to Iowa to find a job that fits their needs.

      "But I have faaamily" "But I have frieeends".. Fire up any job search engine and start looking around the country and you'll see jobs all over the place for different types of jobs that go unfilled because they people don't want to move to 'nowhere'.

      H1-Bs are already coming to a new country so Iowa looks the same as Nebraska the same as Seattle to them.

    29. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a lot of "on-the-job" training in tech companies. Hell, I interned at Google and the amount of internal tools/frameworks/libraries they use is enough to make your head spin. But the real core issue is that in order to perform very well at some of these jobs, it takes both a passion, and having your head wired in a very specific way.

      And when demand goes up, and pay with it, you'll see a lot of generally good people, but lacking one of those two qualities, trying really hard to get their head around software, but only succeeding at being passable programmers. I've seen this happen a lot of times.

    30. Re:"Labor Shortage" by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      there are many times more IT jobs than coding jobs

    31. Re: "Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This my experience as well. Hundreds of candidates over the last decade. Now a CS degree on a CV is a warning sign.

      No puzzles, no tricks, no domain specific knowledge. Choose any language you like and solve a few rudimentary problems, feel free to open a browser and use Google, SO or any docs. Feel free to talk through the problem with me or the interviewing dev lead. Fail. Over and over and over again. It's painful for all involved.

    32. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can self-correct. Pay mid-level workers more, they will have more disposable income, they will pay for their own training. The current system, where they want to pay less for more, is not sustainable.

    33. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a myth

      There is no shortage of people with an CS degree. But there is certainly a shortage of people that can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks. Proper CS is hard, you need to know tons of things about very different topics from algorithms and maths, to hardware details and interfaces. In addition problem solving and abstract thinking skills are required. Only a small fraction of people is able to do that and even if people have the talent, but are only into CS for the money, they will likely never learn enough.

      The issue with H1B is that they are justified with the real shortage of really good people, but are used to keep wages down for people doing routine, trivial tasks that can be done even by people with only so-so education and skills.

      Ah yes, and you are right, however how many with CS degrees have never been given a chance to write good or bad code in the first place?

      The whole argument supporting H1b Visas in the US at least is a straw man argument. H1b's are only there so that the companies in question can hire contractors and pay them pennies on the dollar to do a job that they would have to pay an American with the same qualifications a competitive wage. Buy low, sell high.. that is the 1950's mindset that is prevailing here and the more the H1b's undercut the American worker the worse the economy will be. These same companies are being hacked on a regular basis and wonder why their IT security is so deplorable.. could it be that you have a department of underpaid non english speakers running things? I have no sympathy, you get what you pay for. I have started my own business coming out of college and while it is harder and less certain, at least for me I am making enough money to pay down my student loans and live nice without being victimized as a wage slave so I am thankful that these business have had their heads up their asses. I hire American by the way and pay a competitive wage + stock options in the company so that every employee is aware that they will be paid according to their contribution to the bottom line, yes that does take a potato or two off my family's plate, but we are eating well and are smart enough to share the wealth and pay it forward. We will see who is still around 10 years down the line.

    34. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brilliant! could not agree more. the reality in the US is (and this is here in the silicon valley; no idea how it is in the rest of the country) that the average CS engineer is not very good. Just like the average CS engineer on a H1 visa is not very good. There is a lot of anecdotal stories about how good someone was and was replaced by a dumb-as-a-rock replacement from India. The reason companies do this is because the replacement is effectively supported by another set of 4-5 subpar engineers like him for a cost savings over an american subpar engineer. And at some point 5 subpars do better than one subpar; not always but more often than you imagine.

    35. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most shitty developers can learn how to be good developers with proper mentoring, and their code won't damage production if you have proper code review, automated testing, and manual testing in place.
       
      The problem is that companies want a skilled senior developer for $80k now. They don't want to hire recent graduates and spend three or five years training them and carefully monitoring their work, only to lose them when they reach senior skill levels because the guy (or girl, whatever) they hired at $55k is now good enough that some other company will pay them $120k.

      "There's a shortage of talent" is what they say, but "We're too cheap to pay for talent" is what they mean.

    36. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with most of that. I think the number of people who are absolutely incapable of being skilled engineers is less than half the population. I think some people just need more time to ramp up than others. It's cheaper and more convenient to cut loose anyone that doesn't grab all the concepts rapidly, but it's foolish.

      Further, I think the best way to become passionate about something is to become highly skilled at it. I don't mean the reverse - have a passion, develop a skill. I mean develop a skill and then have a passion. Nobody gets excited about writing "Hello World" or playing "Mary Had a Little Lamb" on the piano. But when you ship a functioning non-trivial application or sit down to play "Somebody to Love" it feels awesome - then you'll love writing software or playing piano. So a lot of the people that seem indifferent to this field just haven't developed enough skill to enjoy it.

      I started college in the mid 1990s, and had little prior computing experience. My peers that did have it breezed through the classes while I struggled. Fast forward ten years and I was the sole developer at a company too poor to hire someone better. We had a hundred different IT problems and if I couldn't fix it the website stayed down and the company folded. It was stressful, but in the course of a few years I made tons of mistakes but learned at an amazing rate. And somewhere in there writing software switched from being something I tolerated to collect a paycheck into something I loved. The biggest cause for that switch is that problems that took me weeks to solve in 1998 or 2002 took minutes in 2008. That felt awesome. It still feels awesome, and I'm a hell of a lot better now than I was in 2008. No genius, no amazing innate talent, just time and practice.

    37. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't write Fizzbuzz in an interview when I graduated college with a CS degree. I could have managed it as a homework assignment, even without StackOverflow or equivalent. And I sure couldn't write a game of battleship in an interview.

      I learned. I have tens of thousands of lines of code in production now. I can write FizzBuzz in an interview and making a game of battleship sounds easy if boring (unless you want fancy graphics).

      If you walked into an interview for an organic chemist and they asked you to build a model of some molecule, or walked into an interview for a mathematician and they asked you to do a double integral, if you couldn't do it at that very moment does it mean you'll never manage it? Of course not.

    38. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Piata · · Score: 1

      Except talent is bullshit. Don't push the mythical creator nonsense where people are born with certain abilities or they aren't. What people call talent is actually a person's persistence in pursuing a skill and being passionate enough about it to become an expert. The easiest way to show this kind of progression is through visual artists: https://medium.com/@noahbradle... Artists don't wake up one day being talented, they spend decades improving their craft. The same applies to any skill, including abstract thinking. Anyone can have a talent for abstract thought, they just need the interest and dedication to improve that skill.

    39. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't a shortage of people who can actually write good code for non-trivial tasks, Mr. Kool-aid drinker. Hot on the heels of their collectively laying off 50,000 skilled workers in Washington, Microsoft and Kyocera were quickly in DC claiming that they couldn't find skilled workers. The shortage is 100% BS.

    40. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't write Fizzbuzz in an interview when I graduated college with a CS degree.

      You're part of the problem.
      a FizzBuzz implementation as a "homework assignment"? Are you kidding? It is literally SIX lines of code ! That's a 10 minute question. In an interview setting i'll generously give you 15.

      Here are some actual homework assignments I had in college:

      * Write a Connect 4 game that is played over the network
      * Using Lex and Yacc write a program that pretty-prints C code.
      * Write a chat program for DOS in assembly for two computers connected by a null-modem cable
      * Write a program to design Bézier curves

      Those are actual homework assignments, that take a couple hours each and actual CS knowledge.

      FizzBuzz? It takes 6th grade math, good logic skills, and a rudimentary understanding of any programming language. If you have a CS degree and can't do it in 15 minutes or less, go ask your alma mater for a refund.

    41. Re:"Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I think it's a bad argument on the shortage. We have wage depression in many IT groups b/c of how many are imported in. Wage Depression = less people entering the CS field because why bust your ass getting a degree when you can make more in almost any other technical major.

    42. Re:"Labor Shortage" by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      This is false reasoning.
      Success requires hard work, but hard work does not lead to success
      unless native ability (talent) is already present.
      I could practice singing 12 hours a day for the next 10 years, and I would
      still suck at singing.
      I just don't have the talent (genes) needed to be a good singer, and I never will.

    43. Re:"Labor Shortage" by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      And he must be fluent in Hindi.

  9. just farm the work out remotely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it'll be cheaper anyway

  10. "Labor Shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You speak of the "U.S. labor shortage" yet I look around and see American colleagues who are stuck in dead-end positions with no raises/promotions and struggling to find anything better, and then on the floor above me is at least a couple hundred H1-Bs in positions that could easily be filled by Americans who are looking.

  11. Trump and the Democrats agree... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> bill introduced by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat...Trump's immigration policies

    Nice to see some bipartisan agreement and action again, right?

    1. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      The fun part is Trump and the Democrat will likely support this measure and the Republicans in Congress will oppose it.

      Should make for an interesting show.

    2. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by unixisc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Both Republicans and Democrats are split on this. The Dems have both their working class constituencies - the ones that haven't already defected like those in MI, PA and WI, as well as their minority constituency - Indians, who still vote more heavily Democrat than Republican

      Republicans, OTOH, have the collision b/w their business interests, who want more visas, vs their own grassroots that would like to see even legal immigration curtailed until unemployment is drastically reduced

      So in all likelihood, there will be bipartisan support for both sides

    3. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      indians tend to vote more republican, is my experience. they 'like' authority and authoritarian concepts. its deep in their culture. and this aligns perfectly with R-based thoughts.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you haven't been paying attention for the last 10 years. Democrats are the authoritarian party these days, they're the ones lining up and pushing anti-constitutional amendments. Making the claims of "safe spaces" and support ideas like no-platforming. There's plenty supporters in their base that believe violently attacking people for having opinions that they disagree with is fine. The vast majority of universities fit solidly in the democrat camp as well, and they're also right there pushing for anti-free speech, trying to implement them. In various cases student unions use harassment and threats to try and stop people from speaking. Then there's the entire Title IX garbage that was pushed through as well. And the universities fell all over themselves implementing it with nary a word against it. And now you can see the absolute abuse that's being carried on by that, and how it's used to silence people with dissenting opinions.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, republicans see the limiting of 1st amendment rights with hatespeech and gendered speech laws, 2nd amendment rights always being under attack, a growing welfare state and general fund coffers making people more dependent on the federal government as being more authoritarian.

    6. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you haven't been paying attention for the last 10 years. Democrats are the authoritarian party these days

      They're both authoritarian.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      indians tend to vote more republican, is my experience. they 'like' authority and authoritarian concepts. its deep in their culture. and this aligns perfectly with R-based thoughts.

      Uh, do you have any data to back that up? Everything I've seen has indicated that while there are some pockets of Indians who've moved to the right and support the GOP, the majority of them, who live mainly in NJ and CA, are still heavily (D)

    8. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Both Republicans and Democrats are split on this. The Dems have both their working class constituencies - the ones that haven't already defected like those in MI, PA and WI, as well as their minority constituency - Indians, who still vote more heavily Democrat than Republican

      Republicans, OTOH, have the collision b/w their business interests, who want more visas, vs their own grassroots that would like to see even legal immigration curtailed until unemployment is drastically reduced

      So in all likelihood, there will be bipartisan support for both sides

      First off, H1-B's cant vote. So there goes that conspiracy theory.

      Secondly, they aren't complaining about what Trump did... He left an obvious loophole open that H1-B employers are well versed in using from other countries. They're complaining about a bill put forward by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (a D strangely enough) to raise the minimum H1-B salary to US$130,000. At the moment, they can invent fees and charges to reclaim most of the current salary, but it's going to get a bit hard to hide when they're trying to take $100,000 from a $130,000 salary.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      To answer my own post, if you want to reduce the flow of cheap labour whilst reducing the flow of jobs overseas there is only one way to do it.

      Legalise and regulate.

      Put simply, you cant stop it so dont even try. Split the H1-B (or 457) class visa into two. Once class for actually skilled immigration, the other for temporary workers.

      The first class for the highly skilled. I.E. if a lab wanted to bring in a German scientist, this class is for people who can stand on their own merits and can demonstrate a competency by demand. You can put in weighted metrics (I.E. a degree from somewhere like the UK more than one from Spain which is worth more than Indonesia or India, as would work experience). For this class there must be a demonstration of skills and should either come with or lead to permanent residency.

      The second class, this is for the H1B abusers. Those who want to bring in cheap labour. Restrict the jobs they can apply for, set a hard cap on the number of visas (no advance applications and once they're gone, they're gone) and charge a $10,000 fee per application (that's application, not granted visa) to be paid by the hiring employer (not the recruiter) and limit of no more than 12 months, after which the worker needs to leave the country before applying for another visa even if it's a permanent residency.

      Regulating it is the only effective way of curtailing it. However no-politician will ever go for it because you'd get the "they turk ur jerbs" crowd's knickers in a knot despite the fact you will get less H1B abuse... Not to mention that businesses that like cheap labour will oppose it tooth and nail.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Responding to both your posts here

      H1Bs currently can't vote, but most of them aim to become citizens over time - by having their employers file their green cards and ultimately becoming citizens. Once they do, who do you think they're more likely to support - the politicians who made it easier for them to get where they ended, or harder?

      I've argued that aside from H1B, the OPT authorizations - something that F1 visa holding students are allowed to do for a year or two - convert directly to green cards. These people have US degrees, and are more likely to be exposed solely to the US work culture, rather than Indian or any other. In fact, not just US work culture, but US culture, and be more likely to assimilate - something that has been at issue w/ immigration. Not something that people who've been working for years in India and suddenly brought here are likely to do.

      Your other 2 ideas are fine. Split the visas - make the H1Bs actually for people who have the skills in question, and put in the criteria you've mentioned. The other one - for the companies that claim that they legitimately can't find the people - assign them the temporary visas, and then let them decide whether they want to bring them in, or just have them work remotely from the Bangalore office, and just come on occasion when the clients need them

    11. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Another point I forgot to mention in my earlier mail just above - Trump's immigration plans - both legal and illegal - have been written by Jeff Sessions, who preferred him over Ted Cruz. While Trump does have Indian business associates, they are in India's real estate sector, not in IT, so they're not gonna push him to make these changes

    12. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You might want to stick your nose out of your safe space sometime.

      Trump is as authoritarian a President as we've had in my lifetime. Before Trump, the parties were roughly equally authoritarian. By "anti-constitutional amendments" do you mean laws that violate the Constitution? Plenty of those from all around. As far as safe spaces go, I don't see much of a difference. Trump wants the theater to be a safe space for neo-Nazis, and right-wing football fans apparently don't want anyone to spout off with a trigger gesture before a football game. I think I know what you're trying to say with the "plenty supporters" sentence, but you don't distinguish it from, say, Tea Partiers lashing out at moderate Republicans. As far as anti-free-speech goes, all sides want to use social pressure to condition people's speech. For every leftist saying that you shouldn't arbitrarily insult people, there's a right winger claiming that "Happy Holidays" is anti-American.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    13. Re:Trump and the Democrats agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as safe spaces go, I don't see much of a difference.

      Get your vision checked.

      Trump wants the theater to be a safe space for neo-Nazis

      First, no, Trump didn't say that. He said theaters should be safe. He's not asking for a space space for any specific group. Trump's "demand" is an apology. One which holds as much weight as me demanding you to get your vision checked (but you really should... it's for your own good)

      Second, who's the Neo-Nazi? Mike Pence, who was just there to watch the show? Wanting to watch a play makes you a Neo Nazi now?

      You're making a false equivalence. Or you just are too blind to notice the difference, which is why I say get your vision checked.

      and right-wing football fans apparently don't want anyone to spout off with a trigger gesture before a football game.

      Now tell me how many people were protested to the point that they cannot attend the game, or even cancel football games altogether.

      Meanwhile, the left has successfully gotten speakers to cancel their talks. They try to get people banned from social media. They try to get people fired from their jobs for thoughtcrime.

      Tea Partiers lashing out at moderate Republicans.

      Something the left ought to do more of. The right is more willing and capable of calling out their own.

      As far as anti-free-speech goes, all sides want to use social pressure to condition people's speech

      This is again a false equivalence. Both the robber and the home owner used guns. That doesn't mean they're equally bad.

      For every leftist saying that you shouldn't arbitrarily insult people, there's a right winger claiming that "Happy Holidays" is anti-American

      Notice the difference in your wording. The left says people "shouldn't" say something. The left is dictating what other people should or shouldn't say, with the implication that the left will do something to ya if you disobey.

      The right is claiming something "is" or "isn't" American, or in other words align to the their values. That's not dictating that you should say the same thing. The right isn't forcing their values on you. You can keep saying "happy holidays". The right will keep thinking you're not American, but... so what? Doesn't stop you from continuing to say "happy holidays".

  12. Oh no! My body shop will close! by mveloso · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now we know who's abusing the H1B visa program - the ones who complain the loudest.

    We offshore our India team, so we won't be affected by the H1B changes. But the body shops here will be decimated, which is probably going to be a good thing.

    1. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by ems2004 · · Score: 2

      It is not hard to stop the abuse but why let it happen in the first place? H1B should be classified as temp visa which can not be used as pathway to greencard. Max limit should be 3 years. Any one who ever used H1B should be barred from ever applying for US immigration. All the abuse will stop over night.

      --
      ..... best things in life are not so free..........
    2. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      How effective are you then in keeping your workforce, given that offshoring companies are a dime a dozen in India - not just the HCLs, the TCSs and the Wipros, but also really small ones like Zensar, CSS Corp, Mindtree, Syntel, et al who are often ready to lure them? Or have you found some happy median b/w what would keep them from bolting and what you would have paid an US employee here?

    3. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckoff.. h1b should open the way for greencard!!

      It shouldn't be used to fill anything except advanced positions and if you really need to use it... they should make you do it yourself instead of allowing staffing firms to farm out bodies and shit. Also anyone with an h1b should be allowed to find work at other companies. 130 minimum on h1b is exactly right. I didn't take analysis of algorithms so my starting wage could be 50k when union teachers who spent college taking psych, english, dance, and expressive theatre start at the same wage.

      I also tire of shady recruiters spamming me with 10 messages a day "desperately" trying to fill positions I'm overqualified for only not to get any farther from the phone screen ever. Then getting a sit down interview for 3/4ths of non-indian staffing people who I respond to.

      Fucking assholes wasting my time to help depress my own wages. Many of my friends are citizens who came over on these visas.. they talk about living on bunk beds getting worked 80 hours a week to get their 60k salary... anyone who does that deserves to live here. But nobody should be able to do that to anyone at my expense.

    4. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by ghoul · · Score: 1

      There are no other paths open for legal immigration for non white folks. During the time when any tom dick and harry could immigrate it was kept closed so that only white people could immigrate. When it was opened up to non white people it was choked with country limits and also no more general immigration allowed - only company based and family based which are backed up by decades. The only feasible way for Indians to immigrate is come on an H1, prove they can do the work and have someone sponsor a GC for them. If you shut off the H1-GC pathway you basically want to keep Brown people out. America was built by immigrants. What white immigrants did, brown immigrants do too. Whites went through a 7 year indenture, browns are going through a 6 year H1B. Not much has changed.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    5. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      H1B visas are already temp visas. They last three years, and can be renewed once (yielding a total of 6 years).

      Most H1B visa holders to not permanently emigrate to the US.

    6. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, I read the title and thought "I haven't seen a single Indian working the the auto body/repair shop I use".

    7. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      That's strange. I'm sure America has a rich multicultural and multiracial heritage.

      Right now a white person wanting to emigrate to America has exactly the same options as a non-white person. Should the H1B visa scheme end, a non-white person would have exactly the same options for emigrating to America as a white person.

      Reality appears to have completely disregarded your ignorant rant.

    8. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you shut off the H1-GC pathway you basically want to keep Brown people out.

      Yes! That is exactly the point! Reducing unemployment/underemployment among American citizens is just an added bonus.

    9. Re: Oh no! My body shop will close! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... not exactly.

      Even though I agree with your sentiment and have long argued immigration limits are not racist by definition (but nationalistic) - many "white" countries (australia,uk, etc) have much higher country caps for visa application than other countries.

      Sort of based on political friendliness, economics, etc. But also sort of racist.

    10. Re:Oh no! My body shop will close! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Now we know who's abusing the H1B visa program - the ones who complain the loudest.

      We offshore our India team, so we won't be affected by the H1B changes. But the body shops here will be decimated, which is probably going to be a good thing.

      This wont happen.

      First off, they're not even complaining about Trumps exec order, they're complaining about a bill put forward by Californian Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (and I wonder who her party is) to raise H1B salaries to US$130,000.

      Secondly body shops wont close under Trumps exec order because they only have to demonstrate they tried to hire an American. This is the situation in Australia, a company that wishes to hire Australia's equivalent of a H1-B (Visa subclass 457 or just 457 for short) has to demonstrate that there isn't a sufficiently skilled Australian for the job. They do this by creating a job description that no one in reality can meet (I.E. 10 years experience with Windows 2012 in a production environment), of course no Australian could meet this and that part of the bargain is fulfilled. So now they get their Indian on a 457 who just coincidentally works for far less than an Australian.

      They're not complaining about Trump's plan because it was all for show. He left the same loophole wide open for them and companies like Tata and Infosys have a lot of experience at abusing it.

      The best case scenario here is that the jobs for H1-B's in the future will just be shipped overseas, again in the best possible scenario to another developed nation where Indians can be imported. However the most likely scenario is for Americans to be shipped offshore to head up Indian teams.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  13. sounds like a good plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indians don't want to get paid twice as much? Sounds like trump has it right.

    1. Re:sounds like a good plan by unixisc · · Score: 1

      They don't wanna pay twice as much. When it comes to negotiating salaries for people they employ, they are extremely tight, but funnily enough, when it comes to expected salaries, they expect something near the $200k mark, if not much more

  14. Does this bill mean.... by mark-t · · Score: 0

    .... that it is legal in the USA to discriminate based on country of origin now, even when they are legally landed permanent resident, and entitled to work in the country? I'm not wholly up on US immigration policies, or how h1b's normally work, but it seems top me like this bill might be setting companies up to deal with a swarm of discrimination lawsuits.

    1. Re:Does this bill mean.... by naughtynaughty · · Score: 4, Informative

      This has nothing to do with Permanent Residents, they aren't here on H-1B visas

    2. Re:Does this bill mean.... by Qzukk · · Score: 2

      and entitled to work in the country?

      Yes, it's legal in the US to not hire people who are not entitled to work in the country.

      If Congress passes (and the President signs) a law changing who is entitled to work here, then the employers must also deal with that.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Does this bill mean.... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      1. It is not the corporations making/changing the law. So it cannot be their fault even *if* it was determined to be discrimination (it won't)
      2. It is the H1B that is needed in order for them to live and work in the US... they wouldn't need the H1B visa if they were permanent legal residents
      3. FTS states that the Bill will effectively double the minimum wage requirement in order to make it less cost effective to bring "talent" from another country. That is applying the same requirement despite country of origin so it cannot be racial discrimination.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    4. Re:Does this bill mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... that it is legal in the USA to discriminate based on country of origin now, even when they are legally landed permanent resident, and entitled to work in the country? I'm not wholly up on US immigration policies, or how h1b's normally work, but it seems top me like this bill might be setting companies up to deal with a swarm of discrimination lawsuits.

      Immigration rules are quite a bit different. It is totally within law to apply different rules to different countries--this is widespread and worldwide. People from Canada can enter the USA and stay for 6+ months and don't get a passport stamp if they enter on the ground. People from Japan, EU, South Korea get 90 days of visa-free entry. People from Russia have to apply in advance. People from Mexico are routinely denied tourist visas. People from other countries, like North Korea and many African nations, have no real shot of getting a visa of any kind.

      Most countries do exactly this. Immigration rules are often involve treaties and agreement between nations. Taiwan has different rules for certain Asian nations. As mentioned, the USA and Canada have very lax rules, perhaps the most lax of any two countries in the world (don't quote me on that, just guessing) and neither Canada nor the USA grant those rights to any other nation.

      Visas, I believe, can be revoked at any time for any reason. Permanent residency is different and can't just be pulled. But those on H1B visas? Those can be pulled and canceled if the State department decides to. You can bet, for instance, that if there were a war with China, this may happen and all Chinese nationals not holding permanent residency or citizenship would be sent home.

      US Constitutional rights and laws don't quite apply the same way at or entering the border. Some rules, like due process, are still in effect, but others are not. Any non-citizen can be denied entry at the state department's discretion, even if that person holds a valid visa. Customs agents, for instance, have the right to search anything without probable cause, something not possible within the border.

      The USA also has hard caps on H1B visas per country. Those are fully legal and have been around forever. They can change the rules and say "No more from India" as well and revoke all the existing H1B visas.

    5. Re:Does this bill mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are confusing the proposed bill with the president's executive order. the bill raises minimum wage. the order is to ban entry from certain countries. to answer your concern, companies must follow the law. if they are following the law, they can get sued, but they won't lose. executive orders are laws.

    6. Re:Does this bill mean.... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I am no fan of the Dems, but does this bill say anything beyond the visas in question? In particular, does it say anything about the countries of origin, being tougher on Indians than they might be on, say, Romanians or Swedes?

    7. Re:Does this bill mean.... by ems2004 · · Score: 2

      This actually the cure for H1B problem that h1B holders should never be allowed to become permanent residents. That will take away the sheen from H1B program If the rules are made to only address the real shortage(which does not exist in the first place).

      --
      ..... best things in life are not so free..........
    8. Re:Does this bill mean.... by ems2004 · · Score: 1

      It IS the corporations who write ANY law in the US.

      --
      ..... best things in life are not so free..........
    9. Re:Does this bill mean.... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Well... yes... but I think you know what I mean

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    10. Re:Does this bill mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Exact opposite of that.
      H1Bs are exactly the same as slave labor because they cannot look for other positions and thus artificially depress the H1B going rate.
      If there was no way that they could become permanent residents then they would become EVEN MORE attractive to sweat shops than before.

    11. Re:Does this bill mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The corporations may have had this power in the past but Trump but Trump has thrown a major wrench into the works. In just a couple of weeks he has cause Lockheed to start cutting the price on the F-35 program. A single Tweet questioning future US sales was all that was needed. A few automobile manufacturers have halted or stopped to reconsider moving their operations out of the US. They are afraid of being labeled as anti-US. Trump has called out the Pharmaceutical companies to lower prices and keep more of their operations in the US. In return he has offered to streamline the FDA approval process which will lower the price of getting new drugs to market. The US government is the number one purchaser of drugs in the US because of Medicare and Medicaid. That provides the government with a substantial amount of leverage when negotiating prices. Trump is not a politician he is a businessman who is addicted to making "deals". All of his actions so far have all been targeted at setting the table for the negotiations to come. The US has a substantial amount of power in the world and he is just making sure everyone is aware of that power and using a very public setting. Back room deals have suddenly been forced into the open. Trump is attacking the status quo that has seen the US giving away way more than it receives in the international arena. Trade policies and security policies have been questioned and while most things will not change it will shine a spotlight on the issues and that was what Trump promised in his campaign. Whether he lasts or not there needed to be a re-evaluation of US policies that a lot of people are unhappy about. Making US employees the priority in the H1-B visa process is the only right thing to do. If this makes some foreign company get upset is not of any great concern to the US employees.

    12. Re:Does this bill mean.... by zuckie13 · · Score: 2

      Trump had nothing to do with them cutting the price of those fighters. Just because he says it does not make it true. If you actually look into it, he's taking credit for the fact that the next batch they build (90 as opposed to the initial 10), will cost less per fighter (about 6 -7 million less) than the last batch. 90x6.7 million =~ 600 million. The discussions on those costs started before he was elected....so yeah.....liar.

    13. Re:Does this bill mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump! Trump! Trump!

    14. Re:Does this bill mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      source?

    15. Re:Does this bill mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am no fan of the Dems, but does this bill say anything beyond the visas in question? In particular, does it say anything about the countries of origin, being tougher on Indians than they might be on, say, Romanians or Swedes?

      No it doesn't say anything about being tougher on any specific Indians, but as a *class* they will be disproportionately affected because they currently receive about 70% of the H1b visas and the Indian owned staffing firms Tata, Infosys and Wipro are a H1b dependent companies and almost exclusively recruit from their home country of India.

      FWIW, this is similar to the logic used to justify that policies that result in the disproportionate cutting higher salaried people is equivalent to age discrimination, or that admitting people to college by SAT score is inherently racist/classist because it disproportionately affects certain classes of people.

      Or the claim that Trump's executive order "to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality." as being disproportionately affecting those refugees of the Islamic faith.

    16. Re:Does this bill mean.... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      USA and Canada have very lax rules, perhaps the most lax of any two countries in the world (don't quote me on that, just guessing)

      Depends whether the Shengen Area of the EU counts as one country or many countries.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  15. Thanks, Trump! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After the dot com bust, I read a study that predicted that the IT industry will have 1M+ job openings by 2030 because baby boomers will have retired by then and foreign workers will stay home to pursue a middle class lifestyle. That prompted me to go back to school to learn computer programming on a $3,000 tax credit that George W. signed into law after 9/11. People thought I was crazy to go into computers when health care became the new money major. Fast forward 16 years later... I'm enjoying my career in IT support, making more money and paying more in taxes. Looking forward to making more money and paying more in taxes as the baby boomers retire and foreign workers stay home in the next 13+ years.

    1. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Senior care.

    2. Re:Thanks, Trump! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Senior care.

      I had several friends who abandoned computers for healthcare after the dot com bust. They make more money than I do today but they hate their jobs because all they do is wipe asses and change bed pans. Some of my best paying IT contracts has been hospitals. Go figure...

    3. Re:Thanks, Trump! by unixisc · · Score: 2

      They should introduce bidets in this country

    4. Re:Thanks, Trump! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should introduce bidets in this country

      Google has bidets in their restrooms. Great when they work. When they don't work, I find my balls touching the ice cold water in the bowl and my ass catching fire from a bad heating element in the seat. That's no way to take a shit.

    5. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, AI will change the bed pans and wipe ass, soon.

    6. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Cederic · · Score: 2

      If somebody is so infirm that they are unable to go to the toilet, why would a bidet help? Do bidets include some magical teleportation device that takes you from your bed to the toilet, waits for you to take a shit then switches you to the bidet so you can wash your arse before you're dropped back off in bed again?

      Or did you just utterly fucking fail to understand the point being made?

    7. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Juan Hong Low, is that you?

    8. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get your balls iced and your ass flamed for free? And yet you complain??

      I have to pay extra for that!

    9. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have bidets build into the toilet seat which clean the sitter. Thus the aid no longer needs to wipe the person. Some people can make it to a bathroom with help but are unable to clean themselves afterwards. The ability to shift your feet is different from the ability to touch your ass.

    10. Re:Thanks, Trump! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      My point was that once the bidet is used to clean the butt of the patient, the nurse gets to wipe a (relatively) cleaner butt, instead of the dirty one to start w/. I wasn't thinking about someone who's so infirm that s/he's unable to get to the bathroom

    11. Re:Thanks, Trump! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      This actually is a good job to automate - people will be better off for it

    12. Re:Thanks, Trump! by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      ... and my ass catching fire from a bad heating element in the seat. That's no way to take a shit.

      Now there's a workmans comp claim if I've ever seen one. "Your honor, creimer's ass-hair caught on fire due to a poorly maintained bidet"

    13. Re:Thanks, Trump! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I clearly failed to understand the additional use case involving the mobile but inflexible patient.

      Bedpans was the cue.

      However, I'm pretty confident that a bidet will not, with no assistance, remove the need for carer attention to the bottom area, so it's an expensive and potentially uncomfortable way of taking a few seconds off a continued unpleasant task.

    14. Re: Thanks, Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I combined the two and went into Healthcare IT. Probably the best move I ever made short of building a startup and selling it to Google.

  16. Self serving anyone ? by nomad63 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "unfairly target some of its members" ??? Are they kidding ? What about their sham operations unfairly replacing American workers ? And "it will not solve US Labor shortage" ?? Again which labor shortage ? The one where people refuse to work for poverty range salaries, whereas the 4 Indians crammed into a one bedroom apartment sharing one car, making 40% less than the American worker they are replacing ? That is not called a labor shortage. It is called slave driving. All those infosys, tata, wipro, etc companies can go to hell as far as I am concerned.

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
    1. Re:Self serving anyone ? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      These Limited Liability holding corporations aren't made out of money.

    2. Re:Self serving anyone ? by NewYork · · Score: 1
  17. take yr warning & shove it up yr curry hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    take that cheap foreign labor and shove it up yer curry hole

  18. Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zerofoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Time and time again we hear how this technical talent simply doesn't exist here in the US and we need to go abroad to find it.

    If this is true, why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

    Something tells me these H1B visa holders are neither entrepreneurial nor brilliant.

    1. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wondered the same thing. Be successful H1B's, in your own country. I'll keep mine. My belief is that we will out compete you. BTW. Threaten Trump? Good luck with that.

    2. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If this is true, why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

      Probably because their home country lacks a middle class to bridge the gap between the poor and the rich. Without a middle class there are no consumers to buy advance products.

      Something tells me these H1B visa holders are neither entrepreneurial nor brilliant.

      You're wrong about that. It takes a lot of determination to rise up against societal norms, get an education and leave their home country. Those workers who come to the United States are more likely to be the ones who starts new companies in their home country.

    3. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you scan some one at home? Can you? It is just like stealing money from your own wallet when there is no money in the first place. One single biggest reason for the fall of middle class in america is H1B cancer.

    4. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those workers who come to the United States are more likely to be the ones who starts new companies in their home country.

      bullshit.

      I have lived in the bay area for over 25 yrs and have 'trained my replacements' countless times.

      indians who are brought here to work at the likes of intel, cisco, apple, fb, twitter and so on - they are not any smarter than the avergage local IT guy. they are not horrible people but they are not special, either, and this is the whole point - you can find 'regular old IT people' anywhere and you don't have to fly them in from india and china (why is china not mentioned, btw? lots of h1b's are from all over asia, not just india).

      you won't find regular people starting new companies.

      now, at the smaller 100 person startups (I'm at one now) you CAN find folks from india who are the best in their field. but these are not h1bs! they are indians who came to the US and now live here with intention of staying. we have some really good engineers from india at my place, but when I was at cisco (etc) - it was nothing special and everyone was mediocre, at best, there. and the place was FLOODED with folks from india; you would go a whole day and not hear english spoken in the hallways (cisco is famous for that, sadly).

      the best and brightest don't need sponsors such as h1b to get them here; their own intelligence will get them regular jobs. h1b is entirely just to displace local workers with cheap labor AND THAT'S ALL IT WAS EVER MEANT TO BE.

      the jig is up, guys. and its about time! I hope its real, this time, though. something tells me that the orange haired monkey that is now running this country will not really care much about US; and he'll do whatever he wants to make himself better off. the rest of us, I seriously doubt he has our best interests at heart. not a republican big businessman. those are the very people that exclusively abuse this program and benefit directly from it!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home?

      Because in their home-land they can't seem to figure out how to build their own countries like the United States did with a lot of hard work and time. It's much easier to just come to the United States and reap the benefits of all that hard work and siphon back to their respective home lands. Let's take Iraq for instance. The Sunni, the Shiites and the Kurds have been more concerned about killing each other over religious beliefs than they have been about building up their country's infrastructure to actually provide positive benefits for their citizens. In other words: they can't get their shit together so they come here because we can.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    6. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the jig is up, guys. and its about time! I hope its real, this time, though. something tells me that the orange haired monkey that is now running this country will not really care much about US; and he'll do whatever he wants to make himself better off. the rest of us, I seriously doubt he has our best interests at heart. not a republican big businessman. those are the very people that exclusively abuse this program and benefit directly from it!

      IMHO, the risk is that the general Trump persona and the over-the-top reaction to everything he does will render his potentially useful actions ineffective, and worse, possibly poison issues like H1-B as just another aspect of a racist nationalist agenda, making positive change on that issue impossible.

      It's utterly clear that the globalist/transnationals completely support mass immigration, jobs transfer, etc, whether for cynical motivation (more money for people at the top) or because it fits into some complex long-term agenda with altruistic motivations (spread the wealth, etc), so don't be surprised if/when Trump fails H1-B will back at status quo or worse when the globalists regain control.

      As for Trump's personal motivation, I'm never quite sure on this. It's easy to align him with the usual cadre of rich corporate types, but I sometimes suspect that Trump himself doesn't feel like he fits into that crowd as a natural member, which is why he tries so hard and often comes off as a tacky and nouveau riche. He has to flout his wealth harder to prove he belongs.

      Bottom line, he may not be motivationally aligned with traditional corporate interests or may not feel like he has to tow their line.

    7. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the best and brightest don't need sponsors such as h1b to get them here;

      I am vehemently against the H1-B visa system but I will have to disagree with the above statement. I don't know how the truly best and brightest cannot work in the U.S. without some sort of visa.

      As for your statement about H1-B visa workers being mediocre like most American workers.... The vast majority of H1-B workers I have met (98%) across multiple industries, in multiple companies, and many states leads me to believe that achieving mediocrity would be a life's dream for them. The education system (heavily rote and with rampant academic dishonesty) actually makes the U.S. education system, which is constantly excoriated by everyone, look pretty good.

      Beyond poor education/training, my impression of most H1-B visa workers is that they're just fundamentally stupid. It doesn't matter the training you give them: the raw material doesn't exist for them to be good at their jobs.

    8. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zifn4b · · Score: 2

      Time and time again we hear how this technical talent simply doesn't exist here in the US and we need to go abroad to find it.

      It's propaganda from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Why do you think they are so upset with Trump's policies and have been taking to twitter and all kinds of other PR campaigns to smear him? They stand to lose a lot of money if the playing field changes. Do your research, the facts are out there. It's all about the money money money.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    9. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by gtall · · Score: 2

      Threatening Trump is easy, just ask Putin. You didn't think Trump's Putin love was deep affection, did you?

    10. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because their home country lacks a middle class to bridge the gap between the poor and the rich. Without a middle class there are no consumers to buy advance products.

      You're missing the point, they can make their IT company over in India, staffed by Indians, and export products and services to the world (the US in particular is referenced in this article, but why not sell elsewhere as well). Just like Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, etc do from their respective countries.

    11. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      Your example of American superiority is our superiourity to a country which we bombed into the stone age, kicking off a civil war with our own ignorance and greed?

      Your example demonstrates our responsibility to refugees...

      That said, we have no similar responsibility to enable H1-B abuse...

    12. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by gtall · · Score: 1

      Trump is no businessman in the sense of Big Business. He has no Board of Directors in his toy companies, they are strictly Mom and Pop type operations. He cannot even make good hiring decisions. You can see that by what he believes make good cabinet nominees. That is no team he's assembling, it is just some guys and gals he likes. He's in way over his head.

    13. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't Trump-supporting Slashdot readers build their own world class companies? Aren't you guys entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists (/paste)?

    14. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

      Because Indians want to come to the U.S. and take advantage of our infrastructure, university system, clean air and potable tap water, police and firefighters who don't do shakedowns or demand bribes to do their jobs, and high standard of living--all while undermining the very tax and employment system that makes those things possible.

    15. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zifn4b · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LOL

      Your example of American superiority is our superiourity to a country which we bombed into the stone age, kicking off a civil war with our own ignorance and greed?

      Your example demonstrates our responsibility to refugees...

      That said, we have no similar responsibility to enable H1-B abuse...

      I'll grant you this, we did have military operations in Iraq and the Middle East in general in recent times but you can't make that the scapegoat for The Middle East's complete and utter incompetence. The killing that I'm referring to has been going for 1000+ years way before the United States ever existed. Sorry, try again. Learn history if you want to join the discussion. At least America supports religious freedom instead supporting coerced Theocracy to the point that if you leave the Theocratic faith, you will be executed. The Middle East makes its own self look stupid without Americans or anyone else having to point it out.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    16. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      Deep affection for cheap and quick political posturing.

    17. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is true, why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

      In time, they almost certainly will. In the 1950s and 60s workers in the US auto industry were successful in not allowing foreigners to come to the USA and take their jobs - wages were high and times were good even for American workers without college degrees. But then foreign auto companies got their act together and were successful in competing with the US auto companies.

      Protectionism can help American workers in Silicon Valley in the the short term. But, in the longer term, American workers are either going to have to get their own act together and find a way to compete on a level playing field against the rest of the world or Silicon Valley will go the way of Detroit and Saginaw.

      Something tells me these H1B visa holders are neither entrepreneurial nor brilliant.

      China and India are each about three times as big as the USA - and they both have large segments of their populations rising up out of desperate poverty into a lower middle class lifestyle with access to decent eduction. There are a lot of really smart good people in China and India and many more on the way.

      If you look at Japan and Germany, neither succeeded in their ambition to rule to world but people in both those countries do OK for themselves. That's what the USA should be planning for itself: eventually the world will be ruled by China and India but there's no reason in principle that the USA can't still do OK for itself - like Japan or Germany - or even Denmark or New Zealand.

    18. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Lisias · · Score: 1

      Something tells me these H1B visa holders are neither entrepreneurial nor brilliant.

      I worked with a very talented Indian professional once. He said that the best professionals on this country just don't leave the country. He can earn exactly the same amount of money that the best Europeans and Americans ones, and spend it on a incredibly cheaper one. There's no bad place if you are rich enough, and a middle class salary from USA or Europe makes you rich in India.

      So, yeah. You appear to be right. The ones that stays home appear to be the better ones, so the ones that emigrate should be the less qualified (or competent) ones.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    19. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by e3m4n · · Score: 2

      actually I think its more propaganda from Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Micro$oft. Its hard to buy that next-worlds-most-expensive-luxury-yacht if you have to actually pay your programmers what they are worth.

    20. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time and time again we hear how this technical talent simply doesn't exist here in the US and we need to go abroad to find it.

      If this is true, why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

      The talent exists here but the companies just want short time work. I usually get two job postings sent to me from headhunters a week. A vast majority of the jobs coming through that avenue are 3-6 month jobs. American workers need consistent work to pay bills and live. The H1-B visa holders come from such a crappy environment they are willing to work those jobs just for the chance to possibly get another short term job just so they don't have to go back to their crappy home in their originating country.

    21. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by ghoul · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Trump got handed over 100 million dollars from his daddy. Had he put it into a bank FD it would now be worht 5 Billion dollars. Trump is currently worth 4.5 Billion. Thats how good a businessman he is, he cannot beat the returns on a fixed deposit. His daddy and his granddaddy were good businessmen but then they were immigrants 1st and 2nd generation - If you want something done right get an immigrant to do it.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    22. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      "Cant figure out how to stop the religious wars in their homelands so come to America to reap its Bounty" Sounds like the Pilgrims.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    23. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, Iraq was a mess long before even the Gulf War.

    24. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by zifn4b · · Score: 2

      actually I think its more propaganda from Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Micro$oft. Its hard to buy that next-worlds-most-expensive-luxury-yacht if you have to actually pay your programmers what they are worth.

      Oh that's nothing. Brace yourself. Here is the US Chamber of Commerce directory. Push the Search Directory button with no criteria. Notably on this list:

      • Hong Kong - See People's Republic of China
      • U.S. Department of Commerce China Gateway
      • U.S.-India Business Council
      • U.S.-Korean Business Council
      • U.S.-Pakistan Business Council

      And that's just the tip of the iceberg. It seems there's are a lot of non-American interests in the "U.S." Chamber of Commerce.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    25. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the jig is up, guys. and its about time! I hope its real, this time, though. something tells me that the orange haired monkey that is now running this country will not really care much about US; and he'll do whatever he wants to make himself better off. the rest of us, I seriously doubt he has our best interests at heart. not a republican big businessman. those are the very people that exclusively abuse this program and benefit directly from it!

      IMHO, the risk is that the general Trump persona and the over-the-top reaction to everything he does will render his potentially useful actions ineffective, and worse, possibly poison issues like H1-B as just another aspect of a racist nationalist agenda, making positive change on that issue impossible.

      It's utterly clear that the globalist/transnationals completely support mass immigration, jobs transfer, etc, whether for cynical motivation (more money for people at the top) or because it fits into some complex long-term agenda with altruistic motivations (spread the wealth, etc), so don't be surprised if/when Trump fails H1-B will back at status quo or worse when the globalists regain control.

      As for Trump's personal motivation, I'm never quite sure on this. It's easy to align him with the usual cadre of rich corporate types, but I sometimes suspect that Trump himself doesn't feel like he fits into that crowd as a natural member, which is why he tries so hard and often comes off as a tacky and nouveau riche. He has to flout his wealth harder to prove he belongs.

      Bottom line, he may not be motivationally aligned with traditional corporate interests or may not feel like he has to tow their line.

      Doesn't this image politics nonsense drive you crazy, though? I can't see how playing the game is the right thing to do. We must resist and decry image politics now lest it gain even more politics. We must judge things based on facts and reason, not image and feelings.

    26. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Probably because their home country lacks a middle class to bridge the gap between the poor and the rich. Without a middle class there are no consumers to buy advance products."

      Why would selling technological products at home be a requirement? It's a global economy.

    27. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Why would selling technological products at home be a requirement? It's a global economy.

      The global economy is the U.S. and Europe, both of which have established middle classes.

    28. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      States with the biggest H1-B problems, and demanding more to come into the US, are dominated by Democrats.

      Republicans cannot be both racist and pro-H1-B. Instead, take a look at the businesses benefiting from H1-B visas and who they are donating to the most.

      For some perspective, here's a Republican bill to partially limit H1-B. The bill being discussed here is about adding a new minimum wage to try to avoid the perception of replacing talent with slave labor. It also has other out-of-touch requirements, which would hurt US applicants.

      Lofgren's legislation also plays to her Silicon Valley base: It would set aside 20% of the allocated H-1B visas each year for startups, which she defines as firms with 50 or fewer workers.

      I cannot name a startup that needed H1-B assistance for some of their first 50 employees.

      The only thing that can fix H1-B is to remove H1-B entirely. Businesses should be able to sponsor international talent and spend money bringing them into the US with those people working toward US citizenship. There's no reason that we should be bringing in average (and often below average) talent, especially if that talent has no interest in staying in the US, thus not improving our tax revenues. If we want everyone else's best and brightest, then that's the best way to get them and retain them.

    29. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Trump is an odd duck and I think a product of celebrity culture as much as anything. If you would have looked at him ten years ago, his public positions and political beliefs would paint him fairly squarely as a Democrat, or at least a New York Democrat. He may also be narcissistic enough that he only really cares about himself and the rest of the big business fat cats don't rate any special treatment from him, or even though he's part of those circles he doesn't feel any tribal loyalty towards them.

      News media (or at least the liberal-leaning part of it) will demonize everything he does, but that's hardly new. Some probably just want to peddle controversy so anything will be spun so as to be more dramatic than it really warrants. It just seems like an abrupt change because we've had 8 years of Obama presidency, but there were plenty of people or publications that were doing the same throughout Obama's term and talking about how everything he did was somehow ruining the country. You probably just never saw any of that because you didn't go looking for it or tune in to those programs. If you mostly view content that slants to the left, you would expect it to be as harsh towards the previous administration.

      Perhaps Trump has realized that it doesn't really matter what you say or do, as the country is so divided (and actively seeks out reinforcement for that division) that there's always going to be a group that will spin things in his favor as much as there will be a group that spins things against him. Such a system doesn't reward integrity, decorum, or anything really. Maybe a Trump presidency and all the cavalier, politically incorrect shit-slinging is what it takes for us to collectively evaluate what brought us to this point and make a change so that those attributes are valued and rewarded. Otherwise I suspect that in enough time we'll remember back to a time when the Trump-Clinton election was a civil affair compared to the current clown posse and their shenanigans.

    30. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure you are familiar with the immigration process in the US. How can someone from India just come to the US and stay (and work!) without going through the H1B->Greencard process? Seriously, I want to know....

      Oh there isn't another (commonly accessible) way?

      Ah well nevermind that.... just keep making up whatever narrative your brain needs to keep supporting its existing views. Don't let reality get in the way...

    31. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, Iraq was a mess long before even the Gulf War.

      To be fair, there wouldn't be an Iraq at all if it weren't for a French and British secret agreement...

    32. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      I'm coming around to the thought that Trump's persona is about the only thing that could break the logjam. Every other Republican has eventually been beaten down by a hostile media, and an opposition party that acts as if it is in charge even when it isn't. His strategy has been pretty easy to understand - drive the opposition so crazy that they make stupid errors, while tossing really substantial moves into the mix that go unnoticed in all the noise. Trump acts like the lightning rod while his staff actually does the real behind-the-scenes political work appears to be the way it's working out.

      Note that many of his moves are actually aimed at driving wedges between various components of the opposition's coalition, while beating down corrupt players in the GOP. He seems to be building a new center-right coalition, and it appears to be working.

    33. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Pilgrims were puritan assholes too obnoxious for even the English to tolerate. British religious wars were over by then, except in Ireland.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    34. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump has also spent quite a lot of money, I'm sure he'd rather be dating models and living the high life than subsisting somewhere in Peoria watching his interest accumulate.

    35. Re: Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there are other visas.

    36. Re: Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_policy_of_the_United_States

      Because there are other types of visa ? L visa is common for actually worthwhile employees. For example.

    37. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by swb · · Score: 1

      I do think that the biggest mistake his critics make is assuming he's following the standard playbook. They say "he's doing X wrong" without realizing he's abandoned that playbook.

    38. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like you're just repeating what the talking heads tell you to repeat ad naseaum.

      Keep it up, you definitely don't look like a misinformed idiot.

    39. Re: Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he's President now, so your story is worthless. Power > money.

    40. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At least America supports religious freedom instead supporting coerced Theocracy to the point that if you leave the Theocratic faith, you will be executed."

      That depends on which Americans you ask, and many of the ones now in power want to push us that direction.

    41. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is true, why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

      because the first world is aggressively draining away their best people with the promise of a better life.

      If not for that, knowledge workers would be fucked because there's no way to protect them with EU-style tarrifs. We have to either keep the brain drain working, or make a principled decision to sacrifice our quality of life for global equality.

      It sounds like Trump's plan to replace lottery with bidding will preserve or improve the brain drain, but I haven't thought it through well enough.

    42. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how much "wealth" Trump has because he won't release his taxes. He might be worth $200 million, he might be worth more... or less. Some speculate that if his Russian bankers call in their loans he would be bankrupt. You don't know.

    43. Re:Why don't H1Bs simply build companies at home? by m00sh · · Score: 1

      Time and time again we hear how this technical talent simply doesn't exist here in the US and we need to go abroad to find it.

      If this is true, why don't these entrepreneurial and brilliant technologists build world-class companies and products in their home countries?

      Something tells me these H1B visa holders are neither entrepreneurial nor brilliant.

      They cannot build world-class companies in India because India does not have the solid institutional and infrastructure to allow for that. There is too much corruption, the markets aren't there, the investment isn't possible and so on.

      It used be the same problem with China about 10 years ago. They solved the problem and are creating world-companies left and right. In some metrics, they are even overtaking the US.

      Just from statistics, foreign technologists combined with US infrastructure and institutions create more companies. There might be many causes to this. One of them is that US filters immigrants so that it chooses exactly the kind of people that would benefit to come to the US.

  19. Re:OMG by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    When management can pay $20,000 a year to a worker in the Philippines to write code, what incentive is there for me to learn how to write code? I can't beat $20,000 a year.

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  20. Re:OMG by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

    Americans farm out a lot of stuff, ranging from making our clothes to picking our tomatoes.

    It has nothing to do with Americans not knowing how to do something but rather Americans aren't really interesting in sewing shirts in a sweatshop or picking tomatoes in the hot sun. So we hire people who are willing to do those things.

    Not really any different than my hiring my maid to clean my house for $3/hr so I can do something more enjoyable.

  21. As a liberal by Ryanrule · · Score: 0

    They can go fuck a cow.

    1. Re:As a liberal by ems2004 · · Score: 1

      How does the new rating system work? I want to vote you up.......++5

      --
      ..... best things in life are not so free..........
  22. What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refuse to tell us how to reboot our Dells?

    1. Re:What are they gonna do? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

      The amount of needful that will get done could drop as much as 15%.

    2. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Refuse to tell us how to reboot our Dells?

      When I worked on the Google IT help desk in 2008, I had to walk a newly hired computer science graduate on how to TURN ON his workstation. He actually expected to find someone standing to turn on the workstations like they do at the university computer labs. He was shocked that he had to do manual labor.

    3. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a person to turn on the computer for you is the kind of thing you would expect in a heavily-unionized shop or a country where labor is exceedingly cheap.

    4. Re:What are they gonna do? by Salgak1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's actually an improvement. In 1979, I had to teach a Pakistani student how to use a laundromat. Fellow student down the hall, he had asked me what the best way was to the river, to wash his clothes. . .

    5. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Having a person to turn on the computer for you is the kind of thing you would expect in a heavily-unionized shop or a country where labor is exceedingly cheap.

      Or volunteering to run the university computer lab as a prerequisite to join the computer priesthood to protect computers from users.

    6. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They Indian government appears to be making with much fear. "Us will not be the accepting tolerant of this insult to the much hard-working Indian IT professional," said the Prime Minister.

    7. Re: What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not unusual. I've worked in environments where it is strictly against the rules to perform any type of configuration change even as far as moving a monitor a few inches to the side.

    8. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least your fellow student wanted to find the river to wash his clothes. Some (even US born) students lacked the understanding that clothing needed to be (at least occasionally) washed.

      Wish I could say that I have seen it improve in the past 30 years, but I still encounter at least one student a year needing this life lesson.

    9. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      join the computer priesthood to protect computers from users.

      YOU'RE MAKING THE MACHINE SPIRIT ANGRY!

    10. Re:What are they gonna do? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      What's your point? They got an education that didn't intersect with actually running the machines. That is literally what IT is for.

      You may also be shocked to learn that most mechanical engineering grads can't rebuild their car. Most electrical engineers can't re-wire a house. As specialization increases you have people that are highly trained in one area but don't have the breadth of the 'jack of all trades' that exist in some fields.

      Next you'll be complaining your cardiologist is a terrible orthopedic surgeon. "But they're doctors, it's all pretty much the same".

    11. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That is literally what IT is for.

      Uh, no. It's not IT's job to turn on your computer. The Fortune 500 companies I've worked for in the past have policies in place that prevent IT techs from running over to turn or reboot a user's workstation.

      You may also be shocked to learn that most mechanical engineering grads can't rebuild their car.

      No, but mechanical engineers should know how to turn on the ignition switch.

      Most electrical engineers can't re-wire a house.

      No, but electrical engineers should know how to turn on a light switch.

      As specialization increases you have people that are highly trained in one area but don't have the breadth of the 'jack of all trades' that exist in some fields.

      Or, as Robert Kiyosaki writes in "Rich Dad, Poor Dad," the more you specialize about something in college the less you know about everything else in real life.

      Next you'll be complaining your cardiologist is a terrible orthopedic surgeon. "But they're doctors, it's all pretty much the same".

      No, but I do expect them to turn on their workstation in the examination room without calling IT to turn it on for them. Although I've shocked a few doctors when I refused to transfer their iTunes library to a new workstation because having iTunes installed on their workstation was against hospital policies.

    12. Re:What are they gonna do? by Foofoobar · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like he wanted to play a joke on you or someone put him up to it. While I believe YOU ARE NAIVE ENOUGH TO BELIEVE he couldn't understand how to turn something on, occums razor suggests it is more likely that this is a joke played on you.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    13. Re:What are they gonna do? by JWW · · Score: 0

      Most electrical engineers can't re-wire a house.

      Bullshit, most EE's could easily do this. Now, it wouldn't necessarily be to code, but we can have a discussion about the regulatory state later.

    14. Re:What are they gonna do? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      Well, I knew plenty of kids who dropped off laundry with Mummy and Daddy before heading out to party on a Friday night. Heck, one SHIPPED his wash back to Connecticut (College was in Pennsylvania) and he got a box of clean laundry back every week. . .

    15. Re:What are they gonna do? by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      Refuse to tell us how to reboot our Dells?

      When I worked on the Google IT help desk in 2008, I had to walk a newly hired computer science graduate on how to TURN ON his workstation. He actually expected to find someone standing to turn on the workstations like they do at the university computer labs. He was shocked that he had to do manual labor.

      Did you have to hold it for him when he had to go?

    16. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like he wanted to play a joke on you or someone put him up to it.

      It wasn't a joke. His help desk ticket history showed that he was a new hire without an assigned manager. He obviously fell through the cracks. Google was hiring 300+ people per week back then.

      While I believe YOU ARE NAIVE ENOUGH TO BELIEVE he couldn't understand how to turn something on, occums razor suggests it is more likely that this is a joke played on you.

      If I thought he was pulling a joke, I would have reported him to security and have him escorted off the campus.

    17. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's a different scenario entirely. He was literally unaware of laundromats because Pakistan probably didn't have them, and he was willing to do the much more manual process to clean them.

      On the other hand, the Googler was inept with the hardware that they reasonably should have understood. How one makes it to your first job, circa 2008, without turning on a workstation is astounding.

    18. Re:What are they gonna do? by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      I hope he quit and did something useful.

    19. Re:What are they gonna do? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Most electrical engineers can't re-wire a house.

      Sheeit... you're kidding, right? Any EE that can't figure down basic wiring, look up Code, know how to keep the neutral line balanced, and get it done to ensure it's safe and compliant? Yeah, that person isn't worth a damn as an EE, seriously. When you compare it to the regs, boundaries, and environment adaptation required to rig-up industrial control systems? House wiring is a do-it-in-your-sleep piece of cake.

      I get what you were getting at, but really... that bit wasn't the best example.

      (Okay... *recent* EE grads who don't know shit outside of Verilog might have a hard time with it, but c'mon...)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    20. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turning on a computer is a basic life skill. Much like cleaning a windshield if you have a drivers license.

    21. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. I will certainly enjoy doing less of the needful.

    22. Re:What are they gonna do? by lgw · · Score: 1

      YOU'RE MAKING THE MACHINE SPIRIT ANGRY!

      AIEEEEEEE! There are daemons on the pipes! The token fell out of the token ring! We're doooooomed!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    23. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I hope he quit and did something useful.

      Based on my experience at working Fortune 500 companies, he probably got promoted to project manager and found the corporate credit card useful.

    24. Re:What are they gonna do? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. It's not IT's job to turn on your computer. The Fortune 500 companies I've worked for in the past have policies in place that prevent IT techs from running over to turn or reboot a user's workstation.

      It's the IT's job to do whatever the company requires. I've worked in design houses, where they literally expected IT to re-position the mouse/mousepad when they went too far.

      And have you worked at a "real" fortune 500? Everyone I've worked at (5000+ employees and computers at all) had a way for IT to reboot without "running over" so long as the base OS was reachable. So yeah, they'll have a policy about not running over to reboot, because if you are doing that, you are doing your job wrong. Why are you doing your job wrong?

      Or, as Robert Kiyosaki writes in "Rich Dad, Poor Dad," the more you specialize about something in college the less you know about everything else in real life.

      Writes -> Speculates. That someone wrote it in a book doesn't make it true. And the Renaissance man isn't dead yet. Instead, it's a complaint about people ignoring the basics. You can learn the basics to a level of competency and still specialize. Maybe not everyone, but enough that it's common.

      Although I've shocked a few doctors when I refused to transfer their iTunes library to a new workstation because having iTunes installed on their workstation was against hospital policies.

      They must have been shitty doctors. I've seen IT people fired for less. They are doctors, the rules don't apply. Though, I've never figured out, who's worse? Doctors or lawyers?

    25. Re:What are they gonna do? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Wire a house when it's a frame (and do so better than code, even if not strictly to code), yes.

      Re-wire a house, no. You have to cut open walls, pull wires, drill, and put it all back to where nobody knows you were there. "electrician" is more builder than wiring. The wiring is trivial. Getting it to look professional is harder.

    26. Re:What are they gonna do? by mikael · · Score: 1

      They would put the electric sockets at the most convenient locations - like electric sockets behind the sink or on the mid-level half way up the staircase. Maybe not to code, but the most logical and practical location for hoovering a staircase or using an electric drill or saw.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    27. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      It's the IT's job to do whatever the company requires.

      As an enterprise IT tech, I've never turned on a computer for a user. Not in person, not remotely.

      And have you worked at a "real" fortune 500?

      I've worked at eBay, Fujitsu, Google, Intuit, and Sony to name a few over 20+ years. Now that I work in government IT, I'm responsible for 80,000+ workstations.

      Everyone I've worked at (5000+ employees and computers at all) had a way for IT to reboot without "running over" so long as the base OS was reachable.

      That would be against the policies of the Fortune 500 companies I've worked for.

      That someone wrote it in a book doesn't make it true.

      Pull a college catalog. A bachelor degree is very general with half the required classes dedicated to liberal arts and the other half to a specific major. A master degree focuses on a very specific major in more detail. A PhD program focuses on the obscure details that few people will ever know about. See how education goes from everything to very little? Robert Kiyosaki's point is that too much education can prevent someone from being a successful business person because the education system focuses on getting the right answers versus taking risks. Someone with a PhD will take less risk than someone with a bachelor degree or no higher education at all. Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are two notable college dropouts who took great risk and changed the world.

      They must have been shitty doctors.

      Heart surgeons.

      I've seen IT people fired for less.

      I've seen IT people fired for not enforcing policy.

      They are doctors, the rules don't apply.

      You have obviously never worked in a hospital.

    28. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would have the time to prepone all the meetings, and do the upgradation.

    29. Re: What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you misunderstood? Seems reasonable on your first day that you don't just jump on a corporate computer network until you are told.

    30. Re:What are they gonna do? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Any good EE should be able to easily wire a house, even if they've never done such work. However, they might not do it to code unless you give them the actual code to read beforehand, or some condensed version of it.

      The code is, in general, a good idea to follow (though it probably doesn't get updated as fast as it should). It has evolved to prevent house fires and other problems. Just because a EE can figure out the basic theory behind house wiring pretty quickly given their educational background doesn't mean they'll figure out, on-the-fly, why certain practices are bad and can result in a fire later.

      But honestly, it's pretty easy these days just looking at the parts they sell at Home Depot.

    31. Re:What are they gonna do? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's the [sic] IT's job to do whatever the company requires.

      You appear to be confusing "what the company requires" with "what some shitcock from marketing wants".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re: What are they gonna do? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no shit; three fucking wires to tell apart...

    33. Re:What are they gonna do? by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      That would be against the policies of the Fortune 500 companies I've worked for.

      Why would they have policies against supporting users remotely? There are tools to reboot a PC remotely that would not allow the remote person to have any view of the work/files on the PC. Were you too stupid to know of those tools? Or too stupid to be able to sell the idea to the bosses? SMS/SCCM is used by "Fortune 500" companies, and allows remote rebooting of PCs. Why are are you not managing user PCs in an effective manner? The story seems absurd. That you are making up incompetence on your part to make an arguing point to make another slashdotter look stupid. You are only succeeding in making yourself look stupid.

    34. Re:What are they gonna do? by fisted · · Score: 1

      electric sockets behind the sink

      Amazing idea.

    35. Re:What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I thought he was pulling a joke, I would have reported him to security and have him escorted off the campus.

      Because it'd almost be as if you had a little power? Don't get too excited from behind your helpdesk.

    36. Re:What are they gonna do? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nope. I meant what I said. Some companies choose to hire only people who can work a computer, then expect IT to not reboot. Other companies knowingly hire people without the expectation they can use a computer, then hire others around them to hand-hold them in using them. Sometimes this is in assistants. I worked for one "tech company" that the CIO didn't have and had never used a computer. Every email he received was printed and delivered on his desk on paper. His email replies were dictated (then typed up and emailed). An office supply chain expected IT to sit with finance and help finance "program" Excel equations.

      This wasn't one idiot in marketing, but the expectation of the CEO/board of these companies, and was in written policies.

      That you've lead a sheltered life doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

    37. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Why would they have policies against supporting users remotely?

      If a user is working from home and can't access their workstation because its turned off, they should be calling their manager or driving into work to turn it on. They shouldn't be calling the help desk to avoid talking to their manager and/or driving into work.

      Were you too stupid to know of those tools?

      As a help desk tech, I don't think we had access to those tools.

      SMS/SCCM is used by "Fortune 500" companies, and allows remote rebooting of PCs. Why are are you not managing user PCs in an effective manner?

      Until I got into government IT, I wasn't aware of SCCM. Now that I'm responsible for 80,000+ workstations, I can reboot the entire network. One of the senior IT guys runs a script that automatically reboots 25% of the workstations each week.

      The story seems absurd. That you are making up incompetence on your part to make an arguing point to make another slashdotter look stupid. You are only succeeding in making yourself look stupid.

      The stupidity of your comment makes no sense whatsoever.

    38. Re:What are they gonna do? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Because it'd almost be as if you had a little power? Don't get too excited from behind your helpdesk.

      Power is replacing your computer with a box of crayons. I haven't done help desk for nearly a decade now.

    39. Re: What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. With hipaa fines potentially reaching $1.5 million, per incident, doctors can get shit on before they can do whatever they want.

    40. Re: What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And parenting. Don't forget parenting.

    41. Re:What are they gonna do? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I had a solid handle on _all_ the building trades before I started Engineering school.

      Professional electricians don't fix drywall, they will cut the walls open, but leave the fixup after to 'professional' painters.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    42. Re:What are they gonna do? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Where I am, the electricians do the clean-up. Almost always doing the drywall, and only not doing it when they are one contractor in a set of contractors (such as in a major re-model).

    43. Re: What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great minds think alike, fellow ACs, I too was going to say too I don't give a crap about India and do the needful thing of making fun of their weird English, but you beat me to it.

      On a more serious note though, this is the best thing that has happened to us in a long time. My prices will go up this year, hope you'll consider doing the needful too.

    44. Re: What are they gonna do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be the funniest comment I've ever read on Slashdot. Well done.

    45. Re:What are they gonna do? by mikael · · Score: 1

      You've never visited "There, I've fixed it?" :)

      http://failblog.cheezburger.co...

      The mystery Google car:
      https://i.chzbgr.com/full/4575...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    46. Re:What are they gonna do? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I was at the house of a college friend of mine. His mother said she was glad that he had laundry, because that's the only time she got to see him.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    47. Re:What are they gonna do? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In every educational environment I've been in, we've been expected to know a few practical things related to our studies. Graduating with a CS degree and no knowledge of how to trouble-shoot the hardware would be reasonable. Not being able to use a computer wouldn't be.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    48. Re: What are they gonna do? by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      I like Pakistani girls. They are cute, and their manners and cultural upbringing are excellent

    49. Re:What are they gonna do? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They come back after the inspection? Why wouldn't they hire painters? Lower hourly etc.

      I sometimes disparage painters...the proudest I've ever been as an amature 'medicine' cultivator was when a painter asked for something weaker than trainwreck, as he couldn't do his job on it. But the good painters can plaster flat as glass. Thousands of hours experience does make a difference.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  23. I call BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is simply another thinly veiled attempt to maintain an unfair, questionably legal, unethical and immoral position in the united states via H1B visas.

    I am fine with visas filling positions which cannot be filled with American workers but to "restructure" positions then force workers to hire their replacements which are not supposed to be replacements is completely wrong.

  24. HB-1 abuse by davidwr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm pro-open-borders (subject to individual background checks) but if you are going to have a system like HB-1 visas that are nominally only supposed to be used when a US citizen or permanent resident can't be found, you need to do it right.

    This means making it very difficult to "game" the system so that you can hire a foreigner for $60K to do a job that "looks like" a $60K job on paper but is really a $65K (or $165K) job with a low-ball salary designed to make American candidates look elsewhere.

    A partial fix is to do what Trump is suggesting: Have much-higher minimum salaries. If the minimum salary is $130K, you still may have "low ball" job offers of $130K for a job that is really a $200K position, but at least most mid-level and fresh-out-of-college techies won't have to compete with non-Americans for jobs in America.

    They will still have to compete with jobs that will go overseas (and SOME will if hiring foreigners gets harder), which is one reason I'm for open borders when it comes to employment.

    Personally, I would replace all work visas with a general work visa available to anyone who can pass a background check, but I would charge the employee a significant surtax on all income (probably 10% or so) with the funds directed to career-education and -retraining programs for American unemployed workers with any leftover money directed to K-12 and secondary education programs.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:HB-1 abuse by Goldsmith · · Score: 2

      Well, that's an interesting system you're suggesting. It's very similar to what we have now in science. Anyone who can pass a background check can be employed on a student visa (even if they're not a student) at a university. (For scale, universities in the US raise and spend slightly more money on research annually than the total annual funding for startup companies in the US.) So the research labor market is very much an open, worldwide competition, with a lot of people and a lot of opportunity. Allowing universities to do this also builds in the "train your replacement" approach, which is done enthusiastically in this context. This also means the average salaries are very low for positions that can be filled this way ( anything under a tenure track professor position). While I worked at a university, we had a number of homeless scientists working on campus (I was one for a few months). It was interesting and very bohemian, but not what I would call economically fair.

    2. Re:HB-1 abuse by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The problem is 60K may be low on the west coast for IT but H1Bs are also used to hire nurses and teachers in the midwest. 60K is pretty high over there. Hence the concept of prevailing wages. The H1Bs at our company are paid from 85-130K in the Bay Area. Not Google salaries but still more than the median salary of the Bay Area. With a 2 earner household even at the lower end 170K household income does allow you to buy a house and live the American dream. Yes Bachelors do share apartments. They do so to save up money for Downpayments but also to have some social safety net as they dont have family here- roommates become a pseudo family.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    3. Re:HB-1 abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pro-open-borders (subject to individual background checks)

      You mean legal immigration?

    4. Re:HB-1 abuse by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      They will still have to compete with jobs that will go overseas (and SOME will if hiring foreigners gets harder), which is one reason I'm for open borders when it comes to employment.

      You just made a very big jump from losing a few jobs overseas to completely open borders. First, many jobs cannot be outsourced like IT can. Open borders will force carpenters, farmers, cashiers, truckers and many other professions into competition with 3rd-world wages. This will affect tens of millions of jobs.

      Second, open borders with India and China will mean the US will become the most populous country in the world in a few short years. The homeless in the US live better than the average do in those countries. All of our social services like food stamps, unemployment benefits, medicare, schools, police and utilities will collapse under the weight of having to serve 5 times the number of people they were built to serve.

    5. Re:HB-1 abuse by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The problem is 60K may be low on the west coast for IT [...]

      Dell was paying $12.50 per hour plus mileage for techs to drive 500 miles around Silicon Valley. That's about $25K per year.

    6. Re:HB-1 abuse by ghoul · · Score: 1

      You are confusing techs who swap out machines with software developers. IT is a very broad field. And no H1B can be paid 25K. Prevailing wages in Santa Clara County are 70K minimum. Companies will not bother with an H1B for a 25K job as the H1 process itself costs 10K+

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    7. Re:HB-1 abuse by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You are confusing techs who swap out machines with software developers. IT is a very broad field.

      I don't have much experience in dealing with devops — except for cleaning up their messes.

  25. Long overdue by qQ7eBMsfM5gs · · Score: 1

    India's IT has been devaluing our skills and jobs for many years, it's about time somebody does something about it.

  26. There is no labor shortage in tech. by pecosdave · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a shortage of below minimum wage labor within our borders.

    Call centers tend to be run as sweat shops to squeeze as much tech work out of as minimally qualified people as possible for a little pay as they can offer to get them to show up to work. India was the solution to pay even less to get equally unqualified work.

    The problem with tech isn't the lack of people willing to work tech, there's thousands of reasonably good techs that are jobless in every major city. It's the way companies view tech. Bean counters see tech as a pure expense since I.T. rarely brings money into the company directly. The job of I.T. is to enable everyone else in the company to bring money in. Sadly I.T. is seen as the equivalent to cleaning staff or the electrician that had a job to do but never left by many organizations. This view of I.T. is part of why so many companies that shun tech are often caught without good backups and easily fall prey to ransomware. At least ransomware makers are profiting from the mindset.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  27. Lobbyists are the slime here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the details of the issue and look at it from a distance. Lobbyists for a sector say a legislative change pertaining to that sector is bad.

    For all issues the same thing happens. Whichever party proposed the legislation. But people don't seem to see that it's the lobbyists that are always the problem and their attention is easily diverted by an issue that probably doesn't even affect them.

    1. Re:Lobbyists are the slime here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we don't need lobbyists anymore with the cabinet filled with the CEOs that kept them on retainer.

    2. Re:Lobbyists are the slime here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, right...

      I don't live near a swamp to know how it's managed; but is flooding it as good a method of reclamation as draining it?

  28. No labor shortage, it's a cost shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apologies for the anonymous, but I'd rather not be identified. I've worked for multiple fortune 500 companies and it's a cost decision. IT has always been viewed as overhead and a necessary cost of doing business. Moving the majority of support to India literally cuts costs by 60-70%. It doesn't seem that way at first because often similar benefits are required (US LAW)... but the benefits aren't used by the indian counterparts.

    This isn't an issue of quality of employees... it's about providing a service that's "good enough" to get by with. US Employees aren't competitive salary wise with how US LAW currently allows us to exploit (yes I said exploit) H1B Visa for projects that require on site staff (not located in india).

    I don't facilitate this kind of thing, and highly recommend against it. Most often I suggest that 1 US employee is equal to 2-5 indian counterparts and that the issues that arise with foreign replacements (language, cultural etc) often outweigh the cost difference in Tier 3+ or critical positions. Tier 1 and 2 is different matter. Generally there's no difference in education and quality of individuals between US and India. In fact, India seems to be the obvious choice when you compare sick time used, benefits used, and cost per employee.

    I'm not saying this is right. I'm just saying that's how the playing field is right now. So again, there is not a labor shortage, it's a labor shortage at competitive salary requirements.

  29. What about Non-H1-B Salaries by Dust038 · · Score: 1

    I would love a default doubling to our salaries (Though an important note is that is would not be close to 130,000). I might be bias that I am in Illinois, but you all probably know our situation right now. How are employer's saving money with this? or even before this? I don't have too much knowledge on what else that 130,000 or H1-B in general entails so if someone could fill me in on that, that'd be awesome.

    1. Re:What about Non-H1-B Salaries by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Right now your salary is low because you are competing for jobs with people in India due (in part) to the H1-B visa scheme. Your employer can hire an Indian for $60k; you end up earning $60k because otherwise you don't get the job, the Indian does.

      If the cost of employing someone from India (or indeed, anywhere else) was $130k then you could demand $80k, or indeed anything up to $130k (subject to skills availability in your area) and still be a better choice for your employer than the person on a H1-B visa.

      The employer is going to spend more money on staff either way, they're going have a resultant impact on their cost base and their profitability, but the average salary for your skillset will rise and you will earn more.

      The downside is that if your salary rises too high, you start competing again with Indians but this time not through the H1-B visa scheme. Your employer just offshores (or outsources) your job and someone working in India does it.

      Luckily outsourcing software development has been demonstrated to be extremely flawed and problematic, but offshoring is very viable and likely to become more popular with US companies.

  30. Re:OMG by johanw · · Score: 2

    Is that why there are so many Americans working 3 burger flipping jobs just to keep alive and pay the rent?

  31. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does an entity lobbying for foreign companies say something will 'nullify the objective of saving American jobs' with supposedly a straight face...these guys are comedians at night right...just to make ends meet.

  32. What kind of a labor shortage we are talking about by nomad63 · · Score: 0

    I mean, since when cutting and pasting code from a code base and creating a sub-par application is called skilled labor ? Has anyone ever worked with so called wonderful java code that one of these H1B abusing Indian companies' employees produced ? I personally did. One of my old employers had a team of Indian "Java programmers" As a sysadmin, I had to talk to them daily to inform them about problems we were encountering daily. And the solution was to copy another piece of code from a screen and paste it into their source code and compile it and hand it out to me to test again. No optimization , no garbage collection or nothing like that. I know a few people who barely graduated high school and can do a job like that. You don't need no stinkin' (and I mean it figuratively and literally together if you can catch my drift) H1B abusing Indians to do that ? When someone has the title of "Programmer" I expect them to know how to actually write efficient code, not copy someone else's work and hope for the best. Not the way it should be, but according to these H1B abuser outfits, US needs this kind of workers from India. Pfffft... I don't think so. They can now go home, roll up the java code they wrote printed on rough paper and shove it up where sun never shines.

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
  33. Both sides of the coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before I delve into the issue,
    About: I do have Master's degree from an U.S. institution with 7 years of relevant experience. I am on H-1B, and my previous job was replaced by 2 outsourcing firms. I have resided here for 10 years. I have directly worked for American companies (not outsourcing or IT work). In my current company 99% are all Americans and I did not steal or replace anyone's job.

    The Limitation: H-1B is firstly capped by 85,000 visas every year out of which only 20,000 visas are given to people with a Master's degree. If the number of applicants is greater than 85,000, then a lottery takes place. For example, last year there were 240,000 applicants, which means only 1 in every 3 applications is approved. Imagine your fate being decided by a lottery.

    The Abuse: The thing that sucks is that Outsourcing/IT companies abuse the system. There are atleast 10k to 20k applicants from these "outsourcing" companies each year. Whomever wins the lottery gets to work on-site, in USA. The outsourcing firm usually charges it's American client of say $100k+, out of which 60% goes to the employee and 40% goes to the outsourcing company. That's how they make revenue. The big prize for American companies is that along with the on-site techies, you get a dozen offshore support. So from an American company perspective, imagine getting 13 employees for $200k.

    Green Card can be applied in EB-1, EB-2, EB-3 categories. EB-1 is the fastest which takes 6 months and reserved for exceptional candidates (like PhDs + cited publications etc.) or managers with lots of experience. EB-2 is for people like me, with a Master's degree, and takes 6 years (if you are an Indian citizen). EB-3 is for people who only have a bachelor's degree.

    Workers from outsourcing company who come on-site, portray themselves as "Managers" and apply in the EB-1 category. They get the green card in 6 months. A person like me who has gone through the U.S. system of education and experience are made to wait longest. I have seen this abuse first-hand.

    Limitation while on visa: H-1B is strictly controlled. It has to be renewed every 3 years. If you change your title, job duties, company, you will need to apply for a new visa. If you are laid-off, the you go on an illegal status immediately. The advantage outsourced worker, you ask? They work for the same parent outsourcing company. In other words, if their contract ends, they can find a new American client.

    For renewing after 6 years of H-1B, you need to have your green card petition filed by your employer. I will no go into the details, but the process much worser than H-1B.

    Qualifications: Outsourcing companies blatantly lie on their resume. I have seen and worked with people, where they say they have experience in engineering while all they know is IT.

    Pay: $130k+ is absurd. While it maybe feasible in California or other big cities, I don't see payscale rise for people working in smaller cities. Infact it will affect brightest talent since Outsourced workers are already paid $130k+.

    I have been on both sides of the sword. I can empathize what Americans are going through and also as a legal immigrant, how my hands are tied. After jumping through so many loops, I am still on the queue for a green card. As a legal immigrant, bright talent, gone through the US system of education, contributing to the economy and my society, I am made to wait the longest, with so many possibilities of losing your spot along the way.

    I agree with Trump that the system has been abused. I also agree on having a curfew for people abusing the system. I just hope he retains the brightest talent.

    1. Re:Both sides of the coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope he retains the brightest talent.

      Sorry, no. It's whitest talent.

    2. Re:Both sides of the coin by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Just for ref (and to piss you off). My dad came to the USA in 1963 on contract to do research work on the Apollo heat shield. He got a green card in 30 days.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  34. Boo Hoo by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    *word's smallest violin*

    H1B Visas are meant to supplement not replace U.S. workers and yet it's the outsourcing firms that get the largest number of Visas.

    Build up your own fucking economy ass-hole.

    1. Re:Boo Hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      word's smallest violin

      Actually that's two words ;)

      CAPTCHA: verified, so you know it's true

  35. India has everything to lose by zifn4b · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can make claims about freedom of religion and all this other nonsense but this issue is about economics, pure and simple. What's being proposed is that incentives to hire people outside of the United States who have no interest in the success of the United States to do the same job for half the wages be greatly lessened. Also, I can tell you from direct experience in the software industry, Indian contractors produce lower quality code, break more builds, have poor communication and many other things that lead to worse quality software. I can't tell you how many times I traced build breaks back to Indian contractors. The only benefit to hiring them is that they cost less.

    Before you call me a racist, I have high respect for other cultures and enjoy their cuisine a lot. I love Indian food and I think Indian people in general are pretty cool. What I don't like is when the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is throwing all the American citizens under a bus by hiring less skilled workers for a much cheaper price at the expense of American citizens so they can turn even bigger profits when the corporations the Chamber is comprised of are already sitting on vast piles of wealth. It's really a slap in the face. They've taken advantage of the Land of Opportunity so much that it is no longer the Land of Opportunity.

    The U.S. Chamber brought this on themselves. They gamed the system too hard and caused a lot of hardship to good, hard-working Americans and that's why this backlash has occurred.

    --
    We'll make great pets
    1. Re:India has everything to lose by houghi · · Score: 1

      people outside of the United States who have no interest in the success of the United States

      The interest of thos inside will most likely be with themselves and not so much with the USofA. Otherwise they would not hire people from outside the US.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:India has everything to lose by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      Before you call me a racist, I have high respect for other cultures and enjoy their cuisine a lot. I love Indian food and I think Indian people in general are pretty cool. What I don't like is when the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is throwing all the American citizens under a bus by hiring less skilled workers for a much cheaper price at the expense of American citizens so they can turn even bigger profits when the corporations the Chamber is comprised of are already sitting on vast piles of wealth. It's really a slap in the face. They've taken advantage of the Land of Opportunity so much that it is no longer the Land of Opportunity.

      I hear you. One of my former colleagues was an Indian and he was a very skilled Java developer, and believe me I have high respect for anyone that can manage to work with Java skillfully and yet remain sane. He was pretty cool too but I guess he was skilled enough that he found better opportunities, so it's not that Indians are inherently bad as may be implied but rather its just poor training and low standards that hold back their potential as individuals.

    3. Re:India has everything to lose by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      I hear you. One of my former colleagues was an Indian and he was a very skilled Java developer, and believe me I have high respect for anyone that can manage to work with Java skillfully and yet remain sane. He was pretty cool too but I guess he was skilled enough that he found better opportunities, so it's not that Indians are inherently bad as may be implied but rather its just poor training and low standards that hold back their potential as individuals.

      That may be so but it's not the United States' responsibility to educate the entire planet. It's the responsibility of the individual to be motivated to get their own education to raise their own standard of living. If suitable education does not exist in India, create it. The United States started out at rock bottom and got somewhere in 250 years-ish. The United States population is 318.9 million. India's population is 1.252 billion. India outnumbers us 4-to-1. You mean to tell me that I need to elevate India's standard of living when they are perfectly capable of buying books on Amazon and Alibaba and educating themselves and then spreading said education to their population? That's nonsense.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    4. Re:India has everything to lose by m00sh · · Score: 1

      You can make claims about freedom of religion and all this other nonsense but this issue is about economics, pure and simple. What's being proposed is that incentives to hire people outside of the United States who have no interest in the success of the United States to do the same job for half the wages be greatly lessened. Also, I can tell you from direct experience in the software industry, Indian contractors produce lower quality code, break more builds, have poor communication and many other things that lead to worse quality software. I can't tell you how many times I traced build breaks back to Indian contractors. The only benefit to hiring them is that they cost less.

      Before you call me a racist, I have high respect for other cultures and enjoy their cuisine a lot. I love Indian food and I think Indian people in general are pretty cool. What I don't like is when the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is throwing all the American citizens under a bus by hiring less skilled workers for a much cheaper price at the expense of American citizens so they can turn even bigger profits when the corporations the Chamber is comprised of are already sitting on vast piles of wealth. It's really a slap in the face. They've taken advantage of the Land of Opportunity so much that it is no longer the Land of Opportunity.

      The U.S. Chamber brought this on themselves. They gamed the system too hard and caused a lot of hardship to good, hard-working Americans and that's why this backlash has occurred.

      No, H1B reform doesn't solve the problem of hiring people outside the US for cheaper than US employees. It just makes it that they cannot be here in the US. They can still work in Bangalore.

      Cheap labor is not going anywhere. The millions of Indian engineers are not going to become farmers next. Restricting H1B just makes room for outsourcing directly to India. It gives firms in the US that can manage labor force in India from the US a huge business opportunity.

      You'll still have outsourcing, just a different flavor of it. You won't see Indians in the hallway but they will still writing code for cheap.

    5. Re:India has everything to lose by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      You mean to tell me that I need to elevate India's standard of living when they are perfectly capable of buying books on Amazon and Alibaba and educating themselves and then spreading said education to their population? That's nonsense.

      No, I never once said that nor do I believe that we need, or should, do anything about it. We got our own problems here to deal with enough as it is without importing other nation's problems.

  36. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you are hiring someone in the US for $3 an hour you are a monster. I hope you are exaggerating, otherwise please take a second to think of how you are devaluing human life and decency.

    It isn't that American's "don't want to do the job" it's that they "don't want to the job for a non-living wage".

    12 hours a day for $3 an hour isn't going to pay for any type of decent living condition in America. Acting like a feudal lord and being oh-so-beneficent as to allow the peasants to work for peanuts isn't something we should aspire to. The idea of a job-creator class is a joke. People should be ashamed for treating other humans like this.

    We can, and should, do better.

  37. The US Model is backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to fix the employment problem, you remove national restrictions on workers and place them on capital.

    want to start a subcontractor to american companies with employees in the US you have to form a company there, hire employees there(even if you want to import them from india) comply with all labour laws and you must pay for their expenses do it both ways no restrictions on work immigration(ie you get a job in the US you get a work visa, same the other way for india, or gemany or wherever) but companies must be incorporated in THAT country pay taxes in THAT country and bare the cost of importing labour to THAT country, none of this set up a dummy corp bring people in under special permissions, if the imported workers want to leave(the contractor company) they can get another job in the US(or wherever) and they automatically get a work via no holding people hostage no wage terrorism

  38. They should stay and improve their own countries by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    "It takes a lot of determination to rise up against societal norms, get an education and leave their home country."

    It sure does.

    It takes far more determination to fix the societal problems instead of fleeing them. It is not our responsibility to provide a path to middle class for the entire world. Nations must forge that path for their own people.

  39. Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God bless Donald J Trump and the United States of America!

  40. What a load of garbage by Bearhouse · · Score: 2

    There's this : "imposing tougher visa rules unfairly targets some of its members and will not solve a U.S. labor shortage in technology and engineering"
    Then this : "contains provisions that may prove challenging for the Indian IT sector...nullify the objective of saving American jobs"

    So in other words, "this looks uncomfortably like it might work, so we're going to come up with a load of bullshit while we figure out a way of getting round it".

    If there is a labor shortage, surely American jobs don't need saving? Anyway, as many people here have pointed out in the past, this has nothing to do with closet racism, denying smart people with the vital skills we need the right to come and work in the US or protectionism.

    It's about unscrupulous people breaking the rules and exploiting their fellow countrymen while careless (in both senses of the word) suits look the other way.
     

  41. Let Them Cry by DaMattster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am not a Trump supporter but I am definitely anti H1-B visa and offshoring. The Indian firms are wrong as there is plenty of talent in America capable of writing excellent software. Conversely, I have seen very poor software come out of India that was not only unstable but replete with spelling and grammar errors on the user interface. Some stuff was so pooly written, that friends of mine have told me that they ended up re-writing large portions thereby negating any savings. The only reason the Indian IT firms are calling foul is because they're going to lose money and it isn't foul because the Indians engage in protectionism for their economy. They have very high import taxes .... sky high to as much as 25%. So the Indians get no sympathy from me whatsoever.

    1. Re:Let Them Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indian companies not only discriminate against US citizens but also to non-indians. If you're not indian, just try to get an H1B. Because there's an infinite supply of indians sucking up all the H1Bs, nobody else gets a chance to come to the US. Fuck that.

    2. Re:Let Them Cry by djbckr · · Score: 2

      I am not a Trump supporter...

      Neither am I, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. There are a few things he's done right, but by-and-large his presidency is a dumpster fire right now.

    3. Re:Let Them Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Everything he has done so far has been done by other western governments and democractic leaders over the last decade. It seems the "tolerant" left are spreading the flames of hate because their side didn't win and for no other reason.

    4. Re:Let Them Cry by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      He seems to be achieving everything that he ran on. You have to separate the "noise" from the "actions" with this guy.

    5. Re:Let Them Cry by m00sh · · Score: 1

      I am not a Trump supporter but I am definitely anti H1-B visa and offshoring. The Indian firms are wrong as there is plenty of talent in America capable of writing excellent software. Conversely, I have seen very poor software come out of India that was not only unstable but replete with spelling and grammar errors on the user interface. Some stuff was so poorly written, that friends of mine have told me that they ended up re-writing large portions thereby negating any savings. The only reason the Indian IT firms are calling foul is because they're going to lose money and it isn't foul because the Indians engage in protectionism for their economy. They have very high import taxes .... sky high to as much as 25%. So the Indians get no sympathy from me whatsoever.

      It is just going to be shake-up.

      On the one hand, you have cheap Indian IT labor. They are not going anywhere.

      On the other hand, you have people looking for cheap labor to build products and write software.

      You can build enormous walls between them but they'll find a way around it. The current baddie is the H1B because that was the ladder to scale the wall. You take that away, there will be another visa to abuse, another loophole to exploit.

      This is capitalism. It flows around artificial restrictions in the market. The buyers and sellers will find a way.

      There is terrible code written all over the place, not just by Indians. They have their own type of bad code they write whereas we write our own type of bad code. Good code is not just written right away, it is bad code refined over time, refactored and tested over time.

    6. Re:Let Them Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. Vote Democratic next time so they can restore H1-B visa legislation to its initial state. Hey! You are progressive, right? When you can't find work, you can eat pride.

    7. Re:Let Them Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TPP, anti-lobbying bill, H1b restriction, and soon-to-be senator term limits.

      I don't think you've ever seen an actual dumpster fire in your life, I'd say you're probably from a big city, upper-middle class, and liberal.

  42. "Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by Tokolosh · · Score: 0

    Despised Races

    Of all stupid ill-feelings, the sentiment of my fellow Caucasians towards our companions in the Chinese car was the most stupid and the worst. They seemed never to have looked at them, listened to them, or thought of them, but hated them A PRIORI. The Mongols were their enemies in that cruel and treacherous battle-field of money. They could work better and cheaper in half a hundred industries, and hence there was no calumny too idle for the Caucasians to repeat, and even to believe. They declared them hideous vermin, and affected a kind of choking in the throat when they beheld them. Now, as a matter of fact, the young Chinese man is so like a large class of European women, that on raising my head and suddenly catching sight of one at a considerable distance, I have for an instant been deceived by the resemblance. I do not say it is the most attractive class of our women, but for all that many a man's wife is less pleasantly favoured. Again, my emigrants declared that the Chinese were dirty. I cannot say they were clean, for that was impossible upon the journey; but in their efforts after cleanliness they put the rest of us to shame. We all pigged and stewed in one infamy, wet our hands and faces for half a minute daily on the platform, and were unashamed. But the Chinese never lost an opportunity, and you would see them washing their feet - an act not dreamed of among ourselves - and going as far as decency permitted to wash their whole bodies. I may remark by the way that the dirtier people are in their persons the more delicate is their sense of modesty. A clean man strips in a crowded boathouse; but he who is unwashed slinks in and out of bed without uncovering an inch of skin. Lastly, these very foul and malodorous Caucasians entertained the surprising illusion that it was the Chinese waggon, and that alone, which stank. I have said already that it was the exceptions and notably the freshest of the three.

    These judgments are typical of the feeling in all Western America. The Chinese are considered stupid, because they are imperfectly acquainted with English. They are held to be base, because their dexterity and frugality enable them to underbid the lazy, luxurious Caucasian. They are said to be thieves; I am sure they have no monopoly of that. They are called cruel; the Anglo-Saxon and the cheerful Irishman may each reflect before he bears the accusation. I am told, again, that they are of the race of river pirates, and belong to the most despised and dangerous class in the Celestial Empire. But if this be so, what remarkable pirates have we here! and what must be the virtues, the industry, the education, and the intelligence of their superiors at home!

    Awhile ago it was the Irish, now it is the Chinese that must go. Such is the cry. It seems, after all, that no country is bound to submit to immigration any more than to invasion; each is war to the knife, and resistance to either but legitimate defence. Yet we may regret the free tradition of the republic, which loved to depict herself with open arms, welcoming all unfortunates. And certainly, as a man who believes that he loves freedom, I may be excused some bitterness when I find her sacred name misused in the contention. It was but the other day that I heard a vulgar fellow in the Sand-lot, the popular tribune of San Francisco, roaring for arms and butchery. "At the call of Abraham Lincoln," said the orator, "ye rose in the name of freedom to set free the negroes; can ye not rise and liberate yourselves from a few dirty Mongolians?"

    For my own part, I could not look but with wonder and respect on the Chinese. Their forefathers watched the stars before mine had begun to keep pigs. Gun-powder and printing, which the other day we imitated, and a school of manners which we never had the delicacy so much as to desire to imitate, were theirs in a long-past antiquity. They walk the earth with us, but it seems they must be of different clay. They hear the clock strike the same hour, yet surely of a different epoch. They travel by

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Nice copy pasta. Too bad it does not apply.

      The problem they're facing is not racism. Nobody's calling Indians dirty or stupid. But we do need to limit immigration in some way, so why not let in the best and brightest? Those kinds of Indians will have no trouble getting an H1-B in the new system because they can command $200k salaries. It's the barely competent ones earning $40k that will be hurt. But you know what? That's fine. The US does not owe them a job or any social services.

      And in case you're wondering why we need to limit immigration: India has been a democracy for a long time now, but their people are still very poor. In a democracy, the only thing that decides how well the country is run is the people, directly or indirectly. If you move all 1.1 billion Indians to the US, you won't be giving them US living standards, you'll be turning the US into India, and giving everyone Indian living standards.

    2. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      Quote: "The US does not owe them a job or any social services."

      This is the fundamental problem. I agree with you. However, it seems that the US government has gotten into the jobs and social services business. If the government stopped handing out freebies like candy, we would not have this problem, and there would be no need for Trump's wall.

      Of course, not supplying social services would probably cause a huge outcry amongst entitled Americans like yourself.

      As for jobs, they do not "belong" to America, but to whichever private individual or company is doing the hiring, they are not owed to anyone at all. So the employer can hire whomever they damn well please. And if the employee cannot come to the job, then the job (and the taxes) will move to the employee. It is an iron law - you can complain all you want.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    3. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      If the government stopped handing out freebies like candy, we would not have this problem, and there would be no need for Trump's wall.

      Of course, not supplying social services would probably cause a huge outcry amongst entitled Americans like yourself.

      You are just too funny. Do you have any idea just how socialist Indians are? Hint: they have always been friends with the USSR, better than even the Chinese.

    4. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      I know very well. But you generalize. There are Indians who are self-reliant, free-market supporters, who chafe under the socialist consensus. They are the ones who want to escape to an America that is better, not asking for handouts, and willing to pay their taxes due.

      But America wants to shut the door on them, tragically citing the same reasons which they deplore elsewhere.

      I apologize for mixing up two separate, but related, issues. The first is the Indians, which I have discussed above. The second is the Mexicans and other Latin Americans. The latter are perceived to be mooching off the American taxpayer (they are not, but if they are, why does the taxpayer permit it?) Both are "stealing" jobs, just in different industries and different levels of society.

      If you are born and raised American, with all the benefits and advantages that entails (freedom, education, security of life and property, natural resources, environmental quality) and you cannot compete with a third-world jumped-up peasant, you should be ashamed of yourself.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    5. Re:"Across The Plains", RL Stevenson, 1879 by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      America wants to shut the door on them, tragically citing the same reasons which they deplore elsewhere.

      Some people do. Most the comments on this site suggests making reforms to prevent IT sweatshops from popping up. Very few are saying we should stop immigration completely.

      If you are born and raised American, with all the benefits and advantages that entails (freedom, education, security of life and property, natural resources, environmental quality) and you cannot compete with a third-world jumped-up peasant, you should be ashamed of yourself.

      I'm not, because I'm a first generation immigrant. The H1-B process is utterly disgusting. It both dehumanizes people like myself and disenfranchises American workers. It's only purpose as it exists today is to pad the coffers of rich business men. I don't speak out against it because I'm scared to compete with immigrants --- I already did and I'll happily do it again. I speak out because it's a shitty system that should be fixed.

  43. Let them eat cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's about time the american worker get's a reach-around.

  44. I think there's plenty of domestic talent by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    I have very little problem with the original intention of the H-1B program -- giving companies a safety valve to import a small number of workers who actually possess skills that can't be found domestically. I work for a multinational and we use internal transfers a lot for that purpose...and most of the people they bring in are actually the kind of people that the program originally targeted.

    What I don't like is the abuse. Any time a company's IT costs get too high for the MBA's liking, they can turn to any number of "IT services" providers. These companies will always come in cheaper than FTEs, both from a cost and an accounting perspective. Since the company has to make money, they'll offshore most of the work and bring in a few H-1B's to displace all the FTEs over time. In places that do this, I have yet to see evidence that any of these H-1B replacements are exceptional in any way. Often, they're just swapping out a DBA or sysadmin who's been working for 20 years with a DBA who will work much cheaper regardless of quality. What bothers me more is that the company can just pull a "Pontias Pilate" and wash their hands of their entire IT department. This is what happened with the bigger swap-outs that have made the press like Disney and others. All they have to do is point to the fact that their IT is now in control of one of the body shops and they had nothing to do with replacing domestic workers.

    I have absolutely no doubt that (a) there is plenty of domestic talent, and (b) if you don't set an expiration date on people's careers, even more people will study CS and engineering. I say the program should be kept to some degree, but the obvious avenues for abuse should be shut down. My suggestions would be to crack down on the fake labor certification processes, and raise the minimum H-1B wage to a certain percentage over the average prevailing wage for the area they're going to work in. If people see that the program is fair, and don't feel like it's a serious threat for their future earnings and career, then everything will work out for employers over time. The workforce will be happier, and there won't be as much of a language/timezone barrier.

    I don't know -- maybe I've been lucky and have worked with very talented domestic people. But I don't believe companies who say they can't hire people domestically -- they just don't want to pay for it.

  45. India's IT industry is worried? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Good.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  46. Let's just have a shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A shortage will increase wages which has needed to happen for nearly 30 years. Bring on the shortage.

    1. Re:Let's just have a shortage by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      To increase wages, you need to...

      ... ... ... there's actually no way to do this.

      An increase in cash wages decreases the number of jobs by concentrating the same money into fewer hands. You can issue more money, increasing wages by raising product prices (if all wages go up by 10%, then all prices must go up by 10% to generate the revenue to pay the salaries); that does nothing.

      Money is just a proxy for labor. The question is really how much time you work to buy a product. If you make $20/hr and a product costs $30, you buy it with 1.5 hours of labor. If your salary goes up to $40/hr and the product now costs $60, wages haven't increased: you still work 1.5 hours to buy that product.

      Trade finds advantages (wage or technical) to reduce the price of a product, thus allowing people to buy more of that product with the same labor-hours. That makes the population of the importing country wealthier; it also increases the amount of domestic shipping and retailing, while decreasing jobs related to whatever's now being imported. The labor force rapidly adjusts to re-settle unemployment to a stable point (4.5%-5.5% in the United States).

      Technical progress is the long-term solution. This reduces labor investment. Say you and 10 people work for $20/hr and produce 20 of a given product--that product costs $20 per unit. Now we invent a new method of making it such that you and 10 people produce 40 of that product per hour. It's now a $10 product. Instead of prices falling, money is issued (mainly via debt) faster than population growth to create inflation: you now work for $50/hr, and the product costs $25.

      You might notice that the 250% increase in wages is unavoidable here if the inflation rate is 25% and the labor requirements are 50%. It's also notable that you might not have 10 workers making 40 of that product; it might be 5 making 20, and the other 5 workers... well, half your hour's wage is unspent now, so you can buy something else, and someone has to make, ship, and retail that. The jobs fill back in.

      Here's the thing: the minimum wage workers are pegged to a published minimum. If we bump them by inflation, they go from $10/hr to $12.50/hr, while you go from $20/hr to $50/hr. If we raise them by the amount of actual buying power increase the middle-class workers enjoy, then the $10/hr minimum-wage must go to $25/hr. Because you're still trading labor hours in the end, only a set amount of money can be earned in a given time, and thus a set amount can be spent, and thus a set number of jobs can exist; if wages are higher for a subset (e.g. minimum wage), then fewer jobs exist. You've got to decide the trade-off between quality of life of the poor and forcing more people into unemployment while the labor market adjusts to reduce the number of job-seekers (and eventual population) when you make the new policy.

      An economy isn't an ideal system surrounded by an infinite supply of consumers with an infinite supply of money.

    2. Re: Let's just have a shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only slashdot where you can be so smart and so stupid at the same time. The world is not an exercise in university economics. H1bs repress American wage in a certain sector. That hurts that sector. End of story.

  47. Re:OMG by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Umm, have you *seen* the code from such locales?

    Sure, you will have rockstars there as well (I know quite a few living in Pune - they're trying to move here), but for every rockstar, you have something like 10,000 total incompetents whose code will require a massive overhaul just to get built without fatal errors.

    Usually ends up costing more than its worth once you add it all up.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  48. Current reqs are ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have nothing against people moving to the US to actually make a living, projecting a family, etc. Giving to the country and becoming a part of the US. But the perspective or having the current $60k req invites to do something completely different. 60k for a bay area job? what a joke!!! I had for neighbors four adult men sleeping on mattresses on the floor. Of course as soon as they got their stuff done they disappeared, probably to home again. The saved every penny. How are you supposed to compete with that? Also sleeping on the floor? What have they given to the country? To me H1B and L1 can continue, but requisites must be higher.

    1. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      60k for a bay area job? what a joke!!!

      I make $50K+ per year and live in a studio apartment by myself in Silicon Valley. If you live a modest lifestyle, you can do well here. But if you want to pursue the American Dream of having it all (i.e., big house, big cars, big wife and big kids), you need to earn big bucks for that.

      Also sleeping on the floor?

      Some people are willing to sacrifice to achieve their goals. I've known engineers who slept on floors to save up for a down payment on a $1M+ house in Silicon Valley.

    2. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " If you live a modest lifestyle, you can do well here. But if you want to pursue the American Dream of having it all (i.e., big house, big cars, big wife and big kids), you need to earn big bucks for that."

      More likely you've been fired too often and no one wants to work with you.

    3. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      More likely you've been fired too often and no one wants to work with you.

      The only time I ever got fired was when I was working in construction with my father and I got into a fist fight with the boss's grandson when he threatened me with a piece of rebar. That was 25 years ago. Today I'm a successful IT support contractor. Boss's grandson is a drug addict and his father closed the 60-year-old family construction business when he retired.

    4. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by Kjella · · Score: 1

      But if you want to pursue the American Dream of having it all ([snip] big wife and big kids), you need to earn big bucks for that.

      You have it wrong, you need to earn big macs. Plenty big macs.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You have it wrong, you need to earn big macs. Plenty big macs.

      According to Apple, the biggest big Mac you can get has 16GB RAM. ;)

    6. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also sleeping on the floor?

      Some people are willing to sacrifice to achieve their goals. I've known engineers who slept on floors to save up for a down payment on a $1M+ house in Silicon Valley.

      I'm sure that the few hundred dollars not spent on a good mattress sure got them there faster.

    7. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60k for a bay area job? what a joke!!!

      I make $50K+ per year and live in a studio apartment by myself in Silicon Valley. If you live a modest lifestyle, you can do well here. But if you want to pursue the American Dream of having it all (i.e., big house, big cars, big wife and big kids), you need to earn big bucks for that.

      Also sleeping on the floor?

      Some people are willing to sacrifice to achieve their goals. I've known engineers who slept on floors to save up for a down payment on a $1M+ house in Silicon Valley.

      Some people work to have a regular (not pop star) life. If you want to bust your ass off to live bad. You can surely ask for a pay reduction. I think AC was clear on people who gives nothing, take a job and leave.

    8. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Some people work to have a regular (not pop star) life.

      As an IT support contractor, I haven't worked overtime in over ten years. My employment contracts prohibits me from working more than 40 hours a week. Fortune 500 companies and even the government are unwilling to pay overtime.

      If you want to bust your ass off to live bad. You can surely ask for a pay reduction.

      Or become a software developer.

    9. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that the few hundred dollars not spent on a good mattress sure got them there faster.

      A mattress takes up space. A sleeping bag can be tossed into the closet.

    10. Re:Current reqs are ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. Sleeping on the floor is dumb. Cots are cheap.

  49. brain gap by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    96% of adult Hindus in the US have college degrees.

    36% of adult Christians in the US have college degrees.

    http://www.pewforum.org/2016/1...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:brain gap by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Most Americans are stupid and most American Christians aren't Christians according to the Bible. Otherwise, Trump wouldn't be POTUS.

    2. Re:brain gap by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      That's not taking into account that many people can come in as a foreign student and get a college degree for free or severely reduced cost, meanwhile the skyrocketing costs of college for even in-state tuition is going further and further out of reach of many americans. If the US shored up all the foreign aid dispersal until after higher education dispersal to all that wish to have it, each year, thereby paying in foreign at only what was remaining, we would not have that gap. Before you take that first sentence and decide it is somehow selfish or nationalistic, consider this is the same forumla france employs and they give college to just about all their citizens that can pass an entry exam.

    3. Re:brain gap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardly a surprise.

      The overwhelming majority of Hindus in the USA came to the USA from other countries. Largely India, with a spattering from maybe a dozen other places. Out of India's ~900 million Hindus, only the most talented and most well educated will be accepted to a university and/or find permanent employment in the USA.

      Comparing the full population of Christians to a specially selected group of Hindus isn't that meaningful.

    4. Re:brain gap by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      [...] come in as a foreign student and get a college degree for free or severely reduced cost [...]

      You appear to be misinformed. International students typically pay three times more than a typical American student. They're actually subsidizing public colleges at $9B per year.

      http://www.businessinsider.com/foreign-students-pay-up-to-three-times-as-much-for-tuition-at-us-public-colleges-2016-9

    5. Re:brain gap by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      96% of adult Hindus in the US have college degrees.

      36% of adult Christians in the US have college degrees.

      Because the US only lets in the smart ones. In India, only 8% have college degrees. 36% are illiterate. Should we let them in too?

    6. Re:brain gap by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Comparing the full population of Christians to a specially selected group of Hindus isn't that meaningful.

      Both groups are "selected" - adults who live in the United States.

      That doesn't answer the question: Why are American Christians so poorly educated?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:brain gap by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      Because the US only lets in the smart ones. In India, only 8% have college degrees. 36% are illiterate. Should we let them in too?

      If we can elect an illiterate president, I don't see why not.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  50. Ryan knows wtf he's doing by raymorris · · Score: 2

    I'd damn sure rather have Paul Ryan as President. Ryan really knows what he's doing. Trump, Pence, and Clinton have never *read* the federal budget, Paul Ryan has *written* the federal budget, more than once.

    There's a reason there was no "campaigning" for Speaker of the House this time around, why Paul Ryan was the consensus pick, even though he refused to follow tradition and do campaign appearances for the reps who voted for him. His peers wanted Ryan, without a campaign, because they know Ryan is the smartest of all of them.

    1. Re: Ryan knows wtf he's doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He hasn't written a budget. Just a proposal that was full of magic asterisks in place of revenue. But guess this counts as expertise in the current Republican Party.

    2. Re:Ryan knows wtf he's doing by lgw · · Score: 1

      We haven't had a federal budget in forever. Just continuing resolutions. Ryan is part of the problem.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  51. Have you met any board members of large companies? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    That is no team he's assembling, it is just some guys and gals he likes

    Have you met any people that sit on the boards of large companies? I have - and I can tell you that most of these boards are made up of people that the CEO/President likes.

    Corporate governance is hardly independent in this country.

  52. THEY TOOK OUR JERBS! by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    Obligatory South Park: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Except this time it's the Indians complaining that Americans are taking their jobs. Still hilarious.

  53. Re:They should stay and improve their own countrie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not our responsibility to provide a path to middle class for the entire world.

    The three fundamental truths of human existence: there is no God, life has no purpose, and free will is an illusion.

    At the most fundamental level "responsibility" is an artificial social construct relating to the kind of world people want to live in.

    Some people think the purpose of life is to compete to do as much as you can for yourself - to be as selfish as possible. Other people think the purpose of life is to do as much as you can for others - to be as generous as possible. Of course, the truth is that the notion of life having purpose is itself meaningless.

    Would there be less suffering and misery in the world if people were more cooperative and generous - as opposed to being more competitive and selfish. Well, yes, of course.

    But, then, free will is fundamentally an illusion: people are no more capable of being different from who they are than they are capable of changing the fundamental gravitational constant.

    The most we can hope for is that the laws of physics and random chance will be merciful and we will make "choices" that result in less suffering rather than more.

  54. Go 15% of Trump! [Re:No Sympathy] by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    stocked mostly with H1-Bs and owned and ran by Indian immigrants. The way that they abused the heck out of their own countrymen

    I worked with one visa worker who confided that he was paid only once every 6 months. He got his full amount, but had to budget carefully. I've seen other shady visa practices also.

    I don't like Trump and didn't vote for him, but on THIS issue he is right (perhaps accidentally).

    1. Re:Go 15% of Trump! [Re:No Sympathy] by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      How does Trump get credit for "a bill introduced by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat from California"?

    2. Re:Go 15% of Trump! [Re:No Sympathy] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same way Obama gets to take the shit over TARP when it was GW's idea.

    3. Re:Go 15% of Trump! [Re:No Sympathy] by NewYork · · Score: 1

      Casteists/Racists/Terrorists should be expelled from USA https://qz.com/889524/the-us-s...

  55. Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills

    1. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills

      I've been told in a previous comment that there are CS students who are interested in CS only for the money, graduate without ever touching a computer, and then expect to get paid six-figures for knowing CS theory without ever applying it.

    2. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's possible to get a CS degree without ever using Windows, AD, a VPN, or ever hearing the term "OSI model". So, throw those people into a business with 10,000 users, all on Windows, and what could that CS grad do?

      The expectation is that a CS student would self-teach themselves IT while getting a degree in CS. That's no longer true. It seemed more true for those who got a CS degree in the early '90s (and before).

    3. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they only get a six figure pay in octal.

    4. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It's possible to get a CS degree without ever using Windows, AD, a VPN, or ever hearing the term "OSI model".

      I'd think that's kind of given, considering that CS has nothing to do with any of those things, pretty much like biology has nothing to do with learning to fix microscopes.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      That's still $262,143 a year.

      A six figure salary in binary, now, that's a lot funnier.

    6. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be an issue, except there is no IT degree, so people hire CS graduates, expecting them to be programmers or sys admins. And you can get a CS degree without being competent in either (yes, "some" programming is required, but certainly not competency).

    7. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by kristianbrigman · · Score: 1

      The lowest six-figure salary in octal would be 100000, or only $32768...

    8. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Yep, I agree these are problems.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I have seen CS students nonplussed that we expected them to graduate with some knowledge of the science. Personally, I figured that if you were just interested in learning to program for the money, the MIS program was just across the river in the business school.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re:Shows you how bad CS is for basic IT skills by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be an issue, except there is no IT degree, so people hire CS graduates, expecting them to be programmers or sys admins.

      When I went back to community college to learn computer programming, I was required to take an IT-related class with hands on labs for hardware, software and networking. That class was meant to prepare students for the CompTIA A+ and Network+ certifications. I had my A+/Network+ certifications prior to taking the class since my work experience as a video game tester prepared me for those certifications.

  56. There is no labor shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't solve a labor shortage? We don't have a labor shortage. We have a job shortage for the skilled labor we already have. If I have a choice between giving $$$$$ to a guy who lives near me for quality work or $$ to a guy who lives in another country for sub-par work, then another $$ to another guy in another country to fix the sub-par work up to acceptable, then I'd rather pay the guy who lives close to me, because if those other two guys become homeless and turn to crime to survive, they don't live near me, but the first guy does. I like to keep my city thriving, thank you. Heck, I'd rather pay $$ to four unskilled local guys to give me sub-par work, because one of those four guys might turn into someone I'd pay $$$$$, and in the mean-time, none of them is robbing me in an alley.

    1. Re:There is no labor shortage by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      There is no labor shortage.

      Out of curiosity: do you admit that there can be money shortage?

  57. US labor shortage? by drew_92123 · · Score: 2

    There is no such thing... we have plenty of people willing and able to work.

    The biggest challenge we face is that we will need to train workers to take their places... this is because India has made skilled workers so cheap in the past couple of decades that US companies has little or no incentive to hire entry level folks here in the states and train them, and individuals saw little to no value in paying for this training themselves let alone spending years in school for a job that was already taken by some goon in another country.

    1. Re:US labor shortage? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      This is an example of the breakdown of the family. Education in India is not cheap. As a ratio to annual income it is more expensive than in the US and loans are hard to get. Entire families make sacrifices to support the education of a promising kid and when that kid does well he supports his younger siblings and cousins. Thats how a poor country is able to create technically trained labor while a rich country is busy buying ATVs and Boats. Yes an Indian immigrant will work cheaper. Every immigrant works cheaper than the locals for he/she does not have choice. The local can choose to work in an industry not open to immigrants for a better salary. To Expect the govt to pay for training because your family is not willing to invest in you and make the necessary sacrifices is just another symptom of people having more loyalty to the state than to the family. Social Security started this breakdown of the family. If you no longer need to have successful children to support you in your old age you are much less willing to make sacrifices for their education. As the state becomes more and more the family at some point children will be brought up in creches like in the Soviet Union while all adults work for the glory of the state. Indian cultural values are those which America used to have while America is becoming more and more Soviet everyday.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  58. Am I Understanding This Correctly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "India's IT lobby..."

    A foreign nation has a group lobbying to affect our laws? I'd ask how lobbying is still legal, but the last thing a human would ever do is create legislation that would negatively impact one of their revenue streams, I suppose.

  59. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "OMG, you mean American's might have to learn something "

    Please learn this: a plural doesn't use an apostrophe. An American, several Americans. Simple.

  60. Scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    curry? No way this is bad for me. If they can't come in and hose us I might move up a bit. I really don't give a damn if In the 99.9% if I can get paid better for the work I do.

  61. Re:OMG by barc0001 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Easy. You get to be one of the guys they hire to fix that crap code and process. EVERY project I have ever worked on with overseas code resources has had massive problems with the quality of code that is returned.

    The same cycle always holds true: First the overseas resources are given full tasks to complete. Then the returned code is total shit and doesn't do what was asked. So the tasks are broken down into smaller chunks, and those still don't work. Then the resources are asked to provide procedures and subroutines written to a rigid spec, and 70% of those finally work. Then the company realizes that they're paying experienced software engineers over here to spend hours a day breaking things into small enough chunks that the overseas people will *probably* not screw up and the amount of time wasted is enormous, plus those software engineers could just do it themselves in a fraction of the time.

    So the company stops offshoring after wasting a couple of years of time and god knows how much money.

  62. Good for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I make $50K+ per year and live in a studio apartment by myself in Silicon Valley.

    That's great and everything that you can live on such a meager salary.

    But, have you gone up to PayScale.com or some other website to see what you're worth with your skillset?

    My English teacher cousin makes over $90K in San Francisco with awesome benefits. Political Science professors at Berkeley make over $285K.

    If you are a developer with over 2 years of experience, you should be making $200K - at least. Some of the guys are making over $350K.

    Wouldn't it be awesome if you were able to bank over $150K a year after tax?

    Some people are willing to sacrifice to achieve their goals.

    Sure, if I were starting up something and taking a draw of $50K, I'd do that if I thought I could win the Silicon Valley lottery and become a billionaire in two years.

    But if Silley Valley corp wants me to relocate from where I live, I am going to demand that I can keep my lifestyle - including living space and commute - which means at least $500K per year.

    I've been down that road before where a recruiter lied to me about how cheap one can live to relocate, and afterwards, I was struggling paycheck to paycheck - that was before the web and the cost of living calculators.

    Experienced (2+ years) software developers: $200K a year should be your minimum to work in Silicon Valley. Anything less, and you are being ripped off. Don't let anyone tell you different.

    1. Re:Good for you! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you are a developer with over 2 years of experience, you should be making $200K - at least. Some of the guys are making over $350K.

      I'm not software developer. I work in government IT. The bad news is that I make significantly less than my Silicon Valley peers. The good news is that I work a regular 40 hour week, get the usual benefit package, paid federal holidays (40 hours), paid time off (80 hours) and unpaid time off (40 hours) per year, and I'm halfway through a five-year contract. My contracting agency gave an extra month in pay as a Christmas bonus last month.

      Wouldn't it be awesome if you were able to bank over $150K a year after tax?

      I bank 20% of my income after tax. If I moved to the Sacramento Valley, I could save up for a down payment, buy a $200K house and pay off the mortgage in 10 years.

  63. So India can't screw us over as easily now? by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    In other news, countries that have been stealing US jobs and screwing US workers for years due to imbalanced trade deals are pissed that those days are over.

    Why we in the US should be in any way unhappy that India will be less effective at stealing our jobs is beyond me.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  64. There is no labor shortage in IT by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    we dont have a labor shortage in our IT industry... what we have in an over abundance of assholes like Mark Zuckerfuck that want to pay pennies on the dollar for skilled labor while he goes and buys an other fucking island or yaht or something.

  65. There is no labor shortage by JWW · · Score: 2

    There is no labor shortage.

    There is a companies willing to pay what it takes to hire someone competent shortage...

  66. Actually this is Trump's legacy right here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This right here is the one good effect of everything Trump has done.
    If this stops the outsourcing and devaluing of IT work and hiring of qualified educated IT workers in the US (OF WHICH THERE IS NO SHORTAGE) starts again, then we will have an excellent economy and better IT security at the same time!

    The problem with the Indian workers is that we were outsourcing IT security and the Indian workers had 0 clue when it came to the culture, they were easily socially engineered and gullible and they had a language barrier when it came to doing their job and understanding directives. This does not make up for them working for 1/4 the going market wage for the same type of work.

  67. Two Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCREW INDIA

  68. To play devil's advocate... by Junta · · Score: 1

    So the companies don't want to spend 6 figures for these IT people. Suddenly, the 'cheap' H1-B option goes away. The dream is that they will start hiring local rather than importing. The reality will be they will suck it up and just fully offshore jobs they would otherwise have kept in the US.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  69. Our responsibility to refugees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a tent in the desert and a bottle of water.

  70. in reply to your hypothetical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if those jobs on American soil were basically all going to H1-B's before they suddenly decide to outsource the entire office, I fail to see why I should give a shit. Since those were not jobs I would have gotten anyway as a citizen, I have lost NOTHING. As a matter of fact, I GAIN because it gets less crowded and I get some semblance of my country back. I never decided to move to the Third World, so I will not miss it if the Third World moves away from me.

  71. The more reason to do it. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Since we're receiving flak from the offshoring bodies, it means that this would be an effective enough measure.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  72. Is offshoring just about the money? by Timothy2.0 · · Score: 1

    What I'd like to know is if offshoring these IT jobs is *just* about the money. If it's a matter of getting *quality work* for cheap, compared to American counterparts, then tightening immigration laws will put the US further behind the IT curve. If it's just about the money, firms should be able to find comparable quality stateside, but I'd like to know if there's an indication, either way, that the quality of home-grown IT grads is comparable in quality.

    1. Re:Is offshoring just about the money? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Its pretty obvious that most american companies only want cheap and don't actually care about quality.

  73. Re:What kind of a labor shortage we are talking ab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was never a labor shortage of US workers, only a shortage of people who didn't want to work for low wages.
    I know several students who changed their college path from IT and Engineering to "safer employment goals".
    Why? because they didn't want to run up huge student debt only to have their jobs "off-shored" as they seen happen to their parent.
    I also know of seveal people who got "layed-off" because they were 50 or older and replaced by H1Bs at less wages.
    Maybe we could get back to having good software again with less bugs.

  74. There IS no labor shotage in IT by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    What there actually is, is a shortage of US IT workers that will take the job even with the unreasonably low salary that most companies want to pay.

  75. Go bugger yourselves! by Seng · · Score: 1

    Go get a job in India, supporting Indians, and finally give those of us in IT some relief! If the day arrives where I don't have to repeat "pardon me?" 50 times, it won't be too soon.

  76. There is no STEM shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there was, we wouldn't be bringing in H1B visa workers and forcing US workers to train them. If there was, salaries would be rising for STEM workers. The problem is management does not want to pay proper salaries to STEM employees that reflect a "shortage"

  77. No labor shortage by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

    There is *NO* labor shortage in IT. There is a perceived CHEAP labor shortage because corporations don't want to pay people what they are worth, while holding up countries like India as an example of what they think people should get paid.

    If you want to pay people what they get paid in India, move your fucking company to India.

  78. You're a couple years and one Speaker out of date by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Two years ago, Obama finally submitted a budget request on time, and Congress passed a budget (written largely by Ryan). Paul Ryan became Speaker in October 2015.

  79. GURU's pls halp URGENT by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If I have one doubt about that I will revert the same.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  80. Get a citizen to do it. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If you want something done right get a citizen to do it.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  81. Be careful what you wish for by linuxguy · · Score: 1

    I have worked in the software industry for over 25 years. Only recently we have started hiring people offshore. We work with people who are essentially contractors. It is very easy to let people go who are not productive. Over the course of a year we have gone through a lot of people, but now have a core team, that is very very good. And very very cheap, compared to a local team. The H1-B visa restrictions will just push people into that model sooner. The Internet is the great equalizer. To the detriment of many and the joy of others.

  82. Re:"Labor Shortage" = management shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even harder than doing CS well is managing people who don't want to be managed in an environment with an overload of tasks.
    What happens in the real world is that before long you have 500 tasks to do, and 200 are deemed drop everything else top priority.
    Soon the whole team thrashes around as a select 20 or 30 of the top-most top priority become the daily firedrill.
    The 300 tasks that actually lead to real improvement are just lost in the notebooks full of paper bug reports.
    Eventually the staff (like me!) quit when it takes 2x units of thrashing to undo the chaos caused by last month's 1x unit of thrashing.
    Life is much better elsewhere, and I'll never ever type 'make' again.

  83. Keep complaining. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we will just ban outsourcing totally. ( "ban" as in tax companies so high they go out of of business if they try it )

  84. Re:They should stay and improve their own countrie by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Half of us are here to squirt, the other half are here to ooze. (Mark Mothersbaugh).

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  85. Experience Shortage by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    There is an experience shortage; all co's want more experience, but importing workers only increases the experience shortage for citizens. A billion hours of school cannot replace experience.

  86. Re:OMG by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    And don't even get me started on those Goobacks from the future, coming back in time here to Take our jobs!

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  87. I take exception with most of what you wrote by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    a. Don't compare the middle east of 1000 years ago to the one of today. There's been 1000 years of scientific advancement.

    b. The Middle East was happily partaking in that advancement until we meddled. There are pictures of girls in Iran wearing modern, brightly colored dresses without burkas. We put one of your Theocrats in power to protect our interests and stop communism.

    c. Two words: Saudi Arabia. They'd have most favorite nation status if we didn't give it to China.

    We do awful, awful things in the middle east for the sake of cheap oil. I suppose it's better than what we do in Central/South America for cheap bananas...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  88. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is so true! I am in a position to break down tasks into small pieces so India consultants won't mess up codes too badly. Later I have to review their codes to correct defects, one by one. American managers are bragging about how brilliant outsourcing strategy is. This is how corporate life is, managers always lead staffs from one success to another.

  89. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But word gets around, and the industry becomes aware of what those guys can and can't do, and adjust the plan accordingly.

  90. H1B is now the new slave trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys and Wipro are the new slave trade dealers. This H1B abuse is damaging everybody:
    1. The American workers from IT sector as they are pressured by slave labor to accept lower and lower salaries.
    2. The Indian workers from IT that accept lower salaries in India because of the promise of a H1B. Yes, as wild as it sounds the promise of a H1B visa that ensures moving to USA is part of the hire package for TCS !!! just ask people in the TCS Thane campus.
    3. The European workers from IT that have limited opportunities due to this slave market. USA companies cannot move workers from Europe to USA if is the case because the H1B program is flooded with applications by Indian slave companies. It is not unusual that sometimes you need to temporary relocate people from one branch to another due to some project contracts: they are forced to use travel VISAs that restrict working and limit stay to 3 months. The same companies prefer to lease slave labor in USA instead of growing the European branches.

  91. Retards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the sentence about leaving loopholes. Well current system is no perfect.

    There is no doubt that H1B attracts talent from all around the world. On the other hand these companies not just limited to Infosys, Wipro and TCS; exploit the visa program.

    Why they need so many visas every year?
    - Simple reason: they send people to US and after few months or a year they switch employers. Hence they keep on needing more and more visas every year.

  92. Re:OMG by thomn8r · · Score: 1
    So the company stops offshoring after wasting a couple of years of time and god knows how much money.

    But by this time, the executives who started the offshoring in the first place have cashed their bonus checks and moved on.

  93. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When employers are telling current employees to train their replacements, replacements that are being brought in because supposedly the employer cant find employees, (HUH?) I dont feel any pity for India or its IT crowd.

  94. Indian IT Sector Warns ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck the Indian IT Sector. What are they going to do about it? Hilarious.

  95. Preaching to the choir by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

    I wish I had beaucoodles of +mod points to hand out.
    A lot of good stuff here. We all know the companies abuse hell out of the H1b program.
    In recent years the companies such as Disney don't even give enough of a shit to hide the fact they're flaunting current laws.
    I read with interest the stories shared here of abuse handed out to H1b visa holders - plenty of them tell their story over on the Programmers Guild forums.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  96. What About Enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, I'm really glad that H-1B abuse is finally getting some lawmakers' attention, but the reality is that there are already regulations on the books that prohibit most of the bullshit companies are pulling. It's a question of enforcement.

    Are lawmakers going to start mandating that these regulations be enforced? They don't ever address the issue of enforcement, so my guess is no.

    This is just patronizing posturing coming from a politician who is getting a jump on her 2018 re-election campaign.

  97. Of course when the shoe is on the other foot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India has about 350 foreign pilots, down from 800 four years back. The countryâ(TM)s airlines had been required to phase them all out by December 2013.
    http://bit.ly/2ksfzD6

  98. Re: OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And chances are you'll find the same code at the next company unlucky enough to outsource. They are big in recycling (code that is)

  99. Re: OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So the company stops offshoring after wasting a couple of years of time and god knows how much money."

    I do wish at least the stops offshoring part were true but it only lasts until the next batch of management/executive knowitalls begin their "sweeping" reforms, teaching the world how to do it better...