Or just skip the middle and use the renewable (well net CO2 increasing I guess is more what is being talked about) energy sources for energy and not produce that CO2 in the first place...
Sure it plays to a stereotype, but I don't think claiming a lisp and an effeminate voice is a common feature of some group is anything like claiming said group is dumber, or weaker, or worth less.
I don't read it as saying anything about homosexuals or homosexuality. It's just the fact that in order to diminish the sexual side of a good pat down they tend to do them in same sex pairs.
Hence if you want to ramp up the sexual aspect and hopefully switch the embaressment from you to the searcher you need to play up a homosexual aspect - and to play something up most people resort to stereotypes.
I guess it does have some implications that the searchers might have some bigotry towards homosexuals and hence not like the experience.
Sure, if you define "external power supply" as an "external power source".
Not if they defined "external power supply" as something you need to plug in/or replace on the device. And hence a bog standard solar panel would remove the need for one.
I doubt it. Accepting email (and then ignoring it) costs the "speculants and cybersquatters" nothing - they just point them all at the same mail server just as they do with the web servers.
Plus, why is putting up a page of advertisements not "using"?
So because a pilot can crash the one aircraft he is flying, they should just allow him to bring as big an arsenal as he can carry with him to pass to his terrorist accomplices in the secure area so they so they can take out a dozen planes 747s instead of the 10 seater he was flying?
The only possible "rudeness" was "evolutionary throwback", and even that doesn't seem rude - just a simple fact that if you think it's a "miswiring" for people to have a desire to protect children then clearly your wiring is missing the stuff evolved along side being social group based animals. It says nothing about whether than is good or bad and hence I can't see how it can be classified as rude.
Unless your so liberal that anything "old" must be bad, but that seems unlikely.
Rabbits are generally considered cute, yet people have very little aversion to killing them in huge numbers when they reach pest levels.
And parents are not "miswired" regarding their childs death, the species as a whole is correctly wired to prioritize protecting children. Sure you might be an evolutionary throw back to a time before humans had evolved to the point where children take a decade to be self sufficient, luckily most of us aren't and hence the species is still around.
It isn't a "parent" thing, it's a human thing. Even people who are not parents are hardwired to protect children (for the most part) of their own group (not just family).
My only point about "defenseless" was, given two randomly chosen killings:
Killing 1: A 5 year old child. Killing 2: A 30 year old man.
There's an astronomically higher chance that the 30 year old did something to "deserve it". Was robbing a bank at the time he was shot, was picking fights with bikers just before he was clubbed witha crowbar, etc, etc. Hence there's a greater chance the child's killing was more "serious".
How dumb the offender is at advertising and bragging that he did done it also plays a part.
And it's not really "afford", it's more "how much does it make life uncomfortable for the cops and hence get pushed up the priority list". Having the damn media bother you for updates puts it higher on the list. The prosecutor, being a politician of sorts, wants things wrapped up before the spotlight goes away so he can have some it - the higher up cops have their own political aspirations or at least want to be on the good side of the prosecutor (and even havea favor outstanding with him), so they'll make sure it's at the top of the underling cop's todo list.
None of which involve the victim actually doing anything or pushing for anythign at all.
Raccoons and rats are pests, a bunch of seals are endangered species.
And for the 5 year versus 30 year old it depends on how you count "damaging". Killing a 30 year old likely deprived the victim of 50 years of living. Killing the 5 year old likely deprived the victim of 75 years of living. 75>50 so by one metric killing the 5 year old is worse.
Economically, along the same lines as your argument, killing the 30 year old is worse. Since there are likely more sunk costs into their education and training.
From the perspective of a Social Security administrator killing the 5 year old is worse, since the 30 year old dieing before they retire reduces the payouts that would have been made to them, while still collecting 10 years of payins...
In reality the 5 year old murder is usally considered worse because the 5 year old is far more defenseless, far less likely to have harmed the murderer, and far less likely for their be carrying large sums of money/etc. Of course that means it isn't actually about the victim, the victim is merely correlated with the likelehood of the crime being more "serious" (assuming you consider killing someone or fun worse than killing someone because they resisted being robbed or killing someone because they cut you off in traffic - not a safe assumption I admit).
You likely use your right hand for the i and n, and your left hand for the g. So you left hand has a head start due to not having been involved in pressing the i and gets there first.
But you're only creating the xbox game to get the "see I have a experience" checkbox so you can get the developer stuff for the other consoles/interest from a publisher, because you didn't want to make one for the PC because you hate every genre that is available on the PC.
It's not the final step and that that game isn't portable shouldn't be a problem. You can just rewrite it for the other consoles now that you have the experience checkbox anyway.
Who cares about Mac OS X, I thought you needed multiple game controllers around a TV???
Who cares about the hardware reliability? You aren't selling the console.
Who cares about "per platform"? You've just argued that you can't do the other platforms because the conole manufacturers/game publishers require experience.
Slashdot Mirror
Or just skip the middle and use the renewable (well net CO2 increasing I guess is more what is being talked about) energy sources for energy and not produce that CO2 in the first place...
How so?
Sure it plays to a stereotype, but I don't think claiming a lisp and an effeminate voice is a common feature of some group is anything like claiming said group is dumber, or weaker, or worth less.
I don't read it as saying anything about homosexuals or homosexuality. It's just the fact that in order to diminish the sexual side of a good pat down they tend to do them in same sex pairs.
Hence if you want to ramp up the sexual aspect and hopefully switch the embaressment from you to the searcher you need to play up a homosexual aspect - and to play something up most people resort to stereotypes.
I guess it does have some implications that the searchers might have some bigotry towards homosexuals and hence not like the experience.
I have email addresses that I check one a year, I'd be mighty pissed if you decided that was just "an alibi".
How is advertising not content?
Sure, if you define "external power supply" as an "external power source".
Not if they defined "external power supply" as something you need to plug in/or replace on the device. And hence a bog standard solar panel would remove the need for one.
I doubt it. Accepting email (and then ignoring it) costs the "speculants and cybersquatters" nothing - they just point them all at the same mail server just as they do with the web servers.
Plus, why is putting up a page of advertisements not "using"?
So because a pilot can crash the one aircraft he is flying, they should just allow him to bring as big an arsenal as he can carry with him to pass to his terrorist accomplices in the secure area so they so they can take out a dozen planes 747s instead of the 10 seater he was flying?
An MMA figher? A wrestler? A rugby forward?
The only possible "rudeness" was "evolutionary throwback", and even that doesn't seem rude - just a simple fact that if you think it's a "miswiring" for people to have a desire to protect children then clearly your wiring is missing the stuff evolved along side being social group based animals. It says nothing about whether than is good or bad and hence I can't see how it can be classified as rude.
Unless your so liberal that anything "old" must be bad, but that seems unlikely.
Interests rate so high? We're you born in the 90s or something?
Rabbits are generally considered cute, yet people have very little aversion to killing them in huge numbers when they reach pest levels.
And parents are not "miswired" regarding their childs death, the species as a whole is correctly wired to prioritize protecting children. Sure you might be an evolutionary throw back to a time before humans had evolved to the point where children take a decade to be self sufficient, luckily most of us aren't and hence the species is still around.
It isn't a "parent" thing, it's a human thing. Even people who are not parents are hardwired to protect children (for the most part) of their own group (not just family).
My only point about "defenseless" was, given two randomly chosen killings:
Killing 1: A 5 year old child.
Killing 2: A 30 year old man.
There's an astronomically higher chance that the 30 year old did something to "deserve it". Was robbing a bank at the time he was shot, was picking fights with bikers just before he was clubbed witha crowbar, etc, etc. Hence there's a greater chance the child's killing was more "serious".
How dumb the offender is at advertising and bragging that he did done it also plays a part.
And it's not really "afford", it's more "how much does it make life uncomfortable for the cops and hence get pushed up the priority list". Having the damn media bother you for updates puts it higher on the list. The prosecutor, being a politician of sorts, wants things wrapped up before the spotlight goes away so he can have some it - the higher up cops have their own political aspirations or at least want to be on the good side of the prosecutor (and even havea favor outstanding with him), so they'll make sure it's at the top of the underling cop's todo list.
None of which involve the victim actually doing anything or pushing for anythign at all.
The judge didn't go to CNN, he sentenced signiciantly lower than the minimum end of the federal sentencing guidelines for the conviction.
Raccoons and rats are pests, a bunch of seals are endangered species.
And for the 5 year versus 30 year old it depends on how you count "damaging". Killing a 30 year old likely deprived the victim of 50 years of living. Killing the 5 year old likely deprived the victim of 75 years of living. 75>50 so by one metric killing the 5 year old is worse.
Economically, along the same lines as your argument, killing the 30 year old is worse. Since there are likely more sunk costs into their education and training.
From the perspective of a Social Security administrator killing the 5 year old is worse, since the 30 year old dieing before they retire reduces the payouts that would have been made to them, while still collecting 10 years of payins...
In reality the 5 year old murder is usally considered worse because the 5 year old is far more defenseless, far less likely to have harmed the murderer, and far less likely for their be carrying large sums of money/etc. Of course that means it isn't actually about the victim, the victim is merely correlated with the likelehood of the crime being more "serious" (assuming you consider killing someone or fun worse than killing someone because they resisted being robbed or killing someone because they cut you off in traffic - not a safe assumption I admit).
No.
The felony was deleting the evidence, the actual invasion of privacy part was a misdeamenor. Even the damn summary makes that clear, FFS.
The "burned his computer" part is what got him in trouble, so no that's spectacularly bad advice.
You likely use your right hand for the i and n, and your left hand for the g. So you left hand has a head start due to not having been involved in pressing the i and gets there first.
At least that's my excuse.
By making the contract actually binding.
"We agree to pay you $X on this schedule, you agree to deliver these milestones on that schedule."
if they don't deliver according to the schedule then they don't get paid.
Of course that will result in significantly higher bid costs, but that's the idea surely.
And of course the spec will need to not be changed every time some politician or beaurocrat sees wants to look busy.
Feel free to write them a check then.
Why would IT know anythign about the results the modelling software spits out. They aren't the ones actually using it.
You expect an IT whistleblower on everything because I'm sure someone did something related to it with Word or Outlook at some point?
But you're only creating the xbox game to get the "see I have a experience" checkbox so you can get the developer stuff for the other consoles/interest from a publisher, because you didn't want to make one for the PC because you hate every genre that is available on the PC.
It's not the final step and that that game isn't portable shouldn't be a problem. You can just rewrite it for the other consoles now that you have the experience checkbox anyway.
Who cares about Mac OS X, I thought you needed multiple game controllers around a TV???
Who cares about the hardware reliability? You aren't selling the console.
Who cares about "per platform"? You've just argued that you can't do the other platforms because the conole manufacturers/game publishers require experience.
Authors often have to make their name writing stuff publishers like before they can actually write the novel they have wanted to do from the start.
You can manufacture and sell your own console if you don't like the restrictions the existing ones have in place.
Of course the XBOX 360 has http://create.msdn.com/en-us/home/membership which requires none of the stuff you've complained about.
Yes, sometimes you actually have to do something you don't "enjoy" before you get to do the stuff you do enjoy.
I'm pretty sure most small business owners don't enjoy huge junks of the work they need to do to get their business running and then keep it running.
I think you already game the steps.
1. Incorporate.
2. Create PC or mobile game.
3. Rent office space.
4. Work with publisher/console maker.
You might have to iterate item 2 until you generate enough money - or start with a bunch of money in the first place.
My supposed to be humourous point was that a "meridian" is a line of longitude. It makes half of a great circle from the north to the south pole.
The divider on a divided highway/freeway/roadway is the "median".