So you have less knowledge than primary school students of genetics, then. Oh well...
You seriously don't know what a recessive trait it?
You seriously can't see how a gay child could increase the survival chances of the children of their siblings - you have an extra worker without their own kids to support.
You seriously think no gay person has ever had kids?
Do you really think that having sickle-cell anemia helps your reproductive success?
Each individual patent does not need "to promote the progress of science and useful arts", just the system as a whole. Some bad patents that are balanced by good patents for a net gain is still a system promoting progress.
It's a clinical trial, so it doesn't matter why it works. It's a study to determine if it works.
They could have designed it based on deep knowledge of the workings of body chemistry, or they could have noticed that people on a treatment for something else don't seem to die from prostate cancer as often as you would expect and decided to try and confirm that with absolutely zero knowledge of mechanism.
It doesn't fucking matter, because explaining the workings isn't the aim of the trial.
But in this particular case the article does explain the workings*, so you are not only retarded but also illiterate.
* Extract the immune cells from the patient. Grow them while exposing them to a protein specific to the cancer cells. Put them back into the patient. So the mechanism is obvious - convincing the patients immune system (well the bit you grew in a dish anyway) that the cancer cells are bad and hence using the normal immune response of the body to attack them. Of course that convincing part is likely tricky to actually do, but irrelevant to the mechanism in the body.
Nothing I've read mentions a police interview (sure a meeting that some police were at, but given the building it was in that's not surprising).
But I haven't read much and really don't care too much, since he's clearly an idiot who got what he deserved - not for not handing over the passwords in that meeting but for not handing them over in the previous 6 months.
And since he was on leave, it wasn't his former employer.
No, but he wouldn't be in prison and we wouldn't know he was a murderer to call him one.
He did manage to hide the body which puts him above the completely inept at murdering murderers, but almost everything else he couldn't have done worse (from what I read, I may be completely misinformed).
And yes I was married, the wife mysteriously disappeared a few years ago, no one's seen or heard from her since.
As I've said before, everyone with aspergers and anyone who just claims to have it should be rounded up a euthanized. It's only a matter of time before they go on a bloody rampage.
I'm put on "administrative leave" so since I'm on leave and stressed about my work prospects I decide to take a trip Vegas on my own time to spend my own money to try and relax a bit.
Hans Reiser is just another inept murderer, the fact that happened to be good at something else is irrelevant.
I really don't think murdering your spouse is a common trait in the computing professions.
Sysadmins acting like they "own" the equipment, and programmers acting like they "own" the code is however, common enough. But I think that's much more universal than computing.
I suspect other people who work with one thing closely have the same "attachment". Drivers and "their" truck/bus/etc (ignoring independent owner/drivers of course who do have that claim).
If your six year old does, then clearly you fucked up as a parent and thank your lucky stars they chose that route instead of just murdering you in your sleep just to watch the life drain out of you.
So you can manage, but other people are too stupid and need the law to do it for them???
We have no ban on toys with food at my house. And yet the most common choice when we ask the 6 year old where we should go for dinner is "the sushi place", though in the last month or two "the chinese place with the shrimp" seems to be coming out on top.
Neither of which are spectacularly great on the health scale, but they don't give out toys.
Which is all fine if you really want to live in a state in which citizens have to carry their papers at all times.
And note, I wasn't saying "brown people" should do what I said, I was just saying that that seems the simplest way to protest such a law if they think it is unjust/bad. Since it would clog up the system if the police had to verify the citizenship of all the citizens who were intentionally not carrying ID whenever possible.
Arizona can do what they like for all I care. I suspect if they managed to get all the illegal immigrants out their economy would collapse even further - you think home prices have fallen in AZ already, wait until all those people no longer need to live in them...
Legal immigrants will have papers - Federal immigration rules requires them to carry them anyway.
Illegal immigrants are breaking the law in the first place, and yes this makes them being discovered more likely, but they should be worried already.
Citizens on the other hand are not required to carry proof of citizenship and are not already breaking the law. They are the ones who are going to be impacted most (well if they look mexican...)
All the brown skinned citizens should just not carry anything that identifies them as a citizen. I'm sure lots of lawyers will be willing to help them sue whenever they get arrested for not carrying their birth certificate/passport.
Slashdot Mirror
Why does that matter, the law in question isn't restricted to closed systems:
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It can only change forms.
Not in this context it isn't. Or I guess the post I originally applied to just didn't make any sense, that'd work too.
1. MATLAB doesn't support 64 bit ints
2. People still us MATLAB.
Thus, there is a group of people "who do the kind of hardcore math that MATLAB is good at" who don't need 64 bit computing.
Which is obviously exactly the point.
So you have less knowledge than primary school students of genetics, then. Oh well...
You seriously don't know what a recessive trait it?
You seriously can't see how a gay child could increase the survival chances of the children of their siblings - you have an extra worker without their own kids to support.
You seriously think no gay person has ever had kids?
Do you really think that having sickle-cell anemia helps your reproductive success?
Not quite.
Each individual patent does not need "to promote the progress of science and useful arts", just the system as a whole. Some bad patents that are balanced by good patents for a net gain is still a system promoting progress.
You "have no intention of letting these people install anything on my machine".
And they have no intention of letting you connect your machine to their network without letting them install some things on it.
Hence, you don't connect your machine to their network.
You "have no intention of letting these people install anything on my machine".
And they have no intention of letting you check your email on a machine they haven't installed some things on.
Hence you don't check your email from your machine.
It's a clinical trial, so it doesn't matter why it works. It's a study to determine if it works.
They could have designed it based on deep knowledge of the workings of body chemistry, or they could have noticed that people on a treatment for something else don't seem to die from prostate cancer as often as you would expect and decided to try and confirm that with absolutely zero knowledge of mechanism.
It doesn't fucking matter, because explaining the workings isn't the aim of the trial.
But in this particular case the article does explain the workings*, so you are not only retarded but also illiterate.
* Extract the immune cells from the patient. Grow them while exposing them to a protein specific to the cancer cells. Put them back into the patient. So the mechanism is obvious - convincing the patients immune system (well the bit you grew in a dish anyway) that the cancer cells are bad and hence using the normal immune response of the body to attack them. Of course that convincing part is likely tricky to actually do, but irrelevant to the mechanism in the body.
Nothing I've read mentions a police interview (sure a meeting that some police were at, but given the building it was in that's not surprising).
But I haven't read much and really don't care too much, since he's clearly an idiot who got what he deserved - not for not handing over the passwords in that meeting but for not handing them over in the previous 6 months.
And since he was on leave, it wasn't his former employer.
No, but he wouldn't be in prison and we wouldn't know he was a murderer to call him one.
He did manage to hide the body which puts him above the completely inept at murdering murderers, but almost everything else he couldn't have done worse (from what I read, I may be completely misinformed).
And yes I was married, the wife mysteriously disappeared a few years ago, no one's seen or heard from her since.
As I've said before, everyone with aspergers and anyone who just claims to have it should be rounded up a euthanized. It's only a matter of time before they go on a bloody rampage.
How do I know if there's an investigation against me, so that I should not leave my home?
That's insane.
I'm put on "administrative leave" so since I'm on leave and stressed about my work prospects I decide to take a trip Vegas on my own time to spend my own money to try and relax a bit.
This is the biggest mistake I could make?
WTF?
Hans Reiser is just another inept murderer, the fact that happened to be good at something else is irrelevant.
I really don't think murdering your spouse is a common trait in the computing professions.
Sysadmins acting like they "own" the equipment, and programmers acting like they "own" the code is however, common enough. But I think that's much more universal than computing.
I suspect other people who work with one thing closely have the same "attachment". Drivers and "their" truck/bus/etc (ignoring independent owner/drivers of course who do have that claim).
They're pushing back or bring forward all the cool stuff so that they do it in 2012.
Just to mess with end-of-the-word-crazies I suspect.
Smart six year olds do not do that.
If your six year old does, then clearly you fucked up as a parent and thank your lucky stars they chose that route instead of just murdering you in your sleep just to watch the life drain out of you.
So you can manage, but other people are too stupid and need the law to do it for them???
We have no ban on toys with food at my house. And yet the most common choice when we ask the 6 year old where we should go for dinner is "the sushi place", though in the last month or two "the chinese place with the shrimp" seems to be coming out on top.
Neither of which are spectacularly great on the health scale, but they don't give out toys.
Which is all fine if you really want to live in a state in which citizens have to carry their papers at all times.
And note, I wasn't saying "brown people" should do what I said, I was just saying that that seems the simplest way to protest such a law if they think it is unjust/bad. Since it would clog up the system if the police had to verify the citizenship of all the citizens who were intentionally not carrying ID whenever possible.
Arizona can do what they like for all I care. I suspect if they managed to get all the illegal immigrants out their economy would collapse even further - you think home prices have fallen in AZ already, wait until all those people no longer need to live in them...
The courts can actually get things right. Faith restored!
Wow Americans are seriously fucked up.
They consider listening in on phone calls an sin.
And of course also think that listening in on phone calls is essential and just.
Amazingly groups are made up of people who don't hold exactly the same views.
That you find that strange says a lot about you - just how "us and them" and "black and white" is your world?
No.
You are white, hence you can't be an illegal immigrant.
Obviously while driving have your license, but not everyone spends all their time in their car. And some people are even passengers.
Since the specialized immigration agents deport American citizens occasionally, just how well do you really think the local police will do?
Why would I give a shit about the case law?
1. I'm not brown skinned.
2. I'm not in Arizona.
3. I'm not a fucking citizen.
Legal immigrants will have papers - Federal immigration rules requires them to carry them anyway.
Illegal immigrants are breaking the law in the first place, and yes this makes them being discovered more likely, but they should be worried already.
Citizens on the other hand are not required to carry proof of citizenship and are not already breaking the law. They are the ones who are going to be impacted most (well if they look mexican...)
All the brown skinned citizens should just not carry anything that identifies them as a citizen. I'm sure lots of lawyers will be willing to help them sue whenever they get arrested for not carrying their birth certificate/passport.
Everyone.
It's the only way to be sure.
Or the more realistic answer from the police:
"bring it in and chuck it in the lost property box, thanks"
And there you go legal obligations met. If you didn't want to bother doing that, then don't take it out of the bar in the first place.
But that's irrelevant for the guy who bought it that's text book receipt of stolen property, here have a felony conviction, thanks.