27 page CAB form and full CAM meeting. Just to edit the/etc/login.defs and change PASS_MIN_DAYS from a 0 to a 7.
I still laugh about it to this day. A single character change and 27 pages of paperwork.
Yeah, show them you know your shit, go ahead and make single character changes all over the place to prove them that their system is pointless. Start with/etc/hosts and then work your way down to/etc/fstab.
With tongue removed from cheek, there is a reason CABs exist in the first place, namely that what one person sees as a no-brainer one character change actually impacts availability to a large number of people because they didnt realize what the true scope of the change was.
Sadly there is no supremely high-tech activity at work in this patent like sending out a flash and scanning for feedback from lenses, instead it is basically an automated anti-glasshole ready to punch anyone who is idly passing by with a recording device, but will completely miss the person with a hidden camera recording them for some time from arms length.
Yea, seems an expensive and obtuse solution for a problem $10 worth of wire and high-intensity IR LEDs can fix.
That reminds me, pick up an IR filter element for my hipster coat button cam...
This has an obvious flaw... It's easy to spot cameras that are *in plain sight* however there are
However nothing. Most people aren't worried about hidden cameras because recent history shows they're not a problem: you have to go out of your way to use them and most people aren't interested enough to do that and most people aren't interesting enough to do it to. Basically the risk is small.
The covertness isn't the problem. The casualness is, and also the fact that once the photo is taken, it's going to be uploaded to google who are interested in tracking everything about everyone for the purpose of pushing ads.
That's the difference.
So to summarize, you (or the hypothetical "you") are not worried that someone would covertly record you without your knowledge, but you are worried that someone with a casual camera will point it at you with only the slightest possible chance of intending to attempt to capture images/video of you? If Google Glass (or just about any other casual camera) were constantly recording/uploading, its tiny battery would wither in minutes. To perform surveillance with it would require dedicated effort, much like the aforementioned hidden cameras. However, the distinction is apparently lost on you in an attempt at privacy-posturing as a replacement for actual privacy.
This has an obvious flaw... It's easy to spot cameras that are *in plain sight* however there are plenty of presently available technologies that completely conceal cameras from view, making this irrelevant to someone really intent on snooping your private information (or posting about you on facebook/google+/etc). Sadly there is no supremely high-tech activity at work in this patent like sending out a flash and scanning for feedback from lenses, instead it is basically an automated anti-glasshole ready to punch anyone who is idly passing by with a recording device, but will completely miss the person with a hidden camera recording them for some time from arms length.
This is why people don't like going to the authorities...
Something is terribly broken at that school... From TFA:
"According to Love, as the teacher is heard attempting to help her son with a math problem, a student says, “You should pull his pants down!” Another student replies, “No, man. Imagine how bad that (c**t) smells! No one wants to smell that (t**t).” As the recording continues, the teacher instructs the classroom that they may only talk if it pertains to math. Shortly thereafter, a loud noise is heard on the recording, which her son explained was a book being slammed down next to him after a student pretended to hit him in the head with it. When the teacher yells, the student exclaims, “What? I was just trying to scare him!” A group of boys are heard laughing."
The incident happened in direct contact with one of the boy's teachers. The teacher failed to control the classroom, failed to discipline the antagonists, and apparently failed to report the incident to the administration (wonder why). The boy's only hope is to get the hell out of there, his teacher (and probably most of the administration) is disturbingly incompetent.
When deciding on an app there are only so many variables that come in to play that can allow someone to compare apps: 1. Number of downloads 2. Average review 3. Specific feature list 4. Price 5. "Editor's choice", top search ranking, "top apps" chart, etc
How each are weighted, in which ecosystems, and by demographic would start to expose where the knowledge gap lies and how to close it. Since you sound more like you are interested in a thesis to solve the problem, you should start from the problem and work backward. You need to know what drives purchase decisions before you hope to influence them.
It's a fork specifically for OpenBSD. Why would they keep support for other OSes?
You only fork when you want to put distance between the original; there is nothing stopping them from making changes/"improvements" to the original OpenSSL project except for scope constraint (i.e. if they just want OpenBSD to be secure) or ego. Either one stinks of selfishness. I cant criticize them directly since they are still doing all of their work for "free" and are publishing it freely, but it has to be pointed out that they are choosing the greater of two evils.
You're not much of a mathematician if you don't already know the value of Pi out to several decimal places without the need to expel valuable ammo in an experiment./john
It might be beneficial to claim to not have a lot of knowledge in your head though, since zombies (per common folklore) prefer higher quality brains and therefore acting like an idiot who cant remember a short set of numbers *essential to almost all of math* might be a good survival tactic.
What's a dead zombie? Is this some kind of recursion?
(Getting old has a lot of advantages, but one of the disadvantages is that it's harder to keep track of popular memes. I mean, I never understood the whole "vampire" thing, and now we're on to zombies. What's next?)
In the case of the "zombie apocalypse" the commonly held belief is that a communicable disease (possibly man-made) turns a normal person into a zombie without them dying first, and is then spread via contact/biting/etc so that a significant part of the population is a zombie. In that scenario zombies are near-dead (at least their cerebral cortex); dead bodies turning into zombies are part of Vodou beliefs and since there arent that many Vodou followers it is not likely that a zombie apocalypse will come to pass as a result of that particular method.
Bennett, I like all of your stuff and this is well-written but...
Troll! Get him, boys!
These apps are just going to increase mass neurosis. We don't need our heads filled with this crap. We need to spend more time thinking about important issues, not the trivia.
I think the more important issue is the general inefficiency in the marketplace for apps (as well as ideas and intellectual property in general). That was my main point. I wouldn't have written the article just to tell people about the parking apps, although I hope some people find that useful.
If that's the issue then why wouldn't you (serious question, not asking rhetorically i promise) gin up a Turk quiz about how app markets are perceived and participated in? It seems like you already knew the answer to "does anyone know about all these cool parking spot apps?" so just get on with the bigger question. The one I have spent a lot of time pondering (non-scientifically) is what could an app store possibly offer by having >1,000,000 apps? Or even >500,000 apps?
At some point ( i would guess its somewhere down around the 10,000 mark) there has to be a diminishing return on the quality of the apps in the store, and I absolutely never understood why advertising "our store has a zillion apps! yay us! come buy our shiny! pick from a zillion apps, like you will ever have a chance to try even a tenth of a percent of them!!!" was ever thought of as effective.
When I want to go somewhere and it's too much trouble, I make procrastinate until it's too late to make it to whatever appointment I was going for, and that way I don't even have the bother of traveling anywhere at all.
instead of make procrastinate, for your next appointment you should try make clean; make depmod; make procrastinate; make install; make clean. Its way more efficient.
Wrong. Businesses descriminating against customers based on gender is absolutly against the law. The reason that 'Ladies Night' isn't a problem isn't because it is legal. It is because the law is not equally applied. Try putting a sign in the windows of your business that says "No Blacks Allowed", and see how long it takes for you to get your ass handed to you in court.
There is a quantifiable distinction between an employer (someone offering compensation in exchange for labor in any number of quid pro quo arrangements), a public accommodation (like public drinking fountains, public schools, etc) and a private group like a yoga studio or country club. This article should clear things up for you: http://blogs.findlaw.com/tarni...
Regarding bathrooms, except for public restrooms, they are all private. Many establishments will not let the general public use their restrooms.
Oops almost forgot: What you point out is entirely about private property law and not at all about discrimination. Show me a private establishment that allows only one specific gender to access the bathroom without paying while denying the other...
There certainly is a lot of money changing hands in the scouts.
I suppose i should have been more clear, the gender specific participants are not compensated solely for their participation, i.e. being a Boy Scout is not a job in the same way that being a Northwestern football player is (ha! i beat you to that one).
Society has decided that sometimes discrimination is bad, sometimes it is unpleasant but necessary, and sometimes it is even good. There is no black and white here.
So lets have some discrimination of boys to fix it!
Makes perfect sense.
Are girls being discriminated against? Where? Says who? They aren't trying to "fix" gender discrimination, they are trying to "fix" lopsided attendance and interest. That being said they are probably still going about it wrong. Their money would go a lot further by simply putting it toward fostering more involved volunteer/nonprofit groups (coder camps geared toward girls, for example.)
Not all jobs and not all applicants are created equal, and that is where the notion that "well every team should be half men and half women" falls apart.
The 3 all important questions to ask at each of those firms are: Who applied for the position in question What were their qualifications Who was ultimately hired
If (taking one of your anecdotes as an example) that when there is a grocery cashier job available, 15 females and 2 males apply, and of them 10 females and 1 male have comparable and sufficient qualifications, then it would not be unusual to see a cashier team made up of 10:1 women to men. This would not be illegal or even unusual in any way. If it were the other way around, that 10 qualified men presented themselves for every 1 qualified female and yet the team was still staffed at 10:1 females to males, then yes you have rather clear-cut (likely illegal) discrimination going on.
Yes, the protected class in these laws is gender, not women, meaning "Sexual discrimination is not legal"
Nope. Gender discrimination is illegal in hiring, firing, pay, and promotions, none of which apply here. This might be illegal if the gender of the teacher was considered, instead of the gender of the students. If you really believe there is a law against gender discrimination in the private provision of classroom incentives, then please provide a specific reference.
Tell that to proprietors (both male and female) who operate "Ladies Night" type promotions on their premises... Its not always cut and dry that it's legal just because employment isn't on the line.
Tell that to the Girl Scouts. Or the Boy Scouts for that matter. Mens rooms, ladies rooms. I don't know how history will judge us, but currently society is quite comfortable treating men and women separately.
No money changes hands in those examples... The question of legality/discrimination is who benefits, and why. See the colorful history of "Ladies Night" in various states (sadly its not gone to the Supreme Court yet) for a perfect example of how this plays out in court. Discriminating via quid pro quo (unequal pay/compensation/remuneration in this case) is often decided to be illegal.
It's not entirely clear what the advantage of a railgun would be, it's very hard on the cannon.
Its in TFS FFS. The main advantage (aside from being a super fucking cool way to shoot/destroy something and being cheaper to procure per round) is that it requires no explosives to be stored on board the ship. Explosives are a huge risk, especially during combat, since your enemy can sink you with one very lucky hit if things get out of hand below deck.
I don't know, aside from a few mountains that mostly stay put there's nothing to hit in the air except other planes, and there's a LOT more room to maneuver than on the street. The riskiest part of a flight is typically the take-off and landing, other than that the only real risk is equipment (or pilot) failure, which shouldn't be dramatically affected by the number of other planes in the sky. Obviously if you had 1000x as many planes in the air you'd need to get a little more aggressive about adhering to flight lanes, but adding additional lanes is almost free. The only thing you'd really need to change is increasing the number of airports to avoid creating dangerously dense spots of air (and runway) traffic.
It'd probably also help if we updated the antiquated and error-prone air-traffic control systems. I know there's several far more intuitive systems that have been designed, but I think they mostly haven't seen widespread deployment yet.
Run out of gas in a car? Put put put putttt.... walk. Run out of gas in a plane? AerrrrrrrrrrrRRRRRRRRRR... CRASH! And that's the consequence of a benign failure mode. Imagine the swift and merciless outcome of a more dramatic failure like a spun bearing or broken crankshaft. Powered planes and gliders have basically nothing in common, even though the public likes to imagine that running out of gas in a plane means soaring gently until you land on a convenient 4-lane road or meticulously preened grass field.
Biting flies, like the zebra, certainly do evolve... typically at a much faster rate than large mammals.
That would make the idea of evolving insect repellent coloring even more amazing.
For proof like in the pudding, the biting flies would have to be shown to exert selection pressure on zebras that is not present where equines without stripes flourish.
It could be the striped coat offers an amalgam of advantages. Hindering attacks from predators trying to pick out a single quarry in a sea of seizure-inducing undulating stripes should not be considered mutually exclusive from hindering insect bites.
Predator logic... A few stripes: bite like hell until my mouth has food in it A shit-ton of stripes: bite like hell until my mouth has food in it
You know, if you're going to just copy and paste part of the article as your summary, you might as well post the last paragraph, and get to the actual explanation:
Zebras have stripes because biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.
Yep, or put another way: "Getting bitten by flies because your hair is too short? Fuck longer hair, let's get some stripes! Because evolution!"
Slashdot Mirror
I have worked for those companies. lol
27 page CAB form and full CAM meeting. Just to edit the /etc/login.defs and change PASS_MIN_DAYS from a 0 to a 7.
I still laugh about it to this day. A single character change and 27 pages of paperwork.
Yeah, show them you know your shit, go ahead and make single character changes all over the place to prove them that their system is pointless. Start with /etc/hosts and then work your way down to /etc/fstab.
With tongue removed from cheek, there is a reason CABs exist in the first place, namely that what one person sees as a no-brainer one character change actually impacts availability to a large number of people because they didnt realize what the true scope of the change was.
Sadly there is no supremely high-tech activity at work in this patent like sending out a flash and scanning for feedback from lenses, instead it is basically an automated anti-glasshole ready to punch anyone who is idly passing by with a recording device, but will completely miss the person with a hidden camera recording them for some time from arms length.
Yea, seems an expensive and obtuse solution for a problem $10 worth of wire and high-intensity IR LEDs can fix.
That reminds me, pick up an IR filter element for my hipster coat button cam...
This has an obvious flaw... It's easy to spot cameras that are *in plain sight* however there are
However nothing. Most people aren't worried about hidden cameras because recent history shows they're not a problem: you have to go out of your way to use them and most people aren't interested enough to do that and most people aren't interesting enough to do it to. Basically the risk is small.
The covertness isn't the problem. The casualness is, and also the fact that once the photo is taken, it's going to be uploaded to google who are interested in tracking everything about everyone for the purpose of pushing ads.
That's the difference.
So to summarize, you (or the hypothetical "you") are not worried that someone would covertly record you without your knowledge, but you are worried that someone with a casual camera will point it at you with only the slightest possible chance of intending to attempt to capture images/video of you? If Google Glass (or just about any other casual camera) were constantly recording/uploading, its tiny battery would wither in minutes. To perform surveillance with it would require dedicated effort, much like the aforementioned hidden cameras. However, the distinction is apparently lost on you in an attempt at privacy-posturing as a replacement for actual privacy.
This has an obvious flaw... It's easy to spot cameras that are *in plain sight* however there are plenty of presently available technologies that completely conceal cameras from view, making this irrelevant to someone really intent on snooping your private information (or posting about you on facebook/google+/etc). Sadly there is no supremely high-tech activity at work in this patent like sending out a flash and scanning for feedback from lenses, instead it is basically an automated anti-glasshole ready to punch anyone who is idly passing by with a recording device, but will completely miss the person with a hidden camera recording them for some time from arms length.
This is why people don't like going to the authorities...
Something is terribly broken at that school... From TFA:
"According to Love, as the teacher is heard attempting to help her son with a math problem, a student says, “You should pull his pants down!” Another student replies, “No, man. Imagine how bad that (c**t) smells! No one wants to smell that (t**t).” As the recording continues, the teacher instructs the classroom that they may only talk if it pertains to math. Shortly thereafter, a loud noise is heard on the recording, which her son explained was a book being slammed down next to him after a student pretended to hit him in the head with it. When the teacher yells, the student exclaims, “What? I was just trying to scare him!” A group of boys are heard laughing."
The incident happened in direct contact with one of the boy's teachers. The teacher failed to control the classroom, failed to discipline the antagonists, and apparently failed to report the incident to the administration (wonder why). The boy's only hope is to get the hell out of there, his teacher (and probably most of the administration) is disturbingly incompetent.
When deciding on an app there are only so many variables that come in to play that can allow someone to compare apps:
1. Number of downloads
2. Average review
3. Specific feature list
4. Price
5. "Editor's choice", top search ranking, "top apps" chart, etc
How each are weighted, in which ecosystems, and by demographic would start to expose where the knowledge gap lies and how to close it. Since you sound more like you are interested in a thesis to solve the problem, you should start from the problem and work backward. You need to know what drives purchase decisions before you hope to influence them.
It's a fork specifically for OpenBSD. Why would they keep support for other OSes?
You only fork when you want to put distance between the original; there is nothing stopping them from making changes/"improvements" to the original OpenSSL project except for scope constraint (i.e. if they just want OpenBSD to be secure) or ego. Either one stinks of selfishness. I cant criticize them directly since they are still doing all of their work for "free" and are publishing it freely, but it has to be pointed out that they are choosing the greater of two evils.
":...being a mathematician, they turn to you."
You're not much of a mathematician if you don't already know the value of Pi out to several decimal places without the need to expel valuable ammo in an experiment. /john
It might be beneficial to claim to not have a lot of knowledge in your head though, since zombies (per common folklore) prefer higher quality brains and therefore acting like an idiot who cant remember a short set of numbers *essential to almost all of math* might be a good survival tactic.
AND a bunch of dead zombies.
What's a dead zombie? Is this some kind of recursion?
(Getting old has a lot of advantages, but one of the disadvantages is that it's harder to keep track of popular memes. I mean, I never understood the whole "vampire" thing, and now we're on to zombies. What's next?)
In the case of the "zombie apocalypse" the commonly held belief is that a communicable disease (possibly man-made) turns a normal person into a zombie without them dying first, and is then spread via contact/biting/etc so that a significant part of the population is a zombie. In that scenario zombies are near-dead (at least their cerebral cortex); dead bodies turning into zombies are part of Vodou beliefs and since there arent that many Vodou followers it is not likely that a zombie apocalypse will come to pass as a result of that particular method.
Or maybe they're smarter than you think:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Hahahahahahaha there aren't enough +1s in all of youtube to express how cool that is...
Bennett, I like all of your stuff and this is well-written but...
Troll! Get him, boys!
These apps are just going to increase mass neurosis. We don't need our heads filled with this crap. We need to spend more time thinking about important issues, not the trivia.
I think the more important issue is the general inefficiency in the marketplace for apps (as well as ideas and intellectual property in general). That was my main point. I wouldn't have written the article just to tell people about the parking apps, although I hope some people find that useful.
If that's the issue then why wouldn't you (serious question, not asking rhetorically i promise) gin up a Turk quiz about how app markets are perceived and participated in? It seems like you already knew the answer to "does anyone know about all these cool parking spot apps?" so just get on with the bigger question. The one I have spent a lot of time pondering (non-scientifically) is what could an app store possibly offer by having >1,000,000 apps? Or even >500,000 apps?
At some point ( i would guess its somewhere down around the 10,000 mark) there has to be a diminishing return on the quality of the apps in the store, and I absolutely never understood why advertising "our store has a zillion apps! yay us! come buy our shiny! pick from a zillion apps, like you will ever have a chance to try even a tenth of a percent of them!!!" was ever thought of as effective.
When I want to go somewhere and it's too much trouble, I make procrastinate until it's too late to make it to whatever appointment I was going for, and that way I don't even have the bother of traveling anywhere at all.
instead of make procrastinate, for your next appointment you should try make clean; make depmod; make procrastinate; make install; make clean. Its way more efficient.
Wrong. Businesses descriminating against customers based on gender is absolutly against the law. The reason that 'Ladies Night' isn't a problem isn't because it is legal. It is because the law is not equally applied. Try putting a sign in the windows of your business that says "No Blacks Allowed", and see how long it takes for you to get your ass handed to you in court.
Citation: http://www.nytimes.com/1994/05...
Agreed, "Ladies Night" has indeed been found to be illegal in most jurisdictions that have heard serious cases regarding it.
There is a quantifiable distinction between an employer (someone offering compensation in exchange for labor in any number of quid pro quo arrangements), a public accommodation (like public drinking fountains, public schools, etc) and a private group like a yoga studio or country club. This article should clear things up for you: http://blogs.findlaw.com/tarni...
Regarding bathrooms, except for public restrooms, they are all private. Many establishments will not let the general public use their restrooms.
Oops almost forgot:
What you point out is entirely about private property law and not at all about discrimination. Show me a private establishment that allows only one specific gender to access the bathroom without paying while denying the other...
No money changes hands in those examples...
There certainly is a lot of money changing hands in the scouts.
I suppose i should have been more clear, the gender specific participants are not compensated solely for their participation, i.e. being a Boy Scout is not a job in the same way that being a Northwestern football player is (ha! i beat you to that one).
Society has decided that sometimes discrimination is bad, sometimes it is unpleasant but necessary, and sometimes it is even good. There is no black and white here.
Golf clap.
Well, the problem is seeing sick people in the hospital and thinking the doctors are making people sick. Correlation is not causation.
Nope, its not the doctors dummy, every nurse I saw in the hospital was a _woman_.
So lets have some discrimination of boys to fix it!
Makes perfect sense.
Are girls being discriminated against? Where? Says who? They aren't trying to "fix" gender discrimination, they are trying to "fix" lopsided attendance and interest. That being said they are probably still going about it wrong. Their money would go a lot further by simply putting it toward fostering more involved volunteer/nonprofit groups (coder camps geared toward girls, for example.)
Not all jobs and not all applicants are created equal, and that is where the notion that "well every team should be half men and half women" falls apart.
The 3 all important questions to ask at each of those firms are:
Who applied for the position in question
What were their qualifications
Who was ultimately hired
If (taking one of your anecdotes as an example) that when there is a grocery cashier job available, 15 females and 2 males apply, and of them 10 females and 1 male have comparable and sufficient qualifications, then it would not be unusual to see a cashier team made up of 10:1 women to men. This would not be illegal or even unusual in any way. If it were the other way around, that 10 qualified men presented themselves for every 1 qualified female and yet the team was still staffed at 10:1 females to males, then yes you have rather clear-cut (likely illegal) discrimination going on.
Yes, the protected class in these laws is gender, not women, meaning "Sexual discrimination is not legal"
Nope. Gender discrimination is illegal in hiring, firing, pay, and promotions, none of which apply here. This might be illegal if the gender of the teacher was considered, instead of the gender of the students. If you really believe there is a law against gender discrimination in the private provision of classroom incentives, then please provide a specific reference.
Tell that to proprietors (both male and female) who operate "Ladies Night" type promotions on their premises... Its not always cut and dry that it's legal just because employment isn't on the line.
Tell that to the Girl Scouts. Or the Boy Scouts for that matter. Mens rooms, ladies rooms. I don't know how history will judge us, but currently society is quite comfortable treating men and women separately.
No money changes hands in those examples... The question of legality/discrimination is who benefits, and why. See the colorful history of "Ladies Night" in various states (sadly its not gone to the Supreme Court yet) for a perfect example of how this plays out in court. Discriminating via quid pro quo (unequal pay/compensation/remuneration in this case) is often decided to be illegal.
It's not entirely clear what the advantage of a railgun would be, it's very hard on the cannon.
Its in TFS FFS. The main advantage (aside from being a super fucking cool way to shoot/destroy something and being cheaper to procure per round) is that it requires no explosives to be stored on board the ship. Explosives are a huge risk, especially during combat, since your enemy can sink you with one very lucky hit if things get out of hand below deck.
I don't know, aside from a few mountains that mostly stay put there's nothing to hit in the air except other planes, and there's a LOT more room to maneuver than on the street. The riskiest part of a flight is typically the take-off and landing, other than that the only real risk is equipment (or pilot) failure, which shouldn't be dramatically affected by the number of other planes in the sky. Obviously if you had 1000x as many planes in the air you'd need to get a little more aggressive about adhering to flight lanes, but adding additional lanes is almost free. The only thing you'd really need to change is increasing the number of airports to avoid creating dangerously dense spots of air (and runway) traffic.
It'd probably also help if we updated the antiquated and error-prone air-traffic control systems. I know there's several far more intuitive systems that have been designed, but I think they mostly haven't seen widespread deployment yet.
Run out of gas in a car? Put put put putttt.... walk. Run out of gas in a plane? AerrrrrrrrrrrRRRRRRRRRR... CRASH! And that's the consequence of a benign failure mode. Imagine the swift and merciless outcome of a more dramatic failure like a spun bearing or broken crankshaft. Powered planes and gliders have basically nothing in common, even though the public likes to imagine that running out of gas in a plane means soaring gently until you land on a convenient 4-lane road or meticulously preened grass field.
Biting flies, like the zebra, certainly do evolve... typically at a much faster rate than large mammals.
That would make the idea of evolving insect repellent coloring even more amazing.
For proof like in the pudding, the biting flies would have to be shown to exert selection pressure on zebras that is not present where equines without stripes flourish.
It could be the striped coat offers an amalgam of advantages. Hindering attacks from predators trying to pick out a single quarry in a sea of seizure-inducing undulating stripes should not be considered mutually exclusive from hindering insect bites.
Predator logic...
A few stripes: bite like hell until my mouth has food in it
A shit-ton of stripes: bite like hell until my mouth has food in it
You know, if you're going to just copy and paste part of the article as your summary, you might as well post the last paragraph, and get to the actual explanation:
Zebras have stripes because biting flies have an aversion to landing on striped surfaces.
Yep, or put another way:
"Getting bitten by flies because your hair is too short? Fuck longer hair, let's get some stripes! Because evolution!"