Steam's DRM, in my opinion, is much less intrusive than SecuROM. Sure, it requires an authentication server. Sure, it runs in the background while you're playing the game. But it's much less intrusive and much more transparent than installing a device driver (or something along the lines of that) that's hard to remove and putting a hard limit on the number of times a game can be authenticated.
Think of it as a "gateway drug" to what I hope will be a DRM-free future, like what iTunes did with its less restrictive DRMing (and eventually, the lack of DRMing) of music downloads (yes, I know that iTunes still DRMs a majority of their content, but that's because Apple's deal with the RIAA restricts them from DRM-free sales).
AS3, the native language of the flash player is what javascript wants be when it grows up
As a language (i.e. not including the libraries), ActionScript is really just JavaScript in disguise. In fact, it is JavaScript; ActionScript is a variant of the ECMAscript language. As such, the core features of the langauges don't differ much. AS does appear to be more "enterprisey", though.
how about speed; is javascript able to render 3D had a frame rate comparable to say the open sourced as3 papervision library
First off: You're conflating the language with the library, so I'll assume that by JavaScript you actually meant the HTML DOM, and by ActionScript, you actually meant Flash.
Now, to answer your question: No, the HTML DOM does not have capabilities for rendering 3D. I'll have to argue that it doesn't need 3D rendering capabilities. Do you need 3D rendering capabilities to read email or post comments to Slashdot? Both use JavaScript and the HTML DOM, and you didn't need to install anything fancy other than your browser to do it.
what about socket connections; can javascript access the read and write to xmpp like the flash player can by utilizing yet another open sourced AS3 library known as XIFF
No, the HTML DOM cannot. This is a problem, but I think the HTML 5 standard includes a model for "pushing" data to the user agent, so this need will be fulfilled in a later version.
MEDIA yeah; could you tube exist now in a javascript only world;
Again, conflating the language with the HTML DOM.
The answer is, again, no. The new HTML 5, however, will include a standard for playing multimedia.
could you tube exist now in a javascript only world; when will we see that dawn of javascript powered browser based virtual worlds
No, and it will never happen.
You may be thinking: With so many "no"s, aren't you winning the argument? No, you aren't. You've been so drawn into the "cool" factor of Flash taht you're forgetting what HTML is used for - to display web pages. Not 3D virtual worlds, but web pages. The HTML DOM + JavaScript should work to enhance web pages - you can use Flash/Java/Silverlight/whatever for everything else. I have admitted a few flaws of the HTML DOM, but it will be fixed, eventually.
What I'm trying to say this whole time is that developers should use the right tool for the job. The obligatory car analogy is obvious here - an SUV (Flash) can go anywhere (those "virtual worlds" you talked about), but for navigating the city (web pages), a sedan (JavaScript and the HTML DOM) will beat Flash at its own game.
and don't even get me started about reduced development time due to its inherently object orientated nature;
The mark of an inexperienced developer. First off, JavaScript is OO - it uses prototypal inheritance, which is more lightweight than the classful inheritance of ActionScript - lightweight being the key word here. Remember that the languages are being used for different purposes.
it will be a glorious day when the canvas object is supported by explorer
The canvas element also works, to an extent, on Internet Explorer. All developers need to do is use the ExplorerCanvas JavaScript library.
however in the mean time the inbetween time if you want to be on the edge of web based experiences and applications the flash player is still the best game in town;
Sure, if you need to be on the "edge". For everyone else, JavaScript and the HTML DOM are just fine.
Finally, what's with your... "exotic" use of the semicolon? You need to use the period while you're programming as well, you know.
You assume that Apple can't announce conferences at any time other than the MacWorld expo or WWDC. Look at all the "Special Events" that Apple have been doing recently. Expect more of those in 2009.
Apple have gotten so good at this thing that they can hype things up not just twice a year, but all year round.
My main complaint is that they present themselves as authoritative
Not really; they're just so good at it, they've developed a very high reputation, but they've never presented themselves as authoritative.
In fact, they noticed this problem themselves, and created The Repository of Lost Legends [*]. It includes articles written in their usual style, but false. The idea was to teach the moral that you should never take any information at face value, regardless of whoever says it.
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to have worked. Common sense isn't all that common these days, is it? [**]
[*] Yes, the acronym for "The Repository Of Lost Legends" spells TROLL. Eat your heart out, GNAA.
[**] Speaking of common sense, you think they would've killed that stupid 90s-era JavaScript hack to "disable" right-clicking already. Anybody with half a brain and the keys Ctrl, A, and C on their keyboard (or the "Edit" menu on their browser window) can easily circumvent this. </rant>.
Because the phone (well, at least, my phone, a Sony Ericsson W810i) has horrible sound quality. The hissing off that thing when using even a pair of $30 earphones is ridiculous. My iPod touch, by comparison, has almost no hissing (even if you listen to it at maximum volume, there's still less hiss than my phone).
My phone also has horrible music management capabilities. The names of the songs, albums, and artists are all cut off at, like, 16 characters; you can't search by genre; when searching by album, sometimes the track order is reversed; there's no album art; and the phone, for some reason, includes its horrible ringtones into the music library.
There exist only two good things about my phone's music player: It has this really awesome bass boost that I like to turn on for fun to pretend I'm sitting in some tricked-out ride; and it doesn't require iTunes.
They implemented this crap because if they say no and stick up for their consumers they know they'll get passed by other parties as a content delivery method.
So, in other words, are you kind of saying that Apple was forced by Hollywood, et al. to do this? Are you essentially reiterating what the GP quoted, but twisting it to cast him in a negative light, but accusing him as a fanboy? Are you essentially proving GP's point?
Oh, by the way: the article has very little to do with FairPlay, and everything to do with HDCP.
I don't like encoding my music into a proprietary format.
You don't seem to have a problem using it on proprietary devices.
Rockbox + your device with proprietary firmware (including iPods -- up to 5.5G) = your device with new, shiny open-source firmware, that, of course, supports.ogg.
Or case in point, the article itself. Already I'm seeing the "applesucks" tag, even though it has nothing to do with the subject matter of even the summary.
Really, it's fashionable on Slashdot to smack anything that isn't related to Linux or Free Software (this isn't really surprising, though).
It's not investigative journalism by any standard whatsoever.
No article by the Register regarding Wikipedia should ever be taken as "investigative journalism". The Register have a well-known anti-Wikipedia bias. I find it funny that everybody is so quick to point the finger at Wikipeda that is doing the shaping of mass opinion (well, at least at Slashdot) here.
Wait a second, if I can't trust anybody, how can I trust YOU to give me that piece of advice? Maybe They WANT me to trust no one. Maybe that's their plan! YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM!
But wait a second, the opposite of not trusting you would be to trust you, right? But I can't trust one of Them! They want to confuse me as who I can trust! This MUST be Their plan! YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM!
Wait a second, if I'm so confused, the obvious solution would be to trust no one. But you just gave me that advice. You're one of Them, so how can I trust YOU to give me that piece of advice? Maybe They WANT me to trust no one. Maybe that's their plan! YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM!
But wait a second, the opposite of not trusting you would be to trust you, right? But I can't trust one of Them! They want to confuse me as who I can trust! This MUST be Their plan! YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM!
Wait a second, if I'm so confused, the obvious solution would be to trust no one...
Fanatics are so fun to mess with, the moment you downplay something, even slightly, they will jump on it and try to jump around it to falsify and even rationalize around it.
Fanatics are so fun to mess with, the moment you downplay something, even slightly, they will jump on it and try to jump around it to falsify and even rationalize around it. That, or they'll just act like idiots.
See what I did there?
The AfD discussions are just that: discussions, not votes. The discussion happens, and an admin decides whether or not to delete the article. There is a good reason for this (imagine somebody getting thousands of volunteers to create accounts and vote for or against articles). However, one could argue that this discussion system is arguably worse than a voting system.
He wasn't talking about any of that crap.
He says "Prime Post" because his post is the second comment on THIS ARTICLE (a play on the First Post meme). 2 is, obviously, a prime.
Are people just that oblivious, or am I the oblivious one not realizing that Mr. Daimanta and Mr. 19thNervousBreakdown here are trolling?
Slashdot Mirror
We should boycott Apple for the HDCP DRM in the new Mini DisplayPort implementation.
No, you should boycott the MPAA, who forced Apple (and nVidia, and ATI) to put HDCP into their products.
Piracy is the response of all good, thinking people to an epidemic of Ninjas.
What are you talking about? There's not a ninja in si
Steam is DRM laden.
How can Steam fight DRM?
Steam's DRM, in my opinion, is much less intrusive than SecuROM. Sure, it requires an authentication server. Sure, it runs in the background while you're playing the game. But it's much less intrusive and much more transparent than installing a device driver (or something along the lines of that) that's hard to remove and putting a hard limit on the number of times a game can be authenticated.
Think of it as a "gateway drug" to what I hope will be a DRM-free future, like what iTunes did with its less restrictive DRMing (and eventually, the lack of DRMing) of music downloads (yes, I know that iTunes still DRMs a majority of their content, but that's because Apple's deal with the RIAA restricts them from DRM-free sales).
AS3, the native language of the flash player is what javascript wants be when it grows up
As a language (i.e. not including the libraries), ActionScript is really just JavaScript in disguise. In fact, it is JavaScript; ActionScript is a variant of the ECMAscript language. As such, the core features of the langauges don't differ much. AS does appear to be more "enterprisey", though.
how about speed; is javascript able to render 3D had a frame rate comparable to say the open sourced as3 papervision library
First off: You're conflating the language with the library, so I'll assume that by JavaScript you actually meant the HTML DOM, and by ActionScript, you actually meant Flash. Now, to answer your question: No, the HTML DOM does not have capabilities for rendering 3D. I'll have to argue that it doesn't need 3D rendering capabilities. Do you need 3D rendering capabilities to read email or post comments to Slashdot? Both use JavaScript and the HTML DOM, and you didn't need to install anything fancy other than your browser to do it.
what about socket connections; can javascript access the read and write to xmpp like the flash player can by utilizing yet another open sourced AS3 library known as XIFF
No, the HTML DOM cannot. This is a problem, but I think the HTML 5 standard includes a model for "pushing" data to the user agent, so this need will be fulfilled in a later version.
MEDIA yeah; could you tube exist now in a javascript only world;
Again, conflating the language with the HTML DOM. The answer is, again, no. The new HTML 5, however, will include a standard for playing multimedia.
could you tube exist now in a javascript only world; when will we see that dawn of javascript powered browser based virtual worlds
No, and it will never happen. You may be thinking: With so many "no"s, aren't you winning the argument? No, you aren't. You've been so drawn into the "cool" factor of Flash taht you're forgetting what HTML is used for - to display web pages. Not 3D virtual worlds, but web pages. The HTML DOM + JavaScript should work to enhance web pages - you can use Flash/Java/Silverlight/whatever for everything else. I have admitted a few flaws of the HTML DOM, but it will be fixed, eventually. What I'm trying to say this whole time is that developers should use the right tool for the job. The obligatory car analogy is obvious here - an SUV (Flash) can go anywhere (those "virtual worlds" you talked about), but for navigating the city (web pages), a sedan (JavaScript and the HTML DOM) will beat Flash at its own game.
and don't even get me started about reduced development time due to its inherently object orientated nature;
The mark of an inexperienced developer. First off, JavaScript is OO - it uses prototypal inheritance, which is more lightweight than the classful inheritance of ActionScript - lightweight being the key word here. Remember that the languages are being used for different purposes.
it will be a glorious day when the canvas object is supported by explorer
The canvas element also works, to an extent, on Internet Explorer. All developers need to do is use the ExplorerCanvas JavaScript library.
however in the mean time the inbetween time if you want to be on the edge of web based experiences and applications the flash player is still the best game in town;
Sure, if you need to be on the "edge". For everyone else, JavaScript and the HTML DOM are just fine. Finally, what's with your... "exotic" use of the semicolon? You need to use the period while you're programming as well, you know.
I take it that you haven't heard of the Canvas element yet?
You assume that Apple can't announce conferences at any time other than the MacWorld expo or WWDC. Look at all the "Special Events" that Apple have been doing recently. Expect more of those in 2009. Apple have gotten so good at this thing that they can hype things up not just twice a year, but all year round.
My main complaint is that they present themselves as authoritative
Not really; they're just so good at it, they've developed a very high reputation, but they've never presented themselves as authoritative. In fact, they noticed this problem themselves, and created The Repository of Lost Legends [*]. It includes articles written in their usual style, but false. The idea was to teach the moral that you should never take any information at face value, regardless of whoever says it. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to have worked. Common sense isn't all that common these days, is it? [**] [*] Yes, the acronym for "The Repository Of Lost Legends" spells TROLL. Eat your heart out, GNAA. [**] Speaking of common sense, you think they would've killed that stupid 90s-era JavaScript hack to "disable" right-clicking already. Anybody with half a brain and the keys Ctrl, A, and C on their keyboard (or the "Edit" menu on their browser window) can easily circumvent this. </rant>.
Because the phone (well, at least, my phone, a Sony Ericsson W810i) has horrible sound quality. The hissing off that thing when using even a pair of $30 earphones is ridiculous. My iPod touch, by comparison, has almost no hissing (even if you listen to it at maximum volume, there's still less hiss than my phone). My phone also has horrible music management capabilities. The names of the songs, albums, and artists are all cut off at, like, 16 characters; you can't search by genre; when searching by album, sometimes the track order is reversed; there's no album art; and the phone, for some reason, includes its horrible ringtones into the music library. There exist only two good things about my phone's music player: It has this really awesome bass boost that I like to turn on for fun to pretend I'm sitting in some tricked-out ride; and it doesn't require iTunes.
They implemented this crap because if they say no and stick up for their consumers they know they'll get passed by other parties as a content delivery method.
So, in other words, are you kind of saying that Apple was forced by Hollywood, et al. to do this? Are you essentially reiterating what the GP quoted, but twisting it to cast him in a negative light, but accusing him as a fanboy? Are you essentially proving GP's point? Oh, by the way: the article has very little to do with FairPlay, and everything to do with HDCP.
I don't like encoding my music into a proprietary format.
You don't seem to have a problem using it on proprietary devices.
Rockbox + your device with proprietary firmware (including iPods -- up to 5.5G) = your device with new, shiny open-source firmware, that, of course, supports .ogg.
Yep. I fear that Google Analytics has gone self-aware. But I'm sure we'll have nothing to worry ab
Thus is the power of Microsoft... the invisible power over the minds of its users.
The "invisible power over the minds of its users" to expect things, like connecting to a VPN, to, you know, work out of the box?
Or case in point, the article itself. Already I'm seeing the "applesucks" tag, even though it has nothing to do with the subject matter of even the summary. Really, it's fashionable on Slashdot to smack anything that isn't related to Linux or Free Software (this isn't really surprising, though).
Verizon. I hear they do wonders when it comes to email security.
It sure is! And its tech support only costs 0.02 cents a minute!
It's not investigative journalism by any standard whatsoever.
No article by the Register regarding Wikipedia should ever be taken as "investigative journalism". The Register have a well-known anti-Wikipedia bias. I find it funny that everybody is so quick to point the finger at Wikipeda that is doing the shaping of mass opinion (well, at least at Slashdot) here.
Trust no one?
Wait a second, if I can't trust anybody, how can I trust YOU to give me that piece of advice? Maybe They WANT me to trust no one. Maybe that's their plan! YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM! But wait a second, the opposite of not trusting you would be to trust you, right? But I can't trust one of Them! They want to confuse me as who I can trust! This MUST be Their plan! YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM! Wait a second, if I'm so confused, the obvious solution would be to trust no one. But you just gave me that advice. You're one of Them, so how can I trust YOU to give me that piece of advice? Maybe They WANT me to trust no one. Maybe that's their plan! YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM! But wait a second, the opposite of not trusting you would be to trust you, right? But I can't trust one of Them! They want to confuse me as who I can trust! This MUST be Their plan! YOU MUST BE ONE OF THEM! Wait a second, if I'm so confused, the obvious solution would be to trust no one...
Sometimes Virgin just isn't interested in sex.
Ha. Haha! Yeah, don't you remember being a virgin? The only people who aren't interested in sex are those who are bored of it.
Your sentence implies that the large majority of Slashdotters have lost their virginity.
Oh, geez, I thought the Linux fanboys were full of themselves, but the Apple fanboys now think Steve Jobs runs the country? ;)
Fanatics are so fun to mess with, the moment you downplay something, even slightly, they will jump on it and try to jump around it to falsify and even rationalize around it.
Fanatics are so fun to mess with, the moment you downplay something, even slightly, they will jump on it and try to jump around it to falsify and even rationalize around it. That, or they'll just act like idiots. See what I did there?
The AfD discussions are just that: discussions, not votes. The discussion happens, and an admin decides whether or not to delete the article. There is a good reason for this (imagine somebody getting thousands of volunteers to create accounts and vote for or against articles). However, one could argue that this discussion system is arguably worse than a voting system.
He wasn't talking about any of that crap. He says "Prime Post" because his post is the second comment on THIS ARTICLE (a play on the First Post meme). 2 is, obviously, a prime. Are people just that oblivious, or am I the oblivious one not realizing that Mr. Daimanta and Mr. 19thNervousBreakdown here are trolling?