Wait a minute. I never took land from anybody by force. Only person I know that had land taken from them by force was by the bank in his foreclosure. So unless you're a banker and your collective "we" just meant bankers, I don't understand what you're talking about.
I will not be held responsible for things done 100-500 years before I was born.
Arizona they might as well be. When it rains you find out they are dried out so you go replace them. Then it doesn't rain again until they are dried out again.
I gave up and rarely use them effectively. Just wipe enough away to get me home.
Not only that, but his complaint about software companies generating wealth is mostly bogus as well. They are able to generate income, but that is much different than wealth. When a software company goes under, typically the code is sold of at rock bottom price and then forgotten about. Look at BeOS as an example. Open source generates true standing wealth.
Many people sue for many things. More often than not they drop it or lose. Occasionally when they win something stupid it gets displayed all over the news so that is probably what you are thinking of.
It's not thinking about weather or not you'll be sued that governs every decision, but whether or not you will win with little legal costs involved. Basically asking, "Is this reasonably safe."
Of course there are those who abuse the system, but it is still worth having the ability to seek recourse when wronged in a way not yet covered by law.
Re:Good reporting there, submitter
on
LLVM 2.2 Released
·
· Score: 1
...and a freer license than GCC.
Really? I'm glad you weren't around when freeing the slaves was the important issue. Perhaps we should have BSDed the slaves. You know, everyone will release them, but of course anyone else can pick them back up and enslave them for themselves.
and I can compare anything to anything. Doesn't matter if it's McDonald's or the best $100 a plate 5 star restaurant. Guess what? I can compare both of them to eating out of a trash can.
As you said the feed back should be on payment and communications, why would I leave feed back just because half of that was satisfied in the first 5 minutes? The communications half isn't taken care of until the transaction is complete.
The seller should care about whether or not the buyer is interested in completing a good transaction. Having the money is not the end of the transaction. Feed back should cover the entire transaction from beginning to end.
As a small time seller on eBay I wouldn't leave feedback until I had received feedback from the buyer. The reasons being that if the feedback is positive then everything obviously went fine, otherwise the buyer should contact me so I can fix the problem or work out a solution. If I get left negative feed back with out any attempt to fix the problem then I will retaliate with negative feed back stating they didn't even try to work something out and feel no need to help the buyer.
Who's going to pay for that ice cream? Benefits have costs you know. Ice cream in the desert is not cheap at all. We'll probably have our wages garnished under the guise of Income Tax until we all get to the point of "Why work at all? I could survive of of ice cream and let other people work to pay for it."
I'm not sure what you mean, both of your example conversations seem entirely appropriate. If it's worse other places then enjoy what you have, if it's better in other places then go there.
Makes sense to me. Why do we have to change McDonalds to be like Quiznos?
"A vote for Paul is NOT a vote for getting rid of anything, or stopping a war, or ending rampant government growth -- it's a vote to put a freedom lover in the most powerful bully pulpit, to remind the politicians and the masses that freedom and responsibility are the individual's right to protect and follow through on."
Thought this was worthy of repeating and is exactly why I am an RP supporter. A revamped version of this should be the head stone of any Libertarian candidates campaign.
Slashdot Mirror
Wait a minute. I never took land from anybody by force. Only person I know that had land taken from them by force was by the bank in his foreclosure. So unless you're a banker and your collective "we" just meant bankers, I don't understand what you're talking about.
I will not be held responsible for things done 100-500 years before I was born.
Arizona they might as well be. When it rains you find out they are dried out so you go replace them. Then it doesn't rain again until they are dried out again.
I gave up and rarely use them effectively. Just wipe enough away to get me home.
We in Phoenix dream of our vaporized metal being merely molten.
You do realize that nanny state is liberal politics right?
Not only that, but his complaint about software companies generating wealth is mostly bogus as well. They are able to generate income, but that is much different than wealth. When a software company goes under, typically the code is sold of at rock bottom price and then forgotten about. Look at BeOS as an example. Open source generates true standing wealth.
I'm sorry...did those people not in the US think they were part of the world? How quaint.
I call fowl!!
I just looked around on http://pricewatch.com/
9700 $189
9600 $51
That includes shipping
Many people sue for many things. More often than not they drop it or lose. Occasionally when they win something stupid it gets displayed all over the news so that is probably what you are thinking of.
It's not thinking about weather or not you'll be sued that governs every decision, but whether or not you will win with little legal costs involved. Basically asking, "Is this reasonably safe."
Yea, it's always cheaper to rip out a century old established economy and replace it with a completely new untested one.
Of course there are those who abuse the system, but it is still worth having the ability to seek recourse when wronged in a way not yet covered by law.
Funniest, topically related reply ever.
You win Slashdot!!
Of course not all police officers. Just the one's that shoot innocent people.
http://xkcd.com/75/
...and a freer license than GCC.
Really? I'm glad you weren't around when freeing the slaves was the important issue. Perhaps we should have BSDed the slaves. You know, everyone will release them, but of course anyone else can pick them back up and enslave them for themselves.
and I can compare anything to anything. Doesn't matter if it's McDonald's or the best $100 a plate 5 star restaurant. Guess what? I can compare both of them to eating out of a trash can.
As you said the feed back should be on payment and communications, why would I leave feed back just because half of that was satisfied in the first 5 minutes? The communications half isn't taken care of until the transaction is complete.
The seller should care about whether or not the buyer is interested in completing a good transaction. Having the money is not the end of the transaction. Feed back should cover the entire transaction from beginning to end.
As a small time seller on eBay I wouldn't leave feedback until I had received feedback from the buyer. The reasons being that if the feedback is positive then everything obviously went fine, otherwise the buyer should contact me so I can fix the problem or work out a solution. If I get left negative feed back with out any attempt to fix the problem then I will retaliate with negative feed back stating they didn't even try to work something out and feel no need to help the buyer.
Who's going to pay for that ice cream? Benefits have costs you know. Ice cream in the desert is not cheap at all. We'll probably have our wages garnished under the guise of Income Tax until we all get to the point of "Why work at all? I could survive of of ice cream and let other people work to pay for it."
I'm not sure what you mean, both of your example conversations seem entirely appropriate. If it's worse other places then enjoy what you have, if it's better in other places then go there.
Makes sense to me. Why do we have to change McDonalds to be like Quiznos?
http://www.snopes.com/critters/wild/frogboil.asp
Thanks, looks like we have nothing to worry about.
"A vote for Paul is NOT a vote for getting rid of anything, or stopping a war, or ending rampant government growth -- it's a vote to put a freedom lover in the most powerful bully pulpit, to remind the politicians and the masses that freedom and responsibility are the individual's right to protect and follow through on."
Thought this was worthy of repeating and is exactly why I am an RP supporter. A revamped version of this should be the head stone of any Libertarian candidates campaign.
Hmm, how can I use this for personal gain?
"Honey, there's new research that says you can make a baby with two women and one guy. What'cha think we give it a try?"
I, for one, support our new Libertarian Overlord.
Heh, Libertarian Overlord. Now that's funny.
Ironyblind? Is that why I had to have my BDUs pressed while in the Army? I guess if they were ironed then the ironyblind couldn't see me coming?