Slashdot Mirror


Third Undersea Cable Cut

Many readers are reporting that another undersea fiber optic cable has been cut, apparently caused by another wayward anchor. It looks like Iran has completely lost Internet connectivity."

655 comments

  1. Third cut? by Eevee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once is accident.

    Twice is coincidence.

    Thrice is enemy action.

    1. Re:Third cut? by KublaiKhan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, it does seem suspicious, especially since it's Iran--a country that's in the news a lot lately, and with whom communication may be rather important.

      If this is followed by reports of various despicable actions in Iran which cannot be verified due to the lack of communication, then it would be even more suspicious.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    2. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Last night while sitting in my chair
      I pinged a host that wasn't there
      It wasn't there again today
      The host resolved to NSA.

    3. Re:Third cut? by bigdavex · · Score: 5, Funny

      A communications disruption can mean only one thing - invasion.

      --
      -Dave
    4. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      yes funny. does not slashdot realize we have had a sub that can do just that for decades?

      http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:3fK6ZB19WjIJ:msl1.mit.edu/furdlog/docs/cnn/2005-02-18_cnn_optical_taps.pdf+fiber+submarine+cia&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&client=opera

      keep laughing guys and gals why the spies among us earn their salary. :-P

    5. Re:Third cut? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

      If this is followed by reports of various despicable actions in Iran which cannot be verified due to the lack of communication, then it would be even more suspicious. Meanwhile a U.S. effort to bring aid to the Kurds has been proven successful. "Operation Dredge Massive Underwater Machete" has stated that its peaceful goals have been accomplished and will slowly pass the rest of Iran's coast in a return to its base in India.
      --
      My work here is dung.
    6. Re:Third cut? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      The cable is actually number four - if I count correctly.

      Target Iran - or a trading delay for the Gulf countries. Any how. No Accident.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    7. Re:Third cut? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Funny

      and Four Times is shrimp getting to like the taste of plastic coating.

    8. Re:Third cut? by VoiceOfDoom · · Score: 1

      That is pure genius

      --
      "Life is pain Highness. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something"

      Westly, The Princess Bride

    9. Re:Third cut? by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yes funny. does not slashdot realize we have had a sub that can do just that for decades? This was about cutting a cable not tapping it. And apparently you don't need a special sub for that, a plain old boat anchor works just fine. Still, it is very suspicious that all three of the undersea cables have been cut within such a short time period. Considering that Egypt was already talking about rationing bandwidth they've got to be shitting themselves now.
      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    10. Re:Third cut? by riseoftheindividual · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If this is the work of our spies, they aren't earning their salary. They're incompetent bastards who should be fired for lacking any type of stealth or subtlety.

      How much tech do you really need to cut a cable? It doesn't seem like it would require much in the way of high tech capability. Given that these cables are communication lines carrying western influences into muslim countries, I would say that at this point, we should not rule out militant acts to make a statement about wanting a reduction of western influence.

      If this is our spies, this would seem to be a pretty boneheaded execution of tapping lines. But, since they work for the government, we can't rule out boneheadedness. Or just really bizzarre random chance, though that's kind of hard for me personally to swallow at this point.

      --
      Patriot - A fan of expanding government power and spending while not wanting to pay higher taxes.
    11. Re:Third cut? by djones101 · · Score: 1

      I yearn to have mod points simply to mod you up for that gem.

    12. Re:Third cut? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      That would be if we all assume it was our guys (Americans/Canadians) that did it, however a small third world country trying to pierce through oppression or a rebel group like al quedea might only have the means to drag an anchor on the bottom of the ocean...i still think it strange though they were all cut within a short period of time, no coincidences for me!

    13. Re:Third cut? by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      There was a point in time when ships were the communication lines carrying western influences into Muslim countries. As for tapping lines: why bother with a physical tap? I'm sure Cisco has a back-door arrangement with the NSA. Besides, all the major peering points (except those that handle internal traffic in large countries like China and Russia) are western controlled.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    14. Re:Third cut? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      well at least now we know redundency is a foreign concept to them. If there's ever a war, all we have to do is slice some cables and the entire...what like middle east and part of asia or something loses their ability to launch cyber attacks and communicate? Not very bright over there, are they? Even worse, don't foreign companies own the fiber cables and they're just leasing them? Forget slicing them, they could say "we don't like your country anymore" and disconnect them and apparently they have no backup connections at all. They're taking one small step for stupid network design and one giant leap for stupidity in general.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    15. Re:Third cut? by Bent+Mind · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought this was interesting:

      "We had another cut today between Dubai and Muscat three hours back. The cable was about 80G capacity, it had telephone, Internet data, everything," one Flag official, who declined to be named, told Zawya Dow Jones.

      The cable, known as Falcon, delivers services to countries in the Mediterranean and Gulf region, he added.

      "It may take sometime to fix the cut but we are rerouting the traffic to another cable in the U.K. and U.S., the bandwidth utilization will go down," the official said.

      So, a "Flag official, who declined to be named" reports that a major portion of the Gulf region's communications are being rerouted through the US and UK.

      It's probably not as fishy as it sounds. I seem to recall a major portion of all Internet traffic at least passes through the US. However, it does make you wonder.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    16. Re:Third cut? by Freeside1 · · Score: 1

      How do you say 'Firesale' in Farsi?

    17. Re:Third cut? by rucs_hack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry to muss your tin hat, but its no accident that all this is happening just after someone made the monumentally stupid decision that boats should anchor in the same area as the cables.

      This is more likely down to one of two things, attempted money saving or pointless bureaucracy.

      I say this because I have serious doubt that if the US were going to do it, they'd have done it in secret. I'd go for it being done after some threats, or as part of an actual invasion, and I don't see one anywhere, do you? It's not as if this could really stop Iran or anyone conducting war, there are these little things called satellites.

      Yes it would disrupt business, but um, what good would that do the US Government? None in the short term, and in the long term the cable would be fixed.

    18. Re:Third cut? by Poltras · · Score: 3, Funny

      First scuba: "Hey dude! I found the cables!"
      Second scuba: "Cool. Now cut the red one. No, not that one, the other one. No not this one!"
      First scuba: "Hey man! Sorry, I'm colorblind.."
      Second scuba: "Sh.t! That's 2 dude. We were simply supposed to cut the good one... Now gimme those scissors. There you go."

    19. Re:Third cut? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Around January 18th, news reports are that several city's power grids have been recently attacked via the internet.

      In completely unrelated news, a couple of weeks later large portions of mideast anti-western terrorist sponsoring areas had internet access disrupted or cut off in a series of coincidental unobserved "accidents".

      Hmm.....

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    20. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    21. Re:Third cut? by GnomeThinker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, a "Flag official, who declined to be named" reports that a major portion of the Gulf region's communications are being rerouted through the US and UK. It's probably not as fishy as it sounds. I seem to recall a major portion of all Internet traffic at least passes through the US. However, it does make you wonder.
      Of course this adds an interesting twist to the NSA wanting to access the 'tubes' that are running through the USA and the big worry that the anti-terrorism battle will be horribly lost if we don't let them sniff every packet that crosses the continent.
    22. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least now we know they cant buy parts for their nuclear weapons online anymore.

    23. Re:Third cut? by monkeyboythom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sigh...more fairy tales from teh Intarweb...

      We all know that colorblind people can see colors correctly underwater while those who have correct vision cannot.

      First scuba: "Hey dude! I found the cables!" Second scuba: "Cool. Now cut the red one. No, not that one, the other one. No not this one!" First scuba: "Hey man! Sorry, I'm colorblind.." Second scuba: "Sh.t! That's 2 dude. We were simply supposed to cut the good one... Now gimme those scissors. There you go."
    24. Re:Third cut? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One in Marseilles, one in Suez. Not the same ruddy deal. The new break is on the FLAG cable - in yest another place: 56 kms from Dubai on a segment between the UAE and Oman.

      You seem to be a knee-jerk skeptic, who's "Nothing to see here, move along" displays not - as you presume - intelligence, but rather a susceptibility to Jedi mind-tricks.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    25. Re:Third cut? by hardburn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whatever it is, it probably literally translates to "bad movie".

      --
      Not a typewriter
    26. Re:Third cut? by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Brilliant. You made me LOL. Thanks.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    27. Re:Third cut? by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      What is that from again? It's been so long.

    28. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid boat anchors are the new trackhoes of the sea.

    29. Re:Third cut? by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Iran wants to limit Internet access to its citizens anyway. Well, there you go.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    30. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You break it in one location so you can tap it in another... hmm....

    31. Re:Third cut? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I couldn't help but think the same thing. I didn't bother to RTFA so.
      [FUD]Is this the "cyberwar" that has been talked about?[/FUD]

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    32. Re:Third cut? by crmarvin42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I say this because I have serious doubt that if the US were going to do it, they'd have done it in secret.
      I'm not a tinfoil hat type, I don't see conspiracy where ever I look, but why would it have to be the US?
      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    33. Re:Third cut? by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Nevermind. Star Wars I

    34. Re:Third cut? by STrinity · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Communications disruption can mean only one thing -- invasion.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    35. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thrice is enemy action.

      That should be "three times, blame Bush administration."
    36. Re:Third cut? by ironwill96 · · Score: 1

      Great comment!

      --
      "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
    37. Re:Third cut? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've heard stories (yes, yes, probably urban legends) that the US Navy was at one point technically able to tap into undersea fiber optic cables using a special chamber mounted on a support submarine. They could get the cable into the chamber, then pump the water out. Then they used a work area which reflected light in just the right way so that they could install their recorder on each cable without interrupt the data going through it.

      Probably BS, but it would be technically impressive if true.

    38. Re:Third cut? by russotto · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm not a tinfoil hat type, I don't see conspiracy where ever I look, but why would it have to be the US?
      You must be new here. The US _is_ the source of all evil, according to Slashdot received wisdom.
    39. Re:Third cut? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Well neither of them know that, so the not colorblind one was the source of the problem :)

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    40. Re:Third cut? by MicktheMech · · Score: 1

      What does Canada have to do with this?

      Oh, we're talking about incompetent spies. Then... yeah, it's probably us.

    41. Re:Third cut? by mea37 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If this is followed by reports of various despicable actions in Iran which cannot be verified due to the lack of communication, then it would be even more suspicious.

      True, but can't we wait until that actually happens before talking about how suspicious it would be? Doesn't the government actually do enough under-handed things that we can display our cynicism talking about those realities, rather than speculating about what kind of plot we'd dream up if we were the ones being under-handed?

      Now, I do think someone's up to something. For years we have undersea cables, and I can't speak to the frequency with which they get cut, but now we're to believe that a number of links have been cut in a short period of time, at least a couple of them by the same sort of accident? Anchors must have suddenly gotten a lot more dangerous...

      Who's up to what, that's the question. I don't buy that it's a campaign to blind us to what's really happening inside Iran, because most people here would bite the line fed them by the mainstream media whether the links were there or not. (Believe the American media is completely free, unbiased, and all-knowing if you want, but don't expect me to play along...)

      The most obvious assumption is that someone is trying to cut the flow of information into Iran, though the motives for that are cloudy to me as well.

      A couple wild-ass theories... Because I can :)

      Perhaps it's a coutner-attack in cyber warfare. Disrupt an enemy in Iran who is attacking Internet-based assets elsewhere in the world, something to that effect. It's an optimistic take, but possible.

      Perhaps the cables aren't the target at all. How much do we know about the locations where the cables were cut? Is the sudden swarm of anchors the result of ships stopping where usually they do not? If so, who owns the ships, and why are they suddenly parking there?

    42. Re:Third cut? by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      selected text
      "search with google"

      one result. this post.

      you're a hero.

    43. Re:Third cut? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      So the careless boater was aiding the terr'sts? Geddim!

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    44. Re:Third cut? by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      We all know that colorblind people can see colors correctly underwater while those who have correct vision cannot.

      I've never heard that before. My understanding is that colorblindness is due to an absence or shortage of color receptor cells in the eye. I don't see how that could give someone better vision underwater.

      OTOH, I have heard that color blind people are better at spotting camouflaged objects. I presume that's because they see things DIFFERENTLY than the non-colorblind person who created the camouflage.

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    45. Re:Third cut? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      It's not terribly difficult to just cut an undersea cable. The difficulty is in doing it surreptitiously. The Vietnamese salvagers did it by hauling the cable onto their ship first. The US is the leader in undersea cable tapping and cutting. They are probably the only ones who have invested the effort to make their attacks look like shark bites.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    46. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The question quickly becomes: is anyone actually retarded enough to think that if you cut off the internotz to Iran, you can secretly bomb them and nobody will notice? Or, not notice in a timely fashion?

    47. Re:Third cut? by mousse-man · · Score: 1

      And Four will be The Lumber Cartel.

      At least I have less spam, which is, in itself, not a bad thing.

    48. Re:Third cut? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I find this interesting. A kneejerk conspiracy theorist calling a voice of reason a kneejerk rational thinker. Or was it a kneejerk enabler? I dunno.

      Either way, how does it feel to be attacked for taking a rash and sane approach to something? Do you think his pressure will break your spirit and force you to toss all common sense out the windows and adopt the America is evil attitude? You don't have to answer that, I was just wondering if I could be rhetorical more then wondering what the answer was. Of course know I suppose I should look up rhetorical so I have an idea about what it means when someone attacks me for not toeing the America is evil line.

    49. Re:Third cut? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. The US _is_ the source of all evil, according to Slashdot received wisdom. I'm not sure if this modding as troll contradicts that or just says it isn't the source of all stupidity.

      Note to self: don't paraphrase Yoda.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    50. Re:Third cut? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Funny

      they should have just hired the COMCAST guys to, uhhh, NAK an RST some of the packets.

      that'll fix 'em!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    51. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how much tech to do really need to test tapping a cable for SIGINT?

    52. Re:Third cut? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      The Federation would not dare go that far!

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    53. Re:Third cut? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, why couldn't it be Iran? I mean they seem to be playing the victim and manipulating the press lately. They sent their patrol boats to harass our navy ships then cried when we fired warning shots in their direction. They showed a film of old 70's style speed boats and then claimed we knew what they were doing by showing someone inside a cabined fishing boat saying something on a radio. I don't see why this couldn't have been Iran wanting everyone to claim the US was up to something.

    54. Re:Third cut? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How's Murphy's law go? Anything that can go wrong, will? Anything that cannot possibly break, will, and at the worst possible time?

      Randomness is weird like that. You can never rule it out just on the face that something is highly, highly, improbable. After all, life is the consequence of a series of highly, highly improbable events.

      I agree that it is suspicious, but I'd like to see proof before blaming a US invasion on this. Besides, what would really be the point of this? Isolate Iran? They'll be up and running in two weeks again. Threaten them? With what? Lack of porn downloads?

      I fail to see how this could be used to coerce Iran. After all, it's not a threat if the other party doesn't know it is a threat.....

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    55. Re:Third cut? by mr_death · · Score: 0

      More than likely, boats were anchoring long before the undersea cable arrived.

      Having said that, I'm not too disappointed that the whack-jobs mullahs that run Iran can't get to their favorite pr0n site.

      --
      It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
    56. Re:Third cut? by Kompressor · · Score: 5, Funny

      We all know that ironyblind people can see irony correctly underwater while those who have correct perception cannot.

      I've never heard that before. My understanding is that ironyblindness is due to an absence or shortage of irony receptor cells in the brain. I don't see how that could give someone better comprehension underwater.

      OTOH, I have heard that irony blind people are worse at spotting camouflaged humor. I presume that's because they percieve things DIFFERENTLY than the non-ironyblind person who created the camouflage.
      There, fixed that for ya ;-)
      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    57. Re:Third cut? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      If this is our spies, this would seem to be a pretty boneheaded execution of tapping lines

      And why are we at war in Iraq again? Didn't it have something to do with intelligence reports about weapons of mass destruction that were't actually there?

      Incompetence, like competence, starts at the top.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    58. Re:Third cut? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      The question quickly becomes: is anyone actually retarded enough to think that if you cut off the internotz to Iran, you can secretly bomb them and nobody will notice? Or, not notice in a timely fashion?

      Of course not. But that's not what you want. What you want is to create a bottleneck everything passes through, and you control the bottleneck.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    59. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Me note must: Yoda paraphrase do not

    60. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      We'll be taking back your geek card now. We were willing to let you get away with not recognizing a line from Star Wars, it being from a prequel and all, but not even using Google before you ask? Have you no decency?

    61. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you're trying to make some nukes
      Don't bother putting up your dukes
      Subs with scissors of nations crossed
      Will ensure *** CARRIER LOST ***

    62. Re:Third cut? by shimage · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, my first impression was that the Iranian government was trying to cut its people off from the outside world (perhaps the firewalls weren't enough?). The biggest threat to a dictatorship is an informed populace (well, in my opinion, anyway). I'm probably way off mark anyway.

    63. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be surprised to see an attack on Iran, now that the people of Iran can not relay their situation to the rest of the world.

    64. Re:Third cut? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      "A communications disruption can mean only one thing - invasion."

      Who the hell thinks this comment is funny?

      War is never funny. A war with Iran is likely to cost tens of thousands of US ervice lives and a hundred thousand or more Iranian lives within a few weeks. Cutting the cables is very likely intended to be a prelude to war. Most likely it is simply another provocation intended to cause Iran to commence the hostilities, if it was intended to support an actual invasion they should have waited until the last moment.

      Iran is not going to be the pushover that Iraq was, although their military spending is only 1% of US spending, their cost basis is much lower. They have bought a lot of missiles, they have proved that their missiles are capable of sinking an Israeli naval ship with advanced electronic countermeasures. They are more than likely capable of sinking the supercarriers. They are certainly capable of sinking any tanker that is stupid enough to lumber through the straits.

      The Iranians can certainly level the green zone and decapitate the US occupation. They can mount a land invasion and cut off the US forces by capturing Basra. They have had four years to gather comprehensive knowledge of the US order of battle etc. in Iraq from their HUMINT assets on the ground. The US does not even have an embassy in Iran, all US operatives in Iran are illegals and it is highly unlikely that the CIA has a tenth the number of agents in the whole of Iran as the Iranians have in Basra or Baghdad.

      The US is unable to occupy Iraq, Iran has three times the population. Russia and China rely on Iranian oil supplies and are going to take every step necessary to prevent the US from gaining control of the middle east. They are just as willing to use nuclear weapons as the Bush administration is.

      What we are looking at here is quite likely the end of US superpower status. If the US goes head to head with Iran and loses a supercarrier it will immediately sink to being on the same rank as China and Russia. That is not funny at all.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    65. Re:Third cut? by __aannpi2461 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm pretty sure this is just a Cloverfield promotion...

    66. Re:Third cut? by bigpicture · · Score: 1

      There are times when things can be accidentally coincidental. But when the probability mathematical odds get really high, then the question should always be: was it deliberate? If it was terrorists there is a high likely hood that there would be a: "look what we did" news cast. But if it were the covert actions of a semi legitimate government, then it would be made to look accidental.

    67. Re:Third cut? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      If this is the work of our spies, they aren't earning their salary. They're incompetent bastards who should be fired for lacking any type of stealth or subtlety.

      Its a provocation, it does not have to be stealthy, the whole point is to get the Iranians to declare war on the US. Bush wants to start another war but lacks the political support at home to make the first move, he would be impeached. So instead the administration has been attempting to provoke the Iranians in various ways: arresting their diplomats in Iraq, conducting special operations in Iran, belicose rhetoric 'axis of evil', stationing three supercarriers in the gulf, etc.

      The other half has been 'Tokinizing' Iranian activities, attempting to reconstruct the Tonkin Gulf incident, allegations that the Iranians are supplying the insurgency in Iraq, WMD claims and so on.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    68. Re:Third cut? by bigdavex · · Score: 5, Informative

      Who the hell thinks this comment is funny?

      I hope that people who have seen Star Wars think it's funny. I'm sorry if I offended you.

      I don't support my country's Middle East policy, for the record.

      --
      -Dave
    69. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now they'll just have to phone/fax Haliburton

    70. Re:Third cut? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Co-incidence is what people call it when they're confronted by something systematic that they aren't able to understand. It doesn't exist.

      When you can't find the evidence, you look for motive and capacity. That makes it most likely that this was caused by the western warmongers alliance in an effort to cover up operations, or by the religious leaders within Iran in an effort to isolate their population from "corrupting influence".

      In light of the real, visible and ongoing efforts being put forth by Iran to humanize their people in the eyes of the world and counteract the demonizing propaganda put out by the US, it's unlikely that they did this to themselves, even though under different circumstances it would be in character.

      It seems pretty obvious that this was caused by the US/UK/Israel alliance as a way to strike at the Islamic countries. Not that it really matters who did it, even if you knew, you still wouldn't have any capacity to hold anyone accountable. What matters to Iran is replacing the old infrastructure with a new one that is less vulnerable and prevent the exploitation of the opportunity this provides their enemies to establish vectors for espionage.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    71. Re:Third cut? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Who the hell thinks this comment is funny? ...someone who's watched Star Wars? But hey, use it for a soap box, too. I'm all for recycling.
    72. Re:Third cut? by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      here, let me fix that for you:

      if this is followed by reports of various U.S. supplied deep penetrator bombings of Iranian uranium processing facilities by Israel in Iran which cannot be verified due to the lack of communication, then it would be even more suspicious.

    73. Re:Third cut? by provigilman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      http://www.internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm/

      Currently the Florida router is listed at 0 as well...does this mean that the US is going to attack Iran and Florida? No, it just means "s--- happens". Not everything is the result of black helicopters...

      --
      "Life's short and hard, like a body building elf." -- The Bloodhound Gang
    74. Re:Third cut? by wiggles · · Score: 1

      Somebody get that one into Fortune.

    75. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's official, you win the internets!

    76. Re:Third cut? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Informative

      ""A communications disruption can mean only one thing - invasion."
      Who the hell thinks this comment is funny? "


      Lighten up Francis. It's a quote from Star Wars, Episode 1.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    77. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      FTSummary:It looks like Iran has completely lost Internet connectivity.

      This is just hacker revenge against countries who don't like our surfing habits and want to restrict them. No internet -- no porn. Fuck Iran.

    78. Re:Third cut? by riseoftheindividual · · Score: 1

      That could be, I wouldn't rule that viewpoint out at all. BUT, I also don't rule out a militant group/foreign government who wants to make a point or see things started.

      We go into Iran right now, that's going to weaken us as a nation(speaking US centric), I don't give a damn what the fiscally ignorant supporters of such action say to the contrary. Unless we were blessed with a magical quick decisive victory that the supporters of the Iraq Invasion were claiming we'd have 5 years ago, we would lose more than we would ever gain out of such an attack. A lot of people in power in other places know this and would love to see us fall on our faces.

      Then again, why try to trip the fool who does such a fine job of tripping their self? Hard to read it honestly, bastards and liars on all sides. Trusting any of them is done at your own risk of being led down the merry path.

      --
      Patriot - A fan of expanding government power and spending while not wanting to pay higher taxes.
    79. Re:Third cut? by Plekto · · Score: 1

      That this is targeting a specific region of the world and that we have the technology to tap into these cables, it's quite obvious to me what's going on here(as well as many others).

      To install a tap on a circuit, you need to first cut or break into it if it's a fiber-optic cable. Then you go in and "repair" it the tap is still in place.

      Not tinfoil hat time, either. Just the U.S. government doing what it does best - tapping into and monitoring our enemies'(and everyone else's) communications. Just one more reason to not use the Net for anything that requires secrecy.

    80. Re:Third cut? by pugugly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love how any criticism of the U.S. is always translated as "The US _is_ the source of all evil".

      Because y'know, any criticism of temporary policies always indicates a vast, hidden belief structure.

      Sigh - Pug

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    81. Re:Third cut? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ironyblind? Is that why I had to have my BDUs pressed while in the Army? I guess if they were ironed then the ironyblind couldn't see me coming?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    82. Re:Third cut? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Funny
      It wasn't there again today
      The host resolved to NSA.

      Wait a minute, I thought it was Network Solutions (NSI) that was picking up all the domain names.

    83. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they're just going to reconnect the cables with something to snoop them.

    84. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      I disagree respectfully with you- I think the most likely explanation is that it is an attempt to blind us to what might happen within Iran. It's to stop information getting out, in my opinion.

      It's a STUPID move, which is why that explanation seems wrong as you- it can't really work, and we have no proof that it's actually being followed up on in any way. My hope is that it will remain mysterious because other proposed actions (like bombing the hell out of Iran) will not make it through the chain of command of the US Military. I suspect that the screw-up with nuclear weapons earlier was a matter of the civilian command trying to get things to happen without following proper procedure. I think this is more of the same and there's no telling how far it will actually go- perhaps not that far.

    85. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cutting a cable is easy.

      Cutting a deep-sea OC-192 is not. These things are in armored sleeves because splicing them is a bitch and the sea a cruel mistress.

      As for "tapping lines", do you have any *idea* how hard it would be to tap an undersea optical cable? What kind of gear(and power) you'd need to keep it running and obtaining data? Stealth and subtlety are great, for movies and video games. Plain old sabotage is judged on effectiveness, not style, and I would not be surprised to find Bush is finally marching us into Iran at this very moment.

    86. Re:Third cut? by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      A communications disruption can mean only one thing - invasion. Really? I thought it meant they're using Comcast.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    87. Re:Third cut? by wurp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Er, coincidence certainly does exist. Three one-in-a-thousand events have a one-in-a-billion chance of occurring together, completely coincidentally.

      I'm not arguing that this particular event is coincidental, but you're being just as blind as your tone implies others are if you think events never coincide just by chance. The important thing is to have some idea of just how unlikely it is for obviously related events to coincide. (In this case, fantastically unlikely.)

    88. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      But we're not talking about what _I_ want, we're talking about whether the people running the country I'm in are in the process of flipping out and doing something completely stupid. These are not people who give a shit about monitoring things. They ignored the intelligence reports they had. They talk about creating history (or did) but they are not serious people, they don't work at things or lay reasonable plans.

      So my question still very much is, "does somebody actually think that if you cut off communications, you can bomb Iran without approval of Congress or the American people, and more than that, do they think they would somehow WIN by such a 'retreat-forward' maneuver?"

    89. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Snook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, if you want to test your surveillance of an enemy's communications networks, deliberately disrupting their communications can be a very worthwhile experiment.

      It's notable that Iran is now supposedly cut off entirely. If the Iranian government has any secret communications links, it'll be much easier to tell when they're using them.

      --
      There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
    90. Re:Third cut? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I always get a laugh out of statements like that. Particularly given that the US and other western nations don't want one of their sources of intelligence compromised. Why do you think Islamic extremeists can keep a web page and forums up rather than having their servers turned off? Maybe because the US thinks it's better to have them talking where they can see and monitor rather than talking privately. I personally believe the US would repair any Internet cables into "terrorist" countries if they were damaged just so they can be used for intelligence gathering and relay. The Internet is an incredibly important tool of intelligence gathering and collection and the only time it would get cut is in the case of a major international war or invasion. I don't see either so I would wager the statement that bad luck comes in three's is probably the important point.

      I also think it's important to point out that there are currently a large number of winter storms moving through the middle east right now and lots of ships are likely being diverted to areas they don't normally tread to avoid/weather them.

    91. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      I'm with you Zeinfeld- this has rattled me bigtime. It's reminding me of how I followed 9/11 on slashdot because that was where all the reports came together quickest.

      I don't believe for a second that the US is going to attempt to invade, but I am very, very suspicious that someone in the White House is attempting to make our military bomb Iran to produce chaos within which they can cling to power. This doesn't mean it will succeed- these guys don't plan and their track record for succeeding longterm is terrible- but I think they are trying to strike at Iran without the approval of Congress (or indeed the american people). That is totally not funny on a lot of levels.

      First, such an act would be a horrific war crime beyond anything my country has done, which is already a lot.

      Second, you're absolutely right that it would be suicidal. My understanding is that the Iranian Sunburn missiles can rather easily take out our supercarriers. Don't we just happen to have three right there in striking range? Is the idea that we get Iran to take out our supercarriers to JUSTIFY the ceaseless war and kick it up a notch? Apart from the war crimes thing, there's a problem if the plan is to destroy our own military to prove we weren't wrong in using it. That's a horrible idea. What if we need to have military force sometime in the future?

    92. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to muss your tin hat, but its no accident that all this is happening just after someone made the monumentally stupid decision that boats should anchor in the same area as the cables.

      Since these breaks involve three locations over 800mi apart on the coasts of three different continents I can only assume that by "same area" you mean "eastern hemisphere".

    93. Re:Third cut? by pallmall1 · · Score: 1

      Shakespeare of the net.

      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    94. Re:Third cut? by Qwrk · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's what we call "all out"........

    95. Re:Third cut? by JoeInnes · · Score: 1

      Sorry, what? "[...]if the US were going to do it, they'd have done it in secret"? I suppose they'd just be hoping no-one noticed.
       
      Doing it "in secret" is impossible when pretty much an entire nation can see what you've done. You just have to make it look like an accident. A heavy metal accident with a chain attached, for example.

    96. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just WANT there to be action against Iran from its enemies, don't you?

    97. Re:Third cut? by macdaddy · · Score: 1
    98. Re:Third cut? by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      It would be amazing...that bit of technology.

      It would mean being able to fusion-splice a prism into a glass strand as thick as a hair. Without interrupting the light, in a sealed chamber underwater at a pressure and atmosphere suitable for a fusion splice.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    99. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      The supercarriers thing concerns me because if the Iranian's Sunburn missiles are all they're supposed to be, those supercarriers are bait. They could all be destroyed if things got nasty.

      I'm trying hard to sort out what's going on (if anything) and being reminded of following 9/11 on Slashdot as that unfolded. So far what I have is:

      We've had an incident where a nuclear weapon was flying across the country to a staging area for overseas operations and got stopped at the last minute- it was called a mistake, but mistakes don't really happen with those, it's a suspicious mistake- theory, someone was trying to go outside the usual chain of command.

      We've had a lot of talk, especially early on, about how 'we create history, we act and others follow along and write up what happened'.

      We have George Bush apparently looking unusually bad just the other day- didn't see that myself. He didn't look good on 9/11 either, he doesn't actually LIKE huge warlike events. obSnark: someone get that man 'My Pet Goat', stat!

      And now we have Iran off the Internet, which does not mean it's unable to communicate (hello, satellite, radio, shortwave?) but some people might be dumb enough to think that if 'news' can't get out of Iran nobody will know what goes on there. I am convinced that the White House believes that if Iran is off the internet and no reporters are allowed in it, it's 'off the radar' w.r.t. public and world opinion, and they'll have an opportunity to make up a story to their liking later.

      You're absolutely right that this is about provocation rather than intelligent warfare or intelligence-gathering. The question is, what next, if anything? Cheney can't tuck an atom bomb between his legs, flap his arms real hard, fly over Iran and drop it. Anything that happens must depend on a lot of other people implementing it. Right now I'm a little skeptical that anyone in the White House could take any really dramatic action, but I sure want to hear about it if they do.

      Any slashdotters in the military noticing anything? Do we have anyone who can send reports from inside Iran if anything happens? Basically we're talking about the possibility of a totally rogue White House operating without Congressional authority. That's unconstitutional and the military should not be playing along with anything like that- and probably are not- but this is potentially a very big deal.

    100. Re:Third cut? by RodgerDodger · · Score: 2, Informative

      The first two got cut because an Egyptian port started ordering ships to anchor-at-sea in a new area - one which the cables passed through.

      It's not that ship anchors have become more dangerous, it's that humans have become more careless.

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
    101. Re:Third cut? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, a simple communications blackout would be easier to achieve at the terminus. Just pull the plug on the router and be done with it. That's if Iran wanted to black itself out ... that doesn't mean their can't be foul play at work from someone else.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    102. Re:Third cut? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Not tinfoil hat time, either. Just the U.S. government doing what it does best - tapping into and monitoring our enemies'(and everyone else's) communications. Just one more reason to not use the Net for anything that requires secrecy.

      Nah; you just have to accept the advice that the internet security folks have been saying again and again, at least from the early 1980s, and probably a lot earlier: The only way to have secrecy is end-to-end encryption. And you can't rely on any builtin encryption; you have to install it yourself. Preferably from the source code, because if you use any vendor's binaries, you have no idea what may be hidden inside them.

      This is not some sort of clever or paranoid advice. It's the ongoing from all the security folks from the beginning.

      (Well, OK; except for the ones who have something they want to sell you. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    103. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems pretty obvious that this was caused by the US/UK/Israel alliance as a way to strike at the Islamic countries.

      What, no RAND Corporation, Halliburton and Reverse Vampires?

      Go see your psychiatrist. You're a raving lunatic.

    104. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm trying hard to sort out what's going on ...

      Good luck with that.

      Cheney can't tuck an atom bomb between his legs, flap his arms real hard, fly over Iran and drop it.

      This is actually more likely than you sorting out what is going on.

      BTW, tell Britney hello for us.

    105. Re:Third cut? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Second, you're absolutely right that it would be suicidal. My understanding is that the Iranian Sunburn missiles can rather easily take out our supercarriers. Don't we just happen to have three right there in striking range? Is the idea that we get Iran to take out our supercarriers to JUSTIFY the ceaseless war and kick it up a notch?

      Well one possibility is that they plan to use nuclear weapons after they lose the carriers. My working assumption is that Bush is a clinical psychopath and that he actually enjoies getting people killed, gives him a buzz. If so using a nuclear weapon would give him the biggest buzz of his life.

      Before you dismiss this as Bush hatred, consider the peculiar reaction Bush had to the Texas executions, his insistence on keeping open the option to use torture at huge political cost despite the evident fact that the US is no longer using torture. I cannot explain this situation in political terms, it makes no sense.

      These adventures in the middle east have not made the US stronger, they have made Iran stronger and the US weaker. A war with Iran will have the same effect resulting in a single pan-Shia state.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    106. Re:Third cut? by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some people think America is always evil. Others think America can do no evil. A few of us believe that we should take it on a case by case basis. There's no proof here that America did anything. But this is likely more than a coincidence. When was the last time you heard of an underwater cable being cut? Never? Yeah, me neither. Then, boom! 3 or 4 in a few weeks. Not very likely. Now, I haven't ruled out coincidence, but I have shown probable cause to search for another explanation. So, who has the means, the opportunity, and the motivation? The Bush administration. Am I saying I know for sure they did it? Of course not.

      Now, are you saying you know for sure they didn't?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    107. Re:Third cut? by jd · · Score: 1

      Ironyblind just means you can't see Irn Bru soda.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    108. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps Iran cut the cables for a US invasion.. remember the lost US satellite ? maybe Iran made that satellite go down... or even worse, US dropped the satellite on purpose and will blame Iran for doing it, together with the cable cutting... this to justify an invasion... you heard here first

    109. Re:Third cut? by jd · · Score: 1

      That, and the Egyptian captains were issued whetstones by the US navy for anchor-sharpening practice.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    110. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the other option of cutting the cable in one area and installing taps in others while the cable is not working correctly. Any gibberish created by the tap being attatched could be passed off as a result of the anchor cut after it's fixed. "Hey our line was broken and after we fixed it there's some 'noise' there." "Bah, the line isn't pristine any more. Data is checking out fine so just ignore it."

    111. Re:Third cut? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      No. I always been 137. Was 167 on the "old" Technocrat, too. Before they ditched UIDs.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    112. Re:Third cut? by jd · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe the transatlantic cable has indeed been cut by accident at least once in the past decade. Even so, we're talking very different incident rates here. Anyways, as for who is responsible, half the planet has motives and the other half have motives for making the first half look guilty of something. This makes "Murder on the Orient Express" look like a tale of lilly-white innocents. It could be any of them. It could even be all of them. The earliest we're likely to know for sure is in 50 years time when the UK declassifies this year's goings-on - as part of SIGINT, they will know what is happening, one way or another.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    113. Re:Third cut? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Co-incidence is what people call it when they're confronted by something systematic that they aren't able to understand. It doesn't exist.

      I think you're thinking of "magic".

      Do you know the meaning of co-incidence? It means some things happening simultaneously. It's quite possible to fully understand an event and say that it was a co-incidence.

    114. Re:Third cut? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      I think coincidence just means that despite being slapped upside the head with a clue, you still don't understand what's going on. It's one thing to accept that some things are beyond your capacity to ever understand but still exist and move on on that basis, it's another thing to believe that just because you can't see the system, it isn't there.

      Coincidences are very often the only hints you get that there is a pattern there, and the best you can do is acknowledge that it exists in some shape and move on with that niggling knowledge resting in your head without either obsessing over it or dismissing it.

      If you can do that, you can intuitively anticipate patterns that are beyond your capacity to properly understand.

      Calling something a coincidence, on the other hand, is a way of psychologically dismissing it. It's a way of protecting a persons sense of being in control, which is very important to most people.

      Maybe in the grand scheme of things, I'm wrong, but I find this perspective on the world empowering, so I'll probably keep it regardless.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    115. Re:Third cut? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      From the fortune cookies file (always handy to have the fortune db accessible):

      Hanlon's Razor:
                      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained
                      by stupidity.

    116. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it would disrupt business, but um, what good would that do the US Government? None in the short term, and in the long term the cable would be fixed.


      FTA: ""It may take sometime to fix the cut but we are rerouting the traffic to another cable in the U.K. and U.S., the bandwidth utilization will go down," the official said."

      What good? Easier to put a wiretap on it if the data is rerouted through cables in your country.
    117. Re:Third cut? by spun · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's true. Could be anyone. I just picked Bush because I know sumdumass loves him. I'm a bad, mean troll, I know.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    118. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RAND really does exist, you know (but are less evil than people think). So does Halliburton (but are more evil than people think). Reverse Vampires? Maybe not.

    119. Re:Third cut? by hazem · · Score: 1


      Last night while sitting in my chair
      I pinged a host that wasn't there
      It wasn't there again today
      The host resolved to NSA.


      Shakespeare of the net.


      Several people are impressed by that. However, I'm the product of the American education system, so that parody has sailed completely over my head. Googling for the first line pretty much yields the parent post. Can you help enlighten me? What is that based on?

    120. Re:Third cut? by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you picked Bush because 98% of the planet wishes it was him, and the other 2% handed him cable cutters.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    121. Re:Third cut? by onepoint · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Color Blind... you don't want it, nor the benefits of it.

      My dad has it, and he See's everything in grays ( well that's the color he calls it ), he can spot the difference in the color black from 4 different producers. my dad work for the government back in the 60's and 70's and he was consistently seeing things. his job was to point out "problems in photographs" so if an image was out of balance, he would just circle it and hand it up the chain of command.

      Some of the more interesting assignments my dad disclosed to me.
      1) military cloth review and rejection for top brass ( 3 and 4 star level )
      2) Paint color review ( hundred of gallons at time )
      3) standardise the color of military traffic lights on domestic bases, so many colors of red variations and green, he got it down to 2 of each and let someone else pick it out.
      4) camo netting review at heights exceeding 10,000 feet
      plus a lot of stuff that I'm not sure about but I saw on the table as a kid

      on of my fathers biggest problems were carpet's, your regular gray carpet might have 800+ threads that were woven to make it, just imagine walking along a carpet, having something that looked like a slice in the carpet ( or a bug ), only to realise that it's just a bad color thread. another problem were berger kings and McDonald's. until the late 80's there were certain ones my dad would eat at, since to him all the plastic chairs and tables ( at the respective franchise ) coloring was similar and color association was rather strong with him, so bad experiences with certain colors would extend into his personal life.

      he never had a chance to become a pilot, but when he worked for the military he always (come hell or high water) from take-off to landing was in the co-pilot chair. how he pulled that stunt was a secret that I have never asked, but he got away with it.

      the color of scotch always made him ill until i found out about the first time he got drunk ( color association ).

      my dad had amazing wood skills when it came to selecting wood for his carvings, wood would just be right and the grain would always just be perfect for what he wanted to do.

      Concrete ageing, that's something my father was a perfectionist at, he could look at a concrete job that was recently poured, tell it's age and by shit luck ( or some magic ) tell if it was cured correctly.

      people with this disorder are different, but none the less, thier skills at other things are sometimes exceeding.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    122. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saber rattling with Iran and war in the region makes Iran stronger.

      Actual war inside Iran would knock Iran's progress back a few decades.

    123. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There seems to be confusion here between CUTTING a cable and TAPPING a cable. The latter does indeed require a fancy submarine and who knows what other technology to avoid being detected. But to cut a cable certainly doesn't require anything like that...in fact, the more you make it look like an accident, the better. So you don't do it sneakily with high tech - you use low-tech tricks like a ship dragging an anchor that would be tough to attribute to any one individual. You wouldn't do it all close to the same spot because that makes it easier to repair and makes it look yet more suspicious. You pick cables that that country relies on but for which other countries have alternative routes - and you cut the cables over a reasonable period of time and over great distances in order to make it look more like an accident.

      So just how unlikely is this anyway? In a typical year, how many cables are accidentally cut? What are the odds that this could be pure coincidence?

    124. Re:Third cut? by KORfan · · Score: 1

      Why would a US carrier get within range of Iranian missiles? A USN CVBG is built around using it's aircraft to strike the enemy, and they can use air-to-air refueling to extend their range more than ten times that of an Iranian shore-to-sea missile. If the Iranian Navy wants to come out to fight they'll sink quite quickly. Iran has no hope of striking a US carrier.

      If you're referring to the 2006 Hizbollah attack on a Saar 5 corvette, keep in mind that the Saar 5 has a displacement of 1227 tons, and a Nimitz-class carrier displaces over 100,000 tons. Damaging a Saar 5 is a long, long way from sinking a carrier.

      Iran's airforce hasn't had proper maintenance since the days of the Shah. This was made clear in the first Persian Gulf war, when they couldn't defeat Iraq. The Iranian F-14s stayed clear of combat and acted as AWACS planes. Iran was using massed infantry attacks against armor, minefields, and large earthen fortifications. Remember the Korean-made plastic keys to heaven? After the Shah was ousted they did their best to drive out the technorati. If you were a geek, you were in unwelcome. If you could maintain electronics, they wanted you to take up camel herding.

      If we had the manpower to invade Iran, and I'll agree that we don't, it would be an exercise in logistics to supply ammunition and fuel. Hopefully we'd have to manage large numbers of prisoners, but only a fool would count on that. Trying to occupy Iran would make Iran look pleasant. If they try to stand against us on a battlefield, they'll lose. If they want to sit in cities and kills us in ones and twos, they'll do so. As it is, we can bomb all we want.

    125. Re:Third cut? by themoneyish · · Score: 1

      Speaking of movies, it might be a fire sale

    126. Re:Third cut? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    127. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traditional:

      Yesterday upon the stair
      I saw a man who wasn't there
      He wasn't there again today
      I wish that he would go away.

      Old joke:

      Yesterday upon the stair
      I saw a man who wasn't there
      He wasn't there again today
      I think he's from the CIA.

    128. Re:Third cut? by emilper · · Score: 1

      How about:

        - winter in Northern Hemisphere -> bad weather -> ships not being able to enter poorly designed ports -> ships attempting to anchor outside port in order to prevent drifting and save on the fuel.

        - lots of cables in place

        - some of the cables end near ports, mostly because there is infrastructure in place

        - some of the anchors, while the ships are pushed by winds/currents, break some of the cables.

      Dilemma solved. Nobody profits.

      To all those folks talking about US submarines cutting cables or US arranging for the cables to be cut in order to do ... whatever ...: take a deep breath, and maybe drink a glass of water. If you imagine any country depends on it's official communications only on submarine cables, think again. I bet Iran has land cables to Russia, Turkey, Pakistan etc. Egypt talked about "rationing" the use of "internet" because the filesharers were using that particular cable to get whatever they are getting from peers in Europe, and because it's better to blame the p2p-ers than to explain why is there only one cable in place.

      Check this out:

      PING irna.ir (209.1.163.102) 56(84) bytes of data.
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=297 ms

      irna.ir is "The Islamic Republic News Agency". It's up and running fine. Iran is not cut off from the internet. Egypt is not cut off from the internet, and it would be stupid ... no, moronic, for US or any European/North American state to arrange this, since Egypt is one of the few states in the Middle East where some resemblance of reason is preserved.

    129. Re:Third cut? by Ginsu2000 · · Score: 1

      Theory 1: Its a NSA ploy so presumably innocent slashdotters will click on the posted Iranian links (to see if they are still up), so that the NSA can justify their snooping.

    130. Re:Third cut? by jsiren · · Score: 1

      Seeing as submarine cables do occasionally get cut by forces of nature and the odd unfortunately laid anchor, it's hard to tell whether these go in the oops or "oops" category...

      Then again, this certainly is no communications blackout. Slowdown, yes; troublesome and costly, yes, somewhat. Even though Internet Traffic Report indicates router1.iust.ac.ir as unreachable, www.iust.ac.ir is currently reachable, at least from northern Europe. I don't know about other connectivity, though.

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
    131. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like I posted in the last cable cutting thread, this is more than likely the US. Having been on sub escorts in that area of the world I know that we have the capability for both tapping (what, you don't think we already do that?) and cutting. If it was the US, it was not a botched attempt to tap the lines, it was purposefully cut. the question most people seem to be overlooking is why? What is going on that we don't know about that is cause for them to do this? It is obvious that it would draw attention, so the why must be pretty important. Reroute traffic for more effective monitoring in the US? Some sort of major terrorist op is trying to start and uses web as main form of comm? Could be lots of things, but again ask yourself WHY?!

    132. Re:Third cut? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Those guys are good.. if they wanted to just tap lines, the outage would be under an hour, and not all at once and at 'off peak' times to not tip off anybody.

    133. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      The router that's dead is vortechosting, but someone from Miami was posting. Who's familiar with the network topology in Florida? What I'm wondering is whether vortechosting being dead cuts off Tampa from the internet.

      Can you have connectivity to Miami but have Tampa still be black?

      That would be significant because Tampa is CENTCOM and SOCOM (aka Special Ops). Is there anyone in Tampa who can still post or is Tampa really black? Because if Tampa is black that could mean SOCOM is where the attack is coming FROM and there are things happening in Tampa that aren't supposed to get out.

    134. Re:Third cut? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Funny

      How much tech do you really need to cut a cable?

      This isn't the 1960s. The people who worked on the Apollo program are all retired. Somewhere, in a submarine, a guy just said, "LOLZ, think I cut cable!" and his commander replied, "pwned! LOLZ! I'll come take a look at it after I finish this MySpace video."

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    135. Re:Third cut? by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      It may be intentional, but who did it? Not necessarily the United States and Israel, if you think about it. Iran may not want to let its people access the Internet, while the powerful get Internet via microwave or satellite.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    136. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be what they mean when they say, "Comcastic"

    137. Re:Third cut? by lawn.ninja · · Score: 1

      We aren't very well versed in warfare tactics eh... First you cut power. Then you cut communications, if you can't completely eliminate them you clog the pipes. This is effectively dividing them up and making smaller individual targets that can't coordinate as well as they should be able to. Then by removing the communications and power you also get the side benefit of messing with their economic system. Bam! Instant instability. Now you let that go and act like you want to help. "Oh no, we'z be sendin' aid right to ya pronto!" After that you let the populace implode on itself. The instability and the recent threats of nuclear weapons now give you a valid reason to occupy the country. You can't let the bad guys get their hands on the nukes right, we're only trying to help. Just my, tin hat wearing, take on it. It's how I'd justify an invasion if I wanted to bypass any type of controls.

    138. Re:Third cut? by orasio · · Score: 1

      No, you picked Bush because 98% of the planet wishes it was him, and the other 2% handed him cable cutters. I don't think that has any logic.
      I live in South America, and I sure wish there was no war against Iran, because I think everybody loses in that scenario. If I wished it was Bush, regardless of whether I like him or not, I would be rooting for war. I don't think 98% of people are rooting for war.
    139. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Let me fix that for you:

      if this is followed by news that Iran just OMG WTF SANK ALL UR CARRIERS DOOD! FOR NO REASONZ! MARTIAL LAW! WAR IS NOW WITH YOU!

      _then_ we know what happened, and the missing data is "after an unprovoked strike at Iran, probably by Special Ops coordinated out of SOCOM in Tampa, Florida" which is apparently out of contact with the Internet as we speak. Specifically, vortechosting is black, you can get through to Miami but there's major and continuing internet outage right around where CENTCOM and SOCOM are. Something's happening, guys.

    140. Re:Third cut? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Because as everyone knows, Iran has absolutely no communication links but that one cable: no radio, no satellite links, no buried cable into neigboring nations: just that one single undersea fiber-optic cable.

      Right.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    141. Re:Third cut? by medcave · · Score: 1

      Florida shows to be down too. Guess they nuked it in retaliation!

    142. Re:Third cut? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We all know that ironyblind people can see irony correctly underwater while those who have correct perception cannot.

      There, fixed that for ya ;-) Attempted facetiousness != irony.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    143. Re:Third cut? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Before you dismiss this as Bush hatred, consider the peculiar reaction Bush had to the Texas executions, his insistence on keeping open the option to use torture at huge political cost despite the evident fact that the US is no longer using torture. I cannot explain this situation in political terms, it makes no sense.

      Bush was a callous jerk about Texas executions, true. Part of that was definitely an act to piss off liberals, because conservatives find those things funny (e.g. Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh) and would be sympathetic to his antics. Even if it wasn't, it doesn't prove that Bush gets turned on by killing people, just that he doesn't feel any mercy or remorse for it if he thinks it's justified.

      As for the torture thing, there are two possible motivations. One is that there are, in fact, a limited number of corner cases where torture is actually useful, though in the vast majority of cases it's horrible and unjustifiable. Another is that the bill to ban torture was seen as an unnecessary overreaction by the left (I don't think it was but Bush and other conservatives undoubtedly did) and supporting that bill would have been seen as a political concession. This is similar to the conservative opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment, which some conservatives saw as a rallying cry for the feminist left more than it was a good-faith attempt to improve the law.

      I have no interest in or desire to apologize for Bush. I always thought he was a well-meaning dullard with too much loyalty to the wrong people, people who ultimately used him. Less Palpatine, more Jar-Jar Binks.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    144. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are almost certainly at least a handful (I feel fairly comfortable saying around 5-10) of diverse long-haul fiber routes into Tampa, owned by multiple fiber providers, and almost certainly more into Miami, some through Tampa and some not.

    145. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      The tone of that is so dark that I think I want to add a little caveat here: I may be REALLY AGGRESSIVELY trying to sort out what's happening in what might be a major US military operation currently underway- which could well get me dragged out of my house by special ops. BUT...

      I'm an American, and consider myself as patriotic as a person ought to be, and if I've correctly guessed what's trying to happen, I have major complaints about the plan. What I'm proposing is that someone, probably Cheney, is trying to execute a false-flag thing (possibly for the second time? I couldn't say), specifically they are trying to orchestrate a strike on Iran for the express purpose of getting Iran to hit back.

      Because if Iran sinks our carriers, as they can in fact do, but there's no news of any attack by US, it's 9/11 all over again, which is completely what the executive branch politically needs right now. They NEED an attack, preferably on military targets they can control and order within range of the attack.

      BUT IF IRAN SINKS OUR CARRIERS OUR MILITARY IS CRIPPLED. Never mind the rightness or wrongness of secret unprovoked bombings of Iran, that's a separate and worthwhile discussion. Endangering such a major backbone of our military for political gain is treasonous.

      So if suddenly OMG they sunk our carriers, that says I guessed right- and THAT says that the people running this were willing to trade off our military effectiveness, literally, for another chance to chant 9/11 9/11 9/11 and get their political way.

      I don't think I have to approve of that in order to be an American, or patriotic. My hope is actually that these perhaps-preparatory actions such as making Iran and Tampa (?) go black, and moving the carriers within Sunburn range, were allowed to happen but the actual part involving an unprovoked and secret strike on Iran hits a roadblock and doesn't happen. Then we'd all be left happily guessing WTF happened, and you can tease me about it all you like ;)

    146. Re:Third cut? by Plekto · · Score: 1

      Re-routing the traffic all through the U.K. means that it is all being monitored. The U.K. analyzes and filters all(100%. Not 90 or 99%, but 100%) information that goes in and out(and has laws it's written to make it legal to do so) through email and the web and so on.

      The U.S. is working on such a system but it's only partially implemented.

      Even 3-4 months of monitoring all of the traffic in and out of Iran is golden from an information gathering/spying perspective. The U.S. just took advantage of the first two breaks. (breaking Iran's cable also sends a "we own you" message to Iran, make no mistake about it) - All it would take is a SEAL team or similar in such shallow waters and a few minutes to cut.

      Why it think this is because of the stupidly simple ease in which you can knock out half of Iran's bandwidth for a month or two. One group of demolition divers and a few hours of work(most of that being decompression). That's nothing compared to thousands of other more nefarious deeds done during the Cold War.

    147. Re:Third cut? by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      "Dilemma solved. Nobody profits."

      Except the cable repair company...

    148. Re:Third cut? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yesterday upon the stair
      I met a man who wasn't there.
      He wasn't there again today
      I wish that man would go away.

        Hugh Means (1875 - 1965)

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    149. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Zeinfeld, this has nothing to do with Bush. He's a figurehead. I've heard elsewhere that in a speech in the last couple days he looked REALLY bad- which brings me back to how lost he was on 9/11. This guy is not running the show. When things go down, he's given a copy of 'My Pet Goat' and told to sit and be quiet. It's Cheney behind this stuff.

      And you can call Bush a psychopath for mimicking a woman on death row begging for her life, but I remind you that Cheney shot a guy in the FACE without consequences- and got an apology from the guy, to boot.

      Bush is not behind this. He's a puppet in a flightsuit. Look to Cheney for this one.

      And you're absolutely right again, that a further exchange of open warfare (the way things are laid out right now) would cripple the US, just wipe us out. The pattern we're seeing isn't really a plan to win, it's all calculated to score political points at any cost, with a lot of bad assumptions about how things could go.

      If this is really happening and leading to the ends I'm suggesting, it's just as well we won't be able to kick everybody around anymore, but I wonder what then will be done about radical Islam. Having the US rendered helpless but then getting thwacked with radical Islam isn't exactly a bargain for the rest of the world. We're not helping- we're making matters worse- but if we go down it'll become a feeding frenzy. Not good.

    150. Re:Third cut? by palantir0 · · Score: 1

      The comment was funny if your sphincter isn't all up in a bunch. People laugh at incredibly awful things to relieve tension and to cope with things that are mostly out of their control. US will retain superpower status regardless of a sinking ship. The world is falling mentality doesn't equate to real world that operates at a much higher level of sophistication.

      War would be a bad thing, no disagreement there. Bush is itching to bomb them before leaving office probably. Isn't likely to happen now however which is a good thing.

      The moral of the story: bury the cables so they don't become anchor food.

      Cheers

    151. Re:Third cut? by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      All you've stated is that you don't believe the coincidence. You have given no proof that this was on purpose or preparation for an invasion. Just because you believe, or don't believe, something doesn't make it a fact.

      How about, you? Hmm...All you've stated is that you believe the coincidence. You have given no proof that this was not on purpose or preparation for an invasion. Just because you believe, or don't believe, something doesn't make it a fact.

      You have to believe one thing or the other. Believing in coincidences means you are necessarily believing in the low probability situation, why else would you label it a coincidence? You did use the word "coincidence" did you not?

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    152. Re:Third cut? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      No, most likely some jackass decided to firewall echo requests to the router, or replies from the router. You know, for "security".

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    153. Re:Third cut? by bdjacobson · · Score: 1

      Well hey, at least if that's the case it's clearly a case where they're actively interested in listening to THEIR data; which makes me less concerned that they're interested in me. Then again, I'm not actively organizing protests (or am I?) :O

    154. Re:Third cut? by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      Once is accident.

      Twice is coincidence.

      Thrice is enemy action.

      And 7 is the number of undersea cables that were damaged in an earthquake near Taiwan in 2006. Sometimes things happen, especially in one of the most traversed areas in the middle east. I've been through there on a ship. There are ships anchored constantly. The anchors that we're talking about are not the tiny kind that are on your fishing boat. They're designed to rip into the sea floor. Sometimes they don't. Sometimes they just drag. I've had the pleasure of being dragged while anchored quite a long ways due to tidal currents near Anapolis MD. It's not far fetched at all. It's reality.

    155. Re:Third cut? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, at a glance it appears that there's really two instances of cable cuts. The first two occured in the same spot (a bit north of Alexandria, Egypt) and could be explained by someone dragging a single boat anchor over both of them (accidentally or deliberately).

    156. Re:Third cut? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Calling something a coincidence, on the other hand, is a way of psychologically dismissing it. It's a way of protecting a persons sense of being in control, which is very important to most people. The desire to be in control makes people see controllable events as random and uncontrollable? Interesting analysis, to say the least! The same theory would be more accurately applied to conspiracy theorists. The compulsion to see undesirable events as having human instigators is an expression of the desire for control. Some folks find the idea that there isn't someone behind these events, that there's nothing that can be done to prevent these random horrors, too frightening for words. They grimly cling to the notion that someone, somewhere is in control of things, making bad stuff happen. Someone who, if the conspiracy were only exposed, could be made to stop these terrible events.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    157. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the first two seemed to be near to each other, so may have been a single "incident". Now if another goes down....

      Where will we get our pics of "Arab Street Hookers" from ?

    158. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.com/search?q=operational+range+of+sunburn+missiles

      They're cruise missiles. Good luck getting through the Strait of Hormuz when the Sunburn's range covers the entire width of the Gulf at that point.

      What reports I've seen suggest the carriers are off the coast of Iran, which is absolutely within Sunburn range. Hell, more than half the Gulf is. If there are friendly forces in Saudi Arabia or Qatar, or if they can fire Sunburns from ships, every inch of the Gulf is vulnerable. It's not like we have these missiles. They're Russian. The rest of Iran's defences suck. They have nothing worth a damn for protecting themselves against bombing or sea-to-land missiles. They just have that offensive capability, and it's not specifically theirs, it's Russian technology.

      "we can bomb all we want" my ass. You make me ashamed.

    159. Re:Third cut? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Why would a US carrier get within range of Iranian missiles? A USN CVBG is built around using it's aircraft to strike the enemy, and they can use air-to-air refueling to extend their range more than ten times that of an Iranian shore-to-sea missile. If the Iranian Navy wants to come out to fight they'll sink quite quickly. Iran has no hope of striking a US carrier.

      The further out the carrier is from the targets, the longer the time it takes to get to and from the target area, the less time can be spent over the targets.

      The supercarrier strategy was developed when? 1970s? 60s? Since then Russia and China have spent rather a lot of time working out strategies to sink them. Both have the resources to build a supercarrier, neither has chosen to do so. One explanation is the standard US military chest thumping 'we are supreme' approach, another is that missile technology has rendered supercarriers obsolete the same way that the machine gun rendered the cavalry charge obsolete.

      If you're referring to the 2006 Hizbollah attack on a Saar 5 corvette, keep in mind that the Saar 5 has a displacement of 1227 tons, and a Nimitz-class carrier displaces over 100,000 tons. Damaging a Saar 5 is a long, long way from sinking a carrier.

      The World Trade Center was even bigger, your point? If the electronic countermeasures can be defeated on the small ship by one missile I would not be too confident that the countermeasures on the larger ship cannot possibly be defeated by a simultaneous attack from many missiles.

      Iran's airforce hasn't had proper maintenance since the days of the Shah. This was made clear in the first Persian Gulf war, when they couldn't defeat Iraq.

      This is somewhat true of the US supplied planes, but the revolution was almost thirty years ago. Since then Iran has been buying planes from Russia and China and even more missiles. Iran has the second largest missile fleet in the third world, second only to North Korea.

      If Iran is a pushover then why is everyone nervous of her? Seems to me that this is just more of the happy-think that got us into Iraq. Its easy to blunder into a disaster when anyone who dares suggest that the military might not be quite as strong as imagined can be dismissed as unpatriotic, a traitor or whatever.

      I don't think that there is anyone in the military command left who has the guts to actually raise hard questions. After seven years of politicization the only generals left are the yes men.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    160. Re:Third cut? by happyfeet2000 · · Score: 1

      Cthulu awakes. And he's pissed. You can follow his path on the map...

    161. Re:Third cut? by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      This is in response to all the posts that suggest Bush is anxious/eager to start a war with Iran before he leaves office, and not just palantir0's post.

      You are all touching in your paranoid naivete. Bush is less than a year away from retiring to Crawford, and leaving all the crap behind. Far from starting another war, he'd be happy if there were signs that Iraq was cooling down. At this point in time, he's more concerned with his place in history than he is with bombing Iran. He'd like to be remembered as the man who started the process of bringing democracy to the middle East, not a trigger-happy fool. After Inauguration Day, you won't hear any more from him until he's out working the stump for brother Jeb in 2012.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    162. Re:Third cut? by Plekto · · Score: 1

      Well, you do need at least a bit of plausible deniability. ie - "This happens all the time..."

      You also can't just yank it or else get slammed by the press and the U.N. for it - and that's a lot of negative publicity our government doesn't want right now.

      So you cut it and conveniently offer to route traffic through other systems(which you control of course). Message sent, offer to help them, and legal (thanks to U.K. laws) means to look at the traffic.

    163. Re:Third cut? by Sh0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what kind does he have?

      I found out I was colorblind when i joined the Marine Corps, until then, I had NO idea I had a problem. when I took the dot tests and the falant tests, i failed utterly.
      One side effect was that i saw through camouflage better, sorta like what you are saying here with your father, but it works because we don't get the same break up of the shapes that camouflage tries to accomplish.

      I have what they call "yellow/green" colorblindness.

      It was odd in my case because it is very rare in blacks, and i'm a black male.

    164. Re:Third cut? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe Iran did it to try and stop the US from gathering intelligence? or maybe the company that gets paid to fix it did it, or a tel com competitor?

      Me? I'm betting on Godzilla. He is on his way to Syria to fight Cthulu since Israel's surprise bombing failed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    165. Re:Third cut? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When was the last time you heard of an underwater cable being cut? Never? Yeah, me neither. Then, boom! 3 or 4 in a few weeks. It happens about once a year or so, judging by a quick Google news search.

      Jun 2007, Colombia, Panama, Venezuela, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua, broken undersea cable
      Dec 2006, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Japan, earthquake damages cable
      Jun 2005, Pakistan loses internet connectivity due to a broken undersea cable.
      Jun 2004, Hong Kong and Vietnam see internet service disruption due to broken undersea fiber
      Nov 2003, UK sees connectivity trouble due to broken transatlantic cable
      Nov 2001, Singapore...same
      Feb 2001, China....same

      Really, the 2 of the 3 cables that were cut were only noteworth because BOTH were damaged. The FLAG and SeaWeMe-4 cable outages have forced European traffic to go WEST to get to most of Asia. Had only one been lost, it would not have been nearly as noteworthy. Cables go out all the time. The fact that two outages coincide ain't really enough to make it a conspiracy. Call me when the bombs are being dropped.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    166. Re:Third cut? by gunny01 · · Score: 1

      If the US is behind this, it's a pretty stupid move. I bet for ever Iranian teenager reading how to bomb the infidels, there's at least ten watching porn. Cut off the internet, and you cut off the messages of the west.

      The Iranian Army will still teach them to make bombs, though.

      --
      kill all the fucking niggers
    167. Re:Third cut? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      the missing data is "after an unprovoked strike at Iran, probably by Special Ops coordinated out of SOCOM in Tampa, Florida" which is apparently out of contact with the Internet as we speak. Specifically, vortechosting is black, you can get through to Miami but there's major and continuing internet outage right around where CENTCOM and SOCOM are. Something's happening, guys. Yes, because it is standard military procedure to disrupt civilian internet communication (but not phone or any other) in the city nearest any base where men in dress uniforms sit in concrete bunkers handling the mundane logistics of a real combat operation thousands of miles away... just in case an internet blogger has xray specs and can see them at their desks? Seriously, if you actually knew anything about SOCOM there at MacDill AFB, you'd know how frickin' stupid you sound. There's nothing to see there. It's the administrative headquarters for special operations units. And even if it was a deployment center full of SEALs and Green Berets and such, you'd never know anything was going on anyway, because the normal activity level would be completely indistinguishable from the deployment of a handful of small special ops teams. What possible benefit could there be from cutting off Tampa's internet connectivity?
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    168. Re:Third cut? by Poltras · · Score: 1

      I have what they call "yellow/green" colorblindness. For my part, I cannot distinguish pale red from pale green... not sure about yellow. And I have no idea about camouflage, but I'd sure like to take the test hehe. Unfortunately no camouflaged ninjas ever attempted to kill me...

      and i'm a black male. Woah, let's stay impersonal here, like slashdot was meant to be. ;)
    169. Re:Third cut? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Looks like a variation of the old classic:

      As I was climbing up the stair
      I met a man who wasn't there
      He wasn't there again today
      He must be from the CIA

      This one goes back about 40 years.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    170. Re:Third cut? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I would be highly surprised if we fought Iran using the same tactics as we use in Iraq.

      Iraq would be cracked like an egg with a old school style bombing. Not that show off are new stealth fighter bombing, I mean dropping bombs from 30-40,000 feet.

      We could also destroy a couple of key water plants and cripple their country.

      Iran is such a problem for us because we wanted to minimize damage, and we've been pretty damn good about it. We could have leveled any city they have in a matter of hours. Conventionally.

      No, the reason it would be a bad idea is because of the political fallout;which you mentioned.
      Now, if the US, Russia and China struck a deal about the outcome, the Iran would just be screwed. No that would be unlikely, but major countries like a regular and dependable supply of oil, and having your supply in constant risk from Fanatics is a risk.

      Clearly what is happening is that the great Cthulu has awoken and there trying to stop it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    171. Re:Third cut? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The world is full of conspiracies. They're all over the place. As a businessman, I'm a conspirator. As someone interested in creating disruptive technologies, I'm a conspirator. Every corporation is an open conspiracy. Conspiracies are everywhere, they're the natural order of our society.

      You can say "There are conspiracies behind this, and I'm going to figure them all out", and you never will, and if you do, no one will care. That's one approach.

      You can say "There are no conspiracies, the world is simple, there are just co-incidences around, that's all", and if you do, you'll toodle through life with a sense that you know everything that can be known, and what you don't know is unknowable. That's another approach.

      The hardest approach is, "There are conspiracies behind this, I can see that they exist in some nebulous form, but I will neither drive myself crazy trying to get to the bottom of it nor will I pretend that the world is the simple thing that my television tells me that it is, I will simply be content to know that these forces are moving with purpose in the world somewhere beyond my sight."

      That is the approach that lets you see deeper into the nature of the world without getting obsessed with the trivialities of whose behind it all.

      Get what I'm saying?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    172. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's another option. Actually creating some kind of war/situation/chaos/etc. to be able to declare something like a national emergency law which includes postponing the elections until an unspecified date at which things 'have settled down again'.

      In the last two years I'm giving this scenario about a 50% chance of happening.

    173. Re:Third cut? by armada · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that it's not the Iranian government (or a rogue faction (wow, that sounded like a clip from a cheesy game just then)) summarily killing all outgoing and incomming public communication? If sensoring public use of the interweb is too much trouble.... just kill it in such a way that you dont come off as the oppressor.

      --
      "This message was sent from an Apple //GS"
    174. Re:Third cut? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Could it possibly be underwater wiretapping gone bad? Practice?

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    175. Re:Third cut? by whowe82 · · Score: 1

      Thats amazing, except for concrete to completely cure takes about 500 years.

    176. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just consider yourself lucky that you're too stupid to comprehend these unpleasantly complex sorts of problems, drink your beer, beat your wife and shut the fuck up, ok?

    177. Re:Third cut? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Touche, sir. But remember, we're talking about the White House. They're CRAZY. You expect the things they do to make sense, and work? :P

    178. Re:Third cut? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      We could also destroy a couple of key water plants and cripple their country.

      They could close the Straits of Hormuz to shipping and cripple every Western economy.

      If we attack their civilian infrastructure they can and will retaliate against ours. We have rather more points of vulnerability than they do: power plants, chemical works, storage depots.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    179. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was odd in my case because it is very rare in blacks, and i'm a black male.

      Hey, I thought you just said you were color blind!

    180. Re:Third cut? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind the day after 9/11 one million Iranians demonstrated in Tehran in a candellight vigil in support of the US.

      Since then the US has done nothing but antagnize them.

      In any war "the people" get the blame for being swine, but in all cases it's a very small number of dangerous lunatics that are the ones that are truly evil. Of course it's the people that suffer the most, the evil swine themselves allways seem to survive to fight another war.

      And so it goes.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    181. Re:Third cut? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind the day after 9/11 one million Iranians demonstrated in Tehran in a candellight vigil in support of the US.

      Since then the US has done nothing but antagnize them.

      In any war "the people" get the blame for being swine, but in all cases it's a very small number of dangerous lunatics that are the ones that are truly evil. Of course it's the people that suffer the most, the evil swine themselves always seem to survive to fight another war.

      And so it goes.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    182. Re:Third cut? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      No, the theory is that you can provoke them by firing a few missiles at them, wait until they haul out one of their missiles and sink one of our superdestroyers we have anchored off their coast, claim they attacked us, and then start bombing.

      You couldn't hide a war, you could easily hide a tiny attack to start a war.

      I don't know what's actually going on, and I doubt it's anything. Within a week or two, everything will be back to normal and a lot of people will look paranoid.

      But if Iran suddenly mysteriously 'decides to attack us' while we're out of contact with them, that's what happened.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    183. Re:Third cut? by juhan+pruun · · Score: 1

      In other news Iran is dealing with Russia to buy long range surface-to-air missile systems. http://www.lenta.ru/news/2008/02/01/iran/

    184. Re:Third cut? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      The Iranian explanation that it was a routine inspection just trying to get the numbers on the side of the boat made more sense than the pentgons explanatin with audio from here and video from there.

      If I was on that ship and somebody said "look - terrorists, they're going to blow us up" I'd have responsed with "they why are they wearing lifejackets?"

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    185. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you won't be getting modded up.

    186. Re:Third cut? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      That must be what they mean when they say, "Comcastic" I'm glad they went with that rather than "comgasmic." Cuz that would just cross the line.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    187. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant! I'm always amazed at the creativity of the /. community

    188. Re:Third cut? by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      It's a very compelling theory, but I have to wonder: why are they only tapping them now?

      I think it's a bit naive to think that they haven't been tapping these lines for an awfully long time. Of course that brings up a related possibility: the taps were discovered and are being removed.

      I also think it's pretty unlikely that anyone would transmit anything sensitive over the internet without strong encryption.

    189. Re:Third cut? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      I'd sure like to take the test hehe. what does it mean if the bottom left of the first test was hard, and i see an 8 for the 2nd test?
      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    190. Re:Third cut? by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's just the new season of "24"

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    191. Re:Third cut? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

      That's a decent first approximation, but it's not good enough if actual maliciousness is reasonably likely. Any competent person doing something malicious will make damn sure it looks like an honest stupid mistake.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    192. Re:Third cut? by weierstrass · · Score: 1

      because the diameter of the eastern hemisphere is 800 miles.

      --
      my password really is 'stinkypants'
    193. Re:Third cut? by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      Sigh...more fairy tales from teh Intarweb...

      We all know that colorblind people can see colors correctly underwater while those who have correct vision cannot.

      First scuba: "Hey dude! I found the cables!" Second scuba: "Cool. Now cut the red one. No, not that one, the other one. No not this one!" First scuba: "Hey man! Sorry, I'm colorblind.." Second scuba: "Sh.t! That's 2 dude. We were simply supposed to cut the good one... Now gimme those scissors. There you go."


      Exactly! The non-colorblind person couldn't see the colors correctly so he was pointing out the wrong cables. Duh!
    194. Re:Third cut? by emilper · · Score: 1

      everybody much too busy being Tom Clancy and cutting tinfoil

    195. Re:Third cut? by GrassIsRed · · Score: 1

      They grimly cling to the notion that someone, somewhere is in control of things, making bad stuff happen."
      Someone like Osama bin Laden you mean? Official explanations are often conspiracy theories too you know.
    196. Re:Third cut? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Oh spun, lol. It isn't that I love him, It is that I don't like seeing him unfairly accused of things. I would goto the defense of even you if everyone started ganging up on you capriciously and maliciously. You could say I'm more motivated by the actions of others then any love for Bush.

    197. Re:Third cut? by rossz · · Score: 1

      Your dad has the rarest form of color blindness. I've only heard of one other person with it. I have the more common red/green type, plus a slight touch of the blue/yellow one. I always bring a friend along when shopping for anything that requires color coordination to avoid embarrassing mistakes, e.g. clothing.

      The ability to spot camouflage is because the design and color choices were made to trick people with normal sight.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    198. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've had subs capable of tapping underseas fiber for years; the US invested something like 10 billion in a sub not too long ago.

      More than likely, if the US military is going to make an Iranian strike they would

      1: Cut lines shortly before invasion.

      2: Jam all communications lines in and out of the country to keep foreign countries (china, russia, etc) from recieving word before troops had established control.

      3: Blockaid all roads inbound and outbound.

      4: CIA spies would destroy the governmental infrastructure of the country by destroying or distrupting key officials.

      5: Simultaneous cruise missile and offshore cannon bombardment followed by an all-out air strike minutes after the initial bombardment. Paratroopers would set on the ground to KO critical installations on be on enemy end prior to attacking. Weapons depots, repair facilities, and capture key infrastructure (fuel reserves, roadways).

      6: All-out tank and infantry storm.

      Problem is, Iran is a 1st world country with lots of ground-troop weaponry and a Sizeable army so the losses from such a movement would be high; Iraq fell because their military was disorganized, Iran is a different story. They have Russia and China as military allies who have already declared they will make war on the USA if they are attacked to defend their interests. Russia has an aging military arsenal and China has a modern albiet buggy warmachine; they have however, over a 10 million man army (something tactile nuclear warheads can take care of). Israel would obviously ramp up their warmachine to help, moving tanks into Iran.

      In any case, for the US to take any action at this point is insane, and I'm sure we'll hear word out of the country soon; rumors at minimum. China and Russia understand MAD very well, but that won't keep them from nuking US installations in the middle-east and stating "you don't nuke our civilian populations, we won't nuke yours".

      We've got the firepower at home and abroad to do the job but the political upheaval that would occur shortly thereafter would be painful to the political establishment.

    199. Re:Third cut? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      There are these telescoping things that fit over the eye and magnify things to the point you can see then as far away as the horizon. I think they are called binoculars and monoculars. If you watch the Iranian video, the guy standing beside the other guy talking on the radio was using a pair to watch the speed boats play chicken with the big navy ships.

      All joking aside, Iraq was attempting to force a situation. Maybe not one where they would get fired on but possible one where they could cause evasive action and observe the ships maneuvering ability as well as it's maneuvers (good for setting traps later). I think their actions were more geared towards an international reaction then any actual damage combined with a little inteligence gathering.

      As for sailors wearing life jackets, Well we don't know that they weren't packed with explosives instead of buoyancy materials. But they probably where wearing life jackets and a likely reason for them to be wearing them could be very similar to why a lot of sailors never learned how to swim in the past. They knew sitting in an ocean waiting to be picked off by sharks or starve to death which ever came first was worse then the 3-5 minutes of not breathing. Similarly, it is reasonable to expect a soldier, suicidal or not, to do something in the line of duty but protect himself in the process. It isn't that they don't mind dieing for their country, it is that they prefer not to especially what falling overboard doesn't help anyone else out.

      But think about this statement on life jackets. What if they were wearing them, You basically said that if I did have a boat load of explosive running towards your ship, If I was wearing life jackets, I could probably get closer then if I wasn't. OK, so what if I could get closer but not all the way close. I could steer the boat at your ship, open to full throttle and jump overboard allowing my boat to crash and explode into the side of yours. And if your ship was moving at any speed, the other boats could pick me up and get us out of there while your still dealing with the confusion of the explosion. It isn't like the ship can stop on a dime. And even if it could, it wouldn't because of the other threats around it. It is hard to second guess something that happened under stress, especially with life and death on the line. For every what if or should of, there is another then if and would of.

    200. Re:Third cut? by Neillparatzo · · Score: 1

      Spy sappin' my salary.

    201. Re:Third cut? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      The hardest approach is, "There are conspiracies behind this, I can see that they exist in some nebulous form, but I will neither drive myself crazy trying to get to the bottom of it nor will I pretend that the world is the simple thing that my television tells me that it is, I will simply be content to know that these forces are moving with purpose in the world somewhere beyond my sight."

      You've just repeated my basic attitude about most things. I like to call it "Devout Agnosticism" for short. :)
    202. Re:Third cut? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Pressing is just using a larger iron to get the job done faster. What would be ironic is if you ironed your BCGs, on account of the fact that you weren't wearing them.

    203. Re:Third cut? by laejoh · · Score: 1, Insightful
      ironyblind?

      It just means you can't understand a certain kind of humour.

    204. Re:Third cut? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      Check this out:

      PING irna.ir (209.1.163.102) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=297 ms

      irna.ir is "The Islamic Republic News Agency". It's up and running fine. Iran is not cut off from the internet. Egypt is not cut off from the internet, and it would be stupid ... no, moronic, for US or any European/North American state to arrange this, since Egypt is one of the few states in the Middle East where some resemblance of reason is preserved. Confirmed.

      $ ping irna.ir
      PING irna.ir (209.1.163.102) 56(84) bytes of data.
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=38.1 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=37.3 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=37.4 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=38.9 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=36.9 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=37.4 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=37.8 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=37.2 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=42.4 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=10 ttl=48 time=38.6 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=11 ttl=48 time=47.3 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=12 ttl=48 time=35.6 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=13 ttl=48 time=49.0 ms
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=14 ttl=48 time=39.1 ms


      --- irna.ir ping statistics --- 14 packets transmitted, 14 received, 0% packet loss, time 196372ms
      rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.669/39.553/49.063/3.852 ms

      Totally, confirmed: 00:45 PDT, 2008-02-02. And, judging by the times, at least one of the three cut wires is repaired. Maybe it was just the weather.

      ...and it would be stupid ... no, moronic, for US or any European/North American state to arrange this, since Egypt is one of the few states in the Middle East where some resemblance of reason is preserved. Frankly, my dear, I just don't give a damn about your strategic plausibility arguments. Just show me that the IntarTubes are still On, mmm-kay?
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    205. Re:Third cut? by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      whoosh
      That's the sound of mod points being wasted on your post.
      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    206. Re:Third cut? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately no camouflaged ninjas ever attempted to kill me...

      Are you sure? What if they did and their attempt failed... how would you know?
    207. Re:Third cut? by daniel23 · · Score: 1

      Check this out:

      PING irna.ir (209.1.163.102) 56(84) bytes of data.
      64 bytes from 209.1.163.102: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=297 ms


      Nice try. I suggest you do a traceroute on that host or feed the IP to some IP2Location look up.

      209.1.163.102 (irna.ir) is hosted somewhere near san francisco

      7 sl-gw35-nyc-11-0-0.sprintlink.net (160.81.172.169) 144.399 ms 128.771 ms 128.782 ms
        8 sl-bb23-nyc-11-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.13.36) 132.188 ms 131.804 ms 131.979 ms
        9 sl-bb24-nyc-6-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.13.170) 137.595 ms 136.567 ms 135.432 ms
      10 144.232.9.118 (144.232.9.118) 1757.524 ms 1757.793 ms 1758.047 ms
      11 cr1-loopback.sfo.savvis.net (206.24.210.70) 227.055 ms 224.271 ms 226.472 ms
      12 er1-te-1-0-1.SanJose3Equinix.savvis.net (204.70.200.229) 217.334 ms 217.254 ms 216.697 ms
      13 hr1-te-2-0-0.santaclarasc4.savvis.net (204.70.200.210) 213.887 ms 213.728 ms 215.181 ms
      14 bhr1-pos-12-0.santaclarasc4.savvis.net (204.70.194.198) 216.759 ms 213.994 ms 213.840 ms
      15 216.34.2.234 (216.34.2.234) 223.272 ms 223.703 ms 223.968 ms
      16 209.1.163.102 (209.1.163.102) 218.678 ms !X 218.600 ms !X 219.086 ms !X

      --
      605413? Yes, it's a prime.
    208. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once is accident.
      Twice is coincidence.
      Thrice is enemy action.


      The only question is if Israel, already mentioned as a suspect, has the ability to arrange this.

    209. Re:Third cut? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      There are times when things can be accidentally coincidental. But when the probability mathematical odds get really high, then the question should always be: was it deliberate? If it was terrorists there is a high likely hood that there would be a: "look what we did" news cast. But if it were the covert actions of a semi legitimate government, then it would be made to look accidental. OK, computer geek, model the ocean currents, the depths of the waters, the weights of boats and anchors, and, showing your work, explain the "high likely hood" that these coincidences are not the direct result of the weather. No? Then, just reply "Idle speculation is more fun for me than being right."
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    210. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, you searched with the wrong terms

      "He wasn't there again today"

      Yields a number of pages with the original poem which the poster modified.

    211. Re:Third cut? by eionmac · · Score: 1

      Cutting enemy communication cables is established UK practice. Refer events in 1914 and 1939 re the various German empires undersea cable communications. Egypt was practice for Iran perhaps?

      --
      Regards Eion MacDonald
    212. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: You father was an excellent bullshit artist and you fell for it hook line and sinker.

      Did he shit golden eggs as well? Seriously, take off the rose coloured glasses and grow up.

    213. Re:Third cut? by cytg.net · · Score: 1

      my thoughts excatly .. so when does the US liberation army inva...liberate those poor people ?

    214. Re:Third cut? by amorsen · · Score: 1

      To install a tap on a circuit, you need to first cut or break into it if it's a fiber-optic cable. Wrong. Fiber-optic cables can be tapped simply by bending them. The "simply" bit gets a bit harder when you have to do it beneath the sea, of course.
      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    215. Re:Third cut? by **loki969** · · Score: 1
      I just found a story in the firehose that might be related to that.

      New release of Mujahideen Secrets software

      Internet Business Law Services reports:
      http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latestnews&id=1968

      "Software designed specifically to aid Muslim terrorists hide their identities and location while online has been released in an updated version, according to security analyst Paul Henry of Secure Computing. He says the program is named Mujahideen Secrets 2, and claims it is "the first Islamic program for secure communications through networks with the highest technical level of encoding." Henry, VP of technology evangelism at Secure states that until recently al-Qaida didn't pose a credible threat on the Internet because of its reliance upon outdated technology. But having now developed modern encryption tools, the entire equation is changed. Equally disturbing is the fact the new jihadist program is being distributed via servers based in the U.S. -- in Tampa, Florida." It's available at http://www.ekhlaas.org/ (... but this site doesn't seem to work very well.)

      Perhaps they disconected the server bc it hosts terror-warez.
    216. Re:Third cut? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      the other person that you mention, is most likely my dad's pal ( he should be about 58 to 63 now ), he's the one that my dad sold most of his business to. they both only see gray ( given a zillion shades of it ) and are in great demand by industries all over the world.

      most people have meet the results of my dad's work or my dad's friend, if you walk into a McDonald's or burger king. all the yellows and all the reds are EXACTLY alike there is no noticeable shade variation ( unless it's age ). Till my father stopped working, he was flown 3 times a year to factories, to confirm that the color coming off the line was exactly like the original color.

      color association can be a real problem, the second you are tricked by the mind, you are stuck. That's why some people walk into an area and walk right out quickly, they get that "vibe" and they need to run quickly ( sometimes it's sound association ).

      most humans have high levels of light sensitivity in which they can see different shades, it requires training. from what I recall, we are green and purple sensitive, so the black gentleman that mentioned he was very rare is correct ( and most likely people from areas where humans are prey ) , since survival in those conditions require keen eyesight development. Darwin rules apply, and over last 10000 years it just became rarer and more rarer.

      Most of Europe, humans lost their prey status when megafauna was eliminated.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    217. Re:Third cut? by emilper · · Score: 1

      It was never down. Repairs on the cables in the Mediterranean will be done sometimes next week due to very bad weather in the area. I don't know about the other cable, though ...

    218. Re:Third cut? by emilper · · Score: 1

      Sir, you are absolutely right and should be modded up.

      Irna.ir is hosted in US, California.
      Baztab.com is hosted in Texas.
      Iran Dayly is hosted in California.
      and so on ...

      I think if somebody wants to disable the Iranian propaganda machine they would have to cut off from the internet not Iran, but United States. Kind of ironic.

      Still:
      http://www.khamenei.ir/ is hosted in Iran and is was up yesterday, and still is
      http://www.president.ir/fa/ is also hosted in Iran and was up, and still is

    219. Re:Third cut? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      My mom has a color association. She hates Red. Nothing in our house was allowed to be red. She also pronounces the word wrong out of sheer spite (She says with a southern drawl not present in any of her other words 'RaaadD'). I don't know why, she says she just hates it. To be honest, its sort of rubbed off on me. I don't have any clothes with red in them, and I can't bring myself to buy anything thats red. It just looks wrong, unless its a small dress on an attractive woman. Then its cool.

      Maybe thats why I don't like Red Hat or Fedora.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    220. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the first meteorite hit my house, I was like wow 1 in a million chance.
      But after the 10th one, I'm searching for trebuchets.

    221. Re:Third cut? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Sure. But really advanced maliciousness uses stupid people to do the dirty work :).

      And sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.

      --
    222. Re:Third cut? by permaculture · · Score: 1

      "I don't see conspiracy where ever I look, but why would it have to be the US?"

      Well, everyone outside the USA (and many inside) have been speculating for the last couple of years about who the USA will invade next.

      And the smart money is on Iran.

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    223. Re:Third cut? by bigpicture · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well if it ain't the GREAT BIG EGO again!!! MR. RELATIVITY THINKING HIMSELF!!! Welcome back. It's a small world and a big Universe. Why are the polar ice caps melting on Mars at a faster rate than on earth??? Why is there evidence that other planets are heating up faster than earth??? No human intervention there. Consider some data and ignore others, "the scientific way". I see you haven't changed, still think that only YOU know the truth, when there are Heisenberg Uncertainty, plus Probability theories out there!!! Who appointed you the TRUTH gatekeeper?

    224. Re:Third cut? by palantir0 · · Score: 1

      He was building the rhetoric to attack/provoke iran. The only thing that cooled that was our report that Iran wasn't building a nuclear bomb. Otherwise, I don't believe for one second that he wasn't on that path. Don't forget that hitting Iran would be nothing like Iraq. There would be few or no troops. Given that only a nuke can penetrate the facilties, it would take alot of work to build momentum to do that. Likely it would be a small ground assault with air support instead of a nuke to take out facility. Now that it has been completely derailed by the report, I agree with you, he won't be able to do anything until he leaves office. I don't agree he doesn't want to do this while at the same time promoting peace in Iraq and Afgan.

      Cheers

    225. Re:Third cut? by crmarvin42 · · Score: 1

      I'm not so naive as to think it couldn't be the US, it's just that the default assumption seems to be that it is hostile action and that it's the US. I find it hard to believe that the US is the only government that is at odds with Iran.

      --
      Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
    226. Re:Third cut? by Brill · · Score: 1

      its interesting how the military recognized and exploited his abilities. cloth, paint, lights, camo. hmmm

    227. Re:Third cut? by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....You can't let the bad guys get their hands on the nukes......

      Except in Pakistan the bad guys may get the nukes soon, if they don't already have them.

      --
      All theory is gray
    228. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet is a great technology, if one line is cut, traffic can just be re-directed. In this case through the United States. I wonder will this "spy satellite" be falling in the zone affected by these "cable cuts".. and if so, what the hell is on that thing that is worth the billions of affected business from India to Egypt.

    229. Re:Third cut? by LiquidFire_HK · · Score: 1

      Cthulu awakes. And he's pissed. Yeah, because you misspelled his name.
    230. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid is a euphemism for "not clinically diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia" I assume? No, you're right. I am to "stupid" to understand it...

    231. Re:Third cut? by MSZ · · Score: 1

      This just in: Undersea cable accidentally cut by stray anchor, whole Iran loses Internet connectivity. In other news, Navy anchor operator awarded medal for great service to Allah and the Iranian nation.

      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
    232. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An attack inside Iran would at least triple the cost of oil and require immediate rationing.
      If the US uses a nuke, Europe will start immediate and total sanctions against the US before the mushroom cloud forms.

    233. Re:Third cut? by gr8scot · · Score: 1
      I didn't know that I had been...

      Who appointed you the TRUTH gatekeeper? Ha! So far, only you.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    234. Re:Third cut? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      But when the probability mathematical odds get really high, then the question should always be: was it deliberate? If I had noticed your alias before replying to you above, I probably would have put that a little bit differently than challenging you to model the scenario in a computer simulation. I think you're missing an important aspect of the 'bigpicture;' specifically, the conclusion that the odds are 'really high' against everything other than your hypothesis ignores the scenario somebody else already proposed above, that boats were anchored in rough waters and their anchors were dragged through some fiber optic cable, which I think is very plausible. Have a nice day.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    235. Re:Third cut? by bigpicture · · Score: 1

      You make the assumption that what is reported is always accurate, or even the intended truth. That might be a little bit naive. Oh no, those in control or who might loose face never manipulate the media, do they?

      For systems with built in redundancy, you might question the odds, of a complete failure. Or why do cables come ashore, at ports or where ships normally anchor? Or do they? Some of these considerations might even be a bit of a credulity stretch don't you think.

    236. Re:Third cut? by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      The reports that were touted by Cheney et al. came from military intelligence. They were thoroughly torn apart by intelligence analysts at the CIA, then thoroughly ignored by those in power. Our spies, to be sure, had nothing to do with those reports.

    237. Re:Third cut? by gr8scot · · Score: 2, Informative

      You make the assumption... That is your own assumption, and is not quite correct. You actually don't know that I've concluded one version or another. What I have said to you so far is only that your estimate of the improbability of the specific claims reported might not account for some relevant, statistically significant variables, such as strength of ocean currents and numbers of vessels anchored in the vicinities of important fiber optic cables. I don't know that to be the correct explanation. I do insist, based on what has been reported and on what remains totally unreported, on not discarding the benign explanation out of hand before I decide which version of events seems likeliest to me.

      ... that what is reported is always accurate, or even the intended truth. That might be a little bit naive. Oh no, those in control or who might lose face never manipulate the media, do they?

      For systems with built-in redundancy, you might question the odds, of a complete failure. OK, let's get specific. "For systems with built-in redundancy" in general, I do indeed tend to more suspiciously "question the odds of a complete failure." It depends how redundant, and what type of system you're describing. So, back to my first comment to you in this thread, I don't have specific information that supports the conclusion that the reported interruptions are necessarily beyond the realm of possibility. Do you?

      When talking about foreign nations whose leaders have antagonistic personal or ideological relationships, I also tend to be less willing to assume the worst. More than enough of that goes on without my help, for my liking. I might turn out to be wrong, but if inaction is incorrectly taken until more solid information is available, no harm is done. Making the opposite mistake is a more serious matter.

      Or why do cables come ashore, at ports or where ships normally anchor? Or do they? It was suggested above that because of lousy weather, many ports have had difficulty accommodating all the boats wanting to dock. As a result, there have recently been vessels anchored where they normally do not, close to shore but not in designated ports. Until I have more specific information about a particular act of sabotage, I'm not going to assume that I know something that I really know to be mere speculation, however plausible the explanation is for the limited set of facts you're considering. That kind of thing seems to me more suited to a James Bond movie than discussion of real-world events. Do you like James Bond? Bourne?

      Some of these considerations might even be a bit of a credulity stretch don't you think. Not until I know that the waters in the locations in question were in fact calm at the time, and that whatever ship's anchors sliced each line had "no good reason" to be anchored in each of those places. So far, I don't know anything of the kind, partly because you have provided no specific information to lead me to that assumption. Of course, neither has anybody else, but most people have not made the claims that you have.

      Have a great day!
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    238. Re:Third cut? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You must admit that this is an entirely appropriate counter-attack. Very moderated.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    239. Re:Third cut? by darkonc · · Score: 1

      What if they did and their attempt failed... how would you know?
      • The unexplained footprints on the ceiling.
      • Ninja stars embeded in your bathroom mirror
      • Your dog has had his larynx removed
      • Your alarm system stopped working.
      • Loss of dial tone.
      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    240. Re:Third cut? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      Exploited? well he was paid real good, for the work he did. That's how he formed his business. the military is real good at figuring out how to get specialist. I learned from my father about civilian contracts and all the paperwork involved.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    241. Re:Third cut? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      It is my suspicion that this is a not-so-subtle "warning". They attacked power plants via the Internet, so we've deprived them of direct access to those sources.

      Overall, it's a fairly punitive rebuttal. They got off easy.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    242. Re:Third cut? by inKubus · · Score: 1

      And the fact that certain US/Saudi Arabian oil companies have cables directly between Houston and Saudi. Private cables, not Flag, which is a consortium of international telcoms and local governments. So, hey, let's extend an olive branch and you can use our network, which flows directly into downtown Houston. Then everyone will forget for a while and in 10 years it will still be there because the tech who connected it died accidentally in a plane crash and it was unlabeled so no one ever thought to check it.

      Granted, it's possible to lose this many at once to chance, but those cables are armored, especially at depths anchors normally go to.. Could this be part of the "information blockade"? Interesting that there was a major "information warfare" exercise recently also..

      The point is, with no long-range communications coming out of a country, the powers that be can say they are saying whatever they want, and we have to believe them. Like how they depict the Iranian president as being very dark-skinned, when the majority of Iranians are white. Or other things. Naturally. And of course, knowing this, and knowing that the same cases were manufactured for all wars previous to now, you come to realize that we the public are pawns and are simply living the story written for us by the great ones.

      Also, this is interesting.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    243. Re:Third cut? by bigpicture · · Score: 1

      That's it, now you are doing your homework! You might have to cut and paste this link, and it will give you some indication of just how many cables there actually are. They take out your cables, they take out your satellites, jam your radio waves, and pretty soon you are blind and deaf. Then they attack. That region is so peaceful, this could never happen, right. I bet the Israelis see it that way too. A lot of things are just what they seem, but sometimes they are not.

      http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Technology/Pix/pictures/2008/02/01/SeaCableHi.jpg

    244. Re:Third cut? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      That's it, now you are doing your homework! Thanks -- I think.

      In the United States, "that's it" can either mean "that's right/good job" or "that's the last straw!!" which is what our previous conversations predispose me to expect. But, then, "doing your homework" is pretty much always complimentary, so I lean towards interpreting "that's it" as a compliment. Also, I have an enormous ego, so I pretty much expect compliments, at any time. ;-)

      They take out your cables, they take out your satellites, jam your radio waves, and pretty soon you are blind and deaf. Then they attack. That region is so peaceful, this could never happen, right. I bet the Israelis see it that way too. A lot of things are just what they seem, but sometimes they are not. That's certainly one factor in making an educated guess. Another is that nobody likes being invaded, or even having a war in their neighborhood. Although in the long-term refugees are likely to become very appreciative, productive & vocally loyal additions to freer society than the one they left, few politicians' terms are that long, so politically, refugees are widely seen as a short-term nuisance, only. And, the regional tension that you correctly noted also has the well-known effect that all nations are about as well-armed as they're able to be, in order to deter their enemies from attack. Lastly, lacking the ability to pull up CNN.com, et al, will keep the civilians relatively less informed, but based on what I know, military operations use different, more robust methods of communication. Cutting civilian communications might be a very distant prelude to eventual attack, but to be honest, its likelihood of leading to riots and such makes it seem more like a terrorist tactic.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    245. Re:Third cut? by spun · · Score: 1

      That's actually a pretty decent motivation. But maybe he actually deserves it. I have to ask, did you defend Clinton the same way?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    246. Re:Third cut? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      When he deserved it.

      The problem as I see it is that there is so much already to criticize Bush (and even clinton) over that we don't need to make stuff up or stretch the truth to exaggerate the effects. Of course when you weed through all the exagerations and outright lieing, you see that is isn't quite as bad or hopeless as people are making it out.

      It seems that in the US, the way to win an election isn't to get a better person on the ballot but to attack and lower the perception of the opponent so you defeat them. It isn't "the best man wins" anymore but more of the one who survived the attacks better. And instead of raising the bar we end up lowering it while at the same time locking out legitimate winers. Look at the primaries, it is more about strategic wins then showing the country you the right person for the job. Edwards stayed in the race to block Hillary's momentum and dropped claiming support for Obama after he stopped her from taking the lead. The republicans have all decided to skip states because certain ones would mean more then others. John McCain win Florida and is claiming victory because they don't split their delegates like the other states.

      Anyways, you have probably already seen that. The point wasn't to show you it but to lead into this next statement. It doesn't matter who wins because the other side will take the next 5 or 8 years stretching the truth, expressing opinions as if they are fact, outright lieing and anything else they can think of to damage the position of the current politician and prop they next guy up. Kerry ran on a platform almost identical to Bush's with the caveat that because he would be president it would somehow all turn out better. He got half the vote on the premise that it would somehow be better with him in office. The differences between the two's stated positions were so minor that most people can't accurately point them out. This tells me that the problem isn't with the politics as much as the perception of the politics. the perception is created because of the lies and stretching of the truth.

      I don't think I would care who the president was or what party he is from, it is the office more then anything I am concerned with.

    247. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When is the war starting? I'm still waiting. (Note: you're a fucking retard.)

    248. Re:Third cut? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You must admit that this is an entirely appropriate counter-attack. Very moderated. But was it moderated +1 Insightful or -1 Troll?
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    249. Re:Third cut? by S-4'N3 · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or are the implications of this fiber cut being greatly exaggerated. I was able to traceroute to an IP in Iran with no problem. Perhaps the lights have gone out for a large portion of the population, but their local hosting services are still up. (and yes, I checked to ensure that the server was physically in Iran and not hosted elsewhere) It's my understanding that the goal of something like the Internet is to have no single point of entry, so if one major fiber goes out, you still have alternate routes in place.

    250. Re:Third cut? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      My chemistry instructor was colorblind and a military pilot, he claimed he had a copy of the colorblind test stolen and memorized the numbers on the bottom of each plate.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    251. Re:Third cut? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I don't know seems like bullshit to me, in my field we judge color to the point where seeing minute color difference in two pieces is very precise. I often compare color under three and four different light sources to get the best compromise possible and my industry is moving to digital analysis. Your average Joe isn't going to see the difference in a red colored Mc Donalds chair under florescent lights, the same chair under diffused northern light and direct sunlight.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    252. Re:Third cut? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      To be honest my first tinfoil hat hunch was that the Iranians or Al Qaeda cut the cable not the USG. Probably not a mainstream extremist element but one of the extremist-extremist factions, every group has a few loose cannons and the ones in Al Qaeda or Iran have to be way out there.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    253. Re:Third cut? by bigpicture · · Score: 1

      I deal a lot with legal documents, and interpretation most times hinges on what precedes or what follows, in this case it means "good job", because you are looking at all known inclusions or possibilities, and not unnecessarily excluding any possibility at this point.

      I have more than a passing interest in this, because I put money on the line a few years back and lost it. A company named Global Crossing, with an IPO of about a half billion capitalization, and two years later Chapter 11. They were in undersea cables, when the flavor of the month was bandwidth, percent of dark cable, and redundancy.

    254. Re:Third cut? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      when I checked router.vortechhosting.com is dead as a door nail but Vortech "can you ping me now" seems to be alive and doing fine. I would be amazed if CENTCOM and SOCOM didn't have plenty of backup resources between them, purchasing commercial bandwidth is likely a luxury rather than a necessity anyways.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    255. Re:Third cut? by galanom · · Score: 1

      At least you accept that throwing bombs indicates a conspiracy. However, don't you think that's too late to find it out? It's like predicting earthquakes from the view of fallen buildings!

    256. Re:Third cut? by Lippard · · Score: 1

      There have been three cable cuts in two incidents. The first incident was the tanker anchor that cut FLAG Telecom's Europe-Asia cable and SeaMeWe-4 in the Mediterranean off the north coast of Egypt, on the route between Palermo, Sicily and Alexandria, Egypt. Those cables run in parallel from Palermo to Alexandria in the Mediterranean, through the Suez Canal into the Red Sea, then from Djibouti to Mumbai, India.

      The second incident was a cut in FLAG Telecom's FALCON cable, which connects up with the Europe-Asia cable off the coast of Mumbai and goes north into the Persian Gulf past Oman, UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain, and lands in Kuwait. In the other direction, it rounds India and connects to Sri Lanka. That one was cut between Oman and UAE.

      None of these cables lands in Iran. There is a subsea cable from Kuwait to Iran; the impact to that was indirect.

      Note that in December 2006 there were *nine* cable breaks in Asia as a result of earthquakes. Submarine cables (like terrestrial cables) break all the time due to natural and man-caused accidents, which is why every cable operator contracts with cable laying and repair fleets to repair breaks.

      I don't think there's anything suspicious here. I've discussed this in similar detail at my blog, which includes a link to Telegeography's submarine cable map.

    257. Re:Third cut? by rossz · · Score: 1

      Nope, not your dad's friend. The other person I knew about was Monty Roberts, a somewhat famous horse trainer.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    258. Re:Third cut? by flynns · · Score: 1

      What's frice?

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    259. Re:Third cut? by Random+Q.+Hacker · · Score: 0

      Every good spy knows, when you rattle your saber, you reveal it.

    260. Re:Third cut? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      Sure, I heard of Global Crossing, they were really big news just a few years back. I can't seem to remember what it was, but wasn't there something odd about their demise?

      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    261. Re:Third cut? by bigpicture · · Score: 1

      They were the darling of Wall Street, so I invested a few bucks. They went bankrupt and got bought out by one of their partner/creditors when the "dot com" bust came. The original stockholders got shut out, and now they are up and running again under the Global Crossing name. Apparently they are one of the big undersea cable players.

    262. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better call Bruce before the bad guys hack their webs and download their firewalls.

    263. Re:Third cut? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      That's it, now you are doing your homework! Nice try. My homework was already done. Now, go and do yours. You claimed that when I called you on your specific claims without evidence, I was making an "assumption." In fact, I was stating the very opposite, refusal to accept any assumption, including yours, without proof, which you still have not provided. The link above only offers a plausible motive for sabotage, not positive evidence. And I never said sabotage wasn't plausible, so you haven't disproved or successfully rebutted anything that I have said, only what you've projected.

      I'm sorry to hear about your financial loss. I hope your portfolio was diversified.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    264. Re:Third cut? by bigpicture · · Score: 1

      It was never about rebutting or proving anything. I think if you look at any of my slash dot posts about any topic in the past the theme is always about casting dispersion on the "I'm right and you are wrong, and here's why" approach as a means of arriving at the truth, or in the case of science or religion arriving at Reality. Thats just what you have done here, and of course with the BIG EGO the next step is DENIAL, "no I'm not doing this and here's why". It's classic, but you don't see that, because EGO is about deception, mostly self deception. Your self deception is that you know the truth about everything, and my position has always been "relative thinking processes can never know the truth" therefore it is always about "don't believe or don't disbelieve" because time changes theories. The world is not flat this year, but it was some years back. Is cholesterol good or bad for you this year, I forget?.

      Here is a copy of my very first post in this endless series. It would seem that as of today we are up to the fourth cable cut, and not anywhere near shipping, in fact an area off limits to ships. I think there were only two when I originally wrote this. It was merely pointing out the probabilities of accidental in such a situation. Not "I'm right and you are wrong", but then I'm not a self appointed moderator, my ego does not require that.
      >>>>>>>>Remember this:
      "There are times when things can be accidentally coincidental. But when the probability mathematical odds get really high, then the question should always be: was it deliberate? If it was terrorists there is a high likely hood that there would be a: "look what we did" news cast. But if it were the covert actions of a semi legitimate government, then it would be made to look accidental."

    265. Re:Third cut? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      I think if you look at any of my slash dot posts about any topic in the past the theme is always... I'm really much more interested in the message than the messenger. Now, back to whodunnit:

      "There are times when things can be accidentally coincidental. But when the probability mathematical odds get really high, then the question should always be: was it deliberate? No problems, yet.

      If it was terrorists there is a high likely hood that there would be a: "look what we did" news cast. But if it were the covert actions of a semi legitimate government, then it would be made to look accidental." That's a specific claim, and with insufficient data to support it. That's all I have to say about this.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    266. Re:Third cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard stories (yes, yes, probably urban legends) that the US Navy was at one point technically able to tap into undersea fiber optic cables using a special chamber mounted on a support submarine.

      That was originally the USS Parche and since it was decommissioned, its role has been taken over by the USS Jimmy Carter

  2. Well that's a bitch by krog · · Score: 0

    I always look forward to fresh news from my RSS feed of the latest fatwas...

  3. So you're telling me... by erareno · · Score: 1

    Iran just got their internets pwned? =O

  4. This is getting exciting! by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Funny

    *brings out the popcorn*

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:This is getting exciting! by nebenfun · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm in Tehran. I hope my Seinfeld torrents finish. Everything is going fine...#@&$(*&NO CARRIER

    2. Re:This is getting exciting! by everphilski · · Score: 4, Funny

      NO INTERNET FOR YOU!

    3. Re:This is getting exciting! by Chazerizer · · Score: 1

      So how did you post that?

    4. Re:This is getting exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA Fuck, I thought I'd never be brought down to the level of the slashdotter who spits water all over his keyboard after reading a comment. Damn you!

    5. Re:This is getting exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That soup guy didn't exist, and if he did, he really wasn't that mean when selling soup (which he didn't, never happened!).

  5. Iran hasn't lost connectivity by anotherone · · Score: 5, Informative

    Iran hasn't lost connectivity, the specific router that Internet Traffic Report is checking has lost connectivity.

    Even the University that hosts the router that ITR is checking is still up: http://www.iust.ac.ir/

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. We'll cut those next. Bwahahahahaaaaa.... Oops, did I write that out loud?

    2. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And chugging hard now, thank you very much!

    3. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Funny

      The countries internet connection is hanging by a thread, and you slashdot their university. Smooth move, asshole.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    4. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by rvolz · · Score: 1

      Correct. I mean, based on the site, Florida would apparently also have no connectivity (as of 16:30 EST).

    5. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by mrboyd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Iran is still on the grid, as is all of the ME. I am still in Dubai (where the 3rd cable has been cut). I received a communication from our ISP (DU/ aka DIC Telecom) telling us about this new cut and that they had to reroute us again. I couldn't notice more slow down in web browsing but bittorrent traffic seems to have been blocked. Could it be a preemptive measure? We live behind a big firewall similar to the one in china here. I would be surprised if they decided not to plead like the Egyptians and just block some of the crap we download to save the bandwidth.

    6. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, though, Iran's communications are being routed through the US and the UK. Bush has demanded that he be allowed to view communications traffic. I think the Administration just wants to know what they are saying. So we can bomb the shit out of them. For reasons known only to the Administration. Dammit.

    7. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      how many more cables would have to be cut to effectively take the middle east off the net?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to ITR Florida is also "out" and presumably under attack
      http://www.internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm

    9. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by mrboyd · · Score: 1

      I have no idea about that, but if it is a conspiracy we will know soon enough. :)

    10. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by ill+stew+dottied+ewe · · Score: 1

      My linux webserver runs at 233mHz you insensitive clod! At this point the hardware doesn't matter, it's the (lack of) bandwidth.

    11. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

      The countries internet connection is hanging by a thread, and you slashdot their university. Smooth move, asshole.

      You're assuming he's not working for the NSA.

      If you were, posting such a link might be intentional.

      Never assume the friendly repairman at your door in a secure location is there to help you.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    12. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      "...but bittorrent traffic seems to have been blocked." Ahh, now we know why this was done.

    13. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

      how many more cables would have to be cut to effectively take the middle east off the net?

      Not too many: since FLAG and SEA-ME-WE-4 (the two fastest links, by far, connecting the region to the rest of the world) are already partially or completely down, I think cutting SEA-ME-WE-3 would be enough to bring what remains of the infrastructure to its knees. If any backbone nerd cared to provide any details... :)

      I'm pretty sure there are other routes; however, they are much slower lines and are mostly dedicated to telephony. Most countries in the middle east also have at least one satellite link of some sort, which are hard to scramble (or so they say).

      However, in case of actual, long-term, bandwidth shortage, it would be quite trivial for most Middle Eastern countries (where telcos and access to international connectivity are typically state-controlled) to block bittorrent, FTP, YouTube, Kazaa, etc, and dedicate all the remaining bandwidth to essential services, such as e-mail, or allocate all the bandwidth to the government and administration.

      The problem of many Middle-Eastern and North African countries is that they never really developed neighbour-to-neighbour communication links. For instance a ping from Tunisia to Morocco has good chances of going through Palermo (Italy) or Marseille (France). I'm pretty sure a ping between two countries in the Gulf would give surprising results too.

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    14. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      Just... you know... out of curiosity...

    15. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      At least that's a fairly legitimate reason to block and such...
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    16. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by mrboyd · · Score: 1

      I don't think there is any legitimate reason to block anything. It's too much of a slippery slope, once you start blocking things you can always find a way to legitimate blocking something else to "save the children" or the elderly.
      One of our provider is blocking everything that doesn't match the "value of the UAE" and yesterday slashdot editors probably posted something VERY BAD for the children because it was blocked by the retards at the TRA in Abu Dhabi (you know who you are).

    17. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the University that hosts the router that ITR is checking is still up


      Or more precisely, it WAS, until it got slashdotted.
    18. Re:Iran hasn't lost connectivity by Lippard · · Score: 1

      None of the cut cables land in Iran, anyway. Iran has connectivity through (at least) TTNet in Turkey over terrestrial cable, and through a submarine cable from Kuwait that has not been cut.

  6. Putting the puzzle pieces together by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was widely reported from a variety of whistleblowers at the turn of the millennium that the U.S. was preparing the U.S.S. Jimmy Carter to be able to tap underwater fibre-optic cables. See Bamford's Body of Secrets for exmaple.

    That this operation was carried out on the submarine named after the president who did the most to reduce spying on civilian targets shows just how petty and spiteful the professional privacy violators in the NSA are.

    1. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was widely reported from a variety of whistleblowers at the turn of the millennium that the U.S. was preparing the U.S.S. Jimmy Carter to be able to tap underwater fibre-optic cables. See Bamford's Body of Secrets for exmaple.

      That this operation was carried out on the submarine named after the president who did the most to reduce spying on civilian targets shows just how petty and spiteful the professional privacy violators in the NSA are.

      What does that have to do with anything? You don't need a sophisticated submarine just to break the cables in half. All you need to do that is a ship with an anchor and an approximate idea of where the cables are located.

      Tapping a cable is a subtle move, requiring a lot of technical expertise and work. Breaking one isn't.
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "That this operation was carried out on the submarine named after the president who did the most to reduce spying on civilian targets shows just how petty and spiteful the professional privacy violators in the NSA are."
      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.....
      Sorry.
      The Jimmy Carter is the last of the Seawolf class submarines. The newer Virgina class is actually lower tech and cost than the Seawolf.
      They named it the Jimmy Carter because he served on Nuclear Submarines. It was named in his honor. it was modified for spying because it was the best for the job and the last available.
      Since he launched it and said what an honor it was to have it named after him all I can say is.
      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha......
      Really..

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by aschoeff · · Score: 1

      A Subtle Knife, for a subtle move?

      Say it isn't so! All we need now is the NSA being responsible for draining the Dust out of the world.

    4. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by merreborn · · Score: 1

      You don't need a sophisticated submarine just to break the cables in half. All you need to do that is a ship with an anchor and an approximate idea of where the cables are located.

      Tapping a cable is a subtle move, requiring a lot of technical expertise and work. Breaking one isn't.
      Well said. If this was a tapping, it wouldn't have made international news -- the outtage wouldn't have lasted more than a few minutes at worst.
    5. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by dollar99 · · Score: 1

      If the break was intentional the goal wasn't to break the line. The goal was to tap the line. Its gotta be easier to implement a tap while the line is down. When it comes back up it will undetectably tapped. Viola!

    6. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by AxB_teeth · · Score: 1

      If this was a tapping, it wouldn't have made international news -- the outtage wouldn't have lasted more than a few minutes at worst.


      In a perfect world, yes. If I were overseeing such an operation, however, I'd be certain that while I was implementing the tap there was a very noticeable diversion.
      --

      However,
    7. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Seriously, that parent poster is smoking conspiracy crack. Using the same logic, naming National Airport after Ronald Reagan is a sick joke because he fired all of those air traffic controllers. They probably serve KETCHUP there, too, just to really get to him.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      Viola!

      Salt water ruins those. Euphonium!, maybe.

      rj

    9. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by AxB_teeth · · Score: 1

      Of course, I forgot... DUN DUN DUN!

      --

      However,
    10. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      So, the US is responsible, and we know that because the folks on the Jimmy Carter royally fucked up 3 times in 2 days? After trying to secretly tap the first cable and cutting it instead, they just said "Oh crap" and went on to the next cable?

      And then cut that by accident?

      And then cut a third by accident?

      Why do I think that is far less probable than either:
      1) Idiots on ships
      or
      2) militants on ships.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    11. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with anything? You don't need a sophisticated submarine just to break the cables in half. All you need to do that is a ship with an anchor and an approximate idea of where the cables are located.
      I would imagine it is much easier to tap an already broken cable without being noticed than to tap a working one.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      It was widely reported from a variety of whistleblowers at the turn of the millennium that the U.S. was preparing the U.S.S. Jimmy Carter to be able to tap underwater fibre-optic cables. See Bamford's Body of Secrets for exmaple.

      I'd personally wonder what rock Bamford was hiding under then - because the USN was quite open that Jimmy Carter was a replacement [in capability] for Parche. You don't need 'whistleblowers' to tell you what the USN openly admits and experts in the intelligence community have already concluded.
       
      But then, that approach, as opposed to pretending Bamford is fount of wisdom knowing stuff nobody else knows, won't sell as many books.
    13. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The best part is that yo yo got a five for it.
      Of course everybody and there dog knows that the Jimmy Carter was modified for underwater OP so no whistle blower needed there. The goal of taping and underwater cable is to do it without anyone knowing that you did it. So even if you where going to break the cable you wouldn't do all of them at once.
      But the best part is that the cable lands in Europe. Any of the countries that it lands at would probably be happy to let the US sniff the cable if we let them share the data.
      Also Egypt has more to loose from Islamic extremists than most countries and they are a pretty good friend to the US. Want to bet that they would let us tap those cables as well?
      Sounds more likely to be fundamentalist trying to cut the Middle East off from porn, western news, and entertainment.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    14. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never read Blind Man's Bluff, have you? Ever wonder how the USS Parche became the most decorated US Navy vessel in history without ever firing a shot?

      Jimmy Carter committed acts of war repeatedly by sending the Parche into Soviet waters to tap their cables.

    15. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking idiot slashbots. the parent post is Insightful?

      More like filled to the brim with conspiratorialist bullshit that is devoid of reason and fact.

      1) THe NSA is nto that incompetent.

      2) cuttin gthe cable is nto the way to do it - the Jimmy Carter cna tap it without interruption

      3) its the NSA, they'd just hack the routers if they wanted in or to DOS somone.

      Jeebus, Slashdotters are becoming more and more stupid.

    16. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I would imagine it is much easier to tap an already broken cable without being noticed than to tap a working one. Sure. Particularly if you don't have a submarine for doing it underwater, undetected. The way those cables are spliced when they break (according to Neal Stephenson's article on them) is by hauling them up to the surface and doing the splice there -- slack is left in the cable for this purpose -- and then dropping it back down. But if you have a specially designed sub for doing it underwater, breaking the cable (with the inevitable result that a ship will be sent out, and the cable hauled up) is the last thing you'd want to do.

      It's not a bad conspiracy theory if the Men In Black are the Russians or the Egyptians or maybe even the Israelis, pretty much anyone in the world except the U.S.

      If you do want to go after the conspiracy-theory angle, who you really want to be looking at are the repair ships. If there was some common thread among all the repair efforts (same contractor doing the work, same organization bankrolling them), then I'd start to come around to the side that something nefarious might be going on. Because that's how I'd imagine someone lower-tech than the U.S. would accomplish a tap.
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    17. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That this operation was carried out on the submarine named after the president who did the most to reduce spying on civilian targets shows just how petty and spiteful the professional privacy violators in the NSA are

      Dumbass - Jimmy Carter was a nuclear submariner before he was President. He himself was probably involved in shit like this.

    18. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1
      Don't confuse the conspiracy theorists with facts. You'll only frustrate yourself.

      1) Idiots on ships Ding-ding-ding. It's happened before.
      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    19. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 points

      First, if you want to tap into the cable you could spice 1 strand at a time and be much less likely to be noticed.

      Second, doing that would be a waste of time as is blocking certain kinds of traffic. Go to Wiki and read the article on encryption.

    20. Re:Putting the puzzle pieces together by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      breaking the cable (with the inevitable result that a ship will be sent out, and the cable hauled up) is the last thing you'd want to do.
      I disagree, you break the cable and wait for them to find the break first, then once they have found the break and are working to fix it then you do the tap (somewhere else on the cable) while the line is being fixed.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  7. Fourth Undersea Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... crashes into field in PA.

    1. Re:Fourth Undersea Cable by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Undersea cable... Field in Pennsylvania... I'm getting nauseous.

  8. Anchor? by band-aid-brand · · Score: 1

    apparently caused by another wayward anchor in this case, the word anchor means "specially engineered cable cutting device capable of precision slices while on the ocean floor"

  9. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iran declares jihad on the ocean.

  10. they forgot the 3rd one when they put in the taps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $5 they are dropping in fiber taps on these.

  11. Can anyone enlighten me? by Pojut · · Score: 1

    What are these undersea cables constructed with? I mean the cabling, insulation, and outer casing.

    1. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Calvin: If girls are made with sugar and spice and everything nice...and boys are made with snips and snails and puppy dog tails...what are tigers made out of?

      Hobbes: Dragon flys and Katydids, but mostly chewed up little kids.

    2. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, the BBC can enlighten you!

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7222536.stm

    3. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Surt · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by mikael · · Score: 5, Informative

      The BBC has an article with a cross section of an undersea cable

      The first cable - the Fiber-Optic Link Around the Globe (FLAG) - was cut at 0800 on 30 January, the firm said.

      INSIDE A SUBMARINE CABLE
      cable infographic
      1 Polyethylene cover
      2,4 Stranded steel armour wires
      3,5 Tar-soaked nylon yarn
      6 Polycarbonate insulator
      7 Copper sheath
      8 Protective core
      9 Optical fibres
      Not to scale

      A second cable thought to lie alongside it - SEA-ME-WE 4, or the South East Asia-Middle East-West Europe 4 cable - was also split.

      FLAG is a 28,000km (17,400 mile) long submarine communications cable that links Australia and Japan with Europe via India and the Middle East.

      SEA-ME-WE 4 is a submarine cable linking South East Asia to Europe via the Indian subcontinent and the Middle East.

      The two cable cuts meant that the only cable in service connecting Europe to the Middle East via Egypt was the older Sea-M-We 3 system, according to research firm TeleGeography.


      It's amazing that a ship's anchor could have the strength to pull apart two layers of stranded steel armour wires, a layer of copper, kevlar layers, and three polyethylene layers.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by russotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's amazing that a ship's anchor could have the strength to pull apart two layers of stranded steel armour wires, a layer of copper, kevlar layers, and three polyethylene layers.

      Have you ever seen an anchor? Sure, it's just a hunk of low-tech metal. But it's a very LARGE hunk of low-tech metal. Connected by a very heavy cable or chain to a ship which weighs many, many tons. Ripping apart a communications cable = not a problem.
    6. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the largest anchor I have seen. Our neighbour has a fence made out of 18-inch anchor chains segments. I can see how having one of those fall on top of a repeater unit could do damage, and the momentum of a large tanker attached to a cable could easily pull it apart.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by evanbd · · Score: 1

      These are large ships, with large anchors. Imagine how big an anchor, and how strong an anchor chain, you'd need for a ship with displacement measured in tens of kilotons.

    8. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      That's not even big, the one's on the largest cruise ships are about 3 times that size, I'm talking the size of a full king-cab pickup. I imagine supertankers and aircraft carriers have anchors about 5-10 times that size. Big ships need BIG anchors.

    9. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing that a ship's anchor could have the strength to pull apart two layers of stranded steel armour wires, a layer of copper, kevlar layers, and three polyethylene layers.

      I don't think it's that amazing. An ocean going vessel is easily well over 35,000 tons, more for oil tankers and suchlike. Any anchor that can hold a ship that size in place will have no trouble with a cable. Put another way, an anchor chain consisting of links made out of the hardest steel, several centimetres or inches thick, is stronger than a cable that is reinforced with strands of steel and kevlar.

      I'm willing to accept that this is a plausible explanation, especially because the two cables in the Mediterranean were probably cut in the same area where ships were anchored because they couldn't enter Alexandria harbour because of a storm. A few dozen ships anchoring in an area where there are undersea cables is an accident waiting to happen. But it's a mighty big coincidence that another cable is now cut, in such a short time period. Fortunately for all the internet-addicts in the region, the third cut doesn't seem to be too big of a problem, but it makes you wonder how this could happen. But then I realize that even on land people rarely know exactly where all the cables and pipes are, so nevermind those which are on the bottom of the sea.
    10. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it is about 8" diameter for shallow waters, and it is buried for shore to shallow water, and they steadily reduce the armouring down to nothing for deep water, that right a 1.6Tera-bit cable is about 27mm diameter in deep water.
      The usual spot for breaks is around Hong Kong... Lots of cables and lots of shipping in the same location keeps the cable repair boats quite busy.

      http://telegeography.com/products/map_cable/index.php for a view of the routes

    11. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      If a 2 tonne backhoe can do it im sure a 20,000 tonne freighter can do it better. Whats more, those cables generally have alot of slack so that they can be pulled to the surface for repair. That anchor probably cut through it as a hot knife through butter, if you think about it.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    12. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      http://static.flickr.com/111/313315426_3b89208612.jpg

      These weigh several tons, and with the added weight of their anchor chain,
      not much can stand up to them.

      After all they are meant to hold a multi-thousand ton ship still at sea
      under light gale conditions.

      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    13. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    14. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's amazing that a ship's anchor could have the strength to pull apart two layers of stranded steel armour wires, a layer of copper, kevlar layers, and three polyethylene layers."

      Not all that amazing really, but most people simply have no conception of the inertia of large vessels. I had an incident with a slow moving train when an adolescent that nearly dislocated my shoulder. A small sailing boat won't have the inertia of a slow moving train, but larger vessel can have much greater. The only considerations with an anchor are the relative strengths. And a ship's anchor likely doesn't look like you think it does. So quite possibly the shear strength of the steel strands versus an anchor that needs to not give against the pull of a many tonned vessel.

      Three cables (at least two in apparently different areas) being cut does seem a bit far-fetched, but that is more a matter of the coincidence than the capability of a ship's anchor being able to break the cable.

    15. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by ill+stew+dottied+ewe · · Score: 1

      That second cable name probably bothered the conservatives. They don't want anyone to know about the cable that delivers the "water sports" porn.

    16. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A large ship carrying crude might weigh 1/2 million tonnes, the anchor could weigh 50+ tonnes, no it is not surprising.

    17. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly is. World's full of fun facts. Moving right along...

    18. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's amazing that a ship's anchor could have the strength to pull apart two layers of stranded steel armour wires, a layer of copper, kevlar layers, and three polyethylene layers."

      Well, either the cable breaks or the anchor chain breaks or the ship sinks. It's your call.

    19. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A ship's anchor also has the strength to keep a ship from drifting off. Go figure.

    20. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not particularly amazing. Boats are heavy. Anchor chains are heavy too. There's a *lot* of momentum kicking around.

    21. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be amazing if a small boat anchor could cut such a cable. Not so amazing for a hundred thousand ton tanker.

      If a wave or current tugs the ship and puts a mere 10 or 20 thousand tons of shearing force on the cable via the anchor, then amazing would be if that relatively puny cable could stop the ship like the arresting cable on an aircraft carrier deck does with a plane.

    22. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Majin+Bubu · · Score: 1

      Yes, the one in the pic is not so big, I have seen larger. However, aircraft carriers are not much different in size from a cruise ship, and they are much less tall (less wind caught -> less push on the ship -> less pull on the chains), so they won't have a larger anchor. But a tanker plowing along at 12 knots dragging one of these is plenty for sinking a submarine... No problem with a cable.

      --
      Ander

      @=

    23. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by artg · · Score: 1

      "The two cable cuts meant that the only cable in service connecting Europe to the Middle East via Egypt was the older Sea-M-We 3 system, according to research firm TeleGeography."

      So .. that would mean only the old-tech cable that you can tap with outdated spy equipment is still working. I wonder where the high-tech spy sub has just been reassigned ?

    24. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's amazing that a ship's anchor could have the strength to pull apart two layers of stranded steel armour wires, a layer of copper, kevlar layers, and three polyethylene layers.

      The anchor may not be heavy but remember that it is attached to a very heavy ship dragging it along! If it is any consolation the steel "armour wires" probably scratched the slightly softer steel anchor a bit when the cable was cut.

    25. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      An average petroleum tanker weighs around 200,000 - 300,000 tons when full. The anchor weighs about three, and 200 feet of chain weighs another 6 tons.

      Standard practice is to drop anchor and a few hundred feet of chain while moving backwards to give the ship a solid hold on the bottom.

      Add a 14 knot breeze and a 4 knot tide, and you've got an anchor that's going to drag a few hundred yards until they pay out enough chain to secure the ship.

      In the meantime, ANYTHING the anchor happens to rumble over is going to be obliterated

      --
      [End Of Line]
    26. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were the cables _literally_ split in two?!? Maybe only the optical fibers broke. They're made of glass, afterall. And isn't glass a little bit fragile? What were they thinking? Glass cables... AHHH-HAHAHAHAHAHA!

    27. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I wonder if the US Navy used that as a reference before they cut these cables?

    28. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_communications_cable [wikipedia.org]
      Includes a nice picture, and description of each layer.

      Obviously this cable was constructed from the outside in. Note that the layer surrounding the core fibers is made of petroleum jelly. There can be only one reason for that.

    29. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing that a ship's anchor could have the strength to pull apart two layers of stranded steel armour wires, a layer of copper, kevlar layers, and three polyethylene layers. of course the anchor can. if its attached to a US carrier
  12. Anchors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The backhoe of the sea.

  13. Not the tubes!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So did the tubes get clogged? crushed?

    I can't get my head around this whole interweb thing... to many tubes.

    1. Re:Not the tubes!!! by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Well, to make it simple, the sad news is that the trucks can't drive through them no more.

  14. A disruption of communication can mean only one... by lthown · · Score: 1, Troll

    thing: war - the advisor dude from Star Wars Episode 1. Looks like the trade federation is coming for the Arabs!

  15. InformationWarfare by SupremeDiety · · Score: 1

    I feel like America is going to do something stupid.

    1. Re:InformationWarfare by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I feel like America is going to do something stupid. "Going to"? Been doing stupid things for awhile I would say, hmm?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  16. When will they learn.... Oblig quote by hermit_tries_virtual · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fry: What's happening?

    Dr. Zoidberg: All 6,000 hulls have been breached!

    Fry: Oh, the fools! If only they'd built it with 6,001 hulls! When will they learn?

  17. Curretn Events and Submarines... by Farakin · · Score: 0

    Did you know North Korea has teh most submarines in the world? hmmmmmmmmm, me thinks someone meant them all to go down at the same time.

  18. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I am too willing to accept that something is fishy when the only 3 cables that were holding comm link to the middle east are somehow ALL cut in the same exact way. Send in the Grissom from CSI
    he'll tell you it is almost improbable to have the 3 cables cut in the same matter , more likely
    someone who wanted to cut communication, so the question becomes, not how or why, but more importantly who???

    USA - maybe
    Rebels - maybe
    Russia or China - 100%

  19. Slowing down our outsourced jobs? by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

    Is this part of some plan to slow town our Indian and Asian counter-parts?

  20. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am too willing to accept that something is fishy
    It's in the bloody sea, what do you expect?
    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  21. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Out of curiosity while would Russia or China be more likely then the USA to want to cut communications with the middle east? Also, by defining USA and Rebels as a maybe, they by definition must be more than 0% likely, therefore it's impossible to then list Russia or China as 100%.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  22. So let me get this straight... by Xelios · · Score: 1

    All I have to do to cripple the electronic infrastructure between countries for over a week is enlist a few boats to drag their anchors across the sea floor? Obviously you can't just cut one cable and take out an entire country's connectivity, but a coordinated attack seems like it could do some serious damage. Maybe we should be burying these cables a little deeper?

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  23. US Navy Frogmen by myrikhan · · Score: 1

    Hey, US Navy Frogmen/Frogpersons need work too!

    The Palestinian-Israeli situation doesn't look so good so perhaps
    Bush is looking for a different legacy.

  24. Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicated! by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can't have a conspiracy theory if it is simple and straight forward. After all, a simple straight forward plan involving just a few people might actually work. No, rather it has to be massively and unnecessarily complicated with lots of intricate connections. That way, the people who notice the conspiracy are great geniuses for being able to see what nobody else could!

    Seriously, it is just more of the same shit like moon landing conspiracy or 9/11 conspiracy. You've probably noticed that we have a fair amount of nutters on /. and of course they are going to subscribe to wacky conspiracies.

    This is just going to be one more of those. However it doesn't work if it is something simple, they are only compelling if they are twisted and convoluted and something only the US government with its massive resources could pull off. A sub with some secret cable cutter sound so much better than a fishing trawler with an anchor.

  25. "The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Understand the procedure now? Just stop a few of their machines, their telephones, their lawnmowers, throw them into darkness for a few hours, and then sit back and watch the pattern."

    "This pattern is always the same?"

    "With few variations. They pick the most dangerous enemy they can find.... and it's themselves. All we need do is sit back and watch."

    "I take it that this place...this Maple Street...is not unique."

    "By no means. Their world is full of Maple Streets, and we'll go from one to the other and let them destroy themselves."

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:"The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Congrats - perfect Twlight Zone reference

      but me without mod points

    2. Re:"The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Monsters_Are_Due_on_Maple_Street

      "With few variations. They pick the most dangerous enemy they can find.... and it's themselves. All we need do is sit back and watch." Well I guess the Middle East is one of those "few variations".
      They're much more likely to blame Israel &/or the USA than to devour each other.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:"The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" by 246o1 · · Score: 1

      That episode was about people. Americans, Israelis, and Middle Easterners are all people. You are exactly wrong, it seems to me, since the Middle East is not an exception to the show's point: people are distrustful and get crazy when exposed to any vaguely negative change.

      --
      Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
    4. Re:"The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Middle Eastern states may blame the US/Israel alot, but they have absolutely no problem waging war upon one another, as well as waging impressive civil wars.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    5. Re:"The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" by Enoxice · · Score: 1

      I wish I hadn't already wasted all my mod points. I love the Twilight Zone (the 28dvd set for $200 was sooo worth it).

      --
      Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
    6. Re:"The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" by porter235 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this quote. It is great!

    7. Re:"The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" by Karem+Lore · · Score: 1

      "Understand the procedure now? Just stop a few of their machines, their telephones, their lawnmowers, throw them into darkness for a few hours, and then sit back and watch the pattern."

      Isn't this from the FBI's handbook for terrorist/hostage situations? (At least that's what the "Die Hard" documentary I watched a few years back said).

      --
      When all is said and done, nothing changes...
    8. Re:"The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Isn't this from the FBI's handbook for terrorist/hostage situations?


      Only if it is followed by burning them alive.
  26. Rerouting traffic by belthize · · Score: 1

    The thing that jumped out at me was:

    "It may take sometime to fix the cut but we are rerouting the traffic to another cable in the U.K. and U.S., the bandwidth utilization will go down," the official said.

          Certainly 3 cuts (or 4 depending on your numbering system) seems awfully strange. If you assume it's intentional
    the obvious (to me) question is why, to what end ?

          Isolation isn't really practical with cell phones etc, the fact that they've rerouted all the way through
    the US and UK (really ?) implies sniffing. Seems like a fairly cumbersome way to do it, why not just quietly
    reroute or even duplicate the traffic.

          Not saying it was intentional ... just pondering the reasoning if it was.

    Belthize

    1. Re:Rerouting traffic by lexarius · · Score: 1

      "Oops, sorry about those cables. We'll just pop on down there and patch them right up." - with "patches" that wiretap the cable and allow for man-in-the-middle attacks. Maybe?

    2. Re:Rerouting traffic by belthize · · Score: 1

      Maybe....

            It's certainly curious having so many chopped cables in 1 week. That
      backhoe operator certainly was out of his depth.

      Belthize

    3. Re:Rerouting traffic by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Isolation isn't really practical with cell phones etc That's a pretty silly statement. A cellphone is just a tiny little radio transceiver, only capable of hitting the nearest tower. Where do you think the signal goes once it reaches there? Hint, it's into the same telecommunications system that feeds into the undersea cables.

      The only part of the infrastructure that cellphones provide an alternative or parallel to, are the lines running from the CO to your house. It doesn't save you if the problem is in one of the backbone segments.

      Now, if you have a satellite phone (e.g. Iridium, Telstar), then you have a truly parallel network, at least until you get to the downlink station where it rejoins POTS. But I'm pretty sure such things are illegal in Iran, except for Western journalists and the elite. They're not something that regular folks have access to.

      That said, if Iran wanted to cut off its own people, say for the purpose of doing something really nasty internally, they have easier ways to do it than cutting cables in the Med. I'm not buying that particular conspiracy theory. Neither does it seem like anything the U.S. would do, or derive much benefit from, particularly given the alternatives the U.S. has at its disposal (including the cable-tapping submarines that have been mentioned over and over in this thread so far).

      The most likely possibilities to me are: (1) it was a terrorist act aimed at disrupting the most heavily Westernized parts of the Middle East, by a group with fairly limited resources, or (2) it was truly an accident or coincidence.
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:Rerouting traffic by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      Yes, you're right that cellphones use the same long-range infrastructure as everything else.

      But is it really true that all of the communication infrastructure for Iran feeds through undersea cables? All of it?

      They don't use satelites? They don't run any communications to/from bordering countries by land?

    5. Re:Rerouting traffic by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      As pointed out earlier, iranet.ir is still connectible. And a traceroute from within the US shows the traffic going to Paris (te10-2.passe1.Paris.opentransit.net) before Iran.

    6. Re:Rerouting traffic by Sanat · · Score: 1

      See... Bush is not dumb

      Two birds with one stone

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    7. Re:Rerouting traffic by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      And a traceroute from within the US shows the traffic going to Paris (te10-2.passe1.Paris.opentransit.net) before Iran.

      We already have an Echelon listening station in the Paris location, so that means we get both NATO feed and US feed of all traffic to/from Iran.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  27. Iranian government's website still works... by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    president.ir, the website for the Islamic Republic of Iran Presidential Office is still up. So it's not a complete Internet blackout, but it could be just a certain geographic region (or a damn good coincidence).

    1. Re:Iranian government's website still works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A domain in the .IR TLD says nothing about where the site is hosted. I'm sure there are plenty of .IR sites actually hosted in Europe somewhere... though it would surprise me if their main government sites were. The sites for the president and the legislature are both reachable from the US.

  28. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by XenoPhage · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am too willing to accept that something is fishy
    It's in the bloody sea, what do you expect? Bloody? Fishy? ...

    Wrong on so many levels...
    --
    XenoPhage
    Technological Musings
  29. Cloverfield 2 by Lurker2288 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So let's see, three cables in three days...that puts the monster in Manhattan by what, next Thursday, give or take a few isolated fishing vessels between here and there? Better charge up those handicams, kids!

    1. Re:Cloverfield 2 by Kitanin · · Score: 1

      Best check your math---this one appears to be travelling Eastward. =)

      --


      Teach your kids: "C++ made baby Jesus cry."
    2. Re:Cloverfield 2 by John+Whitley · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it is the Cloverfield monster, here's the moral imperative of anyone caught in its landfall zone: SHOOT TO KILL any and all person(s) caught in public with a camcorder but without a steadicam rig...! ;-)

    3. Re:Cloverfield 2 by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

      They'll be easy targets, too, because while everyone else is running their asses off in blind panic, they'll be the ones stumbling around with a camcorder jammed to their faces to make sure they capture every harrowing moment.

      Seriously, dude, you're climbing across the roof of a collapsing building--put the camera away.

  30. Got Cash? by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 0

    So, those flag-of-convenience container ships are run by underpaid, overworked captains. I'm sure if you gave one of them $25,000 or so, they would be more than happy to conduct an "anchor test" for a couple hours while they move over a cable lay.

    Someone with a few million and access to some corrupt captains could cut quite a few lines very easily.

    Just a though.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  31. In related news by ObiWanStevobi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Office productivity throughout the Middle East has risen sharply.

  32. CLOVERFIELD LIVES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the Cloverfield monster! He's chewing the damn cables. bloody pest.

  33. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by jo42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is something that the damned Yankees would do as prelude to invading Iran -- to stop all the bloggers from documenting the invasion and getting the rest of the Arab and Muslim worlds up in arms.

    Hey, you wanted a "Conspiracy".

    PS. Osama is hanging out on GWB's ranch in Texas - that's why they can't find him.

  34. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by mrwolf007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Also, by defining USA and Rebels as a maybe, they by definition must be more than 0% likely, therefore it's impossible to then list Russia or China as 100%. Not if it was cut in three different places.
  35. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by sethstorm · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's in the bloody sea, what do you expect? The Revelations haven't happened (yet). It's still the "regular" sea.
    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  36. The Great White Backhoe by xleeko · · Score: 5, Funny


    This reclusive giant of the deep, the Great White Backhoe, spends most of its life in quiet solitude. But, once every seven years, as if called by some unknown force, these gentle beasts gather in great numbers to feast upon the cables of the ocean floor.
    </french-accent>

  37. damn we're screwed by OrangeTide · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now that Iran's source of pornographic material has been cut off, the population will go Jihad on our ass.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  38. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    I am too willing to accept that something is fishy
    It's in the bloody sea, what do you expect?
    Sharks... hopefully, with laser beams attached to their heads.
  39. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by RingDev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many ways are there to cut a cable buried at the bottom of the ocean? Saying that it is improbablr for them to be cut in the same way is absurd. That's like saying it's improbably for 3 people to be shot by a gun, as opposed to beat to death or suffocated with it.

    It is improbable for 3 cables to be cut in such a short time frame, but the manner in which they were cut is entirely plausible and expected.

    More importantly, look at what did cause it. Are the lines running under high traffic waters? If so, why did it take this long for one of the lines to get caught? If not, why were those boats trying to anchor there? What was causing the movement of the anchor? Storms? Idiots? Tides?

    And truly, it's really not even that unlikely. Running cables next to each other makes maintenance easier, so it would lie in reason that if you are dragging an anchor across one, you are likely going to drag across the other. And once you cut the line, you are going to wind up with more vehicles in the area attempt to repair and investigate the situation. And with more traffic you increase the likelihood of another accident.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  40. Stating the bleedin' obvious.. by Shuntros · · Score: 1

    Juts mentioned this story to the girlfriend... Her response? "That'll be the American anti-terrorist strategy then...". Such insight for one so innocent...

  41. Dolphins did it. by dow · · Score: 1

    You are all so wrong you wouldn't believe. Nuclear War? Russia? China? USA? Bwahahaha...

    The dolphins are mobilizing... They are allied with Porpoises, and Duck Billed Platypus'.

    YOU ARE ALL DOOMED!!!

  42. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by hardburn · · Score: 2, Funny

    At risk of being off-topic, Ann Coulter just said she'd back Hillary, so I think the four horsemen should be around here any minute now.

    --
    Not a typewriter
  43. Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into it by mgh02114 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The locations where many of the recent cable cuts have occurred (China, Pakistan, Palestine/Egypt, and now Iran) is highly suspicious. I suspect that the U.S. intelligence community is using a sub to tap into the fiberoptic line to capture all of the data. Unlike copper lines, they probably can't splice into glass fiberoptic lines without breaking the circuit for a while.

    1) Cut the line somewhere roughly, so it clearly looks like an accident
    2) Somewhere else far away, splice into the line using a sub, so the NSA can capture all the data (or even potentially alter it in transit)
    3) Let the commercial communication providers fix the obvious break
    4) Profit! (at least in terms of intelligence gathering and cyber-war capability

  44. "Many readers are reporting..." by jpellino · · Score: 1

    ... and many more are trying like heck, but to no avail.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  45. Re:I smell... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

    a nukular war Just so long as it's not a nuclear war
  46. I'm sorry! All right!! by Bullfish · · Score: 1

    I thought it was a beanstalk! They travel along the ground (and into water sometimes) before they go up to the clouds!

    Jack

    1. Re:I'm sorry! All right!! by jd · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, in The Goodies episode they did.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  47. Short sighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this really is warfare, it's amazingly dumb. It would just force Iran to lay land line to Russia. How is that good for America?

  48. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Doug52392 · · Score: 0

    It's a government conspiracy! Although you do have a point. Ordernarly I would say "thats impossible", but that's the same thing I said when rumors of the NSA wiretapping the Internet surfaced... The government always surprise me by sinking to a new low, maybe this is the new low?

  49. In Soviet Russia... by Nero+Nimbus · · Score: 1

    Undersea fiber optic cables cut you.

  50. Shallow seas by flyingfsck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Persian Gulf is actually very shallow at about 35m at its deepest. So anchor damage by large ships is very likely there.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Shallow seas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Anchors go to the bottom, no matter what the depth! Shallow water actually minimizes the likelihood of dragging the anchor because it is easier to pay out sufficient scope

    2. Re:Shallow seas by scubamage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that I can't recall in recent memory when one of these cables has been cut before the liklihood of these cables being cut one a day for 3 days, purely by chance, to be almost nil. A ship captained by a reactionary who hates the net? Possible. Goverment surveillance? Possible but strangely high profile. You better believe any sensitive data going through those tubes is gonna be monitored by warhawks in every one of the affected nations. Also, it wouldn't surprise me if China at the very least sends a sub out to verify the integrity of the cable over its full length. The fact that we conspiracy nuts are thinking it means that the conspiracy nuts in the affected nations' departments of defense were probobly taking action yesterday.

    3. Re:Shallow seas by almightynayr · · Score: 5, Informative

      please quit pulling numbers out of your ass.. The waters are overall very shallow and have a maximum depth of 90 metres and an average depth of 50 metres. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Persian_Gulf#Geography

    4. Re:Shallow seas by ModelX · · Score: 1
      Persian Gulf is not that shallow but not really deep either. Let me quote Wikipedia:

      The waters are overall very shallow and have a maximum depth of 90 metres and an average depth of 50 metres.
    5. Re:Shallow seas by ivan256 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Pick a year, and enter "Undersea fiber cut " into google.

      Then realize that *your* recent memory isn't a very good thing to base odds on. Better to search.

      This one particularly stands out from my top-of-the-head recollection: http://whirlpool.net.au/article.cfm/388

      There has been at least one major undersea cable disruption ever year of this decade. Either maintenance accidents, shipping accidents, earthquakes....

    6. Re:Shallow seas by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Fair enough :) I hadn't realized they were quite so numerous, suppose this sort of thing doesn't normally make big headlines. eh?

  51. Silence at last! by Radon360 · · Score: 3, Informative

    All my co-workers phones aren't ringing off the hook with callers trying to subscribe them to worthless trade publications today (very likely a coincidence, but it sounds good anyway). So, now we know how to really stop all those nagging calls from people with really poor english on a noisy connection. Then again, so goes many of the tech support and customer service lines, too.

  52. Different Interpretation by a-zarkon! · · Score: 1

    I think the Iranian government did this to isolate themselves from the rest of the world while raising suspicion that it's the work of some Western government. They're pulling the plug to control information into/out of their country prior to some kind of crack-down. Just another crackpot tinfoil-hat theory...

  53. cut for a purpose by recharged95 · · Score: 3, Funny
    To prove the senator's theory that the tubes will fill up with water.

    And all of Iran's computers will overflow.

    1. Re:cut for a purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Integer or floating-point overflow? :-P

    2. Re:cut for a purpose by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      I have to thank you for the mental picture :)

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  54. ooh i got a good one by pretygrrl · · Score: 1

    so like maybe it IS the Jimmy Carter, and maybe they are installing some sort of man-in-the-middle equipment, which requires a cut a re splice?
    thats a neat wrap up of both the surveilance AND the cyberwar aspects of this conspiracy

    --
    Contemplate the marvel that is existence, and rejoice that you are able to do so.
  55. How to tap the cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, the simple way to tap all their cables would be to have a fishing boat (or whatever) make a simple, accidental cut in one place. Then you splice the cable elsewhere while they're fixing it. You know, because otherwise they'd catch you.

    That said, doing them ALL at the same time is suspiciously obvious. If I had to guess, whoever is doing it is doing it to quietly send a message like "we OWN you and there's nothing you can do about it." This feels more like they're trying to put pressure on them than a prelude to war, though, although I think only the US has seriously been considering more wars over there. Definitely NOT a wise option, but that hasn't stopped them before.

    Anyhow, major undersea cables that are well-separated don't just get accidentally cut like this. At least, not all at the same time. This is FAR too suspicious to be coincidence.

    1. Re:How to tap the cable by Eric+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the US wanted to tap the cable, they'd just use the submarine USS Jimmy Carter, which was retrofitted a few years back to perform exactly these sort of operations. They'd do it without any detected loss of connectivity.

    2. Re:How to tap the cable by RxScram · · Score: 3, Informative

      The USS Jimmy Carter (SSN-23, the newest (and heavily modified version) of the Seawolf class submarines) was NOT retrofitted... it was specifically designed and built to be a replacement for the USS Parche. The keel of the Carter was laid in 1998, and the submarine was commissioned in early 2005.

    3. Re:How to tap the cable by Afrosheen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Retrofitted? What does the sub have on it, a giant pair of scissors sticking out of the front?

    4. Re:How to tap the cable by threephaseboy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well gee, First hit on google for "uss jimmy carter":

      This is due to the insertion of a section known as the Multi-Mission Platform (MMP), ... The MMP may also be used as an underwater splicing chamber for tapping of undersea fiber optic cables. This role was formerly filled by the decommissioned USS Parche (SSN-683).
      --
      .
    5. Re:How to tap the cable by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the insight but I was making a joke.

    6. Re:How to tap the cable by eli+pabst · · Score: 5, Funny

      What does the sub have on it, a giant pair of scissors sticking out of the front? Actually it was fitted with a gigantic ear. In fact, the sub gets its name from the comically over-sized ears of Jimmy Carter.
    7. Re:How to tap the cable by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on how you define "retrofit". The MMP wasn't part of the plan for it when the keel was laid.

    8. Re:How to tap the cable by StargateSteve · · Score: 1

      And how would you not detect loss of connectivity? mirror the internet for everyone in Iran, and the handful of iranian sites for the rest of the world? and respond to all emails? gimme a break. !possible.

    9. Re:How to tap the cable by Zymergy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes and No. Its original class design was modified and lengthened by 100 feet to accommodate the "Multi-Mission Platform (MMP), which allows launch and recovery of ROVs and Navy SEAL forces. The MMP may also be used as an underwater splicing chamber for tapping of undersea fiber optic cables." (Wiki)
      OTOH, If the US Navy were doing 'tapping' with the Seawolf-Class SSN, no one would ever know about it. US Navy Submarine crews are the best there are and in this string of events, and the US Navy is not having "accidents" while tapping cables. *If* the US Navy is involved with these fiber cable cuts, they are on purpose and not due to errors. Those men truly know what they are doing and are very well trained.

      I wrote on this same topic (with links) this morning in an different story's thread: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=438002&cid=22263288

    10. Re:How to tap the cable by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Well, they're retro-fitted, so I expect they'd be sticking out the back. Hmm... maybe all they did was sharpen the prop.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:How to tap the cable by e-scetic · · Score: 1

      Sorry, after seeing what the US military is capable of in Iraq and Afghanistan, I don't see them as the best there is.

    12. Re:How to tap the cable by BuddhaMonkey · · Score: 1

      The US military did quite well at what it was supposed to do in Iraq. Occupation wasn't part of the job description. Afghanistan was best done by the CIA and by the time the DoD got there things were already set up for a "victory".

    13. Re:How to tap the cable by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
      I said it was possible to tap the cable without loss of connectivity. I never said that it was possible to cut the cable without loss of connectivity, as that would be a contradiction in terms.

      This means that it's unlikely that the cut would be due to the U.S. government installing a tap, as some conspiracy theorists have suggested.

    14. Re:How to tap the cable by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      Sorry, after seeing what the US military is capable of in Iraq and Afghanistan, I don't see them as the best there is. Don't be sorry. After personally meeting the best that the Navy has to offer, I concur.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    15. Re:How to tap the cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best military. Worst cops.

    16. Re:How to tap the cable by musakko · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've always thought the USS Richard Nixon would have been a better name for a submarine that carries out covert wire tapping operations..

    17. Re:How to tap the cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US Navy Submarine crews are the best there are I know some Royal Navy submariners who might have something to say about that...
    18. Re:How to tap the cable by Hazmat339 · · Score: 1

      Just like if the CIA wanted to run a covert op they would just do it covertly, right?

      In Italy, CIA Agents Are Undone by Their Cell Phones
      http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/15-07/st_cia

  56. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by russotto · · Score: 1

    At risk of being off-topic, Ann Coulter just said she'd back Hillary, so I think the four horsemen should be around here any minute now.


    To bring us back on topic: Apparently barracuda DO in fact school.
  57. Or are they by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    You're completely correct in your estimate of the situation, which is why you are completely wrong. It looks like an "accident". Like when Regean, developed "Alzheimer's". Or Patton died in a Car "accident".

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  58. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Firehed · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the lasers fuse the broken lines back together?

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  59. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 5, Funny

    >The government always surprise me by sinking to a new low, maybe this is the new low?

    Well, it *is* the bottom of the ocean.

  60. Not a big problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to CNN, this new cut is not really a big problem. If I understand correctly, this is because the affected cable is actually laid in a circle. Now that its cut in one place, it can still be used, traffic will just not always be able to use the optimum route.

    Ironically, only last wednesday, there was an assesment that the US was being outdone online in image building. If we're spouting conspiracy theories here, maybe the US wants to have some time to prepare a way to do better in the Middle East?

    Of course, the US could always implement a better foreign policy, rather than invading countries because of their oil, umm, WMD's... That could make it a lot easier to win the hearts and minds of people...

    1. Re:Not a big problem by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      I keep reading all these references to "conspiracy theories" that I haven't seen in this thread. Psi Ops: at least post a few conspiracy theories before you seed the "conspiracy theory" meme.

      Oh, there's a weird one now. Thanks, Psi Ops!

      Haven't seen an anti-American post yet either, tho I haven't read it all yet. I posted an evil Dick Cheney writeup; I don't think that counts. He is an evil fuck, and his brain trust at the Pentagon and the CIA are fully stupid enough to try such a lame stunt.

      Or cables were cut accidently three times. And exit polls don't work after the year 2000.

      Or there may be one idiot submarine commander swanning around cutting cables just to start a commotion. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. How is the cable "broken"? Is it really, or is there some sort of cascading bug in the underseas communications system. Trying to be fair here. Don't really see the sanity of cutting cables, but I never saw the sanity of blowing up a country that had fully opened the doors and surrendered, either. Sane people are not in charge right now.

  61. Sealab by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hey, Quinn! Check out my new raver's wig!"
    [He flips a switch and fiber optic cables coming out of his hair start glowing and flowing in multiple colors)

    "Stormy, where'd you find the cables for that wig? Tell me you didn't pull them out of the control panels."

    "Control panels? Hell no, I'm not stupid! No, I got them outside. There's a whole lot of them out there on the sea floor."

    "Outsi-- you idiot! Those are Internet cables! You can't just steal them!"

    "But everyone's else is doing it!"

    [Hetch appears on the monitor, but the camera reads him as a multi-colored blob.]
    "Hetch sewed himself a fiber-optic suit!"

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  62. Cable Cut, Iranians Angry by CR0WTR0B0T · · Score: 0, Redundant

    All three people with internet access in Iran are irate. I can hear them now shouting - "Bart Simpson is making love to your wife."

    --
    "Nothing to see here. Move along."
  63. Re:I smell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoooooosh.....

  64. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cables in question aren't next to each other, or even close to being near each other. And I'm not sure about this one, but the first cable cut happened with the ships parking in a spot where ships do not normally anchor. Wasn't a single ship either, someone ordered a whole bunch of ships to park themselves over the cable.

    --

    Did anybody else suddenly get dizzy while posting pro-conspiracy messages? As long as I'm being paranoid, I may as well do the job right.

  65. Has anyone considered? by CrtxReavr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know it's, unfortunately en vogue to bash the USA, but has anyone considered that maybe some jihadi has some scuba gear? Wants to keep out the evil, infidel influence?

    -CR

    --
    "So is the BSD licence even more 'free' (than GPLv2)? Yes. Unquestionably." --Linus Torvalds (TinyURL.com/2vugzl)
    1. Re:Has anyone considered? by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, that's impossible. Only the US does bad things.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:Has anyone considered? by wizkid · · Score: 1

      My opinion..... Some religious fantic's are the ones dragging the anchors. 3 cable in this timeframe? I don't think it's a coincedence. Someone is pushing the press to put a good light on it. We don't want to impair anyone wanting to take there call centers overseas. To many corporations are saving all that money for the stockholders, so why should they care if they can't get those service calls for a day or two.

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
    3. Re:Has anyone considered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uhm...jihadis have gotten bashed overy day 24-hours a day since earlier this century. A LOT more than the US ever has.

    4. Re:Has anyone considered? by sheldon · · Score: 1

      Maybe they bought a submarine on ebay?

  66. Well, maybe by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    If this is our spies, this would seem to be a pretty boneheaded execution of tapping lines.

    Maybe it's a sort of purloined letter. Something so boneheaded looking you wouldn't suspect spies of doing it.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  67. Re:Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicat by Firehed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or the conspirators are just counting on an incredibly stupid general populace (safe bet) and an outcry of hatred by those that believe the assumed story towards those who question the truth (also a safe bet, as proven by your post and so many others).

    I'm not taking or stating my views on any of the conspiracies you mention, just pointing out a flaw in the argument. Which I suppose makes me assume you're a conspirator for looking for a loophole, dunnit?

    Of course, what would go into faking a moon landing or 9/11 being an inside job is just the slightest bit more complicated than some idiot in a boat turning out to be from the government instead of just being your standard idiot.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  68. Oh, great... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    I wondered why my daily spam load had dropped a bit. What the heck am I going to do now to fill the gap?

    I suppose I'll have to count on the Russians to fill in with Viagra and Cialis offers...

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  69. Re:Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicat by kalel666 · · Score: 1

    You can't have a conspiracy theory if it is simple and straight forward. After all, a simple straight forward plan involving just a few people might actually work. No, rather it has to be massively and unnecessarily complicated with lots of intricate connections


    There should be a theory to explain that kind of reasoning.

    Something that sounds cool, but I'll be damned if I can think of a name.

    Fuck it, I got no time for this, I need a shave.
    --
    I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
  70. I guess by shadyi · · Score: 1

    May be the ship they sent to fix the first two cables cut the third one instead......

  71. Re:Iran has completely lost Internet connectivity? by TurinPT · · Score: 3, Informative

    5? close guess! The actual number is 18 million.
    Yeah I know you're a troll but I don't care.

  72. Re:Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicat by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    But then there's the corollary: if you are doing black-ops work and do not wish it to ever be known that the job was done by the government, it would be best to do the work in a manner so insanely convoluted that anybody familiar with Occam's razor would immediately conclude that such a plan doesn't make sense, and thus assume that something else much simpler and benign must be going on.... :-)

    For example, as someone else already suggested, if the government wanted to covertly tap such a cable, the most effective way to do this would be to have somebody drop anchor and cut the cable at point A so that no one would notice the several days of individual fibers going randomly dark caused by a submarine installing fiber taps on all of the cables in a different location. The Occam's razor folks would immediately conclude that such a conspiracy was entirely too complex to make sense, and thus anyone suggesting that this was happening would be labeled a nutjob.

    Of course, if you were doing that, you would also probably cut each cable at different times to avoid suspicion, but this, too, can be explained away as a means to further add to the implausibility of such a conspiracy to minimize the odds of anyone believing it.

    That said, Occam's razor tells us that poorly enforced rules about where boats can drop anchor probably caused two of the failures, and Murphy's law neatly explains the third, so odds are pretty good that this is a combination of bad luck and human stupidity rather than malice by a government agency.... Still, it's fun to think about alternative scenarios....

    Besides, we all know the truth. :-D

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  73. Florida's down, too by Insightfill · · Score: 1

    It looks like Iran has completely lost Internet connectivity.

    Using the internet traffic report site, I can see at this time that Florida has 100% packet loss, too. Creepy.

    1. Re:Florida's down, too by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      That is weird. What's in Florida? *google*

      CENTCOM is in Tampa, at MacDill Air Force Base. And SOCOM. Socom is Special Ops. That actually gets my attention more.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Special_Operations_Command Here's what SOCOM does- if they're doing anything now, it's in the middle of an internet blackout that is simultaneous with the Iran internet blackout (whether that is partial or complete).

      I don't think creepy quite says it. "Did Cheney manage to get a nuclear weapon into the hands of Special Ops?" is more the question.

      The commander of SOCOM is Eric Olson, who was appointed only July of 2007. In September, Cheney made a speech to CENTCOM and SOCOM, in Tampa, saying among other things:
      "The terrorists have been at war with the United States for a long time. And after 9/11 this nation made a decision: We are at war with them. This is a long-term commitment, not a passing issue. There will be no running, or relenting, until the problem has been dealt with -- decisively, systematically, and permanently."

      "We've gone on the offensive, destroying safe havens, targeting their leadership, restricting their movements, closing off their money channels, infiltrating their operations, monitoring their communications, and working in dead earnest to stop the proliferation of catastrophic weapons. This new imperative has laid some very important work on many shoulders, from homeland security, to intelligence operations, to law enforcement. But no one carries a heavier burden than the war fighter, who engages the enemy on his own ground and slugs it out in tough conditions for the sake of freedom and the sake of our security here at home."

      "As the prime target of the terrorists, America has also enforced a doctrine that is essential to our own safety, and to eventual victory in this struggle. It is simple to state and understood by all: Governments that support or harbor terrorists are complicit in the murder of the innocent, and they must be held to account."

      I'd sure like to know what they're doing in Tampa right now. We're not necessarily talking about a provocation to Iran executed by regular military attack. We might be talking about a provocation executed by Special Ops. ...for political reasons, and using our supercarriers as the bait for Sunburn missiles, risking complete obliteration of our navy's effectiveness.

      I do NOT LIKE the fact that Florida's black. WTF is happening?

    2. Re:Florida's down, too by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Forgot to post something- remember this? Nuclear weapons mysteriously 'lost' and sent across the country without orders- which does not happen- for reasons that were never really explained?

      http://www.nowpublic.com/politics/six-lost-nukes-sent-middle-east-military-cant-seem-keep-track

  74. I smell the sinister hand of... by Badmovies · · Score: 1

    ...Dr. Malic and his submarine, the Black Shark in all of this. Has anyone in the Middle East spotted a flying lion that speaks with an Asian accent?

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
  75. The very definition of Insightful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How I wish I had some mod points for you. But alas, I'm out. You'll have to settle for "well done!"

  76. It wasn't the US it was the RIAA! by jay42jay · · Score: 1

    The RIAA must have seen some people uploading songs and since they can't really do much in Iran they did what they could. They stopped piracy! At least they'd do this everywhere if they could.

  77. While we're at it... by CFTM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since we're all speculating like crazy on how the evil Americans did it, I figured I'd speculate that the evil north Koreans sent a fleet of fishing boats to the mid east and dropped anchors on these telco lines in order to get the Iranians pissed off so they'd attacked an American vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, precipitating world war III...given that GWB has about 11 months left, they figured to get it down now.

    Yep, that sounds every bit as ridiculous AT THIS POINT.

    Let's wait for a little more information, I'm sure by Monday international news outlets will be giving a more thorough report on what is occurring, though I doubt Fox News ever will...

  78. Re:Iran has completely lost Internet connectivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is supposed to be an Iowa joke, dammit!

  79. You don't seem to understand sir... by Microbie · · Score: 1

    But Mr. Ahmadinejd, your name is the one on the account, so you will need to be on buoy number 37 and we will send someone out tomorrow between 11:00 and 5:00.

  80. net is on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey I'm from Iran and it seems the connection isn't cut... or maybe I am replying offline... so surreal, isn't it? BTW we've got used to the wires being cut under the sea... these sharks have no respect to the internet... dolphins are much better

  81. Shallow enough to scuba dive by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    A recereational scuba diver without a depressurization chamber can safely operate at a depth of 70 meters. I'm sure that scuba gear is easily available everywhere in the world. For a saboteur, that would probably be the easiest method. They could either bring wire cutters or lay delayed-blast charges. It's a pretty big disruption for a pretty small investment.

  82. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bloody? Fishy? ...
    We only wish,
    To catch a fish,
    So juicy sweet!

    But what has it got in its packetses, GOLLUM! GOLLUM!

  83. chances? by Tom · · Score: 2, Informative
    Coincidence?

    It looks like Iran has completely lost Internet connectivity." Ok, I'm paranoid, but it is an election year, and the world would be surprised a lot if Bush didn't fuck up something else before he goes.

    Seriously, what are the chances of this?
    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:chances? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Not paranoia. Our current Presidential brain trust lied to you before, at least 900+ times on record, to start the previous unprovoked invasion and conquest. It't not paranoid to mistrust scheming bastards who've tricked you so many times before.

      Paranoia is, say, you thinking the corner newsstand is a CIA listening post established to monitor you. That would be a symptom of mental illness.

      It's not paranoia when you suspect the man who runs the newsstand of plotting to assault children when he has, in fact, assaulted a 60,000 to a million children in the last six years.

      Americans are not that amnesiac. Almost, but not quite.

  84. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is only one possible conclusion: Manbearpig has learned to swim.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  85. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to a reliable source, it is plausable to hold a section of cable at a certain arc, shave the top layers of the cable off, and then apply the tap. It is also plausable for it to be done without any significant signal loss.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

  86. The Navy must be losing it... by FredMenace · · Score: 1

    They're getting slow in their old age. They were SUPPOSED to cut them all at the same time.

    1. Re:The Navy must be losing it... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      They were SUPPOSED to cut them all at the same time.

      No, you cut them in sequence so you can see how the internal Net and backup lines are configured in Iran, and to allow the printers and multi-core chipsets to report out intel to the NSA before you make it go dark.

      Then the severed machines run BSOD attacks and any other core ops programs the NSA set loose.

      Cheney's in his bunker, counting all his money, setting up the GOP to steal the election as we speak.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  87. hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your internets are belong to us!

  88. That's weird by Zorque · · Score: 1

    It must be a coincidence, but I lost my connection for a few hours today. I live in the western US, though, so it's probably not related. Still...

  89. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then why the hell would you do it within days of each other? That just attracts extra attention and makes no sense.

    I'm not extremely familiar with fiber optic technology, but I'm guessing that an extra repeater is going to cause a noticeable increase in latency...

    The plan is brain dead. The NSA is not that stupid (and yes, the NSA is in charge of signal intelligence, so they would have to be involved in any such "plan")

  90. Re:Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You can't have a conspiracy theory if it is simple and straight forward. After all, a simple straight forward plan involving just a few people might actually work. No, rather it has to be massively and unnecessarily complicated with lots of intricate connections. That way, the people who notice the conspiracy are great geniuses for being able to see what nobody else could!

    It's called Occam's Aluminum Bat.

  91. Florida to? by Drakin020 · · Score: 1

    Pardin if this is a stupid question, but looking through the site...it shows a router in Florida is down. Am I reading this correctly? Again sorry if this is a stupid question.

    http://www.internettrafficreport.com/history/111.htm

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  92. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

    Red Wings FTW!

  93. Re:Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicat by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a pretty simple conspiracy to me, bribe a couple of people to do a cable break and then slip in quietly to do a cable tap or whatever.

    Only the bribers and bribees and the people doing the tap need ever know.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  94. Re:I smell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoooooosh...

  95. Good ol' wiki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found it interesting that this was the first sentence under "Cable Repair" in the following wiki entry.

    "Cables can be broken by fishing trawlers, anchoring..."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_communications_cable#Cable_repair

  96. ATHF by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    [Hetch appears on the monitor, but the camera reads him as a multi-colored blob.]
    "Hetch sewed himself a fiber-optic suit!" "His name is Hesh, Shake, not Hetch."

    "Um, the video distortion affected the audio too, making `Hesh' sound like `Hetch'. Yeah, that's it. I didn't look up the series on IMDb and then completely fail to check the how to spell characters' names, both in dialog and stage direction."

    "Yeah, right."

    "Get back to da story, Shake."

    "Right, so Stormy, he says:"

    "Dude, you look like one of those pure-energy creatures from Star Trek!"
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  97. And nothing of value was lost. (nt) by Kuroji · · Score: 1

    Yes, there is no text here.

  98. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by rve · · Score: 2, Informative

    The cables were cut in three different seas, hundreds, even thousands of miles apart.

  99. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Damocles+the+Elder · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the third one, but according to Ars, the first two were 2 km apart from each other.

  100. It's we who are doomed by Binge · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new Vogon overlords, I'm told their poetry is something to behold... Anyone got a spare Sub-etha?

  101. Mod parent up by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    that was good

  102. Hmm by FredMenace · · Score: 1

    What do you do in an election year when the economy is going down the drain? The standing party generally never wins the presidency when the economy tanks, but hey, I suppose it's worth a shot.

    While we can tap cables, maybe we can't tap them all at once. And maybe we want to control what goes in/out. And make a statement.

    And let me guess, the hackers who supposedly caused the power outages were from the middle east?

    1. Re:Hmm by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Or Cheney's brain trust loosed the "Hackers cut power" meme just before they started severing multiple cables to the middle east in preparation for that damned Iran attack he wants so much. Cut one cable, cut two cables, oopsie here's Iran going dark.

      With Cheney's crowd running the country, you have to posit a conspiracy of him not trying to start a war. He just doesn't care what you think. Iraq was him, all the way, feeding his lies to the President through his own personal three man intel reinterpretation squad. The man likes war. He wants the oil sewn up for the USA. His behavior has been consistent since the Ford presidency, the fake Soviet threat he faked up for Reagan, and the Iraq/Iran war he has so single-mindedly pursued; lie, mislead, plant fake news, control the message, kill massive numbers of people with no qualms, win. I've not seen such a human in my limited life in the US. He's just fewking evil. No one has been so brazenly up front with his desire to change the world into a US empire (with him in charge in his role Grand Vizier). He had a rep for being a backstabbing lying bastard with no morals in the Ford White House, and he's not backed down since.

  103. Humm by d4rkf1br · · Score: 1

    Yeah it totally screams NSA or something. Maybe its some upgrade gone bad to the existing systems used by the NSA to monitor everything? hehe.. I don't normally subscribe to this whole conspiracy theory BS but it sure does seem fishy (no pun intended) However it does give me an idea. How is the communication to India? Primarily some undersea cable as well huh? Surprised no disgruntled or laid off IT worker who has lost a job to outsourcing hasn't tried building a submarine or taken scuba lessons and go hunt down the cables to India. I kid I kid... no need to educate on how impossible it would be, I know there are alot of smarties here who can tell me mathmatically or scientifically why this or that wont work. Really I was just kidding. :-P

  104. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by drspliff · · Score: 1

    I think you're forgetting a key thing though...

    If you want to send a very strong political message to another nation... how would you go around doing it?

  105. Re-routing Traffic... by TiberSeptm · · Score: 1

    This looks like a means for intelligence gathering. If you read the explanation on the FLAG company's website (owner of 2 of the cut cables) they say that traffic will be re-routed through US and UK lines. Sounds like an excellent opportunity to monitor pretty much all internet communication going in and out of Iran doesn't it? Someone asked "why do this in secret" earlier... well there you go. ""It may take sometime to fix the cut but we are rerouting the traffic to another cable in the U.K. and U.S., the bandwidth utilization will go down," the official said." Yep.

  106. Re:Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah right, but you did belive Saddams conspiracy to make nukes, or Soviet conspiracy to spread bot nets

  107. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by amohat · · Score: 1

    Also, could just be arrogance. Could be simple logistics.

    Could it be a coincidence? A student of history would tell you not likely. Governments have done all manner of devious stuff in the past, why would you rule anything out?

  108. "A communications disruption can mean ... " by unsigned+integer · · Score: 1

    only one thing -

    invasion.

    1. Re:"A communications disruption can mean ... " by Carbon016 · · Score: 1

      I will sign no nuclear treaty!

  109. Ya but evil geniuses have to be complicated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You can't have a conspiracy theory if it is simple and straight forward. After all, a simple straight forward plan involving just a few people might actually work. No, rather it has to be massively and unnecessarily complicated with lots of intricate connections. That way, the people who notice the conspiracy are great geniuses for being able to see what nobody else could!"

    Gee that's almost the qualifications for an Evil Genius.

  110. Re:Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicat by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

    I don't think there's any chance of the USA doing this to covertly tap any cables, because I don't believe the White House actually wants any information. They never have before, why would they now?

    Occam's razor suggests to me that somebody wants to have more dramatic warlike actions.

    Right now my theory is somebody whose name rhymes with 'insaney' wants to hear 'Communications out of Iran are all down, sir!' so they can order "Drop lots of bombs on them, and move the supercarriers closer!"

    Because Iran can take out carriers with Sunburn missiles- and if we bomb Iran as Cheney has so wanted to do, but there is NO news of that, and then Iran sinks all our carriers and there's OMG WTF BBQ! news of that 24/7, it's as if they had attacked us.

    Right?

    Nothing may happen- Iran isn't likely to sink our carriers as a random outburst, and our military might not be taking orders blindly from Cheney. I hope not. But if we hear about our carriers being SUNK (after all the effort to play up a threat to them, notice?) you can be sure that Cheney found a way to bomb, without Congressional approval. I still think he was behind the mysterious clearing of a nuclear weapon that almost got flown across the country to a staging airbase for the Middle East.

  111. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    Your diversion suggestion is a good idea, however, I should think there are some real problems with this. Cable companies must inspect their cables from time to time so any tap would risk detection and it would cause a big international incident. Even if the US could tap a cable in an undetectable way, how are they going to record/sift the enormous amounts of data? You would need a lot of computers and storage facilities on the seabed which would be difficult to hide. And how would you power all that equipment?

  112. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by eli+pabst · · Score: 1

    Why would they do all 3 at the same time so as to make it absurdly obvious? They have the technology, both in terms of a specialized submarine with that capability and the ability to tap a fiber optic line. They could easily have done so with minor disruptions so that no one notices. To take down all 3 at the same time for several days would be idiotic. I think Occam's Razor wins here for me.

  113. Three cables cut by loafula · · Score: 1

    Let's see here- 3 cables cut in a short time frame and all in the middle east.. Who would benefit? I'm willing to bet it is more likely foreign governments trying to keep their people uninformed than it is an external power trying to spy. Spying is a subtle act. This is in no way subtle.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
  114. Re:Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicat by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

    I'll probably never get how you can lump the moon hoax conspiracy with the 9/11 conspiracy. I'm not saying that I'm convinced 9/11 was orchestrated by the US government but it's undeniable that there are a lot of fishy details regarding 9/11 like the pentagon no plane theory and the fact that everything except pentagon looked like controlled demolitions. I just want an explanation and so far the most credible ones, believe it or not, are the conspiracy theories (IMHO).

    PS. really loves this
  115. Land by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    I think that the 'black water' may actually be on land...

  116. Proposal for special +10 brilliant rating by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some comments simply deserve a special "otherwise unachievable" rating. The parent post would be one of them.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Proposal for special +10 brilliant rating by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a site called SeenOnSlash.com that tends to have a good selection of the best comments, including this one. They have an RSS feed as well, which is nice.

  117. So long, Florida... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According this Florida is completely disconnected too: http://www.internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm/

    1. Re:So long, Florida... by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      Florida doesn't use undersea cables.

      It's a peninsula attached to the rest of the country.

      It is most definitely NOT disconnected.

      I live in Miami. I'm posting this just fine.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    2. Re:So long, Florida... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Cool beans. So, are you noticing flight after flight of nuclear bombers suddenly departing for somewhere? :P

      Dude, the ability of the Internet to route around outages (intentional or unintentional) is not in question. The fact that you can get through is just proof that the Internet works. I'm more interested in why I saw a total blackout for SOME sort of Florida connectivity.

      You're in Miami, right? It would be Tampa that was dark. Is it in fact Tampa that's black? That's CENTCOM and SOCOM.

    3. Re:So long, Florida... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      What? You mean Florida has more than one router?

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:So long, Florida... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Florida doesn't use undersea cables."

      Are you sure? laying undersea cable is a LOT cheaper than doing it overland. Most coastal areas connect whatever they can with undersea cables. I wouldn't be suprised one bit if most of florida's connections were submarine.

    5. Re:So long, Florida... by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      socom is in miami. Military internet connections don't rely on commercial backbones. They have their own fiber networks.

      tampa and everything south of it including miami is routed through the backbones running through orlando to atlanta.

      We're talking about backbones here. The occasional router doesn't qualify as a backbone.

      My best guess about the blackout of Florida was that some half-assed Internet company had a router go out.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
  118. Marine biology is outer plaice here. by jd · · Score: 1

    Eel urn.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  119. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    the government on the bottom of the ocean, now THERE's an idea we can all stand behind

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  120. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by raehl · · Score: 1

    Bloody? Fishy? ...

    Wrong on so many levels...


    Just wait a week and it'll be fine.

  121. Rod Stewart ACKs the problem by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    The Third Cut Is The Deepest

    I would have given you all of my packet
    But there's someone who's decided to jack it
    And she's taken just all that I had
    But if you want, I'll try to ACK again
    Baby I'll try to ACK again but I know

    The third cut is the deepest, baby I know
    The third cut is the deepest
    When it comes to being lucky she's cursed
    When it comes to ACKin' me she's worst
    But when it comes to being ACKed she's a thirst
    That's how I know

    The third cut is the deepest, baby I know
    The third cut is the deepest
    I still want you by my side
    Just to help me with the anchor I've pried
    And I'm sure gonna give you a try
    And if you want, I'll try to ACK again
    Baby, I'll try to ACK again, but I know

    The third cut is the deepest, baby I know
    The third cut is the deepest

    'Cause when it comes to being lucky she's cursed
    When it comes to ACKin' me she's worse
    But when it comes to being ACKed she's a thirst
    That's how I know

    The third cut is the deepest, baby I know
    The third cut is the deepest

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  122. More to the point by Xest · · Score: 1

    I don't see how the existing conspiracy theory of "They cut the cable so they could install monitoring equipment" possibly makes sense.

    Here's the scenario:
    1) Cable is cut
    2) Monitoring equipment is attached to cable
    3) Cable company comes along, rejoins cable, notices odd monitoring device attached

    Am I missing something here, is this not a fundamental flaw to the plan the fact that any kind of monitoring equipment on a cut would be immediately noticed? Or is it the US navy that will be fixing the cable also? That doesn't seem particularly likely.

    I'm sure there's far less blatantly obvious ways to monitor data travelling along the cables as you say and any equipment on the cable would appear rather prone to be found. I mean, let's face it the Russians and Chinese also have subs and equipment perfectly capable of checking the cable so unless we're going to add them into the plot and make a mega conspiracy theory, monitoring being the reason for the cuts makes next to no sense at all.

    If there is a conspiracy theory here then disruption has to be the goal, monitoring just simply doesn't make sense for the reasons above. I think it's more likely to be that some asshole has figured out he can chop cables with his anchor and has also managed to find where the cables are exactly if it's not simply sheer coincidence related to some change in shipping lanes and anchoring areas.

    1. Re:More to the point by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it did, in this case. I was replying to another poster's post.

      Obviously if the Navy was engaged in tapping fiber lines they wouldn't:
      1) cut them
      2) cut THREE of them

      I mean, duh.

    2. Re:More to the point by psychicninja · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something here, is this not a fundamental flaw to the plan the fact that any kind of monitoring equipment on a cut would be immediately noticed?
      Maybe I can shed some light on the plan:

      1. Pick two spots on the cable 100 miles apart.
      2. Cut place 1.
      3. Cut place two and install monitoring equipment.
      4. Cut in place 1 gets repaired and service is restored.
      5. ?????
      6. Defeat Terrorism!
    3. Re:More to the point by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was primarily agreeing with your sentiment on the issue ;)

      Another point that struck me is how would they extract the data from some monitoring device? If it uses any kind of wireless technology then surely other craft could intercept it and even pinpoint it's whereabouts using any signals it may transmit. If it is passed down the cable then is that really any less obvious than just snooping it at the cable ends?

      The only real non-obvious way would be to visit the device physically or near enough if it just transmits short range signals but as I mentioned previously I'd imagine if there was any truth in navy snooping the first thing on some Russian sub commanders agenda would like be "go see what's down there" right now.

    4. Re:More to the point by amorsen · · Score: 1

      I don't see how the existing conspiracy theory of "They cut the cable so they could install monitoring equipment" possibly makes sense. Especially since you don't actually CUT cables in order to tap them.
      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    5. Re:More to the point by DesertKat · · Score: 1

      Monitoring light on fiber involves the simple bending, not cutting, of the fiber and picking up the light escaping the cladding. This is how fiber is tested, inserting a light source and reading the resulting reception at another point...fusion splicing machines have been using this technology for better than 2 decades. The problem is that there is always a loss of signal that can be detected through monitoring at the nearest switch. Besides the difficulty of the intercept, breaking down the packets to the individual DS3s to the DS1s, then to the individual circuits. Keeping in mind that fiber transmission, today, is at rates that can hardly be imagined, OC388 or OC776. That's over 16 million individual conversations per fiber. The traffic has to be inserted into the light stream with timing marks that are coded, and decoded, during a similar operation at the following reception site. Without the header information, it would take the national laboratory computer a very long time to split out, and combine, a 3 second conversation. Now, I don't think anyone is monitoring anyone's conversations out in the middle of the ocean. The equipment alone would occupy a room of 30-feet by 50-feet.

  123. A List of Conspiracy Theories by tobiah · · Score: 1

    Please list your theory here...

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  124. The Single Anchor Theory by tobiah · · Score: 1

    The cuts were the result of a single freak anchoring mishap...

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
    1. Re:The Single Anchor Theory by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Funny

      Three times... that's one clumsy anchor.

      It'll be springtime, in Iran, for Dick Cheney
      Red states are happy, and not gay
      Iran can't speak out to protest
      Look out! we're cutting all the rest...

  125. Re:Ya but conspiracy theories have to be complicat by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

    The only part that doesn't work is the fact that the cables were completely severed. So the theory is wrong, but it's still actually less convoluted than reality, which is that the USA owns and operates a sub designed to splice and eavesdrop on undersea digital communications cables undetected.

  126. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by falken0905 · · Score: 0

    > PS. Osama is hanging out on GWB's ranch in Texas - that's why they can't find him. So, Is he down there clearing some brush?

  127. Why Tap? by TrashGUY · · Score: 0

    When they could just put a packet sniffer on the non hostile side?

  128. accuracy? by sakurakira · · Score: 1

    I'm not really sure how accurate this is regarding Tehran being completely dead. For some reason, it shows Florida being at 0 also, but that is where I'm writing from.

  129. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by BadMrMojo · · Score: 1

    Also, by defining USA and Rebels as a maybe, they by definition must be more than 0% likely, therefore it's impossible to then list Russia or China as 100%.

    The seemingly erroneous total is a byproduct of that motivational seminar he attended. He's giving his whackjob theories 110%.
  130. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Chryana · · Score: 1

    So now that they have tapped into them, they'll just bring them back on line? Those cables would be the easiest point for any hostile power to secure, since all they would have to do to make any tap irrelevant is to encrypt all the communications which go through the cables. Hopefully, the US intelligence is more competent than that and will use some other means, such as rooting one of the endpoints, to gather data.

  131. Sorry...too drunk to not say it.... by MrKane · · Score: 0

    I For One Welcome Our Crustacean Overlords...

    ...And Their Snapping Claws Of Information Control ;?)
    /back to the realm of bad karma blog.

  132. Lupin 3rd to Steal Persian Crown Jewels by tobiah · · Score: 1

    Feb. 29, 2008 - Renowned international thief Lupin 3rd announced his plans today to steal the Crown Jewels of Persia. Inspector McCleed's subsequent pursuit was hampered by a sabotaged anchor winch.

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  133. Standard US attack procedure by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Sounds like standard ops for a preemptive bombing attack on Iran.

    The main question people in Iran should be asking is: are your printers and computers running strange jobs that seem to be doing something, because if they are, they are doing the prep work to report the Intel back to the US forces.

    Especially those AMD multicore chips you bought in Dhubai ... they're all designed to run spy intel if they receive certain signals.

    To the bomb shelters, Batman!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Standard US attack procedure by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Futzing with spying is too complex for the real world. Anyway, the NSA has monitored those cables for years, no doubt. No need to splice, and that would be one hell of a splice, data processing wise.

      Cutting is just simpler, works every time, and causes a lot of problems. Could be a way of ratcheting up harrassment of the Iranians. Considering that we declared their armed forces terrorists, I don't think cutting their cable is beyond Bush's moral limits.

  134. Obligatory by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    So doesn't this all kind of suggest that maybe the internet really IS a series of tubes?

  135. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by DrVomact · · Score: 1

    To take down all 3 at the same time for several days would be idiotic. I think Occam's Razor wins here for me.

    <paranoia level="high">Ah, but what if a certain American "superpower" suddenly felt an urgent need to tap the cables that go into, say, Iran? Maybe because it wants to start a war in a week or so, and needs that extra big hit of intelligence before it launches the bombers?</paranoia>

    No, I don't think there's anything to it. But the paranoid version sends shivers up and down my spine, while the sensible one doesn't.

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  136. What about the ALTERNATE theory by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    That they cut them so they can replace them with new cables that just happen to have signals ports built in to give the NSA even more detailed access ...

    It's like when I worked in an HQ, you never trust any repairman, even if cleared, that you did not specifically request.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  137. How come there's a Vogon ship over DC? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Um, did anyone remember to go to the sub-sub-basement and see if there's anything on display in the bottom of the locked filing cabinet in the disused bathroom?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:How come there's a Vogon ship over DC? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I tried, but there was a warning about a tiger, so I left.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  138. Fourth Cut?! by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Some news sources are now reporting that a FOURTH cable has been cut as well.

    1. Re:Fourth Cut?! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      What news sources?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  139. Maybe the cables are just emo by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Has anyonw sniffed that traffic? Did the cables transport many HIM or Linkin Park MP3s lately?

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    1. Re:Maybe the cables are just emo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone really should mod parent up as funny....

  140. Somebody is losing... by coolhaus · · Score: 0

    Somebody is losing a lot of Mullah.

  141. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... all they would have to do to make any tap irrelevant is to encrypt all the communications which go through the cables.
    They get a lot of information even if they can't decrypt the message. Abdulla in Alexandria if found to have some suicide bomber vests in his bedroom. Who has he sent encrypted messages to? Who have those people sent encrypted messages to?
  142. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by RingDev · · Score: 1

    Yeah, not that they were right next to eachother, two of them where what, a couple of kilometers apart. Not side by side, but close enough that a single ship dragging an acre could take out both. Just saying that a chain of events could easily create this same situation.

    The primary point remains though, it is not incredible that 3 undersea cables were cut by ships dragging anchors. It is incredible that 3 were cut in such a short timeframe, but the fact that they were cut in such a way is pretty much to be expected. Unless the previous replier was correct, and that ManBearPig HAS learned to swim. But if that is the case... we're all doomed.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  143. WHat? are you serious? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    You can't prove a negative. If you postulate it is not a coincidence it is upon YOU to show evidence of wrong doing. Imagine a police officers came up to you and said "Prove you didn't commit a crime?"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:WHat? are you serious? by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      "innocent until proven guilty" doesn't always work when you're talking about large governments. The US gov't has enough control and power that the top-management there could get away with lots of illegal stuff and bury the evidence enough to create a "reasonable doubt", even with the checks and balances that are supposed to prevent corruption.

      Looking at this, I guess they could do it to hurt Iran's economy and the population's ability to get info in the short term. I have to agree with you though, the US wouldn't have much to gain unless they were going straight into war with them soon, which (correct me if I'm wrong) is nigh impossible at this point without Iran making a clear threat.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    2. Re:WHat? are you serious? by Plekto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The obvious punative reason to do this to people in Iran is to make the people unhappy with the current leadership. That's exactly the sort of reasoning our government believes will work with Cuba as well. As insane as it is, they still think that making the people unhappy will somehow make the people blame Iran's government instead of the U.S.

    3. Re:WHat? are you serious? by LaskoVortex · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't prove the positive either. You can only infer one hypothesis or the other based on testing each, arriving at a refined hypothesis through the process of elimination. In science, we call that "science".

      If you postulate it is not a coincidence it is upon YOU to show evidence of wrong doing.

      One must formulate a hypothesis before anyone can test it. If I postulate, I have no responsibility to show evidence of such postulation--other people can do that. If they are wise, they will consider this possibility here, or risk more cables getting cut through mechanisms they have chosen to ignore.

      Let us consider the facts here. For as many years as I know of, no cable has been cut. Lets think about the probabilities. We'll assume one cable is cut per 1500 days (< 5 yrs) on accident. So, on any given day, the probability is 1/1500 assuming its just another day at the beach (so to speak). Now, I have read about 3 cables being cut in as many days. We can use binomial probability to determine our expectation for 3 cables being cut in just your ordinary average year: 0.0018. How about an ordinary average week? 1.034e-8. Ok, the latter was a pretty improbable event, wouldn't you agree? How about your ordinary average stretch of 3 days?

      So you are going to tell me that its even less likely that the cables were cut by one nation or organization acting maliciously to achieve some end?

      [Tinny voice sounding like you]You know what, actually I think the terrorists who hijacked the planes on 911 were not colluding with each other--but I am exempt from proving this because "you can't prove the negative".[/Tinny voice] Do you see how idiotic you sound?

      We knew to look for colluding terrorists after 911 because three improbable events (planes running into buildings) happened closely in time. Do you see the similarities, or are you going to assert that its just a coincidence?

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    4. Re:WHat? are you serious? by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      You can't prove a negative. If you postulate it is not a coincidence it is upon YOU to show evidence of wrong doing. Imagine a police officers came up to you and said "Prove you didn't commit a crime?" That makes "coincidence" a suspiciously strong alternative hypothesis.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    5. Re:WHat? are you serious? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      It would have worked with Cuba a long time ago, but Fidel was smart. He didn't try all that hard to stop refugees from leaving. This means that the potential revolutionaries that were willing to do something, did something and left, thus leaving a dearth of bodies for the revolution.

    6. Re:WHat? are you serious? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      In general, most Iranians are free to come and go at will. It is bloody expensive - but if you want to live elsewhere, the barriers are at entry - not exit.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    7. Re:WHat? are you serious? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      If I wanted to hurt Iran by using the internet, I'd be dropping satellite dishes not cutting cables. I figure that if Iran and Cuba was supposed to be a butch of cockroaches, why not turn on the lights and watch them scury!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  144. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by sfjoe · · Score: 1

    4) Profit! (at least in terms of intelligence gathering and cyber-war capability

    You don't have to limit your profit to only intelligence gathering. Intelligence agencies have long been known for sharing information to give a local business the advantage over its foreign competition.

    --
    It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  145. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    If that was true (not saying it isn't or is), wouldn't it be smarter to NOT cut all three cables at once? You know, so as to not attract suspicion?

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  146. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Al Qaida never uses electronic communications in ops, not in successful ones, anyway. The 9-11 attackers, and bin Laden himself, only used face-to-face communications. Where's BL again? Can't find him, eh? Seem to work.

  147. Accidental/occidental by moxley · · Score: 1

    How fucking stupid do you have to be to think this is all accidental?

    Seriously.

    Two guesses as to whose interests those doing the cutting are serving.....

    1. Re:Accidental/occidental by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      I'll go with Jamaica. Those heavy accents can never be trusted, mon.

    2. Re:Accidental/occidental by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, I've seen someone roll 15 d6 and have them ALL come up one.
      I've seen 7 rolled 12 times in a row.
      It is known that randomness tends to be clumpy.

      The US has no interest in cutting those cable and it make no sense for them to do so.

      Now something might be going on. Sure, but lets not be jumping to wild speculation.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Accidental/occidental by moxley · · Score: 1

      Three cables in different locations severed within a few days of each other.....

      Wild speculation is thinking that there isn't intent in there.

    4. Re:Accidental/occidental by emilper · · Score: 1

      there is nothing going on ... Iranian sites are available just fine. Only the data from Egypt is going to be rerouted through US and UK.

    5. Re:Accidental/occidental by DrStrangeLoop · · Score: 1

      Dude, I've seen someone roll 15 d6 and have them ALL come up one.

      thats what you get from playing a sorcerer and casting nothing but fireballs all day long :)
    6. Re:Accidental/occidental by tkw954 · · Score: 1

      Here is a related cartoon.

  148. Realistically? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Doesn't seem to make sense, invasionwise, for the USA to cut the cables. Why bother? If we invaded, believe it the cables would be down the instant the bombs arrived. Why bother telegraphing (groan) your move?

    Could be one lousy set of coincidences. Happens. Says something that we automatically suspect the Cheney War Bunker of starting an invasion. Because he did it before? Not paranoid if you are facing a maniac with recent history of starting wars for national gain.

    Could be Cheneyites just trying to cause problems in Iran. They've a history of nastiness in South America that would make your bowels liquefy. It's not past them to try it, but doesn't make operational sense for an invasion. Psi op, yes indeed, that makes sense. He's just a mean old fuck. Meanness defines his government.

    1. Re:Realistically? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Yup, he did do it before. I've had a lot of fun tinfoilhatting the whole thing from the deranged perspective of a guy who shoots old men in the face and likes it, and having reached conclusions, I'm happy to let it drop.

      Remember, if suddenly we find that Iran has launched a dastardly unprovoked attack and wrecked our navy, that's when we'll know Cheney got his hands on a private nuke stash! :D

      And if not- well then we'll ALL be happier, so here's hoping it's just been a gedanke-experiment :)

  149. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Al Qaida never uses electronic communications in ops, not in successful ones, anyway. The 9-11 attackers, and bin Laden himself, only used face-to-face communications.

    They do use encrypted images to send basic updates while on task, though.

    Usually limited to specific messages like "go to ground" "abort" that kind of thing.

    That way they can be browsing a Net image of a nice car, save it to a disk or USB, and decrypt it when they're in a safe spot - which is totally normal behavior for someone viewing an image who wants to save the cool picture.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  150. paranoia by grumling · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe they all got cut because they all run in parallel? An anchor dragging along a canal, breaks one immediately, and opens up the other two, exposing the bare fibers. The current or wake from passing ships break more and more fibers, leading to more outages. I've seen pix of the suez canal, and it doesen't seem all that wide, compared to the ships that pass through it.

    There's one other possibility: the companies who own the networks are leasing glass from each other and there's really only one cable. For example, Level3 (lvlt) builds a network. Since it expensive to build out, they trade glass with whoever may have dark fiber available (often times telcos). It shows up on the books as theirs, but really it maintained by a telco. Happens all the time in the US.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    1. Re:paranoia by ill+stew+dottied+ewe · · Score: 1

      They were in two separate seas, the "pair" in the Mediterranean was over a mile apart. It's not paranoia if they are out to get you.

  151. Occam's razor by wildcatherder · · Score: 1

    After reading the fantastic conspiracy theories, I must refer to Occam's Razor ("wiki" it). I have to believe that someone is repeatedly dropping Occam's Razor and cutting the undersea cables. This is a high-visibility item only because of the great boom in Internet traffic in recent years. Cables get cut all the time. Older cables were wire and resulted in fewer channels lost per incident. Modern cables are fiberoptic and "chock full o' channels". It is considered cheaper to repair damaged cables in that area, precisely because it is shallow, rather than going to expense of properly entrenching them.

  152. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by gnunick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    USA - maybe
    Rebels - maybe
    Russia or China - 100%

    So, you're saying that there's a more than 100% chance that someone did it. Right.

    Anyway, the way I see it, some governmental organization was probably practicing, proving that they could do it and observing the consequences. The chances that the world would learn from this and suddenly make all undersea cables less vulnerable to this sort of attack (how?) seems slim.

    If it hadn't happened under the sea, I'd term it a 'dry run'.

    Jokes aside--The real questions are who did it, and what is the target they were practicing for?

    Of course, many countries have better internet service than the US, but none have bigger economies, more dependent on high tech (never mind the outsourced workforce, which has already been hard-hit by these problems in the Middle East & South Asia), than the US. A sudden loss of most of the internet connectivity for North America would be catastrophic to the US. I say that makes them the richest target, and conversely the least likely to have made this practice run.

    Such an attack would be cheap to undertake, so any number of America's enemies could be responsible. I can think of some prime suspects, but have no reason to pick one over another.

    --
    I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
  153. Just thought of a THIRD reason to do this by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What if there's a revolution going on in Iran and they cut their own cables?

    It's not that hard to arrange, and it would cut them off from any media coverage while nobody could communicate to the media without becoming very visible and easy to arrest ...

    Remember what happened in Bhurma when the monks revolted - they cut the Tubes to the Internets.

    Bing - no pics of people revolting - and they could quell it successfully by killing a few people and beating or imprisoning the rest.

    It's not always what you think. Sometimes it's different ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  154. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except, (according to others posters here) the US has a sub that can do that without needing to break the cable. Also if monitoring communications was the goal, why the rush to do it? Spreading the breaks out (timewise) would look less suspicious. If this is intentional then the goal is likely to be to disrupt communications for some reason.

  155. Iran has lost connectivity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tracerouted the address.

    www.iust.ac.ir
    IP: 194.225.228.25

    prior hops to whats below are more or less stable at 90ms.

    This is in Singapore and varies on various attempts fluctuating between :

    267 ms 288 ms 295 ms so-2-0-0-0.sngtp-cr2.ix.singtel.com [203.208.151.73]
    or
    275 ms 287 ms 295 ms so-3-0-2-0.sngtp-cr2.ix.singtel.com [203.208.182.57]
    or
    ae0-0.plapx-cr3.ix.singtel.com (ping about 90ms on average)

    Routing becomes consistent here:

    322 ms 305 ms 322 ms 203.208.192.226 -> Singapore
    308 ms 311 ms 311 ms 217.218.155.201 -> Teheran
    311 ms 308 ms 305 ms 217.218.163.252
    314 ms 319 ms 349 ms 194.225.239.254
    325 ms 332 ms 305 ms 194.225.228.25

    Ping jumps by about 222+ ms. 300000km/1000*222 = 66600 km/2 = 33300 km at least.
    What we get is more or less an altitude of a geostationary satellite. I lost couple of ms somewhere but from what I see it seams obvious that connection is hanging on a sat comm.

    So cable is either fucked or servers are out. Makes me nervous. War? Doubtfull. Someone is trying to fuck with someone locally? More like it.

  156. Shark Attack Effect? by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if its like the shark attacks in the U.S. They have always been common (somewhat), but the media needs a story to over report about.

  157. Re:Poopy poop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like you and PurifyYourMind would make the perfect couple.

  158. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a reliable source, it is plausable to hold a section of cable at a certain arc, shave the top layers of the cable off, and then apply the tap. It is also plausable for it to be done without any significant signal loss. Underwater? Exposing the optical innards directly to the water?

    And who is supposed to be holding that huge underwater cable?

    And how exactly do you bend it at a certain arc to "shave" it?
  159. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Hoch · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately for this theory, the location of breaks is found by timing the echo of a signal. A second break would cause a shorter time to echo on that end. It would be observable.

    --
    2*31*37*263
  160. signal loss by symbolset · · Score: 1

    It is also plausable for it to be done without any significant signal loss.

    If you just nick 5% of the diameter of each fiber the repeaters you're between will make up for the degradation. It wouldn't look any more suspicious than normal deterioration.

    I think I could design this device. The people with real skills probably wouldn't need anywhere near 5%. Signal injection is much more difficult.

    Breaking the cable does nothing for signal intercept. Broken cable = no signals to intercept. Broken cable = very likely someone will come inspect your snooping operation = very bad outcome. OTOH, breaking the cable to drag away evidence you've been tampering with it when you have another much harder to snoop intercept = good way to cover your tracks.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  161. Opps! I did it again. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    Not to cap Britney Spears when she is down but her song "Opps! I did it again" is aptly named for these events.
    WTF is happening in the Middle East with all of these cable cuts. If I didn't know any better that all of these events could be planned events. Maybe I'm a paranoid android but what are the chances (statisticians please answer) that three cables cuts in such a limited geographical area could occur?

  162. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by oliphaunt · · Score: 1

    Or, in true Neal Stephenson style, the cable is ALREADY tapped by the US, the Iranians know it, and this is just the excuse they're using to change all the codes...

    --




    Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
  163. Prove you didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A police officer is empowered to arrest people he *believes* have committed a crime. If you can prove, on the spot, that you didn't, he might not arrest you.

    But he doesn't need to prove you committed a crime, just that something improbable enough happened to make him justifiably suspicious.

  164. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

    History textbooks speak about things of importance. If it turned out that these three cuts were just a coincidence, it wouldn't be part of history (except in a really specific subject). Likewise tons of coincidences have happened in this world that have not been recorded to history. You can't really look at the percentage of items in a history textbook that were revealed to be coincidence and use that as an indicator for how rare a coincidence is.

    But being 100% sure that this is a coincidence is foolish as well.

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  165. How convenient for the NSA! by Anonymous+Cowhead · · Score: 1
    From the linked article:

    "It may take sometime to fix the cut but we are rerouting the traffic to another cable in the U.K. and U.S...." How convenient. As far as the US is concerned, it's definitely legal to spy on foreign communications that transits US borders. FISA doesn't even apply (not that it really does anymore, but that's another story.) And I wouldn't be surprised if Britain thinks the same...
  166. DA JEWS DID IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sneaky Israeli Mossad operation to destory the Islamic world indeed!

    1. Re:DA JEWS DID IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up!!

  167. Nothing is sacred by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

    Good lord, the conspirators have found a way to hack into and edit Wikipedia!

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  168. Mercury Retrograde. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0
    I am normally one of those conspiracy guys, but not with regard to this.

    I am also an astrology guy. --Which I realize anybody who is in the tech field or sciences tends to put zero stock in, which is fair enough, (though, almost always people do this without first having tried it out, or if they have, only in as much as they looked briefly and only at the nonsense stuff in order to say that they have.) But whatever the case. . .

    Mercury just went retrograde at the end of January, and will remain so until February 19th. Mercury is an indicator of all things related to communication and moving parts, etc., and when it retrogrades, everything tends to stop working properly. Don't ink deals, don't buy new equipment, don't agree to anything because there's always some piece of vital data you're not aware of and when it comes to light later on, you will wish you had waited a couple of weeks.

    I've seen, several times, computer systems (my own and those of other people) which even though they had been working reliably for years, blow many unrelated components all within a matter of days or hours during a retrograde period. (And always during mission critical tasks). When you are trying to make information or systems run smoothly, that's when the universe will put up a wall of mud, telling you to slow down and take on a different style of awareness and living for that period; it's good to stop and put your brain into low gear during these times; that's how best to use the 'flavour' of energy available. --And if you don't, the harder you push, the more stuff will blow up in your face. So it can seem in a high tech world which never wants to stop that it's a, "When it rains, it pours" kind of deal.

    --And in the same way that I doubt the NSA was trying to sabotage my personal computer, (and printer. And scanner. And digital camera. And bank card. And car. Ugh. What a shitty time that was!), I doubt that there was any intent to deliberately knock out undersea communications cables.

    I have my own theories for how and why the universe works in this manner, but I won't get into them here, as I somehow doubt this post will survive the knee-jerk modding I imagine it will be subject to. If it does, however, stay above the zero mark, interested people might want to check out Susan Miller's astrology site to learn more. (It's free and she puts a lot of energy into it.)

    Remember, knee-jerking is not scientific. Real skeptics study something with an open mind, listening to the arguments of both sides and then doing their own evaluation and research before submitting their comments. I have met maybe ten people in my life who call themselves skeptics who function in this manner.


    -FL

    1. Re:Mercury Retrograde. . . by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Am I to understand that you believe that the apparent motion of Mercury has some causal relationship to the functioning of electronics? Not the real motion of Mercury, which is unchanged, or the real motion of Earth, which is likewise unchanged, but the appearance of moving in the opposite direction?

      How about you don't force me to wade through an entire astrology site and just give me a thumbnail explanation of how an issue of relative perception can have an effect on my computer?

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:Mercury Retrograde. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Am I to understand that you believe that the apparent motion of Mercury has some causal relationship to the functioning of electronics? Not the real motion of Mercury, which is unchanged, or the real motion of Earth, which is likewise unchanged, but the appearance of moving in the opposite direction?

      I have several views on this.

      One of which is that perhaps it is not Mercury per se that is causing the effects noted, but that the system we live within is fractal in nature. Events reflected in the small are reflected in the very big. Both Mercury and terrestrial electronics devices inhabit the same system.

      When one considers that matter is an apparent illusion, being rather more akin to an expression of something far more ephemeral, our universe can be recognized as little more than a holographic projection. There is no sound reason not to believe that there are patterns and systems in effect which do not behave according to physics as currently recognized by orthodox science, which is, as everybody knows, limited.

      How about you don't force me to wade through an entire astrology site and just give me a thumbnail explanation of how an issue of relative perception can have an effect on my computer?

      What I am suggesting is that people take some time to evaluate the forces at work, which can be done easily enough by reading through a horoscope such as the ones I linked to previously, and performing their own measurements. If there is something there which tweaks at your mind, then curiosity should demand further investigation to determine whether or not there are real patterns unfolding or if it is merely the mind trying to invent patterns where none exist. It is far more valuable to look at what is going on in the world rather than pretend that previously unrecognized forces don't exist based on current (incomplete) knowledge structures. I find it odd that this is not something which is instantly recognized more often. If you are curious about the universe at all, then you should need no prompting. The need for prompting implies previous conditioning, and such conditioning serves those who condition, i.e, not you.


      -FL

  169. related to opening of Iranian Oil Bourse? by bushwhacker2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    from a post on in the goldismoney forums:

    There's a good chance that this is related to the Iranian Oil Bourse. It is scheduled to be opened between Feb 1 and 11 on the island of Kish in the Persian Gulf.

    http://www.energybulletin.net/12125.html
    http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id...onid=351020103

    The US can't let it open, due to the damage it would do to the dollar. If it relies heavily on the Internet, then cutting the cables seems like it would be an effective, covert, non-violent way to go. And a totally disgusting manipulation of the free market, of course...
    1. Re:related to opening of Iranian Oil Bourse? by bushwhacker2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      sorry for the broken link for presstv.ir, here is a tinyurl version: http://tinyurl.com/3422xw

    2. Re:related to opening of Iranian Oil Bourse? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Wow, THERE you go. That's the missing reason in a nutshell. That's also total mayhem waiting to happen on Monday... just when you thought life couldn't get more interesting.

  170. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    5. Americas enemies will use paper & cdrom delivery methods for communications, slower but secure.
          If they want secure direct comms, just call the #1 communists on the planet, China and ask for a secure sat link for $9.95/minute.

    6. Its not hard to wrap a VPN on top thats triple encoded with keys changing every 60seconds. Im sure the russians can aid in some land based wifi type comms with repeaters every 5 miles.
          Sure its not cheap, but damn cheaper than your own sat.

    I guess this operation is to stop all the minor lower level cells/operatives from communicating effectively.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  171. Not just "many, many" tons by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    Connected by a very heavy cable or chain to a ship which weighs many, many tons. Ripping apart a communications cable = not a problem.
    To further reinforce your point, a large ship, such as an oil tanker, can weigh over a hundred thousand tons.
  172. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by eli+pabst · · Score: 1

    After I posted, the first thing that popped into my mind was that crazy ass story about how the CIA cooked up that scheme involving Howard Hughes constructing that giant deep sea drilling platform the Glomar Explorer that was really a cover to raise a sunken Russian sub. If you would have came up with that theory, I would have seriously wondered if you were insane. So who the hell knows, maybe they are just hiding it in plain site.

  173. Desensitized for war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact is, the average person doesn't give a shit that the Middle East is in this state. Doesn't help that the war since 9/11 has desensitized people to the point where warfare is just an everyday, normal occurrence that doesn't really need to be questioned. Iran could be wiped off the map (as in 100% population dead), and all anyone's going to say is "we going to McDonald's for lunch?". The same as anything (such as being diagnosed with cancer, etc), people DO NOT care until they are personally affected. To most people, war is perfectly acceptable, no matter who's lives are ruined, so long as it's not affecting their own lives.

    I believe our minds aren't wired to understand what we haven't directly experienced. Images, text, video, and reports of war do not provoke serious reactions from us because we are mentally incapable of truly understanding what it's like. At the end of the day, everything we see is just media, nothing more than a concept. Until war happens to you at home, you don't know what war is, and you can't understand it. And guess what people, you can't care about something you don't understand.

  174. A shame no one will probably read this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I'm posting late and anonymously.

    2008, 30th of January @ 4:30 UTC - Marseille, France: Submarine cable SEA-ME-WE 4 gets cut.

    2008, 30th of January @ 8:00 UTC - Alexandria, Egypt: Submarine cable FLAG Europe-Asia gets cut.

    2008, 1st of Febuary "early morning" - 56km from Dubai: Submarine cable FLAG FALCON gets cut.

    No news of a disruption in SEA-ME-WE-4 is given until after the failure of FLAG Europe-Asia.

    FLAG tells the press that for reasons unknown ships were told to drop anchor 86km off shore of Alexandria, Egypt instead of at the usual distance and this damaged the cable.

    No official reason from the agency in charge of monitoring SEA-ME-WE 4 (which is owned by a consortium of companies, not FLAG) is given. However some ISPs told their populace that 'tropical storms' had damaged the cable. No evidence of a tropical storm exists

    At a yet unspecified time FLAG FALCON is damaged 56km from Dubai. Only explanation given by FLAG is the 'anchor story' repeated from Alexandria.

    Speculation:

    Distance from Marseille to Alexandria is approximately 2500km.

    Top speed of a US Seawolf class submarine is 46km/h.

    If a government is involved in the damaging of these submarine cables, it involved more than one vessel. Two at minimum. One for Marseille, and at least one for Alexandria / Dubai.

    Most telephone and internet traffic in the middle east has been greatly reduced in capability. If this were intentional it is most likely either the act of the U.S., U.N., or E.U. all of which currently have some armed forces engaged in conflicts in either Iraq or Afghanistan.

    At first glance it appears Iran is suffering the worst, and given the recent political atmosphere surrounding the country this is suspicious.

    It is too early to tell exactly what is/has happened. Hopefully events start to become clear on February 12th, 2008 as this is the date FLAG has announced it will have the repairs start on the cable.

    Currently I am checking to see how extensive the damage is to communication from the Middle East to the rest of the world. At this time it is highly suspicious that not one, not two, but three submarine cables would near simultaneously be severed at major chokepoints in this part of the world, forcing their traffic to pass through U.S. or U.K. networks before the rest of the world.

    I sincerely hope my fears are completely unfounded, but there are an awful lot of coincidences piling up at one time.

    1. Re:A shame no one will probably read this by Lippard · · Score: 1

      Your claim that SeaMeWe-4 was cut near Marseille is incorrect. It was cut on its Marseille-Alexandria leg, while FLAG Telecom's Europe-Asia cable was cut on its Palermo, Sicily-Alexandria leg. Those two cables are right next to each other off the north coast of Egypt, and were both cut in the same incident by the same tanker.

    2. Re:A shame no one will probably read this by Lippard · · Score: 1

      s/Marseille-Alexandria/Palermo-Alexandria/

      Both cables land in the same places...

  175. Blasphmy! by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 1

    That's not what Woody Allen told me!

    --
    Just -1, Troll talking to another.
  176. Mother Earth, Mother Board by jjohnson · · Score: 1

    Two of the three cables cut were FLAG cables, which Neil Stephenson wrote about in an epic article for Wired called Mother Earth, Mother Board.

    Interesting thing about FLAG--it's an entirely private consortium that was created just to build a cable that went from England to Japan. 95% of all undersea cable goes to or from the U.S.; when a study group identified that major gap--Europe to Asia--they launched the project themselves.

    Add AT&T to your roster of dark conspirators...

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  177. Mod Parent Up, Insightful by gr8scot · · Score: 1

    True, but can't we wait until that actually happens before talking about how suspicious it would be? Doesn't the government actually do enough under-handed things that we can display our cynicism talking about those realities, rather than speculating about what kind of plot we'd dream up if we were the ones being under-handed?
    It might be just the weather.

    Oman's largest telecom, Omantel, said a tropical storm caused the damage while du (DU.AI:[web widget]: DU.AI, , ) , the United Arab Emirates' second largest telecom, said the cables were cut due to ships dragging their anchors.
    Good call, mea37. There is enough duplicity in politics to keep 200% of voting taxpayers busy for 9 lifetimes, without making shit up. As you were, Slashdotters.
    --
    All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
  178. Can you spell "prelude to war"? by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    It sounds very fishy that three cables would be cut in three days. While it's possible, it's not likely probable that that would happen? Or is it? Who would like to calculate the probability of that occurring?

    Ok, so when does the war begin? If it hasn't already? Or will our media and internet be cut too?

  179. It's high-tech Luddites by mcvos · · Score: 1

    It could be high-tech Luddites sabotaging the internet to stop evil porn. I expect the transatlantic link to be next.

  180. Ocean floor by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    Indeed, they are as low as whale shit.

  181. "Ken Lay, anchor's away!" by oobi · · Score: 1

    Kenny's still getting the hang of his new yacht over there in Dubai

    --
    If Big Media is the Harvester of Eyes, does that make Apple an arms dealer?
  182. We All Live in a Muslim Submarine by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Anyone who doesn't believe this is going to be called "Allahs will",go stand on your head over in the corner and be counted.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  183. Re:Can anyone enlighten me? larger Anchor: by pedrocarvalho · · Score: 1

    well, that's a tiny anchor. Something more like this: http://www.menkent.dk/assistpics/22ton2.jpg/

  184. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

    This is something that the damned Yankees would do as prelude to invading Iran -- to stop all the bloggers from documenting the invasion and getting the rest of the Arab and Muslim worlds up in arms. Drop a few million copies of The God Delusion in the Muslim world. Hell, drop a few million copies of The Root of All Evil?, too. Maybe then we'll see some progress.
    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  185. Fully encrypted packets by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1

    I think the original poster was thinking of fully encrypting all the traffic that goes through the cable. So if you were a cable snooper you would have no idea whether Abdullah has sent or received any packets, because even the source and destination addresses would be scrambled while the packets are in transit through the cable.

  186. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only problem is that only 3% of the Slashdot population is going to understand what kind of bloody fish you are talking about.

  187. Oh brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Who the hell thinks this comment is funny?>

    Well, a lot of people. I do. Apparently you're the odd man out on this particular joke.

    "A war with Iran is likely to cost tens of thousands of US ervice lives and a hundred thousand or more Iranian lives within a few weeks"

    Yeah, well, that's a pisser. Although it's unlikely to cost 10's of thousands of US Service men's lives. That said, a war with Iran would be pointless. Iran will fold up on it's own. All the smart Persians left 20 years ago. What's left are the handful of crazy people who believe the Mullahs or the poor wretches who are forced to live there.

    "Cutting the cables is very likely intended to be a prelude to war"

    Wow. You're right. And guess what... your mother isn't really your mother. She's a CIA operative who will kill you at the first sign of invasion.

    "Iran is not going to be the pushover that Iraq was"

    Of course not. The country is physically bigger.

    "they have proved that their missiles are capable of sinking an Israeli naval ship with advanced electronic countermeasures"

    Yes. I'm sure the Israelis would love an excuse to turn Iran into glass with it's nukes. 1967 showed the the middle east was no match for Israel. And I don't even particularly like Israel. But I wouldn't want to be Iran if both Israel and the US were attacking it. For the US it would be stupid war that would bankrupt the country. For Israel, it would be personal. Think of when Russia invaded Germany.

    "They are more than likely capable of sinking the supercarriers"

    Whoa whoa dude. I love your website.... http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/mss_history.html

    "They are certainly capable of sinking any tanker that is stupid enough to lumber through the straits"

    The tankers are the lifeblood of Iran. That would be the equivalent of putting a gun to their own head and pulling the trigger. I hope you're not in charge of their strategy.

    "The US is unable to occupy Iraq"

    On the contrary. Iraq has been occupied for 6 years. It has been messy and expensive, and ultimately stupid. But it was done. Persia is different because if they get rid of the half-wits, a lot of ex-patriot Persians will come back to run the place like a normal country.

    "What we are looking at here is quite likely the end of US superpower status."

    Again, I love your website http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/mss_history.html

  188. Please don't make jokes by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    "Really? I thought it meant they're using Comcast."

    Francis has already yelled at us for making jokes about this. Apparently this is not a joking matter.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  189. Maps by visible.frylock · · Score: 1

    Here are google maps for Alexandria, Dubai, and Musqat. Dubai and Musqat are across the Persian Gulf from Iran.

    Wikipedia shows that similar outages occurred in 2005 and 2006 in Pakistan and Southeast Asia.

    --
    Billy Brown rides on. Yolanda Green bypasses Gary White.
  190. **ALERT! DOUCHEBAG DETECTED!** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a douchebag. Pick up a physics textbook and start reading. The answers are in there.

  191. Well, Iraq switched to the Euro and the... by gmezero · · Score: 1

    In November 2000, Iraq began selling its oil in Euros. Iraq's oil for food account at the UN was also in Euros and Iraq later converted its $10 billion reserve fund at the UN to Euros... ...and then the U.S. invaded and one of the first things it did it switched the country back to selling oil in Dollars. Hmmm...

  192. Well, not for everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Its not hard to wrap a VPN on top thats triple encoded with keys changing every 60seconds"

    It is for the Iranians. This is a government that eschews basic scientific research. I mean, maybe Cisco will sell them something, but it's probably already pwned by the CIA, and the ability to produce custom ASICs in Iran is somewhat limited.

    It's like saying "Yeah, it's simple technology to send a shuttle into orbit". Well, go ahead and show us how it's done if it's so simple.

  193. Colourblindness by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Fascinating.

    It's always interesting to see how people with these genetic abnormalities cope. Some people seem to turn them into gifts, while others just suffer from them. Like autism -- the majority of people with autism seem to be disabled from it. But for a few people it enhances their other skills, sometimes to an extraordinary degree.

    Of course, colourblindness comes in a variety of types. There's even some unconfirmed evidence of the opposite, a rare handful of people (exclusively women) who have an extra color receptor, and can distinguish colours that are isochromatic to the rest of us. Something about a mutated gene for the eye's cone cells, on one copy of the X-chromosome, which results in chimerism of the retina. Apparently it's difficult to do research on this, because the mutation (if it exists) only affects about 1-in-10,000 women.

    Your father may have had something analogous that affected his ability to distinguish the brightness and saturation of colours that are isochromatic to the rest of us.

  194. Logic by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    I think the logic there is that it worked so well with the USSR. The problem is that Russians already had a natural hatred of their leaders, extending back centuries. So blaming all of their problems on their own government wasn't a big leap for them. If necessary, they would have invented imaginary problems for which to blame their government. That's just how Russians are. Hence the need for Gulags, secret police, purges and whatnot, to keep the people in line.

    Cubans and Persians, on the other hand, are much more patriotic. Cubans have remarkably high quality of life for such a poor nation; much higher than most of their neighbours (excluding the US). Communism works better at the small scale, and Cuba's success (or rather, their lack of complete failure) bears this out. Persians in particular adore their government for successfully defending them from Iraq during the war. Whatever else you might think of the Ayatollahs, they're rather more benevolent and progressive than Saddam Hussain. So the majority of Persians aren't very inclined to blame their own leaders for anything -- particularly when the USA is threatening to invade them or drop a few nukes to teach them a lesson.

  195. 3rd Undersae Cable Cut In 3 Days by B.A.+Brooks · · Score: 1

    3rd Undersea Internet/Communications Cable Cut in 3 Days (CNN) -- An undersea cable carrying Internet traffic was cut off the Persian Gulf emirate of Dubai, officials said Friday, the third loss of a line carrying Internet and telephone traffic in three days. (UAFF/ARM) -- My sources told me today that this is clearly a message to other countries by The United States Government and Military that they own the Internet/World Communications and can shut them down anytime they wish. The Internet was invented by Tim Berners-Lee http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/, and is still owned and operated by The Department Of Defense. ARPANET / DARPANET. Do your research and you will find out this is true. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET

  196. A Clear Message From The DoD! by B.A.+Brooks · · Score: 1

    3rd Undersea Internet/Communications Cable Cut in 3 Days (CNN) -- An undersea cable carrying Internet traffic was cut off the Persian Gulf emirate of Dubai, officials said Friday, the third loss of a line carrying Internet and telephone traffic in three days. (UAFF/ARM) -- My sources told me today that this is clearly a message to other countries by The United States Government and Military that they own the Internet/World Communications and can shut them down anytime they wish. The Internet was invented by Tim Berners-Lee http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/, and is still owned and operated by The Department Of Defense. ARPANET / DARPANET. Do your research and you will find out this is true. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET

  197. something funny by raidet · · Score: 1

    Of course there's something funny happening. People are so concerned with how their comments make them look, they deny the patently obvious. If you study history you'll know that government conspiracy is commonplace. The only problem is that a certain class of nutjob will tend to construct the most absurd consipracy theories from the most innocuous events. This causes people to gravitate away from making any kind of conspiracy theory, which is gravely foolish.

  198. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, maybe we should have Dead eye (Dick) Cheney take him bird hunting...

  199. Iran is not disconnected by Helevius · · Score: 1

    Iran is not disconnected, according to a company that monitors routing tables.

  200. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/04/0158249 for the fourth time....
    and China or Russia stand the most to gain as they would be the next ones to control the flow after the cables are cut, to reroute traffic through another source for the moment, and guess what, packet sniffing anyone???

    "Curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back"

  201. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/04/0158249...

    This means your theory of elevated traffic might be true, however I do know that that space is
    monitored by the international comity and also, it may be improbable to have all lines cut the exact
    same way or within so close a time span, however impossible that after the first 2 ( and now up to 4 ) that any governments wouldn't make sure that it would secure the last lines left.

    Now that you made me think of it, definitely another government, they would need extreme training ( more then rebels have ) and high tech equipment to get by security ( a mini sub possibly )
    So we are now left with US/China/Russia.

  202. Iran is not and never was in the dark. . . by tekshogun · · Score: 1

    Internet traffic is affected, yes, but they are not in the dark. If you check the many websites hosted out of Iran, you'll see they can be accessed, albeit slowly. The Internet monitoring from Analog X was only ping one router.

  203. Been There, Done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just off 6 month duty in the Med on USS fast attack sub. Float plan classified. Responsibilities to "disrupt and deny" communications in preparation for further activities.

  204. Re:Maybe the NSA has to cut the cable to tap into by DrVomact · · Score: 1
    I remember that one. There were news reports that the CIA had tried to raise a Russian sub, but that the sub had broken in half during the attempt, and that the salvage attempt ended in failure. I could never figure out whether the whole thing was made up, or whether it truly was tried and they failed, or whether the story of the failure was disinformation circulated by the CIA to cover up their success...

    See, ain't this fun?

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  205. Re:Third cut? do i smell Conspiracy BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he's talking british or something.