Do not blame an ideology for the people who believes in it. Okay, fine. Why does (innocent for sake of argument) Marxism attract the most stupid and violent people? Actually it doesn't. It often attracts rather intelligent pessimists from intellectual groups and academia. These people seem to be the easiest for stupid and violent people to control. Sort of the grown up version of the bully jock getting the nerd to do his homework. The pen is not always mightier than the sword.
either way it wouldn't be bad for google to have a monopoly. The bad thing is if google decideds to use their extreamley popular search engine to shut down competitors in other services. If google started a car company and shut down searches for all ford toyota chevy etc that would be considered an abuse of a monopoly or even a near monopoly.
Again someone who doesn't understand the scientific method. Proven is not a scientific term it is a legal term. It is used as a form of hyperbole in science to refer to a "well tested theory." Although just as you brought up Einstein's theory of general relativity that has not been "proven" by any means. In fact at a molecular level it breaks down completely and is very dis proven. Just because it hasn't been "proven" doesn't make it any less useful though. Just as Einstein's theory is able to be used to predict how large objects will interact, a "theory of global warming" will help in determining how we should react to it.
Now, repeat after me, "There is no such thing as 'proven' in science. Only Well tested and accepted."
1) Time magazine had a great article a year or four ago about the French desiring to be a leader of "The Coalition of the Unwilling" - ie, being the leader of a group of nations who oppose everything the US does. 2) With Iraq, specifically, as much as the US's action was said to be motivated by oil/money, France's opposition was doubly-motivated by oil/money. 3) The French's willingness to sell damn near anyone damn near anything: including nuclear reactors to both Iraq and North Korea.
sorry unless something critical is hit hard enough there is no Hamburger. No explosive decompression. Little more than a whistling hiss. Most criticle componts would need more power than a hand gun is going to provide.
I think your post points it out exactly. By annoying people as much as they can it gets people to ask "Why the heck are they doing this." and as you point out the naked, military force and beer.
Slashdot Mirror
Wow did I get this line from the article wrong
"Dangling between the legs, that would be a clock."
Not run FreeBSD on them?
Linux hit 6.2 10 years ago.
FreeBSD is dead.
They make lawyers rich and businesses Leary of trying new things.
either way it wouldn't be bad for google to have a monopoly. The bad thing is if google decideds to use their extreamley popular search engine to shut down competitors in other services. If google started a car company and shut down searches for all ford toyota chevy etc that would be considered an abuse of a monopoly or even a near monopoly.
I found the wayback machine works well for yanking out static websites from the past.
I don't see a double standard, yet. I don't know the GPs opinion on the MS Monopoly.
There is explosive decompression
Yes there is just not from a bullet hole.
14,000 years old? Hell, he believes a woman gave birth as a virgin!!! Yea, I'd like to see my daughter try to pull that one over on me.
Not global warming. That was hemispherical warming. Also sometimes referred to as summer.
Again someone who doesn't understand the scientific method. Proven is not a scientific term it is a legal term. It is used as a form of hyperbole in science to refer to a "well tested theory." Although just as you brought up Einstein's theory of general relativity that has not been "proven" by any means. In fact at a molecular level it breaks down completely and is very dis proven. Just because it hasn't been "proven" doesn't make it any less useful though. Just as Einstein's theory is able to be used to predict how large objects will interact, a "theory of global warming" will help in determining how we should react to it.
Now, repeat after me, "There is no such thing as 'proven' in science. Only Well tested and accepted."
1) Time magazine had a great article a year or four ago about the French desiring to be a leader of "The Coalition of the Unwilling" - ie, being the leader of a group of nations who oppose everything the US does.
2) With Iraq, specifically, as much as the US's action was said to be motivated by oil/money, France's opposition was doubly-motivated by oil/money.
3) The French's willingness to sell damn near anyone damn near anything: including nuclear reactors to both Iraq and North Korea.
Your tone seems to claim that it wasn't bad? I think there are a few woolly mammoths who'd disagree with you.
You wont hear that from me. That was long before I was born.
Or existing hardware KVMs. I can switch between 8 machines on one KVM and can even chain them together if I need more.
Way to go Linus. Tell them distros to Fork off!!!
Hey we made it to the moon first!!! Or did we?...
Yea they gave us a hand 200 years ago so we should just forgive them for everything they've done, and not done, lately.
Our team of 4 is almost at our goal of $10,000 USD. We only need 196 more $50 pledges.
sorry unless something critical is hit hard enough there is no Hamburger. No explosive decompression. Little more than a whistling hiss. Most criticle componts would need more power than a hand gun is going to provide.
No, the HD is still the overall bottle neck for a modern computer.
Other then a whistling hiss? This myth was disproven on MythBusters quite some time ago.
I think your post points it out exactly. By annoying people as much as they can it gets people to ask "Why the heck are they doing this." and as you point out the naked, military force and beer.