Next time you "see a police beating" throw a bloody hand grenade at them. Great idea. At least you last seconds will be broadcast (hopefully). Sure going to be a bummer on YouTube.
Sure looks cool. But the "grenade" design might cause you a lot more trouble (including getting shot) than the transparency thingy itself. Think about "panic", "terror", "obviously armed with...".
So it's by definition an example for bad design. Even the worst possible design, to be more specific..
Your post frightened me so much, I had to replace all doorlocks, need to change my phone number, my name and will have to spend the rest of my life in a lead-shielded radiation bunker with no internet. Where can I send the bill?
will filesystem specs again be handled as a "trade secret"? If so it is another basically unusable filesystem that I am forced to use on at least one critical machine. At least there is native NFS client support in Windows now. It really helps preventing the worst as the built-in backup option still sucks.
Yes - and it is this kind of simply unacceptable things becoming "common business practice" that make me feel the whole system is rotten to the point from where the decay proceeds exponentially. Such practices -and many others esp. in the financial sector- were considered clearly criminal 20 years ago - almost everywhere in the world. Not for moral reasons, but because the would destroy the system itself. Now, look where we are going...
It does. And it is -besides pseudo-anonymization- exactly what TOR is made for. I guess TOR will gain a lot of popularity in certain parts of northern Europe soon.
And Linux itself does not provide *any* UI. Polished and intuitive or not. So you, Sir, are obviously talking about something that does not even exist. Catch 22, indeed.
I don't get it. Why is everybody so pissed off of him? If he doesn't like the world outside, he doesn't like it. Valid attitude. Not mine, but also not my problem.
What do you want anyway? Force anyone to like you - by offending them? Great idea.
.
Fact is: They sold you a phone with a rootkit installed that could record and transmit anything without your notice or your consent. That's still fucking bad enough for me.
Claiming that "it wasn't activated by default" doesn't change a bit of it.
I don't give up hope that there are people out there who know about the origin of sabotage from reading (p.e. Gibson/Sterling's The Difference Engine) instead of Star Trek marathons.
Yes. But that means that another entity is between them and the public. And there already were demands for social networks to censor user generated content even from the "free" world.
Any third party that might tamper with your content -and collect your subscribers' data- should be avoided.
The weirdest thing about this is, that there are no software patents in Germany.
I guess that said software patents might qualify as "regular" patents since there are phones involved.
Next time you "see a police beating" throw a bloody hand grenade at them. Great idea. At least you last seconds will be broadcast (hopefully). Sure going to be a bummer on YouTube.
Sure looks cool. But the "grenade" design might cause you a lot more trouble (including getting shot) than the transparency thingy itself. Think about "panic", "terror", "obviously armed with...". So it's by definition an example for bad design. Even the worst possible design, to be more specific..
Your post frightened me so much, I had to replace all doorlocks, need to change my phone number, my name and will have to spend the rest of my life in a lead-shielded radiation bunker with no internet. Where can I send the bill?
So culture is all about controlling access? Hmmm... There's some nasty truth in it. Basically that's what Nietzsche said...
will filesystem specs again be handled as a "trade secret"? If so it is another basically unusable filesystem that I am forced to use on at least one critical machine. At least there is native NFS client support in Windows now. It really helps preventing the worst as the built-in backup option still sucks.
unless you're a fscking thought criminal.
Yes - and it is this kind of simply unacceptable things becoming "common business practice" that make me feel the whole system is rotten to the point from where the decay proceeds exponentially. Such practices -and many others esp. in the financial sector- were considered clearly criminal 20 years ago - almost everywhere in the world. Not for moral reasons, but because the would destroy the system itself. Now, look where we are going...
Except that it's only limited to one site
until BREIN decides that they want another one banned.
I don't think so. Blocking EFF is likely to backfire. And don't forget that EFF was one of the initiators of the TOR project...
It does. And it is -besides pseudo-anonymization- exactly what TOR is made for. I guess TOR will gain a lot of popularity in certain parts of northern Europe soon.
There's absolutely no evidence of any relation between exposing people to radiation for silly reasons and cancer! Oh, wait...
And Linux itself does not provide *any* UI. Polished and intuitive or not. So you, Sir, are obviously talking about something that does not even exist. Catch 22, indeed.
It definitely is. I want one!
Transmission.
I don't get it. Why is everybody so pissed off of him? If he doesn't like the world outside, he doesn't like it. Valid attitude. Not mine, but also not my problem. What do you want anyway? Force anyone to like you - by offending them? Great idea. .
Now ask yourself one question: might 1.2k pages not be a little bit excessive after all?
Yes. One might wonder what he's doing for a living...
Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke.
Church Of SubGenius
...1938. These good, old "XY-Of The Year"-stories just never get boring.
Heise (German only) just reported that Google officially denied the rumors they were about to drop Firefox.
Fact is: They sold you a phone with a rootkit installed that could record and transmit anything without your notice or your consent. That's still fucking bad enough for me. Claiming that "it wasn't activated by default" doesn't change a bit of it.
I don't give up hope that there are people out there who know about the origin of sabotage from reading (p.e. Gibson/Sterling's The Difference Engine) instead of Star Trek marathons.
The difference with Gillette is that they sold you a product that did exactly what you wanted it to.
Yes. They did. Somewhen in the 1980s. But maybe I just had less beard, then...
Yes. But that means that another entity is between them and the public. And there already were demands for social networks to censor user generated content even from the "free" world. Any third party that might tamper with your content -and collect your subscribers' data- should be avoided.