Having recently tried to train a replacement to do very simple network tasks (adding ports to vlans, for instance) the CCNA allows you to ensure you and your trainee have compatible vocabulary, and that they'll know how to use the CLI. This isn't to say there aren't a lot of useless CCNA's (and A+, and MCSE)'s out there, but not having to go over enable mode when you really want to be talking about which subnets do what is nice.
How do the linking restrictions of the GPL apply to Java bytecode that isn't (by default, without a custom classloader, 99%+ of the time... etc.) traditionally linked as we think of it in C/C++ (and most other languages)?
For those of you not familiar with it, Java goes hunting for all code at runtime based on the fully qualified (package + class) class name, and resolves methods and fields based on name as well... the code that gets executed at runtime can be completely different than the code compiled against, so long as the method signatures match. That's the crappy, its 11pm and I'm watching the daily show version.
So if I distribute my non-GPL binaries, and GPL'd libraries seperately, am I in violation? What if I use Java WebStart and the user's client downloads the GPL'd libraries from their distribution site? And if I just distribute my binaries and make the user hunt out the GPL'd libraries on their own?
None of the ISPs I've ever dealt with permit you to resell services.
Speakeasy does. I can't find any documentation on the non-current-customer portion of their site, but they allow you to resell your connect a few times, and take care of the billing (and take a percentage). Its fancy, and nice.
If its synchronizing on a schedule ("synchronizing them every minute"), you don't have an NTP client, you have an SNTP client. Real NTP doesn't have a concept of a synchronization interval, the clock is either synchronized or it isn't.
I think.
This appears to be a port of real-deal NTP code to windows. I've never used it, just found it in a few minutes of googling, but its worth a shot.
I have a thing for thin watches. The Skagen black titanium models excite the crap out of me, but I'd rather they tune WWVB and relieve my watch setting obsession.
And finally, do you have the source code for the compiler that compiled the compiler? Yes I do it's pretty standard pratice to compile the comppiler then recompile the compiler with the new compiler.
You don't really understand the trouble here. You need to be able to verify the authenticity of the entire compiler chain; its trivial for the compiler to insert backdoors into the new compiler (including malicious code to reinsert the malicious code in any future compiler compiles...) without any of the source you have available showing any ill effects. The situation you describe gaurantees nothing.
You either know how to program/code, and commenting is part of that, or you don't. Either your staff knows same or doesn't.
Yes. Its completely binary. We are either all Dijkstra's or wet salmon. There are no mediocre programmers in the world, and more so there is a glut of brilliant programmers and its trivial to fill a team with them. Plus, once you do, they all agree and get along and are productive!
Slashdot Mirror
Commenting to undo my accidental positive moderation. You're an idiot. That is all.
Having recently tried to train a replacement to do very simple network tasks (adding ports to vlans, for instance) the CCNA allows you to ensure you and your trainee have compatible vocabulary, and that they'll know how to use the CLI. This isn't to say there aren't a lot of useless CCNA's (and A+, and MCSE)'s out there, but not having to go over enable mode when you really want to be talking about which subnets do what is nice.
How do the linking restrictions of the GPL apply to Java bytecode that isn't (by default, without a custom classloader, 99%+ of the time... etc.) traditionally linked as we think of it in C/C++ (and most other languages)?
For those of you not familiar with it, Java goes hunting for all code at runtime based on the fully qualified (package + class) class name, and resolves methods and fields based on name as well... the code that gets executed at runtime can be completely different than the code compiled against, so long as the method signatures match. That's the crappy, its 11pm and I'm watching the daily show version.
So if I distribute my non-GPL binaries, and GPL'd libraries seperately, am I in violation? What if I use Java WebStart and the user's client downloads the GPL'd libraries from their distribution site? And if I just distribute my binaries and make the user hunt out the GPL'd libraries on their own?
I'm honestly curious.
--
Phil
DomainKeys doesn't break forwarding and... you know, SMTP. DomainKeys doesn't require mail servers to rewrite the headers on every message ever.
:P
In short, DomainKeys wasn't designed by idiots, while the other two apparently were.
I'm unbiased! pffffft
--
phil
I don't believe there are any Industrial Strength(tm) routers that support UPnP; I don't even think there's a decent daemon for the *ixs.
Plus, its a scary idea. A protocol to poke arbitrary holes in firewalls? Brilliant!
CM 5.0 runs on a "customized linux platform"
That's the dumbest idea... ever. Hurrah. At least its not the corporation I work for doing it.
Does this mean I'll be able to get debian packages of the tools for my DL380 Gen4 without having to do magic with alien and their crap ass RPMs?
--
Phil
None of the ISPs I've ever dealt with permit you to resell services.
Speakeasy does. I can't find any documentation on the non-current-customer portion of their site, but they allow you to resell your connect a few times, and take care of the billing (and take a percentage). Its fancy, and nice.
I think that is a trick.
How is that the same as bonding? You can load balance all you want, you're not going to be able to push one stream to 3mbit over two T1s.
Not to say the software solution is useless, just not the same.
--
Phil
More that we got the apollo program out of ICBMs.
If its synchronizing on a schedule ("synchronizing them every minute"), you don't have an NTP client, you have an SNTP client. Real NTP doesn't have a concept of a synchronization interval, the clock is either synchronized or it isn't.
I think.
This appears to be a port of real-deal NTP code to windows. I've never used it, just found it in a few minutes of googling, but its worth a shot.
--
Phil
Where in Google Calendar is CalDAV (or even simple WebDAV) used/implemented?
--
Phil
Sadly, that part of the spec is optional. Most gig gear does implement it though.
Or just use Mozilla Sunbird.
Might be super-devel, but its been working for me for almost a year.
--
lds
Which one do you have? I'm only curious.
I have a thing for thin watches. The Skagen black titanium models excite the crap out of me, but I'd rather they tune WWVB and relieve my watch setting obsession.
--
Phil
Are there any of these (atomic-syncing wrist watches) that are analog and not inhumanly thick? Anywhere? Bonus points if they're solar powered.
--
Phil
In what regulatory domain is a home wired as stated even remotely legal?
:).
And no, 'private island' doesn't count
--
lds
You don't really understand the trouble here. You need to be able to verify the authenticity of the entire compiler chain; its trivial for the compiler to insert backdoors into the new compiler (including malicious code to reinsert the malicious code in any future compiler compiles...) without any of the source you have available showing any ill effects. The situation you describe gaurantees nothing.
--
Phil
Which model is this? I can't seem to find it.
I adore duplexing. I don't know why, but I have some giant crush on duplexing-as-default. Man, do I like things duplexed.
--
lds
I am posting in reply to this article so that I won't be moderate it. This is because everyone, apparently, is an idiot.
You must have gotten a bit screwed if your expensive server didn't have ECC RAM.
Is there any documentation on this array upgrades feature? I can't find anything on their site. Other than that, it looks like a hot machine.
--
Phil
Yes. Its completely binary. We are either all Dijkstra's or wet salmon. There are no mediocre programmers in the world, and more so there is a glut of brilliant programmers and its trivial to fill a team with them. Plus, once you do, they all agree and get along and are productive!
Christ.