Slashdot Mirror


What is the Best Calendar?

An anonymous reader writes "In the flurry of AJAX applications being put to market, Google's new calendar has been getting quite a bit of attention. But being drowned out in this media blitz is Kiko, a startup from Paul Graham's Y Combinator program, along with spongecell, Trumba, Yahoo! calendar, and 30boxes. Which do you prefer?" Update: 04/16 14:55 GMT by Z : YCombinator link fixed.

309 comments

  1. Mayan by bj8rn · · Score: 5, Funny

    No doubt about it.

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    1. Re:Mayan by sunwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ours doesn't even predict the end of the world in 6 years. Lame.

    2. Re:Mayan by Firehed · · Score: 1
      Already on my Despair, Inc. calendar, marked December 21, 2012: "The fourth world age ends in cataclysm, according to the Mayan calendar. Avoid unnecessary contact with New Agers. They are going to be extremely wound up."

      I think it does. Ironically enough, that's when the .com battle (regarding Verisign) is scheduled, IIRC.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:Mayan by corngrower · · Score: 1

      I'm sure hundreds of millions of chinese would disagree with you.

    4. Re:Mayan by bcmm · · Score: 1

      And what about the discordian callender?

      (Type ddate on most Linux boxes)

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    5. Re:Mayan by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      I may be crazy, but I'm not that crazy.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  2. Offline by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got a sexy Drew Barrymore calander which works for me.

    1. Re:Offline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Intersting choice of words to apply to your original ET merchandise. I hope you don't work with kids.

    2. Re:Offline by tpgp · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've got a sexy Drew Barrymore calander which works for me.

      Sorry, it's either a sexy calender or a Drew Barrymore calender - can't be both.

      --
      My pics.
    3. Re:Offline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless he has a shiny paper fetish.

    4. Re:Offline by UHBo2 · · Score: 1

      aghh shiny paper......

    5. Re:Offline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I know what kind of calendar you must like then, no need to thank me for the link.

    6. Re:Offline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how a calendar from 1995 is particularly useful.

    7. Re:Offline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I don't see how a calendar from 1995 is particularly useful.

      You might be surprised... a 1995 calendar works just fine for this year.

    8. Re:Offline by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I thought that calendar only ran to 1992.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Offline by osric · · Score: 1

      oooh, burn.

      --
      Q: What does the "H" in Jesus H. Christ stand for? A: Haploid.
  3. WebCalendar by Masa · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://webcalendar.sourceforge.net/ It's stable and it does everything a web calendar should do.

    1. Re:WebCalendar by nottoogeeky · · Score: 1

      it's fugly. i hate fugliness!

    2. Re:WebCalendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, this does not keep you from using Slashdot, obviously.

    3. Re:WebCalendar by Herve5 · · Score: 1

      fully agreed. I've been using it for more than a year now, with links to iCal, handling of various calendars and users, very sophisticated views gathering different calendars/users etc.

      --
      Herve S.
    4. Re:WebCalendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's fugly. i hate fugliness!


      Fully supported.

      You videoaddicts keep using Windows and Outlook, please. There's also MacOS there for you.

      Thank you for your collaboration. http://c2.com/cgi-bin/wiki/quickDiff?WhyWikiWorks
    5. Re:WebCalendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a fan of this one. I used it and a hacked was able to exploit a PHP weakness, thereby gaining access to the web site.

    6. Re:WebCalendar by cknudsen · · Score: 1
      It's only as ugly as the person who sets it up ;-)

      You can customize the appearance as much as you like. See the Aruba.com site for an example:

      http://www.aruba.com/calendar/month.php

      --
      http://www.k5n.us
    7. Re:WebCalendar by nottoogeeky · · Score: 1

      But that still looks really ugly :/

  4. iCal by generic-man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I like iCal. Of all the calendars listed, iCal works the best when I'm in an airport and I don't want to spend $8 for Internet access during a 1-hour layover. :)

    --
    For more information, click here.
    1. Re:iCal by KinkoBlast · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Too bad iCal is Mac-Only, eh?

    2. Re:iCal by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Of course not. ical runs on anything (well, any Unix at least). And you can use it on any X11 enabled display of course.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:iCal by KinkoBlast · · Score: 1

      He said iCal, not ical. iCal is an application, released by Apple, for Mac OS X. ical is some tcl/tk calender. Personaly, I just go with Sunbird everywhere else - it's rough around the edges (OK, the center is rough too :P) but meh.

    4. Re:iCal by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Luckily, the iCal standard was built in, and is completely compatible with, Google Calendar.

      And frankly, Google's implementation's a bit more useful when you don't have your own computer with you, let alone a Mac.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    5. Re:iCal by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      ...when you don't have your own computer with you...
      Heh -- as if that'll ever happen! C'mon, man, this is Slashdot!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:iCal by generic-man · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The iCalendar standard is used by Google Calendar. Google Calendar doesn't synchronize bidirectionally with iCal.app*, so you can't access your Google Calendar when you're without Internet access. (It happens.)

      * iCal.app doesn't support two-way synchronization by itself; iSync does but there's no Google Calendar plugin for iSync.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    7. Re:iCal by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

      All the best applications are. :-)
      </unnecessary>

    8. Re:iCal by Assembler · · Score: 2, Informative

      ical is a file format. It an open format for sharing calendaring data defined in RFCs 2445-2447. It was originally created with Microsoft's help. Tons of programs (web & standalone) support it, except ironically Outlook.

    9. Re:iCal by RemovableBait · · Score: 1
      Google's implementation's a bit more useful when you don't have your own computer with you, let alone a Mac.

      I thought that was what .Mac was for...

      From http://www.apple.com/dotmac/features.html:

      "Access contacts, calendars, bookmarks, and email on the Web via any Internet-connected Mac, Windows-PC or even hotel TV"

      Although, I don't use a Mac myself, so Google's calendar is pretty damn good IMO.
    10. Re:iCal by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      For instance, on the rare days when one forgets to pack the laptop.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    11. Re:iCal by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      iCalendar is the file format. ical is an application, as is iCal.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    12. Re:iCal by Assembler · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying you're wrong or that I'm right, but as per rfc 2445:

      The file type code of "iCal" is to be used in Apple MacIntosh operating system environments to designate a file containing calendaring and scheduling information consistent with this MIME media type.

      iCal is often used as an abbreviation for the file format's full name. Witness Google, who at calendar.google.com say "Google Calendar can import event information in iCal or CSV (MS Outlook) format."

      Anyway, ics is the file extension for iCalendar files.

    13. Re:iCal by bubba451 · · Score: 1
      And frankly, Google's implementation's a bit more useful when you don't have your own computer with you...

      Well that's ok, because with .Mac, iCal events are also online, as well as being synchronized to your cell phone and your iPod.

      I have my beefs against iCal the program, but with syncing it kicks ass.

    14. Re:iCal by adamjaskie · · Score: 1
      --
      /usr/games/fortune
  5. Julian by AnalystX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like *NIX, it just works.

  6. That is easy by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Lunar all the way!

  7. Evaluating truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    (Paul Graham (is a ((software patent) troll)) wanabee)

    1. Re:Evaluating truth by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Funny

      (+ 1 Parent) ;;Funny
      (- 1 Parent) ;;Ugly/Non-evaluating/Non-existent Pseudo Lisp:)

  8. Integration by thsths · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would prefer any calender that integrates properly with my email client. Why is that so difficult? If I receive an invitation (from Outlook Express or Evolution or what not), I want to be able to accept it right there, without saving it first and then importing it into the calender.

    Mozilla Calendar cannot do it, Yahoo Mail fails the test, even Gmail does not integration (or I haven't figure out how to switch it on). The only program that really does this is evolution (and of course Outlook). For all the other, it should be back to the drawing board.

    1. Re:Integration by silverdr · · Score: 1, Interesting

      iCal with Mail.app allows that quite easily, although you have to dobule-click the invitation first.

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
    2. Re:Integration by Amendt · · Score: 1

      I made a test page at http://hythe.ca/events.html and it allows anyone to add the community supper this week to their google calendar. And everything exports from google calendar to my KOrganizer, so I am happy. P.S. If you want to come to our community supper you are welcome :)

    3. Re:Integration by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Integration is the key, and gmail calendar just saw the light. As with gtalk, maybe in few time we could see it integrated in ways we didnt expect into gmail or google services in general.

      Is not what actually have what matters me more, is the potential future, so doing raw comparisions right now could be unfair. With future integration in mind, i think that either yahoo or gmail will be the best for their respective mail users.

    4. Re:Integration by Jessta · · Score: 1

      A calendar should also integrate with Instant messaging, PDA, SmartPhone, Watch, Web browser, Email client, Home Phone, as well as integrating with everyone elses calendar.

      --
      ...and that is all I have to say about that.
      http://jessta.id.au
    5. Re:Integration by Brice21 · · Score: 1

      Just like ContactOffice which integrate webmail and group calendar : http://www.contactoffice.com/

      --
      Brice Le Blevennec, Digerati
    6. Re:Integration by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you have a Gmail account, go into your Calendar (if you have it), and under the "Calendars" box, you should see a link that says "Other Calendars +". Click it. You now should have the option of adding Public Calendars, Friends Calendars/events, Holiday Calendars, etc, right in front of you, with the same ease of use as Gmail.

      Oh, and if you're an iCal user (or for that matter, use iCalendar as a format either with any of the Mozilla Calendaring project components, or anything compatible), you can upload/migrate/do everything you should be expected to be able to do with different calendaring apps sharing a standard. (And yes, that DOES include adding Friend's Public Calendars/Events through whitelisting by Email address).

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    7. Re:Integration by AmigaBen · · Score: 1
      The only program that really does this is evolution (and of course Outlook).

      Right. Because Groupwise can't do this. Or Scalix. Nope, only Outlook.

      Just saying evolution would have been ignorant, but forgivable, since you would have possibly been talking only about open source options. When you tossed in Outlook...

      --
      +5 Insightful, really!
    8. Re:Integration by elcid73 · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Integration by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1

      Mail.app and iCal does this on Mac. You click on the ics file and iCal asks if you would like to add the event.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    10. Re:Integration by WaltFrench · · Score: 1

      ...I want to be able to accept it right there...

      Why is the obvious so difficult? All these islands of information!

      Perhaps the OSes of the world could supply interfaces for synchronizing events, etc., so that updates migrate across in reasonable timeframes. (At least one, OS X provides an apparently little-used such API). But if there were a generally-accepted formulation, the plane tix I buy online would automatically (or as an option at Travelocity, NWA, etc.), show up in my calendars.

      Frankly, I blame the PDA makers, especially Palm, who have coordination of info as their ONLY business, and yet have not evangelized easy transfer, preferring to lay off synchro onto each OS, telephone and manufacturer of other equipment. Practically guaranteed to drive their business into irrelevance. Which is exactly what seems to be happening.

      All well & good for Google to play a bit well w/ others by using pre-existing interfaces, but synchro is many years away since so many other players have their own approaches.

      --
      "Inquiring Minds Want to Know!"
    11. Re:Integration by krycheq · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had great luck with integrated calendaring using Kontact/Kmail/KCalendar... I receive invites from Lotus Notes users and Exchange users (outlook email client) and am able to click accept/decline buttons built into the invites email messages. Kontact manages to interprit the iCal stuff as an invite and apparently adds these clickable links to the email and then returns a reply to the meeting requestor as well as adds it to my calendar.

      I then sync my Treo to it using KPilot and all is included... even meeting notes, location info, recurrance, and alerts.

      Occasionally I get a time-zone mistake, or it fails to add the meeting with an event alarm, but considering that I don't have to use the cruddy Lotus or Exchange clients I will gladly live with these minor annoyances.

    12. Re:Integration by Assembler · · Score: 1

      Zimbra does what you want. It is open source (+ free:) also. Try the demo at www.zimbra.com.

    13. Re:Integration by magetoo · · Score: 1

      So when a thousand geeks unexpectedly show up, that means you've been slashmobbed?

    14. Re:Integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only program that really does this is evolution (and of course Outlook).
      Notes does it too.

      Although why people insist on combined calendar and e-mail is still beyond me. You might just as well say you want combined binder clips and flashlights.

  9. link by joe+155 · · Score: 1

    fix the link to google calender, its calendar.google.com

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
  10. Discretion by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I prefer a 3-tier calendar, with standard presentation protocols in the UI layer (iCal, vCal, etc), arbitrary logic in the logic layer, and any storage server I want in the storage layer (RDBMS, filesystem, etc). Each in a separate component, with standard interfaces. I like Open-Xchange, open source, Java, Postgres, many APIs. But even OX has problems, like a contacts DB ghettoized in a separate BerkeleyDB storage layer for its OpenLDAP server, rather than storing it in the same Postgres. All these apps should have completely discrete components, with minimum functional redundancy, and easily addable objects (in Java, Perl, C/C++, whatever) that can access every API and dataflow. Since there are so many calendar clients, calendaring needs that utility the most.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Discretion by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Informative

      Moderation -1
          100% Troll

      Pathetic TrollMod is a SlashStalker. Surely some fool who couldn't keep up after posting something stupid in some unrelated thread, now anonymously suppressing my posts. How sad.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Discretion by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      A pity metamod is screwed up. Otherwise those SlashStalkers would never get modpoints again.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Discretion by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at least with your comment I know that they and I are not the only ones reading my whining about TrollModdery :).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  11. I was using Google's until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I discovered some of the months have an extra day! Yes, 31 days! And February only has 28, except for (strangely) some years when it has 29! Sloppy coding on Google's part.

  12. None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Shayde · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been hammering through this problem for the last 5 years, trying to find a group scheduling and calendaring application that has the capabilities of Exchange. It's important to note that there is a big difference between 'calendaring' apps (such as 30boxes and Yahoo Calendar and the like), and 'scheduling', where an interactive application can review a persons or groups schedule, and then add things to their calendar.

    As far as I've been able to tell, nothing does the group scheduling other than Exchange in any decent form. The best most can do is publish ICS files into a public server, and then make them available for public browsing (say, via phpicalendar), or available for remote subscription (which Evolution, et al supports).

    The golden calf for opensource would be an application that supports client-server group calendaring and scheduling, with PDA synchronizing, and multi-platform support. The only thing even remotely moving in this direction is CalDAV, which AFAICT, is moving at a glacial pace.

    Until this problem is resolved, there is no defense against "Why don't we just use Exchange for this?"

    --
    Event Management Solutions : http://www.stonekeep.com/
    1. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Dibble203 · · Score: 1

      I've found that using Kontact, you can use group scheduling without an exchange server. It just sends emails for any of the changes made to the event.

    2. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Does Kontact support free-busy sharing? Outlook/Exchange does and Outlook will also publish free-busy times to a WebDAV server without an Exchange server. Free-busy sharing lets you say "I want to meet with John, Mike, and Mary... when are they all free tomorrow?"

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Airset does most of this. http://www.airset.com/

    4. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      It's important to note that there is a big difference between 'calendaring' apps (such as 30boxes and Yahoo Calendar and the like), and 'scheduling', where an interactive application can review a persons or groups schedule, and then add things to their calendar.

      Why in the heck would I want someone to be able to add a meeting to MY calendar? What, you just come in one day and your day's calendar is automatically populated by luser managers who decide they want you to attend a bunch of worthless meetings? How useless is that? These are the same assholes who set a message's request-read-receipt flag expecting your mail client to send them some kind of acknowledgement that you read it. Sheesh.

    5. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by daffmeister · · Score: 1

      Agreed. We've got two core requirements for our calendar app: integration with email and pda sync. Oh, and Windows support; make that three.

      Email integration means sending meeting invites that you can accept or decline from within the mail client, and if accepting it automatically gets added to your calendar.

      Free/busy scheduling would be nice too.

      I've tried Sunbird/Lightning and Evolution in earnest and found them both pretty clunky in this regard. Evolution was a lot slower generally (connecting to an Exchange Server) than I expected so maybe I had some setting incorrect. It would lock up on a regular basis. Something I can't tell my CEO to put up with.

      I run a linux desktop in a mostly Windows shop so a non-Outlook/Exchange solution would be a godsend to me but I don't think it exists. Right now I keep a WinXP laptop on my desk just for this purpose.

    6. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      As far as I've been able to tell, nothing does the group scheduling other than Exchange in any decent form.

      Exchange doesn't do it so great either.

      But, ever hear of Novell Groupwise? It's the feature-by-feature competitor to Exchange

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    7. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

      >> Why in the heck would I want someone to be able to add a meeting to MY calendar?

      I see your point, but consider how fun it would be to schedule the entire marketing department for prostate exams on April 1st. Including the women.

    8. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      What, you just come in one day and your day's calendar is automatically populated by luser managers who decide they want you to attend a bunch of worthless meetings?

      Yeah, the same luser managers who decide on what groupware package to standardize on...

      Seriously though, it isn't just luser managers. You need to sit down for 30 minutes to talk to 3 customers about your latest problem/issue/prototype/requirements/whatever. You could call them on the phone and leave voicemails asking for 3 suggested times to meet from each of them, and play phone-tag for 3 days. You could use a more limited free/busy publishing app and view their calendars and start searching for a time to meet. Or, you could use exchange and tell outlook to find the next time you and the three customers are free, and while it is at it could it check the conference rooms at the same time.

      In my experience the only folks who end up in meetings all day long are the managers. And really, the only meetings that tend to be wastes are standing meetings - if you are calling a meeting to deal with a particular issue then it often tends to be productive (unless you're one of those folks who calls meetings any time a trivial decision needs to be made).

      When I find a useless meeting on my calendar the next day, I just call the organizer on the phone and see if it can't be dealt with in 5 minutes. If the issue is serious then the meeting is probably worth attending.

    9. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by secolactico · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks for missing the point, and allowing me to bite on a troll.

      Most apps don't simply drop a sched in your calendar. What they do is simplify the process of finding non-conflicting schedules. If someone wants to meet with you, they'll send a request and the calendar app will find a time when everyone invited can attend. If it does, it will ask for confirmation and you can either re-schedule, accept or reject.

      Otherwise you would have to respond each request with a time when you are free, that might or might not conflict with somebody elses'.

      --
      No sig
    10. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Shayde · · Score: 1

      Kontact does this, however Kontact cannot in fact edit anyone elses calendar but your own. It can send out meeting updates, which the remote client needs to interpret as a schedule change (this is actually how Exchange works under the covers).

      I actually use Kontact for all my work, publishing an iCal ICS file up to a phpiCalendar server where my family and workmates can browse and see my schedule combined with others. However, the only one that can actually alter my calendar is me, so this comes under 'calendaring', rather than 'group scheduling.

      --
      Event Management Solutions : http://www.stonekeep.com/
    11. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Brice21 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is an alternative to Exchange, actually it is already used by 350.000 members in europe and accessilbe in the USA on http://www.office.com/. Developped since 1998 in Belgium this web application integrate webmail (with filters, fax/SMS integration), group calendaring (with killing features like display common available time slot in a group, full inviting system with response tracking, iCal export, SMS reminders, ...), document sharing (with webDAV access), address book (with PDF printing, group sharing of contact, vCard export, ...), todos, wikis, notes, chat, forum. Web interface, Pocket PC web interface, WAP interface, ... See http://www.contactoffice.com/ for more information. ContactOffice runs as an ASP with both free (limited) and subscription model (several plans). Jut try it ;-)

      --
      Brice Le Blevennec, Digerati
    12. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      There are some commercial apps that appear to come close, but it's clearly not a priority for the OSS folks. My guess on this is that few OSS-oriented folks actually work on internal infrastructure or talk to desktop users (unless they're trying to write a replacement desktop and are trying to sell the user on how much more productive they'll be when the krunkulator widget goes swizzle instead of wiggle).

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    13. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Take a look at Google Calendar ;). Short of PDA sync, it's got everything you're looking for (and is helping pave a way towards CalDAV becoming the acceptible calendaring standard).

      It's probably not up to snuff for you quite yet (as it was just released, and is technically still a beta), but given some time and some feature growth and likely Mail (OS X) won't be the only application Google has replaced for me.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    14. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by stompro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please take a look at www.scalix.com. It can fully replace exchange, it comes with a outlook connector, an evolution connector, and a pretty decent ajax web interface. The community edition supports unlimited email only users, and 25 full groupware users. The small business edition is under $1000. I have been playing with it for a week or two and it seems pretty nice. The small business edition can integrate with AD, so it seems like it is an answer to keeping Exchange out of the work place. Anyone else have any opinions about scalix?

    15. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by aisaac · · Score: 2, Informative

      What about Chandler? It seems largely to meet your criteria. It is multplatform. It includes individual and workgroup calendars that can be shared across platforms. It includes overlayed multiple calendars (crucial in my view, and poorly handled by Exchange) and manages a single event across calendars.

      There is also Scooby for sharing Chandler calendar information with others. But PDA synching is not yet available.

    16. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      The golden calf for opensource would be an application that supports client-server group calendaring and scheduling, with PDA synchronizing, and multi-platform support. The only thing even remotely moving in this direction is CalDAV, which AFAICT, is moving at a glacial pace.
      Did you look at OpenGroupware.org?
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    17. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by ldspartan · · Score: 1

      Where in Google Calendar is CalDAV (or even simple WebDAV) used/implemented?

      --
      Phil

    18. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like crap.

    19. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by tylersimon · · Score: 1

      Why restrict yourself to Scalix? If you want to use a Commercial product (yes I know Scalix offer a free version but it's pretty restrictive and if you want more then you have to pay big bucks) then there are plenty out there. We recently looked at quite a few - Scalix, Gordano, Kerio, Ipswitch etc and found that the Gordano product (http://www.gordano.com/ offered the best solution - great webmail calendaring, Outlook Sync, Apple iCal\Sunbird support, mobile access - all works neatly together, worth the extra over the others (cheaper than Scalix though). Scalix was nice and pretty but a nightmare to install and configure. Gordano was child's play.

    20. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 out of 5 Google fanboys agree: the feature you want will be added by the time the product in question comes out of beta. In the meantime, please be patient while Googlers work their magic.

    21. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by DieBase99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Outlook Connector is currently under development by a friend of mine... He recently got some corporation sponsorship so hopefully it will be completed soon...
      BUT IT'S PURPOSE IS TO EXACTLY SOLVE THIS PROBLEM.

      It connects into Outlook (via the Mapi protocol) and allows you to bypass an exchange server and instead use an open source linux solution. it is already in beta on sourceforge.net...

      SO IF ANY OF YOU WANT TO HELP... I AM SURE MY FRIEND WOULD APPRECIATE IT!!!

    22. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by swillden · · Score: 1

      There are some commercial apps that appear to come close, but it's clearly not a priority for the OSS folks. My guess on this is that few OSS-oriented folks actually work on internal infrastructure or talk to desktop users

      Kontact does it. At present it only replaces Outlook, not Exchange, but the job's half done. I'm pretty happy with how well Kontact works with Lotus Notes, also.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    23. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by gstone · · Score: 1

      As far as I've been able to tell, nothing does the group scheduling other than Exchange in any decent form.

      Meeting Maker can do group scheduling. It works quite well and there are clients available for Windows/Mac/Linux. When scheduling a group meeting, the client will render a parallel timeline of a given day for all participants, allowing you to choose the best time when everybody (or at least most people) are free. I'ts not free software (in any sense) though.

      On a larger scale, Oracle calendar also has group scheduling. (Its clients are also available on Win/Mac/Linux.)

    24. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by AaronLawrence · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uhm, except of course for Lotus Notes, Exchange's number 1 competitor in the enterprise.

      Admittedly, there is plenty to dislike about it, but Notes has been doing integrated, multi-user calendar+mail for years.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    25. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by enjar · · Score: 1

      Does Google Calendar let you keep your data inside your corporate network? I know my management would not be happy with not having the company's data under our firm control.

    26. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by stompro · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the tip, I will check it out.

    27. Re:None do what is required to displace Exchange. by cknudsen · · Score: 1
      What type of "group sheduling" features do you need. There are open source applications that already do this and have for some time. WebCalendar comes to mind...

      http://webcalendar.sourceforge.net/

      With WebCalendar, you can schedule events with multiple participants and it will do conflict checking to make sure everyone is available. PDA Sync is still lacking, but it is under development.

      Seems to me that you haven't looked very hard...

      --
      http://www.k5n.us
  13. Pencil and paper by schngrg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pencil and paper :-)

    1. Re:Pencil and paper by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You beat me to it...

      I just spent two weeks working and exploring in São Paulo, Brasil (my home is in Florida). I've never been to São Paulo before, and had a rather complex schedule of work and touristing, all managed with a couple of print-outs and old-fashion pen-and-paper notes. No PDA, no GPS, a borrowed cell phone just for emergencies, my laptop secured at the company offices. I did have a real (and decent quality) magentic compass in my watch, just to make certain I didn't get turned around.

      I never worried about finding an internet terminal, or having my tech stolen, or carrying flashy stuff to identify me as a "rich" American. No worries about batteries, either.

      I love my tech as much as the next geek, but I'm a believer in the right amount of tech for the job at hand. Sometimes, paper and pen are all that's needed, and the tech just gets cumbersome or disracting.

    2. Re:Pencil and paper by Takumi2501 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I've had three PDAs now. I've found them to be more time wasters than savers, especially when something breaks down.

      I now use pen and paper for scheduling.

      --
      Sent from my computer.
      Now GET OFF MY LAWN!
    3. Re:Pencil and paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm a recent MBA, and as such have gone through more meetings than I'd care to remember. Scheduling meetings with our advisors had been a monthly/bi-monthly thing, and it has been a nightmare. Imagine this: A group of eight busy MBA students with their own lifestyles (single, married, kids, divorced, full-time, part-time) with three advisors/professors (part-time, full-time).

      Requiring to find common schedules amongst all these people had been next to impossible because the professors refused to use the standard Mail/Calendar solution (Lotus Notes - which absolutely sucks in my opinion, but that's another post). We had to resort to paper and pencil and chasing each person and professor down to find a common time that would work.

      Technology's great but you MUST HAVE buy-in from all parties involved.

    4. Re:Pencil and paper by affenmann · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hipster PDA all the way!

    5. Re:Pencil and paper by SylvesterTheCat · · Score: 1

      Like you, I've traveled to places (within US and abroad) that I've never been before and I am in basic agreement with a lot of you wrote.

      Now, the comments...

      If you travel and use paper maps & printed directions, sometimes you can still look like a tourist because you are trying to make sense of where you are and where you intend to go. You may not attract the attention with "flashy stuff" but you still draw attention to yourself (pick pockets et al.) while you fumble with paper.

      My point is that regardless of where you go, when you are by yourself in a new place, you gotta take precautions. There is no technological solution to a crimal problem.

    6. Re:Pencil and paper by CyclistOne · · Score: 1

      "I love my tech as much as the next geek, but I'm a believer in the right amount of tech for the job at hand. Sometimes, paper and pen are all that's needed, and the tech just gets cumbersome or disracting."

      I completely agree. This is appropriate technology.

    7. Re:Pencil and paper by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      What would be cool is if we could add a gps to our mp3 player. So it looks like we're listening to music but what's really happening is that we're getting directions. :)

      sri

    8. Re:Pencil and paper by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      Depending on where you are, and how cool your MP3 player is, you might be shooting yourself in the foot :).

    9. Re:Pencil and paper by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      I did a quick google search and it looks promising, but does anyone know what kind of battery life I can expect?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  14. Outlook Web by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

    The original AJAX calendaring tool.

    1. Re:Outlook Web by mporcheron · · Score: 1

      orignal, maybe (i'm not sure on this) but let's face it, Google CL2 is free, MS Exchange Server is not.

    2. Re:Outlook Web by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Exchange Server has been released and is actively supported commercially; Google Calendar and Mail are both in beta and only GMail-for-domains offers support to corporate clients.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  15. Veiled ad for Kiko? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems so to me.

  16. Looking for a calendar component by osgeek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    While the calendar lovers are looking through this thread:

    Does anyone know of a free ajaxish calendaring component that I could plug into a web application that I'm developing? I need it to be able to schedule events in a fairly friendly way, but that's about it. So mostly I'm just looking for something that can give me some decent GUI -- display a given time period in month or week format, allow for some click-creating of new events, moving events with drag-n-drop, etc. I'll handle all the back end.

    All of the calendars posted in the original article are built into other heavyier web sites. Even the Sourceforge webcalendar is built on top of PHP, which makes it not useful for me.

    Thanks for any info

  17. I prefer reading /. articles.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that start with "As our 31337 /. r34d3Rz might know, Google's new XYZ service has caught quite some media attention, but what about the similar services from ABC, DEF, GHI and so on?".

    Everything Google, or what???!!

    (seriously, stop that darn surreptitious advertising for http://www.google.com/ on /.)

  18. Outlook 2003 by 1up · · Score: 1

    Even though it has a terrible UI, I find that Outlook 2003 is the best calendar/task manager program I've ever worked with. You can do a lot with it if you know where to look. Plus, it syncs with my Palm, which is an absolute must for my needs. Yahoo! Calendars almost works, but not quite well enough. Besides, desktop apps are faster than AJAX, and you don't have to worry about the server being down when you need to check your schedule. I want to like 30boxes and Google Calendar, but they just aren't powerful enough for my needs.

  19. 30boxes!! by escay · · Score: 1
    The clear difference between 30boxes and most other calendars - including google calendar, kiko, calendarhub etc is Minimal Clutter. for once, there's an application that's more spartan in UI than google - and functionality is not sacrificed for brevity here - 30boxes has enough options to make it a very easy-and-intuitive-to-use calendar. it may not be as easily integrable as others (yet) but for a calendar that's supposed to be a calendar, it's a very good fit.

    Kiko is the only other app that's pretty good from this perspective - it has options to turn off the sidebars and such making it configurable to avoid clutter.

  20. Event calender for a small community by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

    Ah, and while we're at it, I'm looking for an event calender for a small group of people. Currently we're using yahoo groups, but it's calender has troubles with repeating events, randomly it sends or does not send the e-mails for these events, which is pretty disturbing.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    1. Re:Event calender for a small community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Take a look at this:

      http://www.skybuilders.com/timelines/

      They will host your calendar and integrate into
      their personal worldview of the way calendars
      should work.

    2. Re:Event calender for a small community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Check out Connect Daily.

      http://www.mhsoftware.com/

      You can install the software on your own server or sign up for the hosted version.

  21. The best one would be the one that: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    - works on my PC
    - works on my Phone
    - works from my USB stick
    - works from any webbrowser
    - works on a text console

    so front-end is irrelevant, as long as it can read and write iCal

    1. Re:The best one would be the one that: by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Get a PicoPad and put it in your wallet. Use the miniature pen and pad to manage your calendar. There's no battery to replace or costly per-kilobyte charge for data access, either :)

      --
      For more information, click here.
  22. The command line tool "remind" by Florian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...is seriously the best calendaring solution I have come across. It provides a mini languages for recording virtually every possible repetition and exception patterns of recurring appointments (next to storing unique appointments of course), prints out reminders or tabular calendars on the terminal or outputs nicely formatted postscript calendars. And all its functionality is packed into a lean 100k executable. If you don't like noting appointments in its markup language, you can use the program "wyrd" as an interactive, terminal-visual frontend. "remind" is a BSD program and part of all free BSD and Linux distributions. If you install it on a server, you use it via ssh. Implementing a web frontend should be trivial, too.

    --
    gopher://cramer.plaintext.cc http://cramer.plaintext.cc:70
    1. Re:The command line tool "remind" by __aaxwdb6741 · · Score: 1

      alive@m00h alive $ man remind
      No manual entry for remind
      alive@m00h alive $ remind
      bash: remind: command not found
      alive@m00h alive $ uname -a
      FreeBSD m00h.dienub.org 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
      alive@m00h alive $ whereis remind
      remind: /usr/ports/deskutils/remind
      alive@m00h alive $


      Hint: You have to install remind from ports before it's available.

    2. Re:The command line tool "remind" by garcia · · Score: 1

      gopher://cramer.plaintext.cc

      Yes, coming from the Slashdot user that still hosts a Gopher server... Why again should I use a "solution" that brings me back into the stone age? I'm sure that remind is fantastic (I would like to see GMail allow me to repeat on Mon/Wed only -- something that wasn't available as of Friday) but I'm sure it also includes archaic commands.

      Sorry but PS printing isn't something I need. Sync, group and web access, and sharing without extra coding is what I'm looking for.

    3. Re:The command line tool "remind" by mpecatam · · Score: 1

      Why again should I use a "solution" that brings me back into the stone age?

      "Because you're tired of waiting for your bloated calendar program to start up."

      http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~pelzlpj/wyrd/

    4. Re:The command line tool "remind" by wodgy7 · · Score: 1

      For OS X users, there's also a Dashboard widget for Remind: http://nick.vargish.org/software/remindwidget/

    5. Re:The command line tool "remind" by snarkh · · Score: 1


      You can repeat an event on any days you like -- click on the event and on its time and use the ckeckboxes.

    6. Re:The command line tool "remind" by hepwori · · Score: 1
      I would like to see GMail allow me to repeat on Mon/Wed only -- something that wasn't available as of Friday

      You can do this on Google Calendar. Select using the dropdown to repeat "Every week" and then check the checkboxes for Monday and Wednesday.

    7. Re:The command line tool "remind" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another vote for remind. There are a number of scheduling tasks that simply cannot be done with other applications. It can output html (thanks to rem2html) and on OS X you can pipe messages through growl. I ended up using remind because the GUI and web alternatives just didn't work well enough for me.

  23. One more time, but with linebreaks! by 1up · · Score: 1

    Even though it has a terrible UI, I find that Outlook 2003 is the best calendar/task manager program I've ever worked with. You can do a lot with it if you know where to look.

    Plus, it syncs with my Palm, which is an absolute must for my needs. Yahoo! Calendars almost works, but not quite well enough.

    Besides, desktop apps are faster than AJAX, and you don't have to worry about the server being down when you need to check your schedule. I want to like 30boxes and Google Calendar, but they just aren't powerful enough for my needs.

    1. Re:One more time, but with linebreaks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't think people are capable of reading 6 consective sentences?

  24. None by Crouty · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Which do you prefer?
    None of them. Calendar entries are by definition personal and I do not trust any company enough, especially ones that offer the service without charge. It would be different if calendar entries were stored in encrypted form (which would require a client, but that could be done with JavaScript, too). Before you call me paranoid: Personal user data gets abused a lot and besides I really have done well without an online calendar until now, so there is no real need to use one for me.
    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
    1. Re:None by cgenman · · Score: 0, Troll

      besides I really have done well without an online calendar until now, so there is no real need to use one for me.

      "My business has run fine for generations without a computer, so there is no real need for us to have one."

      Sometime in the not-too-distant future you're going to discover why people have sharable calendars. And then you're going to wonder how anyone managed to schedule anything without them.

    2. Re:None by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      I agree 110%. It shocks me how willing people are to give up their personal information. These companies can keep your information indefinitely. The government can get at it as well. Sorry, but you have to be either a moron or or completely clueless about information to buy into any of these online calendars. The same goes for online disk space, etc. There's lots of things I will never send via email because I assume anything I send with it is definitely going to be read by others. People reading this would do wise to think of it the same way.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    3. Re:None by Crouty · · Score: 1
      Sometime in the not-too-distant future you're going to discover why people have sharable calendars.
      Oh I do already, but I would not benefit from having one today.

      But the real point is: if I did benefit from having a sharable calendar, I would still not entrust this data to any John Doe. I would setup my own online calendar. Ad-free, spyware-free, free of charge (already have web space), flexible.

      --
      On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
  25. Outlook by wasabii · · Score: 1

    Outlook

    This AJAX stuff sucks.

    1. Re:Outlook by A10n · · Score: 1

      LOL

      You must be sarcastic... :)

      I have used windows since 3.1 ... and never used outlook for anything.

      Googles cal system seems to be nice, yahoo hasn't adopted ajax yet and their pages are always slow and annoying to click on. 30boxes look nice a swell.

  26. Gregorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not the best but we are pretty much stuck with it in the western world. And its much more accurate than the lunar based calendars like the Islamic and Jewish ones.

  27. or any other not needing adjustment by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    The chinese calendar or other lunar calendar needs no adjustment like our stupid one

    1. Re:or any other not needing adjustment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about UNIX time?

    2. Re:or any other not needing adjustment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the three natural examples of timekeeping we have (the day, the year, and the lunar month) do not add up in easily divisible bits, any calendar is going to either need adjustments or put up with drift. The only thing stupid about our calendar is February having only 28 days while other months have 31. (Why not just 5 months of 31 and 7 of 30?)

  28. One that syncs with my phone by hattig · · Score: 1

    My phone is the device I'll have on me all the time, so it is important that I can get the calendar onto the phone (Symbian based).

    Typically this means I enter the details onto the phone, because it's nigh on impossible to sync this phone with my Mac, where I would use iCal (the application, not the protocol) to manage things. Maybe if there was a way to sync the phone over a web connection with any of the online calendaring services ...

    Generally though I try and remember the important stuff myself.

    Of the web services I've used, none are that good. Google Calendar is very beta. Yahoo!'s is rather basic although I haven't used it recently. None of them really integrate with the other services offered either. It'll probably be a couple of years before any of the companies turns their email + calendar + groups offerings into an integrated web interface.

  29. Flying Spagetti Monster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Holy Day Calender - when is it coming out?

    Isn't today the Chianti and Chocolate Rabbit Day?

  30. Incompatible calendars by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My opinion is that it doesn't much matter which calendar you you. I've tried a bunch of them (Google Calendar, Palm Desktop, Sunbird, Outlook, Lotus Notes, Groupwise, Plaxo, etc...) and the problem isn't typically with a given calendar's capabilities. The problem is that they don't work with each other, especially if you want to use a PDA. Palm Desktop is incompatible with Outlook which is incompatible with Sunbird, etc... Most third party software seems to be written with Outlook/Exchange in mind. iCal is a nice "standard" but it has a minority of marketshare and hence doesn't get enough developer attention. Furthermore, MS isn't about to open up Outlook or Exchange to help matters. Your employer problably uses a different calendar than mine which makes life difficult if you are a consultant or simply have chosen a different calendar for your own use than your company's standard.

    I have a Palm Tungsten T3 but it's not very useful because I have to maintain 2-3 incompatible calendars to keep it useful. Import/Export is simply not a solution unless you are changing calendars and dumping the old one. Google Calendar is nice but it doesn't efficiently exchange data with my desktop calendar, work calendar and pda. It's got potential but but we'll see where it goes. Few/none of the calendar makers have shown any inclination to work together so far (customer lock in and all that) so I'm not optimistic.

    1. Re:Incompatible calendars by Brice21 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I suggest your try http://www.contactoffice.com/ as it is a web application suite featuring calendar, address books, webmail, document, tasks, wiki, etc. It has a UNIQUE FEATURE : a synchronisation software companion that sync it with both Outlook / Exchange and Palm. Here is the full list it support : Outlook (97, 98, 2000, 2002/XP, 2003, Express), Pocket PC via Outlook, Casio Cassiopeia Series via Outlook, Compaq iPaq via Outlook, Dell Axim via Outlook, Handspring Visor, IBM WorkPad, HP Jornada Series via Outlook, Palm (III, V, Zire, Tungsten), Sony (Clié, PEG-300), Palm Desktop (until 4.1.2), Lotus Organizer (5.0, 6.0), Windows Address Book - WAB, Windows CE via Outlook, Windows CE via Schedule+, Microsoft Schedule+ (7.0a, 7.5), Audiovox Thera via Outlook, Fujitsu Pocket Look via Outlook, HP H5450 via Outlook, HP H5450 via Outlook, Qualcomm PDQ 800 Smartphone, Qualcomm PDQ 1900 Smartphone, Symbol SPT 1500, Symbol SPT 1700, Toshiba E330 via Outlook, Toshiba E350 via Outlook, Toshiba E740 BT via Outlook, Toshiba E759 Wifi via Outlook... and many more devices.

      --
      Brice Le Blevennec, Digerati
    2. Re:Incompatible calendars by mbowen · · Score: 1

      Airset handles the incompatibility problem. There is a synch tool that allows it to talk to Outlook and you can export everything into ics. I'll be using it until Google or somebody else specifically implements a palm synch.

      --
      fault-tolerant
    3. Re:Incompatible calendars by Sarbandia · · Score: 1

      Kiko is hard at work on synch. It's a very high priority to us, and hopefully it will be available soon.

    4. Re:Incompatible calendars by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      "MS isn't about to open up Outlook or Exchange" ???

      On the contrary, Outlook+Exchange are pretty much entirely open. They're documented thoroughly in the book "Inside MAPI" and at msdn.microsoft.com.

      MAPI exposes the generic interface between stores/services (e.g. Exchange, Personal Folders, local calendar) and client (e.g. Outlook). It encourages you to write your own rival stores and your own rival clients. Why has no one done this so far? -- presumably because rival clients would reinforce Exchange's hegemony. although lots of companies write their own rival stores related to their own business processes.

      MAPI lets you write any client (as an alternative to Outlook) which interacts with your existing message+calendar+etc stores/services, and it lets you write any store/service (as an alternative to Exchange and Personal Folders) which interacts with Outlook and any other client.

  31. nonAjaxPostItLowTech by sammyo · · Score: 1

    For that really important appointment, a yellow sitcker on the edge of the monitor saves the day.

  32. yea by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    i personally like my Sports Illustrated calendar

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  33. Um.. by iamdead · · Score: 1

    Actually it's http://calendar.google.com/ :) If you insert just "calendar.google.com" into the anchor tag, then you'll end up with current URL...

  34. Airset by ScottyH · · Score: 1

    I've been playing around with Airset lately, and it's not bad.

    http://www.airset.com/

    1. Re:Airset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AirSet has always had the one feature everyone seems to be clamoring for: automatic synchronization with Outlook, Palm, and cell phones. It works great, and has allowed me to coordinate my various calendars (work, personal, groups) and take them with me.

  35. My PDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Works everywhere without needing to find a hot spot. Gives me notifications when things are due. Integrates with contacts.

  36. AJAX=Bending over backwards by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

    To me AJAX is just bending over backwards to make a broken architecture seem a little less broken.

    It staggers me as to how people can think this stuff is so wonderful. AJAX is the embodiment of everything thats wrong with HTML as an application development medium. It's basically architecture overkill to accomplish the most rudimentary functionality for a more traditional native client side application.

    Is this really the way of the future ?! Enourmous amounts of client side javascript, overcomplicated html ? Why ? Just so we can browse to it over the web ? Surely there are better ways.

    1. Re:AJAX=Bending over backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who refuses to run remote scripts or bytecode I agree. Browser extensions I wouldn't have a problem with so long as I could audit or recompile them. That breaks down because there is no consistant extension mechanism accross UA's. If forward-thinking companies were prepared to release just web service API's and let user communities build the extensions, it may be possible.

    2. Re:AJAX=Bending over backwards by SwashbucklingCowboy · · Score: 1
      To an extent I agree with you, however consider the following:

      • The browser is the only application platform that is ubiquitous. (One can argue that Flash, via the browser, also is ubiquitous.)
      • The browser enables easy server side installation of an application.
      • The browser thus does not require an explicit client side installation of an application.

      The above is very compelling for users. Thus, improving the user experience in that environment is also compelling.

    3. Re:AJAX=Bending over backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're stupid. You won't run remote scripts, but you'd run downloadable programs?

      This is all an issue of trust. If you trust the server giving you the remote scripts and bytecode, you should have no qualms running it. You can authenticate that the server is one you trust by SSL or signed bytecode.

    4. Re:AJAX=Bending over backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. I'm amazed that people don't realize this by now. Pretty much every ERP, CRM, collaboration, etc. app was webified years ago. MickDownUnder never stopped to think why this had happened?

    5. Re:AJAX=Bending over backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're stupid.
      Why are you calling people who are aware of the security implications of executing remote code 'stupid'? What makes you think corporations are deserving of trust? What makes you think that the presence of an SSL cert and issuing CA has anything to do with trust?

      The user is the arbiter of what runs on their machine, and under what permissions and terms that software runs. For the moment a small percentage of users are trusting enough to use javascript and flash powered web applications. Not being one of the blind faithful does not make anybody 'stupid'!

    6. Re:AJAX=Bending over backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're stupid. You have not explained how running downloadable executables is any better than running javascript on websites. Moreover, you want to run browser extensions that have viewable source code when javascript is already viewable.

      You have no idea how trust works. When you run a program made by somebody else, you implicitly trust that other person to have not given you malicious code. It does not matter whether that code is coming from a corporation or an individual, either way you're putting your trust in somebody else. The way you check that it's coming from somebody you trust is via cryptographic signatures.

      For the moment a small percentage of users are trusting enough to use javascript and flash powered web applications.

      A small percentage? You're living in la-la-land.
    7. Re:AJAX=Bending over backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're stupid. You have not explained how running downloadable executables is any better than running javascript on websites.
      Who mentioned downloadable executables?
      Moreover, you want to run browser extensions that have viewable source code when javascript is already viewable.
      WTF? Even if you audit a script, current UA's provide zero assurance that the script is not dynamically generated, thus causing the audited version in your cache to be overwritten on a subsequent request. That assurance is possible with code that is running from the users hard drive.
      You have no idea how trust works.

      Trust is that which you place in something with the power to break your security policy. If you disagree with my understanding, then I suggest you take it up with the NSA as it is also their understanding.
      When you run a program made by somebody else, you implicitly trust that other person to have not given you malicious code.

      You may, however, I most certainly do not.
      It does not matter whether that code is coming from a corporation or an individual, either way you're putting your trust in somebody else.

      In a discussion on trust it would do you well to treat organizations as a collection of individuals, none of whom should elicit trust by mere virtue of group membership.
      The way you check that it's coming from somebody you trust is via cryptographic signatures.
      See above, there is no such mechanism for javascript, SSL only ensures that the data has not been modified in transit. Furthermore, whilst a user may trust that a package has been signed and placed into distribution by a given keyholder, that should not be taken to imply the contents of said package are believed to be non-malicious.
      A small percentage? You're living in la-la-land.

      You should purchase a ticket, we're malware free over here.

    8. Re:AJAX=Bending over backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who mentioned downloadable executables?

      I did. Downloaded executables have even worse security implications than downloaded javascript, yet you're fine with them.
      WTF? Even if you audit a script, current UA's provide zero assurance that the script is not dynamically generated, thus causing the audited version in your cache to be overwritten on a subsequent request. That assurance is possible with code that is running from the users hard drive.

      View the web app from your cache if you're so paranoid that you audit every single application that you run. Outside of la-la-land, that is not possible, so you have to place your trust in other software makers. You verify that software is coming from somebody you trust by checking signatures.
      When you run a program made by somebody else, you implicitly trust that other person to have not given you malicious code.
      You may, however I do not.

      So you run code that you do not trust. And you say you're malware free?
      In a discussion on trust it would do you well to treat organizations as a collection of individuals, none of whom should elicit trust by mere virtue of group membership.

      You're going off on some stupid tangent that has nothing to do with the argument.
      See above, there is no such mechanism for javascript, SSL only ensures that the data has not been modified in transit. Furthermore, whilst a user may trust that a package has been signed and placed into distribution by a given keyholder, that should not be taken to imply the contents of said package are believed to be non-malicious.

      SSL ensures that the information you send and receive is coming from and going to the person who owns the certificate. Furthermore, you still don't understand what trust means. It means you believe software from a particular person is safe. All that's left is to show that some particular software is from one of those people. You can do that with SSL.
      You should purchase a ticket, we're malware free over here.

      And software free!
  37. open-xchange.org by houghi · · Score: 2, Informative

    open-xchange.org

    Open-Xchange(TM) is an collaboration and integration server enviroment with a continuous right management for modules and objects. The product is based on existing components like a web server, mail server, directory server, database ...

    There are several interfaces (like WebDAV/XML interfaces) coming along with this software.
    Try it out on http://mirror.open-xchange.org/ox/EN/community/onl ine.htm

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:open-xchange.org by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      But can I sync my Windows Mobile Phone with it?

    2. Re:open-xchange.org by thehunger · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. Open-Xchange can synchronize with any SyncML device via an extension called OXtender for SyncML. Similar extensions are bundled for PalmPilots and Windows CE devices.

  38. Offline, with network sync back home. by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That way im not tied to any 'service' being up and alive, be it pay or free.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  39. Gregorian by phatslug · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well I currently use the Gregorian which seems to be the standard. Anyone care to comment on better options (if there are any)?

  40. What I'd REALLY prefer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be a simple calendar with ical/webdav/caldav-syncing on desktop mozilla sunbird / calendar plugin and syncml-syncing to my syncml-capable cellphone. Would there happen to be an open-source solution to that? (No, calling open-xchange simple is an insult to us all simpletons.)

  41. Supplementary question by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know a good server based calendar solution that works with smart phones as well as regular computers.

    Synchonization is an ugly hack that needs to be retired. It makes shared calendars almost impossible.

    Yahoo! is the best option I have found to date, that has a useable smart phone option. They at least provide a WAP interface. Overall, though, I am still looking for something better.

    I really like the concepts and general UI in the Google Calendar but, until they have a WAP interface or similar, it does not fit the bill. The same goes for 30boxes and some other promising solutions.

    1. Re:Supplementary question by Brice21 · · Score: 0, Troll

      http://www.contactoffice.com/ has a Web interface AND a Wap interface for access by your mobile phone AND a Pocket Internet explorer interface if your phone or PDA runs Windows Mobile edition. Just try it, there is a free version. See the full list here : http://www.contactoffice.com/description/solutions /index.jsp?menu=Solutions&item=Mobility&locale=en_ UK

      --
      Brice Le Blevennec, Digerati
  42. I'll love the one that sync with my palm by fasuin · · Score: 1

    So far, the only one that allows to sync my Palm Calendar is airset (http://www.airset.com/). That's the only I love :-)

    1. Re:I'll love the one that sync with my palm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a Mac, iCal works great. It uses iSync to sync with Palms. That's my setup, and it does a really good job.

  43. It Just Doesn't Matter by InsurgentGeek · · Score: 1

    Beta is better than VHS. Steam was, at one point, better than internal combustion. Notes is better than Exchange. Better and who's going to win are two very very different questions. In a world (calendaring) where interoperability and volume will take the day - where all know whwre this one is going.

    1. Re:It Just Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notes better than Exchange??? It's more bloated, harder to understand, uglier, and buggier.

      Now the guy who created Notes is in charge of software at Microsoft, and he's a bigger asshole than Balmer. (But not as loud.)

  44. features I'm looking for by Marsmensch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I want on my webcalendar:

    1. Perfect compatibility on any browser.
    2. A TO-DO list. I'm amazed by how many webcalendars don't have such a feature.
    3. I would really like to see a mature open source app come out that can run on my own server.
    4. I want problem free syncing to any palm or pocket pc device.
    5. Encryption would be really nice.

    If anyone knows of a solution out there that fits my needs, let me know. If any developpers are reading this, please take note.

    --
    Slashdot: news from nerds.
    1. Re:features I'm looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might want to check out zimbra even if they dont have everything now its all on their to-do list

    2. Re:features I'm looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I do consulting work on a week-by-week basis for a half-dozen different clients. I want each of them to know when I've got work "pending" or "confirmed", but not the name of the company. But each client should be able to see the full details for the bookings that apply to that particular client.

      GoogleCalendar seems to be the closest so far. I can create multiple calendars, one for each client. When I view the "private" calendar, I see a single view that contains all bookings. This is necessary so that I know which weeks are available. The problem is what the clients see: I can give them public access to the same calendar, but they won't see their own details. :( I'm thinking I will need to create a web page that grabs the XML from Google and creates a combined calendar that shows details for the current client and generic available/pending/confirmed data for everyone else...

  45. Skybuilders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not ajax compliant (yea, maybe a good thing) but take a test drive
    of this one:

    http://www.skybuilders.com/timelines/

  46. PocketPC Calendar by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Yes, cat ate my tongue, "comments.pl"

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  47. like there's a difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hard to tell if there's a real difference between any of them. i am switching to google's version because it integrates with my gmail account. but the rest look great, however it's hard to tell, apart from eyecandy, how they're substantially different. it's a calendar for god's sake!

  48. Um, duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  49. Undecided :P by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back when my PocketPCs still worked, I'd use Outlook 2002 (or was it 2000?). I liked being able to print out a one-page monthly calendar for my luddite friends. However; I didn't like the lack of control over "hiding" (rather, not hiding) personal or non-important events.

    Since my PocketPCs cacked out (the batteries would run out because I primarily used my laptop), I started relying on my previously-misused brain, and countless miscellaneous pieces of scrap paper ("lists") that I kept in my pockets. Now I rely on my cell phone. I may have also used my laptop, but it is now non-mobile.

    What I like about my cellphone is that it comes with me everywhere, it is always charged up. However, I like my cell phones to be cell phones, not cameras, video players, or any of that other crap (actually, it does have a flashlight, but I had to transfer all data from my old cell phone to it manually). So the calendar function on my Nokia is limited, and I can only view events one day at a time. However, I know it's always nearby, so I don't have to be at a computer to put something in. Also, I know it will remind me of important events; the PocketPCs were picky when it came to whether they would automatically turn on to remind me of something.

    However, I'll be checking out the Google calendar.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  50. Get with the program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    • PINE, mutt or gnus are the only email clients worth considering.
    • Gopherspace is cool.
    • cal, vi, cron, curl/wget and a httpd give a competent user sync, sharing, group and web access.


    Sounds to me like your problem is; you can't be bothered learing how to use a computer.

    1. Re:Get with the program by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      cal, vi, cron, curl/wget and a httpd give a competent user sync, sharing, group and web access.

      Sounds to me like your problem is; you can't be bothered learing how to use a computer.


      And a hack saw provides all the functionality of a band saw.

      Need to get from New York to Paris? Ocean liner works just fine. It also has much higher baggage limits than those new-fangled jets.

      And who needs gcc? Last time I checked the Athlon/Pentium opcode tables were published standards. Compilers are just for people too stupid to figure out how to follow the instruction pointer...

  51. Spongecell's got read/write API and iPod sync by marcgul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spongecell is the only calendar that has a read/write API http://spongecell.com/api_info/ and an iPod sync tool http://spongecell.com/info/ipod_sync/. Spongecell's Natural Language engine has fared very well in shootouts against 30 boxes, GCal and Kiko.

  52. Alternative to On-line Calendars: Portable Sunbird by meckardt · · Score: 1

    The major problem that I have with one of the on-line calendars is that your information is stored on someone else's server. Although it is unlikely that anyone would use this information, the potential is there. Not that I'm worried if someone finds out that I'm going to a baseball game next week, but the principal of the thing; I don't want anyone... not some hacker, and not the government... having access to my schedule.

    Instead, I am using Portable Sunbird (Portable Sunbird) on a UBS Drive that goes everywhere I do. I plug the drive into any UBS port, and have instant access to my calendar (not to mention Email and Browser Bookmarks using Portable Thunderbird and Portable Firefox)... all without leaving my personal information on the computer I am using at the time.

  53. Infidel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will all be killed by the will of all merciful Allah.

  54. Don't need one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My schedule isn't busy enough to require one. Either that or my memory is really good.

  55. Agreed. by gumpish · · Score: 1

    My office has been using MeetingMaker, but PeopleCube refuses to sell us more seats unless we buy the new version of the product along with maintenance. So in all likelihood we'll be migrating to Exchange later this year.

    It's really a shame that the FOSS community hasn't offered any viable alternatives - it doesn't seem like such an incredible task to get the most basic scheduling functionality. I'd make a feeble attempt at building the whole thing myself if I had the time...

    1. Re:Agreed. by pivo · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at http://www.zimbra.com?

    2. Re:Agreed. by rm69990 · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Agreed. by flakier · · Score: 1

      Promising, but performance is very, no unuseably slow.

      --
      --
  56. definitely by schmu_20mol · · Score: 1

    kiko ... nuff said =)

    --
    "Nae Kin! Nae Quin! Nae laird! Nae master! We willna be fooled again!"
  57. comparison site?? by marcjw · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if there exists a site which would provide a fairly comprehensive comparison of calendaring / groupware / collaboration software such as http://www.cmsmatrix.org/ provides for CMS solutions?

    --
    . Ergo sum cogito - Yoda
  58. ReminderFox by N8F8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I just caught onto ReminderFox.
    • Integrates into Firefox browser
    • Handles one-time and recurring events
    • Stores data in open standard formats
    • Can be configured to store data file on FTP or WebDAV site for sharing and remote backup.
    • Does Reminders (Events) and ToDos
    • Is FREE and Open Source
    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  59. try a Kiko account by rmm4pi8 · · Score: 1

    Really. We don't yet have real groupware features, like shared calendars for resources, though we're working on those. But if you create a calendar for your group, we give you multiple ways to get it onto your users' calendars. If they use Kiko, any invitations sent out will automatically appear on their calendars, but even if they aren't Kiko users they'll still get invitations via email and be able to view an RSS feed. And our email/reminder send is now very stable. So try it out, and if you think there's a missing feature, let us know and we'll add it.

    --
    U.S. War Crimes blog. Email for free Mandriva support.
    1. Re:try a Kiko account by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      ok, this one looks pretty nice, seems to do what I want without overdoing it. Does it cost money? If not, how do you plan to generate revenue :)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:try a Kiko account by rmm4pi8 · · Score: 1

      The web component of Kiko is completely free, and will stay that way. We're currently developing Outlook/mobile phone sync, which we'll probably charge for, and also a number of companies have expressed interest in licensing Kiko for internal use. But remember that we only have four full-time employees, so we don't need to rake in revenue the way a highly-capitalized service like Trumba or 30boxes does. Do let us know, by the way, if there are any other features you need, and we'll do our best to integrate them.

      --
      U.S. War Crimes blog. Email for free Mandriva support.
    3. Re:try a Kiko account by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      ok, well, one request to add this answer to your FAQ, people want to know that this service is viable (has a long-term plan) and that they won't be bothered with lots of spam/advertizements at some point.

      other feature requests are in your feedback inbox... ;)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    4. Re:try a Kiko account by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      Buy the way, did you just in the current month join the kiko team, or were you just not saying everything in your posts on google calendar:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=182944&cid=151 25569

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=182944&cid=151 25461

      You seem to be talking in the "they" form there, while here you switched to the "we" form. It's not bad to plug something you're proud of as long as you're honest about it and warning everyone that you're doing it (as in "disclaimer: I work on this"). However, if you plug something without showing your involvement in it, it's just plain spamming, and most people will tell you to screw yourself when they've found out, even when you're actually offering something good. Just warning you here.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  60. The Real Reason I WANT To use Google Calenders by Justifiable_Delusion · · Score: 1

    Eventually Google will tie everything together. This is going to be a singlke logon uber platform where everything (for the most part hopefully) can be done from my Google logon and the knwoledge of who I am will be properly pieced and known and I will be added to the greater world of who we are.They talk about the online OS. I am nearing it myself. i have a few programs on my computer that I use completely removed from the internet...and then there is my personal document collection, my warez, and all the digital media...I think we will always have some sort of personal hand held storage (all our lives on a holographic cube that only works when our fresh DNA is there...sigh)...but I think we will also operate a lot more online.

    I want to contribute to the great mind that is being created within all of Googles computer. Maybe some rogue hacker who has created the virus of sentient life in computers will hacks google systems through some sickeningly simple but plentiful way of spreading. And then...just maybe... a benevolent computer god will rule the masses into a mathematical utopia of scientific and human renasaince...till some fucker trips the plug and we start killing each other again.

    --
    Mad, adj : Affected with a high degree of intellectual independence. Ambrose Bierce - The Deveil's Dictionsary
    1. Re:The Real Reason I WANT To use Google Calenders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone mod this guy insightfully funny !

  61. Horde by rarwes · · Score: 1

    I am looking for a solution that has all information that I want in one place.
    - Todo list
    - contacts
    - calendar
    - interface to an imap server
    - RSS feedreader

    Syncing to a phone or whatever should be possible.
    I don't trust free services so I want to have this on my own server.

    Currently, I am looking at Horde http://www.horde.org/ which has all applications that I want. I had a few problems getting it to work (Javascript errors in the Administrators account) but it looks promising

  62. Re:Integration: Airset by midtoad · · Score: 1

    Try Airset - it syncs your Outlook calender to its web calendar so you don't have to do so manually.

    --
    - midtoad
    Umwelt schützen, Fahrrad benützen
  63. A dot com Déjà Vu? by nektra · · Score: 1

    It's incredible how a lot of companies are going behind a very simple piece of software like it were gold, for Google and Yahoo is an understanable integration but some are full based commercially on these calendar applications.

    Just wait some months to see something better on SourceForge for general and private consumption.

    Vote for Ajax as the buzzword of the year, and don't forget beyond all these buzzwords powered companies what you see are just Turing machines :-)

  64. Why would we want a clone of Exchange? by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Think outside the box. Calendars, email, etc. are useful tools, but it'd be a mistake to try to do everything exactly the way Microsoft does. For an alternative approach, you might want to try Citadel instead. Open source, AJAX-enabled, and talks to lots of client packages out there. And it doesn't try to be a clone of Microsoft's offering -- instead, it starts with the approach of helping your user community to work/play/quack *as* a user community instead of as a bunch of disparate users who happen to be occasionally sending data back and forth. Give it a try.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  65. multi-user calendars- thoughts/experience by Not+Public · · Score: 1

    ok, first of all, the original post din't specify a "web" solution, or even that it be multi user or what os it was on....

    so to that end, I live and die by broderbund/riverdeep's Calendar Creator at work. have for at least five year now.
    the plus side: flexible recurring events, multi day events span the day cells in month view (simple, but rare and effective), integrated contacts/addressbook, supports mutliple views with different categories in different views, very flexible layout, cut/paste/drag/etc.. can print to pdf/image files.
    the negatives: windows only, doubtful if its really still being actively developed, I hate the publication/dev companies, no reminder system, not multi-user capable at all, no email integration, no scheduling/meeting/appointment invite system. kinda poor import/export.

    now, as to the various webscal options.
    yes, webcal by knudsen is probably the most well rounded and function standalone calendar... but as other posts have pointed out... it looks and feels "cludgy" ... and its not a all in one, single shot done deal kinda of package. it takes some tweaking.

    kiko - love it. recommend it. their "natural language" entry is cool. more flexible and accurate than googles. their developers are responsive and intelligent. lacks an integrated email system, but still has a functional invite/meeting system that doesn't force all you peers into the same mail sys. has reminders to email/sms/pop-ups. I like pretty much everything about it in fact. if only they can get that multiday spanning day cells in month view that Calendar Creator and Google have. otherwise, I really really like them.. my other request of them would to offer something like gmail's hosting of your domaim mail. so that again, you're not tied into moving all your calendaring peers to another system, just using your existant accounts. maybe just an imap/pop3 interface to any existant server, with some jscripting glitter and magic for calendaring interaction? I also have to mention that I like their addressbook. if onyl it were acessible to an email client. but i like how it doesn't force fields upon you, and it doesn't leave empty ones sitting there staring you in the face.. makes everything more condensed and pleasant to view.

    google calendar- also like it. it has all the normal google strengths, many of kikos. in fact, I'd probably be more infavor of gcal over kiko if i had met it first. but I'm not fond of its pretty much insisting that your calendaring peers also be gmail users. I'm torn as to what I think about the multi calendar interface. I like being able to divide up my life like that and haev separate public/private settings per calendar, but still, within each calendar (or across all of them) I'd still like some lable/tag/categories feature. and while they have the cell spanning feature for multiday events in month view... I big plus- its only for events that aren't using times. big downer. especially in week view, if the event goes from 3 to 4 for 3 days in a row.. why shouldn't that event entry span those dates in those times? I also have a beef with gcal's print output. nasty. I like the overlaying ajaxy events on the screen, why can't i have them in print? Why does everything print across two pages? why can't I click print, then select landscape and a single page? ... etc.. etc.. etc.. and for being a part of the "google goodness" with its simplicity over glitz... there are occasions where they may have gone to far.. at least in the config/settings area.

    big point of concern and contention with both kiko/gcal

    how are they going to make their money? as of my last use of gcal. didn't see any ads. kiko. no ads. yet. subscription for features? which features? how much? subscription for no ads? again, how much? its my one beef with all these "beta" programs.. they lure you in while things are sweet.. but then BAM, once you've invested your data and time into the software/package/service/whatever .. the

    1. Re:multi-user calendars- thoughts/experience by Sarbandia · · Score: 1

      It's all about keeping your burn rate down and getting users. If you must know how we plan to get money...either we'll add advertisments eventually (only nice contextual ones, we promise), or we'll start charging for a feature (only a new one - we won't take anything away from the free version).

  66. Zimbra by bigpicture · · Score: 1

    I didn't see Zimbra mentioned here, and it is possibly the best internet calendar that there presently is.

  67. I want a calendar with no boxes by Infonaut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I haven't explored all of the available calendars, but I've tried a few. My biggest problem with all of the ones I've tried thus far is that they try to replicate the 'boxes in a grid' design of paper calendars. I would prefer to see someone come up with a calendar that uses a list view, so I can always see by default a four-week view, with all of the dates laid out vertically.

    I would find it much more efficient to look at dates that are stacked vertically, so I can scroll up or scroll down through the year. Weeks could be delineated by simple horizontal lines, and months by lightly shaded background colors.

    Boxes truncate long words and are particularly inefficient for screen display, because the resolution of computer screens is so crappy compared to the resolution and flexibility of pen and paper. Providing a single long horizontal space for all the information relating to a day would be much more advantageous.

    Adding more and more features to a flawed paradigm is simply annoying to me. Give me a layout that works, before adding all kinds of Ajax. Think outside the box (sorry, I had to say it).

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by moochfish · · Score: 3, Informative

      See Google Calendar's Agenda view.

    2. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by Sarbandia · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have you tried kiko's upcoming view? It's exactly what you're asking for. As a Kiko developer, I made sure that we had a list.

    3. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I *love* the upcoming view. It's what I've been searching for in a calendar for years!

      Now, give me an application that will do this right on my desktop and be visible at all times (instead of requiring me to fire up a browser just to look at), and we'll talk.

    4. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is 2006 and we are saying wow a calendar app... have some vc money...

      How moronic is that.

    5. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by Infonaut · · Score: 1

      Have you tried kiko's upcoming view? It's exactly what you're asking for. As a Kiko developer, I made sure that we had a list.

      Nice. I just signed up for an account to see what you were talking about. I like the upcoming view, though I would also really enjoy it if the month view could be switched in prefs to the same kind of list view you use to show upcoming appointments.

      I understand that you can't please all the people all the time, and I know I'm probably in the minority in my annoyance with calendar boxes. I'm going to give Kiko a spin and see how it operates.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    6. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by Infonaut · · Score: 1

      See Google Calendar's Agenda view.

      This is nice, but as with kiko calendar, it only shows upcoming events. What I'd really like is a calendar app that allows me to switch the default box view to a list view, so I can see all the days in a month in one vertically-oriented view. I like being able to see upcoming events that way, but it would be really nice if I could see everything that way.

      I understand that the calendar grid is the accepted paradigm for displaying days, weeks, and months, but I am continually frustrated by it because I don't think it is really optimal for the horizontally-oriented, low-resolution screens we all use for these calendars.

      Something tells me I'm one of about five people in the world who feel this way.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    7. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Just found this dashboard widget. Now, to buy a Mac...

    8. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by rmm4pi8 · · Score: 1

      Glad to hear it. Do let us know if you have any bug reports or feature requests, and we'll do our best to address them.

      --
      U.S. War Crimes blog. Email for free Mandriva support.
    9. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by rmm4pi8 · · Score: 1

      Real question (and you're not the first person I've heard this kind of comment from about web apps):

      Why is leaving another program open all the time any different than just leaving a browser window open all the time? Especially because if you can install another program on your desktop, you can probably install Firefox, and then just leave Kiko open in a tab.

      I just really don't understand this complaint, despite it's frequency, and I'd be happy if you could explain it to me.

      --
      U.S. War Crimes blog. Email for free Mandriva support.
    10. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by moochfish · · Score: 1

      btw, google tends to be good about reading user feed back. perhaps you should try submitting your idea to them.

      http://www.google.com/support/calendar/bin/request .py?contact_type=suggestion&submit=Continue

    11. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just not the same. It would help if you could use the system tray to quickly check your calendar. For example, I love how easy it is to just double-click the time in Windows and a calendar instantly pops up - no waiting.

    12. Re:I want a calendar with no boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should fix your public demo so that users cn edit the calendar. I'd heard about it from Paul Graham's site, was interested to see what it could do, am looking for something like this, but was stopped by the lack of a usable demo.

      Firefox 1.0.7 on XP

  68. simpler calendar by robbywalker · · Score: 1

    I wanted something simple that would fit on a Google Personalized Home Page - so I wrote the Month-A-Majig

    It's doesn't have a lot of the advanced features of other calendars - but it also doesn't have the overhead. I've had a lot of positive feedback, and I'm always open to suggestions.

  69. Gmail integration by jdbartlett · · Score: 5, Informative
    Gmail does not integration (or I haven't figure out how to switch it on).
    I may be able to help you here! According to Gogle:
    Gmail Integration
    Gmail now recognizes when messages mention events, and you can add those events to your calendar with just a couple of clicks
    More here:
    Gmail integration
    Gmail now recognizes when messages mention events, so when you get emailed about an event, you can add it to Google Calendar with just a couple clicks. Look for the Google Calendar links on the right side of your Gmail window.
    It'd be neat if iCal/Apple Mail had a feature like Gcal's Gmail integration.
    1. Re:Gmail integration by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      PS: I uploaded a screenshot of this working: here ya go. Pretty slick, non?

    2. Re:Gmail integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think you forgot to include the full url for your link...

    3. Re:Gmail integration by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      I may be able to help you here! According to Gogle: ... Gmail now recognizes when messages mention events, and you can add those events to your calendar with just a couple of clicks

      Yeah, except it doesn't work. Or perhaps the calendar data that Gmail looks for is very specific. I can cetainly say that emails sent to my Gmail account that mention specific events *do not* have any link to add events to Google Calendar.

      A much better solution would have been to give the user the ability to add a calendar event via a dialogue box when reading *any* message in Gmail. That would be the only true way to have the two applications interacting. It's little bugs like this that make me think that the people who wrote the Gmail interface with Google Calendar don't actually *use* Google Calendar ... or maybe they don't use Gmail.

    4. Re:Gmail integration by jdbartlett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Works fine for me (and I actually got the image right this time!)

      You're probably right, though, their recognition criteria will probably become more elaborate as the service becomes more established.

    5. Re:Gmail integration by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      That's great - but why not allow the user to define their own appointments? Say you get a mail that says "I want a draft by the end of the month" or "in a week's time" ... Gmail doesn't seem to recognise these phrases as appointments, and that means the only way to mark that date in your schedule is to open up Google calendar and do it by hand - ie. you probably won't do it at all.

      My point was simply that they haven't thought about integrating the two applications, beyond a very, very cursory level. What they've managed to do is great for showing off, but is terrible for everyday use.

    6. Re:Gmail integration by thsths · · Score: 1

      > I may be able to help you here! According to Gogle:

      > Gmail Integration
      > Gmail now recognizes when messages mention events, and you can add those events to your calendar with just a couple of clicks

      Well, I can read, but I can also try it. And it most certainly does not work, or not in the cases that I have tried. Since they look like standard invitations from Outlook and evolution, this is rather surprising. It would have been the first thing I would test with the calender (hey, it was the first thing I did test!).

      So I can only conlude that Google Calender has not seen any serious testing. Welcome to the wonderful new world of Beta software that does not work[TM].

    7. Re:Gmail integration by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      Of course it's beta, Google and other freeware developers are appreciated for releasing beta products to the general public, but it does work, as this screenshot shows. A beta version is by definition a product in which some features are buggy or incomplete or even not implemented. This feature, however incomplete, does work, and I'm positive Google will continue to improve the criteria for automatically detecting appointments to add - it's not an easy thing to guess every way an appointment could be written. In the meantime it's good to see that functionality at all! I have to agree with you that it's slightly surprising it's able to pull apart an e-mail to find a date reference but doesn't yet work with Outlook appointments, but not every developer will think the same way. Also, we are the serious testing for this product, that's why it says 'beta'!

    8. Re:Gmail integration by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      You mean why not have a button in GMail that opens a textbox so you can type in a new calendar appointment in case it's not automatically recognized? I think that's a grand idea! Suggest it to Google! Do it! Now! Or else! This is the great thing about public betas.

    9. Re:Gmail integration by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      appreciated for releasing beta products

      The problem is that Google products never LEAVE beta. "Beta" has become internet slang for "If we stick this label on it, and leave it there forever, no one will ever give us crap when it screws up."

      -Eric (who has been using "Google Groups Beta" for about 5 years now)

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Gmail integration by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      Google Maps/Local left beta last October. Google News and Google Earth both left beta in January. Google Desktop left beta about this time last month.

      (etc.)

      Not sure what the deal is with Groups.

    11. Re:Gmail integration by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Google News and Google Earth both left beta in January.

      Someone better tell them to change their logo then.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:Gmail integration by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      Did you link to the wrong logo? That's the google Groups logo. Google News logo is here, Google Earth logo is here.

    13. Re:Gmail integration by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      That's not the one that show up on google groups for me.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:Gmail integration by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      That's because Google Groups is a different service. Google provides a number of services. Those mentioned in my earlier comment (plus several others) recently came out of 'beta' status. Several new features were added to Google Groups in Feb, but, unlike those services mentioned in my previous comment, it has not been officially released from 'beta' status. Google does release products from 'beta' when they are ready.

    15. Re:Gmail integration by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Oh, I've suggested it ... but that doesn't mean that they'll pay attention.

      I also suggested that the webclips interface (which as far as I know no one actually uses) could be used to alert you of your appointments - the next appointment is displayed across the top of your email, but you can use the arrow keys to scroll through them in order. Neat, huh? But I'll bet that never gets implemented ...

  70. Cat got your -1 Overrated mod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good god man, you can't expect people to learn an entire programming language just to crack a joke; but it would explain emacs :-o

    1. Re:Cat got your -1 Overrated mod? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't get in such a tizzy over my own bad joke:P

  71. Moleskine by Jaro · · Score: 0

    After trying PDA's, online calendars (yahoo, gmx...) I switched to a pen and a Moleskine diary. Always available, no need for backups, no power source of internet needed, no crashes. It's great.

    1. Re:Moleskine by kinaole · · Score: 0

      ... no need for backups ... I would seriously suggest a xerox machine for the occasioanl backup of your moleskine's crucial pages, especially if you carry it everywhere.

  72. Come back to me... by Khuffie · · Score: 1

    ...when they support Opera. It gets no love. :(

    1. Re:Come back to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just spoof as Mozilla and Google Calendar appears to be fine in Opera 9.

  73. You have been on SLASHDOT TOO LONG by tempest69 · · Score: 1
    I would find it much more efficient to look at dates that are stacked vertically, so I can scroll up or scroll down through the year. Weeks could be delineated by simple horizontal lines, and months by lightly shaded background colors.
    Now your brain has been made fully compliant to the slashdot standard of simple horizontal lines, and monster scrolling.

    Honestly now that I have spent enought time on slashdot, I want the slashdot style interface for my personal calendar, slashdot green and all. Sure you need a few different icons, and a link that says "tomorrows news".

    Another thing I want is some trickier scheduling, If I want to water my plant every three days, it's what I want, If I want to feed my cat every ten days, I want to be able to schedule it, not that a cat would let you pull that kind of thing. If I feel like knowing when a full moon is out and the crazies are out, the calendar should be good about it.

    And it should bug me on my cell when I haven't checked my calendar in a reasonable timeframe. Oh and I want it to only do it for things I mark as important, and possibly set some things to send a text reminder without a warning.

    A scheduling agent would be nice once they get the schedules happy. Nothing to freakishly hard, but nothing that really does it for me yet.

    Storm

    1. Re:You have been on SLASHDOT TOO LONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bla bla and more blabber.

    2. Re:You have been on SLASHDOT TOO LONG by Infonaut · · Score: 1

      Now your brain has been made fully compliant to the slashdot standard of simple horizontal lines, and monster scrolling.

      Actually, since you could pack more text on screen if you had the days in a month listed as a series of horizontal lines of text, it would take up less, not more space than a calendar showing a month in the standard grid view. By scrolling I simply meant that the text would be arrayed vertically, not that it would necessitate scrolling in the browser window. I'm actually looking for a calendar view that is *more* space efficient, not less.

      For example, have you ever tried to type in a nice long word like "association" in one of those calendar grid boxes? It either wraps in an odd way, or gets truncated by the app. If all of the items for a given day were shown on one horizontal line, that problem would vanish.

      We're only attached to the month grid calendar view because it's been around for so long. There's really no reason we should use it in computer applications, any more than we should have rotary dials on cell phones.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  74. Notes yes Lotus by e-matt · · Score: 1

    I used Lotus Notes at work from 1997-2005 and it works great for calendaring for individuals or groups

  75. need programmable forms with exceptions by chewmanfoo · · Score: 1

    The slashdot troll crowd is a very cosmopolitan bunch, so perhaps someone has heard of/built/used an app like I'm about to describe. If so, TIA... I need a calendar app that allows users to create events (appointments, say) that must fall under strict criteria and flag exceptions if a user attempts to violate the criteria. This is best explained in the form of an employee time off calendar. At the beginning of the year, admins can setup employee accounts, with total # of vacation, personal hours they're allowed, as well as %coverage needed on particular days and the like. Then, throughout the year, the associate can login to the calendar, enter timeoff requests, and be greeted with, "You may have March 15-29 off! Enjoy yourself." Or, "December 25 is a restricted day - the company must have 98% coverage that day. You cannot have this day off. However, your supervisor can override this exception with her password." Or, "Your request for April 12 off is denied: you have no more vacation hours left." Has anyone seen/used/built such a calendar? TIA, chewmanfoo

  76. Julian works for me! by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    I'd say the Julian calendar is most logical?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Calendar

    Currently the time is: 2453842.03565 ;-)

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  77. What about planzo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been happy with it. It probably doesn't support all of the same functionality, but it seems to have been around before a lot of these.

  78. What it is NOT by BWhaler · · Score: 1

    FULL Disclosure: I'm an Apple Guy. I don't know the best, but the absulte worst is Apple's iCal. If use it for business with a full schedule, it's barely usable. It's obvious Jobs has never used iCal outside of a script in a demo. I'd write a long list as to why, but I am too tired doing it when I sent Apple feedback after 10.2, 10.3, 10.4 Because I won't use Micosoft's solution with their file format lock-in, and because I like the ease of iSync and .mac, I am stuck using iCal. I've just accepted iCal and its 1992 calendaring functionality as one of the costs of being a Mac guy. And as for 10.5, I have now given up all hope that it will be any better.

  79. Google's calendar by mag46 · · Score: 0
    I just tried Google's calendar since reading about it here, and it's surprisingly good. Visually it's very similar to iCal (my current calendar of choice), but has the obvious advantage (or disadvantage) of being online, which is a huge help. I'm often switching computers, reformating, even switching OSs (trying Linux now and then) and not having to back up every appointment will be nice. I even started using my school's webmail site, instead of downloading each message to my laptop, for the same reasons: available everywhere, don't have to be backed up.

    With the prevalence of these online applications, will computers ever be reduced to simply basic OS and a web browser, with everything else done and stored online?

  80. synchronization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until they have a synchronization app for outlook (so that I can synch with my cell phone), they are all useless to me. At least KIKO says coming soon....

  81. plans by YoungHack · · Score: 1

    I really like Plans, http://www.planscalendar.com/

    1. Re:plans by theVicar · · Score: 1

      +1 to this - it doesn't have the nice functionality that WebCalendar or some of the others have, but I settled on it as soon as I saw how bad the usability on all those other ones was and just how many hoops the users are expected to jump through to use all those extra features. I was very surprised to see how badly designed they ALL are. Even Plans has some glaring flaws, like the inability to differentiate events from shared calendars by color, but overall it's definitely the least-bad of the bunch. Google's calendar would be fine if it was available as a free perl script anyone could put on their site, but obviously that would serve no purpose for them. Still, that puts Plans ahead of Google Calendar by far.

      --
      ---The Vicar---
  82. Well, there's Exchange Server (...ducks...) by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

    I need to investigate the aforementioned OpenExchange more thoroughly, but in the meanwhile... I run an Exchange Server instance (have to since I develop against the MS stack for a living), and though it's neither free as in speech nor free as in beer, it does cover your criteria list pretty well: Web interface, Smartphone support, scheduling & schedule sharing, server-push based synchronization, etc. Until OSS finds a way to put up a solid, interface-compatible Exchange substitute (including scheduling, invitations & reminders), the various $5-$10/month account hosting services are an option I suppose.

    I'm still hoping for a viable replacement myself, of course.

  83. Which one? Google by Nitewing98 · · Score: 1

    After trying a LOT of calendars that integrate with both iCal and Windows, I'd have to say Google's new calendar comes closest. I tried running my own DAV server to publish my calendar on the local net, but the only Windows calendar I could find that could read iCal format was Mozilla's, and asking Windows users to switch to Mozilla wasn't feasible.

    With Google's calendar, I can export my appts. from iCal, then publish it back to iCal users and also give Windows users the web address of my calendar, satisfying everyone.

    --

    Nitewing '98

    Everything works...in theory.

  84. Google Calendar vs Yahoo Calendar by labnol · · Score: 1

    http://labnol.blogspot.com/2006/04/google-calendar -vs-yahoo-calendar.html We've seen Google Finance quickly grab marketshare from Yahoo Finance because of a more interactive interface. The same could be said about Google Calendar. Though both Yahoo and Google offer similar set of features, the interface of Google Calendar is miles ahead of Yahoo Calendar.

  85. Mobical - has SyncML by Mr.+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    I use Mobical because it uses the SyncML protocol that my cellphone uses. I can sync all my PIM data (contacts, calendar, notes) easily. Still waiting for one of these web2.0 calendars to take advantage of SyncML.

    --
    "Aren't you going to get into costume?"
    "I never get out of it."
    -- Tom Stoppard (R&G Are Dead)
  86. aiming too low by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    Kiko doesn't seem to have anything over the other AJAX calendars coming out. Looks to me like they were aiming too low. I'm not even sure who would buy them at this point, given that Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo! all already have their own systems ready.

  87. My favorite calendars by rjdohnert · · Score: 1

    MSN Calendar and EssentialPIM are my favorites

  88. AJAX Calendars by baudbarf · · Score: 1

    I have yet to find one that suits my needs, yes, even the all-holy Google Calendar.

    Here's what I demand:
        AJAX - Without it, a web calendar is as ineffective and nasty as creating ASCII art in VI.
        Easy recurrence settings - I want to easily set an appointment for every wednesday without filling out a three-page questionnaire on the topic.
        Right-click support - When I want to do something, I often look for a right-click context menu to do it in. Google, I'm ashamed of you. I really thought you'd be ahead of the game on this one.
        Custom increments - My day-view and appointment setup can be displayed in hours or in 30-second increments, it's completely up to me how granular my scheduling will be. Google, again, I really hope you're listening.
        Recurrence Deletion - When I delete an instance of a recurring appointment, I want the default action to be "delete just this one" instead of "delete all occurrences," and I don't even want to be prompted to delete all. I'm a big boy, and I can "delete all occurrences" from a context menu if I so desire.
        A "current time" bar - A line running across my day-view, showing the current time.
        Dynamic Updates - I want to be able to leave my calendar open ALL DAY without any reloading nonsense, and I want to be able to watch my appointments slide up the day-view, and past the "current time" bar.
        Audio Event Notification - Using a simple Macromedia Flash SWF as an engine, a sound could be played to notify me of events. This is vital for me, since I'm usually in front of the computer, so SMS notification is a bit ridiculous.
        Location Awareness - This is a big one. The calendar will keep a list of locations I've used in the past. It knows where they are geographically. When it sees two concurrent appointments in different locations, then it calculates the driving time between them, adds in a user-determined amount of "slack time" (10 minutes?) and sends my notification THEN. Basically, it knows when I have to leave and alerts me to the appointment WHEN I MUST BEGIN MY COMMUTE, not 10 minutes before it starts. The calendar should keep one location as "home," and assume that I must be there if I haven't had any appointments for a few hours, and calculates commute time from that location accordingly. A nice side effect of this features is that the calendar can easily display driving directions for you, or a list of routes for the day.
        Smart text parser - Google got it right on, here, although theirs could use some smartening-up. I want to be able to say "dinner at parent's house this friday"
        Countdown - I'm mathematically disadvantaged, so I especially have trouble figuring out how soon I'm supposed to leave for an appointment, with the AM/PM shuffle and the strange 60-based (instead of 100-based) numbers. I want a running countdown to my next appointment, seconds included. I also want to be able to mouseover any event and see a countdown to it. I've already written a greasemonkey script to supplement Planzo.com's calendar with this functionality; but Planzo is a disaster, calendarwise, and I abandoned it for my own sanity.

    Aside from this, general ease-of-use and intuitive GUI would be great - I haven't seen a web calendar yet which had successfully tackled those simple concepts.

    --
    You can run but you can't hide, except, apparently, along the Afghan-Pakistani border.
  89. Not the Best Technology but.. by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

    I use my Palm (Treo 650) Calendar more than anything. Is the best the coolest or the one you use the most?

    On a related note, this would make a great Slashdot poll.

  90. Even simpler: by Stoutlimb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are there any calendars (other than Outlook) that will also sync with my PDA??

  91. Playboy Calendar by corngrower · · Score: 1

    Wow, no one mentioned that yet? You can sure tell this is Geekville.

    1. Re:Playboy Calendar by lposeidon · · Score: 0

      it is a very good calendar. but you may get slapped with a lawsuit if you start marking dates on it while in a meeting

      --
      Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
  92. Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Online calandering/agenda/productivity software has one major hurdle that must be overcome because they can be widely adopted and replace current offline solutions. That is privacy and trust.

    When you use a web app to do anything, the data you send up there is collected and logged, probably indexed and correlated with other information to build a profile. This is done by almost any company, but the matter is especially serious for certain high profile companies, who admit that they may never delete any data. This is powerful stuff that may be used in many ways, some of which the originator of the information may not agree with.

    Imagine, they'll know what you search for (possibly identifying the information you are after, interests, hobbies, profession, place of resident, disease... ). They'll know what you send in email, IM and WHO you interact with. With this calendar in use, they'll even know your day to day schedule, potentially understanding what you do, your interaction with other business and people, and where you are at.

    Some people may argue that "You should have nothing to worry about unless you are doing something wrong". Well, that is all fine if the values of what is "right" and "wrong" of the company or society controlling your data fits with your morals (they mostly do today). However, things may change, (Japanese Americans in WW2, Jew in Nazi Germany etc... ) and it is dangerous to have that much of your information stored by a 3rd party forever.

    Untile the matter of privacy and trust is solved, it will be difficult for the masses, coporate and goverment to adopt online productivity apps to a large degree.

  93. Security Laxness in Google Calendar by wfried · · Score: 1

    I don't like the way Google Calendar has my entire Gmail contact list in plain HTML in their home page. The contact list is used when inviting others to your events, but this could have been implemented in a more secure way.

  94. Google is best by marlinSpike · · Score: 1

    Most Google tools are generally better thought out, better engineered, better developed, and simply head and shoulders above the competition. That's not hype, it's simple fact, evidenced by their tools.

  95. Unfortunately, Outlook + Exchange by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 1

    ... for one simple reason. None of the spiffy AJAX-ified online calendars (and some are quite nice) have the ability to sync wirelessly to a mobile device. Once I got used to having instant, two-way push-syncing between my desktop and my BlackBerry, there's really no going back.

    Outlook and Exchange themselves blow. But this is one killer feature that I simply cannot, and do not want to, live without. Unfortunately it's also going to be a tough one for open source or small companies to break into, due to the politics (and financial demands) of wireless hardware and networks these days.

  96. Blackberry/Mac support by gnatware · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a shared calendar application to recommend (hopefully not hosted by a Web 2.0 startup that won't exist six months from now) that syncs calendar entries with Blackberry ON A MAC?

    Maybe this segment is not significant enough for RIM and/or developers to spend time on, but I can't find anything that actually works reliably. Some software syncs contacts, but all seem to balk (or break) on calendars.

  97. Lotus Notes by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

    Lotus Notes does it and it can manage multiple-time zones including daylight savings.

    --
    I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    1. Re:Lotus Notes by swillden · · Score: 1

      Lotus Notes does it and it can manage multiple-time zones including daylight savings.

      As long as you don't change time zones. If you do, whether or not the appointments get moved seems random. I'm sure it's not actually random, but I'm not sure how it decides to move what -- and I know that it massively screwed my calendar every time I tried it. Disclaimer: I haven't tried this is Notes 7. Maybe it's better?

      I use Kontact now, and it does a much better job, though there are a couple of minor timezone-related features it still lacks (Notes also lacks them). I'm going to add them someday when I have a free weekend, unless someone beats me to it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Lotus Notes by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

      I admit I haven't tried switching timezones. What I meant about multiple timezones was scheduling a meeting when people are in various timezones.

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    3. Re:Lotus Notes by thsths · · Score: 1

      > Lotus Notes does it

      Yes, I know, Lotus Notes can do nearly everything, but can it also do it right? I have tried the Lotus Notes client several times, and it has always been the most horrible piece of software on my machine. Big, slow, ugly, unintuitive and often disfunctional, too.

      And I refuse to take them serious unless they are not only "fully behind Linux", but also deliver a client for it.

    4. Re:Lotus Notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be the victim of a BOFH administering your Lotus Domino/Notes installation. In my experience as a user/developer/administrator of Domino, when it does something, it usually does it correct. Maybe not in the most intuitive way, but correct at least.

    5. Re:Lotus Notes by rfisher · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Although I have two problems with Notes' calendaring.

      1. It can't seem to recognize an event that has been forwarded to me instead of email directly to me. I have to manually add the event to my calendar.

      2. It doesn't want to inter-operate with anything, so I have to use the Notes client, or I'll miss all my meetings.

      Oh...& just the general fact that Notes is all-around annoying. The software that is universally hated by its users but that a few sadistic people get to inflict on everyone in their company.

    6. Re:Lotus Notes by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      1. [Notes] can't seem to recognize an event that has been forwarded to me instead of email directly to me. I have to manually add the event to my calendar.
      Yeah, that is kind of annoying. If you can't find the original meeting chairperson to add you to the invite list, that is.
      2. It doesn't want to inter-operate with anything, so I have to use the Notes client, or I'll miss all my meetings.
      All the managers in my firm sync their Blackberries to Notes, and they show up at their meetings on time. (Unfortunately.)
      Notes is all-around annoying. The software that is universally hated by its users
      Huh? "Universally hated"? Not in my experience, it isn't. I like it rather a lot. (And no, I'm not a decision-maker at my firm.) Been using it since release 2.1. ('Course, I'd like my firm's implementation of it a lot more if they'd open up the Webmail client for us, but that's not the software's fault.) Don't forget, Notes is more than an e-mail platform.
    7. Re:Lotus Notes by rfisher · · Score: 1

      "Huh? 'Universally hated'?"

      Yeah, that's been my experience.

      True: Notes is much more than email platform. In fact, it isn't email platform at all. It's just been used to build one.

      I've used Notes at three different jobs (& not for email at one), & I have known many people at other companies that have used it. The only person I've actually spoken to who liked it was one CEO.

      In my experience, most Notes users--whether usinig it for email or not--never see the features that really make Notes what it is. They just see a (usually) mediocre user experience.

      Articles like the following one make be think that my experience is fairly common.

      http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1 705106,00.html

    8. Re:Lotus Notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a developer of Lotus? ;-)

  98. Windows Calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I know, I'm a tool... But Windows Calendar in the Vista Beta is like a nice combo between Apple's iCal and MSFT's own Outlook. And you can publish it to remote locattions.

  99. sync by firebus · · Score: 1

    it's all about sync. i can live without any other individual feature. if i can't sync it with other calendar software, on other devices (palm. outlook. etc.) there's nothing that compels me to use any of these.

  100. Use Outlook as a pipe by darnok · · Score: 1

    I currently rely on my Treo and Yahoo Calendar for my calendaring needs - I enter stuff on the Treo, and my SO and friends can read and/or update my Yahoo Calendar.

    I use a very old copy of Outlook as an intermediary to keep them in sync - Treo syncs with Outlook, which then syncs with Yahoo. I never use Outlook for anything other than this purpose, but it's particularly well suited to this task - like it or not, just about everything can sync with Outlook.

    I'll be checking out calendar.google.com, now that I've played around with it a bit. It can sync with Outlook (albeit in a clunky manner, at the moment), so it should be fine for me if I decide to go ahead with it. No harm in running Treo+Yahoo+Google, if Outlook is the pipe between all three.

    For those of you who *could* use Outlook to solve your problems, but you hate the product or Microsoft, give this approach some thought.

  101. Agreed by ManufacturedMirth · · Score: 1

    Notes is tough to beat as a group calendaring tool - I'm trying to find a useful way to replicate its functions using other software, and finding it difficult.

  102. Contempo.biz - in beta, supports TZs, reminders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hello, I just wanted to point out: http://contempo.biz/ is a new calendar product in early beta stages right now. Slashdot is welcome to give it a try, and take a look at some of the features. Go to the site. You will need an authcode to create an account; the authcode is "cherrycoke" (I prefer diet actually, but the code is just "cherrycoke"). Anyway, after a few Slashdotters sign up I'll probably turn off that auth code. Also I will delete signups with invalid info. Anyway, it has a few new features:

    • SMS reminders for events - ok, a few others have this, but it's integrated all over the place
    • Pure CSS layout - no AJAX, so all pages can be bookmarked. However that means you'll want to use Firefox
    • Print envelopes directly from the website - I have never seen another site with this feature
    • Timezone integration everywhere - today's meetings are spread around timezones, so it is important to be able to print a calendar or make meetings in any timezone
    • A whole bunch of stuff coming in the future which I won't even go into right now.
    A lot of these features have not yet been rolled out, but they are in beta. Oh, for those of us blessed with Linux desktops, check out this feature that will be coming soon (as soon as we finish the Windows version of it): scan a business card from your web page
  103. 13 Month Mayan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    13 Month mayan like calandar is best.

  104. whatstheplan.com by jimmyp9999 · · Score: 1

    the company i work for has just launched whatstheplan.com. the idea is to fill the niche of actually planning events, promoting them and inviting people to come to them. since a lot of these apps have the ability to sync up with vCalendar feeds we can actually integrate with them. it seems like a lot of these calendaring apps aren't too focused on making a really high-quality event planning system. check it out and give it a try next time you plan a party or something.

  105. what is the best calendar? by drivekiller · · Score: 1

    share-able among the workgroup members, on or off site
    cross-platform client support
    doesn't live on somebody else's server

    Apple could make iCal into this, it wouldn't be that hard. I certainly wouldn't complain if the server only ran on OSX Server.

    In the meantime, I recommend MeetingMaker. Rock solid server software for Mac/Windows/Solaris/Linux . Native clients for Mac and Windows, Java clients for anything else. There's even a connector for outlook if you really must....

  106. Zimbra - best new tool yet by corigo · · Score: 1

    Open source, superior email client, and first really Exchange competitive application since Netscape calendaring server went the way of the Netscape browser. Supports iCal standard so that it supports Apple iCal client, Palm and all iCal compatable calendaring systems, Outlook, Outlook Express, etc.

  107. Remind is not a part of any BSD, or most linuxes by Homestar+Breadmaker · · Score: 1

    Admittedly, I haven't tried every linux distro, but its definately not a part of most of them. Nor is it a part of any BSD.

  108. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  109. Gregorian Calendar by fiaworldrally · · Score: 1

    A large majority of the world already uses it. And no bugs. Except maybe February.

    1. Re:Gregorian Calendar by daverabbitz · · Score: 1

      February isn't a bug, it's a gotcha. Bugs are variance from the specification, gotchas are variance from expectation.

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
  110. SpongeCell NLP Rocks My Socks by Gieckboy · · Score: 1

    Reviewers have been going on about the natural language functions on Google Calendar, but having run some tests of my own I'm not all that impressed. Pollack Media Group ran a comparison of natural language calendars a while back and I used these same queries to compare the NLP functionality of Google's calendar and Web 2.0 upstart SpongeCell. In almost every instance SpongeCell performed better than GCal:

    1. "Media Convention Friday through Sunday"
    SpongeCell: Successfully added 3-Day/All Day event
    GCal: Failed to add event, time, multiple days

    2. "Conference call with Joe Smith monday at 2"
    SpongeCell: Successfully added event
    GCal: Successfully added event

    3. "dinner with Jack and Cindy tonight at 7"
    SpongeCell: Successfully added event at 7PM
    GCal: Failed, added event at 7AM today (in past)

    4. "flight to los angeles departs saturday at 9"
    SpongeCell: Successfully added event
    GCal: Successfully added event

    5. "Call Dave at 10"
    SpongeCell: Successfully added event
    GCal: Failed, added event at 10AM tomorrow

    6. "Arrange convention travel tomorrow"
    SpongeCell: Successfully added event
    GCal: Successfully added event

    7. "Lunch with Jeff tomorrow"
    SpongeCell: Successfully added event (at noon)
    GCal: Successfully added event (all day)

    8. "CSI viewing party tomorrow night"
    SpongeCell: Successfully added event (8-9PM)
    GCal: Successfully added event (all day)

    9. "pick up Zoe for soccer at 4"
    SpongeCell: Successfully added event
    GCal: Successfully added event

    SpongeCell consistently outperformed the NLP translation abilities of Google's calendar.
    Seriously, I wish Google would stop spreading themselves thin and just stick to what they do best - putting ads on everything in sight.

    1. Re:SpongeCell NLP Rocks My Socks by TWISorg · · Score: 1

      Cool review with lots of detail.

  111. naptaar.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  112. Netvibes by Fisch2 · · Score: 1

    Google calendar integrated into Netvibes is my favorite hands down (www.netvibes.com)!

  113. Re:Integration: Airset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also syncs Palm devices and cell phones.

  114. Re:Alternative to On-line Calendars: Portable Sunb by slide-rule · · Score: 1

    I've tried the whole Sunbird thing off an on for over a year, and I give major props to J. Haller for his Portable versions of the mozilla tools. However, Sunbird itself needs major work at the interface level to make it a viable product. It seems to handle the actual iCal (*.ics) format well enough, but the user experience has been sorely lacking for quite some time, and I've not ever noticed much effort thrown into this project that improves upon it in the time I've been watching. Sure, it can be made to work, but it's like you have to learn a series of hoops to jump through to get there... not anything I'd ever dream of getting my wife and/or non-tech-peers to try to understand. Fortunately (for me and my small circle of influence) google calendar is out now and seems to work rather nicely. If they (or someone else) get plugins working for outlook, Mac iSync, etc, I think it really stands a nice chance.

  115. Airset by SaxMan101 · · Score: 1

    Airset. I haven't seen this one mentioned yet. I got turned onto it by Joel Splosky(sp?). Its pretty nice.

    --
    Normal is a setting on a washing machine.
  116. Lotus Notes by Hymer · · Score: 1

    I just love Lotus Notes... and hate IBM for not porting the Notes client to Linux (and for not porting Admin & Developer to Mac OS X)...
    ...and YES I do know that Notes runs fine under WINE.

    --

    Lotus Notes is like a woman... you either love it or hate it... and sometimes both at the same time...

  117. Zimbra by btpier · · Score: 1

    Apparently you haven't looked too deeply. In addition to the other obvious alternatives others have suggested, Zimbra http://www.zimbra.com/ does all the group scheduling stuff that exchange does. They've even added resource scheduling recently. Best of all it uses a bunch of great open source projects and glues them together nicely. The "network" version is far, far cheaper than exchange.

  118. My cellphone by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    My cellphone. It works without an internet connection and fits easily in my pocket.

  119. What are calendars really good for? by tatersalad · · Score: 1

    Personaly, the only good I can see in calendars is for oggling at the amazingly sexy Lucy Pinder. Otherwise, they're pretty useless.

  120. use iCal, then gcal to group everyone together by vrillusions · · Score: 1

    I use iCal as I use a mac at work. I then publish it to a site and then link to that in gCal. So if I need to see something and I'm at a computer I can check gCal. If I'm on the road iCal syncs to my iPod so I have everything there. And I have been known to just print out a page or two and stuff it in my wallet