My van has a DVD player and it will for some time.
Sometimes I use a raspberry pi and let the kids access media that way but it's also always good to have a couple DVDs on hand
For all intents and purposes, Facebook has a monopoly on the social internet market in that there is no other social network any one person can get all their friends and family onto.
The "if you don't like it don't do business with them" doesn't hold much water with me. Capitalism is supposed to provide consumers with *choices*. Yet if a person's friends are all on Facebook my choice is already made for me. I cannot go to an alternative solution that values my privacy, and if I were not on Facebook I would be missing events. It's not even because there could never be a profitable business that values my privacy, it is because FB got in first and "the masses" will go to anything else.
But the bag in the wind example is exactly one of the wide breadth of reasons why automated driving is a completely different problem. In a game of chess, the system has no need to consider the environment of the room the chess board is in. When you are diving, you need to consider everything in the environment and determine whether it is important or not. Google needs to figure out how to determine that bag in the wind in the air isn't important while not driving into something else heavy that that may be dangling from a string. Also none of this bears any importance unless it is affordable and marketable. I have heard that LIDAR is very expensive, therefore it will never find its way into consumer vehicles. Also, Google can't release a car that stops at every bag in the wind.
When you release something into the world, you should really understand people. For example, I wouldn't leave a bottle of pills on the nightstand of someone who has committed suicide, or give an alcoholic a bottle of wine as a gift. Sometimes you don't know, but these are things that are easily predictable.
When you release something into the world, you should really understand people. For example, I wouldn't leave a bottle of pills on the nightstand of someone who has committed suicide, or give an alcoholic a bottle of wine as a gift. Sometimes you don't know, but these are things that are easily predictable.
I'm actually wondering if maybe people tend to just toss their Android devices, but if you have spent $500+ on a device you damn well want to fix it. Personally, my Samsung S3 is just on the way out right now though but I did need to replace the battery once.
That's actually incorrect, you just don't realize the things that humans are doing because you take it for granted. The example I always use is that I as a human know to be extra careful pulling out of the driveway if there are garage doors open down the street, because I know the neighbors and their habits and if garage doors are open there are probably kids running around the neighborhood playing. An automated car would not detect things in this way, by comparison any sensor that it has is a relatively narrow way of seeing the world and as we have seen from Tesla it may not even see all it needs to see for normal driving.
This leads me to ask.. why are people pushing the idea that we need to advance technologically when we are clearly not headed for the kind of world that is better for more people here. Do we like shiny new things that much, that we would sacrifice our entire place in the economy?
Have no fear, next month banks will be relieving you of the responsibility of having credit because you friended someone who is deep in debt. Or you won't be able to get health insurance because of meds the rest of your family is taking and they think it might be hereditary.
A computer recently beat the top champion at go, which is a great deal more computationally deep than chess; but I agree with your point. All of this is really just a simple calculation done over and over on a very grand scale. Experiencing the real world is opposite, there is an almost infinite number of rules that need to be understood and utilized in order to understand it even on a fundamental level.
Again, it depends what is more important; success of corporations that no longer contribute to your country or the the health and well-being of the citizens that actually live in that country. Clearly, the people that are in power have selected the former, they do nothing but benefit from the situation. I am full well that this would be painful for the economy and I am prepared to grow my own vegetables and live without technology. I just ask that it be done evenly across the board, rather than watching some aristocratic elite rise to the stop while everyone else starves.
How long will the battery last if a person does the 2.5 second acceleration at every stop light? Because in all honesty I would have trouble not doing that.
Slashdot Mirror
You know what makes good birth control? Robot sex dolls with real AI!
My van has a DVD player and it will for some time. Sometimes I use a raspberry pi and let the kids access media that way but it's also always good to have a couple DVDs on hand
For all intents and purposes, Facebook has a monopoly on the social internet market in that there is no other social network any one person can get all their friends and family onto.
The "if you don't like it don't do business with them" doesn't hold much water with me. Capitalism is supposed to provide consumers with *choices*. Yet if a person's friends are all on Facebook my choice is already made for me. I cannot go to an alternative solution that values my privacy, and if I were not on Facebook I would be missing events. It's not even because there could never be a profitable business that values my privacy, it is because FB got in first and "the masses" will go to anything else.
I commented on my obvious logic fail but it didn't go through.
But the bag in the wind example is exactly one of the wide breadth of reasons why automated driving is a completely different problem. In a game of chess, the system has no need to consider the environment of the room the chess board is in. When you are diving, you need to consider everything in the environment and determine whether it is important or not. Google needs to figure out how to determine that bag in the wind in the air isn't important while not driving into something else heavy that that may be dangling from a string. Also none of this bears any importance unless it is affordable and marketable. I have heard that LIDAR is very expensive, therefore it will never find its way into consumer vehicles. Also, Google can't release a car that stops at every bag in the wind.
Sorry, who has *attempted* to commit suicide. Obvious logic fail there.
When you release something into the world, you should really understand people. For example, I wouldn't leave a bottle of pills on the nightstand of someone who has committed suicide, or give an alcoholic a bottle of wine as a gift. Sometimes you don't know, but these are things that are easily predictable.
When you release something into the world, you should really understand people. For example, I wouldn't leave a bottle of pills on the nightstand of someone who has committed suicide, or give an alcoholic a bottle of wine as a gift. Sometimes you don't know, but these are things that are easily predictable.
Well I just searched on 'vehicles with infrared sensors' and came up with nothing.
I'm actually wondering if maybe people tend to just toss their Android devices, but if you have spent $500+ on a device you damn well want to fix it. Personally, my Samsung S3 is just on the way out right now though but I did need to replace the battery once.
You didn't do a very good job of hiding your bias. Just sayin.
I am totally against determining the most reliable phone in terms of reliability.
Yet look at all the people praising Uber now for their lower prices.
That's actually incorrect, you just don't realize the things that humans are doing because you take it for granted. The example I always use is that I as a human know to be extra careful pulling out of the driveway if there are garage doors open down the street, because I know the neighbors and their habits and if garage doors are open there are probably kids running around the neighborhood playing. An automated car would not detect things in this way, by comparison any sensor that it has is a relatively narrow way of seeing the world and as we have seen from Tesla it may not even see all it needs to see for normal driving.
This leads me to ask.. why are people pushing the idea that we need to advance technologically when we are clearly not headed for the kind of world that is better for more people here. Do we like shiny new things that much, that we would sacrifice our entire place in the economy?
Have no fear, next month banks will be relieving you of the responsibility of having credit because you friended someone who is deep in debt. Or you won't be able to get health insurance because of meds the rest of your family is taking and they think it might be hereditary.
A computer recently beat the top champion at go, which is a great deal more computationally deep than chess; but I agree with your point. All of this is really just a simple calculation done over and over on a very grand scale. Experiencing the real world is opposite, there is an almost infinite number of rules that need to be understood and utilized in order to understand it even on a fundamental level.
OMG.. their. Sorry. I'm not a professional speller. :-)
It's good to hear some people find there niche. There are a great many talented people that never get into a position like that.
Becoming expensive is the entire point of starting a career. And IT companies wonder why more people don't go into it.
Again, it depends what is more important; success of corporations that no longer contribute to your country or the the health and well-being of the citizens that actually live in that country. Clearly, the people that are in power have selected the former, they do nothing but benefit from the situation. I am full well that this would be painful for the economy and I am prepared to grow my own vegetables and live without technology. I just ask that it be done evenly across the board, rather than watching some aristocratic elite rise to the stop while everyone else starves.
Ads are a SERVICE. Shut up and take it.
How long will the battery last if a person does the 2.5 second acceleration at every stop light? Because in all honesty I would have trouble not doing that.
Spark plug replacement? people still do that?