"Or, perhaps they should make sure that Tesla owners can read at a 4th grade level before becoming owners. I'm fairly certain that Tesla lawyers ensured that the EULA describes EXACTLY what "autopilot" does and does not do"
1) Are you saying the EULA is written so a 4th grader would completely understand it?
“Hillary Clinton I think is a terrific woman,” he told Greta Van Susteren. “I am biased because I have known her for years. I live in New York. She lives in New York. I really like her and her husband both a lot"
"Does Uber require that the person they are paying to drive actually be the driver? If so, then the drivers are definitely employees, but if the person they are paying is allowed to subcontract someone else to do their work (and presumably still make a profit while doing so), then the driver is not"
Silent coder confirmed that you were oversimplifying with your snow shoveling response.
It sounds to me like you're still oversimplifying.
"If someone agrees to drive for Uber as an independent contractor, then Uber is that person's client. If an independent contractor agrees to work for a client who isn't willing to negotiate their pay rate, then that's on that person"
It doesn't work like that, you need to look up the legal definitions of an employee and an independent contractor and how the law distinguishes between them.
"....but that doesnt matter in the slightest....."
Of course it matters, it is a fact, and it's a large margin at that. *You* can still choose how or if it matters to you, but that won't change the fact that Trump won the election and lost the popular vote.
Nah, that would be like saying Trump lost too because he lost some debate with Hillary. Losing the popular vote by over 2 800 000 votes is clearly losing the popular vote.
Yup, Trump won the election but lost the popular vote, hence he lost too, just not the election.
That said, I'm sorry for my comment. It was my sad attempt at trolling and it took nearly 24hrs to get a response and have my comment down voted, and if it wasn't for the update I'd probably never have gotten any attention.
It is not the religion, per se, that is the problem. It is fundamentalists or extremists who claim to be part of the religion that are the problem.
I think we can safely say that it is both. Idiots are a problem, and people who get them worked up to do stupid things in the name of religion are also a problem. Take away that excuse and they'll have many less takers.
Not really, not all fundamentalists, and religions or ideologies, contribute to the problem. But for extremists, I think most agree they're a problem in every culture.
"Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, who were responsible for the 9/11 attacks"
Any support for that. I thought they were all from Saudi Arabia. And all I remember Osama saying was "wow, good for them" after the attack, and there wasn't flight simulators to train on in Afghanistan anyway.
Lots of people say this, very few have (practical) plans for implementing it. Trouble with "cleaning up" this kind of crap is that it kind of has to start at the top -- and the top is exactly where the people benefiting such behaviors are sitting.
I see the problems, I'd agree that attention to "the top" is important, I'd also think all levels need to "clean up" their understandings.
Slashdot Mirror
But the average traffic a plane encounters isn't at all like the average traffic a car encounters.
Maybe you would care more if a stupid person killed someone close to you.
Of course there is the rare exception.
Interesting, thanks
"Or, perhaps they should make sure that Tesla owners can read at a 4th grade level before becoming owners. I'm fairly certain that Tesla lawyers ensured that the EULA describes EXACTLY what "autopilot" does and does not do"
1) Are you saying the EULA is written so a 4th grader would completely understand it?
“Hillary Clinton I think is a terrific woman,” he told Greta Van Susteren. “I am biased because I have known her for years. I live in New York. She lives in New York. I really like her and her husband both a lot"
Absolutely. And they should make it much more clear that drivers should keep their hands on the wheel at all times, which autopilot doesn't imply.
And Tesla needs to promote the idea that you need to "keep your hands on the wheel at all times" rather than the idea of an "auto-pilot".
"Does Uber require that the person they are paying to drive actually be the driver? If so, then the drivers are definitely employees, but if the person they are paying is allowed to subcontract someone else to do their work (and presumably still make a profit while doing so), then the driver is not"
Silent coder confirmed that you were oversimplifying with your snow shoveling response.
It sounds to me like you're still oversimplifying.
"If someone agrees to drive for Uber as an independent contractor, then Uber is that person's client. If an independent contractor agrees to work for a client who isn't willing to negotiate their pay rate, then that's on that person"
It doesn't work like that, you need to look up the legal definitions of an employee and an independent contractor and how the law distinguishes between them.
"....but that doesnt matter in the slightest....."
Of course it matters, it is a fact, and it's a large margin at that. *You* can still choose how or if it matters to you, but that won't change the fact that Trump won the election and lost the popular vote.
Nah, that would be like saying Trump lost too because he lost some debate with Hillary. Losing the popular vote by over 2 800 000 votes is clearly losing the popular vote.
"That's why he's taking office in 20 days"
Yup, Trump won the election but lost the popular vote, hence he lost too, just not the election.
That said, I'm sorry for my comment. It was my sad attempt at trolling and it took nearly 24hrs to get a response and have my comment down voted, and if it wasn't for the update I'd probably never have gotten any attention.
Trump lost too
It is not the religion, per se, that is the problem. It is fundamentalists or extremists who claim to be part of the religion that are the problem.
I think we can safely say that it is both. Idiots are a problem, and people who get them worked up to do stupid things in the name of religion are also a problem. Take away that excuse and they'll have many less takers.
Not really, not all fundamentalists, and religions or ideologies, contribute to the problem. But for extremists, I think most agree they're a problem in every culture.
Correction,
"justice for all" also in the sense of equality of individual worth
Exactly
Censorship, under some common definitions, implies that it is imposed. This is not the case here.
"The prosperity of the modern world wasn't created by people giving away their money."
The prosperity of the modern world wasn't created by capitalists.
All individuals are social, and it is honorable to fight, for -- justice for all !
I saw something (could be wrong) that said most of her popular votes excess came from 3 precincts in CA
No, her popular vote majority came from one individual at a time spread out over the country
"Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, who were responsible for the 9/11 attacks"
Any support for that. I thought they were all from Saudi Arabia. And all I remember Osama saying was "wow, good for them" after the attack, and there wasn't flight simulators to train on in Afghanistan anyway.
How many of those influenced US foreign policy?
Goldman Sachs? then a lot.
Check back in 4 years...
Very much agreed, I'm just trying to be diplomatic.
start cleaning things up a bit
Lots of people say this, very few have (practical) plans for implementing it. Trouble with "cleaning up" this kind of crap is that it kind of has to start at the top -- and the top is exactly where the people benefiting such behaviors are sitting.
I see the problems, I'd agree that attention to "the top" is important, I'd also think all levels need to "clean up" their understandings.