You're kidding me right ? Microsoft, Apple, etc. just love DRM, because it allows them to tie content to (their) proprietary software and hardware, and continue raking in the profits. The only way we are ever going to be free of DRM, is by refusing to buy/support products that make use of it.
If you want quality, why not go for a player that plays ogg vorbis ? For the same file size, ogg files are higher quality than mp3 and wma, thanks in part to variable bitrate encoding.
Just an educated guess, but: methane is one carbon atom and 4 hydrogen atoms. It will eventually get oxidised into 1 carbon dioxide molecule and 2 water molecules, due to increased sunlight in the upper atmosphere.
That's because you are doing things backwards. Sounds like you are loading in a whole hour of dv and then cutting it.
In LiVES, it is better to cut your scenes first using the shuttle controls/dvgrab, and then load in each scene as a separate clip. You can then fine tune the clips, and bring them together in the multitrack window.
Your dream is a reality in many places, at least in Europe. Right now I am posting via the Funkfeuer network (http://www.funkfeuer.at/index.php?id=42&L=1)
There are similar projects going on in many European cities. Here it is simpler than in the US, because of the shorter distances involved.
there must be some way to absorb the radiation and convert it into power to lift the capsules. That would solve 2 problems at once - shielding the passengers, and providing lifting power.
"Among his insights: 'Microsoft has been leery of doing too much with Linux because of all the weirdness with the licenses and the possibility that one false move would make a Microsoft product public domain at worst, or subject to the GPL at best.'"
Actually, it's the M$ EULA that's weird, not the GPL, which is very clear and easy to understand.
"But now, 'the idea is to create some sort of code that is jammed into Linux and whose sole purpose is to let some proprietary code run under Linux without actually "touching" Linux in any way that would subject the proprietary code to the GPL.' According to Dvorak, it's only a matter of time before Linux is 'cracked' by Microsoft, meaning Microsoft figures out a way to run proprietary code on it."
Hahaha, there is no need to 'crack' Linux. It's perfecly possible to run proprietary, closed source apps on top of Linux. Why would you need to license such code under the GPL, unless it contained existing GPL code ?
For a supposed "expert", Dvorak shows amazingly little understanding of either Linux or the GPL.
PC component makers have become lazy. Four years ago I built myself a 2.8GHz P4 machine with 512MB RAM, and that would still be considered "high end" today.
Where are the 10GHz CPUs ? Where are even the 5GHz CPUs ? Where are the 8 or 16GB RAM machines ? Have the component-makers stopped improving ?
No wonder people are not buying, it seems like PC technology stopped improving 4 years ago.
Adding a mid-struct member is only a problem if you take shortcuts like casting a struct * to a void * and expecting to read back the same members at the same memory locations. That in itself is appalling coding style, and would be worthy of an F-.
Hardware does "just work", but only if the hardware manufacturers provide full specs for the hardware, and not just closed source binary drivers. The fault lies with the hardware companies, not with the Linux developers. Claiming otherwise is just FUD.
Slashdot Mirror
You're kidding me right ? Microsoft, Apple, etc. just love DRM, because it allows them to tie content to (their) proprietary software and hardware, and continue raking in the profits. The only way we are ever going to be free of DRM, is by refusing to buy/support products that make use of it.
If you want quality, why not go for a player that plays ogg vorbis ? For the same file size, ogg files are higher quality than mp3 and wma, thanks in part to variable bitrate encoding.
Prior art right here
Just an educated guess, but: methane is one carbon atom and 4 hydrogen atoms. It will eventually get oxidised into 1 carbon dioxide molecule and 2 water molecules, due to increased sunlight in the upper atmosphere.
That's because you are doing things backwards. Sounds like you are loading in a whole hour of dv and then cutting it.
In LiVES, it is better to cut your scenes first using the shuttle controls/dvgrab, and then load in each scene as a separate clip. You can then fine tune the clips, and bring them together in the multitrack window.
Well:
If a gamma ray from far away could play today a blu-ray, then I would say that gamma ray was sellable on e-bay.
(and before an anonymous coward makes a "funny" response, no I am not gay...)
Your wait is over.
are those metric Sols or Imperial Sols ;-)
Anyway, congratulations NASA !
Your dream is a reality in many places, at least in Europe. Right now I am posting via the Funkfeuer network (http://www.funkfeuer.at/index.php?id=42&L=1)
There are similar projects going on in many European cities. Here it is simpler than in the US, because of the shorter distances involved.
Nothing. Nobody uses mono for anything important anyway.
well, I figured he must be big geek, and therefore have a Slashdot log in.
On the other hand, he's probably too busy playing with his new toy.
You are John Titor, and I claim my $10.
Well, if you don't need insulation, all you would really need is a breathing mask and oxygen tanks.
Doesn't seem like that stupid of an idea to me.
there must be some way to absorb the radiation and convert it into power to lift the capsules. That would solve 2 problems at once - shielding the passengers, and providing lifting power.
I can't seem to get an answer from anyone. Does it or does it not run Linux by default ? Or is it an add-on like for the PS2 ?
Most probably he spelt "agreement" correctly when he said it, as well.
j/k
What about the _real_ mystery: does the PS3 come with Linux as standard or not !?
Actually, it's the M$ EULA that's weird, not the GPL, which is very clear and easy to understand.
"But now, 'the idea is to create some sort of code that is jammed into Linux and whose sole purpose is to let some proprietary code run under Linux without actually "touching" Linux in any way that would subject the proprietary code to the GPL.' According to Dvorak, it's only a matter of time before Linux is 'cracked' by Microsoft, meaning Microsoft figures out a way to run proprietary code on it."
Hahaha, there is no need to 'crack' Linux. It's perfecly possible to run proprietary, closed source apps on top of Linux. Why would you need to license such code under the GPL, unless it contained existing GPL code ?
For a supposed "expert", Dvorak shows amazingly little understanding of either Linux or the GPL.
There is so much great unencumbered music around these days.
For example, my current favourite : http://www.sonicsquirrel.net/
PC component makers have become lazy. Four years ago I built myself a 2.8GHz P4 machine with 512MB RAM, and that would still be considered "high end" today.
Where are the 10GHz CPUs ? Where are even the 5GHz CPUs ? Where are the 8 or 16GB RAM machines ? Have the component-makers stopped improving ?
No wonder people are not buying, it seems like PC technology stopped improving 4 years ago.
Adding a mid-struct member is only a problem if you take shortcuts like casting a struct * to a void * and expecting to read back the same members at the same memory locations. That in itself is appalling coding style, and would be worthy of an F-.
Hardware does "just work", but only if the hardware manufacturers provide full specs for the hardware, and not just closed source binary drivers. The fault lies with the hardware companies, not with the Linux developers. Claiming otherwise is just FUD.
Why pay $450 ? You could upgrade to Linux for free.
Don't worry, the net has survived everything that's been thrown at it, I doubt a few more doublings in website numbers is going to affect it...
It's not "slashdot logic". It's called "past experience".