Slashdot Mirror


The Internet Now has Over 100 Million Web Sites

1sockchuck writes "There are now more than 100 million web sites on the Internet, according to Netcraft, whose monthly web server survey has reached 101.4 million sites. From the article: 'The 100 million site milestone caps an extraordinary year in which the Internet has already added 27.4 million sites, easily topping the previous full-year growth record of 17 million from 2005. The Internet has doubled in size since May 2004, when the survey hit 50 million.'" This is a far cry from the August 1995 results that just cleared 18,000.

181 comments

  1. Ridiculous! by KidHash · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nobody could need more than 640 websites...

    1. Re:Ridiculous! by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      No, really, 3 computers should satisfy the world's computing needs...

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:Ridiculous! by Funkcikle · · Score: 1

      I imagine the same proportion of sites are still worth visiting.

    3. Re:Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody could need more than 640 websites...

      This is by far the most ridiculous misquote ever. Everyone knows it's 640k sites.

    4. Re:Ridiculous! by gwyrdd+benyw · · Score: 3, Funny

      I still remember the good old days when the web was first born, and I had the (realistic!) goal of visiting every single web page in existence...

      --

      I adblock all animated gifs.
      Blessed be the prime numbered slashdotters
    5. Re:Ridiculous! by robbywalker · · Score: 0, Redundant

      100 million web sites! We're gonna need lots more tubes to get that much internets out there.

    6. Re:Ridiculous! by eln · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah yes, back when a person's favorite links were his "Hot List," and he put them online because his browser didn't have a bookmark function (and oh yeah, so other people could see them too I guess), and when a "blog" was known as a "personal home page." Back when I could teach a whole class everything there was to know about HTML in one day. Back when 99% of the sites on the Internet were "under construction."

      My first website (other than the ubiquitous "rants" page) was basically a collection of Monty Python scripts I ripped off of gopher sites and HTML-ized. Back then, I actually got mentioned on one of those "cool site of the day" pages. These days I'd probably just get sued.

    7. Re:Ridiculous! by HardcoreWizard · · Score: 2, Funny

      The world needs no more than three jokes, repeated over and over again in eternity!

    8. Re:Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #!/usr/bin/perl -w
      for ($i=0;$i<100000000;$i++) {
      open(FILE, ">/var/www/html/site_$i.html");
      $j=$i+1;
      print FILE <<ENDHTML;
      <html>
      <body>
      <p>Welcome to webpage number $i!</p>
      <p>Go to the next page <a href="site_$j.html">here</a>.</p>
      </body>
      </html>
      ENDHTML
      close(FILE);}

      Oops! Looks like I just doubled it! The interweb now has 200 million websites!

    9. Re:Ridiculous! by Chmcginn · · Score: 1
      I imagine the same proportion of sites are still worth visiting.
      Do you mean proportion or absolute number?
      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    10. Re:Ridiculous! by livingdeadline · · Score: 1

      Does that include the Dead Parrot Sketch and "Netcraft confirms it, [something] is dying"?

    11. Re:Ridiculous! by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new three-trick pony overlords.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    12. Re:Ridiculous! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, that includes YOU!

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    13. Re:Ridiculous! by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Remember when altavista and webcrawler were cool search engines?

      Remember when there WERE no search engines and you'd have to get magazines with websites and reviews?

      Remember the first time you downloaded mirc and was flabbergasted when you found out you could CHAT with someone? Before the time people said ASL? When they just said Hi, I'm so and so. Where are you?

      Remember when you first saw a FREE version of UNIX that you could download, and which was a royal pain to actually install?

      I do.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    14. Re:Ridiculous! by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      Remember the first time you saw porn? Now that was something. Friggin historical moment, it was.

    15. Re:Ridiculous! by qzulla · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember all that and look how it has worked out for you when I clicked (not selected as we did in the old days) your link:

      Server not found

      Firefox can't find the server at ghazan.hazara.org.

              * Check the address for typing errors such as
                          ww.example.com instead of
                          www.example.com

              * If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.

              * If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.

      qz

    16. Re:Ridiculous! by JPDeckers · · Score: 1

      I still have my "Internet for Dummies" 1st edition 1994 with an overview of "nearly all websites" available. Surfing was explained as telneting to port 80 and starting a text-browser on the server, BUT, a new graphical browser (mosaic 0.8x?) was also something you could check out!

      Remember Veronica and Gohper ? Remember having your browser, email-client & usenet reader one a single 1.4M floppy ?

      Bigger frustration: Remember 1993, sex.com was still available, and checking upon it, seeing it costs $100/year, deciding "this internet is not going anywhere", atleast, not commercially...

      Oh well...

      [ Queue the "I put the tubes for the 'Net myself in the ground" oldies ]

    17. Re:Ridiculous! by dheera · · Score: 1

      I for one UNWELCOME overloads. it's aggravating to see that stupid sentence everywhere.

    18. Re:Ridiculous! by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      That was way before the Internet. And it was ASCII, and we liked it.

    19. Re:Ridiculous! by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1
      I still have a published copy of "Zen and the Art of the Internet" by Brendan P. Kehoe, and it doesn't even mention the WWW. FTP, telnet, USENET, and gopher are all there, but no web. :-)

      You can read it on the web as well if you'd like. :-)

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    20. Re:Ridiculous! by Reapy · · Score: 1

      You are 100% correct. While probably not dating back as far as you, I had a first webpage about 10 or 11 years ago and, as you said, along with the rants, I put up some far side comics that I had scanned in because I thought they were really funny. I even wanted to make sure that I didn't take some wierd credit for the pictures, and put in the book title, author, and page numbers of each comic. It was my thoght if people liked them they might want to go find whole book and read the rest, and addtionally could locate the funny comics in their own copies by going to the page number.

      Well this sat somewhere online for about 10 years or so while I completly forgot about it, until sometime last year, the isp hosting the site informed me that they had received a cease and desist letter from some company who is out to protect the far side ip. To be save the ISP blocked the site until I took down the photos, but I just told them to go ahead and delete it since I lost the password a long while ago.

      But still, crazy to see something done 10 years ago catching up with you like that. Back then it was no big deal, now, apparently I was destroying thier intelectual property.

    21. Re:Ridiculous! by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      Actually, I totally agree. It was the first and last time I will ever use it. You can mark my words.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
  2. Shameless Plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the 100 millionth site was www.PeenieWallie.com

    What will the 300 millionth be?

    1. Re:Shameless Plug by Meatloaf+Surprise · · Score: 1
      What will the 300 millionth be?

      hopefully something a lot better

  3. Yes but... by fernandoh26 · · Score: 0

    Yes but what is the condition of its toobes? It's not a dump truck ya know....

    --
    Chums up, let's do this!
    1. Re:Yes but... by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Considering the nature of most of those pages, it would have to be sewage tubes.

  4. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, that's like 90 million porn sites? :O

    I can believe it.

  5. how many porn sites? by scatteredsun · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the rate of growth in porn sites is. anyone know a number?

    1. Re:how many porn sites? by justinbach · · Score: 1
      anyone know a number?

      uh...42?
      --
      I left my wallet in El Sigundo!
    2. Re:how many porn sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      69

    3. Re:how many porn sites? by varmittang · · Score: 1

      99,999,999 porn sites and one website that only says, "Bring back the Porn", encase they took all the porn off the net.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    4. Re:how many porn sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn does not exist on the internet and that's why we don't need .xxx domain names.

    5. Re:how many porn sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      69%

    6. Re:how many porn sites? by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Alright. Everyone join in now.

      One, two, three...

      o/~ The Internet is for porn. The Internet is for porn. Grab your dick and double click for porn, porn, porn. o/~

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    7. Re:how many porn sites? by sirjoebob · · Score: 1

      i think the number looks like "8" ... only sidewayz ;)

    8. Re:how many porn sites? by nevillethedevil · · Score: 1

      I'm actually in the middle of a very intensive and scientific study into this very question.......

      --
      Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
    9. Re:how many porn sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just heard a stat on the news today there are 15 Million sites that contain kiddie porn. If that is accurate this world is truly a mess.

  6. In other news by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    Netcraft has also released new information that the internet now has 999,956,522 pornographic websites currently.

    Happy browsing everyone!

    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the other -899,956,522 are to help people who have problems counting the number of digits in very large numbers...

    2. Re:In other news by XHIIHIIHX · · Score: 1

      even with the commas

  7. The internet is for porn? by Parallax+Blue · · Score: 1

    If this holds true... NERDS REJOICE!

    1. Re:The internet is for porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  8. Even more exciting.. by realmolo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is the fact that that of those 100 million, *at least* 99 million are porn sites.

    God Bless the Internet.

  9. Back in my day... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    ...we had over 100,000 BBS's! You kids and your new-fangled internet...

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Back in my day... by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 1
      ...we had over 100,000 BBS's! You kids and your new-fangled internet...
      When the first public dialup internet provider opened in my local calling area, the BBS scene died immediately. I'm still somewhat bitter over that. The internet never really replaced all that bulletin boards had to offer.


  10. How many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are just stupid aliases for google spamming?

  11. The number is grossly inflated by Red_Foreman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    While there may be over 100 million web sites, not all have any semblence of unique content. Between phishing sites and domain registrars that pre-register domains and re-sell those domains (leaving adds to some search engine as a default), there's no way there's 100 million+ different sites out on the web.

    That would be an interesting statistic - how many web sites are there with unique content?

    1. Re:The number is grossly inflated by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      I dunno about unique content, but TFA shows around 50 million "Active" sites.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    2. Re:The number is grossly inflated by OakDragon · · Score: 1
      Actually, 50 million "active" sites out of 100 million total really amazes me, if true.

      I wonder what percentage of the 100 million are A) domain squatting link tubs, and/or B) dead blogs.

  12. PHB to Dilbert by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

    Please print a fresh copy of the Internet for me, right away.

    1. Re:PHB to Dilbert by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      "I can't print; is the Internet down?"

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  13. 90% of which are blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all linking to other blogs.
    The other 10% are news aggregators like slashdot which mostly link to blogs, or services someone slapped a blog-like interface on, like YouTube.

    1. Re:90% of which are blogs by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      AC, you say that like it's a bad thing. Blog/News Aggregators rock! Slashdot, as you mentioned is one, as is YouTube. My favourites besides those big ones are here in Canada with me, at Progressivebloggers.ca and the Saskblogs Aggregator.

      Aggregators, like Fark.com and the others mentioned help widdle down the 101,000,001 webpages out there, to something someone can hope to consume in a day. It will one day change television as we know it, and give the neighbour and their dog as big an online presence as eBay once had at the turn of the last millennium. Blogs are the distillation of written history in the making (when they aren't splogs).

    2. Re:90% of which are blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What bugs the hell out of me is the infinite recursion of blogs. Part of it due to people just looking for attention, part of it 'cause we chimps apparently have nothing better to do than spend all day rehashing stuff.
      Blogs aren't about distillation most of the time, they are about recursive rehashing.
      I go to an aggregator like Digg which links to a blog which links to a blog which links to a blog which links to an article that someone actually put some friggen info on, not just meta-wanking.

    3. Re:90% of which are blogs by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      You're right that there is a certain level of repetitiveness, and less "creation". But aggregators are still a good way for someone to find the creators of content, and first hand accounts of the news. If it weren't for fark, and slashdot, thousands of important news makers on the Internet throughout the year would go unnoticed to most users.

    4. Re:90% of which are blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aggregators, like Fark.com and the others mentioned help widdle down the 101,000,001 webpages out there,

      I'm not sure I want Fark.com widdling on my web pages. Though at least the stench of urine won't come across the tubes...

      The word you were after is "whittle".

    5. Re:90% of which are blogs by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      Thank you AC, I thought it didn't look 'write' ;-) Wood you like to make any other corrections?

  14. Mmm, the memories. by Vegard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember when the "google equivalent" was a web page with all the worlds web servers was listed. It rapidly got divided into one page per country....

    1. Re:Mmm, the memories. by SETIGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Here's a subset of my .mosaic-hotlist-default which still sits in my home directory. Frankly, I'm amazed at how many have evolved into something else.

      • http://sunsite.unc.edu/ianc/ Tue Feb 15 12:46:13 1994 Internet Underground Music Archive
      • http://www.cs.colorado.edu/homes/mcbryan/public_ html/bb/summary.html Tue Feb 15 16:20:03 1994 The Mother-of-all BBS
      • http://adswww.colorado.edu/adswww/adshomepg.html Fri Feb 18 13:17:54 1994 Astrophysics Data System Home Page
      • http://nearnet.gnn.com/gnn/gnn.html Tue Apr 19 11:15:27 1994 GNN Home Page
      • http://www.mojones.com/motherjones.html Tue Apr 19 12:22:19 1994 Mother Jones
      • http://wwww.cs.colorado.edu/~mcbryan/WWWW.html Tue Nov 15 12:26:03 1994 The World Wide Web Worm
      • http://www.ai.mit.edu/stocks.html Thu Dec 29 10:19:53 1994 Experimental Stock Market Data
  15. Yeah, but... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
    ...how many of them are ad/pr0n/phishing-laden cybersquats, how many are "my first webpage" single-page sites, how many contain the default IIS or Apache test pages, how many are toss-off political candidate or jumped-the-shark-by-now specialty (e.g. Kerry 2004 campaign) websites, etc? In short, how many of them are actual, funct^M usable, ongoing websites? That's what I want to know.

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by krell · · Score: 1

      " jumped-the-shark-by-now specialty (e.g. Kerry 2004 campaign"

      "I jumped the shark, and then I didnt jump the shark".

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
  16. Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The internet did not just reach 100 million sites - Netcraft's crawl reached 100 million sites.
    The internet didn't double in size since 2004 - Netcraft's crawl doubled in size since 2004.

    1. Re:Ridiculous by sjwest · · Score: 1

      netcraft was rather retarded doing 'www' hunting as none of ours where included when iis jumped over apaches server mind share (slashdot article of old ps 'thanks' godaddy). If netcraft have improved (iis v apache outstanding) its nice to know there trying to do it properly, raher than just using godaddy domain names as the survey data model.

    2. Re:Ridiculous by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      I remember the fuss when there were 80 million sites, and that was back in the 90's

    3. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't the GoDaddy thing an entry in a previous copy of the report, where a months (massive) growth in IIS and decline in Apache was almost all accounted by them moving from one to the other?

    4. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep domain parking is microsoft's new iis 'fud'

  17. actual sites? by countach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    50 million more sites or 50 million more domain name squatters?

    1. Re:actual sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to know what the numbers are for websites that have been REMOVED as well.
      Huge growth in quantity does not translate into better quality content.

      For reference, I give you http://www.myspace.com/.........And NO, YOU CAN'T GIVE IT BACK!

  18. Heh - remember Yahoo back then? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
    Didn't they once have a web form to submit your site in order to get it listed, period?

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Heh - remember Yahoo back then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that when Yahoo was a stanford.edu site?

    2. Re:Heh - remember Yahoo back then? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      The first one I can think of was called "What's New?" Eventually they stopped accepting every single submission. I forget if they started requiring money to be listed or if it was some other criteria... I think they just stopped accepting personal websites.

      Then Yahoo came along and would list anybody equally, with all their categories and subcategories... they stopped taking just anybody, too.

      A couple of friends of mine started a business selling websites (both the servers and building the sites). The company didn't fare too well, but they created "What's New Too?" and actually made some money from banner adverstising...

      Those days are long gone.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  19. But what *is* it mostly? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    from the and-most-of-it-is-porn dept.

    Funny ha ha, but a lot of folks would accept that statement at face value. At this point, measured in Netcraft's metric of "number of web sites", it would be interesting to know what most of the Internet actually *is*. Blogs? Personal sites? Phishnets?

    If I were a betting man, I'd put my money on the hypothesis that the biggest category of "active web site" is the typosquatters.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  20. Server Too Busy by ziesemer · · Score: 1

    ... and how many have yet to be slashdotted?

  21. I think that number is wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that number is wrong...

    More like 99,999,969

  22. accuracy by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    How on earth could they ever claim this is an accurate number? The whole world is moving in the direction of name-based virtual hosting. One IP could potentially host thousands of web pages, all with different domain names.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:accuracy by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Counting the number of registered domains? Surely that's what the low-level employees of ICANN do all day long...

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:accuracy by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I could write a perl script that could count all the registered domains if I was ICANN. No need for a low level employee. Oh, except to write the script.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:accuracy by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You can do that for second-level domains, but not reliably for anything lower in the tree.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:accuracy by Pancake+Bandit · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? This is VERY accurate stuff we're talking about. In recent news, the US knew the exact moment that our population reached 300 million.

    5. Re:accuracy by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      further, each of those could have a bunch of ~user's which I consider a separate 'site'.

  23. Web sites are not 'The Internet' by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Internet has doubled in size since May 2004, when the survey hit 50 million

    How can an article citing Netcraft stats, submitted by a nerd, and approved by a nerd, get this basic concept wrong? The phone I used today was part of the internet. This week, I added half a dozen web sites to an existing box, on an existing single IP address. "The Web" and "The Internet" aren't the same thing. At all.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Web sites are not 'The Internet' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "The Web" and "The Internet" aren't the same thing. At all.

      No they are "the internets"

      Do ur research pal, they're not the same at all, google it...

      One of the things I've used on the Google is to pull up maps

    2. Re:Web sites are not 'The Internet' by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      I would also add the fact that 1 domain can have multiple websites and multiple domains can serve the same website, so I wouldn't say that that domain and websites are always the same thing.

    3. Re:Web sites are not 'The Internet' by Ekhymosis · · Score: 1
      Silly rabbit! This is slashdot. The editors don't check for accuracy nor do most posters. According to popular concensus, you don't have to be a nerd to be an editor at /. or very intelligent at all...

      Goodbye sweet karma!!!!!

      --
      Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
    4. Re:Web sites are not 'The Internet' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2001 called. It wants to pull its stick out of your ass.

    5. Re:Web sites are not 'The Internet' by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      How can an article citing Netcraft stats, submitted by a nerd, and approved by a nerd, get this basic concept wrong?

      Obviously the submitter and editor are either NOT nerds, or need to have their nerd quals revoked.

    6. Re:Web sites are not 'The Internet' by cserindere · · Score: 1
      "The Web" and "The Internet" aren't the same thing. At all.
      At least they are not like people I know who think they own the internet. My favorite question is: "My internet is broken, can you help me fix it?"
  24. Internet capacity being reached? by Parallax+Blue · · Score: 1

    How long until the creation of websites along with bandwidth-intensive things such as Bittorrent overwhelm the internet's capacity? I'm no expert, but is this possible? If so, whatever happened to Internet2? It may need to be rolled out sooner than previously thought..

    1. Re:Internet capacity being reached? by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      Internet2 is not a replacement for or sequel to the Internet. It's a private network of universities, research facilites, and the like. In that regard, it's something of a throwback to what the Internet was in the very beginning. Check out the wikipeida page on the subject.

    2. Re:Internet capacity being reached? by Salsaman · · Score: 1
      "Imminent Death of the Net" has been predicted so many times, it even has its own entry in some computing dictionaries

      Don't worry, the net has survived everything that's been thrown at it, I doubt a few more doublings in website numbers is going to affect it...

  25. Congratulations... whoever you are... by Duggeek · · Score: 1

    I wonder if we could ever find the actual 100,000,000th site to recognize them. Bake them a cake... or something?

    --
    This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
    1. Re:Congratulations... whoever you are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if we could ever find the actual 100,000,000th site to recognize them. Bake them a cake... or something?

      www.PeenieWallie.com

  26. MySpace by vafada · · Score: 1

    10% are MySpace profile... i kid, i kid.

  27. Parked Domains? by askegg · · Score: 1

    How many of these "new" domains are those horrible "parked domains" that advertise their own sale and link to other sites (presumably to lift their google ranking)?

    --
    I don't make predictions, and I never will.
    1. Re:Parked Domains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you see these parked domains, this is a sign that your search technique isn't good enough.
      Also, stop typing domain names in the adressbar that you are not sure about.

  28. Well, I won't believe it until... by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Netcraft confirms it.

    Oh. Whoops.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Well, I won't believe it until... by cloudkiller · · Score: 1

      where are my mod points when i need them...

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this sig]
  29. Don't worry I have a degree in wastewater eng'g by wsanders · · Score: 1

    With people like me in charge of the internet, you don't have to worry. I have a Master's in Civil Engineering, several course in wastewater engineering, and I'm a certified Water Plant Operator in the State of New Mexico!

    Back to work shoveling sludge.....

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  30. thats only 1 site for every 3 Americans by darkchubs · · Score: 1

    SEO spam accounts for what % . or derivative news feed aggregate sites. what about 3rd level domains, like myblog.blogservice.com .

  31. Domain name != website by Kjartan+Albertsson · · Score: 1

    This survey seems to be counting domain names, not websites. Aren't there over a million people with websites on myspace alone? stupid survey.

  32. w00t by dieth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    some other random loser gets credit for something I submitted over 14 hours ago and got marked as rejected!

  33. hmmm by Hennell · · Score: 0

    They'd better count again. I make it about three more then that....

  34. wow by nozavroni · · Score: 1

    How am I going to download the internet now?

  35. How are they counting. by cwinfough · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are they counting unique sites ie "http://www.yourname.com" and "http://www.joe.yourname.com" or are they just counting primary domain names? :>

  36. Hidden inaccuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how much of it is the "hidden web"?*

    That being sites that for one reason or another can't be reached from a particular point, if at all. Let alone all the hidden content that search engines can't see.

  37. Overpopulation by cptnapalm · · Score: 0

    The internet is overpopulated! There will be millions of web servers starving for electricity! We must limit our child processes through education!

  38. and only one that matters by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:and only one that matters by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      heh, haven't seen a zombo link in a while. I prefer obmoz, myself. [checks to see if it still works] It does.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:and only one that matters by clambake · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought you said zombie link.

  39. And how many are worth anything? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Sheer count is nothing. Its sort of like counting cars.. sure there may be a mind boggling amount of them, but how many of those are actually drivable and arent sitting in a junk yard?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  40. Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's kinda a lot... I guess...

  41. yeah right! by Treates2 · · Score: 0

    only 60,000 are actual websites the rest are domain squatters.

  42. Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you get back to me when the number of websites that are actually worth visiting climbs to 100? Thanks!

  43. Netcraft confirms it by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

    Yet another crippling bombshell hit the BSD community today. It is official, of the 100,000,000 websites, 999,956,522 of them are pornographic. The other 43478 non-pornographic websites are all running BSD and are dying. Film at 11:00

    (Sorry, can't resist when it comes to Netcraft)

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    1. Re:Netcraft confirms it by codename.matrix · · Score: 1

      Could you explain your math equation to me again - just out of curiousity...

    2. Re:Netcraft confirms it by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      oops. I'm taking codeine for back pain. Is that a good enough excuse?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Netcraft confirms it by varmittang · · Score: 1

      Acceptable.

      We would have also accepted:

      Well, for large sums of 2 it works.
      What are you, the addition police.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  44. More is better? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    OK there have been some great services and sites that have come into being in the last ten years. However, it is very hard to see that 100 million sites == a whole lot of value. There are probably way less than 1 million sites that have content worth checking out. The rest is just Goobage.

    Every crap site added makes for more jusk that makes it harder to find anything worthwhile.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:More is better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, he just said "Goobage".

    2. Re:More is better? by morcego · · Score: 1
      There are probably way less than 1 million sites that have content worth checking out. The rest is just Goobage.


      You are way too generous. Even tho you are technically correct (heck, 1 is "less than 1 million"), that would be 1% of the total number of sites. My bet is way below that, more like
      0.2%.

      Now, if you mean that 1% of the total content is worth checking out, you might be closer to the mark. As usual, the 10-90 rule probably applies here to, with 10% of the websites containing 90% of the total content. If we consider that half of the sites that are worth visiting (my 0.2% estimative) are on that 10%, you have only on that part 0.9% of the internet content, with the other half on the 90% (of sites) accounting for exactly 0.1% of the internet content.

      Adding those figures, you go back that 0.2% of the internet sites, which are worth checking out, contain 1% of the internet content.

      Anyway, that is just my personal estimative.
      --
      morcego
  45. 1995 by psybre · · Score: 1

    I really miss my 1995 website. Sigh.
    ~psybre

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor. -- d474
  46. Forget how many are porn sites by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

    My question is, how many of these sites are phishing sites?

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  47. Good thing but... by CapitalT · · Score: 1

    how many of those are worth it?

    My list:
    1-Slashdot.org
    2-Homestarrunner.com
    3-Wikipedia.org
    4-Google.com
    5-Syllable.org
    6-Flickr.com
    And all open source related sites...

    Some sites are popular but aren't worth the bits that they are transmitted on (eg. Digg.com).

  48. if netcraft wants to provide helpful info by wardk · · Score: 1

    they should tell us which 4 or 5 of those are actually worth visiting!

  49. Sen. Stevens, your tubes are calling...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100 million sites. Dang, we better get more tubes out there FAST.

  50. Growth yes, but why? by Statecraftsman · · Score: 1

    So year over year there something like 40-50% growth in the number of sites. The question is why? Do we all wake up in the morning thinking, "I wish there were more websites!"

    This just reflects that more people are coming up with more ideas that include having their own little piece o' web. It's not important how many ideas people have or how many domains they run. It's how much time humanity is spending online that matters. It's how much good the internet is doing for us. Just wanted to point out the number is really irrelevant for human quality of life.

    That is, unless you own a hosting company.

    1. Re:Growth yes, but why? by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > So year over year there something like 40-50% growth in the number of sites. The question is why?

      You have questions.... and since I ain't Radio Shack I have more than blank stares for ya. :)

      Blogs. Microsoft, Google and a lot more bit players are in a race to see how many domains they can host for free. And these days they don't call em personal homepages (that is so 20th Century and conjures up visions of crapy geocities pages) anymore, now we call them blogs. Plus Microsoft gets to boost their netcraft server share ranking with every free domain they host on IIS. And probably cheaper than what they spent bribing Godaddy to move their parked domains from Apache.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  51. Don't worry, by runlevel+5 · · Score: 1

    I'm no expert either, but when we run out of tubes, we shall build a glorious new internet out of pipes.

  52. Their study isn't complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upon reading that they did this study in November 2006 (which means today), I checked the stats for my two websites. One of them was hit by someone in Japan - dunno how.... My other site hasn't been visited by anyone since 10/29/06.

    Yeah, yeah - talk to me later about getting more web site hits.

    Anyway, impossible that their study is complete.

  53. How much more is more? by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    ""There are now more than 100 million web sites [CC] on the Internet, according to Netcraft..."

    ... Half of which are parked domains, "coming soon" or other typo-prone domains.

  54. Yahoo back then (well, 1996 anyway) by MikeRoefone · · Score: 1
  55. People getting it wrong. by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

    On a related note, I don't know if this has ever jarred with people like it used to do with me but it used to annoy the piss out of me whenever people referred to webpages as websites. Anyone?

  56. Not since the USA... by linuxg0d · · Score: 1

    ... has a number been pulled, so creatively, out of someone's ass!

    Congratulations!

  57. and here I am .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. with only one penis to enjoy them all with. *sigh*

    (no, I'm not looking for donations, thanks anyway)

  58. Death Eaters by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    3.388579132890506E-4 % of the people on Myspace put down their occupation as 'Death Eater'.

  59. The Internet Now has Over 100 Million Web Sites... by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ..and 99.99 million of them are crap.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  60. News at 11 by thatgun · · Score: 1

    Netcraft confirms it: the internet is thriving!

    1. Re:News at 11 by thatgun · · Score: 1

      Oops. Meant to post AC...

      *dodges vegetables on way out of town hall* ...The post above was obligatory! Please give me a break!

      Please?

  61. Re:I feel bad for his wife by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Gah! Please mod my above post as off-topic. I meant to post this on the Aliens loader thread. Personally, I blame IE7 and the new tabbed browsing. Yeah, that's it . . .

  62. 1988 by ukemike · · Score: 1

    I remember back before there were 1 million USERS on the internet. Then came AOL, and it's been downhill ever since.

    Actually that's not fair. The internet has become the ultimate knowledge resource that I believed, back then, that it could be, except with banner ads and pop-ups.

    Way back then I could read sci.physics or rec.arts.drwho as fast as my 2400 buad modem could download the text. Who could possibly need a 9600 baud modem? No one can actually read THAT fast!

    --
    -- QED
    1. Re:1988 by havenskate · · Score: 1
      Porn.

      I remember the days of BBSs and loving it when people used HSLINK on my BBS.. And I remember one protocol (can't remember the name) that'd let you download gifs or Jpegs and see it as it downloads... ahh, that 2400baud modem was never fast enough.. even when we got to 14.4k it still wasn't fast enough! :P But, it was kind of exciting to get just a little bit of the picture at a time. hehe

      The BBS days were fun... 1-800-YOU-WISH. hehe.. Leechmodem anyone? haha.

    2. Re:1988 by HarryCaul · · Score: 1

      Was it YModem? Seems like it, but it's all hazy now.

      I remember when lynx seemed like a major jump over previous gopher clients. And by using "pages" on my shell account, I had tabbed browsing!

  63. Time for the politicians to step in... by thejake420 · · Score: 1

    In the beginning, Al Gore created the internet. (The tubes were on backorder, but some friendly teamsters installed them a couple of weeks later.)

    In the present, half the web is porn and the other half is making fun of GW's latest gaffe. (Essentially, the whole Internet revolves around bush in one way or the other...)

    In the future, after Bush declares martial law the day before the election, the powers that be will step in and tell us which 42 of those 100,000,000 websites we're allowed to view without a visit from the men in black for one reason or another.

    --
    Webmaster
    www.JakesJokes.com
  64. 100 million channels... by concept14 · · Score: 1

    ...And there's nothing on!

    --
    Quis metamoderunt ipses metamoderatores?
  65. Of those 42 million 'websites'... by The+Raven · · Score: 1

    ... I bet a good half of them are spam domains, used to pump Google ranks, host tens of thousands of /search-terms/ folders, and otherwise useless sites with little to no content.

    The quantity of CONTENT on the Internet has little to do with the number of domains hosted. In fact, the number of domains is pretty irrelevant, since it seems the bittorrent protocol hosts more actual content nowadays than the http protocol.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
  66. How do you define a site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some sites have tens of thousands of hostnames all pointing to the same IP address - would this count as one site or tens of thousands? One example I can think of looks like this: Chicago-IL.ziply.com, Urbana-IL.ziply.com, Virginville-PA.ziply.com, anywhere in the US basically. A small number of sites like this could skew the results.

  67. How accurate is this count? by ESRB · · Score: 1

    What about the deep web? Can netcraft's count be even remotely accurate?

    1. Re:How accurate is this count? by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      The deep web refers to pages/data/misc content not accessible through a link but that is part of a website, meaning that the deep web doesn't have an effect on the site count.

    2. Re:How accurate is this count? by ESRB · · Score: 1

      I got the impression that, in addition to what you said, the deep web also included entire sites not indexed, perhaps due to a robots.txt that prohibits it?

  68. All those sites and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100 million websites, 90 million new porn sites..
    and I still can't find my fetis.. err..elephants.. err..homework..

  69. Large Increase in Microsoft Webservers by Jesterboy · · Score: 1

    FTA, it seems that Apache still rules the web, but I really have to wonder, what happened in May 2006 to cause Microsoft's share to jump so much? Did they release a new product during this time or something? It seems to be a pretty good sized jump.

    1. Re:Large Increase in Microsoft Webservers by JeepFanatic · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly I think it had something to do with GoDaddy decided to move to to MS servers.

    2. Re:Large Increase in Microsoft Webservers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* Paid to switch *cough*

    3. Re:Large Increase in Microsoft Webservers by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Godaddy switched from Apache to IIS, so all their parked domains were using IIS all of a sudden.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  70. in two years it will pass 200 mlln by legion89 · · Score: 1

    when it will reach 1 billion? in 2015?

    1. Re:in two years it will pass 200 mlln by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      when it will reach 1 billion? in 2015?

      That's the year MySpace reaches 1 billion users.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  71. Stats useless without the underlying methodology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Without understanding how the web sites are identified, this number is meaningless. I've never seen published a methodology of how they identify what is included in the survey.

    If I set up a DNS server with a wildcard A record, I can create a single web page providing 10,000 links to different sites, all in the same domain, but each with a different host name, each resolving to the same IP. Visit that page, and each of the 10,000 pages in turn, and you'd just have identified 100 million new sites.

    Check the methodology at SecuritySpace, along with their Monthly Web Site Growth image (half way down the page). It projects an estimated "Active Web" size significantly smaller than that of Netcraft.

  72. Slashdot effect by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 0

    Is that including the servers that have burned up.

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
  73. Re:oh snap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the title should say 100E6 web sites on port 80? My HTTP server keeps a low profile on a non-standard port. Was I counted, damnit! No website left behind.

  74. But... but...! by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

    Yeah but... Netcraft confirmed it!

    (Ahh, the smell of burning karma)

    --
    Yup...
  75. MySpace is the new GeoCities by tepples · · Score: 1
    conjures up visions of crapy geocities pages

    Didn't you mean "conjures up visions of crappy myspace pages"?

  76. A fine number by qzulla · · Score: 1

    But how many are worth looking at?

    qz

    1. Re:A fine number by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      All of them except goatse (since it's not even worthy for its creator I guess).

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  77. Why google? by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    When all you need to index is 6 sites? :P

    1. Re:Why google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever tried using Slashdot's search engine? It's awful =)

  78. Re:The Internet Now has Over 100 Million Web Sites by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Thank God for Cool Web Search.

  79. 100 Million Websites... by mrpaco18 · · Score: 1

    And I'm on Slashdot for some godforsaken reason.

  80. Just a moment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have them all bookmarked. Let me go count...

  81. 100M + 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they didn't count the one I run at home.

    -m10

  82. Re:Frist st0p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats awesome, I accidentally clicked on the text of this post (using the new comments viewing system) and it went straight to the goatse pumpkin! No text style differences and no [goatse.cx] domain marking visible.

  83. Printed Guides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what I remember most from those times? Printed guides to the Internet! They were mostly collections of addresses with descriptions for the ones that made to the top of each category. I want to see them try it now.

  84. 100 millions? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    100 millions web sites seems like a low figure to me. You mean 100 million servers right ?

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  85. I'd like the *list* of all those... by kickdown · · Score: 1

    to include them in a new anti-search engine that just zaps you through the internet, untargeted:http://www.webjumping.com/. Right now, it's based on a crawler that so far has only seen a tiny fraction. I'd love to have the complete, real thing in my database!

    --
    Continuous positive slashdot karma since... uh, maybe next year.
  86. Not including the 150 million phishing sites ... by ninja_assault_kitten · · Score: 1

    Not including the 150 million phishing sites hosted on the 250 million zombie systems out there.

  87. Re:The Internet Now has Over 100 Million Web Sites by mgblst · · Score: 1

    Really? How can 99 Million Pron sites be bad?

  88. Won't somebody please think of the tubes?! by dwalsh · · Score: 1
    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
  89. It's me!!! by manwal · · Score: 1

    That's my site! I just put my new site online!! I'm the 100 millionth website!!1!