Haha, first, the majority of voters voted for the Democrat.
Second, the "bubble" exists in deep red states in the South and midwest. Have YOU ever tried to step out of your bubble? And maybe understand why most of the country voted against Trump?
Small sample size, but of the two Macs I've owned in my life, both died after a couple of years. Power supply went wiggy in one, while the other died because the display cable was stupidly put in a poorly-designed hinge (as Apple eventually admitted publicly). They fixed the latter the first time it went out because of the stupid design decision (driven no doubt by narcissistic sociopath pseudoartist Steve Jobs), but when it inevitably went out again they wouldn't. I have literally 10+ year PC laptops that still run.
"+1. Everything I ever needed to know about unions I learned the first time I helped my employer set up a convention booth at Moscone Center."
So you're extrapolating about all unions from your experience with a single union in a single facility in a single state? I think maybe your sample size is too small.
Who cares if there's a closed source version of it? That doesn't affect the functionality of what's been contributed to the open source version already.
How do you function at your level of stupidity? Coal is dying because it's cheaper to use natural gas, and even renewables in a lot of places. Are you so mindnumbingly stupid to think that if you took all these regulations off the energy sector suddenly coal is cheaper than natural gas?
The laws under which the EPA issues and enforces rules were created by Congress, and what they can do with those rules is strictly circumscribed by the law. It's not a general lawmaking authority, and Congress has to specifically delegate that rulemaking power to the agency, the President just can't create these agencies completely on his own.
It's not that separate and discrete. The executive order stopped all immigrant visa issuances, too, based purely on nationality, which violates the law.
If he had issued an order stating that immigrant visas would not be issued to a certain class of people from the 6 countries, that would be different. That is why I suspect SCOTUS carved out those exceptions.
Slashdot Mirror
Haha, first, the majority of voters voted for the Democrat.
Second, the "bubble" exists in deep red states in the South and midwest. Have YOU ever tried to step out of your bubble? And maybe understand why most of the country voted against Trump?
Small sample size, but of the two Macs I've owned in my life, both died after a couple of years. Power supply went wiggy in one, while the other died because the display cable was stupidly put in a poorly-designed hinge (as Apple eventually admitted publicly). They fixed the latter the first time it went out because of the stupid design decision (driven no doubt by narcissistic sociopath pseudoartist Steve Jobs), but when it inevitably went out again they wouldn't. I have literally 10+ year PC laptops that still run.
"Macs have now"
Now?
"That's entirely normal. Those machines belong to the conference and presenters supposedly have no say."
The linked story notes he was observed creating the presentation on a mac laptop. On an airplane.
"+1. Everything I ever needed to know about unions I learned the first time I helped my employer set up a convention booth at Moscone Center."
So you're extrapolating about all unions from your experience with a single union in a single facility in a single state? I think maybe your sample size is too small.
"and hopefully not release the compiled version for free"
I think I found the flaw in your plan...
You may want to keep an eye on that coworker; his/her judgment may not be the most reliable.
Who cares if there's a closed source version of it? That doesn't affect the functionality of what's been contributed to the open source version already.
Third party injunctions are a thing in U.S. courts.
Conference proceedings are a very different thing than peer-reviewed research.
They've been on the market for almost a decade, actually...
Maybe he already has one? I better search AltaVista.com to see.
We were talking about "democracy," not the weirdly weighted system the US has.
How do you function at your level of stupidity? Coal is dying because it's cheaper to use natural gas, and even renewables in a lot of places. Are you so mindnumbingly stupid to think that if you took all these regulations off the energy sector suddenly coal is cheaper than natural gas?
By getting less votes than the Democrats in the last Presidential AND congressional elections.
"why didn't the rule go into effect asap during Obama's tenure?"
Because they wanted to give the industries reasonable time to comply?
Wow, EVERY single argument you made is demonstrably wrong.
The EPA rulings were not in violation of "the laws on regulations."
This WAS an appeals court. It wasn't the "Ninth Court" (assuming you meant Ninth Circuit).
The laws under which the EPA issues and enforces rules were created by Congress, and what they can do with those rules is strictly circumscribed by the law. It's not a general lawmaking authority, and Congress has to specifically delegate that rulemaking power to the agency, the President just can't create these agencies completely on his own.
Chevron deference only applies when the rule is ambiguous. It doesn't let federal agencies create new laws.
"Obama used regulations on coal to essentially kill the industry, as he promised."
Stop repeating talking points that are lies. Regulation didn't "kill the industry," the free market did.
We really need more civics education in this country.
Federal environmental laws specifically state how the EPA is supposed to regulate. They can't just put in or take out whichever rules they want.
No, they did it a lot in Bush and Reagan Americas too.
You honestly think THE INTERNET isn't part of "commerce among the several states"?
It's not that separate and discrete. The executive order stopped all immigrant visa issuances, too, based purely on nationality, which violates the law.
Check out this, from a right-winger even:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...
If he had issued an order stating that immigrant visas would not be issued to a certain class of people from the 6 countries, that would be different. That is why I suspect SCOTUS carved out those exceptions.
"Me? I'm winning"
Nah, you're not. I know it, you know it, we all know it. You're just trying to psych yourself up so you don't collapse in tears.