Not a rhetorical question: Why do all the Trump apologists assume that the Congressional committees and the intelligence committees will provide them with the proof they have? Why exactly do you think you are privy to what they've found out?
Coincidentally, slashdot designates you a friend of a friend. I actually haven't looked at the friend/foe stuff in probably 10+ years, kind of forgot about it.
Fame is not the same thing as social status. If you wanted to just save lives and help people and didn't care about status or money, you should have become a paramedic in a dangerous area. You'd save a lot more lives than a doctor.
Depending on the case discovery disputes ARE the case. I worked for a plaintiffs'-side law firm that got into epic discovery battles (as in more than once they made the national legal news media) and we really did go after documents intensely because a single document or two could have made the difference between winning and losing a multimillion dollar case. It wasn't about trying to pressure the other side or punish them.
On the other hand I totally agree that judges tend not to care about them.
I like how so many of the comments are complaining that he didn't get any due process rights. On a story about his lawyers submitting an appeal to a court that then ruled on it.
The bad parts of Slashdot have always been bad. The difference is now there are a lot more forums that cater to the same audience, with less clunky interfaces, so it gets less traffic.
Slashdot Mirror
Have you tried buying anything at a store with gold?
Not a rhetorical question: Why do all the Trump apologists assume that the Congressional committees and the intelligence committees will provide them with the proof they have? Why exactly do you think you are privy to what they've found out?
"Please show us a conservative campaign that the Russians exploited for purposes of divisiveness"
Trump-Pence 2016.
I like WMP better than Groove, because it doesn't have the obnoxious marketing thing going, though I've switched mostly to musicbee.
Though as bad as Groove is, it's better than the pinnacle of incompetent design that is iTunes.
Oh, not coincidentally at all, my bad, the reason you mentioned friend/foe was because of that fact. Nevermind, I'm old and absent-minded.
"The internal combustion engine has proven its value as a technology for more than a century."
So maybe it's time to develop a new way of doing things?
Not believing in idiotic right-wing conspiracy theories would be a good start to a definition.
Did the Bones character turn towards the camera, hold up a Coke, and say buy coke?
Well played, my friend, well played...
I have little problem getting past nudity. Gratuitous violence might turn me off to a show, but I haven't noticed much of that in the shows I like.
Coincidentally, slashdot designates you a friend of a friend. I actually haven't looked at the friend/foe stuff in probably 10+ years, kind of forgot about it.
They added a lot more original shows, which on average are better than the network shows.
I knew we should have pinned her into the coffin with a stake through the heart.
In the early TV days the NEWS ANCHORS WOULD SHILL PRODUCTS DIRECTLY. There is no way that ANYTHING done on TV now even comes to close to that.
Uhhh...citation?
I know a genuine Panaphonics when I see one. And look, there's Magnetbox and Sorny!
I've been on slashdot since 2000 or so, and I did not notice much of a difference between CmdrTaco here and CmdrTaco gone.
I try to avoid late-era Heinlein. His stuff got so bad.
Fame is not the same thing as social status. If you wanted to just save lives and help people and didn't care about status or money, you should have become a paramedic in a dangerous area. You'd save a lot more lives than a doctor.
"Doctors don't become doctors in order to win awards, they want to help people."
Doctors become doctors largely because of the social status and money.
It's not really Star Trek unless those consoles blow up constantly, killing their operators.
Depending on the case discovery disputes ARE the case. I worked for a plaintiffs'-side law firm that got into epic discovery battles (as in more than once they made the national legal news media) and we really did go after documents intensely because a single document or two could have made the difference between winning and losing a multimillion dollar case. It wasn't about trying to pressure the other side or punish them.
On the other hand I totally agree that judges tend not to care about them.
That's just wrong. Denying a cert petition is a ruling. The decision to do so is entered and published as Supreme Court order.
I like how so many of the comments are complaining that he didn't get any due process rights. On a story about his lawyers submitting an appeal to a court that then ruled on it.
The bad parts of Slashdot have always been bad. The difference is now there are a lot more forums that cater to the same audience, with less clunky interfaces, so it gets less traffic.