Stop the government aide to the companies outsourcing to foreign countries. When a company outsources, we still allow them to deduct that cost from their federal (and state) taxes. Lets stop that.
Have anyone considered the privacy and security issues when sending this information to foreign companies? The call center for American Express in India may not have the same security and legal protection for your records -- but then again with the patriot act, we don't have any privacy anyways.
Even when taking a photo, to have it admitted as evidence you must have the person taking it verify that they did take it. This goes with digital or film camera -- or any type of documentary evidence.
This is just general, but there are many rules about entering photograghs and other documents.
They will cancel the service, which exposes the whois information. Then since it had to be registered with Godaddy, then GoDaddy will suspend or cancel the domain.
It seems as the DMCA, the copyright extension, the butchering of the spam laws are all a results of payoffs to our "representitives". And even when they are paid for, some companies are still usurping them to chill commentary or block competition. If you have any doubt of that, just look at actions of Lexmark, Mattel and Dibold.
At first, I thought it would be a joke, like edavis.org which made it like Davis was selling property, contracts, and laws of California to the highest bidder. It was funny, especially when they tried to get it taken down.
Maybe Bush bush auctioned off our e-mail boxes when he took payoffs to sign the I-CAN-SPAM act.
You have to realize that if much of the heat loss from the house was stopped, the energy requirement would go do dramatically.
What I have not seen is the application in areas that weight would make a difference, cars, planes, and maybe even clothes.
In clothes, you can have the equivlent in a down jacket in the thinkness of a windbreaker. It would be light as a feature, and not be subject do damage by exteme normal wear.
Of course, everyone on/. forgets that even if it is a great insulator, you don't have to completely cover the area, but have small breaks in the area of insulation to allow breathing
The game companies will be renting the games, not selling them. Similar to some of the lawsuits with the record label selling CDs without notice. When the companies start start admit that they are renting the games, they will drop the price.
A friend once told me that the money is in "Pay per play!"
There was a case by Playboy on one of the prior Playmates using the Playmate trademark as a meta tag on her web site. The court ruled that her use of the term was proper because she was a playmate.
Trademark cannot be used to quiete discussion and commentary (see Mattel v. MCA records). But, this case is possibly on the line and it is good that an appeals court will write a decision that will become usable for other courts.
It did come out in 1987, but that was in conjunction with MicroSoft. I first used it in 1988 on a Wang PC, but it would not officially be able to run on non-IBM systems. In 1992 (maybe 91) IBM releaased OS/2 2.0 and had the smoke and mirrors show at the Windows/OS/2 show in Boston.
I sometimes take my laptop up to the coffee shop in Hollywood (Hollywood Green Room) and sit there for a couple of hours using my laptop, sipping on 2 coffees, and using my cell phone for occassional access. I may get lunch, depending on what they have and my mood, but a wireless tip jar is always good. It depends on the user and the use, if they just chat, browse for hours and sip on coffee or check mail and write.
Even if spammers move their servers overseas, the people running the business here can be sued. Even if the spammer is completely overseas, they can still be sued. If a US company hires a spammer to spam, the US company can be sued.
Slashdot Mirror
Have anyone considered the privacy and security issues when sending this information to foreign companies? The call center for American Express in India may not have the same security and legal protection for your records -- but then again with the patriot act, we don't have any privacy anyways.
Have 500 people, who are defined as ISPs, who received his spam, file a lawsuit against him for $10,000 each.
Let the magic of numbers work against him.
This is just general, but there are many rules about entering photograghs and other documents.
They will cancel the service, which exposes the whois information. Then since it had to be registered with Godaddy, then GoDaddy will suspend or cancel the domain.
If the people who leave open servers open are on the hook to be sued, they will wise up very quickly.
Even though the information is hidden, the e-mail is forwared to the registrant.
If he got a patent on it, and microsoft was charged $.01 per use, Microsoft would be out of business from all the crashes.
I have tried that, but everyone that I tried it with could not smell the calogne when they opened the e-mail.
It seems as the DMCA, the copyright extension, the butchering of the spam laws are all a results of payoffs to our "representitives".
And even when they are paid for, some companies are still usurping them to chill commentary or block competition. If you have any doubt of that, just look at actions of Lexmark, Mattel and Dibold.
Maybe Bush bush auctioned off our e-mail boxes when he took payoffs to sign the I-CAN-SPAM act.
What I have not seen is the application in areas that weight would make a difference, cars, planes, and maybe even clothes.
In clothes, you can have the equivlent in a down jacket in the thinkness of a windbreaker. It would be light as a feature, and not be subject do damage by exteme normal wear.
Of course, everyone on
Another thought, what about cell phone companies using the phone location service to send bill collectors?
A friend once told me that the money is in "Pay per play!"
Remember video games were $0.25 per play?
There was a case by Playboy on one of the prior Playmates using the Playmate trademark as a meta tag on her web site. The court ruled that her use of the term was proper because she was a playmate.
Trademark cannot be used to quiete discussion and commentary (see Mattel v. MCA records). But, this case is possibly on the line and it is good that an appeals court will write a decision that will become usable for other courts.
It did come out in 1987, but that was in conjunction with MicroSoft. I first used it in 1988 on a Wang PC, but it would not officially be able to run on non-IBM systems. In 1992 (maybe 91) IBM releaased OS/2 2.0 and had the smoke and mirrors show at the Windows/OS/2 show in Boston.
When I was at IBM in 97, they had instructions to move to OS/2 desktops instead of Windows unless if can be shown that you must have Windows.
Even if you only get 2MB, why does it matter. It is still much faster than dial-up and still as fast or faster than many DSL and cable modems.
If that is an issue, then the discovery of the people whitelisting them is appropriate, then people can go after the improper whitelisters.
Then if any spam filtering companies are whitelisting spammers, then go after the companies for fraud.
Even if spammers move their servers overseas, the people running the business here can be sued. Even if the spammer is completely overseas, they can still be sued. If a US company hires a spammer to spam, the US company can be sued.
India? No Russia. They would turn their systems into spam factories and child porn servers.
But, you have to have some way to encourage people to go for punitive damages. If not, then why would people go for them?
Under California Penal Code 502 it is illegal to access another's computer without permission.