Slashdot Mirror


Spammer Profile: Scott Richter

prostoalex writes "Westword.com published an article on Scott Richter, the owner of what is supposedly the nation's fastest-growing online marketing company, which mostly specialized in sending out those unsolicited electronic mail messages. Richter is the guy currently being sued by New York Attorney General and Microsoft Corporation for sending out nearly 9000 e-mails only to Hotmail accounts."

438 comments

  1. Spam time! by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF is HIS email address???

    1. Re:Spam time! by Pingular · · Score: 3, Funny

      scottrichter@hotmail.com

      --

      When anger rises, think of the consequences.
      Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    2. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it up, Sir Haxalot!

    3. Re:Spam time! by nocomment · · Score: 5, Informative

      According the Contact Us page, it's info@optinbig.com.
      Hey Andy! you take requests? http://www.optinbig.com/ unkay?

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    4. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Email address?

      No, get him with USPS junk mail. That's a whole lot more fun. =) It's been done before with the guy who was #1 at the time (Alan Ralsky or something like that, I beLIEve...)

      Get his home address and have fun...

    5. Re:Spam time! by jlechem · · Score: 1

      No I think it's srich10195@aol.com . If not take care on the poor bastard with the same name.

      --
      Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
    6. Re:Spam time! by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... and, for good measure, make sure you also do webmaster@optinbig.com, optinbig@optinbig.com, admin@optinbig.com, abuse@optinbig.com, scottrichter@optinbig.com, srichter@optinbig.com, and whatever else you can think of.

    7. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to get REAL revenge on this guy send him some cheap ass piece of garbage from Canada using UPS. He'll be charged like $50 in brokerage fees and be quite pissed when he finds out it's just some stupid item worth like a dollar.

    8. Re:Spam time! by NixLuver · · Score: 2, Funny
      LOL... Yeah, fill out all catalog requests and the like with his addy? Nasty, nasty...

      In other news - fighting dead-tree spam: I like to take all of the "SASE" type of mail and swap the contents around, so that Credit1 gets the "free gift request" from OurHome.com, and the like. Sucks up their time and money sorting that stuff out.

    9. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...you should also try:
      a@optinbig.com
      aa@optinbig.com
      aaa@optinbi g.com
      b@optinbig.com
      ba@optinbig.com
      baa...
      et c.

    10. Re:Spam time! by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      and whatever else you can think of.

      like... postmaster maybe?

      just remember, if you always put your email down as postmaster@localhost, you'll never get spam.

    11. Re:Spam time! by Sethb · · Score: 1

      I like to take all those SASE cards that fall out of magazines, and drop them in the mail without filling them out. I'm hoping the magazines get sick of paying for them, so they'll stop including their stupid cards to try to get me to subscribe to a magazine that I already subscribe to.

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    12. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I send back pieces of toilet paper with "shit" on them. You know why? Because opening envelopes is a boring job and I want to make people's lives a little more fun.

    13. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that...

      WTF is his meatspace address?

    14. Re:Spam time! by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      You forgot asshole@optinbig.com, moron@optinbig.com, prick@optinbig.com, retard@optinbig.com, etc, etc.

      Seriously, that's what this guy is and he knows it. He doesn't care who he pisses off or pisses on just as long as he gets rich quick.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    15. Re:Spam time! by RY · · Score: 1
      Read the AUP on the web site, it make it clear that the company does not SPAM. ALL of the 350,000 email address the company send to want the marketing. Just look at part 4 of the AUP
      You may not distribute, publish, or send any of the following types of e-mail: Unsolicited promotions, advertising or solicitations (commonly referred to as "spam"), including, without limitation, commercial advertising and informational announcements, except to those who have explicitly requested such e-mails. Commercial promotions, advertising, solicitations, or informational announcements that contain false or misleading information in any form. E-mails containing forged or falsified information in the header (including sender name and routing information), or any other forged or falsified information
      I am having a problem finding the OPT-OUT email address. Oh wait it is a SPAM stie.
    16. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone... say... DID want to direct a ton of junk mail towards... um... their own email for EDUCATIONAL purposes only... who might I... errr... someone go about doing that?

    17. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't care who he pisses off or pisses on just as long as he gets rich quick.

      You could've saved some time and just written "He's an American." We'd all know what you meant.

    18. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, why not send him a box of pot or E tablets? Add throw in a CD labled "Young Boys".

    19. Re:Spam time! by whittrash · · Score: 1

      SCOTT@OPTINBIG.COM, Send him something if you want to end up in spam hell! DO NOT SEND HIM MAIL. He will reply over and over and over and over and over and over.

    20. Re:Spam time! by Buran · · Score: 1

      I subscribed to Model Railroader online. First issue arrived within two weeks. Unwrapped it and opened it. A subscription card fell out.

      Hmmmmmmmmm... *insert evil look here*

    21. Re:Spam time! by Timmeh · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd try sphincter@optinbig.com, considering his line of work...

    22. Re:Spam time! by jgregs75 · · Score: 1

      http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archi ves/001165.html 20, 19, 18, 17.... can't wait to get this out!

    23. Re:Spam time! by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      I subscribed to a science fiction magazine a few years ago. I got a renewal notice before I got my first issue.

      The cards in the magazines I don't mind, though. When you're done reading for the moment, you just shake the magazine and you've got a good bookmark :-)

    24. Re:Spam time! by Buran · · Score: 1

      Pretty sad, isn't it? This same magazine, which I was reading lying down in bed, dumped three or four more loose (do they not even make an effort to tie those things down?) cards, most of them trying to sell other magazines from the same publishing house. That's not counting the full-double-page-spread for the readers-choice ballot crap for "best whoozawhatchit of the year, they get this cheap lucite trophy, you, our dear readers, get to pay for them" stuff. I honestly don't know why magazines do that, unless it's so that company can then print "The New XYZ 2000! Voted Best Hunkajunk of the Year by Insert-Weird-Interest-Here Magazine!" in their ads...

    25. Re:Spam time! by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Email him with your Hotmail account. After it gets added to his spam list, report it to Hotmail management, and they'll have even more ammo for the lawsuits. Of course, only do this if you use this account as a junk address (and really, what other use is there for a hotmail account)?

    26. Re:Spam time! by inode_buddha · · Score: 1
      "Personally I'd try sphincter@optinbig.com, considering his line of work..."

      Naaah... wrong addy, that's the goatse guy. He opted in big, and look what happened! You wouldn't want to be the guy that hurt him, would you?

      --
      C|N>K
    27. Re:Spam time! by zero_offset · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sucks up their time and money sorting that stuff out.

      No, actually it doesn't. When I was a kid, I worked for a company which did direct-mail advertising. (I dislike it too, but I was 17 and hadn't really received junk mail in my name yet, and this was back when "online" meant a 300 baud connection to CompuServ and spam e-mail was just a glimmer in some evil asshole's eye.)

      Anyway, we had people who hated direct mail, and they waste their time doing all sorts of "clever" things, and frankly, it was only noticed by the office staff when somebody did something exceedingly disgusting, strange, or illegal.

      You'd waste more of their time by trying to come up with something *creative*. Shit, why not make it fun for the poor asshole opening your envelope? They're working for minimum wage hand-keying response cards; they sure as hell aren't making the big bucks off annual subscriptions or whatever.

      In any case, when you send a million direct-mail pieces, you fully expect to get a bunch of junk back (the other stupid one is putting metal washers in the return mail... the postage is PRE-PAID, you won't cost them a single cent in extra charges), and you have hordes of low-paid drones to sort that stuff for you.

      *shrug* What else can I say? I wish it worked, too.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    28. Re:Spam time! by NixLuver · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the look 'behind the scenes' - Since you worked in the 'industry' ( >;) ) do you have any suggestions that might actually make a difference?

    29. Re:Spam time! by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Yes. Arrange things so that you pass by your outdoor trash cans on the way back from the mailbox. :)

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    30. Re:Spam time! by kiore · · Score: 1

      Or replying to an email I received today

      Dear Ruth Ani,

      Yes, I would very much like to assist you liberating the 130,000,000 million dollars your father acquired while serving as Sierra Leone's vice president.

      I phoned the number you gave in your email, but it was engaged. Please phone me (collect) on my private line (303) 464-8164 at your earliest convenience.

      Sincerely yours

      Scott Richter

  2. Write your congress-critter! by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 5, Funny

    Voice your support for the Death Penalty for spamers!

    --
    But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    1. Re:Write your congress-critter! by Tom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why exactly was the parent modded as Funny?

      Now while we can argue about whether or not it's a bit excessive, I'm taking bets that the sudden and brutal death of, say, the top 20 US spammers would bring spam down to 1995 levels almost instantly.

      In addition to the 20 cretins that we are rid of, the next 20 might also realize just who will be filling the freed-up slots, and a good part of them will move into something that resembles honest work.

      Now for the "may be excessive" part:
      Wars have been fought and thousands been killed for less.
      Spammers commit a crime that is not very much realized in the modern world - they attack the common. They don't rob one guy a lot, they rob everyone a little. In other times, there would have been no hesitations to subject them to the most drastic penalties.

      In fact, the death penalty should be modified for spammers to make sure it's slow and painful. A literal death by a thousand needle pricks might be very appropriate to the crime. Just pinch them once for every spam they sent.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Write your congress-critter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nah, we'd rather see castration/sterilization used.

      Mind you, I'm not talking about "chemical" castration, either...

      It's only fair--a penis as large as the ones they must have would constitute a medical problem, I should think. That is to say nothing of the female spammers who might've tested those pills by mistake...

      In any event, to counter the notion that it is "cruel and unusual punishment" I would submit that we already have similar punishment for some sex offenders, and that spammers who send sexual advertisements most certainly target children, and thus, spammers may be considered sex offenders, so...

    3. Re:Write your congress-critter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vlad farted

    4. Re:Write your congress-critter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like they care !

      They wil just mod it down to something that only abuses ISP's (instead of it abusing the recipients), and gratiously accept any penalties put on such behaviour, without acknowledging the bother/time/agony that is placed on the actual recipient.

      In short : Companies (ISP's or gouverments) get money for the abuse they suffer, but the "little man" on the street get's nothing. As if they(the "little people", voters actually) do not get abused at all by these (spaming) practises.

    5. Re:Write your congress-critter! by PacoTaco · · Score: 1
      Voice your support for the Death Penalty for spamers!

      Hmm, I wonder what they'd get for their last meal.

    6. Re:Write your congress-critter! by stridebird · · Score: 1
      Why exactly was the parent modded as Funny?

      Funny sig, wasn't it? Me, I came for the tech chat, i stay for the sigs.

      --

      this is not funny

  3. Know what I hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's bad enough that they're spamming me, but then they lie about me signing up for their list. I didn't sign up, I know I didn't sign up, they know I know I didn't sigh up, so why bother?

    1. Re:Know what I hate? by diersing · · Score: 1
      When you signed up for the that free pr0n download, bible, magazine, gamespy account.... there is a check box. You prolly unchecked it thinking you were in the clear and not signing up for anything, but next time - read the text next to the box. Sometimes they say leave this box checked if you don't want our newsletter or some other crap.

      We're all signed up for some shit or another, my defense is a dummy hotmail account I use on such things, I let it collect all the bulk and then I can report it all as spam (or just use some M$ disk space), either way it doesn't bother too much.

    2. Re:Know what I hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is on an account that doesn't get used for signups. It's just a random firstname@example.com spam.

    3. Re:Know what I hate? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't understand why they tell blatent "You signed up to our list" lies either. It isn't, as someone suggested, because it's illegal if you didn't sign up - it isn't (at least in the US.) The Can Spam law was very clear - they can legally spam you until you beg them to quit. Regardless, they were making that claim for a long, long time before any laws about spam were in place.

      Spammers have a different mindset from normal people.

      They are trying to sell a product, but they usually tell lies in the subject field and/or the From line. Most of us wouldn't think "Hey, I want to sell to people, so I'll start out by making it clear that I'm lying to them and can't be trusted." But spammers think that way. And some people are apparently dumb enough to buy from them.

    4. Re:Know what I hate? by Fr33z0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had my (ISP) email address for the past 8 years or so, and when I first got that internet connection I was pretty naive, I'd use my real email address everywhere, it was on a popular site, it went unmunged on newsgroups and all was well. Not so long after getting it the spam started coming in, and it's increased over the entire 8 years without my involvement (I stopped using that address many years ago when I got my own domain)

      That address must be on every spam list/CD known to man, my ISP offers (free) filtering so I switched that on just to save my hard drive - I still get several hundred that make it through their filter every day, and they block tens of thousands each month - on the rare occasion when I go "oh, I signed up for an account on this site years ago, I wonder if my account still exists" - I go to the site, put that email address in the "remind me" box, fetch my new mail and literally have to do a search on that account's inbox - it's that bad that I can't even quickly find an email minutes after receiving it.

      So I've written off that account, I play around with anti-spam technologies from time to time and I use it as a throwaway account though, so I continue to let it exist and fetch my mail a few times a day - anyway... about 6 months ago I noticed I was getting dozens of the same email in a row from the same guys, for shits and giggles I clicked the unsubscribe link and did my usual "shauihfeuihgerisbuisrghsruighuisegr@hduiwehfeuiwh uighuierghruigher.com" - it came back with the "Thank you, you have now been removed from our list!" so I thought "ok, they're just building an unsubscribe list" - I put in my email address too (it's worthless now anyway, and I figured this way I covered my ass) and waited a couple of weeks - as I expected I just got spammed harder by them, to the point where I was receiving over a hundred of the exact same email every day. I looked up the contact details on the site that they were advertising, did a whois on the domain and got the contacts, whoised whatever was after the @ on each of the contacts and so on and so on and wrote my email.

      Essentially, I emailed the spammer and BCCd his ISP, the site he was advertising's webmaster, cust feedback, billing company, and anybody else I could find who had business dealings with the site or spammer that was responsible for spamming me so hard.

      I said "I unsubscribed from the list I didn't subscribe to, you were still sending hundreds of identical emails to me every day. As you are not honoring unsubscribe requests I don't know what else to do but go over your head.

      All, please ensure I am removed from this list, I don't care how, you are all responsible to an extent."

      for the next week I got about 10-20 of the same email daily, the week after I got
      It's a silly amount of hoops to jump through to get removed from one list (and futile, considering I get thousands of UCE from other sources), I did it largely to see if it would work, it did, draw your own conclusions :D

    5. Re:Know what I hate? by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sadly, they're just doing what everyone else in the computer industry is doing. It's become not only acceptable, but _expected_ to lie your ass off.

      "Normal" people also wouldn't, for example, think "hey, I'm trying to sell stuff to these people, so let's first make sure I've annoyed the living crap out of them. Surely they'll express their hatred by buying lots of stuff."

      Yet all the pop-up and pop-under ad retards do just that. Not only that, but now they want to take over the browser and force you to watch half a megabyte of full screen movie before you can even get to see what the site offers. Yeah, that's gotta fly well with both the potential buyers _and_ the site owners. Not.

      Or see the RealNetworks retards. Yeah, buddy. Spamming the living hell out of me with popups, even when not using RealOne, surely will make me reach for the credit card and buy the premium player. Not.

      Speaking of which: "Normal" people would never think, "I'm trying sell people stuff over the 'Net, so let's install spyware on their computers until it crawls, hog their bandwidth, spam them with popups, etc. And generally make it hard to use the very medium over which I'm selling stuff."

      Gator, anyone? And a thousand others.

      "Normal" people would never think "I'm trying to build a loyal fan base, so let's sell them a clearly non-tested non-functional product."

      Yet, at least one game I've bought (Victoria from Paradox Entertainment, German version) threw up a script syntax error right on startup. FFS, not a crash, not a sound lockup, nothing even remotely blamable on my drivers or hardware. A script syntax error. Noone even started that game before selling it. Sad.

      Basically IMHO the spammers are just a symptom of the complete lack of accountability or responsibility in this industry. The whole "if you can make a buck with snake oil, lies and deceit, go for it" mentality. Spammers are just the brute force/low IQ version of what everyone else is doing.

      Until we stand up and say "no more!" to the whole snake oil deal, it will only get worse.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    6. Re:Know what I hate? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      Sadly, they're just doing what everyone else in the computer industry is doing

      You look at the spammers, the idiots trying to force pop-ups on everyone, and the spyware folks, and then paint everyone in the computer business with the same brush. That's sort of like looking at people hanging out in the red-light area of San Francisco at 1:00 am and saying "American's don't think of anything but sex."

      I'm not defending spammers, but the people that spam are essentially the same low-lifes we've always had. Trying to claim that because some software companies use sleazy tactics that they are a fair representation of the entire software industry is, IMO, a bit far fetched.

    7. Re:Know what I hate? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Want more examples? Well, here's a random one:

      Over the last 13 months or so, I've had the dubious honour of working with IBM's WebSphere 5.0. We ran into bug after bug after bug after bug.

      Starting with 5.0's being unable to use more than one Oracle data source in the same transaction, which cost the whole team about 2 weeks of scrambling to figure out why it suddenly doesn't work, _plus_ 42 days of waiting for IBM to fix it.

      Continuing through such issues like a _massive_ performance problem under serious load, but only when using JAAS, resulting in timeouts on the productive system! With IBM's support asking us for trace logs again and again and again, even after being sent an .ear file which clearly reproduced the problem.

      Now also add the problem, not yet fixed, that IBM's code swallows exceptions and throws some completely unrelated exception instead. E.g., a ClassNotFoundException when _de_serializing comes as NotSerializableException. It also comes without a stacktrace. It makes debugging a nightmare.

      Combine that with the most piss-poor admin GUI ever. It takes about 4 _hours_ to export the whole application off the Solaris test server. Deploying even the most basic servlet (2-3 classes total kind of basic) takes minutes.

      It's also the only single-user server product I've ever seen. It literally can't cope with two people deploying stuff at the same time.

      In another team here the inside joke is: "You can tell who's using WebSphere. You hear loud cursing from his office."

      The whole thing has cost us several man-years in bugs alone.

      You know what? Now I understand why IBM makes far more money from consultancy than from selling the actual hardware and software. No, seriously. It's got to be the most blatant scam of all times: sell crap software cheap, and expensive consultants to make it work.

      That's just one example.

      So, yes, I think that this whole industry has got to the point where the scum rises to the top. If there is someone who still cares for the customer, it must be either lost in the noise, or it must have happened in the 80s.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    8. Re:Know what I hate? by CantGetAUserName · · Score: 1

      At work we have an email address used as a group inbox. Nobody acutally has this account as a personal account. It can't sign up for anything, /but/ it is on our website. Take a guess how much crud it gets.

      --
      Semper en excreta sumus solum profundum
    9. Re:Know what I hate? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      So, yes, I think that this whole industry has got to the point where the scum rises to the top.

      I feel sorry for you. You're only options, since you believe that way, are to either become scum so you can do well, or to kill yourself.

  4. I've got it! by swordboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    This guy must be Andy Richter's brother - the guy who wrote the MyDoom virus!

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:I've got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's funny

  5. New business? by monstroyer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just yesterday, Microsoft was devising a plan to invoice spammers, now they are suing a spammer. Who needs the operating system business when you got hotmail!

    9000 spam emails doesn't sound like that much. An acquaintance of mine is the developer of si20 and there's more spam than 9000 in a measly half a day of operations.

    Is this merely a symbolic legal pursuit? Or is this considered a lot of spam by the powers that be?

    1. Re:New business? by eln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not that it's a lot of spam, it's that this guy is easy to pursue. A lot of spammers are based in unfriendly countries and are very difficult to sue. This guy is easy to sue.

      The basic theory here is to pick the low hanging fruit, and hopefully the others will back down out of fear. Not likely to happen that way, but that's the idea.

    2. Re:New business? by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      RIAA has similar strategy.

    3. Re:New business? by whiteknight31 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What they could mean is 9,000 different peices of spam. Like 1 million that is selling Vi@agra and a half a million selling get rich quick scepems, ect. Just an idea.

    4. Re:New business? by spood · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you had RTFA, you would realize that the 9000 were collected by Hotmail's "spam traps", created for the sole purpose of collecting spam. Further, these 9000 were all part of the same campaign with fraudulent headers. The 9000 represent only a fraction of e-mail sent to Hotmail addresses as part of the campaign, but since the spam trap addresses could never have legitimately opted in, they are the smoking gun in the lawsuit against 'Snotty'.

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    5. Re:New business? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      If his "fruit" is "hanging low" where I can "pick" it, you damned well better believe I'd throw the fear of God into him, along with any other spammers.

      And somehow, I think "picking his low-hanging fruit" would be a really damned good deterrent to anyone else doing it. Screw the Eigth Amendment.

      p

    6. Re:New business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the homepage link looks like it goes to a domain called 'macfag.org' due to the underline, and the content of your post seemed to back it up. i clicked the link; colour me disappointed.

    7. Re:New business? by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      It looks like they charged him with 9000 that were very carefully tracked and verified. If they went after him for the other gazillion, he'd just need to find one that was iffy, and contest that.

      They do the same in many criminal cases - cherry-pick the offenses and only bring to court the ones with the best evidence, witnesses, etc....

    8. Re:New business? by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      RIAA has similar strategy.

      Are you defending spammers, or offended by Microsoft? I always wondered what a moderation fiasco it would be if somehow spammers were put up against Microsoft in a debate on Slashdot. Seems like maybe that would be the end of it all. A portal would open up in the middle of the universe and just suck us all into the nothing.

  6. Profile?? by nycsubway · · Score: 2, Funny

    He'll be about an eight inch tall, squashed under my shoe if I ever meet him.

    1. Re:Profile?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt that anyone on slashdot could squash this guy with anything other than his belly, especially one with such a low uid.

  7. OptInRealBig's policy by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The policy from the guy's spam business site:

    It prohibits:

    "Unsolicited promotions, advertising or solicitations (commonly referred to as "spam"), including, without limitation, commercial advertising and informational announcements, except to those who have explicitly requested such e-mails."

    Hmmmm.....

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:OptInRealBig's policy by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Miss one pre-checked "Share my e-mail address with your partners!" link on any website you give your e-mail address to, and it's game over for that account. You've explicitly requested to be spammed and put onto so many lists you'll never get off of them all...

    2. Re:OptInRealBig's policy by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      OptInBig has the freshest opt-in, co-registered names in the industry.

      which should be read: "We have the most up to date email database in the spam industry"

      'freshest' = most recently plucked, usually by a web crawler
      'opt-in' = annoying sales jargon, to agree to be a part of something.
      'co-registered' = someone else agreed to be a part of something for you! Really, I'm not sure what co-registered means in this sales pitch context.
      Spammers have a very loose definition of the term 'unsolicited'. I can't believe this guy claims he is not a spammer. His business model is by definition, Spamming.

      [optinrealbig.com] Possesses over 45 million online consumers in its database

      I would bet that none of these 'online consumers' are aware that they are part of this list, or have ever willingly agreed to be a part of any 'consumer list'. How often does anyone agree to recieve "commercial advertising and informational announcements"? Yes please, sign me up, I want to know about every discount viagra and male organ enhancement offer available. While you are at it, make sure I know about all the breast enhancement products out there as well.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
  8. Fatal allergies? by The+I+Shing · · Score: 4, Funny

    By any chance, does that article mention anything that he's fatally allergic to, say, something that could be purchased in bulk from a supermarket?

    Just wondering.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Fatal allergies? by Trigun · · Score: 0, Troll

      yeah, ricin.

      Oops, Now I have the CIA reading Slashdot.

    2. Re:Fatal allergies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he's allergic to ricin.

      But I'm not suggesting or implying anything!

    3. Re:Fatal allergies? by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      I'd like to send him a "personal lubricant" laced with urushiol and Dimethyl Sulfoxide.

    4. Re:Fatal allergies? by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear he's fatally allergic to those lead pills... you know, the ones that come in 7.62mm pacets?

      --
      What would Brian Boitano do?
    5. Re:Fatal allergies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very clever...

      Urushiol causes the rash from poison ivy. However, it needs to seep through the skin to take effect.

      Thus we also have DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide). According to your link, it has solvent properties which "allow contaminants to be absorbed through the skin and transported into the bloodstream" ...

    6. Re:Fatal allergies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like say, bleach or rat poison?

    7. Re:Fatal allergies? by anticypher · · Score: 1

      DMSO is good for disolving female hormone treatments. Grind up estrogen tablets (the first week of birth control pills), add a small amount of alcohol, then mix with DMSO.

      For delivery, this can be disolved in a cup of cold water by adding a drop of dish washing detergent (DMSO is an oil). Dump this mix on the victim, where the estrogen/DMSO mix would soak the clothing and remain in contact with the skin for a prolonged period of time. This would result in a small but effective amount of estrogen reaching the bloodstream.

      Estrogen poisoning of a large, testosterone filled guy, in this example weighing 240 lbs, would cause all kinds of medical problems for a period of months. Voice change, loss of sexual function, enlarged nipple erectile tissue and enlarging of the fatty deposits in the breasts, hair loss, persistent diarrhea, headaches, and vision problems.

      That I am conversant with such a procedure and the resultant effects is a good reason why you should not fuck with my mail servers.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    8. Re:Fatal allergies? by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Did you bother to look at what urushiol is?

      I think distributing poison ivy throughout his body might be even more fun than trying to get enough estrogen into his system to cause problems.

      And, again, the fact that I know about such matters should be a sign that my mail servers too are server with which not to fuck.

    9. Re:Fatal allergies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you can always make him soak in coca cola for a few days. It does dissolve a tooth overnight if I remember correctly.

      However while you are at it, you might as well use bleach or something even nastier.

  9. Booo! ... oh wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's a spammer! Burn him!

    Oh wait, he's spamming Microsoft Hotmail accounts? Oh hey man welcome back to the community!

    1. Re:Booo! ... oh wait by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Yes, and you gotta love the irony: a spammer being sued by one of the largest spam source on the internet :)

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Booo! ... oh wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're so dumb that you believe hotmail actually sends or even allows the the sending of bulk unsolicited emails and further are completely ignorant of the fact that one can set the From address in email to ANYTHING then you do not deserve to complain about spam.

  10. He's #4 by rossz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Spamhaus.org rates him as the nation's (world's?) #4 spammer.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:He's #4 by kevcol · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then perhaps he should respond to some of those emails that promise he will "get bigger".

  11. Tired of the "fastest growing" statistic by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If I got one hit on my website last month, and got fifty this month, I'd have, statistically, the fastest growing web site in the world.

    You see this in business news all the time. Brand X is the fastest growing company blah blah. Well, yeah. It's easy to see big growth numbers when you have three employees.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Tired of the "fastest growing" statistic by Professor_Quail · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could look at it like that, in terms of percentages...but I think a better way to describe the growth might be in terms of acceleration...example:

      Spammer A averages 500,000 emails/day, and increases his averages 1000 emails/day/day.

      Spammer B averages 200,000 emails/day but increases his average by 5000 emails/day/day.

      Obviously spammer A is 'worse' (sends out more total emails), but spammer B could be said to be growing faster.

    2. Re:Tired of the "fastest growing" statistic by Shut+the+fuck+up! · · Score: 1

      My company did all its projections at the end of the first month we got our first sale. Last month - no sales, this month - 2 sales. That's infinite growth. w00t!

  12. Never fails to amaze.... by Epyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am amazed that you can run an entire business of sending out emails that no one reads. I understand tha overhead = negligable thing, but still...How can he afford the trained monkies to write these things.

    1. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by Grrr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... sending out emails that no one reads.

      Obviously false. That's the carrot at the end of the stick.

      <grrr>

    2. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by whiteknight31 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since if one idiot in 100,000 clicks on it he makes money.....

    3. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, think about it for a moment. If you even have a real product, and that product costs, oh say around $25, what happens if you mass email 10 million people, and .005 % of them respond and buy? Congratulations - you just made $1,250,000.

      --
      But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    4. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by abb3w · · Score: 1

      How can he afford the trained monkies to write these things?

      Obviously you haven't read many Geek T-Shirts lately.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    5. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by sqlrob · · Score: 2, Informative

      You added a few zeros
      $12,500, but the same principle still applies - "free" money is still free money

      And Richter is making money by mailing for others as much (or more than) anything he owns. If nobody buys, you still make money on what you charged the customer to send 'em out.

    6. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by VX1984rr3 · · Score: 2

      People do read them... Microsoft and New York believe that $40M will bankrupt him... so that means someone is paying him big bucks to send the spam, and those people are getting results.

    7. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      Scott Richter is not your classic computer geek. He never got near a computer until a few years ago, and it took him some time to grasp the machine's true potential.
      What I find amazing, or maybe not so amazing after all, is that most of these spammers aren't very computer-savvy, but they all sem to have a history of fraud-related felony convictions
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the problem is that there's people out there who buy this stuff.. just read the bit about the iraq playing cards.

      his a classic example of an oppurtunist that just doesn't care, just as long as he makes money. had he been from a different neighbourhood he would be pimpin or selling crack. " At 32, Richter's already spent nearly two decades chasing the Next Big Thing -- and finding it, the past few years, in cyberspace."

      "The Pentagon had developed the cards as an intelligence tool, to be distributed to the troops. Richter saw them as the war souvenir the public had been waiting for. Within hours, his company was shooting out e-mails advertising the cards for sale -- more than 15 million e-mails, in fact. Richter moved 40,000 decks of the cards in a week, buying them for 89 cents each and selling them for $5.95. Yet at the time he started the blitz, he didn't have a single deck in stock. Nobody did.". find a product that's cool for stupid people and sell it through a medium that reaches the stupid people - kaching!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid fucking idiot. Why don't you stop hitting your wife?

    10. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice math, moron. No wonder you lost another job. What a fucking worthless lout.

    11. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you talking about? I'm not losing my job, I'm at the end of my contract. FOAD. Idiot.

    12. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter how many times you repeat a lie... it's still a lie. You fuck off and die you worthless dickhead.

  13. "Spamford" Wallace reborn... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    Most spammers run and hide from their reputation, but the even scummier version is proud of what they've done, and seek the publicity of being the most known spammer of the time... figuring that'll be good for their business, those who want ads by spam but don't know how to do it will turn to him.

    1. Re:"Spamford" Wallace reborn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the best ways to catch a felon is that they can't keep their mouths shut, they want to boast about what they have done to someone. Seems kilers, rapists, thieves and spammers are cut from the same cloth.

  14. Who modded this as funny? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    It clearly needs 'insightful'.

    1. Re:Who modded this as funny? by sYn+pHrEAk · · Score: 1

      hahaha. exactly what I was thinking!

    2. Re:Who modded this as funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same people who mod anything on Slashdot as funny. People with a very anti-social and broken sense of humor. I bet they also scored people pointing out spelling and grammar mistakes as funny too.

  15. Will this last very long? by Srividya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am surprised that mass emailing is still profitable in America, with its restrictive new laws against spam. From India, cheaper connection costs and abundant IT expertise, in addition to laws which allow complete freedom of email, would seem to make India the much better choice for mass emailing business. How long till competition puts Mr. Richter out of business?

    1. Re:Will this last very long? by pyros · · Score: 5, Informative
      I am surprised that mass emailing is still profitable in America, with its restrictive new laws against spam.

      Your misconception is that the new federal law (which replaces all state laws, some of which had real teeth to them) is restrictive. The irony in the law being named CANSPAM, and it really is named CANSPAM, is not to be understated here. The law says that UCE must be labeled as such, but leaves it up to the sender to define how it is labeled.

    2. Re:Will this last very long? by savagedome · · Score: 1

      They already do that.

      From the article here:
      "lawsuits charge Richter and his accomplices with responsibility for sending illegal spam through 514 compromised Internet Protocol (IP) addresses in 35 countries spanning six continents."

    3. Re:Will this last very long? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Goddamn it, we're not going to outsource EVERYTHING out to you people. We'll keep our bandwidth wasters over here, you just take all the important, honest work.

    4. Re:Will this last very long? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1
      I am surprised that mass emailing is still profitable in America, with its restrictive new laws against spam. From India, cheaper connection costs and abundant IT expertise, in addition to laws which allow complete freedom of email, would seem to make India the much better choice for mass emailing business. How long till competition puts Mr. Richter out of business

      Srividya, you're a genius! Let's let Indian spammers using Indian bandwidth and Indian IT send all of the spam to...Indians, since there's complete freedom of email.

    5. Re:Will this last very long? by VX1984rr3 · · Score: 1

      The front offices (at least the ones that have them) seem to be in America. A large amount of emails originate from outside the United States. I guess it is hard to get a backwater Russian/Indian/etc. business person to offer up the services like the US based ones can.

    6. Re:Will this last very long? by MajorDick · · Score: 1

      We did this for a customer, You'd be amazing HOW effective it really is.
      For a targeted semi-qualified list of 100k recipients we saw a 20% click through rate, yes %20. But much more important was the increase in traffic to their site after sending out a total of 500k mesages over a month, the site traffic increase totaled over 300% and STAY that way even 6 months down the road. We were originally told the lists were opt-in and with the customer being a trusted long time client (7 years or so) we had no reason to think it wasnt, especially after he assured me it was and since he spends shitloads of money in all kinds of marketing trade shows etc , So at first we werent suprised by the return rate, Then some months down the road he asked me to write him an email spider as the one he had used to procure the lists he gave us wasnt returning the quantity he wantded, I about had a stroke. Although I dont like his tactics there is NO denying it increased his traffic AND his business, and since his business is one where refferals are key to him selling his product it will continue to help his business

    7. Re:Will this last very long? by crimethinker · · Score: 1
      There's a nice double meaning in the "CAN SPAM" act. We're supposed to think the "can" means "can it," i.e. throw it in the trash can. What if the House of Misrepresentatives meant "can" as in "able to?"

      Maybe the bill was originally called "Attention Scumbags: You CAN SPAM The Whole Freaking World Now," but they shortened it to "CAN SPAM" and got the cover of a double meaning, too.

      -paul

      --
      Pistol caliber is like religion: everyone has their favourite, and theirs is the only right choice.
    8. Re:Will this last very long? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      I am surprised that mass emailing is still profitable in America, with its restrictive new laws against spam.

      What laws against spam are you dreaming about?

    9. Re:Will this last very long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relax, it's a new troll on the block. Check the sigs and home page; when was the last time you saw an Indian programmer whore him/herself out so blatantly?

  16. The best part is... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    ...that you'll die sooner or later, and then you won't get any more spam.

    Unless of course there's life after death, in which case you'll probably get spamned for all eternity.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:The best part is... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      S4*A*L?
      Spam For After Life?

    2. Re:The best part is... by dev11 · · Score: 1
      that you'll die sooner or later, and then you won't get any more spam.

      I don't know about that. I get a lot of spam that tells me I can be younger and reverse the aging process. Man, imagine that. Now I'll never stop getting spammed!

    3. Re:The best part is... by antibryce · · Score: 1


      I've often thought that if I go to hell when I die Satan will be standing there with a HUGE spool of cat5, some crimpers, and a big-ass patchpanel, and he'll say to me "I want every soul down here to have an internet connection, ASAP!"

    4. Re:The best part is... by mirko · · Score: 1

      ...under Windows, of course : where would the fun be if you could not get MyDoomed as weel as spammed ?

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  17. His policy is Rule #1 compliant. by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Rule #1: Spammers lie.

  18. Just Curious by Poligraf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it possible to "SPAM back" someone by the means of /. effect?

    Imagine a couple hundred thousand /.-ers sending angry mail to some sites/accounts each day ...

    One thing though is to somehow avoid showing your own address in order not to get into SPAMmers databases.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:Just Curious by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it possible to "SPAM back" someone by the means of /. effect?

      I suppose you'd also favor chopping off someone's hand when they steal something?

      An eye for an eye is not sound policy. We've got various laws against using your computer to create a nuisance for others, and they apply to us all, not just to spammers. I don't think I'd cry if any or all of the top ten spammers happened to be hit by a truck, but that doesn't mean I condone intentionally running them down.

      This guy is finally getting at least some of what he deserves, which is a trial potentially followed by punishment under the law. If you can contribute evidence to support the charges against him, or bring new charges, then go for it. Otherwise, leave it be.

    2. Re:Just Curious by zelphior · · Score: 1

      Not likely. I've set up a spam trap account, and occasionally reply to the emails I get requesting to be removed from the lists, following up with emails to the accounts ISP's, and have yet to find a valid account. All the ones I've looked into come from bogus accounts. Don't know how they intend to make any money advertising "Vi@gra" or "pe-nis extentons" and no way of even getting back to the people advertising the product. The viagra ones at least mention the brand name, so that in case you are a complete retard you will find out what viagra is, but when I get a spam advertising some random, unknamed product which supposedly increases my breast size, and then no way to get said product, it's just stupid.

      --
      If you can read this then I forgot to check "Post Anonymously"
    3. Re:Just Curious by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      An eye for an eye was a biblical limit on retribution. If someone pokes out your eye, the most you can do to him is poke out his eye. ie you can't kill him or sell him and his entire family into slavery. A fair and balanced (TM) response. Spamming the spammers is approved by (at least one) God.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    4. Re:Just Curious by VX1984rr3 · · Score: 1

      Most of the orginating email addresses are not real.

    5. Re:Just Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You spamnazis scare the living shit of me. Seriously.

      The single biggest reason to overhaul the email system is not to stop spam, but, to undercut the frightening authoritarian undercurrent that captivates and encourages otherwise normal people on the topic of spam.

      If you work in my company, I hope you're fired. If you live in my town, I hope you move soon. You people fucking scare me.

    6. Re:Just Curious by Cyno01 · · Score: 2
      I suppose you'd also favor chopping off someone's hand when they steal something?
      No, but i wouldn't be opposed to a public flogging of a criminal in liu of jail time, certanly less costly for the american tax payer and more of a deterrent for crime. I think the 8th amendment needs some rework.
      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    7. Re:Just Curious by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      I have discovered that many of these advertizements don't need a valid return address.

      Having a website link for these who want to make an order is enough.

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    8. Re:Just Curious by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      >I suppose you'd also favor chopping off someone's hand when they steal something?

      Nope, I'm from Russia, and from Iran ;-).

      When doing what I propose I don't harm the person; I just make it impossible for him to continue wasting my time.

      As for the law, with all due respect to it, this kind of crime (SPAM) pays as of now.

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    9. Re:Just Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you'd also favor chopping off someone's hand when they steal something?

      Not for theft, maybe, but for spamming I'd consider it.

    10. Re:Just Curious by Soruk · · Score: 1

      I'm not a "spamnazi". Sure, I hate spam. I'm a programmer. A hacker (in the traditional sense). With a sense of humour. I see this as a technical challenge, something I enjoy doing. Which is why I wrote MailStripper. (The sense of humour? Say my product name out loud.)

      --
      -- Soruk
    11. Re:Just Curious by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1
      bah! when i find junkmail in my mailbox i rent a dumptruck and transport a significant portion of the county dump to the mailman's front yard! when i catch someone driving drunk, i force them drink more and then drive backwards all the way back to where they started from! when a fat, drunk girl hits on me at the bar i go find an even fatter, drunker man to hit on *her*! when a used car salesman rips me off, i quit my job and go work as a used car salesman, sabotage his car, and then rip him off even worse! and when i when i catch an employee wasting time reading /., i make them surf 24 hours/day at -1 for the rest of the week!

      (note: management is incapable of wasting their time, as anything we do is for the greater good of humanity)

    12. Re:Just Curious by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • This guy is finally getting at least some of what he deserves, which is a trial potentially followed by punishment under the law. If you can contribute evidence to support the charges against him, or bring new charges, then go for it. Otherwise, leave it be.
      Sounds like they won't need too much more to nail him. Those 9000 E-mails sent to spamtraps that never could have opted in to anything are a serious smoking gun. Snotty's blustering about countersuing Spitzer and how Spitzer's not produced any actual NY residents who didn't opt-in are just that -- blustering. I suspect the judge will laugh hysterically at the countersuit before dismissing it, and Snotty will find out that his previous felony conviction was a walk in the park. Doubt he'll get just probation this time.
    13. Re:Just Curious by whittrash · · Score: 1

      How bout you hack them, drop a trojan in the spam machine with a credit card keystroke program sending data back to one of their secret sleaze servers, thus framing them with a trojanized trojan and they will get tracked down and the FBI will shut down their operation, confiscate their computers and get them started on a much needed Federal prison vacation. But that would be illegal...oops, MY BAD! Better not do that!

      Re:Just Curious/bi/penis enlargement (Score: -1, Karma Ho)

    14. Re:Just Curious by JumperCable · · Score: 1

      An eye for an eye is not sound policy. We've got various laws against using your computer to create a nuisance for others, and they apply to us all, not just to spammers. I don't think I'd cry if any or all of the top ten spammers happened to be hit by a truck, but that doesn't mean I condone intentionally running them down.

      Not so fast. We aren't asking people to necessarily spam him back. We can all just ask him to stop spamming us, our family & friends. I am sure he has sent you an e-mail recently.

    15. Re:Just Curious by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      Is it possible to "SPAM back" someone by the means of /. effect?

      I would say just run a new story about SPAM, with all of their website addresses on the front page. The ones that didn't get shutdown would have blown a couple of hundred bucks keeping up with the traffic.

    16. Re:Just Curious by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      but that doesn't mean I condone intentionally running them down.
      I would mwahahaha

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  19. This guy sounds like a real prize by LochNess · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the article:
    "And Richter now finds himself in a media spotlight at a time when he's coming off probation from a felony conviction arising from a fencing investigation two years ago -- a subject he's not at all eager to talk about.".
    1. Re:This guy sounds like a real prize by The+I+Shing · · Score: 2, Informative

      And here's a link to a newspaper article about Mr. Richter's other felonious activities:

      at the Rocky Mountain News

      If he didn't have so much money from spamming he'd probably be on his way to the big house right now.

      --
      You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    2. Re:This guy sounds like a real prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..arising from a fencing investigation two years ago..

      Fencing?
      As in, he hit someone in the wrong place with an epee or what?
      "En garde! Touche!"
      "I am rubber, you are glue"...oops, sorry, wrong scenario, force of habit..

    3. Re:This guy sounds like a real prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no... he was ignorant of various zoning laws, and built an inappropriate structure on the border of his property.

    4. Re:This guy sounds like a real prize by Dovregubbens+Hall · · Score: 1

      Big house? Is that what you call the buildings on Capitol? :-)

  20. Free Advertising by Squeebee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sadly, all we are doing is giving this guy free advertising. Even bas publicity is good publicity. On a different note, a lot of these guys are not ashamed of what they do. I met one once at an Open Source conference and when you ask him what he does he very plainly states "I'm a spammer". The guy was a total pariah.

    1. Re:Free Advertising by djh101010 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I met one once at an Open Source conference and when you ask him what he does he very plainly states "I'm a spammer".

      I am a fairly mellow person, but boy, if I ran into one of these guys, I'd have a hard time not just taking a (physical) jab at them. I'm very sure I wouldn't (be able to | want to) stop myself from giving a very blunt verbal response.

      Long ago, there was a cracker in Milwaukee (early 1980's) who made it to the cover of Time Magazine. I ran into him a few years later, and the only question I could come up with was "Why aren't you in jail?"

      He wasn't amused. Onlookers were. I think that means I won that interaction, right?

    2. Re:Free Advertising by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Even bas publicity is good publicity.

      Geez, /. spelling, go figure. I think you meant this, no? Or was it this? Either way is good.

      BTW, I have no association with the first link, I picked it because it was easy to find. My association with the second link, however, is confirmed every Friday night at The 19th Hole (that's a bar for you non-golf-fans).

    3. Re:Free Advertising by stomv · · Score: 1, Funny

      Seriously -- why didn't you just punch him in the face, and then yell something like This spammer just tried to kiss me!

      You'd have had everybody on your side instantly, and even a night in jail would've been worth the satisfaction.

    4. Re:Free Advertising by VX1984rr3 · · Score: 1

      SPAMing is not honest work. How hard is it to collect as many emails that you can and then extrapolate the rest and then have a bunch of linux machines crank out email!! Every technology has its good and bad uses. Without SPAMers though, we would not be spending money on really smart engineers to find solutions to the problem... so there is the rose in the manure pile.

    5. Re:Free Advertising by darnok · · Score: 1

      > I met one once at an Open Source conference and
      > when you ask him what he does he very plainly
      > states "I'm a spammer". The guy was a total
      > pariah. ...So you're implying that the other people at the Open Source conference weren't total pariahs, then?

      Riiiight

    6. Re:Free Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Sadly, all we are doing is giving this guy free advertising. Even bas publicity is good publicity.

      So what you're saying is that he is the boob-cup-ripper-off-er-er of the internet. Hmm. I agree.

  21. surprise by fuentes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "OptInRealBig sends out between 50 million and 250 million e-mails a day, generating close to $2 million a month in revenues."

    And people wonder why spammers do what they do. There are $2m worth of idiots connected to the internet.

    1. Re:surprise by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      And there are , by some reports, 1 milliom + machines infected with "MyDoom.x".
      What does that tell us?

    2. Re:surprise by torinth · · Score: 1

      More than $2M in idiots, probably. THe $2M is the figure that advertisers pay to get in on OptInRealBigs distribution. One would imagine that the advertisers net far more than that.

      I wouldn't be surprised if there's several more levels and the spam that OptInRealBig distributes involves over $100M at the consumer (idiot) level.

    3. Re:surprise by dzym · · Score: 4, Funny

      Idiots are worth $2 apiece? :)

  22. I can't believe I am saying this.... by Rydian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Woohoo! Go Microsoft!

    I hope you win this one.

    --
    chown -R us. /base
    1. Re:I can't believe I am saying this.... by VX1984rr3 · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't Microsoft do what it does best... Hire him! He then could help them build their holy grail of spam killers.

  23. Who gave 'em that figure? by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $2mil/month? Riiiight. Someone should let the IRS know, as I highly suspect that they've not heard anything about this $2mil/month revenue.

    1. Re:Who gave 'em that figure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2MM/month really isn't a lot of revenue

      chances are, whoever you work for makes at least double

      this is revenue, not profit remember

    2. Re:Who gave 'em that figure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2MM/month really isn't a lot of revenue

      chances are, whoever you work for makes at least double

      The product I work on makes at least 10 times that a month, but as an actual bussiness as opposed to a parasite like Fatty Wotshisname. I hope he gets anal warts or is busted for horse porn.

    3. Re:Who gave 'em that figure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope his anal warts get busted by taking part in horse porn.

    4. Re:Who gave 'em that figure? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      I don't know what kind of taxes he pays. But there is a theory that spamming could be used to launder money from drug sales or whatever they wanted. They spam (legally, thanks to our most esteemed congress), file taxes saying "We made all this money" and then nobody asks where the money came from - obviously, they just sold a lot of crap via spam. But did they? Or did the money come from elsewhere and they just needed some way to make it look "legitimate".

      Many spammers have dubious backgrounds. Eddy Marin, for instance, has a history of cocaine trafficing, amoung other things.

      More info on Eddy here and a picture here.

      Bottom line, even if they pay the taxes, you can't trust where the money came from. Rule # 1 - Spammers Lie.

  24. RealBigBaldSpot by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    For all his success, why doesn't he sport a William Shatner(tm) Rug on that shiny dome?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:RealBigBaldSpot by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      'cause he's not Canadian.
      It's cold up here!

  25. First an Iraqi spy, now a spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bah. I've never trusted Scott Richter and don't see why this comes as such a surprise. He used to be the head U.S. weapons inspector for UNSCOM back in the 1990s and at that time was very adamant about the fact that Saddam Hussein had WMD. Then all of a sudden George W. Bush is elected and suddenly Richter changes his tune. Now he claims that Iraq destroyed all of their weapons while he was an inspector and that there are no more weapons.

    The bottom line is this: Scott Richter's public service record is spotty *AT BEST*, and the fact that he has now (apparently) turned to a career of spamming should cast doubts on *all* of his activities for all American citizens.

  26. YahooMail, too by cethiesus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I get about 30 messages a day from this guy's "Allied Marketing Promotions Inc." on my Yahoo account. They usually arrive in chunks of 5-10 messages at a time, all peddling different "products", mostly the same spam fare such as mortgages and pills of one sort or another. It started about two weeks ago but Yahoo's spam filter still hasn't caught on...

    Definitely someone with an aluminum bat deficiency.

    --


    "Ford," he said, "you're turning into a penguin. Stop it."
    1. Re:YahooMail, too by mazachan · · Score: 1

      yes.. I've been getting that too.. But now the name is changed to Apollo Marketing Promotions.. The email addresses are all different. Arrghh!

    2. Re:YahooMail, too by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Damn, is THAT who he is? I got that same 30 a day on my Yahoo account that I've never used to sign up for anything, and has never gotten any spam before.

      "Opt In" my ass.

    3. Re:YahooMail, too by mazachan · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they're the same, but they deserve to be wiped from this planet regardless. I just have my yahoo filter set to delete anything that has "Marketing" in the From fields. It seems to be doing a decent job. That or yahoo decided to crack down on him/her.

    4. Re:YahooMail, too by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2, Informative

      THOSE bastards????

      Well, thanks to his spamming operation suddenly bombarding me with piles of messages at my work address, I've gone to the effort of completely firewalling his netblock from my mailservers. Along with several other spamhaus-listed netblocks. So, to all of you OTHER spammers who can no longer get to the servers at work, you can blame "Allied Marketing Promotions" for getting you cut off completely.

      It was odd, over the last weekend I suddenly started getting about 20 "Allied Marketing Promotions" emails every day, and it annoyed me enough to just cut them off completely. (Having gone through the trouble of configuring my home server to use the Spamhaus blocklist, it already rejects them, thankfully.

  27. Fencing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a felony conviction arising from a fencing investigation two years ago

    I know jabbing and swishing at another guy with a foil is pretty lame, but I didn't realize it was illegal.

    1. Re:Fencing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    2. Re:Fencing? by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      And here's another definition just for you.

  28. Phone number!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strange enough, I think even Linuxers agree with you.

    Want to help out? Just call:

    (303) 464-8164

    And ask for Sales, tell them your interested in spamming 9600 hotmail accounts, and any email account with "SCO" in it... :D

    That phone number is taken from their website. I am 100% that emailing, DDOS, etc will have no effect on them, but I am 80% sure that getting 200+ phone calls, will definitely hurt business! (not to mention if you ask for a call back, leave voice mail, etc. to flood there systems.)..
    LOL!

    Go Jebus Go!!

  29. "The Internet Is Not Free" by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Says asshat: What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free.

    GOD I FUCKING HATE THESE PEOPLE!

    Since when does this dickhead own the Internet? Since when is it "not free" as in "you owe me money"?

    ARGH! I not only support the death penalty for these asshats, I think they need to deport this guy's goddamn family to central Cambodia.

    The absolute contempt that these people have for all other living beings outside their small inner circles is so mind-numbingly infuriating that I can't even come up with a suitable rant against this guy. The absolute level of FURY that these moronic losers can invoke through their childish, imbecilic, self-centered "give it all to me" outlooks on life could never BEGIN to compare to the narcissism displayed by everyone in Hollywood COMBINED. NEVER HAVE I SO DESIRED TO POP SOMEONE'S HEAD LIKE AN OVERINFLATED BALLOON!

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow dude! That's some SERIOUSLY nice RAGE!!

      I think you should take it 1 step further though, why don't you call him and explain your feelings??

      (303) 464-8164

      N'joy!

    2. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      C'mon, man. Don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel.

    3. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      There needs to be a new moderation:

      "fucking pissed off, but right."

    4. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I think they need to deport this guy's goddamn family to central Cambodia."

      Hey I live in central Cambodia, you asshat.

    5. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      H3b@l pr0z@k can help you with your rage problem.

    6. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      holy hellfire damnation that was funny. as were a few of the replies. mods, get crackin! funny i say! funny!

    7. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by NineNine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you thought about maybe getting a hobby... like heavy drug use?

    8. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by sosegumu · · Score: 1

      ARGH! I not only support the death penalty for these asshats, I think they need to deport this guy's goddamn family to central Cambodia.

      I love the word "asshat;" it's funny.

      --
      It's easier to wear the spandex than to do the crunches. --David Lee Roth
    9. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by VX1984rr3 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I second the "asshat" comment!

    10. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free. I make my money by signing you up at my Web site, getting your information, and using that information to figure out what you like.

      I quite agree. When I hear this type of confused smokescreen argument I think of everyone's favorite litigious bastards, the SCO Group. No such thing as a free lunch, so pay me right now.

      The argument is weak, and not very well thought out. The assertion he's making is that my e-mail can't be free because there's no such thing as a free lunch. But my e-mail is already non-free. I see ads when I check it. I pay something like $17 a year for POP3 access. In short, his crap e-mail doesn't justify my mailbox's existence. There is already an economic model behind it before a single spam lands in it.

      There is a special place in hell for people like Scott Richter, and we owe a lot of thanks to to the folks from Redmond and New York who are helping to escort him there.

    11. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you missed a totally perfect INSENSITIVE CLOD setup. Nice moves.

    12. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      as is "cock-gobbler", and "fuck-knuckle".
      I think one of the more obtuse I've heard has to be "Monkey-juggler" but no one seems to get it.

    13. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent '+1 Angry' or '-1 Take your meds'.

    14. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But my e-mail is already non-free. I see ads when I check it. I pay something like $17 a year for POP3 access.

      How silly of you. There are still services providing free POP3 mailboxes - what are you paying for?

    15. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      Mainly to keep the address. I plan to ditch it at some point. What free POP3 services do you know of? If they offer it with webmail I might be up for it.

    16. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, once his faimly gets deported, someone will need to be there with the baseball bats.

    17. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by jbrw · · Score: 1

      http://fastmail.fm/ will give you 10Mb of space with web/IMAP access for free.

      Feel free to use the username of "jwilson" if you're in a generous mood. Or not. It's all good.

    18. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you didn't notice -- He's

      THE MAD POSTER!!!! GRRRR

      He's got a reputation to uphold

    19. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Yesss, young padawan. Give in to your hatred ;)

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    20. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      I'm trying this out now. It's pretty nice. I already like IMAP better than POP, so it's better in that regard. And it's faster than the e-mail I'm using now. Thanks!

  30. Jail... by Dieppe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's clear from the article that this joker should be in Prison for theft, and other crimes...

    But according to him he's raking in the big bucks! He used to be fat, but now he's 240lbs! Hey, I wonder if he has a large penis now as well?

    Point is, the article failed to mention the fact that he is still stealing resources from other ISP machines. While he claims that the Internet isn't free, and he's one of those good "internet marketer bulk emailers" and that all 40 million email addresses were opt-in, and that he's not one of those scummy "hard core spammers" and he honors all remove requests...

    Spammers ALWAYS LIE!

    He and Darl should get together sometime...

    ----

    I know, this is probably redundant and has probably already been said... but I do hate when thieveses like this joker just keep getting away with spamming.... so the question is asked. Who is giving him the money to continue his "business" and how can we (or anyone) stop it?

    1. Re:Jail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and how can we (or anyone) stop it? "

      You can start by calling him:

      (303) 464-8164

      And asking him how it feels to get 400+ phone calls from pissed off /.ers!

      I also suggest asking him about his penis size.

    2. Re:Jail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's clear from the article that this joker should be in Prison for theft, and other crimes... "

      I guess we should add all the people that have DL music and movies without paying for them right.

      I just love the hypocrisy here... on one hand you guys will fight for the right for someone.. including yourself to DL all the music and movies for free yet if a person sends out Spam you call for their death and dismemberment. I have a family member that you would call a "Spammer" yet he just extended his mail direct marketing business into the internet and he get hate mail from people has sent e-mailings to. He has a WORKING opt out link in all of his e-mails and the server actually takes people off his list when they request it. So while he abides by all the laws for both internet and direct mail you guys would call him a criminal while at the same time DL the "Cold Mountain" movie from some server at a university... kind of like a preacher getting a blow job while at the same time giving a sermon on the evils of sex

    3. Re:Jail... by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      While he claims that . . . all 40 million email addresses were opt-in

      They were - by his definition of "opt-in", which appears to be "they haven't actually physically provided a set of stone tablets, carved in triplicate and signed in blood, stating in seventeen languages that under no circumstances whatsoever will they ever be in the slightest bit interested in receiving email from anyone at all, along with sufficient evidence that they are indeed the person who is claiming not to want spam to convince a jury of their deadliest enemies".

    4. Re:Jail... by Phenris+Wolfe · · Score: 1

      but I do hate when thieveses like this joker just keep getting away with spamming.... Yes, we hateses thieveses....They stole it from us! Gollum!

    5. Re:Jail... by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      No hypocrisy but what you project;

      Many who agree with DLing content and disagree with electronic marketing (spam or otherwise) are quite clear that they disagree with the laws that make one illegal and the other not.

      That your family member conducts him or herself in a manner in accord with the law is not (always) being argued. That their actions are objectionable is.

      You seem to be confusing 'legal' with 'right'.

  31. I love these guys. by amarodeeps · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "I'm not going to argue that there isn't one person in forty million who didn't subscribe," Richter says. "But we document where the addresses come from, and when people complain, we remove them from our list. What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free. I make my money by signing you up at my Web site, getting your information, and using that information to figure out what you like."

    Here we see a prime example of self-delusion and self-righteousness substituting for morality. Right, the Internet isn't free. But I didn't realize that I was paying Scott Richter to get online--I thought I was paying Verizon for DSL service.

    It is entertaining to see how much these people hate Steve Linford though.

    It's really simple folks: if what you are doing is legit, why do you have to forge your headers? Why do you have to hide behind false email addresses? If it is legit, why do you have such a hard time getting legitimate ISPs to sell you bandwidth? Figure it out.

  32. Contact Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From a PDF of the lawsuit:

    OptInRealBig, LLC is a limited liability corporation, with its principal place of business at 1333 W 120th Ave, Suite 101 Westminster, CO 80234.

    Wonder if he is getting enough mail at is office? I would expect that a few additional catalogs would do alot to spruce up the place.

    1. Re:Contact Info by dankdirk77 · · Score: 1

      MOD UP PLEASE!!!

      --


      SCO: 800-726-8649
      Verisign: 800-361-8319, 888-642-9675
      Diebold: 800-433-VOTE (8683)
    2. Re:Contact Info by darksoulz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dont forget his home address. Being a resident of the Denver area, I've been tempted to drive by and let him know exactly what I think of his "marketing".

    3. Re:Contact Info by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    4. Re:Contact Info by rkelly · · Score: 1

      That address is about 2 miles from my house.

      Hmmmmmm.

    5. Re:Contact Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what are you waiting for??

    6. Re:Contact Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you waiting for?!

    7. Re:Contact Info by GordoSlasher · · Score: 1

      Hey, his business address is right across the street from where I work. I guess the sign on that building says P3NIS ENLARGEMENT after all.

    8. Re:Contact Info by fulldecent · · Score: 1
      Is he was on the east coast, I would commit some act to his home, put up a website of public humility and post my e-mail address. Then after the flood, I would forward the address to him.

      I find you to be similarly obligated :-)

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    9. Re:Contact Info by darksoulz · · Score: 1

      I've been really tempted to grab a can of spray paint and put a big 'spammer' sign on his front lawn. Just so his neighbors are aware of who's living next door.

    10. Re:Contact Info by dave+at+hostwerks · · Score: 1

      Although it would be harder to pull off, it'd be much more effective to use dry lawn fertilizer to spell SPAMMER out. It'd take most of a year before it faded.

      hehehe

      --
      d a v e
      "Hmmm...upgrades."
    11. Re:Contact Info by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Concentrated weed killer works better, because then he has to replace the topsoil and sod to make the grass shut up. A bulldozer costs a few $$$, ou know.

      --
      C|N>K
    12. Re:Contact Info by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      What are you waiting for? Break out the slingshot!

  33. spamming != marketing by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How the hell can you call spamming "online marketing". Although I'm, a techie, I have respect for skilled marketeers, analyzing markets and fitting producsts to customers.. Spammers just dump their shit indiscriminately. It's like calling the burger flipper at McDonalds a chef!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:spamming != marketing by FrancisR · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's more like calling the guy behind McDonalds roasting rats over a flaming trashcan a chef.

    2. Re:spamming != marketing by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      "skilled marketeers"
      yes, those are the people responsible for putting those little "genuine Grannie Smith Apple" labels on apples. I really love those guys, because sometimes I'm not sure if it's a bannana Im eating. And I so much love injesting the glue left over after peeling the little fucker off.

    3. Re:spamming != marketing by Super+Grover · · Score: 1

      >It's like calling the burger flipper at McDonalds a chef!

      You're not going low enough. It's more like calling a jizz mopper a chef.

      --
      Salsa Shark. We're gonna need a bigger boat.
    4. Re:spamming != marketing by fulldecent · · Score: 1
      Marketing can be good. I muted the Super Bowl and unmuted the commercials. I don't know who won or even who was playing, but I can tell you the best commercials:
      • The McDonnalds one with the hanburger wrapper in the drier
      • The Staples one with the office supplies maffia
      • The ?Car? one with all the kids having soap in their mouths
      What was your favorite?
      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    5. Re:spamming != marketing by vidarlo · · Score: 1

      I strongly agree. Google's ads actually made me buy something from them. They're relevant ads, about a topic I'm surfing usually. And also, its small ads, theyre text only, no blinking shit, and they're quick to load. Overall, they work fine, and don't piss me off, because they're so specific, and not ugly to look at either.

  34. DOUBLE WARNING: CHILD IS A FAT PARENT MOLESTER by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 0, Troll


  35. Another article on Snotty. by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Talbott: 'Spam king' didn't opt for this call

    Having been steadily bombarded with e-mail come-ons for "Vi@gra," breast enlargements and the secret to "ALL NIGHT sex," an average recipient would no doubt like to tell a spam king to back off.

    So when Scott Richter's phone number landed on my desk, I called. And, lo, he answered. I asked him if he'd mind my printing his number in the newspaper.

    His colorful response suggested that he wouldn't like it. On the other hand, millions of us don't particularly like being spammed. To print or not to print his number. That is the conundrum. [snip!]

    (And, yes, he did print the business phnoe number.)
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Another article on Snotty. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      D'oh! It probably works better with the link (I will use preview, I will use preview...)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  36. more information by cluge · · Score: 5, Informative
    This article misses a few key points that are summed up nicely here (requires a click to accept policy and then REFOLLOW the link) The SpamHaus information includes not only a brief description of his transgressions, but addresses from his domain registry etc. The one thing to remember about this person is that he has been dilligently obeying the first rule of spammers for years.

    Rule 1: Spammers lie Take a look at a few of his quotes here

    The article about him from the BBC is what scares me. "We are very excited [about the new CAN-SPAM law]," said Scott Richter, the president of OptInRealBig, an e-mail marketing firm in Westminster, Colo. "All of our clients had been worried about the California law. In the last two hours we have been booking a lot of orders for January."
    This guy is the kind of guy that would piss in your pool. Now that he's got the internet, he gets to piss on millions of people at a time.

    AngryPeopleRule

    --
    "Science is about ego as much as it is about discovery and truth " - I said it, so sue me.
  37. optinbig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the contact info is on their web site, if you have any questions. (Or want to offer a valuble new product) Contact us via e-mail: info@optinbig.com or phone: (303) 464-8164

  38. Client list by Broodje · · Score: 1

    OptInBig is honored to work with many of the best online e-marketers and e-retailers the Internet has to offer. Please contact us to discuss our clients who have experienced a successful partnership with us firsthand. Let us help you make the most out of your marketing campaigns!

    How embarassing to be on that list.

  39. Look at any major spammer's past... by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They all have been in some sort of legal trouble.
    And it usually involves extortion, scam or theft. I wish the media would concentrate more on their criminal past. Maybe then people would get a clue and not do any business with them.

  40. Snail Mail Addy by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

    According to Clint Talbott of the Daily Camera, Scott Richter's office address is:

    1333 W. 120th Avenue Suite 101
    Westminster, CO, 80234

    No mention of a home mailing address, unfortunately. Maybe it's actually listed in the Qwest white pages? Somehow, though, I doubt it. . .

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    1. Re:Snail Mail Addy by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      That doesn't matter. What are the adress of his Clients?

  41. India has no such CANSPAM label law by Srividya · · Score: 1

    Therefore mass email sent from India can be more effective because it does not have such easily filtered strings and headers.

    1. Re:India has no such CANSPAM label law by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      BWAHAHAAHAH

      They're breaking the law installing trojans that relay, and you think they're going to *label* according to law?

  42. How can I OptOutRealBig?? (nm) by nuclearspike · · Score: 1

    (no message)

    1. Re:How can I OptOutRealBig?? (nm) by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny
      How can I OptOutRealBig??
      Remove your (cable)modem, mailbox, fax and telephone and burn them in your back yard.
  43. Physical Address and phone for Optinbig.com by raider_red · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Please sign them up for every catalog and junk mail item you can.

    1333 W 120th AVE
    Suite 101
    Westminster, CO 80234
    US
    +1.3034648164

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    1. Re:Physical Address and phone for Optinbig.com by tgd · · Score: 1

      And what? Push the cost of your vendetta on the companies you trick into sending catalogs to him?

    2. Re:Physical Address and phone for Optinbig.com by raider_red · · Score: 1

      Sounds alright to me. They're the ones filling up MY real mail box. And I didn't sign up for their crap.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    3. Re:Physical Address and phone for Optinbig.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. An eye for an eye. Real enlightened, buddy.

    4. Re:Physical Address and phone for Optinbig.com by raider_red · · Score: 1

      I prefer to think of it as killing two birds with one stone.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    5. Re:Physical Address and phone for Optinbig.com by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 1

      Please don't lump the junk mail industry in with the spam industry. Junk mail is paid in whole by the company sending it out. The cost is expensive and by definition they are naturally encouraged to trim their list to only send to actual purcasers. This is the exact opposite of spam where the cost is pushed to the consumers side. You may not like junk mail but you did not pay for it and it is a relatively small inconvenience to dump if you don't want it. The idea is that if nobody buys anything with a mailing, the sender has lost actual money. The more volume sent - the higher the cost - hence the higher the risk. The exact opposite of spam.

      --
      Stay tuned for new sig...
    6. Re:Physical Address and phone for Optinbig.com by Knight55 · · Score: 0
      I agree

      I'm tired of recieveing mail with "Our Friends" at PO BOX XX instead of my name. Wal-Mart can kiss my ass.

      --
      1888 Franklin St.
  44. Interesting: a phone number... by andy55 · · Score: 1

    On optinbig's site [optinbig.com], they list a phone number to call to set up an appointment.

    I'm older now and out of touch with go-to resources of a certain nature, but I'd be nice to see someone do some DOS via phone (the nice thing about a phone is that you don't even need a distributed DOS to get the job done).

    Call me old fashioned.

    1. Re:Interesting: a phone number... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Agreed! I was just dusting off my old 1200 Baud modem!! I thought I'd never get to use this baby again, what the hell was I thinking!!!!

      atdt,(303) 464-8164

      atdt,(303) 464-8164

      atdt,(303) 464-8164

      atdt,(303) 464-8164
      atdt,(303) 464-8164

      atdt,(303) 464-8164

    2. Re:Interesting: a phone number... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Now that would be abuse. One person, one "I do not want to be spammed" phone call ought to do the trick.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Interesting: a phone number... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about one call for every spam message. Keep it in context ;-)

  45. This is why they're suing him by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

    Read this article, then substitute all instances of "terrorist" for "Scott Richter".
    The article is about terrorists, but could easily be seen as a way for a spammer to make a lot of money.

  46. getting worse by tloh · · Score: 2, Informative

    On a related note, I've noticed the spam filters of my yahoo account has consistantly failed in recent days to block stuff from one or two specific spamers. I think we're beginning to see the wide-spread deployment of those new ani-filtering techniques some have talked about. These annoying idiots are clogging up my mailbox to the point where I need to empty it out myself once or twice a day such that legitimate mail don't get bounced back.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:getting worse by Steve+B · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I think we're beginning to see the wide-spread deployment of those new ani-filtering techniques some have talked about.

      What we need is a prosecutor looking to make a name for himself who is willing to do the homework to apply the existing anti-cracking laws (what is filter evasion, if not an attempt to circumvent computer security for the purpose of gaining prohibited access to other people's computer?)

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  47. Solution by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    "What we need is a good old fashioned hanging." -- FTC Commissioner Orson Swindell at the 2003 FTC Spam Conference.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  48. PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know his email address, but his PHONE NUMBER is

    (303) 464-8164

    N'joy!!

    ps- Don't forget to ask if his penis is larger!!

    1. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can someone please verify this?

      For all I know Mr. AC could have posted his 'friends' phone number, got modded up as informative, and exploited the slashdot crowd to arrange a personal vendetta against some random bloke.

    2. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can someone please verify this?

      Verification

    3. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Scott Richter
      Colorado Springs, CO 80903
      (719) 277-0971

      Scott Richter
      10633 W Ontario Ave
      Littleton, CO 80127
      (303) 979-8035

    4. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Quixote · · Score: 1
      According to this site this number is that of his company, not his personal number.

    5. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Kizzle · · Score: 1

      Call them up and play this http://www.spamradio.com

    6. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by La+Fortezza · · Score: 1

      That's funny, Sun Microsystems' Broomfield office also uses that exchange. I recognized it from my many a call to the HAS group concerning my F15ks.

    7. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

      :D

      Thanks. /me goes and kicks self.

    8. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Here's a link to all the real estate records I could find in Adams County that belong to S. Richter:

      10011 LOWELL WAY

      2670 W 80TH WAY

      Something

    9. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by swordboy · · Score: 1
      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    10. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by GordoSlasher · · Score: 2, Informative

      A local newspaper reporter actually spoke with Richter and revealed two phone numbers: the one listed above, and another unpublished number he used to speak with him. Quite a potty-mouth Mr. Richter has. Here's the article.

    11. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually live within walking distance from there. What would someone pay for a picture of a flaming bag of shit on his porch? I'll start the bidding low.. $10. :>

    12. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by SpectreSpeed · · Score: 1

      Spam radio is fun, tanks fer teh link

  49. Slashdot Interview? by GeorgeH · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about a Slashdot Interview with this guy (or another spammer)? I think it would be really interesting to see what (civilized) questions we could ask him and what his answers would be. He says that he puts himself in front of the media so it shouldn't be too hard to get in touch with him.

    How about it editors? (I tried suggesting an interview with a spammer before, but since I didn't have a name or contact information the editors didn't want to hear it. I wonder why I should do their job for them when they're the ones getting paid...)

    --
    Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
    1. Re:Slashdot Interview? by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Think this through - how does Slashdot conduct an interview?

      They send the interviewee questions VIA EMAIL, and get the responses VIA EMAIL.

      Ergo:

      1) It is unlikely that /.'s questions would get through the wall of flames to this moron.
      2) It is unlikely the /. crew would wish to give this moron a live email address to respond to.
      3) Assuming they did, it is unlikely this moron's response would be accepted by the /. mail servers - it would in all likelihood be rejected as spam.

    2. Re:Slashdot Interview? by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      I think it would be really interesting to see what (civilized) questions we could ask him

      I'm sorry, you must be on the wrong website.

    3. Re:Slashdot Interview? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we could ask this fat guy what his favorite fatting food is.

      If he likes the Denny's extra fat breakfast, I might be willing to send him a few coupons for a free meal or three. At 300 lbs and a bit more bad food and he might not be able to send any more spam.

    4. Re:Slashdot Interview? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why I should do [the slashdot editors'] job for them when they're the ones getting paid...

      Because they're sure as shit not going to do it. They don't even do any basic reading of the articles they link to, or the ones they write up themselves!

      Slashdot: Made by people who want to call themselves journalists and coders, but can't get actual jobs as either one.

    5. Re:Slashdot Interview? by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

      And maybe we should negotiate with terrorists, rather than kill or capture them.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    6. Re:Slashdot Interview? by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

      If you want to use that metaphor, why not think of it as an interrogation. I don't condone spamming, but I think that we could learn a lot about it (and how to stop it) by listening.

      For example, by reading this guy's words I realized that spam is a social problem and could be stopped if we educated people that spammers are amoral and shouldn't be trusted with your money. If people stopped buying from spammers the problem would go away. Admittedly, that's about as likely as STDs going away but it could put a dent in the problem.

      Also, I thought we did negotiate with terrorists. Take a look at Saudi Arabia some time... or even just look at that picture of Donald Rumsfield and Sadam Hussein and think really hard about what's going on.

      --
      Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
  50. Another story and contact info by NothingCleverToSay · · Score: 1

    The Daily Camera a local newspaper in Boulder also has this story. A nice quote: Richter did not return my phone calls Thursday, so I couldn't ask him how someone who admitted he was guilty of a felony could now assert his innocence. Since he didn't answer the phone, maybe he'd respond to a letter. His office address is 1333 W. 120th Avenue, Suite 101, Westminster, Colo., 80234. (Just in case you're curious.)

  51. VIRUS SPAM by icebones · · Score: 1
    for about a month now I've been getting messages from my ISP that I was sent a virus... they deleted it, etc. The best part is that the most of the from addreses are obviously spammers. Hmm, Could this be a new trend?

    Not that it bothers me, even if something get's through I use AntiVir, Kerio, and Mozzila.

    --
    Life is pain. Anyone who says differently is selling something.
  52. 9000 is that all? by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

    This Kiwi guy was sending approx one hundred million emails a day!! From memory he eventually stopped after receiving a series of death threats at his home. Big spam operator exposed

    --
    serenity now!
  53. The best line in the article is the last... by Frennzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The sign on the window next to the entrance of OptInRealBig's offices in Westminster leaves no room for misunderstanding. Or irony.

    NO SOLICITING.

    1. Re:The best line in the article is the last... by djeaux · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they meant NO SOLICITORS.

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    2. Re:The best line in the article is the last... by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1

      So don't solicit. But if you happen to superglue all the doors and windows shut, well, the sign didn't tell you not to do that, did it?

  54. Bizarre Quote from article by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Interesting
    spamlord says: "What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free".

    Thats right. Thanks to the spamlords its a cost-center for most firms transmitting and receiving this junk instead of a profit center.

  55. Why is this idiot doing an interview by raider_red · · Score: 1

    Look, they've published his name, the name of his business, and the address of his web site. It took me one whois lookup to post it to Slashdot, and sometime next week, he'll probably get a little extra snail mail.

    Do these guys realize what they're exposing themselves to? I'm sure it's good to publicize your business, but the receiving crowd is going to be exceptionally hostile.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  56. Easy by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    One thing though is to somehow avoid showing your own address in order not to get into SPAMmers databases.

    Start a new email account, and never check it again. No worries.

  57. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody should pull an Alan Ralsky on this guy. Sign him up for so much junk mail, they have to deliver it on a dump-truck to his office, every single day.

  58. Let's hire Leon ... by lake2112 · · Score: 1

    It might be good to get "a cleaner". I know a guy all we have to do is supply a name. But he has some rules 1. No women 2. No kids Let me know if you are interested.

  59. Judginging from your average spammer by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd say work. And raid roach spray.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  60. No way! by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Sadly, all we are doing is giving this guy free advertising. Even bas publicity is good publicity. On a different note, a lot of these guys are not ashamed of what they do. I met one once at an Open Source conference and when you ask him what he does he very plainly states "I'm a spammer". The guy was a total pariah.

    I'm going to assume you went ahead and gave him the ass whooping he deserves. Otherwise, the rest of us will have to do so to you for passing up the opportunity.

  61. Size M@tters by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    He'll be about an eight inch tall, squashed under my shoe if I ever meet him.

    Yeah, but then he'll just take some herbal vi@gra and grow back to 6'1", because everyone knows it makes pricks get bigger.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  62. My, those Samoans are a surly lot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've always been here baby. We've been known to toss out the odd troll if things get a little too slow.

  63. Lost weight? Really? by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

    At 6'1" and 240lbs., the man has a BMI of 31.7, in the Obese category (even worse than Overweight). Sure, he may not be pushing 300lbs anymore, but he's still fat.

    --

    God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
  64. Bushy by pjh3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I've always wondered is if the President gets spam, and if so, does he buy the penis enlargers (or did capturing Saddam do the trick). I'm sure the spammers would know.

    .

    1. Re:Bushy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't use email (he used to). He does this so that it can't be requested via FOIA.

      It's a pity he isn't more annoyed with spammers. I wonder what /. would think of "The War On Spam," the commitment of thousands of US troops to invading their home addresses, or possibly having them held for an indeterminate amount of time in Cuba...

    2. Re:Bushy by Imperator · · Score: 1

      I suppose Bush could probably open an email, but do you really think he could read it? This is the guy who can't even use a teleprompter--he gets his speeches read to him, phrase by phrase, through an earpiece.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  65. Just out of interest by PatrickThomson · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have the international phone number for them right here, I'm in the UK and I just wasted 5 seconds of thier time going "um" and apologising. Perhaps someone with a stronger constitution can take out +1 303 464 8164

    Official source for this number, from the optinbig website.

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  66. This quote says it all... by Blitter · · Score: 1
    "I didn't know anything about computers," he says now. "All I knew was how to log into AOL. That's still about all I can do."

    classic.

    --
    I am Jack's writable stack pointer.
  67. Wrong. by schon · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of spammers are based in unfriendly countries and are very difficult to sue.

    Not true. The vast majority of spammers are based in the US.

    1. Re:Wrong. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      Since when does 'a lot' have to mean 'the majority'? What the original poster said is true, a lot of spammers are based overseas.

    2. Re:Wrong. by schon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since when does 'a lot' have to mean 'the majority'?

      When it's implied that the two are the same. Try reading the thread in context.

      What the original poster said is true, a lot of spammers are based overseas.

      First of all, no - there are only a few spammers (IMHO) that are based overseas.

      And second, nitpicking doesn't change that he meant (based on context) that most spammers are based overseas.

    3. Re:Wrong. by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1

      I didn't read it as "most spammers are based overseas" which would, IMO, be wrong. I read it as "Scott is the one they sued because he's easy to find and he's in the US."

    4. Re:Wrong. by Tor · · Score: 1
      Since when does 'a lot' have to mean 'the majority'? What the original poster said is true, a lot of spammers are based overseas.


      The context was that Alan Ralsky stands out as low-hanging fruit, by virtue of being based in the US -- as opposed to 'a lot' of spammers being based overseas.

      Reality is that 70-80% of the world's spam originate in the US (again, according to SpamHaus). Hence, this motivation alone is not enough. (Though it is true that Alan is also #2 on SpamHaus' list of the most notorious spammers).

      -tor
    5. Re:Wrong. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      a lot of spammers use overseas servers..

      you have to admit that almost all of spam is targeted at usa citizens.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the fact that 70-80% of the world's spammers are in the US, indicates that our society has been infected with a serious mental illness brought on by the capitalist system. Much like communism failed due to flaws in human nature, capitalism is destined to do the same. Think about all of the problems in this country surrounding corrupt businesses and politics and you will see that capitlism is failing. The fact that, according to current statistics, the majority of the wealth in this country is now possesed by only 8% of the population and the rest of the 92% are BELOW what was previously "middle class" is startling, but true.

      We need to do something to get out of this thicket folks. One of the things we can do is to be sure to vote out the current administration this fall. And remember, we'll have to play dirty too. You can't beat an opponent who doesn't play fair, if you play by the rules.

    7. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      overseas servers dont make a lick of difference
      the crime was still committed in the USA.

      just because the packets happend to route through a different country doesnt make it any less that they may have originated and destined for the USA.

    8. Re:Wrong. by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 1
      you have to admit that almost all of spam is targeted at usa citizens.

      About 75% of the spam I get is in Chinese or Korean charsets. Considering that the dominant language in the US is English and that most of us are too damned lazy to learn a second language, and those that do learn Spanish or French or something, somehow I doubt that Americans are the major spam target.

    9. Re:Wrong. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      About 75% of the spam I get is in Chinese or Korean charsets. Considering that the dominant language in the US is English and that most of us are too damned lazy to learn a second language, and those that do learn Spanish or French or something, somehow I doubt that Americans are the major spam target.

      I live in Hong Kong. 95% of the spam I receive is for viagra/dick enlarger/mortgage/cable descramblers. Occasionally I go to the referenced websites and usually they ONLY deliver to the US anyway, and most of their products won't work (financial instruments, cable descramblers) outside the US anyway. Americans invented spam. Americans are the source of most spam. Americans are the targets of most spam. The rest of the world gets swamped just by carelessness. (Why the fuck send ads to the .hk domain when it's impossible to deliver your product there?).

    10. Re:Wrong. by houghi · · Score: 1

      The rest of the world gets swamped just by carelessness. (Why the fuck send ads to the .hk domain when it's impossible to deliver your product there?).

      From the spammers point of view. Why not? I get the spam pointed towards the US and the spam pointed towards people who use different charsets and I do not want either. From a spammers point of vieuw it is simpel. I have the adress, I use it.

      They do not even validate it anymore if the adress aexists. I asume they just do both harvesting and combine whatever they find before the @ with domains they find. This means when they have bla@example.com and blabla@example.net, they will also send out bla@example.net and blabla@example.com.

      The reason I think this is because I have only 3 valid adresses on my domain, yet I get mail send to about hundred adresses.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Wrong. by schon · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I read it as "Scott is the one they sued because he's easy to find and he's in the US."

      Yes, which was preceeded with "This guy is small potatos - why don't they go after someone bigger?"

      So, if the answer is "this guy is local, whereas a lot of spammers are overseas" means that "a lot" is relative to the number of spammers in the US. As most spammers are in the US, it's false.

  68. My favorite by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My favorite quote from the article:

    "We made nothing," Richter recalls. "I thought all you had to do was put up a Web site and you'd be a millionaire. I didn't understand the Internet."
    Richter, on his first attempt at online marketing.

    He just summed up the entire tech bubble.

    1. Re:My favorite by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

      It also sums up the total IQ of him and his customers. It was a very very long time since I heard anyone say anything so mindboggingly stupid.

  69. Experiencing Confusing Emotions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow I'm actually a little tired of putting spammer info up on Slashdot. Does that make me a bad person?

    ------
    The long awaited return of Flan.org

  70. Yeah, right. by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    I wish the media would concentrate more on their criminal past. Maybe then people would get a clue and not do any business with them.

    The sort of people mindless enough to actually look into a badly-worded spam for increased penis size, longer orgasms, debt consolidation, or what-have-you aren't likely to notice or care about the past histories of the people that have ensnared them.

    1. Re:Yeah, right. by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      I said "doing business with" not "buying from". There's differece. You don't honestly believe he comes up with all these stupid products on his own, do you?

  71. Wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are $2m worth of idiots connected to the internet

    Read that again - it doesn't say that they get $2M worth of orders, it says that they get $2M worth of revenue.

    As in, moron 'A' decideds "hey, I want to advertise my new product, but I don't know how - so I'll pay "OptInRealBig" to do it for me.. they wouldn't be doing anything illegal, they told me so."

    Spammers don't make money selling stuff, they make money by conning 'advertisers'.

    Moron 'A' doesn't need to be connected to the internet to be conned out of his money.

    1. Re:Wrong... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      So the best idea would be to spam the advertisers.
      Hunt them down and "enlighten" them on the consequenses of using these services.
      Attack the disease rather than the symptoms (Spammers being the symptom).

    2. Re:Wrong... by EugeneK · · Score: 1
      ..they make money by conning 'advertisers'.

      I believe it was WC Fields who said,

      "You can't cheat an honest man."
  72. info@optinbig.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    info@optinbig.com

    I really do hope the spambots pick THIS one up!

  73. More outsourcing woes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can't even spam without worrying about being outsourced to India. Next you'll tell me that Indians can be crackwhores in East Oakland as well. What career options are left for me?

  74. Dead SID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Try again. Your transmission contained an error.

  75. 500,000 UNIQUE IMPRESSIONS! GUARANTEED! by hendridm · · Score: 2

    I'm guessing he doesn't get paid by the click. Companies probably come to him with mass-mailings they would like distributed. He charges his fee to distribute them. When the company realizes those mass mailings resulted in ZERO new business, they move on to another strategy. Next in line is another company who wants to do the same thing and make the same mistake. It's an industry of lies and one-time customers, me thinks.

    1. Re:500,000 UNIQUE IMPRESSIONS! GUARANTEED! by zelphior · · Score: 3, Funny

      The problem is that there is not ZERO new business. He sent out 15 million emails advertising Iraqi most wanted playing cards, and generated 40,000 orders. That's a sucess rate of around .26%. This may be low, but it is something, with a profit of $151,800. So next time he sends out the email to 60 million people, hoping to generate 120,000 responses. At $5.06 profit per order, that would generate him $607,200. And that was just over the course of a week. With really small return rates, the spammer's goal is to send out the message to more and more people. So until the percentage of people responding to spam reaches zero, there will always be people willing to invest in it. And the amount of spam will increase as it nears the end, rather than a slow decline, as spammers desperately try to keep up profits by spamming more and more people to get the diminishing returns on their marketing.

      I imagine them like loyd in Dumb and Dummer "What are the odds of me and you getting together?"
      "One in a million"
      "So you're saying there's a chance!"

      (sorry if I butchered the quote, it's been a few years since I saw the movie)

      --
      If you can read this then I forgot to check "Post Anonymously"
  76. Newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buying from = conducting legal transaction = doing business with.

  77. Waste of time... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    Why? If they don't bounce, they are certainly unread. Why waste your time sending them hate mail?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  78. Re:Fatal allergies? How about water? by Isochrome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most people have a fatal reaction to water, taken in large enough doses.

    You can buy various brands. I like San Pellorino.

  79. Trained Monkeys by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Judging from the grammar and spelling in most spams I'd say trained monkeys were writing them.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  80. Opt in? by RT+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I once complained to "dotregistrar.com" about one of their clients. I used their web form to file the complaint, since they do not have any operational phone numbers. An e-mail address is required, so I used "alec@dotregistrar.mydoman.com" (I have configured my mail server to allow me to create these types of addresses on-the-fly). I never heard back from them, but to date I have recieved over 100 spam to that very same address!

    Their AUP does state:

    DotRegistrar may disclose any Required Information, specified in paragraph 10, above, to third parties or to the public at large, for any purpose and at its discretion.
    There is no information about data collected as part of a complaint, so I guess I was supposed to assume that. Any other dotregistrar stories? Did I "opt-in"?
    1. Re:Opt in? by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      Remember, those companies have 800 numbers. You can easily get them back in phone bills with a shell script the size of my thumb.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    2. Re:Opt in? by RT+Alec · · Score: 1

      This company does not have a toll free number, and I don't live near them. Nobody answers their phone anyway. I did call them, left a (nice) message, and nobody ever returned my call.

  81. Another number to try.... by skedastik · · Score: 0

    According to the daily camera columnist he contacted Scott on Jan. 30th using this number: (303) 550-9828

  82. Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by Nept · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the article. Case in point was Iraq trading cards. He sent out 15 million emails, received 40,000 purchases. That's 1:375. Better than I would have thought. That's also $5.06 profit per transaction, which means he grossed $202,400, and I'll bet his net take wasn't much lower than the gross (what's the overhead for a spammer? Virtually nil, I would imagine.)

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    1. Re:Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by jfengel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about the overhead, but I'm sure it's bigger than zero. Fifteen million emails at (say) 1K apiece (probably an overestimate, but it's a rough order of magnitude) is fifteen gigabytes.

      If you want to get that out in any sort of reasonable order, you're going to require a T1, at $1K per month. It's probably more than that; he probably requires a T3, for more money. Plus a bunch of servers and a small team of MSCEs to maintain them.

      Plus his own marketing department to find people willing to hire him to spam, and a sales department to actually fulfill all of those 40,000 transactions. And an office to put them in, and so on.

      Rough guess, it takes him $10K per month to stay in business. Now, that's still trivial compared to a $200K profit, but it's not "virtually nil". And I'd bet I'm low by as much as an order of magnitude; businesses have a way of being more expensive than you expect.

      The next trick is to raise his rents, as it were. Hit him with a fine when he sends illegal spam (as opposed to the legal stuff under the MAY SPAM law). Make service providers drop him for fear of being sued. And if he steps a toe out of line (like being behind MyDoom), send him to jail for a trillion years.

    2. Re:Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the overhead, but I'm sure it's bigger than zero. Fifteen million emails at (say) 1K apiece (probably an overestimate, but it's a rough order of magnitude) is fifteen gigabytes.

      Except that it doesn't quite scale that way. The spammer sends out a few messages with huge BCC: lists. Also, they use a hijacked third party's server to do it. The net cost for that is rather small to the spammer, because the real work (sending out all of the information) is happening on a machine from whom the spammers are stealing resources.

    3. Re:Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1

      That's also $5.06 profit per transaction, which means he grossed $202,400, and I'll bet his net take wasn't much lower than the gross

      Let's hope he's cheated on his taxes and the IRS have read that article. :-)

      If it's good enough for Capone, it's good enough for spammers!

    4. Re:Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Ok, so lets assume your number of 15GB a day for 15 million mails a day is accurate. That's 450GB a month. By buying bandwidth in bulk, I can get that at less than $200 a month, EASILY. Colocating a server is a much cheaper than hiring the lines. One small server would easily handle a mail volume like that when the number of messages are small (everything can trivially be cached in RAM, so no IO bottleneck). Bandwidth + leasing a suitable server would be unlikely to go much above a $500-600 unless he's had to pay a premium to find an ISP willing to host his crap.

    5. Re:Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, but the Iraq trading cards is the only non-dodgy thing ever advertised by spam. Compared to fake drugs, fake degrees and genital enhancers. The sort of things that wouldn't even get advertised on QVC.

      Heck, I wanted to buy a deck! I just didn't (even from a web search) because I thought if that sort of things was advertised by spam it must be a con of some sort. So the spammer polluted the idea of me buying it from other companies on the web.

    6. Re:Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by Steve+B · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd like to see a spammer arrested for distributing porn to minors... and for the other prisoners to know that "he's in here for showing dirty pictures to little girls".

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    7. Re:Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by Dovregubbens+Hall · · Score: 1

      Who is the source of the information? Right, the spammer. Rule #1: Spammers lie.

  83. Re:sad sad sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Death penalty doesn't take away the problem, but only the symptom.

    What you say is true, and I am glad I live in a civilised country where we no longer regularly murder^Wexecute people on the off-chance that we might have got the right person, in the case of spammers I'm prepared to make an exception.

  84. they are fast-growing - just like cancer by rbird76 · · Score: 2

    The problem is the association of "fast-growing" with "good". Yes, cancers that are fast-growing could be considered successful, but I don't think one would call them good. They are parasitic, and aggressively self-centered, to the point of destroying the organism within which they reside...just like spammers. "Fast-growing" isn't good if by doing so you kill what you rely on - it is unsustainable and can only end badly.

    Of course, this is a spammer here - he has operated in the criminal realm, taking what he did not earn and contributing nothing, kind of like a lamprey (and about as slimy). Forethought isn't a useful concept - in his mind, there will always be one more victim, one more fish to suck the life from. As long as he doesn't need to work, or create value, he's at home. If we're fortunate, that home will be a prison in NY, making license plates.

  85. Call him collect. by schon · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm in the UK and I just wasted 5 seconds of thier time going "um" and apologising.

    Call him collect.

    Repeatedly.

    And tell him he can opt out at any time, but it will take two weeks to process his request, during which time he may still receive your valuable announcements.

  86. The number works - I just talked to him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So I called and found him on the corporate directory (press # then spell out Richter) and got him directly. No secretary or anything. At first he played very stupid (which was quite convincing for some odd reason) and then after I pointed him to the article ("uh what's slashdot?") his story started to change. The parting shot before I got tired of listening to his ever-changing stories and justifications was "well, I'm making a shitload of money doing this." Obviously we have someone who is very un-apologetic about his behavior and someone who needs to be introduced to slashdot. Let's introduce him, shall we?

  87. OK by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 3, Interesting


    You can usually reverse-resolve a phone number through google like this.

    ...or at least narrow it down to a location.

    1. Re:OK by gid13 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Following the daily camera link on that search yields an article that claims Mr. Richter himself answered this number: (303) 550-9828

      (article is at this URL):
      http://www.dailycamera.com/bdc/opinion_colu mnists/ article/0,1713,BDC_2490_2615380,00.html

  88. Real revenge by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Have 500 people, who are defined as ISPs, who received his spam, file a lawsuit against him for $10,000 each.

    Let the magic of numbers work against him.

  89. most of the weight... by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

    most of the weight is from oding on penis enlarger pills that just happened to work...or so the spam told me.

    --
    Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
  90. Acceptable Use by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1
    From his company's acceptable use policy:

    You may not distribute, publish, or send any of the following types of e-mail:

    Unsolicited promotions, advertising or solicitations (commonly referred to as "spam"), including, without limitation, commercial advertising and informational announcements, except to those who have explicitly requested such e-mails.


    A little ironic, don't you think. A little too ironic, yeah I really do think.
    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Acceptable Use by dev11 · · Score: 1
      It isn't that surprising, really. They only say they reserve the right to terminate the contract, not that they will actually do so. It's more like saying, "Now, Bob, you know you're not supposed to send spam, right?" *wink wink*. So really what it means to me is don't get caught. From their AUP:

      ...that Optin determines in its sole discretion is harmful to its servers, systems, network, reputation, good will, other Optin customers, or any third party.

      Basically, it doesn't outright prohibit any of these things, but they can void the contract if you make them look bad. This is just standard CYA legalese.

      Oftentimes, (but not always, of course) just having disclaimers is a clue of what the real intentions are. It's like the wording on a porno tape that says it has "redeeming social value". I am not against porn, but most porn isn't exactly Shakespeare.

  91. Don't forget by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to fake your return e-mail address. There is nothing like a faked return address to show that you are serious about contacting someone. Might I suggest yourname@optinbig's IP address?

  92. Obligatory bash.org quote... by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

    1. Re:Obligatory bash.org quote... by Westech · · Score: 1

      Come on, is that any way to treat the marketing geniuses who come up quality ad campaigns like "make Her.hApppy inBed gheihhaADFG!" and "sa,spec1@1 $33 priclng av@1la61e For @ limlted t1me!"?

    2. Re:Obligatory bash.org quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea !!!!
      Damn those Spammers!

    3. Re:Obligatory bash.org quote... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      You're quite right - they should have to share a cell with a psychotic nymphomaniac ex-English teacher with a viagra addiction and a habit of violence towards anyone who spells incorrectly.

  93. Consequence of the Rule #1 by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    SPAMmers must die ;-).

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  94. Some more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OPTINREALBIG.COM
    1333 W 120TH AVE #101 WESTMINSTER CO 80234 (303)464-8164

  95. He registers under his name by Knight55 · · Score: 0
    If you open the email, yes I know it's bad but just this once, and run a whois on the domain he actually lists his name and his phone number.

    I ran up my long distance bill up rather high that month, even at night :-)

    --
    1888 Franklin St.
  96. We have a winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But Spitzer's lawsuit claims that there were ample reasons for consumer complaints. Microsoft had set up spam traps on its Hotmail service, e-mail accounts created for the sole purpose of collecting bulk mailings. How these accounts "opted in" for Synergy6's offers isn't clear, but in a one-month period, the traps snagged 8,779 messages from the campaign. Most of the messages contained false sender identities -- claiming, in many cases, that the sender was the recipient's user name or a major online company such as AOL, Yahoo or Hotmail.

    Richter says that Spitzer has yet to produce one piece of fraudulent mail sent out by OptInRealBig. Technically, he hasn't even produced an aggrieved mail recipient -- a live one, anyway. Although the lawsuit estimates that 5 percent of the recipients of the Synergy6 campaign were New York residents, the $20 million figure sought in the suit is based on the spam-trap examples of fraud. "Those aren't New York residents," Richter notes. "They're going to have to produce 8,000 New Yorkers."

    AOL is incorporated within Virginia and Virginia Code (law) views falsifying ANY header information as identity fraud and falls within the felony category. Mr. Richter, as a felony on probation, I don't think you want to go there. Unless you want to visiting your two other colleagues on the Spamhaus list.

  97. Re:How can I OptOutRealBig?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The preferred method involves two gas tankers and a flamethrower.

  98. For fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if this will work but how about posting
    email adresses for the spammers spiders to find

    For example:

    uce@ftc.gov (Use this adress to report spam)
    webmaster@bsa.org (Let microsofts pals have some fun)

    president@whitehouse.gov (Why not)
    vice.president@whitehouse.gov

    Hope fully posting adresses like these will reduce the number of spammers or at least make them work a little bit harder.

    1. Re:For fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      From: "President of the United States"
      To: "Sender"
      Subject: Out of Office reply

      Hi,

      I am currently out of office either on vacation or visiting some third world country. Please contact Dick Cheney for any urgent requests, otherwise I will call you back as soon as I return.

      Regards,
      W.

  99. Quote From the Article by eyeota · · Score: 1

    Scott Richter... "I didn't know anything about computers," he says now. "All I knew was how to log into AOL. That's still about all I can do."

    Someone wanna do a black op to uninstall AOL from his computer and save us all a lot of grief?

    Now if we could only get AOL to stop sending him discs, we could cross another spammer off the list for good.

  100. Oh, I understand now ... by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    ... what is the primary motivation of different crusaders - from Jerry Falwell till Ralph Nader ;-).

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  101. I've blocked several hundred domains by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in my Mecury Mail rule file.

    That doesn't block the senders e-mail address but rather the links that spammers use. Spammers use countless IPs and countless forged e-mail addresses to send spams that all point to the same domain so it's a highly effective means to block large amounts of spam. You also can't obfuscate a link thanks to HTML standards. And since only spammers use those domains there's 0% collateral damage. Unless someone is foolish enough to buy one of the blocked domains that doesn't intend to use it for spam.

    The other benefit is that a new IP is free from the ISP or from that open proxy. Domains cost money. By filtering out those domains I've basically cost spammers a thousand bucks or so because all those domains are now useless to advertise to my e-mail accounts. The more domains they buy to try to spam me with the more money they waste.

    I also have a simple catch-all written in VB to bait spam with on my home connection which saves me money on bandwidth since I can preemptively filter domains on my real server.

    Ben

  102. NE atty generals all have the same look by wwest4 · · Score: 1

    CT
    NY
    MA

    apparently, putting sex offenders and deadbeat dads in the stocks isn't easy with long hair, an unwaxed head, non-perfect teeth and a suit that costs less than three grand.

    of course, it's a different game once you get down into NJ. That dude looks like Herbert Kornfeld.

  103. Hebal Prozac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H3b@l pr0z@k can help you with your rage problem.

    "Hebal Prozac?" What, is that only available in Israel?

  104. be more precise... by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    Why do you call it "the nation's fastest-growing online marketing company"?
    They use spammer tactics, promote spammer products, tell you that their mailings are perfectly legal... So what are they?

    Repeat after me: "THEY ARE SPAMMERS"!

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  105. OFFICE PHONE NUMBER by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 1

    From the parent's article:

    (303) 550-9828

    Apparently the guy answers this one. article here

  106. This could be him..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Colorado Divorce Detail

    County EL PASO
    Petitioner RICHTER, KATHRYN K
    Respondent RICHTER, SCOTT A
    Date 11/04/2003
    Docket # 001010
    Decree Type Separation

    1. Re:This could be him..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should ash his ex-wifes atty to go after a bit more of that big pile of loot he claims to have.

  107. Watch Scott the Spammer in action.. by Dynamoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here's a very recent thread at Abestweb where Richter tries to con some affiliates into signing up to his program. It all starts to unravel when they begin to pick him apart. Look out for the Ukranian connection.

    Oh just for fun, one of Richter's outfits is CPAempire. Check out the parody site at SPAMempire. ;)

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  108. I hope he'll understand by cgenman · · Score: 1

    What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free. I make my money by signing you up at my Web site, getting your information, and using that information to figure out what you like."

    If Microsoft and headline-grabbing state officials are after him, he argues, it's only because he's so good at what he does, so effective, so...big.

    Well, I make money by clubbing you over your head, stealing your wallet, and selling your personally identifying information to Russian mobsters.

    You understand, it's just business. And I'm just good at what I do, and I do it big, big, BIG!

  109. SPEEL C-H-E-C-K-E-R-S by muzzmac · · Score: 1

    He's fatally allergic to Spell Checkers.

  110. Article Text - What a Bastard by dave1212 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Article Text:

    From westword.com
    Originally published by Westword Jan 29, 2004
    (C)2004 New Times, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Mr. Spam Man
    Microsoft wants to shut him down. New York's attorney general wants to see him in court. But Scott Richter keeps thinking big.
    BY ALAN PRENDERGAST

    John Johnston

    Scott Richter

    Stephen Chernin/Getty Images

    Talking trash: Microsoft attorney Brad Smith (left) watches as New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer vows to delete Scott Richter's profits.

    Source: Brightmail Logistics and Operations Center

    FWD: SCOTT, DON'T SUFFER BETWEEN PAYCHECKS! THINK BIG!

    In Scott Richter's world, size matters.

    Richter knows that Americans like things big. Bigger penis, bigger breasts. Big savings. Big chance to win big. Think big about the bigness people crave, and big profits could be yours.

    Richter is a big fellow himself, 240 pounds or so packed on a 6' 1" frame. He used to be bigger, before he got into big-time weight loss. But these days, it's his business that'sreally big. His e-mail marketing company, OptInRealBig, controls a host of like-minded domain names, including SaveRealBig, RealBigCash, RealGreatGifts, RealBigHosting andLesbiansSizzle.com (lesbians, God knows, are big). At 32, Richter's already spent nearly two decades chasing the Next Big Thing -- and finding it, the past few years, in cyberspace.

    Last April, as American forces marched into Baghdad, Brigadier General Vincent Brooks showed a group of reporters a mock-up of playing cards featuring the faces of Iraqi leaders sought for questioning. Right away, Richter knew this was going to be big, big, big.

    The Pentagon had developed the cards as an intelligence tool, to be distributed to the troops. Richter saw them as the war souvenir the public had been waiting for. Within hours, his company was shooting out e-mails advertising the cards for sale -- more than 15 million e-mails, in fact. Richter moved 40,000 decks of the cards in a week, buying them for 89 cents each and selling them for $5.95. Yet at the time he started the blitz, he didn't have a single deck in stock. Nobody did.

    "We sold them before we ever owned them," he recalls. "Wal-Mart would've taken three weeks to get them in. We knew we could find them, so we went to work."

    Richter tells the story while bottle-feeding one of his five-month-old twin sons in the kitchen of his Westminster home. It's a clean, spacious, well-lit place, with a portrait of Marilyn Monroe in the foyer, three Rhodesian Ridgebacks cavorting on the back deck, and hockey trophies and a pair of giant flat-screen monitors towering over the desk in the den. It's the kind of house you'd expect a young, sober, hard-driving entrepreneur to inhabit with his young, budding family. It's also totally at odds with Richter's reputation among his enemies on the Internet, who regard him as one of the most notorious and "morally challenged" spammers in the world.

    If you have an e-mail account and have ever been careless about the kind of information you scatter about while surfing the Web, chances are good that you've received mail from Richter. OptInRealBig boasts of having a list of 45 million e-mail addresses at its disposal, many with additional demographic or consumer-preference information. The company also e-mails to millions of other addresses provided by clients, who use Richter's services to hawk everything from diet pills and porn sites to vacation packages and Christmas toys. OptInRealBig sends out between 50 million and 250 million e-mails a day, generating close to $2 million a month in revenues.

    According to the Spamhaus Project, a British-based organization dedicated to combating the expanding swamp of unsolicited e-mail, Richter's operation ranks as the third-largest source of spam on the Internet. "OptInRealBig.com and Richter's many aliases are 'block-on-sight' domains for most of the Internet's mail systems," states the group's profile of Richter. "Due to his

  111. 9,000 emails? Wow! by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

    I'm glad the guy's being sued, but for 9,000 emails? That's nothing. I mean, I understand that they have to zero in on something, but I find it odd that out of millions upon millions of bizzarely spelled pitches for useless quack herbal boner bullshit, these 9,000 emails are singled out as a high crime.

    Isn't there some way to broaden the scope a little? Seems like the only message here is not to send spam to Hotmail accounts.

    1. Re:9,000 emails? Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been pointed out by other posters here AND the article - these 9000 were sent to special spam trap addresses that could not have "opted in" for anything. 9000 is more than enough to prove his claims are a lie.

  112. source/destination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have long wondered if companies in the US are sending out of country to avoid nasty legal problems, and if all the span I receive by obviously non-native english speakers originates out of the US. Think about it -- if you have servers in the US and Russia, and send the US spam from Russia and the Russian spam from the US, you are making it difficult for both countries to hastle you...

    So what is the source and destination of the *majority* of spam?

  113. Fuc# that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A big 12" dude named tyrone ought to rape them.

    1. Re:Fuc# that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12"? Midgets piss me off...

  114. The only thing missing by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    The only thing missing from the "optinrealbig" site was a "Permanently remove my e-mail address" option.

    Though knowing spamers it'd just generate more spam... hrmmm... spam-trap address completely unguessable, now there's an idea

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  115. Re:Why do I still bother reading those comments?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another US chauvinist framebait modded as Funny here.

    Didn't see you complaining when all the ANTI Bush / ANTI American "jokes" were modded +5,Funny on here..
    I guess your belief in free speech on Slashdot carries the rider "..as long as I agree with it", huh?

  116. questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) you stated in an interview on XXXXX that you do remove email addresses when asked (ie. Opting-Out). Explain the procedure for doing so.

    2) In another article you said that former employees *stole* lists and destroyed data. Where did you file the suite (note: it is my understanding that these suites are in the public domain. What are there people names, and let us hear their side of the story). ... what other questions would YOU like to ask.

  117. I forgot to add this... by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    The next trick is to raise his rents, as it were. Hit him with a fine when he sends illegal spam (as opposed to the legal stuff under the MAY SPAM law). Make service providers drop him for fear of being sued. And if he steps a toe out of line (like being behind MyDoom), send him to jail for a trillion years.

    The real trick is to take a loaded Desert Eagle, put the barrel against his forehead and pull the trigger. That is the only way to stop spammers -- more "regulations" are just more laws for spammers to break. Added costs are just added costs for the people from whom this criminal steals resources. Only death will stop him, and it will serve as a warning to others.

  118. procedure to opt out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the interview he stated that he will remove someone from (all?) lists if asked. So, tell us how this is done! I do not want to keep receiving your CRAP!!! your penis enlargment pills, your breast enlargement pills, your weight loss pills, your...

    Also, if I can request to be removed, can my ISP? Hey MS/Hotmail/YAHOO/... get on the band wagon and force him to remove the names from ALL your clientel (as their legal representative)...

  119. Slashdot spam? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    Excuse me, but why are you pasting your web site address outside your sig? Isn't it a bit ironic that you are against spam, yet you advertise your own site, which happens to be completely irrelevant?

    I've asked you about this before, but got no answer.

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  120. Increase your length by mousse-man · · Score: 1

    The new CAN-SPAM approved label for permitted commercial email?

  121. Re:sad sad sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what do you propose to do with the monsters that are running around in society? There are plenty of people in the US that have been convicted of several murders at different times that are out on the streets that should have been put down like a rabid dog.

    The penalty for anti-socal behavoior 500 years ago was being kicked out of town. Now the world is so full of people, that doesn't work so we put them in jail with tends to turn bad people into worse people. There is a point where enough is enough and they need to be put down.

  122. no, the REAL best part is... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    at some point the spammer will die, and then he won't be able to spam anymore.

    if there's some justice in the world, he'll suffer from a stroke whose treatment is hindered when his spam interferes with the paramedics downloading his medical information from a medical database; while he lingers in a long, painful vegetative state, the hospital runs a continous loop of Viagra/Levitra/Cialis advertisements into the ICU.

    On the other hand, spammers are like roaches (except roaches don't lie) in that there's always more to replace the ones that stop. Back to reality...

  123. their partners know what they are by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    Spammers are employed third- or fourth-hand by companies who are less-than-fastidious about how they market other companies' products; they are employed far enough downstream that their (ultimate) sponsors don't have to get their hands dirty. The people who hire people like this spammer know exactly what they're getting - they don't care, because they'll get their marketing money anyway, while being insulated from the crimes they paid for. The buck is easily passed up the chain, and if caught (!), the spammer will probably walk away, while his sponsors pretend he never existed.

    If I employ someone to collect protection money from businesses, I have to know that the person I've employed is a criminal of some sort. While spamming is not the same kind of crime, I know that someone willing to engage in it is likely to participate in other activities that involve the absence of a working conscience.

  124. who sends his mail? coldspark.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coldspark.com

    1. Re:who sends his mail? coldspark.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice!@1!

  125. A well written article! by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 1
    I doubt anyone's mentioned this, but this article is a very good piece of journalism IMO.

    It's absent of sarcastic comments (questioning != sarcastic, mind you), It doesn't just relate a single person story, but counter points both sides with insight and (most importantly) balance.

    If only more journo's did this kind of quality stuff...*cough*slashdot*cough* ;)

    --
    click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.
  126. he costs me money by mabu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am now getting somewhere in the area of 40,000 spams a day to one of my servers. This system handles e-commerce for a number of small and medium-sized companies. The volume of junk e-mail has gotten so out of hand that it's bogging down my mail processes sending/receiving clients order acknowledgements and critical communication.

    More than 80% of the mail my system handles is totally unsolicited. In fact, a substantive portion of it is random names @ random domains - there's no way it was ever solicited or welcome!

    Now I have to build an entirely new server because F'ing assholes like this guy waste my resources and I have to handle his shit or else I'll lose my legitimate business. To say I'm furious is an understatement to the Nth degree. Any money this asshole makes is at the expense of thousands of ISPs who have to spend money and time on bandwidth and system resources. THIS GUY NEEDS TO BE IN JAIL!!!

  127. Correction by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    Nope, I'm from Russia, and NOT from Iran.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  128. To hell with his email address.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I want to see his 95" long penis.

  129. The 411??? by jgregs75 · · Score: 1

    So check this out. I think you'll maybe find some use of a couple addresses useful in this blog. http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archi ves/001165.html

  130. Energy Source by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of the (non-computer) engineering types on my mailing list sent this in:

    SPAM as an energy source? Somebody hasn't thought this one out - Spam takes some amount of energy to create, so the reaction is basically endothermic. But, on the receiving end, we all know that it frequently takes considerable time and energy (expressable as watts) to get rid of it. So, at that point, it is again endothermic. So, this is following the rules of thermo, there is an unavoidable energy loss in the process. If we want to quantify the power input of a PC, divided by the amount of spam generated per unit time, we could get the energy input (input of energy in terms of creativity and potential information is taken as approaching zero). And on the output end, while it may cause increase in blood pressure and temperature, at best it is a catalyst, contributing nothing to the reaction.

    Conclusion, spam is adding to the entropy of the universe - WE HAVE FOUND ANOTHER SOURCE OF GLOBAL WARMING!

  131. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  132. Re:Watch Snott the Spammer in action.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not surprising, it looks like Scotty was trying to listwash the forum poster's email addresses.

  133. Re:Why do I still bother reading those comments?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another US chauvinist framebait modded as Funny here.

    Yeah, I mean who's going to argue with him that France isn't the best ally in war? A frenchman? I doubt even they would bother.

  134. Unfortunately by Rudebr00d · · Score: 1

    What really pains me here is that Scott Richter sounds like a great entreprenurial mind (ie: the iraqi deck of cards). Everything he worked on up until the Big* email businesses were very ingenious. And that's not to say that the business idea behind his email spamming is bad at all. It's just really unfortunate that someone with that strong of a grasp on marketing and retail resorts to marketing his products through such an unapproved and frowned upon method.

  135. While I understand your frustration with spammers by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In fact, the death penalty should be modified for spammers to make sure it's slow and painful. A literal death by a thousand needle pricks might be very appropriate to the crime. Just pinch them once for every spam they sent.

    ...and I'm also sure that's why you're at +5, I'd like to hear your opinion on how someone raping, torturing and finally killing a child should be punished. Or Osama Bin Laden for that matter. Because then you either have some really morbid ideas, or you believe that sending a bunch of 0s and 1s over an Internet connection is the worst crime a human can commit.

    A single spammer would be a slight annoyance. A million spammers is a disaster. But let's take another of Slashdot's favorite subjects, mp3 trading. A single mp3 pirate would be a slight annoyance. A million pirates is a disaster. By the same logic that lets you judge spammers by the total damage caused by spam, the RIAA should also be allowed to judge pirates by the total damage caused by piracy. Wouldn't surprise me if they went for the death penalty too.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  136. Re:Lost weight? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This BMI is bullshit.
    People like SCHWARZENEGGER or Travolta are considered obese by these fucked up standards.

  137. Yes Re:Fatal allergies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Lye

  138. Re:While I understand your frustration with spamme by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    By the same logic that lets you judge spammers by the total damage caused by spam, the RIAA should also be allowed to judge pirates by the total damage caused by piracy.

    No, because as has been documented (including this FA) only a small number of Americans are responsible for most of the spam. With file trading, there are millions of us^H^H them, so dividing the damage by the number of perps does not lead to death penalties in this case.

  139. biggest... by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    arsehole in the world.... he sounds like such a shifty prick. He'll get he come up'ns one day...

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  140. Re:Why do I still bother reading those comments?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad France was not interested in a one-of-many US wars...

    Oh, wait... I think I get it... You mean that France is _supposed_ to help US in those foolish wars, right?

    Ah, then you're right! France is a bad slave-country indeed! It must be punished!
    Obey, France! OBEY!!!
    Now, kiss my feet! That... Good country!

  141. Spamming is like Prostitution by geeksgirl · · Score: 1

    Taking legal action against 'Snotty' is just a waste of time. You can get rid of him but I'm pretty sure there were a quite few people who read the article and thought 'Hey, this would be a good way to make money, take over where Scott leaves off'. In fact, right now, I'm sure some spammer somewhere is sending out millions of unsolicited mail telling you how you too, for a measly $10.00, can get rich the Scott Richter way.

    Plently of people have moral issues with prostitutes and prostitution, so who do the laws target, the prostitutes who are just trying to get by and make a living. But there would be no prostitutes if there were no willing customers.

    SO, the point I'm really trying to make is this, if you really want to stop the spammers, sue the idiots who make it a profitible business for them. You can start with the 40 000 who bought Scott's little war souvenir cards. They made it worth Scott's while to send out the other 14 960 000 mails to people who obviously know better.

    How long would the spammers be able to maintain their bulk mailing if nobody, absolutely nobody, bought a damn thing from them?

    Supply and demand, that's what it is really all about.

    --
    "I'm going to worry like hell and that's not an easy job, believe me" - Lu-Tze "Thief of Time"
    1. Re:Spamming is like Prostitution by Steve+B · · Score: 1

      The difference is that prostitutes are simply selling a service to a willing customer, whereas the spammers are stealing service, cracking computers in order to evade filters, etc (and that's not even counting the 99+% illegal content of the spam messages themselves -- almost every one of them is either touting a blatant fraud or distributing porn to minors).

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  142. Unsafe link? by mseeger · · Score: 1
    [LINK]what is supposedly the nation's fastest-growing online marketing company[/LINK]

    Following that link makes my IDS nervous:

    Time, Event, Intruder, Count, Destination Port, Intruder IP
    04.02.2004 09:04:32, HTTP_Favorites_Icon_Overflow, ip-66-235-245-150.sterlingnetwork.net, 1, 1160, 66.235.245.150

    Looks like slashdotting them may backfire ;-).

    Regards, Martin

  143. Mob Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If people would just orgnize they could easily drive him out of the country. Make it a point to protest his family at every chance. his kids school, his work, his church, his house, his job, at the gas station at any place he would go. Make his life a living hell by invading his privacy and make him a prsioner. His wife family and friend will only support him so much before they realize majority rules and his is truly scum. And I bet his community would and neighbors would rather he leave after a few months.

    Just cause he makes a profit form it, doesn't make it right.

    Sell crack makes a profit too.

    Stop all the talk and do something.

    1. Re:Mob Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that child welfare has to investgate every claim made???

      Using an untraceable MO buy him child porn from outside the US.

      Using an untraceable MO buy him marijuana seeds from one of the many seed banks in Canada or outside the US, some will even mail live plant cuttings.

      And many many more items can be bought in his name for $20-30 that will have the FBI, DEA and everyone else crawling up his butt.

    2. Re:Mob Rule by robnauta · · Score: 0

      I disagree with this post. As the mydoom worm showed, the best defense is to not sink to their levels, this will only backfire.
      The bad sides of spam is that it's often anonymous and harassing. To advocate anonymous harassment and fake claims just makes you like them.

    3. Re:Mob Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - it's best not to get him in trouble with the law or child welfare.

      Everyone just sign him up for junk snail mail, as was done with Richard Colbert and any other spammer unfortunate enough to have his information posted here.

      One could also go as far as travel to your favorite pr0n shop, pull all the 'Request for Info' cards from all the gay pr0n mags and have him signed up as well.

    4. Re:Mob Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes the only way to look the snake in the eye is to get down on your belly too.

  144. Re:While I understand your frustration with spamme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's about the mass effect. These guys don't just torture one person. They torture (yes, spam is torture) millions of users every day. Add up the time wasted on spam (someone on /. did) and you end up with staggering amounts of time, equalling several human lifetimes. Killing one child is bad, but in effect, spam kills dozens every year.

    Anyway, you shouldn't drag down spam discussion to child rapists. You can't compare the two at all, and punishment should be decided in each case seperately. As for Osama, I'm not going there, but Osama has killed less people that George Bush Junior has. Mind you, the Iraq war was just as illegal as blowing up the WTC (and one could argue that the US Gov't is guilty of gross neglience in that case anyway).

    As for the RIAA, the damage done by file sharing is at best open to discussion; either way we do live in a democracy. If 70% of people think filesharing is okay, then it ought to be legalized, no matter what a small minority of lobbyists try to shove down your throat.

  145. Re:While I understand your frustration with spamme by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kjella, those 1's and 0's are only as good or bad as they're used for. E.g., posting pics of child rape is also just 1's and 0's, but somehow that doesn't make it as harmless as hosting a human rights site.

    E.g., if you're into splitting things into bits and then debating those bits, a landmine is just nitrogen, oxygen, iron, carbon, and some other equally harmless elements. Nothing you wouldn't find in soil naturally, you know. So, by that kind of warped logic, surely noone should be punished for placing a few of them on a playground. Right?

    E.g., a bullet is only lead and a copper jacket. You probably get the analogy with "it's only 1's and 0's" by now.

    Basically what I'm saying is: it's safe to get off that high horse now ;)

    It's not the 1's and 0's we're debating, it's the way they're used.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  146. "The internet isn't free" by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free. I make my money by signing you up at my Web site, getting your information, and using that information to figure out what you like.

    He's right - the internet isn't free, I pay my ISP for my account... Now perhaps I wouldn't complain so much about receiving spam if the money made from the spam paid for some of my bandwidth, but it doesn't... infact, the exact opposide - the spammers are effectively stealing the bandwidth that I'm paying for.

  147. Re:While I understand your frustration with spamme by Tom · · Score: 1

    I'd like to hear your opinion on how someone raping, torturing and finally killing a child should be punished.

    I don't know. I'm not a "law-system in a box". If this is a serious question, give me more details and a day or two and I will give you a well-thought-out personal opinion.

    Or Osama Bin Laden for that matter.

    To the best of my knowledge, he has not been actually convicted of any crime so far, has he?

    or you believe that sending a bunch of 0s and 1s over an Internet connection is the worst crime a human can commit.

    No, I don't. But you obviously believe that sending a bunch of guys with boxcutters to the US is.
    Spotted the point? It's not what you do, its the impact you have. Raping a young girl is technically (penetration of penis into vagina) the same act as loving sex. Of course it isn't, because technicallities aren't everything. Context and impact are vastly more important.

    A single spammer would be a slight annoyance. A million spammers is a disaster.

    Nope. Read spamhaus - 200 spammers are responsible for 90% of the spam. Not "a million".

    By the same logic that lets you judge spammers by the total damage caused by spam, the RIAA should also be allowed to judge pirates by the total damage caused by piracy. Wouldn't surprise me if they went for the death penalty too.

    Me neither. But you cleverly avoided the core of my argument: Spammers damage society as a whole. Their crime is like polution: There'll be a few deaths, but overall, no major damage to any one individual. Just a bit of damage to all of us.

    I fail to see how MP3 copying falls into that same category.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  148. whois contact info by negacao · · Score: 1

    OptInRealBig.com, LLC.
    Domain Administrator
    1333 W 120th AVE
    Suite 101
    Westminster, CO 80234
    US
    +1.3034648164
    49049@whois.gkg.net

    (registrant, admin, tech, and billing contact are all the same)

    1. Re:whois contact info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that's 15 minutes from my place. Nice. I'm gonna bag me a spammer.

    2. Re:whois contact info by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 1

      Or opt-in his company email addy on a few spam lists.

      info@optinbig.com

      --
      /*drunk.. fix later*/
    3. Re:whois contact info by negacao · · Score: 1
      You're probably being fecitious, but..



      It's all in good fun, until you go around bagging spammers. Yeah, I know I'm eating trollbait here, but.. No bagging spammers! Period. Only do what they do.

  149. More than a FEW companies... by booyah · · Score: 1

    http://www.anywho.com/qry/wp_rl?street=W+120+Ave&c ity=WESTMINSTER&STATE=CO&whiteshark.type=a

    how many other business has this guy got registered outta his house?!? thats kinda funny, maybe there is a legal lead there :-)

    --
    #include sig.h
  150. Funny? by theghost · · Score: 1

    It was modded funny because anyone who really believes that people who annoy and inconvenience them should be put to death is a FUCKING PSYCHOPATH.

    Wars have been fought and thousands been killed for less.

    Unjust wars. Senseless wars. Wars that were crimes against humanity.

    Don't you think that maybe (just maybe) you are blowing things a little bit out of proportion?

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    1. Re:Funny? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Don't you think that maybe (just maybe) you are blowing things a little bit out of proportion?

      I absolutely do.

      But it is voicing the thoughts that most people don't dare to think that makes a difference between a discussion and an endless rehash of the same old ideas.

      You know, someone just might get a good, less extreme, solution off this. Or not, but it was worth the try.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  151. Practice what you preach by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Basically IMHO the spammers are just a symptom of the complete lack of accountability or responsibility in this industry. The whole "if you can make a buck with snake oil, lies and deceit, go for it" mentality. Spammers are just the brute force/low IQ version of what everyone else is doing.

    Until we stand up and say "no more!" to the whole snake oil deal, it will only get worse.

    Nice sermon, but I notice you're still running Windows software from those master sellers of crap, lies and snake-oil in Redmond, 'cause the game you mention is Windows only.

    I guess it's like "Bob" Dobbs said: "I don't practice what I preach, because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Practice what you preach by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess there is some sweet irony in getting back the same kind of mindless zealotry that I was dishing out a couple of years ago. Yep, that was me, starting around 1999. Preaching about how everyone should abandon everything they need that computer for, and switching to linux just to oppose The Beast (TM). And that, obviously, having the unstable Netscape 4.x and gcc must account for everything anyone would ever need on their computer.

      And do you even remember the word "astroturfing"? I used to write that word a lot :P

      (Before 1999, I was an OS/2 zealot.)

      You couldn't tell now, right? Funny what growing up can do to someone, eh? ;)

      But still... As opposed to what? To turning the whole computer into something completely useless for what I need? Yeah, that's got to count as a good solution. About as good as a hanging counts as helping quit smoking.

      At that point I might just sell the damn box and keep just the consoles. (Which I'm using more than the PC anyway, come to think of it.)

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    2. Re:Practice what you preach by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Well, if you have game consoles, I have to wonder what non-gaming stuff you need to do that couldn't be done with Mac OS X or Linux.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    3. Re:Practice what you preach by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Well, basically I don't have much non-gaming stuff that I really need done on my home computer. This is really just a glorified game console in a big tower case ;)

      Well, either way, just to make it clear, since I must have come out a bit unclear the first time around: what I meant by "standing up" was more like insisting that the normal consumer and economic laws and rules apply to software too. Not vigilante actions, nor crippling my own computer to flip the bird to Microsoft.

      What I was "preaching" is more along the following lines:

      1. let's say Ana's Builders Co is a construction company. And they contact Joe's Steel Corp to buy 10 tons of steel I-beams, with x% carbon content and a bunch of other technical specs.

      If said beams don't match the contract, Joe receives a letter from Ana's lawyers. And chances are Joe will pay up a hefty chunk of damages.

      Doubly so if said beams broke and caused other damage in the process. Joe doesn't have the luxury of having a catch-all EULA which basically says "ha ha, sucks to be you. You've accepted by opening the crate. Now it's your problem, not mine."

      2. let's say I go buy something off the shelf. Let's say a ball point pen, or an el-cheapo electronic watch, or whatever. If it doesn't work as advertised, I can at the very least expect my money back.

      Basically I'm arguing that there's a reason why economic laws, regulations and the ever popular civil lawsuits were invented.

      Because if everyone must spend time and money to find out if a product even works at all in advance, it is in fact the same kind of plundering everyone's time and money as spam is. So having a law that says "if the pen or watch doesn't work, you get your money back" is far better for society as a whole than making everyone spend half their time reading reviews of pens, and reviews of watches, and reviews of toilet paper rolls, and whatnot. Just to find which brand works at all.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  152. My long-standing spam theory by forkboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of suing the customers, sue the guys who PAY the spammers to spam. Very few of these spamemrs are selling their own products...they're usually guns-for-hire for some website that wants to promote its product or service. So arrest the bastards.

    It's against the law to hire someone to conduct an illegal activity in yout stead, you're generally charged with the same crime that person commits. (i.e. hiring a hitman gets you a nice fat murder trial) So...since states are making spamming illegal, by that logic, hiring a spammer is also illegal. This also opens up foreign website owners who employ spammers to extradition from friendly countries.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  153. Scott's Alleged IP Address Range by billstewart · · Score: 1
    RSK sent the following email to Dave Farber's list (apologies for any formatting damage...)


    > Where does SPAM originate? Meet Scott Richter.

    1. Blocking all IP traffic to/from 69.6.0.0/18 will make some of the symptoms of this go away.

    2. The 600-plus-page document compiled by the NY AG and staff was here:
    http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2003/dec/syn2.pdf and has been mirrored by someone here:
    http://www.pc-radio.com/syn2.pdf

    I looked up the IP address ranges on ARIN Whois, and got the following records Wholesale Bandwidth Inc (the /18) and My Email Wizard (the /24) from Westminster, CO.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  154. Teach your spam filters to recognize the charset by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Depending on the format used by the mail, there are one or two places you can find the charset indicators. So tell your spam filters to discard anything with those charset indicators.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  155. Drive-by Spamming by Motorcycle in Cambodia? by billstewart · · Score: 1
    You insensitive Clod!

    If you send Scotty the Spammer's family to Cambodia, they'll start spamming Cambodians who get their email by motorcycle relay

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  156. Howdy, Spam-Eating Troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Howdy, there, troll! If your "family member" sends people email they don't want, he's wasting their time, and people will get annoyed about that. A "working opt-out link" is just a promise from a spammer to stop annoying you after you're already annoyed, but as Rule 1 says, "Spammers Always Lie", so nobody believes a promise to stop annoying you. However, if you'll post his opt-out address, I'll be happy to sign up - my email is "*.*@*.com".

  157. Re:Lost weight? Really? by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

    Check out:

    http://www.a-guide-for-seniors.com/Pages/height_we ight_chart.html

    Did you see the picture of the guy? He's no bodybuilder.

    --

    God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
  158. Clinton had interns to do that for him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it's too obvious a joke, that's why I'm posting as Anonymous Coward :-)

  159. Heh, that number works alright... by Fox+(Canada) · · Score: 1

    I just called him up on the number that the newspaper article claimed to get a hold of him at. He answered alright. Sounded forwarded. It rang about 3 times, changed to a different ring, then someone answered. I exclaimed "Scott!" He said "Hey! What's up?!" I then proceeded to tell him how he could obtain a larger penis. Needless to say, he hung up. Apparently Scott doesn't want a larger penis? How could you not?? Hasn't he seen his own ads, where it states that "your female lover may not be as pleased as you think she is!". It disgusts me that Scott wouldn't want to please his female lover as much as he could. What a callous bastard. Fox