Why not just put the timer on the traffic lights themselves then and allow the human to manually decide what happens? Either fully automate our personal motorcoaches or gtfo.
This is a much more anonymous alternative. They even have a custom contract with Google to not pull user data with their adsense crap. You can even proxy the links through a proxy server:)
Of the four paragraphs in the article, there's one entirely about how the toolbar run by the website will protect you from XSS, and hardly goes into detail about anything amusing at all. It's not even that good of an XSS hole... simply boring.
Google only allows H.264 video to be played in its browser. It also supports Flash. I understand that supporting is killing Flash, but seriously, they're not mandating the use of HTML5 only like Apple. "Comparing apples and oranges" as they say.
What he said is entirely valid, and it really brings nothing new to the market. Digg and Reddit, and even Twitter have cornered this market for a long time have they not?
Most TVs can only handle resolutions of up to 1920x1080, as they're made for HD video, so there is a slight advantage to the multiple monitor layout. However, the frames between the monitors would drive me insane.
I don't think the argument is against governments being able to privately discuss and debate legalities without public scrutiny. The argument is that once the government has had enough time to develop an argument to present to the public, why should that argument remain secret? How will that benefit their constituents?
I believe this had occurred; I remember a discussion about it within the OpenTTD community on IRC — a few years back — about talking to Sawyer, but apparently it was found he had no legal recourse to sue OpenTTD. I wish I had the logs.
Slashdot Mirror
Why not just put the timer on the traffic lights themselves then and allow the human to manually decide what happens? Either fully automate our personal motorcoaches or gtfo.
This is a much more anonymous alternative. They even have a custom contract with Google to not pull user data with their adsense crap. You can even proxy the links through a proxy server :)
Why is it so expansive?
Grammar. I see that alot, ironically.
I was sad when I finished Throne of Bhaal, because I knew I would never be satisfied by another game ever again.
This seems like something actually interesting to read! Can we swap kdawson for samzenpus please.
I'd like them to definitively prove that he was the user behind the IP address.
Of the four paragraphs in the article, there's one entirely about how the toolbar run by the website will protect you from XSS, and hardly goes into detail about anything amusing at all. It's not even that good of an XSS hole... simply boring.
Why the fuck is this categorised as Apple? It can't have less to do with Apple. Seriously.
Google only allows H.264 video to be played in its browser. It also supports Flash. I understand that supporting is killing Flash, but seriously, they're not mandating the use of HTML5 only like Apple. "Comparing apples and oranges" as they say.
No more rehashes of Halo :D
Oh god I laughed so hard. A shame you weren't logged in so karma means nothing to you!
India is not involved with ACTA. Most of Asia is not involved with ACTA. ACTA will only affect the consumer as far as I can see, and it sucks.
What he said is entirely valid, and it really brings nothing new to the market. Digg and Reddit, and even Twitter have cornered this market for a long time have they not?
Don't hijack the one fucking processor that has a chance of possibly dethroning the wintel empire with its vast quantities of low energy and epic win.
Once again, Slashdot is not a lawyer. Ask one.
You've got it all wrong! It's the vendor of the world's largest enterprise software, dah!
Not the same. MS was openly destructive. At least, sometimes, Apple offers something new and competitive.
How does collecting genetic data assist in statistically analysing population trends?
Most TVs can only handle resolutions of up to 1920x1080, as they're made for HD video, so there is a slight advantage to the multiple monitor layout. However, the frames between the monitors would drive me insane.
The Australian Electoral Commission does not allow this. They're a tad archaic.
I don't think the argument is against governments being able to privately discuss and debate legalities without public scrutiny. The argument is that once the government has had enough time to develop an argument to present to the public, why should that argument remain secret? How will that benefit their constituents?
It has been in discussion for two years, isn't two years long enough?
Isn't that essentially what OES2 is? Except for the fact it's locked to SLES, that's basically what it is, Netware on Linux.
I believe this had occurred; I remember a discussion about it within the OpenTTD community on IRC — a few years back — about talking to Sawyer, but apparently it was found he had no legal recourse to sue OpenTTD. I wish I had the logs.