You're right. They should have started out with either from a DV camera or the MPEG2 from a DVD. There was no reason to go to some other stupid codec before re-encoding the material a third time.
He pondered that the testing might have been better on the Mac because of the Velocity Engine available on G4 & G5 processors which would make it much faster. He never said the video quality would be better, jackass.
No, actually the final battle in The Hobbit is pretty huge. But, it is the only big battle. I'd rather see Peter Jackson do The Hobbit as a miniseries, though.
IBM has already licensed Mac OS X from Apple once. Well, they licensed Next from Next -- that's really the same thing now. They didn't really do anything with Next when they licensed it. But, that doesn't prevent them from doing it again and perhaps going somewhere with it this time. I have to wonder if Apple would be as interested in it as Next was.
Actually, if it is on the Mac, it shouldn't have an OK button at all. "OK" should be replaced with a meaningful verb like "save" or whatever you're doing in that dialog.
Dammit, now whoever is responsible for the Voynich Manuscript hoax is posting on Slashdot as "aepervius". The strange post that I am replying to appears to have the features of a real language, yet it is so heavily encoded it may take decades to find its true meaning. Whoever this Aepervius is, he's clever -- apparently he's also discovered time travel.
I think that having two different form factors will destroy the iPod brand. It'll introduce descrimination between people with proper iPods and those with mini iPods and will confuse people when an iPod is mentioned. "Wait, which iPod?"
I think that having two different form factors will destroy the iPod brand. It'll introduce descrimination between people with proper iPods and those with mini iPods and will confuse people when an iPod is mentioned. "Wait, which iPod?"
Slashdot Mirror
That seems to fall in line with Apple's marketing style. They like to infuse social commentary into their prose.
You're right. They should have started out with either from a DV camera or the MPEG2 from a DVD. There was no reason to go to some other stupid codec before re-encoding the material a third time.
He pondered that the testing might have been better on the Mac because of the Velocity Engine available on G4 & G5 processors which would make it much faster. He never said the video quality would be better, jackass.
I believe Compressor is what Apple recommends for real encoding needs.
No, actually the final battle in The Hobbit is pretty huge. But, it is the only big battle. I'd rather see Peter Jackson do The Hobbit as a miniseries, though.
Are you saying that 90% of users should use Macs?
IBM has already licensed Mac OS X from Apple once. Well, they licensed Next from Next -- that's really the same thing now. They didn't really do anything with Next when they licensed it. But, that doesn't prevent them from doing it again and perhaps going somewhere with it this time. I have to wonder if Apple would be as interested in it as Next was.
Photographs in newspapers and magazines are also color corrected.
Does iRiver make anything that doesn't look like ass with a large iRiver logo that is about half the size of the object it brands?
That's rediculous. The image you linked is nowhere near high enough resolution to be able to produce a fake.
Oh well, I guess now it's...
ALL YOUR PASTE ARE BELONG TO US
Directory? It's called an application package, you heathen! ;)
Actually, if it is on the Mac, it shouldn't have an OK button at all. "OK" should be replaced with a meaningful verb like "save" or whatever you're doing in that dialog.
There are add on battery packs for your purpose.
In the real world, it isn't too difficult to drop the iPod onto its dock at the end of the day. In fact, mine spends most of its time there.
Here's to the crazy ones.
I don't think anyone knows who the author is. They are only guessing.
Dammit, now whoever is responsible for the Voynich Manuscript hoax is posting on Slashdot as "aepervius". The strange post that I am replying to appears to have the features of a real language, yet it is so heavily encoded it may take decades to find its true meaning. Whoever this Aepervius is, he's clever -- apparently he's also discovered time travel.
Precisely. But, I guess it'd be Plain Belly Sneetches.
Apple prices above commodities because they don't sell commodities.
I think that having two different form factors will destroy the iPod brand. It'll introduce descrimination between people with proper iPods and those with mini iPods and will confuse people when an iPod is mentioned. "Wait, which iPod?"
Winter's Solstice
I think that having two different form factors will destroy the iPod brand. It'll introduce descrimination between people with proper iPods and those with mini iPods and will confuse people when an iPod is mentioned. "Wait, which iPod?"
Are you going to carry a spare battery with you every day for the years it takes for the iPod's battery to fail?
Shrek already isn't standing the test of time that it's Pixar competitor Monsters Inc. is. Look at the home video market for one indicator.