Slashdot Mirror


User: Soulskill

Soulskill's activity in the archive.

Stories
17,754
Comments
244
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 244

  1. Re:Paywall for slashdot? on A Peek Into the Business Side of Online Publishing (Video) · · Score: 1

    Paywall for us? Hell no.

  2. Re:MI - hour wait but worth it. on U.S. Election Day In Progress: What's Been Your Experience? · · Score: 1

    Also waited for about an hour. Part of the wait was due to the time (close to the lunch rush), and part of it was due to some sort of senior voting official re-educating one of the not-so-senior voting officials. There was a point of debate over how much quicker it was to have one volunteer dedicated to swiping people's driver's licenses, rather than having the guy on the laptop both swipe and enter data.

    Oh well. We had good old paper ballots, so no exciting footage of mis-calibrated touchscreens.

  3. Re:The Problem with Trading Hands on CmdrTaco Looks Back on Fifteen Years of Slashdot · · Score: 2

    I have no choice but to browse at -1. Even though I tell the system to browse at 1, I see everything.

    Is this on the mobile version of the page? That's a known bug that should be addressed by the new mobile site, which is available at http://mbeta.slashdot.org/. If not, can you provide details about your browser version and OS version, and perhaps a screenshot of what you're seeing? The comment slider is currently working as expect for me on all my browsers. If you'd like to do so privately, feel free to email soulskill@slashdot.org (or feedback@slashdot.org where the engineers will see it as well).

  4. Re:What about the back? on Get Your 15 Years of Slashdot Shirt (For free, Depending) · · Score: 1

    No, you see, we'll be handing out what we call "moderation pies" and...

    Actually, let me double check our cleanup budget.

  5. Re:You still look 12 on Slashdot Turns 15, What Are You Doing Later? · · Score: 3, Informative

    *shrug*

    You're welcome to believe or not as you choose, but a quick browse through at -1 should provide plenty of evidence that even the most uncomplimentary or impolite comments are staying in place.

  6. Re:Post Removed on TSA Spending $245 Million On "Second Generation" Body Scanners · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a troll. No posts are being removed.

  7. Re:You still look 12 on Slashdot Turns 15, What Are You Doing Later? · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, that's just people finding a new way to troll by pasting that line into their comments. No posts are being deleted.

  8. Re:How about some birthday presents for the users on Slashdot Turns 15, What Are You Doing Later? · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We've got a couple presents coming. We're just about done wrapping them.

  9. Re:Should have just held it a little early... on Slashdot Turns 15, What Are You Doing Later? · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm going to have to see a birth certificate to validate your UID.

  10. Re:Host a G+ Hangout! on Slashdot Turns 15, What Are You Doing Later? · · Score: 2

    Interesting idea, we hadn't thought of that. I'll see if that's something we can do.

  11. Re:logo contest on Slashdot Turns 15, What Are You Doing Later? · · Score: 1

    It's in addition to the logo contest.

  12. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet on Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal · · Score: 1

    Yeah, there's some negativity. We know how our readers respond pretty well, so we expected it.

    I'm hopeful that we'll get some much-needed support for our engineering crew, and some time set aside for fixing lingering problems that we've wanted to tackle for months/years. We have a huge, huge list that's we would really like to get to.

    I haven't spoken with any of their editorial staff yet, but I'm also hopeful they can put some resources into helping us out. We're running a pretty light crew these days, and it'd be great to get some help running interviews, doing reviews, making better videos, etc.

  13. Re::-( Oh... on Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal · · Score: 1

    The people running Slashdot aren't changing at all. Plus, Geeknet was a corporation, and it owned Slashdot before today.

  14. Re:recruiter spam on Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No. You have my word on that.

  15. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet on Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal · · Score: 1

    How will this change /.?
    Put simply: I haven't heard anything about changing Slashdot. I would guess (and this is only a guess) some links that already exist in the header and footer will change, and that some of our regular ads will be swapped out for Dice ads. (Which would have no effect on you if you ignore the ads anyway.) As far as I can tell, Dice is mainly just interested in owning a tech news community.

  16. Re:Care to Elaborate? on Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll make sure he sees your comment.

    I understand your worries about our autonomy. As an editor, it's a worry I've had for years, any time a part of the organization has changed. It's part of the job description. Cautiously optimistic is a good way to put it. Here's another reason why I feel that way: they clearly know what Slashdot is like; if they wanted to change how we do things, it would be much easier for them to just fire us all and bring in new people who don't already have very strong opinions about what Slashdot should be.

    To be frank, I have no idea if or how Slashdot and Dice will be integrated. I don't have any information about it, and I don't know that anybody does. Perhaps the 'Jobs' link at the top of the page under Channels will change. I assume there will be a link in the footer. Sorry, I wish I had more information to give you. All I can promise is that we editors will continue to fight for user experience.

  17. Re:Care to Elaborate? on Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, I'll answer what I can; we editors are not part of the decision-making process, so I first heard this news only a few hours ago myself. This is my reaction from what I've heard today from the higher-ups. Duress isn't a factor -- in fact, one of the quotes from the meeting I most liked was in response to a question about whether we were posting news of the announcement on Slashdot, and how the community would react. The Dice folks simply said, "Let them talk." I'm sitting in a conference room right now next to a gentleman from Dice, and he's just been curious what people are saying; hasn't suggested any comments or messaging at all.

    As far as being consumed by a bigger fish, keep in mind that Geeknet (aka SourceForge aka VA, etc) was a bigger fish itself. If you think about Geeknet's business, it was rather broadly spread. Slashdot's a news site, ThinkGeek's an e-commerce business, Sourceforge is its own thing. They have common roots, but they don't really go together. I've been aware of Dice, but not terribly familiar with it, but wouldn't you say its business would tend to fit Slashdot better than ThinkGeek?

    As far as the MySpace situation.. well, not all companies are alike, and not all companies see value in the same way. The crew currently running things is more concerned about the Slashdot user experience than some others have been in the past, and that's been a plus. Obviously, I can't see the future, so I don't know how it's all going to play out. But my initial impression is positive. I'm thrilled at the possibility of getting a bigger investment into Slashdot, both from an engineering perspective and an editorial perspective.

  18. Re:Please keep the URLs working on Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't think this will be an issue, but I'll make sure everybody's aware of it.

  19. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet on Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal · · Score: 5, Informative

    The media business part of Geeknet is being moved over as a whole. So, all of our projects and priorities are continuing unchanged. In fact, we just had a meeting about this, and the folks from Dice were very clear about not wanting to interfere with the community.

  20. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone on Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is still pretty new to us, but we've been looking at this as a positive thing -- we were worried earlier that if we were rolled into a business that focused entirely on news, we'd be expected to conform to company standards -- see the Gawker sites, for example.

  21. Re:Cease and desist on Google Awarded Face-To-Unlock Patent · · Score: 1

    This comment has been posted in violation of Slashdot Patent 2019.42.1337, "System and Method For Acquiring Humor-Induced Positive Moderations On an Internet Comment." For a nominal fee of approximately $54.24, we will gladly license the technology for limited personal use.

  22. Re:Leave you phone^W lojack at home. on Leave Your Cellphone At Home, Says Jacob Appelbaum · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's nothing abnormal about your account. Your posting bonus is easy to kill because your karma is hovering right around zero, and because you seem to generate a lot of moderations. The comment to which I'm replying has, at this moment, 20 mods to it (and none from the editors; we don't really care what you say, as long as it's not spam or links to shock sites). The parent comment has even more.

  23. Re:Leave you phone^W lojack at home. on Leave Your Cellphone At Home, Says Jacob Appelbaum · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your submissions weren't 'removed' at all, you just apparently don't know where to look for them. You can see see them on your user page.

  24. Re:Moral Credibility on Subcontractor Tells Fukushima Workers To Hide Radiation Exposure · · Score: 1

    We decline hundreds of submissions every day. Most people are fine with it. A few go crazy and call it censorship or fascism or worse.

    Note that I said decline, not delete; the "censored" submissions are still publicly viewable, just like every other rejected submission.

    A few examples here, here, here.

    The author also seems to misapprehend the nature of Slashdot editors; we aren't random, numerous, or anonymous. There are four of us, and we're all employees of a publicly-traded company.

  25. Re:Missing one important word: on On Slashdot Video, We Hear You Loud and Clear · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry.