BUT WHY THE FUCK DO YOU NEED TO POINT IT OUT ALL THE TIME? Everyone knows this. And it doesn't make you look smart. It makes you look like a smug asshole.
Can't you discuss without coming up with crappy analogies that have nothing to do with this?
The argument is that NAT DOES NOT PROVIDE SECURITY. Well it does most of the time. No-one is saying that NAT is needed (if they do, they're morons). But that NAT DOES NOT PROVIDE SECURITY is a fucking lame statement because in 99,9999% of the times, it drops all incoming connections if a user haven't decided to forward a port or an IP.
So if you come up with a bad enough analogy you automatically win the argument?
Socks is very often used without shoes so that doesn't count. NAT isn't used very often without a firewall.
I lock my apartment-door but also the door to the building. My apartment is trusted so i don't look doors inside. I don't trust my neighbours fully, but more than i trust the street so i won't lock the door if i'm just going out to throw out the trash.
In other words. I firewall between subnets and use software firewalls on the clients just because i can. I feel relatively safe without them, but why not? There's very little administrative overhead. The alternative would be to Subnet every machine or use something like private vlan, which I don't have the equipment to use.
HTML5 wants to be as good as native apps. How do you do that without compromising security? ALLOW YES OR NO for the whole fucking internet. Good luck.
Google thinks their Chrome store is the security model of the future. Everything is denied, except when you download a web app from chrome store. SInce it's google you can trust them. And finally the web is owned by google. NICE
You could also use Keepass. Not as safe as your head, but can store more than a few passwords.
this
I use keepass and dropbox to sync the keepass database between my most used computers. The downside is that I can't access stuff i don't remember when i'm not at one of those computers.
Before keepass i just used 3 or 4 different passwords for every site.
BORING interstellar space?
You're on notice that all of your cards, no matter what their basic function, are being confiscated. Blasphemy will not be tolerated on the Enterprise.
Yeah I agree that's nice. But a fee for access to the market where everything should be safe is a good idea. If someone wants to manually download.apks thats fine. I've done it time to time. But the market place should not be riddled with stuff i'd only compare with spam.
Slashdot Mirror
I plan to live much longer than 2038 thank you very much. But hey, to each his own. Might be that the basement isn't that worthwhile :P i keed. :
On 10/10/10!
Whoo!
Fixed that for you. Stupid americants putting the month first.
Constantly whining about this shit is just as lame as correcting people for saying Linux instead of GNU/Linux.
BUT WHY THE FUCK DO YOU NEED TO POINT IT OUT ALL THE TIME? Everyone knows this. And it doesn't make you look smart. It makes you look like a smug asshole.
Can't you discuss without coming up with crappy analogies that have nothing to do with this? The argument is that NAT DOES NOT PROVIDE SECURITY. Well it does most of the time. No-one is saying that NAT is needed (if they do, they're morons). But that NAT DOES NOT PROVIDE SECURITY is a fucking lame statement because in 99,9999% of the times, it drops all incoming connections if a user haven't decided to forward a port or an IP.
So if you come up with a bad enough analogy you automatically win the argument? Socks is very often used without shoes so that doesn't count. NAT isn't used very often without a firewall.
I never RTFA. But my point is i'm just annoyed by people trying to act like such network experts by pointing out NAT != FIREWALL. It's getting OLD.
blablablabla. i99% of the times, NAT is in conjunction with a stateful firewall. That's why people say NAT = FIREWALLED.
HDCP is dead.
Leo Strut.
The internet is only insecure if you don't trust the internet. Come one everybody. Let's trust the internet and share the love.
That would be 1010011010
They're French. It's in their nature to lose stuff.
You mean like passwords?
I lock my apartment-door but also the door to the building. My apartment is trusted so i don't look doors inside. I don't trust my neighbours fully, but more than i trust the street so i won't lock the door if i'm just going out to throw out the trash. In other words. I firewall between subnets and use software firewalls on the clients just because i can. I feel relatively safe without them, but why not? There's very little administrative overhead. The alternative would be to Subnet every machine or use something like private vlan, which I don't have the equipment to use.
It is not possible that a video of a cat has only 3 views. Learn the laws of the internet.
I CAN HAS XBMC FOR THE PS3?
HTML5 wants to be as good as native apps. How do you do that without compromising security? ALLOW YES OR NO for the whole fucking internet. Good luck. Google thinks their Chrome store is the security model of the future. Everything is denied, except when you download a web app from chrome store. SInce it's google you can trust them. And finally the web is owned by google. NICE
Don't forget to add i'm so sorry 3>
Add some SOAP and virtualization in the mix and you got a synergy that will revolutionize the way you manage your beowulf raytracing..
yeah i'm finished with foxit. Google reader from now on.
Yeah if this debate could cool off, maybe the world would be a chiller place.
You could also use Keepass. Not as safe as your head, but can store more than a few passwords.
this
I use keepass and dropbox to sync the keepass database between my most used computers. The downside is that I can't access stuff i don't remember when i'm not at one of those computers. Before keepass i just used 3 or 4 different passwords for every site.
BORING interstellar space? You're on notice that all of your cards, no matter what their basic function, are being confiscated. Blasphemy will not be tolerated on the Enterprise.
I AM LEGEND
Yeah I agree that's nice. But a fee for access to the market where everything should be safe is a good idea. If someone wants to manually download .apks thats fine. I've done it time to time. But the market place should not be riddled with stuff i'd only compare with spam.