To play devil's advocate: At the moment he is a climate change denier largely due to lack of cohesive education on the topic. When he asked for someone experienced with first hand knowledge of the annual global climate talks to tell him more, the people who believe in it refused to give him any names.
I can see an argument for being able to adjust the temperature of my house before I get home on the rare occasion I'm getting home at an unusual time. I wouldn't get a connected thermostat just for that though.
I find that no worse than the minimum wage advocates that pay less than they are advocating for. If he alone changes his hiring and business practices it will just hurt his business to the point where it's a net negative. If his competitors are also forced to make the same changes, they won't get an advantage over him and America will be better off for it.
She was "extremely careless" with classified information. Coney recommended no charges because there was no intent, which is not required under the law. She also deleted emails after they were subpoenaed for a criminal investigation.
Clinton's email server was not within the laws and policies at the time, it was, however, consistent with what previous administrations had done before those policies were added.
Two other statistics of interest would be the percent of people that aren't employed, as opposed to the percent that have filed for unemployment, and the percent working part time, which skyrocketed due to Obamacare.
Slashdot Mirror
To play devil's advocate: At the moment he is a climate change denier largely due to lack of cohesive education on the topic. When he asked for someone experienced with first hand knowledge of the annual global climate talks to tell him more, the people who believe in it refused to give him any names.
I can see an argument for being able to adjust the temperature of my house before I get home on the rare occasion I'm getting home at an unusual time. I wouldn't get a connected thermostat just for that though.
I find that no worse than the minimum wage advocates that pay less than they are advocating for. If he alone changes his hiring and business practices it will just hurt his business to the point where it's a net negative. If his competitors are also forced to make the same changes, they won't get an advantage over him and America will be better off for it.
You left out the ability to ignore labor laws for H1Bs as they'll get deported if they lose their jobs.
I think the answer is actually no. The phrase "turned into" implies that it wasn't always.
She was "extremely careless" with classified information. Coney recommended no charges because there was no intent, which is not required under the law. She also deleted emails after they were subpoenaed for a criminal investigation.
No, I want to lock her up for deleting them after they were subpoenaed, I don't really care what was in them.
At the time she set up her server, it was against the rules. If she had been the previous secretary of state, it would not have been.
Pretty sure Hillary promised the same thing.
Becomes problematic when he's still an active topic.
Oblig xkcd
Same way Hillary promised to, by giving them different jobs.
Coal power generates significant radioactive waste.
Coney gave a long speech detailing exactly how she broke the law then concluded it by saying that the FBI recommended no charges.
Well, for all we know it was noticed or it might even have been a DoD connection and no one ever told him.
Clinton's email server was not within the laws and policies at the time, it was, however, consistent with what previous administrations had done before those policies were added.
More likely some country that never started using coal power and thus never sees the need to ban it.
Two other statistics of interest would be the percent of people that aren't employed, as opposed to the percent that have filed for unemployment, and the percent working part time, which skyrocketed due to Obamacare.
As Mythbusters proved, a bull in a china shop is generally agile enough to not destroy anything.
It's possible that they could limp home normally, but are unable to do the relatively fine maneuvering needed to navigate the canal.
So automation won't displace human workers because new jobs will be created for humans to do... Isn't that the definition of displacement?
Clinton got more votes because Trump was almost as bad a candidate as she was.
How about:
2, x, 8, y, 32, z. Can you guess x, y and z?
Political correctness is in large part discrimination in favor of the historically powerless.
He may be corrupt, but he's inexperienced as a politician, making it more difficult for him to exercise his corruption.
I'd guess that person got an immunity deal in exchange for testifying (pleading the fifth)