If the only people wanting to go into the bathroom were post-op trans women you'd have a point. When anyone can go into the women's restroom or locker room by claiming to be trans, or, in some arguments, without even claiming that they're trans, that can lead to problems.
Only if you're found unfit to stand trial, if you're tried and found not guilty by reason of insanity, you won't have to answer to the charges if you ever get out of wherever they send you.
Rather than have no new laws, you could have an automatic veto for all new laws, which is the most that the president could do if there was one. This would mean a 2/3 majority required for all new laws.
A large portion of what we pay for insurance goes towards the mandatory liability insurance. I would expect that the owner of the car will still have to pay this portion regardless.
Slashdot Mirror
Just like Americans can elect someone different if they don't like how the government is spending their money.
Harder with locker rooms.
If the only people wanting to go into the bathroom were post-op trans women you'd have a point. When anyone can go into the women's restroom or locker room by claiming to be trans, or, in some arguments, without even claiming that they're trans, that can lead to problems.
It does, however, have environment/pollution on the list.
FYI if the president doesn't sign or veto it for ten days it becomes law without his signature.
Only if you're found unfit to stand trial, if you're tried and found not guilty by reason of insanity, you won't have to answer to the charges if you ever get out of wherever they send you.
I like the German practice of capitalizing all nouns, can we adopt it as the standard instead of this movement away from capitalizing proper nouns?
It's also a problem for us as newspapers are usually the ones responsible for investigations into local affairs.
You're more likely to misplace something that you use frequently like a cell phone. On the other hand, you're also more likely to notice it's missing.
I would be very surprised if they were surprised at the lack of useful data on it.
Next thing you know we'll be outlawing stupid, flippant and ignorant.
Why would the travelers in question be unable or unwilling to show ID?
It probably wasn't about making a game to make money or the like. They probably liked the old game and wanted to play it with a modern engine.
No, but it does mean negatively famous.
Rather than have no new laws, you could have an automatic veto for all new laws, which is the most that the president could do if there was one. This would mean a 2/3 majority required for all new laws.
Your complaints about the masses are also true for politicians.
Only loses his career in DC, where he isn't working at the moment.
Because stuff like this never happens when the Democrats are in charge.
This is largely intended to cover the cost of having someone do what the cops are doing, so why is Vigilant the one getting the money?
I agree with you right up to the point where Vigilant gets the money.
Risky is anything that causes insurance to have to pay out.
A large portion of what we pay for insurance goes towards the mandatory liability insurance. I would expect that the owner of the car will still have to pay this portion regardless.
They calculated what they are, they just didn't save them.
One of the rules of Go is that you can't repeat an earlier board position, meaning cycles are not allowed.
The number matters far less than the scope.