In a rape case it is often very hard to prove what happened. There is often little or no evidence and witnesses. The standard for criminal convictions is "beyond a reasonable doubt" in most places and it can be quite hard to reach that bar.
No, that's not the reason false rape accusers get away with it at all, as could be easily demonstrated:
It's just not perceived as such a big problem (as made up statements about such false accusations "rarely happening" were repeated so many times, people started to believe it was true).
People need to realize the financial scale of SJW business. Since mid 90th USA alone spends more than 1.5 billion dollars on fighting "domestic violence against women", a case founded on outhright lies, called out in Christina Sommer's book, "Who Stole Feminism". It's one out of endless government programs spent with zero or even negative effectiveness.
It isn't just someone out there with some crazy ideas, ignoring glaring evidence, it is mostly people and organizations who are paid for solving made up problems it is people who would lose their jobs if we finally figure what is going on.
Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first shelter for the victims of domestic violence, had to run after getting death threats from the feminists for daring to state that violence is not a gender issue and more than 60% of women in her shelters where themselves violent. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Now, applying "gamergate was about harassing some random people out there including those who have literally nothing to do with anything, bar being victims" logic, we can conclude, that feminist movement is about harassment.
There have been stories like "we had sex and he put finger into my mouth and I didn't like it". (one POC celebrity) Or like "he asked for oral sex, I asked maybe later and then he kind of slightly nudged my head" - James Franco.
The pinnacle of sexual harassment, assault, rape and eating people alive (if we conflate definitions, let's do it grandly) for me was a Doctor, who "sexually harassed or assaulted or raped or eaten alive" by inviting her to become a "friend" on the facebook (something, that evil serial harasser/assaulter/rapist/cannibal did to all his patients).
The bloated approach to what does constitute sexual (insert something from unwanted comment to brutal murder) went so far, that when applied to men, figured that 6 million of american men are sexually assaulted/raped/murdered by women every year National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2010
But wait, it's not yet finished, these numbers are not scary enough some are working hard to get even more impressive figures.
You are not getting it. GPS accounts for gravitation as well as Einstein's common relativity effects. Which as OP stated were wrong (hence we have invented "dark energy").
Fast forward to today. Girls are playing video games left and right. And it's not just dating sims or Barbie Adventure or whatever, they're fragging people online.
Women gamers mostly play: 1) all kinds of "mobile games" 2) Sim's kind of games 3) very little of "frag" kind of games (outnumbered 20 to 1 or so)
So while there definitely is a sizable pool of girls playing "boys games", that's not what most girls do.
In 1906 an Indian man named Bhagat Singh Thinde made the crazy argument that he was White, (He argued he was from a high caste, despised low caste people, had enough prejudice in him to qualify as White.
You are making stuff up. Indians belong to Caucasian race, race is not always about skin color.
There is plenty of evidence that having people with different backgrounds and ideas results in better outcomes for companies.
Results of numerous academic studies of the topic suggest that the presence of more female board members does not much improve — or worsen — a firm’s performance. In this opinion piece, Wharton management professor Katherine Klein summarizes academic research on the topic and discusses the possible reasons and implications for these surprising findings. Klein is also the vice dean of the Wharton Social Impact Initiative
Doesn't american left look authoritarian to you? There is no valid criticism, it's all misogyny/some sort of nazi/bigotry/etc. Only one right way, silence/ban/fire everyone who disagrees,
European social democrat voter here, if it matters.
Not long before that (less than a century, closer to half a century) only rich could vote which was roughly 3% of population.
What "working" meant has also changed a lot, going from "place where you are likely to die from an accident that is also likely detrimental to your health" to nice office jobs.
WW2 has accelerated the process (commies in USSR were pushing women to work starting 1920).
Attributing "women can work now" to emancipation movements is rather naive..
Hybrid > Diesel > Otto (traditional gasoline) > Pure electric
The only problematic component of a pure electric vehicle is the battery array. Everything else (compared to traditional cars) is both cheap and/or lasts forever. Hence, ignoring battery, it is hardly surprising that PE vehicles are cheaper to keep running.
This seems to be a common misconception.
In a rape case it is often very hard to prove what happened. There is often little or no evidence and witnesses. The standard for criminal convictions is "beyond a reasonable doubt" in most places and it can be quite hard to reach that bar.
No, that's not the reason false rape accusers get away with it at all, as could be easily demonstrated:
Girl made false accusation of rape after her ex-boyfriend rejected her
As far as punishment goes, there is a which is, of course, overlooked, for reasons not that widely known and even contrary to the mainstream narrative.
It's just not perceived as such a big problem (as made up statements about such false accusations "rarely happening" were repeated so many times, people started to believe it was true).
People need to realize the financial scale of SJW business. Since mid 90th USA alone spends more than 1.5 billion dollars on fighting "domestic violence against women", a case founded on outhright lies, called out in Christina Sommer's book, "Who Stole Feminism". It's one out of endless government programs spent with zero or even negative effectiveness.
It isn't just someone out there with some crazy ideas, ignoring glaring evidence, it is mostly people and organizations who are paid for solving made up problems it is people who would lose their jobs if we finally figure what is going on.
Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first shelter for the victims of domestic violence, had to run after getting death threats from the feminists for daring to state that violence is not a gender issue and more than 60% of women in her shelters where themselves violent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Now, applying "gamergate was about harassing some random people out there including those who have literally nothing to do with anything, bar being victims" logic, we can conclude, that feminist movement is about harassment.
Where have you been all this time?
There have been stories like "we had sex and he put finger into my mouth and I didn't like it". (one POC celebrity)
Or like "he asked for oral sex, I asked maybe later and then he kind of slightly nudged my head" - James Franco.
The pinnacle of sexual harassment, assault, rape and eating people alive (if we conflate definitions, let's do it grandly) for me was a Doctor, who "sexually harassed or assaulted or raped or eaten alive" by inviting her to become a "friend" on the facebook (something, that evil serial harasser/assaulter/rapist/cannibal did to all his patients).
The bloated approach to what does constitute sexual (insert something from unwanted comment to brutal murder) went so far, that when applied to men, figured that 6 million of american men are sexually assaulted/raped/murdered by women every year National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2010
But wait, it's not yet finished, these numbers are not scary enough some are working hard to get even more impressive figures.
I'd rather they'd add something practical, so that I don't have to stick with Waze.
" uses AI to ensure the phone screen's brightness is more appropriately set for your surroundings"
What a brilliant excuse to know your "surroundings", just in case some pesky commission asks "why, google?".
Why did these Free Speech Believers close /r/incels.
Windows Store not taking off hardly has anything to do with Steam Machines.
You are not getting it.
GPS accounts for gravitation as well as Einstein's common relativity effects.
Which as OP stated were wrong (hence we have invented "dark energy").
I'd also struggle to name 10 female romance authors, heck, even one...
She didn't invent frequency hopping (which was a known concept decades before her) she co-patented actual device that could do frequency hoping.
Fast forward to today. Girls are playing video games left and right. And it's not just dating sims or Barbie Adventure or whatever, they're fragging people online.
Women gamers mostly play:
1) all kinds of "mobile games"
2) Sim's kind of games
3) very little of "frag" kind of games (outnumbered 20 to 1 or so)
So while there definitely is a sizable pool of girls playing "boys games", that's not what most girls do.
Regulations on CO2 emission in EU are being tightened up. (decision was made back in 2012, actually)
All car manufacturers would need to pay about 100 Euros for each extra 1g of CO2 over something around 100g CO2. (that's average over all sold cars)
Diesel engines are actually more efficient as far as CO2 metrics go, but after VW scandal, demand for diesel cars dropped sharply.
So the only options car manufacturers (all of them, not only Ford) have, is:
1) Sell more pure electric vehicles (0 CO2)
2) Go hybrid
3) Raise prices
Spent 10 billion over a decade, revenue of 7 billion in one year, what am I missing?
There is no way Uber's infrastructure/staff costs even remotely close to 7 billion a year.
What else did we learn from the article? That Uber gets about 20% cut of what you pay for the drive. That's more than I'd thought (about 10%).
In 1906 an Indian man named Bhagat Singh Thinde made the crazy argument that he was White, (He argued he was from a high caste, despised low caste people, had enough prejudice in him to qualify as White.
You are making stuff up. Indians belong to Caucasian race, race is not always about skin color.
Hiding is not a problem, there are platforms dedicated to it, but the problem is, it won't work, since thee reason for disparity is NOT biased hiring process.
Blind recruitment trial to boost gender equality making things worse, study reveals
It is comical we even mention HR bias in the context of the lawsuit.
There is plenty of evidence that having people with different backgrounds and ideas results in better outcomes for companies.
Results of numerous academic studies of the topic suggest that the presence of more female board members does not much improve — or worsen — a firm’s performance. In this opinion piece, Wharton management professor Katherine Klein summarizes academic research on the topic and discusses the possible reasons and implications for these surprising findings. Klein is also the vice dean of the Wharton Social Impact Initiative
Research on this subject ins't too consistent either: “Rigorous, peer-reviewed studies suggest that companies do not perform better when they have women on the board. Nor do they perform worse.”
Doesn't american left look authoritarian to you?
There is no valid criticism, it's all misogyny/some sort of nazi/bigotry/etc.
Only one right way, silence/ban/fire everyone who disagrees,
European social democrat voter here, if it matters.
Are you fucking kidding me...
Is here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6p0...
And yes, there are the outright legitimate arguments about women simply being paid less because they are women
And why would you ever hire men, if you could hire women to do exactly the same job for less money?
In South Africa, where black population was actually paid less than whites, they had to enforce quotas for whites.
Not long before that (less than a century, closer to half a century) only rich could vote which was roughly 3% of population.
What "working" meant has also changed a lot, going from "place where you are likely to die from an accident that is also likely detrimental to your health" to nice office jobs.
WW2 has accelerated the process (commies in USSR were pushing women to work starting 1920).
Attributing "women can work now" to emancipation movements is rather naive..
Google changed Android so that all apps have "internet" rights.
Smart move, it's an advertisement company after all.
Porsche Panamera Hybrid
Mercedes S Class Hybrid
BMW 7 (eDrive)
Just off top of my head. All of these would be eligible if they were cheaper.
If you got 60k+ for a car, you don't need 4k tax reduction.
Disclaimer: I work in automotive (not by Tesla)
Complexity of cars goes like this:
Hybrid > Diesel > Otto (traditional gasoline) > Pure electric
The only problematic component of a pure electric vehicle is the battery array. Everything else (compared to traditional cars) is both cheap and/or lasts forever. Hence, ignoring battery, it is hardly surprising that PE vehicles are cheaper to keep running.