Slashdot Mirror


Most Cities Would Welcome a Tech Billionaire, But Peter Thiel? (bloomberg.com)

Sarah McBride, writing for Bloomberg: Tech billionaire Peter Thiel is moving to Los Angeles from San Francisco, adding another dose of legitimacy to a burgeoning startup scene in Southern California -- along with some controversy. The co-founder of PayPal and an early investor in Facebook, Thiel runs Founders Fund, one of the more-respected venture capital firms in Silicon Valley. He comes with a little baggage, though, including his staunch support for President Donald Trump, his secretive funding of the legal battle between Hulk Hogan and Gawker.com, and comments some people say have been derogatory toward women. "I'm not sure why Peter Thiel believes he'll receive a warmer reception on the L.A. tech scene than he's had in Silicon Valley," said Tracy DiNunzio, chief executive officer of Tradesy, a fashion-reselling company based in Santa Monica, California. "Our venture and startup ecosystem is fairly left-leaning."

283 comments

  1. Why not? by nospam007 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    He's a supporter of Donald Trump, who wants a military parade, like the ones the French have, to celebrate the day when the 99% began cutting off the heads of the 1%.
    Sadat was also fond of military parades, until the day, when a couple of the tens of thousands of armed people walking by, shot him dead.
    Perhaps Peter can stand beside him during the parade.

    1. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peter can't stand by Sadat. As you mentioned but somehow managed to forget half a sentence later, Sadat is dead. I'm not what Thiel's politics are, but he probably supports Trump's stance on enforcing immigration laws and upholding the constitutional right to bear arms, along with his policy of creating millions of jobs.

    2. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why do conservatives insist on coming to California if it's such a shithole? It's the most liberal state in the country and SF and Silicon Valley are much further to the left and have been that way for the last century. Just make your own tech companies in the podunk flyover states you come from.

      Stop trying to leech off our companies and our success. You aren't welcome here and, to be quite honest, you can't compete here. Be gracious that we subsidize your podunk state and stay out.

    3. Re:Why not? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      If Sadat, used commas, they way you, do I'd say, it was, justified.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You subsidize them? Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes? Here's a hint - it's not f'ing you. Skipping over the fact that third world countries subsidize most of the developed world, in terms of actual tangible work, the "podunk" states you so despise do much more to maintain your standard of living than you think. Try heating your home or feeding your family with HTML5, AI, blockchain, or whatever it is you clowns rave about these days. Fact is most of the crap coming out of silicon valley is less than useless, distracting the rest of the world with constant noise while reducing their productivity and ability to solve problems themselves, and turning future generations' brains to mush. That's not economic value creation, it's destruction, and the world is finally starting to come around to that realization. So get off your high horse and wake up to the fact that it is you that is subsidized by actual hard working people, and their views matter as much as yours.

    5. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do conservatives insist on coming to California if it's such a shithole?

      Probably like most people for the weather. If I were in LA or SD today I would most likely be out sailing my yacht or on the beach instead of preparing for tomorrow's snow storm. It has nothing to do with politics.

    6. Re: Why not? by nonBORG · · Score: 0

      I think you have zero understanding of economics or industry. It is not the people who do things, it is companies that do things. If the company employees people in India and give them a task that they do for money those people are just working for the goals of the company not their own goals. Their own goal is to get paid, the company needs to motivate them with payment or something that motivates them to achieve the goal of the company.

      If you are do HTML5 then you are in the same boat if you work for a company, you are achieving the goal of the company. HTML5 has a different skill level etc but if they could do it with a dirt floor in India just as efficiently and cheaper they would (and do on some occasions probably not with a dirt floor.)

      What protects your jobs and you is various things including the company you work for choosing to benefit you. Most HTML5 ect workers are actual hard working people.

      If you live in a prosperous country that is what is benefiting you most. Not as much your skills, a better reason to ask is why is your country prospering as opposed to the dirt floor country. You will find it is comes back to the leadership of your country and the laws and systems the put in place. The leaders now days if they could go and figure out what differentiated your country from other countries they would be able to maintain your countries prosperity.
      A small note, your country can influence other countries to bring prosperity to them but it cannot afford to make those countries prosperous or they will just weaken themselves and their influence and in the worst case the will become like those countries. There is a reason why other countries are trying to emulate a lot of the US (not necessarily current stuff but the fundamentals.)

      --
      You can't handle the truth! - Because I don't post left all my comments get modded down, bye bye Karma.
    7. Re:Why not? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "If Sadat, used commas, they way you, do I'd say, it was, justified."

      Alas, you have, a point. :-)

    8. Re: Why not? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes?

      A bunch of retarded hicks that are easy to manipulate. Thanks Cleetus.

      And the Committee to Re-elect Trump fires off their favorite line, which will ensure his victory in 2020.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    9. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a dumb reactionary!

      We knew that already.

    10. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I have a dual degree in computer science and economics, and have worked as an actuary (heavily involving, you guessed it, economics) for 15 years. What's your story?

      And yes, it is the people that matter. Because if they do the work that makes your life possible, they can easily decide to stop doing that for you, and do it for the benefit of their own nation or "podunk state" instead. I'd like to see the SJW asshats in silicon valley have to pick up a shovel or butcher a cow (Mark Zuckerberg aside, I hear he has already done this).

    11. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And before you make assumptions, no, I am not a trump supporter in the least. I just think everyone's opinions matter, not just those who agree with me.

    12. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes?

      A bunch of retarded hicks that are easy to manipulate. Thanks Cleetus.

      So, tell us, Hillary!, how'd that disdain for "flyover country" work out for you 14 months ago?

    13. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who see the attribute of having put Gawker to death baggage. Yep that's your kind.

      See while Gawker was bottom feeding trash whose downfall was their own doing - their breach of Hogan's right to privacy - they still employed people like you, elitist snobs of SF, so made them your buddy. How dare Thiel smack your buddy right?

    14. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try heating your home or feeding your family with HTML5

      What a genius idea! Here's $5 million of venture capital funds!

    15. Re: Why not? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      You snowflakes are so funny.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    16. Re: Why not? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes?

      Last time I checked it was...Japan, Mexico, Vietnam.

    17. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your tech companies are so great, you can run them without sky high taxation to subsidize them.

    18. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great bait my friend.

    19. Re:Why not? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It's an example, of the the use of the so called Shatnerian, comma. Indicates a pause, for dramatic, purposes.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    20. Re:Why not? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Mr. Thiel went to Stanford which is where it hooked up with some friends or acquaintances and together built a company that got him that fortune. So he's not exactly a new import into Silicon Valley.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    21. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trying to leech off our companies and our success. You aren't welcome here and, to be quite honest, you can't compete here. Be gracious that we subsidize your podunk state and stay out.

      Tell you what: Let's take my city as an example. South Bend, Indiana. (And our fine university - The University of Notre Dame.)

      We have huge businesses and startups alike flourishing here, thanks to sane governance and state constitution-mandated property tax rates. While you're bitching and moaning about your high taxes, we buy five-bedroom houses on two acres for $300k.

      ND attracts top talent to their MBA program, and our alumni give back, to the tune of one of the top-10 endowments in the world. We are attracting the talent that - quite honestly - is leaving your shithole state for 'podunk flyover' country where they can afford to live and start businesses. It's not 'sexy' to live in Indiana, but it's peaceful, prosperous, and friendly.

      The next time you do any of these things, remember that you are funding our Indiana 'podunk' lifestyle - and we're laughing all the way to the bank.

      Use health insurance (Anthem)
      Fix your roof (Angie's List)
      Take your medicine (Eli Lilly)
      Fly anywhere (Boeing Manufacturing)
      Sit down at your office desk (Hill-Rom)
      Get orthopedic surgery (Zimmer Biomet)
      Buy any household cleaners (Calumet Specialty)

    22. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did daddy hurt you? Maybe didnâ(TM)t pay enough attention to you growing up? Your desperate need for attention is probably indicative of a learning and or social disorder... possibly verging on outright depression caused by an overwhelming sense of inadequacy.

    23. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh an actuary. That explains everything.

      You spend a lot of time on spreadsheets, doing ridiculous hours for a slavemaster partner getting paid a pittance.

      FYI double degrees are standard in most developed countries, once again youâ(TM)re just average at best.

    24. Re: Why not? by javaxman · · Score: 0

      Yea. I remember his anti-woman, anti-worker rants I his garbage Stanford Review editorials back when he was just another selfish rich kid. Dude was always a self-hating Nazi bro-douche, itâ(TM)s shameful that anyone ever worked with him.

    25. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California has the 5th largest economy in the world. They grow more food and build far more cars than your shitty state.

    26. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Ramming facts up progressive azzwhole is sooooooo much fun. Watch dem nibberizing Trotsky snowflakes melt hahaha ...!

    27. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't meant to answer rhetorical questions. Especially not with incorrect answers.

    28. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI double degrees are standard in most developed countries, once again youâ(TM)re just average at best.

      Yeah, got a reference for that claim?

    29. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got a reference for those claims?

      Note: An important claim is "more food", not "higher monetary value food".

    30. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I donâ(TM)t actually, but on quick survey of my colleagues here in London itâ(TM)s almost 53%, but I included auncillary staff to be fair... some of those donâ(TM)t even have a degree nor need one.

      As for my graduating year back in Australia it was certainly higher proportion who did double degrees in the engineering, typically economics or mathematics. Quite a large number ended up with first class honours as well.

      Interestingly the proportion of engineers with a masters in my company is over 30%, I think likely because it is a standard perk in our industry that companies will pay for it.

      Only 3% have PhDs.

      Basically Iâ(TM)m saying you are not special; I canâ(TM)t be arsed doing a deep dive to find pre calculated statistics so that quick notepad analysis will have to do.

      I can be arsed laughing at the fact you are an actuary though. Real jobs were too hard for you?

    31. Re: Why not? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      You subsidize them? Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes? Here's a hint - it's not f'ing you. Skipping over the fact that third world countries subsidize most of the developed world

      You keep using that word. It doesn't mean what you think it means.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because when you have enemies who despise you, it's fun to see the grovelling at your feet for some spare change. There's nothing like having those who hate and loathe you begging before you for some money. Then you take some bills out of your pocket, wipe your ass with them, and hand them over.

    33. Re: Why not? by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      academic excellence does not necessarily mean you are smart at anything else other than those subjects.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    34. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha London...

      Isn't it prayer time, Mohammed? Get out your little rug.

    35. Re: Why not? by Bartles · · Score: 0

      They did before they turned off the water.

    36. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if thatâ(TM)s supposed to upset me? I mean for one, Iâ(TM)m a staunch aetheist.

      It also shows your ignorance. Uk has 5% of people who practice Islam, but have a higher percentage of people who claim no religious affiliation than the USA.

      Perhaps if you ever got a day off from your spreadsheets and Visual Basic you might go see the world, realise you donâ(TM)t have to be as frightened as you are.

      Actually you said 15 years, right? You should definitely have made partner by now, you probably just spent some time skiing in the French Alps? ... or are you still nothing?

    37. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a different AC, I have nothing against Muslims, at least the 99.99% that aren't extremist. But I have disdain for extremists of all variants, hence my disliking of silicon valley scum. As for actuaries, all you have shown here is a complete lack of knowledge of what we do. I am in fact an executive at an insurance company, not "slave labor" to a partner. And pittance? Haha. I probably made more when I was 30 than you will ever make in your life. Not that that matters to me or anyone else, my point is you are wrong about basically everything.

    38. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I know full well what actuaries do, the most mindless modelling of all. As for making more by 30 than me? Iâ(TM)m not normally one for dick measuring, but Iâ(TM)m not sure the last time I can across an actuary who made more than a successful quant trader, especially given I had enough capital being thrown at me to choke a thousand horses during the 2000s... The last 15 years youâ(TM)ve been working to live, Iâ(TM)ve been working because itâ(TM)s fun.

      You play with your spreadsheets and silly insurance risk models, little mr executive man. Now go tell your wife how you really showed some guy on the internet how macho actuaries really are.

    39. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh, quant trading, let's all bow down. Wait, quant, why does that sound familiar? Ah yes, you lot are the reason the economies of the world crash every few 15 years. So screw off.

    40. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you arent one for dick measuring, then why does it matter if he only made a "pittance" as an actuary?

    41. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, largely all markets are currently shaky because the USA keeps stacking on debt continuously. Soon enough interest on debt will start rising to become a significant portion of state revenues and markets are correcting as people move out of the way.

      The governments of the last 20 years are to blame. Somehow the people who put them in power beer hold them accountable.
      Just you wait until a treasury auction fails. Then youâ(TM)ll see a real crash.

    42. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Means to an end, I read this guy being an elitist jerk:

      âoeIf you aren't living in Silicon Valley, New York or Austin what the fuck are you even doing on this siteâ

      Thought Iâ(TM)d press to see what the fuck he was even doing on this site. Turns out he is just a white collar excel basher who never made it.

      I feel justified enough. I think itâ(TM)s bullshit the whole cult of Silicon Valley. Smart, successful people are universal.

    43. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As compared to the Russian trolls for Trump and the party of the workers??

      You do know what you sound like, right? Hint: it rhymes with momunist.

    44. Re:Why not? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      He's a supporter of Donald Trump, who wants a military parade, like the ones the French have, to celebrate the day when the 99% began cutting off the heads of the 1%. Sadat was also fond of military parades, until the day, when a couple of the tens of thousands of armed people walking by, shot him dead. Perhaps Peter can stand beside him during the parade.

      He is? I read that he was one of the people potentially backing Steve Bannon after the Mercers withdrew their support to the latter. That would put him at odds w/ the president, not endear him to the White House or for that matter, the mainstream GOP

    45. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also have a degree in Economics, thirty years in tech working for Microsoft and Oracle on West Coast and grew up farming, working on cars, building houses and getting into fist fights with the dumbass rednecks in my native Ohio shithole. Iâ(TM)d never go back to that backwater. California builds Teslaâ(TM)s and grows a huge amount of the nations food. Quit dragging the country down, red states. Weâ(TM)re sick of you refusing to pull your weight

    46. Re: Why not? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      You do realize that California by itself has an economy bigger than most countries, right? Agriculture is one of it's biggest exports. The entire west coast is filled with agriculture as well as a burgeoning tech culture. It is well documented that a number of red states (san places like Texas and Florida) take more than they give when it comes to federal dollars. Blue states tend to have to pay more to make up for shitty economic policies of red states or whatever they call conservatism. In the war of ideas, conservative ideas have failed time and time again - see Kansas and Oklahoma. Ask yourself, why doesn't Peter Thiel not go to Kansas? It's because assholes have tried trickle down economics to the point that they can't even fund 5 days of school. If you're a startup, do you think that's a good place to setup shop. Nobody is going to go there where there are poor resources.

    47. Re:Why not? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 0

      As a former Purdue grad, the joke I hear when I visit West Lafayette, is that Indiana's greatest export is it's people. Nobody is interested in staying here because the state government is terrible. Pence apparently did a number of idiotic things there that even pissed off the Indiana Republican party.

      Long ago, Indiana was a great conservative state, and I absorbed some great aspects of its conservatism. But conservatism is nothing more than a cult that has no intellectual heft behind any of its positions. In the end, most red states who practices the current form of conservatism is slowly rotting frm the inside. It's like Egypt and other countries, where they distract their population by talking about social cultural issues. So moronic.

    48. Re:Why not? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why despite all that Trump is reputedly still calls Bannon for advice. ::eye roll:: The mainstream GOP doesn't give a shit about anything as long as they can pass more tax cuts. That's the only ideas they have.

    49. Re: Why not? by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 1

      You subsidize them? Who builds your cars, grows your food, makes your clothes?

      China?

  2. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Guy's a Trump troll who also bankrolled lawsuits against media whose main crime was breaking the law.

    Fixed that for you.

  3. Why do his politics matter? by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're a startup and you need funding and you've got a demonstrably astute tech investor with a deep rolodex and sacks of money to invest, why do you care who he votes for?

    I certainly wouldn't.

    This politicization of every aspect of life is way out of hand.

    1. Re:Why do his politics matter? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 0

      That's like asking the medieval Catholic Church "why does everything have to be about religion?"

    2. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      Oh wait, I know this one! Because when you lay down with dogs you wake up with fleas.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:Why do his politics matter? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 0

      why do you care who he votes for?

      Well, if your startup makes money, he makes money.

      Why would you want your own success inextricably enabling the success of a cunt?

    4. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't care who he votes for. You do care what his involvement in your startup will mean for PR, partnering, hiring, acquisition and other aspects of business. He was an early and public supporter of Trump and bankrolled the anti-Gawker lawsuit. Because of this, him being involved in your company may make it harder to get other people's attention that you need.

      Or not. Maybe he'll help direct attention to your start up in a way that adds something.

      But you have to accept it will have both positives and negatives.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There's absolutely nothing wrong with discriminating against conservatives. In fact, it's a very good thing. Deal with it.

    6. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. We would ask that question today. Most leftists today would say that making everything about religion is foolish. Yet somehow they can make everything about politics.

    7. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      So angry. What’s wrong snowflake? Your vodka running low?

    8. Re:Why do his politics matter? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Typical gutless passive-aggressive response from the left making such remarks while hiding behind AC.

    9. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The anti-Gawker lawsuit? You mean the one concerning whether or not it is okay to publish someone's private sex tape after a judge had ordered it to be taken down? That anti-Gawker lawsuit?

      I don't know anything about the guy's politics, but that one sounds about right to me.

    10. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different AC, but no that was pretty much just aggressive, nothing passive about it.

    11. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do his politics matter?

      Peter Theil is a "social justice" communist who the CIA had serious reservations about dealing with because he leaned so far to the left, but they really wanted that Palantir system. A couple years ago Theil left the reservation and cost the mafia money. Neither is forgivable, and he is now considered "right-wing", and Slashdot carries a FUDdish headline denouncing him without saying anything.

    12. Re: Why do his politics matter? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Ok, the Trump association, I can sort of understand.

      But putting out of business a tabloid (with other questionable practices) that published a full sex tape of a celebrity without his consent (a sex tape which had no redeeming news value of any kind, other than the fact that some guy gave consent for his wife to have sex with a celebrity while he was videotaping it).

      How is that bad? Is the porn industry in LA really upset over this? Or is it the tabloids or the papparrazis?

    13. Re:Why do his politics matter? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most "conservatives" today aren't really conservative by the classical definition. They are classical liberals. The Left usurped the term "liberal" when the label "progressive" got a bad reputation due to its association with socialism, fascism, eugenics, and racism in the early 20th century. They've worked really hard since then to push the worst of those associations onto the right, but originally everyone knew they were associated with the left, and "progressives" in particular.

      Ironic that when conservatives speak to the Left the way the Left speaks to conservatives every day, The Left considers it a sign of mental instability.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re:Why do his politics matter? by gweihir · · Score: 0

      I certainly wouldn't.

      Which makes you scum, but does increase your chances of economic success. Perverted incentives at work.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    15. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I am referring to his Trump support. The fact that he is a gay man I could not care less about, and I really couldn't care less about Hogan / Gawker either.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    16. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So 25 years ago when GLBT people were still seen as "queer" by the majority, you would've been OK with businesses shunning people who were overtly pro-GLBT?

      70 years ago when interracial marriages were frowned upon by the majority, you would've been OK with businesses shunning interracial couples?

      100 years ago when women didn't have the right to vote, you would've been OK with businesses shunning people who thought women should be able to vote?

      160 years ago when slavery was the norm in half the country, you would've been OK with businesses shunning anyone advocating freeing the slaves?

      See, the problem with basing acceptance on what's deemed "normal" by the masses is that "normal" changes over time. People are fickle, and tend to follow what's popular, not necessarily what's right. What's normal today won't be what's normal 25, 50, 100 years from now.

      Democracy's strength doesn't come from the majority imposing its will upon the minority. Its strength comes from allowing a wide variety of viewpoints to coexist. That allows it to find and take advantage of better ideas more quickly. Other systems of government may not even consider that idea because they've suppressed and subjugated the minority who would've brought it up for consideration. Minorities like people who were anti-slavery in the early 1800s, pro women's suffrage in the late 1800s, for racial integration in the first half of the 20th century, and opposed to discrimination against GLBT people in the second half of the 20th century.

      Democracy's strength comes from preserving that minority, even if you disagree with it. Especially if you disagree with it. If democracy hadn't protected people with those ideas when they were unpopular, those reforms never would've happened. That's why we don't discriminate against people based on how they voted (secret ballot), or their political opinions, or their religious views, or their race, or gender, or a myriad of other things which simply aren't relevant to running a business. Sure if you don't like that racist, you don't have to go camping with him. But discriminating against people in an activity which is completely orthogonal to the reason you dislike them - that is destroying the fundamental basis of democracy.

      The whole point of democracy is protecting and preserving people's right to disagree. Advocating discrimination against people who hold a different opinion than yours, for no other reason than because they hold a different opinion, makes you a bigot. What, you thought that term only applied to racists? Perhaps you should look up its definition in the dictionary. Take away the right to disagree (while still living a normal life) and you've gutted democracy.

      Tolerance doesn't mean accepting only people who hold the same beliefs you do. It means accepting and coexisting with and even defending people who hold different beliefs than you do.

      "'I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall

    17. Re:Why do his politics matter? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most "conservatives" today aren't really conservative by the classical definition. They are classical liberals.

      Libertarians are classical liberals. Conservatives are classical authoritarians. Classical liberals didn't build walls, start trade wars, vote for massive debt increases, and cozy up to foreign dictators.

      They've worked really hard since then to push the worst of those associations onto the right.

      They had a lot of help with that from the right.

    18. Re:Why do his politics matter? by w3woody · · Score: 1

      The problem, both with your examples and with your argument, is that they mix morality and money.

      Now I'm all for morality. God knows I've been a strong supporter of LGBT causes and my (Scots-Irish) father in another era spent some of his misspent youth in Memphis protesting for black equality. I'm also all for money--and using money to build an organization, to hire people, to create wealth and to build something that adds to the economic gestalt. I'm even for consumers being picky with their money, deciding to spend their money on things they support, such as organic farming or refusing to cater to businesses who don't treat customers with equality and respect.

      But it has been my experience that when we start mixing morality and money on the grand stage, both money and morality lose. And that's precisely what you're advocating here: that we as a society (rather than as individuals) choose how we spend our money based on a moral framework that, more often than not, is incomplete once we move onto the grand stage. (It's easy as a consumer to avoid a bakery who refuses to sell a cake to a gay couple. But as a society do we punish the Kosh Brothers for their stance in criminal justice reform, a position taken for a decade before President Obama praised their position? Or is it more complicated than that?)

      So sure, take your moral stance on Peter Thiel. If y'all don't want him in California, we'll certainly take him in Raleigh. There are plenty of people who aren't as repulsed by his politics, and certainly we'd be happy to spend his money in areas like the American Tobacco campus in Durham, which has a bustling startup culture and which has the potential to create significant employment opportunities for minorities.

      Because let's "spread that money around a little" (as a famous person once quipped) and help build some wealth before we start spitting on someone's assistance.

    19. Re:Why do his politics matter? by w3woody · · Score: 1

      As an aside, in the State of California, political affiliation and belief are protected classes.

      So, from a legal perspective, it is in fact illegal to discriminate against conservatives. Just as it is illegal to discriminate against liberals.

    20. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

      When you're just working with a parody representation of a 'conservative' you'll come out with pronouncements like that. Try to grow up a little and stop simply relying on the stereotypes that are popular in your echo chamber.

    21. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like an anti gay dog whistle from you. Why is it liberals hate gays so much?

    22. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is such a precious example of how phenomenally fucking stupid you are. Bravo.

    23. Re:Why do his politics matter? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Try to grow up a little and stop simply relying on the stereotypes

      I am not relying on stereotypes. I am relying on the official actions and stated policies of the party and their national leaders:

      A majority of the Republican party (74%) supports building the wall.

      Congressional Republicans just voted for a budget that adds $1.5 trillion to the national debt.

      Several Republicans have been indicted for colluding with Putin and Russian hackers.

      Does any of this sound like "classical liberalism"?

    24. Re: Why do his politics matter? by kenh · · Score: 1

      Says the fellow that can't imagine liberals remaining in the minority.

      If shunning conservatives is OK, then do is shunning liberals... "What's good for the goose..."

      --
      Ken
    25. Re: Why do his politics matter? by kenh · · Score: 0

      So it's conservatives that want to:

      Control what you eat (salt, beverage size, etc),
      Take away your guns,
      Indoctrinate your children in meaningless head-start programs as soon as they're potty-trained,
      Regulate waterways that only exist after heavy rains,
      Force everyone to buy healthcare coverage as dictated by government,
      Bans books from libraries because they deal factually with historic race relation,
      Etc?

      Think again

      --
      Ken
    26. Re:Why do his politics matter? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >bankrolled the anti-Gawker lawsuit

      WHy suddenly people saying that like it was a bad thing to do?

      Gawker, that piece of shit tabloid sleezy crapball yellow crap deserved to die.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    27. Re: Why do his politics matter? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      So it's conservatives that want to:

      Control what you eat (salt, beverage size, etc),
      Take away your guns,
      Indoctrinate your children in meaningless head-start programs as soon as they're potty-trained,
      Regulate waterways that only exist after heavy rains,
      Force everyone to buy healthcare coverage as dictated by government,
      Bans books from libraries because they deal factually with historic race relation,

      What's your point? Libertarians don't want to do any of those things either. But self-described "conservatives" want to do plenty of authoritarian crap that is the antithesis of "classical liberalism".

    28. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Several Republicans have been indicted for colluding with Putin and Russian hackers.

      Umm, no, please read the damned indictments. A group of Russian nationals was arrested for ID theft and trolling Twitter, but not hacking.

      Another few people got 18 USC 1001 charges for talking to the FBI. You might think I'm kidding, but that's actually pretty much how it works in practice. What's worse is that FBI interviews are not recorded by policy (a very BAD policy, mind you) and instead agents write reports called 302s. So you can get indicted for basically talking to them. Period. Full stop. If you read some of those indictments, you'll see that some of the "lies" were essentially that the FBI didn't believe that they didn't remember the exact timing of a meeting from months ago and such. If you're forced to talk, you want a lawyer and you want to answer every question in writing after reviewing every available source of information exhaustively.

      There's no mention of Russian "hacking" as of yet, nor Putin, nor have you identified WTF they hacked. Hint: most of your go-to stories have been RETRACTED, so be sure to read the back page 3 weeks after every bombshell.

      So please give links and quotes of actual bits of indictments if you're going to say random things like that. They're online and you have zero excuse for not going to direct sources. No, I do not want a link to the WaPo. Original sources only. Anything less and you're just another tool who reads the headlines and stories from anonymous sources that don't bother to link to public docs.

    29. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civil war when?

    30. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop deflecting from your homophobia.

    31. Re:Why do his politics matter? by pots · · Score: 0

      The controversy surrounding the anti-Gawker lawsuit is not a defense of Gawker. Nobody liked Gawker. The controversy is that Thiel abused his money to bankrupt someone that he didn't like, over a personal vendetta. Hogan's position in that suit may have been justified, and note that it isn't Hogan getting flak for this, but without Thiel's money the suit would not have turned into what it was.

      Certainly the outcome was positive, but the method highlighted a major issue with out legal system. Namely that rich people have greater sway, even though everyone is supposed to be equal before the law.

    32. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only others can detect your dog whistles. That's how dog whistles work. If they say you're dog whistling, then you are.

    33. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about Gawker.
      It's about using the justice system as a tool available to the highest bidder and not even being ashamed of it.
      It indicates that Thiel believes in the courts as a tool to get what he wants, not something with any relation to justice.
      Now one should probably blame the US citizens for allowing this to be possible, but it's no reason to have anything but a very negative attitude towards anyone taking advantage of a corrupt system. Even if it's corrupt to the core and invites it.

    34. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      tl;dr: every group straight white men extended freedom to has allied against us.

    35. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you're a fucking loser who can't win an election despite 99.99999% odds in their favor, declaring anyone who disagrees with you is a Russian plant is one of the dumbest yet most common tactics. It's a favorite among you brain dead sheep.

    36. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being a shallow cunt and making shit up.

    37. Re: Why do his politics matter? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That was nothing more than a pretext and you know it. Peter Thiel never gave a flying shit about Hulk Hogan. He was nursing a (Totally nonsensical, considering he lived in California, and for now in the Bay Area no less.) years-long grudge against Gawker for mentioning that he's gay in an article last decade. Pretending that the lawsuit was really just about the sex tape is purposefully obtuse at best, really more like intellectual dishonesty, and at worst nothing more than trolling.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    38. Re: Why do his politics matter? by javaxman · · Score: 1

      If you have a choice, and it costs nothing to choose ethical business partners, why do otherwise? He is not the only investor in town, especially if you are a good investment.

    39. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberal hate gays because gays are not easily manipulated by white women. It's like in that TV show, V, when the aliens orchestrate a fake conspiracy of scientists so they can silence them.

      Don't fool yourself; all this social hypocrisy with the diversity programs and the so-called rape culture is a smoke screen hiding a power grab by white women. It will fail because they have no actual solidarity and no aptitude for management, but in the meantime the damage they cause is real.

      If your gut tells you that something is wrong, trust yourself. Those who bash Thiel are not normal liberals, they're bloodthirsty gold diggers shooting at things they can't control.

    40. Re:Why do his politics matter? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 0

      Well, aside from the negative baggage his support for 45 and his Gawker lawsuit bring, there's also his *other* company... the one that most people seem to forget about:

      Panantir: The creepy-as-fuck company he started to help the various three letter agencies spy on us. (Named after the talisman that the dark lord Sauron used to corrupt Saruman the White to evil and to drive Denethor to madness and suicide. Seriously, THAT is the image you want to invoke when you name your startup???)

      Between the FBI trying to force Apple to build backdoors into the iPhone, the NSA intercepting Cisco shipments coming into the US to add surveillance backdoors, to the same NSA tagging Google's cross-datacenter links, to dedicated rooms in AT&T switching centers for government taps to go in, to the Equifax breach, to the general concern about the amount of data that Facebook and Google have and the goldmine it would be if the TLAs had unrestricted access...

      Thiel's founding and chairmanship of Palintir... and the legacy of his association with the company even if he were to resign... would make him a liability at any company that wanted users to believe, in any way, that their data would be secure and not simply handed on a platter to the TLAs; or to any company that wanted to operate in the EU, where the governments actually give a modicum of a care about citizens' privacy.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    41. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem, both with your examples and with your argument, is that they mix morality and money.

      Stop right there. Morality is a social phenomenon. Money is too. Without a social life, both have no value.

      They are inseparable despite the efforts of an army of business-minded sociopaths.

    42. Re:Why do his politics matter? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I had to define "tolerance" it would be something like "respect and kindness toward members of an outgroup".

      The Emperor summons before him Bodhidharma and asks: "Master, I have been tolerant of innumerable gays, lesbians, bisexuals, asexuals, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, transgender people, and Jews. How many Virtue Points have I earned for my meritorious deeds?"

      Bodhidharma answers: "None at all".

      The Emperor, somewhat put out, demands to know why.

      Bodhidharma asks: "Well, what do you think of gay people?"

      The Emperor answers: "What do you think I am, some kind of homophobic bigot? Of course I have nothing against gay people!"

      And Bodhidharma answers: "Thus do you gain no merit by tolerating them!"

      -- I can tolerate anything except the outgroup

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    43. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The politicization of life doesn't go far enough. You want to be linked to shitheads, go ahead, but accept that makes you a shithead.

    44. Re: Why do his politics matter? by BlueStrat · · Score: 0

      It indicates that Thiel believes in the courts as a tool to get what he wants, not something with any relation to justice.

      Oh, so he's taken a page from Leftist SJW groups like "watermelon" eco-warriors, open-borders radicals, and other Leftist extremists, then. What's your problem? That he was successful where so many of the Leftist SJW groups failed?

      Envy is ugly.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    45. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Kartu · · Score: 1

      Doesn't american left look authoritarian to you?
      There is no valid criticism, it's all misogyny/some sort of nazi/bigotry/etc.
      Only one right way, silence/ban/fire everyone who disagrees,

      European social democrat voter here, if it matters.

    46. Re: Why do his politics matter? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Doesn't american left look authoritarian to you?

      Yes. What's your point? That doesn't mean conservatives are "classical liberals".

    47. Re:Why do his politics matter? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      This politicization of every aspect of life is way out of hand.

      Absolutely, doing something unethical is absolutely fine if you do it for money.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    48. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That abandoning of decency and a basic moral compass is way out of hand.

      There's more to life than profit, the fact you can't see that is disturbing.

    49. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homophobe

    50. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Equality before the law is and always has been a lie.

    51. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      If you're trying to set up a Conservative friendly social media or video sharing service his politics are actually a plus.

      The interesting thing is that Sam Altman is probably a libertarian type too.

      http://blog.samaltman.com/e-pu...

      You can't tell which seemingly wacky ideas are going to turn out to be right, and nearly all ideas that turn out to be great breakthroughs start out sounding like terrible ideas. So if you want a culture that innovates, you can't have a culture where you allow the concept of heresy-if you allow the concept at all, it tends to spread. When we move from strenuous debate about ideas to casting the people behind the ideas as heretics, we gradually stop debate on all controversial ideas.

      This is uncomfortable, but it's possible we have to allow people to say disparaging things about gay people if we want them to be able to say novel things about physics. Of course we can and should say that ideas are mistaken, but we can't just call the person a heretic. We need to debate the actual idea.

      Political correctness often comes from a good place-I think we should all be willing to make accommodations to treat others well. But too often it ends up being used as a club for something orthogonal to protecting actual victims. The best ideas are barely possible to express at all, and if you're constantly thinking about how everything you say might be misinterpreted, you won't let the best ideas get past the fragment stage.

      I don't know who Satoshi is, but I'm skeptical that he, she, or they would have been able to come up with the idea for bitcoin immersed in the current culture of San Francisco-it would have seemed too crazy and too dangerous, with too many ways to go wrong. If SpaceX started in San Francisco in 2017, I assume they would have been attacked for focusing on problems of the 1%, or for doing something the government had already decided was too hard. I can picture Galileo looking up at the sky and whispering "E pur si muove" here today.

      I.e. what the SJWs who infest Google and FB (and Reddit, whose board Altman was on) are scared of is that the people who have haven't drunk the Koolaid and may - horror of horrors - fund people who want to start companies who challenge their control of The Narrative.

      Odd really, I always thought Altman's politics were like those of the average Redditor. However read that blog post and it's clear they're not. The dude is OK.

      Also The Guardian mentioned him negatively in a hit piece on Thiel :

      https://www.theguardian.com/ne...

      If you're interested in the end of the world, you're interested in New Zealand. If you're interested in how our current cultural anxieties - climate catastrophe, decline of transatlantic political orders, resurgent nuclear terror - manifest themselves in apocalyptic visions, you're interested in the place occupied by this distant archipelago of apparent peace and stability against the roiling unease of the day.

      If you're interested in the end of the world, you would have been interested, soon after Donald Trump's election as US president, to read a New York Times headline stating that Peter Thiel, the billionaire venture capitalist who co-founded PayPal and was an early investor in Facebook, considered New Zealand to be "the Future". Because if you are in any serious way concerned about the future, you're also concerned about Thiel, a canary in capitalism's coal mine who also happens to have profited lavishly from his stake in the mining concern itself.

      Thiel is in one sense a caricature of outsized villainy: he was the only major Silicon Valley figure to put his weight behind the Trump presidential campaign; he vengefully bankrupted a website because he didn't like how they wrote about him; he is known for his pu

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    52. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -- I can tolerate anything except the outgroup

      A ridiculously long read. But, absolutely worth it. Thank you for linking to it.

    53. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Trump support..."

      Wah. He has more in common, politically, with someone I don't like than someone I do!

      Hashtag tribalism!

    54. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My word, you Americans have hit rock bottom, haven't you? Fucking idiots, the lot of you.

    55. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, liberals are having a tough time manipulating straights nowadays too.

      Women who are liberals tend to be so ugly that they couldn't snag a blind guy who's spent 20 years in prison and has been dreaming about sex every day since going in.

      Or worse, they're tranny she-males hoping to get lucky and "prove" that it wasn't a mistake to chop their dick off.

      Honestly, there's almost zero visual differentiation between these two classes nowadays.

      #Wouldn'tFuckOnADareWithACarTire'sWorthOfRubberAndSomeoneElse'sDick

    56. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of America hates you. But sure, make it about Leftists.

    57. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Spamalope · · Score: 2

      'White men are guilty of original sin by existing' narrative is central to their narrative. If original sin is a core belief can they really be a purely political and not religious movement? I looks more like religious fanaticism from way (waaaay) over here, complete with cries of heretic!

    58. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great link

    59. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Marisaze · · Score: 1

      Your carefully cultivated echo chamber is not representative of most of anything. If you actually go out and talk to people, and then actually listen to those that don't share your political ideology, you might realize that most people are individuals that have opinions that don't always follow party lines. Someone who on the grand scale could be Liberal or Conservative can very easily have opinions on specific things that are drastically different from other Liberals/Conservatives.

    60. Re:Why do his politics matter? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      He bankrupted a media company that was doing Evil. I see nothing wrong with using money to stop Evil.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    61. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      tl;dr: every group straight white men extended freedom to has allied against us.

      I was trying to disagree with you but I can't, seems every group straight white men have helped have allied against them, while Asians seem to not care about those groups and continue to take over the world. It will be strange years from now when Asians own everything and set all these freedoms people have been enjoying back a few hundred years

    62. Re:Why do his politics matter? by pots · · Score: 1

      ... Why? Why don't you see anything wrong with that? You're talking about a vigilante.

      If I used my gobs of money to bankrupt you, would you have a problem with it then? There's probably someone out there who thinks you're evil.

    63. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very well written, except for the fact that you used "Democracy" in place of "Freedom".

    64. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it is the left who wants to:

      Decide who you have sex with,
      or who you get to marry,
      or what you do with your body,
      or what type of contraception to use ( none ),
      or what science to believe ( it better not be evolution ),
      etc.

    65. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      An important consideration is that in today's political environment, many people are what you would call Capital C conservatives. They've made it into a brand and they rally beneath it. Whereas a conservative is somebody who resists big changes.

    66. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      NC would be a perfect place for him. Considering what facists the Republican party has been there.

    67. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Or reject what science says and go with junk science from non-scientists. Force a country to be a christian nation, follow christian ideology

    68. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I'm not opposed to Gawker going out of business. I am opposed to billionaires secretly funding revenge lawsuits against people who have wronged them. See also: I'm not opposed to the KKK going out of business. I am opposed to the government arresting them all just for advocating their idiocy.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    69. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Why? Why don't you see anything wrong with that? You're talking about a vigilante.

      If I used my gobs of money to bankrupt you, would you have a problem with it then? There's probably someone out there who thinks you're evil.

      If you used gobs of your money to bankrupt somebody for no good reason (assuming they have done no "evil") then you deserve to rot in hell, asshole. Just saying. Figure it out, ass clown. You're comparing apples to oranges. Watch CNN much? Even they know the difference.

      People like you make me want to puke.

    70. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So 25 years ago ... [blah, blah, blah] ..."

      PRESENT DAY: Most people think fucking animals is "wrong."

      In 25 years or so, if it's still considered "wrong," will you STILL be fucking animals? Or blathering about situational ethics?

    71. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, yes, I've heard the fascists there are a lot more tolerant than the intolerant, leftist, anti-fa fuckheads that hang out by the droves in funny California.

    72. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just not from this planet are you?!?

      Don't those crazy gun grabbers use money to undermine something they see as "evil"? (Yeah, they see it wrong, but that's not the point.)

    73. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, calling him a "vigilante" implies that he went outside the bounds of the legal system to seek recourse.....except he didnt.

    74. Re:Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Conservatives are classical authoritarians"......give me a fucking break
      Almost every single authoritarian regime since the time of Kings has been leftist. For instance, Germany, when run by the National Socialist German Workers Party. See, socialism is an inherently left leaning stance and putting "National" in front of it doesnt suddenly shift it to the right side of the political spectrum. Maybe you would like to talk about the authoritarian regimes of Stalin or Mao?? China built a great big wall to keep out the Mongol hordes.....were they being "authoritarian"?
          Was the Berlin Wall erected to keep people in or keep people out? And what was the affiliation of the government that built it? See where I am going.....

      Perhaps you might be able to provide some examples of these "conservative authoritarian" regimes that have taken part in the activities you described.

    75. Re:Why do his politics matter? by pots · · Score: 1

      I checked the dictionary because I thought you might be technically correct there, but no: going outside the legal system is not required. It might be technically inaccurate to call him a vigilante because it doesn't seem like he was really after justice, just revenge. This seems like an unimportant distinction though.

      The parent claimed that his actions were justified because the results were positive, I said that isn't how it works.

    76. Re: Why do his politics matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vigÂiÂlanÂte
      ËOEvijÉ(TM)Ëlan(t)Ä"/Submit
      noun
      a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate.

  4. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that was the excuse for the lawsuits and judgments...

    Real reasons why the lawsuits got financed by Thiel is:
    (1) He was butthurt that he was outed
    (2) Gawker dug up a lot of dirt on the tech scene

  5. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just hire non-political foreign workers. Then, destroy the competition with superior products.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think foreign workers are non-political? Some percentage are intimately political and work on-the-side for their foreign government.

  6. Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't agree with him, but for crying out loud, what ever happened to the 1st amendment and freedom of expression? No one bats an eye when people on the left like Bloomberg or Soros donate to political causes they believe in, but if someone wealthy on the right such as Koch brothers or Thiel donate to political causes they believe in, then everyone gets bent out of shape? Where's the fairness in that? This is exactly why Trump won in the first place, people need to stop suppressing the beliefs of others simply because you disagree with them. If you have a problem with what someone says, debate their ideas and arguments, but don't go all big brother with the thought police. I think this sums it up quite nicely

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLG9g7BcjKs

    1. Re:Ok? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer that NOBODY bribes our politicians.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Ok? by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      people need to stop suppressing the beliefs of others simply because you disagree with them.

      The problem is that so many Leftists adamantly believe in an ideological/political structure that cannot hold up to logical, intellectually-honest debate or comparisons with others. If such were widely allowed in public discourse, they would not gain adherents and would lose nearly all support.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    3. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd take the food from the mouths of politicians' children?

      Won't someone think of the poor politicians?!

    4. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump won because he lied his ass off to everyone and enough people fell for it. Yes all politicians lie but his lies were so over the top and then he would claim he didn't say what he just said. Plus he insulted so many people, didn't matter if they were disabled, veterans, Democrats or Republicans, everyone was fair game. Some people thought that meant he was an "outsider" and consider that a plus. It just means he is a terrible person and anyone who did an ounce of research would have known that.
      The reason people get bent out of shape when the Kochs donate is they try to hide their donations, setting up multiple institutions to make it difficult to trace back to them. My question is why make your donations secret? It seems suspicious when they do that. NPR did a story of the complicated ways the Kochs go about hiding their political influence. At least when Soros donates you know it came from him.

    5. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean like debating evolution versus creationism? Or climate change versus sticking your head in the sand?

  7. I live in Los Angeles county... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and I welcome the millions of dollars in increased tax revenue. On the other hand, if he pays no taxes, then fuck him.

  8. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Airing peoples' dirty laundry isn't against the law. It's crass, but it isn't against the law.

    Airing the government's dirty laundry, on the other hand...

  9. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I'm in the wrong but I couldn't care less about someone's political leanings if they're in a posistion to help and teach me.

  10. Is LA that different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the politics in LA really that different that NorCal? No.

    1. Re:Is LA that different? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      The politics in LA, San Francisco and a few other coastal enclaves are about the same, although SF may lean even farther than the rest. Except for that, the rest of the state tends to be conservative. The reason most people don't know that is that the left coast enclaves have the majority of the population, and run the state for their benefit and ignore the rest of us.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Is LA that different? by xx_chris · · Score: 1

      The California House Congressional delegation is 39 Democrats to 14 Republicans. There are two Democratic Senators from CA. There are no Republicans elected statewide to any governing posts, Governor down to State Superintendent of Public Instruction. Cheeto lost statewide in California, 61.73% to 31.62%. California is a deeply blue state.

    3. Re:Is LA that different? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      If you'll look at a map of California's counties, you'll see that the coast is strongly Democrat and the inland counties are Republican. However, if you look at a map of the population, you'll see that most of the voters live on or near the coast, and outnumber the comparatively thinly-populated inland. Thus, by population, California is a blue state, even though most of its area is red. Guess which one matters in an election.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:Is LA that different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those "enclaves" as you call them hold most of the people in the state. Or do you not care for democracy?

    5. Re:Is LA that different? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      That's my point. I called them "enclaves" because they're fairly small, geographically, but they're heavily populated, mostly with liberals. Most of the state is much more conservative, but the population density is fairly low, so the the liberals in LA, SF and a few other places can control the state.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    6. Re:Is LA that different? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      And if L.A. wasn't constantly trying to play Keep Up With San Francisco, it wouldn't be nearly as liberal as it is. I've had the thought that we might all be better off (especially Californians) if S.F. was split off and became functionally the American Hong Kong.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  11. The real reason by u19925 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real reason why he wants to move out of Silicon Valley is that he can't afford housing in this area. All others are just excuses.

  12. Of course LA will receive him better by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    in LA money is king, no matter what your views.

    In SF money is also king, but you don't have to like it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, in LA there are more teenage boys whose blood Thiel can drink.

      Since when do petty insults get a +4 insightful on /.?

    2. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when do petty insults get a +4 insightful on /.?

      Since this became the norm for political discourse.

    3. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe he was trying to go for a Funny mod based on a story that ran sometime back about Thiel being a customer of a company that does transfusions for people using blood from young people based on some supposed health benefits of doing so that were observed when doing this in mice.

      The story got a lot of traction and got repeated in the tech press and well known blogs, but after some tech journalists looked into it, it turned out to be bogus. However, it's one of those things that seems to have stuck around probably because it's both interesting as well as silly.

    4. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pope's attacks are based on fake news again? Say it ain't so.

    5. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when do petty insults get a +4 insightful on /.?

      I'm sorry, Mr Thiel, you can't sue Slashdot because they ain't got shit.

      Gawker had it coming. They refused to take down a sex tape on their server after a judge ordered them to.

    6. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Gawker had it coming. They refused to take down a sex tape on their server after a judge ordered them to.

      It's adorable that you think Peter Thiel's lawsuit against Gawker had anything to do with a tape of a sad has-been having depressing sex with the coke-whore wife of his friend as a radio stunt.

      Say, how's your blood, anyway? Would you like to make a few bucks?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pope Ratzo at the Quads

      The outlook wasn't brilliant for the student march that night;
      The quads were filled with rent-a-cops and not a picket sign in sight;
      With Cooney busted for possession, and Barrows, the riot laws;
      A sickly silence fell upon the supporters of The Cause.

      A straggling few got up to go, in deep despair. The rest
      Clung to that hope which "springs eternal in the human breast;"
      They thought, If only Pope Ratzo could be rallying that mob,
      We'd put up even money now, with Ratzo at the quads.

      But Flynn preceded Ratzo, as did also Jimmy Blake,
      And the former was a no-good and the latter was a fake;
      Forlorn, that stricken multitude discouraged by the odds,
      For there seemed but little chance of Ratzo’s getting to the quads.

      But Flynn let fly a bottle, to the wonderment of all,
      And Blake, the much despised, set a bomb off in the hall,
      And when the dust had lifted and men saw what had occurred,
      Jimmy beaned the Dean of Students, while the bombed out library burned.

      Then from five thousand throats and more there rose a lusty yell,
      It rumbled through the valley, it rattled in the dell,
      A Harley roared up from the street, and was tearing up the sod,
      And Ratzo, Pope Ratzo, was advancing through the quads.

      There was ease in Ratzo’s manner as he wheeled into his place;
      There was pride in Ratzo’s bearing and a smile on Ratzo’s face,
      And when, responding to the cheers, he lightly gave a nod,
      No stranger in the crowd could doubt `twas Pope Ratzo at the quads.

      Ten thousand eyes were on him as he gunned the throttle loud;
      Five thousand tongues applauded as he signaled to the crowd.
      And while the nervous officers grabbed the night sticks from their hips,
      Defiance gleamed in Ratzo’s eye, a sneer curled Ratzo’s lip.
      And now a can of tear gas came hurtling through the air,
      And Pope Ratzo stood a-watching it in haughty grandeur there,

      Close by the haughty Ratzo , the can unheeded sped --
      "That ain't my style," said Ratzo . "Break it up!" the coppers said.
      From the streets, black with people, there went up a muffled roar,
      Like the beating of the storm waves on a stern and distant shore.

      "Kill them; kill the pigs!" shouted someone from the mob;--
      And Ratzo guns his engine, and wipes-out on the lawn.
      With a fist of protest shaking, Ratzo’s visage shone;
      He jumped back on his Harley; he bade the march go on;
      The Harley takes off through the quads, 'till it hits a vicious bump;
      And Ratzo sails through the air, landing smack upon his rump.

      "Fascists!" he screeched, "Capitalist, Imperialist, Racist, Sexist pigs!"
      "If I must I'll ride a tricycle, but we'll have this march - you dig?"
      They saw his face grow stern and cold; they saw his muscles strain,
      And they knew that Pope Ratzo wouldn't lose that bike again!

      The sneer is gone from Ratzo’s lip; his teeth are clenched in hate;
      He sniffs with cruel derision as he lets go of the brake.
      And now he throws it into first, the clutch he now he lets go,
      And now the air is shattered as the bike takes off - alone.

      Oh! somewhere there's a campus town where they drum and chant all night.
      They protest for the rain forest, and demand the caribou’s rights.
      And somewhere bongs are being passed, and somewhere radicals shout;
      But there is no joy at Old State U -- Pope Ratzo has Wiped Out!

    8. Re:Of course LA will receive him better by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      My fans...I love 'em. Think of the time he put into this.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  13. Fuck This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Video Games, Movies, Books, TV, Sports, Cooking, Comics, Tech, Cars....

    You can't find a single subject that hasn't been fucking infested with demented Liberals crashing and burning. Everything always has to be about politics all the time. They've always been deranged losers, but now that they lost an election that their media propaganda masters told them they were 99.9999999% likely to win, they've brought it to an entirely new level of lunacy. Their goal here is to make everyone else as miserable as they are, no matter how prosperous and successful the economy and country are.

    Never let them poison you, no matter how zealously they infest your choice of entertainment and ruin it. I mean, fuck - we have video games in medieval settings where the NPCs scold you for not using their pronouns of choice. That's suicidal levels of insanity.

    1. Re:Fuck This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has never been a better time to save money.

    2. Re:Fuck This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry too much about it. These tactics will blow up in their faces. Spectacularly.

      They're driving even traditionally left-leaning folks over to the right with their brand of crazy.

  14. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Libel is against the law. Possession of stolen property is against the law.

  15. Slashdot mods biased much? wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "including his staunch support for President Donald Trump, his secretive funding of the legal battle between Hulk Hogan and Gawker.com"

    Last I knew we still lived in a Free country. That you'd base his political admiration on anything is quite telling of how left you've become.

    The Gawker funding wasn't secretive. They published and refused to remove a private "sex tape" that never should have been public. There's no journalistic value in that.... OH wait, slashdot mods. Yeah I know, you're going to shadow ban this post too. It all goes on imgur anyway.

  16. Re:Because. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Cities dwellers aren't nerds, there's too many distractions. You wastes of space are marketing and sales people.

  17. Some bint who owns a dress shop by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I'm not sure why Peter Thiel believes he'll receive a warmer reception on the L.A. tech scene than he's had in Silicon Valley," said Tracy DiNunzio

    Who?

    chief executive officer of Tradesy

    What?

    Yeah, I'm sure he like totally cares what she thinks.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Some bint who owns a dress shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DiNunzio was quoted because Sarah McBride, the "journalist" of this article, needs to inform you that voting for Trump nullifies every other accomplishment in someone's life.

  18. Overt liberal bias much? by JustNiz · · Score: 0

    > He comes with a little baggage, though, including his staunch support for President Donald Trump,

    Since when is supporting the government "baggage"?

    1. Re:Overt liberal bias much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to LeftyDot. Slashdot died a long time ago.

    2. Re:Overt liberal bias much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      POTUS is not the government. He is one elected official at the head of three co-equal branches. Supporting him is not synonymous with supporting the government, just like supporting the government doesn't not necessarily mean one supports Trump.

    3. Re:Overt liberal bias much? by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when is supporting the government "baggage"?

      Since that part of our government is a piece of shit, that's since when.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Overt liberal bias much? by fredrated · · Score: 1, Troll

      Supporting Trump is not supporting the government, it is supporting a mentally unstable narcissist that cares for nothing but himself, and that reflects on Thiel, at least in the part of the community with brains.

    5. Re:Overt liberal bias much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overt liberal bias is the number one product of Bloomberg.

    6. Re:Overt liberal bias much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that mentally unstable narcissist that cares for nothing but himself is the government.

  19. You are encouraging this behavior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are encouraging this behavior.

    1. Re:You are encouraging this behavior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's sjw logic, which only works in scented safe spaces.

  20. Re:Because. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Because you can be a "nerd" without being involved in "relevant" development, or even development at all. Fuck off, you needlessly elitist piece of shit.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  21. Invitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Thiel,

    Come to the midwest. We love republicans and entrepreneurs. Consider Dayton or Cincinnati.

    -A midwesterner

    1. Re:Invitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear A Midwesterner,

      No thanks, I've seen how you guys treat queers. I'd rather be out in the open on Grinder than sneaking around between truck stop and airport bathrooms.

      -Mr. Thiel

  22. Re:Because. by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally I wouldn't choose to live the lifestyle that working for Google etc forces on you, no matter what they paid me.

    Apart from anything else, being surrounded by the obligatory bunch of neckbearded hipster millennials who all think they're "alternative" yet all look, dress, speak, think and act exactly the same, and all march lock-step according to extreme peecee liberal brainwashing, would drive me nuts.

  23. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not libel if it's true. neither Thiel's sexual orientation nor the Hulk sex tape were false or fabricated.

  24. Concise an well said by CraigCruden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Extremely well said and concise. Bringing into how we relate to people because of their personal politics (conservative vs liberal vs progressive vs socialist) is extremely toxic. If we cannot talk or do business with people that hold differing political views - the civility of society will only continue to decline.

  25. Texas... by Templer421 · · Score: 1

    Is always welcoming to entrepreneurs and has no state sales tax.

    To hell with California, come to a free country where you can do just about anything you want.

    1. Re:Texas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except smoke weed.

    2. Re:Texas... by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Texas has a 6.25% state sales tax. Maybe you meant it has no state income tax?

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
  26. I actually agree with the Politburo on this one by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thiel would not be a good fit for Los Angeles. He should come to Arizona, where we love his politics and where he would appreciate the lower rents and cost of housing for workers. The Phoenix area is a burgeoning tech scene that has grown up around Arizona State, Intel, Honeywell, and a host of newer and smaller tech enterprises. Hardly a Silicon Valley yet, but he can help make it one.

    1. Re:I actually agree with the Politburo on this one by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      The advantage of gay neighbors is that their garage sales rock. Their stuff is higher quality, and it matches.

  27. So the question is does money trump decency? by gweihir · · Score: 2

    In the end I expect it will, because most people that have or want power or money use "decency" only for virtue signalling, but do not actually believe in it. Thiel may just be more honest in his evil than others. Which, paradoxically, makes him a little less evil.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:So the question is does money trump decency? by huckamania · · Score: 0

      You must think half the country is evil. That is sad.

      Or maybe you just miss Gawker?

  28. Admission by liberals ... by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

    ... that they are intolerant of any views other than their own.

    1. Re:Admission by liberals ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what scumbags those liberals are. Those intolerant bastards make me sick!

  29. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Possession of stolen property is a crime.

  30. Seems like New Hampshire would have fit better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like New Hampshire would have been a better fit for him if he leans libertarian. Libertarians tend not to shy away from politically incorrect ideas even if one doesn't support em. Like a Libertarian is going to support racist conservative whose being wrongly abused by government even if they don't agree with conservative non-sense that puts certain ethnicities below that of others. aka Christopher Cantwell.

    New Hampshire has attracted a lot of libertarians from Silicon Valley over the past several years and he might come off at a glance as leaning Libertarian even if not a principled libertarian. Of course it's sometimes hard to tell given libertarians are traditionally fiscally conservative and socially liberal (though given the liberals advocating of violence more and more it's hard to say this is still true- ie advocating government action is advocating violence and unless it is used against violence is wrong- ie taxes are wrong- a law against rape is not- but if you redefine rape as some chick deciding after a sexual encounter that she didn't like it then that isn't rape).

    He may be too conservative and what I'd refer to as a fake libertarian. That is the vast majority of "libertarians" outside of New Hampshire are little more than republicans in sheep clothing and it's mostly principled libertarians that are coming home (ie New Hampshire)- though we get some stupid "libertarians" who don't even understand what a libertarian actually is.

    I don't have much faith in libertarian-leaning individuals with religious views because they tend to be flaky and unable to maintain logical principled positions- of course neither do the majority of people manage to think logically rather than emotionally and there aren't exactly principles behind the democrat or republican parties to begin with.

    A libertarian is someone who takes a philosophical view that the use of violence to achieve social or political objectives is immoral. You don't have to be a nice person to be a libertarian- but you do have to share this life philosophy. * You can as a libertarian and many do have other values like not being an ass hole or being a big supporter of charitable causes *.

    I have to say I don't agree with at least his support of the use of violence against Gawker. I don't believe in "intellectual property" either although there may be a place for fraud as it relates to a sort of trademark of a lesser degree (ie fakes should be legal so long as it's advertised as a knock-off and your not defrauding the buyer).

    I'm not much of a fan of Facebook or PayPal either- but neither in and of themselves particularly violate libertarian values even if a lot of libertarians aren't huge fans centralization of the violations of people's personal privacy Facebook commits routinely. It's hard to argue and I don't think any libertarian would that Facebook is or should somehow be obligated to stop legally. Users are getting what they deserve and we should have little sympathy given people willy nilly ignore the issue to such a degree that they only have themselves to blame for the outcome.

    It's also hard to blame someone for making it rich in the manor he did it. The real issue is PayPal/Facebook ultimately ended up being so successful it was to the detriment of humanity- and given your opting into such a not-in-your-interest business- it's hard to fault him too much- even if I'd rather see principled libertarians putting political values first (ie end government, facebook has become a terrible government in its own right, albeit one you opt into, which isn't a violation of libertarian values, but just rather disagreeable to those values) and supporting decentralization and privacy (but not by via use of violence- or in other words government as he did in the Gawker case).

    1. Re:Seems like New Hampshire would have fit better by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      But in Arizona, you can be a libertarian who golfs and hikes year round.

    2. Re:Seems like New Hampshire would have fit better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe- but if you have a population of people that prioritizes year round golfing and hiking over freedom your not going to be very effective at organizing or impacting change which was the whole point of the movement. Besides Keene, New Hampshire has some of the best trails and hiking in the world. Mount Monadnock is the #1 hiked mountain in the world and we also have Mount Washington which is the largest mountain on the east coast.

      Before the Free State Project Free State Project participants analyzed the different states and factors that would lead to the most likely chances of success. Different states had different advantages, but ultimately New Hampshire won out. It was one of the best states because of the proximity of its population to the state house and distance between major population centers, good political climate (ie not a big government state, the governor at the time even welcomes free staters), ease of access to representatives (we have 400 state reps), job prospects (low unemployment- people will leave if there are no good jobs), population size (too many people and your migration won't have any political impact), population distribution (too spread out and its hard to organize), etc, etc. Today we have 20 principled libertarians in the house and a lot more representatives elected elsewhere. It's just a start, but we have gotten numerous bills introduced and killed off a lot of bad ones too. It's highly unlikely we would be able to achieve any positive results in Arizona.

  31. Tolerance by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would there be an article like this?

    "Our venture and startup ecosystem is fairly left-leaning."

    So intolerant then. If Peter Thiel wouldn't be welcomed because he's not like you, what does that make you? I guess it has finally become obvious to everyone how intolerant and exclusionary "left-leaning" cultures are.

    1. Re:Tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Peter Thiel isn't welcome anywhere not because he's not like them, but because he's an asshole.

    2. Re:Tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know much about Peter Thiel do you?

  32. Taxes by kenh · · Score: 2

    So he should stay in SF and not contribute to LA tax base?

    --
    Ken
  33. Re:Because. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    You've had fun living on the industrial legacy of your state's early innovators, but it's not going to be easy to live like the Jetsons when today's California requires ten years of impact studies and a hundred-lawyer HR staff before you can back your Prius out of your own driveway.

  34. I'd care about the character by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Of my investors. Ever read the history of the Commodore Amiga? Jack Tramiel basically backed the engineers into a corner that let him take everything until Commodore road in and saved the day. Tech investors have a long history of screwing over start up. So yeah, I'd care who the guy voted for. Maybe I'd still risk it. But I'd be aware of the risk...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  35. One woman's baggage by poity · · Score: 1

    is another woman's badge of honor

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  36. Commiefornia is going BANKRUPT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leeching off your success? You mean the HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars in unfunded debt liabilities that your parasitic government will never, ever be able to pay?

    Sounds like a smashing success, indeed! See you in the food lines, comrade!

    1. Re: Commiefornia is going BANKRUPT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost like the red states were taking money from California or something??

      Easy to have a balanced budget when you take money from others and provide no services.

      It is amazing how red-staters keep believing that they are donors when they are paupers who keep taking money from other states.

  37. Thiel should move to Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moving to LA isn't exactly a big exodus; he's still paying California state income tax. He should move to Florida, where there's no state income tax. Set up shop in Miami. Starve the failing monstrosity in Sacramento of his tax dollars.

  38. Isn't he a Kiwi? by ClarkMills · · Score: 2

    Peter Thiel is a New Zealand citizen.

    I didn't vote for him... :)

    1. Re:Isn't he a Kiwi? by twosat · · Score: 1
  39. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    And yet Gawker lost their court case.

    Its weird how a not breaking the law gets a court to find against you.

    Oh wait, you're wrong.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  40. Re: Because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know youâ(TM)re just trolling, but I can assure you that USA is barely first world on average (crumbling infrastructure, totally ok with people massacring people, insane amounts of poverty and lack of universal health care etc) ... on top of that, engineers in other parts of the world are paid easily up to 10x more. Silicon Valley couldnâ(TM)t afford me. The constant smell of marijuana is also a bit over the top in my opinion.

  41. Why would he stay in Cali? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What reason would there be in staying in the highest tax state in the nation? He could move to one of the 40 Trump supporting States.

  42. "coming to California"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we're already here and have been all along.

    California is the state of Ronald Reagan, Bob Dornan, etc.

    The left was only able to hijack the state and make it one-party-rule by super-majorities in the state house by importing millions of immigrants from leftist countries. Now we have the highest gas taxes in the nation, while our trasportation infrastructure crumbles. We now have some of the highest income taxes in the nation, while we hae the worst income inequality. We now have some of the highest business taxes and regulations, while our manufacturing businesses flee the state (SpaceX and Tesla do NOT offset all the other losses). We now have the highest levels of homelessness and poverty and the highest rates of welfare consumption in the nation.

    The very same progressives who try to hush all this stuff up by claiming California is a "net maker" and other states are "net takers" are outraged that Trump just partly unmasked that lie by taking away PART of the SALT federal tax deduction that Democrats in places like New York and California have for decades used to hide the true impact of their tax-and-spend policies. California lawmakers are currently trying to re-classify California taxes as "charitable deductions" to try to thwart this and keep hiding the effects of their policies. As a general rule, if you think you need to be that dishonest in your lawmaking, you are almost certainly in the wrong.

    The sad truth about morons like you is that the "tech workers" who are the most liberal are the ones working on phones, and tablets, and web sites, whereas those of us who work in aerospace, defense, and other areas that actually matter and where lives are on the line tend (Musk and some of his people being outliers) to be on the political right - and plenty of us are still here but finding the place increasingly fascistic and jack-booted. Right wingers in tech tend to keep their views to themselves, not having that National Socialist tendency to demand that others listen to their views and agree with them, so you might well have right wingers working around you who would surprise you. You guys on the left, however, lack the self-control to shut up and just do the work; the rest of us are all forced to notice you, so we know who you are. California may well be currently in the death-grip of you Marxist-leaning loons with your propaganda and speech codes and intrusive bloated totalitarian government worship, but things that connot be sustained won't..... and we'll be here to pick up the bits and pieces when your drug addled fantasies collapse .... we like the weather.

    1. Re: "coming to California"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for posting. With all the noise and the chest thumping of the phonies we often forget that real people with common sense and decency still exist.

    2. Re:"coming to California"???? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      What's striking is driving across from Arizona and seeing gasoline a full dollar higher on the California side.

    3. Re: "coming to California"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the core reason .CA is so expensive and South Bend isn't is because people have voted with there feet and their pocketbooks to move to CA. With all the chest thumping on Slashdot about how great rural America is, people are moving to cities in droves.

    4. Re: "coming to California"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if some of this is more shitposting propaganda from st Petersburg. Diviseviness? check.

  43. Thiel is a libertarian and you're incompetent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nazism involves the collusion of the state with favored corporations to the exclusion of genuine market forces.

    Thiel is a libertarian anarchist who is trying to abolish the state.

    Anyone who knows anything can see these are mutually exclusive.

    You are incompetent.

    1. Re:Thiel is a libertarian and you're incompetent by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The actions of his that I have noticed do not signify someone who's trying to get rid of or minimize the state, but rather someone who's trying to use it to his own advantage.

      I may well claim to be a libertarian, I haven't read anything he's written, but that's not what the actions of his that I have notices show. What actions has he taken that cause you to believe he is trying to eliminate or minimize the state rather than to use it to his own advantage?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  44. Re:Because. by BlueStrat · · Score: 0

    You've had fun living on the industrial legacy of your state's early innovators, but it's not going to be easy to live like the Jetsons when today's California requires ten years of impact studies and a hundred-lawyer HR staff before you can back your Prius out of your own driveway.

    Speaking of the Prius, I saw a traffic accident in San Francisco...a Prius and a Vespa collided at an intersection.

    There was glitter *everywhere*!

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  45. Re:Because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Software development and computer design happens to a large degree there, but engineering, the stuff that gets you living like the Jetsons, most definitely is not the mainstay of these states.

  46. What?!? by execthis · · Score: 0

    Wow the whole point of this article is to bag on someone because of who they support politically and some (non-abusive) statements they made?

    This type of abuse and hatred is exactly what drives people far from "the left".

    "The left" is hatred. Is intolerance. Is abusive.

    I would never want to live in a society that was controlled by the left. It would be hell.

    1. Re:What?!? by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      Yeah; free national health car is one of the things that your so-called left brings us.

      Our right wing party (National) is to the left of the Democrats in many ways but Thiel still wanted citizenship here.
      Any foreigners allowed in your 'burb or do you just shoot them?

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    2. Re:What?!? by youngone · · Score: 1

      Thiel still wanted citizenship here.

      Yes, in very dubious circumstances.

      How much did he "donate" to the National party to be granted citizenship in New Zealand despite having been here for a total of 12 whole days, then never returning or investing the money he said he would.
      I imagine there was a payoff to the Labour party as well, because I can't imagine why there has never been an inquiry about the whole matter.
      Not that it's an isolated incident, no-one is really sure what this criminal is called, but the minister of immigration gave him citizenship as well, against the advice of officials.

    3. Re:What?!? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      What a laughable argument. Ever been to a left of center rally? It's an amazingly positive vibe. it's because the left is a highly diverse set of people with different views that we try to accept. A right of center (if such a thing exists these days) doesn't have the diversity seen in the left and suffers from group think. Since they are mostly fighting for something they can't have, it is a pit of rage and hostility.

    4. Re:What?!? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Yeah; free national health car is one of the things that your so-called left brings us.

      TANSTAAFL

      Nothing is free (as in beer). Not even free beer. They just shuffle things around so you don't notice (over)paying for it. And if it's run by the government, it's wasting your people's money, time, and resources to do a barely-passable at best job of it.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    5. Re:What?!? by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      Imagine all you like, there is no indication of anything improper for Mr Thiel's citizenship application. We do not have a history of bribery here of public officials esp. political parties.
      That said you don't need money if you just play to the vanities of politicians.
      Yeah Bill Yan is also a dody s**t and that was under Labour in 2001 (?). So a decade between drinks.

      The Immigration Minister made the call for Thiel who was recommended I beleive but with no real information and apparently does not recall the incident.
      Seems Thiel just schmoozed with the senior National Party figures and blew smoke up their ass

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    6. Re:What?!? by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      Umm I know you are right wing enough not to be running on oxygen however our Governments balanced budget is paid from general taxation.
      Can you spell b-a-l-a-n-c-e-d 'Merkins?
      We could privatise it and then pay twice as much - once again 'Merkins show the way.

      That is what tax is for to pay for things the private sector cannot/ will not provide.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    7. Re:What?!? by youngone · · Score: 1

      You're right, we do not have a history of bribery here in NZ, but there is at least one incident which springs to mind, involving Mr. John Banks and Kim Dotcom's $50,000 donation to his mayoral campaign.
      Although Mr. Banks was found not guilty on appeal, the circumstances of the new evidence were extremely odd, and it also cost Mr. Banks his marriage.
      You are probably correct about Mr. Thiel's ability to charm which just raises a whole host of further questions about various senior National party people's judgment really.

    8. Re:What?!? by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly Our Fat German was found to be an unreliable witness regarding Banks being asked to spit the donation into 2 x $25,000 cheques. Last time that he trusted the Tories I am sure!

      And Banks did not help out Dotcom after he got arrested; with the recent paternity suit Banks lost it puts a new light on the law 'n' order scumbag that Banks traded on with National as Minister of Police (and talkback radio).

      NZ does not suffer from bribery so much as ' a mate doing a favour for a mate' and, of course, nepotism.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
  47. You gotta love sed by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It's, possible, to, overdo, it, though.

    I, ,m,e,a,n, ,r,e,a,l,l,y,

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:You gotta love sed by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      sed, is incapable, of knowing when Shatner, would put a dramatic pause, in.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  48. Fuck the Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject says it all.
    The Right is back in a big new way.

  49. Re:He can stay out of L.A.... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ignoring a judge's order to take down a sex tape isn't a very good idea

    http://gawker.com/a-judge-told...

    It's also hypocritical given they'd earlier criticised people for not taking down Jennifer Lawrence's nudes. Jezebel and Gawker were both owned by Gawker Media.

    https://imgur.com/a/ULIA4

    Gawker pissed of Thiel by running this

    http://gawker.com/335894/peter...

    Apparently they outed him when he was on a business trip to Saudi Arabia.

    So Thiel backed Hogan's lawsuit, and that bankrupted Gawker media.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  50. Re: He can stay out of L.A.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So the lesson here is people living in glass houses shouldn't throw stones at people who own hail makers.

  51. California full of wealthy hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    California is full of wealth from far left liberal companies who do little to contribute to help California's giant size debt from helping all the poverty living in the state. Clearly these liberals are hypocrites with a ideology that doesn't work for most. Add in the wealth from Hollywood elite and other wealthy people and you would think that would lower poverty. But not so much, and Peter Thiel would be wise to leave the state so he can stop being the whipping boy for liberal lefties. Let California drown in its own broken ideology.

  52. The best place to get blood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of young healthy blood in LA?

  53. He wants to whine like the bitch he is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wouldn't be happy going somewhere he couldn't bitch and moan about how hard it is to be a piece of shit to everyone.

  54. Don't waste your time in California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't waste your time in California where the tech scene is so in-bed with liberal politics one's professional worth is questioned on every turn.
    Instead, start something great in Kansas City!

  55. LA may have more to bussiness than politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SIlicon Valley is getting tapped out, the rents are through the roof. Per the San Jose Mercury news 71% of the engineers are here on H1-Bs. Between the 1.5 Million dollar homes that cost anywhere from 250-450 in most other U.S. Cities, and the 150:100 gender imbalance, Silicon Valley is losing talent, finding it hard to attract new talent, and the main reason for the small amount of talent that it is now attracting, and holding onto has to do with the area having been historically the center of the tech universe 40 years ago when land was cheap.

    When the venture capitalists move to other locations there will be a large swooshing sound as the unliveable bubble here drains quickly. LA is a great choice, it already has infrastructure, ports, a large talent pool to begin with, and near identical laws and climates. I suspect a lot more venture capitalists will start the move.

    The single most common problem for startups last year was getting kicked out their buildings, because the buildings were being sold to make room for skyscrapers. these weren't mom and pops or starry-eyed dreamers these were startups with hundreds of millions in backing, having to re-locate because all the property along vast corridors were sold to build skyscrapers and condos.

    Don't get me wrong Silicon Valley needs these buildings, I feel a lot better about getting kicked out of the home I was renting 1600sqft, 3bd was sold for 1.3M, when I know my customers with hundreds of millions were getting kicked out of their buildings too.

  56. Re:Proud to be prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's bitztream the autism-hating, custom EpiPen-hating, Musk-hating, Qualcomm-hating, Firefox tabs-hating, Slashdot editors-hating Slashdot troll!

  57. nobody likes gay Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad!

  58. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Staunch support for the sitting president is controversial?

  59. but that's NOT "tolerance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tolerance is enduring/allowing someting or someone you do not like.

    There's no such need for "tolerance" when you like and agree with the person or thing. If you love your duaghter, you have no need for "tolerance" for her --- but you might not like the guy she marries and thus you might need "tolerance" for him. See the difference?

    I like sausage pizza. I do not need to tolerate it. When I dine with friends and they want pepperoni, I tolerate it.

    get it yet?

    Tolerance has nothing to do with "an outgroup" -- and quite frankly with the flipping of morality, in many large cities religious Christians and Jews are the "outgroup" and gays, transgenders, etc are the "ingroup". By YOUR definition then, those religious Jews and Christians should be the ones getting protections and tolerance, right?

    No, "tolerance" is not about the specific subject or person or political position, it's all about enduring that with which/whom we personally disagree. The tolerant religious person who opposes homosexuality nevertheless treats gays well. The tolerant gay activist who opposes the religious person he knows opposes gay marriage nevertheless treats that person decently and with respect. The tolerant Muslim treats the Jew well as a fellow human being. The tolerant religious Jew treats the outspken atheist well as a decent human being.

  60. Hogan won the suit because he was in the right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that Hogan won that lawsuit on the merits. If Thiel had not bankrolled Hogan so that the playing field was level, Hogan would have simply been unable to pursue it and get the recompense he sought, due to Gawker's vastly superior resources.

  61. She's also ignoring his stated intent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thiel says he's getting away from tech, so her admonition that the local tech scene won't be any more welcoming makes for a big, "So what? He didn't want to associate with them anyway."

  62. Fix error in post: by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Not:
    I may well claim to be a libertarian (I used to, but now I'm a minarchist),
    but rather:
    He may well claim to be a libertarian

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  63. Re: Because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading into the subtext of your message... you're jealous about plowing the retarded sister, aren't you?

  64. Re: Because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is why we aren't in debt, have a stronger economy than any red state, etc.

    What cool-aid are you drinking that you believe that crud you are spouting??

  65. Are you talking about the bankruptcy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thiel's bankrolling the lawsuits against them was for two reasons:
    1) It's legal - we got rid of restrictions on maintenance and champerty, not that you likely know what those are.
    2) He hated them, they've posted all kinds of agitprop going after him, including the nonsense you keep spouting.

    The lawsuit itself, however, was very much about the sex tape. No matter how much Thiel hated them, there wouldn't be a lawsuit to bankroll if they hadn't done that and even then they wouldn't be in such big trouble if they'd actually obeyed the judge's orders.

    So your post is deeply confused because Thiel doesn't have a lawsuit against Gawker, Hogan did. There are bankruptcy proceedings, mind you, but that's not the same thing, either.

    1. Re:Are you talking about the bankruptcy? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      2) He hated them, they've posted all kinds of agitprop going after him,

      None of which was false.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  66. Poor widdle snowflake by mccrew · · Score: 0

    Poor Peetie thinks all the other kids are being so mean to him. Poor Peetie has to retreat to his safe space. Poor widdle snowflake indeed.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  67. Re:Because. by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    As an engineer turned marketing, I think you're off base. The company I work for now, has people with backgrounds in theater and dance. The kind of creative energy that comes between us is really amazing. I sometimes thing like a engineer, and they approach problems different from me. I feed them the tech and community input and then we together create a story.

  68. Re:Because. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    As an engineer turned marketing, I think you're off base.

    You literally proved my point AND attempted to refute it in the same sentence. Then you even expounded upon it. Honestly can't tell if this is an expert troll or a mentally deficient city dweller, well played.

  69. Re:Because. by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure what point you were trying to make other than "marketing and sales people" are wastes of space. Which makes absolutely no sense in a business. You need all parts to succeed. Your condescending tone and arrogance is amusing though. Not that your opinion matters much to me. My comment wasn't directed at you anyways as much for others reading this thread.

  70. How's life in the hypocrite lane?

  71. Re:Because. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    The point was that city dwellers are marketing and sales people. "Wastes of space" wasn't even used as a modifier but a qualifier.

  72. Yeah it's a bit sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The state in the US that can't provide water to its own people and needs to be bailed out by the federal government which is bailed out by printing more money believes they are too good for Thiels money or anyone's money. Why isn't California given to Mexico in exchange for them building the wall?

    These styrofoam hipster libtards that don't want Thiel around should just continue their worship of big pharma - TPP and Obamacare - and leave other folks alone.

    1. Re: Yeah it's a bit sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was barely English. Calm down, friend. Visit California some time. Then visit Louisiana or Kentucky or whatever red state you hate by virtue of only having heard about it on the internet. They're all very nice places full of good people.

      Except Mississippi. Fuck Mississippi.

  73. Re: Because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, all those engineers in rural Alabama are really working on the cutting edge of tech.

  74. Re: Because. by MercTech · · Score: 1

    Yep, them dumb country boys don't make phone apps. They make something stupid like rockets to mars. https://www.nasa.gov/centers/m...

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  75. Re: Because. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    You mean like...the only people to ever get to the moon?

    If we had more resources dedicated to rednecks we'd be raping and pillaging alien civilizations by now as payback for all the anal probes.

  76. Re:Because. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Apart from anything else, being surrounded by the obligatory bunch of neckbearded hipster millennials who all think they're "alternative" yet all look, dress, speak, think and act exactly the same, and all march lock-step according to extreme peecee liberal brainwashing, would drive me nuts.

    Like most older generations, you misconstrue what "alternative" means. They don't mean alternative to each other, they mean alternative to you. They've seen what you are like, what you have done with the world, and have decided, collectively as a group, it was all a mistake and needs to be changed.

  77. Re:Because. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    > what you have done with the world

    Don;t blame me. I didn't do anything with it.

  78. I suspect he'll somehow survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Oakland residents didn't storm his residence and do something like flipping his car and setting it alight, then he will probably be ok in LA.

    The resources Thiel can offer may completely outclass other offers for startups, so I think he'll be ok on that point as well.

  79. Re:Because. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    > what you have done with the world

    Don;t blame me. I didn't do anything with it.

    And like every generation tells the one before, "Your failure to do anything is why it is crap."

  80. Re:Because. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I look forward to your response when kids start telling you this.