It's typical of those members of the cult of death to make statements such as those above when confronted with the possibility of other approaches other then their coveted death based solutions.
Yes one can take that meaning however it just proves the point that killing doesn't solve anything.
You are deep into the cult of death, as were the Nazis, and as is the Government of Israel and it's current enemies.
One task it to choose the cult of life over the cult of death.
One task is to have the Government of Israel choose the cult of life and make choices that don't involve taking lives.
One task involves having Israel's enemies choose the cult of life and choose actions that don't take lives.
This takes communication. It takes work. It takes creative thinking. It takes relationships. It takes thinking that isn't at the level of thinking that you are thinking. It takes you going beyond your level of thinking. Take the red pill and choose the cult of life.
Yes, the voice of violence is very loud since it's a very easy solution. For sure the politicians and military are quick to resort to violence. That is why they need to have their power checked and revoked. Now of course this only works across the planet so it will take time. It also doesn't solve the problem with those that take up arms without being governments.
Solving issues like gang violence and the violence of the mafia are similar. While you might think that they are at a smaller scale they are essentially the same, except for scale.
Anyone who chooses violence to solve a problem - except in personal self defense - IS the problem and not the solution.
The cultural shifts needed are many.
It isn't about idealism, it's about moving towards a planet where murder, killing, death and power over others are unacceptable solutions for all human beings everywhere.
There are many steps that you need to take in your deprogramming from your cult of death. If it's acceptable for you to kill someone then it's acceptable for them to kill you. Where we need to get to is that it's unacceptable for anyone to kill anyone for any reason.
Personal self defense is one thing, war is quite another.
Oh, wait, the Iraq War was the USA, Britian, et. al., invading and killing people in Iraq. Oops. Your argument back fired. Those in Iraq were defending themselves!!!
Either way war isn't the answer.
You've identified a problem that needs solutions other than killing. When someone comes into your country with weapons demanding your women and property there are other solutions than killing them or surrendering to them.
Solutions will not be easy. Killing will only beget more killing. Haven't you read history?
As much as members of Scientology are indoctrinated into their delusional cult you are deep into the cult of death of your country. Break free of your cult blinders and free your mind. Take the red pill and enter the real world where death of any human being is a tragedy.
It won't be easy, and if you think it is that's simply more of your cult delusion.
There are no simple answers except that killing isn't the answer, it never is.
If they hire you you can start when they want you to. Nothing to do with me. I, of course, encourage you to find other solutions that supporting those who kill your fellow human beings.
Intelligence gathering is a support activity for those that kill and as such anyone involved is guilty of murder no matter how little they contribute. The only measure is how many people are hurt, injured, killed as a result of your actions and resulting hacking or intelligence.
While the goals that you state might sound lofty to yourself you are in fact contributing to the problems in the world. It's likely that your support will make this a thousands year conflict rather than finding solutions that resolve matters without any more killing.
War is never necessary except for those who's purpose it serves. For the rest of us - the other %99.9999... war is not necessary. To keep people such as Bush, Saddam, Hitler, Stalin, etc... in power they need wars. War is the best thing that drives their mission. It defines them. It drives them forward. It gives them power. It sucks the life out of everyone though. It is futile.
You obviously have bought the mainstream propaganda about war. War is all about death and power. Killing others so that you have power. That is evil no matter what side you are on.
I don't live in utopia. I live in a world at war. Death and destruction everywhere. Indroctrination into the death cult occurs from birth whether it's into the death cult of a suicide bomber in the middle east or the honor macho death cult of the west. They are the same - death to others at all costs.
Murder, death, kill. There are other solutions and your the one in the dream world if you think that killing is the answer to the problems facing the world.
You really do eat the propaganda from the military don't you. As the Iraq and other recent Wars has demonstrated there are many ways that innocents get killed, so your intentions or the intentions of the soldiers is irrelevant.
However, I wasn't just speaking of the innocents. Killing begets more killing. You kill them. They are motivated to kill you. Again your side kills members of their side. On and on it goes.
The forever war is just what those in power want - which ever side they are on. The only answer is to stop the killing by all those involved using communication and other methods.
If you want to kill and murder people - men, women, children, and babies - then joining will provide you that opportunity.
Those that provide technical support to those that kill are also responsible for the deaths that they cause.
By killing others for your cause you become the terrorists for your enemy. They of course are your terrorists. You each reinforce each others goals of killing terrorists yet do nothing to really solve anything. You just punt the problem elsewhere and magnify it.
Only those wanting to be guilty of murder and death will join.
We all profit from laughter! None profits from either the positive or the negative! Sustainable profit comes from a balance of the negative and the positive with neither or either taking over in importance from the other.
While some might say that profit is a positive difference, to others it's a negative! Thus balance is needed for all to profit.
Profit is about positive sum-games.
"'Positive-sum' outcomes are those in which the sum of winnings and losses is greater than zero. This becomes possible when the size of the pie is somehow enlarged so that there is more wealth to distribute between the parties than there was originally, or some other way is devised so everyone gets what they want or need."
Also record their badge numbers, names and ranks. Their work locations and another other information such as what they said. Document, document. Then communicate your interactions with the puppets of Big Brother State Power, the officers and other agents of State Terrorism in action against 99.999999999% of people who are NOT terrorists. By communicating each incident in detail the terrorism of State Power can be revealed and potentially checked (limited).
You've been brainwashed or are attempting to brainwash people with muddy water.
Let's clean the mud out of what you're saying.
It's a well known fact that the US Government supports the Government of Israel. It's well known that Israel often bombs people. So yes, the US support of Israel is seen as terrorism by those that are being bombed. If you don't believe me go and read their newspapers and blogs. You'll see that among the listed reasons to hate the US.
Yes, it does take a special breed to organize and attack their enemy. Such as those in the Pentagon. Such as those resourceful people with survival skills living in the desert where there isn't much water. (No I don't mean the people of Dune but it is an apt parallel isn't it?).
Another point is that if you are steeped in the political rhetoric and supporting that one side you ARE part of the problem and not part of the solution. The solution requires people standing up to those with the weapons or the desire to use weapons and telling them NO. NO. and NO.
Peace - for all - is the only way forward.
The end of Terrorism - the laudable goal of the so called War On Terrorism - also requires the end of State Sponsored Terrorism that the War On Terrorism also is.
Yes, the only response to a particular brain to being killed is "dying". I wasn't referring to a particular brain that would seek revenge or retaliation though. That's why a list of other possibly agents of retaliation was listed. I thought that you could use your brain to figure that out. I'm happy to clarify and since your comment was funny I enjoyed it too.
Yes, you can say that most terrorism requires or has planning, patience, and execution phases. The notion of the reptile brain is that it's part of our base emotional response: fight, flight, or freeze. It's the part that gets pissed off when someone cuts you off in traffic or when someone kills your loved ones.
I don't think that any of us are qualified to know for sure that terrorism is a uniquely human trait. It wouldn't surprise me if other species engaged in it to.
Your self defense is terrorism to those you defend against.
The so called double speak "War on Terrorism" is a war of state sponsored terrorism against an amorphous enemy - sometimes targeting well known geographic areas.
To think that one has the right to violate people's private speech is the arrogance of State Power that the few with the delusion that they are the Government think that they can also do with impunity. Eventually it will bite them back as people like their privacy as well as liking being alive.
Just because it's self defense to your society doesn't make it any less State Sponsored Terrorism to those that are defended against!
Let me ask you this. If you support fighting those that attack you, don't you think that your countries enemies also think the same, that fighting is the answer?
The Japanese were defeated by the detonation of TWO nuclear bombs in the worst single acts of State Sponsored Terrorism the World has ever seen. 100,000+ dead within moments and days. A man made disaster that only Mother Nature had been able to match. It broke their will to fight. Their cultural leader, the Emperor of Japan, ordered them to stop fighting and they complied. That's why you don't have Japanese terrorists being a problem. In that case ultimate force crushed the will of a highly organized militant society.
That won't work with the distributed religious zealots of radical Islam. They are not organized into a hierarchy but are loose nit groups of small hierarchies. They are also fighting back against who they perceive as a Goliath with the next to nothing that they have. Ok, some have more than the others. There are also many other power games going on.
The central thesis still stands: if you kill people their friends will want to kill you back. Basic instinct.
Sometimes it's overcome and other times it isn't.
One such time of not being overcome was time that the Bush gave his clearly Revenge Oriented Speech atop the rubble of the WTC. This and subsequent orders sent hundreds of thousands of people into action seeking revenge. I used to live one and a half blocks from there and I was aghast that the US President would seek revenge from the pile of rubble. It doesn't bode well for life on Earth when the man with the most powerful weapon systems seeks revenge. No well indeed as we've seen since.
I suppose only the privileged few with the weapons at their disposal think that they are entitled to do what they will including seeking revenge with those weapons.
As a result I treat any with weapons of any sort as potential terrorists and especially those in uniforms and authority.
Your analysis isn't any less simplistic than mine.
The facts are complex, yes. Not all people retaliate. Some time quite some time. Yes, ideologies such as intense religious fervor and extreme dogmas do come into play as well.
However, when a major Government directly supports repressive governments, for many decades, across a region of the planet how can you expect to have no retaliation from those within that region? That's what I wonder. At least be honest about this aspect of it.
It's hard looking in the mirror and seeing the evil that ones collective does for it's often justified by ones own self centered survival. How about simply counting the dead as the measure of evil regardless of the political reasons? If you do that then many (if not most) governments - and other active groups - on the planet have a lot to be held accountable for.
Force and killing are not the answer. It's about time politicians got that. It's about time that those with the weapons and the desire to use them got that. It's about time that those without the weapons but with the desire to use them learned that. Unfortunately they all have seemed to have learned the opposite lesson since killing on the mass scale is so easy in reality and so easy politically since the body politic either directly supports it, are placated sheep, are brainwashed, have been hoodwinked or think that they have no power or say in the matter.
Peace is the way forward for the human race as weapons of mass destruction technology spreads to any with the skills, knowledge ability, and - worst of all - desire to use them. People need to feel heard, but also need to respect others. You can't create respect with bombs or troops. What you create is fear and loathing regardless of who you are.
The simple fact that humans organize into Governments that think that they can with impunity kill other human beings in other parts of the world is what breeds terrorism. When you bomb people a fraction of those that survive, or their relatives, or descendants, may at their choice become fighters against those bombers or those who otherwise terrorized them. It's simple primitive brain response to being killed and all humans still have that primitive brain, it's known as our lizard brain. It's responsible for the fight, flight or freeze response.
So YES, any place that people gather, or communicate one on one, one on many or many on many will be a place where potential plans for evil deeds are carried out. The Pentagon is one such place for those with organized power centers while other places, real or virtual are places where those kinds of communications can occur.
Those in power are those that kill. They are often the ones that also need to be stopped along with the - so called - terrorists that they fight. They both carry out evil deeds including killing.
What you need is a clear transfer of all copyrights, patents and trademarks in the specific program from them to you. Look for a copyright transfer agreement, they are quite particular.
If you wrote it using their equipment on their time they might have a problem releasing it unless you can convince them of a good reason. They could really benefit from your work being open sourced.
If you wrote it on your own time with your own equipment and not on their premises then they really shouldn't have any problem writing you a release of any of their possible copyrights, patents and trademarks in the work - since it wasn't a work for hire. You might need to state that you didn't incorporate any lines of code from their work into your code. You'll also need to clarify if their work has any of your code in it - that could be a sticky point (a.k.a. SCO) if it's not clarified now in writing.
However it's complicated by them having a similar program that they are commercializing.
Really you should consult a lawyer rather they us fiends.
Look, I don't actually advocate killing except in self defense (direct) and in the case that you've judged yourself so evil that you deserve it by your own hand.
Live is precious. Unless you are doing evil such as an agent of evil (the state, or a state employee). Do what is right, give people their rights above state power.
Ok, I don't know how paranoid you are but give me a break!!! FOUR times!!! That's simply beyond probabilities as a natural occurence. It's even beyond a specific occurance four times!!! It's gotta be planned? Don't you think?
The probabilities of four, 4, FOUR, cables being taken out is astronomical. It's like a determined force did it or an exteresterial landing in the ocean did it, but we all know that the likelyhood of that happening is beyond nilch since it would take any space faring civilization billions of kilo-year-quads of energy and material and time to reach our pathetic world across the stars. Barly enought for reality to be created by the one and holy jc.
For get it you're hoplelessly lost in the notion that your non-real phantasies are really reality rather than being stupid kirk based nonsense generated from religioso based crap beliefs intelligently designed to have you be the idiot. Thank nothingness that you got the last sentense and that you've given up all beliefs whatso ever!!!
All the best,
Peter
live free of religous nonsense crap beliefs or just kill oneself NOW.
It sounds very fishy that three cables would be cut in three days. While it's possible, it's not likely probable that that would happen? Or is it? Who would like to calculate the probability of that occurring?
Ok, so when does the war begin? If it hasn't already? Or will our media and internet be cut too?
Slashdot Mirror
It's typical of those members of the cult of death to make statements such as those above when confronted with the possibility of other approaches other then their coveted death based solutions.
Yes one can take that meaning however it just proves the point that killing doesn't solve anything.
You are deep into the cult of death, as were the Nazis, and as is the Government of Israel and it's current enemies.
One task it to choose the cult of life over the cult of death.
One task is to have the Government of Israel choose the cult of life and make choices that don't involve taking lives.
One task involves having Israel's enemies choose the cult of life and choose actions that don't take lives.
This takes communication. It takes work. It takes creative thinking. It takes relationships. It takes thinking that isn't at the level of thinking that you are thinking. It takes you going beyond your level of thinking. Take the red pill and choose the cult of life.
Yes, the voice of violence is very loud since it's a very easy solution. For sure the politicians and military are quick to resort to violence. That is why they need to have their power checked and revoked. Now of course this only works across the planet so it will take time. It also doesn't solve the problem with those that take up arms without being governments.
Solving issues like gang violence and the violence of the mafia are similar. While you might think that they are at a smaller scale they are essentially the same, except for scale.
Anyone who chooses violence to solve a problem - except in personal self defense - IS the problem and not the solution.
The cultural shifts needed are many.
It isn't about idealism, it's about moving towards a planet where murder, killing, death and power over others are unacceptable solutions for all human beings everywhere.
There are many steps that you need to take in your deprogramming from your cult of death. If it's acceptable for you to kill someone then it's acceptable for them to kill you. Where we need to get to is that it's unacceptable for anyone to kill anyone for any reason.
Personal self defense is one thing, war is quite another.
Oh, wait, the Iraq War was the USA, Britian, et. al., invading and killing people in Iraq. Oops. Your argument back fired. Those in Iraq were defending themselves!!!
Either way war isn't the answer.
You've identified a problem that needs solutions other than killing. When someone comes into your country with weapons demanding your women and property there are other solutions than killing them or surrendering to them.
Solutions will not be easy. Killing will only beget more killing. Haven't you read history?
As much as members of Scientology are indoctrinated into their delusional cult you are deep into the cult of death of your country. Break free of your cult blinders and free your mind. Take the red pill and enter the real world where death of any human being is a tragedy.
It won't be easy, and if you think it is that's simply more of your cult delusion.
There are no simple answers except that killing isn't the answer, it never is.
Break free. Take the red pill.
If they hire you you can start when they want you to. Nothing to do with me. I, of course, encourage you to find other solutions that supporting those who kill your fellow human beings.
Intelligence gathering is a support activity for those that kill and as such anyone involved is guilty of murder no matter how little they contribute. The only measure is how many people are hurt, injured, killed as a result of your actions and resulting hacking or intelligence.
While the goals that you state might sound lofty to yourself you are in fact contributing to the problems in the world. It's likely that your support will make this a thousands year conflict rather than finding solutions that resolve matters without any more killing.
Stop the killing now.
War is never necessary except for those who's purpose it serves. For the rest of us - the other %99.9999... war is not necessary. To keep people such as Bush, Saddam, Hitler, Stalin, etc... in power they need wars. War is the best thing that drives their mission. It defines them. It drives them forward. It gives them power. It sucks the life out of everyone though. It is futile.
You obviously have bought the mainstream propaganda about war. War is all about death and power. Killing others so that you have power. That is evil no matter what side you are on.
I don't live in utopia. I live in a world at war. Death and destruction everywhere. Indroctrination into the death cult occurs from birth whether it's into the death cult of a suicide bomber in the middle east or the honor macho death cult of the west. They are the same - death to others at all costs.
Murder, death, kill. There are other solutions and your the one in the dream world if you think that killing is the answer to the problems facing the world.
You really do eat the propaganda from the military don't you. As the Iraq and other recent Wars has demonstrated there are many ways that innocents get killed, so your intentions or the intentions of the soldiers is irrelevant.
However, I wasn't just speaking of the innocents. Killing begets more killing. You kill them. They are motivated to kill you. Again your side kills members of their side. On and on it goes.
The forever war is just what those in power want - which ever side they are on. The only answer is to stop the killing by all those involved using communication and other methods.
If you want to kill and murder people - men, women, children, and babies - then joining will provide you that opportunity.
Those that provide technical support to those that kill are also responsible for the deaths that they cause.
By killing others for your cause you become the terrorists for your enemy. They of course are your terrorists. You each reinforce each others goals of killing terrorists yet do nothing to really solve anything. You just punt the problem elsewhere and magnify it.
Only those wanting to be guilty of murder and death will join.
We all profit from laughter! None profits from either the positive or the negative! Sustainable profit comes from a balance of the negative and the positive with neither or either taking over in importance from the other.
While some might say that profit is a positive difference, to others it's a negative! Thus balance is needed for all to profit.
Profit is about positive sum-games.
"'Positive-sum' outcomes are those in which the sum of winnings and losses is greater than zero. This becomes possible when the size of the pie is somehow enlarged so that there is more wealth to distribute between the parties than there was originally, or some other way is devised so everyone gets what they want or need."
Profit gains from your spell checker: heathenous was the word.
You gain by knowing the correct spelling of the word "hethenious".
We both gained thus there was Profit Gained! Praise be Profit!
I invested in rhyming of words for fun and profit. Also, rhyme zone is cool:
http://www.rhymezone.com/r/rhyme.cgi?Word=profit&typeofrhyme=perfect&org1=syl&org2=l
No, you can't have the negative of my photo's either.
As the profit of the universe I hereby censor my image from view by the hethenious masses as well as by the devout itsybitsyers who worship me.
Bow down and don't see my image.
http://www.truecrypt.org/
Also record their badge numbers, names and ranks. Their work locations and another other information such as what they said. Document, document. Then communicate your interactions with the puppets of Big Brother State Power, the officers and other agents of State Terrorism in action against 99.999999999% of people who are NOT terrorists. By communicating each incident in detail the terrorism of State Power can be revealed and potentially checked (limited).
You've been brainwashed or are attempting to brainwash people with muddy water.
Let's clean the mud out of what you're saying.
It's a well known fact that the US Government supports the Government of Israel. It's well known that Israel often bombs people. So yes, the US support of Israel is seen as terrorism by those that are being bombed. If you don't believe me go and read their newspapers and blogs. You'll see that among the listed reasons to hate the US.
Yes, it does take a special breed to organize and attack their enemy. Such as those in the Pentagon. Such as those resourceful people with survival skills living in the desert where there isn't much water. (No I don't mean the people of Dune but it is an apt parallel isn't it?).
Another point is that if you are steeped in the political rhetoric and supporting that one side you ARE part of the problem and not part of the solution. The solution requires people standing up to those with the weapons or the desire to use weapons and telling them NO. NO. and NO.
Peace - for all - is the only way forward.
The end of Terrorism - the laudable goal of the so called War On Terrorism - also requires the end of State Sponsored Terrorism that the War On Terrorism also is.
Yes, the only response to a particular brain to being killed is "dying". I wasn't referring to a particular brain that would seek revenge or retaliation though. That's why a list of other possibly agents of retaliation was listed. I thought that you could use your brain to figure that out. I'm happy to clarify and since your comment was funny I enjoyed it too.
Yes, you can say that most terrorism requires or has planning, patience, and execution phases. The notion of the reptile brain is that it's part of our base emotional response: fight, flight, or freeze. It's the part that gets pissed off when someone cuts you off in traffic or when someone kills your loved ones.
I don't think that any of us are qualified to know for sure that terrorism is a uniquely human trait. It wouldn't surprise me if other species engaged in it to.
Your self defense is terrorism to those you defend against.
The so called double speak "War on Terrorism" is a war of state sponsored terrorism against an amorphous enemy - sometimes targeting well known geographic areas.
To think that one has the right to violate people's private speech is the arrogance of State Power that the few with the delusion that they are the Government think that they can also do with impunity. Eventually it will bite them back as people like their privacy as well as liking being alive.
Just because it's self defense to your society doesn't make it any less State Sponsored Terrorism to those that are defended against!
Let me ask you this. If you support fighting those that attack you, don't you think that your countries enemies also think the same, that fighting is the answer?
The Japanese were defeated by the detonation of TWO nuclear bombs in the worst single acts of State Sponsored Terrorism the World has ever seen. 100,000+ dead within moments and days. A man made disaster that only Mother Nature had been able to match. It broke their will to fight. Their cultural leader, the Emperor of Japan, ordered them to stop fighting and they complied. That's why you don't have Japanese terrorists being a problem. In that case ultimate force crushed the will of a highly organized militant society.
That won't work with the distributed religious zealots of radical Islam. They are not organized into a hierarchy but are loose nit groups of small hierarchies. They are also fighting back against who they perceive as a Goliath with the next to nothing that they have. Ok, some have more than the others. There are also many other power games going on.
The central thesis still stands: if you kill people their friends will want to kill you back. Basic instinct.
Sometimes it's overcome and other times it isn't.
One such time of not being overcome was time that the Bush gave his clearly Revenge Oriented Speech atop the rubble of the WTC. This and subsequent orders sent hundreds of thousands of people into action seeking revenge. I used to live one and a half blocks from there and I was aghast that the US President would seek revenge from the pile of rubble. It doesn't bode well for life on Earth when the man with the most powerful weapon systems seeks revenge. No well indeed as we've seen since.
I suppose only the privileged few with the weapons at their disposal think that they are entitled to do what they will including seeking revenge with those weapons.
As a result I treat any with weapons of any sort as potential terrorists and especially those in uniforms and authority.
Your analysis isn't any less simplistic than mine.
The facts are complex, yes. Not all people retaliate. Some time quite some time. Yes, ideologies such as intense religious fervor and extreme dogmas do come into play as well.
However, when a major Government directly supports repressive governments, for many decades, across a region of the planet how can you expect to have no retaliation from those within that region? That's what I wonder. At least be honest about this aspect of it.
It's hard looking in the mirror and seeing the evil that ones collective does for it's often justified by ones own self centered survival. How about simply counting the dead as the measure of evil regardless of the political reasons? If you do that then many (if not most) governments - and other active groups - on the planet have a lot to be held accountable for.
Force and killing are not the answer. It's about time politicians got that. It's about time that those with the weapons and the desire to use them got that. It's about time that those without the weapons but with the desire to use them learned that. Unfortunately they all have seemed to have learned the opposite lesson since killing on the mass scale is so easy in reality and so easy politically since the body politic either directly supports it, are placated sheep, are brainwashed, have been hoodwinked or think that they have no power or say in the matter.
Peace is the way forward for the human race as weapons of mass destruction technology spreads to any with the skills, knowledge ability, and - worst of all - desire to use them. People need to feel heard, but also need to respect others. You can't create respect with bombs or troops. What you create is fear and loathing regardless of who you are.
The simple fact that humans organize into Governments that think that they can with impunity kill other human beings in other parts of the world is what breeds terrorism. When you bomb people a fraction of those that survive, or their relatives, or descendants, may at their choice become fighters against those bombers or those who otherwise terrorized them. It's simple primitive brain response to being killed and all humans still have that primitive brain, it's known as our lizard brain. It's responsible for the fight, flight or freeze response.
So YES, any place that people gather, or communicate one on one, one on many or many on many will be a place where potential plans for evil deeds are carried out. The Pentagon is one such place for those with organized power centers while other places, real or virtual are places where those kinds of communications can occur.
Those in power are those that kill. They are often the ones that also need to be stopped along with the - so called - terrorists that they fight. They both carry out evil deeds including killing.
Well, I concur. It was just a rant... without any deep meaning intended...
It's more likely that it was Godzilla waking up from a deep sleep and finding himself tied up in the cables he thought he'd shake them loose.
Life is precious. I don't do evil. Never an agent for the state. I can't give you rights above state power, only you can do that!
And is munching those tasty cables as an appetizer for the rest of the main meal: us.
What you need is a clear transfer of all copyrights, patents and trademarks in the specific program from them to you. Look for a copyright transfer agreement, they are quite particular.
If you wrote it using their equipment on their time they might have a problem releasing it unless you can convince them of a good reason. They could really benefit from your work being open sourced.
If you wrote it on your own time with your own equipment and not on their premises then they really shouldn't have any problem writing you a release of any of their possible copyrights, patents and trademarks in the work - since it wasn't a work for hire. You might need to state that you didn't incorporate any lines of code from their work into your code. You'll also need to clarify if their work has any of your code in it - that could be a sticky point (a.k.a. SCO) if it's not clarified now in writing.
However it's complicated by them having a similar program that they are commercializing.
Really you should consult a lawyer rather they us fiends.
Look, I don't actually advocate killing except in self defense (direct) and in the case that you've judged yourself so evil that you deserve it by your own hand.
Live is precious. Unless you are doing evil such as an agent of evil (the state, or a state employee). Do what is right, give people their rights above state power.
Ok, I don't know how paranoid you are but give me a break!!! FOUR times!!! That's simply beyond probabilities as a natural occurence. It's even beyond a specific occurance four times!!! It's gotta be planned? Don't you think?
The probabilities of four, 4, FOUR, cables being taken out is astronomical. It's like a determined force did it or an exteresterial landing in the ocean did it, but we all know that the likelyhood of that happening is beyond nilch since it would take any space faring civilization billions of kilo-year-quads of energy and material and time to reach our pathetic world across the stars. Barly enought for reality to be created by the one and holy jc.
For get it you're hoplelessly lost in the notion that your non-real phantasies are really reality rather than being stupid kirk based nonsense generated from religioso based crap beliefs intelligently designed to have you be the idiot. Thank nothingness that you got the last sentense and that you've given up all beliefs whatso ever!!!
All the best,
Peter
live free of religous nonsense crap beliefs or just kill oneself NOW.
It sounds very fishy that three cables would be cut in three days. While it's possible, it's not likely probable that that would happen? Or is it? Who would like to calculate the probability of that occurring?
Ok, so when does the war begin? If it hasn't already? Or will our media and internet be cut too?