Slashdot Mirror


Android TV Update Puts Home-Screen Ads On Multi-Thousand-Dollar Sony Smart TVs (arstechnica.com)

Google is testing a new "Pilot Program" that puts a row of advertisements on the Android TV home screen. XDA Developers, which was the first to report the program, says: "We're currently seeing reports that it has shown up in Sony smart TVs, the Mi Box 3 from Xiaomi, NVIDIA Shield TV, and others." Ars Technica reports: The advertising is a "Sponsored Channel" part of the "Android TV Core Services" app that ships with all Android TV devices. A "Channel" in Android TV parlance means an entire row of thumbnails in the UI will be dedicated to "sponsored" content. Google provided XDA Developers with a statement saying that yes, this is on purpose, but for now it's a "pilot program."

Sony has tersely worded a support page detailing the "Sponsored channel," too. There's no mention here of it being a pilot program. Sony's page, titled "A sponsored channel has suddenly appeared on my TV Home menu," says, "This change is included in the latest Android TV Launcher app (Home app) update. The purpose is to help you discover new apps and contents for your TV." Sony goes on to say, "This channel is managed by Google" and "the Sponsored channel cannot be customized." Sony basically could replace the entire page with a "Deal with it" sunglasses gif, and it would send the same message.

212 comments

  1. Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iOS for life!!!!

    1. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see you download torrents, file manage, have access to SD cards, play every media format in existence and actually have your phone fixed. If you let your Android get hacked chances are you're a dimwit.

      Enjoy your sandbox kid.

    2. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no thanks, I think anime is for children

    3. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Apple products are for incompetent morons who are clueless. Paying 5000+ for a 1200 (at most) computer. Stupid fucks!!!

    4. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $5000 is a rounding error in my income, though and anime is for children and pedophiles

    5. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transcode the file. Enough said

    6. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh u misunderstand. Adding zero and making 500 as 5000 is not rounding error...

    7. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol $500 is nothing

    8. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What sort of children would watch Ebichu the Housekeeping Hamster?

    9. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the pedophile

      Anime is not for pedophiles

    10. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And completely trash the quality through generational degradation...yeah that sounds really cool and convenient.

    11. Re:Android is a piece of shit! by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Android TV, not Android. It's a different OS.

    12. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple products are for incompetent morons who are clueless. Paying 5000+ for a 1200 (at most) computer. Stupid fucks!!!

      Apple products are for two classes of people:

      1. "Normals". These are the folks that know that they don't have the knowledge to play Policeman for every single device they own, just want to work WITH (rather than ON) their devices, and look to Apple to create an environment where they don't have to worry about such matters.

      2. "Experts with a Life". These are folks that actually have the knowledge to play Policeman for every single device they own, but since they have a life outside of their Mom's basement, look to Apple to create an environment where they generally don't have to worry about such matters on a daily basis.

      Hope this helps.

    13. Re:Android is a piece of shit! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Android TV, not Android. It's a different OS.

      No, it isn't. It's a different launcher. Android TV is Android.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re: Android is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as opposed to thousands for a tv that forces ads on you? sucker.

  2. suckers by binarybum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those of us that bought the original sony google TVs and were abandoned by both sony and google have never forgotten. Pretty sure none of us will buy Sony again - definitely not TVs at least.

    --
    ôó
    1. Re: suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm AC... but honestly I haven't purchased Sony shit since their rootkit crap in the mid 2000s. I may have inadvertently bought media they control (movies) but I guess that's less than $100 since that event. Sony is a garbage ethics corporation.

    2. Re: suckers by youngone · · Score: 2

      Yup. Me too. Never deal with Sony, their products are rubbish and their "support" is worse.

    3. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would NEVER buy a smart TV anyway, they are a bad investment.
      With a dumb TV you can add what smarts you want, from a chrome cast to ATV through to a full blown computer.
      And these devices will receive software updates long after the SmartTv has been abandoned
      And you can upgrade or swap you preferred smarts as you want.

    4. Re:suckers by speedlaw · · Score: 1

      The Sony HDD 250 was the best DVR ever built, and way ahead of its time. The lack of a clock set by sony in software and subsequent abandonment by Rovi/Microsoft taught the danger of spending your real money on their fantasy idea

    5. Re:suckers by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm with you. I have a "dumb" monitor and feed it with a sub-$100 Rasberry Pi setup (since I only need 1080p because I'm old and feeble of sight). I can run Kodi (with illegal plug-ins) and thus access a raft of great stuff (including YouTube) and I have a Chromecast that lets me access Netflix.

      For the money, I bet a *much* better quality "dumb" screen than I'd get if I went the "Smart TV" way and if I don't like the smart side of things I can always change software at the flip of a micro-SD card. Who the hell would buy a smart TV????

    6. Re: suckers by Spamalope · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes! I had tons of Sony home theater/stereo/high end CRT (artisan pro-printshop/photographer monitors) and other Sony stuff. Not one thing since, and it every time the competing brand has turned out to be a better choice. 80s/90s innovative Sony is long gone...

    7. Re: suckers by Woldscum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I quit Sony after I got a Rootkit installed on my laptop just by playing a CD.

    8. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us that bought the original sony google TVs and were abandoned by both sony and google have never forgotten. Pretty sure none of us will buy Sony again - definitely not TVs at least.

      The only Sony products I will buy anymore are those without microprocessors or software, so... pretty much just wired-headphones.

    9. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. I have a "dumb" monitor and feed it with a sub-$100 Rasberry Pi setup (since I only need 1080p because I'm old and feeble of sight). I can run Kodi (with illegal plug-ins) and thus access a raft of great stuff (including YouTube) and I have a Chromecast that lets me access Netflix.

      For the money, I bet a *much* better quality "dumb" screen than I'd get if I went the "Smart TV" way and if I don't like the smart side of things I can always change software at the flip of a micro-SD card. Who the hell would buy a smart TV????

      Smart TVs are like clicker remote controls... in five or ten years, when you see that someone has one, you,ll be like, ,,OMG, you have one of THOSE?!?,,

      Then you,ll start laughing uncontrollably, end with a fit of coughing and have tears streaming down your cheeks.

    10. Re:suckers by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      You’re ranting about Sony, but this seems to be affecting several Android products, not just sony

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    11. Re: suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here! I don't buy a DVD or watch anything from Sony, much less buy any of their trash. I won't buy a Bluray player because it was invented by Sony, and no mater what the brand, Sony gets a license fee!

    12. Re: suckers by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      I never liked them.

      [looks all smug and superior]

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:suckers by cerberusss · · Score: 0

      How do you deal with audio, though? Are there actually monitors with good speakers?

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    14. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a dumb screen and get your smart device separately.
      It works just as well (or better) and is a lot cheaper both now and in the long run.

    15. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Those of us that bought the original sony google TVs and were abandoned by both sony and google have never forgotten. Pretty sure none of us will buy Sony again - definitely not TVs at least.

      Whoooooooopsie... did idiots just pay a lot of money to become victims of BOTH surveilance AND advertising?

    16. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No TV has good speakers.

    17. Re:suckers by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I too use a Pi, but I also have a smart TV. The key is to have options so that if one goes sour you are not stuck with it.

      There are benefits to buying a proper TV over a dumb monitor too. TVs do a lot of image processing that monitors don't. Even with high quality content it helps to remove/hide artefacts and to improve things like motion resolution. Also they don't make plasma or OLED monitors, and there are not many monitors that go up to TV sizes (50+ inches). Most only have one or max 2 HDMI ports and no ARC support too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re: suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone once gave me a PS3 and I was disgusted by the fact that it comes with all sorts of preinstalled garbage like Spotify, Netflix and Amazon Videos that I will never, never use but the damned thing wouldn't let me remove them or at least the icons from the menu.

      That was the only time I ever powered the thing on. It went right back into the box and has been sitting in my garage collecting dust for the past decade or so. Glad I didn't waste any of my money on that pile of shit.

      Most Japanese technology companies are crap. Not only do they make shoddy products, but they also put money upfront and short-term gains above everything, including customer satisfaction.

    19. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chromecast sucks. Miracast is WAY better.

    20. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. I regret buying my 2016 ad-roid TV, even if the TV itself and picture quality is great. I will NEVER buy another Sony TV. Whenever I hear someone talking about getting a new TV, I tell them to stay away from Sony and why. Serving ads every time it's powered on, and having un-removable home-screen items, is enough for them to outright stay away without question.

    21. Re:suckers by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      The Sony Trintron CRT was amazing and I don't regret the one I bought in 1992. But they never quite achieved that level of technical dominance in the flat screen era.

      Mostly they were a company with some great individual technologies -- the various Walkman models were always pretty good, they had some decent VCRs but overall they never seemed to be the best at any one thing and I don't think they were ever considered a real high end brand.

    22. Re:suckers by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      For the money, I get a *much* better quality "dumb" screen than I'd get if I went the "Smart TV" way

      That's inaccurate. Smart TV's are actually cheaper BECAUSE they are "SMART". The cost of the TV is subsidized by the advertising revenue the OEM's expect to collect once you connect it to the internet. I simply never set up internet on the TV.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    23. Re: suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. I paid $25 for a Walkman when I was like 10 (a lot of money at the time). That thing was indestructible. I also have a nice set of MDR-V6 monitors. Sony makes great hardware. Never trust a Sony product that is digital in any real way.

    24. Re:suckers by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      Sony used to be a company I thought I could trust. Advertisements junking up everything? No thanks.

    25. Re:suckers by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      So this is like the zillionith article /. has had about how bad smart tvs are.
      We all know this.

      I'm currently using an old dumb tv, connected to hdmi to linux mint, and it works great.

      However, when looking for a replacement the pickings are quite thin.
      Sure, a "non-smart" display can be purchased from Dell or somesuch, but they are incredibly pricey compared to the giveaway deals on "smart" tvs.
      What do people reccomend for a dumb(smart) tv?

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    26. Re: suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quit Sony after I got a Rootkit installed on my laptop just by playing a CD.

      I have a Mac, and so Sony was not able to SILENTLY install that Rootkit on my computer (even though they had one to install).

    27. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you deal with audio, though? Are there actually monitors with good speakers?

      Who uses the built-in trash audio in a flatscreen TV (or monitor)?

      Just use your regular audio system. Not only is it 1000 times better than ANY TV audio setup, you obviously aren't using it for anything else while you are watching TV, so...

      Damn, Slashtards are so frickin' LAME sometimes...

    28. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any recent TV will have audio optical out to a better system. Or feed the Pi into the system and only send the TV video output. There are options.

    29. Re: suckers by rockmuelle · · Score: 1

      Dropping OtherOS on the PS3 was the final straw for me and Sony. At least when I buy a Samsung product I expect to be screwed in some way (e.g., all my old Samsung TVs slowly dropping support for apps... easily fixed with a FireStick or similar).

    30. Re:suckers by mellon · · Score: 1

      What choice do we have? All the TVs are running crapware. What I do is to just make sure that it can't connect to the network and download updates, and then I use an external set-top-box (an Apple TV, as it happens, but doesn't have to be) to deliver content. I wish you could buy a TV that wasn't "smart," but that doesn't seem to be an option at present.

    31. Re:suckers by mellon · · Score: 1

      That's great in theory, but where is this dumb TV that you can buy? When we went shopping for TVs, this simply wasn't an option.

    32. Re:suckers by Windowser · · Score: 1

      What do people reccomend for a dumb(smart) tv?

      Buy a Smart one and never connect it to your network. It will essentially be a non-smart one

      --
      Avoid the MS tax, always buy I.B.M. PC's (I Built-it Myself)
    33. Re: suckers by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, it seems like their Mirrorless cameras are all the rage right now, and I personally have preferred the Playstation to the competitors since sega folded as a hardware concern.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    34. Re:suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doubtful, most people like having less moving parts, and will just ignore the ads, like they do everywhere else.

    35. Re:suckers by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      That's where I'm at. Got a decent deal on an LG Smart TV. Spent a couple hundred bucks for an Intel NUC and dropped in a 500gb drive and 16gigs of ram. Installed Kubuntu, and plugged it in via HDMI. The TV gets 3 inputs - power and 2 HDMI cables. It doesn't need more than that.

      That little box is beefy enough to push 2k content, streams stuff flawlessly, and if I wanted to, I could install Steam on it and play a whole lot of games. I've got most of my current rotation of music on it to play through the surround sound, and a pile of movie rips that I've been meaning to get to. It should be good to go for Amazon and NetFlix, but I haven't tried them yet.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    36. Re: suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a small Sony radio recently, it works better than I expected and seems to be very well made. I'll by a radio made by Hitler if it performs the best.

    37. Re: suckers by Cederic · · Score: 1

      They do produce an exceedingly well rated camera.

      I didn't even consider buying it though, because rootkit.

    38. Re: suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I paid the equivalent of $400 for a Discman (longer ago than I care to admit).

      It was a worthless piece of rubbish. The small plastic spindle in the centre broke, and had to be replaced (the disc would no longer spin up, being out of balance).

      Sony wouldn't sell the $0.02, user-serviceable piece of plastic by itself. They forced you to buy an entire replacement laser unit, which had to be carefully installed, for $200 (plus labour).

      Not learning my lesson, I bought the next model of Discman when it came out. It had the exact same problem.

      So I gave up a purchased a Panasonic portable disc player. It had more features (anti-skip that was 10x more than the best Sony had at the time and a locking spindle, among other things) than the Discman, and was ~$40 less.

      I found that old Panasonic in my things a few months back. Sure if the damn thing doesn't still work, all these years later.

      Sony? Never again.

    39. Re: suckers by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The Panasonic shockwave CD player was awesome in the day.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    40. Re: suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart products are verybuseful for dumb people. Dumb products are very useful for smart people. It has always been this way.

    41. Re: suckers by mikeiver1 · · Score: 1

      Same here. Also have a Samsung TV that if connected to the internet will also force ads to the screen on power up. No opt out either. Since I use a computer to drive the TV I only connect to the internet to DL firmware updates maybe once a year. This is getting worse with each iteration of TVs that they release. If a person buys a TV and keeps it for 10 years then they have little chance of capturing any further revenue from them, like it or not this is the way they are all going. There was an interview with the head of Visio that stated much the same as well.

  3. "Smart" TVs by nadass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The TVs are no longer "smart" if they simply shovel Google adverts into your face like you're some kind of ad-hungry maggot. (For once I'm glad I have a dumb smart tv... aka, Panasonic.)

    1. Re:"Smart" TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you ever think "smart" meant?

    2. Re:"Smart" TVs by Z80a · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not very smart to have a computer connected to the internet inside your television that you can't actually control.

    3. Re:"Smart" TVs by houghi · · Score: 1

      I use the Smart TV as I have a a monitor. No network connection and I set up the wireless to a non existing account, just in case it would otherwise try to find an open WIFI connection.The next one I buy, I will probably disble the Wifi with a schroud of alu foil and blacj tape for the cvamera. I will also look if I can see a microphone because I do not trust the sucker.

      I also remember when I called people who did this crazy idiots.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:"Smart" TVs by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Older "smart TVs" were much worse than Android TV smart TVs. Android TV is far more customizable and has a lot more software for it.

      That said, having actually had to fuck wi... ahem, configure one for my parents, I ended up just giving them my old laptop to be plugged into another HDMI port and told them to just ignore the entire "smart" aspect of it. Android TV is almost as locked down as typical smart TV systems that came before it, to the point where even getting a sideloaded apk to run on it was a chore and a half. And then most of the android software wouldn't work properly anyway for a variety of reasons ranging from control interface to incredibly restricted permissions.

      Honestly, just buy a cheapest TV that has a panel you want, and just plug a cheapo laptop into it and just have a wireless trackpad/trackball/similar pointer device as a "remote". You'll get all of the functionality of a "smart TV" and a lot more, without all the garbage of awful interface, ads in your face and insane restrictions on OS permissions. And it'll be a lot cheaper especially for larger models.

  4. Next time I'm going with a monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ethernet disconnected. At least I don't have to deal with this crap if I HDMI out of my PC to it.

    1. Re:Next time I'm going with a monitor by mellon · · Score: 1

      Make sure you don't have any open WiFi.

  5. All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are people surprised that companies are NOT interesting in your time, space, and money? All they care about is selling you out in order to make a few bucks.

    Is Sony, etc. going to stop? No, all that will happen is that a few people will complain about how disrespectful this is and absolutely NOTHING will change. :-(

    Boycotting these companies won't stop this stupidity. Most people just don't care.

    I'm not sure what a good (or practical) solution is to get this to stop. While banning ads would solve the problem too many people just don't give a fuck about blatant (commercial) propaganda.

    1. Re:All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's a new video scaling method! Super advanced.

      Just show video in native and use the rest of the screen for ads.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      All hail the class action law suit. Suing stuff like this in court is so easy, class action millions up for grabs. They are stealing your bandwidth, stealing your time and stealing the use of the hardware they sold you, leaves they wide open to major penalties. They can not claim you agreed, they are just out and out stealing it, Sony and Google, evil inc, at it again.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what a good (or practical) solution is to get this to stop.

      Find Sony execs. Kill them.

      No, seriously. That will cause things to change. Once enough execs from enough companies get killed, they'll realize that if they keep fucking us over, they'll die. Of course, the people who do the killing will be killed themselves, or sent to prison to rot away the rest of their lives. Isn't it important enough for you to give your life to make this sort of thing stop?

      Oh, it isn't important enough?

      That's why nothing changes. Things change -- really change -- only when enough people are willing to kill and die for it to change. None of us are willing yet. (Hey, I'm not willing either.)

    4. Re:All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what a good (or practical) solution is to get this to stop.

      My money is on President Not Sure.

    5. Re:All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are people surprised that companies are NOT interesting in your time, space, and money? All they care about is selling you out in order to make a few bucks.

      Is Sony, etc. going to stop? No, all that will happen is that a few people will complain about how disrespectful this is and absolutely NOTHING will change. :-(

      Boycotting these companies won't stop this stupidity. Most people just don't care.

      I'm not sure what a good (or practical) solution is to get this to stop. While banning ads would solve the problem too many people just don't give a fuck about blatant (commercial) propaganda.

      My next choice will be a projector, I think they are all or most still dumb. Hooked to an open dvr & sound bar.

    6. Re:All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by Megane · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting those ads downloaded (or any sort of proof that they were shown so you can get paid) when I refuse to connect your crappy "smart" TV to my network! You assholes can stick your Brawndo ads where the sun don't shine.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      I suspect somewhere in the papers included in your TV there is a "use of TV is consent to EULA", and a link to an online page listing the actual terms that are subject to change without notice.

    8. Re: All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait until things get cheap enough for them to solder the SIM card in there...

    9. Re:All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck are you going to campaign a class-action suit on a right to NOT see ads? Such a "right" doesn't exist, never ever ever will.

      Twatwaffles like you amaze me, you preach capitalism until the cows come home but once its actually implemented you refuse to understand the consequences. This is one of them.

    10. Re: All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there should be laws like GDPR. requiring brand to inform customers abd label products what they buy into. Such as a label 'this product includes advertisrments' which means adds without buyers consent. Just like warning on packs of sigarettes. it not diffucult to do, but poloticians will get lobbied to block such laws by evil companies.

    11. Re:All hail the almighty advertising dollar! /s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you actually clicked submit on that.

  6. Just dodge it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As soon as I unboxed my Sony XBR 75 and just after I got it set up I plugged in my Roku Ultra4k. I only use the internet to update firmware on the TV never the smart features.

    1. Re:Just dodge it! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      As soon as I unboxed my Sony XBR 75 and just after I got it set up I plugged in my Roku Ultra4k. I only use the internet to update firmware on the TV never the smart features.

      What does the firmware do, other than support the framework for the "smart" part of your TV? Do you even need to update the firmware?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Just dodge it! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      My current TV had firmware updates that fixed the color settings - there were some options that didn't work correctly and some input signals that were flagged wrong. I know I'm in the minority that have a TV where firmware updates actually fixed bugs. I don't use its smarts.

  7. “Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Sebby · · Score: 2

    The way this was sneaked in is alarming.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Luthair · · Score: 0

      Yes, though unfortunately there aren't many alternatives for TVs without ads - https://www.rtings.com/tv/lear...

      Really though you shouldn't allow your SmartTVs online anyway since they usually have tracking technology spying on what you watch.

    2. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      The way this was sneaked in is alarming.

      Yeah, the audacity is a bit staggering. If I spend multiple thousands of dollars on a device I'm OK with advertisements in the Google Play store or iTunes or some app like that but I'm not OK with the space on my home-screen/desktop being chewed up so that these bozos can make money by shoving advertisements in my face. One of the things you pay for when you buy a device is freedom from bullshit like that.

    3. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Anonymice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole point of "Smart" TVs is for natively streaming online media, quickly & easily, without the fuss of having to muck around with HDMI cables & external devices. And the concept of locally streaming via DLNA is very much limited to the realm of the geek/enthusiast, and that's very unlikely to ever change.

    4. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you use a TV with an OS made by an advertising company, can you really find it that surprising or audacious? People need to stop thinking of Google as a technology company and start thinking of them as what they really are: The world's biggest ad agency.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    5. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Spamalope · · Score: 1

      More like: If I bought a multi-thousand dollar top of the line TV without advertising financial support, back dooring it into the product after it's too late to return it is a taking. Ad supported products are worth far less.

    6. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      If you use a TV with an OS made by an advertising company, can you really find it that surprising or audacious? People need to stop thinking of Google as a technology company and start thinking of them as what they really are: The world's biggest ad agency.

      Does it surprise me that Google would do this ... ummm ... No. this is Google we are talking about here. Do I find it audacious? You better believe that I do, in fact it's not just audacious it is bloody outrageous. Apple and Microsoft do not repurpose my desktop background or screensaver to shove advertisements in my face, Toyota does not project advertisements onto the windshield of my car and the Asus company who made my computer monitor does interrupt my work by flashing advertisements across it. If Google wants to subsidise devices or hand them out for free in exchange for people putting up with advertisements that OK in my book, but if I buy a device outright unsubsidised doing this is bloody outrageous.

    7. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      More like: If I bought a multi-thousand dollar top of the line TV without advertising financial support, back dooring it into the product after it's too late to return it is a taking. Ad supported products are worth far less.

      Yup, there is a reason I don't own a singe Google device and there is a reason I always buy 'dumb' televisions and this episode is basically it.

    8. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Microsoft do not repurpose my desktop background or screensaver to shove advertisements in my face,

      Does this post need a /s?

    9. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Not forced onto Win10 yet I see... It force installs paid 3rd party software and sticks big tiles about it all over the start menu. Reinstalls with updates. They spam you with conventional ads too, but only for their own software so far. What, you think they shoved it down everyone's throat free of charge out of the goodness of their heart? Lol. Almost certainly the total remote access to all your files was either paid for or compelled by the government on top of that.

    10. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Falconhell · · Score: 2

      I use an old Dell dual core desktop, to a Panasonic smart TV via hdmi. The TV never gets connected to the internet, the whole exercise took 1/2 an hour to setup, including OS install. No mucking around, just a once only setup, still going fine 4 years later.
      I will never allow my TVs to connect to the internet, exactly because they can pull this shit.

    11. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's so fucking hard to get one HDMI cable, plug one end into your TV, the other end into a box and controlling said box with a wireless keyboard.

      So fucking hard.

      Wait, no, it isn't, because that's how TV has always worked. Cable, satellite, even fucking broadcast involves taking a two-ended cable, plugging one end into your TV, the other end into something else and using a wireless interface to control it.

      With old TVs, you were done setting them up the moment you finished making the connections and adjusting the picture. Smart TVs want you to go through menus to configure the hell out of them once you turn them on for the first time. Old TVs start working the moment you turn them on. Smart TVs need time to "boot up".

      What exactly are smart TVs doing to make the process of setting up a TV easier? It takes longer to set up, longer to start up, it delivers ads... is this all for the sake of having one less remote control, or for not having to take one half-second to press the "Switch Input" button?

      Shit, if our society is getting this lazy, you may as well just put your credit card and address into your smart TV so it can buy all the crap it advertises to you automatically and send it to your house.

    12. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be one of the Win 7 holdouts.

    13. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Luthair · · Score: 1

      The point is you bring your own streaming device to the party rather than let TV manufacturers slurp up way more data about you.

    14. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by omnichad · · Score: 2

      In this case, "mucking around with an external device" would be having to use the computer controls instead of a simplified remote control UI. This works only because you're in the "realm of the geek/enthusiast" as stated. That said, I don't have my TV connected and I use a Roku - which in a few years pays for itself vs the electricity cost of running an old desktop.

    15. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Apple and Microsoft do not repurpose my desktop background or screensaver to shove advertisements in my face

      You don't remember Active Desktop all the way back in the Windows 98SE days? It's true that you could turn it off. Today, the lock screen by default is Microsoft-controlled.

      If Google wants to subsidise devices or hand them out for free in exchange for people putting up with advertisements that OK in my book, but if I buy a device outright unsubsidised doing this is bloody outrageous.

      This is what happened. You just didn't get a choice to buy an unsubsidized device.

    16. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I have an old HP stream box that runs windows 10 in tablet mode. It makes a great set-top box. I'm thinking of getting one of these. for my other tv's, since the stream box is no more. This is not much more then a Roku and does way more.

      I don't store anything locally, I run an openSuse box that acts as a NAS for the home and gives me torrenting or anything else I want.

    17. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      And the concept of locally streaming via DLNA is very much limited to the realm of the geek/enthusiast, and that's very unlikely to ever change.

      You should wander through YouTube sometime. There are literally 1000 kids telling you how to set up local DLNA streaming, or any other "Smart" TV alternative your little heart desires, all geared for the audience with a 5th grade vocabulary. And they're getting views. Lots of views.

      Geeks cherish the idea that only they can understand the holy rituals necessary to purge the dark demons from people's devices. It ain't so. You may understand, but understanding is not required in order to successfully perform the rituals. The number of people blocking ads and bypassing invasive "Smart" TVs is rising, or anti-adblocking wouldn't be a thing. Remember when it wasn't? It wasn't that long ago. Things are changing.

    18. Re: “Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internet TV function is now hijacked by evil companies !

    19. Re:“Trojan Horse” comes to mind by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      It’s mucking around to use a palm size wireless keyboard and a wireless mouse? it’s very easy for most people not just geeks, exactly like using the ubiquitous PC. My 91 year old father can do it. With my various channels as shortcuts, I rarely need to use the keyboard.

  8. Sue them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sue them seeking some amount of civil damages and criminal prosecution under the computer fraud and abuse act.

    They are doing things on your system and allowing others to have access to your system without your explicit permission.

    1. Re:Sue them by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      That law makes anything a federal judge doesn't like retroactively illegal...Are you a federal judge?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Sue them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron who thinks there's "50$ worth of steel" in every new car, so kindly fuck off to layman's law school before you try to interpret any of it. K thx.

    3. Re:Sue them by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You keep repeating that. Fuckoff Drinkypoo.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. Don't connect your TV to the internet. by Edward+Nardella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why you shouldn't connect your TV to the internet. In fact, you should generally avoid connecting things to the internet.

    --
    My sig doesn't address Anons, sigs aren't visible to them.
    1. Re:Don't connect your TV to the internet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see....
      Computer? Kinda need internet access there. Phone? That's a given. Netflix-enabled device? Well, duh. Game consoles? Gotta get those 10's of gigs of updates somehow.

      While your sentiment is noted and appreciated, that's not how the world is working today. You have to expect this and then react appropriately instead of just adhering to some blanket statement like yours.

    2. Re: Don't connect your TV to the internet. by Edward+Nardella · · Score: 1

      I said generally, I didn't say always.

      --
      My sig doesn't address Anons, sigs aren't visible to them.
    3. Re:Don't connect your TV to the internet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telephones are perfectly functional without an Internet connection.

      Oh, wait, you mean one of those $1000 wireless Twitter terminals that incidentally support phone calls as a legacy feature for the few who actually use it?

  10. Skip smart TVs by night · · Score: 1

    Trust me, buy whatever TV looks best, but do NOT put it on the network. Buy something like a ROKU, then you are in control of channels, ads, etc. The roku client is better than the smart tv client for many services like HBO and network. On top of that you can replace your roku without replacing the entire TV. It also lets you view local content with Plex or similar software.

    1. Re:Skip smart TVs by aXis100 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but you missed the part where the update also happened on the MiBox 3. The MiBox is "like a ROKU".

      I've been using one for the last 6 month and it's been great. I saw the update come through last week, though I havent seen the sponsored channel yet.

    2. Re:Skip smart TVs by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The point stands though. You can much more easily replace your sub$100 MiBox 3 than you can your TV though.

      The bad news is that roku dropped the 4k ultra unit which i have. Now if you want 4k you can only get the stick which only does wifi.

        I only got the roku because netflix on the smarttv was buggy buffering garbage. Netflix on windows 10 was idiotic garbage. The roku just works and works well, but the one i'd recommend buying is discontinued... ... facepalm.

    3. Re:Skip smart TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still buy those, but Roku's site does not list those anymore. :(

    4. Re:Skip smart TVs by tepples · · Score: 1

      buy whatever TV looks best, but do NOT put it on the network.

      That wouldn't work for a TV that locks out even "dumb TV" features unless you connect it to the network in order to agree to the End User License Agreement for the system software.

    5. Re:Skip smart TVs by omnichad · · Score: 1

      OK, then just buy an actual Roku. Problem solved.

    6. Re:Skip smart TVs by night · · Score: 1

      Don't use the TV remote. Don't use the TV features. Don't use the TVs volume. Use it just like a computer monitor and use the roku for on/off, volume, picking your streaming service, pause, etc. You get much better performance, better client, more channels/streaming services, etc. Then the TV can't fingerprint what you are watching, can't spy/track you, and of course can't show you ads.

  11. Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The connected TV and BluRay devices from Sony and other manufacturers have had a selection of commercial services pushed by default in the menu system already before the time of the Android TV. That doesn't hamper the use of the device though.

    "This channel is managed by Google" and "the Sponsored channel cannot be customized."

    This way the manufacturers put a part of their user experience in the hands of a company that doesn't understand consumer electronics based on their past behaviour.

  12. Smart TVs are a dumb investment by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) Never EVER give your TV direct internet access
    2) If you want a “smart tv”, use an external box which serves content to the TV via HDMI
    3) See #1

    These devices aren’t supported more than two or three years anyway - if you give them internet access, you’re providing a nice easy way for bad guys into your home.

    Think of a smart tv as just another badly designed IoT device.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how that helps.

      Now your external box updates and serves you ads. But at least they're not coming from the TV!

    2. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      Not to disagree with your overall premise (I do agree with it), but in this case this also effects some of those boxes from your step #2. So even following this advice you could end up in the same boat in this case.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    3. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not to disagree with your overall premise (I do agree with it), but in this case this also effects some of those boxes from your step #2.

      While this is true, if you buy an unlocked box, you're in control. Even cheap Android sticks often have years of ROM support before they're abandoned for the next cheap stick. It's somewhat wasteful to be replacing them regularly, but they're small. Many of them will run a "real" Linux kernel, some of them even mainlined, so they can have a useful life after Android.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by s4080326 · · Score: 1

      Yes but it is cheaper to replace a $100 device than a $2000 TV.

    5. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      I don't see how that helps.

      Now your external box updates and serves you ads. But at least they're not coming from the TV!

      SBCs that run Kodi flawlessly cost like $50. You have a great number of choices.

    6. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He said SBCs that run Kodi, not Kodi boxes. You can run Kodi on a Raspberry Pi, for example. LibreELEC is a minimal Linux distribution, not Android. Small silent PCs are available new for less than $200 too, although that's overkill.

    7. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by sad_ · · Score: 1

      2) If you want a “smart tv”, use an external box which serves content to the TV via HDMI

      you mean, like the Mi Box 3 from Xiaomi or the NVIDIA Shield TV?

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    8. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Problem is that the cheap unlocked Android sticks don't support Netflix at anything above SD resolution. Doubtless other streaming apps are the same - I can't imagine Disney will allow HD video streaming on rooted devices either.

      DRM screws us again.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but it's unlikely that they can be rooted in any meaningful way through WAN. At least the android TV device that I had to recently configure was so locked down, you couldn't even run apks from a hooked up flash USB memory without first fucking with it in some rather unorthodox ways. And then software package would often not work because of android TV not being quite like android.

      People who actually do this kind of crime generally look for lowest hanging fruit, and massively diversified field of TVs that would likely require significant tailoring of malware for each model doesn't strike me like such a field.

    10. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by eth1 · · Score: 1

      1) Never EVER give your TV direct internet access
      2) If you want a “smart tv”, use an external box which serves content to the TV via HDMI
      3) See #1

      These devices aren’t supported more than two or three years anyway - if you give them internet access, you’re providing a nice easy way for bad guys into your home.

      Think of a smart tv as just another badly designed IoT device.

      I'm wondering how long it will be before manufacturers start installing non-removable SIM cards in there to shove ads/steal data via a non-turn-off-able cell connection.

    11. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Go with an x86 device, there are several decent fanless ones with HDMI around $100. Or you can get a used one. I run win10 in tablet mode, because it streams everything and runs kodi; but it's nice to have the option to run Linux.

      I could never get hbo go and netflix to both work on Linux, but this was at least 3 years ago. :(

    12. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said SBCs that run Kodi, not Kodi boxes. You can run Kodi on a Raspberry Pi, for example. LibreELEC is a minimal Linux distribution, not Android.

      Technically correct is the best kind of correct, isn't it? <grin>

      Yes, you can use something like LibreELEC to run Kodi on a dedicated, low-end piece of kit. (I know. I've been doing it for a decade.) The thing is, Joe Average Consumer isn't going to take the time to put LE on an RPi or low-end x86 box or comparable. Convenience and clean looks are more appealing, so far more likely is that Joe will pick up a cheap Android box -- OS in place and Kodi either pre-loaded or a quick online install away -- which means Joe will be running Android TV, which means ads.

    13. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SBCs that run Kodi flawlessly cost like $50. Joe Average Consumer has a great number of choices. Whether he uses them wisely is up to him.

    14. Re: Smart TVs are a dumb investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will definitely happen with 5G. The Wifi and ethernet wired port will disappear and you will be forced to use a mobile network and login your account to enable and update your TV just like your WIFI IOT devices. YOU will be the product unless there is regulation by law or just dont buy products. We have not seen the worst of evil companies yet. The future wil be very difficult for those whowant privacy and prevention of intrusion into their personal live. Do you really think 5G is for consumers ? No way. its for corporations to collect all your data and behavior. nit much different than what is happening in China just for another purpose.

    15. Re:Smart TVs are a dumb investment by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Sadly, soon there will be no choice since all TVs are going to be "smart"

  13. the only solution is not buy smart TVs by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    and if you already have one reset it to factory settings and see if it forgets your internet configuration, it is does not then either unplug the ethernet or change the wifi password and dont update your TV, i dont let my smartTV connect to the internet because i dont trust it

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:the only solution is not buy smart TVs by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      I was looking for a TV in the 20-35 inch range for my mother a couple months ago. I don't know what's available online, but in stores everything is "smart" unless it's tiny. Most of what was available was 720p as well - often without labeling it so. They just stay vague about the resolution. A couple of times I had to search the TVs model online to avoid buying one of those by mistake... but I couldn't avoid the "smart" stuff, not without ordering online at least. Everything is "smart" now.

      I own a 40-something inch 1080p TV from 2014 that isn't "smart" and I'm hoping it lasts a while. My Roku is sufficient for my internet streaming needs... no need to build that in. I don't want to have to wait for the TV to boot and load advertisments just to play a game or watch a Blu-ray... but it's looking like there won't be a choice before long.

    2. Re:the only solution is not buy smart TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A computer monitor will do for you, there are several options like 32" 1080p and 40" 4K and bigger, as well as 27", 28" 1080. Newer ones may have dual HDMI.
      I wonder if you use an external tuner (for.. TV), does it wake up the monitor when you turn it on with the remote then sleeps the monitor when you turn it off. It should, obviously.

    3. Re:the only solution is not buy smart TVs by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      My 32" set is "dumb" but it's about 5 years old. Even then I was hearing that it was hard to avoid "smart" sets. Sounds like it's getting worse.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re: the only solution is not buy smart TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a Benq TV or some China brand. Add free. All this add stuff are from abusive top brands. You may only get a well known branded product by selling your soul and privacy first.

  14. Pi Hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they be Pi Hole'd?

  15. Why did Linux ruin scroll bars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What is the deal with scroll bars? It's bad enough that they collapse width just like Windows 10 does. But now clicking on the empty space brings the page position to where you clicked. It used to scroll one page. A real pain in the ass if you're dealing with a 1000 page long pdf document. Why would you change functionality that has been the same for decades? Who asked for this?

    1. Re:Why did Linux ruin scroll bars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # This doesn't fix all of the new scrollbar misbehaviors
      # (there are several) but it fixes the worst one.

      mkdir -p ~/.config/gtk-3.0
      cat >> ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini <<EOF
      [Settings]
      gtk-primary-button-warps-slider = false
      EOF

    2. Re:Why did Linux ruin scroll bars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the deal with scroll bars?

      You're in the wrong thread, Jerry. We're busy bitching about Sony and Google and ad bullshit being forced on us over here, not shitty and ugly UI decisions in new OSes.

  16. Don't connect your wallet to the company. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You have to expect this and then react appropriately instead of just adhering to some blanket statement like yours."

    Mmmmm, yes. So how's that working out so far? Appropriately is simply never buying any display device that calls itself, smart.

  17. Pack up your bags, start over anew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is really it. If we techie/hacker types want to live in a society we believe in, now is the time to say 'This is ENOUGH! THIS IS NOT WHAT I SIGNED UP FOR!', leave the country, renounce your citizenship, and band together anew, whether squatting territory that is technically another's, pretending there is still Terra Nulla and colonizing it, or building a seastead and finding the goods and services that will allow you the purchasing power to collectively own what you want.

    Why is this necessary? IP Laws, followed by collective bargaining/purchasing power, followed by a direct democracy of your peers (hint: the average citizen in your country is *NOT* one of your peers. Hell, many of us can agree the majority of our family members are not either. If you disagree, consider yourself lucky. You have either have a smart family, or are suitably average yourself!) With those three issues out of the way hardware can be purchased tailored to the market, or sufficient dedicated individuals will be collected to rapidly reverse engineer, exploit, reflash, or redesign a device to meet the needs of the domestic public. Anything short is simply pissing unwind and wondering why you're wet and reek of piss afterwards.

    1. Re:Pack up your bags, start over anew. by nadass · · Score: 1

      That is really it. If we techie/hacker types want to live in a society we believe in, now is the time to say 'This is ENOUGH! THIS IS NOT WHAT I SIGNED UP FOR!', leave the country, renounce your citizenship, and band together anew, whether squatting territory that is technically another's, pretending there is still Terra Nulla and colonizing it, or building a seastead and finding the goods and services that will allow you the purchasing power to collectively own what you want.

      Why is this necessary? IP Laws, followed by collective bargaining/purchasing power, followed by a direct democracy of your peers (hint: the average citizen in your country is *NOT* one of your peers. Hell, many of us can agree the majority of our family members are not either. If you disagree, consider yourself lucky. You have either have a smart family, or are suitably average yourself!) With those three issues out of the way hardware can be purchased tailored to the market, or sufficient dedicated individuals will be collected to rapidly reverse engineer, exploit, reflash, or redesign a device to meet the needs of the domestic public. Anything short is simply pissing unwind and wondering why you're wet and reek of piss afterwards.

      WUT?!

    2. Re:Pack up your bags, start over anew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave?

      No. I'm here to make, by my small contributions, or fail in the process, the society that I want to live in. I'm not intetested in living somewhere else. I love where I live, as fucked as things may get at times.

      I swore allegiance every day as a small child to the flag and to the nation for which it stands. I'm here until I kick the bucket, and if the ship goes, I'll go down with it.

      That's what home is like.

    3. Re: Pack up your bags, start over anew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wut? Even as a 5 year old child I refused to recite the United States Pledge of Alligiance, it just seemed wrong to me to have children mindlessly pledging to something they didn't understand or consent to.

    4. Re: Pack up your bags, start over anew. by Tyger-ZA · · Score: 1

      Indoctrination. It's easier when you start them young, just like religion.

      It's just weird that a country would need to do this, as if they might all grow up resentful of their country for some reason.

    5. Re: Pack up your bags, start over anew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they say China brainwashes its children with patriotic garbage.

  18. Smart TVs are dumb by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

    Your display might be good for 10 years. The "smart" part is going to be good for 2. Plugging a smart device into HDMI makes about 1000 times more sense.

    1. Re:Smart TVs are dumb by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2

      My "tv" is a Commodore 1701 monitor that I got in 1984.

      So it's been running for 35 years now.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    2. Re: Smart TVs are dumb by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      And of course you can only watch NTSC composite video, right?

    3. Re:Smart TVs are dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice. I have a couple of 1084S monitors that need flybacks. All my commodore gear runs on 4x3 CCTV LCDs that have svideo, but Id like to fire up a 1084S again.

    4. Re: Smart TVs are dumb by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's right. I get "free cable" from the local cable tv company because I do a few odd jobs for them, so even though I don't really watch tv I have the service and all of the channels. They gave me a new digital box a few months ago when the old one decided to quit and the tech had to spend a bit of time figuring out how to get it to output 480p which is all that my monitor can do.

      But I really just use it occasionally when the cable company phones me to say "check channel 342 to be sure it's working", so my monitor is both little used and quite adequate for my purposes.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    5. Re:Smart TVs are dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plugging a smart device that runs Android TV (like the Xiaomi one) and displays ads?

  19. I'm curious by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me when "pilot program" started to mean "will the people flip the fuck out because we're doing shady shit"?
    Seriously, it's like they'd invent screens small enough to be in the back of our eyelids mostly so we can be advertised to in our sleep...

    --
    Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
    1. Re:I'm curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, it's like they'd invent screens small enough to be in the back of our eyelids mostly so we can be advertised to in our sleep...

      Futurama called it.

  20. Send google a bill for wasting bandwidth and time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figure 10,000 per advertisement payable to the victim of the bandwidth theft by the advertisements.

  21. "Help" whether you like ot not. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    The purpose is to help you discover new apps and contents for your TV.

    What if I don't want help? What if I don't want to be forced to discover new apps and content?
    In any case, 99.9% will probably be crap and the other 0.1% I won't want anyway.

    Your sense of "improved experience" may not be mine.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:"Help" whether you like ot not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you on this, but you have to realize that you're not the customer. You're the product. Your attention and potentially your wallet gets sold to their real customers, which are advertising companies.

  22. Like windows 10 ? by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    You have to disable all the spyware ? In a TV. Fuck no I paid for it. Go away.

    1. Re:Like windows 10 ? by Spamalope · · Score: 1

      You seem to have the mistaken idea that your Sony TV is yours. You only have a limited use license to use it within the terms of service, changeable at any time, dictated by Sony. Ownership is only for corporations...

  23. Dear Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've got a Samsung Smart TV, but it keeps trying to switch me to their online Korean channels. Everytime it starts, by default, its on their channels, trying to show me k-pop or some such. I got sick of it, unplugged it from the internet and use a TV box instead. The TV still switches to its default channels every-time, but they don't get the benefit of forcing me to watch the channels they control, instead it just shows an error message.

    It's not just the TV, Bixby! It pops up, to use it you have to agree to an invasive EULA, to turn it off, you have to start it up, agree to the invasive EULA, then it only turns the button off, not Bixby or the invasive snooping it does. That cost them a smartphone sale on the last upgrade.

    The TV shit will cost them a TV sale on the next upgrade of TVs.

    Dear Samsung, Fuck You.
    An ex-customer.

    1. Re:Dear Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine if it worked like the Internet did in 2001 - on Windows with ActiveX enabled.
      You will turn it on and be presented many offers of HD porn covering all the giant screen, no matter what time is it or who is in the room.
      I hope porn does find a way to defeat the internet giants, I miss porn ad showing up on any website as well.

    2. Re:Dear Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a 32" stupid TV for these very reasons. If I get something bigger, it will be stupid too. If I can find such a beast.

    3. Re:Dear Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have a 40" stupid TV from Samsung

    4. Re:Dear Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too :-)

      I hope stupid TV will last. And if they will not then I can still connect my OSS set-top box to a PC monitor.

    5. Re:Dear Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a commercial display. Tons of inputs, longer lasting and no "smart" features.

    6. Re:Dear Samsung by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      I got sick of it, unplugged it from the internet and use a TV box instead.

      Why in the world did you ever plug it into the internet in the first place? I thought everyone on Slashdot knew better.

      The TV shit will cost them a TV sale on the next upgrade of TVs.

      Dear Samsung, Fuck You. An ex-customer.

      I could be wrong, but it seems that you're missing the point. The most important lesson here isn't "don't buy Samsung" - although that's certainly a good idea - it's "don't buy a smart TV". And if you MUST buy one - I know it's getting harder and harder to buy any other kind - then for Dog's sake never connect it to the Interwebs!

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    7. Re:Dear Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a large Samsung Smart TV, and a cheapsh!t sony DVD player with ethernet and wifi to get online content.
      I'd rather swap-out a cheapsh!t DVD player when it gets polluted than deal with a big polluted TV.
      I've been told that there's no way anything coming-into the DVD player can go through the HDMI connection to permanently affect the TV (i.e. this kind of sponsored advertising malware) - does anyone know otherwise?

    8. Re:Dear Samsung by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I'm contemplating just buying big computer monitors to replace my TVs when they wear out.

      Although computer monitors are increasingly software defined now too :(

    9. Re:Dear Samsung by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      I just bought a Vizio 40" smart tv...and don't have it plugged into my ethernet, and the ad-free AppleTV is.

    10. Re: Dear Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always wanted a sony Android TV to develop apps Just got a S75-900 75" stupid dumb Benq TV. very happy not bought into Android with the Evil company adding adds to TVs now without buyers consent and the risk of bloatware and viruses. Google and Sony should be fined for this. But that money will never reach the buyers ! Technology has gone wrong.

  24. Google is damaging its reputation, AGAIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Google is testing a new "Pilot Program" that puts a row of advertisements on the Android TV home screen.'

    Google is becoming more and more abusive.

    1. Re:Google is damaging its reputation, AGAIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is not damaging its reputation. They are merely confirming their reputation.

    2. Re:Google is damaging its reputation, AGAIN! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Google isn't damaging their reputation. They're damaging the manufacturer reputation. In the end, the average consumer is not going to realize it's Google - they're going to complain to the manufacturer.

    3. Re: Google is damaging its reputation, AGAIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intrusive Marketing should be stopped.

  25. Idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was supposed to be a fucking satire, not a "how to do things now"

  26. TVs with built in IQ tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a nifty feature.

    Now if you were one of the unlucky ones who happen to have failed this test by attaching your television to the Internet ... don't despair. You can retake the test at any time.

  27. Humble suggestion: Submit GDPR request to Sony by lrose · · Score: 1

    If enough of us ask smart TV manufacturers for our data perhaps they will have second thoughts.

    We should however be prepared to pay more for TVs if they do.

    These guys seem to have a decent howto:

    https://www.datarequests.org/blog/sample-letter-gdpr-access-request/

  28. Well, this sucks... by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking about replacing my 16 years old Sony projection TV - which has performed like a champ, but is getting a bit long in the tooth. Sony was the top contender - not only because they have some pretty good offerings, but specifically because they didn't put ads on my screen.

    Now Sony is also out, joining Samsung, LG and Visio. I'm starting to think the issue is actually with Android. Everywhere you get Android, ads will follow sooner or later, like a rash. Not to mention that you have to sign on with Google every bloody time.

    Can we break Google in an Android company that makes and sells the software, and an add conglomerate that can FOAD?

    1. Re: Well, this sucks... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I've got an LG TV and it doesn't show me ads. It's 3 years old but had an update not long ago. It runs WebOS.

    2. Re:Well, this sucks... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      You can still buy any brand you want without worry, although you may still want to stay away from some brands on principle. Just use a third-party media device, and leave your TV as a dumb HDMI terminal. It's a better experience anyhow. For the moment at least, I believe most TVs only use WiFi, not the more expensive cell networks, so they can't connect behind your back without your consent.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re: Well, this sucks... by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Lucky you. I have an LG from 2017 (also runs WebOS) and it shows an ad in app selection screen. It fill just a corner of the screen and it's just a picture so it's easy to ignore but even so it shoudln't be there

    4. Re:Well, this sucks... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      You can get a 1080 projector and a 9 foot screen for a pretty reasonable price if you have room for a setup like that. I recently found a pretty nice sound bar made by a company I've never heard of before (Nakamichi.) If you don't mind about doubling the price of your setup, you can replace the 1080 projector with a 4K and have a theatre-quality home theatre. And setting things up like that seems to avoid all the smart TV fuckery. You need some space and good comfy chairs though.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re: Well, this sucks... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I don't know if yours is the same but I'm not logged into it and I have advertising cookies turned off.

    6. Re: Well, this sucks... by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I really haven't put too much effort into it. I just accepted the default options and got that. I doesn't annoy me that much but the money I paid for the TV should be enough for LG

  29. Are they that powerless? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Sony basically could replace the entire page with a "Deal with it" sunglasses gif, and it would send the same message.

    Sony could also change the home screen to remove the advertising, could they not? I mean, like any mobile phone maker they have their own special "customized experience" on their Android smartphones, are they not able to make the same changed on the Android TV UI?

  30. Custom firmwares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is anyone making custom firmware for any smart TVs, similar to how OpenWRT works for routers? I'd prefer my TV to be 100% dumb, but if that's almost impossible these days then I'd at least prefer to replace the "smart" bit with a kodi distribution. But perhaps TVs are all too locked down and it's impossible.

    1. Re:Custom firmwares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a commercial display. You won't find them in normal TV stores, but look them up on the website of your favorite manufacturer/brand and you'll find plenty. They cost more, but it's worth it. They're built to last a lot longer, they have craploads of inputs on the back, and they don't have any "smart" crap in them whatsoever.

  31. There's been ads on my Android Sony for 3 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a 60 inch Sony Android TV in 2016. It's had ads on it since I got it. Every app would add stuff to the home screen with ads. Ads for Netflix shows, ads for Sony Games, ads for TV shows. I managed to turn them all of turning off notification permission for nearly every app. No idea why Android TV uses notification permission to gate putting ads on the home screen.

    In any case next time I buy a TV I'll just order a monitor from Dell or something like that. It will be more expensive but I don't want a "Smart TV" ever again.

  32. "I told you so" opportunity by Ronin441 · · Score: 1

    I have a theory that a few years from now, somebody will write malware or ransomware that affects a very large number of "smart" TVs -- perhaps all of a particular brand, or all running a particular firmware. On that day, every one of us who never gave their "smart" TV the wifi password will be able to say "I told you so."

  33. Install a PiHole by sosume · · Score: 1

    Install a pihole on your land and laug hat all the suckers that have to watch ads!
    However, it should be illegal to present ads on a device you paid the full price for. Would a class action lawsuit help to curb rhis behavior?

  34. Well then... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Crossing Sony TVs and Android TV devices off the list of products I'd consider buying

  35. This is why I hate smart TVs by mpercy · · Score: 2

    All I want from my TV is several fully capable HDMI ports and stunning display and a trivial way to switch between the inputs (heck my audio receiver probably will be handling that function anyway, so not so many HDMI inputs). Definitely no "smarts". Would likely live without speakers (sound provided by external receiver system) and tuner. I'll attach an AppleTV or Chromecast or even a laptop with my own selection of software when I want "smarts".

  36. Just buy a monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A monitor is like a TV but no android OS, no network connectivity, no tuner, basically just a bare display.

    It costs more despite less tech and smaller size for some odd reason, but it's better than putting up with all that "smart" crap

  37. Charge people OR show them ads. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Not both. If you want to build ads into my TV, you're giving it to me for free, not thousands of dollars.

    1. Re:Charge people OR show them ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Well Google and Sony, you're off my "to buy" list. Good luck.

  38. What's full price, exactly? by tepples · · Score: 1

    However, it should be illegal to present ads on a device you paid the full price for.

    Such a law would have to define "full price" in such a way that a company can't claim that full price is half the company's market cap. What would be, say, the "full price" for a year of Google Search service? I'm interested to read how you might approach writing that law.

  39. Holy fuck that's evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! PIece's of shit!

  40. LIAR!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The purpose is to help you discover new apps and contents for your TV.

    The purpose it to make money for someone else and using your property to do.

    This is like Tesla getting their auto drive to work and then adding an update so your car will go out and work for Tesla's version of Uber when you are not in it.. and 1 update later, when you are in it.

  41. Possibly worse than reported - sniffing HDMI traff by ZoomieDood · · Score: 1

    We have a Sonia Bravia 65" smart tv. I reluctantly attached it to the internet for updates.

    I don't watch much TV, but my wife does.

    I rented 2 DVD's recently, Creed and Avengers: Infinity War.

    My wife is watching her full-blown stream of solved/unsolved murder investigation programs and she starts yelling at me about Jason Momoa's picture and ad promotion of Aquaman that keeps popping up on the entire screen every 5 minutes.

    I have no idea what the heck she's talking about, but I was taking heat for what kept interrupting her tv watching. She was truly annoyed, and I correctly surmised that ad's were being injected, but didn't know by who. But the correlation to "super hero movie ads" and my rare use of the TV for watching action/super hero movies makes me wonder if HDMI traffic from the DVD player is being tracked as well.

    I'm seriously upset about this ad injection crap, and I'm about to try factory refreshing this tv and removing any semblance of internet connection from it.

    Sony, your bed-buddy choice is going to make you some serious enemies that your ad revenue isn't going to replace.

    Stay. Out. of. OUR. TV. Viewing. Choices.

  42. Re:Android TV is a piece of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android TV, not Android. It's a different OS.

    My bad, fixed it.

  43. Infotainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And these devices will receive software updates long after the SmartTv has been abandoned
    And you can upgrade or swap you preferred smarts as you want."

    This is precisely why i refuse to buy a car with an infotainment center in the dash.

    10 years from now itll still be married that pitiful lil quad core computer that hasnt received a software update in 9 years.

  44. Fuck you, Android TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The purpose is to help you discover new apps and contents for your TV."

    Fuck you, I DO NOT want your 'help' to find more shit to watch.

  45. you WILL watch ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Face it

    you WILL watch ads

    or else...

    actually, there is no 'or else'

  46. If you don't like it push back. by Blue23 · · Score: 1

    Any company will push for what bring them money. The time to push back is now while it's still a pilot. Some people with cheap access to lawyers looking for full refunds on their Sony smart TVs because of admitted malware installation. Organized boycotts of the companies. Charges for theft of services of internet access for unwanted ads. I'm sure there's more ideas, which regardless of individual merit have a nuisance factor that will signal to Sony and the others this is not acceptable.

    It is natural for companies to try to make new & increased revenue streams. If it's in a way that you find intrusive you need to be willing to push back otherwise it will happen.

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
  47. sony tv featured in idiocracy movie by urbieta · · Score: 1

    this is the evidence https://pasteboard.co/I8KMamT....

  48. Ads? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you guys not know that if they coiuld make a smart TV that instead of watching you right back, listening in on your private and intimate conversations, learning everything it can about you and your habits to try to tailor and target ads that will be most likely effective in altering and shaping your behavior, subverting your will and getting you to patronize their advertiser,s businesses, ultimately to maximize their profits, could rather just rob you at gunpoint, they would?

  49. Stop buying Sony products and Android TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an older Sony Android TV which is now sort of functional. I simply bought a Firestick to replace the awful interface that kind of works.

    Sony used to be a big player and made quality gear, no longer, they are just a giant turd covered in burnt hair. Just stop buying their products.

  50. What's the problem? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    So what. Sony put an advertisement on their home screen. What's the big deal?
    You're getting updated. What's wrong with that? Nothing's free after all.