Max Planck famously averred that science advances one funeral at a time. Ditto with this - we just have to wait for the dinosaurs in charge to the content companies to die for legal streaming to blossom.
I mean, why is it the case that browsers do not come with a setting to allow users to specify whether or not they want to enable autoplay? Are there any technical reasons why this might a difficult feature to implement?
Is there anything broadcast for free worth watching? Last time I checked, I could only get channels with more ads than content, channels with preachers (and ads) and channels with Spanish soaps (and ads.) Quite frankly, I'd pay NOT to have to watch any of that.
Or might it be because the GUI people have to justify their paychecks? How long has it been since the GUI problem, with the type of hardware generally used, has been solved? 15 or 20 years?
the secret stems in making sure to convey sincerity. It is all too easy to send insincere thank-you emails, that will elicit, if anything, a negative reaction. Just like those commercial letters that we all get every so often, which seem to be addressed specifically to us, to the exclusion of everybody else, but which, of course, aren't.
It is true that duck.go redirects you Google. It is also true that you end up in a page of Google search results, at the top of which is DuckDuck.go. This aside, the problem is that DuckDuck.go is not very good. I used it as my default search engine for two weeks a couple of months ago, and had to reluctantly acknowledge that it is has (it did then) a long way to go to become comparable to Google's. Which sucks big time, for I am sick and tired of Google:-(
On this news, investors reacted as they are wont to do: hysterically. No wonder we have market collapses every so often, with investors reacting like neurotic sheep.
For the most part, the ads I see tend to be the same largely irrelevant junk that I never buy. It's true that I use adblockers galore, and don't get to see so many ads anyway.
Which just shows that you know nothing about football. In schoolyards all over Europe, children play informal football games without referees, where the offside rule is never enforced. The end result is all too often for the children to stay bunched up in front of their respective goals - i.e. a game in which nothing much happens. The offside rule is one the fundamental rules of football.
The soccer dinosaurs doing everything they can to prevent progress. Max Planck claimed that science progresses one funeral at a time. That's probably true of sports as well. Well, at least the repulsive, corrupt Blatter is largely out of the picture.
I never knew exactly what this company was all about. I always wondered though who came up with such an uninspiring name for a company. They might just as well have called themselves Everything-that-Is-Boring-and-Tedious-and-Mindless-and-Uncreative-about-Computing-Is-Us.
Most Americans are I am sure reassured in the knowledge that their military is dependent on Microsoft for its security. Let's invade some country - let's foist a few BSODs on them.
They are also the ones who fill out your phone with bloatware that you can't uninstall, who have penchant for installing and removing apps from your phone without your consent, and for adding a heavy layer of software cruft to Android. But, they are the most explosive devices in the market.
Slashdot Mirror
Max Planck famously averred that science advances one funeral at a time. Ditto with this - we just have to wait for the dinosaurs in charge to the content companies to die for legal streaming to blossom.
I mean, why is it the case that browsers do not come with a setting to allow users to specify whether or not they want to enable autoplay? Are there any technical reasons why this might a difficult feature to implement?
Is there anything broadcast for free worth watching? Last time I checked, I could only get channels with more ads than content, channels with preachers (and ads) and channels with Spanish soaps (and ads.) Quite frankly, I'd pay NOT to have to watch any of that.
Google home page - well okay, that one should be a lot of white space and a search box, I'll give them that one.
I prefer it with a lot of dark space and a search box. Thankfully, there are solutions for this. Imperfect ones, but better than the alternative.
Or might it be because the GUI people have to justify their paychecks? How long has it been since the GUI problem, with the type of hardware generally used, has been solved? 15 or 20 years?
With breakthroughs of this magnitude, Google keeps showing the world what it is capable of.
the secret stems in making sure to convey sincerity. It is all too easy to send insincere thank-you emails, that will elicit, if anything, a negative reaction. Just like those commercial letters that we all get every so often, which seem to be addressed specifically to us, to the exclusion of everybody else, but which, of course, aren't.
I'd bet that in Rome you cannot dig anywhere without stumbling on some archaeological finding.
Coming from Microsoft, it's probably more like Intercal.
A piece of software that fills out a much-needed gap in the Linux world. Thanks, MIcrosoft; we could not expect any less from you.
It is true that duck.go redirects you Google. It is also true that you end up in a page of Google search results, at the top of which is DuckDuck.go. This aside, the problem is that DuckDuck.go is not very good. I used it as my default search engine for two weeks a couple of months ago, and had to reluctantly acknowledge that it is has (it did then) a long way to go to become comparable to Google's. Which sucks big time, for I am sick and tired of Google :-(
Now please stick your Modern Life Services you know where.
Huge middle finger to you, Sinclair. May you rot in hell.
On this news, investors reacted as they are wont to do: hysterically. No wonder we have market collapses every so often, with investors reacting like neurotic sheep.
For the most part, the ads I see tend to be the same largely irrelevant junk that I never buy. It's true that I use adblockers galore, and don't get to see so many ads anyway.
Which just shows that you know nothing about football. In schoolyards all over Europe, children play informal football games without referees, where the offside rule is never enforced. The end result is all too often for the children to stay bunched up in front of their respective goals - i.e. a game in which nothing much happens. The offside rule is one the fundamental rules of football.
The soccer dinosaurs doing everything they can to prevent progress. Max Planck claimed that science progresses one funeral at a time. That's probably true of sports as well. Well, at least the repulsive, corrupt Blatter is largely out of the picture.
Don't forget some enlightened states in the interior.
The much-maligned Itanium remains impervious to all these attacks. Just saying.
I never knew exactly what this company was all about. I always wondered though who came up with such an uninspiring name for a company. They might just as well have called themselves Everything-that-Is-Boring-and-Tedious-and-Mindless-and-Uncreative-about-Computing-Is-Us.
More vaporware. That happens all the time. $2.3B? The idiocy of some is vast.
Most Americans are I am sure reassured in the knowledge that their military is dependent on Microsoft for its security. Let's invade some country - let's foist a few BSODs on them.
They are also the ones who fill out your phone with bloatware that you can't uninstall, who have penchant for installing and removing apps from your phone without your consent, and for adding a heavy layer of software cruft to Android. But, they are the most explosive devices in the market.
It's a worthy conceptual child of PL/1.
A setback for those in the UK keen on establishing a police state.