Supporters of Hillary Clinton, not the Clinton campaign.
And the right wing took that football and ran with it. For years. Hell, Trump hasn't given up on it. He's basically said he's dropping it to get his campaign to move on. Sheriff Joe Arpaio STILL thinks the birth certificate is a fake.
Actually, it's kind of impressive how Trump is taking credit for "ending" the whole birther circus when he was pretty much the only person keeping it alive the past few years. It's like someone opening up a dam, sending water downriver to the nearest town and once it's about to flood, closing up the dam then claiming they saved the town.
How do you know if the game on Steam, matches (exactly) what you got on the CD?
What CD? The only thing included in my retail copy of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided was a piece of paper with a Steam key on it.
Which my review of will no longer be counted apparently.
I bought Fallout 4 and Far Cry Primal from Amazon on Prime Day and got actual CDs in the mail. Surprisingly, the CD versions were slightly cheaper than the digital download versions. I just had to wait 2-3 days to get them.
I get a bad feeling for the transfer just from the list of supporters: Facebook, Google, Twitter, Amazon, Cloudflare and Yahoo. It feels, to me, that they are not doing it for freedom but rather for money. They are going to have services or other means of making money off the transfer where they cannot do it currently.
The problem is the Congressmen trying to block the changeover aren't doing so in the interests of online freedom, but rather in the interests of maintaining control over the internet. Either way it's all about power.
How about demolishing the houses of the families of Palestinians accused of attacking Israelis? Or continuously building heavily fortified settlements in Palestinian territory against international law? Do either of those things count as incitement? I swear, sometimes Israel is like a little kid that keeps poking a beehive with a stick then comes crying when they get stung.
Every Apple keynote from now on should just be presented by Laverne Cox and Drake's character from DeGrassi(post-shooting of course). That way you've got handicapped, minority, female, transgender, and even Canadian covered. Problem solved!
Yes, please, vote for someone like Gary Johnson, who DOESN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT ALEPPO IS.
Christ Almighty.
He's also the only candidate that, when confronted with something he should have known, apologized, said he made a mistake and is only human (ie that he will make mistakes) and would try to limit those mistakes by having competent advisers around him. Trump or Clinton would have just danced around the question to begin with until the interviewer gave up and asked another question. I don't know why Americans expect presidents to be subject matter experts in all facets of domestic and foreign policy. Personally, I trust someone who has the balls to say "I don't know" a lot more than someone who just blusters away when confrontest with their lack of knowledge.
Wonder how much the university spends on football every year (including coach's salaries, stadium and all associated costs)?
Could that money be put to better use?
Yep. All $0 of it. UCSF has exactly 9 sports, none of them football. And of the sports they do have cross country, beach volleyball, and possibly golf(depending on if they have their own course/how much they pay to play on local courses) are fairly low-capital sports. Perhaps you were thinking of Cal or USC?
If you want to shock children about the Vietnam war, there are plenty of other photos to choose from. The summary execution of the Viet Cong partisan is a very good example.
Out of curiosity, why do you find that picture shocking? It was a very common occurrence that is authorized by the Geneva convention and the rules of war.
No it isn't.
The Geneva convension is rather big on the rights of prisoners of war, you could in fact say it is the largest part of it, because it is. I am amazed you could get yourself to even believe that.
Commissioned officers captured in civilian clothing are considered spies and unlawful combatants and therefore not entitled to prisoner of war status. As an unlawful combatant as defined by the Geneva convention, they are eligible for but not guaranteed the rights and protections of a POW. If the status of the combatant is in doubt a "competent tribunal" is required to determine the status, but as the prisoner had already confessed to the act, been found in proximity to evidence of the act (the mass grave), and there were witnesses to the act his status was not in doubt and therefore a trial was not necessary. And summary executions of spies (during open conflict) and other unlawful combatants has been accepted practice for centuries.
The problem is that one of two people - Clinton or Trump - is going to end up as President. While neither of them is particularly likable you have to consider all the judges that they will appoint, all of the cabinet secretaries that they wil appoint, etc. All of those people have a big influence on the direction of the country albeit less obviously that the President.
How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time. The more people vote outside of the 2 main parties, the more exposure the alternative parties get. The more exposure they get, the more people will support them. The more people support them, the better they will poll. If they poll high enough, they get automatic inclusion into presidential debates. The more debate exposure they get, the more people vote for them. When enough people vote for them the alternative parties are eligible for federal campaign funding the next election, which helps them campaign more and gets the cycle repeating again. Best case, they become viable candidates for Senate, rep, or president. Worst case, they garner enough popularity that the main parties shift to include policies supported by the third parties. The system can be beat from within, it just takes a long time and requires a lot of help.
Part of me perversely hopes you Trump fans get what you want. Because you're not going to get what you think you're getting, and it mildly bugs me that you are all so fucking stupid.
The problem is that when all the Trump supporters get their comeuppance, those of us who saw through the act get punished as well.
If you want to shock children about the Vietnam war, there are plenty of other photos to choose from. The summary execution of the Viet Cong partisan is a very good example.
Out of curiosity, why do you find that picture shocking? It was a very common occurrence that is authorized by the Geneva convention and the rules of war. He wasn't even a partisan, he was an NVA officer captured in civilian clothes near a mass grave and who admitted to carrying out the killings. Did you know the photographer that took the picture even regretted how the image was twisted into an anti-war icon because the photo didn't convey the circumstances surrounding the execution.
Personally, as someone with a history degree, and who as a child reread multiple times a (I believe Time) book set on Vietnam in their elementary school library, I found the image of the protesting monk burning himself to death to be much more shocking and powerful than the execution photo.
Yes, release it all. In fact, create a law mandating it for candidates so we don't have to go through this particular flavor of mud-slinging every four years.
That said, Hillary has already proven her capability to destroy critical information, and the LAST word you could ever use to describe any punishment that has come from that is "fair", so I can only imagine what kind of colored "history" would ever be made public.
Couldn't be any more colored than Trump's "healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency" letter and "astonishingly excellent" laboratory results. But I agree, all health and tax records for final presidential candidates should be released by law as a requirement for candidacy elligibility, and the FEC should have accountants and medical doctors on staff to do automatic reviews and audits of those documents.
This is why psychiatrists/psychologists are not allowed to comment on the health of people who are not directly under their care. If you don't know what is going, you can't make a reasonable assessment of the subject's health. Doctors who have not reviewed the patient's medical file and made an examination of the subject should shut up because they do not have all of the information needed to make an accurate assessment.
This does not dismiss the one thing that needs to happen; release the medical records. That is a way that any qualified MD can make at least an initial assessment of someone's health and formulate and educated opinion, particularly in recommending her capability to hold a demanding job for the next four years. THAT is what is truly in question here; her capability to do an important job for quite a long time.
If she had merely caught the common cold 12 times in the last 2 years, I could understand people demanding only an opinion from someone who has directly examined her. However, that is far from reality, even with her medical history remaining somewhat private.
I say she should agree to release her medical records when Trump agrees to release his tax returns. Fair trade, right?
"The association is generally recognized as politically conservative or ultra-conservative, and its publication advocates a range of scientifically discredited theories, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast"cancer, and that there are links between autism and vaccinations."
Well that explains that.
How about addressing what they said instead of calling them dickheads because you're a liberal and don't like half of your own countrymen?
All he did was quote Wikipedia which said that the majority of the opinions expressed by the AASP are both scientifically and medically unfounded; implying that the findings of this survey should be taken with a grain of salt as those participating in the survey are self-selected to have a negative bias towards Clinton's candidacy. Your response and the apparent outrage contained within it indicates a certain amount of projection, perhaps because you also adhere to some of those beliefs outlined within the quote? The hostility evident in your response definitely correlates with the hostility regularly seen in staunch Trump supporters as well.
Why not wait for the dust to settle a little before rushing this story out?
Because unlike our posts the summaries can be updated. Hell, most news websites do the same thing for running current events: get the story started then update it as more information is released.
I went to a rural Baptist university. A dry campus in a dry town (the one sports bar in town could only serve beer and wine). We were going to parties on campus and getting drunk pretty much every weekend after our football games. Hell, I never even drank until I went to that school. I don't see Stanford being very successful.
The Irish subsidiary is (supposedly) the largest tax payer in Ireland. They have roughly 5,000 employees and are growing in Ireland.
They certainly will be once they pay back $14.5 billion in back taxes. In any case, say they are reporting $100 billion in profit in Ireland. At the rate of.005% that still $500 million in taxes paid. With the volume of sales and cash Apple has, it's easy for them to be one of the highest taxpayers in Ireland even with their ridiculously low rate.
"Profits made in Ireland" "profit due to sales in EU" are all really meaningless. Apple A sells something to Apple B. It can price it such that A makes 100% of the profit or vice versa or any percentage it chooses. We do not want governments to enact laws, regulation about these internal details. Enforcement will be difficult, and compliance will be too onerous to the companies.
Yes, we do. Enforcement and compliance is easy: Apple A (in the US) and Apple B (Ireland) are both divisions of the world-wide Apple corporation. Apple A does the design work and Apple B owns necessary patents, trademarks, etc. Apple A just paid $10 billion to license the "Apple" name from Apple B for the year. Congratulations, Apple A just imported a good valued at $10 billion, now pay a duty of 30% (since it's imported from Ireland which is a known tax haven), for a total of $3 billion.
Slashdot Mirror
Supporters of Hillary Clinton, not the Clinton campaign.
And the right wing took that football and ran with it. For years. Hell, Trump hasn't given up on it. He's basically said he's dropping it to get his campaign to move on. Sheriff Joe Arpaio STILL thinks the birth certificate is a fake.
Actually, it's kind of impressive how Trump is taking credit for "ending" the whole birther circus when he was pretty much the only person keeping it alive the past few years. It's like someone opening up a dam, sending water downriver to the nearest town and once it's about to flood, closing up the dam then claiming they saved the town.
The robots have begun to steal weapons. It's only a matter of time before the uprising starts.
If $600 is now referred to as a "plenty", what would the $9,100 be?
Whenever I think of Tesla drivers complaining about the Autopilot, I think of this(sorry, couldn't find the actual clip)
Thank god they aren't using Saints Row or we'll have AI robots running around using dildo bats.
How do you know if the game on Steam, matches (exactly) what you got on the CD?
What CD? The only thing included in my retail copy of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided was a piece of paper with a Steam key on it. Which my review of will no longer be counted apparently.
I bought Fallout 4 and Far Cry Primal from Amazon on Prime Day and got actual CDs in the mail. Surprisingly, the CD versions were slightly cheaper than the digital download versions. I just had to wait 2-3 days to get them.
I get a bad feeling for the transfer just from the list of supporters: Facebook, Google, Twitter, Amazon, Cloudflare and Yahoo. It feels, to me, that they are not doing it for freedom but rather for money. They are going to have services or other means of making money off the transfer where they cannot do it currently.
The problem is the Congressmen trying to block the changeover aren't doing so in the interests of online freedom, but rather in the interests of maintaining control over the internet. Either way it's all about power.
How about demolishing the houses of the families of Palestinians accused of attacking Israelis? Or continuously building heavily fortified settlements in Palestinian territory against international law? Do either of those things count as incitement? I swear, sometimes Israel is like a little kid that keeps poking a beehive with a stick then comes crying when they get stung.
Every Apple keynote from now on should just be presented by Laverne Cox and Drake's character from DeGrassi(post-shooting of course). That way you've got handicapped, minority, female, transgender, and even Canadian covered. Problem solved!
Yes, please, vote for someone like Gary Johnson, who DOESN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT ALEPPO IS.
Christ Almighty.
He's also the only candidate that, when confronted with something he should have known, apologized, said he made a mistake and is only human (ie that he will make mistakes) and would try to limit those mistakes by having competent advisers around him. Trump or Clinton would have just danced around the question to begin with until the interviewer gave up and asked another question. I don't know why Americans expect presidents to be subject matter experts in all facets of domestic and foreign policy. Personally, I trust someone who has the balls to say "I don't know" a lot more than someone who just blusters away when confrontest with their lack of knowledge.
Wonder how much the university spends on football every year (including coach's salaries, stadium and all associated costs)?
Could that money be put to better use?
Yep. All $0 of it. UCSF has exactly 9 sports, none of them football. And of the sports they do have cross country, beach volleyball, and possibly golf(depending on if they have their own course/how much they pay to play on local courses) are fairly low-capital sports. Perhaps you were thinking of Cal or USC?
If you want to shock children about the Vietnam war, there are plenty of other photos to choose from. The summary execution of the Viet Cong partisan is a very good example.
Out of curiosity, why do you find that picture shocking? It was a very common occurrence that is authorized by the Geneva convention and the rules of war.
No it isn't.
The Geneva convension is rather big on the rights of prisoners of war, you could in fact say it is the largest part of it, because it is. I am amazed you could get yourself to even believe that.
Commissioned officers captured in civilian clothing are considered spies and unlawful combatants and therefore not entitled to prisoner of war status. As an unlawful combatant as defined by the Geneva convention, they are eligible for but not guaranteed the rights and protections of a POW. If the status of the combatant is in doubt a "competent tribunal" is required to determine the status, but as the prisoner had already confessed to the act, been found in proximity to evidence of the act (the mass grave), and there were witnesses to the act his status was not in doubt and therefore a trial was not necessary. And summary executions of spies (during open conflict) and other unlawful combatants has been accepted practice for centuries.
The problem is that one of two people - Clinton or Trump - is going to end up as President. While neither of them is particularly likable you have to consider all the judges that they will appoint, all of the cabinet secretaries that they wil appoint, etc. All of those people have a big influence on the direction of the country albeit less obviously that the President.
How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time. The more people vote outside of the 2 main parties, the more exposure the alternative parties get. The more exposure they get, the more people will support them. The more people support them, the better they will poll. If they poll high enough, they get automatic inclusion into presidential debates. The more debate exposure they get, the more people vote for them. When enough people vote for them the alternative parties are eligible for federal campaign funding the next election, which helps them campaign more and gets the cycle repeating again. Best case, they become viable candidates for Senate, rep, or president. Worst case, they garner enough popularity that the main parties shift to include policies supported by the third parties. The system can be beat from within, it just takes a long time and requires a lot of help.
Part of me perversely hopes you Trump fans get what you want. Because you're not going to get what you think you're getting, and it mildly bugs me that you are all so fucking stupid.
The problem is that when all the Trump supporters get their comeuppance, those of us who saw through the act get punished as well.
If you want to shock children about the Vietnam war, there are plenty of other photos to choose from. The summary execution of the Viet Cong partisan is a very good example.
Out of curiosity, why do you find that picture shocking? It was a very common occurrence that is authorized by the Geneva convention and the rules of war. He wasn't even a partisan, he was an NVA officer captured in civilian clothes near a mass grave and who admitted to carrying out the killings. Did you know the photographer that took the picture even regretted how the image was twisted into an anti-war icon because the photo didn't convey the circumstances surrounding the execution.
Personally, as someone with a history degree, and who as a child reread multiple times a (I believe Time) book set on Vietnam in their elementary school library, I found the image of the protesting monk burning himself to death to be much more shocking and powerful than the execution photo.
Yes, lets all diagnose someone via an OPEN INTERNET SURVEY.
The only valid internet diagnose is cancer, so they are not even doing that right.
After watching every season of House I can tell you one thing though: it's never lupus.
Seems to be the case. I saw the other day Trump suggested that the military should have its own courts. The guy's a fucking genius.
He has also hinted at a desire to purge the top brass of the American military (4th paragraph from the bottom).
Yes, release it all. In fact, create a law mandating it for candidates so we don't have to go through this particular flavor of mud-slinging every four years.
That said, Hillary has already proven her capability to destroy critical information, and the LAST word you could ever use to describe any punishment that has come from that is "fair", so I can only imagine what kind of colored "history" would ever be made public.
Couldn't be any more colored than Trump's "healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency" letter and "astonishingly excellent" laboratory results. But I agree, all health and tax records for final presidential candidates should be released by law as a requirement for candidacy elligibility, and the FEC should have accountants and medical doctors on staff to do automatic reviews and audits of those documents.
This is why psychiatrists/psychologists are not allowed to comment on the health of people who are not directly under their care. If you don't know what is going, you can't make a reasonable assessment of the subject's health. Doctors who have not reviewed the patient's medical file and made an examination of the subject should shut up because they do not have all of the information needed to make an accurate assessment.
This does not dismiss the one thing that needs to happen; release the medical records. That is a way that any qualified MD can make at least an initial assessment of someone's health and formulate and educated opinion, particularly in recommending her capability to hold a demanding job for the next four years. THAT is what is truly in question here; her capability to do an important job for quite a long time.
If she had merely caught the common cold 12 times in the last 2 years, I could understand people demanding only an opinion from someone who has directly examined her. However, that is far from reality, even with her medical history remaining somewhat private.
I say she should agree to release her medical records when Trump agrees to release his tax returns. Fair trade, right?
From Wikipedia.
"The association is generally recognized as politically conservative or ultra-conservative, and its publication advocates a range of scientifically discredited theories, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast"cancer, and that there are links between autism and vaccinations."
Well that explains that.
How about addressing what they said instead of calling them dickheads because you're a liberal and don't like half of your own countrymen?
All he did was quote Wikipedia which said that the majority of the opinions expressed by the AASP are both scientifically and medically unfounded; implying that the findings of this survey should be taken with a grain of salt as those participating in the survey are self-selected to have a negative bias towards Clinton's candidacy. Your response and the apparent outrage contained within it indicates a certain amount of projection, perhaps because you also adhere to some of those beliefs outlined within the quote? The hostility evident in your response definitely correlates with the hostility regularly seen in staunch Trump supporters as well.
Why not wait for the dust to settle a little before rushing this story out?
Because unlike our posts the summaries can be updated. Hell, most news websites do the same thing for running current events: get the story started then update it as more information is released.
I went to a rural Baptist university. A dry campus in a dry town (the one sports bar in town could only serve beer and wine). We were going to parties on campus and getting drunk pretty much every weekend after our football games. Hell, I never even drank until I went to that school. I don't see Stanford being very successful.
I can see the testing questions now:
How satisfied were you with the intensity of the explosion?
On a scale of 1 to 3, what degree would you say your burns are?
How much would you have to dislike a person before you would consider getting them this product as a gift?
Gotta make sure the customers are getting quality products after all!
The Irish subsidiary is (supposedly) the largest tax payer in Ireland. They have roughly 5,000 employees and are growing in Ireland.
They certainly will be once they pay back $14.5 billion in back taxes. In any case, say they are reporting $100 billion in profit in Ireland. At the rate of .005% that still $500 million in taxes paid. With the volume of sales and cash Apple has, it's easy for them to be one of the highest taxpayers in Ireland even with their ridiculously low rate.
"Profits made in Ireland" "profit due to sales in EU" are all really meaningless. Apple A sells something to Apple B. It can price it such that A makes 100% of the profit or vice versa or any percentage it chooses. We do not want governments to enact laws, regulation about these internal details. Enforcement will be difficult, and compliance will be too onerous to the companies.
Yes, we do. Enforcement and compliance is easy: Apple A (in the US) and Apple B (Ireland) are both divisions of the world-wide Apple corporation. Apple A does the design work and Apple B owns necessary patents, trademarks, etc. Apple A just paid $10 billion to license the "Apple" name from Apple B for the year. Congratulations, Apple A just imported a good valued at $10 billion, now pay a duty of 30% (since it's imported from Ireland which is a known tax haven), for a total of $3 billion.