The majority of google hits for the phrase are in reference to this paper. Of the remaining hundred or so, most use the term in quotes without actually iving a definition... All I've been able to determine is that y is qunatal & e is not. Spectacular!
I'm curious about the logic of the pro wi-fi anti-cell folks here. Several have hinted at this stance, but I've not seen much justification. If you only have wi-fi, aren't the tweens just going to use skype or some other internet telephony? Or will the wi-fi be throttled to say 56k, and only be adequate for web-surfing?
*Some* people like to talk, *some* people like to be heard, and *some* people like to listen. These people should recognize that not everyone fits into all of these categories. Nor do they apply all of the time. http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200303/rauch/
There are plenty of public spaces where there is a reasonable expectation of little noise (libraries, movie theaters, plays, public meetings, most kinds of stores) and this expectation has always been implicit for airplanes (the alternative was not an option). It's not unreasonable to expect that the status quo to persist, particularly when one is thrown in with a random mix of strangers for an extended period of time. Talk all you fucking want on a 40 minute commuter shuttle (though I feel sorry for your inability to be with yourself that long), but by gum you better respect the varying activities of others (and the incumbent conditions) on a 6 hour flight.
Libraries? Plays? Speeches? City council meetings? Supermarkets? Book stores? We should expect to have our ear drums rattled by the constant din of vapid drivel simply because we don't want to sit at home? Bullshit.
You need to think non-conventionally, the Titanic was stupid. Hydrofoils and catamarans are the way to go. And don't forget to incorporate wind-assist technologies to shave even more time off when possible. Although some people might not like the fuzzy itenerary this would create, you could reap the benefits and keep a consistent schedule by simply using the wind to reduce energy, and therefore cost, to maintain constant speed.
Different phone systems use different frequencies, and some have been shown to most definitely have an adverse impact on equipment. Really though, this is a case where an American agency is applying the precautionary priniciple (in the face of the expense and infeasibility of testing) and a European agency is throwing caution to the wind. Of course it's usually the other way around.
Engineered transgenic animals where a select gene is purposefully inserted for the benefits of its expression IS NOT THE SAME THING as cross-breeding random beasts. All of your "crazy" examples for point three are legitmate. I mean hell, you forget insulin production by yeast. Or would you rather we go back to slaughtering sheep for that?
And that includes 1-click, etc. BofA has a patent on "Keep the Change," an admittedly clever idea, and so Wachovia has to opt for the less user-friendly: take a dollar on every transaction. (Actually, they could presumably go for the "X% of the transaction value")
I suspect that this is something they'd be likely to lose in court. Afterall, the court took Xerox's patent on photocopying away, even though there was more effort in development and no trolling nor as obvious wide-ranging impacts, just the monopolization intended by the system.
This is silly. Besides, the problems inherent every random schlub mandating their pet topic be covered in the school curriculum, we already have much broader legislation addressing this: NEEA of 1990
You get a GUI with a window for the application you launched. If that happens to be a terminal, you can even launch more programs. All the wm does it let you select which window in the stack you wish to play with.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah see, thing is, all that useless vegetable matter is kinda supposed to be compost...
What about Canada? You're just as guilty of centricism. What about Mexico, Panama, Honduras...
The majority of google hits for the phrase are in reference to this paper.
Of the remaining hundred or so, most use the term in quotes without actually
iving a definition... All I've been able to determine is that y is qunatal &
e is not. Spectacular!
They produced a model to analyze *vocalization* not speech.
Saying that a gorilla, dog, or Neanderthal speaks implies connotes certain things.
That depends on where you live, sales tax and use tax are different things and nobody has'em.
I'm curious about the logic of the pro wi-fi anti-cell folks here.
Several have hinted at this stance, but I've not seen much justification.
If you only have wi-fi, aren't the tweens just going to use skype
or some other internet telephony? Or will the wi-fi be throttled
to say 56k, and only be adequate for web-surfing?
Based on the context, stats given, I think the submitter meant prevalent.
*Some* people like to talk, *some* people like to be heard, and *some* people like to listen.
These people should recognize that not everyone fits into all of these categories. Nor do they
apply all of the time. http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200303/rauch/
There are plenty of public spaces where there is a reasonable expectation of little noise
(libraries, movie theaters, plays, public meetings, most kinds of stores) and this expectation
has always been implicit for airplanes (the alternative was not an option). It's not unreasonable
to expect that the status quo to persist, particularly when one is thrown in with a random mix
of strangers for an extended period of time. Talk all you fucking want on a 40 minute commuter
shuttle (though I feel sorry for your inability to be with yourself that long), but by gum you
better respect the varying activities of others (and the incumbent conditions) on a 6 hour flight.
Libraries? Plays? Speeches? City council meetings? Supermarkets? Book stores?
We should expect to have our ear drums rattled by the constant din of vapid
drivel simply because we don't want to sit at home? Bullshit.
You need to think non-conventionally, the Titanic was stupid. Hydrofoils and catamarans are the way to go.
And don't forget to incorporate wind-assist technologies to shave even more time off when possible. Although
some people might not like the fuzzy itenerary this would create, you could reap the benefits and keep a
consistent schedule by simply using the wind to reduce energy, and therefore cost, to maintain constant speed.
Different phone systems use different frequencies, and some have been shown to most definitely have an adverse
impact on equipment. Really though, this is a case where an American agency is applying the precautionary
priniciple (in the face of the expense and infeasibility of testing) and a European agency is throwing caution
to the wind. Of course it's usually the other way around.
+1 Informative
Or they could do what everybody else on the planet does: noreply@${localdomain}
Engineered transgenic animals where a select gene is purposefully inserted for the benefits of its expression
IS NOT THE SAME THING as cross-breeding random beasts. All of your "crazy" examples for point three are legitmate.
I mean hell, you forget insulin production by yeast. Or would you rather we go back to slaughtering sheep for that?
Donald Duck in Mathmagic Land
Also of relevance:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jansky
I suspect smebody at SciAm crunched their numbers wrong, here are some real stats: http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/evla/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_destruction
a) Greenspan is just parroting prior thinkers
b) it's not really about capitali$m
Why can't we see all tags for articles? I want to see how many other people were tempted to label this "stophittingyourself"
And that includes 1-click, etc. BofA has a patent on "Keep the Change," an admittedly clever idea,
and so Wachovia has to opt for the less user-friendly: take a dollar on every transaction. (Actually,
they could presumably go for the "X% of the transaction value")
I suspect that this is something they'd be likely to lose in court. Afterall, the court took Xerox's patent on
photocopying away, even though there was more effort in development and no trolling nor as obvious wide-ranging
impacts, just the monopolization intended by the system.
This is silly. Besides, the problems inherent every random schlub mandating their pet topic be covered in the school
curriculum, we already have much broader legislation addressing this: NEEA of 1990
Passing on the right is also illegal here. :-P
And in case you haven't noticed, we'll be having to answer to "papers please" soon enough as it is
You get a GUI with a window for the application you launched. If that happens to be a terminal,
you can even launch more programs. All the wm does it let you select which window in the stack
you wish to play with.
There is no linux version of X. Do you mean XFree86?