Neonazis and pedophiles would also like to be treated like normal citizens, because that "exposure" encourages the spread of their inclinations throughout the population, since groups tend to be more uniform than diverse. Not saying that gays are equivalent to criminals, but the claim that their influence is healthy is far-fetched.
You certainly find things like market crashes in economics, and "scarcity" can also mean mass starvation. Efficient is not the same thing as plentiful.
I would expect the kid did attack him, not as not to start the aggression but he was standing his own grown to protect himself if possible.
How much provocation would it take for you to get in a fight with a guy while walking on the street? He'd have to be saying some nasty shit about your mom, because he's not going to kidnap you and you're not carrying enough money to bleed for. Seems more like Martin was more concerned with "reputation".
"We don't need you to do that" is not clearly saying "NOT" to follow. Seems like the dispatcher is trained to be involved as little as possible. Even when Zimmerman reports that a drugged-out guy is walking towards him and reaching into his waistband the dispatcher just waits on the line to see if the caller goes down so that he can dispatch an ambulance.
Zimmerman grabbed his gun, jumped out of his car, and chased down a random stranger who was just walking down the street.
Kind of a willful misrepresentation, because in that case the situation would have ended well. Even a teenage punk is not going to tussle with a man with a gun, so either the athlete would have raced away or he would have frozen and found out that it wasn't some rival gang member come to avenge the rape of his little sister but a "concerned citizen".
Obviously $0 is an exaggeration, but a decrease in value is a real loss of wealth. And living next to a turbine exposes you to persistent unwanted noise which is maddening and stresses the body. Yes, coal plants are worse, but for the negative effect on an individual level to be equivalent you'd have to be choking on the emissions and stung by the acid rain.
Seems like it would be easier for these things to be targeted. When your 10-year-old daughter has an HD webcam, an iphone, and the keys to your car, worrying about what she is typing is a little naive...
If he wanted to keep the kid in sight yet not tip him off that the police were coming, I could see how he might have been forced into creepy behavior. Martin's only recourse is call the cops to investigate the "stalker's" motives, however. Even if someone annoys or threatens you, you are still the instigator if you strike them first. (90% of guys locked up for domestic violence have found this out the hard way). Of course if it was Zimmerman who first tried to grab the kid to make a "citizen's arrest"...
Right, if Martin killed Zimmerman after he drew his weapon he would have been justified. In states that don't recognize a strong right to self-defense people attacked by multiple assailants or even in their own homes are routinely prosecuted and often convicted because they didn't escape hard enough. And most of the people being stripped of their right to self-defense are black (drug dealers).
None of those three items are laws, the breaking of which would be chargeable offenses. Carrying the gun was legal, as was observing someone in public (or a private neighborhood which Zimmerman was responsible for securing). If Martin attacked him, he was the first and only person who broke a law.
Zimmerman was a ranking member of the "neighborhood watch", and should eligible for a kind of "sovereign immunity" like cops have when they blast away at unarmed "threats".
Criminalizing thought or more thoroughly investigating suspicious people will cost many billions of dollars. The deaths of a few children are just not that important in terms of money, let alone in terms of liberty.
Sounds like an excuse. Kind of untestable though, since gender difference will always be grounds for claiming bias, and when one group becomes dominant the other will be considered incapable. If men disappeared from management, however, a prejudice that there is "something wrong" with them (as is used to explain the decline in men getting degrees) will be politically correct.
Taking away the freedom of everyone is still taking away freedom. Prohibiting burkas, headscarves, yarmulkes, along with berets and balaclavas or whatever, is enforced conformity to the state religion of Europe: Socialism.
expecting your files to continue to be available when you're storing them with someone known for their access to files to which people aren't supposed to have access.
Logical.
Both indicate that Megaupload was a great place to store your files if you can assume a just application of law. Of course under a fascist axis of power it does turn out to be a bad idea. Best to store all your important data with the NSA.
Someone getting paid millions of dollars should damn well look ideal. If there is a problem with society it's the conservatism that keeps grannies like Megan Fox around instead of giving new talent a chance to fulfill their potential.
I'd prefer no sales tax at all, since it's a regressive tax, but if we're going to have one, it should be applied everywhere.
If not no tax then lots of tax? That's some strange logic. Maybe you also think that uniform taxation means a lower and fairer rate, but it doesn't work that way. My state raised sales tax by 25% ("because of inflation" "because other states are doing it" "for the children") and ended up with a budget surplus to blow on vanity projects and contractor handouts, while reducing services and raising fees.
Neonazis and pedophiles would also like to be treated like normal citizens, because that "exposure" encourages the spread of their inclinations throughout the population, since groups tend to be more uniform than diverse. Not saying that gays are equivalent to criminals, but the claim that their influence is healthy is far-fetched.
You certainly find things like market crashes in economics, and "scarcity" can also mean mass starvation. Efficient is not the same thing as plentiful.
I would expect the kid did attack him, not as not to start the aggression but he was standing his own grown to protect himself if possible.
How much provocation would it take for you to get in a fight with a guy while walking on the street? He'd have to be saying some nasty shit about your mom, because he's not going to kidnap you and you're not carrying enough money to bleed for. Seems more like Martin was more concerned with "reputation".
"We don't need you to do that" is not clearly saying "NOT" to follow. Seems like the dispatcher is trained to be involved as little as possible. Even when Zimmerman reports that a drugged-out guy is walking towards him and reaching into his waistband the dispatcher just waits on the line to see if the caller goes down so that he can dispatch an ambulance.
Zimmerman grabbed his gun, jumped out of his car, and chased down a random stranger who was just walking down the street.
Kind of a willful misrepresentation, because in that case the situation would have ended well. Even a teenage punk is not going to tussle with a man with a gun, so either the athlete would have raced away or he would have frozen and found out that it wasn't some rival gang member come to avenge the rape of his little sister but a "concerned citizen".
Obviously $0 is an exaggeration, but a decrease in value is a real loss of wealth. And living next to a turbine exposes you to persistent unwanted noise which is maddening and stresses the body. Yes, coal plants are worse, but for the negative effect on an individual level to be equivalent you'd have to be choking on the emissions and stung by the acid rain.
cam session, phonecall, pics, meetings, whatever
Seems like it would be easier for these things to be targeted. When your 10-year-old daughter has an HD webcam, an iphone, and the keys to your car, worrying about what she is typing is a little naive...
They are pretty similar, since the only purpose of the digital exams may be your doctor's amusement
If he wanted to keep the kid in sight yet not tip him off that the police were coming, I could see how he might have been forced into creepy behavior. Martin's only recourse is call the cops to investigate the "stalker's" motives, however. Even if someone annoys or threatens you, you are still the instigator if you strike them first. (90% of guys locked up for domestic violence have found this out the hard way). Of course if it was Zimmerman who first tried to grab the kid to make a "citizen's arrest"...
Right, if Martin killed Zimmerman after he drew his weapon he would have been justified. In states that don't recognize a strong right to self-defense people attacked by multiple assailants or even in their own homes are routinely prosecuted and often convicted because they didn't escape hard enough. And most of the people being stripped of their right to self-defense are black (drug dealers).
Obviously authorized visitors should be issued picture ID badges in Neighborhood Watch Communities.
Your claim is absurd, but you might consider that Zimmerman was a semi-official security guard for the gated community.
What's next, arresting a woman who shoots a rapist because she was wearing skimpy clothing?
None of those three items are laws, the breaking of which would be chargeable offenses. Carrying the gun was legal, as was observing someone in public (or a private neighborhood which Zimmerman was responsible for securing). If Martin attacked him, he was the first and only person who broke a law.
Zimmerman was a ranking member of the "neighborhood watch", and should eligible for a kind of "sovereign immunity" like cops have when they blast away at unarmed "threats".
But in that case the old wife gets your house and shed...
Kind of the price of invading someone else's home. This guy's ancestors were living in French territory, and he was born in the motherland.
Criminalizing thought or more thoroughly investigating suspicious people will cost many billions of dollars. The deaths of a few children are just not that important in terms of money, let alone in terms of liberty.
Sounds like an excuse. Kind of untestable though, since gender difference will always be grounds for claiming bias, and when one group becomes dominant the other will be considered incapable. If men disappeared from management, however, a prejudice that there is "something wrong" with them (as is used to explain the decline in men getting degrees) will be politically correct.
Take the headgear off the cow and you basically have a sheep.
Taking away the freedom of everyone is still taking away freedom. Prohibiting burkas, headscarves, yarmulkes, along with berets and balaclavas or whatever, is enforced conformity to the state religion of Europe: Socialism.
it's a fucking illegal...If it can be shown
Logical.
expecting your files to continue to be available when you're storing them with someone known for their access to files to which people aren't supposed to have access.
Logical.
Both indicate that Megaupload was a great place to store your files if you can assume a just application of law. Of course under a fascist axis of power it does turn out to be a bad idea. Best to store all your important data with the NSA.
If the government wanted to it wouldn't need a law to cut off transfers to Manning.
Someone getting paid millions of dollars should damn well look ideal. If there is a problem with society it's the conservatism that keeps grannies like Megan Fox around instead of giving new talent a chance to fulfill their potential.
I'd prefer no sales tax at all, since it's a regressive tax, but if we're going to have one, it should be applied everywhere.
If not no tax then lots of tax? That's some strange logic. Maybe you also think that uniform taxation means a lower and fairer rate, but it doesn't work that way. My state raised sales tax by 25% ("because of inflation" "because other states are doing it" "for the children") and ended up with a budget surplus to blow on vanity projects and contractor handouts, while reducing services and raising fees.