I hope I'm getting the sarcastic vibe correctly from your post! It's quite funny how Space Nutters distort reality and lie about history when it comes to space. How many space lunatics have you heard repeat the lie that Teflon was invented by NASA? Hmm, even though Teflon was discovered by accident in 1938 and was already used in the Manhattan Project? Oh the lies and distortions necessary to justify space "exploration".
From someone on the Manhattan project: During the War, it was easier to get gold than Teflon.
Back in the day, there was a gizmo in Kansas City Railroad Station that transmitted position from a pen to a remote pen via telephone. One could exchange signatures and short notes.
That's not the bit that scares me the most. The bit that scares me the most is that anyone with an ounce of skill in reverse engineering can identify the security flaws used, and anyone with an ounce of skill in assembly can disassemble Stuxnet, alter what it targets, and launch the new variant.
By banning the talk, the DHS is preventing US industries from protecting themselves against economic warfare. Plenty of nations (China and Russia especially) are investing in cyber-warfare. There's plenty of amateurs out there with axes (albeit often as delusionary as the DHS') to grind. It is simply not excusable for the US to be placed in this kind of danger.
Patent sugar, sue the sugar manufacturers for infringement, destroy the sugar industry. When sugar is only available in our pills, charge $200 for a box of them. Shut down production after 5 years, and lock up the patents for the next 200 years. Implement worldwide. Profit! Sugar is gone.
If it was that simple then it would fail to account for the fact that diabetics (who go around with high blood sugar levels almost all the time) are more prone to all types of infection than non diabetics.
With diabetes one could have a triple blind study.
It's only bad for "the rest of us" if by "the rest of us" you mean "Windows users, the vast majority of computer users" because Microsoft will inevitably drag its feet in fixing its vulnerabilities (if it is even able to fix them) even though it now has a direct window into how Windows machines are being attacked.
That really suggests that, rather than be upset about the lack of open sources, people should be concerned as to why Google felt it reasonable to release software they're reluctant to release sources to because they're embarrassed.
Would embarrassing source lead to embarrassing object code: either hard to maintain, buggy, or with security holes?
If you're using a free service, you should expect that if someone comes along and offers to buy your username, they'll get it. I don't know why this would be surprising.
How about paying an ISP for an email account and having spamers use your username freely?
Slashdot Mirror
If they made off with enough bitcoin to damage the economy, then of course it would be a warlike gesture or even an atrocity.
I hope I'm getting the sarcastic vibe correctly from your post! It's quite funny how Space Nutters distort reality and lie about history when it comes to space. How many space lunatics have you heard repeat the lie that Teflon was invented by NASA? Hmm, even though Teflon was discovered by accident in 1938 and was already used in the Manhattan Project? Oh the lies and distortions necessary to justify space "exploration".
From someone on the Manhattan project: During the War, it was easier to get gold than Teflon.
France has stated that it will open several new nuclear reactors before 2022, and will increase the amount of power that it exports to Germany.
Not if Germany stops nuclear power by 2022.
Burning huge amounts of lignite. like they do now.
Die Grünen, nien danke.
Atomkraft, nein danke
FTFY just saying.
"PROTECT GOVERNMENT Act" sounds like the next step then, censoring material that could hurt the current government.
s/GOVERNMENT/American Social Safety/
Here's an idea, let's not connect it to the Internet.
How else will they be able to outsource the monitoring to India?
That adds a whole new dimension to help desks.
You fool! The more you polish it, the more it reverses the polarity!
That is Al hats, not genuine Sn hats.
I want to convert all of my skin directly into a brain.
Do not sit on the neural network.
Back in the day, there was a gizmo in Kansas City Railroad Station that transmitted position from a pen to a remote pen via telephone. One could exchange signatures and short notes.
Of course fax has been around for a long time.
--
Read My Sig.
What the hell is this autopen machine? Wouldn't this amount to some sort of forgery, at the very least?
Just think. President Kennedy could have signed it.
But when I ingest caffeine it just makes my pee smell like coffee.
Unless of course its tea.
well, at least my dog is finally getting enough cheese.
That's no cheese or moon.
--
Freshness Date: Use by 05/21/11.
I'd love to see some hard numbers on what an average malware author nets a month.
Ask either that answer to that or to a question for which you know the answer. The data can be separated.
That's not the bit that scares me the most. The bit that scares me the most is that anyone with an ounce of skill in reverse engineering can identify the security flaws used, and anyone with an ounce of skill in assembly can disassemble Stuxnet, alter what it targets, and launch the new variant.
By banning the talk, the DHS is preventing US industries from protecting themselves against economic warfare. Plenty of nations (China and Russia especially) are investing in cyber-warfare. There's plenty of amateurs out there with axes (albeit often as delusionary as the DHS') to grind. It is simply not excusable for the US to be placed in this kind of danger.
That is why Stuxnet needs to be classified.
Patent sugar, sue the sugar manufacturers for infringement, destroy the sugar industry. When sugar is only available in our pills, charge $200 for a box of them. Shut down production after 5 years, and lock up the patents for the next 200 years. Implement worldwide. Profit! Sugar is gone.
Eric Holder is that you?
If it was that simple then it would fail to account for the fact that diabetics (who go around with high blood sugar levels almost all the time) are more prone to all types of infection than non diabetics.
With diabetes one could have a triple blind study.
i think it's possible the syrian government agrees with you
i think it's possible the Syrian people agree with you
FTFY
This is Facebook, so the two factors are username and password.
The two factors are zero and one.
That is because it is open source.
I'm not following you.
Those guys don't like open source, and that might stop them.
He can't read your comment - for some reason his firewall isn't letting him load this page anymore. Something about malware.
Maybe if he goes to the right place, then the malware will infect him with the source.
--
Luke use the souce.
It's only bad for "the rest of us" if by "the rest of us" you mean "Windows users, the vast majority of computer users" because Microsoft will inevitably drag its feet in fixing its vulnerabilities (if it is even able to fix them) even though it now has a direct window into how Windows machines are being attacked.
That is because it is open source.
Please leave the room, I have to transform it into a shitter.
What was the combination for that again?
That really suggests that, rather than be upset about the lack of open sources, people should be concerned as to why Google felt it reasonable to release software they're reluctant to release sources to because they're embarrassed.
Would embarrassing source lead to embarrassing object code: either hard to maintain, buggy, or with security holes?
If you're using a free service, you should expect that if someone comes along and offers to buy your username, they'll get it. I don't know why this would be surprising.
How about paying an ISP for an email account and having spamers use your username freely?
Cleaning filters?
--
To invent you need a good junk and a pile of imagination. T. Ed Sun.