There is a better way. First of all, most stickers are too thin, so you still get a certain amount of light data which can give you proximity information and at times the ability to reconstruct the image from the data available even if it's not perfectly clear depending on the circumstances. A friend of mine gave me a plastic camera lid sticker and it was akin to putting a blue nylon across the camera, it simply made everything blue.
It's easier to secure the sensors directly than to try to deal with vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the system whether it's a phone or a laptop. Most of the time you don't need a powered microphone or a camera in standby on you, but you have one, because of your phone, tablet or laptop.
What you need to do is actually take out the little camera module entirely, or if you have the time, remove the camera module, solder a switch (they're usually listed as micro slide switches) on the side of the camera. This is a way better idea since it also looks visually pleasing, I really don't know why microphones, radio, speakers, and cameras don't come with physical off switches out of the factory. Thankfully it's fairly easy to make your own, even if you're not an electrical engineer. ( Here's one fellow on YouTube showing how to solder https://www.youtube.com/watch?... )
If you don't want to deal with soldering, most of those modules are removable, just put a piece of plastic strip under it and click it back on. Remove the strip when you need to use it.
If you sound like a person, and act like a person, I'm going to assume you're a person. If there exists an AI where I am entirely unable to discern the difference between it and a person, then it's time we start declaring AI as persons.
Now, if it's just a number of spam bots, or a bot swarm trying to sway opinion on comments and emails, I highly doubt those people are going to abide by the requirement in the first place. But it's nice to punish them under the law once they are caught. Unless it's a government agency in which case, back to square one.
I don't know man, back in the days criminals who are about to stab you would just ask to see if they can bum a smoke. Now it's like, "Ay man! ay! What's your WIFI password bro? You got a WIFI password on you?" I wonder if the "thief" was planning on something a lot more sinister like using the old couple's IP for his own evil purposes and when eventually investigated misdirect the authorities. Then again, talking to the people while riding the bike you stole from them, the kid doesn't sound too bright. It's possible however that someone smarter asked him to do it.
This kind of fellow is increasingly more common and can be found in the corners of many college campuses today. For some reason people in their early 20s love to live stream their neighbors, roommates, basically other people just living their lives. These people were referred to as serial killers in the 80s, but we call them content streamers nowadays. Most of them have an unhealthy relationship with GTA V, and I have personally spoken to 3 who fit the profile perfectly. One of whom is not a college student which lead me to believe it's a cultural movement. I see it as something Internet privacy issues brought us where these young fellows simply decided, who gives a damn (perhaps demonstrating a subliminal rebellion) and are literally filming strangers like it's a BBC documentary. It makes them feel empowered from what I can tell, and it's a bonding experience in their group. Yes, it's our fault. Specifically the fault of military and law enforcement taking the privacy battle all the way to an Orvellian reality exposed by whistleblowers. "The Internet troll" is a real life personality now as opposed to being an Internet alter-ego. We'll now just have to deal with it. That's another thing these groups say, "Deal with it." Also "U mad bro?"
This is the risk you take with using a dependency by "some dude" rather than an organization which takes steps to implement proper security. Also demonstrates how auto-updates can also be abused and is not always a good thing. If you must use such a library, go over the code line by line first.
To their credit, the paper does state an ex ante probability of there not being any life beyond our own, within a certain percentage range. So they are certain that they can probably say that there isn't any life in the Universe beyond our own. Definitely maybe a useful thing. Certainly does not factor potential for human technological achievements. What if we can bend the Universe in the future to bring some of those impossible distances to the realm of possibility? I am certain I can say that's likely to be a thing. Anywhere between 1% to 99% by my own calculations.
This is actually a good thing he is doing. Mr. Duda could have patented his work himself and became financially very successful in a short period of time. But instead he is spending money to ensure the technology is available to everyone at no cost, simply improving everyone's products. He would much rather say I improved upon Huffman and walk away. Presumably not in a solid gold Lambo.
A post truth world. This is it folks, your government has failed you. I realize that's dramatic, but if you look at what we are facing here, it's pretty much the result of our intelligence agencies giving up on protecting your... data. There was a time a program would not be authorized because it violated your private information. Now we are at a point where we are implementing ways to gauge every person's stress levels. We got here because we wanted to be safe. We were afraid, and getting rid of our fight to protect privacy was a pesky hinderance. Remember the Patriot Act? It was the first move which made permanent this idea that we can't stop people from collecting and processing intimate information of unsuspecting citizens, so we might as well embrace it and create this world where all the decisions worth anything are made in secret, and the story of acceptance is auto generated based on your data. That's what you are facing as a feeling breathing human being, people with greater economical positions accurately deviding how you should feel. It's not just America, nobody is doing anything to inform you of it, we have managed to make permanent social standing. There still are some people who see this and advocate for privacy, but they will soon stop because they will grow tired of it and run out of money. *sigh*
I think AI can cripple innovation if built properly. Take the example of the formulaic news articles and movies we've been seeing today generated based on user data (trends, mental profiles, relationships between the profiles etc.). People who produce them have a high level of assurity that the next piece of media will be recieved positively. Then something else comes along and it completely makes the previous thing obsolete, a disruptor. Such a system could adapt quickly to produce more content based on the disruption further discouraging innovation. Just a thought, not a machine learning expert.
âoeA full life-cycle assessment would be needed to ensure the technology does not solve one environmental problem â" waste â" at the expense of others, including additional greenhouse gas emissions.â
That sounds important. Also no zombies caused by extremely resilient mutant enzymes sounds great:)
It's a shame Mr. Comey was constantly surrounded by poor imbeciles living under cloudy conditions most of the time but the point here is that the standard must be set for an ideal world or you've destroyed what you are trying to protect. Not unlike raising your kids while a teacher with a gun imposes upon them, for their safety of course. You would however be raising people who see absolute authority in weapons as most of us tend to remember our teachers for the rest of our lives, sometimes as people to exemplify. If I believe that I have no ability to protect my privacy, I'd rather not use the Internet. Most of the time I do not anyways, given there really is no way, but porn is free. I shudder to think who is using that data for what purpose but I know a few people (corporate entities?) can get it all, that's creepy enough. Treat the Internet like a cigarette, you start because of your friends, cool for a while, starts to taste great, but lets be honest, it's just bad for you.
Musk explained what he meant by saying that computers can communicate at "a trillion bits per second", while humans, whose main communication method is typing with their fingers via a mobile device, can do about 10 bits per second.
Why do you insist on utilizing this primitive linguistic communication? Your android brain is capable of so much more. --Borg Queen
The real question here is *beep* hang on, email...... What we must pay attention to is *beep* text message,... hah (writes answer), errr right, as I was saying, *starts car*, err, *beep beep beep* (puts on seatbelt) It's a difficult world to *facebook notification* haha omg, Err... driving right now... Send... Semi truck horn... 24 months later. I love apples!
I think the first word it would utter would be, "Kill me." Lets keep this kind of research off the news, on international waters, until they can grow something without a nervous system nor neurons, and can grow organs.
Lets take a moment to remember we only thought this to occur in the centers of gas giants, in space, quite a bit far out there. We have just replicated this on this planet. Of all the posibilities for things to happen, this one is pretty rare. I feel proud to be a hairless monkey today.
Slashdot Mirror
There is a better way. First of all, most stickers are too thin, so you still get a certain amount of light data which can give you proximity information and at times the ability to reconstruct the image from the data available even if it's not perfectly clear depending on the circumstances. A friend of mine gave me a plastic camera lid sticker and it was akin to putting a blue nylon across the camera, it simply made everything blue.
It's easier to secure the sensors directly than to try to deal with vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the system whether it's a phone or a laptop. Most of the time you don't need a powered microphone or a camera in standby on you, but you have one, because of your phone, tablet or laptop.
What you need to do is actually take out the little camera module entirely, or if you have the time, remove the camera module, solder a switch (they're usually listed as micro slide switches) on the side of the camera. This is a way better idea since it also looks visually pleasing, I really don't know why microphones, radio, speakers, and cameras don't come with physical off switches out of the factory. Thankfully it's fairly easy to make your own, even if you're not an electrical engineer. ( Here's one fellow on YouTube showing how to solder https://www.youtube.com/watch?... )
If you don't want to deal with soldering, most of those modules are removable, just put a piece of plastic strip under it and click it back on. Remove the strip when you need to use it.
If you sound like a person, and act like a person, I'm going to assume you're a person. If there exists an AI where I am entirely unable to discern the difference between it and a person, then it's time we start declaring AI as persons. Now, if it's just a number of spam bots, or a bot swarm trying to sway opinion on comments and emails, I highly doubt those people are going to abide by the requirement in the first place. But it's nice to punish them under the law once they are caught. Unless it's a government agency in which case, back to square one.
I don't know man, back in the days criminals who are about to stab you would just ask to see if they can bum a smoke. Now it's like, "Ay man! ay! What's your WIFI password bro? You got a WIFI password on you?" I wonder if the "thief" was planning on something a lot more sinister like using the old couple's IP for his own evil purposes and when eventually investigated misdirect the authorities. Then again, talking to the people while riding the bike you stole from them, the kid doesn't sound too bright. It's possible however that someone smarter asked him to do it.
This kind of fellow is increasingly more common and can be found in the corners of many college campuses today. For some reason people in their early 20s love to live stream their neighbors, roommates, basically other people just living their lives. These people were referred to as serial killers in the 80s, but we call them content streamers nowadays. Most of them have an unhealthy relationship with GTA V, and I have personally spoken to 3 who fit the profile perfectly. One of whom is not a college student which lead me to believe it's a cultural movement. I see it as something Internet privacy issues brought us where these young fellows simply decided, who gives a damn (perhaps demonstrating a subliminal rebellion) and are literally filming strangers like it's a BBC documentary. It makes them feel empowered from what I can tell, and it's a bonding experience in their group. Yes, it's our fault. Specifically the fault of military and law enforcement taking the privacy battle all the way to an Orvellian reality exposed by whistleblowers. "The Internet troll" is a real life personality now as opposed to being an Internet alter-ego. We'll now just have to deal with it. That's another thing these groups say, "Deal with it." Also "U mad bro?"
This is the risk you take with using a dependency by "some dude" rather than an organization which takes steps to implement proper security. Also demonstrates how auto-updates can also be abused and is not always a good thing. If you must use such a library, go over the code line by line first.
To their credit, the paper does state an ex ante probability of there not being any life beyond our own, within a certain percentage range. So they are certain that they can probably say that there isn't any life in the Universe beyond our own. Definitely maybe a useful thing. Certainly does not factor potential for human technological achievements. What if we can bend the Universe in the future to bring some of those impossible distances to the realm of possibility? I am certain I can say that's likely to be a thing. Anywhere between 1% to 99% by my own calculations.
I'm...
This is actually a good thing he is doing. Mr. Duda could have patented his work himself and became financially very successful in a short period of time. But instead he is spending money to ensure the technology is available to everyone at no cost, simply improving everyone's products. He would much rather say I improved upon Huffman and walk away. Presumably not in a solid gold Lambo.
*** We were afraid, and our fight to protect privacy was a pesky hinderance.
A post truth world. This is it folks, your government has failed you. I realize that's dramatic, but if you look at what we are facing here, it's pretty much the result of our intelligence agencies giving up on protecting your ... data. There was a time a program would not be authorized because it violated your private information. Now we are at a point where we are implementing ways to gauge every person's stress levels. We got here because we wanted to be safe. We were afraid, and getting rid of our fight to protect privacy was a pesky hinderance. Remember the Patriot Act? It was the first move which made permanent this idea that we can't stop people from collecting and processing intimate information of unsuspecting citizens, so we might as well embrace it and create this world where all the decisions worth anything are made in secret, and the story of acceptance is auto generated based on your data. That's what you are facing as a feeling breathing human being, people with greater economical positions accurately deviding how you should feel. It's not just America, nobody is doing anything to inform you of it, we have managed to make permanent social standing. There still are some people who see this and advocate for privacy, but they will soon stop because they will grow tired of it and run out of money. *sigh*
Then again, you might be pleasantly surprised by some common sense.
I think AI can cripple innovation if built properly. Take the example of the formulaic news articles and movies we've been seeing today generated based on user data (trends, mental profiles, relationships between the profiles etc.). People who produce them have a high level of assurity that the next piece of media will be recieved positively. Then something else comes along and it completely makes the previous thing obsolete, a disruptor. Such a system could adapt quickly to produce more content based on the disruption further discouraging innovation. Just a thought, not a machine learning expert.
Was this essentially unintentional swatting? Also, would an SSID called, "This Access Point Is the Bomb!" empty out an airport?
âoeA full life-cycle assessment would be needed to ensure the technology does not solve one environmental problem â" waste â" at the expense of others, including additional greenhouse gas emissions.â
That sounds important. Also no zombies caused by extremely resilient mutant enzymes sounds great :)
It's a shame Mr. Comey was constantly surrounded by poor imbeciles living under cloudy conditions most of the time but the point here is that the standard must be set for an ideal world or you've destroyed what you are trying to protect. Not unlike raising your kids while a teacher with a gun imposes upon them, for their safety of course. You would however be raising people who see absolute authority in weapons as most of us tend to remember our teachers for the rest of our lives, sometimes as people to exemplify. If I believe that I have no ability to protect my privacy, I'd rather not use the Internet. Most of the time I do not anyways, given there really is no way, but porn is free. I shudder to think who is using that data for what purpose but I know a few people (corporate entities?) can get it all, that's creepy enough. Treat the Internet like a cigarette, you start because of your friends, cool for a while, starts to taste great, but lets be honest, it's just bad for you.
Banana for scale.
If it's true, it's probably rootkitted.
ÃÃmersen saldirmiyo yani.
"Whooopth!" - Daffy Duck
I don't think anybody here thought Steve Jobs invented the electricity. Hopefully.
Musk explained what he meant by saying that computers can communicate at "a trillion bits per second", while humans, whose main communication method is typing with their fingers via a mobile device, can do about 10 bits per second.
Why do you insist on utilizing this primitive linguistic communication? Your android brain is capable of so much more. --Borg Queen
I just had to :)
The real question here is *beep* hang on, email... ... What we must pay attention to is *beep* text message, ... hah (writes answer), errr right, as I was saying, *starts car*, err, *beep beep beep* (puts on seatbelt) It's a difficult world to *facebook notification* haha omg, Err... driving right now ... Send ... Semi truck horn ... 24 months later. I love apples!
About time somebody did this, great work Microsoft team.
I think the first word it would utter would be, "Kill me." Lets keep this kind of research off the news, on international waters, until they can grow something without a nervous system nor neurons, and can grow organs.
Lets take a moment to remember we only thought this to occur in the centers of gas giants, in space, quite a bit far out there. We have just replicated this on this planet. Of all the posibilities for things to happen, this one is pretty rare. I feel proud to be a hairless monkey today.