Slashdot Mirror


World's Only Sample of Metallic Hydrogen Has Been Lost (ibtimes.co.uk)

New submitter drunkdrone quotes a report from International Business Times: A piece of rare meta poised to revolutionize modern technology and take humans into deep space has been lost in a laboratory mishap. The first and only sample of metallic hydrogen ever created on earth was the rarest material on the planet when it was developed by Harvard scientists in January this year, and had been dubbed "the holy grail of high pressure physics." The metal was created by subjecting liquid hydrogen to pressures greater that those at the center of the Earth. At this point, the molecular hydrogen breaks down and becomes an atomic solid. Scientists theorized that metallic hydrogen -- when used as a superconductor -- could have a transformative effect on modern electronics and revolutionize medicine, energy and transportation, as well as herald in a new age of consumer gadgets. Sadly, an attempt to study the properties of metallic hydrogen appears to have ended in catastrophe after one of the two diamonds being used like a vice to hold the tiny sample was obliterated. The metal was being held between two diamonds at a pressure of around 71.7 million pounds per square inch -- more than a third greater than at the Earth's core. According to The Independent, one of these diamonds shattered while the sample was being measured with a laser, and the metal was lost in the process.

278 comments

  1. Fake News by BoRegardless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hydrogen was not lost. It just sublimated.

    No chance in hell we will use metallic hydrogen due to pressures required.

    1. Re:Fake News by Nutria · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. poised to revolutionize modern technology and take humans into deep space... someone at the International Business Times doesn't know what "poised" means.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not fake, merely not particularly relevant. This is a thing that did happen, it just has very few real world consequences to the majority of people.

      I don't imagine the researchers were very surprised that their diamond shattered under such intense pressure.

    3. Re:Fake News by Snotnose · · Score: 0

      No chance in hell we will use metallic hydrogen due to pressures required.

      and aerodynamics sez bumblebees can't fly.

    4. Re:Fake News by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      30 years obsolete. Once computer power grew to the point that they could model wings that flex, bumblebees were allowed to fly again.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Fake News by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hydrogen was not lost. It just sublimated.

      To be fair, it said "metallic hydrogen" has been lost, not simply "hydrogen" - so not fake.

      (P.S. People. Please stop misapplying the phrase "fake news". The fire's host enough w/o needlessly fanning the flames.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re: Fake News by ralphsiegler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And none of the researchers believe they can't make more. It's only a delay in metallic H research. "sadly", what drama queen wrote that slop?

    7. Re: Fake News by ralphsiegler · · Score: 5, Funny

      Until they hit the Pentium division bug, which has caused the massive recent bumblebee die-off

    8. Re: Fake News by dougdonovan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      they call it the media nowadays.

    9. Re:Fake News by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (P.S. People. Please stop misapplying the phrase "fake news". The fire's host enough w/o needlessly fanning the flames.)

      This. Fake news is written by fake reporters -- people who are deliberately trying to deceive, frighten or mislead by writing fictional stories. It is not the same as real news with errors.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    10. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the funding cuts when do you think they can buy another diamond?

      If my diamond got obliterated, damn will I be sad.

    11. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      (P.S. People. Please stop misapplying the phrase "fake news". The fire's host enough w/o needlessly fanning the flames.)

      This. Fake news is written by fake reporters -- people who are deliberately trying to deceive, frighten or mislead by writing fictional stories.

      This article implies that something was lost which was "poised to revolutionize modern technology and take humans into deep space". That is deceptive (maybe even misleading, too!) and makes this legitimately "fake" news.

    12. Re:Fake News by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      and aerodynamics sez bumblebees can't fly.

      Urban myth. No scientific paper ever said that bumblebees were unable to fly because of their aerodynamics.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    13. Re:Fake News by Khyber · · Score: 1, Insightful

      " people who are deliberately trying to deceive, frighten"

      So they're terrorists and we need to press to have them charged as such - what the fuck are YOU doing to further this?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re: Fake News by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Since the IBT was media even before the existence of New Media, and the Old Media was quite often facile and Yellow, I'm not sure I understand what your point is.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    15. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      and aerodynamics sez bumblebees can't fly.

      That old meme. "Scientists said bumblebees can't fly, yet they go right on flying. Dumb ol' scientists!"

      It came from applying rigid-wing models to bumblebees, which doesn't work; a bumblebee is a much more dynamic system that needs more complex math to describe. Aviation engineers never claimed that bumblebees can't fly just because a simple mathematical model computes a self-evidently incorrect result.

      http://www.snopes.com/science/bumblebees.asp

    16. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Books were written about it instead. When a subject is important, why settle for a journal? Le Vol des Insectes.

      Go ahead and google it yourself. Oh, and the original claim was that bumblebees cant fly according to fixed wing aerodynamics, which is true.

    17. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aerodynamics sez an F-117A can't fly. Computers make otherwise.

    18. Re: Fake News by knightghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no more news - there is only misinfotainment. With spelling and grammatical errors.

    19. Re:Fake News by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Drat. If ONLY it had lasted long enough for my grant to be approved! Now I'll never find enough money to make more!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    20. Re:Fake News by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How can ordinary people tell what news is real news and what news is fake news when they can't trust the people who define it?

    21. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No chance in hell we will use metallic hydrogen due to pressures required.

      This exactly.

    22. Re: Fake News by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Ah, ok.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    23. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They wouldn't buy an expensive diamond. They'd create one in the lab. Lab ones are more pure and are actually less valuable, purely because of the De Beers monopoly on natural diamonds.

    24. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they can't find it, they lost it.

    25. Re: Fake News by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "A piece of rare meta poised ..."

      A clear test case for AI. We could have a contest to see who can write an AI bot that writes summaries with fewer spelling, grammatical, and factual errors than a Slashdot editor in the fewest lines of code. BTW, English spelling has never been my strong suite, but doesn't the word "metal" have a mandatory "l" at the end?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    26. Re:Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Informative

      The paper said that aerodynamics are unable to explain how bumblebees fly. There were no equations at the time (may still not be) that would allow wings that small to generate enough lift to hold the bee in the air - they're using properties of turbulence and other less well understood fluid dynamics to get their lift.

    27. Re:Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Its metallicness was lost, and the actual hydrogen likely escaped the room in the process.

      Now, how something that requires that much diamond-shattering pressure to exist in the first place will be revolutionizing anything in the consumer space before every boomer on the planet is dead, that's some hyperbole that's lost on me.

    28. Re:Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      Fake News started the Spanish American War... at least according to the history books when I was in school.

    29. Re:Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Ordinary, or rather: average, people don't seem to try to tell the difference, or care.

    30. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      makes this legitimately "fake" news

      No, misreporting, even hyperbole, does NOT make fake news. Stop trying to dilute the term fascist!

    31. Re: Fake News by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      DeBeers has a monopoly on fiat gemstones, and not just any fiat gemstone, but only one specific kind. Let that sink in for a minute.

      Once upon a time, Aluminium was considered rare and valuable. That was until someone figured a way to get the ore processed very inexpensively. Then all those fine (expensive) Aluminum dinnerware sets became almost worthless overnight. And so it will be with DeBeers, once people realize that a diamond is a diamond and you can have a custom diamond made for you very inexpensively. Then all those expensive necklaces worn by the starlets during the Oscars can be worn by anyone.

      I can't wait to see all that jewelry become worth ... less.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    32. Re:Fake News by chispito · · Score: 1

      This. Fake news is written by fake reporters -- people who are deliberately trying to deceive, frighten or mislead by writing fictional stories. It is not the same as real news with errors.

      Popularize a term and it will inevitably be misused. "Fake News" is not in the dictionary. It means whatever the largest number of people mean when they say it.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    33. Re:Fake News by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Sounds intentional to me, now nobody can prove it that wasn't pure hydrogen and was contaminated with metal from the containment vessel. Until other experiments replicate the result, this sounds a lot more like Fleischmann Pons cold fusion than like a new state of matter.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    34. Re: Fake News by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure the slashdot editors couldn't pass the Turing Test.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    35. Re:Fake News by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      If only there were people working in reliable journalism that could check the facts and determine whether they were valid or not...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    36. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't divide, Intel Inside.

    37. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because scientists are trying to figure out if they can keep it that way without the pressure and temperature constraints. If it's possible, it's the world's most easily kept form of hydrogen, great for rocket fuel. If it also turns out to conduct electricity with no resistance at said temperatures... Well, I don't need to explain that to you, do I?

    38. Re: Fake News by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why people want to buy brown diamonds. I'm not sure they do want to buy them at all or if it is just a massive ad campaign to try and create demand. No woman I've asked likes the way brown diamonds look- even if you call them "chocolate".

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    39. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pentiums dont melt steel bees

    40. Re: Fake News by cerberusss · · Score: 2

      There is no more news - there is only misinfotainment. With spelling and grammatical errors.

      The only holdout is Slashdot!

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    41. Re: Fake News by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No woman I've asked likes the way brown diamonds look- even if you call them "chocolate".

      The weird thing is, I can't imagine why anyone would like a plain diamond. It just looks like glass. Rubies, emeralds and sapphires are colorful and can compliment ones eyes, or clothes or accessories, while diamonds just don't attract attention. Unless there's a dozen of them, in which case you're bankrupt.

      Of course, I'm just a man and I wouldn't understand anything a woman wants.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    42. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah and also don't forget, 640k is enough RAM for everybody, and wireless communication is impractical and impossible. Never mind air travel.

    43. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you can't use the theories of fixed wing aerodynamics on bumblebees because bumblebees are not using fixed wings. Try propeller tech instead.

    44. Re: Fake News by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      Who brought up brown diamonds?

    45. Re: Fake News by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3

      Lab ones are more pure and are actually less valuable, purely because of the De Beers monopoly on natural diamonds.

      I wanted to buy a lab diamond as an anniversary gift, because I figured CVD is a lot less damaging to the environment than mining, and I found that the lab diamonds are MORE EXPENSIVE, not cheaper. A quick look at prices on eBay confirms this is still true. Apparently, I am not the only one who prefers to avoid the environmental destruction and political corruption caused by mining.

    46. Re: Fake News by drewsup · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chocolate...because "shit coloured" didn't track well at DeBeers advertising session groups...

    47. Re:Fake News by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The paper said that aerodynamics are unable to explain how bumblebees fly.

      What paper said that? The Weekly World News?

    48. Re:Fake News by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Aerodynamics sez an F-117A can't fly

      An F-117A flies in the same way that a brick strapped to a rocket flies. Aerodynamics has very little to do with it.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    49. Re: Fake News by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Funny

      English spelling has never been my strong suite

      Q.E.D.

    50. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you can't use the theories of fixed wing aerodynamics on bumblebees because bumblebees are not using fixed wings.

      Yes, that was the mistake, as was already obvious from the thread.

    51. Re:Fake News by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Stop trying to dilute the term fascist!

      And as for you, please stop trying to dilute the term fascist.

    52. Re: Fake News by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      Only if it really was the metallic hydrogen that it was suspected to be. I guess more measurements would have made certain what it really is.
      They shouldn't have a problem to get funding for a lot more diamonds now though.

    53. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: Metallic hydrogen only requires to be crushed once.
      It is the diamonds of carbon.

      But yeah, doing that large scale would still be fucking costly. Even with 100% renewable automated system.

    54. Re: Fake News by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      There few, if any, actual staff journalists there. IBT is now a cesspit of uninformed bloggers who can post stories to fluff their online resume. There's little reliable or insightful content on there.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    55. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metallic hydrogen is expected to be stable and once made, would continue to exist at one atmosphere.

    56. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aerodynamics has everything to do with everything that exhibits controlled flight.

    57. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People, please stop using the word "this" as if it was in some way a complete sentence.

    58. Re: Fake News by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Any object will exhibit controlled flight if you apply enough controlled force to it, irrespective of whether it interacts with the surrounding medium.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    59. Re:Fake News by vtcodger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "No chance in hell we will use metallic hydrogen due to pressures required."

      Four minutes of intensive research on this subject leads me to believe that no one is quite sure whether metallic hydrogen is stable at room temperature and one atmosphere pressure. If it is, then it'd possibly be like diamonds and many other materials. Takes enormous pressure to make (at least by squeezing it), but once made is usable. BTW, there's apparently some chance that it might not only be stable, but the fabled room-temperature superconductor.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    60. Re:Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      The paper said that aerodynamics are unable to explain how bumblebees fly.

      What paper said that? The Weekly World News?

      They weren't the original source, but I bet they picked up the story 10 or 15 years after it was first published.

    61. Re:Fake News by Megol · · Score: 1

      We do use diamonds even though they are created requiring high pressures and heat. Metallic hydrogen is expected by many to be stable at normal pressures once created. The problem is creating them to verify this.

    62. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I prefer blood diamonds. It's a special thrill to be able to wear as an ornament something that caused death and despait to other human beings who we wouldn't even bother to look down on.

    63. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh pretty sure this was on porpoise.

    64. Re: Fake News by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      I suspect the diamonds they are going for will be extremely expensive for their size. Most likely natural diamonds with exceptional qualities.
      The biggest difficulty in making metallic hydrogen is achieving the enormous pressures required. And for this, you need the best diamonds you can find, or else, they will shatter.
      Cheap synthetic diamonds, the kind you find in abrasives, are not pure at all. High quality synthetic diamonds are not that cheap compared to their natural counterparts, and it is not even sure that they can be made with the required characteristics.

    65. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your history books were fake news and turned you into a terrorist. Please kill yourself.

    66. Re: Fake News by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      English spelling has never been my strong suite, but doesn't the word "metal" have a mandatory "l" at the end?

      Yes, but this was a piece of rare meta. Completely different word. Try to concentrate.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    67. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No chance in hell we'll ever use diamond due to the pressures requried

    68. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead and google it yourself.

      I'm sorry, but I stopped doing other peoples' homework when I graduated high school.

    69. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it doesn't.

    70. Re: Fake News by alva_edison · · Score: 2

      Diamonds have a very low critical angle with respect to air. It's this effect that allows diamond to put on a light show that similarly cut glass cannot. However diamonds value is more extrinsic than intrinsic. Enforced through monopoly power on many natural sources and aggressive marketing campaigns.

      --
      He effected a bored affect.
    71. Re:Fake News by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Isn't this true of all the materials they have come up with that is superconducting? It always has some ridiculous requirement, temps so low as to never be useful, insane pressures, they just can't seem to find anything that would in a million years ever be of any practical use.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    72. Re:Fake News by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      The paper said that aerodynamics are unable to explain how bumblebees fly.

      What paper said that? The Weekly World News?

      They weren't the original source, but I bet they picked up the story 10 or 15 years after it was first published.

      The Weekly World News probably had proof that bumblebees came from a planet orbiting a small star in Andromeda, and that was the reason they could fly. I'm sure there were also stories over the year about them abducting and impregnating women who gave birth to half human/half Andromeda bee offspring too.

    73. Re:Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      The paper said that aerodynamics are unable to explain how bumblebees fly.

      What paper said that? The Weekly World News?

      They weren't the original source, but I bet they picked up the story 10 or 15 years after it was first published.

      The Weekly World News probably had proof that bumblebees came from a planet orbiting a small star in Andromeda, and that was the reason they could fly. I'm sure there were also stories over the year about them abducting and impregnating women who gave birth to half human/half Andromeda bee offspring too.

      You know that Men In Black was actually a documentary?

    74. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't expect it to last. It was, after all, a beta meta.

    75. Re:Fake News by maestroX · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you get the pressures with a magnetic field?

    76. Re: Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      A clear, mostly flawless, and importantly: clean, diamond will sparkle in the sunlight with rainbow colors - more brilliant than other gemstones.

      Yeah, that's about it. Oh, and they're really crazy hard, incase you want to cut glass or something.

    77. Re:Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Go ahead and google it yourself.

      I'm sorry, but I stopped doing other peoples' homework when I graduated high school.

      If you want the reference, 'tis your own homework.

    78. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do use diamonds even though they are created requiring high pressures and heat. Metallic hydrogen is expected by many to be stable at normal pressures once created. The problem is creating them to verify this.

      Except experimental evidence says metallic hydrogen isn't stable at normal pressure--it sublimated when the diamond broke.

    79. Re:Fake News by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Considering the engines provided a max of around 22,000 pounds of thrust and the plane weighed around 30,000 pounds empty, the brick strapped to a rocket analogy is inaccurate. The aerodynamics work, if there is a rapid enough input to deal with the rapid changes in airflow. The same has been the case since at least the F-14; the F-117 was just an extreme case. Modern fighters are even less statically stable than the Nighthawk was. It's what gives them their maneuverability.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    80. Re: Fake News by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Natural Diamonds and Artificial Diamonds are indistinguishable, except for the fact that an Artificial one is technically superior in just about every way one could judge a diamond. They are also VERY easy to produce, and in VERY large sizes that are nearly impossible to find naturally. This makes the whole Natural vs Artificial argument really stupid.

      A diamond is a diamond. It takes special tools to find imperfections in the natural diamonds for even "experts" to tell the difference.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    81. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would someone continue a "massive ad campaign" if there is no market?

      Common sense, bro. Look into it.

    82. Re:Fake News by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Yes but you would have to strip the electrons off of the hydrogen so it would be affected by them. Also you wouldn't be able to generate the electrical power by hand crank that are needed like one can do with the diamond anvil

      --
      Time to offend someone
    83. Re: Fake News by Rei · · Score: 1

      1. That was just an old theory, and not a widely accepted one.

      2. Given what we've just seen, it demonstrably isn't.

      That doesn't mean that there aren't compounds formed at great pressure that can remain stable at moderate pressures and represent very dense energy sources - there surely are. Metastability is a very real thing. But apparently not in the case of metallic hydrogen at ~STP.

      Assuming that this actually even was metallic hydrogen; even that is somewhat in dispute.

      --
      I'll never forget the last thing grandma said to me before she died: "What are you doing in here with that knife?!?"
    84. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Massive ad campaign = Marketing

      Marketing = Creating demand where there is none

      Duh!

    85. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. X1000

    86. Re: Fake News by green1 · · Score: 2

      You're wrong.

      You know how you can tell the difference between a natural and a synthetic diamond? There's only one way. You look for the imperfections that occur in natural ones. Synthetic ones are "too perfect" and therefore worth less money (DeBeers logic)

      The last thing you'd want here is a natural diamond as it wouldn't be as good for the application as a synthetic one where you can be sure there are no impurities.

    87. Re:Fake News by green1 · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like we actually DO know the answer now. It's not, otherwise this sample wouldn't have been destroyed when the diamond applying pressure to it broke.

    88. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Books were written about it instead. When a subject is important, why settle for a journal? Le Vol des Insectes.

      Go ahead and google it yourself. Oh, and the original claim was that bumblebees cant fly according to fixed wing aerodynamics, which is true.

      No, one person, who was neither a physicist, nor an aerospace engineer claimed it, in a note, without showing the math, and that was back in 1934.

      Welcome to logical fallacies 101!

    89. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was for stealth. Isnt that why the fly by wire system was implemented on the b2 and f117? Because an aerodynamic plane is not stealthy as far as radar is concerned.

    90. Re: Fake News by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Natural diamonds do not conduct electricity. Artificial ones do.

      If those properties are good or bad depends on on what you want to use them for.

    91. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Because an aerodynamic plane is not stealthy as far as radar is concerned."

      Ah, that's not really it. An aerodynamic plane can also be stealthy, for instance look at the F-35. Radar returns are very strong off of sharp features and metallic objects. Corners, strong angles, sharp edges. Yeah, don't ask me to explain the edges of wings, I can't! I Am Not A Stealth Expert (IANASE).

      Besides, the computer-assisted control systems aren't about aerodynamics anyway, and neither are the fly by wire systems. Fly by wire is mostly about saving weight. Computer-assisted stability control is about dynamically unstable aerodynamic shapes. Aerodynamic shapes come in both stable and unstable configurations.

      Traditional aircraft design built-in flight stability, that's what the inverted "V" shape is all about. The V shape applies forces to the wings that cause the plane to want to fly straight and level, even with hands off the stick. However in military planes and some kinds of show planes, less stability (or even unstable) designs get you a more responsive, more agile plane.

      There are even designs that have the wings swept forward! These are of course crazy unstable and won't fly at all without computer assist. These were impossible to make and fly, prior to having computers fast enough to keep them controllable.

    92. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding is that the majority of mined diamonds are brown. They get used for industrial purposes, mostly in saw blades, grinding surfaces, that sort of thing. The hardness isn't affected, only the appearance.

      Of course you can't get the same price for a brown diamond destined to become a blade edge, as you can a gem quality diamond.

      The diamond industry perhaps wants to sell brown diamonds as gemstones (for the price premium) but they have an uphill battle on that one.

    93. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No chance in hell we will use metallic hydrogen due to pressures required.

      and aerodynamics sez bumblebees can't fly.

      No, it doesn't.

    94. Re:Fake News by swillden · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like we actually DO know the answer now. It's not, otherwise this sample wouldn't have been destroyed when the diamond applying pressure to it broke.

      Maybe it wasn't destroyed. Maybe it just rolled under the coffee table. I hope the dog didn't lick it up.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    95. Re:Fake News by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The paper said that aerodynamics are unable to explain how bumblebees fly.

      As below, what paper said that?

      I've seen this BS over and over and over for decades but never ever seen so much as a hint as to what "paper" claimed this.

      Anyone with even a microgram of common sense who reads this crap should immediately yell "Bullshit!", since bumblebees obviously do fly.

      If the science of aerodynamics couldn't explain it every scientist in the world would be studying the hell out of it.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    96. Re:Fake News by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      You know that Men In Black was actually a documentary?

      That's what I heard about Jurassic Park and The Hobbit.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    97. Re:Fake News by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The sample wasn't destroyed. It was lost. It was only 1/5th of the width of a human hair and they can't find it.

    98. Re: Fake News by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      I prefer blood diamonds. It's a special thrill to be able to wear as an ornament something that caused death and despait to other human beings who we wouldn't even bother to look down on.

      I enjoy wearing real furs where 30 minks were hunted and slaughtered rather than fake fur that imitates the real thing. It gives me a feeling of power over the base beasts.
      I enjoy having a purse of real crocodile-skin, because it means that brute was slaughtered so I could look good.
      I enjoy having a necklace of diamonds that a 13-year-old was forced to dig out of a mine. Third-world primitives.

    99. Re: Fake News by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Rubies, emeralds and sapphires are all more expensive gemstones than diamond.

      I would only buy lab stones unless I had some reason for wanting a particular piece of jewelry that already had stones mounted. They look just as nice and are a lot cheaper to obtain.

    100. Re:Fake News by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Not all of the fake reporters have those aims. Some of them simply want ad views, lots and lots of ad views. Making up news is a good way to get them. If you post a story titled "Trump's issues order permitting execution of illegal immigrants" or "Obama's secret terror cells in the white house' or 'Kim Kardashian to perform televised surgery" you are going to get a lot of views.

    101. Re:Fake News by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It was a really, really tiny sample. It may have just pinged out of the equipment, never to be found. Only way to be sure is to make another.

    102. Re:Fake News by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Expected by some. It's not a majority-held view among specialists, but it is a possibility.

    103. Re:Fake News by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      "No chance in hell we will use metallic hydrogen due to pressures required."

      Four minutes of intensive research on this subject leads me to believe that no one is quite sure whether metallic hydrogen is stable at room temperature and one atmosphere pressure. If it is, then it'd possibly be like diamonds and many other materials,

      that are made from material that is stable at room temperature, such as carbon.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    104. Re: Fake News by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      What you are saying is true for sapphire, not diamond.
      Synthetic diamond is usually yellowish because of nitrogen impurities. Better quality synthetic diamonds have fewer impurities but they are close in price to natural diamonds though the situation may change as the technology progresses.
      And synthetic diamonds are not differentiated because they are "too perfect" but because they have some types of impurities (ex : silicon) that do not appear in natural diamonds as well as characteristic growth patterns.
      One advantage of synthetic diamond is that impurities can be deliberately added in order to archive desirable characteristics. What I don't know is what is best for making metallic hydrogen : specially designed synthetics or carefully chosen naturals. It seems that both types can be used in diamond anvil cells.

    105. Re:Fake News by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      How can ordinary people tell what news is real news and what news is fake news when they can't trust the people who define it?

      No one cares.

      They care about whether the news confirms or denies their biases. Confirms = good. Denies = fake.
      They care about whether the news supports or undercuts their tribe. Supports = good. Undercuts = bad/fake/etc.

    106. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbaric conservative attitude? CHECK
      Six digit UID? CHECK

      Seems legit guys.

    107. Re: Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      So, the DeBeers marketing schtick since artificial diamonds reached price parity is something to the effect of: "the amount you sacrifice to this token signifies the depth of your commitment, at DeBeers we suggest 2 months' salary." Yeah, I gave them 2 weeks. My wife doesn't like big and flashy, if she did, I would have gotten a CZ at the time. I guess artificial diamond has dropped in price since then.

    108. Re: Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      So, when you say artificial, are we talking Cubic Zirconia, or is there something new on the market?

      I thought CZ had a marginally lower refractive index. A difference in electrical conductivity is a pretty huge thing for a clear rock.

    109. Re:Fake News by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      You know that Men In Black was actually a documentary?

      That's what I heard about Jurassic Park and The Hobbit.

      Don't forget The Martian... lots of people believe that, while questioning whether or not Armstrong really got to the moon in 69.

    110. Re: Fake News by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I didn't expect it to last. It was, after all, a beta meta.

      So what we need is something better, to beat the beta meta. In other words a better beta meta beater.

    111. Re: Fake News by green1 · · Score: 1

      That's easy. Synthetics are ALWAYS BETTER IN EVERY SINGLE WAY. So it would be the synthetics.
      There is never a case where you'd want to risk a natural diamond for this sort of process. The risk is far too high.

    112. Re: Fake News by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Because marketing.

      Brown diamonds comprise the vast majority of the stones mined and virtually all of them were turned into industrial abrasives if they couldn't be baked to remove the colouration.

      The problem with _that_ being that it's been cheaper and easier to make diamond abrasives using industrial processes for quite a while.

      The actual value of mined gemstones is low and de Beers has been limiting supply for decades by turning most of what's mined into abrasives. It's one thing to do that and sell at a loss when you can push up profits in other areas.

      de Beers been hoovering up and destroying most of the world's artificial diamond production to maintain margins for a couple of decades, but the sheer quality and quantity of manufactured stones (eg: Polar bears - perfect 1 carat octahedrons stamped out by the thousand and purchased by the kilogram) has been starting to overwhelm their ability to pay to keep them off the market - the fact that they seek to keep the price high for gemstones by controlling supply on the open market means that the producers of these things means they can virtually name their own price and have been making a handsome profit out of crystals which are destroyed upon purchase.

      That level of profit simply encourages the makers to produce more stones, to be sold to the buyer who can't stand to see them on the open market and is willing to pay a premium to ensure it happens that way. The end result is that when the dam breaks and de Beers can't afford to buy any more, diamond prices will crash in a way not seen in commodities markets since the start of the industrial revolution. Even the fall in the price of aluminium is likely to be minor by comparison, both in percentage _and_ in speed at which the bubble bursts.

      I have a dog in this fight. My wife is a gem diamond trader and like many in the industry she refuses to even consider the possibility that diamonds are intrinsically worthless. All I can do is resist her attempts to increase inventory levels with consequent risk exposure.

      I don't think it will sink in that the only thing worth paying for on any stone is the workmanship that went into making it a gem until long after the price crash hits home. Far too many wealthy people have large gem collections that they use to keep score and they simply can't comprehend (or are in denial) that such things are likely to lose 90%+ of their value overnight when the market changes.

    113. Re: Fake News by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Only some artificial ones do. Polar bears don't as a for-instance and that's one of the reasons that de Beers are frantically trying to keep them off the open market.

      The other reason being that they only cost a couple of dollars apiece to make (1 carat perfect gemstones).

      There's crazy profit in making artificial gemstone quality diamond, simply by selling them to people who don't want them on the open market and crush the things as soon as they're in the warehouse.

    114. Re: Fake News by psycheitout · · Score: 1

      A fine golf clap for the trolls out there. I can't even read a benign article about a lab mishap without the comments section turning into a bs argument about truth in media. Who would make this up and why?! Seriously!!

    115. Re: Fake News by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      So everything is now Slashdot? I guess I'm ahead of the curve since I've been here since about 2000.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    116. Re: Fake News by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      That.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    117. Re: Fake News by syntotic · · Score: 1

      It is not the editor but the keyboard of modern laptops. They omit and miss typed keys, and the correctors sometime pick a word and just change it long after the cursor went ahead writing. No one noticed how hard and slowly it is to write in this island type keyboards? Mine omits the letters S I N often...

    118. Re: Fake News by syntotic · · Score: 1

      The fancy is that it is a LAB diamond. It is what you pay extra for.

    119. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (P.S. People. Please stop misapplying the phrase "fake news". The fire's host enough w/o needlessly fanning the flames.)

      Fake News

    120. Re:Fake News by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      This is being pushed with the dangled possibility that metallic hydrogen is a stable material once formed.

      The odds of that are extremely low, but it's a way to sell media reviews.

    121. Re: Fake News by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      In this case you'd be right - because with synthetic you have the possibility of assembling large lonsdaleite crystals instead of diamond - and lonsdaleite is a LOT stronger than diamond.

    122. Re: Fake News by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I've gotten enough of these notes that I'm pretty sure on these sorts of posts I need a "the above was satire, seriously" signature.

    123. Re: Fake News by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why people want to buy brown diamonds.

      You probably don't understand why people want uncut, on-matrix diamonds either, despite them being vastly more interesting than the shit DeBeers sell.

      Why are you asking women about diamonds? They're only associated with women in particular due to some shit from some advertising campaign somewhere. When I got engaged, I looked for and found a very interesting piece starring an olivine (a very interesting mineral) and the fiancee loved the fact that I'd actually spent several hours thinking about our engagement ring instead of sucking from the dick of some advertising fuckwit.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Difficult material remains difficult by jandrese · · Score: 5, Informative

    As I recall the biggest problem they had in making the stuff in the first place was constantly shattering the diamonds when they tried to shine light through them. Also, the breathless talk of this revolutionizing every industry under the sun is tremendously overblown. Right now these are laboratory curiosities, they may very well amount to nothing.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, the breathless talk of this revolutionizing every industry under the sun is tremendously overblown.

      Was definitely going to be useful to every industry at the center of the Sun.

    2. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by HiThere · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, they *had* theorized that after it was originally made it might be stable at much lower pressures. This may not have been correct.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At the center of the Sun they have lakes and rivers of the stuff!
      What they want is OUR regular, plain, old Hydrogen!

    4. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they *had* theorized that after it was originally made it might be stable at much lower pressures.

      Did they? Or was that merely what the last over-hyped headline said?

    5. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by meerling · · Score: 1

      True, but you have to start somewhere, and you never know what will ultimately come of a new discovery or even what other discovers will be made using the insights from this one.

    6. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by meerling · · Score: 2

      Much lower pressures... You mean like 35 million pounds per square inch instead of the 71.7 million pounds per square inch, of which, both are way beyond the approximate 14 pounds per square inch (no millions there) you have outside that diamond anvil they made it in.

      Stable at a lower pressure isn't the same as stable at any pressure or stable at no pressure, and let's face it, going from 71,700,000 to about 14 is pretty darn close to going to zero.

    7. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      Using that metric, everything and anything could "revolutionize the world" so the term becomes meaningless. Such hyperbole should be reserved for usage in things that are a bit more fleshed out and actual candidates for said revolutionizing.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    8. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by Megol · · Score: 1

      They did as did many other people that worked on the idea of metallic hydrogen. Which would be trivial to check using google. Just saying...

    9. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I only read it on popular sites, so I don't know the details, but AFAIKT they didn't have any good idea of how low a pressure it might be stable under. Only hopes, and some reason to believe that it would be stable at lower pressures. (And I don't even know what their "reason to believe that it would be stable at lower pressures" was, just that they had one.)

      Certainly, some of the people writing the articles I read thought that this meant STP, but I didn't see any quotes from the concerned scientists that indicated that *they* thought so.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly what they did by the sounds of the article. So I guess they probably weren't all that surprised that it happened. Disappointed maybe.

    11. Re:Difficult material remains difficult by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Question for you: How much pressure is needed to make diamonds, and will they evaporate in a vacuum?

      Because we don't know something also means we don't know if it's stable at half the pressure or 1/710millionth of the pressure.

  3. Makes No Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're unable to make more metallic hydrogen, then we'd never be able to use it to transform modern electronics. So clearly they can just make more of the stuff. I'm a bit confused why the experiment wasn't within an enclosed chamber and why you couldn't wave a magnet around in there and then scan every nano-meter to find the sample.

    Perhaps if I read the article I'd understand more. Perhaps not.

    1. Re:Makes No Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming metallic hydrogen is magnetic.

    2. Re: Makes No Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Find the sample? It's gone. It can't exist without that extreme pressure. It turned back into gas.

    3. Re: Makes No Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lost a microscopic bit of aluminum in my test chamber. Go find it with your magnet.

  4. Yep, this is Meta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, meta is not rare any more.

  5. World's Only Sample by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That you know about. Pretty sure I saw some of that junk in the shed.

  6. You had one job !! by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Funny
  7. Dont worry I've got a backup by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    As it turns out I have a backup sample, because you have to keep it at incredibly high pressure I keep it in the much more reliably pressurized environment of a dorm room with two Chemical Engineering majors.

    Indeed because of the pressures involved I had to add some padding around the sample to prevent the rare metal from being crushed.

    You can come collect it whenever, except of course when there's a sock on the door handle (P.S. there is never a sock on the door handle).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Dont worry I've got a backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What a relief they have a backup! It sounds that not only did they break the diamond, but they also lost their sample of hydrogen to compress. Where in the world are they ever going to find any more hydrogen? Oh, what a setback!

      What I really want to know from these authors is how heavy my revolutionized wristwatch will be with those diamond anvils and supporting hardware inside of it. The piece of hydrogen itself would not be very massive, but all its containment sure would be.

  8. Just like losing a contactlens, everyone help look by El+Cubano · · Score: 4, Funny

    I helped find a lost contact lens once, so I know what this is like. As long everyone stops what they are doing and helps to look for it, someone will eventually find it. The key is to not step anywhere without first scanning the area very carefully.

    Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

  9. Live look! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnsizkVjGm8

  10. So where did they look? by Curate · · Score: 0

    Did they look on the floor nearby? Did they look in the couch? How about near where they put their keys?

    1. Re: So where did they look? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only looked under the one light in the room.

  11. Not newsworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They made it so... either they can make it again, or they can't because it wasn't real.

  12. Vibranium by s1d3track3D · · Score: 1

    Ok, let's all relax, it's not like they lost vibranium.

    1. Re:Vibranium by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure my wife's toys are full of that stuff.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Vibranium by s1d3track3D · · Score: 1

      heh, that's vibratenium.

  13. My hand slipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My labmate Geoff is a cutup who tries to make people laugh at inappropriate times. Unfortunately, he succeeded and I managed to get one of the diamonds pretty good. So it was my bad, but it was really *his* bad.

    1. Re: My hand slipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snitches get stitches.

  14. So they lost the hydrogen metal they made.... by bobbied · · Score: 2

    What a gas!

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  15. Lost hydrogen metal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oops!

  16. Diamonds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use CCC perfect diamonds or cubic zirconia?

  17. Metastability by painandgreed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I found most interesting about the article is that the guy they were talking to was actually considering that it might still be stable in solid form (and even stuck in the equipment) although also stated it might have just evaporated away. However, he also admitted that some think that they didn't even succeed and were actually getting readings off some aluminium used in the experiment. He says they'll just have to repeat the experiment to prove their case.

    1. Re:Metastability by thesupraman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What, repeat an experiment with surprising one off results?

      You, sir, obviously have not spent enough time around modern academia!
      Once you get the result you *want*, you then spend 100% of your time writing, publishing, hyping, funding, and publishing some more.

      No one REPEATS experiments, my god, you may not get the same result! All that effort wasted!

      Sad, isnt it.

    2. Re:Metastability by floodo1 · · Score: 1

      When the news that they had created the sample hit in the first place hit Slashdot there was a LOT of commentary with sources about how most likely this is not solid hydrogen ... this appears to be more simply another clickbait announcement.

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    3. Re:Metastability by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would love to be able to repeat some of my experiments for confirmation...

      Tell me though, are you willing to pay for it? I need some more drill core from very specific depths, and the boring is right around a million dollars or more per hole - depending on the depths needed and how remote each location is. How many can you pay for? How soon can you get someone out there drilling?

      Once you get the result you *want*, you then spend 100% of your time writing, publishing, hyping, funding, and publishing some more.

      I can't deny that there are people like that in the sciences, but please, do tell me in what field are there NOT some kind of leech like people doing as little as possible for as much money as they can milk? MOST scientists are in it for the science, not glory / money / everything else you accuse us of.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    4. Re:Metastability by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I heard the lead on a Science Friday interview - he invited everybody in academia to come to his lab to learn the technique on how to make it, as he wants everybody working on the material. It sounds like they can fairly easily do it again, so I am surprised this article makes no note of that.

      Well, "surprised" in that I pretend journalism doesn't exist just to sell ads.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Metastability by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      Once you get the result you *want*, you then spend 100% of your time writing, publishing, hyping, funding, and publishing some more.

      MOST scientists are in it for the science, not glory / money / everything else you accuse us of.

      Even if you're in it for the science, you spend most of your time writing, publishing, hyping, funding, and publishing some more.

    6. Re:Metastability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here, Here...
      Scientist, lawyer, rock star (just neurosurgeon and rocket car pilot away from being B. Banzai), but, I digress.

      Been in science, a long time, over 25 years. Started out washing glassware, stuffing cotton into serological pipets. All you kids today with your fancy disposable glassware, tubes and pipets, in my day we had to pay some poor kid 4 dollars an hour to stuff and autoclave everything. Don't get me started on nuclease or RNA'se free water.

      But back to the matter at hand... I have seen some academic scientists coast through multiple grant cycles on one years worth of work. Re-tool the data, maybe add some supplementary data, collaborate to get more data (without doing anything yourself), then tweak the underlying hypothesis and/or title of the grant, resubmit, and then the NIH and their study sessions (made up of your scientific peers / friends / sometimes competitors) will score, and you get money. Of course, if you don't publish during the interim, then your basis for the grant is less firm, so go back to the well, and submit to as many journals as you can afford (it does cost money to get published in a real journal). This does happen, particularly when the professor has tenure, or something that is difficult to reproduce due to cost constraints. Even if they get a grant, the university will take at least half for "overhead" and "indirect costs". Hiring help in the lab, that will cost you. I want to pay a research assistant, fresh out of college with a B.S., if they will take the 25 - 35K a year I can afford, I have to tack another 25% on to that for fringe benefits. Multiply that by 3 Assistants, and one associate or post doc, and well over 150,000 dollars is gone in salary. With chemical costs, and anything science costing so much more than it used to, due to mergers... in the old days there was competition, you could buy one enzyme from, for arguments sake, 10 suppliers, same with chemicals, and anything else you need for research. Now there are much fewer, Thermo Fisher bought Lifetechnologies (who had previously bought about 5 large companies, and untold small ones), they bought Pierce, and of course Thermo had bought Fisher Sci, years before. GE bought everyone else. EMD bought Millipore, and then EMD Millipore bought Sigma-Aldrich. The point is, sometimes the reason why some work on the same thing over and over, and don't deviate, is because they know the area, the thing, the theories and hypothesis better than anyone. Some back data mining, collaborations that make sense, and expansion on the theme is needed in this day and age, to fully flush out the underlying scope of the original idea. New research can not happen every four years, once you start. New researchers can get all types of deals from suppliers and from NIH and other sources for new and novel ideas, while the old timers, get to spend their twilight, polishing either diamonds or turds, depending on what they started with. This plus the fact that tenure, and lack of benefits for professor level researchers, means they have no impetus, other than the love of science, to keep going with new ideas. The hallways of any academic institution that still has tenure track, is filled with old men and women, showing up, collecting their guaranteed non grant subsidized money, often not having to, or able to teach, but still a great source of knowledge, and generally fun to talk to. You will often find them by the coffee maker or water cooler. One old timer, used to hide in his office and smoke... what were they going to do, fire him, no chance, and with an ash tray in the fume hood, and a little beta mercap, or DTT in the air, who could tell anyway. So, needlessly long post short, sometimes, the research is rehashed because the research is not fully completed, and there is still valid analysis to be done, and sometimes, it is added to by other researchers that are in fields that can assist, or add to the picture, and lastly, there are just a few, bad eggs, that just milk the system to do as little as

    7. Re:Metastability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me though, are you willing to pay for it? I need some more drill core from very specific depths, and the boring is right around a million dollars or more per hole - depending on the depths needed and how remote each location is. How many can you pay for? How soon can you get someone out there drilling?

      Just start a myth about there being buried treasure in the exact spot you need drilled. Make sure to recruit an international cast of crackpots to claim that every treasure imaginable could be down there. The CueCat guy can help you out, he's completely full of it. That should get you enough funding for at least four holes.

    8. Re:Metastability by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      What, repeat an experiment with surprising one off results?

      You, sir, obviously have not spent enough time around modern academia! Once you get the result you *want*...

      Seeing how their experiment exploded while trying to take measurements, I suspect they haven't gotten the results they want yet. they are trying to get to step 3 or 4 and others are trying to debate step 1 still. To get to step 4, you often have to redo step one several times. In the lab I worked in we did scattering experiments many times over, if only to test different source heating arrangements for the thermal disassociation of fluorine gas. One reason for both was that run time was limited because the fluorine would degrade the nozzle providing a limited time while better nozzle would allow for longer run times.

    9. Re:Metastability by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I would love to be able to repeat some of my experiments for confirmation...

      Tell me though, are you willing to pay for it?

      Heh, ya. My first thought in an earlier article about reproducing peers experiments was "how did they get grants to reproduce all those experiments?"

    10. Re: Metastability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " That should get you enough funding for at least four holes."

      Wait a minute, my prostitutes only have 3 holes. Am I missing something? I need to email Madam Gloria and ask for a refund; or atleast a discount.

  18. Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let me get this straight. They are simultaneously concerned about losing their one and only tiny sample, but had intended to study its potential use in mass produced gadgets and other things, suggesting that they'd be able to pump out whatever quantity they needed. So why worry about losing the sample? Either it's hard to make and studying its use is pointless or worrying about losing it is crying over spilled milk.

    Also if it took that amount of constant crushing force to keep it from sublimating... do we really want that in a handheld device? And could such a crusher even fit?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      People tried for years and years to make diamonds in the lab with little to no success. As they continued they were able to make small ones, now days they can make a diamond in the lab that is of comparable quality to mined diamonds at a lower cost.

      Once the process has been figured out and the end result examined it is possible that things can be adjusted to increase efficiency and decrease difficulty improving yields, this is how most manufacturing processes work. All sorts of things started off hard to make, but over time we learned and improved things.

      They were studying the sample, it is possible that the sample didn't need the force to stay stable anymore, that is part of the studying part. Since the sample was lost in the debris and is so small it is unlikely they will be able to find it. Yes it is possible it did revert back to a gaseous state, but it might still be in a metallic state. Maybe this research does end-up in a dead end, but maybe it will be a catalyst for significant technological advances over the next 30 years.

    2. Re: Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it possible that you don't understand that lots of things are extremely hard to do for the first time but get easier with experience? Perhaps thinking is that way with you?

  19. Answers one question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The discoverers said that the material might be metastable - meaning it might be stable (for some period of time) at lower pressures and higher temperatures. Diamond anvil cells shatter all the time, its part of the price of admission. I don't know how much the laser heated the sample, but whatever the temperature was, it was too high for the (claimed to be) metallic hydrogen to remain, suggesting it won't be useful in normal industrial/commercial contexts. Note that diamond is quite useful but it, too, is only metastable at room temperature and pressure.

  20. Excuse my stupidity but I'm not a physicist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But do they mean lost as in "it fell on the floor or something and is so small no one can find it?" or lost as in "it was metallic hydrogen but during the mishap it became something other than metallic hydrogen?"

    In either case, why don't they just repeat the process and create more?

    1. Re:Excuse my stupidity but I'm not a physicist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But do they mean lost as in "it fell on the floor or something and is so small no one can find it?"

      Lost as in fell out of the vice (aka vise), thus returning to a gaseous state, dissolved into thin air and no one can find it.

    2. Re:Excuse my stupidity but I'm not a physicist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The (claimed) metallic hydrogen was formed in a diamond anvil cell, squeezed between tiny facets on two diamonds. At least one diamond shattered. Nobody knows if the phase change attained under extreme pressure, is stable or reverses itself when the pressure is released. If the phase transition was reversible, the sample most likely turned into a gas upon decompression. If the new phase was stable in a sudden decompression to ambient, it was probably riven and stabbed into tiny bits by the disintegrating diamonds.

      The process certainly needs to be repeated, because science requires reproducible results. To get even this one sample almost certainly required numerous failed trials, producing many smashed diamonds.

      I am not a real physicist, but I did undergrad research in another condensed matter physics realm with tricky (air sensitive) samples. That research failed, but in instructive ways. It can take many many failed trials before you get a promising result. Then many more to get a confirming result.

    3. Re: Excuse my stupidity but I'm not a physicist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was keeping it metal was the pressure. They lost the pressure so no more solid. This is what I gathered from the comments here.

  21. Wait a sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is supposed to "revolutionize modern technology" and yet we can't even create a second sample of this? Remind me again, how this is going to "revolutionize modern technology" ?

    1. Re:Wait a sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Remind me again, how this is going to "revolutionize modern technology" ?"

      By going in a circle.

    2. Re:Wait a sec... by Megol · · Score: 1

      Nobody sane claimed a second sample can't be created?

  22. Convenient by dohzer · · Score: 1

    How convenient. When they go to test the substance... oops... it's gone!
    I wonder if they ever actually had it.

    1. Re:Convenient by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      "Well, this laser goes up to 11..."

    2. Re:Convenient by Megol · · Score: 2

      They have tested it before, this was yet another test. And if you had spent some time reading about the problems the team faced (pressures being so high that it can shatter diamonds easily) you'd not be surprised the diamond cell was destroyed - as (again from the problems documented) shining a laser at a diamond under that kinds of pressure makes it even more fragile.

      So instead you wrote some shit based on nothing. Time well spent? Nah.

  23. Area 51 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    No problem, just bust into the Roswell stash. The Zorkians carried plenty with them.

  24. I was told ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was always told on TV that "Diamonds are forever"

    Apparently it was a lie.

    1. Re: I was told ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is.a lie. They are only metastable at STP and will.eventually revert to either graphite or carbon dioxide gas, depending on the ambient oxygen fugacity.

  25. implying incompetence ? by luckypunq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously .. scientist working at the extreme limits are criticised by talentless keyboard jockeys because of equpitment failure. Click bait shit at it's most disgusting. These men and women doing this work should be praised and admired not mocked by morons.

    1. Re:implying incompetence ? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We live in a society where companies like Diesel who run major fashion lines and advertising campaigns to glorify stupid. In all fairness, Diesel was trying to suggest that one shouldn't always take the "smart and sensible path", but people wore shirts saying "Smart is ok, but stupid is fun". The people wearing that clothing seemed to believe that doing the stupid thing could be far more productive and constructive than having and idea and properly planning and executing it in a constructive manor.

      We had a president who for 8 years told the American people that even as the son of one of the most powerful men in the world (Director of Central Intelligence or VP of the US as the time) was a C+ student... meaning that his professors, knowing there would be a call from one of the most powerful men on earth if they failed his son, gave him the lowest possible grade they thought they could get away with... in a business school. Now mind you, I really really like GWB, I think he is one of the nicest people on earth, a man with the absolute best intentions with a heart as pure as laboratory diamonds. Sadly, he's dumb as a brick and has absolutely no capacity for understanding the consequences of his decisions.

      When presented with the choice of Al Gore who is only mildly more intelligent but at least as far as politicians are concerned is a mental giant or GWB, the American people felt they associated much better with GWB. Even though Al Gore would likely make decisions to improve the lives of all people and would do his absolute best to represent the emotional, spiritual, etc... interests of all Americans, he came off as too smart and too nerdy (and too much of a know it all) and the people sided with the C+ flunky who had a good heart and spoke to the people in a way that they could relate to. I don't believe that was a calculated action by GWB as I believe calculation of any type is not his strength. I believe his sheer dumbness allowed people to better love and identify with him. I feel terrible that now that I know more about him that I said so many bad things about him while he was in office. It was like picking on the slow kid at school who couldn't defend himself because he didn't even understand the insults. He might be one of the best people on earth at heart and as a representative of the vast majority of the American people, he was spectacular. Too bad he was also expected to provide leadership, manage money and a military a role he was clearly no suited for. This is a very strong case for separating the presidency into president and prime minister.

      We also live in a society which glorifies hate and violence. We believe a child who dresses up in camouflage pajamas and spends 8 weeks in basic training should be called a hero for stepping up to protect the American way. Without having the slightest idea of what the American way is other than to dress up in said pajamas, he/she is placed in a position of ultimate judgement. He/she is expected to make conscientious decisions whether to take the life of a mother, a father, a son or a daughter. He is expected with no more experience than that of a child to represent the American people at the end of a gun and make judgement calls that have overwhelming impact on society as we know it. We call these children heroes and we praise them in media, advertisements and more. People forfeit business class and first class seats in support of their sacrifices for freedom.

      Consider that that child, fresh out of high school will make $18,802.80 a year as a private and can easily escalate to $22,165.20 by doing their jobs with some level of diligence within a year. Also consider they are provided with excellent quality (though questionable tasting) food, excellent medical care, excellent dental benefits, clothing, housing, career education, transportation and college aid. Their quality of life and standard of living when not at war is approximately equal to a $60,000 a year job at the age of 18 with absolutely no education other than a Basic and AIT provided

    2. Re:implying incompetence ? by luckypunq · · Score: 1

      Thankyou sir for your insightful and compassionate response, it is appreciated

    3. Re:implying incompetence ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al Gore would likely make decisions to improve the lives of all people
       
      Only according to what you believed was best for all people.
       
      The logic you're displaying is the same logic that got Trump elected and most of you still can't see that. It really baffles me.

    4. Re:implying incompetence ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bro, If you are in the US I'd emigrate to Canada, they'll be coming for your kind soon, you common-sense-wielding terrorist! #FAKETHINKING

    5. Re:implying incompetence ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading this follow up article, instead of focusing on the failure, it triggered my mind to be fascinated by the fact that they were able to keep such a massive amount of pressure stable for as long as they did.

      That was my initial reaction as well. The original article seemed to hint that it didn't last long, which either I read wrong, or was just misreported (as so much science is). I bet they got tons of results from the experiments they must have performed during all this time. That's progress enough, even if they don't get to repeat the experiment. But certainly someone should try to repeat it.

      I started picturing methods of creating such pressure and realized that my understanding of Newton's laws of thermodynamics and motion seem to be contrary to such an achievement. I immediately thought "If every action has an equal and opposite reaction, how would one create such pressure without some sort of stable force to restrict the opposite reaction from going the wrong way?" I considered it would require some sort of vise. I wondered however what kind of material could possibly be strong enough to withstand such pressure. I considered a vise made of laboratory diamond and then wondered how one would make such a mechanism to apply force to the diamond to compress it. Then I saw some comments about lasers being somehow involved and immediately wondered how lasers could be used to create such pressure. Could one make a containment area of a substance like diamond and then apply heat the gasses to increase pressure? Even so, how would one power such a laser in a stable environment for long enough to create ever increasing heat along a temperature gradient so that it would not end in combustion.

      Now, clearly you misunderstood the process. They compressed the gas in a diamond anvil (that's two very precisely polished diamonds being crushed together with a special micrometric screw. The laser is shone through the diamond to inspect and measure the gas, not to heat it.

    6. Re:implying incompetence ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trump won! GET OVER IT! Why are you still here bitching? Aren't you supposed to be out winning?

    7. Re:implying incompetence ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that orangutan didn't win shit and you know it. You don't care that Russians were involved because you're stuck in the party over country mode.

  26. Fake Comment by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

    BoRegardless isn't OP's real name, and hell does not exist.

    Have I been pedantic enough?

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  27. Look at the bright side by dlleigh · · Score: 2

    They've discovered a new way to create powdered diamond. Quote from the lead researcher:

    “I’ve never seen a diamond shatter like that. It was so powdered on the surface, it looked like baking soda or something like that.”

    1. Re:Look at the bright side by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      So now the most rare element on earth is that shattered diamond. Quick, gather up all the pieces!

    2. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've discovered a new way to create powdered diamond

      Diamonds! Soon, in your laundry detergent. For more vibrant colors!

  28. useful for theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will help refine theories of material science, and advance our models of gas giants. But for the average person on Earth, metallic hydrogen is useless.

    1. Re:useful for theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But for the average person on Earth, metallic hydrogen is useless.

      Yes, but once I'm fully clad in my metallic hydrogen armour, I won't be the fucken average person, will I?

      Muahahaha ... uhh ...err... oh gosh, it's awfully tight in here ...

  29. Not the end of the world. by woboyle · · Score: 1

    They made it once. They can make it again. Not easy, but it should be easier than the first time, when they weren't even sure it could be made!

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  30. Probably gonna need more... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ...Scientists theorized that metallic hydrogen ... could have a transformative effect on modern electronics and revolutionize medicine, energy and transportation, as well as herald in a new age of consumer gadgets.

    To do all that, they're probably going to need a lot more metallic hydrogen than was lost in the accident. So I'd suggest the scientists concentrate upon making more metallic hydrogen.

    .
    . iow, don't cry over sublimated hydrogen.

    1. Re:Probably gonna need more... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      ...Scientists theorized that metallic hydrogen ... could have a transformative effect on modern electronics and revolutionize medicine, energy and transportation, as well as herald in a new age of consumer gadgets.

      To do all that, they're probably going to need a lot more metallic hydrogen than was lost in the accident. So I'd suggest the scientists concentrate upon making more metallic hydrogen.

      . Luckily, once they've solved the trivial problem of how to keep metallic hydrogen viable at room temperature/pressure they'll be able to use the almost unlimited supplies of metallic hydrogen available to help build more metallic hydrogen manufacturing equipment. Out of metallic hydrogen. . iow, don't cry over sublimated hydrogen.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  31. Seriously? by bistromath007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It sucks that this was lost, because it's cool research.

    Despite that, how goddamn stupid do you have to be to think this is a big setback for technology? You have to press it between two diamonds harder than they can stand it just to force it to continue existing. The consumer technology that might've fallen out of this will arrive in 2455 instead of 2450. Oh no.

    1. Re:Seriously? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      hmm... I'm not sure if I'm with you on this. I agree it's hard to see this as a setback. I don't believe it is. I imagine we learned a great deal about the process from the failure and should be able to achieve better results the next time.

      I don't have a clear understanding of how we could apply such science into applied engineering today, but I'm wondering if we learned a lot more than is visible on the surface. Let's consider that we now know how to create that much pressure. Let's also consider that we know that helium can actually become metallic.

      Ok... let's also consider that once the material is compressed, the energy is stored and it may be possible the experts in forming diamond crystals will be able to engineer a more perfect structure for the containment of the metal without the need to apply additional pressure. It is also possible that as a room-temperature super conductor, we might be able to learn how to encapsulate liquid helium in a crystalline structure on a quasi-molecular (proper term?) level. We may be able to find a way to produce some sort of liquid like beads of minuscule room temperature superconductors. I may be possible to crystallize large amounts (billions of parts) of metallic hydrogen in arrays of crystal so that it might be etched.

      We could also possible find that this could be an alternative method of storing large amounts of energy for use in space. Imagine a lightweight material able to propel a turbine within a generator as the energy is released? That could be a safer and more practical alternative to nuclear radiation. We would only need a method of storing the material in cells and releasing the material in a controlled fashion.

      What about all the other options. While superconductivity is sexy, can this process be effectively applied to other materials? Could it be done on a large scale? Can this be a theoretical alternative method to producing nearly perfect structures as opposed to carbon nanotubes? Could we get the benefits of a perfect structure but on a larger scale? Could we find a way to push particles of other materials through a compression chamber of this sort to produce wires that are less volatile?

      I would imagine that the scientists involved with this project have though in many of these same directions. They have likely thought in more. But I believe that at this point of their research, they need to learn more about the structure of the material they have created and hopefully identify better solutions to contain the compressed energy.

  32. The last time I dropped some hydrogen metal by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I would tell you about what happened the last time I dropped some metallic hydrogen, but neither I nor anyone else has ever dropped the stuff. Therefore nobody really knows what happens when you drop it. This sample was too small to track as the diamond shattered.

    They think it probably turned to gas (sublimated), but it may have remained solid and might be under the lab bench right now. Or maybe some other, unexpected thing happened - maybe it reacted with oxygen in the air to form water. Nobody knows until the try it again and watch closely.

    1. Re:The last time I dropped some hydrogen metal by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      It may also be on the floor, waiting for someone to step on it, crack the grain, and suddenly turn from a dust speck into a hundred and seventy liters of extremely hot hydrogen gas, quickly reacting with the oxygen in the air...

    2. Re:The last time I dropped some hydrogen metal by Rande · · Score: 1

      If it suddenly expanded from room temperature, then it'd be extremely cold, not hot.
      That's how your refrigerator works - it compresses the gas, cools it off outside, and then once inside, lowers the pressure, causing it to cool down.

  33. meta-stable? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Does that mean it wasn't meta-stable then?

    1. Re:meta-stable? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Does that mean it wasn't meta-stable then?

      No. It indeed is metastable.
      It resolved to a higher entropy state. This is normal.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:meta-stable? by StevenMaurer · · Score: 1

      If it spontaneously resolves to a higher entropy state with no pushing, that means it isn't stable, meta or otherwise.

    3. Re:meta-stable? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Yes that would be my understanding too.

    4. Re:meta-stable? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Well it hung around for a long time in the singular state (metallic hydrogen and solid diamond in a regular crystal). That was the low entropy state log2(1/num_states) = 0. That was also the metastable state. It was sitting on the metaphorical knife edge ready to fall off at any point. It did and now its in the new higher entropy and more stable state of "Splattered all over the lab and floating as a gas". log2(1/billions_of_states) = a much bigger number.

      However it seems it was pushed by a laser light. In metastability in circuits we normally deal with thermal noise doing the pushing, but the noise is part of the system. So deciding what is in the system and what is not determines whether or not it's metastable.
       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  34. Drama Physics by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    The new era of physics: reality show physics. Follow the hopes and dreams of your favourite physics stars with our live Labcam[tm]. Blew up the only dilithium crystal in the known universe? Calm down everybody, we will crowd-fund a new one, this is what the Labcam[tm] is for. I trust this is not a "dog ate my homework" situation.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  35. oops but then ;) by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    They can make more, after all! it only takes more of someones else s money ;)

    1. Re:oops but then ;) by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I believe in real research like this. Makes more sense to me than federal dollars going to study shrimp on mini tread mills or why some humans can't smell their urine after eating asparagus. Some of these dollars spent on federal studies are nuts ;) Just saying

  36. What about the transparent aluminum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Is that safe and sound? Scotty is going to need that in San Francisco sometime soon.

    1. Re:What about the transparent aluminum? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      http://www.surmet.com/technology/alon-optical-ceramics/

      Been done... feel free to buy some. It's mass produced now

  37. if it is true, and not pie in the sky by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    then they can make it again, otherwise it is a bullshit story or they are chasing after a ghost that isnt there

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  38. Not lost by Dunbal · · Score: 0

    Putin sent agents in to steal it. By now it must be in Russia somewhere. Damn you Russia, DAMN YOU!!!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  39. pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > a pressure of around 71.7 million pounds per square inch

    How many firkin-force per square furlong is that?

  40. And they called me crazy. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    My comment on the first story about the metallic hydrogen. https://slashdot.org/comments....

    Glad to be proven right. And so quickly.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    1. Re:And they called me crazy. by Megol · · Score: 2

      You haven't been proved right and you had an extremely bad knowledge of material science in the linked post. Given that you don't attempt to backtrack now I assume you still are proud to be clueless? And you are also a liar as nobody called you crazy for the linked (still clueless) post.

      But I have to admit you are beginning to look like a crazy guy that just "know" that hydrogen can't be metastable while material scientists have good reasons to believe it probably is.

    2. Re:And they called me crazy. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I'm a liar for using a bit of hyperbole? That's a bit overboard.

      As far as my original post, this post shows I was correct. Once the pressure was released, the sample was gone. Or did they say they found tiny flecks of metallic hydrogen in the rubble of the diamond vise?

      My reasoning for not believing hydrogen is metastable after being under enough pressure to turn it into a metallic solid, is that we would have seen samples of it, because at some point in the last 15 billion years, it must have been under such high pressure at some place in the universe. As the saying goes, we are made of star-stuff. Show me the naturally occuring flecks of stable metallic hydrogen that were created in some gravity well. Until then, accept that some times common sense leads to correct answers.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  41. Just more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fake news.

    Can't prove your paper? No surprise. That is "modern" science. The elders call it conjecture, but don't let us old folk get in the way of "progress".

  42. Not much to see here, unless.... by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 2

    They created a minuscule amount. That was all. It is not even clear that it was metallic hydrogen - other experts in the file remain publicly very skeptical. Quite frankly, if I were feeling mischievous, I would conclude that the researches "misplaced" the sample to make sure that nobody could verify that it was not, after all, metallic hydrogen.

  43. This reminds me... by VAXcat · · Score: 2

    ...of the time when Glenn Seaborg had the only sample of Plutoniium in the world in his pocket while traveling to another lab. If his pocket had been picked or he'd been run over in traffic, things could have turned out quite differently..

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  44. Hydronium Hydrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kind of like those expanding T-Shirts.. or Ant Man.. it grew and grew and grew

  45. Re:Fake Reporters by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Except reporters who do real work can insert stories deliberately trying to deceive, frighten or mislead with varying degrees of fiction in with their valid work.

  46. Re:Reliable by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Only problem is that there are no such people, or any such place. Then of course you run into the problem of stories that falsely report that a story is fake. It's a real hall of mirrors

  47. Re:Fake Reporters by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    Except reporters who do real work can insert stories deliberately trying to deceive, frighten or mislead with varying degrees of fiction in with their valid work.

    Citation please. Any such reporter would destroy their career pretty quickly.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  48. Next time... by tigersha · · Score: 2

    ..set the damn laser to stun!! Not kill dammit!!

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  49. Re:Fake Reporters by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    The safe bet is to assume they all do this to varying degrees and to demand proof they are not. But unless the reporters who slurred PewDiePie are fake reporters or their careers are destroyed, there you go.

  50. Re:Reliable by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Informative

    Only problem is that there are no such people, or any such place. Then of course you run into the problem of stories that falsely report that a story is fake. It's a real hall of mirrors

    I see what you're trying to do. You claim there's no way to trust any source of any information, so we are ripe for influence by whoever connects with our base instincts of fear, anger, and survival.

    Journalism isn't perfect, but nevertheless it's essential to the proper functioning of a democracy.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  51. Re:Fake Reporters - For reference by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Playlist: Why is PewDiePie Your Enemy? https://www.youtube.com/playli...

  52. Eeeee by ememisya · · Score: 1

    "Whooopth!" - Daffy Duck

  53. absent minded prof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i thought they misplaced it, like car keys

  54. Alernative manufacturing methods by mattr · · Score: 1

    Even if not stable, would it theoretically be possible to maintain "pressure" in some other way such as encasing in a nanostructure that perhaps has an innate pressure? Maybe you only need nanowires not a macro-sized chunk of it.

  55. Research was already classified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is already classified because it can be used in Military Tech.
    It was not really lost. Just rephrase it, research is top secret and not in public domain.

    1. Re:Research was already classified by Megol · · Score: 1

      Yes it can be used in e.g. explosives. No it isn't secret at all.

  56. Re:Democracy! by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Don't even get me started on democracy. People just need to figure out which way others are trying to manipulating them and why and just make the best of a lousy situation in the lousy universe in which they live.

  57. Software used with intention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is so important to protect the water. It's a valuable resource. Software has been developed for water! Try it FREE! www.ModernDayMystic.com

  58. Re:But on that note... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    When your own body is a perpetual source of pain and let down, anything involving large numbers of people you aren't going to ever meet or have anything much to do anything with really isn't going to change a whole lot.

  59. lost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well find the damn thing then!

  60. It Could Be Worse by cstacy · · Score: 1

    At least it didn't open a portal to Dimension 67e24 and bring destructive HydroMech aliens to earth!

    Are we sure the lab tech running the laser doesn't have super powers, though?

  61. Ask Chuck Norris for help by bazorg · · Score: 1

    Using the diamonds and lasers looks complicated and unreliable when they could just ask Chuck Norris to grab the hydrogen and give it a squeeze.

  62. It heralds a new age of consumer gadgets? by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Scientists don't even know for sure they've made hydrogen metal, have no idea what its properties are, can only create a microscopic amount and can only hold it in a stable state using a diamond anvil cell at extreme pressures. So how does that herald a new age in consumer gadgets?

  63. Bring a magnet. by jocarren · · Score: 1

    I believe metallic hydrogen should be ferromagnetic... maybe they can find it with a small magnet.

  64. Re:Fake Reporters by Raenex · · Score: 1, Troll

    MSMBC ginning up fake Tea Party is racist story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Katie Couric documentary deceptively edits gun supporters to make them appeared stumped: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    CNN "shorthanded" call for taking black riots to suburbs as call for peace: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    NBC edits call to make Zimmerman look racist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    The New York Times and the narrative:

    It was a shock on arriving at the New York Times in 2004, as the paper's movie editor, to realize that its editorial dynamic was essentially the reverse. By and large, talented reporters scrambled to match stories with what internally was often called "the narrative." We were occasionally asked to map a narrative for our various beats a year in advance, square the plan with editors, then generate stories that fit the pre-designated line.

  65. Rarest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seriously doubt this was anywhere near the rarest material on the planet. I'm quite sure antimatter still holds that title. They make that a positron at a time, and it doesn't have a very long shelf life.

  66. everything is fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else can we do when we have the fakest president in office in history?

  67. Re:Just like losing a contactlens, everyone help l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another thing that works sometimes is to get a bright light like a desk lamp or bright flashlight and shine it very low across the floor parallel to the floor.
    anything on the floor will be easier to see with the side lighting and you can see a contact lens on a carpet a lot easier.

  68. Busy anti-static carpet to blame....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pink.......Damn.....that was the last 0402 6.8K resistor......good luck in the carpet with that one......

  69. Re:Reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Indeed, which is why it's too bad journalistic integrity is all but dead (at least in the US). 90% of all the media Americans consumed is owned by 6 conglomerates. The partisan hacks that work for them have to follow guidelines on how to report. We are getting news crafted by billionaires, for billionaires.

    CNN gave the presidential debate questions to Clinton ahead of time and reporters were running their stories by the DNC before publishing. Complete and total corruption. I have no doubt that conservative new sources are similarly corrupt.

  70. If they can't make another one ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    ... their research is not reproducible and therefore useless.

  71. Oh noes! by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    A piece of rare meta poised to revolutionize modern technology and take humans into deep space has been lost in a laboratory mishap.

    What kind of rare meta was it? Meta internet memes? Slashdot Meta-moderation? I just hope it wasn't the meta of leaving comments on Slashdot about the poor editing of content on Slashdot, or this post might disappear in a puff of logic!

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  72. blocked pages are not /. material by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Don't link to pages that blocks adblocker

  73. Tasted like chicken by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Who'd a thunk it.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  74. Diamonds are Forever by mesterha · · Score: 1

    They should sue De Beers.

    --

    Chris Mesterharm
  75. Re: Fake Reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bernie? Is that you?

  76. Oh, you mean the staff of the Washington Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "- people who are deliberately trying to deceive,"

    And before you argue, watch those nudniks tweet. You'd swear these people were educated in the third world.

  77. If it was real, it should be reproducible by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    If they can't replicate it, then was it ever really true?

    I mean I'm really quite sure that metallic Hydrogen exists in Jupiter's core and likely other places in the cosmos, and that creating it was truly a feat of science/engineering.

    However, if you can't replicate it then maybe you never actually had it the first time?

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
    1. Re:If it was real, it should be reproducible by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      They described the procedure. It's difficult, certainly - ion-polished diamond anvils! - but it should be achievable by other laboratories. They just need to modify their own diamond anvil equipment in the same manner.

  78. Bumblebees can't fly in the dark by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    Try it sometime. Catch a bumblebee, bring him indoors and let him fly around in the evening. When you turn the room lights off he'll fall to the ground. When you turn them on he'll start flying again.

  79. Was anyone else imagining... by timmee · · Score: 1

    this experiment happening in the Black Mesa facility? Maybe right as Gordon Freeman arrives?

    1. Re:Was anyone else imagining... by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Dr. Freeman worked in the anomalous materials lab, and his team was given a sample of "stuff" and had to figure out what it was based on its observable properties.

      This is the opposite case: the material's identity is known, but its properties are not.

      Therein lies the rub of anomalous materials: you don't know if the anomalous material will do something unfriendly like detonate when any given test is performed.

      Hence, the hazardous environment suit and heavily armored chamber deep underground in an unpopulated desert.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  80. Re:Fake Reporters - For reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    da fuq do I can.

  81. Re:Fake Reporters by Raenex · · Score: 1

    MSMBC ginning up fake Tea Party is racist story:

    Correct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  82. A lot of data missing by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    The only 2 ways you could hold it would be a cube shaped which means: if you are lucky enough to get it square, you need 6 clamps. Or if it is a sphere then you need 2 hollow halves. Then comes the question if it is being held down that way, how do you see it? How can you measure it's resistance? How can it hold together by itself? If it needs that kind of pressure, it's similar to bringing up a deep sea fish and trying to study it at atmospheric pressure.. it just comes apart. If it takes that kind of pressure to hold it together, why would it not give a big explosion as it destructs?? Is this someone pulling a prank on us??

  83. Re: Fake News okay they lost a sample nobody keeps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re: Fake News okay they lost a sample nobody keeps logbooks? not reproducible ?

  84. Science is about repeatability of results by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    It's time to make some more.

  85. Re:Just like losing a contactlens, everyone help l by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

    They should try one of those metal detectors that you see advertised in comic books. I understand those things always find valuable metal objects.